A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
In Canada, a wave of Christian churches are condemning the recently enacted Bill C-4, a law that criminalizes the act of providing, promoting or advertising conversion therapy. The legislation was unanimously passed by the 44th Parliament and was the first bill to do so. It took effect on January 8.
In response, thousands of clergy in Canada have dedicated their Sunday sermons to denounce the new law, which could criminalize teachings on biblical sexual morality, Fox News reported. Over 4,000 Christian pastors who publicly admitted to wanting to protest the legislation have come together to support an initiative sparked by Liberty Coalition Canada, which was also promulgated in the U.S. by Pastor John MacArthur of Los Angeles.
The controversial legislation, which was fast-tracked through the Canadian Parliament just last month without any lengthy debates, describes the belief that heterosexuality and cisgender identity are preferable as a “myth.” Any type of conversion therapy or counseling that does not support this worldview, under Canadian law, can now be punished with a five-year jail sentence.
Critics of Canada’s ban on conversion therapy, among other new rules under the just-enacted legislation, claim that the language of the bill is too broad and can even cover personal conversations. Some pastors who were arrested by authorities in Canada for violating COVID restrictions on gatherings spoke out and said the law will enable religious persecution.
“The biblical gospel is a message of conversion, whereby Christ causes sinners to be born-again, thus converting them from sinful propensities to godliness,” Canadian pastor Jacob Reaume of Trinity Bible Chapel, whose church incurred more than $100,000 in fines in 2021 for refusing to comply with COVID restrictions, told the Daily Wire. “The bill’s language is vague enough that many think it might criminalize a biblical call to forsake sodomitic propensities to embrace righteousness.”
Another Canadian pastor Tim Stephens of Fairview Baptist Church, who was detained in a maximum-security facility in the summer of 2021 for refusing to close his church, argued that the new law “promotes a truly harmful type of ‘conversion’ using puberty-blocking chemicals, surgeries to remove functioning breasts and sexual organs, regular hormone treatments, and truly harmful counseling that has led to exorbitant suicide rates.”
Stephens called upon Christians not only in Canada but in the United States as well, to fight the “spiritual battle” against the “strongholds” and the “opinions and philosophies that are raised against the knowledge of God.” He lamented that the Constitution will not be able to prevent the advancement of “these godless ideologies.”
“Revival and reformation is needed,” Stephens remarked. He added that the Church must lead the way, but that in the United States like in Canada, there are “only a few voices sounding the alarm and speaking truth to culture.”
Other pastors are also warning against the impending doom these ideologies are causing in the west. Pastor Andrew Brunson, a missionary who was unjustly imprisoned in 2016 and caused a conflict between Turkey and the U.S., said during his 2018 release that religious persecution is coming soon to Western countries. He now works as a special advisor for religious freedom at Family Research Council, where he observes the developments in North America and calls Canada’s ban on conversion therapy “a dark wave of hostility” that will crash onto the church.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
They have had more deaths from this one shot since it has rolled out than they have in the last thirty years in VAERS reporting.
Canadian Doctors Stephen Malthouse and Charles Hoffe are on a road trip across the country to raise awareness about the dangers of taking the vaccine. “The rollout of the vaccine is having a devastating effect on the population. This is the most dangerous vaccine ever rolled out,” Hoffe said. “And now they are coming for our children.”
More and more people are being injured every day from taking the “vaccines,” reports the doctors. Yet, despite the shocking numbers, most doctors are not reporting the injuries or even questioning the safety of the “vaccines.” The few medical professionals asking questions and expressing concern are ostracized and labeled as pushing “vaccine hesitancy.”
Vaccine Injuries
I now have ten patients in my small practice who are literally disabled after their first shot, revealed Dr. Hoffe.
Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab.
According to the doctor, the blood clots also explain his patients’ neurological disorders and lung problems. “These stings cause permanent damage. And the damage gets bigger after every shot.”
Injuries Unreported
The reporting system for vaccine side effects of the American Centers for Disease Control, VAERS, counts almost one million confirmed side effects for the new Covid vaccines.
Doctor Malthouse explains that the number of cases registered with VAERS “has been shown only to represent 1% of what is happening in real life.” For example, there have been 20,000 deaths (almost 50% of them reported within the first 24 hours of the shot), 100,000 hospitalizations, and over 30,000 severely disabled people who are permanently unable to work. As a result, the actual number of people adversely impacted by the vaccines is more likely to be closer to 100 times these actual reported numbers.
Despite the shocking numbers of deaths and injuries, Dr. Malthouse is questioning why The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has ignored all of these red flags. The Doctor states,
They have had more deaths from this one shot since it has rolled out than they have in the last thirty years in VAERS reporting. And that is only 1%. So we can imagine what the real death rate is of the shot. It is astronomical; in fact, it is pretty much a vertical line since that shot has been rolled out.
Total Failure
The doctors hope that people realize that they have been misled and misinformed. “Clearly, these vaccines don’t work. In British Columbia, 90 percent of the population has been vaccinated, but the corona restrictions remain in place and are even being tightened. Therefore, the rollout of the vaccine has turned out to be a total failure.”
Watch the following interview by Press For Truth with Dr. Charles Hoffe and Dr. Stephen Malthouse:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“I honestly thought I was going to die in there.” John O’ Looney
John O’ Looney is an independent coroner and funeral home director in the UK. When RAIR Foundation USA interviewed Mr. O’Looney back in September, he was adamantly against the vaccine mandates because of the shocking death toll apparently caused by the “vaccines.” Recently, he exposed the pressures coming against medical officials to falsify death certificates to inflate the number of Covid deaths artificially.
Dying with a positive Covid test and dying from Covid are two completely different things. The PCR tests used to detect Covid are inherently flawed, a fact that even the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) concedes.
O’Looney is well known for exposing the hospitals in the UK ordering nurses to administer a lethal dosage of a medication called midazolam to Covid patients, leading to even more deaths. Then on December 16, he reportedly developed Covid symptoms and was rushed to Milton Keynes, a UK hospital.
In a RAIR interview with Dr. Sam Dubè, a Canadian doctor who learned what happened to John O’Looney, Dr. Dubé revealed the nature of his hospitalization and how a team of friends rescued him over and above the objections of the hospital staff.
Now in a hospital ICU on 10 liters of oxygen, O’Looney was confronted with the very problems he already knew existed. Hospital administrators demanded he signs forms to allow them to treat him with experimental treatments. O’Looney, however, refused Remdesivir (developed initially as a failed Ebola drug), which can cause a shutdown of the kidneys. All while he was not able to breathe well.
You can hear about how he was rescued in the following RAIR interview with Dr. Sam Dubè
After his ordeal and healing at home, O’Looney issued this statement, which reads in part:
There were no excess deaths in 2020 – it is that simple, and nothing will change my mind all the minds of those in the industry who have their eyes open to this lie – and there are many.
The reality is the death rate only soared the moment they began putting needles into arms in January 2021 You can believe it or not but I was one of the people picking up these poor souls and a huge amount of them.
Fast forward and now we see a huge increase in thrombosis related deaths exclusively in jab recipients.
I was recently admitted to the ICU in Milton Keynes hospital after developing Covid symptoms.
I took three lateral flow tests whilst there and was told at the time I was not positive only to be told later on the ward I was positive so clearly it was inconclusive so I will say I felt and feel terrible still.
But fundamentally for me things to change very much in the hospitals and one of the very first people to visit me bedside was a representative from Oxford University funded by the gates foundation begging me to trial new medicines (whilst being unable to look me in the eye) not even related to Covid – naturally I declined.
I was told I would die and these medicines would be my last chance; again, I declined and stuck to my guns.
Trust me, that’s not an easy thing to do laying there in a hospital ward on your own, unable to breathe easily, and denied any family support or visits.
It is deliberate, and it is to break you. There seems to be more emphasis on encouraging me to be a guinea pig than actually treating me. I looked across at other people in the ward with sadness who were all vaccinated without exception. In fact, to my knowledge, I was the only one in the ward unvaccinated – they will probably be all gone now… And I was reminded “how selfish I was” even in the ambulance on the way there, I shit you not…. The Hospital environment has fundamentally changed beyond recognition for me, and while there were shadows and echoes of what it once was, it’s a very different place now. I suspect it is already being fully privatized; we just haven’t been told…
I feel very fortunate to have escaped hospital (I never dreamt I would have lived to say that) with the help of family in friends.
I was initially sceptical about Covid but I can confirm it’s validity and it is very nasty.But I can also tell you it is 100% man-made this is not a natural virus and this is an attack on all of us – it’s a bio weapon.
My advice to you moving forward is network, prepare and under all circumstances try to avoid going into hospital because I suspect many of the poor souls I saw in there will never ever leave having become test tubes for the Gates Foundation.
The sinister whispering the secrecy and the guilty looks amongst certain members of staff spoke volumes to me It was honestly very chilling and traumatising just seeing how it has changed – especially when I asked to leave.
The tactics used to try and force me to stay were sadistic to say the least and that is as much detail as I can go into except to say I feel very very lucky to have gotten out.
Rumble — In November, Dr. Melvin Bruchet and his friend, Dr. Daniel Nagase, filed criminal charges against elected and appointed BC government officials over a possible conflict of interest regarding provincial lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. The doctors exposed a severe spike in stillbirths at a Vancouver hospital. The women were injected with the experimental Covid "vaccine" in all cases. In December 2021, the Canadian government targeted Dr. Melvin Bruchet and unlawfully placed him in detention against his will.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The Soviet Union often claimed that dissidents had “mental issues” and would lock them up in asylums, keep them drugged, and eventually they would die.
In November, Dr. Melvin Bruchet and his friend, Dr. Daniel Nagase, filed criminal charges against elected and appointed Candian government officials in British Columbia over a possible conflict of interest regarding provincial lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. The doctors exposed a severe spike in stillbirths at a Vancouver hospital. The women were injected with the experimental Covid “vaccine” in all cases. In December 2021, reminiscent of the Soviet Union’s treatment of dissidents, the Canadian government targeted Dr. Melvin Bruchet and unlawfully placed him in detention against his will.
Stillbirths Explode in Canada
In November 2021, RAIR Foundation USA reported that stillbirths in fully “vaccinated” women are exploding in Canada,
….in Waterloo, Ontario, 86 cases have been reported in six months, compared to typically five to six per year, says doctor Daniel Nagase. “That is highly unusual.”
At Lions Gate Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 stillbirths were recorded over 24 hours, reported the doctor. Until recently, Dr. Nagase worked at an Alberta hospital but said he was fired after treating three covid patients with ivermectin at the Rimbey Hospital and Care Centre.”
Soviet Style Detention
On December 8, Dr. Bruchet had an argument with a tenant over loud music in his apartment building (a relatively common occurrence). It is unclear whether the tenant reported him as a candidate for the mental health act or someone else. Suddenly, Dr. Bruchet was targeted by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).
While Dr. Nagase was being interviewed in his home, three RCMP squad cars and six RCMP officers descended on Dr. Bruchet and hauled him off in handcuffs for a “psych evaluation.”
The first diagnosis made by the hospital was “frontal lobe dementia” after taking a PET scan. According to Dr. Nagase, such a situation normally does not warrant detention – just diagnosis and sending the individual home. Since Bruchet is 81, anyone outside the situation might assume that was correct. It was not.
Dr. Nagase was apprised of the situation and managed to get him out of the Psych ward on a day pass with the promise of returning on his own recognizance. Dr. Bruchet returned due to the hospital’s threats they would send the police after him.
The hospital then did a second evaluation and diagnosed him with “mania,” a condition that presumes the person may have outbursts and perhaps even be dangerous. They then took away the doctor’s phone access.
Dr. Nagase was concerned that the hospital might have given him Abilify, a medicine often used to treat mental and mood disorders that should not be given to elderly patients. In addition, the doctor was concerned because Dr. Bruchet was abnormally slurring his words. A common side effect of the powerful anti-psychotic medication.
The Soviet Union notoriously used psychiatric medicine to discredit dissidents. The Soviets often claimed that dissidents had “mental issues” and would lock them up in asylums, keep them drugged, and eventually they would die. How is this any different?
The question remains: was Dr. Bruchet unlawfully detained because he exposed the connection of stillbirths to the Covid vaccines? Or because he argued with his tenant over loud music? Or was Dr. Bruchet’s age a convenient excuse? “Dr. Mel,” as he is affectionately known, practiced medicine for many years in British Columbia.
The following is an exclusive interview with Dr. Sam Dube, a Canadian doctor who informs RAIR of the troubling situation:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Daniel Pisano is dying of COVID-19. He’s been on a ventilator in Florida for 28 days now at the Mayo Clinic. His doctors give him a less than 5% chance of survival.
His wife and son want him treated with the COVID plan recommended by Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). It involves using ivermectin. They want Dr. Eduardo Balbona to treat their family member. The Mayo Clinic refused. The family went to court, hoping the court would force the clinic to allow an outside doctor to treat Pisano. Judge Marianne Aho decided against it.
They appealed that decision and lost that court battle, too. They don’t get to decide what course to take for the 70-year-old Pisano.
The Mayo Clinic asserted that the FLCCC COVID battle plan doesn’t fall in line with their COVID protocol, which at this point appears to be to leave Pisano on a ventilator and hope for the best. This, despite hundreds of stories of people using ivermectin to survive COVID.
Jonathan Bowling and his family have several comorbidities which make recovering from COVID-19 much more difficult. Watch his story as he credits the FLCCC protocol for saving their lives after they fell ill with the disease: https://t.co/DagGiMqjJypic.twitter.com/A7Toe2B49V
— FLCCC—Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (@Covid19Critical) January 8, 2022
Ivermectin is a drug used for livestock but it’s also been used for decades on humans. Numerous peer-reviewed studies show ivermectin can help people with the Bat Soup flu.
Why doesn’t a family have any say in the care of a loved one? More importantly, why would the Mayo Clinic allow people to die rather than try ivermectin? What’s stopping them?
For starters, perhaps the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The FDA famously and foolishly tweeted this in August of 2021:
Let’s also not forget that Dr. Malone said on Joe Rogan’s podcast that ivermectin, when purchased in bulk, costs less than 01. cent per dose. How can big pharma make millions of dollars at that price?
Dr. Balbona is a former physician at the U.S. Capitol, where he treated members of Congress and the Supreme Court. He has had a lot of success with ivermectin and the FLCCC therapeutic suggestions, though he admits to tweaking dosages. He stated he has cured “dozens and dozens” of seriously ill COVID patients.
He also faces an ongoing assault against his practices, even though he’s been successful. He frequently comes to his office and hears messages like this on his voicemail,
Your license should be revoked, you worthless piece of garbage. You are killing people, not helping them, and to harass the Mayo Clinic, because you are not good enough to be their doctor is disgusting. Disgusting. You and doctors like you should all be banned from society. Shame on you. Disgusting. Goodbye and good riddance. I hope you get COVID. Goodbye.
If nothing else, the left has done a phenomenal job of brainwashing their sheep into believing everything they want them to believe.
Remember, Michigan Democrat Rep. Karen Whitsett praised Trump and hydroxychloroquine for saving her life when she had COVID, and her party censured her.
FACT-O-RAMA! Ivermectin has been approved for use against COVID in 22 countries.
The battle against ivermectin is mind-boggling. It’s helped save a lot of people from COVID worldwide. Yet the left not only won’t accept that they openly shame people who use it and survive. Big Tech is booting people off of YouTube and Twitter for daring to question “science” incarnate, Dr. Fauci.
Biden has been pushing for vaccine mandates for almost everyone, except illegal immigrants and welfare recipients, the latter of whom are among the least vaccinated.
The Supreme Court recently spanked Biden and his attempt to mandate vaccines.
Watch this video of President Brain Fog as he tells people who stand up and fight his vaccine mandate nonsense to “have at it:”
They “had at it,” Joe. You lost. Now, let people have ivermectin.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Under new policy, everyone five years and older must get at least the first dose of the experimental Covid-19 vaccine.
QUICK FACTS:
Ronald McDonald House, a nonprofit charity organization, has announced it will relocate unvaccinated residents by the end of the month.
Everyone five and older must be vaccinated in order to stay at Ronald McDonald House in British Columbia and Yukon, CityNewsreports.
The charity said on Wednesday it would move children and families under its care to alternate housing if they are not vaccinated against Covid-19 by Jan 31, some of the listed alternatives including hotels or similar charity facilities.
A video recently posted to social media shows a father confronting staff regarding the new mandate, in it the man claiming his son who has Leukemia was being evicted due to his vaccination status.
A staff member seen in the video does not provide any suggestions that the organization will help the family find alternative accommodation, notes CityNews.
WHAT RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SAID:
Ronald McDonald House later issued a statement saying its family services team and social workers will work to find alternate housing for families who refuse to get everyone over the age of five vaccinated by the deadline, according to CityNews.
“On the recommendation of public health, the 14 member Board of Directors made the decision to mandate vaccinations for everyone working, visiting, or staying at RMH BC & Yukon to ensure we meet the highest standards of health and safety and protect the vulnerable population we serve,” the emailed statement reads.
“We appreciate that this policy will impact those who have made a decision not to vaccinate however, the overall health and welfare of all our residents is our primary concern.”
WHAT THE FATHER SAID:
Austin Furgason, a father-of-two from Kelowna, British Columbia, shared a video on Facebook on Tuesday showing him confronting an administrator at the Ronald McDonald House in Vancouver, where his family has been staying while his four-year-old son, Jack, according to The Daily Mail.
Jack is undergoing treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Mr. Furgason called the mandate “some kind of crazy evil like I’ve never seen in my life.”
“I just want to get this straight: by the end of the month, my four-year-old boy with Leukemia is getting evicted because we don’t have a vaccine?” he asks in the video, as the administrator replies that the eviction would not apply to his son (who is under five) but rather to his parents if they are unvaccinated.
“You are evicting kids with Leukemia,” he said. “It’s not just us. We have talked with other families in the same boat.”
“I was in shock when I received the eviction letter, and I am still in shock,” the Kelowna husband and father said, notes Toronto Sun, “Even Fox News wanted me to come on.”
“It’s not OK in our view,” said Furgason. “We think it’s pretty messed up.”
Reports say a fundraiser on GoFundMe for Austin and Lindsay Furgason was started shortly following the video was uploaded to Facebook, as of Wednesday the fundraising is $73,623 for their son’s cancer treatment.
BACKGROUND:
Ronald McDonald House sent letters to its resident families informing them of the mandate on Monday, notes The Washington Examiner.
Ronald McDonald House Charities—founded in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1974—runs many hundreds of programs benefiting sick children and their families in 62 countries.
The video of Furgason’s confrontation with the RMHBC administrator went viral on Twitter, being viewed more than 721,000 times as of Wednesday.
Quebec’s UnVaxxed Tax, Judge SUSPENDS DAD’S VISITATION & 4 Year Old Cancer Patient EVICTED FROM RMH!
A Quebec Superior Court judge has suspended a father's right to see his child based on his unvaccinated status and also because he is what the court refers to as a “conspiracy theorist”. Meanwhile the Quebec government is also now suggesting that you pay up or jab up as they prepare to pass new legislation that will allow them to tax the unvaxxed! And finally a BC father and his family is facing eviction from Ronald McDonald House where his 4 year old son receives leukaemia care all because the parents still have questions about the experimental Covid-19(84) jab that have gone unanswered. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth covers these 3 breaking stories that once again prove without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19(84) nightmare we are all living through has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control!
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
On Thursday afternoon, the Supreme Court weighed in on Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate for companies with more than 100 employees. The Court ruled with a 6-3 margin to strike down the OSHA mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees, but it did allow the mandate for federally funded healthcare agencies with a 5-4 vote.
The court’s conservative majority concluded the administration overstepped its authority by seeking to impose the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s vaccine-or-test rule on U.S. businesses with at least 100 employees. More than 80 million people would have been affected.
“OSHA has never before imposed such a mandate. Nor has Congress. Indeed, although Congress has enacted significant legislation addressing the COVID–19 pandemic, it has declined to enact any measure similar to what OSHA has promulgated here,” the conservatives wrote in an unsigned opinion.
The conclusion on the per curium brief in favor of striking down the mandate concluded that OSHA’s powers are limited to regulating the workplace, yet COVID-19 affects more than just the workplace, which means that the pandemic falls outside of OSHA’s purview.
In November, Biden ordered federal contractors, employers with 100 or more employees, and healthcare workers to force their employees to either show proof of vaccination or be tested weekly and wear masks to work. Since then, employers have been scrambling to figure out how to proceed as the deadline loomed for compliance while the issue was tied up in the courts. On Monday, the mandate officially went into effect, with no guidance from the Supreme Court on how they should proceed. Many companies felt they had no choice but to begin enforcement of the policy.
The Biden administration’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) cited a provision in OSHA regulations that it said gave broad authority to the federal government to protect employees at private companies from workplace hazards. Detractors said the language in the regulations was never intended to be used to mandate widespread vaccinations.
States immediately began filing lawsuits claiming the mandate was unconstitutional. A Louisiana federal court swiftly blocked the mandate. But in December, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the lower court only had the authority to block the mandate in the states that had filed suit. A federal court in Texas then issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of the mandate for the states that filed lawsuits.
A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reinstated the vaccine mandate in mid-December, prompting a flurry of petitions to the Supreme Court for relief. The Biden administration petitioned the Supreme Court demanding a nationwide stay of the injunctions, pending a full review by the lower courts. This past Friday, the Court held an emergency hearing on the mandate for private employers as well as the one for healthcare workers.
As more details and analysis come down the line, we’ll share more with you. But in the meantime, breathe a sigh of relief that the vaccine mandate is effectively dead.
Special thanks to Paula Bolyard for her background work on this story.
Rumble — A commandant of a Marine leadership academy may lose his job after encouraging parents to look into possible side effects of COVID-19 vaccines before giving them to their children. OAN's Christina Bobb sat down with him to discuss the situation.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“The vaccine is not gonna work, early treatment has always worked, and government mismanagement of patients is why people have died.” – Nurse Morgan Wallace
At a local county school board meeting in Wilmington, North Carolina, registered nurse Morgan Wallace unleashed on medical authorities, accusing them of causing deaths by refusing to promote early life-saving Covid treatments.
Nurse Wallace worked for New Hanover County Hospital for ten years and saw how firsthand how patients died unnecessarily because the government does not allow specific early Covid treatments.
We ran your heart and lungs outside your body with your chest open while you were bleeding on the floor, and what I realized was that patients were needlessly dying because of government’s withheld policies for treating Covid.
Everyone who died with Covid should be considered murdered. Early treatment has always been effective.
Ticking Time Bombs
Wallace recently resigned from the hospital due to their controversial mandatory “vaccine” requirements. Furthermore, she does not believe the Vaccines protect against Covid but rather cause harm,
I also watched the entire staff at the hospital including in my unit get vaccinated and then get Covid.
Amongst all other kinds of ailments, you have now loaded your body with millions of spike proteins and you are a ticking time bomb for cancer, blood clots, and whatever kind of ailment may come up in your body.
Helping To Deliver Early Treatment
The decorated nurse chose to leave her job and open her own practice to help Covid patients in need.
I was highly decorated and highly respected at New Hanover. I was the November 2020 employee of excellence and I had a job opportunity this year from the chief medical director at this hospital and I chose to walk out and stand up for what is right.
Wallace is the only one in her area offering early Covid treatment. She is determined to keep people out of the hospital. The nurse explains,
I’m tired of hearing people go and ask doctors can they be treated for Covid, and their only option is a vaccine, or go home, or go into the hospital where you’re not going to make it out.
People Are Rising Up
“The vaccine is not gonna work, early treatment has always worked, and government mismanagement of patients is why people have died,” states Wallace. “Families have realized this, and they are rising up and, they are going to come after governments and the hospital.”
“The cat is out of the bag, and people are speaking globally, including the inventor of the vaccine,” explains Nurse Wallace referencing Dr. Robert Malone, the highly respected inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Watch Nurse Wallace’s powerful and impassioned speech at the New Hanover County school board meeting.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
On Jan. 3, 2022, a group of Navy Seals declining to take the COVID-19 vaccine due to religious reasons, received protection in the form of a preliminary injunction from a federal court in the Northern District of Texas Fort Worth.12
The COVID vaccine mandate instituted by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) requires that all U.S. military personnel receive the COVID vaccine by Dec. 14, 2021.3 While religious exemptions are permitted, the Navy has failed to approve even a single one of the 3,247 requests for a religious exemption.4
Navy Seals Argue COVID Vaccine Mandate Violates Free Exercise of Religion Clause of U.S. Constitution and Religious Freedom Restoration Act
In response, 35 Navy Seals represented by the First Liberty Institute filed a lawsuit against President Joe Biden alleging that they faced disciplinary repercussions for filing a religious exemption, including being kept apart from vaccinated colleagues as well as dismissals.5 The Navy Seals Complaint argues that that the Navy violated the Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) when no action was taken on their religious exemption requests.6
U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor sided with the Navy Seals and ruled against the Biden administration’s COVID vaccine mandate. He issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Navy from punishing the Navy Seals who had filed religious exemption. The injunction barred the Navy from declaring the unvaccinated Navy Seals non-deployable or disqualified from Special Operations.7
The Court pointed out that not only did the Navy fail to grant a single exemption for COVID vaccines, but it has not approved any religious exemption for any vaccine at all over the past seven years.8 The judge stated that even if the religious exemptions were granted, the Navy said the Seals would be considered, “medically disqualified” and would be forever prevented from deployment and from receiving bonuses and incentive pay – even though Navy personnel with medical vaccine exemptions do not face the same severe consequences.
Some Navy Seals were informed that they would lose their Seal Tridents if they were granted a religious exemption to vaccination or even if they just applied for one.9
Court Applied Strict Scrutiny Analysis to Justify Injunction
The Court came to the same conclusion on both the RFRA and the First Amendment claims. Because the Navy treated medical exemptions differently than religious exemptions, the court applied strict scrutiny analysis and found that the Navy did not have, “a compelling interest justifying the substantial burden on Plaintiff’s religious beliefs.”10
Once a substantial burden to their religious beliefs was established by Plaintiffs, the Defendants must then show that the burden furthers a compelling interest and that they are using the least restrictive means to further that interest. The Judge explained that it is not enough for the Defendants to show their policy furthers a broad compelling interest such as “national security”, but rather they must show a compelling interest in vaccinating the 35 individual Plaintiffs in this matter.
With a 99.4 percent vaccination rate, the Court concluded that the Defendants do not have a compelling interest in vaccinating the Plaintiffs in this case. The Court further stressed that the fact that unvaccinated Navy personnel with medical exemptions are still eligible for deployment belies the compelling nature of the vaccinations policy. Since the Plaintiff’s policy was deemed not to be compelling, the Court did not need to address whether it used the least restrictive means before issuing an injunction.11
The Court concluded that the Plaintiffs suffered irreparable harm from the vaccine mandate.
Plaintiffs have suffered the more serious injury of “infringement of their religious liberty rights under RFRA and the First Amendment . . . .” Pls.’ Br. 28, ECF No. 16. The crisis of conscience imposed by the mandate is itself an irreparable harm. See BST Holdings, 17 F.4th at 618; Sambrano v. United Airlines, 19 F.4th 839, 842 (5th Cir. 2021) (Ho, J., dissenting) (citing Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 92 n.68 (1974)). “The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Elrod, 427 U.S. at 373 (plurality opinion).12 (emphasis added)
“There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment. There is no military exclusion from our Constitution.”
Finally, the Court found that that balance of hardships favors the Plaintiffs because their loss of liberty outweighs the Defendant’s interest in vaccinating the 35 Navy Seals and that it was not against the public interest to issue a preliminary injunction.
Judge O’Connor stated:
The Navy servicemembers in this case seek to vindicate the very freedoms they have sacrificed so much to protect. The COVID-19 pandemic provides the government no license to abrogate those freedoms. There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment. There is no military exclusion from our Constitution.13
As of Dec. 29, 2021, over a month after the vaccine mandate deadline passed, more than 8,000 Navy service members, 5,328 active duty and 3,002 Ready Reserve, have not received COVID vaccines.14
There are several other lawsuits pending against the Biden administration, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro, and DoD that are attempting to block the COVID vaccine mandate.15
Josh Buice explains what brought him to a conclusion to lead his church to separate from the SBC. You can read his full explanation here: https://g3min.org/why-we-are-no-longe...
Justin Peters' Interview with Dr. Josh Buice on Leaving the SBC
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
One of the great joys of my life has been serving as the pastor of three different churches that have been affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention. I currently serve the church where my wife and I grew up as children on the west side of Atlanta—Pray’s Mill Baptist Church. Although our church is 180 years old and predates the SBC, our congregation has maintained a longtime affiliation within the SBC. However, in recent days we came to the conclusion that there was no profitable path forward for us within the SBC and we made the decision to officially separate.
Over the last few years, there has been a great deal of transition and change within the Southern Baptist Convention. That’s a nice way of describing the devious deconstruction plan that has been at work for many years behind the scenes. Along the way, we have witnessed scandals, controversies, and divisions. It is not my desire in this article to add fuel to the fire, however, as a lifelong SBC member and pastor, I believe it’s necessary to provide a reason for our church’s decision to officially separate from the SBC effective on January 1st, 2022.
The Commendable
What I will say in this article should not be seen as a denial of the fact that there are many good and gifted professors who are serving in the SBC entities and doing a good job of training men for the pulpit and church planting. When I look back on my time at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, I am grateful for many of the professors who invested in me and helped prepare me for the work of gospel ministry.
Alongside professors are many good pastors and local churches who have been healthy and profitable in supporting Christian education and church planting for many years within this network that we know as the SBC. Therefore, we can be thankful for these gifted individuals and churches who have sacrificed much to accomplish much for the glory of God.
But, all is not well within evangelicalism and that also includes the SBC. In recent years, we’ve witnessed quite a transformation take place within the once-beloved SBC that has necessitated separation for what I believe is far more than preference matters.
The Downgrade
Over the past decade or more, things began to shift with the SBC leadership that moved the once theologically conservative denomination in a leftward direction. The biggest catalyst to this leftward movement undoubtedly was the acceptance of the social justice agenda which has resulted in the greatest downgrade in our modern era of church history. Any denial of this downgrade is simply a refusal to report the facts about where the SBC is today, where the SBC was yesterday, and where the SBC is moving tomorrow.
While this shift did not take place overnight, it began to pick up the pace drastically over the last 4-5 years. Back in 2018, I was part of a group that assembled in Dallas, Texas for a meeting regarding the problems of social justice. As we assembled, I was concerned but hopeful. Little did I know that our meeting and subsequent Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel would not only serve as a means of confirming what was already in motion beneath the radar, but it would expose many people and institutions within the SBC and their involvement in this devious movement.
Sadly, the top-tier SBC leaders continue to double down on their positions. They have sought to deflect charges of theological capitulation and rigorously work to protect their positions through cultural virtue signals and theological word salads.
During this downgrade, we have witnessed once trusted voices and institutions accept the ideologies of the social justice movement and platform notable voices within their hallways, classrooms, and conference circuits. They came together under the banner of the gospel only to embrace a social justice gospel that resulted in confusion, division, and in some cases—a complete derailing altogether. This must not be overlooked. If left unchecked, the social justice agenda will leave an indelible mark upon preachers who will be sent out into local churches to serve as pastors.
The SBC once fought a war on the inerrancy of Scripture during what has become known as the “Conservative Resurgence.” After claiming a victory over the “Battle for the Bible” the SBC has moved into a new era where this once theologically conservative denomination has adopted the controversial “Resolution 9” at the 2019 SBC in Birmingham. How could the SBC openly champions inerrancy, at the same time adopt a resolution stating that we need to employ Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality (CRT/I) as “analytical tools” for gospel ministry? This was done, in all reality, without much public debate, and through sly political schemes.
Moving beyond the 2019 SBC, after a break in 2020 due to COVID-19, the SBC reconvened in Nashville in the summer of 2021 to discuss business and make decisions as a group of churches. During the meeting, there were multiple attempts from the floor to call upon the SBC to openly renounce the teachings of CRT/I. At each juncture, all of these attempts were rejected and generic language was adopted in place of specific language that openly rejected CRT/I.
One must ask the honest question as to why there was such an open refusal from the SBC leaders at this point? In the past, the SBC openly challenged Disney and eventually boycotted Disney in 1997. One must ask why the SBC was willing to boycott the gospel according to Disney but failed to boycott the gospel according to social justice? Why are theologians, pastors, and professors unwilling to reject CRT/I when concerned unconverted soccer moms are flooding school board meetings demanding that their local schools refuse to teach such ideologies to their children? It appears that unconverted soccer moms are more concerned about their local schools than SBC leaders are about local churches.
One must ask why the SBC was willing to boycott the gospel according to Disney but failed to boycott the gospel according to social justice?
During this downgrade, we have also witnessed a progressive attack upon the pulpit within the SBC. A movement in recent years has focused on dividing the office and function of the pastor in the life of the local church. As the progressive winds continue to blow through evangelical circles, it seems that in order to continue to maintain the big tent approach to evangelicalism, the SBC must allow for women to preach so long as they are not ordained to the office of elder. We have watched the rise of popular figures like Beth Moore continue to weave this methodology into the fabric of the SBC through the years.
This downgrade has not been a sudden explosion. It’s the result of what might be considered a crock-pot approach to compromise and failure. The SBC celebrated victory on the subject of inerrancy but never entered the battlefield to address the issue of biblical sufficiency. As a result, the slow cook of pragmatism has led the SBC to embrace theological error in order to become culturally relevant which has been quite evident through the virtue signaling of major SBC leaders in the wake of tragedies like George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. Pragmatism demands that you do whatever works and provides the best results. Standing for biblical justice as opposed to social justice is the unpopular and narrow road that is not culturally acceptable.
When the SBC is willing to cancel Walt Disney but unwilling to cancel Derrick Bell or Kimberlé Crenshaw, we have serious problems.
Allow me to be crystal clear at this point. This is not merely a personal conviction or preference matter. The present downgrade that has encompassed the SBC is one of both methodological and theological errors. When the SBC is willing to cancel Walt Disney but unwilling to cancel Derrick Bell or Kimberlé Crenshaw, we have serious problems. To be clear, the social justice movement is not purely Marxist, but it has roots in a postmodern attempt at deconstruction, and such a dialectic will be catastrophic if not corrected. J. Gresham Machen described this theological compromise as “the modern hostility to doctrine.” 1
This downgrade involves compromise on theological levels such as complementarianism (roles of men and women in the church), ecclesiology (the office and function of elder), and most important of all is the gospel (the social justice movement has replaced theology with victimology—resulting in the rise of a new religion).
For that reason, our church which is 180 years old and predates the SBC by three years, has determined by a 100% congregational vote led by the elders who voted in a 100% eldership vote to lead the church away from the SBC due to such compromise. The SBC has failed. The leaders have compromised. The SBC must know that local churches do not need the SBC, but the SBC does need local churches—both large and small.
We as elders determined that it would be a violation of our conscience and a misuse of money to invest in a system that has clearly rejected all forms of correction in private and public settings. Therefore, we are no longer an SBC church, but we are Baptist and will continue to cooperate with other like-minded churches and pastors for the work of missions and theological education for the glory of God.
The Final Straw
As I attended what would be my final SBC in Nashville in 2021, the final straw was apparent through the election of Ed Litton as the president of the SBC. To watch leaders of SBC seminaries like Danny Akin take to Twitter to encourage the messengers of the SBC churches to vote for Ed Litton in the runoff was quite revealing. Danny Akin is entrusted with millions of SBC dollars to train pastors for the pulpit and he sent the signal that Ed Litton is a proper example for SBC pastors and future pastors to follow.
Following the SBC annual meeting in June of 2021, the plagiarism scandal (which is being referenced as “Sermon Gate”) surfaced which further exposed the failures of Ed Litton’s pulpit practices. Rather than calling for his resignation, the 11th Commandment of the SBC appears to be in full force as the SBC elites not only enable his capitulation, but they celebrate him as a faithful leader. This was put on vivid display as Adam Greenway, who serves as the president of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, extended an invitation to Ed Litton to address the student body. Rather than preaching, they held a Q&A session where Greenway asked Litton to respond to allegations of plagiarism and then accepted his answer and applauded him.
As the pulpit goes, so goes the church. This was the final straw for me and for our local church. We refuse to be associated with a group of churches that elect and support leaders who will not be held accountable for sin.
As the pulpit goes, so goes the church.
As the final word on the matter, it is not my desire to cast stones at a sinking ship. I find no pleasure in separating from the SBC. In logical terms, when we reached the conclusion that we can no longer support the educational entities or the church planting agencies of the SBC (the very reason the SBC exists), it only made sense that we should invest our time and energy elsewhere.
A couple of years ago as we gathered together with our local church for a meeting to discuss the problems within the SBC after the adoption of Resolution 9, one wise elderly woman in our church stood and made a simple, yet profound statement. She said, “Pastor Josh, if it is true and we must eventually leave the SBC, it will not be that we left the SBC but that the SBC left us.” That accurately describes the current scenario that many SBC churches are experiencing.
As we came to a close in our congregational members’ meeting where we voted on December 26th to separate from the SBC, we closed by praying for the SBC churches and leaders. It would be our earnest desire to see the SBC repent and change direction, but since there is no evidence of such a change of direction from the leaders within the SBC, we must exit this aging battleship and move onward in this fight of the faith.
As a local church pastor and president of G3 Ministries, I find myself very committed to a high view of the local church. While this decision has been a long time in the making, I have had to come to the place where I see my commitment to the local church as far superior to any organizational or denominational relationship. At whatever point the network or denomination fails to hold to biblical positions, we must make the hard decision to separate. In so doing, I walk away from the SBC without shame. I involved myself in the SBC, attended the meetings, and sought to do my little part in the work of the SBC causes. Now as I walk away, I do so without regret knowing that this decision was not merely a reactionary decision made in haste. The decision was made for the glory of God and the health of our local church for which I do not apologize.
When Charles Spurgeon was addressing the compromise among Baptists in England, he penned “The Downgrade in the Churches” where he wrote the following:
A chasm is opening between the men who believe their Bibles and those who are prepared for an advance upon the Scripture. . .The house is being robbed, its very walls are being digged down, but the good people who are in bed are too fond of the warmth. . .to go downstairs to meet the burglars.
It appears that Spurgeon’s words could be applied to the present downgrade within the SBC. We must remember the words of Paul as he penned a letter to the church in the city of Colossae. He wrote, “See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ” (Col. 2:8). When you’ve done all within your power to stand—sometimes the only option that remains is to separate.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
ABOVE: Dr. Robert Malone
No to Vaccine Mandates.
No to Vaccine Passports.
No to Vaccinating Healthy Children.
No to Censorship.
No to Limits on Reasonable Debate.
So say the organizers of the “Defeat the Mandates. American Homecoming” rally against the COVID-19 vax mandates that will take place in the nation’s capital on January 23.
Speaking on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast late last month, mRNA vaccine architect Dr. Robert Malone explained the purpose of the rally,
“This is not about being anti-vaccines; it’s about being anti-mandates, and our hope is that we bring people together. People from every walk of life, every party, every religion, every ethnic background … The thing that we can agree on is personal liberty and the right of people to make their own choice.”
Dr. Malone added that he hopes the event not only encompasses the United States but all nations around the world who wish to see vaccine mandates and passports outlawed. Freedom-loving people in Australia, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere in Europe will be rallying in their countries the same day, per the doctor.
According to the rally’s website, the march will start at the Washington Monument at 11:30 AM EST and end at the Lincoln Memorial, where a “wide range of featured guests,” such as “recording artists, prominent doctors, first responders, journalists, pro athletes, and premier thought leaders will give a series of inspiring talks and musical performances.”
The full list of the speakers is yet to be announced, but the preliminary list features top medical professionals in their fields, including Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Richard Urso, as well as Children’s Health Defense Board Chair and Lead Counsel Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a famed California philanthropist, a fierce advocate for early treatments and a major donor to the rally Steve Kirsch, Civil Rights and Constitutional Law Attorney Tricia Lindsey, and others.
The organizers include Global Covid Summit and Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the organizations that have been outspoken about the risks associated with the COVID shots, particularly in children, heavy-handed government response, and efficacy of the early treatments.
Global Covid Summit represents over 15,000 doctors and scientists around the world, who met in September to sign a Declaration calling on the decision-makers to stop preventing healthcare practitioners from prescribing effective COVID treatments to their patients that have proven to save countless lives and implying that by doing so, they commit “crimes against humanity.”
The Summit produced another Declaration in October, warning against vaccinating children against COVID and arguing the risks associated with vaccines far outweigh the benefits. The New American has covered the story here.
The CHD, according to its website, sees the January 23 event as one of the steps in the ongoing pushback against government overreach. Besides participating in the DC rally, the organization encourages “concerned citizens around the world to Show up Strong at their statehouse for the first day of the 2022 legislative session” to let the lawmakers know how many people are willing to “come together and peacefully assemble to stand against mandates.”
The CHD is especially concerned with the lawmakers in New York, California, Louisiana, Washington D.C., and others moving to advance legislation that would make COVID shots mandatory for children attending K-12 schools. “They are coming for our children and the only thing that stands in their way is We the People,” reminds the CHD’s publication, The Defender.
The January 23 event is also supported by The Unity Project headed by Dr. Malone along with Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Paul Alexander, and Dr. Aaron Kheriaty.
Steve Kirsh wrote on his Substack, “We are not marching against the COVID vaccines, we’re marching against the government forcing these vaccines onto Americans. It’s something I hope we can all agree on.”
He further explained:
We don’t even know what is inside these vials and we are being forced to take it.
Speaking with The New American in December, Kirsch said that according to his calculations, the COVID shots have killed more people than they saved. That disproportion is even worse when it comes to children: for every 1 child saved from COVID, 117 will die because of the vaccine-associated adverse events.
Bret Weinstein, an evolutionary biologist, visiting fellow at Princeton University, author, and a podcast host, called on his Twitter audience to “join us:” “With our Constitution, we Americans are uniquely positioned for this fight. It’s time for us to #StandUp. The [vax mandate] orders are immoral, and we will not comply,” he wrote.
Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonary and critical care specialist and a co-developer of effective, COVID early treatment protocols, joined with Weinstein to call on people to “march to call attention to the relentless insanity and cruelty.” “As Americans, we should be at the forefront of the fight to regain the freedoms taken from us ignorantly, fraudulently, or harmfully,” he added.
“Resist. It’s our obligation,” posted Dr. Richard Urso.
As of January 9, over 24,000 people have signed up for the rally, according to the event’s Twitter page.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Not only did the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals shut down the OSHA workplace mandates, but the court also challenged the validity of the pandemic and all subsequent emergency orders and physical restrictions that governments have imposed under its premise.
On page 10, the court states: “The natural first step in enacting a lawful ETS (emergency temporary standard) is to show that employees covered by the ETS are in fact exposed to the dangerous substances, agents, or hazards at issue—here, COVID-19.”
OSHA cannot prove that covid-19 represents a “grave danger” to everyone in the workplace
The court affirmed the definition of emergency temporary standards, that they “are an unusual response to exceptional circumstances.” Throughout history, the courts have unilaterally ruled that OSHA’s authority under § 655(c) is an “extraordinary power” that should be “limited” and “delicately exercised.” In other words, OSHA cannot flagrantly establish emergency temporary standards, and the agency cannot be used as a political weapon to force people to give up their body autonomy for some concocted idea of “safety.”
Therefore, the 5th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that the Biden administration’s vaccine, mask, and PCR testing mandate (with all its threats of coercion and extortion) are “anything but a “delicate exercise” of this “extraordinary power.”
“Quite the opposite, rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly ‘grave danger’ the Mandate purports to address,” the court ruled.
OSHA cannot prove that exposure to airborne viruses is a workplace hazard when exposure is the key to immunity
The Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) failed to properly define “covid-19” and prove that all employees are in “grave danger” to a new causative agent. Under OSHA’s own rules (Int’l Chem. Workers, 830 F.2d at 371), the agency cannot propose a new ETS if the agency is unable to properly identify and isolate a substance of “grave danger’ at such levels that warrant hazardous exposure in the workplace.
A new OSHA ETS cannot be legally enacted unless it:
Addresses “substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful.” Airborne viruses do not fall under this definition because they are endemic, and exposure cannot be veritably traced with current diagnostic standards, especially across the entire workforce.
Shows that workers are exposed to these “substances,” “agents” or “new hazards” in the workplace. There is no accurate method to properly trace exposures to airborne viruses.
Proves that the exposure places workers in “grave danger.” Exposure and natural immunity to airborne viruses can be considered the opposite of a “grave danger.”
Provides evidence that it is “necessary” to alleviate employees’ exposure to this “grave danger” in the workplace. There is no medical necessity to justify widespread interference of people’s lives, their breathing, their interaction, and immune function, all to promise “workplace safety.”
Instead of providing a burden of proof that covid-19 is a “grave danger” for all workplaces with over 100 employees, the federal government provided examples of “clusters” and “outbreaks” to purport there is “evidence of workplace transmission.” However, the court reiterated that these examples “miss the mark” because “OSHA is required to make findings of exposure —or at least the presence of COVID-19—in all covered workplaces.”
OSHA relies on non-specific symptom reporting and diagnostic test results that are provably fraudulent for sequencing a specific causative agent. Restrictions are completely unnecessary in the workforce and are extraordinarily cumbersome. There are NO instances in American law where the rights of one person supersede the bodily autonomy rights of another. Moreover, the federal government failed to prove that exposure to covid-19 is a workplace hazard because there is mounting evidence that natural immunity improves the safety of the working environment.
I'm calling on Republicans to leave Twitter: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
On Fox News Tucker Carlson Tonight, Tucker Carlson speaks to Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Green on her twitter account ban after tweeting about the government statistics on covid vaccine saying big tech like facebook or twitter cannot stop the truth. The congresswoman says she has four strikes before finally banning her. Tucker said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy should have defended the Congresswoman by asking Twitter to get her account back or everyone should leave Twitter.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Twitter — as busy as ever, policing who may or may not have a public platform and what may or may not be said on that platform — permanently banned a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), on Sunday. Greene’s fatal error, as far as Twitter was concerned, was violating its COVID-19 “misinformation policies.” After the ban, Greene took to Gettr to skewer Twitter for its inconsistent and selective application of its own rules: as you might expect, Leftists get a pass.
The New York Times took the social media giant’s side, of course, explaining that “Twitter suspended Ms. Greene’s account after she tweeted on Saturday, falsely, about ‘extremely high amounts of Covid vaccine deaths.’ She included a misleading chart that pulled information from a government database of unverified raw data called the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, a decades-old system that relies on self-reported cases from patients and health care providers.”
The Times didn’t deign to explain why Greene’s chart was “misleading,” but it did claim that “the VAERS database, which is managed by the Food and Drug Administration and the C.D.C., has been cited in many coronavirus falsehoods to push the idea that side effects from the Covid-19 vaccines have been underreported. A spokeswoman for the F.D.A. declined to comment, but pointed to an overview of the VAERS database on the F.D.A.’s website that said VAERS reports ‘generally cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.’”
All right. But there are numerous reports of people getting ill or dying after receiving the vaccine, and the social media giants’ determination to suppress such reports rather than refute them on the basis of evidence only causes more suspicion of the vaccines. Rather than ban Greene, Twitter or its trusted authorities could have taken the trouble to end this “misinformation” once and for all by explaining why she was wrong and providing data to support their case.
But that’s not how fascists operate. Nor are they consistent in the application of their own rules, since they aren’t really rules at all, but just tools to discredit and destroy their foes. Greene pointed out on Gettr that Twitter had let numerous Leftists violate their terms of service: “When Maxine Waters can go to the streets and threaten violence on Twitter, Kamala and Ilhan can bail out rioters on Twitter, and Chief spokesman for terrorist IRGC can tweet mourning Soleimani but I get suspended for tweeting VAERS statistics, Twitter is an enemy to America and can’t handle the truth. That’s fine, I’ll show America we don’t need them and it’s time to defeat our enemies.”
Greene is right. In 2018, Rep. Waters (D-Trump Hate) called on her followers to confront and menace Trump administration officials: “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Video of her incitement is readily available on Twitter to this day; Waters, however, was not banned. In June 2020, future Vice President Kamala Harris tweeted a fundraising resource for the defense of violent Leftist rioters: “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishu) did likewise. Neither was banned. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) vowed “hard revenge” for the killing of Soleimani, and was not banned. Greene could have added that Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, remains active on Twitter despite threatening violence against Donald Trump and other Americans.
All this (and there is much more like it) makes it clear that Twitter really is “an enemy to America,” as Greene said. The whole idea of the freedom of speech is that the remedy to bad speech is more speech, not the suppression of speech, which opens the door to tyranny and may result in people being forced to hold positions that turn out not to be true after all. Leftists’ oft-repeated respect for “science” is at odds with their authoritarian bent, as true science doesn’t advance in an atmosphere of threat and censorship, but one of open inquiry.
It was clear when Twitter banned Trump, and now, with the banning of Greene, it is even clearer: Twitter is arrogating to itself the right and responsibility to police the American public discourse and to serve as its gatekeeper. It is long past time to remove Twitter’s protection from legal liability and to treat it as a publisher rather than a neutral platform, which it most decidedly is not. If Twitter continues its arrogant usurpation of power over the public square, the ultimate result will be nothing less than the end of the United States as a free society.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Brownstone Institute) Every sick child, and probably every adult at some point, asks that existential question: why am I suffering?
No answer is satisfying. To be sick is to feel vulnerable, weak, not in control, not in the game. Life is chugging along outside of your room. You can hear laughter, cars going here and there, people out and about. But you are stuck, shivering under blankets, appetite disrupted, and struggling to remember what it was like to feel healthy.
With fever, all of this is worse because the capacity for one’s brain to process information with full rationality is deprecated. High fever can induce a form of brief insanity, even involving hallucinations. You imagine things that are not true. You know that but can’t shake it off. The fever breaks and you find yourself in a pool of sweat, and your hope is that somewhere in this mess the bug has left you.
For children, it is a scary experience. For adults too, when it lasts long enough.
From the depths of suffering, people naturally look for a source of hope. When is recovery? And what can I expect once that happens? Where is the meaning and the purpose behind the ordeal?
For a conventional respiratory virus, and for many other pathogens, generations have known that there is a silver lining to the suffering. Your immune system has undergone a training exercise. It is encoding new information. That is information your body can use to be healthier in the future. It is now prepared to fight off a similar pathogen in the future.
From the depths of suffering, this realization provides that much-needed source of hope. You can look forward to a better, healthier life on the other side. You will now confront the world with a shield. That dangerous dance with pathogens has been won for at least this particular virus. You can enjoy a stronger and healthier you in the future.
For generations, people understood this. Particularly in the 20th century, when knowledge of natural immunity became more sophisticated, along with the documentation of herd immunity, this became culturally entrenched.
Speaking from personal experience, my own parents were constantly explaining this to me when I was young. When I was sick, it became my essential source of hope. This was crucial for me, as I was an unusually sickly child. To know that I could become stronger and live more normally was a blessing.
Nothing made the point more prescient than my bout with chickenpox. To wake with itchy red spots all over me threw me into panic at the age of 6 or 7. But when I saw the smiles on my parents’ faces, I relaxed. They explained that this is a normal sickness that I absolutely needed to get as a young person. I could then get a lifetime of immunity.
It is far less dangerous to get it when you are young, they explained. Don’t scratch the sores. Just endure it and it will be over soon. I will have done my duty to myself.
That was a striking education for me. It was my introduction to the reality of natural immunity. I learned not only about this one sickness but all kinds of viruses. I learned that there is a plus side, a silver lining, to my suffering. It created the conditions that led to a better life.
Culturally, this was considered to be a modern way to think, a mental awareness that enabled generations not to give up hope but rather to look to the future with confidence.
From the beginning of the current pathogenic crisis, this piece has been missing. Covid has been treated as a pathogen to avoid at all costs – personal and social. No price was too high to pay to purchase avoidance. The worst possible fate would be to confront the virus. We must not live life normally, we were told. We must reorganize everything around slogans: slow the spread, flatten the curve, socially distance, mask up, regard everyone and everything as a carrier.
After two years, this is still the case in many parts of the country. Public health authorities have not recognized, must less explained natural immunity. Instead, our source of hope has been the vaccine, which the authorities said would turn you into a dead-end for the virus. That seemed like hope for many. Then it turned out not to be true. Hopes have been dashed and we were plunged right back where we were before.
Covid’s coverage of the country is so broad now that everyone knows one or many people who have had it. They share stories. Some are short bouts. Others last a week or longer. Nearly everyone shakes it off. Some people die from it, particularly the elderly and infirm. And this universal tactile experience has also given rise not so much to another round of panic – that is certainly there – but exhaustion and the great question: when will all this end?
It ends, as the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration said, with the arrival of population immunity. In this sense, it is like every pandemic that has come before. They swept through the population and those who recover have lasting immunity to the pathogen and probably others in the same family. This happens with or without a vaccine. It is this upgrade of the immune system that provides the way out.
And yet even now, millions of people have not been made aware of the payoff to confronting the virus. They have been denied hope that it ever will end. They simply do not know. The authorities have not told them. Yes, you can find out if you are curious and read competent opinions on the topic. Maybe your doctor has shared that view.
But when you have the leading voices in public health seeming to go out of their way to pretend that natural immunity does not exist, you are going to throttle that knowledge in the general population. The immunity passports do not recognize it. The people who are fired despite having demonstrated robust immunities know this all-too-well.
Of all the scandals and outrages of the last two years – the incredible failings of public officials and the silence of so many people who should have known better – the strange silence on acquired immunity is among the worst. It has a medical cost but also a huge cultural and psychological one.
This is not just an arcane matter of science. It is the main means by which the population can see the other side of the pandemic. For all the fear, suffering, and death, there is still hope on the other side, and we can know this because of our awareness of how the immune system works.
Take that away and you take away the possibility of the human mind to imagine a bright future. You promote despair. You create a permanent state of fear. You rob people of optimism. You create dependency and promote sadness.
No one can live this way. And we do not have to. If we know for sure that all this suffering was not for naught, the universe and its functioning seem a bit less chaotic and appears to make a greater degree of sense. We cannot live in a pathogen-free world but we can confront this world with intelligence, courage, and conviction that we can get to the other side and live even better than we did before. We do not need to give up freedom.
The people who denied us this knowledge, this confidence, have engaged in a cruel game with human psychology. What makes it worse is that they knew better. Fauci, Walensky, Birx, and all the rest, have the training and the knowledge. They are not unaware. Perhaps Gates’s ignorance is understandable but the rest of these people have actual medical training. They have always known the truth.
Why have they done this to us? To sell vaccines? To elicit compliance? To reduce us all to fearful subjects who are easier to control? I’m not sure we know the answers. It’s possible that natural immunity came to be seen by these technocrats as too primitive, too rudimentary, insufficiently technocratic, to be allowed as part of the conversation.
Regardless, it is a scandal and a tragedy with an enormous human cost. It will be generations before we see a full recovery.
That recovery can begin at least with awareness. You can examine all the studies and see for yourself how this goes. We are now up to 141 studies that demonstrate robust immunities after recovery, a much better form of immunity than can be induced from these vaccines. We should be happy for the studies but they should not have been necessary. We should have known based on prevailing science for these sorts of pathogens.
We currently confront a tragic morass. Cases are at an all-time high. There is a growing realization that nothing has worked. The loss of trust is palpable. More people now know that everyone will get this thing. There is no more hiding, no more success in “being careful,” no option but to get out there and take a risk with this thing. But what bolsters one’s confidence that doing so is worth it? The realization that you will be stronger as a result.
Take away the knowledge of natural immunity, and thus the realization that there can be a better life on the other side of sickness, and you leave people with existential emptiness and a lasting sense of despair. No one can live that way. No one should have to.
Sheriff Jody Greene Rebuffs Atheists, Won't Remove Bible Verse from Office Wall. Columbus County, NC
A North Carolina sheriff is rejecting calls from an atheist organization to remove a Bible verse from a sheriff's office wall, saying in a new social media post, "We need more Jesus." At issue is a Bible verse featured prominently on an office wall of the Columbus County (N.C.) Sheriff's office. The verse Philippians 4:13, which says, "I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me," is displayed on the wall in black letters. The Freedom From Religion Foundation, in a December 6 letter to Sheriff Jody Greene, asked him to remove the verse, arguing that it violates the U.S. Constitution. Columbus County Sheriff 805 Washington Street Whiteville, NC 28472 Phone: 1-910-642-6551 Email: info@columbussheriff.com https://columbussheriff.com/
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Columbus County (North Carolina) Sheriff Jody Greene has had a Bible verse displayed on a wall in the sheriff department’s building for years. No one complained, until three weeks before Christmas that is, when he received a complaint letter.
The verse: “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me. Philippians 4:13,”
The complaint letter was from Chris Line, an attorney with the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), an advocacy group for atheists, agnostics, and non-theists. the letter stated;
The Supreme Court has said time and again that the “First Amendment mandates government neutrality between religion and religion, and between religion and nonreligion.”
And:
The court has also ruled “the Establishment Clause, at the very least, prohibits government from appearing to take a position on questions of religious belief.”… [T]his Bible verse display promoting Christianity in a sheriff’s office building is correctly viewed by a reasonable observer as an endorsement of religion, and is therefore unconstitutional.”
Sheriff Greene ignored the letter and kept the Bible verse on the wall.
When the FFRF didn’t get a response from him, on December 14 FFRF’s co-president Annie Laurie Gaylor issued a public statement: “The Columbus County Sheriff’s Office must serve all citizens equally, whether Christian or non-Christian. A blatantly Christian message in a law enforcement division sends a message of exclusion.”
Still, Sheriff Greene remained silent. And then a local TV station learned about the complaint letter and ran a story about it. Only then did he decide to respond, via his Facebook page:
Good afternoon, Columbus County citizens. I would like to address the recent news article WECT TV6 ran on me concerning a Bible verse that is posted on the wall at the Sheriff’s Office. The verse is “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me. Philippians 4:13”
First, the Bible verse was placed on the wall after I took office. It was paid for with private funds, not with county funding. The verse is one of my favorite Bible verses, and it seemed fitting for all the adversity I have had to endure. It is very motivational to me and my staff.
Here at the Sheriff’s Office we work hard in everything that we do. Before we execute a search warrant, or any service that puts our people in immediate harm’s way, we ALWAYS go to the Lord with a group prayer. ALWAYS!
The complaint was politically motivated, said Greene:
I have taken many pictures with that Bible verse in the back[ground] with not a single issue, but now that we are going into an election year, it is an issue.
He said nothing about removing the verse. Instead, he doubled down:
Currently, in Columbus County, we are at 180 [drug] overdoses. Drugs and violence are killing our youth.
We need more Jesus and less politics.
He then challenged FFRF to bring it on:
It is time, past time, to stand up. So let me be clear: I will not waiver on my stance and Christian beliefs.
Merry Christmas and God bless you ALL!
As of this writing, the FFRF remains silent in face of his challenge. But his Facebook page lit up. Within hours he had 45 responses, and all but three were supportive:
• “Stay strong, Sheriff. You and your staff are appreciated.”
• “Thank you, Sheriff Greene. Prayers for you & all your staff as they protect us.”
• “Thank you Sheriff Greene and the entire department for all you do. Merry Christmas.”
• “I am inspired by your bold courage in standing for Christian values.”
• “You have my full support to keep Christian beliefs and standards in our sheriff’s office. We must take a stand and defend our rights. Thank you for taking a stand.”
And so on.
Even Franklin Graham, of Samaritan’s Purse, went to his own Facebook page to support Greene:
I’m thankful this Sheriff knows where the true solution to life’s problems and challenges comes from, and he is standing his ground.
Will you pray for Sheriff Greene and his staff? And leave an encouraging note?
More support for the sheriff poured in:
• “God bless you Sheriff and your department!!!! We are praying for all of you.”
• “STAND FIRM!! You have our support 100%.”
• “Christianity is not a religion … it is a relationship with Christ!”
• “STAND! Sheriff, I’m glad to know the leader of our law enforcement has heart, faith & a backbone. You don’t stand alone.”
• “You’re doing a great job! Please don’t take it down. Christians must stand for their faith and for each other. You have my support!”
And so on.
If the atheist FFRF (which claims that it has 800 members in North Carolina, a state with more than 10 million residents) decides to take on Sheriff Greene in a court of law, there is no doubt that pro-bono law firms such as the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) or Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) would relish the opportunity to defend him.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) New research out of Brown University has found that children who are forced to distance from others and wear a mask all day long at school suffer brain damage and drastic declines in IQ.
Dr. Mark McDonald, a clinical psychiatrist for children and adolescents, cited the Brown study in a recent interview with Cindy Drukier of “The Nation Speaks.” The study found that “children born during the pandemic have significantly reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance compared to children born pre-pandemic.”
Going to “Zoom” school, having to wear a mask, and being forced into isolation has led to “deprivation overall, of social contact, [of] not being able to see faces, being stuck at home all day long, [and this] has actually caused brain damage to the youngsters,” McDonald further explain during the NTD program (NTD is a sister media outlet of The Epoch Times).
Concerning the masks specifically, we already know that they inhibit oxygen uptake, which is needed for healthy brain activity. Those who wear them end up breathing in recycled carbon dioxide (CO2) and other waste, which damages brain tissue.
Masks and lockdowns are killing our children
In another episode of the interview, Prof. Carl Heneghan, director of the University of Oxford‘s Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, explained that children are also being damaged by the constant diet of fear that is being pumped into them by governments and media outlets.
This “fear we instill into children,” Heneghan explained, has caused disastrous psychological problems in many young ones that they will likely have to carry for the rest of their lives.
Heneghan cited his own study on the matter, which found that “eight out of 10 children and adolescents report worsening of behavior or any psychological symptoms or an increase in negative feelings due to the COVID-19 pandemic.”
“School closures contributed to increased anxiety, loneliness and stress; negative feelings due to COVID-19 increased with the duration of school closures,” the study further found. “Deteriorating mental health was found to be worse in females and older adolescents.”
By older adolescents, Heneghan refers to children 12 years of age and older who face increasing peer pressure, social pressure and are much more aware of what is going on than smaller children who might still be innocently following along with the narrative.
“The first thing is to deescalate any fear and anxiety around covid for children,” Heneghan says. “For children, [covid] is actually a very safe disease.”
“We should really prioritize education and those interventions that are in children’s best interest,” he added.
A December 20 study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that mental health visits skyrocketed by 24 percent among 5- to 11-year-olds, and by 31 percent in 12- to 17-year-olds, once the plandemic was officially launched in early 2020.
Many of these children started wetting their beds or their pants, or refusing to make eye contact. Some of them were no longer comfortable attending sleepovers with their friends or being away from their mothers for extended periods of time.
Tony Fauci is largely to blame for all of this hysteria, but so are many other deep state figureheads and politicians. Anyone who pushed any kind of fear throughout this saga – Donald Trump included, seeing as how he rolled out Operation Warp Speed and still takes credit for it – is directly to blame for all this damage to children.
Teenagers, comparatively, have come out of this whole thing even more “wrapped up in social media and phones and Zoom school because they’ve been trained for the last year and a half that they do not even want to go out anymore,” Heneghan says.
More related news about masks, lockdowns, and other plandemic restrictions can be found at Genocide.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“My two children still have it better than the other children, locked up alone in their rooms at the facility because at least they are together,” reports Maria.
A German mother critical of the state’s Covid measures had her home raided and her children violently removed by police and child protective services. The children are being held in a state facility and have been unable to see their mother for over a month. The distraught mother is pleading for the public’s help.
Court Removes Children
On November 15, 2021, Maria reports that German police and child protective services broke into her family’s apartment. They physically overwhelmed her and violently separated Maria from her children. The children were then thrown into a foster care facility in Treptow-Köpenick.
This past year, Maria did not have her children attend school due to the harsh Covid requirements. The Court claims they removed the children due to Maria’s noncompliance with school attendance. However, Maria repeatedly petitioned the children’s school and its board to allow her kids to participate in distance learning. However, she was flat out denied. Furthermore, the school would not address her safety concerns surrounding face masks and repeated covid tests of the school children.
Maria explains that the raid her family experienced “was orchestrated to be as dramatic and traumatic as possible.” She continued, “To have done all this in the name of child welfare and to justify the action as such is a pure mockery.”
German Children Are Imprisoned
Since December 14th, the children have been forced into quarantine at the state facility they are imprisoned in after a symptom-free girl tested positive. The children were supposed to be isolated for seven days, then given the opportunity to regain their freedom through testing.
Although Maria prohibited the children from undergoing the testing, her children were coerced by the State. Despite not having any symptoms, one of her healthy children “allegedly tested positive.” Both of her children have now been forced into quarantine until December 31st and had to spend Christmas alone and isolated.
“I made a request to the child protective services that my children return home for the Christmas holidays, placing myself in quarantine with them during their stay, but I received no response,” states Maria.
The children are both homesick and desperately missing their mother. Maria reports that her 9-year-old daughter cries every time she’s on the phone with her. No one at the facility plays with the children or interacts with them. Even Christmas was not acknowledged to the children.
Nevertheless, “I must honestly say, my two children still have it better than the other children, locked up alone in their rooms at the facility because they are together,” reports Maria.
State Shows No Mercy
Until her children can come home, Maria has been standing outside the facility singing for her kids. She hopes that her children, along with the others who are suffering inside, can hear them.
Unfortunately, Maria singing outside the facility has cost her gravely. Before Christmas Eve, the facility informed Maria she would only be allowed to speak with her children for ten minutes, twice a week, due to her singing. So regardless of Christmas or the fact that her children were alone in quarantine, she was only allowed two phone calls.
Maria reports that the state is now considering further punishing her and relocating the children to an unknown location.
Call To Action
Maria is asking others to join her outside the state facility and help support all the suffering children held against their will throughout Germany.
Please join me.
The greater our numbers, the greater the attention we’ll receive and the greater our safety will be.
At the following Telegram addresses, you can contact us: @AniKa_17 + @mariamaria_71
We will tell you the exact location and time of our meeting.
Thank you for your attention. Thank you for condolences and support.
Watch the following heartbreaking video released by Maria:
The FDA announced last week that the agency is ditching existing regulations that prohibit properly licensed healthcare providers from sending women the first of a two-dose abortion pill, and, as some reports noted, the timing is extremely suspicious, per the American Wire:
Roughly two weeks after the high court heard oral arguments in a case involving a Mississippi law that essentially challenges Roe, the Food and Drug Administration has announced it is rolling back restrictions on sending abortion pills through the mail.
…[T]he FDA permanently lifted restrictions on prescribers sending mifepristone, the first in a two-drug therapy that terminates pregnancies up to 10 weeks, through the mail.
Previously, FDA regulations required the pill to only be dispersed in clinics or hospitals by providers who were specifically certified to do so.
Got that? The left-wing ghouls running the Biden regime seek to undermine a growing number of state laws that dramatically restrict abortions ahead of a Supreme Court decision that could wind up striking down the murderous procedure altogether or, at a minimum, return the 10th Amendment authority to states themselves for their residents to decide if they want to continue allowing the procedure or not and if so, under what conditions.
As a sop to the Democrat Party’s semi-sane faction, small though it may be, the FDA will not change the rules for misoprostol, which is the second drug in the treatment protocol and is taken up to 48 hours after the first one; it has already been available via prescription at any pharmacy for years.
“The FDA’s decision will come as a tremendous relief for countless abortion and miscarriage patients,” Georgeanne Usova, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, crowed (remember when this garbage ‘legal’ organization used to represent those who had no voice, regardless of their political positions — like the unborn, perhaps?). “However, it is disappointing that the FDA fell short of repealing all of its medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone and these remaining obstacles should also be lifted.”
“It’s really significant,” added Florida State University law professor Mary Ziegler, in response to the FDA’s rule change.
“Telehealth abortions are much easier for both providers and patients, and even in states that want to do it, there have been limits on how available it is,” she added.
Meanwhile, as the FDA allows doctors to send medication to a woman so she can kill her unborn child, the agency is working with the Post Office to prevent Americans from getting ivermectin, which has been proven to be effective against COVID-19, unlike a couple of the vaccines.
According to a press release from Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the seizure happened at the international mail facility within Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport on October 4, Newsweek reported.
The press release noted further that as officers were conducting an x-ray inspection of a package from China, they “noticed some discrepancies.” The package stated that it contained “decorative beads,” CBP said.
The outlet added:
Ivermectin, which is a drug often used in animals to combat parasites, has been praised by some as an effective treatment against COVID-19. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently warned that Ivermectin is not an approved treatment against COVID-19 and can cause health issues in humans if used improperly.
“There are approved uses for ivermectin in people and animals but it is not approved for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19,” the FDA said on its website, adding that the drug is approved for human use to treat parasites, head lice, and “skin conditions such as rosacea.”
In fact, the FDA and the Post Office are specifically targeting ivermectin not China, as civil rights attorney Aaron Siri noted on Twitter this month.
“The FDA is working with the post office to hold packages containing ivermectin. The FDA could better use its resources to, I don’t know, publicly release the docs submitted by Pfizer to license its mandated liability-free V earlier than 75 years from now!” he wrote.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Several liberal municipalities from San Francisco to New York have moved to allow non-citizens to cast ballots in local elections.
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., is leading a coalition of Republicans in Congress to sponsor legislation that would ban federal funding to states or localities that allow foreigners to vote in U.S. elections.
“It’s ridiculous that states are allowing foreign citizens to vote,” Rubio said. “However, if states and localities do let those who are not U.S. citizens to vote in elections, they shouldn’t get U.S. citizen taxpayer money.”
The measure is being cosponsored by GOP Sens. Steve Daines of Montana, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, John Kennedy, of Louisiana, Rick Scott of Florida, and James Lankford, R-Oklahoma.
Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., plans to introduce companion legislation in the House. “Voting in this country is a right that should solely be limited to American citizens. Allowing non-citizens or illegal immigrants to vote, even if only in state or local elections, gives foreign nationals influence on some of the most important decisions impacting our families, our rights, and our representation in government,” Duncan said.
Daines said he was concerned that “far-left states and cities have moved to disenfranchise Americans by allowing non-citizens to participate in our elections.”
Kennedy said the move toward non-citizen voting makes a mockery of U.S. citizenship.”
The proposed federal law comes a few months after Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger proposed an amendment to his state’s constitution banning non-citizen voting in his state.
“From New York City to San Francisco, more and more extreme liberal jurisdictions are extending voting to non-citizens,” he told Just the News. “Citizens-only voting has overwhelming bipartisan support.”
Rubio’s new bill would prohibit federal funds from going to any state or local government that allows foreign citizens to vote in any federal, state, or local election and require all state or local governments to certify they do not allow foreign citizens to vote when applying for federal funding.
The issue of non-citizen voting first came to a boil at the end of the 2018 Georgia governor’s race, when Democrat Stacey Abrams suggested the “blue wave” of voters she hoped would put in her office included the “documented and undocumented,” the latter a liberal preferred term for illegal aliens.
Republicans from eventual winner Brian Kemp to President Donald Trump alleged she was calling for foreigners to vote. Abrams denied it, saying she only meant that illegal aliens are part of the constituency she planned to represent and was not seeking ineligible voters to cast ballots.
But within two years, several liberal communities have begun the process of allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections. A 1994 congressionally-passed law prohibits non-citizens from voting in elections for federal officeholders.
San Francisco, nine cities in Maryland, and two communities in Massachusetts have all approved noncitizen voting, although the latter are still awaiting state legislative approval. And Chicago, New York City, and Los Angeles are also moving forward with plans to allow foreign citizens to vote in local U.S. elections.
In this video, Patriot Nurse discusses the nature of the next phase of the freedom fight. We are in a battle with machine learning and artificial intelligence, exactly like the ones reading and filtering this description into desirable and undesirable categories. Online Course: http://bit.ly/3qvDJeg Paypal: https://bit.ly/39hs23m Patreon: https://bit.ly/2D9IIfJ Subscribestar: https://bit.ly/2RESD4S Bitcoin: 3FxJWbSL9nFSMRgymSsicniPxTPd26Kuvj Ethereum: 0x5134d6f2700Fa21cEcE6ED1ABDE240b3B320bDDd Litecoin: MC1qkabuDXGCrjNcXwxvz5qgtsFGVpXYKF
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Since the beginning of the plandemic, the world was told that getting “vaccinated” with an Operation Warp Speed injection would “cure” the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). Nearly two years have passed, however, and the exact opposite is proving to be true.
A new letter from researcher Günter Kampf that was published in The Lancet blows some major holes in the mainstream injection narrative, one of the biggest being that Fauci Flu shots are not stopping the spread as claimed.
In fact, there appears to be a greater spread of illness and death among those who took the shots in obedience to government guidelines compared to those who left their immune systems alone to fight disease naturally.
According to Kampf, the epidemiological relevance of the fully vaccinated “is increasing,” based on the latest data. At best, the jabs are providing no protection whatsoever. At worst, they are making the people who take them more prone to a negative health outcome.
“In the UK, it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated),” Kampf writes.
“[Twelve] of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type.”
In Germany, he adds, the rate of symptomatic covid among the vaccinated is increasing. Back in July, it was around 16.9 percent among patients 60 years of age and older. As of October 27, that figure skyrocketed to 58.9 percent, “providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission.”
CDC: Most highly vaccinated counties are also the most diseased countiesA similar phenomenon is occurring in the United Kingdom as well. Symptomatic covid cases among the fully vaccinated are rising just as they are in Israel and elsewhere where Fauci Flu shots are being widely administered.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently announced that four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (84.3-99.9 percent) are “high” transmission counties.
All of this would suggest that getting jabbed likely means getting sick or spreading sickness to others. And yet the official story is that the fully vaccinated are not to even be counted as a potential source of transmission.
“It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures,” Kampf says.
To continue calling the current situation a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is simply false, Kampf warns. In reality, this is a pandemic of the vaccinated, as the plandemic would already be over had everyone chosen to remain unvaccinated.
“I don’t bend over for bullies trying to ‘stigmatize’ me,” wrote a Natural News reader about this unfair mischaracterization of the unvaccinated. “And being stigmatized in a sick society is a badge of honor while being well adjusted is the opposite.”
“The ‘vaccinated’ are the ones to avoid,” wrote another. “They are the sick. They are the disease spreaders. They have compromised immune systems. They have 251x the viral load in their nasal passages and throat. Stop cowering and go on the offense.”
This writer would further add that, yes, it is time for the unvaccinated to stand boldly and unashamed, and to equip themselves with this kind of knowledge in order to counter the constant falsehoods coming from the media and the government.
If you enjoyed reading this story, you will find more like it at Pandemic.news.
