A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
OAN Staff Abril Elfi
10:50 AM – Monday, November 25, 2024
Special counsel Jack Smith announced on Monday that he will be dropping his election interference case against President-elect Donald Trump.
On Monday, Smith filed a six-page motion stating that he has asked U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to throw out the case ahead of Trump’s impending inauguration.
“The (Justice) Department’s position is that the Constitution requires that this case be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated,” Smith wrote in a six-page filing. “This outcome is not based on the merits or strength of the case against the defendant.”
Earlier this month, Trump said he would fire Smith once he was back in office.
Smith charged Trump with four felonies in the case, alleging he conspired to overturn the 2020 election results. Trump has pleaded not guilty.
In Trump’s Florida documents case, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the charges, ruling that Smith’s appointment was unlawful. Smith has since appealed the decision.
The final report will have to go through a classification review by the intelligence community, a process that can sometimes take weeks before it is approved for any kind of public release.
This a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
Much of the credit for Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential victory should go to Turning Point USA founder and CEO @RealCharlieKirk, Glenn says. The left has dominated get-out-the-vote efforts for years. But in 2024, Charlie Kirk was able to beat them at their own game. Charlie joins Glenn to explain his winning strategy and why he believes Trump would have lost states like Wisconsin if they hadn’t targeted new voters so intensely. Glenn and Charlie also discuss how “this was the election of the podcast.”
Fences are going up around the White House and the Vice President's house this weekend, along with more buildings in DC being secured from possible election violence.
New fences up at Treasury and the Vice President's house due to election violence fears.
Anti-scale riot fencing is being installed at the Vice President's residence tonight, and earlier today we saw spiked fences around the Treasury Building next to the White House. The election is just 72 hours away.
The economy grew by 2.8% in the third quarter, slightly below the expected 3.1%, with consumer and business spending remaining strong despite slower housing and trade. With the election nearing, economic concerns, especially high inflation, are a top priority for many voters. A recent poll showed more people trust Trump over Harris on economic issues. Ed Siddell, CEO of Egis Financial, will discuss key drivers of GDP growth, how consumer spending and savings might influence the election, and potential Fed actions on interest rates post-election.
The Weekly Reload Podcast examines how gun control groups are out-fundraising the NRA ahead of the 2024 election, as Ed Morrissey of Hot Air weighs in on what this financial edge might mean for Second Amendment supporters.
As we enter the final stretch before the historic 2024 election, the fight for financial backing between gun rights and gun control groups is heating up, highlighting more profound questions about the role of money in shaping political influence.
Gun Control Funding Outpaces NRA
This year, gun control groups like Everytown for Gun Safety, Giffords, and the Brady Campaign have gained a financial edge over the NRA and its allies. Ed Morrissey, managing editor at Hot Air, notes that these groups now have a massive fundraising advantage, primarily thanks to a few wealthy and desperate donors like Michael Bloomberg and the backing of larger progressive dark money networks.
With this financial support, gun control groups have secured significant spending power, allowing them to push their agenda in various state and local races across the country.
But Morrissey questions whether this funding surge will truly translate into a significant advantage on Election Day. Although gun control groups have a clear funding lead, Morrissey believes the results of the highest-profile races may not be heavily swayed by money alone. Instead, the deeply rooted values held by voters on both sides of the gun debate may play a more decisive role.
The NRA’s Targeted Strategy
In contrast, the NRA and other gun rights groups have taken a more focused approach, targeting key races like those of Senators Jon Tester in Montana and Jared Golden in Maine. Morrissey points out that this strategic spending aligns with the core supporters of the gun rights movement, aiming to make impactful investments where possible rather than trying to match gun control groups dollar-for-dollar.
The NRA’s approach reflects a more cautious stance following recent struggles. After years of financial and internal management issues, former NRA donors may be hesitant to contribute to large organizations and instead shift their support to smaller, more effective, hardline groups like The Second Amendment Foundation and Gun Owners of America (GOA). While these groups advocate fiercely for gun rights, they lack the NRA’s historical reach, creating a gap that the pro-gun side has yet to bridge fully.
Ad Messaging & “Coalition Spending”
As for how each side is spending, a notable trend this election is what Morrissey calls “coalition spending” by groups like Everytown. With a well-funded coalition, gun control groups are expanding their spending beyond traditional races, even putting resources into school board elections. Everytown and Giffords are also running ads that combine gun control with other high-profile issues, like abortion, aiming to capture voters focused on multiple issues at once. The NRA, meanwhile, has linked gun rights with crime control, arguing that the two are closely related.
Both sides recognize that tying their cause to broader social concerns could strengthen their appeal. For gun control advocates, highlighting gun policy alongside abortion rights could resonate with left-leaning voters who prioritize judicial decisions and a progressive court system. Meanwhile, the NRA’s focus on crime and self-defense speaks directly to its core supporters, emphasizing how Second Amendment rights protect personal safety.
Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump: A Contrast in Gun Policy
Both major party candidates have approached gun policy in unique ways. While Kamala Harris claims to own a handgun for self-defense, her past support for gun control policies and “mandatory buybacks” has led many gun rights supporters to view her stance with skepticism. Morrissey argues that her recent statements may not be enough to convince voters who remember her more restrictive views from earlier campaigns.
On the other hand, Trump’s messaging has centered on the importance of protecting gun rights, often reminding voters to head to the polls and painting Harris as a threat to the Second Amendment. Morrissey suggests that, despite Trump’s occasional controversial statements on gun policy (such as his past support for “red flag” laws and the political maneuvering around bump stock ban), he has built a level of trust among gun owners, largely due to his record of Supreme Court appointments that led to major pro-gun rulings.
The Real Question: Does Money Make the Difference?
For both sides, the bottom line remains: how much does funding sway voter decisions, especially on such a deeply personal and value-driven issue as gun rights? According to Morrissey, while significant funding certainly allows gun control groups to extend their reach, it’s uncertain whether this financial edge will result in an electoral advantage. For many gun rights voters, the choice is clear, and no amount of money is likely to change their stance.
As we careen toward Election Day, the divide over gun rights and gun control funding is a microcosm of the broader American political landscape—where funding, ideology, and voter turnout are tightly interwoven. Regardless of where the money flows, it’s the voters, driven by their deeply held beliefs, who will ultimately determine the outcome.
The FBI warned this week that multiple types of election-related fraud schemes are targeting Americans that are voting, with the election being less than a week away.
On Tuesday, the bureau stated that the scammers use slogans, names, and images of candidates running for an office position to steal victims’ personal information, to sell merchandise, and to fraudulently solicit campaign contributions.
The law enforcement agency pointed out four ways voters could fall victim to election-related scams. Voters could be deceived into submitting funds to a joint pool of money to support a candidate. If the candidate wins, they have been promised money in return.
Americans could also be fooled into thinking they are donating money to a real PAC, when in reality, the scammer who contacted them is not connected to the claimed organization, keeping the funds for themselves.
Additionally, one can be scammed into buying merchandise with the logo of the candidate they support, but the company selling it is not involved with the campaign, and the item does not end up being shipped to the customer, the FBI continued.
Finally, the bureau highlighted victims receiving emails or text messages alleging that they are not registered to vote in the state and telling them to follow a link to a fraudulent page meant to steal personally identifiable information.
For more protection, the FBI said voters should be “cautious” when getting unsolicited calls, texts, and emails. They advised Americans not to click on any unknown links. The bureau also said that voters should check the status of the PACs on the Federal Election Commission website before donating any money.
Anyone can check their voter registration status at www.vote.gov.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
Should Christians vote in the 2024 election? Some argue that they can't support either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. Others say Christians should stay out of worldly politics. But Pastor Josh McPherson of Grace City Church joins Glenn to explain why he has "a fundamental conviction that we cannot be Biblical unless we ARE political." It's time for followers of Christ - both in the pews and in the pulpit - to stand up, speak out, and VOTE: "When the Church goes silent, a culture loses its conscience and government loses its mind, and everyone suffers."
Stephen Gardner and Lawyer Katie Cherkasky discuss Trump's legal battles, how the US military has gone woke under Biden and Harris, and how a corrupt, Trump hating Judge pulls one last sneaky trick to hurt Trump before the election.
In this video, Patriot Nurse discusses the potential for post-election chaos in the U.S., taking a hard look at how similar situations have played out in other countries and what Americans can do to prepare. Drawing from recent history in places like Venezuela, Honduras, and Haiti, she breaks down the patterns of supply disruptions and unrest that can follow a contested election. From critical fuel and food shortages to the essentials often overlooked, Patriot Nurse shares strategies for preparedness. GET THESE Supplies NOW to ensure you are ready for what’s coming.
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
Delaware County election board member John McBlain has resigned, accusing the panel of rushing to add three “voter service centers” in deeply Democratic parts of the suburban Philadelphia county, something he said adds a "blatant element of unfairness to the county’s election process."
McBlain, the lone Republican on Delaware County’s election board, has been the minority party appointee on the three-member election board since 2021. All members of the election board are appointed by the county council, which has been majority-Democratic since early 2020. A provision in the county’s charter ensures a check on the majority party, however, requiring that at least one member of the election board be a representative of the minority party.
At a special meeting of the election board on Friday, McBlain announced his intention to quit effective at the end of November, saying his decision was due to the board’s approval of three voter service centers in Upper Darby, Chester, and Chester Heights — all three Democratic strongholds.
“I thought I could serve on this board as long as I believed that we were making sure the elections were both secure and fair,” McBlain began at the end of the meeting on Friday, October 11. “I think the board has put their finger on the scale, so I don’t think that that fairness aspect is there anymore. Therefore, I — as much as I’m tempted to do so, as of effective immediately — I tender my resignation as of November 30th, 2024, so that I can complete my duties during the election certification process. But then I hereby resign from the board after that date.”
Voter service centers (VSCs) are essentially no different than “satellite election offices,” which were controversial as far back as the 2020 general election. Whichever name is used, the creation is meant to be a literal extension of the county’s primary election office — the one place where a voter can register to vote, request a mail-in ballot, and return that ballot, all at the same time and same place. Philadelphia’s satellite election offices drew the ire of Republicans that year because Philadelphia refused to allow poll watchers anywhere inside, arguing that the locations were county election offices, so they could not be polling places. A Commonwealth Court ruling later upheld that argument to exclude poll watchers.
Like Philadelphia, Delaware County also used satellite election offices in 2020, the rationale largely being the pandemic. But according to McBlain, since 2020 “the only voter service center that we’ve maintained has been [the original and main election office] at the Media courthouse, and we’ve done that for every election, and that has been adequate.”
Now, McBlain says, the three VSCs seem to be created spur of the moment, and they’re in some of the deepest blue parts of the county.
“I don’t understand what has changed. We are down — I want to say by more than a third, if not two-thirds — the number of applications for mail-in votes as we were in 2020,” McBlain said.
“There’s no more pandemic where we need to sort of spread things out. There’s no need for it. The Media [county seat] office is more than adequately handling all requests for registration for applications to handle receipt of mail-in or absentee ballots,” McBlain told Broad + Liberty after his resignation. “No one has been calling publicly for [VSCs]. I don’t recall one member of the public attending a previous meeting this year [prior to Oct. 11] and advocating that we ought to have voter service centers to provide better service to the residents.”
At a September 24 meeting of the election board, county election director Jim Allen distinctly raised the possibility of adding VSCs, and listed only the sites in Upper Darby, Chester, and Chester Heights as possibilities.
But it’s what happened next that troubled McBlain the most.
McBlain says just after that meeting, he was talking to Allen. Then Donna Cantor, who McBlain says is a lawyer for the county Democratic party, approached them both.
“She [Cantor] came up to Mr. Allen and told him that Colleen Guiney, the chairwoman of the [county] Democratic Party, had a list of volunteers to staff the voter services center. I expressed shock,” McBlain said.
“I said, ‘I didn’t realize that we had decided that we were going to have voter services centers.’ And to Jim Allen’s credit, I mean, he immediately said ‘Well, listen at any voter services centers, we’re not going to have partisan volunteers staffing.’ But the Democratic Party was already prepared to staff these voter services centers at the September meeting where again, it was discussed almost in passing,” McBlain explained.
Election Director Allen did not directly refute that a conversation with Cantor happened, but he did offer his own context.
“[S]omeone approached me about the possible use of volunteers in front of Mr. McBlain, and I turned away the suggestion. There were no specifics or a ‘list,’” he said.
Cantor did not respond to a request for comment asking if she disputed McBlain’s version of the conversation.
Guiney responded to a request for comment, but did not answer specific questions about whether the county Democrats were somehow prepared to staff VSCs before the VSCs were even discussed publicly and approved. Guiney mostly filibustered.
“It is a matter of public record that voter services centers are located in areas convenient to public transit, and in facilities already wired into the secure Delaware County communications system,” Guiney said. “We have had Voter Service Centers in previous elections, and surrounding counties have already opened Voter Service Centers this cycle. This matter has already been discussed at the publicly streamed Board of Elections meeting leading up to the most recent meeting.
“The Democratic party has robust volunteer engagement, but the County is not using volunteers at the Voter Service Centers. Any Delaware County resident, of any political party, is welcome to apply for a temporary position with the Board of Elections by contacting the Bureau of Elections for more information,” Guiney concluded.
During the public comment portion of the Oct. 11 special meeting, 21 total people rose to address the election board. The Broad + Liberty analysis showed that five of them spoke about regular polling locations, one spoke about poll worker safety, thirteen spoke in favor of adding VSCs, and two expressed concerns about VSCs.
“So at the time of the [Oct. 11] meeting, it was clear that there was a partisan [effort] to pack the room in favor of this. There were dozens of Democratic committee people and volunteers,” McBlain said. “There were a dozen or more members of the League of Women Voters who were nothing more than the provisional wing of the Delaware County Democratic Party who were present to speak in favor of it.”
A request for comment to the two other members of the election board, sent to them via the county’s spokesperson, was not returned.
Democratic state Representative and chair of the Upper Darby Democratic committee Heather Boyd was among the thirteen who spoke in favor of the measure. Others included a county Democratic committee member, someone who ran for delegate to the Democratic National Convention last May, as well as a donor to a local Democratic candidate and the founder of a progressive group in Delco. Two people from the League of Women Voters also spoke.
One Drexel Hill resident questioned the rationale for the satellite site locations. “I’m also concerned about the equity of these polling places, these satellite polling places. Where is the equity for the communities that have a heavy Republican presence? Where is their pop-up satellite location [in] communities such as Parkside, Trainer, and Upland — communities that are also considered perhaps low income communities, where is their pop-up voting site?”
McBlain also said VSCs came up very briefly but somewhat unseriously months ago, he suggested the county survey all municipalities to see which ones might be interested, but that the county never acted on that suggestion.
To anyone thinking McBlain has a hair trigger for an election conspiracy need only listen to his Democrat counterparts to understand that’s not the case.
“I think you served on the board with great distinction,” Election Board Chairwoman Ashley Lunkenheimer said upon hearing McBlain’s intention to resign. “I think there are very few in the county or in the commonwealth who have a better knowledge of election law and I think that your viewpoint has always been well served on this board, but I appreciate that you’re continuing your duties through the election because we need — you have a really good perspective on elections.”
“John McBlain is someone who I’m gonna disagree with on a great many policy issues, but we both have the same factual understanding of how elections are conducted,” Democratic Councilwoman Christine Reuther told the Inquirer in November, when Reuther was about to renominate him to the election board. “He doesn’t see conspiracy theories every time you turn around.”
Reuther’s November comments to the Inquirer came just as a long-simmering partisan power struggle over the election board was about to come to a close. Earlier in the year, the county council passed an ordinance that would allow it to reject the minority party’s nomination for the election board. The resolution went further, saying that the county had the “unfettered discretion” to reject as many candidates from the minority party as it liked until it found a suitable candidate.
Council Democrats passed the ordinance in January 2023. Republicans quickly denounced the move as a power grab. When Republicans sued in June, a spokesperson for the council accused Delco Republicans of playing politics.
“Interestingly, the Delco GOP's public statements on this case suggest [sic] a ‘blatant power grab,’” the county said in a statement to the Daily Times. “However, the change in the law which is being challenged was passed in January 17, 2023. Now, more than five months later, has the lawsuit [sic] been filed. It appears less an effort to secure a fair election, and more a weak effort to develop a talking point for an upcoming county election.”
However, a judge ruled in December that the ordinance was illegal and struck it down.
“The Ordinance was an arrogant attempt by the County Council to create a veto power for themselves to block the right of the Delaware County Republican Party Chairman to nominate his preferred member to the Delaware County Board of Elections,” said Wally Zimolong, one of the attorneys who fought the suit on behalf of the county GOP.
Reuther, a member of council who oversees the county’s elections, has also danced on the partisan tightrope in a presidential election before.
In 2020, Reuther was clearly in the lead in the county’s pursuit of and eventual acceptance of election grants from the Chicago-based Center for Tech and Civic Life, or CTCL. Those grants would later become famous for receiving a $350 million infusion from Mark Zuckerberg
As Delaware County got nearer to accepting the grant, the county solicitor flagged to Reuther some of the left-leaning tendencies of the grant agency.
“Not at all surprising,” Reuther said in response. “I am seeking funds to fairly and safely administer the election so everyone legally registered to vote can do so and have their votes count. If a left-leaning public charity wants to further my objective, I am fine with that. I will deal with the blow back.”
The Pennsylvania General Assembly later banned local election offices from accepting grants from outside, private agencies, in part because of concerns that the grants resulted in improper and unbalanced political influence.
McBlain was not a part of the election board at the time.
But this time, he says it’s not election security he’s worried about.
“I think this is the Delaware County Democratic Party putting their hand on the scale with these voter services centers to literally get out the vote in highly partisan areas of the county without any consideration of [if] there’s a reason that they didn’t come in and offer it in Marple or Springfield. I just wasn’t going to be a part of it anymore. I’m disgusted that this partisanship is showing its head at the 11th hour.”
Todd Shepherd is Broad + Liberty’s chief investigative reporter.
Todd Bensman, senior national security fellow for the Center for Immigration Studies, joins to discuss a potential immigrant surge before a possible Trump administration, a 2023 Biden-Harris bill that asks Mexico to “internally deport” aspiring border crossers, and whether border patrol officers would resign should Kamala Harris win the presidency. Blaze News senior politics editor Christopher Bedford joins to break down Kamala Harris’ recent media blitz, an upcoming appearance on Fox News, a potential hit on "The Joe Rogan Experience," and how this might impact the 2024 election. Hal Lambert, founder of Point Bridge Capital and creator of the MAGA stock index and the “Politically Responsible Investing” strategy, joins to discuss the fundraising lead Senate Democrats have over Republicans and Elon Musk’s decision to pour $75M for Donald Trump into his super PAC. Finally, with Halloween quickly approaching, fashion writer O.W. Root joins us to discuss why kids can’t draw scary faces.
As the upcoming U.S. election approaches, it's vital for every Christian to consider the critical issue of life in the womb when casting their vote. In this video, we explore why voting for a candidate who supports protecting the unborn is not just important—it's essential. You'll hear about the impact of leadership on life issues, including a startling example of Donald Trump's use of language at rallies and what it reveals about the cultural moment we're in. Stick around for a powerful discussion about judgment, morality, and where our values should align.
Scott is a Presbyterian pastor and lifelong Republican, but in August he took a risk and publicly endorsed Kamala Harris for president. Unwilling to vote for former President Donald Trump due to what Scott feels are a lack of moral values, he's felt politically homeless for the past decade.
Is Kamala Harris a Christian? Evaluating "Evangelicals for Harris"
JD Vance DENIED Service at Primanti Bros. Restaurant & THIS was his RESPONSE! 🚨JD Vance was BLOCKED from Entering Primanti Bros. Restaurant & THIS was his response! Do you think JD Vance's Response was appropriate in response to being denied service at Primanti Brothers Restaurant?
Marjorie Taylor Greene SNAPS: Says Republicans Should LOSE ELECTION!
Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly snapped and said Republicans should lose the election because of the "weak" and "feckless" leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson.
Marjorie Taylor Greene ROASTS Mike Johnson FOR DEFYING TRUMP!
Was Marjorie Taylor Greene RIGHT About House Speaker Mike Johnson?
Republican House Speaker implodes over inner-party chaos as Marjorie Taylor Greene's previous attacks seem to be potentially validated over Johnson's false fight surrounding the looming government shutdown. Yasmin Kahn and Brett Erlich break it down in The Damage Report.
The Georgia State Election Board convened on Friday to discuss and vote on nearly a dozen proposed changes to election rules ahead of the November general election. Among the most contentious proposals was a new requirement for all ballots to be hand-counted at each polling location, which the board has now approved. Supporters argue that hand-counting ballots is essential for ensuring election integrity and increasing public trust in the process. However, opponents warn that this rule could lead to significant delays in reporting election results, especially in larger counties. The concerns were echoed by election officials who fear the change will create logistical challenges at a time when election preparations are already underway. The meeting, held at the Georgia State Capitol, drew a large crowd, requiring two overflow rooms to accommodate the number of attendees. In addition to the hand-counting requirement, the board is considering other changes, including a proposal to publicly post the names of all registered voters for the Nov. 5 election. Critics, including members of the Georgia Association of Voter Registration and Election Officials (GAVREO), expressed concerns about the timing of these changes, warning they could disrupt the preparation and training of poll workers. "Any last-minute changes to the rules risk undermining the public’s trust in the electoral process and placing undue pressure on those responsible for managing the polls," said GAVREO President W. Travis Doss Jr. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger also voiced concern that the rule changes could cause confusion and chaos on election night, a view shared by many Democratic officials. "Activists seeking to impose last-minute changes in election procedures outside of the legislative process undermine voter confidence and burden election workers," Raffensperger said. During the public comment period, 30 people spoke, with the majority opposing the changes. One speaker highlighted the already tight timeline for election officials, saying, "Now is the time for election officials to train workers, perform security protocols, print ballots, and mail absentee ballots, not to learn new rules and procedures." Despite the concerns, some supporters believe that tighter election rules are crucial for maintaining free and fair elections. "Any way we can tighten up elections and ensure transparency is critical to voter confidence," said one attendee in favor of the new rules. MORE: Georgia election systems get ‘health check’ ahead of November The board has only voted on the hand-counting rule so far, with 10 more proposed changes still under consideration. Any approved changes will take effect 20 days from now, just as overseas and military ballots are being sent out and in-person early voting begins. The Cobb County Election Board has also urged the state to refrain from making rule changes so close to the election, unanimously voting earlier this week to call for a halt to any further modifications.
On Wednesday's episode of "Carl Higbie FRONTLINE," Carl exposed how the Biden administration is ready to push another Russian collusion narrative after the election, showed how the deep state is making up crimes to attack former President Donald Trump, talked about Brian Stelter going back to CNN, and more on NEWSMAX.
Americans are finally starting to feel the impact of unchecked immigration under the Biden-Harris administration. Venezuelan gangs are terrorizing communities. Illegal immigrants in New York City now account for 75% of arrests in Midtown Manhattan. This wasn't by accident. It’s a globalist plan to overwhelm and collapse our country. Glenn Beck saw this coming back during the Arab Spring. He predicted how the movement would see Islamists, anarchists, Marxists, and progressives all working together. It would cascade throughout Europe and eventually to the United States. Now, in the middle of this chaos, there are two issues that citizens in every Western country — including ours — are being censored over: immigration and elections. Glenn connects the dots and does a deep dive on the data to answer: Are illegal immigrants voting in our elections? If so, are the numbers meaningful enough to choose the next candidate? The numbers in the swing states are shocking! Some of the best work that exposes the White House’s master plan on illegal immigration has been produced by Mike Howell at the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project. He joins Glenn to separate fact from fiction on how widespread illegal voting by noncitizens really is and explains why Democrats in Congress really don’t want to pass the SAVE Act. “They’re lying to you. ... Illegal voting is a largely unpoliced matter by design.”
The election is likely to be a close one. House Republicans are sounding the alarm on possible non-citizen voting in U.S. election as Democrats claim no evidence exists of such a phenomenon. One America’s Daniel Baldwin examines the issue to find the truth.
Who really runs this country? Is it Joe Biden? Kamala Harris? Yeah, no one really believes that. What about Pelosi, Schumer, or Jeffries? Obama? They even have to answer someone. It’s obvious political power brokers — a cabal — just led a coup on a sitting U.S. president. It’s not about democracy. It’s about money, and this cabal controls A LOT of it. The days of Soros and the Tides Foundation controlling the Democrat purse are behind us. There’s a new system in place that has the power to dump one president, groom another, and overthrow an entire election process in less than 48 hours. It wasn’t just the dark-money billionaires that opened up the financing floodgates. Apparently, we’re supposed to believe that the ENTIRE COUNTRY suddenly became excited for President Kamala Harris. Small donations allegedly skyrocketed. ActBlue, the Left’s main small-donor fundraiser platform, reported $27.5 million … within the first FIVE HOURS. Just a few hours later that number NEARLY DOUBLED to $46.7 million. After 24 hours, ActBlue was reporting over $90 MILLION for Mrs. Yellow School Bus. ActBlue declared that it was its biggest fundraising day of the entire 2024 election cycle. The former Federal Election Commission chair has said that “it’s quite clear” that Kamala Harris can just be GIFTED all of Joe Biden’s campaign funds, but the current FEC Chair Sean Cooksey told Glenn in an interview on “The Glenn Beck Program” that this is “unprecedented,” and he expects legal challenges to follow. He also said that it better happen soon because the window is closing fast. Gary Lawkowski, a partner at Dhillon Law Group and the deputy general counsel for the Trump campaign, filed a formal complaint with the FEC. He says Glenn Vice President Harris’ smash-and-grab seizure of President Biden’s campaign funds is the biggest campaign finance violation in history. Glenn asks, “What the hell is going on here?!” and reveals more ActBlue donation irregularities his research team stumbled onto that are very suspicious.