Leftist Indifference to Christian Genocide

Whether for Obama, Clinton, or Biden, Nigeria is not a “country of particular concern.”

BY RAYMOND IBRAHIM

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/01/leftist-indifference-christian-genocide-raymond-ibrahim/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.  This article is reprinted from the Gatestone Institute. 

A recent and ostensibly insignificant “label change” by the U.S. Department of State sheds light on both President Joe Biden and former president Barack Obama, as well as on a potential presidential candidate for 2024, Hillary Clinton.

On November 17, 2021, the State Department removed Nigeria from its list of Countries of Particular Concern, that is, nations that engage in, or tolerate violations of, religious freedom. It did this despite several human rights organizations characterizing the persecution meted out to Nigeria’s Christians as a “genocide.”

According to an August 2021 report, since the Islamic insurgency began in earnest in July 2009 — first at the hands of Boko Haram, an Islamic terrorist organization, and later by the Fulani, Muslim herdsmen also motivated by jihadist ideology — more than 60,000 Christians have either been murdered or abducted during raids. The kidnapped Christians have never returned to their homes, and their loved ones believe them to be dead. During the same time, approximately 20,000 churches and Christian schools have been torched and destroyed. Nigeria was also the nation with the most Christians murdered (3,530) for their faith in 2020. According to another tally, at least 17 Christians were murdered every day in the first half of 2021 alone. As for those Christians who survive the jihadist raids, millions of them are currently internally displaced people.

Irrespective of these abysmal statistics, the U.S. State Department does not believe that Nigeria should be categorized as a Country of Particular Concern; and that nations such as Russia, which was included on the list, are worse violators of religious freedom than Nigeria. In removing Nigeria from the list, the Biden administration has demonstrated a sheepish continuity with a previous administration. Despite jihadists having slaughtered and terrorized Nigeria’s Christians all during President Barack Obama’s eight-year tenure (2009-2017), and despite the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom having repeatedly urged that Nigeria be designated as a Country of Particular Concern, the Obama administration obstinately refused to acquiesce. It was only in 2020, under the Trump administration, that Nigeria was placed on that list — only to be removed again just recently.

To his credit, President Donald Trump had also forthrightly asked the current Nigerian president, Muhammadu Buhari (whom many Nigerian officials insist Obama helped bring to power), “Why are you killing Christians?”

Needless to say, many observers have slammed the State Department for its recent decision again to let Nigeria literally get away with mass murder.

As Sean Nelson, Legal Counsel for Global Religious Freedom for ADF International noted:

Outcry over the State Department’s removal of Country of Particular Concern status for Nigeria’s religious freedom violations is entirely warranted. No explanations have been given that could justify this decision. If anything, the situation in Nigeria has grown worse over the last year. Thousands of Christians, as well as Muslims who oppose the goals of terrorist and militia groups, are targeted, killed, and kidnapped, and the government is simply unwilling to stop these atrocities. Blasphemy cases are regularly brought against religious minorities, including humanists, in the North. Removing Country of Particular Concern status for Nigeria will only embolden the increasingly authoritarian government there. We call on the U.S. government to rectify this inexplicable decision and instead continue America’s long tradition of standing up for those who are persecuted worldwide.

Similarly, the Chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, Nadine Maenza, said:

USCIRF is especially displeased with the removal of Nigeria from its CPC designation, where it was rightfully placed last year…. We urge the State Department to reconsider its designations based on facts presented in its own reporting.

John Eibner, president of Christian Solidarity International, frankly said:

The State Department’s decision to de-list a country where thousands of Christians are killed every year reveals Washington’s true priorities…. Removing this largely symbolic sign of concern is a brazen denial of reality and indicates that the U.S. intends to pursue its interests in western Africa through an alliance with Nigeria’s security elite, at the expense of Christians and other victims of widespread sectarian violence…. If the U.S. CPC list means anything at all—an open question at this point—Nigeria belongs on it.

Worse, not only did the Obama State Department for eight years refuse to designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern; during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State (2009-2013), she, too, refused to designate Boko Haram in Nigeria as a “terrorist” organization — despite Boko Haram (which roughly translates to “Westernization is forbidden”) being a jihadist group whose adherents have slaughtered more Christians and bombed more churches than the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria combined. Clinton’s refusal persisted despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and more than a dozen senators and congressmen for her to designate Boko Haram. Instead, Clinton took the position that “inequality” and “poverty” are “what’s fueling all this stuff” — a reference to ideologically charged Muslims of Boko Haram terrorizing and murdering Christian “infidels” — to use the words of her husband, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, from 2012.

Her callousness — as with her response to the murders of Americans at Benghazi, Libya: “What difference at this point does it make?” — was particularly visible in 2014, when Boko Haram, a group she had long shielded, abducted nearly 300 schoolgirls from Chibok, Nigeria. It was an incident that made headlines and therefore required a response.

Publicly, Clinton bemoaned the lot of the kidnapped girls: “The seizure of these young women by this radical extremist group, Boko Haram, is abominable, it’s criminal, it’s an act of terrorism and it really merits the fullest response possible.” Meanwhile, as a 2014 report pointed out,

The State Department under Hillary Clinton fought hard against placing the al Qaeda-linked militant group Boko Haram on its official list of foreign terrorist organizations for two years. And now, lawmakers and former U.S. officials are saying that the decision may have hampered the American government’s ability to confront the Nigerian group that shocked the world by abducting hundreds of innocent girls.

Indeed, two years earlier, in 2012, when Clinton was actively shielding Boko Haram from the terrorist label, a spokesman for the group announced that they were planning on doing something just like they did at Chibok — to “strike fear into the Christians of the power of Islam by kidnapping their women” — though that too had fallen on Clinton’s deaf ears. Notably, although news media initially presented the kidnapped Chibok schoolgirls as Muslim, it later came out that they were Christian, at which point the media quickly lost interest.

Being placed on the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations is important: it helps to ostracize and stigmatize malign groups and makes it illegal for any U.S. entities to do business with them. Most importantly, it allows U.S. intelligence and law enforcement to use certain tools and take certain measures that otherwise might not be legal, such as those offered by the Patriot Act: more surveillance, more efficient interagency communication, and so on.

Discussing Clinton’s failure to apply the terrorist designation onto Boko Haram — while simultaneously condemning them for engaging in “an act of terrorism” in regards to Chibok, 2014 — a former senior U.S. official said soon after:

The one thing she could have done, the one tool she had at her disposal, she didn’t use. And nobody can say she wasn’t urged to do it. It’s gross hypocrisy… The FBI, the CIA, and the Justice Department really wanted Boko Haram designated, they wanted the authorities that would provide to go after them, and they voiced that repeatedly to elected officials.

Apparently such is the official, unwavering, and consistent response, whether under Obama/Clinton or now under Biden: Nigeria is not a “country of particular concern” — even as genocide continues to unfold against its Christians.

 

ATTORNEY GENERAL Garland Ignores Vital Immigration Law Enforcement Crippling national security and public safety.

BY MICHAEL CUTLER

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/01/ag-garland-ignores-vital-immigration-law-michael-cutler/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Rampant violent crime across the United States, particularly in cities and states run by radical leftist mayors and governors is of great concern to Americans everywhere and is an outgrowth of the insanity of the defund police movement and “criminal justice reform” which has led to violent criminals being released without bail causing carnage at unprecedented levels.

Perhaps in response to this crisis, on January 21, 2022, the Department of Justice issued a press release:  Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Delivers Remarks at the U.S. Conference of Mayors that provided a transcript of his remarks as they were delivered.

It is important that, as you read the transcript, to remember that the Attorney General of the United States is also the chief law enforcement officer of the United States.  Many federal law enforcement agencies operate under the aegis of the Justice Department but even those agencies that operate under the auspices of other agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security, and the Treasury Department still rely on the federal prosecutors of the Justice Department they partner with to further criminal investigations and prosecutions for all crimes comprehended under federal statutes.

Violations of federal criminal laws are prosecuted by federal prosecutors who are assigned to the U.S. Attorney’s offices located across the United States.

Federal prosecutors are not, however, required to accept the prosecution of all cases that are presented to them by federal agents.  Because of limited resources and political considerations, federal prosecutors have far-ranging discretion in deciding whether or not to pursue criminal charges in the cases that are brought to them.

U.S. Attorneys are beholden to the “marching orders” issued by the Attorney General for whom they all work.

This brings us back to Attorney General Garland’s prepared remarks and a particular worrisome excerpt:

Keeping our country safe and the American people safe is a core priority of the United States Department of Justice. A critical part of keeping our country safe is protecting it from foreign and domestic terrorism.

These are dangers that Justice Department law enforcement components work against all day, every day. And as I have said, they are dangers that we work against together with our state and local partners, without whom we cannot succeed.

Another important part of keeping our country safe is working alongside all of you to protect our communities from violent crime, particularly the scourge of gun violence.

At the Justice Department, we stand shoulder to shoulder with you in the fight against violent crime, and we will use every tool at our disposal to protect our communities.

Last year, the department launched a comprehensive anti-violent crime strategy aimed at harnessing our resources of every relevant component in the department, including our United States Attorneys' Offices, our litigating divisions, all of our law enforcement agencies, and our grantmaking offices.

Recognizing the importance of anti-violent crime strategies that are tailored to individual communities, we directed each United States Attorneys Office to work with its state and local partners to address the crime problem in those communities.

As a result, the FBI, ATF, DEA, and U.S. Marshals Service partnered with state and local agencies and police departments to embed agents in homicide units, confiscate illegal firearms, disrupt violent drug trafficking, and provide other support where needed.

That very last paragraph is beyond shocking.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the immigration law enforcement elements of that federal leviathan are conspicuously absent from the Attorney General’s statement which included the threats posed by international terrorists even as he enumerated many other federal agencies.

The Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) has always included immigration law enforcement officers.  In point of fact, the 9/11 Commission, to which I provided testimony, made it abundantly clear that the 9/11 terror attacks and other such attacks, were only possible because of multiple failures of the immigration system.

A variety of other task forces have also traditionally included immigration law enforcement personnel.

Other law enforcement efforts are largely duplicated by local and state law enforcement agencies however, the enforcement of the immigration laws including the deportation (removal) of illegal aliens is unique to the DHS.

We will consider the findings and recommendations of the 9/11 Commission shortly, but first I want you to know that in writing my article today I am calling upon my extensive real-world experiences as an INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) special agent.

I was the first INS agent assigned to the Unified Intelligence Division of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in New York City.  I worked closely with the DEA, FBI, local and state police, and a variety of law enforcement agencies both within the United States and even foreign governments.

That assignment lasted for about four years whereupon I was promoted to the position of Senior Special Agent and assigned to the Organized Crime, Drug Enforcement Task Force.  Once again, I was assigned to various other federal agencies to provide my unique authority and expertise as an INS agent to assist in conducting investigations and subsequent prosecution of large-scale narcotics trafficking organizations.

There are a variety of crimes that pertain specifically to aliens who commit serious crimes in the United States that are uniquely pursued by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  Among these crimes are:

8 U.S. Code § 1326 (Reentry of aliens who were previously removed from the United States)- which carries a maximum of 20 years in prison for aliens who are deemed to be “aggravated felons.”

8 U.S. Code § 1324 (Bringing in and harboring certain aliens).

18 U.S. Code § 1546 (Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents) can carry up to 25 years in prison when such crime is committed in conjunction with terrorism.

18 U.S. Code § 922 (Unlawful acts concerning firearms and ammunition) the following subsection addresses possession of firearms or ammunition by illegal aliens:

(5)who, being an alien

(A)is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or

(B)except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(26)));

Additionally, the removal (deportation) of aliens helps to combat recidivism.  Criminal aliens who are no longer in the United States cannot carry out crimes in the United States.

Nevertheless, the Biden administration has gutted both border security and the enforcement of our immigration laws from within the interior of the United States.  Garland’s omission of immigration law enforcement from the efforts to help combat violent crime was clearly consistent with the policies of the Biden Administration.

Transnational gangs are running rampantly across the United States, frequently profiting by their involvement in the drug trade which has caused the deaths of tens of thousands of victims in the United States.

Gang violence causes many additional deaths- frequently within the ethnic immigrant communities where these criminals, from all over the world, now operate with impunity particularly in so-called “Sanctuary Cities” and “Sanctuary States.”

The preface of the official report 9/11 and  Terrorist Travel - Staff Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States began with the following paragraph:

It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.

Border security is national security, but perhaps the most overlooked element of immigration law enforcement is the enforcement of our immigration laws from within the interior of the United States. 

Page 54 of the above-cited report contained this excerpt under the title “3.2 Terrorist Travel Tactics by Plot.”

“…once in the United States terrorists and their supporters tried to get legal immigration status that would permit them to remain here, primarily by committing serial, or repeated, immigration fraud, by claiming political asylum, and by marrying Americans. Many of these tactics would remain largely unchanged and undetected throughout the 1990s and up to the 9/11 attack.”

Thus, abuse of the immigration system and a lack of interior immigration enforcement were unwittingly working together to support terrorist activity. It would remain largely unknown since no agency of the United States government analyzed terrorist travel patterns until after 9/11. This lack of attention meant that critical opportunities to disrupt terrorist travel and, therefore, deadly terrorist operations were missed.

I included that statement in my prepared testimony when, on March 10, 2005, I testified before a hearing conducted by the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims on the topic,  Interior Immigration Enforcement Resources.

Advice for Garland, Biden and Mayorkas: as I noted in my prepared testimony for a hearing conducted by the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 12, 2006, “A nation without secure borders can no more stand than can a house without walls.”

Finland Parlament Member on Trial for Using Biblical Description of Homosexuality

A criminal conviction for posting a Bible tweet is now a very real possibility in Finland. On 24 January, former Minister of the Interior Päivi Räsänen will face a criminal trial after being accused of engaging in “hate speech” for publicly voicing her deeply held beliefs on marriage and human sexuality. In April 2021, the Prosecutor General brought three criminal charges against Räsänen over the contents of a church pamphlet Räsänen wrote over 17 years ago, for engaging in a debate on a 2019 radio show and, most recently, for a tweet containing a picture of Bible verses she directed at her church leadership. ADF International has been supporting Päivi for the past two years. We sat down for an interview to hear her story. To support Päivi, please visit https://adfinternational.org/freespee... .

Paul Coleman Discusses Trial of Päivi Räsänen for Expressing Biblical Beliefs about Human Sexuality

The minister of Finland: I will not renounce my faith! Päivi Räsänen in Against the Tide TV

Jeff King interviews Päivi Räsänen, a member of the Finnish Parliament for over 25 years, about her experience facing religious persecution. A Bible verse posted to her personal Facebook page has led to a legal battle that has lasted more than two years. She is facing up to six years in prison for three different “crimes."

 

BY Savannah Hulsey Pointer

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/finland-parlament-member-on-trial-for-using-biblical-description-of-homosexuality/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Finnish Christian Democrat MP on trial for hate speech after saying homosexuality is a developmental disorder and a sin.

QUICK FACTS:
  • A government official and former Interior Minister is now on trial for her Christian-based comments on homosexuality.
  • Paivi Rasanen, who has been the nation’s Parliament since 1995, is being taken to task over comments made on three occasions, stretching back as far as 2004, according to The Independent.
  • Charges against the government official were announced in April of 2021 when a state prosecutor said Rasanen’s remarks could fuel intolerance toward homosexuals.
  • Rasanen is facing legal action for the instances, including one where she posted a photo of excerpts from the Bible.
RASANEN RESPONSE TO THE CHARGES:
  • “In all the charges, I deny any wrongdoing. My writings and statements under investigation are linked to the Bible’s teachings on marriage, living as a man and a woman, as well as the Apostle Paul’s teaching on homosexual acts,” she explained according to CBN News. “The teachings concerning marriage and sexuality in the Bible arise from love to one’s neighbor, not from hate towards a group of people.”
  • “According to my knowledge, the court has to for the first time take a stand on whether it is legal or not to cite the Bible,” Räsänen continued.
  • According to The Independent, Rasanen appeared in court on Monday with a Bible in hand saying she was “honored to be defending the freedom of speech and religion.”
BACKGROUND:
  • In addition to a 2004 article where she is accused of making derogatory comments about the LGBT community, she is also being scrutinized for a 2019 radio interview and tweets sent in the same year.
  • She described homosexuality as a “genetic degeneration” in the program broadcast by Finnish public radio station Yle, according to the prosecutor’s case against the lawmaker.

Health Officials Deny Even a Single Death From COVID Shots

BY DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA

SEE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/27/health-officials-deny-death-from-covid-shots.aspx;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • As of January 7, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received 9,936 reports of death following the COVID jab in the U.S. When you include foreign reports received by VAERS, the death toll stands at 21,745
  • A total of 1,541 miscarriages have also been reported post-jab in the U.S., or 3,594 if you include foreign reports. Despite these shocking statistics, U.S. health officials and “fact-checkers” insist not a single death can be attributed to the shots
  • According to OneAmerica, a national life insurance company, in the third quarter of 2021, working-age Americans (aged 18 to 64) died at a rate that is 40% higher than the pre-pandemic rate, and they didn’t die from COVID
  • The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021, and teens’ mortality in the U.K. shot up 47% in the three months after they became eligible for COVID shots
  • A recent histopathologic analysis of the organs from 15 patients who died within seven days to six months’ post-jab, ages 28 to 95, found 14 of the deaths — 93% — were caused by the jab

As of January 7, 2022, just over a year into the campaign to inject every human being with a gene transfer product to protect against COVID, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received 9,936 reports of death following the COVID jab in the United States’ territories alone.1 When you include foreign reports received by VAERS, the death toll stands at 21,745.

A total of 1,541 miscarriages have also been reported post-jab in the U.S., or 3,594 if you include foreign reports. Despite these shocking statistics, U.S. health officials and “fact-checkers” insist not a single death can be attributed to the shots.

During an early January 2022 Senate committee hearing on the nation’s Omicron response (see video above), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and director for the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, testified — under oath — that they “did not know” how many deaths had been reported to VAERS following COVID “vaccination.”2,3

Walensky referred to the shots as “incredibly safe,” claiming — against all science — that they “protect us against Omicron, they protect us against Delta, they protect us against COVID.” She also falsely claimed that all reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths have been “adjudicated.”

No, VAERS Is Not a Repository of Fake Reports

Worse yet, both Walensky and Fauci claim any and all adverse events following vaccination get reported to VAERS, including accidental deaths and car accidents. They both actually claim that if a person gets the COVID shot and gets hit by a car afterward, that is reported as an adverse reaction.

Nothing could be further from the truth. First of all, adverse events are not automatically reported and, certainly, obvious accidents are not entered into the system as a suspected vaccine side effect.

As reported by Health Impact News,4 there are about 18 reports in VAERS that include “road traffic accident,” but most if not all relate to an adverse event, such as a heart attack, occurring while driving. They were not hit by someone else and entered into the system. As noted by Pam Long in aJanuary 12, 2022, Twitter thread:5

“If anyone in public health utters ‘a person can get hit by a car & report their death to VAERS’ you need stop them, in any public meeting, and demand they explain what motive would a physician have to inflate VAERS reports with car accidents or any unrelated mortality?

Despite Walensky’s & Fauci’s cliché testimony to Congress. Not one person ‘got hit by a car’ & reported their own death to VAERS as a vaccine injury. Most reports are filed by medical professionals, using diagnostic language about drug reactions.”

VAERS was designed and created as an early warning system. It’s true that anyone can file a report, but it’s time-consuming, requires the knowledge of medical details a patient oftentimes won’t have and carries penalties for filing a false report. There’s absolutely no reason to suspect, let alone assume, that people are filing false reports just to make the shots look bad.

Fact-Checker Outs Himself as a Pharma Propagandist

Walensky and Fauci aren’t the only ones lying about the lethality of the COVID jab. Mainstream media are all-in as well. In a USA Today fact check,6 Daniel Funke claims that “COVID-19 vaccines [are] safe for children” and “not linked to deaths.”

“... online, some claim children face more risk from the vaccine than COVID-19 itself,” Funke writes. “USA TODAY previously rated False a claim that children are 50 times more likely to die from the COVID-19 vaccine than the virus. This claim is similarly wrong.

Public health officials say the vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech is safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 in children ages 5-11. As other independent fact-checking organizations have reported, the benefits of the vaccine outweigh its known and potential risks.

‘Over 700 children have died due to COVID-19 in the United States,’ Dr. Sonja Rasmussen, a professor in the departments of pediatrics and epidemiology at the University of Florida, said in an email.

‘I am not aware of any deaths in children that have been attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine’ ... The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine for children outweigh its known and potential risks, according to the CDC. The shot does not cause death.”

Funke cites data from Pfizer’s clinical trials, “which found the vaccine was safe” for children, as “no deaths were reported” in Pfizer’s trials for 12- to 25-year-olds, and those for 12- to 17-year-olds. Funke dismisses the rationale for looking at VAERS data on the basis that anyone can file a report and that reports are unverified, and therefore cannot be used to determine causation.

All Opinion and No Data

There are so many issues with this “fact-check,” no wonder Facebook attorneys are using the legal defense that fact checks are “opinion” only and not actual assertions of fact.7,8 There’s nothing but opinions in this piece. As “evidence” that the COVID shots are safe and have caused no deaths, Funke presents:

Another opinion piece by USA Today
The supposed opinion of unnamed “public health officials”
Biased opinion assertions by other pharma-funded propaganda organizations (aka, “fact-checking organizations”)
The opinion of a single professor who admits she is unaware of publicly available data
The unsupported opinion of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a captured agency that has repeatedly been caught manipulating data and changing definitions to fit the pandemic narrative
Pfizer’s preliminary trial data, which whistleblowers warn may have integrity issues9
The unsupported claim that VAERS data are unreliable because anyone can file, the implication being that people can file fake reports
The debatable claim that VAERS data cannot tell us anything about causation, hence it’s useless looking at it

It’s hard to come up with a less compelling list of evidence for safety, but then again, propagandists have to work with what they have, and in this case, they have nothing. Funke presents zero actual data to support his opinion.

Explain the Rise in Mortality if You Can

There are many data-driven reasons to suspect, predict and even assume that the COVID shots are killing more people than they’re saving — regardless of the age group in question. It would take an entire book to cover it all, so I will only review a few of those reasons here.

One very telling clue that recently came to light is life insurance data. According to OneAmerica, a national life insurance company based in Indianapolis, in the third quarter of 2021, working-age Americans (aged 18 to 64) died at a rate that is 40% higher than the pre-pandemic rate, and they didn’t die from COVID.10

And, according to CEO Scott Davidson, this catastrophic abnormality is consistently seen “across every player” in the life insurance industry.11 A 40% increase in mortality is simply unheard of, and as of yet, they claim to have no clue as to what’s causing young and middle-aged people to die prematurely at such an astounding rate.

Looking at it from a sleuth’s point of view, one might ask, “What environmental factor with unknown safety was introduced in 2021 to people in this age group?” Sure, pandemic restrictions have led to spikes in drug overdoses and suicides, which affects this cohort in particular. But “deaths of desperation” cannot account for all of it.

The one wild card is the COVID jab. More than 173 million working-age Americans (18 to 64) got these experimental gene transfer injections,12 and doctors and scientists have elucidated several mechanisms by which they might injure or kill.

What’s more, the rise in deaths began AFTER the rollout of the shots, and whatever the causative factor, it is not only national but likely international in scope. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, for example, also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021.13

Excess deaths (exceeding pre-pandemic norms) are also reported in the U.K.14 Among teens (aged 15 to 19), mortality spiked right after teens became eligible for the COVID shot.15 Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, and that same period of time in 2021, teenage deaths rose by 47%.16

A rise in disability claims17 also suggests that many who aren’t killed by this novel lethal threat are seriously injured, often long-term. For all of these reasons, the COVID jabs cannot be taken off the table. Logic demands that they be looked into as a potential causative factor.

Can VAERS Data Demonstrate Causality?

One person who has taken a strong stance against the claim that VAERS data cannot tell us anything about causation is Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. In the video “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,”18 he argues that VAERS can indeed be used to determine causality.

It’s important to realize that the idea that VAERS cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the deaths is attributable to the COVID shot. Kirsch argues that this premise is in fact false and that causation can be determined using VAERS’ data.

To prove his point, Kirsch gives the following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose, nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

When you look at the VAERS data, what you would find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after the second dose, all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of death.

According to the CDC, you cannot ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just a random chance that everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the first dose or from another condition.

Kirsch argues that causality can indeed be identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another explanation for why people — many who are young, in perfect health with no predisposing conditions — die exactly 24 hours after their second dose. It’s even difficult to come up with another explanation for people who do have underlying conditions.

For example, is it reasonable to assume that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions, would die from DVT exactly 24 hours after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed diabetes would die from DVT exactly 24 hours after their second dose?

Why not after the first dose, or two months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same condition at the exact same time, over and over again?

At a bare minimum, as an early warning system, VAERS is designed to flag potential causation. It’s by looking for repeated patterns of side effects that you would begin to identify a potentially problematic vaccine. Once a pattern is identified — and there’s no denying death within 24 hours to one week is a pattern seen for the COVID shots — an investigation should be launched.

But no such investigation has been launched for the COVID jabs. Clear-cut patterns are simply ignored. As an early warning system, VAERS is performing as intended, despite severe underreporting (the CDC recently published a paper in which they admit COVID jab adverse effects in children are underreported by a factor of 6.519). It’s the follow-up that’s lacking. But lack of investigation and follow-up do not evidence that the shots can’t cause death.

‘Bad Batches’ Are Another Clue

Another clue that hints at SOME of the shots being able to cause rapid death is the “bad batch” phenomenon. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have no adverse events associated with their use.

According to howbadismybatch.com, a site that matches up vaccine lot codes with reports in the VAERS system, approximately 5% of the lots are responsible for 90% of all adverse reactions. Some of these batches have 50 times the number of deaths and disabilities associated with them, compared to other lots.20

Another website that basically does the same thing is TheEagle’s VAERS Dashboard. (A video explaining how to use the dashboard can be found on Bitchute.21)

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, cofounder of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German parliament, discuss this “smoking gun” evidence in the video above. According to Fuellmich and Wodarg, this lot-dependent data shows vaccine makers are conducting secret experiments within the larger public trial.

They appear to actually be doing lethal-dose testing on the public. Wodarg argues that the evidence for this is very clear from the data. They also appear to be coordinating these lethal-dose experiments, so that they’re not all releasing their most toxic lots at the same time, or in the same areas, so as to avoid detection through clustering.

More Data Showing COVID Jabs Can Kill

In closing, I will raise just two more pieces of evidence that speaks to COVID jabs having the ability to kill large numbers of people:

A recent histopathologic analysis of the organs from 15 patients who died within seven days to six months post-jab, ages 28 to 95, found 14 of the deaths — 93% — were caused by the jab.22,23 None of the original coroners’ reports implicated the shots, however.

The association was only established through autopsy, which revealed a “process of immunological self-attack” that is “without precedent.” “Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals,” Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt wrote.

According to researchers at Columbia University, the real number of people killed by the COVID jabs is about 20 times the reported rate, based on their analysis of two publicly available databases (VAERS in the U.S., and another in Europe).24,25,26 That analysis was published in October 2021, but few ever heard a peep about it. According to the authors:

“Comparing our age-stratified VFRs [vaccine-induced fatality rates] with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure.

We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.”

Based on the ever-mounting data, the claim that COVID shots have not, cannot, and/or will not cause death simply isn’t credible. And the longer these shots continue to be used, the greater the likelihood that they will indeed kill far more than the actual virus ever did. We also need to remember that the disabilities and long-term chronic ill-health these shots are causing will prematurely kill many more, even if it takes 10 or 15 years, and we have no data on any of that yet.

Antifa’s Red Goons Shut Down Andy Ngo at Dartmouth. University Surrendered to Threat

Antifa’s Red Goons Shut Down Andy Ngo at Dartmouth. University Surrendered to Threats

Milkshake for Andy Ngo at Dartmouth College

Terrorists Get Andy Ngo Event at Dartmouth Cancelled -- Admin Caves to Fascists

Greg Gutfeld weighs in on Andy Ngo's cancelation at Dartmouth College

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/antifas-red-goons-shut-down-andy-ngo-at-dartmouth-university-surrendered-to-threats/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Dartmouth College

As the FBI retails the lie that “white supremacists” are the greatest threat to domestic security in the United States, Antifa goons who proudly declare themselves dangerous communists are threatening violence to shut down conservative speakers.

This time the target was Andy Ngo, the journalist who tracks Antifa’s terror activities. He lost a speaking gig at Dartmouth University after Northeast Antifa threatened protests, he reported in the New York Post. The communist thugs also threatened Ngo.

Dartmouth surrendered. Administrators confessed they feared what Antifa might do. Message sent: If Antifa orders a university to shut down a conservative speaker, the school will meekly obey.

Death Threat

The threats came from Northeast Antifa on its Northeast FASHWATCH Twitter feed, Ngo reported. The group announces it is “queer as f***,” “Anti-fascist as f***,” and “communist as f***.”

Obviously, the group is crazy as f*** as well, but anyway, it also calls itself “Commie Pinko F@gs fighting back.”

The obsession with sodomy is not surprising. Erotopathy and communist ideology — sexual revolution and political revolution — have walked hand-in-hand since at least the French Revolution.

That aside, the Dartmouth College Republicans and Turning Point USA invited Ngo and Gabriel Nadales, who quit Antifa and moved right, to speak about far-left extremism. Title of the event: “Extremism in America.”

Yet “soon after the event was announced,” Ngo wrote for the Post, “Antifa and its army of online trolls threatened violence to shut it down. In turn, Dartmouth administrators gave the extremists exactly what they wanted: The Hanover, NH, college canceled the in-person event at the last minute, citing vague ‘safety issues.’”

Such were the concerns, he continued, that cops cleared the speaking venue and sent in a bomb squad and dogs before Ngo arrived.

Northeast Antifa began publishing threats on Twitter on January 18, including a “disturbing flyer featuring a photograph of my bloodied face from when an Antifa mob beat me in 2019 in Portland, Ore.” Ngo continued. “I was hospitalized for a brain hemorrhage from that assault and robbery.”

The communist thugs tweeted these threats:

Anti-fascists from Mass, NH, VT, Maine; anti-fascists from all over New England will be mobilizing January 20th, 2022 at Dartmouth College to disrupt & prevent fascist propagandists like Andy Ngo from normalizing their reactionary beliefs on college campuses in the Northeast.…

As anti-fascists, it is our responsibility to the communities we serve to never give fascists a safe space to spew their lies. Please spread the word to everyone you know and we hope to see everyone on Jan. 20th

On Instagram, the “Commie Pinko F@gs fighting back” escalated. They targeted Ngo and strongly implied they would kill him:

This is to Andy Ngo himself: when you f–k with us you are not f–king with college students. When you enter our home you start playing by our rules, not yours. New England is anti-fascist, and we will hold that line until death.

The John Brown Gun Club, a radical leftist “militia,” promised to be there with a “battalion of Antifa,” while Upstate Antifa tweeted that it hoped “NH antifascists give him a milkshake welcome.”

Another Antifa goon vowed to pay anyone who assaulted or poisoned him.

Continued Ngo:

On Reddit, a thread announcing Antifa’s call to direct action went viral on the Socialist Rifle Association subreddit. There, some of the pseudonymous users posted about killing me and coming armed to the event to stop the “pests.”

Hanover police, nearby Lebanon police and the Grafton County Sheriff’s Office met the threats with a robust and commendable response. Dozens of officers secured the lecture hall where we were scheduled to speak. They secured every entrance and exit at the building, Moore Hall.

The message was clear: Law enforcement will ensure First Amendment activities are protected in Hanover, NH. Dartmouth’s administrators, however, felt otherwise.

Two hours before the event was set to begin, and with many attendees already en route, the administration canceled it. Over the phone, senior assistant dean for student life Anna Hall said the decision was made by “several” people but refused to say who when asked by a student organizer. The organizers were given the ultimatum of “transitioning” to a Zoom meeting or nothing at all. They reluctantly chose the former.

Lawsuit After Assault

Last year, Ngo filed a $900,000 lawsuit against Rose City Antifa, whose members attacked him in Portland Oregon, in 2019.

“Rose City Antifa members and others … lobbed containers full of liquid, purportedly ‘milkshakes’ … and other unknown liquids, at Ngo,” the lawsuit alleges.

“Milkshaking” is the name for attacking people with liquids that contain potentially toxic material such as quick-drying concrete.

The lawsuit says Rose City goons “who threw projectiles, including milkshakes, eggs, and containers; punched; and kicked him. Members also hit him in the head with plywood hard-edged sign placards and carbon-hardened tactical gloves.”

In December, the judge in the case rejected a motion from the defendants to toss it out of court on the grounds that it was frivolous.

Confrontation On The Horizon: Federal Government vs. We The People

BY ROGER KATZ

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/01/cataclysmic-confrontation-federal-government-vs-we-the-people/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- Once again, the Deep State is resorting to the seditious legacy Press as their Sounding Board to sway public opinion to their rancid cause. And this Neo-Marxist and Neoliberal Globalist captured Press is, true to form, falling back on the usual dreary, boring rhetoric of racism to chastise and cajole anyone who fails to support the passage of their ridiculous measures.

See two Fox news articles just posted, January 18, 2022. One Fox news article is titled “Liberal media use Martin Luther King Jr. day to push election Legislation, claim ‘voting rights under assault,’” and the other Fox news article is titled, “Schumer tells Democrats to reluctant to nuke filibuster: ‘We are all going to go on the record.’”

These Deep State Globalists are intent on maintaining a stranglehold on the Nation, insistent on the usurpation of the sovereignty of the citizenry to maintain indefinite and absolute control over the Federal Government, over the Nation’s institutions, and over the Nation’s people.

And this unlawful usurpation of the citizenry’s sovereignty by a rogue, treasonous, tyrannical Federal Government and a duplicitous Congress is too painfully evident to be reasonably denied. To enshrine a successful Counterrevolution in perpetuity, these plotters need to have absolute control over the electoral system. And their blueprint for that was laid out in the takeover of the 2020 General Election, which saw a quiet coup of Government. And these conspirators are hell-bent on keeping the lid on that, censoring, ridiculing, and strong-arming any American who insists on questioning the legitimacy of the election that took place—that resulted in the ousting of Donald Trump, and the seating of the corrupt, senile dimwit and subservient toady of the Neo-Marxists/Neoliberal Globalists, Joe Biden, into the U.S. Presidential suite.

The American people need to remember and constantly remind themselves that, despite the coup d’état of the Federal Government, through the wide-ranging, unlawful scheming and fraud of the 2020 General Election, the American people still wield, by right, ultimate and sole sovereignty over Government. But it is not succored for them, as they can see. They must assert it.

And there must eventually be an accounting, and there will be an accounting, after the 2022 Midterm elections. And the American people are holding fast to and must continue to hold fast to their firearms.

Many other Americans, who, in their dim memory, recall the sacred right of the people to keep and bear arms, are purchasing firearms and ammunition for the first time, recognizing a free Constitutional Republic is rapidly falling from their grasp. And they are prepared to assert their lawful power over the Government.

This absolutely terrifies the ruthless forces—operating silently in the shadows—both here and abroad. For far too long they have exerted inordinate influence and power over their many toadies——

  • In the Federal Government
  • In Many State and Local Governments;
  • In the Public and Private Health Fields;
  • In the Press, in Social Media, and “Big Tech;”
  • In Broadcast and Cable News and Commentary;
  • In Academia and Public Education;
  • In Business, High finance, and the Central (Federal Reserve) Bank;
  • In Sports and other Entertainment.

And with the exceptionally good reason these ruthless, powerful forces are terrified of America’s many armed citizens. But these destructive forces can’t back down now. They can’t ease up on their grand one-world takeover game plan. They have come much too far for that.

Yes, they have been able to prevent the Populist Donald Trump from securing a second term in office, albeit through massive election fraud, chicanery, and illegal electoral engineering. And they have unlawfully silenced dissent. And they have unlawfully denied to tens of thousands of American citizens, operation of the citizens’ sacred Constitutional Rights through blatant and glaring, disregard of and outright violations of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. They have pushed the American people against a wall.

And so, the forces that dare to crush our Nation and its people into submission must see their game through to the end: it is all, or nothing at all—both for them and for us.

How do we know this? The absurdist, farcical play the Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists puppet-masters have staged to date demonstrates how frantic they are to control the actions and thoughts of the American people.

These destructive agencies must proceed forthwith with their agenda, that they may undertake the grand finale: their dangerous endgame. They must and will, at some point, attempt to confiscate the firearms of the American people en masse.

But… Hold the line! No Violence!

Just consider the outright, outrageous unconstitutional actions and schemes that Americans have suffered to date through the deceit and machinations and illegal maneuvering of the treachery of many in the Federal Government and through the treachery of many actors outside the Government as well—taunting, challenging, daring the American people to resist.

[They want the Patriots to start the fight, so they can point and say we caused the civil war, DON’T give them the ground. Hold the line! No Violence.]

Consider These Outrageous Assaults On Our Constitution And On The Sovereignty Of The American People:

  • Creation of Nancy Pelosi’s “Star Chamber” January 6 Commission
  • Establishment of the DOJ Department’s newly formed Domestic Terrorism Unit, to target and hunt down American citizens
  • Insidious Attacks on America’s Moms and Dads, and on Trump Supporters
  • Continued Mindless, Senseless Denigration of and Attacks on Donald Trump
  • Incoherent, Duplicitous Disinformation/Misinformation/Pseudo-Information Campaigns Orchestrated by the Federal Government, the Legacy Press, and Major Social Media Companies, all directed against the population at large
  • Psychological Conditioning Programs Designed to Produce and Provoke Mass Confusion, Anxiety, and Hysteria in the Nation’s Citizenry and in the Nation’s youth and young adults
  • The Perpetration and Perpetuation of an outlandish fictitious pseudo-religious dogma grounded absurdly on the Glorification of Victimhood and on the Idea of the Moral Righteousness of Social and Sexual Deviancy and of a host of other Psychological Pathologies
  • De facto Abrogation of Natural, Basic Rights and Liberties of the Citizenry
  • The Contemptuous Dismissal of U.S. Supreme Court Orders and Decisions; and Disdainful Disregard of Congressional Statutes
  • Governmental Policy Decisions and Initiatives Designed and Calibrated to Destabilize Society, Weaken the Economy, and Endanger National Security
  • Odd tolerance toward, even outright enabling of, harmful, illegal Actions of the worst, most detestable elements of Society and, concomitantly, Clampdowns on the Freedoms and Autonomy of Average, Responsible, Rational Americans
  • The Presumptuous, Outrageous Opening of the Nation’s Territorial Borders to Millions of Itinerant illegal aliens, many of whom have been deported from the country several times before but who are given Sanctuary in the U.S. by the Administration in clear violation of the Nation’s Immigration Laws
  • Creation of new voting blocs from the millions of illegal aliens, convicted felons, lunatics, malleable adolescents, malcontents, and slothful individuals
  • Seditious Pronouncements and Narratives Passed off as “News” by a Press that is in league with the Neo-Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist Agenda to Eradicate a free Constitutional Republic
  • Neo-Marxist Legislators blatantly and egregiously telling Social Media and Big Tech Kingpins to engage in further Censoring of Speech instead of urging restraint and the refraining of censorship, on pain of Congressional action
  • Harris-Biden Administration nominations of the most corrupt, ill-suited, inept, Anti-American, and, in some instances, strange and bizarre cast of characters ever to hold public office
  • House Passage of the  Voting Rights Package, combining the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote Act—a Bald-faced, Shameless Attempt by Congressional Marxists to unlawfully bypass Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution—thereby federalizing the election process that belongs solely to the States and ensuring that Neo-Marxists retain control of Congress in November 2022 after the Midterm elections
  • Unmitigated, incessant Lying and Deceit directed toward the American People
  • A painfully and oddly taciturn Republican Members of the Senate and House, seemingly oblivious to the blatant Neo-Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist attempt to destroy the Republic: Have they been bribed to remain quiet, or are most of them just frightened docile little lambs themselves, afraid to lock horns with the Neo-Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist toadies and puppet-masters?

How can the Federal Government and various State Governments, along with the Press, and Social Media Companies, get away with continuous wholesale evisceration and immolation of our Nation and its people? The short answer is: They can’t; at least not legally anyway, but for the fact that Americans allow this to happen, at least tacitly.

But how long will Americans put up with this dangerous nonsense and are you ready to Get OUT AND VOTE like never before in 2022?


About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit www.arbalestquarrel.com.

Arbalest Quarrel

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem Announces Heartbeat Law, Keeping Promise to Strengthen State’s Pro-life Laws

BY THE BLAZE

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/south-dakota-gov-kristi-noem-announces-heartbeat-law-keeping-promise-to-strengthen-states-pro-life-laws/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) on Friday announced two new bills to keep her promise to ensure that her state has the “strongest pro-life laws in the books.”

Timed to coincide with the March for Life in Washington, D.C., the first bill unveiled by the Republican governor would codify her executive order from last September restricting access to chemically induced abortions. Her order prohibited abortion pills (mifepristone and misoprostol) from being delivered via courier, telemedicine, or mail service and banned abortifacients from being dispensed or provided in schools or on state grounds. The governor’s office described “chemical abortions” as “a dangerous procedure that are four times more likely to cause the woman getting the abortion to end up in the emergency room.” Noem’s bill would make her executive order state law.

The second bill is a fetal heartbeat bill modeled after Texas’ Heartbeat Act, which prevents a woman from seeking an abortion after her unborn baby develops a heartbeat, usually sometime around six weeks.

“Every human life is unique and beautiful from the moment it is conceived. Every life is worthy of our protection, worthy of the right to live,” Noem said in a statement. “We hope that this year’s March for Life will be the last and that the Supreme Court will finally protect every unborn life. But until that comes to pass, these bills will ensure that both unborn children and their mothers are protected in South Dakota.”

Last year, Noem ordered the unborn child advocate in her office to examine South Dakota’s laws and make recommendations to strengthen them to protect unborn life.

Her action came after the Supreme Court rejected an emergency request to block the Texas Heartbeat Act from taking effect. Last week, the court rejected another legal challenge to the Texas law, sending the case to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where it is expected to fail.

The draft South Dakota bill, “Prohibiting Abortion After Detection of Fetal Heartbeat,” is very similar to the Texas legislation. It would prohibit abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, except in cases where a physician believes that a medical emergency necessitates an abortion, an emergency would “prevent compliance” with parts of the law, or if an abortion is performed by someone “carrying out duties under federal law.”

The law uses the same innovative enforcement mechanism as the Texas law that’s been harshly criticized by pro-choice advocates: A physician, the woman seeking an abortion, or anyone involved who “aids or abets the performance or inducement of an abortion” can be targeted by a private civil action brought by any person “other than the state.”

An abortionist could face up to $10,000 in statutory damages for each abortion performed and additional damages for “emotional distress,” costs for legal counsel, and “injunctive relief” “sufficient to prevent the defendant from violating” the law again.

This unique and controversial provision of the law was designed to shield it from review by federal courts. The law’s critics claim that if this scheme were widely adopted for all sorts of laws — say gun control laws — constitutional protections for certain rights would be rendered meaningless.

In a Supreme Court decision permitting a lawsuit against the Texas law to proceed, Chief Justice John Roberts said, “Texas has employed an array of stratagems designed to shield its unconstitutional law from judicial review.”

Roberts condemned state lawmakers for attempting to “nullify this Court’s rulings,” declaring that “it is the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake” in that case. His writing was interpreted to suggest that he may ultimately side with the court’s liberal justices in abortion cases, voting to uphold the long-standing Roe v. Wade decision that established a constitutional right for women to kill their unborn children. 

Later this year, the Supreme Court will rule on a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy in a case that could potentially overturn Roe.

In remarks published Friday, Noem said that the total number of abortions in South Dakota has decreased “more than 80% over the last decade.” The governor thanked state legislators in both parties for supporting her bill to ban abortions of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome, as well as numerous other pro-life efforts.

“We respect life in South Dakota, and I look forward to the day when we protect all unborn lives,” Noem said. “Our laws must reflect our values and our commitment to protect the inalienable rights of all of our citizens.”

Facebook Bans Criticizing Taliban and Ben and Jerry’s support of anti-Israel BDS

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2022/01/facebook-bans-criticizing-taliban-and-ben-and-jerrys;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

What do Facebook, Ben and Jerry’s, and the Taliban all have in common? They support terrorists.

Facebook has threatened to ban the head of the watchdog group UN Watch due to alleged content violations, including a post denouncing the Taliban and the movement to boycott Israel.

The post in question showed a photograph of Taliban leaders in the presidential palace in Kabul after their takeover of the country in August 2021. Hillel Neuer commented on the photo, “Prediction: Ben and Jerry’s will never announce a boycott of the Taliban.”

The statement was an ironic reference to the ice cream giant’s controversial decision to end sales in the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem.

That post was censored by Facebook for what it called “violating our Community Standards.”

UN Watch does really important work in its niche. And Hillel Neuer’s posts tend to see a lot of traction. He takes the fairly dry issues of UN abuses and corruption and finds ways to make them relevant and pop.

One of UN Watch’s key issues is the elevation of regimes that abuse human rights, like China and Pakistan, to leading roles in UN bodies.

There’s no conceivable violation in Neuer’s post. But Facebook, like any lefty institution, uses the strictest and most ruthless standards when going after conservatives and people whose politics it dislikes while refusing to hold its own accountable.

U.S. Judge Blocks Biden’s Federal Employee COVID Vax Mandate

BY AMERICAN FAITH

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/u-s-judge-blocks-bidens-federal-employee-covid-vax-mandate/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Texas judge blocks U.S. government from disciplining employees who failed to comply.

QUICK FACTS:
  • U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown ruled on Friday that Joe Biden can’t require federal employees to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, Reuters reports.
  • Judge Brown said the question was whether Biden could “require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment,” concluding that “under the current state of the law as just recently expressed by the Supreme Court, is a bridge too far.”
  • Brown also said the government could protect public health with less invasive measures, such as masking and social distancing.
  • He worried that the government was going to begin disciplining non-compliant employees imminently, arguing the mandate amounted to a “Hobson’s choice” between their “jobs and their jabs.”
  • Judge Brown wrote in a 20-page injunction that the executive order “amounts to a presidential mandate that all federal employees consent to vaccination against COVID-19 or lose their jobs.” “Because the President’s authority is not that broad, the court will enjoin the second order’s enforcement,” he went on to say.
  • “Regardless of what the conventional wisdom may be concerning vaccination, no legal remedy adequately protects the liberty interests of employees who must choose between violating a mandate of doubtful validity or consenting to an unwanted medical procedure that cannot be undone,” the judge said.
  • “The government has not shown that an injunction, in this case, will have any serious detrimental effect on its fight to stop COVID-19,” he added. “Moreover, any harm to the public interest by allowing federal employees to remain unvaccinated must be balanced against the harm sure to come by terminating unvaccinated workers who provide vital services to the nation.”
WHAT ELSE THE JUDGE SAID:

The case is about “whether the President can, with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment,” Brown wrote, according to The Hill.

OFFICIALS AGREE:
  • Marcus Thornton, foreign State Department service officer and president of Feds for Medical Freedom, said their “fight is far from over” and his group will pursue “every lawful avenue available” to strike down the mandate, Government Executive reports.
  • The group is expecting thousands of its members to join a march in Washington on Jan 23.
  • “Today’s decision by Judge Brown is a victory for the thousands of men and women who want to serve their government without sacrificing their individual rights,” Thornton stated. “The 6,000-plus members of Feds for Medical Freedom want nothing more than to continue their service to this country without being subjected to unconstitutional mandates.”
PSAKI DISAGREES:

White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said 98% of federal workers are vaccinated or have sought medical or religious exemptions, claiming “We are confident in our legal authority,” in response to the judge’s ruling.

BACKGROUND:
  • Judge Brown is based in Galveston, Texas, and was appointed by President Donald Trump.
  • The Biden administration has already filed an appeal on the injunction, according to reports.
  • Biden issued the mandate by executive order in September, but the Supreme Court last week struck down a Biden order that would have forced private sector employers with over 100 workers, along with the U.S. Postal Service, to test or vaccinate their employees for Covid-19.
  • The federal employee case was brought by Feds for Medical Freedom, which filed three different lawsuits against the mandate, as well as an American Federation of Government Employees council that represents workers in the Homeland Security Department’s Federal Protective Service. 

FOIA Request Confirms FBI Working With Pfizer to Target Project Veritas

FOIA Request Confirms FBI Working With Pfizer to Target Project Veritas

fitton doj thumb

DOJ Documents Obtained by Judicial Watch Confirm Existence of Communications Between FBI & Pfizer about Project Veritas investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/doj-documents-obtained-by-judicial-watch-confirm-existence-of-communications/

Amazon is CANCELING pre-orders of James O'Keefe's new book American Muckraker - We are working hard to resolve this issue

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2022/01/20/james-okeefes-new-book-american-muckraker-hammers-powerful-who-control-information-and-ideas-n1551281

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/foia-request-confirms-fbi-working-with-pfizer-to-target-project-veritas/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The FBI and its Deep State controllers are apparently quite concerned about independent journalists who don’t toe their propaganda line.

In November, the agency raided the homes of Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe and his employees to search for “evidence” in the “theft” of Ashley Biden’s diary. She is the daughter of President Joe Biden.

Now, Judicial Watch reports, the FBI is in cahoots with Pfizer, the Big Pharma China Virus vaccine profiteer, to pin something on the outfit.

Even leftist journalists expressed dismay and concern about the raid. They should be more worried now.

FOIA Request

Judicial Watch uncovered the probe in the FBI’s reply to a Freedom of Information request.

That inquiry of December 21 sought “all records of communications, whether by email (on .gov or non.gov email accounts), text message, or instant chat, between officials in the FBI, including but not limited to officials in the offices of the FBI New York Field Office on the one hand, and employees and representatives of Pfizer Inc. on the other hand, regarding Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe and/or Project Veritas.”

It also sought all FBI-Pfizer comms to or from the e-mail domain “@pfizer.com.”

The FBI denied the records. But the denial confirmed that it was targeting PV with the help of the Big Pharma beast. Pfizer, apparently, is exacting revenge for PV’s reports that showed Pfizer’s own scientists doubt the efficacy and wisdom of mass vaccination against the China Virus. One employer called the outfit “evil.”

“The records responsive to your request are law enforcement records,” the agency’s FOIA officer replied:

There is a pending or prospective law enforcement proceeding relevant to these responsive records, and release of the information could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings. Therefore, your request is being administratively closed.

In other words, the FBI confessed it is targeting Project Veritas, and doing so with Pfizer’s help.

Big Pharma is pulling in $65,000 a minute peddling ineffective and potentially dangerous China Virus “vaccines.”

Bourla Confesses

Just days after the raid on the homes of O’Keefe and his employees, Pfizer chieftain Albert Bourla — the foreign-born animal doctor who landed in the United States just 20 years ago and is apparently still unfamiliar with the First Amendment — linked his company not only to the FBI but also the CIA.

In a talk with Atlantic Council Vice President Frederick Kempe, Bourla explained what the company had done to combat damaging “conspiracy theories” about the vaccines:

We were targeted by a lot of, let’s say, dark organizations that you don’t really know [who owns them]. You suspect that there are some countries behind. We were getting a lot of briefings from CIA, from FBI, about cyberattacks that may happen to us, but also about the spread of misinformation.  

Bourla allowed that some of the unvaccinated are legitimately concerned about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines.

“But there is a very small part of professionals [who] circulate, on purpose, misinformation so that they will mislead those that they have concerns [with the vaccine],” he continued. “Those people are criminals. They’re not bad people. They are criminals because they literally cost millions of lives.”

Raid in November

The obvious question is what the FBI and Pfizer are doing about PV and why. We might never know. We can assume one thing. Because Bourla has labeled those who dispute the official vaccine narrative as “criminals,” the FBI had to act. Presumably, that would include mRNA vaccine pioneer Robert M. Malone.

PV’s troubles began in November, with the FBI raid and its suggestion that the outfit stole Ashley Biden’s diary.

In fact, as O’Keefe said, a tipster provided the diary. The guerilla journalism outfit refused to publish it because it could not authenticate its contents.

The author of the diary, believed to be Ashley Biden, said she was molested as a child and took “not appropriate” showers with her father.

Even leftists were concerned about the precedent the FBI raid set.

“I’m sorry, but this is worrying from a press freedom perspective — unless & until DOJ releases evidence Protect Veritas was directly involved in the theft,” tweeted Trevor Timm of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. “Because if there is none, then the raids could very well be a violation of the Privacy Protection Act.”

The Privacy Protection Act protects “any work product materials possessed by a person reasonably believed to have a purpose to disseminate to the public a newspaper, book, broadcast, or another similar form of public communication.”

The Committee to Protect Journalists and the American Civil Liberties Union also worried about the raid. Of course, they tossed in the obligatory denunciation of PV for its “methods.”

We await their commentary on the FBI working with Pfizer. Imagine what the Fourth Estate’s worthies would say if the FBI were working with Pfizer to target the New York Times.

Real America’s Dan Ball With James O’Keefe: PRESIDNT TRUMP SLAMS AT&T FOR AGREEING TO DROP ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK

Call AT&T & DirecTV Today -- Cancel Culture in News is Unacceptable!

Rumble — Don't let woke executives shut down OAN! Let your voices be heard! Call AT&T and DirecTV to demand OAN remains on your channel lineup. Join the movement and stand up for freedom of the press!

Call DirecTV at 800-531-5000!
Call AT&T at 800-288-2020!

KlowdTV:
Watch OAN Live on KlowdTV subscription prices start at $2.50 /mo
https://klowdtv.com

Insanity Wrap: Ivermectin Doctor Suspended, Forced to See Shrink

BY STEPHEN GREEN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2022/01/18/insanity-wrap-ivermectin-doctor-suspended-forced-to-see-shrink-n1550298;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

MIT-educated anti-vaxxer doctor who treated COVID patients with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine has her license suspended and must undergo psychiatric evaluation ‘for spreading misinformation’

Dr. Meryl Nass has had her license to practice medicine in Maine revoked and will undergo mandatory psychiatric evaluation “for spreading misinformation,” according to the Daily Mail.

Insanity Wrap is pro-vax, not anti-vax, like Dr. Nass. Although to be fair, it’s undeniable that the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines has been oversold, now that they’re talking about second, third, and possibly fourth booster shots.

But it’s also clear that Dr. Nass engaged in some questionable medical practices, including “diagnosing” over the phone and lying on medical records (she admits this), and her patients ended up in the hospital.

Sometimes, gentle reader, the headline doesn’t tell the whole story — the details in the Daily Mail writeup are damning if true, and we humbly suggest you read the whole thing.

But…

The State mandating a psychological evaluation for “spreading misinformation” sounds just too much like something from the last years of the Soviet Union.

When it became politically passé to send dissidents to the GULAG, Soviet authorities under then-Party Chairman Leonid Breshnev tried something new: sending dissidents to insane asylums.

The Party has the best interests of the People in mind, you see, so you’d have to be literally crazy to oppose the Party.

Lock’em up and drug’em up in the dirtiest, foulest asylums imaginable.

Welcome to your kinder, gentler totalitarianism.

Fortunately, we aren’t there — not yet.

It’s true that a neurological evaluation is the only way to tell if Nass is truly suffering from dementia, and whether she’s mentally fit to practice.

Insanity Wrap has no problem with that.

What we do have a problem with is the chilling message sent when the stated reason for Nass’s psych eval is her dissent from the Party line.

It looks to us like just one more banana peel on the slippery slope.

“It gives the jab under the skin or it gets back to rehab again,” fictional serial killer Jame Gumb would have said, had he been on Maine’s medical licensing board.

Nass might be suffering from dementia, but who’s the crazy one here?

Biden’s handlers ditch Greece’s EastMed pipeline project in order to appease Turkey

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2022/01/bidens-handlers-ditch-greeces-eastmed-pipeline-project-in-order-to-appease-turkey;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Biden’s handlers: forever projecting weakness on the international stage.

“The US quietly ditches Greece’s EastMed pipeline project to ship Israeli gas to Europe,” by Ragip Soylu, Middle East Eye, January 11, 2022:

The US government silently abandoned an eastern Mediterranean pipeline project that would carry Israeli gas through Cyprus to Europe this week by submitting a non-paper to Athens explaining its reasons, Middle East Eye has learned.

The US non-paper, according to the Greek media, described the project as a “primary source of tension” and something “destabilising” the region by putting Turkey and regional countries at loggerheads.

A non-paper is an unofficial diplomatic correspondence.

A Greek diplomat, speaking anonymously to Middle East Eye, said the media reports were exaggerations.

Greek public broadcaster ERT claimed that the non-paper also listed three reasons to explain why the US no longer supports the project: environmental concerns, lack of economic and commercial viability, and creating tensions in the region.

The project angered Ankara in 2020 after Greece, Israel and the Greek Cypriot administration signed a deal to build a 1,900-km long natural gas pipeline in the eastern Mediterranean, passing through disputed maritime territories claimed by both Turkey and Greece.

The Trump administration and its secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, had been strong supporters of the project, as well as the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum that excludes Turkey, under the pretext that Europe needs to diversify its energy needs vis-a-vis Russia.

The US State Department, now under President Joe Biden, abruptly changed that policy on Sunday and said that Washington was shifting its focus to electricity interconnectors that can support both gas and renewable energy sources….

Thousands of Churches Warn Against Canada’s Ban on Conversion Therapy

BY CHRISTIANITY DAILY

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/thousands-of-churches-warn-against-canadas-ban-on-conversion-therapy/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In Canada, a wave of Christian churches are condemning the recently enacted Bill C-4, a law that criminalizes the act of providing, promoting or advertising conversion therapy. The legislation was unanimously passed by the 44th Parliament and was the first bill to do so. It took effect on January 8.

In response, thousands of clergy in Canada have dedicated their Sunday sermons to denounce the new law, which could criminalize teachings on biblical sexual morality, Fox News reported. Over 4,000 Christian pastors who publicly admitted to wanting to protest the legislation have come together to support an initiative sparked by Liberty Coalition Canada, which was also promulgated in the U.S. by Pastor John MacArthur of Los Angeles.

The controversial legislation, which was fast-tracked through the Canadian Parliament just last month without any lengthy debates, describes the belief that heterosexuality and cisgender identity are preferable as a “myth.” Any type of conversion therapy or counseling that does not support this worldview, under Canadian law, can now be punished with a five-year jail sentence.

Critics of Canada’s ban on conversion therapy, among other new rules under the just-enacted legislation, claim that the language of the bill is too broad and can even cover personal conversations. Some pastors who were arrested by authorities in Canada for violating COVID restrictions on gatherings spoke out and said the law will enable religious persecution.

“The biblical gospel is a message of conversion, whereby Christ causes sinners to be born-again, thus converting them from sinful propensities to godliness,” Canadian pastor Jacob Reaume of Trinity Bible Chapel, whose church incurred more than $100,000 in fines in 2021 for refusing to comply with COVID restrictions, told the Daily Wire. “The bill’s language is vague enough that many think it might criminalize a biblical call to forsake sodomitic propensities to embrace righteousness.”

Another Canadian pastor Tim Stephens of Fairview Baptist Church, who was detained in a maximum-security facility in the summer of 2021 for refusing to close his church, argued that the new law “promotes a truly harmful type of ‘conversion’ using puberty-blocking chemicals, surgeries to remove functioning breasts and sexual organs, regular hormone treatments, and truly harmful counseling that has led to exorbitant suicide rates.”

Stephens called upon Christians not only in Canada but in the United States as well, to fight the “spiritual battle” against the “strongholds” and the “opinions and philosophies that are raised against the knowledge of God.” He lamented that the Constitution will not be able to prevent the advancement of “these godless ideologies.”

“Revival and reformation is needed,” Stephens remarked. He added that the Church must lead the way, but that in the United States like in Canada, there are “only a few voices sounding the alarm and speaking truth to culture.”

Other pastors are also warning against the impending doom these ideologies are causing in the west. Pastor Andrew Brunson, a missionary who was unjustly imprisoned in 2016 and caused a conflict between Turkey and the U.S., said during his 2018 release that religious persecution is coming soon to Western countries. He now works as a special advisor for religious freedom at Family Research Council, where he observes the developments in North America and calls Canada’s ban on conversion therapy “a dark wave of hostility” that will crash onto the church.

Doctors Warn of Vaccine Damages in Patients: ‘People Are Being Deceived’ (Video)

BY AMY MEK

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/doctors-warn-of-vaccine-damages-in-patients-people-are-being-deceived-video/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

They have had more deaths from this one shot since it has rolled out than they have in the last thirty years in VAERS reporting.

Canadian Doctors Stephen Malthouse and Charles Hoffe are on a road trip across the country to raise awareness about the dangers of taking the vaccine. “The rollout of the vaccine is having a devastating effect on the population. This is the most dangerous vaccine ever rolled out,” Hoffe said. “And now they are coming for our children.”

More and more people are being injured every day from taking the “vaccines,” reports the doctors. Yet, despite the shocking numbers, most doctors are not reporting the injuries or even questioning the safety of the “vaccines.” The few medical professionals asking questions and expressing concern are ostracized and labeled as pushing “vaccine hesitancy.”

Vaccine Injuries

I now have ten patients in my small practice who are literally disabled after their first shot, revealed Dr. Hoffe.

Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab.

According to the doctor, the blood clots also explain his patients’ neurological disorders and lung problems. “These stings cause permanent damage. And the damage gets bigger after every shot.”

Injuries Unreported

The reporting system for vaccine side effects of the American Centers for Disease Control, VAERS, counts almost one million confirmed side effects for the new Covid vaccines. 

Doctor Malthouse explains that the number of cases registered with VAERS “has been shown only to represent 1% of what is happening in real life.” For example, there have been 20,000 deaths (almost 50% of them reported within the first 24 hours of the shot), 100,000 hospitalizations, and over 30,000 severely disabled people who are permanently unable to work. As a result, the actual number of people adversely impacted by the vaccines is more likely to be closer to 100 times these actual reported numbers.

Despite the shocking numbers of deaths and injuries, Dr. Malthouse is questioning why The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has ignored all of these red flags. The Doctor states,

They have had more deaths from this one shot since it has rolled out than they have in the last thirty years in VAERS reporting. And that is only 1%. So we can imagine what the real death rate is of the shot. It is astronomical; in fact, it is pretty much a vertical line since that shot has been rolled out.

Total Failure

The doctors hope that people realize that they have been misled and misinformed. “Clearly, these vaccines don’t work. In British Columbia, 90 percent of the population has been vaccinated, but the corona restrictions remain in place and are even being tightened. Therefore, the rollout of the vaccine has turned out to be a total failure.”

Watch the following interview by Press For Truth with Dr. Charles Hoffe and Dr. Stephen Malthouse:

See selected coverage on coronavirus tyranny:

Shocking Escape: Covid Whistleblower Abused in UK Hospital Rescued by Friends

BY FAYE HIGBEE

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/shocking-escape-covid-whistleblower-abused-in-uk-hospital-rescued-by-friends-interview/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“I honestly thought I was going to die in there.” John O’ Looney

John O’ Looney is an independent coroner and funeral home director in the UK. When RAIR Foundation USA interviewed Mr. O’Looney back in September, he was adamantly against the vaccine mandates because of the shocking death toll apparently caused by the “vaccines.” Recently, he exposed the pressures coming against medical officials to falsify death certificates to inflate the number of Covid deaths artificially.

Dying with a positive Covid test and dying from Covid are two completely different things. The PCR tests used to detect Covid are inherently flawed, a fact that even the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) concedes.

O’Looney is well known for exposing the hospitals in the UK ordering nurses to administer a lethal dosage of a medication called midazolam to Covid patients, leading to even more deaths. Then on December 16, he reportedly developed Covid symptoms and was rushed to Milton Keynes, a UK hospital.

In a RAIR interview with Dr. Sam Dubè, a Canadian doctor who learned what happened to John O’Looney, Dr. Dubé revealed the nature of his hospitalization and how a team of friends rescued him over and above the objections of the hospital staff.

Now in a hospital ICU on 10 liters of oxygen, O’Looney was confronted with the very problems he already knew existed. Hospital administrators demanded he signs forms to allow them to treat him with experimental treatments. O’Looney, however, refused Remdesivir (developed initially as a failed Ebola drug), which can cause a shutdown of the kidneys. All while he was not able to breathe well.

You can hear about how he was rescued in the following RAIR interview with Dr. Sam Dubè

After his ordeal and healing at home, O’Looney issued this statement, which reads in part:

There were no excess deaths in 2020 – it is that simple, and nothing will change my mind all the minds of those in the industry who have their eyes open to this lie – and there are many.

The reality is the death rate only soared the moment they began putting needles into arms in January 2021 You can believe it or not but I was one of the people picking up these poor souls and a huge amount of them.

Fast forward and now we see a huge increase in thrombosis related deaths exclusively in jab recipients.

I was recently admitted to the ICU in Milton Keynes hospital after developing Covid symptoms.

I took three lateral flow tests whilst there and was told at the time I was not positive only to be told later on the ward I was positive so clearly it was inconclusive so I will say I felt and feel terrible still.

But fundamentally for me things to change very much in the hospitals and one of the very first people to visit me bedside was a representative from Oxford University funded by the gates foundation begging me to trial new medicines (whilst being unable to look me in the eye) not even related to Covid – naturally I declined.

I was told I would die and these medicines would be my last chance; again, I declined and stuck to my guns.

Trust me, that’s not an easy thing to do laying there in a hospital ward on your own, unable to breathe easily, and denied any family support or visits.

It is deliberate, and it is to break you. There seems to be more emphasis on encouraging me to be a guinea pig than actually treating me. I looked across at other people in the ward with sadness who were all vaccinated without exception. In fact, to my knowledge, I was the only one in the ward unvaccinated – they will probably be all gone now… And I was reminded “how selfish I was” even in the ambulance on the way there, I shit you not…. The Hospital environment has fundamentally changed beyond recognition for me, and while there were shadows and echoes of what it once was, it’s a very different place now. I suspect it is already being fully privatized; we just haven’t been told…

I feel very fortunate to have escaped hospital (I never dreamt I would have lived to say that) with the help of family in friends.

I was initially sceptical about Covid but I can confirm it’s validity and it is very nasty.But I can also tell you it is 100% man-made this is not a natural virus and this is an attack on all of us – it’s a bio weapon.

My advice to you moving forward is network, prepare and under all circumstances try to avoid going into hospital because I suspect many of the poor souls I saw in there will never ever leave having become test tubes for the Gates Foundation.

The sinister whispering the secrecy and the guilty looks amongst certain members of staff spoke volumes to me It was honestly very chilling and traumatising just seeing how it has changed – especially when I asked to leave.

The tactics used to try and force me to stay were sadistic to say the least and that is as much detail as I can go into except to say I feel very very lucky to have gotten out.

See selected coverage on Covid tyranny:

Soviet Canada: Doctor Locked in Psych Ward Who Exposed Stillbirth Explosion in ‘Vaccinated’ Moms

Rumble — In November, Dr. Melvin Bruchet and his friend, Dr. Daniel Nagase, filed criminal charges against elected and appointed BC government officials over a possible conflict of interest regarding provincial lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. The doctors exposed a severe spike in stillbirths at a Vancouver hospital. The women were injected with the experimental Covid "vaccine" in all cases. In December 2021, the Canadian government targeted Dr. Melvin Bruchet and unlawfully placed him in detention against his will. 

BY FAYE HIGBEE

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/soviet-canada-doctor-locked-in-psych-ward-who-exposed-stillbirths-explosion-in-vaccinated-moms-interview/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Soviet Union often claimed that dissidents had “mental issues” and would lock them up in asylums, keep them drugged, and eventually they would die.

In November, Dr. Melvin Bruchet and his friend, Dr. Daniel Nagase, filed criminal charges against elected and appointed Candian government officials in British Columbia over a possible conflict of interest regarding provincial lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. The doctors exposed a severe spike in stillbirths at a Vancouver hospital. The women were injected with the experimental Covid “vaccine” in all cases. In December 2021, reminiscent of the Soviet Union’s treatment of dissidents, the Canadian government targeted Dr. Melvin Bruchet and unlawfully placed him in detention against his will.

Stillbirths Explode in Canada 

In November 2021, RAIR Foundation USA reported that stillbirths in fully “vaccinated” women are exploding in Canada,

….in Waterloo, Ontario, 86 cases have been reported in six months, compared to typically five to six per year, says doctor Daniel Nagase. “That is highly unusual.”

At Lions Gate Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 stillbirths were recorded over 24 hours, reported the doctor. Until recently, Dr. Nagase worked at an Alberta hospital but said he was fired after treating three covid patients with ivermectin at the Rimbey Hospital and Care Centre.” 

Soviet Style Detention

On December 8, Dr. Bruchet had an argument with a tenant over loud music in his apartment building (a relatively common occurrence). It is unclear whether the tenant reported him as a candidate for the mental health act or someone else. Suddenly, Dr. Bruchet was targeted by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

While Dr. Nagase was being interviewed in his home, three RCMP squad cars and six RCMP officers descended on Dr. Bruchet and hauled him off in handcuffs for a “psych evaluation.” 

The first diagnosis made by the hospital was “frontal lobe dementia” after taking a PET scan. According to Dr. Nagase, such a situation normally does not warrant detention – just diagnosis and sending the individual home. Since Bruchet is 81, anyone outside the situation might assume that was correct. It was not.

Dr. Nagase was apprised of the situation and managed to get him out of the Psych ward on a day pass with the promise of returning on his own recognizance. Dr. Bruchet returned due to the hospital’s threats they would send the police after him.

The hospital then did a second evaluation and diagnosed him with “mania,” a condition that presumes the person may have outbursts and perhaps even be dangerous. They then took away the doctor’s phone access.

Dr. Nagase was concerned that the hospital might have given him Abilify, a medicine often used to treat mental and mood disorders that should not be given to elderly patients. In addition, the doctor was concerned because Dr. Bruchet was abnormally slurring his words. A common side effect of the powerful anti-psychotic medication.

The Soviet Union notoriously used psychiatric medicine to discredit dissidents. The Soviets often claimed that dissidents had “mental issues” and would lock them up in asylums, keep them drugged, and eventually they would die. How is this any different?

The question remains: was Dr. Bruchet unlawfully detained because he exposed the connection of stillbirths to the Covid vaccines? Or because he argued with his tenant over loud music? Or was Dr. Bruchet’s age a convenient excuse? “Dr. Mel,” as he is affectionately known, practiced medicine for many years in British Columbia.

The following is an exclusive interview with Dr. Sam Dube, a Canadian doctor who informs RAIR of the troubling situation:

 

Family Fights for Ivermectin for Dying Loved One, Courts Say ‘No’

BY KEVIN DOWNEY, JR.

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/kevindowneyjr/2022/01/16/family-fights-for-ivermectin-for-dying-loved-one-courts-say-no-n1549942;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Pisano is dying of COVID-19. He’s been on a ventilator in Florida for 28 days now at the Mayo Clinic. His doctors give him a less than 5% chance of survival.

His wife and son want him treated with the COVID plan recommended by Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). It involves using ivermectin. They want Dr. Eduardo Balbona to treat their family member. The Mayo Clinic refused. The family went to court, hoping the court would force the clinic to allow an outside doctor to treat Pisano. Judge Marianne Aho decided against it.

They appealed that decision and lost that court battle, too. They don’t get to decide what course to take for the 70-year-old Pisano.

The Mayo Clinic asserted that the FLCCC COVID battle plan doesn’t fall in line with their COVID protocol, which at this point appears to be to leave Pisano on a ventilator and hope for the best. This, despite hundreds of stories of people using ivermectin to survive COVID.

Ivermectin is a drug used for livestock but it’s also been used for decades on humans. Numerous peer-reviewed studies show ivermectin can help people with the Bat Soup flu.

Related: Here’s What Happened When I Caught COVID (Sorry, Joe, I Didn’t Die)

Why doesn’t a family have any say in the care of a loved one? More importantly, why would the Mayo Clinic allow people to die rather than try ivermectin? What’s stopping them?

For starters, perhaps the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA famously and foolishly tweeted this in August of 2021:

Let’s also not forget that Dr. Malone said on Joe Rogan’s podcast that ivermectin, when purchased in bulk, costs less than 01. cent per dose. How can big pharma make millions of dollars at that price?

FACT-O-RAMA! Rogan used monoclonal antibodies and ivermectin, among other meds, when he beat the Hong Kong Fluey.

Dr. Balbona is a former physician at the U.S. Capitol, where he treated members of Congress and the Supreme Court. He has had a lot of success with ivermectin and the FLCCC therapeutic suggestions, though he admits to tweaking dosages. He stated he has cured “dozens and dozens” of seriously ill COVID patients.

He also faces an ongoing assault against his practices, even though he’s been successful. He frequently comes to his office and hears messages like this on his voicemail,

Your license should be revoked, you worthless piece of garbage. You are killing people, not helping them, and to harass the Mayo Clinic, because you are not good enough to be their doctor is disgusting. Disgusting. You and doctors like you should all be banned from society. Shame on you. Disgusting. Goodbye and good riddance. I hope you get COVID. Goodbye.

If nothing else, the left has done a phenomenal job of brainwashing their sheep into believing everything they want them to believe.

Remember, Michigan Democrat Rep. Karen Whitsett praised Trump and hydroxychloroquine for saving her life when she had COVID, and her party censured her.

FACT-O-RAMA! Ivermectin has been approved for use against COVID in 22 countries.

The battle against ivermectin is mind-boggling. It’s helped save a lot of people from COVID worldwide. Yet the left not only won’t accept that they openly shame people who use it and survive. Big Tech is booting people off of YouTube and Twitter for daring to question “science” incarnate, Dr. Fauci.

Biden has been pushing for vaccine mandates for almost everyone, except illegal immigrants and welfare recipients, the latter of whom are among the least vaccinated.

The Supreme Court recently spanked Biden and his attempt to mandate vaccines.

Watch this video of President Brain Fog as he tells people who stand up and fight his vaccine mandate nonsense to “have at it:”

They “had at it,” Joe. You lost. Now, let people have ivermectin.

Stephanie Hamill with Lt. Col. Stu Scheller

SENT TO THE BRIG, IMPRISONED FOR 8 DAYS DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE

MARINE OFFICER WHO CRITICIZED LEADERSHIP FOR AFGHANISTAN WITHDRAWAL DISCHARGED

Ronald McDonald House Evicts Unvaxxed Family with Four-Year-Old Son Battling Cancer

BY JON FLEETWOOD

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/ronald-mcdonald-house-evicts-unvaxxed-family-with-four-year-old-son-battling-cancer/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Under new policy, everyone five years and older must get at least the first dose of the experimental Covid-19 vaccine.

QUICK FACTS:
  • Ronald McDonald House, a nonprofit charity organization, has announced it will relocate unvaccinated residents by the end of the month.
  • Everyone five and older must be vaccinated in order to stay at Ronald McDonald House in British Columbia and Yukon, CityNews reports.
  • The charity said on Wednesday it would move children and families under its care to alternate housing if they are not vaccinated against Covid-19 by Jan 31, some of the listed alternatives including hotels or similar charity facilities.
  • A video recently posted to social media shows a father confronting staff regarding the new mandate, in it the man claiming his son who has Leukemia was being evicted due to his vaccination status.
  • A staff member seen in the video does not provide any suggestions that the organization will help the family find alternative accommodation, notes CityNews.
WHAT RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SAID:
  • Ronald McDonald House later issued a statement saying its family services team and social workers will work to find alternate housing for families who refuse to get everyone over the age of five vaccinated by the deadline, according to CityNews.
  • “On the recommendation of public health, the 14 member Board of Directors made the decision to mandate vaccinations for everyone working, visiting, or staying at RMH BC & Yukon to ensure we meet the highest standards of health and safety and protect the vulnerable population we serve,” the emailed statement reads.
  • “We appreciate that this policy will impact those who have made a decision not to vaccinate however, the overall health and welfare of all our residents is our primary concern.”
WHAT THE FATHER SAID:
  • Austin Furgason, a father-of-two from Kelowna, British Columbia, shared a video on Facebook on Tuesday showing him confronting an administrator at the Ronald McDonald House in Vancouver, where his family has been staying while his four-year-old son, Jack, according to The Daily Mail.
  • Jack is undergoing treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
  • Mr. Furgason called the mandate “some kind of crazy evil like I’ve never seen in my life.”
  • “I just want to get this straight: by the end of the month, my four-year-old boy with Leukemia is getting evicted because we don’t have a vaccine?” he asks in the video, as the administrator replies that the eviction would not apply to his son (who is under five) but rather to his parents if they are unvaccinated.
  • “You are evicting kids with Leukemia,” he said. “It’s not just us. We have talked with other families in the same boat.”
  • “I was in shock when I received the eviction letter, and I am still in shock,” the Kelowna husband and father said, notes Toronto Sun, “Even Fox News wanted me to come on.”
  • “It’s not OK in our view,” said Furgason. “We think it’s pretty messed up.”
  • Reports say a fundraiser on GoFundMe for Austin and Lindsay Furgason was started shortly following the video was uploaded to Facebook, as of Wednesday the fundraising is $73,623 for their son’s cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND:
  • Ronald McDonald House sent letters to its resident families informing them of the mandate on Monday, notes The Washington Examiner.
  • Ronald McDonald House Charities—founded in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1974—runs many hundreds of programs benefiting sick children and their families in 62 countries.
  • The video of Furgason’s confrontation with the RMHBC administrator went viral on Twitter, being viewed more than 721,000 times as of Wednesday.

________________________________________________________________

Quebec’s UnVaxxed Tax, Judge SUSPENDS DAD’S VISITATION & 4 Year Old Cancer Patient EVICTED FROM RMH!

A Quebec Superior Court judge has suspended a father's right to see his child based on his unvaccinated status and also because he is what the court refers to as a “conspiracy theorist”. Meanwhile the Quebec government is also now suggesting that you pay up or jab up as they prepare to pass new legislation that will allow them to tax the unvaxxed! And finally a BC father and his family is facing eviction from Ronald McDonald House where his 4 year old son receives leukaemia care all because the parents still have questions about the experimental Covid-19(84) jab that have gone unanswered. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth covers these 3 breaking stories that once again prove without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19(84) nightmare we are all living through has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control!

Supreme Court Rules 6 to3 on osha Vaccine Mandate

BY CHRIS QUEEN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/chris-queen/2022/01/13/breaking-supreme-court-rules-on-vaccine-mandate-n1549122;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Thursday afternoon, the Supreme Court weighed in on Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate for companies with more than 100 employees. The Court ruled with a 6-3 margin to strike down the OSHA mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees, but it did allow the mandate for federally funded healthcare agencies with a 5-4 vote.

The Associated Press reports:

The court’s conservative majority concluded the administration overstepped its authority by seeking to impose the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s vaccine-or-test rule on U.S. businesses with at least 100 employees. More than 80 million people would have been affected.

“OSHA has never before imposed such a mandate. Nor has Congress. Indeed, although Congress has enacted significant legislation addressing the COVID–19 pandemic, it has declined to enact any measure similar to what OSHA has promulgated here,” the conservatives wrote in an unsigned opinion.

The conclusion on the per curium brief in favor of striking down the mandate concluded that OSHA’s powers are limited to regulating the workplace, yet COVID-19 affects more than just the workplace, which means that the pandemic falls outside of OSHA’s purview.

Read the full text of the Court’s per curium here.

In November, Biden ordered federal contractors, employers with 100 or more employees, and healthcare workers to force their employees to either show proof of vaccination or be tested weekly and wear masks to work. Since then, employers have been scrambling to figure out how to proceed as the deadline loomed for compliance while the issue was tied up in the courts. On Monday, the mandate officially went into effect, with no guidance from the Supreme Court on how they should proceed. Many companies felt they had no choice but to begin enforcement of the policy.

The Biden administration’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) cited a provision in OSHA regulations that it said gave broad authority to the federal government to protect employees at private companies from workplace hazards. Detractors said the language in the regulations was never intended to be used to mandate widespread vaccinations.

States immediately began filing lawsuits claiming the mandate was unconstitutional. A Louisiana federal court swiftly blocked the mandate. But in December, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the lower court only had the authority to block the mandate in the states that had filed suit. A federal court in Texas then issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of the mandate for the states that filed lawsuits.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reinstated the vaccine mandate in mid-December, prompting a flurry of petitions to the Supreme Court for relief. The Biden administration petitioned the Supreme Court demanding a nationwide stay of the injunctions, pending a full review by the lower courts. This past Friday, the Court held an emergency hearing on the mandate for private employers as well as the one for healthcare workers.

As more details and analysis come down the line, we’ll share more with you. But in the meantime, breathe a sigh of relief that the vaccine mandate is effectively dead.

Special thanks to Paula Bolyard for her background work on this story.

 

Colonel punished for encouraging parents to research vaccines

Rumble — A commandant of a Marine leadership academy may lose his job after encouraging parents to look into possible side effects of COVID-19 vaccines before giving them to their children. OAN's Christina Bobb sat down with him to discuss the situation.

1 16 17 18 19 20 40