There’s a group of people who control what you are allowed to see, what you read, what you watch, the posts you engage with. You haven’t heard of them, you don’t know their names. But they determine, through methods both direct and indirect, whether you are allowed to be exposed to particular messages. Their decisions can bankrupt companies, silence voices and fundamentally shift cultural norms. Who are these people and how do they do this? Well, at the top level you have a network of global elite and its creed… a universal framework full of guidelines and ratings designed to enforce approved narratives and punish disapproved ones.
Category: New World Order/Bilderberg
Is Civil War Coming Soon to America? Author Explains How the Left is ‘Pushing’ for Conflict
Terrorism expert Robert Spencer discusses cultural and political terrorism in the U.S.A. and his new book, "The Sumter Gambit: How the Left is Trying to Foment Civil War."
These Global Organizations Want to Control You
DR. STEVE TURLEY: The World Order of George Soros
The World Economic Forum Faces COLLAPSE amidst Global Elite CHAOS!!!
The Soros Activist at the Heart of California’s $800 Billion Slave Reparations
George Soros succeeds in turning black people against each other.
Citizens Club of Springfield, IL Conversation with IL Supreme Court Justice Lisa Holder White
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
In 2021, the Equal Justice Institute celebrated a settlement with the University of California in which the system agreed to stop using SAT and ACT test scores, objective merit-based metrics, in college admissions, until 2025. The racialist lawsuit claimed that test scores violate the California Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause as “indicators” of race.
The “SAT is a barrier to equal opportunity”, Lisa Holder, a counsel with the Equal Opportunity Institute, claimed.
Like a lot of destructive leftist activists, Lisa Holder received a Soros Justice Fellowship from the radical billionaire’s Open Society Foundation. The similarity in the names of the Equal Justice Society and Soros’ Open Society Foundation is more than strictly coincidental as Soros was one of the EJS’ founding donors.
Beyond drawing six figures in compensation from the Equal Justice Society, Lisa Holder has her own law practice that focuses on racial issues and occasionally draws a check for teaching at UCLA.
Holder is also a member of California’s Reparations Task Force which has proposed to bankrupt the state and its taxpayers with as much as $800 billion in racial reparations in a state that was never a slave state. Among the various aging machine politicians (along with Kamala’s minister) who staff the task force, she may be the most important and effective racial campaigner on it.
Lisa Holder had fought to end California’s ban on racial discrimination through affirmative action in a proposition backed by $1 million from George Soros’ Open Society Policy Center, along with former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, the wife of Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and major corporations and nonprofits. Despite all the billionaires and companies in her corner, Californians turned down the proposition to legalize racial discrimination.
What voters wouldn’t go for, California’s extremist one-party legislature did. Holder claims credit for drafting two bills, AB 241 and 242, which mandated indoctrination in racist woke ideologies for doctors, lawyers, and judges. Implicit bias training has been linked to all sorts of racist ideas and discriminatory practices associated with critical race theory including ‘white privilege’. It has also been shown to encourage medical professionals to dispense treatment and prioritize triage based on race rather than medical need potentially using racial discrimination to kill people.
AB 242 claimed that “all persons possess implicit biases”, but that “most people have an implicit bias that disfavors African Americans and favors Caucasian Americans” and “other socially stigmatized groups, such as Native Americans, immigrants, women, people with disabilities, Muslims, and members of the LGBTQ community”.
Conveniently, Lisa Holder is also a “recognized racial justice scholar and equity consultant”.
The reparations proposal is a whole lot bigger than legalizing racial discrimination through affirmative action or forcing doctors and lawyers to hear about their white privilege.
Racial reparations had also been a longtime Soros cause. In 2021, former Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, since dispatched as Biden’s ambassador to India after an aide’s sexual misconduct scandal, revealed that the Soros network had offered funding for a racial reparations program in Los Angeles. The billionaire’s extremist network has also funded a variety of reparations activists including Nkechi Taifa, a senior policy analyst in the Soros network, described as a “principal player and catalyst in the reparations movement” and a “founding member of the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America” (N’COBRA)
Taifa is also a commissioner of the National African-American Reparations Commission (NAARC). Another NAARC commissioner, Cheryl Grills, is also a member of the California Reparations Task Force. Jeremiah Wright, the bigoted Obama mentor who cheered 9/11, is an honorary member of NAARC.
While it was a foregone conclusion that the panel would vote themselves millions of dollars, the real controversy within the reparations movement and the dozens of organizations that have sprung up to lobby for free money was whether it would be limited to the descendants of slaves or would be given out to all black people or perhaps all Africans: which might include Elon Musk.
The California task force brought in members from both camps. The National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America has vocally argued that all black people should get reparations. NAARC claims support for this position from BLM and other racist hate groups. That is also N’COBRA’s position. However, groups like the National Assembly of American Slavery Descendants and the American Descendants of Slavery have forcefully made the argument that only the descendants of slaves should be eligible for a check. This is at least legally tenable.
In January, the split commission voted to limit reparations to descendants of slavery by 5 to 4. That is the position of the more established black community and it was championed by chairwoman Kamilah Moore, but opposed by Lisa Holder and Nkechi Taifa. And the debate is still going on with pro-race activists claiming that tracing genealogy is unworkable and that black immigrants should be eligible for reparations because America is so fundamentally racist.
With a $22.5 billion deficit in the state, the difference between limiting reparations to those who can prove that they descended from slaves and everyone with the right skin tone could be massive. The $800 billion estimate widely discussed is based on the state’s over 2 million black residents. Limiting reparations to the descendants of slaves would produce a smaller, but likely still wildly unworkable number.
Cheryl Grills of NAARC condemned the “preoccupation with a dollar figure”, but the dollar figure remains the best argument for those advocating for limiting reparations to those whose ancestors were enslaved along with their contention that purely race-based reparations would be shut down by the courts. The Soros network’s activists however remain committed to universal reparations and $800 billion in payouts.
While the debate has largely played out within the black community, the intervention of the Soros network on the side of the most destructive and impossible position is typical.
The Soros networks, like all leftists, seek destruction, not healing, and making reparations as universal and as unworkable as possible would stimulate the most outrage and anger.
And that would further divide the races and tear apart not only California but America.
George Soros has dedicated his life to dividing people of all nations and backgrounds. With California’s racial reparations, the activists he has supported have turned black people against each other.
Globalists Finally Say It Out Loud: Sex With Minors Is OK — and the UN Is Onboard
BY KEVIN DOWNEY, JR.
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
International legal “experts” — backed by the United Nations — have released a report stating sex with minors is perfectly acceptable.
“Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law,” according to the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). You can read that part for yourself on page 12.
FACT-O-RAMA! The pedo-loving report is called “The 8 March Principles for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Criminal Law Proscribing Conduct Associated with Sex, Reproduction, Drug Use, HIV, Homelessness and Poverty.”
The shocking legal “recommendations” were released purposely last month on March 8, which is International Women’s Day.
Like most global tyranny, this pedo-riffic report comes disguised as a virtue:
Today, on International Women’s Day, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) launched a new set of legal principles elaborated by jurists for a human rights-based approach to criminal laws proscribing conduct associated with sex, reproduction, drug use, HIV, homelessness and poverty.
Some of the groups involved in this five-year endeavor of evil include the usual suspects of global Marxism: the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the UN Development Programme (UNDP), and of course, no global nod to legal pederasty would be complete without the World Health Organization (WHO).
For those of us paying attention, watching the global commies try to normalize sex with children comes as no surprise.
The report does not call for decriminalizing sex with kids — yet — nor does it recommend an age at which kids can consent to sex. However, it does suggest children have the legal “right” and the mental capacity to agree to sex.
FACT-O-RAMA! Manhattan’s commie District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, recently offered a child rapist a sentence of only 30 days. The miscreant responded by going on to commit five sex crimes in about 90 minutes.
Related: The Trans Movement Will Be the Catalyst for Normalizing Pedophilia
Angry parents — or as the Department of Justice would call them, “domestic terrorists” — around the nation have been finding pornographic books in their kids’ school libraries and reading them aloud at school board meetings to make a point: stop sexualizing kids.
The grotesque push from the far-left to normalize sex with kids isn’t new, and having an international clique of legal wizards push the agenda is shocking and yet expectable.
Speaking of which, why can’t we see Jeffrey Epstein’s client list? Maybe because it contains the names of global “elite” pedos, some of whom may be behind the vile legal “recommendations.
Marjorie Taylor Greene: Bragg is trying to please George Soros
SEE: https://ellacruz.org/2020/05/09/soros-the-reason-behind-tyrannical-judges-sheriffs/
George Soros-backed groups have spent $40 million to elect 75 progressive prosecutors over the last decade - meaning one in FIVE Americans now live in areas covered by his criminal justice reformers
- The 91-year-old billionaire philanthropist has for the last 30 years given away huge chunks of his fortune through his Open Society Foundations
- Soros's networks have worked to support left-leaning district attorneys across the country, pouring significant funds into the races
- Among the major recipients are the Los Angeles district attorney, George Gascon, and the Philadelphia DA, Larry Krasner
- Jason Johnson, president of the pro-police action group Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund (LELDF), accused Soros in a new report of harming the country
- He said the DAs were working 'to quietly transform the criminal justice system for the worse, promoting dangerous policies and anti-police narratives'
On Thursday's "The Chris Salcedo Show," Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene slams Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for going after former President Donald Trump and connects the prosecutor to left-wing billionaire George Soros.
Shining Light On The Globalist’s Plan To Control Your Bank Account
The controlled takedown of America has been a plan for a long time. If you control the money you control the people. It’s the destruction of capitalism using socialism so they can usher in globalism with no freedom of any kind.
Michael Rectenwald: The Rise of Corporate Fascism
Rep. Ronny Jackson: House Probing Covid Origins, Gov’t Pandemic Response~Gov. Officials Texts Prove Covid Was A Scam To Control You
Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Tex.) discusses the jurisdiction of the newly formed Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Covid origins, issues with Covid vaccines, and his Foreign Adversary Management Risk (FARM) Act to address the buy-off of American land by the Chinese Communist Party.
Bombshell: Gov. Officials Texts Prove Covid Was A Scam To Control You
Government lies and fear-mongering tricked many people into believing there was a deadly virus about to get them. Now you can see for yourself the texts that prove it.
Stew Peters WITH Alex Jones: Globalists War Against Humanity
Klaus Schwab Believes A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) Will Make Globalists “Masters of the World”~Elon Musk Torches One-World Government at World Government Summit
BY LUIS MIGUEL
SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/klaus-schwab-believes-ai-will-make-globalists-masters-of-the-world/;
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
Could they make their intentions any more clear?
Klaus Schwab, chairman of the globalist World Economic Forum, said at the World Government Summit in Dubai this week that as mankind advances toward innovative new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), synthetic biology, and the metaverse, those who control these technologies will become “masters of the world.”
“Our life in 10 years from now will be completely different, very much affected, and those who master these technologies, in some way, will be the masters of the world,” Schwab told his audience.
The German WEF head, known for coining the term “The Great Reset,” also spoke of his “deep concern” that these emergent technologies “will escape our power to master [them]” if states do not implement globalist systems of governance.
“You cannot catch up with the new technologies, you have to be a front-runner because otherwise, you will be on the losing outside,” he added.
Schwab also popularized the concept of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” — in part by writing a book with that title — which involves the aforementioned technologies. In his book, Schwab argues that the new era of technology will include transhumanism, which he defined as “a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.”
“Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us — they will become part of us,” wrote Schwab in his book. “Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices — from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets — will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brains.”
Schwab also used his speech in Dubai to advance his economic vision, which he terms “stakeholder capitalism.”
Said the WEF chairman:
What is absolutely essential is this cooperation of the different stakeholders of global society: government brings direct power, business brings the innovative power, civil society brings the concerned power, academia brings the power of truth, and maybe I should add media, which brings the critical dimension in this dialogue.
We need all those stakeholders to shape together the future.
Of course, what Schwab is describing is the same elitist system that organizations like The John Birch Society have for decades warned is the end goal of the globalists: A system not governed by popular sovereignty and constitutions, but by the will of the self-described “elites” in business, academia, government, the media, and Big Tech.
While there are potential benefits and uses for many emerging technologies, the WEF crowd sees them as nothing more than instruments of control.
In particular, the idea of transhumanism opens up the possibility of wielding not only political power over the masses but direct control over their minds and bodies.
This can be seen in a recent WEF presentation in Davos, during which the organization showed a video concept for brain-wave monitoring technology that is said to allow employers to observe how hard employees are working. It can also be used to determine if workers are distracted, and even if they have feelings of attraction to one another.
“You can not only tell whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, but you can discriminate between the kinds of things they are paying attention to,” the presenter said. “Whether they’re doing something like central tasks, like programming, peripheral tasks like writing documentation, or unrelated tasks like surfing social media or online browsing.”
The presentation displayed various other uses of the technology, such as waking people up if they begin to fall asleep at work by means of an MIT-made haptic scarf that gives employees “a little buzz.” It could even tell employers if employees have “amorous feelings” for their co-workers.
These concepts are not new. From Elon Musk’s “neural link” that directly connects the brain to computers (and is already working on animals), to Mark Zuckerberg’s so-called metaverse, to the installation of electrodes in the brain, to genetically engineered viruses to activate certain areas of the brain — the research on merging humans with machines has been going on for decades and raises major questions for the future of humanity.
But what is cause for concern is that now these technologies are coming closer than ever before to becoming reality. Individuals, societies, and governments will have to grapple with all of the moral ramifications they bring.
If individuals — like Klaus Schwab — who have made no secret about their desire to destroy our freedoms are salivating at the thought of having their hands on these technologies, maybe we should pause to consider whether they will truly be a net benefit to humanity.
_________________________________________________________________
Elon Musk Torches One-World Government at World Government Summit
Far-Left Koch and Soros operatives mount lobbying campaign to revive Iran nuclear deal
BY ROBERT SPENCER
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
Few people were aware of just how bad Obama’s Iran nuke deal really was. The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Iran explains some of the deal’s very worst aspects:
1. The expiration dates: While the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the agreement is called, did include real restrictions on Iran’s nuclear activities, these were all slated to expire in the near future. The agreement anticipated the “conclusion of consideration of the Iran nuclear issue by the U.N. Security Council 10 years after the Adoption Day” — that is, the adoption of the agreement itself on July 14, 2015. It added: “There will be no additional heavy water reactors or accumulation of heavy water in Iran for 15 years.” But what about after that? The agreement didn’t say. Apparently, at that point, Iran would be free to build nuclear weapons with no objections from anyone.
2. The delay in inspections: The day after the conclusion of the JCPOA, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu observed: “Iran has two paths to the bomb: One if they keep the deal, the other if they cheat on the deal.” They could get the bomb even if they kept the deal because the JCPOA contained the provision that Iran could delay requested International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections for up to 24 days — ample time to clean up for the inspectors.
3. The removal of sanctions: Even before the deal, it was questionable how effective the economic sanctions that the United States and U.N. had placed upon Iran really were. In March 2015, Thomas Erdbrink, Tehran bureau chief of the New York Times and longtime resident of Iran, remarked, “As the politicians are talking for months to end the sanctions, my shopkeeper tells me he has more foreign products for sale than ever.”
Nonetheless, the JCPOA was quite definite about removing all economic sanctions on Iran. This included the removal of sanctions that had originally been intended to be removed only when Iran definitively gave up its nuclear program; now the Islamic Republic was being given sanctions relief and allowed to continue its nuclear program, only with certain restrictions that would all eventually expire anyway. Sanction relief allows the Iranian mullahs to finance jihad groups worldwide.
4. The lack of any consequences for breaking the agreement: The 159-page Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action went into tremendous detail about the Iranian nuclear program and how it is to be temporarily restricted in various ways. It also expatiated at length exactly which sanctions were to be removed. But it was conspicuously lacking in specifying penalties for Iran’s not holding to the agreement. There was vague talk about the sanctions being reimposed, but no concrete guidelines about how that was to be done, and nothing was said about recovering money given to Iran in the interim.
5. Americans were not to be allowed to inspect Iran’s nuclear sites: On July 30, 2015, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi pointed out, “American and Canadian inspectors cannot be sent to Iran. It is mentioned in the deal that inspectors should be from countries that have diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran.” IAEA inspectors, he added, would not be given access to “sensitive and military documents.”
In an interview with Al Jazeera the following day, Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, further broadened these restrictions to apply to other signatories to the deal as well: “Regardless of how the P5+1 countries interpret the nuclear agreement, their entry into our military sites is absolutely forbidden.”
Who, then, was supposed to be inspecting Iran’s nuclear sites? Why Iran itself?
6. Iran could inspect its own sites: On August 19, 2015, the Associated Press dropped a bombshell. Confirming rumors that had circulated since the agreement was signed, it reported that a secret side deal between the IAEA and Iran allowed the Iranians to conduct their own inspections of their own sites: “Iran, in an unusual arrangement, will be allowed to use its own experts to inspect a site it allegedly used to develop nuclear arms under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work.”
These terms were, obviously, absurdly easy on Iran. What exactly did the rest of the world get out of this agreement? Only a newly flush and increasingly bellicose Iran, thanks to Barack Obama. And possibly again soon, thanks to these lavishly funded hard-Left operatives.
“Koch, Soros Operatives Host Secret Meeting To Plot Iran Nuke Deal Revival,” by Alana Goodman, Washington Free Beacon, February 1, 2023:
A coalition of progressive activists bankrolled by George Soros, Charles Koch, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund are mounting a secret lobbying campaign to revive the Iran nuclear deal by tying it to the Iranian human rights movement, according to internal correspondence obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
Activists from groups including J Street, NIAC Action, the Open Society Foundations, Human Rights Watch, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund are coming together behind a plan to lobby lawmakers to use human rights bills as cover to revive negotiations for a nuclear deal with Iran. That’s according to a January email sent from a J Street lobbyist to other activists and obtained by the Free Beacon.
“I’m writing to suggest that this group convene virtually next week to brainstorm and hopefully find consensus on the elements of legislation to support the Iranian people that we could propose to diplomacy-oriented lawmakers,” J Street’s Dylan Williams wrote. “Given the usual need to be discrete [sic], the charged nature of the topic, and the outrageous threats against several members of this group, please do keep this initiative close-hold,” he added.
The activist groups “plan to pursue a dual-track legislative agenda, where they would find a way through legislation to give pro-deal Democrats cover by supporting Iranian women and Iranian human rights, without in any way challenging the revival of a nuclear deal, while at the same time building a coalition of members of the House and Senate willing to write a very public letter to the president urging him to keep the door to diplomacy over on the nuclear file,” a source familiar with the discussions told the Free Beacon.
The news comes as U.S. lawmakers are facing increased public pressure to tighten sanctions on Iran amid the Iranian regime’s violent crackdown on protesters and continued military support for Russia. The strategy is a sign that even the strongest advocates for the nuclear deal realize the pro-diplomacy position has become politically toxic—and that politicians who want to reenter the agreement will need to at least give the appearance of backing the Iranian human rights movement.
The Iranian regime’s violent crackdown on protesters, military expansion in Latin America, and threats against the United States have complicated the Biden administration’s attempts to renegotiate the nuclear deal, but supporters of the agreement say the negotiations should continue despite these concerns.
The activists’ strategy—crafted during a private summit in New York in December—includes pitching human rights legislation to pro-Iran-deal lawmakers, in order to give the legislators political cover to sign a letter asking the Biden administration to consider resuming the nuclear agreement, a source briefed on the discussions told the Free Beacon.
The activists gathered for a strategy meeting during the week of Dec. 3 at the Pocantico Center at Kykuit, the John D. Rockefeller family’s estate in Westchester County, New York, a source familiar with the discussions told the Free Beacon. The 200-acre property houses the family’s 40-room stone manor, an underground gallery with artwork by Pablo Picasso and Andy Warhol, and “expansive Italian-inspired gardens with French and English influences,” with views of the Hudson River, according to the New York Times.
J Street’s Williams sent the email to a small group of activists, including NIAC Action’s Ryan Costello, Open Society’s Mike Amitay, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Matt Duss. These groups have all received funding from either George Soros or Charles Koch, both political megadonors….
Bill Gates Calls the Rise of CCP a ‘Huge Win’
Whoa! Stunning Video Exposes Globalist Bill Gates Plan For Chinese Control of the World
Globalist Bill Gates has been caught on camera pushing for Chinese domination of the Global Economy and World Governance. In a powerful interview, the billionaire Globalist expressed some incredibly shocking ideas that have caused many American patriots to disagree with his notions.
BY CATHERINE SALGADO
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
Billionaire Bill Gates recently called the rise of the greatest mass murderer in world history, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), a “huge win for the world.” Gates also praised the extremely authoritarian COVID-19 lockdowns of Australia and urged the U.S. to be less hostile to China. Which leads to the question: Why is an American billionaire touting murderous totalitarianism and praising America’s worst enemy?
The Epoch Times reported that Bill Gates urged America and Australia to be conciliatory to the CCP. “I see China’s rise as a huge win for the world,” Gates enthused to the Lowry Institute in Sydney, Australia on Jan. 23. “[T]he current mentality of the U.S. to China—and which is reciprocated—is kind of a lose-lose mentality.”
The billionaire, who has been tied to vaccine scandals for years, mourned that U.S.-China hostility could impede medical progress and work on climate change. “That could be very self-fulfilling in a very negative way,” Gates said, referring to the “lose-lose mentality.” He did not seem concerned that China is the world’s biggest polluter and considers forced live organ harvests routine medical procedures. Not to mention the fact that the CCP is responsible for up to 500 million deaths.
”We’re all in this together. We’re humans. We innovate together and we have to change the modern industrial economy together in a pretty dramatic fashion,” Gates blathered. I contest the assertion that Gates is himself a human, but I find his vague plan for “dramatic” economic change worrying. What does he envision?
The Microsoft founder seems to admire failure if it leads to more money and power for elites. In fact, Gates, who invested hundreds of millions in the COVID-19 vaccines, once called vaccines the “best investment” he ever made, boasting to CNBC that he had made a 20-to-1 financial return on his vaccine investments (I guarantee at least some of that is a personal benefit). That’s probably why he loves Australia’s COVID-19 policies. Sure, the country rounded up COVID-positive citizens and transported them to “quarantine camps,” arrested escapees from the camps, and then imposed a restrictive COVID vaccine mandate (the vaccines that turned out to have been very ineffective at stopping the spread of COVID). But Gates is a fan nonetheless.
“Some of the things that stand out are that Australia and about seven other countries did population scale diagnostics early on and had quarantine policies … that meant you kept the level of infection low in that first year when there were no vaccines,” Gates enthused. Notice he did not say post-vaccine when it turned out that the vaccinated make up the majority of COVID-19 deaths in multiple countries.
But the Australian government wasn’t the only entity whose failed measures were admired by Gates, according to Epoch Times. World governments imposed lockdowns at the recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO). Suicides skyrocketed under lockdowns (including in Australia), particularly among young people, and a Johns Hopkins meta-analysis of many other studies concluded that the COVID-19 lockdowns had negligible benefits and caused massive harm. Yet Gates urged increased cooperation between world governments and the WHO for future pandemics.
”We need to be doing, every five years, a comprehensive exercise at both country and regional levels of pandemic preparedness, and you need a global group that’s scoring everybody,” Gates announced. “Scoring everybody”? Is Gates referring to the WHO Treaty, which would essentially give all power to impose lockdowns in most countries (including the U.S.) to the WHO? “The idea of large campaigns communicating with the public about infectious disease, they [the WHO] have some of those skill sets, and their work was incredibly beneficial,” Gates asserted.
Gates also hinted at future pandemics during a Jan. 21 meeting with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. “I’ve admired your work and your contribution,” he told Albanese, adding, “We’ve just been through the pandemic, but we need to prepare for future health challenges.”
While Gates seems to see China as the world’s savior, particularly in the medical field, the CCP continues to face critiques for its ongoing efforts to cover up the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in China. Even state propagandist Hu Xijin recently expressed doubt regarding the CCP’s official statistics, Epoch Times noted.
Researcher Peter Zhang wrote for Epoch Times, “A report by UK-based analytics company Airfinity estimated 3.7 million COVID-19 infections and 25,000 COVID-19 deaths in a single day on Jan. 13, bringing the total death toll to 584,000 since Dec. 7, 2022.” He added, “That data, experts fear, is just the tip of the iceberg. Some estimated that the death toll could reach 200 million to 400 million people, given the growing infection rate.” Meanwhile, there are no statistics on the mass arrests and reported killings following widespread anti-regime and anti-COVID-measures protests in China.
Why is Gates lauding the CCP? What benefit does he perceive for himself and the world in the rise of Communist China?
Callum Smiles: Rebel News’ Coverage of the WEF’s Annual Conference~Trevor Loudon Surprisingly Supports The Great Reset Of The World Economic Forum
Trevor Loudon Surprisingly Supports The Great Reset Of The World Economic Forum
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM: Davos Exposed~Oligarchs, CEOs, Politicos Facing Heat as World Wakes Up to Great Reset
Elon Musk꞉ WEF an 'Unelected World Government' Pushing 'Satanic' Agenda!!!
MEP Warns: WEF is One of the Biggest Threats to Democracy, Rule of Law, Free Market'
BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
The annual Davos confab of the globalist elites is getting serious pushback this year. It’s getting a lot harder for the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its servile presstitutes in Fake News media to write off their critics as “tinfoil hat extremists” and “right-wing conspiracy theorists.” From the world’s richest man to a rapidly growing throng of bloggers, vloggers, citizen journalists, and independent-media platforms from all parts of the planet and across the political spectrum, the billionaire denizens of Davos are being called out and their toxic command-and-control “masters of the universe” schemes are being exposed.
Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter, tweeted out a pointed barb aimed at the Davos cabal on January 18. Refreshingly candid and accurate for a leading CEO, it read, “WEF is increasingly becoming an unelected world government that the people never asked for and don’t want”
The maverick entrepreneur’s comment quickly garnered 10.8 million views, 49.4 thousand retweets, 3,683 quote tweets, 231.4 thousand likes, and 11.8 thousand replies (mostly positive, with many including videos and memes blasting WEF chief Klaus Schwab).
Musk then posed a simple survey: “The World Economic Forum should control the world: Yes or No.” With 2,420,521 votes cast, the response was an emphatic 86 percent “NO!”
A few days earlier, on January 15, Musk tweaked Schwab and the WEFers for their ESG (Environment, Social, and Corporate Governance) mandates they are attempting to foist on governments, businesses, media, social media, and individuals. “The S in ESG stands for Satanic,” said Musk, who is himself a professed atheist.
Musk has flippantly claimed he didn’t go to Davos this year because it would have been boring. The WEF has responded by saying the Tesla/Twitter/SpaceX titan wasn’t invited this year. A former darling of Davos (see Musk’s many entries on the WEF website here), he is now a pariah to the self-anointed “great and good.” He has obviously fallen from grace with the Davos gods for, among other things, breaking up their global media-propaganda monopoly by buying Twitter; exposing their Deep State/media collusion and censorship by releasing the Twitter Files; reinstating thousands of Twitter accounts that had been banned for expressing Covid vaccine skepticism, belief in election fraud, and other politically incorrect viewpoints; challenging the WEF’s false overpopulation narrative; endorsing Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for president in 2024; and much more.
Hmmm. Doesn’t sound like the WEFers are truly committed to “diversity,” does it? You know, as in their “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion” (DEI) agenda that they have been aggressively promoting in hundreds of speeches, reports, programs, videos, articles, and op-eds for the past several years. But, like ESG, DEI is simply another globalist tool to be used to fasten a Chinese communist-style “social credit” system upon humanity. Like the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), WEFers don’t apply ESG or DEI to themselves. ESG, DEI, WEF, CCP: the three-letter acronyms fit comfortably in each other’s company — and millions of awakening souls around the world are catching on to the Orwellian scheme embedded in them.
Similarly, as the video below shows, Levant put Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp on the spot, and like Bourla, Kemp stonewalled.
Callum Smiles of Rebel News pummeled Wall Street Journal writer Gerard Baker with questions about apparent conflicts of interest with major media outlets cozy relationship with the WEF. Baker insisted that from his perspective, the WEF conference is just a bunch of people getting together to talk — nothing extraordinary.
Rebel News’ Avi Yemini got a much icier reception from CNBC’s vice president and international managing editor Patrick Allen. Yemini and his cameraman approached Allen as he stood on the public sidewalk smoking a cigarette outside CNBC’s temporary pavilion in Davos. Allen belligerently told Yemini to leave and grabbed his microphone and threatened to “punch” him out.
Larry Fink, a billionaire CEO of predatory behemoth BlackRock and a member of the WEF board of trustees, evaded Rebel News ambushes but Ezra Levant did visit the BlackRock Davos pavilion and provided a profile of Fink nonetheless, employing videos of Fink's recent interviews.
(See more Rebel News coverage of Davos here).
Savanah Hernandez, a reporter for ThePostMillennial and Turning Point USA, was also onsite at Davos asking questions and giving daily commentary to media back in the United States.
Japanese journalist Masako Ganaha may have been the only independent reporter to have scored an “interview” with Klaus Schwab.
The Davos Maestro was less than gracious to the diminutive (but heroically persistent) reporter, granting her barely a few words before dismissing her. Nevertheless, Masako Ganaha did great reporting in Davos under difficult circumstances and provided commentary to many media outlets around the world. (See her Twitter feed here.)
Swiss-based Noor Bin Ladin is another independent journo who was on the ground at Davos reporting, interviewing, and providing incisive commentary. (If the name sounds familiar, it’s because her father is Yeslam Bin Ladin, brother to the late Osama Bin Laden. Her mother, Carmen Dufour Bin Ladin, was born to a Swiss father and a Persian mother and grew up in Switzerland. Like many other Western women who marry Muslim men, Carmen realized too late she had made a mistake and went through a horrendous ordeal to be able to divorce her husband and leave Saudi Arabia with her four daughters, including Noor). Her Davos reporting and commentary can be followed on Twitter and Gettr.
Andrew Lawton of the Canada-based True North Centre (TNC News) was one of the few independent journalists (and perhaps the only one) to be granted official access to the WEF confab. While definitely critical of the WEF, he had to be careful to avoid being ejected from the event. (Lawton’s True North reports can be seen here.)
ZeroHedge’s Tyler Durden reported that “Al Gore is testing out his performative Greta mode at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week,” comparing Gore to the snarling, emotive Greta “How DARE you!” Thunberg. Gore “tried to go climate activist beast mode during a Q&A panel,” Durden said, with pathetic results. “His attempt this week to pull off a ‘Greta moment’ and shed his notorious stiffness resulted in an unhinged rant wherein he claimed that carbon emissions and greenhouses gases are trapping ‘as much extra heat as would be released by 600,000 Hiroshima class atomic bombs exploding every single day on the earth.’”
The non-stop, motor-mouthed, ever-entertaining British actor/comedian/activist Russell Brand has been tearing into the WEF and their Great Reset with fierce relish for months — and amassing a following of millions.
Alex Jones’ InfoWars did wall-to-wall live coverage of the 2023 Davos gathering.
Additional coverage was provided by:
Michael Matt’s Remnant TV
Glenn Beck on The Blaze
Catherine Salgado at PJ Media
Brannon Howse World View Weekend Broadcast Network
Jack Posobiec at Human Events
Mike Adams at Natural News
And there are many more who could be cited. Fox News even got in on the action with WEF segments or Davos reporters making guest appearances on Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, Jesse Waters, and Maria Bartiromo (a longtime WEF invitee, who reported again from inside Davos).
The takeaway is that The New American is not such a lonely voice anymore; many other alternative media organizations, bloggers, talk show hosts, etc. have grasped, like Elon Musk, that the gameplan of the WEF’s Great Reset is to accelerate centralizing and concentrating power into the hands of the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, and the WEF-aligned globalist corporations — until they have total control. We are no longer alone in the tinfoil-hat gallery warning about this malevolent New World Order these megalomaniacs envision for all humanity. That is VERY good news. Knowledgeable, informed resistance is GROWING. That is why governors and attorney generals in nearly two dozen states are disinvesting billions of dollars from BlackRock, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Vanguard, and other woke ESG-promoting funds, and/or are pursuing legal action against them. And that is why BlackRock’s Larry Fink whined in an interview at Davos with Bloomberg News that the attacks on him and BlackRock are “ugly” and “personal.” That is why Alberta’s newly elected Premier Danielle Smith has been able to stand up to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (Klaus Schwab’s lapdog Young Global Leader) and has ended her province’s health-consulting agreement with the WEF.
Resistance to tyranny and would-be tyrants is never futile.
Order, read, and share “The Great Reset and Transhumanism,” our 100-page, heavily illustrated, in-depth expose of the World Economic Forum’s agenda to “reset” the planet and all humanity economically, politically, socially, biologically, morally, and spiritually.
Related articles and videos
2023 World Economic Forum Underway in Davos
Al Gore’s Radicalism on Display at Davos
WEF-UN Push Compulsory “Climate Education” to Transform Kids Into Enviro-activists
Bill Gates, Davos Elites Pushing Global Food Control Under Guise of “Food Security”
From Food Inflation to Food Shortages to Food Crisis to — Famine?
George Soros Doubles Funding to Group Working to Make the Supreme Court an Arm of the Leftist Establishment
BY ROBERT SPENCER
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
The hard Left controls the Executive Branch and the Senate, and after the Kevin McCarthy imbroglio, it may end up controlling the House as well, either by means of a Democrat speaker or, if McCarthy succeeds after all, a pliant, controlled opposition establishment Republican speaker. But the Judicial Branch is a big wrench in the works, as it’s full of Donald Trump appointees and others who simply won’t go along with the Left’s authoritarian, pro-abortion, internationalist, socialist agenda. George Soros, however, is intent on changing all that.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Wednesday that “progressive megadonor George Soros has ramped up donations to a group dedicated to packing the Supreme Court, signaling progressives’ determination to reshape the judiciary even after a string of defeats.” Soros’ Open Society Foundations have poured no less than $4.5 million into Demand Justice in order to “support policy advocacy on court reform.” According to the Free Beacon, “that’s nearly double the $2.5 million Soros gave the group in 2018 when it formed to oppose Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.”
Demand Justice actively supports the violent intimidation of Supreme Court Justices: “In the wake of the leaked 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon called for the removal of protective fencing around the Court to help protesters provide ‘more accountability’ of justices.”
Soros’ support for Defend Justice is just one part of a much larger agenda. In light of the money, Soros has sunk into the Legislative Branch, this $4.5 million looks like a drop in the bucket. He gave $128,485,971 to Democrat candidates in the 2022 midterm elections, which no doubt played a considerable role in the outcome. And it isn’t as if we weren’t warned. As far back as 2004, then-Senator Hillary Clinton (D-Election Denial) declared, “We need people like George Soros, who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts.” Soros himself then came to the podium and said, “It is the first time that I feel that I need to stand up and do something, really, uh, imp—, uh, and become really engaged, um, in the electoral process in, in this country.” Oh, he’s engaged in the electoral process, all right.
One indication of the difference Soros made was that he gave, according to Politico, “$1 million for the Georgia runoff, which Sen. Raphael Warnock won…, giving Democrats a 51-seat majority in the Senate.” Soros is also working for the long term. Politico added that “last January, Soros seeded Democracy PAC with $125 million, a ‘long-term investment’ in his political priorities. The group was formed to support pro-democracy ‘causes and candidates, regardless of party, and to invest in ‘strengthening the infrastructure of American democracy: voting rights and civic participation, civil rights and liberties, and the rule of law,’ Soros said in a statement at the time.”
This statement was, of course, a steaming pile of deception. Soros claims to support “pro-democracy” causes and candidates, regardless of party but gives only to Democrats. His concern for “the infrastructure of American democracy” quite clearly refers not to our actual republic, but to “our democracy” that the Left is constantly claiming to protect, by which term they actually mean their own hegemony.
Soros has an eye for detail as well. The Capital Research Center (CRC) reported Friday that his “influence on left-wing DA candidates is often wildly underestimated. Since 2016, when Soros first began to back the campaigns of district attorneys (presumably as part of the ‘Resistance’ to the Trump administration), CRC researchers have tracked more than $29 million in funding from Soros through a personal network of political action committees (PACs) formed specifically to back left-wing DA candidates. In total, Soros cash has generously supported over 20 individual candidates, many of whom won their elections and remain in office today.” The result? “Skyrocketing violent crime, countless murders, little to no accountability, limited prosecutorial experience, a proclivity for scandal, and a tendency to unfairly prosecute political adversaries.” George Soros, CRC added, “certainly has a type.”
Related: The Mystery of Evil
So what’s it all about? What is George Soros trying to do? The man himself shed some light on this question back in June 1993, when he told the UK’s Independent: “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.”
He has apparently inexhaustible amounts of money and an unshakeable dedication to backing candidates and causes that have the effect of weakening America and making it more squalid, poorer, and more dangerous than it was before he began showering Leftists with his largesse. If Soros is a god — or more precisely, if he thinks of himself as one — he is a god of vengeance and destruction, visiting harm upon the United States of America for evils real or imagined, and imperiling its very continued existence as a free society in the process. The $4.5 million to destabilize the Supreme Court is just a small part of a sinister whole.
America, Behold Your God
Understanding George Soros’ self-image is key to grasping much of what’s going on these days.
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/america-behold-your-god/;
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
George Soros contributed $128,485,971 to Democrat candidates in the 2022 midterm elections, which no doubt played a considerable role in the outcome. And it isn’t as if we weren’t warned. As far back as 2004, then-Senator Hillary Clinton (D-What The Hell Happened to MY Turn) declared: “We need people like George Soros, who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts.” Soros himself then came to the podium and said: “It is the first time that I feel that I need to stand up and do something, really, uh, imp–, uh, and become really engaged, um, in the electoral process in, in this country.” Oh, he’s engaged in the electoral process, all right. That’s our problem.
One indication of the difference Soros made was that he gave, according to Politico, “$1 million for the Georgia runoff, which Sen. Raphael Warnock won on Tuesday night, giving Democrats a 51-seat majority in the Senate.” He is also working for the long term. Politico added that “last January, Soros seeded Democracy PAC with $125 million, a ‘long-term investment’ in his political priorities. The group was formed to support pro-democracy ‘causes and candidates, regardless of party, and to invest in ‘strengthening the infrastructure of American democracy: voting rights and civic participation, civil rights and liberties, and the rule of law,’ Soros said in a statement at the time.”
Soros’ statement was, of course, a steaming pile of misleading blague and deception. He claims to support pro-democracy causes and candidates, regardless of the party but gives only to Democrats. His concern for “the infrastructure of American democracy” quite clearly refers not to our actual republic, but to “our democracy” that the Left is constantly claiming to protect, by which term they actually mean their own hegemony.
Soros has an eye for detail as well. The Capital Research Center (CRC) reported Friday that his “influence on left-wing DA candidates is often wildly underestimated. Since 2016, when Soros first began to back the campaigns of district attorneys (presumably as part of the ‘Resistance’ to the Trump administration), CRC researchers have tracked more than $29 million in funding from Soros through a personal network of political action committees (PACs) formed specifically to back left-wing DA candidates. In total, Soros cash has generously supported over 20 individual candidates, many of whom won their elections and remain in office today.”
The result? “Skyrocketing violent crime, countless murders, little to no accountability, limited prosecutorial experience, a proclivity for scandal, and a tendency to unfairly prosecute political adversaries.” George Soros, CRC added, “certainly has a type.”
So what’s it all about? What is George Soros trying to do? Soros shed some light on this question back in June 1993, when he told the UK’s Independent: “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.”
He has apparently inexhaustible amounts of money and an unshakeable dedication to backing candidates and causes that have the effect of weakening America and making it more squalid, poorer, and more dangerous than it was before he began showering Leftists with his largesse. If Soros is a god, or more precisely, if he thinks of himself as one, he is a god of vengeance and destruction, visiting harm upon the United States of America for evils real or imagined, and imperiling its very continued existence as a free society in the process.
George Soros is 92 years old, and can’t live forever despite his pretensions to divinity, but his son Alexander stands ready to carry on his work, and the destructive influence of this malignant family will likely be felt long into the future. The ray of hope amid all this is the fact that George Soros is not really any kind of god, and that eventually even his power will be broken. The will of human beings to live in freedom and dignity is given by the real God and cannot be extinguished, no matter how many billions Soros may throw against it. In the meantime, however, the United States of America is in for difficult times, as this hubristic megalomaniac continues to devote obscene sums of money to corroding our national power, unity, and cohesion.
Open Borders and Weaponized Mass Migration: Fuel for Globalism
The Deep State is using open borders and weaponized mass migration to overrun the United States and the Western world to advance its one-world agenda, warns The New American magazine's Alex Newman in this episode of Behind The Deep State. Right now, millions of illegal immigrants are crossing the border, and are being given papers and released into the United States by the Biden administration. This has been a boon for cartels and human traffickers. And incredibly, numerous Republicans are plotting with Democrats to provide amnesty to these tens of millions of illegal immigrants, turning them into Democrat voters and making America a one-party state, just like happened to California after previous amnesties. Wars started by globalists destroyed many of the nations these migrants are fleeing from, but the mass migration encouraged by globalist predators is not humanitarian. Neither is the "we need workers" pretext supported by evidence and facts. The goal, as UN officials have explained, is ending nations and national sovereignty.
For more great content, visit TheNewAmerican.com
Globalists Continue To Move U.S. Closer To Nuclear War
Every day that goes by, the closer we get to destruction. The Globalists want it, and God will allow it. Find out why by watching the video.
FTX was HEAVY into funding vaccine research, biotech engineering and other globalist depopulation agendas through the “scientific research” community
BY ETHAN HUFF
SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-11-19-ftx-heavy-into-vaccine-research-biotech-depopulation.html;
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.
(Natural News) The hundreds of grants and investments totaling at least $132 million that were earmarked by the FTX Foundation and its FTX Future Fund for use in developing new bioweapons, “vaccines” and other chemical and pharmaceutical products are officially null and void. And their recipients are now in a panic about it.
Following the announced resignation of the entire Future Fund leadership team on November 11, one of the companies that was supposed to receive a cash grant from it, SecureBio, lamented the fact that employees at his firm will now be out of a job unless emergency backup funding is procured.
“We don’t think it is right that anyone should lose their jobs over a financial calamity totally unrelated to the excellent work they are doing,” announced SecureBio co-founder Kevin Esvelt.
SecureBio had initially been awarded a $1.2 million grant to develop “better pandemic defenses,” according to Coin Telegraph.
Another company, a biotechnology firm called Sherlock Biosciences, was supposed to receive $2 million from the Future Fund to study infectious diseases. HelixNano, a similar firm within the same field, was supposed to receive $10 million for vaccine research.
Then there is Our World in Data, which was supposed to be given $7.5 million to “track trends relevant to humanity’s long-term prospects,” whatever that is supposed to mean.
FTX was also involved in research to “debunk” the merits of ivermectin as a viable remedy for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
Another entity that was supposed to be on the dole of FTX’s “philanthropic” efforts via Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) “Building a Stronger Future” initiative is ProPublica, which was to receive the first tranche of a $5 million grant this year, followed by more disbursements in 2023 and 2024.
Organizations that received money from FTX in the 90 days prior to its bankruptcy could be subject to a “clawback”
According to Molly Kovite, a lawyer and member of the “Effective Altruism” group, all of these organizations and others that received money from an FTX entity within the 90 days prior to its bankruptcy declaration could be forced to pay it all back through a process known as a “clawback.”
Two days after Kovite announced this on November 14, Open Philanthropy, the philanthropic funder that Kovite represents, announced that it is seeking applications from grantees affected by the collapse of the Future Fund. Each application will be evaluated and provided funding at the group’s discretion.
Meanwhile, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) are requesting that SBF, the former FTX CEO, and John Jay Ray III, the current CEO, provide more information about what happened to collapse the fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange.
Some 13 different requests for documents, lists, and answers have been sent by these two, who are still awaiting answers on behalf of the American public.
“The public is owed a complete and transparent accounting of the business practices and financial activities leading up to and following FTX’s collapse,” the two lawmakers wrote, emphasizing that there has been an “apparent lack of due diligence by venture capital and other big investment funds eager to get rich off crypto.”
“These developments justify our long-standing concerns that the crypto industry ‘is built to favor scammers’ and ‘designed to reward insiders and to defraud mom-and-pop investors,'” they further added.
SBF and Ray have until November 28 to provide the requested materials, which also include “complete copies of all FTX and FTX-subsidiary balance sheets, from 2019 to the present.”
Warren and Durbin also want SBF to provide an explanation for his business decisions as well as strange statements he has made on Twitter that appear to be encoded for secret communication.
The latest news about FTX and SBF can be found at Collapse.news.
Sources for this article include: