Silent War Ep. 6153: DeepState AntiVax Target List, SCOTUS on MANDATES, GENOCIDE REVEALED

In this episode of The Silent War:

Biden Regime Compiling Database Of Religious Objectors To Vaccine.

WHO Joins EU and Changes Direction — Suddenly Warns Against Taking Continued COVID Booster Shots.

China Seals People's Doors, Xi'an Residents Cry For Food.

Quebec to Heavily Tax the Unvaxxed.

Research suggests Hemp, Cannabinoids, and Cannabis may be more protective against covid than masks and vaccines.

The Veritas Fauci Drop showed that the government willingly covered up HCQ and Ivermectin being effective cures for Covid.

A Concrete Barrier going up around the white house.

Global Economy Heading For "Mother Of All" Supply Chain Shocks As China Locks Down Ports.

Latest UK Health Data Shows Vaccinated Deaths Higher than Unvaccinated Deaths in Last Three Months
As Fully Vaccinated Australians In Hospital With COVID-19 Surpass Unvaccinated.

Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s OSHA Vax Mandate For Private Businesses in 6-3 Vote yet
Roberts and Kavanaugh Side with Lefties, Allow Healthcare Worker Vax Mandate to Stand
& Trump losing massive support among his base for his continued support of vaccines.

All of this, and more.

5th Circuit Court of Appeals, in shutting down OSHA mandates, also challenged the validity of the pandemic and government restrictions

BY LANCE D. JOHNSON

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-01-06-5th-circuit-shuts-down-osha-mandates.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Not only did the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals shut down the OSHA workplace mandates, but the court also challenged the validity of the pandemic and all subsequent emergency orders and physical restrictions that governments have imposed under its premise.

On page 10, the court states: “The natural first step in enacting a lawful ETS (emergency temporary standard) is to show that employees covered by the ETS are in fact exposed to the dangerous substances, agents, or hazards at issue—here, COVID-19.”

OSHA cannot prove that covid-19 represents a “grave danger” to everyone in the workplace

The court affirmed the definition of emergency temporary standards, that they “are an unusual response to exceptional circumstances.” Throughout history, the courts have unilaterally ruled that OSHA’s authority under § 655(c) is an “extraordinary power” that should be “limited” and “delicately exercised.” In other words, OSHA cannot flagrantly establish emergency temporary standards, and the agency cannot be used as a political weapon to force people to give up their body autonomy for some concocted idea of “safety.”

Therefore, the 5th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that the Biden administration’s vaccine, mask, and PCR testing mandate (with all its threats of coercion and extortion) are “anything but a “delicate exercise” of this “extraordinary power.”

“Quite the opposite, rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly ‘grave danger’ the Mandate purports to address,” the court ruled.

OSHA cannot prove that exposure to airborne viruses is a workplace hazard when exposure is the key to immunity

The Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) failed to properly define “covid-19” and prove that all employees are in “grave danger” to a new causative agent. Under OSHA’s own rules (Int’l Chem. Workers, 830 F.2d at 371), the agency cannot propose a new ETS if the agency is unable to properly identify and isolate a substance of “grave danger’ at such levels that warrant hazardous exposure in the workplace.

A new OSHA ETS cannot be legally enacted unless it:

  1. Addresses “substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful.” Airborne viruses do not fall under this definition because they are endemic, and exposure cannot be veritably traced with current diagnostic standards, especially across the entire workforce.
  2. Shows that workers are exposed to these “substances,” “agents” or “new hazards” in the workplace. There is no accurate method to properly trace exposures to airborne viruses.
  3. Proves that the exposure places workers in “grave danger.” Exposure and natural immunity to airborne viruses can be considered the opposite of a “grave danger.”
  4. Provides evidence that it is “necessary” to alleviate employees’ exposure to this “grave danger” in the workplace. There is no medical necessity to justify widespread interference of people’s lives, their breathing, their interaction, and immune function, all to promise “workplace safety.”

Instead of providing a burden of proof that covid-19 is a “grave danger” for all workplaces with over 100 employees, the federal government provided examples of “clusters” and “outbreaks” to purport there is “evidence of workplace transmission.” However, the court reiterated that these examples “miss the mark” because “OSHA is required to make findings of exposure —or at least the presence of COVID-19—in all covered workplaces.”

OSHA relies on non-specific symptom reporting and diagnostic test results that are provably fraudulent for sequencing a specific causative agent. Restrictions are completely unnecessary in the workforce and are extraordinarily cumbersome. There are NO instances in American law where the rights of one person supersede the bodily autonomy rights of another. Moreover, the federal government failed to prove that exposure to covid-19 is a workplace hazard because there is mounting evidence that natural immunity improves the safety of the working environment.

Sources include:

CA5.USCourts.gov [PDF]

Brighteon.com

NaturalNews.com

Workers v. Wokers: First Liberty Sues Biden Administration over Business Mandate

This week, First Liberty filed a lawsuit on behalf of three prominent national religious organizations. We are asking the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Sixth Circuit to review the Biden administration’s unconstitutional federal vaccine mandate. Learn more about this new case here: https://firstliberty.org/osha/

OSHA changes employer policies to BURY Covid-19 vaccine side effect reporting in latest cover-up of jab injuries

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-25-osha-buries-covid-vaccine-side-effects-coverup.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has quietly released a new Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) that clarifies employers are no longer required to report adverse reactions caused by Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.”

Since too many people are becoming injured or dying as a result of the jabs, OSHA and other federal agencies are “working diligently” to hide the truth in order to avoid “any appearance of discouraging workers” from complying with the “mandates.”

Even though 29 CFR 1904 requires businesses to report all vaccine side effects to health authorities, OSHA has made an exception for Fauci Flu shots – even though this is against the law.

“DOL (Department of Labor) and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations,” OSHA’s FAQ section now reads.

“OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts.”

At least through May 2022, OSHA will not be enforcing 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements, which otherwise would have required all employers to record worker side effects from Chinese Virus injections.

“We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.”

Even in cases where employers incentivize or require employees to take the jab against their will, OSHA’s new reporting exception will allow employers to basically hide any vaccine adverse events that emerge.

In the age of covid, the rules change on a whim almost daily

OSHA also removed three other FAQs that explained how employers have a responsibility to report all adverse reactions to the injections, even in cases where the jabs were merely “recommended.”

These now-deleted FAQs clarified that employers have a legal duty to report adverse reactions stemming from mandatory injections, though it was previously optional in cases where the vaccine was merely “compelled” but not required.

“The two scenarios used to be properly differentiated on the agency’s web page which made it unquestionable when a business was exempt from reporting the vaccine side effects, stating that ‘the vaccine must be truly voluntary’ in order to qualify,” reported The Gateway Pundit.

It was clearly specified at that time that in order to be exempt from reporting requirements, a vaccine-injured employee must have truly taken the jab(s) by choice and not under coercion.

“For example, an employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from their choice,” it stated.

“If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing adverse action, then the vaccine is not merely ‘recommended’ and employers should consult the above FAQ regarding COVID-19 vaccines that are a condition of employment.”

Since many large corporations and major employers are now demanding that their employees take an “Operation Warp Speed” injection in order to keep their jobs, OSHA bent to the demands of corporate America that these reporting requirements be abolished.

Until at least next spring, very few, if any, covid vaccine adverse events will make it into the government databases, in other words. This is likely to create the illusion that the shots are safe and effective, even if millions of workers are being injured or killed behind the scenes.

“So now they’ve come right out and admitted it,” wrote one commenter at The Gateway Pundit about how OSHA and the federal government are no longer even attempting to hide their agenda.

“People are dying and they don’t want you to know so you’ll go out and die, too. What more do we need to hear?”

The latest news about Chinese Virus tyranny can be found at Fascism.news.

Sources for this article include:

TheGatewayPundit.com

NaturalNews.com