Judge: No July Fourth Fireworks ‘Bursting in Air’ Over Mount Rushmore

Judge: No July Fourth Fireworks 'Bursting in Air' Over Mount Rushmore


SEE: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/fireworks-rushmore-monument-july4/2021/06/02/id/1023694;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A South Dakota federal judge has further denied Republican Gov. Kristi Noem’s request for a permit allowing fireworks over Mount Rushmore to celebrate Independence Day, The Hill reported Wednesday.

President Joe Biden's administration initially denied Noem’s permit request to celebrate the Fourth of July with fireworks, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and respect for Native American tribes as reasons.

“Potential risks to the park itself and to the health and safety of employees and visitors associated with the fireworks demonstration continue to be a concern and are still being evaluated as a result of the 2020 event,” wrote Herbert Frost, National Park Service regional director, at the time the denial was issued. “In addition, the park’s many tribal partners expressly oppose fireworks at the Memorial. These factors, compiled with the COVID-19 pandemic, do not allow safe and responsible fireworks display to be held at this site.”

Noem sued to appeal the denial.

U.S. District Judge Roberto Lange, an appointee of President Barack Obama, issued the 36-page decision, which denied preliminary judgment to Noem based on the unlikelihood of her prevailing in her suit against federal officials, according to the report.

“This Court fully understands the State's position and why this suit was brought,” Lange’s decision read. “But under governing law, the State is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its claims and has not met the requirements for interim legal relief.”

Lange said in his decision that the reasons cited by the Biden administration were not "arbitrary and capricious."

Noem said she would appeal the decision.

"I am disappointed that the court gave cover to this unlawful action with today’s decision. But rest assured, this fight is not over," Noem said. 

"My legal team will appeal this incorrect decision so that we can return the Fireworks Celebration to Mount Rushmore and celebrate our nation’s birthday at America’s Shrine to Democracy for next year and in the future,” Noem said in a statement following the ruling.

Last year, President Donald Trump held a national celebration at the monument for the first time since 2009, when the celebration was paused due to concerns about wildfires, CNN reported at the time.

The gathering was criticized for the lack of masks and social distancing amid the pandemic.

Related Stories:

CEO of COVID-19 vaccine maker Moderna worked with Big Pharma billionaire pal of China’s Xi while promoting lab where virus escaped


SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-02-ceo-moderna-big-pharma-billionaire-pals-china-xi.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) The longer the COVID-19 pandemic lasts, the more we learn about its diabolical origins and the key players involved in ensuring that it was not only financed and developed but released on the world by a Chinese Communist regime hell-bent on global domination.

As the walls close in on ‘lead American immunologist’ Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding what he knew about the virus and when he knew it, other devious connections have been made in recent days that are equally alarming.

For instance, a report published earlier this week has tied the CEO of Moderna, one of the first pharmaceutical companies to develop a COVID-19 vaccine (coincidentally), to a big pharma billionaire who is also an associate of ChiCom Dear Leader Xi Jinping and who actually stumped for the Level 4 lab in Wuhan where the virus is believed to have been created and released.

Big League Politics notes:

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, who is pushing experimental COVID-19 vaccines designed to alter the RNA of recipients, previously worked as CEO of BioMerieux, a firm owned by a billionaire who was instrumental in the development of the infamous virology lab in Wuhan, China.

French pharma billionaire Alain Merieux, creator of BioMerieux, once served as the Co-President of the Franco-Chinese Committee on Emerging Infectious Diseases. Through this role, Merieux was instrumental in the development of the P4 Laboratory in Wuhan where the COVID-19 virus may have been synthesized and released to devastate society.

The Chinese-French partnership was key to the lab’s development. According to a report from GNews, the government of then-French President Nicolas Sarcozy worked over many years to ensure the construction of the lab, as Merieux was constantly advising Sarkozy to continue working with the ChiCom regime on that and other projects.

The former French leader traveled to China in November 2007 to put ink to an agreement that would “ensure that all necessary measures are taken as soon as possible to implement all projects including the Wuhan P4 laboratory.” And from that point, a course of events was put in place that has culminated in forced changes to lifestyles, losses of life, and trillions in wealth vanquished.

“P4 laboratory construction in Wuhan is very important for Chinese public health and a good symbol of the France China Collaboration in public health,“ Xi would say years later as the lab was set to open.

According to the reports, BioMérieux helped with the propaganda end, selling the concept of the controversial infectious disease lab to the Chinese people in and beyond Wuhan. That included disinformation campaign drives with Xi, who portrayed the lab as a breakthrough for public health.

An online profile of Merieux, which has been translated from French, details his deep ties to China; his father-in-law was also a Western collaborator with the brutal dictatorship of Mao Zedong.

“At the very beginning of the 1960s, Alain Mérieux’s father-in-law, Paul Berliet, discovered this country. If he was part of the trip of General de Gaulle, the first Western head of state to go to Beijing in 1965, the heir to the Berliet transport group already knows the highest dignitaries of the Maoist regime, Zhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping in particular,” the profile notes.

Meanwhile Bancel “was leading Mérieux’s organization in the same role as they were working to create the Wuhan virology lab,” Big League Politics adds.

These revelations come as it appears that a) the virus indeed was manufactured in the Wuhan lab; b) it was allowed to escape on purpose, and c) Fauci was both aware of the research and aware that the infectious diseases agency he has run since the early 1980s helped fund it as well.

A reckoning, indeed.

Sources include:



Absolutely NOT safe and NOT effective: FDA and CDC lied about vaccine efficacy to obtain ’emergency authorized use’ (EAU) for highly-suspect human medical experiment using mRNA


SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-01-fda-cdc-lied-about-vaccine-efficacy.html#;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) As they say, the proof is in the pudding. COVID-19 shots have been the deadliest inoculations ever documented, by far, and that’s according to the CDC’s very own data. More people have died from Covid vaccines (approaching 5,000 now) than all vaccine deaths totaled since the 1950s. No wonder why. They couldn’t even reach the EAU (emergency authorized use) 50 percent efficacy threshold for approval, and that is pretty sad, but worst of all, these ‘treatments’ are super dangerous and haphazard.

Safety thresholds have been thrown out the window with all of these Covid jabs from all three manufacturers. They always assume that none of us can remember what happened last month or last year, but some of us can (the unvaccinated) and do, and we review the data and the findings too. Investigative journalists who support clean living and healthy living must expose the truth to the masses, or the “fence riders” (those not sure whether to vax-up or not) have no chance at all.

Scamdemic Alert: Gene-tampering Covid jabs offer ZERO safety or effectiveness proof while causing blood clots around the world

In the summer of 2020, the FDA’s commissioner stated that in order for the vaccine manufacturers to even get just emergency authorized use, they had to cross the minimum threshold of 50 percent efficacy, that’s according to their own documented standard, and even if they did, that would only be considered a medical experiment, not some mass campaign to inoculate more than 70 percent of the world’s populace in less than 6 months. So how did they even get 50 percent efficacy, when the shots haven’t proven that ANYBODY at all is yet immune to Covid? Easy. Fake the research. Fake the results. Fake everything.

All Covid vaccines are actually a crime right now because none of them even meet the EAU threshold. FDA testing reveals more than half of the test-subject participants came down with Covid-19 within 7 days post-vaccination, but the symptoms were labeled “reactogenicity” to alter the results in order to gain emergency approval. In other words, the FDA/CDC created a gray area where they say symptoms of Covid overlap with symptoms and adverse reactions or “side effects” of the inoculations.

So what did the vaccine manufacturers do to solve this little dilemma, and in their favor? They never bothered to verify whether those test subjects (human guinea pigs) even had Covid, they just chalked up all the symptoms they had as common reactogenicity.

They simply never checked to see if the vaccinated sheeple really caught Covid, because they didn’t want those results (and records), as they would demolish their chances of reaching the 50 percent EAU acceptable medical experiment threshold. And when will the worldwide “test” of vaccine “efficacy” cross the blood clot threshold of 50 percent?

Reactogenicity is the inflammatory response to vaccination, now used as a cover story for “safety and efficacy” of dangerous, deadly Covid vaccines

Chronic inflammation is the root of nearly all ill-health problems. The CDC tries their best to convince the worried, “hesitant” populace that all the horror stories are fake and that the only side effects from inoculations are slight pain at the injection site, fatigue and a low-grade fever. That’s only the tip of the iceberg, and they know it, but most Americans never look any deeper than that.

Forget about “hesitancy.” It’s gone way beyond that. The skeptics of vaccines have much more to worry about than a slight fever or some numb pain called reactogenicity. If the CDC and the FDA were honest, or even if someone somehow was keeping them honest, they would have to disclose right now that the jabs are causing blood clots around the world.

Now, the CDC is targeting young teens. Pfizer wants 12-year-olds to get the vaccine, even though there’s nary a case of death on Earth for anyone that young, and if there is, it’s probably faked too (they probably died in a car wreck or drowned, and then tested positive for Covid proteins – and those are fake tests too).

Meanwhile, the vaccine industry is busy collaborating with the CDC and the tech giants, shutting down all talk (and literature) about natural remedies and indigenous cures that have worked against these viruses for millennia. The scamdemic also reveals that the PCR tests are fundamentally invalid and fraudulent.

The vaccines don’t prevent infection, but rather cause blood clots and hyper-inflammatory responses that are very dangerous to the immune system and can even cause mad cow disease in humans through the uncontrollable creation of prions thanks to mRNA “technology.”

Tune your internet frequency to Pandemic.news for updates on how to prepare for the upcoming VACCINE PANDEMIC and communist apocalypse.

Sources for this article include:




Constantinople Victory Day: Erdogan’s Day of Shame


SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/06/day-of-shame;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

May 29 is a holiday in Turkey. It is celebrated with great pomp and ceremony, especially in Istanbul because it marks the anniversary of the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople on that day in 1453. After a 53-day siege, the forces of Sultan Mehmet II were able to breach the walls of the city, following weeks of intense bombardment. Public prayers are held at the mausoleum of Sultan Mehmet II and ceremonies are conducted at three locations where the sultan’s statues are located. A re-enactment of the final battle, a musical laser show, fireworks, dances, music, adulatory speeches and a parade by colorfully dressed Ottoman soldiers highlight the Istanbul celebrations. Meanwhile, bookstores do a roaring trade selling books, commemorative albums, and magazines about the Ottoman victory nearly six centuries ago.

Last May, President Erdogan described Mehmet II’s victory as “not only one of the greatest victories in history but also a turning point that ushered a new era.” The man who has the integrity of a hyena and the style of a poison toad added that Mehmet the Conqueror and others had helped Turks “call these lands our home.” A typically strange phrasing when Constantinople is 2,600 miles (as the crow flies) from the Turks’ arid homeland in Central Asia. But then again, May 29th in Turkish-occupied Anatolia is a day full of hot air, chest-thumping, racism, and nostalgia for the good old days when slaughtering Christians brought one closer to the 72 celestial houris.

A person who respects the truth and is honorable would think twice about celebrating the sham and shameful “victory” on May 29, 1453.

What kind of victory was it when the Byzantine defenders numbered 7,000 (about 2,000 were Italian) while the Ottoman forces had 80,000 fighters. According to various European sources, the Ottoman army numbered 300,000. In every category (ships, cannons, bombards, cavalry, horse transport, large rowing boats), the Ottomans vastly outnumbered the defenders who were led by Emperor Constantine XI Palaiologos. Despite their huge military advantage, it took the Turks almost two months to conquer the city.

What kind of victory was it when the Byzantium “Empire” was just the city of Constantinople and several villages? Turks boast they vanquished the Byzantium Empire but the “empire” they vanquished was a city of 50,000. It wasn’t the empire of Emperor Basil I and II and General Narses or the empire that ruled over the lands from the Euphrates to Gibraltar? It wasn’t the empire whose capital was the most sophisticated in Europe and had a population of 400,000. A great city where women taught at the universities.

Byzantine Empire had fractured long before the Ottoman hordes showed up at the gates of Constantine the Great’s city. Throughout its history, Byzantium had overcome close to 30 sieges but had been severely wounded by the sacking (1204) of Crusaders. In the previous decade, it had also been ravaged by the Black Death (bubonic plague).

By 1450—a few years before the Turk turned up, the empire—actually city-state–was impoverished and exhausted. The Turks conquered a shrunken city and not an empire.

What kind of Turkish victory is it when mostly Spanish sailors manned the Turkish ships, the Ottoman sappers were Serbs and the Ottoman cavalry had a great many Serb mercenaries?

What kind of Turkish victory is it when single cannon, built by a Hungarian named Orban, played a decisive role in breaching the city walls? Orban’s cannon was an unheard-of 27 ft long and could deliver 600 lb. stones over a mile.

What kind of glorious victory is it when just before the Ottoman attack the sultan beheaded the Byzantine ambassador sent to negotiate with him?

What kind of victory is it when “blood flowed through the streets like rainwater after a sudden storm, corpses floated out to the sea like melons along a canal,” according to Greek historian George Sphrantzes? The corpses were mostly those of Greek civilians. As one historian put it, they had become “food for the [Turkish] sword.”

What kind of victory is it when the winners’ losses are far higher than that of the defeated? Because of their vast number, Turks could absorb the losses while the 7,000-Byzantium army couldn’t.

What kind of victory is it when Turks raped teenage girls and good-looking teenage boys? It’s documented that after the city was conquered, soldiers’ tents were full of teenagers (girls and boys) waiting to be raped and sold as slaves. After three days of looting and desecrating churches, about 30,000 of the inhabitants were sold into slavery.

What kind of victory is it when old people and the infirm who had sought shelter in their churches were hacked to death?

What kind of victory is it when the winner occupies the main cathedral (Hagia Sophia) of the vanquished and converts it to a mosque? Didn’t the Turks have the creativity, discipline, craft, and dedication to build a mosque for their God rather than steal a holy place Greeks had built for their God? Any thinking or honorable Turk would feel humiliated that one of its greatest leaders saw fit to steal his enemy’s sacred ground. We are not talking about shameless Erdogan who recently converted the church to a mosque.

Emperor Constantine XI died while leading a final charge in defense of his city. Sultan Mehmet lived till the age of 48. By then, he was emaciated and looked twenty years older. In the Ottoman tradition of patricide and fratricide, he was killed by poisoning upon the orders of his son. Bayezid II paid his father’s Persian doctor to poison the “conqueror” of the Byzantium “Empire”.

This year, too, “sultan” Erdogan celebrated the shameful victory of Mehmet II and filled the air with his usual rancid proclamations and awkward braggadocio. Of course, the man who looks as if he has been weaned on pickle has no honor or sense of shame. Over the years, consistent with his style, he has exaggerated the power of the Byzantium’s defenders so as to inflate the reputation of Mehmet II and the horde of 300,000 which was preoccupied with raping infidel girls and boys and hacking to death defenseless old people in Hagia Sophia.

Two warships flying Iranian colors are sailing south and may be headed to Venezuela


SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/06/two-warships-flying-iranian-colors-are-sailing-south-and-may-be-headed-to-venezuela;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Iran and Venezuela have grown dangerously close in recent times. Now comes this news.

Biden is a laughingstock to America’s worst enemies, who are emboldened by his weakness.

Iran is already enriching uranium, now at levels only found in countries making bombs. Iran has openly admitted to violating the previous nuclear deal. Should sanctions be lifted, it would be disastrous, since Iran would only increase its aggressive activity.

“Iranian Warships Possibly on Way to Venezuela,” by Daniel Sonnenfeld, The Medialine, May 31, 2021:

A clash with US Navy may occur if Tehran tries to subvert American sanctions on the Islamic Republic and its far-left ally

Two warships flying Iranian colors are sailing south along the east coast of Africa and may be headed to Venezuela, Politico reported on Saturday.

The US national security apparatus is monitoring the ships’ progress. The vessels, a frigate and the Makran forward staging base, are believed to be headed toward the Islamic Republic’s South American ally, but their destination, cargo and goal are unclear.

If the ships are indeed headed for South America, Tehran has chosen a puzzling moment in which to send military vessels to the US’s backyard. Negotiations on the return of both Iran and the US to compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, have been ongoing in Vienna and the sides have expressed cautious optimism. If success is achieved, the White House will lift crippling economic sanctions placed on Iran.

The Makran is a repurposed oil tanker, and it is important to note that Iran has sent oil shipments to its ally in the past, as recently as April.

Dr. Nancy Gallagher, director of the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, told The Media Line, “Iran has sent oil to Venezuela before because Iran does not think that the US has the right to use sanctions to stop Iranian oil sales.”

Gallagher adds that “the Iranians may also be trying to send the message that if the US has the right to have its warships in international waters near Iran (which it does under international law), then Iran has the same right to have its naval ships in international waters in the Western Hemisphere.”…

CALIFORNIA: GOVERNOR Newsom to Pay More Than $2 MILLION For Violating Religious Freedom

Churches Wrestle $2M From Gavin Newsom Over COVID Lockdowns


SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/06/02/churches-wrestle-2m-from-gavin-newsom-over-covid-lockdowns-n1451576;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The State of California has agreed to pay more than $2 million to a San Diego church and a Catholic priest who challenged Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, which violated the Christian leaders’ religious freedom. In two separate settlements, the state agreed to pay $1.6 million to South Bay United Pentecostal Church and $550,000 to Catholic Priest Father Trevor Burfitt. Judges also granted permanent injunctions to protect their religious freedom rights.

“The South Bay case represents an unprecedented three trips to the United States Supreme Court in a one-year period, which resulted in a landmark decision that opened up the churches in California for 40 million people,” Charles LiMandri, a special counsel at the Thomas More Society who represented South Bay, said in a statement on the settlement. “The permanent injunctions in these cases uphold and protect one of the most cherished principles of our republic: The Free Exercise of Religion.”

“Restrictions on churches cannot be more severe than restrictions on retail. We are pleased with the final results in these two important cases,” Paul Jonna, another South Bay lawyer, added.

South Bay challenged Newsom’s “Blueprint for a Safer Economy,” which lifted some COVID-19 restrictions but treated religious services more harshly than retail and dine-in restaurants. The church’s challenge ultimately prevailed when the Supreme Court ordered the lower court to reconsider the case according to the precedent in Tandon v. Newsom (2021). In that case, the Supreme Court overruled the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, granting an injunction allowing in-home prayer meetings.

The Burfitt case, meanwhile, paved the way for Tandon. Father Burfitt challenged Newsom’s Blueprint and Judge Gregory Pulskamp issued a preliminary injunction in the priest’s favor, ruling that the Blueprint had failed to treat houses of worship in a manner “equal to the favored classes of entities” referred to as “essential businesses.”

Thomas More Society lawyer Christopher Farrah cited that injunction while celebrating California’s ultimate capitulation to Burfitt’s religious liberty claim.

“The injunction in Burfitt was the first of its kind in the country, anticipating what the Supreme Court would later hold definitively, that houses of worship must receive the same treatment as the most favored secular comparators,” Farrah noted. “If favored businesses are allowed 100% occupancy during a pandemic, so must churches be allowed.”

LiMandri and Jonna are currently representing Grace Community Church Pastor John MacArthur, who is still fighting COVID-19 injunctions against the church.

RecommendedCOVID Tyrant Newsom Can’t ‘Move the Goalposts’ on Religious Freedom, Supreme Court Rules

These hefty settlements send a powerful warning to governors like Newsom. Violations of religious freedom will not be taken lightly. These two cases have cost Newsom’s government more than $2 million, and they likely won’t be the last.

BLM Founder Patrisse Cullors, Marxist Abolitionist She doesn’t want to just defund the police — she wants to abolish them.


SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/06/blm-founder-patrisse-cullors-marxist-abolitionist-paul-kengor/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors has been in the news a lot lately because of controversy over her income and financial dealings, including recent purchases of several new homes. Cullors lashed out at these criticisms by protesting, “The fact that the right-wing media is trying to create hysteria around my spending is, frankly, racist and sexist.”

The fact is that Cullors’ own organization has demanded answers. Hawk Newsome, head of Black Lives Matter Greater New York City, called for “an independent investigation” of Cullors. “If you go around calling yourself a socialist, you have to ask how much of her own personal money is going to charitable causes,” says Newsome. “It’s really sad because it makes people doubt the validity of the movement and overlook the fact that it’s the people that carry this movement.… We need black firms and black accountants to go in there and find out where the money is going.”

But another particularly striking Cullors revelation of late has gotten almost no publicity. It was flagged for me by Mike Gonzalez, author of an upcoming major new book on BLM. It’s a video by Cullors titled, “What Is Abolition And Am I An Abolitionist?” Posted on her personal YouTube channel, it needs to be widely watched.

In that video, Cullors repeatedly calls herself an “abolitionist.” She talks about her “abolitionist journey” and the “abolitionist future we deserve.” She announces that she’s writing a book titled An Abolitionist Handbook.

Cullors applies her abolitionist goals to police — and not just police but even prisons and jails. She states flatly, “Abolition is the getting rid of police, prisons and jails, surveillance, and courts.”

Yes, the abolition of police, prisons, jails, surveillance, and courts — all part of what Cullors calls the “prison industrial complex.” As many of us have noted, she emphasizes that BLM’s “defund” movement is about literal abolition. That is, not just defunding the police, but abolishing the police. Plus prisons and jails, and now surveillance and courts, too.

In the video, Cullors points to (as she often does) her mentor Angela Davis, whom she hails as a fellow abolitionist, including of prisons. Davis, of course, is America’s best-known female Marxist. In Moscow in 1979, the Soviets (in a hall of entirely white folks) awarded her their prestigious Lenin Prize. Cullors’ memoir opens with a foreword by Davis.

It’s important to pause here to understand something crucial that helps make sense of where Cullors is coming from on this “abolition” theme.

Cullors, of course, is a proud Marxist (see my American Spectator piece “The Politics of Patrisse Cullors”). She describes her “ideological frame” as that of a “trained Marxist organizer” who is “super-versed on ideological theories.” In interviews and in her memoirs, she speaks of her intensive study reading Marx, Lenin, Mao, and other leading Marxists. “We spent the year reading, anything from Marx, to Lenin, to Mao, learning all types of global critical theory,” she said in an April 2018 interview.

Those of us who have repeatedly underscored these significant facts have done so for good reason, namely that when Cullors tells us this about herself, she’s telling us something very instructive. This is her philosophy and her worldview. And utterly essential to the Marxist philosophy and worldview is the notion of abolition.

Karl Marx (and Marxism) was all about abolition. The word is omnipresent throughout his writings. As noted by Marx biographer Robert Payne, the word “abolition” seems to practically jump off every page of the Communist Manifesto. “And after he has ‘abolished’ property, family, and nations, and all existing societies, Marx shows little interest in creating a new society on the ruins of the old,” observed Payne. “The Communist Manifesto was the gauntlet he threw at the world.”

It was indeed. Go online to various writings of Marx and do a search on words like “abolish” and “abolition,” as well as “criticize” and “criticism.” You’ll be struck immediately.

The goal of the Marxist project was one of fundamental transformation, of pursuing permanent revolution and unrestrained criticism of everything — nothing less than what Karl Marx called “the ruthless criticism of all that exists.” Marx in his essay declaring religion “the opium of the people” said that “the criticism of religion is the beginning of all criticism.” In that infamous essay, he used the word “criticism” 29 times.

Marx’s ideas were utterly radical, or (as Marx openly conceded) “contrary to the nature of things.” Above all, Marx in the Manifesto acknowledged that communism seeks to “abolish the present state of things.”

Think about that one: “abolish the present state of things.” Read it again. Say it out loud. What could be more radical, more revolutionary?

For those who think that Marxism was about mere markets and wealth, chew that one over.

Marx in the Manifesto stated that communists “openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.” Note these words: “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.” “All” meant “all.” He and Friedrich Engels closed the Manifesto with this: “Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things.”

Quite chillingly, Marx, who wrote about the devil, had a favorite quote from the Mephistopheles (i.e., devil/demon) character in Goethe’s Faust, “Everything that exists deserves to perish.”

Again, chew that over: “Everything that exists deserves to perish.”

That is reckless and irresponsible — as reckless and irresponsible as calling for the abolition of police, prisons, jails, surveillance, and courts.

Above all, Karl Marx, like Patrisse Cullors, was an abolitionist.

Marx and Engels in the Manifesto targeted everything from property to the family to faith. “Abolition of the family!” they wrote with an exclamation. “Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the communists.” They noted that “Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality.”

God has long been a special target for these revolutionaries. To quote Marx’s socialist buddy Mikhail Bakunin from his signature book God and the State: “If God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.”

Yes, you read that right: “If God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.”

Marx envisioned an apocalyptic revolution leading to the abolition of capitalism, classes, and the state itself. In the process, even democracy (temporary exploited) would be abolished.

Reading all of this closely, of course, was Vladimir Lenin, the totalitarian despot and mass killer that Patrisse Cullors read closely. In his most revealing work, The State and Revolution, Lenin, in his chapter “The Transition from Capitalism to Communism,” quoted Marx and Engels: “the bourgeois state does not ‘wither away,’ but is ‘abolished’ by the proletariat in the course of the revolution.”

That wasn’t the only thing that Lenin and the Bolsheviks sought to abolish. Consider Lenin’s landmark October 2, 1920, speech to the Russian Young Communist League, in which Lenin instructed the 600 assembled delegates in how to “accomplish the task of destroying the foundations of the old.” Lenin said of Marx: “He critically reshaped everything that had been created by human society, without ignoring a single detail. He reconsidered, subjected to criticism, and verified on the working-class movement everything that human thinking had created.” Everything, everything. Among them, the “old schools” would need to be abolished. “The old schools produced servants needed by the capitalists,” sniffed Lenin. “We must therefore abolish them.”

The new “aim,” Lenin told young communists, was simple: “learn communism.” He told the youth, “You have to build up a communist society,” and “every young man and woman” must proceed in that task without exception. “You must train yourselves to be communists.” As for “the old society,” said Lenin, “We had to destroy all that, and overthrow them.” This meant “overthrowing the tsar, overthrowing the capitalists, and abolishing the capitalist class.”

Abolish, abolish, abolish. Lenin, too, was an abolitionist. Communism required a constant process of abolition.

In short, the notion of abolition dominates Marxist thoughts and writings. Marxists are abolitionists. And, not surprisingly, so is Patrisse Cullors, as she tells us in this new video and upcoming book.

So, when you hear Patrisse Cullors, founder of BLM, talking about “abolishing the police” — and, more so, “getting rid of” prisons and jails and surveillance and courts—and when you hear her calling herself a trained and studied and committed Marxist, you need to understand that the Marxism is not unrelated. For those liberals who shrug off the fact that Cullors is a Marxist, well, you have a lot to learn.

And above all, most disturbing is what this says about the destructive roots of the “abolish the police” movement that Patrisse Cullors and BLM have inspired. The Marxism matters.

Denver School Board Director, a BLM Activist, Accused of Molesting 62 Children

Who is Tay Anderson? Denver school board member accused of ...


SEE: https://pjmedia.com/uncategorized/kevindowneyjr/2021/06/01/denver-school-board-director-a-blm-activist-accused-of-molesting-62-children-n1451340;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Denver school board director Tay Anderson, a BLM activist and possibly the youngest black elected official in Colorado, has been accused of sex crimes ranging from inappropriate touching to “violent acts of rape” by 62 youngsters, 61 of whom are here illegally and likely seemed like easy targets, and one of whom is as young as 14 years old.

Ian Miles Cheong was quick to jump on Anderson’s Twitter throat, with a copy of Anderson’s tweet where he calls for BLM riots and declares that Antifa isn’t real.

The Washington Post referred to Anderson as the “face of Denver’s protests.” The Colorado Herald posted texts from Anderson to children, many with heart emojis saying, “Let’s be friends.” There is a petition on Change.org calling for Anderson’s arrest.

Anderson tweeted his innocence over the holiday weekend but stepped down from the school board because schools and pederasts don’t mix well when the cops are sniffing around.

Anderson was already under investigation after a rape accusation by a group called Black Lives Matter 5280 and called him out in this tweet.

This accusation brings the number of victims on the list to 63, which is enough to make Bill Cosby fidgety. The Colorado Herald said, “While DPS (Denver Public Schools) continues to dodge the issue and protect its prodigal son, the continued deflection of responsibility for protecting underage students by DPS is saddening and frightening.”

“When Anderson was elected, at his first board meeting,” the Herald continued, “he said he would remain seated during the pledge of allegiance. ‘We will not stand while our country separates families and keeps kids in cages,’ Anderson said at the event.” Anderson also drew criticism last March when he accused a white man of committing a mass shooting in Colorado and the shooter turned out to be a pro-ISIS Muslim male from Syria.

Texas Gov. Abbott Declares Border Emergency as Intel Community Warns of Rising Terrorist Threat


SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/bryan-preston/2021/06/02/texas-gov-abbott-declares-border-emergency-as-intel-community-warns-of-rising-terrorist-threat-n1451521;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Joe Biden likes to accuse you and me of being terrorists because we don’t agree with him. He has numerous other Democrats playing the same game, which is corrosive to the republic. Dissent is only patriotic when a Republican is in the White House, it seems.

Meanwhile, the U.S. intelligence community is warning that chaos on the border is leading to a rising terrorist threat to the country, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Intelligence officials told the White House in a classified briefing that individuals with ties to terrorist groups may be illegally crossing the southern border, contradicting claims by Democrats that the immigration crisis does not constitute a national security threat.

Immigrants with connections to Islamic terrorist groups have begun taking advantage of what one senior Customs and Border Protection official called “a porous border.” In April, border patrol officers arrested two Yemeni nationals on a terrorist watch list. National security officials have pledged to assist officers in counterterrorism operations at the U.S.-Mexico border to help the strapped agency handle the influx of threats, according to a memo reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.

There was also the armed Iraqi who didn’t make much news beyond the border. There is also the ongoing case of ventilator theft the Del Rio Sector of the Border Patrol is dealing with.

Human trafficking is still a huge ongoing problem. Various Border Patrol sectors post about issues they’re encountering and thus far are not being censored as heavily as the media.

Bombshell Emails Reveal That Fauci Wasn’t Being Straight With the American People




SEE: https://pjmedia.com/columns/megan-fox/2021/06/02/emails-reveal-that-fauci-wasnt-being-straight-with-the-american-people-n1451475;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Dr. Anthony Fauci is getting roasted all over social media after the Washington Post and BuzzFeed released scores of his emails, obtained through FOIA requests. The ones that aren’t heavily redacted tell quite a story. It should come as no surprise to readers of PJ Media that Dr. Fauci didn’t believe the line of crap he sold us about wearing “the typical mask you buy in the drugstore” to protect us from the virus—at least he didn’t in Feb. 2020.

“Masks are really for infected people to protect them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” Fauci wrote in an email to Sylvia Burwell, presumably President Barack Obama’s former HHS secretary. “The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.”

Recall that in March 2020 Fauci was telling people to stop buying masks. We later learned that he made the recommendation because he was “concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply.”

We’ve been telling you for a year that it’s written on the boxes that drug-store masks are not sufficient to protect from viruses. Dr. Fauci knew it then and he knows it now. Yet, STILL, our children are forced into these things and made to wear them all day in order to participate in school. He should be arrested and charged with the mass child abuse of America’s children.

Somehow, advice for sick people to wear masks to avoid infecting others morphed into “even healthy people have to wear masks,” including people who are vaccinated, even after “asymptomatic spread” panic never panned out. The level of convoluted nonsense here is off the scale.

PJ Media has written extensively about how Facebook decimated our traffic and hurt our business over false fact-checks for raising questions about the response to the virus. When our sister sites Townhall and RedState reported that some scientists were questioning whether COVID-19 was engineered or leaked from a lab, they got choked by the Big-Tech bullies and told that we were spreading “fake news.” (Sign up for VIP today to help us stay independent from the censors.)

An email Fauci received in Feb. 2020, obtained by BuzzFeed, says that the COVID-19 virus showed signs of “potentially” being engineered. Kristian Anderson, professor of immunology and microbiology at Scripps Research, emailed Fauci saying, “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

Why was this point of view silenced? Who knows if that’s true or not? Anderson’s email coincides with and echos a report suggesting the possibility of an engineered virus, which was pulled a few days later for factual errors.

To be clear: I strongly object to media outlets being silenced and censored for reporting what one or more scientists think they’ve found. Whatever it is, the public should hear it. If it is withdrawn later, as was a report that made some scientists believe that COVID-19 might be engineered, then the press should report that. Scientific integrity is preserved and the public is treated to a real-time look at how science is never settled and is always changing and advancing or being clarified. Most importantly, the public is treated like adults and not small children who are incapable of understanding science and evolving studies.

Why are we being controlled like Chinese press outlets? It doesn’t even matter if the virus was engineered or not. The fact that one or more scientists have reason to believe it might be (even if they change their minds at a later date) is newsworthy. It is not okay for the Big-Tech powers that be to shut down any story they want and punish and silence media for trying to tell it.

Back in February of 2020, anyone who reported that the virus might be engineered or may have come from the Wuhan lab was censored and defamed. In May of last year, Fauci declared: “If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated … Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species.” Facebook censored any news outlet reporting that the virus may have escaped from a Chinese facility. Recently, the establishment has admitted that the virus could have leaked from the Wuhan lab, after dismissing that theory as a cooked-up “racist” Trump provocation for the better part of a year. How dare they? 

It’s true that our knowledge of the virus changed over the months, but I don’t think there is any excuse for Fauci making half of America believe that a cloth mask is some kind of magic solution against a virus he knew to be far smaller than the holes in the masks. Nor is it appropriate to have hidden ongoing studies and findings about the virus from the public. It’s negligent and dishonest. This is the kind of thing that dictatorships do. I am looking forward to Rand Paul’s next session with Dr. Fauci at a Senate hearing.

If you want to scroll through Fauci’s emails yourself, here they are:



Fauci's Emails and the Covid Cover-Up

If you like your pandemic, you can keep your pandemic


SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/06/new-emails-cast-light-faucis-coronavirus-cover-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Last May, Dr. Fauci offered National Geographic magazine an “exclusive” interview. It was one of the millions of exclusive interviews that he seemed to be doing for every media outlet in the country and on the planet. But there was a special twist to this particular exclusive interview.

President Trump revealed a week earlier that he had seen evidence that the coronavirus pandemic had come out of a Chinese lab. The media and its pet experts rushed to shut down what they called a “conspiracy theory” even though it was backed by secret intelligence.

And the media’s biggest pet expert was Fauci who was more than happy to oblige.

Fauci told the magazine owned by Disney, China’s big corporate partner, the evidence is “very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated” but he turned curiously evasive when asked if it could have leaked from Wuhan's Level 4 lab and dismissed the relevance of the question since the virus "was in the wild to begin with".

While Fauci pretended to be disinterested in the question of the pandemic’s origins, emails released through Freedom of Information Act requests showed he knew what was at stake.

In April, before Fauci’s interview or President Trump’s comments, Peter Daszak, whose EcoHealth Alliance had moved millions in grants from the National Institutes of Health to study bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, thanked Fauci for protecting the lab.

Daszak offered Fauci a “personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators” for backing "a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology." The entire middle part of the email was curiously redacted. It’s unclear if the collaborators would have included the Chinese scientists laboring away in Wuhan.

The EcoHealth Alliance had been working with Wuhan's top man, Shi Zhengli, and Fauci wasn’t a disinterested party. The Wuhan grant had come through NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases which Fauci has headed since 1984. The lab release theory wasn’t just bad news for the EcoHealth Alliance, whose grant would be suspended by the Trump administration, but for Fauci, who wasn’t just helping the media slam Trump, but was also helping himself.

“We’ll all know the shoddy truth of how a conspiracy theory pushed by this administration led @NIHDirector to block the only US research group still working in China to analyze COVID origins,” Daszak later angrily tweeted.

“Why was it canceled? It was canceled because the NIH was told to cancel it," Fauci glibly told Congress that summer. "I don’t know the reason, but we were told to cancel it.”

Not even Fauci’s biggest media fans could pretend that he didn’t know why it was canceled.

But even while Fauci was pretending that he didn’t understand why the issue kept coming up when he was in front of the cameras, his emails show that he was well aware of the issue.

Emails show that Fauci was urgently conferring with NIAID's Principal Deputy Director Hugh Auchincloss over gain of function experiments. “She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad,” Auchincloss wrote in one email. Fauci likely already knew the answer.

Fauci closed another email to Auchincloss with a curt, "You will have tasks today that must be done." It was a curious response to the sort of thing that he would breezily dismiss as an irrelevant distraction that he was baffled to be even asked about while in public forums.

But Fauci was actually a longstanding fan of gain-of-function research despite its deadly risks. 

In 2012, he pondered the possibility that “an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed” and then badly replicated so that a “scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?”

What was Fauci’s response to a pandemic caused by dangerous gain-of-function research?

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks."

It’s entirely possible that we might all be living in that no longer hypothetical world right now.

A year later, Fauci lifted a gain-of-function moratorium on influenza viruses. In 2017, NIH lifted a pause on gain-of- function research on influenza, SARS, and MERS. The pause had been implemented by the Obama administration which offered guidance for lifting it in its final days.

Nature Magazine succinctly described the move in a headline, "The National Institutes of Health will again fund research that makes viruses more dangerous."

This year, Fauci dismissed the funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.” 

But the very respectable lab and its scientists were, as former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said, “engaged in efforts connected to the People's Liberation Army” with “military activity being performed alongside what they claimed was just good old civilian research.”

Fauci insisted that the NIH was not directly backing gain-of-function research that could have produced a pandemic, but the NIH could not deny that the Chinese Military could have done so.

He admitted in a Senate hearing, “You never know” when asked about possible gain of function research being carried out anyway, but kept insisting that he trusted Chinese researchers.

Some of the researchers had to be hospitalized with an unusual illness before the pandemic. The revelation of that and other research has helped demolish Fauci’s attempt to stonewall the theory that the pandemic had come out of the very same lab funded by his National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Fauci has signaled a greater openness to the theory he once fought, but it’s much too late to salvage his reputation. The latest release of Fauci emails, heavily censored in places, once again shows that he was the man who knew too much.

As the National Geographic interview went live, a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases employee gushingly emailed him, “I am grateful to say my Director is Dr. Anthony Fauci and share with my family, friends, and church that if you said it, it’s gospel.”

But the faith in Fauci is falling into expert heresy as new revelations arrive every day. The prayer candles and t-shirts, the tide of Fauci fantasies and fan mail, are beginning to recede. Even his biggest fans are turning from the gospel of Fauci to ask some very hard questions.

The experts and the media made it a priority to suppress the China lab leak theory under President Trump. Without Trump, the media no longer has any real need to cover for Fauci and China. What was once falsely described by the media as a “conspiracy theory” is now science.

And if those Fauci emails set off alarm bells, the ones he’s sending now must be deafening.

Texas Healthcare Workers Refuse to be “Human Guinea Pigs,” Sue Hospital Over COVID Vaccine Mandate


SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/texas-healthcare-workers-refuse-to-be-human-guinea-pigs-sue-hospital-over-covid-vaccine-mandate/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A Houston hospital was hit with litigation on May 29 for allegedly making its employees and doctors get the COVID-19 vaccine to keep their jobs.

The Houston Methodist Health System network became the first hospital in America to require all employees to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Currently, it oversees eight hospitals and has more than 26,000 employees. Houston Methodist gave workers a deadline of June 7 to get the vaccine — if not, staffers risk suspension and termination.

As a result, 117 employees have joined a lawsuit in Montgomery County that alleges the hospital is “illegally requiring its employees to be injected with an experimental COVID-19 mRNA gene modification injection or be fired.” “Methodist Hospital is forcing its employees to be human ‘guinea pigs’ as a condition for continued employment,” the lawsuit states.

Hospital CEO Dr. Marc Boom sent out a letter in April to staffers announcing that employees have to be vaccinated by June 7. “Please see the HR policy that outlines the consequences of not being compliant by June 7, which include suspension and eventually termination,” the letter, which was included in the lawsuit, stated.

The employees who are challenging the hospital believe they should have freedom of choice to take the vaccine without “force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any type of binding or coercion,” and that the mandate is a violation of the Nuremberg Code, a medical ethics code that bans forced medical experiments and mandates voluntary consent.

The lawsuit cited that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its first emergency use authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 in December 2020, but the vaccines are awaiting full FDA approval and licensing, which will likely take months for the agency to review additional data.

Jennifer Bridges, a nurse who has worked at the Texas hospital for six years, is the lead plaintiff in the case. She said she wants more time for the FDA to gather more research on the vaccine before she gets it.

“People trying to force you to put something into your body that you’re not comfortable with, in order to keep your job, is just insane,” Bridges told KHOU-11, Houston’s CBS News affiliate.

Dr. Boom responded to the lawsuit, saying that 99 percent of Houston Methodist employees have already met the requirements for the vaccination mandate against the “deadly virus,” and added, “As health care workers, it is our sacred obligation to do whatever we can to protect our patients, who are the most vulnerable in our community. It is our duty and our privilege.”

He went on to state that “It is unfortunate that the few remaining employees who refuse to get vaccinated and put our patients first are responding in this way. It is legal for health care institutions to mandate vaccines, as we have done with the flu vaccine since 2009. The COVID-19 vaccines have proven through rigorous trials to be very safe and very effective and are not experimental.”

“Fact-checkers” back Dr. Boom’s claim that “COVID vaccines are not experimental,” arguing the shots have not skipped any trial stages. But the formal stages that the COVID jabs went through are far from enough to consider them “not experimental.” This type of reasoning seems to be purely sophistic since the FDA grants EUA for “investigational” drugs. All three injections that got EUA — Pfizer/BioNTechModerna and J&J — were defined as “investigational” by the FDA.   

According to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), an investigational product refers to a preventative (vaccine), a therape​utic (drug or biologic), device, diagnostic, or palliative used in a clinical trial. An investigational product may be an unlicensed product or a licensed product when used or assembled (formulated or packaged) differently from the approved form, when used for an unapproved indication, or when used to gain further information about an approved use.

The FDA guidance on “Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities” explicitly states that people “have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product.” Until the drug gets full approval, an informed consent of the recipient to use it is necessary.

However, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), state and local mandates are subject to state and local laws.

“The federal government does not mandate (require) vaccination for people. Whether a state or local government or employer, for example, can require or mandate COVID-19 vaccination is a matter of state or other applicable law.”

Also, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EOEC), a federal government agency that protects workers from discrimination, issued a new guidance on May 28, that, ironically, promotes discrimination against workers who refuse to get an experimental gene injection. The guidance allows employers to legally require COVID-19 shots to re-enter a physical workplace as long as they follow requirements to find alternative arrangements for employees unable to get vaccinated for medical reasons or religious beliefs.

Some of those accommodations include allowing an unvaccinated employee to wear a face mask and social distance while at work, to work a modified shift, get periodic tests for COVID-19, or be given the opportunity to telework or accept a reassignment, according to the guidance.

Hence, the outcome of the lawsuit filed by the Texas healthcare workers is hard to predict.

Are feds discussing ‘VAX passport’ to resuscitate REAL ID?

REAL ID image


SEE: https://onenewsnow.com/medical-health/2021/06/01/are-feds-discussing-vax-passport-to-resuscitate-real-id;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Department of Homeland Security says there are no plans for anything like a vaccine passport – but some think it's still on the minds of people within the department.

DHS made the announcement Friday seeking to clarify what Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said earlier in response to a question in a television interview. Mayorkas had said the agency was "taking a very close look" at the possibility of vaccine passports as the coronavirus pandemic eases and Americans begin to travel overseas.

Twila Brase of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom suggests Mayorkas "may be talking from what he knows inside his own agency or some thought that they have had and forgetting that President Biden has said, 'No, they're not going to be doing that.'

She adds: "Some of Biden's other staff have also said that they're not going to be doing it as well. However, the Department of Homeland Security is heading up the REAL ID program … and that makes me think that there is perhaps some discussion within the department that they would use the vaccination passport as a way to advance REAL ID, which has been delayed now for another two years."

The REAL ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005, enacted the 9/11 Commission's recommendation that the federal government "set standards for the issuance of sources of identification, such as driver's licenses."

The Act established minimum security standards for license issuance and production and prohibits federal agencies from accepting (for certain purposes) driver's licenses and ID cards from states not meeting the Act's minimum standards.

The ability to board a flight is one area where people might see or hear the need for REAL ID, but Brase is concerned that people might one day be told they need it for health care services.

Related articles from One News Now:




Woke Public Schools IMPLODING as School Choice SURGES and Homeschooling SKYROCKETS 700 Percent!!!


Woke Public Schools are IMPLODING as School Choice SURGES and Homeschooling SKYROCKETS an astonishing 700 Percent! In this video, we’re going to take a look at the extraordinary rise of school choice programs in states across the country, how homeschooling is surging at rates never imagined just months ago, and how enrollment in woke public schools continues to plummet like never before; you are NOT going to want to miss this!