Berlin Airlift in Reverse: U.S. Flying Baby Formula From Germany~”GERMAN FORMULA EXPRESS” COMPANY TAKING RETAIL ORDERS

May 22, 2022 John

Berlin Airlift 1948-1949 - COLD WAR DOCUMENTARY

Our series on the history of the Cold War period continues with a documentary on the Berlin airlift - the operation conducted by the Western powers in order to supply Berlin, which was under the Soviet Blockade.

GERMAN FORMULA EXPRESS TAKING ORDERS:

BY RICK MORAN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/05/22/berlin-airlift-in-reverse-u-s-flying-baby-formula-from-germany-n1599847;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In June 1948, the Soviet Union blockaded the partitioned city of Berlin, hoping to force the recently victorious allies to leave.

It didn’t work. “Operation VITTLES,” a military airlift of hundreds of tons of food, medicine, and other supplies, kept the Soviets from their goal. For more than a year, hundreds of planes flew in supplies to the isolated city until they finally relented.

There’s some irony in the news today about U.S. military planes flying baby formula from Germany to Indiana. Only this time, the threat isn’t from a foreign power. The threat is from the criminal incompetence of the Biden administration, which ignored the baby formula crisis for months until the media began to report on it.

Stars and Stripes:

More than 130 pallets filled with formula departed for Indianapolis on a C-17 aircraft a little after 5 a.m. Germany time as part of Operation Fly Formula. Each pallet of Nestle Health Science Alfamino Infant and Alfamino Junior formula held over 430 of the 14.1-ounce containers of formula, labels on the packaging showed.

Another 114 pallets of Gerber Good Start Extensive HA formula are expected to arrive soon, the White House said in a statement Thursday, adding that the equivalent of up to 1.5 million 8-ounce bottles of the three formulas will be delivered.

The crisis began in early February when the FDA discovered a rare kind of bacteria that may have contaminated some formula that ended up sickening four infants. It was never established that the bacteria came from the Abbott Nutrition plant in Sturgis, Mich. But there were some other problems with sanitation at the plant, and it was shuttered.

From February on, the clock was ticking on this crisis. And the Biden administration was asleep at the wheel.

All of the measures taken by the White House to deal with this crisis, including the president invoking the Defense Production Act and this latest public relations stunt to deliver a few dozen pallets of formula to America, won’t adequately address the immediate crisis.

Simply put, the Biden administration was caught flat-footed and wasn’t ready.

NRO:

There aren’t any fundamental problems with producing baby formula. How do we know? Europeans, Japanese, and Australians are producing it just fine. There’s only a baby-formula shortage in the United States, and it’s because the United States government has adopted policies that allowed what should have been a relatively minor market disruption to turn into a widespread, prolonged shortage.

Instead of allowing parents to buy foreign formula as they would buy any other good, the Biden administration is making a big show of airlifting it here with specially contracted flights. The United States of America should not be dependent on airlifts for an adequate supply of baby formula. As Eric Boehm pointed out for Reason, if foreign brands of baby formula are safe to be airlifted now, they should be available for purchase all the time. It’s clear that the 98-percent-domestic baby-formula market leaves Americans vulnerable to supply shocks that the rest of the world doesn’t face.

No “supply bottlenecks” or “disruptions” caused this crisis. The shortage isn’t the fault of the pandemic wreaking havoc on the supply chains.

The administration didn’t start addressing this crisis until earlier this month despite having a lead time of at least 2.5 months. But the media continues to run interference for the doddering old fool in the White House because they’d rather assist in Biden’s lies than do anything to make the president’s political problems worse.

____________________________________________________________

AND: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10825003/Nestle-airlifting-baby-formula-Netherlands-Switzerland-amid-crisis.html

GERMAN BABY FORMULA AVAILABLE HERE: https://germanformulaexpress.com/

BIDEN DESPERATELY HAS GERMANY AIRLIFT BABY FORMULA TO THE UNITED STATES

Joe Biden Is the Equivalent of 9/11 for the American Economy

May 22, 2022 John

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2022/05/20/joe-biden-is-the-equivalent-of-9-11-for-the-american-economy-n1599568;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Joe Biden’s tumultuous year and a half of pretending to be president has seen the fall and rise of many things in the United States: gas prices, of course, are rising through the roof, along with prices on pretty much everything else. But for the stock market, it’s a different story altogether. Yahoo Finance reported Friday that U.S. stocks have just endured their longest losing streak since 2001; in other words, Joe Biden’s presidency has had an effect on the U.S. economy that is equivalent to 9/11.

This is not in any way to diminish the untold suffering that resulted from the attacks. Nearly 3,000 people were brutally murdered. There is no equivalent for that and no mitigation of its horror. The analogy between then and now is not in that but in the fact that the economy is suffering to a degree that we have not seen since the immediate aftermath of that terrible day.

According to Yahoo Finance, the major stock indexes were “heading for steep weekly losses as concerns over the resilience of corporate profits in the face of inflation resurged this week.” Luckily, Old Joe’s Commie pals threw us a lifeline: “the S&P 500 traded lower, erasing earlier gains after China’s central bank unexpectedly cut a benchmark interest rate to offer some relief to borrowers in the country still grappling with a widespread COVID-19 outbreak.”

Nonetheless, “the index dropped more than 1.5%, bringing it on an intraday basis lower by more than 20% from its recent record close from Jan. 3. If the losses hold through market close, the S&P 500 will have entered a bear market.” Well, of course, we will. That is as certain as Joe’s next teleprompter gaffe.

Meanwhile, the news from the other indexes was no better: “the Dow shed more than 400 points or 1.4%, and the Nasdaq dropped more than 2% during intraday trading. Treasury yields sank, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year note sinking to just above 2.8%, and U.S. crude oil prices edged up to more than $112 per barrel.” And this has been going on for a while: “the losses Friday for the major U.S. stock indexes extended a slide seen earlier this week. As of Thursday’s close, the S&P 500 was on track for a weekly loss of 5.4% — its biggest since January. And the index was also on track to post a seventh straight weekly loss or its longest losing streak since 2001. The Dow and Nasdaq paced toward weekly losses of 5% and 6.2%, respectively.”

The longest losing streak since 2001. What happened in 2001 that made stocks take a nosedive? According to CNN Money, that fateful year “began with a bang. The Nasdaq surged a record 14.17 percent on the second trading day of 2001 after the Federal Reserve surprised investors with a half-percentage point rate cut. That was the first of 11 attempts by central bankers to revive consumer and business spending. Stocks continued to rise in January only to tumble by April. They gained sharply through May before gradually declining through summer.”

But then came 9/11, and suddenly the economic picture was drastically different: “the Dow industrials fell more than 1,300 points in the first week after the markets reopened following the terror attacks, its worst week since the Great Depression. By Sept. 21, the major indexes had fallen to three-year lows. But less than 10 weeks later, the major indexes erased their post-Sept. 11 losses, vindicating investors who called for patriotic buying after the attack.”

Will the American economy similarly rebound now? It could, but there is no chance of such a recovery while Joe Biden and his henchmen have their knees on our collective economic windpipe. It is the Biden administration’s profligate spending, an uncontrolled increase of the money supply, and relentless commitment to green fantasies and socialist internationalism that have gotten us in this fix, and there is no end in sight.

Could the stock market recover? Sure, if Biden suddenly became an America-First president and focused on relieving the plight of the American people rather than the Ukrainian people and if he abandoned his schemes to destroy the economy chasing more green delusions and worked to restore the energy independence the nation had achieved during the Trump administration. But that’s about as likely as Old Joe reading a message off his teleprompter without saying something silly and/or incoherent.

The next milestone will be when the stock downturn becomes the worst since the Great Depression. Watch for that one soon. And then what will we see in America? Breadlines? Hoovervilles? Food riots? In Joe Biden’s America, during the presidency that Nancy Pelosi gushed was “perfect,” all this and more is in the offing. Old Joe Biden’s presidency will long be remembered for its many milestones, and wrecking the strongest economy on the planet will stand as one of the foremost.

The 10-Year Pandemic Plan

May 21, 2022 John

BY DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA

SEE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/05/21/the-10-year-pandemic-plan.aspx?v=1653157804;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

THE PLAN shows the official agenda of the World Health Organization to have ten years of ongoing pandemics, from 2020 to 2030. This is revealed by a WHO virologist, Marion Koopmans. You will also see shocking evidence that the first pandemic was planned and abundantly announced right before it happened. Make sure to watch, and share this everywhere.

More information, and to see all the documents featured in THE PLAN, go to: https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/proof

Story at-a-glance

Thousands of medical doctors and scientists now believe that the pandemic was planned and used to install a world dictatorship
The World Health Organization has planned for 10 years of infectious diseases from 2020 to 2030
Bill Gates stated publicly in 2018 that a global pandemic was imminent, likely within the next decade, while Melinda Gates went so far as to state that an engineered virus in the coming years was humanity’s greatest threat
Data from World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) shows data on COVID-19 test kits imported by different countries in 2017 and 2018
Numerous additional announcements occurred in the years and months leading up to 2020 that signaled a pandemic was coming
A group of international lawyers, experts, and scientists is now trying to spread the word that the COVID-19 pandemic is a criminal operation intended to increase control and establish a world dictatorship

As the dust begins to settle from the COVID-19 pandemic, it’s easier to look back with clarity on the unprecedented events that have taken place over the last two years. Thousands of medical doctors and scientists now believe that the pandemic was planned and used to install a world dictatorship. Further, it’s unlikely to be the last.

The World Health Organization, in fact, has planned for 10 years of infectious diseases from 2020 to 2030, as revealed by WHO virologist Marion Koopmans in “The Plan,” featured above. When asked whether chances are high that there will be a second pandemic, she responds (translated from Dutch), “Yes, this has been in the WHO’s 10-year plan for some time. That plan says that there will be a major infectious disease crisis. Well, this was year one.”¹

How could they know that an infectious disease crisis is imminent in the next decade? A series of shocking evidence reveals that this may have been the plan all along — a plan that hasn’t been hidden. On the contrary, it’s been stated openly for years that a pandemic was coming, setting the stage for widespread acceptance and compliance around the globe.

Proof the Pandemic Was Planned?

The WHO virologist’s acknowledgment that the agency has a plan for 10 years of ongoing pandemics mirrors a statement by Bill Gates that COVID-19 was “pandemic one” and “pandemic two” is coming. “We’ll have to prepare for the next one. That will get attention this time,” he says — while smiling.²

It’s important to understand that Bill Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder, contributing more to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial budget³ than any member-state government, via multiple avenues including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as GAVI, which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with WHO, the World Bank, and various vaccine manufacturers.

In short, Bill Gates is essentially the owner of WHO, and WHO’s 10-year pandemic plan is also Gates’ plan. As noted by Stop World Control:⁴

“In the globalist view, mankind as a whole must submit to the 'World' Health Organization, without them ever asking our opinion or even consulting with other medical experts. In fact, every medical expert speaking out against their decisions is censored.”

Other world leaders are also on board. England’s Prince Charles, for instance, has publicly stated, “There will be more and more pandemics if we don’t do ‘the great reset’ now.”⁵

Millions of COVID-19 Test Kits Sold — in 2017 and 2018

It’s difficult to ignore the numerous announcements, both subtle and overt, that a pandemic was coming, which occurred in the years and months leading up to 2020. Data from World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) shows COVID-19 test kits were imported by different countries in 2017 and 2018. “Let this sink in for a second: Literally hundreds of millions of COVID-19 test kits were exported and imported, all over the world, during 2017 and 2018,” Stop World Control explains.⁶

The data was posted on September 5, 2020, on social media and it went viral. The next day, WITS swapped “COVID-19 test kits” with “medical test kits,” but the Internet Archive Wayback Machine still has an image of the original.⁷ Meanwhile, in 2017, Anthony Fauci somehow knew that an outbreak was coming. In fact, he all but guaranteed it, stating:⁸

“There is no question there is going to be a challenge for the coming administration in the area of infectious diseases. There will be a surprise outbreak. There’s no doubt in anyone’s mind about this.”

Gates also stated publicly in 2018 that a global pandemic was imminent, likely within the next decade, while Melinda Gates went so far as to state that an engineered virus in the coming years was humanity’s greatest threat.⁹

Then there’s the often-overlooked fact that the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored a novel coronavirus pandemic preparedness exercise shortly before the pandemic started.

The event, which took place on October 18, 2019, in New York, was called Event 201, and it included a detailed simulation of a coronavirus outbreak with a predicted global death toll of 65 million people within a span of 18 months.¹⁰ December 19, 2019, shortly after the event, Gates tweeted, “I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.”¹¹

Moderna Had COVID-19 Shots in 2019

Here’s another unsettling fact: December 12, 2019, Moderna, together with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), sent mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill¹² — again, that’s before the pandemic started. The confidential documents were revealed by The Daily Expose, which reported:¹³

“What did Moderna [and NIAID] know that we didn’t? In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine, and evidence suggests there hasn’t been a singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity throughout 2020 and 2021 either.”

Going back further, in 2010, The Rockefeller Foundation released a report titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” which uses scenario planning to explore ways that technology and growth/development and government might play out over the coming decades. One of the scenarios they detailed was a pandemic with some eerie similarities to COVID-19:¹⁴

“In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit … The pandemic … had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and of office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.”

The scenario suggests that China fared far better than the U.S., due to its government’s “quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”

As the pandemic continues, “national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.”

The increased authoritarian control and oversight of citizens continued even after the pandemic ended, and was welcomed at first in exchange for “greater safety and stability.”

Pandemic Propaganda Has Been Ongoing for Years

So-called “predictive programming” prepares the public for future events via entertainment. In the 2003 series “Dead Zone,” a coronavirus pandemic is featured with chloroquine emerging as the cure. “V for Vendetta” is another example. This 2006 movie features the rise of dictatorship and fear-based propaganda due to a virus. Curiously, the film is set in 2020 as “an uncompromising vision of the future.”

In 2012, a comic book titled “Infected,” produced by the European Union for distribution among their employees only, also depicted a virus originating in a Chinese lab that sets the stage for worldwide tyranny, described as the “one health approach.”¹⁵

Even the Summer Olympics in 2012 included the scenario of a pandemic — complete with nurses and hospital beds — in its opening show.¹⁶ Even in the months leading up to the pandemic, additional red flags were raised. Among them:¹⁷

Months before the pandemic, a panel discussed the need for “a global disruptive event to make the world willing to accept experimental vaccines”
In August 2019, Australia published a management plan for a pandemic¹⁸
Six months before the pandemic, the Global Vaccination Summit prepared to vaccinate the entire world
In September 2019, WHO instructed all governments to prepare for an imminent pandemic due to a “rapidly spreading lethal respiratory pathogen”¹⁹

And in 2022, a group of international lawyers, experts, and scientists is now trying to spread the word that the COVID-19 pandemic is a criminal operation intended to increase control and establish a world dictatorship:²⁰

“The power structures colluded to stage a pandemic that they had been planning for years … To this end, they deliberately created mass panic through false statements of fact and a socially engineered psychological operation whose messages they conveyed through the corporate media.

The purpose of this mass panic was to persuade the population to agree to experimental so-called “vaccinations" (which they are not). These have been proven to be neither effective nor safe, but extremely dangerous and even lethal.”

Thousands Standing Up Against the Tyranny

At this point, signs that an all-encompassing global totalitarian plan is being quietly put together, piece by piece, are all around us. The Rockefeller Foundation released a “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan” that calls for the use of a digital "patient identification number" to track all Americans after testing them for COVID-19,²¹ and multibillionaire criminals are working to impose worldwide tyranny. As noted by Stop World Control:²²

“Total world domination has been a diabolical desire of many powerful leaders throughout world history. Just think of the notorious world empires of Rome, Great Britain, the Persians, the Russians, and so on.

This perverse passion has never left the corrupt hearts of humanity, but the means to achieve this goal have changed. Instead of invading nations with tanks and bazookas, they now enslave humanity using the force of fear. Once they can create enough panic, they can present the 'solution'. This solution, however, means removing our freedoms and submitting us to their control.

The main players in globalism are the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, the European Union, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and particularly the many private banks that basically control the world already. These visible entities are, however, just a facade that hides the true powers, which are the many 'Secret Societies.'”

Thousands have opened their eyes to the truth, however, and are making progress in sharing it with the world. This includes, among many others:

America’s Frontline Doctors	World Doctors Alliance
World Freedom Directory	Doctors for COVID Ethics
Great Barrington Declaration	World Freedom Alliance

If you want to be a part of positive change, know that there is hope — and it starts with information. With every fact you share with your inner circle, the knowledge grows and, with it, optimism for the future. A simple yet profound notion to remember is this:²³

“The tyranny is 100% dependent on the ignorance of the public. The solution is therefore to inform the people around us. Once people know what is really happening, they will stop complying and start resisting.”

Brighteon: VAXXED PILOT SUFFERS CARDIAC ARREST AFTER FLIGHT

May 21, 2022 John

MUST SEE: The HighWire with Del Bigtree

Why Did The U.S. Just Buy 13 Million Doses Of MONKEYPOX Vaccine?

May 21, 2022 John

Another ‘Conspiracy Theory’ May Be About to Come True: The WHO Could Decide if You Get Medicine, When You Travel, and What You Write on Social Media

May 20, 2022 John

BY KEVIN DOWNEY, JR.

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/kevindowneyjr/2022/05/20/another-conspiracy-theory-may-be-about-to-come-true-the-who-could-decide-if-you-get-medicine-when-you-travel-and-what-you-write-on-social-media-n1599468;

AND: https://thenewamerican.com/who-planning-major-power-grabs-states-congress-can-stop-it/

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A tip of the tinfoil hat to my conspiracy theory friends. You’re right again.

The president of the United States would NEVER hand over immense power regarding healthcare, travel, and censorship to the World Health Organization (WHO), right?

Tucker Carlson broke a story on Thursday that every American needs to understand regarding the “Global Pandemic Treaty.”

This January, the Biden administration submitted a series of proposed amendments to something called the International Health Regulations (the IHR). Now, the Biden administration’s amendments, along with those from several other countries, will be combined to create a new global pandemic treaty. “We need a pandemic treaty.” That treaty is set to be adopted starting this weekend in Geneva at the World Health Assembly.

Now, the full text of the treaty is not yet finished, but a W.H.O. working group has summarized what it’s going to look like. The document begins by promising to restrict the W.H.O’s authority just to pandemics. Calm down, it’s just pandemics: “W.H.O. Secretariat to play the leading, convening and coordinating role in operational aspects of emergency response to a pandemic.”

In a nutshell, the WHO wants:

total control over the world’s pandemic response
to distribute medicine on a basis of “equity”
to censor any “disinformation” that doesn’t agree with what they say
have real-time information about when/where YOU travel. You know, for the “health security of the world, comrade”

That means unelected officials from other countries will have a ridiculous amount of power over Americans. There is no apparent accountability. I think the word for this is “communism.” Can it REALLY happen? Buckle up.

Centralized Control: The WHO Treaty & Amendments Unleash Tedros as Health Dictator of the World – Tucker Carlson
The WHO's Would-Be Treaty Powers 1.) The authority to declare what constitutes a pandemic. It could be the flu. 2.)https://t.co/J2nMn40pOv pic.twitter.com/TZkFyRd3JN

— Lorphic (@Lorphicnews) May 20, 2022

FAST FACTS

President Trump removed the U.S. from the WHO and Gropey Joe brought us back in
The WHO lied and ran cover for China during the “pandemic.” China claimed COVID couldn’t be transmitted from human to human. The WHO backed up that lie. WHO covered for China re: the origins of the Hong Kong Fluey. The WHO’s bigwig, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, went so far as to congratulate China on its handling of the Bat Stew Flu
Tedros is from Ethiopia. He once called an outbreak of cholera a simple case of “acute watery diarrhea” among a group of people whom Tucker suggests Tedros found to be “disfavorable”
Tedros is a friend of Lord Fauci
This all links China, the WHO, and Fauci. See the problem yet?

FACT-O-RAMA! Chinese doctor Ai Fen tried to warn the world about COVID. China made her disappear.

If this treaty goes through, the WHO would potentially have total authority over worldwide emergency operations. The WHO, not our own government, would control how future pandemics are dealt with in the U.S. They’d also decide what is and is not a “pandemic.”

The treaty is full of nonsense, like this,

National and global coordinated actions to address the misinformation, disinformation and stigmatization that undermines public health.

Which means censorship in the name of “public health reasons.” Pssst, that’s communism.

WHO would have the capacity to deploy proactive countermeasures against misinformation and social media attacks. You know, like Facebook and Twitter are already doing.

If this treaty goes through, foreign agents will decide who gets vaccines and medicine based on “equity.”

From the treaty,

Equitable and effective access to vaccines, therapeutic, diagnostics, and essential supplies and for clinical trials.

Healtchcare workers and most vulnerable get medicine first.

Most vulnerable? Who gets to decide who is the most vulnerable? The WHO, that’s who.

But no one would use this power to keep medicine from getting to “certain groups,” right?

Wrong. The CDC is all about vaccinating minorities first, and 25 states are ok with that. Now imagine this sort of ~~equity~~ racism on a global scale.

WHO will have the power to “develop standards for producing a digital version of the International Certificate of Vaccination and Prophylaxis.” This means that something the “tinfoil wackjobs” have been warning us about could very well become a reality, the beginning of a New World Order.

You can watch Tucker brilliantly spell it out here in the first 15 minutes of his monologue, or you can read it here. Please watch it. It’s arguably one of the most important stories of the year.

Russian officials: American biolabs in Ukraine conducted illegal experiments on rivers and infected children with tuberculosis

May 20, 2022 John

BY ARSENIO TOLEDO

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-18-american-biolabs-conducted-illegal-experiments-rivers-children.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Russian officials are claiming that the biological weapons research laboratories in Ukraine have conducted illegal experiments on the country’s rivers and deliberately infected children with tuberculosis. The Russian government claimed that the children infected with tuberculosis were native Russians living in eastern Ukraine.

According to General Igor Kirillov, commander of Russia’s Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Protection Troops, the Defense Ministry’s investigation into American-funded bioweapons labs has provided the Russian government with substantial evidence proving that the Ukrainian government in Kyiv attempted to infect residents of the Luhansk region with a highly pathogenic strain of tuberculosis in 2020. (Related: RUSSIAN CLAIM: Democrats, Soros, and Gates set up Ukraine biolabs to make money for elections.)

“Leaflets made in the form of counterfeit banknotes were infected with the causative agent of tuberculosis and distributed among minors in the village of Stepove,” said Kirillov. Since 2014, this village has been occupied by pro-Russian separatists in Luhansk.

Kirillov added that the organizers of these experiments deliberately targeted less hygienic children, including kids who were more likely to put random things in their mouths and handle food without washing their hands.

The general added that bacteriological studies among children in Stepove confirmed that the isolated bacteria investigators found on the leaflets were resistant to first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs.

“The infection of the banknotes was most likely artificial since the material contains extremely dangerous strains of the pathogen in a concentration that can ensure infection and the development of the tuberculosis process,” noted Kirillov.

Kirillov added that the spread of tuberculosis through the Luhansk region exhibited signs of “deliberate, man-made contamination [using] leaflets with biomaterials of

high pathogenicity.”

The Russian government further claimed that the experiments on children were run by foreign specialists of uncertain nationality who entered Ukraine through third-party nations to conceal America’s involvement in the experiments.

These specialists were quickly evacuated from biolabs in the eastern portions of Ukraine to the country’s west shortly before Russia launched its invasion. Kirillov said they took with them all of their equipment and the drugs they used.

American-supervised specialists conducted experiments on Ukrainian rivers

At a recent meeting of the United Nations Security Council, Vasily Nebenzya, Russia’s ambassador to the U.N., alleged that the U.S. is using its experimentation in Ukraine to develop bioweapons. These experiments include studying how water-borne pathogens spread.

“Ukrainian specialists, under the supervision of American colleagues, have regularly carried out a collection of water samples from rivers flowing through Ukraine,” said Nebenzya. “The aim here is to establish the presence in them of specific dangerous pathogens, including cholera, typhoid, hepatitis A and E, and to evaluate the way in which they spread through the water in order to draw conclusions on the ability of these pathogens to incapacitate.”

“Then the collection of these samples was sent to the United States,” continued Nebenzya. “We have a logical question: Why? Why is a collection of dangerous pathogens being collected by the United States, which might then be spread through the waters of this region?”

Nebenzya warned that the results of America’s experimentation on river-borne pathogens could be used “to create a biological catastrophe, not only in Russia but on the whole [region] through the waters of the Azov and Black Seas and in Eastern Europe.”

During the same Security Council meeting, Nebenzya also accused the U.S. of deliberately refusing to strengthen the Biological Weapons Convention, a global treaty banning the use and prohibiting the development of bioweapons.

Nebenzya accused the U.S. of providing incoherent statements regarding American biological research activities and claiming that all activities “are by definition peaceful and ‘beneficial’ for the international community.”

U.S. diplomats are also refusing to speak with journalists who demand answers regarding American cooperation with Ukrainian biological research activities, including such activities that contradict statements made by leading American officials.

Furthermore, Nebenzya has accused American representatives of rejecting an initiative to augment the Biological Weapons Convention that would require countries to report military biological activities conducted beyond their territories.

“This means that the U.S. intentionally blocks attempts to reinforce the Biological Weapons Convention regime, which aims to make it possible to efficiently detect violations of the Convention,” said Nebenzya.

Bioterrorism.news has more on the U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine.

Watch this clip from the May 16 episode of “The Stew Peters Show” discussing Russia’s accusations.

This video is from the What Is Happening channel on Brighteon.com.

WHO-Policy Division-America’s Frontline Doctors

May 19, 2022 John

World Health Assembly to vote on IHR amendments in unprecedented WHO power grab

". . . the upshot of these amendments is to surrender sovereignty to the WHO regarding very broadly defined public health crises subject to the whim of the WHO Director-General."

SEE THE AMENDMENTS HERE:

https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4

BY MOSHE TOKAYER

SEE: https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/world-health-assembly-to-vote-on-ihr-amendments-in-unprecedented-who-power-grab;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Next week, May 22-28, the World Health Assembly, the governing body of the World Health Organization (WHO), will meet to vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The amendments can be seen here. The IHR and the new amendments if passed are legally binding on the United States and on all United Nations member states as a matter of international law.

According to Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin in their report on this issue, “These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.” The amendments eliminate the requirement to consult with the affected member state.

In addition, the WHO will be empowered to collaborate with other nations to deal with a declared health crisis even against the wishes of the affected nation.

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) position statement on these amendments puts it this way, “The WHO would have the power to decide what constitutes a ‘pandemic’ and to decide quarantine measures on a global scale. WHO would control the development and safety of new treatments and would decide vaccine mandates for each country! . . . the proposed amendments empower the corrupt Director-General to unilaterally declare a health emergency in any nation even against the opinion of that nation for any illness that is widespread.”

Incredibly, the Biden administration proposed the amendments. According to AFLDS’ position paper, “This amendment . . . will serve to give away our country’s healthcare system, national sovereignty, and personal freedoms to the WHO on a silver platter. America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) strongly opposes the creation and implementation of any treaty or international instrument that governs world pandemic preparedness and response.”

Succinctly put, the upshot of these amendments is to surrender sovereignty to the WHO regarding very broadly defined public health crises subject to the whim of the WHO Director-General. The current Director-General is not even a physician and is wholly unqualified. Even if he were qualified there is no scenario in which this ends well.

According to Peter Hoekstra former Chairman and Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee and more recently US ambassador to the Netherlands during the Trump administration, “. . . this ‘next pandemic’ is neither far off nor a hypothetical ‘conspiracy theory’. According to multiple credible reports from the U.S. Department of State, to the executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Peter Jennings, China has been preparing for bio-warfare using pathogens for more than six years.” It is no surprise that one of the amendments requires transferring genetic sequence data to the WHO.

In fact, the Trump administration pulled out of the WHO primarily because of its “mistakes” at the beginning of the COVID pandemic, including its deferential approach towards China. According to Hoekstra, “Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party.”

Placing our health policies in the hands of this man in particular who is beholden to the Chinese Communists is terrifying indeed.

We must do everything in our power to stop these amendments from being ratified.

____________________________________________________________

SEE: https://aflds.org/policy-division/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Issue Brief: WHO Pandemic Treaty

An AFLDS Issue Brief for Citizens and Policymakers

STATEMENT OF POSITION

During what some have called “the eye of the storm” in terms of the global pandemic crisis, the governing body of the World Health Organization, the World Health Assembly, is quietly planning to vote on an amendment to WHO’s International Health Regulations in just a few days, on May 22-28, 2022. This amendment, proposed by officials from the Biden Administration, will serve to give away our country’s healthcare system, national sovereignty, and personal freedoms to the WHO on a silver platter. America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) strongly oppose the creation and implementation of any treaty or international instrument that governs world pandemic preparedness and response.

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

Our own U.S. government has thrown us to the wolves once again. On January 18, 2022, the United States of America through the Biden administration and Loyce Pace of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, quietly submitted proposed amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulation (IHR).The proposed amendments are on the agenda for the World Health Assembly (WHA), the governing legislative body for WHO, to be held May 22-28, 2022.^[1] The proposed amendments were not made known to the public until Sunday, April 10, 2022, whereupon WHO acted stealthily with a virtually nonexistent public participation process. The WHO invited video and written submissions which were due by 5:00 p.m. on April 13, 2022. Unless We The People activate, these amendments will be enacted at the World Health Assembly between May 22-28, 2022. If the proposed amendments are allowed to pass, there is a six-month grace period following amendment approval during which countries may withdraw their approval. However, it is highly unlikely that withdrawal of these amendments will occur during this grace period. Just as countries never return the power they take; this global power will likely come to fruition at the end of this grace period. The WHO’s plan is for these amendments to go into effect during the World Health Assembly in 2024.

WHO IS “WHO”?

The World Health Organization was founded on April 7, 1948, and is a specialized agency of the United Nations. The WHO claims that they are a global organization, made up of over 8,000 professionals including the “world’s leading health experts”.

WHO IS WHO’s fearless leader? Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. And, while one would think a corporation designed to be the nation’s leader in public health would be headed by a physician, Tedros has a Ph.D. in philosophy. He is the former Chief Minister of Health of Ethiopia and was tightly aligned with a left-wing organization that was classified as a terrorist organization in his home country. He was promoted and supported by China. China was embarrassed in 2003 by the WHO exposing its role in the SARS pandemic. In 2020 Tedros delivered for the Chinese government, praising China for its “new standard for outbreak control.” We highly suggest you review more concerning details about Tedros in an article by the Observer Research Foundation entitled Dr. Cover-up: Tedros Adhanom’s controversial journey to the WHO.^[2]

The WHO is funded in two ways. First, funds come through hefty, yearly fees paid by the countries that partner with the WHO. The United States is one of the WHO’s top donors, contributing $730 million in 2021. Secondly, funds come through private donors. One of the biggest donors to the WHO will surely ring a bell… Bill Gates. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second-largest donor to the WHO with donations of nearly $780 million in 2021.^[3] Surely, this should bring us all pause about the real objectives of this organization.

WHAT WILL THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS CHANGE?

The proposed amendments stand to change everything, and we lose a lot if we remain complacent. Essentially, the proposed amendments give power to the Director-General of WHO (Tedros) which would give him the right to declare health emergencies at will and act on his own. The WHO would have the power to decide what constitutes a “pandemic” and to decide quarantine measures on a global scale. WHO would control the development and safety of new treatments and would decide vaccine mandates for each country! The WHO has already stealthily changed the definition of a pandemic from a disease that causes a lot of death worldwide to a disease that occurs in many countries worldwide. Just so we are clear, the proposed amendments empower the corrupt Director-General to unilaterally declare a health emergency in any nation even against the opinion of that nation for any illness that is widespread. And keep in mind that the WHO preamble defines its area of concern so broadly it easily encompasses war, child development, education, racial justice, etc.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MUST BE SOUNDLY DEFEATED.

It is the position of America’s Frontline Doctors that the World Health Organization (WHO) should be nothing more than a debating society with no authority to make or enforce its recommendations. As AFLDS has advocated for nearly two years that medical advice should be individual, between a trusted healthcare provider and the patient. Healthcare is far too complicated to be handled at any level other than that of the provider and patient. It most certainly should not be governed on a global scale by a private organization of industry leaders in big pharma, public health experts, and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. No single organization should be granted this kind of power, ever.

First and foremost, any rules governing health should require the enactment of legislation in each individual country. No small group can serve as the mind of an entire profession. No group of patients can serve as a representative group of all patients. The WHO should never be granted the power to do anything other than making reports and recommendations to be considered by individual governments for the enactment of legislation.

Peter Breggin, MD, and Ginger Ross Breggin authored a comprehensive report on May 4, 2022, entitled Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO.^[4]

In the conclusion of his report, Dr. Breggin eloquently stated what must be done to prevent the WHA from approving the proposed amendments:

We must immediately mount an international campaign, especially focused within America, to force the U.S. to withdraw these amendments before they come to a vote. Otherwise, America and the nations of the world will take a giant stride toward forfeiting national sovereignty to WHO and the U.N. In reality; they will be forfeiting their sovereign powers to the global predators who rule the U.N. and WHO, including the Chinese Communist Party and supporters of the Great Reset, like Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and giant foundations and corporations — all of whom benefit from weakening or destroying the sovereignty of the Western nations. Western civilization, and mainly the United States, is all that stands in strong opposition to the globalist takeover of the world, called the New World Order or the Great Reset. (Id.)

CONCLUSION

Despite all that we have been through in the last two years, there has never been a more pressing issue. The World Health Organization is gearing up to extend its power for the “next pandemic.” Remember, we are in the eye of the storm. The powers at being are working harder than ever to achieve totalitarian control of you and your family. The time to act is NOW.

In the history of humankind, no pathogen has ever wiped out the human race. The fear that has been so carefully cultivated is being utilized to justify this move. We do not need an emergency action on pathogens. An international instrument that governs world pandemic preparedness and response is not necessary. The WHO conveniently skipped the question of whether or not the amendments are needed, and jumped directly to addressing what the amendments should include.

AFLDS is sounding the alarm for immediate action. We The People must immediately bombard the White House and all federal legislators. Please contact your legislators IN WASHINGTON now and pressure them concerning the dire consequences of this amendment. Remember to include your name with the city and state you reside in. Information for YOUR legislator can be found at this link: https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials/

Please also submit written comments to the HHS Office of Global Affairs at the World Council for Health link here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/campaigns/stop-the-who/2022/05/24-hours-leftcomment-at-the-stakeholder-listening-session-for-75th-world-healthassembly/74090/#written-comment

Please be advised and on notice that AFLDS will publicly oppose any legislator that does not take action to block the proposed amendments and stop this dire threat to the Constitution of the United States of America.

Footnotes

[1]

https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4

[2]

https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/dr-cover-up-tedros-adhanoms-controversial-journey-to-the-who-65493/

[3]

https://qz.com/2102889/the-who-is-too-dependent-on-gates-foundation-donations/

[4]

https://www.americaoutloud.com/biden-handing-over-u-s-sovereignty-to-who/

Biden set to sell America’s sovereignty to globalists at WHO on May 22

May 19, 2022 John

On Sunday, May 22 the sovereignty of America will be up for a vote at the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland. One America's Pearson Sharp has more.

Democrats Introduce Bill To Put Americans In Quarantine Camps

May 19, 2022 John

FDA Authorizes Pfizer Booster for Kids Aged 5-11

May 19, 2022 John

FDA Authorizes Pfizer Booster for Kids Aged 5-11

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/fda-authorizes-pfizer-booster-for-kids-aged-5-11/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

American regulators authorized a single Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for healthy five- to 11-year-olds in a bid to enhance their protection against the infection and severe disease. The additional dose, like the initial vaccination series for young Americans, is covered by the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which means that it remains “investigational,” e.g., experimental.

According to the Tuesday press release of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the said age group could take a third dose at least five months after completion of a primary series with the Pfizer-BioNTech shots.

Claiming that vaccination “continues to be the most effective way to prevent COVID-19 and its severe consequences, and it is safe,” FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf said that children have been getting infected and hospitalized at a higher rate with the arrival of Omicron. He added that children “may also experience the long term effects, even following initially mild disease,” and urged parents and caregivers to vaccinate their children.

Conversely, Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, did not mention that the vaccination protects against infection — because it does not — and instead claimed that it is “effective in helping to prevent the most severe consequences of COVID-19.”

But there’s a caveat: “Since authorizing the vaccine for children down to 5 years of age in October 2021, emerging data suggest that vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 wanes after the second dose of the vaccine in all authorized populations,” noted Marks. He then concluded that the agency determined that the “known and potential benefits” of a booster dose for children outweigh its “known and potential risks.”

The decision was made without holding a traditional meeting of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), which evaluates vaccines’ safety, efficacy, and appropriate use by reviewing and verifying the data provided by the vaccine’s manufacturer.

In other words, the federal body did not identify any information that should have been discussed in more detail by the experts on additional doses of the experimental biological product for children that started being used in humans only last year.

While the FDA said that it would post the documents it used to conclude that the booster was “safe and effective” later, the decision left many wondering if the third dose is indeed necessary for children.

For example, is there a “medical emergency?” As appears on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, Covid deaths in the age groups of 5-11 and 12-17 are not even reflected in its Covid tracker “due to low numbers.”

While that alone should be enough to end the discussion on experimental gene therapeutics for children, the media and non-establishment experts point to efficacy and safety concerns.

It appears that the overwhelming majority of American children may not need any Covid shots, let alone additional doses, since they have already recovered from Covid.

As reported by the Associated Press,

Adding to public confusion, the CDC estimates 3 out of every 4 U.S. children of all ages have been infected with the coronavirus since the pandemic’s start — many of them during the winter omicron wave. Still, health authorities urge vaccination even in people who’ve previously had COVID-19, to strengthen their protection.

Is natural immunity, which one acquires after recovering from an infection, worse than “vaccine immunity”? Eighty-one research studies published in reputable medical journals confirm that natural immunity to Covid is equal or superior to any immunity provided by the shots due to the fact that the latter do not form mycotic immunity, which is crucially important to guard off the respiratory infection.

But the matters get even worse since the efficacy of shots turns negative over time.

Writes renowned vaccinologist and bio-expert Dr. Robert Malone,

The CDC recently the CDC recently reported higher COVID-19 case rates have been recorded among fully vaccinated children than unvaccinated in the age group 5-11 since February 2022. That’s the first time CDC recorded a higher case rate among fully vaccinated young children since data was first collected in December 2021.

That means that vaccinated children are more likely to get infected with Covid than their unvaccinated peers.

How about the “safety” part? Apparently, it is extremely disturbing. What is even more disturbing is that America’s top regulatory body is informed on the data.

While the FDA says that it had “no questions” in regard to Pfizer documents, Pfizer — and the FDA — is fully aware that the shot is associated with significantly elevated death rates in the vaccinated trial participants compared to those who received a placebo.

Calling the vaccination of children “child sacrifice,” Malone notes,

Research shows that there is no benefit to children receiving a COVID shot, and in fact, the shots can cause potential harm, adverse effects and death. According to Pfizer’s own study trial data, the chance of death in children from the shot is 107 times higher than death from COVID.

The deadly ramifications of the Pfizer shots were also observed by the Office for National Statistics, which revealed that children are up to 52 times more likely to die following the Covid injection than children who have not received it, added the doctor.

The final decision on recommending children aged five to 11 to get a third dose of Pfizer shot will be made by the CDC on Thursday.

Biden Admin Includes Crack, Meth Pipes in Tax-funded “Safe” Smoking Kits

May 18, 2022 John

Report: Biden Admin Includes Crack, Meth Pipes in Tax-funded “Safe” Smoking Kits

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/report-biden-admin-includes-crack-meth-pipes-in-tax-funded-safe-smoking-kits/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Contrary to the Biden administration’s repeated denials, it appears that it is actually financing “safe” pipes for drug addicts.

According to an investigative report posted last week by the Washington Free Beacon,

The findings are the result of Washington Free Beacon visits to five harm-reduction organizations and calls to over two dozen more. In fact, every organization we visited — facilities in Boston, New York City, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, and Richmond, Va. — included crack pipes in the kits.

The outlet posted a picture of the contents of the “safe smoking kits” that are available thanks to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant program, which began in May.

“The kits became the subject of national attention in the wake of a Free Beacon report in February indicating that a $30 million harm-reduction program was set to fund the distribution of free crack pipes in ‘safe-smoking kits’,” the outlet reminded.

As reported by The New American, the grant includes awards of $400,000 for 25 municipal applicants tasked with providing residents with “harm reduction” supplies related to drug use and will run for three years. The funding is provided through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

The goal of the program is to advance “racial equity” and provide “support” for “underserved communities” by reducing the rate of drug overdoses and related health issues such as STDs and other infectious diseases.

“Safe smoking kits/supplies” were also on the list of the HHS program, and the unnamed HHS representative told the Free Beacon that those would include pipes that could be used to smoke crack cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and “any illicit substance.”

Faced with the uproar, top administration officials vehemently denied that drug paraphernalia would be included in the kit.

Then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki denied that the administration would soon begin distributing crack pipes. She called the Free Beacon’s report “inaccurate,” and stated, “[The pipes] were never a part of the kit.” Psaki added that included in the “safe smoking kits” were “alcohol swabs, lip balms, and other materials to promote hygiene and reduce transmission of diseases like HIV and hepatitis.” The program, Psaki said, was designed to address the opioid crisis that was “killing millions of Americans.”

HHS spokeswoman Sarah Lovenheim chimed in and clarified that the department “is not distributing crack pipes,” adding that the program will adhere to “state and local laws.”

Mainstream media “fact-checkers,” such as USA Today, typically quoted official statements to support the claim that crack pipes would not be included in the kits.

The Free Beacon visited non-profit organizations in major cities to see what they were offering to drug addicts and found that the “safe” drug pipes, were, in fact, offered to anyone who’d ask for them.

For example, in Washington, D.C., “just about a mile from the U.S. Capitol and within blocks of two elementary schools,” a harm-reduction center had pipes for crack and meth “readily available.” No ID was required to get the supplies. The center, which had received $3.1 million from the HHS, did not confirm whether it participated in that specific HHS program.

At one such facility run by the Boston Public Health Commission, and visited by the Beacon reporters, the staff asked for their initials, dates of birth, housing situation, and HIV status before offering “an array of drug equipment,” such as crack pipes and various syringes for drug injections. The rule is to get a single pipe and a single syringe to an addict once a day. The report noted that it was unclear if the supplies were provided thanks to the HHS grant.

A harm-reduction center in Richmond, Virginia, could also offer only a pipe for smoking crack.

“To make up for the shortcoming, the employees added a meth pipe along with two ‘snorting kits,’ which include straws, a plastic razor blade to break up drugs, short plastic straws, a small spoon, and a bedazzled playing card to snort drugs off of,” said Free Beacon.

Reporters were offered “a long menu of drug paraphernalia available free of charge” in New York, where they were asked for their initiatives, DOBs, and ZIP codes.

On the “menu” was a “booty bump” kit for rectal ingestion of narcotics and smoking kits that included two pipes — one for crack and one for meth. According to the report, “The center advertises that its pipes are made of Pyrex, a stronger tempered glass designed for high heat.”

In Baltimore, the reporters were given “two smoking kits containing glass crack pipes as well as Chore Boy copper mesh, a cleaning product used to hold the crack rock at the end of the pipe,” as well as instructions on how to properly use it all. While IDs were not required, the reporters were asked to provide their initials, DOBs, and ZIP codes.

Commenting on the new report, the White House called it a “conspiracy theory,” and insisted that no federal money is spent on smoking pipes.

As reported by The New American, following the original Free Beacon report, Senate Republicans introduced the Cutting off Rampant Access to Crack Kits (CRACK) Act, which would prohibit federal funding and distribution of drug paraphernalia.

College Student Expelled for Refusing COVID Booster After Previous Severe Reactions

May 18, 2022 John

College Student Expelled for Refusing COVID Booster After Previous Severe Reactions

BY CAROLYN HENDLER, JD

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/05/college-student-expelled-for-refusing-covid-booster-after-previous-severe-reactions/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A student at Union College was unenrolled and forced to leave the campus in upstate New York after she refused to take a COVID-19 booster shot. The pre-med biology and Spanish language student suffered severe adverse reactions after receiving the first series of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID shots in the fall.¹

Sophomore Ellie Puentes is a first-generation student who attended Union College on an academic scholarship. Puentes received the first set of COVID vaccines when the college required the shots in order to attend school. Immediately afterward, Puentes suffered from sharp adnominal pain landing her in a hospital emergency room for hours. She still suffers from constant nausea, vomiting, chest pains, and shortness of breath.²

Puentes said:

Just the other day I wake up randomly just puking and I don’t know what the cause of that is, and then on top of that, I have shortness of breath. I can’t work out like I used to. I’m getting chest pains where this never happened prior to the vaccine. And I don’t know what’s going on! “The puking happens more often than I would say the diarrhea and the shortness of breath. … I get these sharp pains in my chest and even my immune system, I believe, has just gone down. I’ve been more sick than I’ve ever been.³

College Rejects Medical Exemption to COVID Booster

When the college recently announced that boosters would be mandatory, Puentes e-mailed the school explaining her situation and the severe adverse reactions she had to the first series of COVID shots and asked to speak to the administrative staff in person about this issue. That request was denied, and Puentes was expelled from school and ordered to leave campus via e-mail. [4] The school refused a letter from Puentes's long-time doctor who stated the COVID vaccine booster shot was “ill-advised”⁵ as well as the paperwork she received from the hospital after her visit post-COVID vaccination.⁶

The letter Puentes’ doctor sent to the college read in part…

Ms. Puentes is a 20-year-old who has had severe, prolonged symptoms since receiving her COVID vaccines…She missed one week of school after the shot…it is my opinion that Ms. Puentes be granted an exception from receiving the booster COVID vaccine. She currently is in an unfavorable state of health, presumably caused by the vaccine itself and getting the vaccine is ill advised.⁷

Despite Union College purportedly allowing exemptions to vaccination for approved medical and religious reasons, the doctor’s letter was ignored by college officials.⁸

Both Puentes’ doctor and the doctors in the emergency room diagnosed her with gastritis. However, Union College denied that gastritis could be an adverse reaction to the shot. The school nurse told her to just get Moderna’s Spikevax COVID biologic this time, which uses the same messenger RNA (mRNA) technology as Pfizer/BioNtech Comirnaty COVID biologic if she was concerned about the reactions she had to Comirnaty.⁹

Pfizer/BioNTech Confirms Reaction Was Likely from COVID Shot

Undeterred, Puentes reached out to Pfizer to inquire whether her severe symptoms could be due to the vaccines she was forced to get to attend college. Puentes said Pfizer confirmed her fears stating, “They confirmed that the symptoms I’m having could be or are related to the vaccine because they have seen others with the same reactions.”¹⁰

Union College officials discounted the vaccine manufacturer’s confirmation that other people were diagnosed with gastritis like Puentes and that her symptoms were likely from the Comirnaty vaccine. Puentes was denied a medical exemption to the COVID vaccine requirement and she was expelled from school.¹¹

The school’s actions are not supported by government policy as the federal health officials consider individuals, who have received the initial two-dose series of COVID shots, to be fully vaccinated and they have not changed the definition of “fully vaccinated” to include booster doses. However, despite the federal government's stance, Union College is not alone in demanding receipt of COVID booster doses. A number of private businesses and schools are mandating the COVID booster shot as proof a person is “fully vaccinated.” New York University, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, the University of Notre Dame, the University of Michigan, and Northwestern are among the other universities that require a COVID booster for attendance.¹² ¹³

Puentes’ friends started a GoFundMe account to help her pay for the remaining weeks she had on campus and to raise money for a lawyer.¹⁴ GoFundMe, an online fundraising platform, shut Puentes’ account down silencing her friends’ efforts to help the young college student.¹⁵>

Click here to view References:

¹Trigoso E. Union College Student Booted for Rejecting Vaccine Booster After Having Serious Side Effects. The Epoch Times May 3, 2022.
²Ibid.
³Ibid.
⁴Ibid.
⁵Schmidt D. EXCLUSIVE: Union College Sophomore Gets Expelled for Refusing Booster Shot, Despite Her Doctor Saying Her Getting Booster Is ‘Ill-Advised’. Chicago Thinker Apr. 28, 2022.
⁶Schwartz I. Ellie Puentes: Union College Kicked For Out For Not Taking Booster After Adverse Reaction To Vaccine. RealClear Politics May 7, 2022.
⁷Schmidt D. EXCLUSIVE: Union College Sophomore Gets Expelled for Refusing Booster Shot, Despite Her Doctor Saying Her Getting Booster Is ‘Ill-Advised’. Chicago Thinker Apr. 28, 2022.
⁸Ibid.
⁹Trigoso E. Union College Student Booted for Rejecting Vaccine Booster After Having Serious Side Effects. The Epoch Times May 3, 2022.
¹⁰Ibid.
¹¹Schwartz I. Ellie Puentes: Union College Kicked For Out For Not Taking Booster After Adverse Reaction To Vaccine. RealClear Politics May 7, 2022.
¹²Durkee A. Booster Still Not Required To Be ‘Fully Vaccinated,’ CDC Says. Forbes Jan. 5, 2022.
¹³Miller K. Some Colleges Are Now Requiring COVID-19 Boosters. Verywell Health Dec. 22, 2021.
¹⁴Trigoso E. Union College Student Booted for Rejecting Vaccine Booster After Having Serious Side Effects. The Epoch Times May 3, 2022.
¹⁵Schwartz I. Ellie Puentes: Union College Kicked For Out For Not Taking Booster After Adverse Reaction To Vaccine. RealClear Politics May 7, 2022.

DATA REVEALS STAGGERING AMOUNTS OF VACCINE INJURY

May 17, 2022 John

While the FDA limits J&J’s Covid shot due to blood clot risks, a slew of other indicators are showing major warning signs from around the world, signaling mounting harms regulatory agencies have missed.

Michele Bachmann: Secretive WHO vote threatens American sovereignty

May 16, 2022 John

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://robertspencer.org/2022/05/michele-bachmann-secretive-who-vote-threatens-american-sovereignty;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Biden administration appears to be prepared to hand control of America’s national sovereignty over to the World Health Organization (WHO), as Michelle Bachmann explained on Steve Bannon’s War Room.

From May 22 to 28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly convenes at the UN in Geneva to vote on proposals that will enable the WHO to assert unprecedented power over the health choices of American citizens, effectively taking control over American sovereignty. Americans never thought this would happen or could happen. But it is now a genuine possibility.

These proposals would have the U.S. cede sovereignty to the WHO during anything that was deemed a health emergency. All in your best interests, of course.

Acting NIH top dog: Fauci and others received $350,000,000 in secret royalties from pharmaceutical firms

May 15, 2022 John

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://robertspencer.org/2022/05/acting-nih-top-dog-fauci-and-others-received-350000000-in-secret-royalties-from-pharmaceutical-firms;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“An appearance of a conflict of interest.”

No kidding, really?

The corruption is so deep and endemic in Washington, you need wings to stay above it.

“Acting NIH Director Admits Appearance of Conflict of Interest in Secret Royalty Payments to Fauci, Scientists,” by Mark Tapscott, Epoch Times, May 11, 2022:

Undisclosed royalty payments estimated at $350 million from pharmaceutical and other firms to Dr. Anthony Fauci and hundreds of National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientists do present “an appearance of a conflict of interest,” according to the agency’s acting director.

Dr. Lawrence Tabak, who took over as NIH director following the December 2021 resignation of the agency’s long-time leader, Dr. Francis Collins, told a House Appropriations Committee subcommittee that federal law allows the royalty payments, but he conceded that they don’t look ethical.

“Right now, I think the NIH has a credibility problem and this only feeds into this, and I’m only just learning about this,” Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.) told Tabak. “People in my district say, ‘Well, so-and-so has a financial interest,’ or they don’t like ivermectin because they aren’t benefitting from that royalty.

“You may have very sound scientific reasons for recommending a medicine or not, but the idea that people get a financial benefit from certain research that’s been done and grants that were awarded, that is, to me, the height of the appearance of a conflict of interest.”

In response, Tabak said NIH doesn’t endorse particular medicines.

“We support the science that validates whether an invention is or is not efficacious, we don’t say this is good or this is bad. … I certainly can understand that it might seem as a conflict of interest,” he said….

Moolenaar’s reference to Fauci was in regard to him telling The Associated Press in a 2005 article that first brought the NIH royalties issues into the headlines that he had donated his royalties to charity.

But the issue faded from the headlines after 2005, and it’s only now getting renewed attention as a result of revelations first reported on May 9 by The Epoch Times that documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by a nonprofit government watchdog show an estimated $350 million in undisclosed royalty payments from pharmaceutical and other private firms to top NIH executives, as well as to hundreds of the agency’s health scientists and researchers….

Left fumes after GOP, Manchin block abortion rights bill

May 12, 2022 John

Is Ivermectin a Cancer Solution?

May 12, 2022 John

BY DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA

SEE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/05/12/ivermectin-antitumor-effects.aspx;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Story at-a-glance

Ivermectin has notable antitumor effects, which include inhibiting proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity in cancer cells
Ivermectin may target cancer in multiple ways, including inducing apoptosis and autophagy while also inhibiting tumor stem cells and reversing multidrug resistance
Along with direct cytotoxic effects, it’s believed that ivermectin regulates the tumor microenvironment, mediating immunogenic cell death
The development of an injectable form of ivermectin, or liposomal ivermectin, could help overcome some of its limitations regarding solubility, and open its use to a broader range of cancers
Considering that the “war against cancer” has been ongoing for decades, with little to show in terms of lives saved, repurposing existing drugs with favorable safety profiles and notable anticancer effects — like ivermectin — makes sense

Ivermectin is a widely used antiparasitic drug that's listed on the World Health Organization's essential medicines list¹ and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In low- and middle-income countries, ivermectin is commonly used to treat parasitic diseases including onchocerciasis (river blindness), strongyloidiasis, and other diseases caused by soil-transmitted helminthiasis, or parasitic worms.²

The drug is also used to treat scabies and lice. It's estimated that the total number of ivermectin doses distributed is equal to one-third of the world's population and, as such, "ivermectin at the usual doses (0.2–0.4 mg/kg) is considered extremely safe for use in humans."³

Ivermectin also has demonstrated antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties and made headlines for its potential role in treating COVID-19⁴ — although much of the positive press has been censored and falsely labeled misinformation.⁵ Now researchers are highlighting another potential use for ivermectin, which is equally as exciting as its potential role in COVID-19 — as an anticancer agent.

Ivermectin's Powerful Antitumor Effects

Ivermectin has notable antitumor effects, which include inhibiting proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity in cancer cells.⁶ It appears to inhibit tumor cells by regulating multiple signaling pathways, which researchers explained in the Pharmacological Research journal, "suggests that ivermectin may be an anticancer drug with great potential."⁷

Their graphic, below, shows the multiple ways that ivermectin may target cancer, including inducing apoptosis and autophagy while also inhibiting tumor stem cells and reversing multidrug resistance. They stated that ivermectin "exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs."⁸

Pharmacol Res. 2021 Jan; 163: 105207

Many may not be aware that scientists Satoshi ōmura and William C. Campbell won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015 for their discovery of ivermectin.⁹ The medicine is used to treat not only parasitic diseases like malaria but also shows promise for treating asthma and neurological diseases, in addition to cancer.

Along with direct cytotoxic effects, it's believed that ivermectin regulates the tumor microenvironment, mediating immunogenic cell death — another reason for its promise as an anticancer agent.¹⁰ Research suggests the drug may be useful for the following cancers:¹¹

Breast cancer — The proliferation of multiple breast cancer cell lines was significantly reduced following treatment with ivermectin.

Digestive system cancer — Ivermectin significantly inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells in vivo and in vitro. The drug also inhibited colorectal cancer cell lines and inhibited the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer).

Urinary system cancer — Ivermectin significantly inhibited the proliferation of five renal (kidney) cell carcinoma lines without affecting normal kidney cells. It also had an inhibitory effect on prostate cancer cells.

Hematological cancer — In one study, ivermectin killed leukemia cells at low concentrations while leaving normal hematopoietic cells unharmed.

Reproductive system cancer — Ivermectin inhibited the proliferation of ovarian cancer cell lines and enhanced the efficacy of the conventional chemotherapy drug cisplatin, improving the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Brain glioma — Ivermectin inhibited the proliferation of human glioblastoma cells in a dose-dependent manner.

Respiratory system cancer — Ivermectin inhibited the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in mice, using doses that were not toxic to immune cells known as thymocytes. Ivermectin also significantly inhibited the proliferation of lung cancer cells and may reduce the metastasis of lung cancer cells.

Melanoma — When melanoma cells were treated with ivermectin, their activity was effectively inhibited.

Ivermectin Shows Promise Against Colorectal Cancer

A study published in Frontiers in Pharmacology specifically highlighted ivermectin's potential to fight colorectal cancer, which is the third most common cancer worldwide.¹² The drug was found to inhibit colorectal cancer cell growth in a dose-dependent manner as well as promote cell apoptosis.

Further, even at low doses of 2.5 and 5 µM, ivermectin induced cell arrest in colorectal cancer, leading researchers to state, "[I]vermectin might be a new potential anticancer drug therapy for human colorectal cancer and other cancers."¹³ Considering that the "war against cancer" has been ongoing for decades, with little to show in terms of lives saved, repurposing existing drugs with favorable safety profiles and notable anticancer effects — like ivermectin — makes sense.

The Pharmacological Research scientists similarly noted, "Drug repositioning is a shortcut to accelerate the development of anticancer drugs."¹⁴ Not only has ivermectin been shown to permeate tumor tissues effectively, but it has a long history of successful use in humans. They explained that even when doses were increased, no serious adverse effects were found:¹⁵

"[T]he broad-spectrum antiparasitic drug IVM (ivermectin), which is widely used in the field of parasitic control, has many advantages that suggest that it is worth developing as a potential new anticancer drug. IVM selectively inhibits the proliferation of tumors at a dose that is not toxic to normal cells and can reverse the MDR [multidrug resistance] of tumors.

Importantly, IVM is an established drug used for the treatment of parasitic diseases such as river blindness and elephantiasis. It has been widely used in humans for many years, and its various pharmacological properties, including long- and short-term toxicological effects and drug metabolism characteristics are very clear. In healthy volunteers, the dose was increased to 2 mg/Kg, and no serious adverse reactions were found …"

Is Liposomal Delivery a Game Changer?

The development of an injectable form of ivermectin, or liposomal ivermectin, could help overcome some of its limitations regarding solubility and open its use to a broader range of cancers. The cancer immunotherapy treatment pembrolizumab, for instance, is approved to treat PD-L1-positive, triple-negative breast cancer, which accounts for only about 20% of cases.

As an immune checkpoint inhibitor, it works best in so-called "hot" tumors, which are already infiltrated by T cells. If ivermectin could be injected into the tumor, inducing T-cell infiltration into the area and inducing immunogenic cancer cell death, it's possible that it could turn a "cold" tumor into a "hot" one, thereby making it more effectively treated.¹⁶

Biotech company Mountain Valley MD has developed a liposomal delivery system for ivermectin that they believe could dramatically widen its treatment potential. In an interview with Medical Update Online, Dennis Hancock, Mountain Valley MD president and CEO, explained:¹⁷

"So the business value proposition really simply is, we take the best-selling and best-acting drugs and expand their ability to be used on … more types of cancer on a broader spectrum. So you still need the cancer drug and what our Ivectosol does is it enables it to be used in a broader universe …

What's really exciting about the work that Mountain Valley MD is doing is we're enabling drugs that have already been proven in their efficacy and safety to do better and do more faster — so we're not asking people to 'wait five years and see'…"

Most of the research involving ivermectin for cancer to date involves oral or in-vitro administration. Mountain Valley MD is conducting preclinical trials using liposomal ivermectin for metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer and possibly bladder cancers. They also have plans to produce liposomal ivermectin for use in human trials.¹⁸ In a news release, Mike Farber, director of life sciences at Mountain Valley MD, stated:¹⁹

"The extensive research supporting the drug ivermectin as effective in the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity in a variety of cancers, and as an initiator of immunogenic cell death, is overwhelming. Imagine what is possible when you have the world's only human injectable form of ivermectin that can be directly injected into a tumor or provided through more bio-available forms such as intravenously.

We believe this will be groundbreaking research with near-immediate application to be able to proceed directly to human trials based on the safety and efficacy of ivermectin."

What About Ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2?

In the U.S., ivermectin has been vilified as a treatment for SARS-CoV-2, despite its impressive inhibitory effects on the virus.²⁰ Even the FDA has a dedicated webpage warning "why you should not use ivermectin to prevent COVID-19."²¹

It's interesting to note, however, that Africa has a lower number of cases, severity of disease, hospitalizations, and deaths than other areas of the world,²² which may be due to using prophylactic medications for endemic infections — ivermectin and others, such as sweet wormwood — that have successfully treated COVID-19.

For instance, a study from Japan demonstrated that just 12 days after doctors were allowed to legally prescribe ivermectin to their COVID-19 patients, the cases dropped dramatically.²³ The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association²⁴ noticed the low number of infections and deaths in Africa, where many use ivermectin prophylactically and as the core strategy to treat river blindness.²⁵ More than 99% of people infected with river blindness live in 31 African countries.

Aside from these observations, a study published in the March 2022 issue of the International Journal of Infectious Diseases found that treatment with ivermectin reduced mortality in COVID-19 patients — and to a greater degree than remdesivir.²⁶

Another recent investigation by Cornell University, posted on the University's preprint server January 20, 2022, found ivermectin outperformed 10 other drugs against COVID-19, making it the most effective against the Omicron variant.²⁷ It even outperformed nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid), which was granted emergency use authorization against COVID-19 in December 2021.

Remdesivir costs between $2,340 and $3,120,²⁸ and nirmatrelvir costs $529 per treatment,²⁹ while ivermectin's average treatment cost is $58.³⁰ Do you think this has anything to do with ivermectin's vilification?

Dr. Pierre Kory, who is part of the group that formed the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group (FLCCC) to advance early treatments for COVID-19, pleaded with the U.S. government early on in the pandemic to review the expansive data on ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, and to keep those with early symptoms from progressing and help critically ill patients recover — to no avail.^31,³²

However, if you'd like to learn more about its potential uses for SARS-CoV-2, FLCCC's I-MASK+ protocol can be downloaded in full,³³ giving you step-by-step instructions on how to prevent and treat the early symptoms of COVID-19.

FLCCC also has protocols for at-home prevention and early treatment, called I-MASS, which involves ivermectin, vitamin D3, a multivitamin, and a digital thermometer to watch your body temperature in the prevention phase and ivermectin, melatonin, aspirin, and antiseptic mouthwash for early at-home treatment.

Household or close contacts of COVID-19 patients may take ivermectin (18 milligrams, then repeat the dose in 48 hours) for post-exposure prevention.³⁴ Whether ivermectin's potential as an anticancer agent will be stifled the same way it was for COVID-19 remains to be seen, but it appears to be a compound that's worth watching as a potentially powerful agent in the fight against cancer.

TREASURY SECRETARY JANET YELLEN CLAIMS ACCESS TO ABORTION BOOSTS ECONOMY

May 11, 2022 John

Treasury Sec. Janet Yellen: Overturning Roe will be ‘very damaging’ to ...

Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo joins 'Fox & Friends First' to discuss Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's assertions that abortions are good for the economy and the $40 billion Ukrainian aid bill that passed the House.

SEE: https://nypost.com/2022/05/10/janet-yellen-warns-abortion-ban-would-damage-economy-women/

New World Order: Great Reset, DePopulation Agenda & Global Surveillance Being Set Up

May 11, 2022 John

Steve Shultz interviews Mel K, who will be discussing the New World Order Reset into 2030, global surveillance and how we must awaken and resist, and much more! Note: We will NOT be broadcasting this episode on our YouTube channel so make sure and join us at all our other sites!

Mirrored copy of "MEL K: '2030 - The Great Reset Agenda'" posted 3 May 2022 on the Elijah Streams channel on Rumble.
URL: https://rumble.com/v13dn41-facebook-and-rumble-only-mel-k-2030-the-great-reset-agenda.html

Elijah List Ministries / ElijahStreams TV, 525 2nd Ave SW, Suite 629 Albany, OR 97321 USA
Thank you for making the always-free Elijah List Ministries possible! Click here to learn how to partner with us: https://secure.qgiv.com/for/eslsl/

Prefer to donate by mail? Make your check or money order (US Dollars) payable to "ELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES" and mail it to:
Elijah List Ministries / Elijah Streams TV
525 2nd Ave SW
Suite 629
Albany, OR 97321 USA

Join us this TUESDAY as Steve Shultz interviews Mel K — LIVE RIGHT HERE — on May 3, at 11AM Pacific Time. Mel K will be discussing the New World Order Reset into 2030, global surveillance and how we must awaken and resist, and much more! Note: We will NOT be broadcasting this episode on our YouTube channel so make sure and join us at all our other sites!

Witness the girl-maiming SCAR CULT being pushed by Biden and leftists who encourage young girls to have their breasts sliced off with medical scalpels

May 10, 2022 John

Image: Witness the girl-maiming SCAR CULT being pushed by Biden and leftists who encourage young girls to have their breasts sliced off with medical scalpels

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-09-scar-cult-biden-leftists-girls-sliced.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Girls as young as 13 are increasingly opting to slice off their breasts as part of an LGBT push to turn more American children into transgenders. And the Biden regime is largely to blame for this horrific trend.

Thanks to years of grooming at government-run public schools, American kids today are less concerned about enjoying their innocence and more focused on cutting off their genitals and taking gender-bending pharmaceuticals in order to join the ranks of the “rainbow” cult.

On their own, innocent children would never dream up perversions like this. Evil adults, many of them demon-possessed, are the ones responsible for turning the United States into Sodom and Gomorrah – and their demonic work has only just begun.

The below video from The Western Journal explains how the Biden regime (meaning the Obama regime, since Barack appears to be the one truly running things) is largely responsible for the trans-ification of America into a nation of Baphomets:

Since 2017, the percentage of American teens wanting to become transgenders has more than doubled

School curriculum, media programming, government messaging, and corporate propaganda are all contributing factors as well to the swift decline of America’s youth.

The end result of all this grooming is confusion, followed by pressure and even a desire to follow the script straight into “transitioning,” which is what increasingly more children these days are doing.

In 2017 when Donald Trump first became president, only about three or four out of every 100 American teens expressed interest in becoming transgender. By 2021, that number had more than doubled to nine in 100 children.

One can only imagine what the figure is currently as things accelerate exponentially.

“These children have been groomed to believe the idea that if they don’t feel quite right socially if they don’t fit in for one reason or another, they might be trapped in the wrong body,” writes Michael Austin for The Western Journal.

“Because of this, many kids who suddenly identify as trans are experiencing social awkwardness, going through puberty and/or suffering from social development disorders such as autism and ADHD.”

It is perfectly normal for young people to experience confusion about who they are as they develop from childhood into puberty. What is not normal is them having perverse adults all around trying to convince them that this points to transgenderism.

“These children are being groomed to believe that the normal stresses of childhood can be solved through gender transitioning,” Austin adds. “They’re told that if you don’t feel right in your own body, the only way to feel whole is to mutilate that body to better fit the opposite gender.”

The Biden regime and leftists call this “gender-affirming care,” but nothing could be further than the truth. Instead of affirming children in their natural-born genders, perverse adults are telling them that they must affirm a different gender than the one that matches their anatomy.

Again, this is called grooming, and the Bible warns that people who engage in such are better off having a millstone tied to their neck and getting tossed into the ocean, as opposed to the judgment they will face at the hands of an angry God.

“Children need to learn how to tie their shoes and they need to be taught about math and reading, not the strange sexual ideologies of political activists,” Austin says.

“If you disagree, if you believe this sort of political and sexual grooming should be permitted in a classroom full of young children, there’s only one thing left to say: OK, groomer.”

The latest news about America’s rapid decline into the depths of hell can be found at Collapse.news.

Sources include:

WesternJournal.com

NaturalNews.com

BlueLetterBible.org

Latest CDC data shows 106 children died, 48,033 suffered adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination

May 10, 2022 John

BY MARY VILLAREAL

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-06-106-children-died-following-covid-vaccination.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revealed that 106 children have died following Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination.

A quick search on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) showed there had been 48,033 reports of adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines among children up to April 22. A similar search for serious adverse reactions among children, ranging from hospitalizations to permanent disability and death returned 12,548 results.

All these data showed that children have suffered adverse reactions to the COVID-19 injections – either through being breast-fed by vaccinated mothers or due to overeager healthcare workers who have been vaccinating children not yet legally eligible for the vaccines.

As of April 22, two children under six months died, as did four other children between ages one and five.

The information acquired from VAERS does not paint the whole picture. The CDC itself estimated that only one to 10 percent of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. Thus, the number of children who died because of the vaccines could be as high as 10,600. (Related: Dr. Zelenko: Covid vaccine mandates for children are “coercive human experimentation, crimes against humanity.”)

Still, drug regulators in the U.S. are looking to authorize the administration of the injections to children as young as six months old.

Big Pharma pushes for COVID shots in children

It’s been long established that children are the least affected by the COVID-19 virus, and vaccines are associated with serious adverse events. Yet, big pharmaceutical companies like Moderna are pushing through with their desire to vaccinate them as fast as possible by requesting the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use authorization of its two-dose vaccines for children as young as six months.

Public health officials, including the CDC, have consistently downplayed and ignored the natural immunity among children, despite studies confirming that it is equal to or even superior compared to “vaccine-induced immunity.”

Ironically, despite the agency forcing COVID-19 vaccines on children, it doesn’t feel the same way for their chickenpox, measles, mumps, or rubella vaccine. The agency said these vaccines are not necessary for individuals who have laboratory confirmation of past infections or had blood tests to show that they are immune to the aforementioned diseases.

Studies have also shown that children are at very low risk of spreading COVID-19 infection to other children or adults, as seen in household transmission studies.

A report from 2020 also said scientists observed children fare much better than adults when it comes to contracting the virus. Furthermore, they have far fewer illnesses or mortality from COVID.

Another research, this time from 2021, also revealed that the airway immune cells in children are ready to sense viruses, resulting in a stronger, earlier response to an infection compared to adults. (Related: Leaked top-secret Pfizer document shows COVID-19 vaccine is FAR MORE DANGEROUS than the world knows.)

Pfizer has also admitted that from its own study trial data, the chance of death in children from the COVID-19 vaccine shot is 107 times higher than death due to COVID itself. Children ages 10 to 14 were statistically 52 times more likely to die if they are double vaccinated. Teenagers aged 15 to 19 with two COVID shots were at least three times more likely to die than unvaccinated persons in the same age group.

Follow VaccineDamage.news for more information about the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines.

Watch the clip below to know more about the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines to children.

This video is from the Chinese taking down EVIL CCP channel on Brighteon.com.

PA. GOVERNOR WOLF: ‘Churches Paid To Push The Shots’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre~CHURCHES ARE RECEIVING FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS TO PROMOTE COVID SHOTS; NOT ONLY IN PA.

May 8, 2022 John

Florida Mother sues school for helping daughter transition without parental consent

May 6, 2022 John

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://robertspencer.org/2022/05/mother-sues-school-for-helping-daughter-transition-without-parental-consent;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A courageous Florida mother, January Littlejohn, is standing up against the violation of her parental rights “after her transgender child transitioned at school without her consent.” Littlejohn is now suing the school.

The girl was 13 at the time of transition.

Minors are under the custodial care of adults for a reason. Teens are more inclined to act on emotions and impulsivity, given their developing brains and hormones.

The battle for parental rights continues everywhere as Leftists seek to impose state control over children and arrogate to “educators” the right to decide what is in children’s best interests. The Biden administration is advancing institutional “gender-affirming care,” which encourages support for a range of “treatments” for gender dysphoria, including surgery, speech therapy, puberty blockers, and hormone therapy for children and adolescents who say they identify as transgender.

Every youngster has a need to belong, and the instant effect of becoming part of a community may seem to be lifesaving for them at the moment. However, conditioning children to believe that transgenderism is the solution to their identity crisis is a big mistake. Youth vulnerability is being manipulated by some adults (who are making significant money in doing so), to the long-term detriment of children.

Transgender Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel Levine is rigid, slamming critics of “gender-affirming care,” saying that “no doctor worth their salt opposes it.” Levine’s response was a direct response and insult to Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who opposes it.

Activists such as Levine ignore the natural hormonal and psychological processes that many youngsters go through in struggling to adapt to a difficult and/or awkward adolescence, not to mention the impacts of life’s stresses (inside and outside of the home). Instead, transgender activists are coaching youngsters that any number of natural or life difficulties they may experience can be attributed to a gender identity crisis, which can be “easily fixed” via “gender-affirming care.” In other words, kids are being groomed, while anyone who opposes this practice is demonized as “abusive,” “discriminatory” or “not worth their salt.”

There are many people who end up regretting and reversing their transgender decision, which proves on its face that a key premise of transgender activists such as Levine, that anyone who struggles with gender identity issues is actually the other gender, is false.

In a case from Canada, a victim of transgender grooming who came from an “emotionally manipulative family” in the first place describes her experience as a teen, struggling with her gender identity issues:

She could move into the Covenant House youth shelter, and then freely go on hormones to push ahead with medical transition.

“They thought it was so important for me to be on testosterone that it was OK if I left home and probably didn’t graduate high school,” recalled Eva, who asked that her last name not be published to preserve her privacy around sensitive issues. “Even at that point in life, when I was 16 and totally believed this was the only thing that was going to save me, I was more rational about it.”

Unfortunately, not every youngster is able to be “rational about it,” as Eva was fortunate enough to be. Many who regret their decisions go the full way of transition, and after their adolescent turbulence, they are left picking up the pieces of regret and the irresponsible adult destruction of their lives.

“Florida mom filing suit after child transitioned at school without her consent: ‘Happening all over’ US,” by Bailee Hill, Fox News, May 2, 2022:

A Florida mother is filing suit and issuing a stark warning to parents nationwide after her transgender child transitioned at school without her consent.

Florida mom and mental health professional January Littlejohn and her attorney Vernadette Broyles discussed the lawsuit and why she is “outraged” over the incident.

“This is happening all over the nation,” Littlejohn warned on “Fox & Friends First” on Monday. “This same protocol is in place in many, many schools across districts everywhere, and even the guides being used to dictate these transgender support plans that cut parents out even have the same language.”

“So this is a very systematic way that parents are being excluded from important decisions occurring with their children, and further, social transition is a medical intervention that schools are grossly unqualified to be taking these steps without parental involvement,” she continued.

According to Littlejohn, her daughter, who was 13 years old at the time, expressed confusion over gender during the pandemic after a group of friends transitioned to the opposite sex.

She eventually found out the school was working on a “transgender support plan” with her child, but the school initially declined to allow her involvement given she was “protected by a nondiscrimination law.”….

_________________________________________________________________

School ATTEMPTS To Transition January Littlejohn's Child Behind Her Back! Parents Sue!

The Quisha King Show is about faith, culture, and politics. This week we have January LittleJohn and her attorney Vernadette Broyles. January is a Mom who had to sue her school because they were transitioning her behind her back. Vernadette is the president of Child and Parent Rights; a parental rights advocacy group and attorney for January. January and Vernadette's Links: https://childparentrights.org/

January Littlejohn: Florida school 'transitioned' my daughter, deceived us; Wake Up America

January Littlejohn: “How Gender Ideology Almost Destroyed My Family”

Florida Family Policy Council “Empowering Parents to Protect Children: Responding to Critical Race Theory & Transgender Ideology”

HHS Secretary Backs Use of Unapproved Puberty Blockers, “Gender-reassignment” Surgery in Children

May 6, 2022 John

HHS Secretary Backs Use of Unapproved Puberty Blockers, “Gender-reassignment” Surgery in Children

HHS SECRETARY DEFENDS SEX CHANGES FOR KIDS

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/hhs-secretary-backs-use-of-unapproved-puberty-blockers-gender-reassignment-surgery-in-children/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra implied that minors should decide for themselves if they want to undergo irreversible “gender-reassignment” procedures. The secretary also stated that it is up to a patient and his or her physician to choose to use off-label puberty blockers even though they might pose a risk to children’s health.

During Wednesday’s Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Becerra was asked by Senator Mike Braun (R-Ind.) about the department’s endorsement of “gender-affirming care” for young children, which includes the prescription of hormone therapy and sex-change surgeries.

Referring to a recently released department document titled “Gender-Affirming Care and Young People,” Braun asked Becerra why the department recommended using puberty blockers that were not approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), i.e., were not considered “safe and effective” for gender-transition purposes in minors.

“Would you agree that the off-label prescription for usages not approved by the FDA is potentially dangerous for patients, especially kids?” asked the senator.

Becerra reassured him that if there were any serious concerns about such drugs’ safety, the FDA would “raise the alarm.”

“The FDA would raise alarms if they saw that a particular medicine or treatment would be misused. At this stage, what we know is that for a drug to be out there available, it has to be safe and effective as the FDA has found,” said the secretary.

In other words, if the hormone therapy drugs hurt children, the FDA would say so. And if it does not, then the drug is “safe,” and there is nothing to worry about.

Braun was quick to point out what appears to be a double-strand approach to medicine, implying the department was not as tolerant when it came to endorsing off-label Covid treatments. “For many parents across the country, this [use of puberty blockers on their children] has more potentially tragic consequences,” he noted.

After Becerra failed to provide a definition of what irreversible “top” and “bottom” surgeries are, both mentioned in the HHS document, the senator went on to ask in what case it would be appropriate to perform irreversible gender-reassignment surgery on kids.

“Those decisions are made by that individual in consultation with the physician and caregivers, and no decision would be made without having consulted appropriately,” Becerra answered.

Braun argued the government should not be “pushing” children toward having irreversible sex-change therapies and surgeries.

“We’re navigating in territory that we’ve never done as a government,” he said, proposing a focus on improving children’s mental health rather than therapies that permanently alter children’s bodies and lives. “It would be wise to back up a little bit” with the current approach taken by the HHS, Braun suggested.

To that, Becerra reaffirmed his position that “in America,” those who “need” to have “life-affirming care” should receive it. The secretary also said that the recommendations posted by his department are backed by “many of our medical experts” who found that these interventions “help improve the lives of many Americans.”

As reported by The New American, in late March, the HHS launched a new website that offers “resources for transgender and LGBTQI+ youth, their parents, and providers,” the goal of which is to “affirm an LGBTQI+ child.” According to the site, when children and adolescents believe that their “gender identity” does not match their biology, they should be offered support from mental-health “councils” to “reaffirm” the child’s perceived “identity.”

The HHS also released an aforementioned document that lists “appropriate” treatments for “transgender” youths. This includes “top” surgery, which creates a “male-typical chest shape or enhances breasts,” and “bottom” surgery, which involves genital or reproductive-organ surgery. The department also recommends using “facial feminization,” puberty blockers, and prescribing testosterone for girls and estrogen for boys who are confused about their gender.

The HHS resources are only a part of the Biden administration’s much broader pro-trans agenda, which included policies ranging from “reinforcing federal protections for transgender children” to improving transgender travel experiences.

Last week, Assistant Secretary for Health Rachel Levine, the highest-ranking “trans” person in the government, said that medical professionals have reached a consensus on the value of gender-affirming care for “transgender” children.

“There is no argument among medical professionals — pediatricians, pediatric endocrinologists, adolescent medicine physicians, adolescent psychiatrists, psychologists, etc. — about the value and the importance of gender-affirming care,” Levine, a medical doctor trained in pediatrics and adolescent medicine, told NPR.

Levine’s statement appears to be incorrect. According to the guidance released by the Florida Department of Health in late April, there is a lack of “conclusive evidence,” particularly regarding the “potential for long-term, irreversible effects” of gender-reassignment therapy for children. The document also refers to a paper published in the International Review of Psychiatry that found that 80 percent of those seeking gender-altering therapy will lose their desire to identify with the opposite sex.

« 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 … 84 »

Berlin Airlift 1948-1949 - COLD WAR DOCUMENTARY

BIDEN DESPERATELY HAS GERMANY AIRLIFT BABY FORMULA TO THE UNITED STATES

Story at-a-glance

Proof the Pandemic Was Planned?

Millions of COVID-19 Test Kits Sold — in 2017 and 2018

Moderna Had COVID-19 Shots in 2019

Pandemic Propaganda Has Been Ongoing for Years

Thousands Standing Up Against the Tyranny

American-supervised specialists conducted experiments on Ukrainian rivers

More related articles:

World Health Assembly to vote on IHR amendments in unprecedented WHO power grab

". . . the upshot of these amendments is to surrender sovereignty to the WHO regarding very broadly defined public health crises subject to the whim of the WHO Director-General."

Issue Brief: WHO Pandemic Treaty

An AFLDS Issue Brief for Citizens and Policymakers

STATEMENT OF POSITION

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

WHO IS “WHO”?

WHAT WILL THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS CHANGE?

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MUST BE SOUNDLY DEFEATED.

CONCLUSION

College Rejects Medical Exemption to COVID Booster

Pfizer/BioNTech Confirms Reaction Was Likely from COVID Shot

Story at-a-glance

Ivermectin's Powerful Antitumor Effects

Ivermectin Shows Promise Against Colorectal Cancer

Is Liposomal Delivery a Game Changer?

What About Ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2?

Since 2017, the percentage of American teens wanting to become transgenders has more than doubled

Big Pharma pushes for COVID shots in children

More related stories: