As Biden Rails Against Second Amendment, Congress Negotiating Radical Gun-control Schemes

BY PETER RYKOWSKI

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/as-biden-rails-against-second-amendment-congress-negotiating-radical-gun-control-schemes/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As Biden railed against self-defense rights in a Thursday speech, Democrat and Republican members of Congress are teaming up to enact new federal gun-control laws, moving our nation closer to achieving the Left’s goal of full civilian disarmament.

The tragic school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, on May 24 has given leftists another excuse to push their predetermined goal of more gun control. Many Republican politicians are also joining their effort to incrementally make it impossible for civilians to defend themselves.

Last week, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) asked Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) to work with Democrats on negotiating new gun-control measures. That same day, Cornyn and other Republican and Democrat senators formed a working group that is currently holding meetings.

The group’s membership includes Republican Senators John Cornyn (R-Texas), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.). Collins and Toomey previously voted in favor of legislation to impose “universal” background checks. Democrats in the working group include Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.).

The Senate negotiators are considering “red flag” laws and expanded background checks, though participants have claimed the talks are focusing on mental health and school safety. On Wednesday, Senator Murphy, a vocal gun-control proponent, claimed, “There is growing momentum to get something done and we agreed on a plan to keep working.”

“Red flag” laws, which multiple Republican politicians have supported, are particularly dangerous as they allow the government to confiscate law-abiding Americans’ firearms — without due process or even an accusation of a crime — merely because they are labeled as “dangerous.” This violates both the Second and Fourth Amendments.

Meanwhile, expanded background checks will result in citizens needing the government’s permission to own or purchase a firearm — violating the Second Amendment — and it also would inevitably result in a national gun registry.

The House of Representatives is pushing its own gun-control schemes. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announced that next week, the chamber will vote on a major gun-control package, H.R. 7910. This bill’s provisions include expanded background checks, restrictions on how individuals can store their firearms, and a statutory ban on so-called bump stocks. Pelosi also announced the House will soon consider legislation to ban so-called assault rifles. None of these proposals would have stopped the shooting in Uvalde.

Republicans Surrender

Just in the past two weeks, many Republican politicians have caved to the Left’s gun-control demands. Multiple Republicans in the Senate, including Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), and Mitt Romney (R-Utah), expressed support for either “red flag” laws or federal background checks.

Republican congressmen Chris Jacobs of New York and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois both endorsed banning so-called assault rifles and raising the minimum age for firearm purchases to 21, joining representatives Brian Mast (R-Fla.), Mike Turner (R-Ohio), and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), previously expressed support for similar restrictions.

Separately, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson endorsed raising the minimum age for firearm purchases to 21. Appearing on CNN to express his support for gun control, the governor claimed that there might be “bipartisan” support for such a policy. This is despite the fact that making 21 the minimum age to purchase or own a firearm would deny Second Amendment rights to millions of American adults.

Biden Rails Against Guns

Not to be outdone, Joe Biden delivered a primetime address Thursday evening in which he pushed for radical gun-control policies. Throughout his speech, he called on Congress to “do something” to address mass shootings such as in Uvalde. “Doing something,” based on the policies Biden advocated for in his speech, includes:

  • banning so-called assault rifles;
  • banning “high-capacity” magazines;
  • raising the minimum purchase age for rifles, assuming a full ban is not possible;
  • expanding federal background checks;
  • a federal “safe storage law”;
  • a federal “red flag” law; and
  • repealing liability immunity for firearm manufacturers.

During his speech, Biden illustrated his low regard for the Bill of Rights by claiming, “the Second Amendment, like all other rights, is not absolute.” He also falsely claimed that mass shootings tripled following the 2004 expiration of Congress’ assault-rifle ban.

Finally, Biden predicted that if Congress did not pass his extremist policies, Americans would “act to turn your outrage into making this issue central to your vote.”

Each gun-control policy Biden announced is unconstitutional and only amounts to advancing the Left’s civilian-disarmament agenda. For an illustration of its ultimate goal, one only needs to look at Canada, which is in the process of totally outlawing firearms. Because of the robust constitutional protections in the United States — which Canada and other countries do not have — the Left has been far less successful here. If the American electorate is educated and informed and takes concerted action against such schemes, the forces of liberty will win this battle.

To urge your U.S. representative and senators to completely oppose gun control, visit The John Birch Society’s legislative alert here.

Biden’s USDA pushes transgender agenda or no school lunches

USDA: Biden Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack

Featured Image

HERE'S THE DEAL; TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT; YOU HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE?

SUPPORT GENDER IDENTITY OR LOSE FUNDING FOR SCHOOL LUNCHES

Forces schools to let boys use girls’ bathrooms or lose federal lunch funding

SEE: https://www.fns.usda.gov/news-item/usda-0100.22

USDA leverages School Lunches

Vilsack to Deliver Address Announcing USDA Framework to Transform the Food System

USDA is announcing details of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s framework to transform the nation’s food system. The address will underscore USDA’s commitment under the Biden-Harris Administration to increase competition, bolster access to healthy, affordable food, ensure growers and workers receive a greater share of the food dollar and advance equity as well as climate resilience and mitigation.

President Joe Biden's USDA is now saying schools that receive Food and Nutrition Service funding will have to update their non-discrimination policies to include gender identity or lose funding for school lunches. One America's Stella Escobedo spoke about this issue with Deputy Director of Investigation with America First Legal, John Zadrozny.

Biden Starves Poor Kids to Push Trans Agenda

_____________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

https://www.ammoland.com/2022/06/usda-using-tax-dollars-to-pressure-employees-on-citizen-disarmament

Congress Targets 2nd Amendment with Mega Gun Control Wish List

Ban Everything

Ban Everything

BY JOHN CRUMP

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/06/congress-targets-2nd-amendment-for-deletion-gun-control-wish-list;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

WASHINGTON, D.C. -(Ammoland.com)- Obama advisor Rahm Emanuel once said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” And gun-grabbing politicians have latched on to his words.

Since the senseless acts of violence in Buffalo, NY, and Uvalde, TX, Democrats have smelled fresh blood in the water and have pounced. They are exploiting the tragedies to attempt to pass a dream list of gun control packages through Congress. Moreover, some Republicans are on board with some of these proposed draconian laws.

The Democrats believe that they can get legislation passed that we as a community have successfully prevented from becoming law in the past by exploiting the actions of two madmen. This article will break down anti-gun bills that I envision coming down the pipeline. I will give some background on each proposal and discuss how likely they are to pass in the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Red or Yellow (it's all the same) Flag Gun Confiscation

The most likely item to pass both chambers of Congress is a bill on red flag laws or extreme risk protection orders (ERPO). Sidney Blumenthal and Lindsey Graham have been working on a proposal in the background. The proposal ranges from so-called yellow flag laws to grants to states to enact red flag laws. They might call it a yellow flag law, but it will still be a red flag gun confiscation bill.

The threat of some kind of red flag legislation reaching the President’s desk is extremely high. These laws violate an individual’s right to due process as guaranteed under the US Constitution. The extreme risk protection order (ERPO) target doesn’t have the opportunity to defend themselves in court before their door is kicked down by the police and their property is stripped from their possession. Sell-out Republican Senator Susan Collins supports this type of bill.

21 to Buy Guns

Raising the age to buy a semi-automatic rifle to 21 is also likely to pass out of the House, although it will not be a slam dunk in the Senate. The bill has some support from weak-kneed RINO Republicans in Congress. Overcoming the filibuster will be hard, although Democrats might be willing to drop other legislation as a “compromise” to get this bill passed.

Unenforceable Safe Storage Laws

Safe storage laws are another measure that has some out-of-touch Republicans' support. I wouldn’t call it a sure thing for a bill to be passed, but I see some type of safe storage law making it out of the House only to be blocked in the Senate. But there will be immense pressure put on Republicans by Democrats in the Senate and special interest groups to back this bill.

Bump Stock Ban Redo

A bump stock ban is also in the works. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has already banned the controversial item by changing the definition of a machine gun, but that is on shaky ground legally. If the Supreme Court takes up the case brought by Gun Owners of America (GOA) out of the Sixth Circuit of Appeals, that ban could be knocked down.

Rob Olson, Chief Legal Counsel for GOA, claims that the ATF abused Chevron deference when changing the definition of a machine gun. Some Justices on the high court have shown skepticism that Chevron can apply to a criminal statute. Many gun rights activists believe GOA will get a victory if it is taken up by SCOTUS, and apparently, so do the anti-gunners in Congress. Any proposed law like this will fight a tough uphill battle because the language will likely include expanding the ban past just bump stocks to other types of trigger devices such as binary triggers. Are belt loops next!?

Serialize Everything

Another proposal on the table would require serializing all unfinished firearm frames and 3D printed guns. These are known colloquially as 80% frame and receivers. A bill will probably pass the House in some form, but I believe this will be stopped in the Senate. Once again, there will be a lot of pressure to pass something. Even if a bill does pass, it will be unenforceable.

Now let’s get to the proposal that Democrats will almost assuredly introduce, but I believe it does not have a great chance of passing out of Congress. Although you never know since most Republicans in Congress seem not to have a backbone.

Standard Magazine Ban

A magazine ban has been batted around that would ban magazines holding more than ten rounds. I don’t believe that a proposal like this can make it through the Senate and might be a sacrificial lamb to pass other less extreme bills. Republicans tend to play defense and are happy just not to give up everything. Democrats, ask for the world, then settle for half.

Assault Weapons Ban… the Sequel

The second sacrificial lamb proposal is a 1994-style “assault weapons ban.” The original ban did not affect the crime rate. This piece of legislation has been a wet dream of Democrats for years. Dianne Feinstein has introduced this bill multiple times, and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has also thrown weight behind a ban. Biden wants this legislation on his desk, but I don’t see Republicans letting a bill pass in the Senate. I see this as a negotiation piece of legislation. But you never know if the anti-gun politicians will be able to dig up the votes to pass a bill.

Everything Gets a Background Check

The final piece of legislation I can see being introduced is universal background checks. This proposed law has been a goal of Democrats for a very long time. The anti-gun side will be sure to bring this proposed law up, but the chances of it passing in the Senate is slim, although it could pass the House.

We need to pressure our legislators not to bend a knee to the anti-freedom coalition. Here are a few names we need to put extra pressure on to keep the line on gun rights. Senator John Cornyn of Texas, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, and Senator Susan Collins of Maine are the weakest links on the Republican’s side. We need to let ALL members of Congress know where we stand.

I sign off all my YouTube videos by saying, “Stay ever vigilant; stay ever free.” What I mean by that is that freedom requires constant vigilance. If you are vigilant, you can take action to prevent our freedoms from being stripped. Our political apathy has led to many of our rights being stripped away. It is time that all gun owners wake up and get at least as politically involved as the anti-gun side.

All gun owners should voice their concerns about overall gun control measures to their Senators. Senator’s offices can be reached through the Senate switchboard at 202-224-3121 or online here.

Here are links to some of the worst of these anti-freedom bills:


About John Crump

John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.

John Crump

 

Uvalde, TEXAS Police chief Arredondo gave money to campaign of anti-gun Robert ‘Beto’ O’Rourke who now promises to confiscate AR-15s

Uvalde Police Department refusing to cooperate with the investigation

Uvalde PD refusing to cooperate with the investigation is a knife in the back to the loved ones of the 21 killed. The police should not get special treatment. There were colossal failures that must be investigated thoroughly to ensure accountability & save lives in the future

Image: Uvalde Police chief Arredondo gave money to campaign of anti-gun Robert ‘Beto’ O’Rourke who now promises to confiscate AR-15s

Mayor delays swearing in of Uvalde School District Police Chief to City ...

BY J.D. HEYES

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-01-uvalde-police-chief-arredondo-gave-money-to-beto-orourke-campaign.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) The outrages following the mass murders of 19 school children and two adults in Uvalde, Texas last week continue to emerge as we learn more about the tragedy, including a little detail about the city’s police chief.

Uvalde Schools Police Chief Peter Arredondo donated a total of $17 to Act Blue and $5 of it was “earmarked for Beto.” The $10 donation was earmarked, “Need to Impeach.” And while the amount donated was not much, it certainly shows his political affiliation and ideology: That citizens should not be able to own the most popular self-defense rifle in the country.

You may recall that year Robert “Beto” O’Rourke, formerly a Democratic member of Congress, was running for governor against current GOP Gov. Greg Abbott. After he lost that race, he decided to run for president and entered the Democratic primary sweepstakes. During a debate, he famously said, “Hell yes, we’re coming after your AR-15s.” Indeed, that ‘pledge’ inspired now-Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), who owns a restaurant in Rifle, Colo., where wait staff are required to wear a sidearm, to run for Congress.

“The police chief of the Uvalde CISD Police donated money to ActBlue in December of 2017 that was earmarked for… Beto O’Rourke. Can’t make it up,” noted political commentator Pete D’Abrosca.

He then reminded his followers that Arrendondo was the one who stopped responding police officers from entering the Robb Elementary School as the shooter was inside killing people.

“To be clear: this is the same guy who stopped 19 LEOs from entering the school while 21 people were being murdered,” he wrote.

“A first responder unwilling to place the lives of the innocent above their own safety should consider another career field.”

5/9 pic.twitter.com/tQCcODkfTa

— Mike Baker (@ByMikeBaker) May 28, 2022

Why the Democrats’ Latest Gun Grab Effort Will FAIL!!!

DR. STEVE TURLEY: Why the Democrats’ latest gun grab effort will fail! We’ll be looking at the latest in the political class’s attempt at blaming you, the law-abiding citizen, for the latest mass shooting, we’re going to see the REAL cause of violent crime, and make sure to stick with me to the very end of this video when I’ll reveal precisely why all of this is nothing more than sound and fury ultimately signifying nothing; you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Canada: Trudeau bans handgun sales in sweeping firearms control legislation

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://robertspencer.org/2022/06/canada-trudeau-bans-handgun-sales-in-sweeping-firearms-control-legislation;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“The federal government is moving to freeze the sale of handguns in Canada as part of its latest effort to reform the country’s gun laws.” The reform plan is moving fast and could be implemented as soon as this fall.

The Trudeau government now has the advantage to ram through bills, given the anti-democratic Liberal-NDP pact that was signed to prop up Trudeau until 2025.

Trudeau brands his gun ban move as a safety issue: “Keeping Canadians safe is the Government of Canada’s top priority.”

That’s if you think he’s believable. His list of infractions includes ethics violations. Trudeau threw out a welcome mat for Islamic State jihadists and continues a lax immigration policy that provides a perfect opportunity for jihadists and the worst criminals to enter Canada while screaming “racism” (along with his useful idiots) at anyone who asks questions. Yet he touts his commitment to keeping Canadians “safe.”

Trudeau habitually works the emotions of the Canadian population. Many are not even aware of the extent of illegal guns in the country. If someone plans to carry out a mass murder, which many mass murderers discuss before it actually happens, if they didn’t have access to a legal firearm, they will likely turn to the illegal market.

According to the President of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, Adam Palmer:

“People can’t be naive to the realities of how it works with organized crime and smuggling….There will always be an influx of guns from the United States into Canada… Heroin is illegal in Canada, too, but we have heroin in Canada. 

Looking South of Canada, Washington, D.C. still has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, yet it is one of the most dangerous places in the country to live. People fire guns. Guns don’t fire themselves. Take, for example, knife crime. It hit a scary record high as a knife offense was “reported every 11 minutes.”

With regard to handguns, the new measures include a complete freeze on buying, selling, and transferring handguns within the country and preventing anyone from bringing newly acquired handguns into Canada. Anyone involved in acts of domestic violence or criminal harassment, such as stalking, will have their handguns taken away.

For a full report on what Trudeau is up to with handguns and a range of other firearms, see his government site HERE.

“Ottawa moves to ban handgun sales with sweeping new firearms control bill,” by Stephanie Levitz, Toronto Star, May 30, 2022:

OTTAWA—The federal government is moving to freeze the sale of handguns in Canada as part of its latest effort to reform the country’s gun laws.

The freeze could be implemented as early as this fall, and would prevent the purchase, sale, transfer or importation of handguns, though individuals who already legally own handguns could still use them.

“In other words, we’re capping the market for handguns,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Monday while announcing the new measures.

The freeze is part of Bill C-21, broad legislation tabled Monday that also revives elements of the government’s most recent legislative effort — also known as C-21 — to update gun laws.

That bill failed to pass before the 2021 election.

Provisions it included which were brought back in the new bill are red and yellow flags, which restrict access to firearms to those deemed to be a danger to themselves or others.

Individuals subject to a protection order or involved in an act of domestic violence or stalking could also face having their licences revoked.

The bill will also formalize a mandatory buyback program for anyone owning any of the 1,500 “assault-style” weapons rendered illegal by the Liberals back in 2020.

Previously, the buyback program was to be voluntary. It has yet to be put in place.

But the end of the sale of handguns to almost all Canadians is a marked departure from the last bill.

The Liberals had previously said the government would work with the provinces and municipalities to allow them to enact bylaws to ban handguns in specific locations.

But gun control advocates had urged the government to implement a national prohibition, rather than allowing for a patchwork of rules that would depend on the willingness of individual jurisdictions to act. Meanwhile, some provinces and cities pushed back against the idea.

That approach simply wasn’t the right “fit,” Trudeau said Monday, so the freeze is the chosen approach.

“This is a concrete and real national measure that will go a long way toward keeping Canadians safe,” he said.

While the freeze is part of the bill, the government tabled regulations Monday that could see it implemented before the law itself receives royal assent.

Government officials said the regulations are to ensure the freeze can be implemented swiftly to curb any possible run on the market while the bill itself is wending its way through Parliament.

The number of registered handguns in Canada increased by 71 per cent between 2010 and 2020, reaching approximately 1.1 million, according to federal statistics.

The text of the regulations was not public by the time of Monday’s briefing with officials.

In the information accompanying the release of the bill, the government said the freeze could be implemented by fall 2022.

Handguns are currently restricted firearms in Canada, meaning to own or use one legally, a licence is required, and getting one of those normally requires background checks and a safety training course.

Those opposed to further restrictions to gun ownership in Canada in turn point out that as a result of Canada’s highly regulated firearms system, the vast majority of guns are acquired and used in accordance with the law.

Any new measures criminalize people who are actually following the law as opposed to those using guns illegally to commit crimes, they argue, and don’t curb violence…….

___________________________________________________________________

A Tale of 2 Tyrants: Biden & Trudeau Go After Guns

HOW TO Trigger Gun Haters In Canada! FLASHBACK-Canadians LOVE Their Enslavement! WE GRILL THEM

BREAKING: HUGE Gun Control Package Moves Forward

Ban On Parts Submitted!

Here Comes The Assault Weapons Ban!!

 

I’m Convinced Democrats Want More School Shootings; Here’s Why

Biden: ‘Just This Month, We Thought that White Supremacy Was Finally Being Got Hold Of’

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/05/28/california-democrats-apparently-want-more-school-shootings-n1601612;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In the aftermath of any mass shooting, there’s always a universal desire to prevent them from happening again. Everyone wants to “do something” to address the problem… at least, I thought they did. I used to believe that the radical left genuinely believed that gun control would stop mass shootings, but now I’m convinced that it is not their primary objective.

On Thursday, mere days after the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, the California State Senate voted to repeal a law requiring that law enforcement be notified when a student threatens violence against school officials.

Why would they do such a thing? How many times have we heard that mass shooters showed warning signs before their offenses, including threats of violence? Why would such a commonsense requirement like reporting a threat of violence to law enforcement to be repealed?

Because of racism!

The law was endorsed by ACLU California Action, which claims that the requirement disproportionately affected minorities.

“Once students make contact with law enforcement, they are less likely to graduate high school and more likely to wind up in jail or prison. These harms fall disproportionately on students from marginalized groups: Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students,” ACLU California Action said in a statement.

“Our existing system has led to alarming disparities in the type of students who are most likely to suffer these harms,” California state Sen. Steven Bradford, a Democrat, told the Daily Caller. “Black students, Latinx students, students of color, and students with disabilities are disproportionately referred to law enforcement, cited, and arrested.”

“SB 1273 will reduce law enforcement involvement in schools and give teachers and administrators, who are often best suited to determine the appropriate response, the flexibility, and power they need to support students,” Bradford added, before noting that teachers and administrators will still be able to use their discretion instead of being required to call law enforcement.

As if that somehow makes it better?

“In a study of mass shootings from 2008 to 2017, the Secret Service found that ‘100 percent of perpetrators showed concerning behaviors, and in 77 percent of shootings, at least one person — most often a peer — knew about their plan,'” explains David Harsanyi of National Review.

Isn’t threatening violence against school officials a warning sign?

More harrowing details emerge in Uvalde, Texas school shooting~Texas Lt. Gov. on Uvalde police response: ‘We were not told the truth’

Authorities say officers waited in the hallway for more than 45 minutes before agents used a master key to open a door and confront the gunman.

Texas Lt. Gov. on Uvalde police response: ‘We were not told the truth’

Texas Lt. Gov.: ‘We were not told the truth’ on police response to Uvalde shooting Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick says state officials were told a ‘different story’ when being initially briefed on the Uvalde tragedy. ... LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK: We were told that there was a security officer and they were a little hazy on how the engagement went, but that a security officer was there. Well, it turned out he was not on campus. He drove onto the campus, but he was not on campus, as we were told and led to believe. No one mentioned the fact that there was this 45-minute-to-an-hour hold by the chief of the police of the school district while there were still shots being fired. Now, we believe that most of those shots were being fired into the door of the wall to hold back law enforcement. But we don't know. And so imagine the parent who has to go through this for the rest of their life and they will be thinking, 'Was my child still alive and could have been saved?' So that was another fact that we weren't told. And so this is heartbreaking. This is horrendous. With these shootings, one of the parts of this job that you don't ever want is to have to go to a funeral of, particularly a child, but anyone killed in a shooting or one of our police officers killed in the line of duty. We've had a lot of funerals, a lot of memorial services, and a lot of hospital visits. So I take this personally, and I know the governor takes it personally. And for me, it's 140 or 150 people killed in Texas in the last six or seven years of collective anger when we're not told the truth.

Biden Responds To Texas School Shooting WITH THE USUAL LIBERAL GUN CONTROL POLITICIZING

IT’S NOT THE GUNS: America’s left-wing culture of DEATH and self-mutilation is a FACTORY that produces mass shooters

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-25-americas-left-wing-culture-of-death-and-self-mutilation-factory-mass-shooters.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) In the wake of the mass shooting yesterday in Uvalde, Texas, we must remember that on the very same day, over 2,700 human babies were murdered in America via abortion factories, according to reliable abortion estimates.

The same Leftists who demand abolishing the Second Amendment by falsely claiming it will stop shootings also celebrate the mass slaughter of human babies as they’re being born… or even after they’re born, via “post-birth abortions” that the Left celebrates. (See Abortions.news for full coverage.)

Don’t pretend for a second that the Left cares about the lives of children.

What they care about is stripping armed Americans of their last remaining line of defense against tyranny: The Second Amendment. Left-wing Marxists and tyrants know that if they can successfully take away firearms from the American people, they can then run whatever totalitarian scenarios they want, including rounding up conservatives and throwing them into concentration camps under the cover of an “outbreak.”

If Americans give up their guns, the radical left-wing fascists will treat the American people in the same way Australia’s government treats their citizens: Like prisoners in a giant prison camp.

Australia has just announced two years in prison for anyone breaking covid rules.

Firearms in the possession of citizens give pause to tyrants. This is the entire point of the Second Amendment — the idea that if the government becomes too tyrannical and dangerous, armed citizens might put a stop to the government terrorism being carried out against the people. That’s why the Founders included the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

Never give up your guns. Not under any circumstances. To do so is to surrender to a murderous regime of criminals and tyrants.

The REAL cause of mass killings and murderous rage

The real cause behind mass killings in America is abundantly evident: Programming of kids through pop culture (media, Hollywood, music, violent, graphic video games), indoctrinating them with themes of satanism, self-mutilation (transgenderism), baby-killing via abortion, and invoking emotional rage against others. And if a child or teen begins to wake up and think outside the box, they get dosed with psychiatric drugs to keep them in line.

These are all things that are taught by the political Left in America today. The message to children and teens is crystal clear: Your life doesn’t matter at all. (This stands in contrast to the conservative, pro-Christian message which is that “Every life matters, including yours.”)

So if murder and self-mutilation is the message being pounded into the heads of children and teens, should we really be surprised when this twisted, demonic culture produces mass murderers who recognize no value in the lives of the innocent?

Our own government values no life at all. They invest in bombs and weapons of war. They set up false flag operations to murder innocent children in order to score political points (Oklahoma City bombing, anyone?). The FDA harvests the organs of murdered babies to use in medical experiments, all funded by your taxpayer dollars. Don’t pretend for a second that the government values life and wants to protect the innocent. They murder the innocent on a routine basis in order to enrich and empower themselves.

Get full details on all this and more in today’s uncensored, sometimes outrageous Situation Update podcast via Brighteon.com:

Brighteon.com/7a0f8663-f8fd-4ed5-8522-8cd5ea34efc0

Heroic Border Patrol Agent WITH A GUN Ends Texas School Shooter’s Murderous Rampage

BY GWENDOLYN SIMS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/gwendolynsims/2022/05/25/heroic-border-patrol-agent-with-a-gun-ends-texas-school-shooters-murderous-rampage-n1600699;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Details continue to emerge about Tuesday morning’s horrific mass shooting at a Texas elementary school, including how a member of the U.S. Border Patrol ended the murderous rampage of the 18-year-old shooter.

According to reports, it all began when the suspect shot his grandmother in San Antonio, Texas. He later led law enforcement on a high-speed chase culminating when he crashed his pickup truck 85 miles away in Uvalde, Texas. Next, the armor-clad shooter fled to nearby Robb Elementary School, where he began shooting and ultimately barricaded himself in a classroom.

A citizen called 911 while two local police officers exchanged gunfire with the shooter. Both officers were shot. According to the AP, a Border Patrol agent who was working nearby “rushed into the school without waiting for backup.” The shooter was killed by “an elite BORTAC Border Patrol agent [who] entered with a tactical team,” according to Fox News reporter Bill Melugin.

Either way, a Border Patrol agent was injured in the exchange of gunfire with the shooter, however, the highly-trained agent was able to shoot and kill the barricaded gunman, ending his murderous shooting spree.

Related: President Biden Responds to Tragic School Shooting in Uvalde, Texas

Sadly, overnight the death toll from this senseless act climbed to 19 children and two adults.

As many Robb Elementary families mourn, some are still awaiting word of their loved ones. We can only imagine how many more students and teachers would have died at the school if not for the brave Border Patrol agent who stopped the shooter with one of the very-terrible-no-good “assault weapons” the left is constantly bleating to ban. Of course, banning guns would only ensure no one will have them except criminals like this crazed shooter.

Thank goodness there are men and women who will run toward danger, but what if there isn’t a Border Patrol agent or law enforcement officer around next time? Do we really believe criminals and crazies will not kill again?

And there will be a next time as long as the left continues to fixate on guns and not the causational issues of the culture of death: rampant untreated mental illness; the destructive breakdown of the family; loss of real meaning and the value of life; lack of spirituality and purpose; and general hopelessness.

POLICE STATE NEW JERSEY: Cory Booker Wants Federal Licensing For ALL GUN PURCHASES!

POLICE STATE NEW JERSEY

READ ABOUT IT: https://www.westernjournal.com/red-al... STOP BOOKERS PLAN: https://www.beatbookersbill.com Cory Booker is up to his old schemes again, this time bringing down the gun control hammer hard to require a federal license for every firearm purchase you make. These licenses would require training classes and secure storage, can be denied for any reason, and would be limited, all at the discretion of the Attorney General.

Trio of Democrats unveil federal gun licensing bill

A gun control proposal by Sens. Cory Booker, Richard Blumenthal, and Robert Menendez would require all gun owners to be licensed by the federal government, and that's just the start of the unconstitutional infringements on our 2A rights contained within the newly introduced legislation.

 

After Arming Terrorists, Biden Moves to Disarm Law-Abiding Americans~Why Are Second Amendment Cases Stalled in the Supreme Court?

READ ABOUT IT: https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/after-arming-terrorists-in-afghanistan-biden-moves-to-disarm-law-abiding-americans/

Taliban fighters hold their weapons as they stand atop a building at the Kart-e-Sakhi shrine in Kabul, Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Ahmad Halabisaz):

Why Are Second Amendment Cases Stalled in the Supreme Court?

In this video, Dudley Brown of the National Association For Gun Rights joins Eric to discuss possible reasons why the Supreme Court has heard a plethora of 1A cases but has turned most 2A cases away in recent years.

“Gun Control” Ahead: Biden Pick for ATF Part of Biden Admin Anti-gun Agenda

“Gun Control” Ahead: Biden Pick for ATF Part of Biden Admin Anti-gun Agenda

BY C. MITCHELL SHAW

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/gun-control-ahead-biden-pick-for-atf-part-of-biden-admin-anti-gun-agenda/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As the Biden administration continues its leftward march, anti-gun measures not seen since the Clinton administration may be on the near horizon. In fact, Biden may pass Clinton in his anti-gun zeal. His new pick for head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) makes previous directors look gun-friendly by comparison. And Biden makes Clinton look the same.

Biden’s pick of Steve Dettelbach — a former Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Ohio — comes after Senate Democrats refused to support the president’s previous nominee, David Chipman. So, Dettelbach comes in knowing he is Biden’s attempt at a consolation prize. But Dettelbach’s anti-gun agenda — in perfect accord with that of the man who chose him second — may be as much of a driving force for Dettelbach to face Senate confirmation as any sense of ambition.

Both Biden and Dettelbach seek to “solve” the “problem” of so-called ghost guns. And of course, they want to do so by the power of a national ban. But the focus on “ghost guns” is a ruse. Biden has a whole slew of guns in his sights and plans to ban them all.

So-called ghost guns are guns that are privately made and do not have a serial number. Despite the rhetoric from liberal politicians and media, such guns represent a minuscule number of firearms in the United States. And — again, contrary to the rhetoric — most of them are perfectly legal DIY projects made by citizens who purchased legal parts and manufactured other legal parts to put together a legal gun.

But those facts are irrelevant to the Biden administration. Biden — and his second pick for ATF — are determined to ban a slew of guns and are using the manufactured “problem” of “ghost guns” to get the camel’s nose inside the tent.

And Democrats have turned the volume on the rhetoric up to 11. For instance, on Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) urged speed in the banning of “ghost guns,” saying, “It’s high time for a ghost gun exorcism before the proliferation peaks and before more people get hurt — or worse.” Schumer’s speechwriter probably worked on that line for almost a minute.

But when the facts are not on one’s side and all one has is rhetoric, one runs wild with it. But “ghost guns” are just the false tip of the iceberg in Biden’s plans to ban guns.

As the Daily Mail reports:

The announcement coincides with the administration’s new crackdowns on ghost guns and regulations on firearms manufacturers and dealers.

“This final rule is part of the President’s comprehensive gun crime reduction strategy,” according to a fact sheet on the Justice Department action.

Biden has been on an anti-gun kick for years. As vice president, he pushed for “gun control,” and as president, he has only doubled down on that policy. In a speech on Monday, Biden announced his anti-gun policies while making it obvious to anyone who knows anything about guns that he knows nothing about guns.

As Daily Wire reported:

Democrat President Joe Biden renewed his push to ban semi-automatic long guns in a Monday speech that focused on what his administration is doing to crack down on Second Amendment rights.

“We need Congress to pass universal background checks, universal background checks, and I know it’s controversial but I got it done once, ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines,” Biden shouted.

And — building up a full head of steam — Biden continued, stating that people do not need “high-capacity magazines” since deer do not wear “Kevlar vests.” This writer would like to enlighten Biden and anyone else who thinks that a 15-round magazine in a pistol or a 30-round magazine in a rifle has anything in the world to do with Kevlar: They don’t. Kevlar is a material that can be used, among other things, to stop bullets. High-capacity magazines increase the number of shots one can fire without reloading. The tie-in is a comparison between apples and rubber bands.

But liberals often show their ignorance of the things they want to damn and ban — and this is especially true when it comes to guns.

But liberal ignorance in general (and Biden’s ignorance in specific) duly noted, the administration is working feverishly to ban certain guns and magazines. In a statement, the administration said:

This final rule bans the business of manufacturing the most accessible ghost guns, such as unserialized “buy build shoot” kits that individuals can buy online or at a store without a background check and can readily assemble into a working firearm in as little as 30 minutes with equipment they have at home. This rule clarifies that these kits qualify as “firearms” under the Gun Control Act, and that commercial manufacturers of such kits must therefore become licensed and include serial numbers on the kits’ frame or receiver, and commercial sellers of these kits must become federally licensed and run background checks prior to a sale — just like they have to do with other commercially-made firearms.

The final rule will also help turn some ghost guns already in circulation into serialized firearms. Through this rule, the Justice Department is requiring federally licensed dealers and gunsmiths taking any unserialized firearm into inventory to serialize that weapon. For example, if an individual builds a firearm at home and then sells it to a pawn broker or another federally licensed dealer, that dealer must put a serial number on the weapon before selling it to a customer. This requirement will apply regardless of how the firearm was made, meaning it includes ghost guns made from individual parts, kits, or by 3D-printers.

And tying Biden’s baseless anti-gun rhetoric directly to his nomination of Dettelbach, the statement said:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is our top federal law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing our commonsense gun laws. Today, the President is nominating Steve Dettelbach to serve as Director of ATF.

Dettelbach — like Biden — has a history of ignorant anti-gun zeal. When he unsuccessfully ran for attorney general of Ohio in 2018, he called for reinstating the assault-weapons ban as well as implementing background checks on firearms purchases — both of which Biden is pushing for just as he names Dettelbach as his second choice to fill the head chair at the ATF.

And as Biden and Dettelbach push a false narrative about “ghost guns” to overinflate the sense of danger where guns are concerned, their sights are set wider. The statement from the administration ends by saying:

Congress needs to do its job by passing this budget and other essential legislation to reduce gun crime, including legislation to require background checks for all gun sales, ensure that no terrorist can buy a weapon in the United States, ban the sale and possession of unserialized firearms — ghost guns, ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and repeal gun manufacturers’ protection from liability.

Since there is actually no such thing as an “assault weapon” (it is a made-up term), one needs to know what exactly is being banned. What Biden is pushing for Congress to ban are semi-automatic rifles with certain characteristics — such as pistol grips and the ability to accept magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. This describes a wide range of rifles that are owned by millions of Americans who have never used them in any crime.

Furthermore, repealing “gun manufacturers’ protection from liability” is a ridiculous proposal. Since guns are designed to shoot — and can be used for good or evil, depending on the person using them — allowing manufacturers to be sued for the use of guns is a travesty in the making. Can anyone imagine allowing automobile manufacturers to be sued for “car violence” — or other types of crime involving cars? Cars are used to commit bank robberies, art theft, burglaries, and a litany of other crimes. And since cars are used in drive-by shootings that also involve guns, lawyers could have a field day, suing everyone.

RETHINKING: DONALD TRUMP’S MEHMET OZ Endorsement Says as Much about PA Republicans as It Does about Trump

President Trump calls Dr. Mehmet Oz, 

“Smart, Tough, and Someone Who Will Never Let Us Down.” (?)

DIDN'T YOU HEAR THAT TRUMP WAS IDENTIFYING & CALLING OUT "RINOS" (REPUBLICANS IN NAME ONLY)?

MORE PROOF THAT TRUMP HAS BEEN LACKING IN DISCERNMENT FOR A LONG TIME; FAILURES TO PROPERLY VETT APPOINTEES POINT TO CARELESSNESS

NOW ENDORSES A TURKISH MUSLIM WHO WAS FOR GUN CONTROL BEFORE; TIES TO BIG PHARMA, APOSTATE PASTOR RICK WARREN, NEW-AGER OPRAH WINFREY, CORPORATE CONNECTIONS

MUSLIM DR. OZ-NOT WHO HE APPEARS TO BE 

Laura Ingraham Hits Trump for Endorsing Oz in Senate Race

BY MICHAEL LUCIANO

SEE: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/laura-ingraham-hits-trump-and-hannity-for-endorsing-dr-oz-in-senate-race-it-was-a-mistake/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

 

Laura Ingraham is none too pleased with Donald Trump’s endorsement of Mehmet Oz for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania, or Sean Hannity’s for that matter.

Oz is seeking the Republican nomination and hopes to replace the retiring Pat Toomey (R-PA).

On Tuesday’s Ingraham Angle, the Fox News host played years-old clips of Oz expressing concerns about climate change, the ability of mentally unwell people to purchase firearms, and states enacting strict anti-abortion laws. For Ingraham, his previous positions on these issues are disqualifying.

The host welcomed former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway to the show to discuss the endorsement. Conway has endorsed Dave McCormick in the primary.

“Do you think the Trump endorsement of Oz was a mistake?” Ingraham asked Conway.

“Well, President Trump’s endorsement in these Republican primaries is a highly sought after and deeply consequential piece of political currency. So many people want it, they make the trek to Bedminster or Mar-a-Lago–”

The host cut her off and asked, “Was it a mistake, Kellyanne?”

Rather than talk up her preferred candidate – McCormick – Conway praised Trump, who was on the record as being pro-abortion until he ran for president. She said he had a “conversion” on the issue. She also accused Oz of making “rookie mistakes.”

Ingraham then noted that her Fox News colleague Sean Hannity is partial to Oz.

“Hannity, I think, I believe endorsed Oz and I think that’s, you know, that’s probably not inconsequential for President Trump,” she said. “You wouldn’t answer the question whether it was a mistake. I think it was a mistake to endorse Oz. I’ll say it. I’m not afraid to say it. It was a mistake to endorse Oz.”

Watch above via Fox News.

_______________________________________________________________

Donald Trump Endorses Mehmet Oz, While His First Endorsed Candidate, Sean Parnell, Disputes The Choice

DECEIVING CONSERVATIVES BY FOLLOWING MUHAMMAD'S SUPREMACY IDEOLOGY AND THE FALSE GOD "ALLAH"

SEE: PERSONAL TURKISH ROOTS; START AT 14:19 MINUTE MARK:

FOOLING CONSERVATIVES AT CPAC 2022:

Oz has also billed himself as an opponent of China, criticizing McMormick’s ties to China in a campaign ad that calls the hedge fund manager “China’s friend, not ours.”

Pennsylvania Republican Senate candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz discusses COVID-19 'authoritarianism' and argues America's values are under attack on 'Fox & Friends.'

Dr. Oz announces bid for Senate seat of retiring Pennsylvania Republican Pat Toomey

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BY DAVID CODREA

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/04/oz-endorsement-says-as-much-about-pa-republicans-as-it-does-about-trump;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

So the upturned thumb tells us all we need to know? (Dr. Mehmet Oz/Facebook)

U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “This is all about winning elections in order to stop the Radical Left maniacs from destroying our country,” Donald Trump declared Saturday in his “Endorsement of Dr. Oz.” “Dr. Oz is Pro-Life, very strong on Crime, the Border, Election Fraud, our Great Military, and our Vets, Tax Cuts, and will always fight for and support our under-siege Second Amendment.”

A skeptical reaction by the Fletcher character from The Outlaw Josie Wales comes to mind. As does a nagging suspicion about being played.

Hey, someone’s gotta say it.

Regular readers of this column will remember the documentation of Oz’s stances on guns before he was running for office, including hosting “This Is Our Lane: Doctors Speak about Gun Violence,” endorsing infringements “including the banning of semiautomatic firearms” under the guise of “public health,” and further using his mass media platform to “sell” due process-denying “red flag laws” to his low-information audience.

The Gun Feed provided further irrefutable evidence of where Oz’s sympathies lie, including his call for fans to contact Congress to get the CDC back into the anti-gun advocacy through junk science business, and his Moms Demand Action-promoted hosting of anti-gun Rep. Lucy McBath.

“If the former president backs him that will tell all but the most self-deluded ‘3D chess’ apologists all they need to know,” I noted at the time.

Not quite.  The guy made a name for himself on TV by firing people. Perhaps if he was better at picking them in the first place, he wouldn’t need to end up angrily attacking so many he had nothing but high praise for in the beginning.

Consider all the wonderful things he said about William BarrChristopher WrayJeff SessionsMike PenceAnthony Scaramucci“Mad Dog” MattisMark Milley, and more.

Then consider how he described them and their qualifications after their fallings out, respectively: BarrWraySessionsPenceScaramucciMattisMilley

That’s not to say Trump was wrong in his final assessments, but we’re talking about his initial ones here. And noting he’s a man who puts the highest priority on being perceived as a winner, we see the reason he has nothing but superlatives in his latest endorsement:

“Perhaps most importantly, I believe that Mehmet Oz will be the one most able to win the General Election against a Radical Left Democrat looking to do unthinkable harm to our Country.”

How electing someone the smart money says will be a leader in future Republican “compromises” on guns will be a “win” (for anyone who cares about the right to keep and bear arms) is left unstated. But it’s bigger than that, though, right? We need a Republican Senate majority so we can stop dangerous Biden appointments, like the recently confirmed Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, pushed over the top by two other Trump endorsees Susan Collins, and Mitt Romney.

Speaking of that process, it’s on Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans to explain why they didn’t even try to deny a quorum and prevent the vote from coming to the floor. It’s also on each of the national “gun rights groups” that did not urge their members to pressure them, and are now using the existential threat Jackson represents to solicit donations. There was no chance? How would they know without a committed fight, and how would that fight, and its risks, compare against the ones their members will now be forced into?

Now, in Pennsylvania, gun owners will once more be forced into a “lesser of two evils” decision, and one that can’t be resolved in the primary.  Trump’s first choice, Sean Parnell, appeared to be on track with key “conservative” issues, including guns and immigration but suspended his campaign after being accused of abuse by his estranged wife. The other alternative is globalist “Bush Republican” David McCormick who throws gun owners this bone while wearing the obligatory orange vest and cap:

“Protecting our 2nd Amendment Rights – Dave grew up hunting on his family’s farm in Bloomsburg and remains a hunter to this day. He is a strong believer in our Second Amendment rights and will stand up against the extreme left who want to abolish our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.”

An identical testimonial, equally as weasel-worded and meaningless, could have been offered up by Fudds for Biden. This is the best that Pennsylvania Republicans can offer, and the most that Pennsylvania gun owners have the clout to demand? Over the years acceptance of oath-breaking lumps like Tom Ridge, Arlen Specter, and Pat Toomey have convinced the establishment that they can get away with serial betrayals and never pay a price at the polls.

Left unaddressed is what the effects of taking fire out of bellies will have on voter turnout. Won‘t everyone be surprised, including Donald Trump considering his prospects for a 2024 comeback, if their best-laid schemes result in John FettermanMalcolm Kenyatta, or Conor Lamb taking home the prize?


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea

__________________________________________________________________

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT MEHMET OZ:

https://ratherexposethem.org/2021/12/01/pennsylvania-senate-gop-candidate-dr-mehmet-oz-no-wizard-when-it-comes-to-guns/

https://ratherexposethem.org/2022/03/06/dr-ozs-ties-to-pharma-tech-complicate-anti-corporate-campaign-claims/

https://ratherexposethem.org/2015/04/23/doctor-oz-accused-of-medical-quackery/

 

Biden to Nominate ANOTHER Gun Grabber to Lead ATF!?

Steve Dettelbach

ABOVE: Steve Dettelbach, a former federal attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. IMG: www.facebook.com/SteveDettelbach

BY F. RIEHL

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/04/biden-nominate-another-gun-grabber-lead-atf/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Washington, DC – -(Ammoland.com)-  According to POLITICO, Biden is planning to nominate Steve Dettelbach, ANOTHER anti-gunner, to be Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

Biden’s First Anti-Gun Nominee

Together, gun owners were able to defeat David Chipman, Biden’s last ATF Director Nominee.

David Chipman’s scandalous history included:

  • making millions of dollars lobbying against your constitutionally-protected rights for Michael Bloomberg and Gabby Giffords
  • working with Chinese state media to create anti-gun propaganda and downplay a massacre in China
  • and more!

But because of your activism and opposition, President Biden was forced to withdraw his nomination in September.

But now, recent reports indicate another gun-grabber may be nominated to lead ATF “as early as this month.”

Steve Dettelbach : Biden’s New Prospective ATF Nominee

Reports indicate that “[d]eliberations are ongoing but Steve Dettelbach, a former federal attorney for the Northern District of Ohio, is seriously being considered by the White House for the post.”

But Dettlebach is not simply a “former federal attorney.”

In 2018, Dettlebach unsuccessfully ran for public office, promising a host of new gun control initiatives if elected, including:

  • An Assault Weapons Ban
  • Universal Background Registration Checks
  • Gun confiscation for misdemeanor crimes
  • Gun confiscation for those dealing with mental health issues
  • “closing” the made-up “over the Internet” and fake “gun show loophole[s]”
  • Disarming teachers and keeping schools as “soft targets”

In fact, Dettlebach used his position as a US Attorney to advocate for gun control for years, publishing op-eds such as Requiring universal background checks make sense.

In fact, this US attorney heavily weighed in on the Manchin-Toomey gun control proposal in 2013, condemning “[t]he Senate’s failure… to pass the universal background check bill” as “disheartening.”

Key Question: Does Steve Dettelbach Support ATF’s Illegal Gun Registry?

In recent months, Gun Owners of America and Representative Michael Cloud uncovered that the ATF has been maintaining an illegal turn-key national gun registry with nearly a billion Firearm Transaction Records or Form 4473s in Martinsburg, West Virginia.

Indeed, federal law prohibits the centralization of ATF records, maintaining a registry of guns or gun owners, and keeping records that are searchable by name.

Interestingly, Steve Dettlebach acknowledged that this was illegal in a 2013 op-ed, stating:

“Some critics have argued that universal background checks will lead to a national gun registry. But establishing such a federal gun registry is and will remain illegal under the proposal. The existing background check system has been around for 14 years, and there’s no national registry of gun owners. Requiring a background check of gun buyers would not compromise the Second Amendment, which we respect” (emphasis added).

But as it turns out in 2005 and 2006, ATF illegally used congressional appropriations to begin converting out-of-business Firearm Transaction Records (Form 4473s) and Acquisition and Disposition Logs into a digital searchable database.

Dettlebach said that federal law prohibits the creation of a gun registry. What does he think should be done with the 920,664,765 records of guns, gun owners, and acquisition and disposition logs currently in ATF’s centralized database as of November 2021?

How the Grassroots Can Help

So, we know that Steve Dettlebach is a big-time gun control supporter.

And, support for infringements on our constitutionally-protected rights should disqualify anyone from every public office.

But, where does Dettlebach stand on maintaining ATF’s illegal national gun registry?

Will Steve Dettlebach enforce Biden’s proposed rule expanding ATF’s illegal gun registry?

Dettlebach must be held accountable for his opposition to the Bill of Rights should Biden formally nominate him in the coming weeks.

And ANYONE nominated to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives must commit to disbanding any gun or gun owner registry currently maintained by ATF.

In liberty,

Aidan Johnston
Director of Federal Affairs
Follow me on Twitter and on Instagram.


Gun Owners of America

Gun Owners of America has previously supported the right of members and staff to carry firearms on Capitol Hill for self-defense, as GOA supports the rights of all law-abiding citizens to carry firearms in their workplace. Gun Owners of America is a grassroots organization representing more than two million gun owners nationwide and is dedicated to protecting the right to keep and bear arms without compromise.

Gun Owners of America GOA logo

 

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is Anti-Gun

BY LEE WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/04/judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-is-anti-gun/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- You don’t need to be an expert Supreme Court prognosticator, legal scholar or even a tea-leaf reader to know that any potential justice for the nation’s highest court nominated by the Biden-Harris administration is going to be an anti-gun extremist.

There are some who believe there’s still not enough information about Biden’s pick, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, but I strongly disagree. While it’s true she has never ruled on a gun-rights case while serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia – a seat she’s held since 2013 when nominated by Barack Obama – the information is there. All you have to do is take a critical look.

During her Senate confirmation hearings, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked, “Do you believe the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right?”

Judge Jackson’s response is telling: “Senator, the Supreme Court has established that the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right.”

She did not say the right to keep and bear arms was enshrined in the Constitution. Nor did she say it’s part of our God-given right to self-defense. Instead, she believes the RKBA was “established” by the Supreme Court.

That friend is a judicial philosophy taken straight from the pages of Gun Banning 101.

There is more evidence, albeit somewhat circumstantial, why Judge Jackson’s nomination should be rejected by every Senator who supports the Second Amendment. Just look at those who nominated her. The Biden-Harris administration is the most anti-gun crew to ever occupy the White House. Biden’s campaign website is proof of his administration’s true intent.

Among other infringements, Biden wants to ban the manufacture and sale of “assault weapons” and standard-capacity magazines, and place all existing “assault weapons” under the regulatory authority of the National Firearms Act (NFA), which currently regulates machine guns, suppressors, short-barrel rifles and shotguns and other weapons. Biden also wants to institute a mandatory “buy-back” – code for confiscation – of “assault weapons” and standard-capacity magazines, ban private firearm sales, and close a plethora of “loopholes,” none of which actually exist.

There has never been an administration so extreme in their anti-gun goals, which they are going to require any Supreme Court nominee to strongly support. In fact, anti-gun activist justice is crucial for their plans. To believe otherwise makes no sense.

As part of her nomination process, Judge Jackson spent hours meeting with administration officials, most likely Susan Rice, who runs Biden’s Domestic Policy Council. As part of her duties, Rice oversees a “gun violence” team, which was formed quickly after Biden took office. Common sense dictates that any Supreme Court nominee who did not voice strong support for Biden’s anti-gun agenda during these meetings would immediately have been shown the door. Furthermore, Judge Jackson was very well-coached on all key Second Amendment issues. During her confirmation hearings, she dodged and sidestepped questions easily. It was clear she had spent considerable time learning how to support Biden’s anti-gun plans, without giving too much away.

Therefore, any Senator who supports Judge Jackson’s nomination, who believes they can later claim ignorance of her intent to infringe upon our gun rights, should know this: Joe Biden’s nominee is an anti-gun extremist. While legal scholars predict an easy confirmation, the whole country will be watching and scoring the vote.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.


About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams

 

POLICE STATE New Jersey: Assembly to Vote on “Mandatory Jail” Bill

Take Action NJ

BY NRAHQ

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/03/new-jersey-assembly-to-vote-on-mandatory-jail-bill;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Later today, the New Jersey Assembly is scheduled to vote on A.2426, legislation that would create a rebuttable presumption of no bail for gun offenses.  IMG NRA-ILA

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Later today, the New Jersey Assembly is scheduled to vote on A.2426, legislation that would create a rebuttable presumption of no bail for gun offenses.  Earlier this month, an Assembly committee heard our concerns over the mandatory rejection of bail for purely possessory charges.

CLICK HERE TAKE ACTION

Fortunately, most of the offenses which were simply possessory were removed by amendment in the Assembly Law & Public Safety Committee.  However, there remains a lingering issue with A.2426, and otherwise law-abiding citizens are still in jeopardy if this draconian bail bill were to become law.  Over thirty years ago, the state’s semi-auto ban outlawed a handful of guns for cosmetic reasons.  By way of example, there is a semi-automatic Benelli turkey hunting shotgun which is prohibited under New Jersey law simply because it has a thumbhole stock.  There are other examples.  Many years ago, after a short amnesty window, owners risked serious consequences for noncompliance.  Once the grace period ended, those owners would no longer be able to transport, possess, surrender, or even destroy those firearms without serious penalty under law.  Upon expiration, there is no way to comply.  Decades later, relatives who may be left with these guns face harsh penalties with no recourse.  A.2426 stipulates that these heirs sit in jail with no bail.  Again, this is just one example of the unintended consequences we witness in the Garden State on an all-too-routine basis.  This is the quintessential New Jersey gun control bill that establishes harsh penalties for hyper-technical violations of the law with no criminal intent.

Please contact your Assembly members and respectfully ask them to either fix the lingering problems with A.2426 or vote against it.  


About NRA-ILA:

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess, and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

 

Demand Congress Stop ATF’s Secret Rule Making

BY DAN WOS

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/03/demand-congress-stop-atfs-secret-rule-making;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Washington, DC – -(Ammoland.com)- Over the past 2 years, the ATF has been speaking out of both sides of their mouths by cracking down on solvent traps while saying that the agency does NOT regulate the devices.

Recently AmmoLand News broke the story about a secret rule change involving 80% suppressors ahead of ATF’s official rule change deadline. These new rules were implemented without any public notifications or comment periods.

The new secret rule makes it almost impossible for anyone to make their own silencer. The ATF denied 850 out of 3000 law-abiding Americans the right to build their own suppressors by rejecting their Form 1 application.

Worse yet, the ATF sent the personal information of those applicants to local ATF field offices to be investigated for crimes!

The rest of the applicants were asked to provide high-resolution pictures to ATF before their Form 1 Application could be approved.

AmmoLand News then urged Congress to get involved in bringing the Biden admins’ out-of-control government bureaucracy under control. Now some members of Congress are stepping up to the plate.

A letter has now been sent to the ATF from the Senate. 20 Senators signed a letter to the ATF demanding the agency stop making rules in secret surrounding Form 1 suppressors & force reset triggers.

A 2nd letter is going out from Republican House Judiciary Committee Members Rep. Andy Biggs & Ranking Member Rep. Jim Jordan… to the ATF and DOJ telling them to stop abusing their power.

Several gun rights organizations have helped Congress draft the letters, including Gun Owners of America, the American Suppressor Association, and the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition.

The American Suppressor Association is asking you to take action & demand Congress tell the ATF to abide by its previous determinations and not revoke any issued tax stamps.

The American Suppressor Association wants gun-owning Americans to let Congress know that the only way to fix the issue with these hearing-saving devices is to pass the Hearing Protection Act. The HPA would remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act. Find those action links in our in-depth article linked in the description below.

The gun grabbers want American gun laws to look more like the laws in the UK. Let’s give them this win…. Silencers are purchased over the counter in most parts of Europe. In fact, shooting without a suppressor in many European countries is considered rude.

Tell us what you think in the comments below and share this video with your friend & family to help support AmmoLand News, America’s oldest 2nd Amendment News outlet.


About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun owners.

Dan Wos
Dan Wos

THE NEW AMERICAN: Ukraine-A Deep State Wonderland~DR. STEVE TURLEY: HUNTER BIDEN ON BRINK OF INDICTMENT

Ukraine is a giant playground of corruption for the Deep State and Ukrainian President Zelensky is a leftwing globalist puppet of the Deep State, warns The New American magazine's Alex Newman in this episode of Behind the Deep State amid the ongoing conflict with Russian strongman Putin. Alex shows the connections between the Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs, the political dynasties of the United States, and much more. This episode follows last week's exposing Putin's connections to the Deep State and how he is following the globalist strategy for World Order outlined by Deep State toady Henry Kissinger. 🇺🇸 The New American: http://www.thenewamerican.com/

HUNTER BIDEN ON BRINK OF INDICTMENT!!!

REPORT BY DR. STEVE TURLEY: My oh my, how the tables have turned! Now lawyers close to the investigation of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop from hell believe he is about to be indicted, and NOW the question is: what did ol’ Sleepy Joe know about it all? In this video, we’re going to look at the latest reports on Hunter’s indictment, we’re going to look at precisely what role Sleepy Joe played in his son’s illicit activities, and stick with me to the very end of this video when I’ll reveal what the latest revelations all really mean for the future of the Bumblin’ Biden regime; you are NOT going to want to miss this! WATCH NEXT: Biden HUMILIATED as the Globalist Order COLLAPSES!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Hbk6...

Biden HUMILIATED as the Globalist Order COLLAPSES!!!

REPORT BY DR. STEVE TURLEY: Bumblin’ Biden is being utterly humiliated on the world stage as the liberal globalist order collapses all around him! In this video we’re going to see how Biden got spanked by President Xi of China, we’re going to see how China is but the latest in a whole line of nations that want nothing to do with this weak and woke regime, and stick with me to the very end of this video when I’ll reveal the needed geopolitical solution once we finally send Bumblin’ Biden back to Delaware; you are NOT going to want to miss this!

 

Joe Biden Declares War on American Gun Dealers (FFLS)

Joe Biden Declares War on American Gun Dealers

BY LEE WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2022/03/joe-biden-declares-war-on-american-gun-dealers/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- While the world’s attention is focused on the horrific events unfolding in Eastern Europe, the Biden-Harris administration quietly unleashed hell on American gun dealers.

As the NRA first noted, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has started revoking licenses of gun dealers for the most minor of paperwork errors – errors that never led to license revocations until Biden took office.

The move was intended to bolster Biden’s politically motivated stratagem, which he first announced on June 23, 2021, that “rogue” gun dealers are responsible for skyrocketing crime rates in large cities that historically have been controlled by Democrats. The “epidemic of gun violence” wasn’t caused by weak prosecutors who refuse to hold criminals accountable, or gangs or underfunded police departments or by any combination thereof, Biden claimed. It was all the fault of “rogue gun dealers.”

Back then, Biden said rogue dealers willfully transfer firearms to prohibited persons, fail to conduct background checks, falsify records, and/or refuse to cooperate with an ATF tracing request or inspection.

This week, The Biden-Harris administration added four more criteria to the rogue list – all minor paperwork errors: failure to account for firearms, failure to document a gun buyer’s eligibility, failure to maintain records needed to comply with an ATF tracing request, and failure to report multiple handgun sales.

FOIA the FOIA

To vet Biden’s rogue gun dealer theory, on the same day he made his “rogue” speech, the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the ATF, seeking the following:

Copies of documents that show the number of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) and their state of residence, who have been prosecuted for willfully transferring a firearm to a prohibited person over the past three years (from June 23, 2018 to June 23, 2021.)

Copies of documents that show the number of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) and their state of residence, who have been prosecuted for ignoring and/or refusing to cooperate with a tracing request from the BATFE, over the past three years (from June 23, 2018 to June 23, 2021.)

(Note: We did not seek the names or other identifiers of any FFL.)

The FOIA request would prove or disprove Biden’s claims, which everyone, even the ATF, likely knew were false. If the rogue dealers were responsible for the increasing violence, there should be hundreds if not thousands of prosecutions and subsequent FFL revocations. If Biden’s claims were false, there would likely be a half-dozen prosecutions in the entire country.

Four months passed without a word from the ATF — not even an acknowledgment they had received the FOIA request. Then, in October, the ATF finally admitted it had received the request, but warned it might take even longer to process.

“For your information, this office assigns incoming requests to one of three tracks: simple, complex, or expedited. Each request is then handled on a first-in, first-out basis in relation to other requests in the same track. Simple requests usually receive a response in approximately one month, whereas complex requests necessarily take longer. At this time, your request has been assigned to the complex track,” the ATF letter states.

The letter also provided the names of two FOIA liaisons, Darryl Webb and Zina Kornegay. Months of calls and messages left for these alleged liaisons were not returned.

In February, after another four months had passed, Kornegay finally answered her phone.

“I’m seeing a bit of back-and-forth,” she said of the request. “Let me look into this further. I will try and find out what’s going on with this.” She refused to say when the ATF would actually respond to the FOIA request. “Let me speak to my team leader,” she said. “I do see your request, but there seems to be some back-and-forth about the best way to handle it.” Kornegay was clearly alarmed by something she read in the FOIA file. She promised to call in a few weeks but never did.

Now, nearly nine months after the original FOIA was filed, there has been no further communication from the ATF, so the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project sent ATF a second FOIA request – an attempt to find out more information about the kerfuffle our first FOIA request seemingly ignited.

Specifically, we requested copies of all internal ATF emails related to our first FOIA, as well as copies of all external emails the ATF received related to our initial request – for example, emails that may have come from the White House. We will publish any response we receive.

True Intent

The Biden-Harris Administration clearly wants to revoke as many FFLs as they can. Their goal is simple and transparent: Fewer gun dealers will result in fewer gun sales. Like most of their anti-gun schemes, they did not take into account that criminals don’t buy their firearms from licensed gun dealers, they steal them or buy them on the black market, so the administration’s plan will only infringe upon law-abiding firearm purchasers.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.


About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams

1 4 5 6 7 8 13