A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
The Centers for Disease Control has no plans to change its guidance on children wearing masks in schools, according to leaked audio from a closed-door House Energy and Commerce committee briefing obtained by Reason.com.
“The CDC provides guidance,” CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said on the recording. “Our guidance currently is that masking should happen in all schools right now.”
In public, Walensky has been far more encouraging. She said at a press briefing that the agency was looking for “new metrics” in order to relax the mask guidance soon. But that relaxation would appear to apply to adults, not kids in schools.
The leaked audio included this exchange with Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.):
“What we see in the U.S. is an outlier as it relates to the mask mandate for our children to go to school,” said McMorris Rodgers. “[The World Health Organization and UNICEF] have both recommended against masking for kids under the age of five because it’s going to do more harm than good. For children ages 6 to 11, they think that we should be considering other factors like learning and social development. My question today, my one question, is Dr. Walensky, will you commit to update your guidance by Friday to allow children in person without the burden of masks?”
Walensky made no such commitment to a timetable for abolishing school mask mandates. She acknowledged the “limitations” of the Arizona study, as well as other studies the CDC has relied upon to inform their guidance, but rejected any near-term changes on masking in schools.
There’s a very good reason why the CDC is treading so lightly when it comes to masks in schools. The agency doesn’t want to cross the teachers’ unions, as they proved in Feb. 2021 when the agency was about to recommend that schools fully reopen.
The emails were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by the conservative watchdog group Americans for Public Trust and provided to The Post.
The documents show a flurry of activity between CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, her top advisors and union officials — with Biden brass being looped in at the White House — in the days before the highly-anticipated Feb. 12 announcement on school-reopening guidelines.
“Thank you again for Friday’s rich discussion about forthcoming CDC guidance and for your openness to the suggestions made by our president, Randi Weingarten, and the AFT,” wrote AFT senior director for health issues Kelly Trautner in a Feb 1 email — which described the union as the CDC’s “thought partner.”
Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Ala.) asked Walensky how she could justify the current guidance when the rest of the planet was advising against masking school kids.
“I will also say that guidance is just guidance, and all of these decisions, we’ve continued to say, have to be made at the local level,” she said. “As cases come down dramatically, we have deferred our guidance to the local jurisdictions.”
“That’s not acceptable,” said Palmer. Indeed, most of the masking holdouts in school districts are waiting for the CDC to change their guidance! Walensky is saying that it’s not the CDC’s fault that their guidance is being followed at the local level.
Walensky is not in a position to allow for any risk at all to be accepted by anyone. One death, one hospitalization, one positive test is too much. That’s always been her job, which is why the CDC guidance has never been about “following the science” and has always been about eliminating risks.
Taking off a kid’s mask in school is a risk. A very small risk to be sure, but a risk nonetheless. Since politicians and bureaucrats have anointed themselves arbiters of what’s safe and what isn’t safe, until they find the gonads to do what’s normal and right, our kids will be stuck in COVID hell — with their masks on.
If swab was “processed with a PCR test, there’s a 10% chance that it ended up in a lab for genomic sequencing analysis,” tweeted the CDC.
QUICK FACTS:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) posted a tweet explaining that swabs used to test for Covid-19 are being stored for “genomic sequencing analysis.”
“Remember that #COVID19 nose swab test you took? What happened to the swab?” the CDC asked on Twitter. “If it was processed with a PCR test, there’s a 10% chance that it ended up in a lab for genomic sequencing analysis.”
The video linked in the CDC’s tweet did not clarify what the laboratories are doing with the human DNA on the swabs.
The CDC did not immediately respond when American Faith asked the agency what was being done with the human DNA.
Peer-reviewed studies published as far back as 1999 have proven that human DNA can be obtained from PCR-based applications using swabs.
WATCH THE VIDEO LINKED IN THE CDC’S TWEET:
HOW TWITTER USERS RESPONDED:
“Well, this is a concerning development,” one user replied to the CDC’s tweet. “Was the intent provided upfront in a disclosure? I would not have agreed to releasing my DNA!”
“Translation… We now own your DNA,” commented another.
“I didn’t consent to that.. good thing after the first one I decided I’m never doing it again,” one user said.
“I thought this was just a conspiracy theory?” another tweeted back to the CDC.
“They say 10% but I’m sure it’s a lot closer to 100%,” said another.
“I really would like to see the list of things the conspiracy theorists got wrong,” another Twitter user joked.
BACKGROUND:
When French President Emmanuel Macron met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday, the leaders sat opposite each other, a 20-foot table between them, because Macron had declined to take a Russian PCR test, The Washington Post reports.
“Certain leaders follow their own protocols and do not expect to exchange test results with the host country,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. “We understand that, it’s a normal global practice, so we activate an additional protocol to protect the health of our president and guests at the same time. Social distancing is maintained on a larger scale then.”
Rumble — The latest reports from the UK government and from the CDC reveal the vaccines for the Chinese virus are killing far more children than the virus itself. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.
While numerous states run by Democratic governors have started lifting mask mandates for schools, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed that “now is not the moment” to drop mask mandates in schools and other public places. America’s second-largest teachers’ union boss echoed the statement.
In an interview with WYPR‘s Tom Hall on Tuesday’s edition of the show Midday, Walensky said that her agency “still recommends that all schools encourage students to wear well-fitting masks consistently and while indoors. And that’s consistent with our guidance that still also recommends that people mask in public indoor settings in areas of high or substantial transmission.” Walensky, however, reaffirmed that such decisions lie within discretion of the local governments, not the CDC.
Walensky went on to say that she is “cautiously optimistic” about the course of the pandemic yet noted that the number of cases is still too high for people to lower their guard. Also, the hospitalization rate is higher than it was at Delta’s peak, said the CDC chief, who not so long ago admitted that people hospitalized “with COVID” often find themselves in the hospitals for unrelated reasons. Walensky also failed to mention that her own agency has recently found that the Omicron strain is far milder than Delta. It is, actually, a whopping 91-percent less deadly than Delta, the CDC researchers observed.
Walensky further implied that keeping a mask mandate in place is a necessary prerequisite to keeping schools open, even though multiple studies (here and here) suggest that mask usage makes little to no difference in COVID transmission. In fact, the masks have been associated with greater COVID transmission and deaths rates.
Getting children vaccinated against COVID, Walensky added, would also play an important role in keeping community transmission rates low and would facilitate a “return to normal,” even though her own agency has confirmed that vaccinated people can still get infected and spread the infection to others (see here and here). Moreover, the agency reiterated its universal masking recommendation back in July because it found that the vaccinated spread the disease to others at similar rates as the unvaccinated. In spite of that, Walensky yet again falsely claimed during the interview that the vaccines will “protect [children] from infection, severe disease and hospitalization.”
“I know people are interested in taking masks off. I too am interested. That would be one marker that we have much of the pandemic behind us,” Walensky told Reuters the same day.
“We have and continue to recommend masking in areas of high and substantial transmission — that is essentially everywhere in the country in public indoor settings,” she stressed.
Walensky’s comments come as several states across the country have announced plans to end statewide school mask mandates by the end of February or March.
As The New Americanreported today, Democrat governors in four deep blue states of Oregon, New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut all announced earlier this week that they were rolling back their indoor masking requirements, including for schools.
California is easing many of its COVID-related restrictions and lifting the indoor mask mandate for fully vaccinated people, yet continues with the requirement for K-12 schools.
On Wednesday, New York joined the club, and will end the statewide vaccine-or-mask requirement for businesses on Thursday. Masks will still be required in schools and some other places where people congregate, including healthcare facilities, shelters, and public transit stations. Counties, cities, and businesses can still impose their own rules on masking.
Teachers’ Unions
During an interview with MSNBC Tuesday morning, American Federation of Teachers (AFT) President Randi Weingarten insisted kids must continue to be masked in schools until vaccination rates are high among children and community transmission rates are low. Most importantly, Weingarten wants to make sure that there is “no [COVID] transmission” happening in schools, which is practically unachievable.
She added that her union asked the CDC to develop a guidance on how to gradually lift the restrictions for schools without sacrificing safety back in November. The arrival of Omicron, however, hindered that discussion and “brought the masks back,” Weingarten said.
Weingarten appears to be a fierce advocate for vaccinating children.
“I like what Massachusetts has done. What they said, is that on a school-by-school basis, they said if there’s 80 percent vaccination rates, then the school can lift the mandates.”
The union boss seemed to be unaware that the vaccine manufacturers themselves have admitted that the vaccines that were designed against the original Wuhan strain of COVID provide “limited protection, if any” against Omicron.
Weingarten represents the second-largest teachers’ union in America.
While she asks for a “science-based” approach to the pandemic, her own organization as well as her colleagues from the largest teachers’ union, the National Education Association, were the ones who pressured the CDC to keep strict guidelines on school COVID policies. Earlier in May, NEA was caught red-handed influencing the CDC guidance.
Both of the groups are major Democrat donors (see here and here).
Rumble — More doctors are coming forward with evidence that vaccines against the China virus are actually causing significant side effects, including death. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
As of January 7, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received 9,936 reports of death following the COVID jab in the U.S. When you include foreign reports received by VAERS, the death toll stands at 21,745
A total of 1,541 miscarriages have also been reported post-jab in the U.S., or 3,594 if you include foreign reports. Despite these shocking statistics, U.S. health officials and “fact-checkers” insist not a single death can be attributed to the shots
According to OneAmerica, a national life insurance company, in the third quarter of 2021, working-age Americans (aged 18 to 64) died at a rate that is 40% higher than the pre-pandemic rate, and they didn’t die from COVID
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021, and teens’ mortality in the U.K. shot up 47% in the three months after they became eligible for COVID shots
A recent histopathologic analysis of the organs from 15 patients who died within seven days to six months’ post-jab, ages 28 to 95, found 14 of the deaths — 93% — were caused by the jab
As of January 7, 2022, just over a year into the campaign to inject every human being with a gene transfer product to protect against COVID, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received 9,936 reports of death following the COVID jab in the United States’ territories alone.1 When you include foreign reports received by VAERS, the death toll stands at 21,745.
A total of 1,541 miscarriages have also been reported post-jab in the U.S., or 3,594 if you include foreign reports. Despite these shocking statistics, U.S. health officials and “fact-checkers” insist not a single death can be attributed to the shots.
During an early January 2022 Senate committee hearing on the nation’s Omicron response (see video above), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and director for the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, testified — under oath — that they “did not know” how many deaths had been reported to VAERS following COVID “vaccination.”2,3
Walensky referred to the shots as “incredibly safe,” claiming — against all science — that they “protect us against Omicron, they protect us against Delta, they protect us against COVID.” She also falsely claimed that all reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths have been “adjudicated.”
No, VAERS Is Not a Repository of Fake Reports
Worse yet, both Walensky and Fauci claim any and all adverse events following vaccination get reported to VAERS, including accidental deaths and car accidents. They both actually claim that if a person gets the COVID shot and gets hit by a car afterward, that is reported as an adverse reaction.
Nothing could be further from the truth. First of all, adverse events are not automatically reported and, certainly, obvious accidents are not entered into the system as a suspected vaccine side effect.
As reported by Health Impact News,4 there are about 18 reports in VAERS that include “road traffic accident,” but most if not all relate to an adverse event, such as a heart attack, occurring while driving. They were not hit by someone else and entered into the system. As noted by Pam Long in aJanuary 12, 2022, Twitter thread:5
“If anyone in public health utters ‘a person can get hit by a car & report their death to VAERS’ you need stop them, in any public meeting, and demand they explain what motive would a physician have to inflate VAERS reports with car accidents or any unrelated mortality?
Despite Walensky’s & Fauci’s cliché testimony to Congress. Not one person ‘got hit by a car’ & reported their own death to VAERS as a vaccine injury. Most reports are filed by medical professionals, using diagnostic language about drug reactions.”
VAERS was designed and created as an early warning system. It’s true that anyone can file a report, but it’s time-consuming, requires the knowledge of medical details a patient oftentimes won’t have and carries penalties for filing a false report. There’s absolutely no reason to suspect, let alone assume, that people are filing false reports just to make the shots look bad.
Fact-Checker Outs Himself as a Pharma Propagandist
Walensky and Fauci aren’t the only ones lying about the lethality of the COVID jab. Mainstream media are all-in as well. In a USA Today fact check,6 Daniel Funke claims that “COVID-19 vaccines [are] safe for children” and “not linked to deaths.”
“... online, some claim children face more risk from the vaccine than COVID-19 itself,” Funke writes. “USA TODAY previously rated False a claim that children are 50 times more likely to die from the COVID-19 vaccine than the virus. This claim is similarly wrong.
Public health officials say the vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech is safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 in children ages 5-11. As other independent fact-checking organizations have reported, the benefits of the vaccine outweigh its known and potential risks.
‘Over 700 children have died due to COVID-19 in the United States,’ Dr. Sonja Rasmussen, a professor in the departments of pediatrics and epidemiology at the University of Florida, said in an email.
‘I am not aware of any deaths in children that have been attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine’ ... The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine for children outweigh its known and potential risks, according to the CDC. The shot does not cause death.”
Funke cites data from Pfizer’s clinical trials, “which found the vaccine was safe” for children, as “no deaths were reported” in Pfizer’s trials for 12- to 25-year-olds, and those for 12- to 17-year-olds. Funke dismisses the rationale for looking at VAERS data on the basis that anyone can file a report and that reports are unverified, and therefore cannot be used to determine causation.
All Opinion and No Data
There are so many issues with this “fact-check,” no wonder Facebook attorneys are using the legal defense that fact checks are “opinion” only and not actual assertions of fact.7,8 There’s nothing but opinions in this piece. As “evidence” that the COVID shots are safe and have caused no deaths, Funke presents:
Another opinion piece by USA Today
The supposed opinion of unnamed “public health officials”
Biased opinion assertions by other pharma-funded propaganda organizations (aka, “fact-checking organizations”)
The opinion of a single professor who admits she is unaware of publicly available data
The unsupported opinion of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a captured agency that has repeatedly been caught manipulating data and changing definitions to fit the pandemic narrative
Pfizer’s preliminary trial data, which whistleblowers warn may have integrity issues9
The unsupported claim that VAERS data are unreliable because anyone can file, the implication being that people can file fake reports
The debatable claim that VAERS data cannot tell us anything about causation, hence it’s useless looking at it
It’s hard to come up with a less compelling list of evidence for safety, but then again, propagandists have to work with what they have, and in this case, they have nothing. Funke presents zero actual data to support his opinion.
Explain the Rise in Mortality if You Can
There are many data-driven reasons to suspect, predict and even assume that the COVID shots are killing more people than they’re saving — regardless of the age group in question. It would take an entire book to cover it all, so I will only review a few of those reasons here.
One very telling clue that recently came to light is life insurance data. According to OneAmerica, a national life insurance company based in Indianapolis, in the third quarter of 2021, working-age Americans (aged 18 to 64) died at a rate that is 40% higher than the pre-pandemic rate, and they didn’t die from COVID.10
And, according to CEO Scott Davidson, this catastrophic abnormality is consistently seen “across every player” in the life insurance industry.11 A 40% increase in mortality is simply unheard of, and as of yet, they claim to have no clue as to what’s causing young and middle-aged people to die prematurely at such an astounding rate.
Looking at it from a sleuth’s point of view, one might ask, “What environmental factor with unknown safety was introduced in 2021 to people in this age group?” Sure, pandemic restrictions have led to spikes in drug overdoses and suicides, which affects this cohort in particular. But “deaths of desperation” cannot account for all of it.
The one wild card is the COVID jab. More than 173 million working-age Americans (18 to 64) got these experimental gene transfer injections,12 and doctors and scientists have elucidated several mechanisms by which they might injure or kill.
What’s more, the rise in deaths began AFTER the rollout of the shots, and whatever the causative factor, it is not only national but likely international in scope. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, for example, also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021.13
Excess deaths (exceeding pre-pandemic norms) are also reported in the U.K.14 Among teens (aged 15 to 19), mortality spiked right after teens became eligible for the COVID shot.15 Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, and that same period of time in 2021, teenage deaths rose by 47%.16
A rise in disability claims17 also suggests that many who aren’t killed by this novel lethal threat are seriously injured, often long-term. For all of these reasons, the COVID jabs cannot be taken off the table. Logic demands that they be looked into as a potential causative factor.
Can VAERS Data Demonstrate Causality?
One person who has taken a strong stance against the claim that VAERS data cannot tell us anything about causation is Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. In the video “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,”18 he argues that VAERS can indeed be used to determine causality.
It’s important to realize that the idea that VAERS cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the deaths is attributable to the COVID shot. Kirsch argues that this premise is in fact false and that causation can be determined using VAERS’ data.
To prove his point, Kirsch gives the following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose, nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
When you look at the VAERS data, what you would find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after the second dose, all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of death.
According to the CDC, you cannot ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just a random chance that everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the first dose or from another condition.
Kirsch argues that causality can indeed be identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another explanation for why people — many who are young, in perfect health with no predisposing conditions — die exactly 24 hours after their second dose. It’s even difficult to come up with another explanation for people who do have underlying conditions.
For example, is it reasonable to assume that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions, would die from DVT exactly 24 hours after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed diabetes would die from DVT exactly 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the first dose, or two months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same condition at the exact same time, over and over again?
At a bare minimum, as an early warning system, VAERS is designed to flag potential causation. It’s by looking for repeated patterns of side effects that you would begin to identify a potentially problematic vaccine. Once a pattern is identified — and there’s no denying death within 24 hours to one week is a pattern seen for the COVID shots — an investigation should be launched.
But no such investigation has been launched for the COVID jabs. Clear-cut patterns are simply ignored. As an early warning system, VAERS is performing as intended, despite severe underreporting (the CDC recently published a paper in which they admit COVID jab adverse effects in children are underreported by a factor of 6.519). It’s the follow-up that’s lacking. But lack of investigation and follow-up do not evidence that the shots can’t cause death.
‘Bad Batches’ Are Another Clue
Another clue that hints at SOME of the shots being able to cause rapid death is the “bad batch” phenomenon. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have no adverse events associated with their use.
According to howbadismybatch.com, a site that matches up vaccine lot codes with reports in the VAERS system, approximately 5% of the lots are responsible for 90% of all adverse reactions. Some of these batches have 50 times the number of deaths and disabilities associated with them, compared to other lots.20
Another website that basically does the same thing is TheEagle’s VAERS Dashboard. (A video explaining how to use the dashboard can be found on Bitchute.21)
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, cofounder of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German parliament, discuss this “smoking gun” evidence in the video above. According to Fuellmich and Wodarg, this lot-dependent data shows vaccine makers are conducting secret experiments within the larger public trial.
They appear to actually be doing lethal-dose testing on the public. Wodarg argues that the evidence for this is very clear from the data. They also appear to be coordinating these lethal-dose experiments, so that they’re not all releasing their most toxic lots at the same time, or in the same areas, so as to avoid detection through clustering.
More Data Showing COVID Jabs Can Kill
In closing, I will raise just two more pieces of evidence that speaks to COVID jabs having the ability to kill large numbers of people:
•A recent histopathologic analysis of the organs from 15 patients who died within seven days to six months post-jab, ages 28 to 95, found 14 of the deaths — 93% — were caused by the jab.22,23 None of the original coroners’ reports implicated the shots, however.
The association was only established through autopsy, which revealed a “process of immunological self-attack” that is “without precedent.” “Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals,” Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt wrote.
•According to researchers at Columbia University, the real number of people killed by the COVID jabs is about 20 times the reported rate, based on their analysis of two publicly available databases (VAERS in the U.S., and another in Europe).24,25,26 That analysis was published in October 2021, but few ever heard a peep about it. According to the authors:
“Comparing our age-stratified VFRs [vaccine-induced fatality rates] with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure.
We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.”
Based on the ever-mounting data, the claim that COVID shots have not, cannot, and/or will not cause death simply isn’t credible. And the longer these shots continue to be used, the greater the likelihood that they will indeed kill far more than the actual virus ever did. We also need to remember that the disabilities and long-term chronic ill-health these shots are causing will prematurely kill many more, even if it takes 10 or 15 years, and we have no data on any of that yet.
Governor Ron DeSantis criticized the decision by the FDA to revise authorizations for two monoclonal antibody treatments, which led the state to close all monoclonal sites "until further notice."
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. succinctly summarizes how Dr. Anthony Fauci wields his power to control and manipulate science across the globe
It’s Fauci’s job to conduct research on chronic diseases to figure out their etiology and environmental causes to protect public health, but instead, he turned the NIAID into an incubator for pharmaceuticals
Fauci has a $7.6 billion annual budget that he uses to develop new drugs, which he then farms out to universities
Fauci’s control — in collusion with that of Bill Gates — has rendered the majority of global scientific research nothing more than pharmaceutical propaganda
Fauci shares drug patents with universities, sells them to drug companies, splits the patents with them, and walks those drugs through the FDA approval process, which he also controls; once approved, Fauci himself often profits
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. succinctly summarizes how Dr. Anthony Fauci wields his power to control and manipulate science in this riveting episode of The Jimmy Dore Show.1 Fauci has been painted as a hero throughout the pandemic, an image that is not only misleading but wildly inaccurate, as detailed in Kennedy’s best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.”
“I wrote the book because so many Americans were looking at Tony Fauci as this kind of savior,” Kennedy said. “… [T]he man on the white horse, or in the white lab coat, that would ride us out of this coronavirus crises but I knew from the beginning … that he does not do public health and has not done public health since the 1980s.”2,3
Rather than looking out for public health, Fauci and his agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), prioritize pharmaceutical promotion. Kennedy refers to Fauci as the “leader of the pack” when it comes to those promoting pharmaceutical products, profiteering from Big Pharma, and promoting their own personal power.
Public Health Plummeted During Fauci’s Reign
In 1984, when Fauci was appointed director of NIAID, 11.8% of Americans had chronic disease, but this has risen sharply since.4 Fauci doesn’t talk about this public health failure — at least not publicly — but as Kennedy noted, it was Fauci’s job to figure out why cases of autism, food allergies, ADHD, sleep disorders, juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and many other chronic and infectious diseases have skyrocketed.
It was Fauci’s job to conduct research on these diseases to figure out their etiology and environmental causes to protect public health, but instead, he turned the NIAID into an incubator for pharmaceuticals. According to Kennedy:5
“When Tony Fauci came in, 6% of American children had chronic disease. By 2006, 54% had it. We went from being the healthiest country in the world with the healthiest children to the sickest. Literally, we do not even qualify as a developed nation. We are 79th in the world, behind Nicaragua and Costa Rica in terms of our health outcomes.
And why did that happen? Well, the one figure who is more responsible for that than anybody else in the world is Tony Fauci. He is the reason we take more pharmaceutical drugs than any other nation in the world. Three times the average among western countries. We pay the highest prices and have the worst outcomes.”
Fauci’s Multibillion-Dollar Budget Gives Him Immense Power
Fauci has a $7.6 billion annual budget, which in total during his entire tenure is more than half a trillion dollars that he’s been in control of. Instead of using that to reveal the environmental issues leading to outbreaks of chronic disease, he uses the money to develop new drugs, Kennedy explains, which he then farms out to universities:6
“He shares the patents with them, and then he sells them to the drug companies, splits the patents with them, and he walks those drugs through the FDA approval process, which he completely controls from the bottom up. And then he gets them approved and in many cases he himself profits. People within his agency can collect $150,000 a year from royalties off each of these products.”
The NIH owns half the patent for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection, which means that it stands to make billions of dollars as a result. Four of Fauci’s top deputies will also collect $150,000 a year for life as a result — from a product they’re responsible for regulating, an obvious massive conflict of interests.
“The mercantile and commercial interests have overwhelmed the regulatory function at that agency and it no longer does public health — it does pharmaceutical promotion,” Kennedy said.7 As an example, between 2009 and 2016 there were 240 new drugs approved by the FDA, all of which came out of Fauci’s “shop,” he added. “He is the incubator for the whole pharmaceutical industry.”8
How Fauci Controls Science Globally
Fauci has spread the notion that he is untouchable, going so far as to tell MSNBC that an attack on him is an attack on science:9
"It's very dangerous … because a lot of what you're seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science."
Throughout the pandemic, “trusting the science” has become a cultural statement and propaganda tool, but one that’s far from what true science is all about. Far from being a source of independent science, in essence, Fauci’s control — in collusion with that of Bill Gates — has rendered the majority of global scientific research nothing more than pharmaceutical propaganda. Kennedy explains:10
“Every virologist in the world knew that the coronavirus was engineered. All you have to do is look at the genome. Everybody knew that and they kept silent for a year, and here’s how. He gives away $7.6 billion a year. That’s two to three times what [Bill] Gates gives away. Him and Gates work tandemly. They partner up on everything. They talk together a couple times a week.
They are business partners … in 2000, in Gates’ library, the two of them got together and they formally formed a partnership. You take those two and one other guy — Jeremey Farrar — who is their other de facto partner who is the head of the Wellcome Trust, which is the U.K. version of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Between those three men, they control 61% of the biomedical research funding on Earth.
So if you want to get your study funded, you’ve got to go to those guys. Not only can they give you the money, but they also can kill a study because they control all of the other funding sources. They can kill a study, they can ruin a career, they can bankrupt colleges who do science that they don’t want done. So they are able to really dictate virtually all the science on the globe.”
Drug Companies and Universities All Benefit
Kennedy gives a theoretical example of how Fauci yields his immense power to influence science: In his lab, Fauci develops a molecule that kills a virus. This is done by scientists dropping molecules onto one of countless viruses — influenza, Ebola, coronaviruses, zika, and others — in Petri dishes and test tubes to see if it kills them. If the molecule works to kill the virus in a petri dish, they move on to testing it on rats infected with the virus.
“If the rats don’t die, now he’s got a drug,” he says. “It’s an antiviral and it’s usable in mammals because it will kill the virus but it won’t kill the mammal. Then he farms it out to the university.”11 There, a PI, or principal investigator, who is usually a person of power, such as the dean of a department, does a phase I trial, experimenting on animals and around 100 humans. Kennedy explains:12
“For each of the humans that he recruits — he’s a medical doctor, he brings in patients, persuades them to take part in the study — Tony Fauci’s agency gives him $15,000 for every one of those patients. The university keeps 50% of that so now they’re also part of this process. And then if the drug gets through that phase I, then they move on to phase 2 and phase 3. So now they have to bring in 20,000 or 30,000 people.
They bring in a drug company as a partner, and they go through the phase 2 and phase 3 [trials], and then at the end of it, they all split up the patents. So the drug company owns half, Tony Fauci’s agency may get part of it and he and his cronies take little slivers of it so they get paid for life. The university gets a part of it, so now you have all the medical schools in the country … dependent on this income stream.”
‘Independent Panels’ Aren’t Independent
At this point, the new drug still has to get regulatory approval, which brings it before a supposedly independent panel of experts. But this panel isn’t made up of independent scientists looking for the truth about whether or not the drug is safe and effective; it’s made up of Fauci’s and Gates’ PIs, who often have drugs of their own in development. Kennedy continues:13
“When this drug goes to FDA to get approved, it goes to a panel. Tony Fauci’s always saying it’s an independent panel who decides, based upon real science, whether or not this drug is worthy of approval. It’s not an independent science. They’re virtually all his PIs or Gates’ PIs.
Those guys go sit on that panel for a year, and they know that they’ve got their own drugs back at Baylor University they’re working on, or Berkeley or Columbia, that they know are going to be in front of that same panel next year. And they’re all scratching each other’s backs. And they approve that drug and then they go off the panel, finish their drug, and then that drug goes in front of a panel that’s similarly constituted and populated.”
These principal scientists act as gatekeepers to the public, spreading the official narrative under the guise of independent science, often pushing questionable COVID-19 policies. “These PIs control the journals, they control the public debate, they’re on TV all over the world, and these are the people that form the narrative, that protect the orthodoxy,” Kennedy says.14
“If you look at Tony Fauci as the pope, the PIs are the cardinals, the bishops and the archbishops. And they’re the ones that protect the orthodoxy, that make sure that the heretics burn, that doctors who disagree are … delicensed, that they get discredited, that they get gaslighted and vilified and marginalized. They’re the army that controls the narrative.”15
Waking up to Fauci’s façade is necessary to understand the orchestrated planned use of pandemics to clamp down totalitarian control. You can find even more details about the coalition of sinister forces — intelligence agencies, pharmaceutical companies, social media titans, medical bureaucracies, mainstream media and the military — that are intent on obliterating constitutional rights globally in “The Real Anthony Fauci.”
Kennedy’s book has been a best seller for two months now and if you haven’t already picked up a copy I would encourage you to do so now.
Entertaining Content
Dore not only does interviews with important guests as the one above, but he also is a comedian. It can be very depressing when we keep sharing all the devastation that has resulted from COVID. Dore’s mission is to take the news and share the obvious in an entreating way as can be evidenced below how he interprets CNN giving the CEO of Pfizer the CEO of the year award.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In recent days, the pandemic narrative has undergone a remarkable number of U-turns
January 9, 2022, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky sent out a tweet saying “We must protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-19,” in other words, focused protection, which is what tens of thousands of doctors have been calling for since the creation of The Great Barrington Declaration in early October 2020
January 10, 2022, Walensky admitted that the COVID shots cannot prevent transmission
The CDC is now saying you should not retest once you’ve recovered from COVID, as the PCR can provide false positives for up to 12 weeks after the infection has been resolved. They’re also cutting the isolation requirement from 10 to just five days — probably because the failing economy is hurting Biden’s approval rating so they need people to work
The narrative is also changing on what makes for a COVID case and how deaths are counted. Walensky recently admitted about 40% of “COVID patients” tested positive but do not have symptoms and are hospitalized for something else. She has also promised to deliver data on how many people have actually died “from” COVID and how many died “with” it
As noted by Dr. Ron Paul in January 10, 2022, Liberty Report above, U.S. authorities have suddenly started to change their tune with regard to COVID and the COVID shots.
“The opposition to our position is starting to wake up,” Paul says, as some shreds of truth are actually starting to be acknowledged. The good news, Paul says, is that “Maybe some of the things they’ve been saying are not quite accurate, and maybe what we’ve been saying is closer to the truth, and maybe they’re starting to recognize that.”
CDC Director Now Calls for Focused Protection
Indeed, in recent days, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has made a remarkable number of U-turns, completely reversing course on several narrative points.
For example, on January 10, 2022, CNN interview, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky actually admitted that “what [the COVID shots] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission,”1 whereas before, the narrative was that if you get the jab, you have nothing to worry about anymore. In July 2021, President Biden promised that if you get vaccinated, “you’re not going to get COVID.”2 Well, it wasn’t true. Many knew that but were censored when pointing it out.
A day earlier, January 9, Walensky also sent out a tweet saying “We must protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-19,” which is what tens of thousands of doctors have been calling for since the creation of The Great Barrington Declaration in early October 2020. It called for focused protection of high-risk individuals, such as the elderly, rather than blanket lockdowns.
It was recently revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and his former boss, now retired National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to quash the declaration.3 For whatever reason, Fauci and Collins were hell-bent on pushing economy-destroying lockdowns instead. In an October 8, 2020, email to Fauci, Collins wrote:4,5,6,7
“The proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention ... There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises ...”
“Don’t worry, I got this,” Fauci replied. Later, Fauci sent Collins links to newly published articles refuting the focused protection solution, including an op-ed in Wired magazine, and an article in The Nation, titled “Focused Protection, Herd Immunity, and Other Deadly Delusions.”
CDC Follows Political Strategy, Not Science
Now, all of a sudden, Walensky is onboard with the “deadly delusion” of focused protection. Her about-face would be confusing were it not for the fact that COVID countermeasures were never about protecting the public from a virus. From the start, the pandemic had political goals, and it still does.
The pressure is now on to prove the Biden administration has made some sort of progress with the pandemic. Biden made a lot of promises, none of which have come to fruition, so now the political establishment is scrounging to come up with some plan that can make them look as though they’re getting somewhere.
The problem is that cases are now exploding when a successful vaccine campaign should have brought the situation under control. So, they now need a way to minimize the number of cases, whereas before, they used every trick in the book to overcount them,8 in order to scare people into complying with COVID restrictions and getting the jab.
New Testing Guidance Aims to Lower Case Rates
One simple way to cut down cases is to limit testing, and that’s another U-turn we’re now seeing. The CDC is now saying you should not retest once you’ve recovered from COVID. If you test positive, just quarantine for five days and don’t retest to confirm that you’re negative, as the PCR can provide false positives for up to 12 weeks after the infection has been resolved.
Well, we’ve known this for nearly two years already. From the start, experts warned that PCR cannot be used to diagnose an active infection, as it can pick up RNA from dead, noninfectious viral debris.
Health authorities are now spinning the tale that these revisions in the guidance are because we have two years’ worth of data, and they’re just following the science. But that’s pure baloney, seeing how the data never supported their COVID restrictions in the first place.
The CDC’s decision to revise quarantine guidelines down from 10 days to just five days also appears politically motivated. Polls show the economy is a primary concern of voting Americans right now, so they need to strike a balance between the desired demolition of the economy and keeping people at work — at least until the 2022 elections are over.
In short, I suspect most if not all of the recent changes in COVID guidance are to build a narrative that the Biden administration has successfully brought the pandemic under control and reestablished a working economy. The change in narrative is based on political strategy, not science.
CDC Highlights Role of Comorbidities in Vaxxed COVID Deaths
As noted by Paul in the Liberty Report above, Walensky recently stated that 75% of COVID deaths had four or more comorbidities, “So, really, these are people who were unwell, to begin with.” The admission went viral and was cited as proof that COVID is a lethal risk for none but the sickest among us.
The CDC quickly stepped in, clarifying that she meant “75% of COVID deaths among those who have received the COVID jab,” not COVID deaths overall.9 You can see the unedited segment above, where that context is made clear. Still, we know that COVID poses very little risk for healthy unvaccinated people as well and that comorbidities are a primary risk factor regardless of your COVID jab status.
COVID Death Risk Has Always Been Low — Vaxxed or Not
For example, a 2020 study10 found 88% of hospitalized COVID patients in New York City had two or more comorbidities, 6.3% had one underlying health condition and 6.1% had none.
In late August 2020, the CDC published data showing only 6% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death. The remaining 94% had had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their deaths.11 So, yes, COVID is a lethal risk only for the sickest among us, just as Walensky said, but that’s true whether you’re “vaccinated” or not.
As for the study12 Walensky discussed in that “Good Morning America” segment, it found that of the 1.2 million COVID jabbed subjects, only 0.0033% died of COVID between December 2020 and October 2021. (And of those, 77.8% had four or more comorbidities.) This study, Walensky claims as evidence that the COVID shot works wonders to reduce the risk of death.
But does it really? Recall studies13 showing the noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate is on average just 0.26% to begin with, and people under the age of 40 have only a 0.01% risk of dying from COVID.14
When we’re talking about a fraction of a percentage point risk, we’re talking about a risk that is close to statistical zero. So, does lowering your risk of death from 0.01% to 0.003% really translate into something worthwhile? And, more importantly, is that reduction worth the risks involved with taking the jab?
Clearly, it’s not a risk-free decision. OneAmerica, a national mutual life insurance company, recently warned that all-cause deaths among working-age Americans (18 to 64) are up 40% over pre-pandemic norms,15 and they cannot be attributed to COVID.
So, what’s causing these deaths? What potentially deadly thing did tens of millions of Americans do in 2021 that they’ve never done before? I’ll let you ponder whether Walensky’s claim that the COVID jab is saving lives is an accurate one.
CDC Admits Large Portion of ‘COVID Patients’ Aren’t
In another recent media appearance, Walensky stated that:16
“In some hospitals that we've talked to, up to 40% of the patients who are coming in with COVID-19 are coming in not because they’re sick with COVID, but because they’re coming in with something else and have had ... COVID or the Omicron variant detected.”
This, again, is something that we’ve been highlighting since the start of the pandemic. Most so-called “COVID patients” simply weren’t, and still aren’t. They’re hospitalized for something else entirely, and just happen to get a positive test result upon admission — which very possibly is a false positive. Either way, voila, they’re a COVID patient, even though they’re hospitalized for a broken leg or a heart attack.
As noted by Delta News TV, “Comments like these have cast doubt on the severity of the current COVID surge even as the Supreme Court considers legal challenges to Biden’s sweeping private-sector mandates on that very issue.”17
Is the Political Pandemic in Its Final Death Throes?
In a January 10, 2022, blog post,18 Jeff Childers, an attorney, and the president and founder of Childers Law firm, presents a hypothesis for why we might be looking at the end of the pandemic, as the Biden administration has “no reasonable alternative but to wrap this whole thing up in the next 60 days or so.”
“There’s an interesting political dynamic shaping up, a kind of political vice grip that might just be driving federal COVID policy toward authenticity and an end to the pandemic ... a lot of reality has been breaking through lately,” Childers writes.19
He points out how a federal judge recently ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to release all the Pfizer COVID jab data that the agency wanted 75 years to release. The bulk of that data is now due March 1, 2022, the day of Biden’s State of the Union address. Childers suspects the Pfizer documents will contain plenty of counternarrative fodder and politically embarrassing details.
Why We’re Seeing a U-Turn in the Narrative Now
Biden needs some good news by his State of the Union address, as it’ll be his last chance to “help move the needle back toward blue,” and the way he can do that is by declaring the pandemic over. He can then claim to be the great liberator who ended the pandemic measures for good.
“If they handle this right, they can give their voting base and sycophantic media agents all the necessary talking points to boost Dem prospects for the midterm elections,” Childers writes.20
But to pull off that U-turn with any semblance of credibility, they have to start cutting the case rate now, and that’s precisely what we’re seeing. For example, the CDC recently changed its guidelines so you don’t need to retest after you’ve recovered from COVID, so no more false positives from recovered people.
Florida’s official policy is now to only test high-risk individuals and those who are symptomatic. Childers points out that the left-leaning Sun Sentinel even ran an article highlighting the fact that despite surging case rates, Florida has the lowest COVID death rate in the nation, second only to the sparsely populated Alaska. “What incredibly powerful force could make the Sun Sentinel downplay the pandemic like this?” he asks.
Will We Finally Get a More Accurate Death Count?
The CDC also appears poised to change the definition of COVID death to what it should have been all along. Childers notes:
“Fox News ... Bret Baier ... asked [Walensky] ‘how many of the 836,000 deaths in the U.S. linked to COVID are FROM COVID or how many are WITH COVID?’
Director Walensky said ... ‘those data will be forthcoming.’ Until about 10 minutes ago, the CDC said it didn’t HAVE any way to track that kind of information ... But now, apparently, CDC plans to release information about deaths from and with. What do you want to bet they’ll be REDUCING total COVID deaths shortly? By a lot.”
They’re also starting to accurately count only those who are actually sick with COVID rather than including people hospitalized for other reasons who just happen to test positive.
“Yesterday, New York Governor Hochul announced that almost HALF of patients are hospitalized for ‘non-COVID reasons,’ scattering the rotting corpse of the Narrative.
You might recall that just last week she ordered hospitals to start breaking down the reported figures and showing how many folks ACTUALLY are sick with COVID versus just testing positive in the hospital. We’ve been yelling about overcounting hospitalizations for two years now and they just noticed?”21
Same Narrative Switch Seen in Europe
The same sudden switch in narrative can be seen in Europe. Childers continues:22
“Yesterday, the Guardian UK ran a story headlined, ‘End mass jabs and live with COVID, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce.’ It says Dr. Clive Dix — former chairman of the UK’s vaccine taskforce — has called for a ‘major rethink’ of the UK’s COVID strategy, in effect reversing the approach of the past two years and returning to a ‘new normality.’
Shocking the cores the oft-maligned authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Dr. Dix — without getting cancelled — said this:
‘We need to analyze whether we use the current booster campaign to ensure the vulnerable are protected, if this is seen to be necessary ... Mass population-based vaccination in the UK should now end.’ Ending mass vaccinations? Suddenly that idea is okay to discuss in the corporate media? Wow.”
In a January 3, 2022, interview with the Daily Telegraph, professor Andrew Pollard, head of the U.K.’s Committee on Vaccination and Immunization who helped create the Oxford-AstraZeneca shot, also made a previously verboten statement: “We can’t vaccinate the planet every four or six months,” he said. “It’s not sustainable or affordable.”23 And, like Dix, Pollard was not canceled, censored, or de-platformed.
January 11, 2022, Bloomberg also reported that “European Union regulators warned that frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune response and tire out people, according to the European Medicines Agency.”24
Marco Cavaleri, the EMA’s head of vaccines strategy, said during a January 11, 2022, press briefing:25
“While use of additional boosters can be part of contingency plans, repeated vaccinations within short intervals would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy. [Boosters] can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly. We need to think about how we can transition from the current pandemic setting to a more endemic setting.”
That same day, the World Health Organization’s Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) also issued a statement26 saying that “a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.”
They also stated that COVID vaccines that actually prevent infection and transmission need to be developed. The timing of all these statements is nothing if not remarkable. It shows just how coordinated this plandemic narrative is, all around the world.
Justice Sotomayor Called Out
Perhaps the best example that the narrative is undergoing a radical overhaul, Childers says, is Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor being fact-checked and called out as a liar by The Washington Post:
“You’ll recall that Sotomayor confidently told the lawyers during oral argument Friday that ‘100,000’ children were in critical care and on ventilators with Omicron. The lawyers didn’t challenge her even though there aren’t that many total ICU beds in the whole country.
But on Saturday — the next day! — the Washington Post ran an article headlined, ‘Sotomayor’s false claim that ‘over 100,000’ children are in ‘serious condition’ with COVID.’ FALSE CLAIM?? What?? Here’s how the fact-checking article ended:
‘It’s important for Supreme Court justices to make rulings based on correct data … But Sotomayor during an oral argument offered a figure — 100,000 children in ‘serious condition … many on ventilators’ — that is absurdly high. She earns Four Pinocchios.’ It might be unprecedented for a major liberal newspaper to call out a liberal Justice. What could be going on? ...
There seems to be a LOT of sudden momentum surging in the direction of ending the pandemic. If I’m right, we’re going to see even more of this, and pretty quickly, since Biden has to wrap it up in time to declare victory on March 1. Which would explain why they pushed the SOTU back a month. They need the time to get the pandemic wrapped up.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) The latest release from Project Veritas has prompted Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA (messenger RNA) technology and author Dr. Naomi Wolf to call out Tony Fauci and his friends for committing “premeditated manslaughter” against “millions of people.”
Malone appeared alongside Wolf, who is also a former adviser to Bill Clinton, on an episode of Steve Bannon’s “The War Room” to talk about the newest revelations from James O’Keefe.
One of the things Malone said right out of the gate is that the whole thing is “bigger than the Pentagon Papers.” That is when Wolf chimed in to back him up, saying that the people who coordinated this “at the highest levels” are basically guilty of committing mass genocide.
“The fact that Dr. Fauci grossly perjured himself is hugely apparent,” Wolf stated.
“It is the least of the crimes if indeed these are verified documents … I can’t overstate this. This is a premeditated kind of manslaughter of millions of people coordinated at the highest levels according to these documents. Treatments that would have saved lives were intentionally or reportedly intentionally suppressed.”
Fauci lied under oath and committed treason against the American people
Pretty much everything Fauci has been saying for the past two years is lies and nothing but lies. Fauci lied about masks, lied about ivermectin, and lied about gain of function research, among many other lies.
We now know that Fauci basically plotted this whole thing long in advance (and so did Bill Gates). The plandemic was no accident, in other words.
Fauci also spent your tax dollars to commit his crimes against humanity, which have resulted in untold millions of deaths all around the world.
After EcoHealth Alliance was denied funding from DARPA, Fauci made sure Peter Daszak, the head of that organization, got it from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) instead.
DARPA, it turns out, knew full well that EcoHealth’s proposed research involving gain of function experiments on bat coronaviruses was dangerous, which is why it turned down the proposal. Fauci made sure it happened anyway, only to later lie about it under oath before Congress.
“The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” reads a direct quote from DARPA’s rejection letter, which was unearthed as part of the Project Veritas investigation.
This quote, by the way, merely addressed what was in EcoHealth’s proposal, which based on this clearly included mention of GoF – which again, Fauci denied to Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) had ever taken place under his watch.
These are serious crimes, and anyone besides Fauci who was complicit in committing them will hopefully face justice as this saga continues to unfold.
“If the Department of Defense felt this [gain-of-function] research was too dangerous to proceed with, why in the world did the NIH, NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance recklessly disregard the risks involved?” asked O’Keefe in his video presentation about these revelations.
NIAID, by the way, stands for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci has headed for many, many years.
“Isn’t it obvious that there were higher-ups that coordinated, planned, and approved this scheme to wipe out millions of people worldwide while burying any opposition/disclosure of their plan?” responded a commenter to this quote at The Gateway Pundit.
“If you read some of the literature on this subject, you will find reports that this mass annihilation has been in the planning stage for several years. What remains largely unknown is ‘why?’ What was their purpose, what was their total plan, and who are these people?”
The latest news about Fauci’s crimes against humanity can be found at Treason.news.
On Monday, James O’Keefe’s outfit released their latest investigative report. They unearthed a document from a DARPA fellow who claims that to know, with certainty, that Covid-19 was lab-engineered, and that vaccines aren’t working due to special lab-engineered aspects of the virus. Karen Kingston is a former big pharma employee. She says she has the same materials from DARPA that James O’Keefe and Project Veritas have, but is going to share some info with us that they didn’t. She says this information clearly demonstrates that Covid-19 is a bioweapon. Karen joins us.
Karen Kingston ex Pzifer biotech analyst interview by Stew Peters
Reiner Fuellmich is a high-profile German-American lawyer with a long career in which he has conducted controversial criminal lawsuits against Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank and won. He has lately focused on investigating the facts surrounding the pandemic. Fuellmich's public interviews on social media are just informal chats in which both interviewer and interviewee give a free expression of their ideas, opinions, speculations, and conclusions based on what they know. Acting under the aegis of thousands of lawyers worldwide, he has conducted a large number of investigations that have brought him to the point where he and his team can determine that they have the true facts, the evidence of which will be presented more formally in an appropriate court of law in due course. Social media 'fact-checkers' are not the arbiters of truth, fact or opinion and have no business trying to suppress free speech. Viewers/listeners/readers should be allowed to do their own research, make up their own minds and draw their own conclusions based on what is presented, without interference. For the full interview go to: https://planetlockdownfilm.com/full-i... or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMBNC...
Audition with Dr Reiner Füellmich for international lawsuit Nuremberg
Reiner Fuellmich on social media censorship of free speech
The alleged purpose of the research was to identify why transgender “women” experience high rates of HIV, which is something that Fauci knows a lot about as a longtime AIDS proponent.
For their Fauci-funded study, researchers abused male monkeys by subjecting them to feminizing hormone “therapy.” The stated goal was to identify the impact of female hormones on the immune system of male monkeys.
Since Fauci took over the NIAID back in 1984, this is the kind of horrific medical experimentation he has been funding and overseeing. Not just monkeys but also beagles have been subjected to extreme abuse as part of Fauci’s abusive mad scientist experiments.
“It was revealed in November that the NIAID funded a study that infected beagles with heart-worm larvae and euthanized them after experimentations,” reported The Washington Free Beacon.
“As part of another study, researchers infected beagles with mutated bacteria from ticks.”
Fauci loves to abuse animals and seems to have an obsession with gender-bending
Fauci also subjected monkeys to HIV as part of “vaccine” tests he oversaw. Every year, as many as 600 rhesus monkeys are captured and hauled off to an island off the coast of South Carolina where Charles River Laboratories abuses and tortures them for “research” purposes.
Charles River Laboratories, by the way, currently has a $27.5 million contract with the NIAID.
Dr. Katherine Roe, a neuroscientist with PETA, says that Fauci’s latest study involving the “transitioning” of monkeys into transgenders is “yet another pointless, wasteful monkey torture experiment.”
“It’s just bad science to suggest that dosing monkeys with feminizing medication make them good stand-ins for humans,” Roe told the Beacon. “This study will not help to prevent or treat HIV and will not help transgender women.”
Roe added that the study is ineffective if for no other reason than the fact that monkeys cannot even contract HIV. They contract something milder but similar called the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus or SIV.
Roe blames the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for spending billions of dollars on this pointless research even though primates are also unable to contract AIDS.
In a statement, a spokeswoman from Scripps Florid claimed that testing these “sub-populations” of monkeys can help to develop effective treatments for fatal diseases.
“The research you reference concerns a sub-population of people at greater risk of HIV infection, and factors that may or may not affect their response to a treatment/preventative approach in development,” the spokeswoman said.
“It is through these types of targeted research studies that substantive progress against HIV, cancer, ALS, dementia – indeed most diseases and conditions – will be made.”
It turns out that the NIAID has funded all kinds of transgender research involving HIV, almost like Fauci has some kind of obsession with gender-bending – and using American tax dollars to do it.
At one point, Fauci gave $155,000 to the University of Alabama to research the effects of giving testosterone to women.
He also sent $230,000 over to researchers at Emory University to study how immune cells in the rectums of transgender people affect their HIV risk.
Fauci has had a sick obsession with HIV and AIDS since the 1980s, which is important to emphasize. Something is very wrong with the guy.
“I’m thinking his fear experiments on monkeys were a prelude to the covid fearmongering now being imposed on people,” wrote a Natural News reader. “What a monster. He shouldn’t be allowed to walk free.”
The latest news about Fauci can be found at Evil.news.
Ryan & Emily: Docs From New Project Veritas #ExposeFauci Lab Leak Report FALL APART On Inspection
Ryan Grim and Emily Jashinsky discuss the validity of a new Project Veritas report on the lab leak theory.
Sen. Roger Marshall Demands Dr. Fauci Release All Gain of Function Records After Veritas Bombshell
Project Veritas report exposes gain-of-function research
Rumble — Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe released whistleblower documents that are reigniting concerns about the ethics of Dr. Anthony Fauci. One America's Jasmin Hovey has more.
TWEET THIS VIDEO RIGHT NOW: https://ctt.ac/TYeIu • Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium. • The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow. • “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter. • Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried. [WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this. The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top-secret shared drive. DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow. The report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium. According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S. Dr. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. But according to the documents obtained by Project Veritas which outline why EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal was rejected, DARPA certainly classified the research as gain of function. “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter. Major Murphy’s report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines. Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were shrouded in secrecy. “If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked,” Adams said. “I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space, no.” In a video breaking this story published on Monday night, Project Veritas CEO, James O’Keefe, asked a foundational question to DARPA: “Who at DARPA made the decision to bury the original report? They could have raised red flags to the Pentagon, the White House, or Congress, which may have prevented this entire pandemic that has led to the deaths of 5.4 million people worldwide and caused much pain and suffering to many millions more.” Dr. Anthony Fauci has not yet responded to a request for comment on this story. About Project Veritas James O'Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work. Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law, specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues including the right to anonymity. O'Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture.
In virology, ‘gain-of-function’ refers to when scientists “bestow new abilities on pathogens,” according to the journal Nature. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has argued that the Wuhan lab used NIH funding to construct novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that are better able to infect human cells, which led to the Covid-19 pandemic after said viruses were released onto the public.
DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications, PV notes.
Most of DARPA’s projects are classified, though many of its military innovations have influenced the civilian world, particularly in the areas of electronics, telecommunications, and computer science, notes Britannica. The agency is “best known for ARPANET, an early network of time-sharing computers that formed the basis of the Internet.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the chief medical advisor to Joe Biden, is reportedly eligible for the largest federal retirement package in U.S. history.
The 81-year-old has said he does not plan to retire soon. “There’s no way I’m going to walk away from this until we get this under control,” Fauci told ABC’s Johnathan Karl earlier this month. “I mean, that’s the purpose of what we do. That’s — that’s our mission in life. In the middle of it, I’m not going to walk away.” However, if he did retire, Forbes auditors at OpenTheBooks.com say that Fauci’s 55 years of service in the federal government qualify him for an annual retirement package of $350,000, which would go up through annual cost-of-living adjustments.
Moreover, Fauci is currently the federal government’s highest-paid employee, earning $434,321 in 2020 — a sum higher than that of the president, the military’s highest-ranking commanders, and the rest of the federal government’s 4.3 million employees.
The NIAID chief recently made headlines by suggesting that mandatory masks on airlines should continue into the indefinite future and voiced support for a vaccine requirement on domestic flights.
During his exchange with Karl, Fauci said, “We want to make sure people keep their masks on. I think the idea of taking masks off, in my mind, is really not something we should even be considering.”
He added, “Even though you have a good filtration system, I still believe that masks are a prudent thing to do and we should be doing it.”
Fauci went on to say that “A vaccine requirement for a person getting on the plane is just another level of getting people to have a mechanism that would spur them to get vaccinated; namely, you can’t get on a plane unless you’re vaccinated, which is just another one of the ways of getting requirements, whatever that might be. So I mean, anything that could get people more vaccinated would be welcome.”
Fauci has also been a proponent on Joe Biden’s vaccine employer mandate for companies. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently initially blocked the mandate, but the Sixth Circuit overruled that in a consolidated appeal.
As a result, a group of 47 Republican senators and 136 House members is asking the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the mandate
The brief by Republican lawmakers argues that under Biden, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is acting outside the limits of its authority. They assert OSHA was created to protect workers from specific workplace hazards but never from viruses like COVID-19.
“The ETS provision of the OSH Act allows OSHA to address only ‘grave danger’ in the workplace, which includes any ‘toxic or physically harmful’ agent,” the brief reads. “In the statutory scheme established by Congress, these conditions are a meaningful restraint on the agency. OSHA, however, aggressively reads the restrictions as an opportunity for the agency to branch out into public healthcare policy.”
The New Americanrecently reported that Fauci and the National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins colluded to conduct a “quick and devastating” take-down of a document advocating for a lockdown-free COVID-19 response strategy.
Emails released last week by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis revealed retiring NIH Director Collins telling Fauci in October 2020 to discredit the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) — an international document signed by nearly 900,000 physicians that warns against “the damaging physical and mental health impacts” of lockdowns and other forceful measures while calling for achieving herd immunity through “focused protection” of the most vulnerable.
In addition, reports have surfaced about Fauci doling out millions of dollars in National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, from which COVID-19 escaped into the general Chinese public, starting the pandemic.
Per a report from Fox’s The Next Revolution With Steve Hilton, Fauci continued gain-of-function research even after an Obama administration ban, ultimately funding a China-based study that “unlocked a highly specific doorway into the human body.” That’s the same pathway used by COVID-19. According to the January 24 report, Fauci argued in a Washington Post article that “important information and insight can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Some of the most domineering public health figures during the covid-19 scandal are NAMED in a historic indictment sent to the International Criminal Court (ICC). These government, pharmaceutical, and public health officials have ruled un-democratically over the people and imposed harmful policies of subjugation under the guise of “mitigating covid-19.”
Their unaccountable policies of subjugation have deprived people of basic human rights and equal opportunity. The defendants have used medical fraud, perpetrated by fraudulently calibrated PCR tests, to propagate a narrative that only emboldens their own power and control over people’s lives. Their disregard for efficacious treatments, immune system solutions, and their censorship of natural immunity has ravaged the principle of informed consent, contributed to iatrogenic error, and caused undo separation, isolation, medical malpractice, and wrongful death. Their policies have forced provably dangerous genetic experiments onto people using discrimination, segregation, and threats to one’s livelihood. These defendants have subverted the rule of law for nearly two years, ruining countless lives.
Fauci, Daszak, Gates, Hancock, Schwab all named in historic indictment
These beleaguered officials include Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO); June Raine, executive director of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance and Bill and Melinda Gates, who have openly funded and promoted much of these well-documented crimes against humanity.
The defendants also include notable UK officials, including Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister; Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser; Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care; and Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum. The criminal complaint also lists the CEOs of four major pharmaceutical companies, who continue to commit acts of genocide through experimental gene interference “vaccines” that damage the cardiovascular system, innate immune responses, and the reproductive health of women, among thousands of medical concerns documented by pharmacovigilance systems around the world. These defendants include Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer; Stephane Bancel, CEO of AstraZeneca; Pascal Soriot, CEO of Moderna and Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson.
The criminal complaint is brought forth by former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon and human rights lawyer Hannah Rose. They are joined by Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn, nurse Louise Shotbolt, retired law enforcement officer John O’Loony, and human rights activist Johnny McStay. The indictment accuses the defendants “of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code,” “crimes of aggression” and “war crimes.” Because the English court system refuses to take up this historic matter, the plaintiffs are asking the ICC with “utmost urgency” to “stop the deployment of COVID vaccines” and “illegal vaccination passports” and “all other types of illegal warfare” that are being “waged against the people of the United Kingdom” and against people around the world.
Historic indictment documents various crimes against humanity, violations of Nuremberg Code
Public health officials have forced people to use PCR tests that are “completely unreliable” as a diagnostic standard, misleading people and obfuscating data. These tests have been fraudulently calibrated and used to artificially inflate covid-19 case counts and deaths to perpetuate further medical tyranny and deprivation of individual rights.
Effective treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been suppressed, leading to immune failure and severe disease. This, in turn, led to reliance on drugs that cause renal failure and subsequent reliance on ventilators, which cause oxidative damage and cytokine storm, damaging lungs and putting patients at a greater risk of life-threatening pneumonia and death.
Moreover, the UK government has failed to investigate the massive wave of vaccine injury and death following covid-19 vaccination. There are at least 395,049 reported adverse reactions to COVID “vaccines” in the U.K. alone. This experimental gene interference technology was designed from criminal gain-of-function research that weaponized coronavirus spike proteins so that genetic experiments could be deployed through “vaccination” using the engineered spike protein. This experiment has led to a proven increase in eye disorders, heart inflammation, cardiac arrest, and spontaneous abortion. A recent study published in the New England Medical Journal showed 8 in 10 women had a miscarriage after taking a Covid ‘vaccine’ before the third trimester.
Furthermore, the defendants’ lockdown policies have not provably altered the course of infection in the public and have caused “wealth and business destruction, along with a sharp increase in ChildLine calls from children who were made more vulnerable due to destructive public health policies. The defendant’s acceptance of vaccine passports has introduced medical apartheid that violates the medical privacy and body autonomy of individuals through discrimination, segregation, and other acts of malice. Their policies have imposed psychological harm to children and severely deprived the physical liberty of the people, in “violation of fundamental rules of international law.” These violations include travel and assembly bans and forced quarantine and self-isolation without due process of law.
The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is a willingness and informed consent by the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention, either through force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation or any other type of binding or coercion. This guiding principle of medical ethics and the remaining tenants of the Nuremberg Code have all been violated during the covid-19 scandal. After violating these principles for nearly two years with no remorse, the perpetrators must now be brought to their knees.
Thin-skinned Fauci is calling for Fox News’ Jesse Watters to be fired for using the term ‘kill shot’ for Fauci! That’s right! In this video, we’re going to look at the latest controversy to erupt around Fauci and Watters, we’re going to see how Fauci actually ends up owning himself in calling for Watters’ firing, and stick with me to the very end of the video when we’ll find out just how much of a hypocrite Fauci is in the, shall we say, fluid use of words; you are NOT going to want to miss this!
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is topping sales charts. To expose Fauci’s cruel experiments with children, Kennedy cites the BBC’s 2004 Guinea Pig Kids. This documentary is again under attack, and that in itself invites a review.
Since 1984, Dr. Anthony Fauci has headed the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a division of the National Institutes of Health. In 1992, Fauci’s NIAID provided funding for the Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) in New York as an outpatient clinic for HIV-positive children. The city’s Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) offered up children under its care, nearly all of them African American or Hispanic, for secretive drug experimentation.
As biochemist Dr. David Rasnick explains, children as young as three months were given “cocktails” of drugs with dangerous side effects. Rasnick described Didanosene as “very dangerous,” and Nevirapene as “dangerous and debilitating. . . horrible and painful and also lethal.” The children were also given Zidovdine, another name for AZT (azidothymidine). This drug has “never been shown to be life-saving, and it also causes severe anemia.”
As Dr. Rasnick told the BBC, “these children are going to be miserable,” and they were, writing in agony and unable to eat. If they resisted, doctors cut a hole in their belly to administer the drugs. As one victim testifies of the practice, “If you want to get out of there you have to do what they say.” The BBC found medical records confirming the experiments.
ICC nurse Jacklyn Hoerger was ordered to give kids regular and sometimes large doses of AZT. Hoerger adopted two of the girls, whose health improved when she stopped the drug treatment. The ACS then seized the children and put them back on the anti-HIV drugs. In 2004, Hoerger had no idea where they might be, but she knew that some 80 children died in the experiments and saw the mass grave in Hawthorne, New York.
Guinea Pig Kids came under immediate attack but critics steered clear of many facts cited in the documentary. The main problem was “the views of AIDS denialists, who don’t believe that the HIV virus causes AIDS.” The only such person in the documentary was Dr. Rasnick, and critics did not challenge his views on drugs such as AZT, and the harm the drugs had inflicted on the children. In similar style, critics did not explain why Dr. Rasnick, who earned a Ph.D. in chemistry from Georgia Tech, believes that HIV does not cause AIDS. What did the science say?
UC Berkeley molecular biologist Peter Duesberg set forth the case in Inventing the AIDS Virus, with a foreword Nobel laureate Kary Mullis, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction. Mullis, who earned a Ph.D. in biochemistry at UC Berkeley, could not find a single virologist who could show HIV as the cause of AIDS. If you ask a virologist for that information, Mullis said, “you don’t get an answer, you get fury.” Mullis also charged that Dr. Fauci “doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine. He should not be in a position like he’s in.” But he was.
As Duesberg noted, AZT was marketed under the names Zidovudine or Retrovir. The drug has “toxic” effects but in the summer of 1989, Fauci announced clinical trials of AZT on pregnant mothers with HIV. As Duesberg explained, “a drug that interferes with growth can lead only to physical deformities in babies developing in the womb.” That observation did not prevent Fauci from authorizing drug experiments on children in New York.
Fauci acolytes now claim it is “inaccurate” that the New York deaths were caused by the “trial medication,” and “it cannot be determined if Anthony Fauci personally chose to provide NIAID funds to these clinical trials.” Since Fauci runs NIAID, that claim is laughable.
In October, a Snopes piece cited a BBC apology for Guinea Pig Kids, in which the network claimed, “it did not properly investigate the claims and that the medical opinions expressed in the documentary largely relied on an advocate for the fringe (and false) idea that HIV is unconnected with AIDS.” Snopes did not engage in any debate on the cause of AIDS and failed to challenge Dr. Rasnick’s warnings on the dangers of AZT and other drugs with children and adults alike. For further reading, see Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story, by John Lauritsen, with a foreword by Peter Duesberg.
Filmmaker Jamie Doran told Nature Medicine that “My only interest was investigating the very legitimate story of how vulnerable black and Hispanic foster children as young as three months old were being volunteered by the New York City authorities for drug trials.” The Snopes report concedes that “some children were, in fact, enrolled without proper consent.”
Snopes also cites a 2009 New York Times report that 64 children participated in 30 medication trials that were not reviewed by a special medical advisory panel, and 21 children participated in trials that the panel had reviewed but not recommended.
In addition, the informed consent forms from biological parents or guardians were missing from the child-welfare files in 21 percent of the cases. Snopes includes no apology from the officials involved, and none of the improprieties appear to trouble the NIAID boss who funded the “trials” with children.
Anthony Fauci earned a medical degree in 1966 but his bio shows no advanced degrees in biochemistry or molecular biology. Dr. Fauci has reversed himself times but now claims “I represent science.” RFK Jr. calls Fauci the J. Edgar Hoover of public health, but there’s more in play here than corruption and longevity.
In 2014, Valerie Leiter and Sarah Herman of Simmons college found similarities between the NIAID-backed drug experiments and the Tuskegee syphilis study, “when individuals’ bodies were used to satisfy researchers’ curiosity with no anticipated clinical benefit.” Since most of those recruited were African Americans, the authors brand the New York case a “modern Tuskegee.” Other comparisons also come to mind.
In his review of the JFK Jr. book, Thomas DiLorenzo cites Fauci’s “Dr. Mengele–style ‘experiments,’” a reference that may be lost on some readers. Josef Mengele earned a medical degree in 1938, the same year he joined the Nazis’ Waffen SS, where he volunteered for medical service. At Auschwitz, Dr. Mengele performed agonizing and lethal experiments on Jewish and Gypsy twins, most of them children.
In The Real Anthony Fauci, RFK Jr. cites NIAID funding for experiments that locked the heads of beagle puppies into cages, where they could be devoured by flies. Fauci also gave researchers at University of Pittsburgh $400,000 to “graft the scalps of aborted fetuses onto living mice and rats.” The real Anthony Fauci, Kennedy concludes, is “a sociopath who has pushed science into the realm of sadism.”
Kennedy also shows that by 2003 Fauci’s NIAID was running more than 10,000 clinical trials involving children in 90 countries, so the Mengele comparison is not a stretch. Josef Mengele escaped to South America and died in Brazil in 1979. In similar style, Anthony Fauci has never been called to account, and his power has grown to the point that Joe Biden says, “look who’s president, Fauci.”
If children around the world are to be safe, the real Anthony Fauci will have to step down. If freedom and democracy are to endure, America must put an end to Fauci’s reign of white coat supremacy.
WCW just discovered a secret #MonkeyIsland in South Carolina. 3,500 monkeys held captive & shipped for MAX-PAIN gov lab experiments… Fauci’s NIH department OWNS it!
Dr. Fauci's NIAID Is Doing Maximum PAIN Experiments On MONKEYS On Island
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) on Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci re: "Monkey Island"
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Government “doctor” Tony Fauci has once again been exposed for torturing and murdering innocent animals as part of his mad scientist experiments.
New documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request brought to light a “secret island of monkeys” operation being run by Fauci for the purpose of disease research.
Morgan Island, S.C., is one of the locales where Fauci sends American taxpayer dollars to scientists who conduct “excruciating experiments” on rhesus monkeys.
“The monkeys originating from Morgan Island off the coast of Beaufort in South Carolina are acquired and owned by NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases),” reported Great Game India.
It was Justin Goodman, vice president of advocacy and public policy for the White Coat Waste Project (WCWP), who obtained the documents revealing this horror, which is being bankrolled by American taxpayers without their knowledge.
According to the documents, Fauci’s NIAID spent some $13.5 million on the experiments at Morgan Island, which involved intentionally injecting rhesus monkeys with all kinds of deadly infectious diseases such as Lassa and Ebola.
These disease injections resulted in the monkeys experiencing extreme pain, brain damage, loss of motor control, organ failure, hemorrhaging, and a host of other serious health problems.
Fauci also bankrolled other heinous animal experiments at Charles River Laboratories, which is where beagle dogs were intentionally exposed to sandflies that ate them alive.
Morgan Island, just to clarify, is owned by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, and was being leased at the time to Charles River Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company.
At least 44 beagle dogs were captured and succumbed to this extreme torture, all to fuel whatever projects Fauci had in his mind for creating new bioweapons or “vaccines.”
After the beagles were eaten alive, Fauci-funded scientists dissected their bodies before disposing of the remains.
“In many of these experiments, Fauci and staff intentionally withhold pain relief, even though these are some of the most excruciating experiments in the federal government,” Goodman revealed.
The Federal Budget Database shows that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “donated” $13.5 million to this operation. Since 2018, the total “donation” amount is said to be as high as $27.5 million.
“NIAID paid $8.9 million of that $13.5 million,” reported Great Game India.
Fauci has been torturing, murdering innocent animals for at least 40 years
Morgan Island first crossed the WCWP’s radar when the team began investigating “fear experiments” being conducted on monkeys at a National Institutes of Health (NIH) laboratory in Bethesda, Md.
Upon closer look, it was discovered that the source of these monkeys was Morgan Island.
“We started triangulating information about that island with the experiments at the labs, and we found that Fauci’s labs are the single largest supporter of that island,” Goodman revealed.
In 2020, there were 3,521 monkeys present on Morgan Island, and 750 more are born and bred there annually. Somewhere between 500 and 600 monkeys were reportedly shipped from Morgan Island to NIH and NIAHD labs.
“It’s very unlikely that Fauci didn’t know about this given the amount of money involved and the fact that these experiments are happening in his own laboratories,” Goodman added.
“These aren’t being contracted somewhere else. They are happening in his own house. If he’s going to get credit for any good he does, he needs to get blamed for any bad that’s happening on his watch as well. The buck stops with him, and he’s certainly responsible.”
The original source of Fauci’s monkeys is said to be the Caribbean Primate Research Center, which started sending them as far back as 1979. According to PubMed.gov, the monkeys reestablished their former social groups after being removed from the Caribbean and transplanted to South Carolina.
The claim is that monkeys are very similar to humans, and thus serve as viable experimental mammals. The problem, however, is that nine out of 10 drugs that supposedly pass the test on these animals end up failing in humans.
“Research shows that despite their similarities to us, they are incredibly poor predictors of how vaccines and other drugs are going to act in humans,” Goodman says.
So far, the WCWP has exposed six different experiments just on beagles that Fauci has funded over the years. One of them involved a cordectomy, which is when a dog’s vocal cords are sliced and removed to stop him from barking, howling, or crying during an experiment.
“The reason that the Department of Health and Human Services gives on its website for using beagles is that they are small and docile, meaning they are easy to abuse,” Goodman further explained.
More of the latest news about Fauci and his mad scientist experiments on innocent animals can be found at Evil.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) There is a massive coverup taking place with regard to the substantial spike in heart disease that is now occurring ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” were introduced under Operation Warp Speed.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on GB News (U.K.) to discuss the findings of a new abstract published in the journal Circulation, which basically found that cardiovascular events are skyrocketing now that hundreds of millions of people have gotten injected (watch below).
'They aren't going to publish their findings, they are concerned about losing research money'
Dr Aseem Malhotra reveals a cardiology researcher found similar results to a new report showing an increase in risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine. pic.twitter.com/63evorQwlJ
What used to be an 11 percent risk of heart attack over five years among those with some form of underlying heart disease has soared to 25 percent. The inflammatory markers associated with heart disease progression are basically now off the charts, and the only thing that has noticeably changed was the introduction of the jabs.
Since one study is typically not enough to prove something like this, Dr. Malhotra also referenced additional research at a prestigious British research institution that he says a whistleblower told him is being suppressed due to fear that the pharmaceutical industry will stop supplying grant money.
Researchers in the department of that facility that deals with this kind of thing identified a direct link between inflammation around the coronary arteries and the injections they are calling covid “vaccines.”
“We know since July there have been almost 10,000 excess non-covid deaths,” Dr. Malhotra told the host. “And most of those, or a significant proportion of those, have been driven by circulatory disease, in other words, heart attack and stroke.”
“There’s been a 30 percent increase in people dying at home, and often these are because of cardiac arrest.”
Dr. Malhotra’s own father is part of these statistics as he died of cardiac arrest at his home on July 26.
Plandemic tyranny needs to end otherwise mass genocide will continue unabated
Another contributing factor to this sudden and dramatic rise in cardiac events is the lockdowns, which have driven many people to adopt very unhealthy lifestyles marked by sedentary behavior and junk food binge eating.
“People’s diets got worse in general over lockdown and there was pandemic stress,” Dr. Malhotra further explained. “Chronic psychological stress is a significant risk factor.”
Since very few people are taking any of this seriously, probably because of the political ramifications, Dr. Malhotra is calling for an investigation, particularly by the Joint Committee of Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI).
“I personally think this needs investigating, so I think the Joint Committee of Vaccines and Immunisation should absolutely investigate this,” he said.
“I think that the researchers need to take a look in the mirror and realize that they should publish this stuff because their duty primarily is to patients, not the interests of the drug industry,” he further added.
Policymakers also need to stop tyrannizing people with lockdowns, mask mandates, and other forms of medical fascism and terrorism. These “cures” for an alleged virus are worse than the supposed disease itself.
“It’s high time that policymakers around the world put an end to the mandates,” Dr. Malhotra says. “History will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it” if they do not, he added.
According to a commenter on Twitter, Prof. Norman Fenton from the Queen Mary University of London actually had his work censored by the U.K. government and the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
“His paper querying the statistics U.K. government / ONS were using was refused from being published,” this person wrote in a plea. “Please interview him. Something unethical is going on. We are being manipulated.”
Chinese Virus injections are killing thousands. To keep up with the latest, visit Genocide.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Thanks to the efforts of a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, we now have smoking gun confidential documents that show Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that pfizer’s mRNA vaccines were killing thousands of people and causing spontaneous abortions while damaging three times more women than men.
One confidential document, in particular, was part of a court-ordered release of FDA files that the FDA fought by claiming the agency should have 55 years to release this information. A court judge disagreed and ordered the release of 500 documents per month, and the very first batch of documents contained this bombshell entitled, “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”
The document reveals that within just 90 days after the EUA release of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, the company was already aware of voluntary adverse reaction reports that revealed 1,223 deaths and over 42,000 adverse reports describing a total of 158,893 adverse reactions. The reports originated from numerous countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and other nations.
Aside from “general disorders,” the No. 1 most frequently reported category of mRNA vaccine adverse reactions was Nervous system disorders, clocking in at 25,957 reports.
Pfizer has withheld the total number of doses released across the world, citing corporate trade secrets. This is indicated by “(b) (4)” in the document, where specific numbers and facts are redacted.
Even these numbers — already quite shocking, given the FDA’s insistence that mRNA vaccines are “safe and effective” — barely scratch the surface of the damage and deaths caused by these vaccines. “Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown,” says Pfizer on page 5.
Three times as many women damaged, compared to men
Shockingly, the document reveals that more than three times as many women were damaged by the Pfizer vaccine, compared to men. There were 29,914 adverse events recorded in women, with just 9,182 recorded in men. It is not known whether the same number of men and women took the vaccine, but this number exposes the very real possibility of a gender-specific vaccine damage risk that the FDA went to great lengths to cover up.
Anecdotally, most of the neurological damage we’ve seen in people who have been damaged by the vaccine — convulsions, numbness, pain, etc. — has been depicted in women, not men. It looks like the FDA knows the mRNA vaccine exhibits a disproportionate, gender-specific damage profile that also affects women in terms of spontaneous abortions (also covered in the report).
Pfizer told the FDA its mRNA covid vaccines can cause “enhanced disease” by making covid worse
Also to the shock of many observers who are just now digging into this smoking gun document, Pfizer told the FDA under “Safety concerns” (section 3.1.2) that its mRNA injection could cause, “Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD).”
This means the FDA knew the vaccine could sicken and kill patients who were later infected with covid.
Under the label of “missing information,” Pfizer also told the FDA that it has no information about “Use in Pregnancy and lactation” nor covering “Use in Paediatric Individuals < 12 Years of Age.”
“Vaccine Effectiveness” was also listed as “Missing information” by Pfizer.
In other words, Pfizer told the FDA its vaccines could kill people and that it had no information about vaccine effectiveness, yet the FDA fraudulently pushed the vaccine as “safe and effective” anyway. Pfizer even told the FDA that it had no safety information about use in pregnant women, yet the FDA (and Fauci, the CDC, etc.) all pushed the vaccine for pregnant women, despite the utter lack of safety information.
Based on this document, it appears that the FDA itself has been neck-deep in a criminal conspiracy to hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths while granting usage approvals to the very same corporations that openly told the FDA its products were killing people.
Note, too, that the entire corporate media complex has lied from day one, falsely claiming the vaccine has killed no one. They are, of course, complicit in this vaccine holocaust.
Spontaneous abortions, neonatal death, and other effects on pregnant women
In the section labeled, “Use in Pregnancy and lactation,” the report discusses reports of the mRNA vaccine being linked to:
spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each).
Notice that “spontaneous abortion” represents by far the highest number in these reports. In other words, the FDA knew this vaccine would kill unborn babies, but they pushed it on pregnant women anyway.
All mRNA vaccines must be immediately halted, and FDA bureaucrats must be indicted and arrested
This confidential document — just the first of thousands yet to be released — reveals two critical things:
1) The FDA committed criminal fraud and misrepresentation in approving mRNA vaccines as “safe and effective.” This means top FDA decision-makers must now face arrest and criminal prosecution.
2) The mRNA vaccine was known by Pfizer to be deadly even in its first three months of emergency use. This means Pfizer is also complicit in the continued deaths of innocent victims, as Pfizer itself should have pulled its deadly vaccine and halted all sales and distribution.
Find even more details in today’s Situation Update podcast which also covers Alex Baldwin’s magic gun, left-wing abortion pill gobblers protesting SCOTUS, Dr. Oz. running for the US Senate, Australia’s covid death camps, and much more:
