Day: July 29, 2020

PLANNED PARENTHOOD NEW YORK CITY TO REMOVE FOUNDER MARGARET SANGER’S NAME DUE TO HER “EUGENIC IDEOLOGY”

Margaret Sanger Papers Project

PP Protest with Bevelyn Beatty!!!

With so many protest going on around the country in the supposed support of justice for the black community. I decided to go on a protest to the root of the issue. The place where black babies are being murdered at a higher rate that are being born!? Planned parenthood in NYC to fight for the ones who incapable to fight for themselves. Christopher Wright YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/cswright410

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: https://christiannews.net/2020/07/28/planned-parenthood-new-york-to-remove-founder-margaret-sangers-name-due-to-her-eugenic-ideology/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

NEW YORK — Planned Parenthood of Greater New York (PPGNY) has announced that it will remove founder Margaret Sanger’s name from its Manhattan facility bearing her namesake, and is also working with city council to rename Margaret Sanger Square, due to her “harmful connections to the eugenics movement.”

The organization says that “the announcement reflects the first of many organizational shifts to address Sanger’s legacy and system of institutional racism, which negatively impacts the well-being of patients, staff and PPGNY’s broader communities.”

“The removal of Margaret Sanger’s name from our building is both a necessary and overdue step to reckon with our legacy and acknowledge Planned Parenthood’s contributions to historical reproductive harm within communities of color,” Karen Seltzer, board chair of PPGNY, said in a statement.

“Margaret Sanger’s concerns and advocacy for reproductive health have been clearly documented, but so too has her racist legacy,” she said. “There is overwhelming evidence for Sanger’s deep belief in eugenic ideology, which runs completely counter to our values at PPGNY. Removing her name is an important step toward representing who we are as an organization and who we serve.”

The abortion facility on Bleecker Street had heretofore been named the Margaret Sanger Health Center, and a street sign currently marks the intersection of Bleecker and Mott Streets in recognizing Sanger.

However, the organization did not disavow the practice of abortion and will continue to offer its services to end the lives of the unborn. According to the Charlotte Lozier Institute, 53,394 abortions were performed in New York City alone in 2017.

As previously reported, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in New York in 1921, which was originally known as the American Birth Control League. She later changed the name as some found it offensive.

Sanger generally opposed abortion, writing in her 1920 book “Woman and the New Race” that “the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization.”

Her solution to countering abortion was birth control, as she believed that “[t]he most immoral practice of the day is breeding too many children.” She claimed that children get lost in large families and end up in jail or as prostitutes.

Sanger was also a proponent of eugenics against the physically and mentally disabled, as she made a correlation between birth control and the purification of the human race. She additionally called for the sterilization of women in the “moron class,” referring to those with disabilities as being “morons,” “idiots” and “imbeciles.”

“Back then they used words like ‘moron’ and ‘imbecile,’ these were actually scientific terms, and classifying people according to their IQ. And she said women in these classes were not capable of being mothers, and therefore shouldn’t be mothers,” her grandson, Alex Sanger, told Vox in 2016, explaining that he disagreed with her position but otherwise admired Sanger. “She also talked about women with certain inherited diseases like epilepsy or alcoholism — they shouldn’t be mothers, because they’re going to pass these genes onto their children.”

“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives,” Sanger wrote in the aforementioned “Woman and the New Race”. “If we are to make racial progress, this development of womanhood must precede motherhood in every individual woman.”

Sanger launched the Negro Project in 1939, offering birth control in African American communities — especially in the South, where there was significant poverty yet multiple children in a household. She thought that cutting down on the number of children born would better the economic status of a region and consequently the quality of life for society as a whole.

According to New York University, Sanger’s secretary, Florence Rose, wrote a report on “Birth Control and the Negro”, in which she opined that “negroes present the great problem of the South,” because they have “the greatest economic, health and social problems” yet “still breed carelessly and disastrously.”

“‘Constructive’ eugenics aims to arouse the enthusiasm or the interest of the people in the welfare of the world fifteen or twenty generations in the future. On its negative side it shows us that we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all — that the wealth of individuals and of states is being diverted from the development and the progress of human expression and civilization,” Sanger also remarked in the 1922 publication “The Pivot of Civilization”.

“Birth control which has been criticized as negative and destructive, is really the greatest and most truly eugenic method, and its adoption as part of the program of eugenics would immediately give a concrete and realistic power to that science,” she continued. “As a matter of fact, birth control has been accepted by the most clear thinking and far seeing of the eugenists themselves as the most constructive and necessary of the means to racial health.”

2 Corinthians 5:15 states that Christ “died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him which died for them and rose again.”

Please visit Christian News Network’s Outlaw Abortion page to help us work to abolish the worldwide holocaust.




	







	

		

	




			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	
		
	

		
		
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DEEP STATE TOOL OF CONTROL
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

	

						

		


			

	

	

		

	


The Deep State is hyping COVID19 hysteria and an alleged "coin shortage" to promote a cashless society with no cash, warns Behind the Deep State host Alex Newman. But in reality, the establishment has been promoting an end to cash for many years, long before coronavirus and the supposed currency shortage. After burning down the economy with lockdown and shutdown policies, now the elites are peddling universal basic income too. The groups promoting this include the Ford Foundation, USAID, the United Nations, many governments around the world, the credit card companies, the mega-banks, and others. If and when it becomes a reality, financial privacy will be lost and nobody will be able to buy or sell without submitting to the dictates of the system. Christians believe this has implications from a prophecy perspective. ▶️ More Videos: How The Federal Reserve Enslaved Us | Behind the Deep State https://youtu.be/uFUjWc9GOGo How Big Foundations Wage War on YOU! https://youtu.be/kh7Rebqc-I4 Declaration of Independence vs The Deep State https://youtu.be/rhLNdiHmmvs 🇺🇸 The New American: http://www.thenewamerican.com/ 📲 Let's Connect! http://www.facebook.com/TheNewAmerican https://twitter.com/NewAmericanMag https://www.instagram.com/newamerican... #Cashless #CoinShortage #AlexNewman



	







	

		

	




			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	
		
	

		
		
ABUSIVE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN: “MORALITY AGENT” SPITS AT GIRLS NOT WEARING HIJAB, ASKS THEM “WHERE’S YOUR DIRTY OWNER?”
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

	

						

		


			

	

	

		

	


BY ROBERT SPENCER


SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/07/islamic-republic-of-iran-morality-agent-spits-at-girls-not-wearing-hijab-asks-them-wheres-your-dirty-owner;


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:



Tell me again about how women are respected, even revered, and their rights protected under Sharia. This man feels free to treat these girls with hatred and contempt because he is an agent of a regime that is based on Islamic law, which teaches contempt for those outside the fold (unbelievers are like animals according to Qur’an 8:55, and the most vile of created beings according to Qur’an 98:6), and that violence against them is in some circumstances blessed and encouraged by Allah (cf. Qur’an 2:191, 4:89, 9:5, 47:4, etc.). The regime also sanctions beliefs that disobedient women should be beaten (Qur’an 4:34), are inferior to men in intellect (Qur’an 2:282), and have lesser rights than men have (Qur’an 4:11). Such teachings have consequences. Here we see some of them.



“Undercover morality agent SPITS at teenage girls, asks ‘where’s your owner’ and says ‘I’ll f*** your mother’ after seeing them without hijab in Iran,” by Lydia Catling, Mailonline, July 25, 2020:


An Iranian undercover morality agent spat at teenage girls and asked them ‘where’s your dirty owner’ after seeing them without a hijab.


In a shocking video, which has been circulating on social media, a man stops his car and gets out before hurling abuse at the youngsters.


During the heated exchange on the side of the road in Kermanshah, Iran, he says to the girls ‘I’ll f*** your mother’ and claims their behaviour is ‘immoral’ while a police officer appears to do nothing about the incident.


Wearing a hijab has been compulsory for women in Iran since the Islamic revolution in 1979, a rule which is enforced by the state’s morality police.


The video shows, as tensions between the man and the teenagers grow, the man’s wife gets out of the car and says ‘apologise to my husband so he won’t hit you’.


The woman informs them that her husband is from the intelligence services and could get them arrested.


After the man spits in the girls’ faces, another woman wearing a hijab pushes him.


A police car arrives shortly afterwards but the officer watches from afar and the teenagers scream: ‘Officer, why aren’t you doing anything?’


Masih Alinejad, an Iranian journalist who has been campaigning against the compulsory hijab law, shared the video with her 195,000 followers on Twitter.


The girls sent the video to Alinejad and told her they decided to film the incident after it was clear the police were not going to help them….


 



	







	

		

	




			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
NOT AT ALL “PEACEFUL” ISLAM: FRANCE-MUSLIMS PURPOSEFULLY HIT 23 YEAR OLD WOMAN WITH CAR, DRAG HER 800 METERS TO HER DEATH
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

	

						

		


			

	

	

		

	
BELOW LEFT: Maître Céline Cooper, a far-left lawyer who is defending the suspect said the popular outrage over the incident is from right-wing citizens and lambasted the French Minister of the Interior of having spoken of “murder” in the case.




BY ROBERT SPENCER


SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/07/france-muslims-purposefully-hit-23-yeaqr-old-woman-with-car-drag-her-800-meters-to-her-death;


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:



This is a frequent jihadi tactic. The Islamic State (ISIS) issued this call in September 2014:


So O muwahhid, do not let this battle pass you by wherever you may be. You must strike the soldiers, patrons, and troops of the tawaghit. Strike their police, security, and intelligence members, as well as their treacherous agents. Destroy their beds. Embitter their lives for them and busy them with themselves. If you can kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French — or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be….If you are not able to find an IED or a bullet, then single out the disbelieving American, Frenchman, or any of their allies. Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him….


Did this call or others like it have anything to do with the murder of Axelle Dorier? Given the reticence of French authorities to acknowledge the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, we may never know.




“Outrage in France after 23-year-old Axelle Dorier killed by Youcef T. and Mohamed Y. in brutal hit-and-run,” by John Cody, Remix News, July 25, 2020 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):


Axelle Dorier, a 23-year-old French woman and nurse, was struck by a vehicle and dragged 800 meters to her death on July 19 while walking her dog in the city of Lyon, with prosecutors stating that the migrant driver “knowingly knocked down” and drove away from her dismembered body.


The 21-year-old driver, Youcef T., has been placed into custody for “manslaughter” for being responsible for the “hit-and-run death”, Lyon prosecutors say.


Maître Céline Cooper, a far-left lawyer who is defending the suspect said the popular outrage over the incident is from right-wing citizens and lambasted the French Minister of the Interior of having spoken of “murder” in the case.


The atrocious killing has sent shockwaves through France just a week after 58-year-old bus driver Philippe Monguillot was beaten to death by four migrant men, one of which was from Africa, who was arrested in the apartment of Mohammed A, an individual already known to the police. The incident prompted his wife Veronique to tell French newspaper Le Parisien, “We were destroyed in a few seconds, I have the impression of living a nightmare. A nightmare which is getting worse by the day.” Monguillot was killed for trying to enforce a mandatory mask rule on the bus and for demanding the men purchase tickets when they tried to force their way onboard….









Youcef T. claims he “panicked” after the owners of the dog became aggressive and began to attack both his friend and himself. Youcef T. sped away and only to strike Dorier while she walking her own dog. He said he did not realize that she became wedged in his vehicle and simply kept driving.


Dorier had her arm ripped off as Youcef T. dragged her for 800 meters.


According to Lyon Mag, Youcef T. is also being accused by police of driving with a suspended license.


Police say they received a call over a dispute between two motorists and a group of young people who accused him of killing their dog. A few minutes later, they received a second call about “a motorist driving a Golf who knowingly ran over a young woman and dragged her for several meters”, according to La Depeche.


Dorier was first struck by Youcef T, but actually managed to get up, at which point a number of witness accounts say the “driver then purposefully began accelerating” while dragging her behind.


Three hours after Dorier was struck and killed, Youcef T. and his passenger turned themselves into the police and admitted to striking the woman, but claim they did not realize they dragged her for nearly a kilometer. Originally from the Lyon metropolitan area, blood alcohol tests were negative.


The 19-year-old passenger, Mohamed Y., was indicted “for non-assistance to a person in danger” and released under judicial supervision…






National Rally leader Marine Le Pen wrote, “What level of barbarism must we reach for the French people to say stop to this wildness of our society? How many policemen, gendarmes, bus drivers, slaughtered young girls or boys does it take?”…






 



	







	

		

	




			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
BIDEN FORGOT A FEW RACIST DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

	

						

		


			

	

	

		

	


BY ROBERT SPENCER


SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2020/07/27/a-few-of-the-democrats-biden-missed-when-he-called-trump-our-first-racist-president-n715212;


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:



If President Trump is really a “racist,” as Joe Biden claims, he is one of the strangest racists who ever lived: before the coronavirus hit, black and Hispanic unemployment was at record low levels, the president has repeatedly hailed the achievements of black Americans, and Trump himself, before he entered politics as an unapologetic, non-establishment Republican, was widely respected even by the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for his work for the black community. But none of that matters to Joe Biden or whoever is putting words in his mouth: they want us to believe that Trump is a racist, indeed, the first racist president, because for years they’ve been destroying Republicans with this charge, however false it may be. Why stop now? But Biden has missed a few Democrats.


Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster recounts that progressive hero Woodrow Wilson, for example, was born in Virginia a bit more than four years before the Civil War broke out. Throughout his life, he retained the racist attitudes he learned in his youth, and when he became president, he made them U.S. government policy. In 1915, the notorious film The Birth of a Nation became the first motion picture to get a screening in the White House; the film portrayed the Ku Klux Klan as heroes, denigrated blacks in numerous ways, and quoted Wilson as a respected authority.


Wilson was also quoted decrying the supposed “policy of congressional leaders” to “put the white South under the heel of the black South.” In response, Wilson went on, as quoted in the film: “The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation… until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.”


The showing of The Birth of a Nation was indicative of Wilson’s attitudes: during his administration, government departments in Washington were segregated.


The Worst Presidents Everyone Forgets About


Rating America’s Presidents also shows how another Democrat, James Buchanan, presided over the dissolution of the Union in the years leading up to the Civil War, appealing to the South not to secede by adopting a full-hearted, enthusiastic endorsement of slavery and all it represented. On March 6, 1857, two days after Buchanan took office, the Supreme Court, under the leadership of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, published its infamous ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford, a case that had been brought by Dred Scott, a slave who had been taken into free territory and argued that, as a result, he was now free. The court voted 7–2 against Scott. In his opinion, Taney wrote that blacks were a “subordinate and inferior class of beings” who “are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.”


Buchanan strongly endorsed the decision. However, the Dred Scott decision was fundamentally incoherent. As Justice Benjamin Robbins Curtis noted in his dissent, blacks at the beginning of the republic had the right to vote in five states; how, then, could Taney declare that they were not and had never been intended to be citizens? (This was long before the idea became fashionable that non-citizens should vote in American elections and receive the fruit of American taxpayers’ labor.) But Buchanan had neither the wit nor the imagination to think through the implications of that fact, even if he had been inclined to do so.


At that time, the Kansas Territory had two governments: one in Topeka that outlawed slavery and enjoyed the support of a majority of Kansans and another in Lecompton that was pro-slavery. When the Lecompton government sent a proposed pro-slavery state constitution to Washington, Buchanan accepted it, despite the fact that he was committed to the principle of popular sovereignty and that slavery would almost certainly have been voted down in a free and fair election in Kansas. The president tried to win support for the Lecompton Constitution in Congress with a variety of favors and perks, but the House voted it down anyway. Buchanan kept pushing for Kansans to accept it, offering them all manner of inducements also, but they, too, voted it down. They didn’t want slavery, no matter how determined President Buchanan was that they have it.


Joe Biden doesn’t know and almost certainly doesn’t care about any of this, and probably didn’t even when he was of sound mind. American history, the record of our successes and our missteps, and of our struggles and sacrifices to create the freest society the world has ever known, is of no importance whatsoever — indeed, it is actively offensive — to the leftists who are determined to “fundamentally transform” this free society into one that is decidedly unfree. That is why it is all the more important for patriots to arm themselves about our nation’s history so that we can defend it more effectively and beat back the opportunistic and corrosive lies of Biden and his handlers. What we do not know, we do not value. What we do not value, we will lose.


Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 21 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.


Why We Need History


Woodrow Wilson, the Racist Hero of Progressive Internationalists


Fact Check: Is Donald Trump a White Nationalist?


Joe Biden Says America Has ’Never’ Had a More Racist President Than Trump. Here Are 8.








	







	

		

	




			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
SEATTLE: “PEACEFUL PROTESTERS” ATTACK POLICE STATION, WOUND 59 OFFICERS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

	

						

		


			

	

	

		

	
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD


SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/36537-seattle-peaceful-protestors-attack-police-station-wound-59-officers;


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:



Rioters and barely peaceful protesters attacked a police station and wounded 59 officers in Seattle on Saturday, the very weekend a new law took effect that severely curtails the non-lethal measures police may use to quell riots.


Worse still, the city police chief warned the City Council and city residents and business owners to expect the mayhem given the effect the anti-cop ordinance passed in June would have.


Cops collared almost four dozen of the unhinged radicals, who bombed a police station and tossed rocks and explosives at cops, one of whom landed in the hospital.


In addition to declaring war on cops, the ordinance also promised to reward rioters who sue the city.


Saturday Madness

Two posts to the Seattle Police Department blotter describe the mayhem in detail.


Around 4 p.m., about a dozen rioters who had gathered near the city’s Cal Anderson Park and Central College set fire to portable trailers and other equipment at a nearby construction site, and also smashed car windows in the areas, cops reported.


Then the revolutionary mob began breaking windows on 12th Avenue and marched to the department’s East Precinct:


There, several people emerged from the group and began spray painting and attempting to disable security cameras and a fence perimeter around the precinct.


At least one person breached the precinct’s fence line. Moments later, a device exploded leaving an 8-inch hole in the side of the precinct.


After the unprovoked attack on the police building, cops declared a riot and ordered the crowd to disperse, the blotter reported.


Instead, the thugs threw bottles and balloons filled with liquid and shot mortar fireworks and tossed explosives at officers, who in turn used pepper spray, blast balls, and 40mm sponge rounds.


The wanton attack on police with bricks, rocks, mortars and other explosives continued for hours.


By 10 p.m., police had arrested 47 of the unhinged criminals.


By the time the battle for Seattle had ended, the rioters injured 59 cops. “Injuries ranged from abrasions and bruising to burns and a torn meniscus,” the SPD blotter reported.


Letter to City Council

The City Council likely invited the attack on police when they passed the anti-cop ordinance that took effect this weekend on June 15.


Taking the side of protesters, the council passed an ordinance that forbids the city to purchase, own, or rent crowd-control weapons.


The law also forbids cops from using pepper spray if it is “used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event” or “when used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.”


Damages payable to rioters injured if the cops violate the new law is $10,000, plus attorney and court fees, and the settlement does not preclude the plaintiff from collecting a larger settlement.


Two days before the riots, Chief of Police Carmen Best sent the council a letter to show she did “due diligence of informing Council of the foreseeable impact of this ordinance on upcoming events.”


Warned Best:


It is a fact that there are groups and individuals who are intent on destruction in our City. Yes, we also have seen weeks of peaceful demonstrations, but two recent events (Sunday, July 19th and Wednesday, July 22nd) have included wide-scale property destruction and attacks on officers, injuring more than a dozen, some significantly.


Best warned that Saturday’s riot was planned and that the city should assume the arson, looting, and vandalism would continue.


But because of the new ordinance, “we cannot manage demonstrations as we have in the past. If I am not allowed to lawfully equip officers with the tools they have been trained to use to protect the community and themselves, it would be reckless to have them confront this level of violence under the current legal restrictions imposed by Council.”


Continued Best:


Some have asked why officers are not arresting those engaging in criminal behavior, as officers do every day, and as they have in recent protests. If it is safe to do so, and even when it places their lives in danger, our officers always directly address criminal behavior. They do this, however, when they know they have the tools shown to allow the safe use of their policing powers. This Council ordinance denies them access to these tools that have been an essential part of their court-approved tactics....


As City Council’s legislation goes into effect, it will create even more dangerous circumstances for our officers to intervene using what they have left — riot shields and riot batons.


For these reasons, SPD will have an adjusted deployment in response to any demonstrations this weekend. The Council legislation gives officers no ability to safely intercede to preserve property in the midst of a large, violent crowd. Allowing this behavior deeply troubles me, but I am duty-bound to follow the Council legislation once it is in effect. If the Council is prepared to suggest a different response or interpretation of the legislation, I stand ready to receive it.


The next day, Best notified city residents and business owners that the ordinance “bans Seattle Police officers the use of less lethal tools, including pepper spray that is commonly used to disperse crowds that have turned violent. Simply put, the legislation gives officers NO ability to safely intercede to preserve property in the midst of a large, violent crowd.”