THEIR OWN WORDS: SLAVERY AND AMERICA’S FOUNDING FATHERS

Their Own Words: Slavery and America’s Founding Fathers

BY RENEE NAL

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/their-own-words-slavery-and-americas-founding-fathers/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

This article has been partially reprinted from TrevorLoudon.com, with permission.

The most powerful tool in the Marxist toolbox is lies. Lies lead people of goodwill down inconceivable paths. In nazi Germany, it was lies that convinced Jewish people to get on the trains to their deaths. In America, lies about the founding of America are used to slander the founding fathers and to indoctrinate young people into hating the most benevolent, kindest, most prosperous country that ever existed.

The best lies contain a grain of truth. Black Lives Matter is effective because black lives DO matter. But it is based on the lie that black Americans are being hunted. Outliers such as the death of George Floyd are essential in the Marxist desire to spark revolution.

In the case of the founding fathers, the grain of truth is that some did indeed have slaves. But the lie is that founding fathers were pro-slavery. Anyone who seeks the truth will find it if they look to source documents, not progressively scrubbed history books.

Slavery was not introduced by the founding fathers – it had been in America for well over a century by the time the founding documents were conceived. Many of the founders abhorred slavery, but since it was deeply intertwined with the economy and since the slaves themselves were vulnerable to external forces, many advocated for a “gradual abolition”, but an abolition was required as not only did the practice conflict with the founding documents, but the practiced conflicted with Christianity.

From the Jamestown Rediscovery Project:

“A Dutch slave trader exchanged his cargo of Africans for food in 1619. The Africans became indentured servants, similar in legal position to many poor Englishmen who traded several years labor in exchange for passage to America.” (emphasis added)

These black and white indentured servants stayed in America after they payed their “debt”. One of the original African indentured servants, often cited as the “first slave”, is John Punch, and can be traced back to Barack Obama’s white mother Ann Dunham.

According to the Jamestown study, “[T]he popular conception of a racial-based slave system did not develop until the 1680’s.”

By the time the founding fathers were born, slavery was accepted as the norm and would not be easy to overturn. Before the founding fathers, there was little effort to stop slavery.

That all changed with the Revolution, the “Father of the American Revolution”, was against slavery (Samuel Adams) and helped to change the tone of a nation. Some of the founders complained that slavery was an evil pushed onto the colonies by England.

So the question is, what did the founding fathers actually say about slavery?

In the first draft of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote,

“He [King George III] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. . .”

He also stated,

The whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and degrading submissions on the other.”

Joseph Reed, Revolutionary Officer; Governor of Pennsylvania

“Honored will that State be in the annals of history which shall first abolish this violation of the rights of mankind.”

Samuel Adams, Signer of the Declaration,

“But to the eye of reason, what can be more clear than that all men have an equal right to happiness? Nature made no other distinction than that of higher or lower degrees of power of mind and body. . . . Were the talents and virtues which Heaven has bestowed on men given merely to make them more obedient drudges? . . . No! In the judgment of heaven there is no other superiority among men than a superiority of wisdom and virtue.”

James Wilson, Signer of the Constitution

“Slavery, or an absolute and unlimited power in the master over the life and fortune of the slave, is unauthorized by the common law. . . . The reasons which we sometimes see assigned for the origin and the continuance of slavery appear, when examined to the bottom, to be built upon a false foundation. In the enjoyment of their persons and of their property, the common law protects all.”

From Benjamin Franklin, (1773) lamenting that the British government wanted slavery, even as America opposed it…

“. . a disposition to abolish slavery prevails in North America, that many of Pennsylvanians have set their slaves at liberty, and that even the Virginia Assembly have petitioned the King for permission to make a law for preventing the importation of more into that colony. This request, however, will probably not be granted as their former laws of that kind have always been repealed.”

John Quincy Adams, July 4th, 1837

“The inconsistency of the institution of domestic slavery with the principles of the Declaration of Independence was seen and lamented by all the southern patriots of the Revolution; by no one with deeper and more unalterable conviction than by the author of the Declaration himself.”

Elias Boudinot, President of the Continental Congress, lamenting Georgia, North and South Carolina’s continued support for slavery:

“Even the sacred Scriptures had been quoted to justify this iniquitous traffic. It is true that the Egyptians held the Israelites in bondage for four hundred years, . . . but . . . gentlemen cannot forget the consequences that followed: they were delivered by a strong hand and stretched-out arm and it ought to be remembered that the Almighty Power that accomplished their deliverance is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.”

Richard Henry Lee, Signer of the Declaration

“Christianity, by introducing into Europe the truest principles of humanity, universal benevolence, and brotherly love, had happily abolished civil slavery. Let us who profess the same religion practice its precepts . . . by agreeing to this duty.”

James Wilson, Signer of the Constitution:

“Slavery, or an absolute and unlimited power in the master over the life and fortune of the slave, is unauthorized by the common law”

John Witherspoon, Signer of the Declaration:

“It is certainly unlawful to make inroads upon others . . . and take away their liberty by no better means than superior power.”

John Adams, US President, Signer of the Bill of Rights, in a letter to George Churchman and Jacob Lindley (1801)

“…my opinion against it has always been known, and my practice has been so conformable to my sentiments that I have always employed freemen, both as domestics and laborers, and never in my life did I own a slave. The abolition of slavery must be gradual, and accomplished with much caution and circumspection. Violent means and measures would produce greater violations of justice and humanity than the continuance of the practice.”

Benjamin Franklin, Signer of the Declaration, Signer of the Constitution (1772)

“I am glad to hear that the disposition against keeping negroes grows more general in North America. Several pieces have been lately printed here against the practice, and I hope in time it will be taken into consideration and suppressed by the legislature.”

and

That mankind are all formed by the same Almighty Being, alike objects of his care, and equally designed for the enjoyment of happiness, the Christian religion teaches us to believe, and the political creed of Americans fully coincides with the position. . . . [We] earnestly entreat your serious attention to the subject of slavery – that you will be pleased to countenance the restoration of liberty to those unhappy men who alone in this land of freedom are degraded into perpetual bondage and who . . . are groaning in servile subjection.”

Charles Carroll, Signer of the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Senator from Maryland, State Senator in Maryland

“Why keep alive the question of slavery? It is admitted by all to be a great evil.”

Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration,

“Domestic slavery is repugnant to the principles of Christianity. . . . It is rebellion against the authority of a common Father. It is a practical denial of the extent and efficacy of the death of a common Savior. It is an usurpation of the prerogative of the great Sovereign of the universe who has solemnly claimed an exclusive property in the souls of men.”

and

The commerce in African slaves has breathed its last in Pennsylvania. I shall send you a copy of our late law respecting that trade as soon as it is published. I am encouraged by the success that has finally attended the exertions of the friends of universal freedom and justice.”

John Jay, President of Continental Congress,

“That men should pray and fight for their own freedom and yet keep others in slavery is certainly acting a very inconsistent, as well as unjust and perhaps impious, part.”

Noah Webster, Responsible for Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution:

“Justice and humanity require it. Christianity commands it…pray for the glorious period when the last slave who fights for freedom shall be restored to the possession of that inestimable right.”

George Washington

“that it is my wish to hold the unhappy people who are the subject of this letter, in slavery. I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it — but there is only one proper and effectual mode by which it can be accomplished, & that is by Legislative authority: and this, as far as my suffrage will go, shall never be wanting.”

It is anti-intellectual to reduce the founding fathers to mere “slave-owners”. In fact, the founding fathers laid the foundation for America to claw it’s way out of slavery. All Americans should be warned that those who push a false narrative about the intent and nature of the founding fathers’ view of slavery are cherry-picking history and have their own anti-American agenda. Always read the source documents. Seek to understand the context of the time.

Read more here.

Support our work at RAIR Foundation USA! We are a grassroots activist team and we need your help! Please consider making a donation here: https://rairfoundation.com/donate/



NYC: NORTH KOREAN & “PALESTINIAN” PROTESTERS SCREAM “DEATH TO AMERICA” & “DEATH TO ISRAEL”

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/07/nyc-north-korean-and-palestinian-protestors-scream-death-to-america-and-death-to-israel;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Leftist/jihadist alliance, long dismissed as “right-wing” fabrication, grows more open, assertive, and aggressive by the day.

“At Brooklyn ‘No To Annexation’ Rally, Speakers Call To Abolish Police, Israel, And U.S. Government, Crowd Chants: ‘Death To America!’, ‘Millions Of Martyrs Are Marching To Jerusalem!’; Activist: ‘F*ck The NYPD!’ When A Precinct Or A Cop Car Burns, I Feel Closer To Palestine,” MEMRI, July 1, 2020:

Within Our Lifetime, a NY-based pro-Palestinian organization, organized a “Day of Rage” rally against Israeli plans to annex parts of the West Bank. The event, which was called “No to Annexation,” was held in Brooklyn on July 1, 2020, and the video of the event was uploaded to the organizers’ Facebook page. During the rally, an activist named Jamie from the pro-North Korea Nodutdol organization told the protestors that Palestine will be liberated, that Korea will be unified, and that the U.S. and its puppet governments will be “no more.” Another speaker, Amin Hosain of Decolonize This Place, an anti-gentrification movement, said that the police are the enemy and an impediment to the liberation of Palestine, and he said that when NYPD cop cars burn, a “revolutionary country” is being awakened.

Dequi Kioni Sadiki, wife of former Black Panther Seko Odinga, said that the European Jews who force Palestinians into refugee camps, concentration camps, and killing fields are related to the Europeans who forced Africans into slavery and prison death camps. She added that Palestine must be free like the stolen land of North America, which she referred to as “Turtle Island.” A representative of the Puerto Rican New York Borica Resistance movement said that the police, Israel, and the U.S. government must be abolished. Nerdeen Kiswani from Within Our Lifetime said that Palestinians do not only want to return to Gaza and the West Bank, but that they want all of Palestine. Wrapped in a red flag, a man named Rob from the Party for Socialism and Liberation led the crowd in chant in Arabic: “Death to Israel! Death to America!” In addition, the crowd chanted: “Millions of martyrs are marching to Jerusalem!… The gates of Al-Aqsa are made of iron – its gates will only be opened by a martyr… From Gaza to Minnesota, globalize the Intifada!… Black lives matter!… Not just annexation, not just occupation, fight for liberation – bring the whole thing down!” For more about Nerdeen Kiswani and Within Our Lifetime, see MEMRI TV clips No. 6100, No. 6311, and No. 7628.

Jamie, Nondutol Pro-North Korea Activist: “The DPRK also refuses to recognize Israel and calls it an imperialist satellite of the United States.

[…]

“I believe that within our lifetime, Palestine will be yours again and Korea will be one again! The United States of America and all of its puppet governments will be no more!”

[…]

Amin Hosain, Decolonize This Place: “The police that are around us are not our friends. You should not speak to them. They are our enemy. They are an impediment to the liberation of Palestine.

[…]

“When I saw that precinct burn, I thought I was closer to Palestine. When I see an NYPD cop car burn – I say we are waking up a revolutionary country.

[…]

“They know that we will f*cking free Palestine!”

[…]

Dequi Kioni Sadiki, wife of former Black Panther Seko Odinga: “The European Jews, who occupy, slaughter, and continue to force millions of Palestinians on to their killing fields, called refugee and concentration camps, are the relatives of the Europeans, the Spanish, the British, the Portuguese, the Irish, the Dutch, who kidnapped, slaughtered, and forced millions of Africans and indigenous on to slave ships, plantations, reservations, prison death camps, on this Turtle Island [North America].

[…]

“I know that from the River to the sea, Palestine must be free, because from every river to every sea, on this stolen land, this Turtle Island must also be free.”

[…]

Activist at New York Borica Resistance: “You can’t defund the police, you have got to abolish the police! You have got to abolish the Zionistic state of Israel! You have got to abolish the United States Government!”

[…]

Nerdeen Kiswani, Within Our Lifetime: “We don’t want a fake Palestinian state that they give us while Israel still exists. The land that Israel exists on is still stolen. The 1948 lands are still stolen. Jaffa, Haifa, and Tel Aviv – originally named Tel Rabi’a – was stolen. We don’t want to just go back to our homes in Gaza and the West Bank, we want all of it!”

[…]

Rob, Party for Socialism and Liberation: “Death to Israel!”

Crowd: “Death to Israel!”

Rob: “Death to America!”

Crowd: “Death to America!”

[…]

Leader and crowd: “With our souls and with our blood, we will redeem you, oh Palestine! From the water [of the River] to the water [of the Sea] – Palestine belongs to the Arabs!

[…]

“The gates of Al-Aqsa are made of iron – they only be opened by a martyr!

[…]

“A million martyrs are marching to Jerusalem!

[…]

“Resistance is justified, from New York to Palestine! From Gaza to Minnesota, globalize the Intifada!

[…]

“Black lives matter! Black lives matter!

[…]

“Intifada, Intifada! We will start an Intifada!

[…]

“No Palestinian liberation without black liberation!

[…]

“Not just annexation, not just occupation, fight for liberation – bring the whole thing down!”

[…]

Leader: “F*ck your two states!”

Crowd: “F*ck your two states!”

[…]

Speaker: “They come together and they share strategies on how to oppress us, all the time – that is why the NYPD has an office in Jerusalem. What the hell is that?”

Man: “F*ck NYPD!”

Speaker: “And Tel Aviv too!”

 

GEORGIA: MEMBERS OF HEAVILY ARMED BLACK MILITIA SHOUT “ALHAMDULILLAH”

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/07/georgia-members-of-heavily-armed-black-militia-shout-alhamdulillah;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Another manifestation of the Leftist-Islamic alliance. “Alhamdulillah” means “Thanks be to Allah” and is not usually said except by observant Muslims. Here again we see that radical Leftists have the same goal jihadis do: not just the removal of statues of Confederates, but much more. The targeting of Confederate statues is part of a larger effort to make Americans ashamed of our history as a whole, as the targeting of statues of Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and Frederick Douglass shows. The ultimate goal is the destruction of the U.S. as a free republic, and the replacement of that republic with an authoritarian state. The nature of that authoritarian state, however, will be determined by the group that comes out on top after they turn on each other.

“‘We’re in your house… let’s go!’ Hundreds of heavily armed militia protest Confederate carving in Georgia,” by Shawn Langlois, Market Watch, July 5, 2020:

‘I don’t see no white militia, the boogie boys, the three percenters and all the rest of these scared-ass rednecks. We here, where the **** you at? We’re in your house… let’s go!’

That taunt came from one of an estimated 200 armed protesters who marched through Georgia’s Stone Mountain Park on Saturday and called for the removal of a sculpture depicting Gen. Robert E. Lee, Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Gen. Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson….

Reuters reported that the vast majority of the protesters, dressed in black and wearing face scarves, appeared to be African Americans, though various races were represented….

 

LOS ANGELES: “MASS RESISTANCE” OVERWHELMS BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTEST IN SUBURB

BLM had taken over City Hall plaza to protest and announce list of demands to city. When MassResistance came with equal numbers to counter-protest, they didn’t know what hit them! (Video below!)

SEE: https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen4/20c/CA-El-Segundo-BLM-protest/index.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
July 6, 2020
ALT TEXT 
This MassResistance activist wasn't going to let the "Black Lives Matter" demonstration silence him!

Black Lives Matter has been terrorizing cities across America with their menacing “protests” (many of which have become violent), their irrational political demands, and their intimidation of public officials. They call for de-funding or drastically weakening the local police force, changing the names of local landmarks, removing statues, and various radical changes to local government.

Conservative groups often respond simply by holding separate “pro-police” rallies, which have little effect. But our side never comes in equal numbers to directly confront the Black Lives Matter goons and radicals. Now, MassResistance is changing that.

El Segundo, California is a community of about 16,000 situated next to the Pacific Ocean, just south of the Los Angeles International Airport. It’s been nicknamed “Mayberry by the Sea” for its cozy small-town atmosphere. But the city has recently seen a number of left-wing movements coming in to disrupt the peace and tranquility of the town.

On June 25, a local MassResistance activist contacted us. He and others were very upset that Black Lives Matter (BLM) had announced that they’d formed a chapter in El Segundo and were planning a protest and demonstration outside City Hall on June 27 – two days away. BLM also announced they were going to present a list of demands on the city police department, the city government, and the local schools.

We decided that this needed to be confronted. Conservatives have been sitting on the sideline for too long. Our national organization director, Arthur Schaper (who’s based in the Los Angeles area) got right to work. He rallied MassResistance activists in El Segundo and the surrounding area.

ALT TEXT 
Our side got there early and outnumbered them at first, until they caught up and evened up the numbers.

And what a counter-protest it was! As the local newspaper reported, MassResistance activists came and took over!

Shortly before the planned start time, there were more demonstrators in the plaza who were opposed to the cause — some holding “All Lives Matter” signs — than there were protesters in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. That changed as the demonstration got in full swing, eventually attracting about 50 people to each side … The original demonstration carried on, even as counter-protesters shouted over the speakers.

No BLM event had ever experienced that!

ALT TEXT 
Thanks to our crowd, there were more American flags than anything else!
ALT TEXT 
And we were not afraid to be very vocal! It completely rattled the BLM crowd.
ALT TEXT 
In their faces: Someone from our group brought a "Trump 2020" truck that was parked right where the demonstration was taking place!

These “social justice warriors” are used to bullying everyone else and drowning out any other voices. But this time they were the ones often being drowned out by our people shouting and chanting “All Lives Matter,” “Blue Lives Matter,” and epithets about the corrupt, destructive, and un-American nature of their organization. 

ALT TEXT 
This really seemed to steam them, for some reason. One BLM activist came up and angrily told her that no black babies are being aborted by Planned Parenthood - and tried to grab the sign!
ALT TEXT 
At one point one of our people (right, in white dress) had heard enough nonsense from the BLM speaker (left, in yellow pants). She came up and screamed at her, "Why don't you care about the black lives that are being killed in Chicago by other blacks?" Of course, she got no answer.

The BLM event was clearly very well organized. But when confronted by MassResistance, it became clear that their unity of purpose is mostly a façade. Arthur and others walked up and challenged a number of them about the actual goals and objectives of Black Lives Matter (as described on its website and elsewhere) and even the meaning of signs they were holding. Most of the BLM people were clueless about their own organization’s ideas, and could barely explain why they were there. When they realized they were cornered, they would start to babble hackneyed political nonsense. A few just got angry. When Arthur pressed the two leaders of the protest to admit on video that they want to defund the town’s police, they denied it.

ALT TEXT 
When Arthur asked this lady to tell him what a "sundown town" is, she didn't know. She stammered that she was holding the sign for someone else. Par for the course with these dimwitted "social justice warriors." [NOTE: Urban Dictionary says "sundown town" is "a small town (mainly in the South) where black people are beaten and sometimes kidnapped after the sun goes down." Not a fit description for El Segundo!]

Most of the Black Lives Matter demonstrators there were not black, but white liberals. (It seemed like there were more blacks and Hispanics among the MassResistance group.)

ALT TEXT 
When you looked through the Black Lives Matter demonstrators (above and below) just about everyone was white. Apparently the blacks in town had better things to do that day.
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT 
They use these signs to intimidate the local residents. But it wasn't working very well this time!

As we have warned, Black Lives Matter is also devoted to pushing the LGBT agenda. It was certainly part of this event. It’s interwoven into their ideology, along with Marxism, anti-Semitism, and their own brand of racial bigotry.

ALT TEXT 
Banner saying "Make America Gay Again" is displayed as local LGBT activist addresses the BLM crowd, as part of the event.
ALT TEXT 
Sign says, "Black Trans Lives Matter." BLM's stated goals include promoting the transgender agenda in America.

Police ignore laws to accommodate BLM protest

A continuing outrage across the country has been that police departments allow the BLM “protesters” to show up (without a required permit) and do whatever they want, when it’s obvious that anyone else would be treated vastly differently for doing the same things.

Arthur approached the police lieutenant watching the event and confronted him about that. As you can see in our video below, the lieutenant admitted that people normally need a permit to take over the plaza with loudspeakers. He fumbled around when Arthur pressed him to explain why BLM got special treatment. It was shameful - and infuriating.

ALT TEXT 
The El Segundo police lieutenant that Arthur confronted gave a pretty disgraceful answer as to why the the Marxist, thuggist BLM group's demonstration doesn't have to abide by the laws that everyone else does. It's pretty frightening to think about. But at least this time someone's standing up to it!

Watch the VIDEO!

Here’s what you haven’t seen yet anywhere else in America when Black Lives Matter comes into a town to intimidate everyone.

VIDEO: MassResistance takes on Black Lives Matter. (12 min 47 sec)

List of BLM demands to the town of El Segundo:

Here is the list of demands that they presented that day to the El Segundo officials. It’s basically a neo-Marxist “social justice” manifesto disconnected from reality, reminiscent of something out of the Chinese Communist Cultural Revolution. For example, it says El Segundo must “acknowledge and apologize” for a contrived “racist legacy” and hire schoolteachers on the basis of race, not qualifications. And of course, it includes a new wave of mandatory propaganda for the local schools on “race and diversity.”

  • Establish a citizen review board for the El Segundo Police Department;
  • Review and revise the Police Department’s “use of force” guidelines to reduce the likelihood of abuse and injury;
  • Put an end to police racial profiling through training and by publishing the racial demographics of people stopped, questioned or detained;
  • Increase police accountability by ensuring there are consequences for officers who “violate their sworn duty to serve and protect,” as well as for officers who witness civil rights violations and fail to intervene;
  • Create a service-oriented police department while demilitarizing police and evaluating impacts on students of color on having police in schools;
  • Empower the city's Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission;
  • Issue a “proclamation for change” that “acknowledges and apologizes for El Segundo’s racist legacy” and “commits to a more diverse and inclusive future;”
  • Review the law enforcement budget to ensure resources are provided for civilian responders to address non-criminal calls and for programs to end racial bias in policing;
  • Increase diversity of faculty and students in El Segundo Unified School District by establishing enrollment and hiring goals with firm deadlines;
  • Incorporate diversity into the school district's curriculum and to allow student input into the curriculum; and
  • Include issues of social justice, inclusion and diversity into school events and to hold an assembly this fall that addresses issues of race and diversity.

Unfortunately, as in so many locales across the country, the city officials are already starting to grovel and cave in. Their statement, included in the newspaper article, talks about giving BLM “a seat at the table to work collaboratively toward meaningful outcomes.”

But we had our own statement published in the same article:

Arthur Schaper, an organization director with MassResistance, a socially conservative activism group, said he didn’t believe the Black Lives Matter movement was really about protecting Black lives.

“It’s a cultural revolution that wants to rewrite our country’s history,” he said. “America is one of the least racist countries there is.”

Bold truth is especially important at this time.

Final reflection

After this was over, MassResistance was thanked profusely by many El Segundo residents. They realize that it’s very important that good people stand up to this madness. When no one speaks out or confronts an evil cause, it gets more momentum and strength. And when even a few people stand up and fight back, others who were previously timid get a dose of courage and join in.

This needs to be happening everywhere! You will definitely be seeing more of this from MassResistance!

ALT TEXT
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

 

THE CHRISTIAN ROOTS OF AMERICA’S INDEPENDENCE

BY ALEX NEWMAN

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/36278-the-christian-roots-of-america-s-independence;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In this episode of Behind the Deep State, host Alex Newman breaks down some of the amazing history leading up to the Declaration of Independence. Alex especially focuses in on the Christian roots of the Declaration and the little-known facts that are crucial to understanding American history. He also discusses the Black Robe Regiment and the key part played by pastors in the war for independence. Americans will never defeat the Deep State if they don't understand their own history and who they are.

 

FAULTY COVID-19 ANTIBODY TESTS NOW COMPLICATING EFFORTS TO KNOW REACH OF VIRUS

Back in March, the Food and Drug Administration took the unprecedented step of allowing COVID antibody tests to flood the market without review. The tests were billed as a critical tool to assess where the virus had spread and who might have immunity. But in the government’s rush to get more people tested quickly, it may have missed the mark. Over the course of a three-month investigation, 60 Minutes has learned that federal officials knew that many of the antibody tests were seriously flawed but continued to allow them to be sold anyway.

OB/GYN DOCTORS IN THE U.S. WANT COVID-19 VACCINES TESTED ON PREGNANT WOMEN

BY BARBARA CACERES

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/07/ob-gyn-docs-in-u-s-want-covid-19-vaccines-tested-on-pregnant-women/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
OB/GYN Docs in U.S. Want COVID-19 Vaccines Tested on Pregnant Women

A U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report1 on pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection released on June 26 suggested that pregnant women may be at increased risk for COVID-19 complications. The report was followed by a statement issued by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)2 urging that pregnant and lactating women be included in COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutics trials and that pregnant women be among the first to get the vaccine after it is licensed.

Pregnant Women Report Fewer COVID-19 Symptoms

The CDC reported that the government’s COVID-19 surveillance program has received reports of 326,335 women of reproductive age (15-44 years) who had positive rest results for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Data on pregnancy status was available for 29 percent of the women, and among these, 9 percent were pregnant.

Symptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women reported similar frequencies of cough and shortness of breath during COVID-19 infections. However, pregnant women less frequently reported headache, muscle aches, fever, chills, and diarrhea.3

Chronic Conditions Reported During COVID-19 Infections May Be Pregnancy Related

Chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease were reported among pregnant women at roughly twice the rate of those who were not pregnant. However, data was not available to distinguish whether chronic conditions were present before or were uniquely associated with pregnancy (e.g. gestational diabetes or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy).4

More Pregnant Women Admitted to Hospital and ICU for COVID-19 But Death Rates Identical Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

Approximately one third (31.5 percent) of pregnant women were hospitalized compared with 5.6 percent of non-pregnant women. However data were not available to distinguish hospitalization of women for COVID-19 related circumstances from hospital admission for pregnancy-related treatment or procedures, including birthing.

After adjusting for age, presence of underlying conditions and race/ethnicity, pregnant women were 1.5 times more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and receive mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 infections. Risk of death for the pregnant and non-pregnant women was identical (0.2 percent).5

The CDC data indicates that Hispanic and black women may be disproportionately more likely to suffer complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, which reflects an overall increased risk for COVID-19 complications in Hispanic and black populations in the U.S.6

Limitations of CDC study on COVID-19 in Pregnant Women

CDC officials acknowledged at least four limitations to their report, which include missing data, insufficient time for accurate outcomes, lack of data on trimester of pregnancy at the time of infection and whether the hospitalization was related to pregnancy conditions rather than for COVID-19 illness, and no data on pregnancy or birth outcomes such as pregnancy loss or preterm birth.7

COVID-19 Pregnancy Registries Seek Answers

ACOG represents more than 60,000 physician obstetricians/gynecologists in the U.S.8 In response to the CDC report, the ACOG released a statement advising member physicians of the increased risk to pregnant women of COVID-19 infections. ACOG urged its members to encourage pregnant patients testing positive for COVID-19 to enroll in a COVID-19 registry to help gather more data measuring the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.9

In April, UCLA Health and the University of San Francisco launched a nationwide registry called PRIORITY (Pregnancy CoRonavIrus Outcomes RegIsTrY) to study how COVID-19 impacts pregnant women and their newborns. Researchers will collect data throughout pregnancy, then track the new mothers and babies for up to one year.

“The issue is we don’t have data in pregnancy. A lot of this data is extrapolated from other SARS infection, MERS, and non-pregnant individuals,” says Yalda Afshar, MD, assistant professor in the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine at UCLA Health.10

In May, the PRIORITY study launched the Reproductive Health Equity and Birth Justice Core to focus on the impact of COVID-19 on Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities.11 Other COVID-19 pregnancy registries include COVI-Preg, a global collaboration between 198 antenatal clinics from 23 countries,12 the International Registry of Coronavirus Exposure in Pregnancy (IRCEP), and Coronavirus Health Outcomes in Pregnancy and Neonates (CHOPAN) in Australia.

ACOG Says Pregnant Women, Breastfeeding Moms Should Be Test Subjects in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials and Be Among the First to Get Vaccinated

In its June 24 statement, the ACOG also stated:

In light of this new information from the CDC regarding the risk to pregnant patients, it is even more concerning that pregnant and lactating patients have been excluded from clinical trials for a coronavirus vaccine. The new information from the CDC highlights the importance of pregnant patients being prioritized for a coronavirus vaccine once it becomes available. ACOG again urges the federal government to use its resources to ensure the safe inclusion of pregnant and lactating patients, including patients of color, in trials for vaccines and therapeutics to ensure that all populations are included in the search for ways to prevent and treat COVID-19.13

Questions About Safety of Vaccination During Pregnancy

The time-honored rule of avoiding any potential toxic exposure that might interfere with the normal development of the fetus was suspended and replaced by the CDC in 2006 with an assumption that vaccination during pregnancy was safe after the CDC strengthened recommendations that all pregnant women, healthy or not, should get influenza vaccine during in any trimester. This CDC recommendation was followed up in 2011 with another new one directing obstetricians and gynecologists to administer a pertussis containing Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis) shot to all pregnant women during every pregnancy.14 15

Influenza and Tdap vaccines were formerly categorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because it is not known whether they are genotoxic and can cause fetal harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction.16 Influenza and pertussis containing Tdap vaccines were not tested in or licensed for use in pregnant women prior to the CDC’s recommendation for their use by all pregnant women, and their use has been considered “off label” during pregnancy.17

The text of one vaccine manufacturer’s prescribing information for the use of Tdap vaccine in pregnant women highlights a critical lack of knowledge about the potential negative biological effects of pertussis containing Tdap vaccine on the pregnant woman and her fetus, which appears to be common for vaccines administered to pregnant women:

Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Adacel vaccine. It is also not known whether Adacel vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity.” In addition, the following language is common in most vaccine manufacturer prescribing information inserts: “Adacel vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic, mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.18

About 35 Percent of Women in U.S. Get Vaccinated During Pregnancy

Barbara Loe Fisher, cofounder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) states, “The rush to vaccinate pregnant women and reach into the womb to try to passively vaccinate the developing fetus is a clear case of policy preceding science.”19

A 2019 report by the CDC found that 35 percent of women received both influenza and pertussis containing Tdap vaccines during pregnancy. Anne Schuchat, MD, principal deputy director of the CDC states that for any woman wary of getting vaccinated, “it’s been proven repeatedly that these vaccinations are safe for pregnant women and their developing babies.”20

Civil Liability Waiver Encourages Pharmaceutical Companies to Test Experimental Vaccines on Pregnant Women

The 21st Century Cures Act passed by Congress and signed into law in 2016 amended the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 to give vaccine manufacturers a product liability shield so they can’t be sued in civil court when there is evidence that a federally FDA licensed vaccine (or vaccines) recommended by the CDC for pregnant women injured or caused the death of a woman or an infant born alive who was injured in the womb by a vaccine administered to the infant’s mother.

The fact that commercial pharmaceutical companies producing vaccine products are no longer legally liable for harm caused to pregnant women or their infants during gestation if they are born alive, becomes even more significant as COVID-19 vaccines using experimental mRNA and DNA technology are being fast tracked to market.21 As pointed out in a 2017 review of ethical issues involved in vaccine research on pregnant women:

“As a fetus or infant cannot consent to participation in research, a critical issue is how much risk is acceptable to impose upon the fetus or the infant. For research with the potential of direct medical benefit to the woman or fetus, risk proportionate to the potential benefit is acceptable. For research that does not involve the prospect of direct medical benefit, risk to the fetus must be no more than minimal. However, the definitions of minimal risk in the context of pregnancy are unclear.”

Big Gaps in Vaccine Safety Research and Knowledge Concerning for Pregnant Women

In a response to the FDA’s 2018 proposed guidance for scientific and ethical consideration for inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials, Barbara Loe Fisher and Theresa Wrangham on behalf of the National Vaccine Information Center submitted a public comment and noted the “lack of basic understanding of the biological mechanisms and high risk factors for vaccine injury and death in individuals who are not pregnant hampers the ability to design ethical research into the biological effects of vaccination in pregnant women. The lack of published biological mechanism studies and well-designed prospective case controlled studies that assess immune and brain function and genetic integrity before and after adults or children are vaccinated is of great concern to those being directed to receive all federally recommended vaccines. That justifiable concern is magnified when it comes to the potential adverse effects of vaccination on pregnant women and their unborn infants developing in the womb.”22

Fisher observed that, “This maternal vaccination policy is a violation of the precautionary principle to “first, do no harm,” and warned “it is of grave concern to women having babies in America.”23

References:

1 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status—United States, January 22-June 7, 2020Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report June 26, 2020.
2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Statement on COVID-19 and Pregnancy. June 24, 2020.
3 CDC. Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status—United States, January 22-June 7, 2020 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report June 26, 2020.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 CDC. COVID-19 in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups. June 25, 2020.
7 See Footnote 3.
8 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. About Us. 2020.
9 See Footnote 2.
10 WBBJ Eyewitness News. Researchers seek COVID-19 effects on pregnancy. Apr. 20, 2020.
11 University of California – San Francisco. PRIORITY Study Reproductive Health Equity & Birth Justice Core.
12 Advances in Surgery. COVI-Preg, a structured data collection tool available to any facility accessing pregnant patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Apr.28, 2020.
13 See Footnote 2.
14 Fisher BL. Vaccination During Pregnancy: Is It Safe? NVIC Newsletter Nov. 9, 2013.
15 CDC. Vaccines During and After Pregnancy. Dec. 16, 2019.
16 Fisher BL. FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women. National Vaccine Information Center Nov. 17, 2015.
17 See Footnote 14.
18 Fisher BL, Wrangam TK. Written Comment on 83 FR 15161, Docket No. FDA-2018-D-1201 – “Pregnant Women: Scientific and Ethical Considerations for Inclusion in Clinical Trials; Draft Guidance; Availability National Vaccine Information Center June 8, 2018.
19 See Footnote 14.
20 Preidt R. Only a Third of Pregnant Women Get Needed VaccinesWebMD Oct 8, 2019.
21 Fisher BL. COVID-19 Meltdown and Pharma’s Big Money Win: DNA and mRNA Vaccines: Flying Blind Into Uncharted TerritoryNVIC Newsletter Apr. 1, 2020.
22 See Footnote 18.
23 See Footnote 16.

 

THE LEFT’S SOVIET INSANE ASYLUM FOR NON-MASK WEARERS

Progressives' faithful devotion to socialist-style “psychiatric” disposal of political dissidents.

BY JAMIE GLAZOV

SEE: https://cms.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/07/lefts-soviet-insane-asylum-non-mask-wearers-jamie-glazov;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Editors’ note: On July 2, 2020, The Huffington Post published an article by Brittany Wong titled, The Psychology Behind Why Some People Refuse To Wear Face Masks. The subtitle was: "As coronavirus cases spike, those who refuse to wear face coverings remain as firm in their choice as ever. Here's what psychologists say is driving their behavior."

There wasn't much of a surprise where the piece went with it all: a handful of psychologists (clearly of a progressive disposition) are quoted giving their specious views on what is holding many Americans back from wearing masks. The underlying assumption is, naturally, that there's something psychologically wrong with these Americans. And, therefore -- surprise, surprise -- in the conclusion of the article, we are treated with some inspiring tips on "a few ways to try to get through to a non-mask wearer."

Perhaps also not too surprisingly, Wong's article makes no reference to how masks hide God’s image -- and how ample evidence demonstrates that they are not only useless in fighting this "pandemic", but also pose serious health risks. And, of course, nowhere in the article can we find the myriad facts revealing that Covid-19 is not nearly as dangerous as the powers-that-be would like you to believe.

What The Huffington Post is trying to achieve with this recent article is, of course, very clear -- and expected. This leftist gambit vis-à-vis non-mask wearers is directly linked, for instance, to the Left’s fury against Kanye West's support for - and glowing praise of - President Trump, and how it has unleashed myriad vile attacks against Kanye for his thought crimes -- attacks which include insults using Kanye's dead mom, racist hate and accusations of mental illness.

The Huffington Post's resort to implications of psychological deficiency in non-mask wearers is, therefore, very typical of the Left’s faithful devotion to socialist-style “psychiatric” disposal of political dissidents. To mark this ugly development, Frontpage has deemed it important to run Jamie Glazov’s article, The Democrats’ Soviet Insane Asylum for Trump, from our July 7, 2017 issue. The piece reveals how the Left consistently uses the Soviet tactic of smearing political dissidents as “insane” against Trump - for his crime of daring to violate the Left’s One-Party Line. The piece clearly exposes how the insane asylum that the Left is building for the president and for his supporters is the same one that it’s now constructing for American non-mask wearers. Without doubt, the Left continues its undying devotion to the Soviet Evil Empire, not only to its ruthless fascistic political goals, but also to its monstrous methods to attain them.  

The former Soviet Union possessed many imaginative mechanisms to deal with the problem of enemies of the people who obstructed the path to socialist utopia – now known as “social justice.” One of those mechanisms was the practice of confining individuals who were thinking the wrong thoughts to insane asylums. Indeed, if you caused any trouble for the commissars, a good inoculation of neuroleptics (powerful drugs used to “quiet” the symptoms of schizophrenia), forcibly administered through a tube in the nose, could do wonders in bringing your politically incorrect behavior to a halt.

Dissidents such as Valeriya Novodvorskaya, Natalya Gorbanevskaya, Pyotr Grigorenko, Vladimir Bukovsky, Alexander Esenin-Volpin and Joseph Brodsky were all among the brave freedom-fighters who bore the brunt of the Soviet practice of institutionalizing dissidents in mental hospitals and force-feeding them mind-shattering drugs. Novodvorskaya was confined in the prison psychiatric hospital in Kazan for her dissident activites - and she described her harrowing experience in this hospital in her collection of writings, Po Tu Storonu Otchayaniya (Beyond Despair). Gorbanevskaya was committed to a psychiatric hospital for attending the 1968 Red Square demonstration against the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. Grigorenko suffered the same fate for criticizing the Khrushchev regime. Bukovsky was confined to a psychiatric hospital for “anti-Soviet agitation.” Brodksy was sent to mental hospitals for not writing the right kind of poetry; his treatments involved “tranquilizing” injections, sleep deprivation and forced freezing baths. Esenin-Volpin was institutionalized in the Leningrad Special Psychiatric Hospital for his anti-Soviet thoughts.

Today’s progressive Democrats are also faithfully journeying on an uplifting odyssey. Horrified by Trump’s opposition to Obama’s “fundamental transformations,” they have found their own neuroleptics in the form of the 25th Amendment and a bill seeking to impeach the president for being mentally unsound. Indeed, Trump has to be mentally deranged and unfit for office, because what other reason could possibly explain his frightening disagreement with the Left’s un-American creed of identity politics – race and gender uber alles? What other factor could possibly be at play in his embrace of individual freedom and responsibility – and in his rejection of group privileges and racial/gender hierarchies that, as David Horowitz has noted, can only be manifested after America’s Constitution is null and void?

Confronted by Trump’s shocking blasphemy against their anointed plan, several Democrats, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), have now signed onto a bill that seeks to remove Trump by invoking 25th Amendment powers. The bill cites section 4 of the amendment, created in 1967 after JFK’s assassination, that allows for an independent body to remove the president based on the determination that he has been mentally or physically incapacitated to carry out his duties. Raskin’s initiative would activate a probe into whether Trump has been too far “incapacitated” to continue as president.

This effort is, actually, even sicker than the Soviet practice, since the amendment does not refer to psychiatric problems, but to actual incapacitation through assassination or stroke.

Raskin claims he is concerned that “something is seriously wrong” with Trump, citing a “sustained pattern of behavior” and several “errant and seemingly deranged tweets,” which he believes are damaging to U.S. interests. But to anyone who hasn’t drunk the progressive Kool-Aid, it is obvious that Trump’s sustained pattern of behavior is not damaging U.S. interests. Instead, it is unhinging his political enemies and damaging the progressive assault on America’s social contract. Trump’s tweets do not warn, for example, that the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam (an Obama meme) or that you can keep your doctor if you like him. They are singing the praises of America and calling out a corrupt media for its brazen lies and political partisanship.

The only reasonable observation in Raskin’s statements is that (to people like him): “it certainly doesn’t feel like the ship is on an even course right now.”

Consequently, the Democrats are now trying to steer the ship back into progressive waters. They are doing so by applying the lessons of the Soviet secret police – in quashing those who disagree with them like Andrei Sakharov. Sakharov refused to toe the Soviet party line and be politically correct; therefore, like Trump, he was also obviously mentally ill. That’s why the Soviet authorities had to confine him in a closed ward of the Semashko Hospital in Gorky, where he was force-fed and given drugs to alter and enlighten his state of mind.

And now enter the new self-appointed social redeemers of our time: the progressive Democrats who are consumed with ferocious rage as they watch the horror show of an American president strengthening America and abandoning the enlightened course on which Obama’s ship sailed. There is no secret about what the true yearnings of the Raskin Gang are, but absent a totalitarian state to back them up, they are bound to fail.

Jamie Glazov holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is the editor of Frontpagemag.com, the author of the critically-acclaimed, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror, and the host of the web-tv show, The Glazov Gang. His new book is Jihadist Psychopath: How He is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us. Visit his site at JamieGlazov.com, follow him on Twitter: @JamieGlazov, and reach him at jamieglazov11@gmail.com.