WORKING GROUP ESTABLISHED TO ADDRESS INTENSIFYING THREAT FROM COMMUNIST CHINA

BY F. RIEHL

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2020/07/working-group-established-to-address-intensifying-threat-from-communist-china/#axzz6TUW3wkmm;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Acting Secretary Wolf Establishes China Working Group to Address Intensifying Threat

WASHINGTON – -(AmmoLand.com)- Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad F. Wolf recently hosted the inaugural meeting of the Department’s China Working Group. The Group’s purpose is to holistically articulate, prioritize, and coordinate the Department’s response to evolving threats to the Homeland posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

“The Chinese threat is intensifying at an alarming rate through CCP’s malign activity in the trade, cybersecurity, immigration, and intellectual property domains,” said Acting Secretary Wolf.

“Consistent with President Trump’s leadership and direction, DHS is at the forefront of combating these threats to the Homeland and our way of life. The Department’s role in curbing China’s malign activity has never been more important nor timely. DHS’s newly-established China Working Group will prioritize, coordinate, and articulate decisive near- and long-term actions commensurate with the threat we face.”

The Working Group will cement the Department’s already critical role of working on the frontlines to protect the Homeland from CCP’s systematic campaign to undermine our economic prosperity, national security, and fundamental freedoms. Recent Department actions have included:

  • Working with industry and State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial governments to combat CCP disinformation campaigns or broader efforts to distort our country’s public discourse and undermine confidence in our democratic processes.
  • Targeting illicit Chinese manufacturers who have exploited the pandemic—which originated in China and spread through CCP malfeasance—by producing and disseminating fraudulent or prohibited COVID-19 PPE and medical supplies to the United States. This has resulted in the seizure of over 1,000,000 FDA-prohibited COVID-19 test-kits and 750,000 counterfeit masks.
  • Leveraging the President’s May 29th Proclamation to deny entry to high-risk “graduate students” (F and J visas) whose purpose is stealing our intellectual property to advance Beijing’s economic and national security interests.
  • Reinforcing global norms (human rights, free and fair trade) by withholding from market goods forcibly produced by the more than 1 million Uyghurs (and other Muslim minorities in the
  • Xinjiang Province) CCP has interned in concentration camps.
  • Leveraging technology and innovation to target and interdict illicit fentanyl (and other synthetic substances originating in China) before it reaches our communities and claims more American lives.Department of Homeland Security
  • Working with others in the U.S. government and in the industry to protect our information and communications technology infrastructure from CCP malign activities (IPR theft, data collection, etc.)
  • Leveraging foreign investment oversight, including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and the interagency body formerly known as Team Telecom, to curb CCP’s attempts to exploit our free-market by exerting influence through corporate channels to undermine our economic competitiveness.
 

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE DENOUNCED AS “SYSTEMICALLY RACIST” AT EVANGELICAL CONFERENCE

SEE: https://www.wayoflife.org/reports/declaration_of_independence_denounced.php;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

 

The following is reprinted from The Stream, June 5, 2016, and it is more relevant today than ever. The author, Mark Tooley, is a conservative Methodist and president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD). It is a brilliant and important rebuttal of Leftist mythology about American history.

_____________

Last evening Native American activist Mark Charles, as the opening plenary speaker at the evangelical Justice Conference in Chicago [‘Let Justice Roll,’ June 3-4, 2016], denounced the Declaration of Independence as “systemically racist.” The Justice Conference tweeted this comment, to which I responded, leading to other retweets, and resulting in deletion of the original tweet, presumably to avoid further controversy. Charles apparently also denounced the Constitution as racist and told his audience: “Everything you own is stolen.”

According to my colleague Chelsen Vicari, who’s attending the Justice Conference, the crowd of mostly young evangelicals liked Charles’ comments, and subsequent speakers approvingly referenced them. Mark Reddy, the event’s executive director, spoke after Charles to encourage everyone to “sit in it,” be uncomfortable and “not allow yourselves to get offended” by what we heard.

Well, I’m offended, and anyone of any religion who cares about history, human rights and the uplift of humanity should be too. The Justice Conference is sponsored by World Relief, the global humanitarian arm of National Association of Evangelicals. Charles is an increasingly popular speaker at events for mostly white, upper middle class, highly educated urban evangelicals who evidently feel empowered and sophisticated by Charles’ guilt trip.

If Charles wants to provide a scholarly overview of centuries of injustices against American Indians, he could thoughtfully do so without smugly denouncing the whole American project as a wicked sham. The Declaration of Independence and its historically revolutionary affirmation of human equality have uplifted and inspired hundreds of millions of people globally of all races and ethnicities. Indeed, thanks a great deal to the Declaration and its startling claim, there are few regimes or ideologies today in the world that don’t at least pay insincere lip service to human equality. That claim is rooted in the ethical system and anthropology of Judaism and Christianity, asserting that all humans are of equal value before God, and that all societies seeking justice will recognize legal equality for all people.

There are many thousands of human rights advocates who have been persecuted, jailed, tortured and killed, across decades and around the world, continuing even today, because of their direct fidelity to the Declaration and its ideals. Heroic dissidents in Cuba, China, Vietnam, Sudan, or countless other places, would decidedly not share Charles’ disdain for America’s founding document. Nor did human rights crusaders like Frederick Douglas, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela or Mother Teresa.

As an escaped slave and fearless abolitionist, here’s what Douglas said:

I have said that the Declaration of Independence is the ring-bolt to the chain of your nation’s destiny; so, indeed, I regard it. The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles. Stand by those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.

Here’s MLK in his “I Have a Dream” speech: “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

The high point of his peroration quoted the Declaration: “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.’”

Here’s Nelson Mandela, recently released from prison after decades of resistance to Apartheid, addressing the U.S. Congress: “We could not have made an acquaintance through literature with human giants such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson and not been moved to act, as they were moved to act. We could not have heard of and admired John Brown, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, W. E. B. Du Bois, Marcus Garvey, Martin Luther King Jr. and others. We could not have heard of these and not be moved to act as they were moved to act. We could not have known of your Declaration of Independence and not elected to join in the struggle to guarantee the people’s life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” ...

The writers of the Declaration of Independence were, like all of us, sinners and hypocrites. They didn’t fully live up to their own ideals, and neither does anyone. But their courage and insight, likely far superior to anybody among us alive today, enriched all humanity.

Charles challenges the Declaration’s brief reference to “merciless savages” whom the Americans complained the British crown supported in alliance against the colonies. How does Charles propose to describe the 18th century style of Indian warfare that unashamedly kidnapped, tortured and mutilated men, women and children indiscriminately, comparable to if not worse than ISIS today? My own Scots-Irish ancestors, having escaped hardships in Belfast, and living on the Virginia frontier in the 1700s, were attacked one day by warriors from distant Ohio. He was left for dead, she was kidnapped with her baby, her eye knocked out by one warrior, her crying baby repeatedly threatened with death. Mother and child were captive in Ohio until rescued months later. They got off easy compared to many others.

The Justice Conference is devoted especially to advocating for immigrants. The main victims of Indian attacks in the 1700s weren’t the established rich on the east coast but working class recent immigrant families like my ancestors who couldn’t afford to live in safer lands. Charles could correctly critique savagery in European and American warfare, but he should not minimize Indian savagery. The pagan tribes, like pagan cultures everywhere, from which we all ultimately descend, had their own rough ideas of honor and justice that are rightly abhorrent to nearly everyone today. Values descending from the Ten Commandments and Sermon on the Mount, as expressed in the Declaration’s assertion of human equality, however unevenly upheld, should seem infinitely preferable, especially at evangelical conferences.

As to Charles’ dark claim that “Everything you own is stolen,” alas, it is true everywhere among fallen humanity in some sense, and was true in America long before Europeans arrived. When the first English came to Virginia, the Powhatan Confederacy, founded by the great chief who was father to Pocahontas, had conquered, dispossessed and wiped out dozens of competing tribes while establishing his own vast empire. Even more than Europe at the time, pre-European America was a churning cauldron of tribal warfare, shifting alliances, conquests, genocides and constantly fluid boundaries. Today’s America, where millions from many races and ethnicities, constantly joined by arriving new immigrants, live in relative peace and equality, seems vastly preferable to the supposed Arcadia of ancient, constant tribal warfare.

If a Mark Charles of the early 1600s had sought to critique the conquests and rapaciousness of the Powhatan Confederacy, perhaps on a religious speaking circuit across the Virginia tidewater, the old Chief likely would have impatiently had obliging warriors bash the dissident’s head against a rock. Mercifully, thanks to the Declaration and Constitution, every American can speak his or her mind freely, whether wisely or not, to any receptive audience.

But I hope Mark Charles and his various evangelical hosts will consider a broader, less myopic perspective. It should be based not on the fashionable, reflexively anti-Western biases of secular academia, so rich in grievance, but instead on a realistic and generous Christian understanding that all humanity is sinful, with honesty about all our depravities, every culture’s, past and present. And it should also be grateful for our countless, incomparable blessings of today, with appreciation, not just contempt, for past generations who, by divine grace, helped make today possible.

— Author: Mark Tooley, Reprinted from The Stream, June 5, 2016

TWITTER CENSORS TRUMP BY COMPLETELY REMOVING HIS TWEET FOR FIRST TIME

Twitter has completely removed President Trump’s (3) tweets, while it previously stuck to placing notices meant to debunk the president’s claims

BY NATIONAL FILE

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/twitter-censors-trump-by-completely-removing-his-tweet-for-first-time/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Monday night, as President Donald Trump began posting about the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 following a viral video of a doctor touting its ability to not only treat but prevent the disease, Twitter removed at least three of the president’s tweets, leaving no trace of what the president wrote on the social media platform.

Tensions between the big tech website and President Trump appear to have reached a new height, as the platform has now censored several posts by President Trump that appear to have promoted the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19.

The president began sharing articles and tweets promoting the use of hydroxychloroquine after a viral video of frontline doctors revealing their experiences treating COVID-19 in the field.

Google Whistleblower Greg Coppola joins The Alex Jones Show to break down how big tech censorship will bring about the new renaissance as he launches a new social network at https://revelations.live/

In place of President Trump’s tweets is a message from the platform that reads “This tweet is no longer available.”

Twitter Censors Trump Removes Tweets 1

Twitter includes a hyperlink that explains the various notices users may see on Twitter, explaining they could stem from a user deleting the tweet, Twitter deleting the tweet, or a series of other possibilities.

However, at time of publication, none of the messages Twitter identifies correspond to the message currently in place of President Trump’s censored tweets.

In the past, Twitter has occasionally removed copyrighted content posted to the president’s Twitter account, and has recently started placing notices under President Trump’s tweets that have linked to media outlets critical of the president.

President Trump has repeatedly sparred with the president throughout 2020. In May, the president signed an executive order targeting the liability immunities afforded to social media companies by the Communication Decency Act of 1996.

The legislation affords social media platforms immunity from libel written on the website by users in exchange for maintaining a neutral platform. President Trump has threatened to officially strip this immunity from Facebook, Twitter, and Google, arguing that the big tech companies have engaged in political censorship of conservatives.

 

HOUSE PASSES BILL REPEALING ALL OF TRUMP’S TRAVEL BANS & PREVENTING FUTURE PRESIDENTS FROM ENACTING SIMILAR BANS

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/07/house-passes-bill-repealing-all-of-trumps-travel-bans-and-preventing-future-presidents-from-enacting-similar-bans;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

This is insane: “the No Ban Act would repeal all of Trump’s travel bans and would prevent future presidents from enacting similar broad bans based on national origin.”

So future Presidents would not even be able to ban people entering the United States from a country with which the U.S. was at war.

Note also that this bill is an attempt to end the “Muslim ban,” which does not exist. What does exist is a ban on immigration from several countries, most but by no means all of which are Muslim, that cannot or will not provide accurate information about prospective immigrants. The list of countries was devised during the Obama administration, while Biden was Vice President. Most Muslim countries have no such restrictions. To characterize this, as the hopelessly compromised Judy Chu does here, as “driven by prejudice,” is irrational and dangerous, as it casts a legitimate national security measure as hateful, a line of argumentation that would ultimately make it impossible for the United States to do anything to defend itself at all.

The suicidal, anti-American Left becomes more open about its priorities and intentions by the day.

“Trump accuses Democrats of going ‘Stone Cold Left — Venezuela on steroids!,'” by Marisa Schultz, Fox News, July 25, 2020:

President Trump Saturday lashed out at House Democrats who this week passed a repeal of his travel ban, claiming the party has gone “Stone Cold Left.”

In a morning tweet, Trump said his travel ban that initially targeted predominantly Muslim-majority countries and was expanded after court challenges was a “big win” and “successfully keeps very bad and dangerous people out of our great country.”

“The Dems have gone Stone Cold Left — Venezuela on steroids!” Trump tweeted.

The House Wednesday passed “The No Ban Act” on a mainly party-line vote of 233-183. Two Republicans — Reps. Will Hurd of Texas and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania — joined with Democrats.

The legislation was hailed as a long-awaited victory for Muslim Americans and civil rights groups who had been protesting Trump’s travel ban since 2017.

But the victory was expected to be short-lived. The Senate has no plans to take it up, and Trump would surely veto the check on his authority. Trump said Saturday the legislation “hopefully, will be DEAD in the Senate!”…

The No Ban Act would repeal all of Trump’s travel bans and would prevent future presidents from enacting similar broad bans based on national origin….

“This ban never had anything to do with national security; it was always driven by prejudice,” said bill sponsor Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif….

“This is not a Muslim ban,” said Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz. “This is a legitimate travel restriction implemented for the safety of this nation.”

 

MASK NAZI: WOMAN MACES COUPLE FOR NOT WEARING MASKS WHILE EATING

Brainwashed leftist becomes jackbooted enforcer for unconstitutional mask mandates

BY JAMIE WHITE

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/mask-nazi-woman-maces-couple-for-not-wearing-masks-while-eating/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A couple having lunch at a dog park found themselves on the receiving end of pepper spray after an irate woman noticed they weren’t wearing face masks while they were eating their food.

Ash O’Brien and husband Jarett Kelley had stopped for lunch with their pug at the Dusty Rhodes dog park in San Diego on Thursday when a “random old lady” confronted them and called them “idiots” for not wearing masks while eating.

When O’Brien told the woman to leave the park and stop harassing her, the woman whipped out a can of pepper spray and unleashed it on the couple.

A bystander’s video footage shows the aftermath of Kelley trying to wrestle the can away from the lunatic woman before catching a dose of spray in his face.

“Are you kidding me? You just maced him and their food because you disagree!” the bystander yelled at the assailant. “What’s wrong with you, lady?”

O’Brien can be heard crying as the woman walks away with her dogs.

O’Brien shared the video with an accompanying statement demanding justice for the senseless assault, adding she’s intent on pressing charges.

“So this happened today at Dusty Rhodes dog park today in ocean beach. This is my husband getting maced by a random old lady. We had our 3 month old pug with us. We were just sitting down eating lunch and minding our own business. We were not wearing masks because we were eating. You can’t wear a mask and eat at the same time. She kept calling us idiots and flipping me off,” O’Brien wrote.

“Then she started saying more stuff and I told her to leave the park and stop harassing us. She then came right up to our table wear we were eating, pointed the mace at me first and got a little on me, and then my husband stepped in and took the entire can. Thank god for the bystander that took this video because we are going to the police now to press charges. I am sharing this because people need to watch out for this lady in San Diego. Please share to spread awareness. That is me crying hysterically in the background because my innocent husband just got maced for no reason. We want justice.”

California’s coronavirus guidelines on masks specifically mention eating and drinking as being one of the few instances where not wearing masks is acceptable. Otherwise, it’s punishable by up to $1000 fine.

But nowhere in the state’s guidelines does it say that civilians can use non-lethal weapons to enforce this policy on the public, especially given some police are already strongly enforcing it across the country.

This is just another example of the rise of the “mask nazis” who go to extreme lengths to enforce a medically-ambiguous mask measure.

 

CALIFORNIA: “MASS RESISTANCE” CONFRONTS BLM RALLY OUTSIDE HIGH SCHOOL

Grooming kids to help push agenda into local school system.

BLM’s race-baiting message to students and LGBT advocacy becoming a nationwide problem.

Local police defended MassResistance when BLM tried to ban us from area.

SEE: https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen4/20c/CA-El-Segundo-BLM-rally_070520/index.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
July 27, 2020
ALT TEXT
These are the messages that Black Lives Matters wants to bring into America's schools.

Even though school’s not in session, most people don’t realize that Black Lives Matter (BLM) is working hard in cities across America to push its radical agenda into the public schools. Left-wing teachers and administrators are opening the doors to them. Local students are being coached to propagandize the message to others.

But MassResistance is already confronting it! Earlier this month, that’s exactly what happened in one California city.

Black Lives Matter purports to be a “civil rights” group. But as their website and their public actions reveal, it is actually a heavily Marxist, anti-American, anti-family organization that has a sickening record of violence against police and others who disagree with them. It is heavily intertwined with the radical LGBT movement. It does not actually support “black lives” in any substantive manner. The public schools are the last place BLM should have any influence.

Last month, parents in El Segundo, CA, were alarmed to find out that a “Students for Change” rally – to be held across the street from the high school with high school and middle school students participating – was being promoted on social media. It was hosted by Black Lives Matter, and included the high school’s “LGBTQ Club.”

ESUS is "El Segundo Unified School District" - all the schools in the city.

What was the message that this radical group was bringing the kids of El Segundo? Would there be any counter information from our side?

After last month’s successful MassResistance counter-rally in El Segundo against BLM, local people were emboldened. A group of ten MassResistance parents, along with MassResistance National Organization Director Arthur Schaper, decided to go to this event, to find out what they were doing, and be heard!

ALT TEXT 
With El Segundo High School in the background, MassResistance parents come to the BLM rally.

The event included about 50 BLM activists. As in most BLM events, almost all of them were white adults, many holding anti-American and other combative signs. (There was a higher percentage of blacks among the MassResistance parents than in the BLM group!) There were also two police officers present.

ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT 
Students (at right, near bench) address the BLM activists.

It became clear that the purpose was to bring in some local students who had already been taught BLM’s class warfare ideology. They would speak to the rally about what they would be doing to promote this in their schools, and especially among other students. The local BLM leaders were also there with their own speeches –expounding upon the “urgent” need to “reform” the local school policies and curricula.

ALT TEXT 
Note the clenched fist. The message seems to be that regular American History in the schools needs to be replaced.
ALT TEXT 
These people are very serious: Indoctrinating children now fuels the future of their radical movement.

Stirring up trouble!

It seemed a perfect day for propaganda – until MassResistance showed up!

Before the speeches began, Arthur and the some of his allies went into the BLM crowd to ask them – quite politely – about what their signs meant, what their political goals were, and what they were doing to help “black lives.” In other words, they tried to engage in some dialogue.

But instead, the BLM activists became angry and cursed in the most foul and disgusting manner. They had no interest in any reasoned conversation on the issues. The people holding signs couldn’t really explain what the signs meant. Legitimate questions just made them angrier.

These are people who thrive on intimidating others and forcing public officials to implement their bizarre ideas. But a few MassResistance activists pressing them with questions derailed the activists. Clearly, their movement isn’t driven by substantive ideas, but by emotion – and a hatred of normal society.

ALT TEXT 
This man came up to Arthur and screamed an uncontrollable rant of profanity (it seemed every other word was f***.) and veiled threats. These are the people who want to influence your children in the schools.
ALT TEXT 
Arthur politely asked the woman holding the sign what it meant. She ddn't seem to know. Instead she screamed that he was an a**-h*** and walked away.

Trying to stop MassResistance

Before long, the BLM leader approached Arthur. He said that Arthur and his friends had no right to “question our speakers.” He said that the law says that Arthur and the others must separate themselves from the rally participants. He said that he had lawyers there who would get involved if Arthur didn’t immediately comply.

ALT TEXT 
The BLM leader got in Arthur's face and ordered him to leave, threatening legal action. Arthur stood his ground.

Arthur told him, “There is no such law. I can be wherever I want and talk to whomever I please. Go ahead and get your lawyers.” The BLM leader called the police over. The police agreed with Arthur. So the BLM leader stomped away, back into the crowd.

At one point the BLM people started blocking Arthur’s camera when he was taking photos – and the police intervened and told them to quit it.

ALT TEXT 
Trying to block the MassResistance cameraman, until the police intervened.
ALT TEXT 
The police officers knew that we were going to defend our rights, and were very reasonable.

The speeches

It’s not an exaggeration to say that the speeches were largely incoherent statements about the “systemic” racism, homophobia, and transphobia in El Segundo – a bizarre twist on the traditional Marxist class struggle rhetoric. In particular, the schools are full of people who “are addicted to bigotry and racism.” They did not try to contain their hatred of American society.

Several high school and middle school students gave speeches. About half of them said they were “LGBTQ.” They whined about racism, “classism,” “transphobia,” or “homophobia” that kept them all from being “who they really are.”

One middle school girl talked about how she “identifies” as a boy. Another girl talked about how she is a bisexual. This brought applause from the BLM audience.

One black middle school boy told the crowd that because of the white majority in El Segundo, he used to think of himself as white and would laugh at jokes made against black people, then he realized that he was “black only in skin color” and “white in every way but skin color.” It fits right in with the BLM talking points.

One white girl said that the “systematic racism” in El Segundo was so bad that it is now “the fifth most racist city in California.” (Arthur asked where she got that statistic, but she refused to answer.) A lot of macroaggressions every day at school, she said. And they droned on and on.

The only thing that can fix all these terrible social problems, the students agreed, is the cultural cleansing that the BLM demands the schools undertake.

ALT TEXT 
Does this mean that anyone who doesn't mouth the BLM mantra will meet with violence? It seems that way.

At the end, the BLM leaders gave their own speeches, which were mostly more race-baiting nonsense, including such gems as “Suppose a group was laughing at your race – starting in elementary school?” It would have been laughable if these people weren’t so deadly serious.

 

ALT TEXT 
Just in case the BLM activists forgot their lines, they brought their handbook with them!

A dialogue on race?

A theme repeated by a number of the students in the rally was: “It’s time to start having those hard conversations about race, sexuality, and systemic racism.” And we definitely want to do that! So at the end of the event, Arthur and a few other MassResistance activists engaged in spirited discussions with some of the students. Some of them took up Arthur’s challenge to have those “hard conversations.”

ALT TEXT 
These three MassResistance parents weren't afraid to exchange some ideas with BLM.

But before long one of the BLM leaders came up to the students to escort them away. She seemed worried that some of them might start thinking for themselves and stop believing the BLM talking points! One of the students walked back to our activists and continued the discussion! A victory for our side? In some ways it’s BLM’s biggest nightmare!

ALT TEXT 
Note the shirt's message: Make America Constitutional Again." This seemed to really upset the BLM bullies.

Final Reflection

BLM’s targeting of the public schools is very aggressive and must be taken seriously. It uses civil rights as a Trojan horse for its radical agenda. Its connection with the LGBT movement is not coincidental.

Black Lives Matter is largely run by angry white people whose hatred of society (and anyone who disagrees with them) seems sociopathic. They behave like classic bullies. They thrive on intimidating and attacking people, especially in a crude and vulgar manner.

But they are weak and cowardly when confronted. Pro-family people must stand up to them.

And in this case, the El Segundo police were extremely accommodating to MassResistance. They had seen us in action about ten days earlier when we stood up to Black Lives Matter – and were also not afraid to stand our ground to the police when we were in the right. They clearly respected that. When they saw Arthur this time, the first thing the police officer said to him was, “Nice to see you again, sir. How was your Fourth?” And they stood by him against the BLM thugs.

Pro-family people need to learn from this. The “culture war” flame has been turned up a lot higher!

ALT TEXT
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!


 

ARMED MILITIAS ARE RISING UP AS LEFTIST RIOTERS BEGIN DESTROYING THEMSELVES~HUNDREDS OF BLM ANARCHISTS ARRESTED

★★★ A NEW CONSERVATIVE AGE IS RISING ★★★

Heavy-Armed MILITIAS are RISING UP as Leftist RIOTERS Begin DESTROYING THEMSELVES! In this video, we’re going to take a look at how the escalation in leftist violence is indeed causing them to self-implode, and in the process, how more and more Americans are lining up with those who want to restore law and order, and how this all guaranteeing the collapse of the far left, you’re not going to want to miss this!

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hundreds of Black Lives Matter Activists ARRESTED as Public Opinion Turns AGAINST Them

★★★ A NEW CONSERVATIVE AGE IS RISING ★★★

Hundreds of Black Lives Matter Activists ARRESTED across the nation as Public Opinion Turns Decisively AGAINST Them! In this video, we’re going to look at the hundreds, and I do mean HUNDREDS of arrests as the Trump administration is cracking down on these Democrat-ruined cities, and we’re going to see how the latest polls show that the vast majority of Americans are rejecting Black Lives Matter and their radical Marxist agenda; you’re not going to want to miss this!

THE UNCERTAIN PROMISE OF A COVID-19 VACCINE: WHAT WE’RE NOT BEING TOLD

With the prospects of a second wave of infection later in the years, many are holding out for the promise of a COVID-19 vaccine. The promise being offered by the World Health Organization, governments, vaccine developers and funders like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is that a vaccine will eliminate the danger of the virus and release us from lockdowns, social distancing and other measures that have created the biggest disruption to human life and economies seen for over 70 years. But the process of developing safe and vaccines using technologies that have never been used on a large scale, and doing this under an unprecedented warp speed time-frame, is far from straightforward.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bill Gates Confronted About Widespread Vaccine Side Effects

Bill Gates Confronted About Widespread Vaccine Side Effects

At least 80% of trial subjects reportedly suffering side effects

BY PATRICK HOWLEY-NATIONAL FILE

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-confronted-about-widespread-vaccine-side-effects/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Vaccine oligarch Bill Gates expressed apathy in a CBS interview about the fact that his Moderna Coronavirus vaccine, which National Institutes of Health (NIH) has a financial stake in, is testing horribly in vaccine trials, with at least 80 percent of trial subjects reportedly suffering side effects.

This news comes on the heels of a major protest in Africa against the vaccine being tested on black people on the continent. Military insurer Tricare admitted that it wrongly told more than 600,000 U.S. military members that they had the virus.

Hospitals in Florida are showing massive problems with testing accuracy, with Orlando Health admitting that its 98 percent positive rate was actually 9.4 percent.

The CDC admitted that it is mixing antibody and viral test results to derive its case numbers and you can test positive on an antibody test if you have antibodies from a family of viruses that cause the common cold. Here is Gates responding to vaccine side effects:

No wonder people in Africa are protesting the vaccine tests.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) own a financial stake in the Bill Gates-funded Moderna Coronavirus vaccine, raising big questions about the supposed impartiality of the federal government’s policy decisions during the Coronavirus outbreak. NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci, a financial ally of Bill Gates whose institute is part of NIH, has been critical of Hydroxychloroquine and the FBI even raided a health spa serving intravenous vitamin C, which are competitors to a vaccine.

“We do have some particular stake in the intellectual property” for the Moderna vaccine stated Francis Collins, the director of NIH, in a revelatory recent Economic Club panel discussion. “One of the vaccines– the one that’s furthest along– what started, actually, at the federal government in our own Vaccine Research Center at NIH– then worked with a biotechnology company called Moderna to get to where we are now, with very impressive Phase I results and getting ready to go into a large-scale trial as early as July. That one, of course, we do have some particular stake in the intellectual property. Others, though, come from companies who’ve invested their efforts into getting them to the point where they might now be ready for a trial,” Collins stated.

Newly published documents from Public Citizen have massive implications. Public Citizen states:

“The U.S. government may jointly own a potential coronavirus vaccine. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has played a critical role in coronavirus research for years. Building off this work, federal scientists have helped design and test mRNA-1273—a vaccine candidate developed in partnership with Moderna.[2] The federal government has filed multiple patents covering mRNA-1273. In this report, we describe two patent applications that list federal scientists as co-inventors.[3] If the government successfully pursued its patent filings, the resulting patents would likely confer significant rights. We also review recently disclosed contracts between NIH and Moderna. The agreements suggest that NIH has not transferred its rights, but instead maintains a joint stake.”

Eight members of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) expert COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel disclosed recent financial relationships with Gilead, the drugmaker that is introducing an expensive Coronavirus competitor to Hydroxychloroquine, the inexpensive anti-malarial drug that President Trump has promoted which many people claim has helped them. This financial relationship between NIH experts and Gilead is especially concerning in light of revelations that NIH has a financial stake in the Bill Gates-funded Moderna vaccine, another competitor to Hydroxychloroquine. Chloroquine critic Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, which funded the Bat Coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology believed to be the source of the outbreak, is part of NIH.

HERE IS THE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE LIST FOR THE NIH EXPERT CORONAVIRUS TREATMENT PANEL. The experts with disclosed ties to Gilead include consultants, people who provided Gilead research support, and honoraria. Members of the panel also disclosed ties to Merck and INOVIO Pharmaceuticals, which took $9 million from a Gates-backed company to develop a Coronavirus vaccine.

Gilead is driving up their prices from what was previously expected (as the company has done in the past, sparking bipartisan condemnation from Senators Grassley and Wyden). No wonder, then, VA study.

President Donald Trump is now officially vindicated with facts on his support for the anti-malarial drug Hydroxychloroquine.

“What we’re finding clinically with our patients is that it really only works in conjunction with Zinc,” stated Los Angeles emergency room specialist Dr. Anthony Cardillo. “So the hydroxychloroquine opens a zinc channel, zinc goes into the cell, it then blocks the replication of the cellular machinery….Every patient I’ve prescribed it to has been very very ill and within 8 to 12 hours they were basically symptom free.”

Bill Gates Is Already Looking Forward to The ‘Next’ Pandemic

Fauci Does Not Bother To Wear A Mask In Public, As Evidenced By His Pitiful First-Pitch Showing At Baseball’s Opening Day.

Fauci Also Took Off His Mask After He Testified In A Washington Hearing

Why did the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation fund research at MIT on how to implant people’s vaccination history under their skin? Why did Fauci meet with Bill Gates’ father, George Soros, and other globalist heavyweights all the way back in 2001? Why did the Stephen King-created television series The Dead Zone predict the Coronavirus outbreak — and a Chloroquine cure for it — back in 2003?

Why did Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID fund the Coronavirus bat research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which President Trump and Secretary of State Pompeo and others have identified as the source of the worldwide outbreak?

HERE’S THE REAL STORY OF CONTACT TRACING


Alex Jones breaks down why people are receiving a positive COVID-19 diagnosis without being tested.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

A Grade 3 Vaccine-Related Adverse Event is Serious 

BY MARCO CACERES

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/07/a-grade-3-vaccine-related-adverse-event-is-serious/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

When Moderna, Inc. announced on May 18, 2020 the results of a Phase I human clinical trial for its experimental mRNA-1273 vaccine for COVID-19, the biotechnology company said the vaccine had produced no “serious adverse events” (SAEs) among the 45 people who participated in the trial and that it considered the vaccine to be “generally safe” and “well-tolerated.” Moderna acknowledged that four (nine percent) of the trial participants suffered Grade 3 adverse events to its vaccine.1 2 3 4 5

In its report (published in The Lancet on May 22) on the results of a Phase I human clinical trial for its experimental Ad5-nCoV for COVID-19, CanSino Biologics, Inc. said it had noted no “serious adverse event” among the 108 trial participants. The Chinese biotech company, working in partnership with China’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences’ Institute of Biotechnology, acknowledged that 10 (nine percent) of the participants suffered Grade 3 adverse events to its vaccine.6 7 8

On July 20, Pfizer, Inc. and Germany’s BioNTech SE announced the results of their Phase I/II human clinical trial for their jointly-developed experimental BNT162b1 vaccine for COVID-19. The companies reported “no serious adverse events” among its 45 trial participants, although they did acknowledge that two (four percent) of the participants suffered Grade 3 adverse events to their vaccine.9 10 11 12

Almost 1 in 10 COVID-19 Trial Participants Suffered Serious Reactions

A total of 198 healthy people participated in the Moderna, CanSino Biologics and Pfizer/BioNTech Phase I and Phase I/II clinical trials. The companies said no serious adverse events were experienced during the trials, and yet they acknowledged a total of 16 Grade 3 adverse events? How is that possible, given that a Grade 3 adverse event is defined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as, “severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care” such as “bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications”?13

In other words, a Grade 3 adverse event is serious. It is only one grade removed from “life-threatening” (Grade 4) and just two grades from “death” (Grade 5).13 Of the 198 participants in the Moderna, CanSino Biologics and Pfizer/BioNTech clinical trials, 16 (eight percent) of them suffered serious adverse events. Imagine if those vaccines had been given to 100 million people, which could have resulted in some 8 million serious adverse events and many questions about potential long-term adverse health outcomes

Of the 198 participants in the Moderna, CanSino Biologics and Pfizer/BioNTech clinical trials, 16 (eight percent) of them suffered serious adverse events. Imagine if those vaccines had been given to 100 million people.

AstraZeneca and University of Oxford Report Zero Serious Adverse Events in Clinical Trial for Their COVID-19 Vaccine

Most recently, the University of Oxford and British-Swiss pharmaceutical firm AstraZeneca plc reported the results of a Phase I/II human clinical trial for their experimental AZD1222 vaccine (formerly known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) for COVID-19. According to the results, published in The Lancet on July 20, there were no “serious adverse events” related to the vaccine among the 1,077 trial participants.14 15

CNN headline about the Oxford/AstraZeneca clinical trial results read, “Oxford’s COVID-19 vaccine appears safe and induces immune response, early results suggest, but more research is needed.”

It appears safe?

References:

1 Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Speeds to Phase III Trial After More Positive DataClinical OMICS July 15, 2020.
2 Business Wire. Moderna Announces Publication in The New England Journal of Medicine of Interim Results From Phase 1 Study of Its mRNA Vaccine Against COVID-19 (mRNA-1273). Moderna July 14, 2020.
3 Cáceres M. Healthy Clinical Trial Subjects Suffer Grade 3 Side Effects to Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 VaccineThe Vaccine Reaction May 24, 2020.
4 Cáceres M. Volunteer Describes His Serious Reaction in Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine TrialThe Vaccine Reaction May 30, 2020.
5 Press Release. Moderna Announces Positive Interim Phase 1 Data for its mRNA Vaccine (mRNA-1273) Against Novel Coronavirus. Moderna May 18, 2020.
6 Branswell H. Early study of Covid-19 vaccine developed in China sees mixed resultsSTAT May 22, 2020.
7 Cáceres M, Fisher BL. 81 Percent of Clinical Trial Volunteers Suffer Reactions to CanSino Biologics’ COVID-19 Vaccine That Uses HEK293 Human Fetal Cell LinesThe Vaccine Reaction July 6, 2020.
8 Hou LH, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trialThe Lancet June 13, 2020; 395 (10240): 1845-1854.
9 Herper M. Covid-19 vaccine from Pfizer and BioNTech shows positive resultsSTAT July 1, 2020.
10 Mulligan MJ, et al. Phase 1/2 Study to Describe the Safety and Immunogenicity of a COVID-19 RNA Vaccine Candidate (BNT162b1) in Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age: Interim ReportmedRxXiv July 1, 2020.
11 Press Release. Pfizer and BioNTech Announce Early Positive Update from German Phase 1/2 COVID-19 Vaccine Study, Including First T Cell Response Data. Pfizer July 20, 2020.
12 TVR Staff. Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 Vaccine Causes Adverse Reactions in Over Half of Clinical Trial VolunteersThe Vaccine Reaction July 18, 2020.
13 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Nov. 27, 2017.
14 Gumbrecht J, Thomas N, Vigue D, Howard J. Oxford’s Covid-19 vaccine appears safe and induces immune response, early results suggest, but more research is neededCNN July 21, 2020.
15 Folegatti PM, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet July 20, 2020.

 
 

 

COVER-UP: NIH REMOVES 5G-CORONAVIRUS STUDY FROM WEBSITE FOLLOWING INFOWARS EXPOSE’

Cover-Up: NIH Removes 5G-Coronavirus Study From Website Following Infowars Exposé

Medical establishment scrambles to censor scientific info —

read the bombshell study for yourself here!

BY JAMIE WHITE

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/cover-up-nih-removes-5g-coronavirus-study-from-website-following-infowars-expose/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The National Institute of Health (NIH) removed a study from its website linking 5G radiation with the coronavirus after Infowars first brought attention to it.

The international study, called 5G Technology And Induction Of Coronavirus In Skin Cells, claims that 5G millimeter waves stimulate DNA in a way that causes cell nuclei to actually produce coronaviruses.

According to the Internet Archive, the NIH removed the study from their website in the afternoon of Friday July 24th, two days after Infowars first reported on it.

The July 2020 study was jointly produced by scientists from Guglielmo Marconi University, Central Michigan University and First Moscow State Medical University.

“In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells,” the study states.

“DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus.”

What’s more disturbing: that the NIH had a study on its official website claiming 5G creates coronaviruses, or the fact it was removed after becoming exposed?

Read the study the NIH doesn’t want you see below:

 



TURKEY OPENLY DECLARES COMMITMENT TO JIHAD ON NON-MUSLIMS

While statues of American heroes come toppling down, Turkey honors a mass-murdering, pedophilic slaver of history.

BY RAYMOND IBRAHIM

SEE: https://cms.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/07/turkey-openly-declares-commitment-jihad-non-raymond-ibrahim;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Raymond Ibrahim, author most recently of Sword and Scimitar, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

While monuments to heroic Americans of a former age—including abolitionists who died fighting slavery—get toppled and dishonored, a land-grabber, mass-slaver, terrorist, and pedophile—Ottoman sultan Muhammad II—was recently honored by the president of Turkey.

During his recent public address celebrating the July 10, 2020 decree to transform the Hagia Sophia, which for a millennium had functioned as Eastern Christendom’s greatest church, into a mosque, Turkish president Erdoğan repeatedly saluted Sultan Muhammad (1432-1481), also known as al-Fatih (“the Conqueror”), for violently transforming Christian Constantinople into Islamic Istanbul. 

Of the apparently intolerable decades when Hagia Sophia served as a museum (1935 to the recent decision), Erdoğan began by quoting a Turkish poet:

Hagia Sophia, O magnificent temple, do not worry: the grandchildren of Muhammad al-Fatih will overthrow all the [Christian] idols and convert you into a mosque; they will perform their ablutions with tears and prostrate; tahlils [recitations of the Islamic credo] and takbirs [cries of “Allahu akbar”] will replenish your empty domes … Your minaret balconies will light up in honor of Allah and his Prophet Muhammad. The whole world will think that Muhammad al-Fatih has resurrected.  This will be Hagia Sophia; this will be a second conquest, a new resurrection”

Erdoğan’s and much of Turkey’s adoration of and desire to emulate Muhammad al-Fatih—this, to quote Erdoğan, “happy, blessed servant of Allah,” who in fact behaved like an ISIS chieftain—should (but won’t) be cause for alarm.

Consider: Sultan Muhammad’s sole justification for conquering Constantinople was that Islam demands the subjugation of “infidels,” in this case, Christians. He had no other “grievance” than that.  In fact, when he first became sultan, he “swore by the god of their false prophet, by the prophet whose name he bore,” a bitter Christian contemporary retrospectively wrote, that “he was their friend, and would remain for the whole of his life a friend and ally of Constantinople.” Although they believed him, Muhammad was taking advantage of “the basest arts of dissimulation and deceit,” wrote Edward Gibbon. “Peace was on his lips while war was in his heart.”

During the siege of Constantinople, he regularly exhorted his followers with jihadi ideology, including by unleashing throngs of preachers crying, 

Children of Muhammad, be of good heart, for tomorrow we shall have so many Christians in our hands that we will sell them, two slaves for a ducat, and will have such riches that we will all be of gold, and from the beards of the Greeks we will make leads for our dogs, and their families will be our slaves. So be of good heart and be ready to die cheerfully for the love of our [past and present] Muhammad.

“Recall the promises of our Prophet concerning fallen warriors in the Koran,” the sultan himself exhorted: “the man who dies in combat shall be transported bodily to paradise and shall dine with Muhammad in the presence of women, handsome boys, and virgins.”

The mention of “handsome boys” was not just an accurate reference to the Koran’s promise; Muhammad was a notorious pedophile.  His enslavement and rape of Jacob Notaras—a handsome 14-year-old noble’s son in Constantinople, whom Muhammad forced into becoming his personal catamite until he escaped—was only one the most infamous. According to Gibbon, the sultan stabbed to death another Christian boy who “preferred death to infamy.”

After his conquest and desecration of the Hagia Sophia, Muhammad had the “wretched citizens of Constantinople” dragged before his men during evening festivities and “ordered many of them to be hacked to pieces, for the sake of entertainment.” The rest of the city’s population—as many as 45,000—was hauled off in chains to be sold as slaves.

This is the man whom Turkey and its president honor—including by rededicating one of Christendom’s greatest and oldest churches as a victory mosque to him.  As Erdoğan concluded his speech:

The conquest of Istanbul [Constantinople] and the conversion of the Hagia Sophia into a mosque are among the most glorious chapters of Turkish history.….The resurrection of the Hagia Sophia represents our memory full of heydays in our history, from [the battles of] Badr to Manzikert, from Nicopolis, to Gallipoli [all jihadi victories] … The resurrection of the Hagia Sophia is required by our respect and commitment to all of our ancestors, from Alp Arslan [Islamic victor of Manzikert and conqueror of Asia Minor, who massacred or enslaved tens of thousands of Christians], to Muhammad al-Fatah, to Abdulhamid [who massacred as many as 300,000 Armenians in the name of jihad between 1894-1896].  The resurrection of the Hagia Sophia … honors Muhammad al-Fatih’s spirit of conquest… Allah willing, we will continue to walk on this sacred path without pause or hesitation, until we reach our ultimate destination.

The message is clear; jihadi ideology dominates Turkey.  Hating, invading, and conquering neighboring peoples—not due to any grievances but because they are non-Muslim—with all the attending atrocities, rapes, destruction, and mass slavery is apparently the ideal, to resume once the sunset of Western power is complete.

Not, of course, that any of this stops Erdoğan from playing the victim card.  In the same speech, he said that transforming the Hagia Sophia into a mosque is not only supposed to “reignite” all Muslims, but “all the oppressed, all the wronged, downtrodden, and exploited”; moreover, the real issue that needs discussing is not his transformation of a site deemed sacred to millions of Orthodox Christians into a victory mosque but rather Western “Islamophobia” and “xenophobia.”

Sadly, because Americans are used to seeing statues of this nation’s heroes toppled—for no other reason than they were white and/or Christian, and therefore inherently evil—the significance of Erdoğan’s words and praise of Muhammad the Conqueror—who as an Asian Muslim is further immune from Western criticism, as that would be “racist”—will remain lost on them.



GLAZOV GANG: BEVELYN BEATTY SHARES WHY SHE PAINTED OVER BLM GRAFFITI IN NYC

A valiant freedom fighter unveils the war we’re in –

and why she’s on the frontlines.

[To get the whole story on the roots of the Left's malice and what lies behind its war of destruction on free societies, read Jamie Glazov’s United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror: CLICK HERE.]

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Instagram: @JamieGlazov, Parler: @JamieGlazov and Twitter: @JamieGlazov.

This new episode of The Glazov Gang features Bevelyn Beatty, a Christian evangelist who is co-Founder of atwellministries.org.

Bevelyn explains Why I Painted Over BLM Graffiti in NYC, revealing the war we’re in – and why she’s on the frontlines.

Don’t miss it!