Parler Sues Amazon Seeking to Reverse ‘Death Blow’

BY TYLER O'NEIL

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/01/11/breaking-parler-sues-amazon-asks-court-to-reverse-illegal-death-blow-n1331525;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Monday, Parler filed a lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the company of breaching its contract and violating a century-old antitrust law by promoting Twitter at its competitor’s expense. Amazon had removed Parler from its servers on Monday morning, claiming the conservative social media platform refused to remove posts advocating violence at the Capitol riots last Wednesday.

Due to Amazon’s removal, “Parler will be offline for a financially devastating period,” the lawsuit claims. It alleges that Amazon applied a double standard, breaking its contract with Parler over a small number of posts while preserving its ties with Twitter, where threats of violence reached into the thousands on Friday.

Amazon acted just as conservatives were flocking from Twitter to Parler, following Twitter’s ban of President Donald Trump’s accounts.

“Given the context of Parler’s looming threat to Twitter and the fact that the Twitter ban might not long muzzle the President if he switched to Parler, potentially bringing tens of millions of followers with him, AWS moved to shut down Parler,” the lawsuit alleges.

Oddly, Amazon leaked the story of Parler’s termination to BuzzFeed more than an hour before it bothered to inform Parler itself. BuzzFeed reported that AWS would remove Parler at 11:59 p.m. Pacific time Sunday night, in an article published at 6:07 p.m. Pacific on Saturday. Amazon did not email Parler about the termination until 7:19 p.m. Pacific, “meaning AWS leaked the letter to BuzzFeed before sending it to Parler.”

Parler’s contract with AWS stipulated that AWS must give notice 30 days before the termination of a contract.

AWS’s “death blow … could not come at a worse time for Parler—a time when the company is surging with the potential of even more explosive growth in the next few days.”

Big Tech wants to silence conservatives. Help us fight back by becoming a PJ Media VIP member. Use promo code CENSORSHIP to receive 25% off your VIP membership.

Yet “worse than the timing is the result—Parler has tried to find alternative companies to host it and they have fallen through. It has no other options. Without AWS, Parler is finished as it has no way to get online,” the lawsuit notes.

A delay of “even one day” in the court granting a restraining order and forcing Amazon to resurrect Parler’s account “could also sound Parler’s death knell as President Trump and others move on to other platforms. It is no wonder, then, that competitor Twitter’s CEO has heartily endorsed efforts to remove Parler from the public sphere.”

The lawsuit argued that AWS engaged in a clear double standard by attacking Parler. “By pulling the plug on Parler but leaving Twitter alone despite identical conduct by users on both sites, AWS reveals that its expressed reasons for suspending Parler’s account are but pretext,” it claims.

The lawsuit notes that Amazon claimed to find 98 examples of posts that clearly encourage and incite violence on Parler. “However, the day before, on Friday, one of the top trends on Twitter was ‘Hang Mike Pence,’ with over 14,000 tweets. … And earlier last week, a Los Angeles Times columnist observed that Twitter and other social media platforms are partly culpable for the Capital [sic] Hill riot, by allowing rioters to communicate and rile each other up.”

“Yet these equivalent, if not greater, violations of AWS’s terms of service by Twitter have apparently been ignored by AWS,” the lawsuit notes, bitterly.

Parler brings three claims against Amazon. It accuses AWS of violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by “contracting or conspiring to restrain trade or commerce.” It accuses AWS of breach of contract “by not providing thirty days’ notice before terminating its account.” Finally, it accuses Amazon of “tortious interference with a contract or business expectancy.” By terminating Parler’s contract, “AWS will intentionally interfere with the contracts Parler has with millions of its present users, as well as with the users it is projected to gain this week.”

Parler has over 12 million users under contract, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit asks the Washington State district court to issue a temporary restraining order and an order forcing AWS to maintain Parler’s account until further notice from the court. It also seeks treble damages for the egregious attack on Parler’s ability to do business.

The lawsuit appears to be on firm footing, and it seeks an order as soon as possible. Stay tuned for more news on this.

Amazon also faces at least one lawsuit for excluding conservative and Christian nonprofits from its charity program, Amazon Smile, relying on the scandal-plagued far-left smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC has long pressured Big Tech companies to blacklist conservative organizations that the SPLC falsely smears as “hate groups” and lists along with the Ku Klux Klan. A similar bias may be at work in this situation.

Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

Parler Will ‘Be Down Longer Than Expected’ as More Vendors Drop Big Tech Alternative
The All-Out Assault on Conservative Thought Has Just Begun
Navalny’s CHILLING Warning: Dictators Will Use Twitter’s Trump Ban to Justify Silencing Opponents
Doubling Down on Division: Joe Biden Uses Capitol Riot to Demonize Trump’s Entire Presidency
 

THREE THINGS AMERICANS MUST DO TO NEUTER THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Three Things Americans Must do to Neuter the Federal Government

BY RENEE NAL

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/three-things-americans-must-do-to-neuter-the-federal-government/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

RAIR Foundation USA will be developing these ideas in the coming days and weeks. Please reach out to assist with expertise in any of the above areas or if you want to help in any way at rairfoundationusa@gmail.com.

The current situation is dire. Without immediate intervention, America will become a socialist state. RAIR Foundation USA has compiled a list of three very important items for Americans to neuter the federal government. If citizens do not act, America is over.

The founding fathers understood that the nature of government is to expand and the nature of man is to be free. The Constitution was written with these concepts in mind. The entire point of “limited government” and “self rule” was to empower the people, not the elites. The system of checks and balances, enumerated powers in the separate branches of government and the electoral college were all written precisely to stop the government from growing and becoming tyrannical.

With two million employees in the federal government alone, not including the post office, which has approximately 600k employees, does the federal government seem “limited” to you?

The following items are key to stopping the federal government from usurping more power, and are rarely discussed by patriots:

1.) Recall Bad Actors: Americans have a tendency to vote and go on with their lives. Subversive elected officials are free to wreak havoc on America with very little scrutiny. It is time that Americans recall bad people instead of waiting to vote them out. Conversely, pro-America elected officials are often left on their own, fighting every day without support of patriotic Americans. It is time for Americans to become engaged in supporting the good guys and active in recalling the bad guys. Right now, Marxists have infiltrated the highest levels of government. They must be recalled.

2.) States Must Stop Accepting Money from the Federal Government: The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution is so vitally important, but has all but been tossed aside. The power belongs to the states, not the federal government. “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government, are few and defined,” said the “father of the Constitution,” James Madison in Federalist 45. But as the decades wore on, the federal government has not only usurped more and more power, they have become the “daddy” of the states by giving them funding, always with strings attached. The states are now completely dependent to the federal government. It must stop. Americans need to make sure that their states stop taking money from the federal government.

3.) All Legislation Must Include the Authors: While much has been discussed about the intent of the founding fathers, very little is discussed about the intent of legislation today. Members of congress rarely write the legislation they introduce, instead putting forward the agenda of hard left actors who write laws (and regulations) that affect all Americans. Radical groups compose legislation, then bribe elected officials with promises of phone-banking and door-knocking to help them keep their power. This is why elected officials often throw their weight behind bad legislation that Americans do not want. If Americans knew exactly who authored the laws, they would understand the intent behind those laws.

Support our work at RAIR Foundation USA! We are a grassroots activist team and we need your help! Please consider making a donation here: https://rairfoundation.com/donate/

 

PRESIDENT TRUMP: ‘A FREE SOCIETY CANNOT ALLOW SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS TO SILENCE THE VOICES OF THE PEOPLE’ (VIDEO)

Transcript from the UN Speech:

Freedom and democracy must be constantly guarded and protected, both abroad and from within.  We must always be skeptical of those who want conformity and control.  Even in free nations, we see alarming signs and new challenges to liberty.

A small number of social media platforms are acquiring immense power over what we can see and over what we are allowed to say.  A permanent political class is openly disdainful, dismissive, and defiant of the will of the people.  A faceless bureaucracy operates in secret and weakens democratic rule.  Media and academic institutions push flat-out assaults on our histories, traditions, and values.

In the United States, my administration has made clear to social media companies that we will uphold the right of free speech.  A free society cannot allow social media giants to silence the voices of the people, and a free people must never, ever be enlisted in the cause of silencing, coercing, canceling, or blacklisting their own neighbors.

On September 24, 2019, President Trump used part of his speech at the 74th Session of the United Nations General Assembly to warn of Big Tech’s expanding power and influence. The U.S. President argued that social media censorship is incompatible with a free society. He also denounced the growing and dangerous trend of “silencing, coercing, canceling, or blacklisting” citizens.

Watch the following excerpt of President Trump’s speech:

BY AMY MEK

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/president-trump-a-free-society-cannot-allow-social-media-giants-to-silence-the-voices-of-the-people-video/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Fast forward sixteen months, Twitter permanently suspends President Donald Trump’s account and censors the official @POTUS U.S. Government account.

The Following Action Must Be Taken

Over the past several years, Twitter, Facebook and Google, have made it a regular practice to delete selective content and entire accounts without warning or rationale, leaving users without recourse. During the 2020 U.S. presidential election the tech giants led an unprecedented censorship campaign against the President of the United States and his supporters.

Over the past week, these platforms have taken their actions to yet another level with the permanent ban of the account of the President Trump. As reported previously at RAIR Foundation USA, While every media business is certainly free to choose the content it publishes and the editorial position it advances on issues including politics, typical media businesses can be held liable for libel and slander for publishing erroneous and damaging content.

These social media behemoths, however, have successfully categorized themselves as “platforms” and not media companies that create or publish content. As “platforms,” these tech giants have successfully positioned themselves as equivalent to passive bulletin boards facilitating discussions, and not the actual creator or curator of that content. Much like a wireless carrier who is not liable for what is spoken on their phone lines, social media platforms are supposed to be the means for neutrally distributing content produced by others. As a result, the social media companies are not responsible for what is said or published on their “platforms.”

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act essentially provides an exemption to these “platforms” from the liability that all other media companies, including your local newspapers and tv stations, New York Times, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC and individual bloggers, must defend themselves from every day.

Examples like the deplatforming of President Donald Trump and countless other conservatives makes it crystal clear that these social media giants have crossed the line from passive distributors of content like a wireless cell phone carrier facilitating phone calls and entrenched themselves deeply as editorial content businesses advancing political agendas.

The ability of these social media companies to become editorial content businesses is completely within their rights and totally within their discretion. BUT, if they make the decision to become editorial content businesses, as they clearly have, then the laws of the United States should treat these companies should lose their liability shield and be exposed to potential liability like all other editorial content businesses such as Associated Press, Time Magazine, Bloomberg New or the Wall Street Journal.

Ironically, back in 2015, Twitter founder Jack Dorsey tweeted “Twitter stands for the freedom of expression. We stand for speaking truth to power. And we stand for empowering dialogue.”

The deplatforming of President Trump by Twitter and the countless examples of these “platforms” removing content or restricting access to their distribution channels makes it crystal clear that these social media giants have obliterated the line from passive distributors and entrenched themselves deeply as editorial content businesses advancing political agendas.

Social media companies must be treated in like manner to how all other media companies are treated with accountability through potential liability. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act must be repealed – our freedoms under the constitution are dependent upon this.

Support our work at RAIR Foundation USA! We are a grassroots activist team and we need your help! Please consider making a donation here: https://rairfoundation.com/donate/

 



 

The Capitol Riot is the Left’s Reichstag Fire

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2021/01/09/the-left-is-enjoying-its-reichstag-fire-moment-n1327058;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

No one can point to any statement from President Trump calling upon his supporters to storm the Capitol, much less to stage a coup against the U.S. government, but it doesn’t matter anymore. The establishment media and the social media giants are insisting that he incited the attack on the Capitol and was trying to install himself as a dictator by means of a guy with a buffalo horn hat and some other dopes and wingnuts, and if you don’t believe it, you’re a racist, bigoted, MAGA-hat-wearing fascist who deserves to be silenced along with the president, and soon will be. But it’s clear who the real fascists are, and they are exploiting their Reichstag Fire moment to the fullest.

On February 27, 1933, four weeks after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, the Reichstag, the German parliament building in Berlin, caught fire. The culprit was a Dutch Communist, Marinus van der Lubbe, who apparently had acted alone. Hitler, however, insisted that the Communist Party, which was a considerable force within the Reichstag, had set the fire, and pressed German President Paul von Hindenburg to approve of an emergency law suspending civil liberties. Communist leaders, including the Communist members of the Reichstag, were hunted down and arrested.

Without their presence in the Reichstag, the National Socialists and their coalition partners had a majority. That enabled the Nazis to pass a further law, the Enabling Act, on March 23, 1933, giving Hitler dictatorial powers and removing any obstacle to his absolute supremacy.

While some people have always maintained that the whole thing was a false flag, most historians believe than van der Lubbe really did set the fire. Nonetheless, the advantages it gave to the Nazis were clear, and so it was no surprise when, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II ended, German General Franz Halder declared that he had heard one of the most prominent and influential Nazis, Hermann Göring, boast that he himself had set the fire.  When confronted with Halder’s statement, Göring denied having had anything to do with the fire, but there is no doubt that its chief beneficiary was Germany’s new National Socialist regime. The Reichstag fire enabled the National Socialists to declare their political opponents enemies of the state and accordingly silence them and outlaw their activity, and opened the door to World War II and the Holocaust.

The All-Out Assault on Conservative Thought Has Just Begun

The parallels to what is happening today are obvious. In the wake of the January 6 riot at the Capitol, the Democrats are trying to criminalize opposition to their program, painting all support of President Trump and his America-First program as incitement to violence and tantamount to sedition. He has been shut out of the major social media networks that exercise near-total control over the means of communication today. And as Trump himself has pointed out repeatedly, for all the demonic frenzy of their desire to destroy him utterly, he is really not the target. We are.

The National Socialists used the Reichstag fire to destroy all political opposition in Germany and assert total control over the lives of every German citizen. They used it to give themselves official, pseudo-legal permission to break every moral law and ethical code ever known to mankind, and ultimately to murder tens of millions of people, including six million Jews (the particular target of their hatred), and lay waste to the entire European continent.

The American Left of today has followed the Nazis’ Reichstag Fire playbook to a T thus far. What is to prevent them from attempting to implement the whole thing? The one thing saving us from woke totalitarianism at this point may be the fact that the sinister authoritarians of the Democratic Party, the social media corporations, and the establishment media may already have overreached. America in 2020, even after fifty years of woke indoctrination in our schools, is not like Germany of 1933. We have a strong tradition of freedom, notably the freedom of speech. In attempting to impose their totalitarian woke straitjacket upon the American people, the Left is going to encounter considerably more opposition than the Nazis did in Germany, where the Weimar Republic was the nation’s first attempt at representative government and never enjoyed great support among the people.

These are indeed, however, as Tom Paine said so long ago, the times that try men’s souls. The way forward is unclear. The avenues that are even available to us to continue to dissent from the Left are being systematically closed down – witness the fact that after banning Trump, the social media giants began to make war on their much smaller competitor, Parler.

The Left is reveling in its Reichstag Fire moment. This is their hour and the power of darkness. But the light of freedom still burns in so many American’s hearts that it is safe to say: this isn’t over.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 21 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

Doubling Down on Division: Joe Biden Uses Capitol Riot to Demonize Trump’s Entire Presidency
Pelosi Threatens to Do Something Drastic if Pence Does Not Remove Trump Under 25th Amendment
6 Other Times People Broke Into the U.S. Capitol
AOC Tried to Blame Ted Cruz for the Capitol Riots. It Didn’t Go Well.
 

American Democracy Died on Capitol Hill

BY DAVID P. GOLDMAN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2021/01/09/american-democracy-died-on-capitol-hill-n1327665;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
‘New Window of Hope’: Chinese Communist Party Hopes Joe Biden Will ‘Restore Normalcy’
6 Other Times People Broke Into the U.S. Capitol
Doubling Down on Division: Joe Biden Uses Capitol Riot to Demonize Trump’s Entire Presidency
The All-Out Assault on Conservative Thought Has Just Begun
 

Mozilla CEO Says Deplatforming President Trump Isn’t Enough

BOYCOTT THUNDERBIRD AND/OR UNINSTALL IT NOW!

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/01/10/mozilla-ceo-says-deplatforming-president-trump-isnt-enough-n1327875;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Winifred Mitchell Baker, the executive chairwoman and CEO of Mozilla, says that deplatforming President Donald Trump “isn’t enough” and has made suggestions for social media and other platforms to crack down on the entire conservative movement.

“There is no question that social media played a role in the siege and take-over of the US Capitol on January 6,” Baker writes in a company blog post. “Since then there has been significant focus on the deplatforming of President Donald Trump. By all means the question of when to deplatform a head of state is a critical one, among many that must be addressed. When should platforms make these decisions? Is that decision-making power theirs alone?”

“But as reprehensible as the actions of Donald Trump are, the rampant use of the internet to foment violence and hate, and reinforce white supremacy is about more than any one personality,” she claims. “Donald Trump is certainly not the first politician to exploit the architecture of the internet in this way, and he won’t be the last. We need solutions that don’t start after untold damage has been done.”

Baker argues that “temporary silencing or permanent removal of bad actors from social media platforms” isn’t enough, and suggests the following actions be taken:

Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.

In other words, Baker is calling for an all-out assault against Trump and his supporters in the name of “transparency.” President Trump has endured bogus allegations of racism, white supremacy, xenophobia, etc., etc. for years, now, the Left is unified in claiming Trump “incited” an “insurrection” at the U.S. Capitol, and is using that bogus claim as a pretext for Orwellian measures to silence Trump and his supporters, as well as efforts to identify, harass, and demonetize those they see as his enablers.

Does this sound familiar to you? I can’t decide whether this is like Oceania in 1984 or Germany in 1933. The Left, with the help of the mainstream media, Hollywood, and Big Tech, has waged a propaganda campaign designed to demonize the political Right, and thus justify the erosion of their freedoms. According to the radical Left, conservatives have no right to be heard and no right to make a living.

In other news, I’ve deleted Firefox, a browser created by Mozilla, from my computer.

Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trumpand the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama. You can follow Matt on Twitter @MattMargolis

The All-Out Assault on Conservative Thought Has Just Begun
Pelosi Threatens to Do Something Drastic if Pence Does Not Remove Trump Under 25th Amendment
Mitch McConnell Destroys Democrats’ Hopes for a Senate Impeachment Trial
Doubling Down on Division: Joe Biden Uses Capitol Riot to Demonize Trump’s Entire Presidency

____________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: 

WARNING: MOZILLA CALLS FOR MORE CENSORSHIP TO ‘BUILD A BETTER INTERNET’ – CELEBRATES TRUMP BAN

BY AMY MEK

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/warning-mozilla-calls-for-more-censorship-to-build-a-better-internet-celebrates-trump-ban/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In the wake of the final suspension of US President Donald Trump by Twitter, left-wing Mozilla – developer of the Firefox browser – wants to go even further than deplatformimg. In a blog post published on January 8, 2021, the company argues that more needs to be done to eliminate “hate” from the Internet. 

“There is no question that social media played a role in the siege and take-over of the US Capitol on January 6.” Mozilla slammed the “reprehensible actions of Donald Trump” who they claim exploited the “architecture of the internet” to “foment violence and hate, and reinforce white supremacy”.

“We need solutions that don’t start after untold damage. Changing these dangerous dynamics requires more than the simple act of de-platforming, or the permanent removal of bad actors from social networks, ”says the foundation.

“We need solutions that don’t start after untold damage. Changing these dangerous dynamics requires more than the simple act of de-platforming, or the permanent removal of bad actors from social networks, ” states Mozilla.

In order to protect the Internet from conservative voices that it considers dangerous, the organization proposes the following heavy-handed actions,

Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.

Censorship

Left-wing Mozilla’s use of countering hate as a justification for the removal of 1st amendment rights for anyone with whom the left disagrees, is the most recent example of authoritarian regimes across history and in the world today. The Nazis claimed all materials they banned to be “degenerate” or of Jewish nature or origin. In the Soviet Union, anything pre-revolutionary was subject to censorship and was deemed “politically incorrect”.  Islamic regimes censor everything from the time before the “Prophet” Muhammad as “Jahiliyyah”, the time of ignorance. Communist China has enacted a National Security Law which bans Western media and social media sites, in what is sometimes referred to as the “Great Firewall of China”.

Mozilla has joined the ranks of authoritarian regimes who will censor anything they deem “politically incorrect”, and target the creator.

Mozilla’s History of Cancel Culture

On April 3, 2014, the CEO of Mozilla, Brendan Eich, was deplatformed and pushed out of the position for making a donation to a “politically incorrect” side of proposition 8 in California. Eich was not only the co-founder of Mozilla but the inventor of Javascript, a code that most web browsers need to operate.

Militant LGBT activists led a campaign to cancel Eich after donating $1000.00 to support a proposition that would maintain the definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman.

Eich was one of the earliest people to be doxxed and deplatformed for his failure to submit to left-wing opinions.

The de-platforming of Mozilla’s CEO was one of the early examples set for corporate leaders in terms of what happens when they do not submit to left-wing opinions. It’s quite likely the template for the Silicon Valley companies dismantling the first amendment today.

Support our work at RAIR Foundation USA! We are a grassroots activist team and we need your help! Please consider making a donation here: https://rairfoundation.com/donate

 
 

The Most Definitive Video Yet of Capitol Police Letting the Protesters In

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/01/08/the-most-definitive-video-yet-of-capitol-police-letting-the-protesters-in-n1325022;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
A protester was shot and killed and a Capitol Police officer died after protesters at a Trump rally poured into the Capitol Building and became violent. Soon thereafter, videos of crowds being allowed in by Capitol Police began to appear.

Here’s how I reported it at PJ Media:

One of the most pervasive story lines following the Capitol protest that turned violent is that the Capitol Police let in protesters.

Though some still doubt it, it’s beginning to appear that some of the protesters were, in fact, allowed onto the grounds and into the building, which explains why there were those who entered and stayed within the velvet guide ropes, taking selfies, and staying peaceful. And those who were not peaceful.

Indeed, two reporters from The Washington Examiner spoke with dozens of people who said that Capitol Police simply allowed them to come into the Capitol Building as they do with visitors.

And now there’s a definitive video showing that not only were police letting the protesters in, but a phalanx of police watched them let the protesters—some of whom were chanting, “f*cking traitors!”—into the building. You can hear another man wonder aloud if it might be some sort of trick when he said out loud, “they’re gonna lock us in.”

One officer greeted the protesters saying, “I don’t agree with you but …”—you can make out him saying “respect” as the crowd clambers in.

See the video in this tweet.

At another door, officers, who obviously had different rules of engagement, were physically halting people as they tried to come into the complex.

Rules changed quickly for the Capitol cops. In an area where a San Diego woman entered through a broken window, a Capitol Police officer shot and killed her.

Obviously, ROE were not the same from entrance to entrance.

The AP reports that the Capitol Police, who are mourning one of their own who was reportedly hit in the head by a violent protester during the takeover, were “still stinging from the uproar over the violent response by law enforcement to protests last June near the White House, officials also were intent on avoiding any appearance that the federal government was deploying active duty or National Guard troops against Americans.”

They were ready only “for a free speech demonstration” and, obviously, not for being overrun by protesters and an out-of-control mob.

The Capitol Police were twice offered federal help to protect the building before and during the rally. They twice said no thanks, according to the AP.

Victoria Taft is the host of “The Adult in the Room Podcast With Victoria Taft” where you can hear her series on “Antifa Versus Mike Strickland.” Find it here. Follow her on Facebook,  TwitterParlerMeWeMinds @VictoriaTaft 

There Are a Lot of Phony Claims, But There Was at Least One Antifa Ally Inside the U.S. Capitol
Political Amnesia: Look at All the Democrats Who Boycotted Trump’s Inauguration
ABC News Executive Calls for ‘Cleansing’ the Trump Movement From America
Wall Street Journal Editors Call for Trump to Resign After an Apparent Three-Martini Lunch. Hic …!
 

The All-Out Assault on Conservative Thought Has Just Begun

BY TYLER O'NEIL

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/columns/tyler-o-neil/2021/01/09/the-all-out-assault-on-conservative-thought-has-just-begun-n1326710;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

After the white nationalist riots in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and others renewed their demands for the suppression of conservative speech on social media. After Trump’s supporters breached the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Big Tech companies clamped down on President Donald Trump and many of his supporters. Incoming President Joe Biden has said he plans to pass a law against domestic terrorism.

While conservatives rightly denounced the violence this week, this response bodes ill for conservative speech not just on social media, but in the public square and even in private organizations.

In the aftermath of the Capitol riots, Twitter suspended President Donald Trump’s account for the first time and Facebook permanently banned the president. After Trump deleted the tweets Twitter had flagged and had his account restored, Twitter proceeded to ban him entirely on Friday, and then it banned the official President of the United States (POTUS) account.

Facebook throttled the great Rush Limbaugh, notifying him that his “Page has reduced distribution and other restrictions because of repeated sharing of false news.” Limbaugh left Twitter in protest after the platform banned Trump. Apple and Google attacked Parler, claiming that the new haven for conservatives had allowed people to plan the violence of the Capitol riots on its platform.

House Democrats filed articles of impeachment that explicitly blame President Trump for the Capitol riots, even though he never told his supporters to invade the Capitol. While the president’s exaggerated rhetoric inflamed the rioters, Democrats repeatedly did the same thing this summer. Before and after Black Lives Matter protests devolved into destructive and deadly riots, Democratic officials repeatedly claimed America suffers from “systemic racism” and institutionalized “white supremacy.”

Columbus’ Proposed Police Witch Hunt Will Send Chills Down Your Spine

Big Tech did not remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s accounts when she called for “uprisings” against the Trump administration. Facebook and Twitter did not target Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez when she claimed that allegedly marginalized groups have “no choice but to riot.” These platforms did not act against Kamala Harris when she said the riots “should not” stop.

This week, Joe Biden condemned the Capitol rioters, saying, “What we witnessed yesterday was not dissent, it was not disorder, it was not protest. It was chaos. They weren’t protesters, don’t dare call them protesters. They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists. It’s that basic, it’s that simple.”

Yet he refused to speak in those terms when Black Lives Matter and antifa militants were throwing Molotov cocktails at federal buildings, setting up “autonomous zones,” and burning down cities. Instead, he condemned Trump for holding up a Bible at a church — without mentioning the fact that that very church had been set on fire the night before.

Despite this hypocrisy, Biden’s speech on Thursday proved instructive. Biden used the Capitol riots to condemn Trump’s entire presidency, accusing Trump of having “unleashed an all-out assault on our institutions of our democracy from the outset.” Biden twisted Trump’s actions into an attack on “democracy.” He claimed Trump’s originalist judges were a ploy to undermine impartial justice — when they were truly the exact opposite. Biden claimed Trump’s complaints about the Obama administration spying on his campaign were merely an “attack” on America’s “intelligence services.” Biden said Trump’s complaints about media bias constituted an attack on the “free press,” when the Obama administration actually attacked the free press.

Despite the fact that leftist violence has wracked American cities for years (remember Ferguson and the shooting of police officers in Dallas in 2016?), Biden seized on the Capitol riots as evidence that everything the Right had been saying the past four years was a blatant and destructive lie.

This reminded me of the Southern Poverty Law Center, a once-noble civil rights organization that has become a far-left smear factory. The SPLC weaponizes its history suing white supremacists and the Ku Klux Klan into bankruptcy and monitoring them through its Klanwatch program to silence conservative thought. It brands mainstream conservative organizations “hate groups,” listing them along with the KKK on a “hate map.” This “hate map” inspired a deranged man to target the Family Research Council (FRC) for a mass shooting in 2012.

Doubling Down on Division: Joe Biden Uses Capitol Riot to Demonize Trump’s Entire Presidency

The Trump administration has worked with conservative organizations the SPLC falsely smears as “hate groups,” and the SPLC has made hay of this fact. Its latest “hate group” report — published last March — mentioned Trump no fewer than 66 times. Yet the SPLC carried water for antifa during the riots this summer.

The SPLC has repeatedly pressured Big Tech to clamp down on conservative “hate groups,” suggesting this is the right way to fight white supremacist terrorismAmazon has excluded mainstream conservative Christian nonprofits from its charity program, Amazon Smile.

After Charlottesville, the SPLC raked in cash with big donations from Apple and JPMorgan. CNN even shared the SPLC “hate map” on its website and Twitter account, effectively endorsing the false accusations.

Not surprisingly, the SPLC has already seized the moment after the Capitol riots.

“One of the powerful lessons we must take away from this week’s coup attempt by President Trump and his supporters is that 2021 is not a time for half measures in the fight against hate and extremism,” Margaret Huang, the SPLC’s president and CEO, said in a statement on Friday. “This violence is bolstered by the infrastructure of white nationalist movements that the Southern Poverty Law Center has been tracking and fighting for decades.”

She warned that the Capitol riots will become “a recruitment tool for white nationalist movements” and “hate groups.” She claimed that “the violence in Washington was predictable and preventable,” citing the SPLC’s list of “hate groups” — specifically the increase in the number of white nationalist hate groups. (Since the SPLC does not explain how large specific “hate groups” are, the number of such “groups” is arguably meaningless. Some “hate groups” consist of merely one person.)

Prominent leftists are likely to celebrate the SPLC as the harbinger of this violence, and the SPLC does do some important work monitoring white nationalists. Unfortunately, the group also smears conservative and Christian groups because they defend biblical sexuality, oppose illegal immigration, and warn about the threat of radical Islamist terrorism. Even fellow liberals have condemned the SPLC’s “anti-LGBT hate group” accusation against Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative Christian law firm that has won multiple Supreme Court cases.

The SPLC also has skeletons in its closet. In 2019, the SPLC fired its co-founder, had its president step down, and had a prominent member of the board distance herself. The scandal broke out due to accusations of (decades-old) racial discrimination and sexual harassment. Amid the scandal, former employees came forward to expose the “con” of exaggerating hate to bilk donors.

Despite all this, the SPLC still enjoys considerable sway among Big Tech, corporate America, the legacy media, and the Democratic Party. When Attorney General Dana Nessel (D-Mich.) announced a new “hate crimes” unit, she specifically cited the SPLC’s list of “hate groups” in the state. Kamala Harris, soon to become vice president, has repeatedly cited the SPLC in attacking Trump’s judicial and administration nominees.

This makes it all the more ominous that Biden has said he plans to prioritize passing a law against domestic terrorism. Domestic terrorism is indeed a serious problem in America, but Biden’s egregious and blatant double standard on the Capitol riots and antifa, along with his party’s growing alliance with the SPLC, suggests he may use such a law to silence conservative dissent while going soft on far-left rioters.

Conservative Christians should pay close attention to this threat. Biden, like the SPLC, has long championed LGBT activism, and in 2018 at an LGBT activist group, he attacked people who have “tried to define family” in the U.S. as “the dregs of society.” At the CNN LGBT town hall in October 2019, Biden called for a kind of terror watchlist to monitor organizations that oppose same-sex marriage and transgender identity. Biden firmly supports the Equality Act, which would outlaw discrimination against LGBT people. While Americans do not support discrimination, laws like this have been weaponized to punish Christians for refusing to celebrate same-sex weddings.

Buckle up, conservatives. The Biden administration represents a serious threat to conservative thought in the public square, and now Democrats have both houses of Congress to ram their agenda through.

Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

The SPLC’s Fall From Grace: How a Civil Rights Group Became a Threat to Free Speech
Joe Biden Demands SPLC-Style Terror Watchlist to Protect LGBT People
Why Biden Is a Threat to Traditional Christians and Religious Freedom
Judeo-Christian Group Sues Michigan for ‘Orwellian’ Witch Hunt Based on SPLC Labels
SPLC Slams Trump’s Terror Designation of Antifa as ‘Dangerous and Unjust’ as America Burns
 

DAVID CLOUD’S “WAY OF LIFE” RECENT ARTICLES

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

LEADERS OF U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DEFYING GOD WITH “INCLUSIVE” LANGUAGE 
(Friday Church News Notes, January 8, 2021, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) - 
In fulfillment of Bible prophecy, the Democratic leadership of the 117th U.S. House of Representatives is 
attempting to defy God with an “inclusive language” policy. The new rules would “address issues of inequities 
on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, age, or 
national origin.” This is impossible nonsense, of course, since addressing alleged inequality on the basis of 
sexual orientation or gender identity creates inequality against sex and religion, etc. The rule would outlaw 
the use of he and shefather, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, husband, 
wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, grandson, or granddaughter, among others. 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the new measures would make the House of Representatives “the most 
inclusive in history.” True, and it would also make it the most stupid in history. “So God created man in his 
own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them” (Genesis 1:27). “The 
kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his 
anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in 
the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision” (Psalm 2:2-4).

UNITED METHODIST MINISTER INVOKES HINDU GOD AT OPENING OF U.S. CONGRESS 
(Friday Church News Notes, January 8, 2021, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) - 
Emanuel Cleaver, an ordained United Methodist minister and Democrat Representative, opened the first 
session of the 117th U.S. Congress by praying in the name of a Hindu god. He concluded, “We ask it in the 
name of the monotheistic God, Brahma, and god known by many names by different faiths. Amen and 
a-woman.” The term “amen” has nothing to do with gender, of course. It simply means “so be it.” According 
to the Encyclopedia Britannica, “Brahma was born from a golden egg and created the earth and all things 
on it. Later myths describe him as having come forth from a lotus that issued from Vishnu’s navel.”

WALL STREET JOURNAL STANDS UP AGAINST CANCEL CULTURE 
(Friday Church News Notes, January 8, 2021, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) - 
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) is standing up for freedom of speech against the totalitarian cancel culture. 
After the WSJ published an editorial on Dec. 11 by Joseph Epstein poking some fun at Joe Biden’s wife, Jill, 
for flaunting the title of “Dr.,” there was a “flood of media and Twitter criticism,” angry tirades demanding 
an apology, retraction, lifelong ban of Epstein, and the resignation of the WSJ editorial editor. Epstein was 
sharply criticized by Northwestern University, where he taught some 20 years ago. The school went so far 
as to remove Epstein’s name from its website listing past faculty. In his reply to the critics, Paul Gigot, 
editor of the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page, wrote, “My guess is that the Biden team concluded it was 
a chance to use the big gun of identity politics to send a message to critics as it prepares to take power. 
There’s nothing like playing the race or gender card to stifle criticism. ... these pages aren’t going to stop 
publishing provocative essays merely because they offend the new administration or the political censors 
in the media and academe.” In a report on the WSJ brouhaha, The New Criterion observed, “Last month, 
after the electors met to cast their votes for him, Joe Biden once again made a plea for unity. ‘Now it’s time 
to turn the page ... to unite and to heal,’ he said. We applaud that sentiment. But we wonder what he 
means by ‘unite’ and ‘heal.’ To judge by the actions of the institutions supporting his cause in this sorry 
episode, ‘turning the page’ might just be euphemism for sweeping everything and everyone out of step 
with his program into the oubliette” (“The ‘Dr.’ will see you now,” The New Criterion, Jan. 2021).

U.S. DIVORCE RATE HITS 50-YEAR LOW, BUT MARRIAGES ALSO ON THE DECLINE 
(Friday Church News Notes, January 8, 2021, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) - 
The following is excerpted from “U.S. Divorce Rate,” Christian Headlines, Nov. 11, 2020: “The new data 
shows that 14.9 marriages per 1,000 ended in divorce in 2019, a rate that is the lowest it’s been since 
1970, according to an analysis by author Wendy Wang, director of research for the Institute for Family 
Studies. It’s even slightly less than in 1970 when it was 15.0, Wang wrote in an online analysis. The data is 
derived from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. ... The drop in the divorce rate likely will 
continue, despite the pandemic, Wang asserted. New data from the American Family Survey shows that 58 
percent of married Americans say ‘the pandemic has made them appreciate their spouse more and half 
agree that their commitment to marriage has deepened,’ Wang wrote.  ... But the Census data also has 
some bad news for the nation: The marriage rate continued to decline in 2019, hitting an all-time low. 
‘For every 1,000 unmarried adults in 2019, only 33 got married. This number was 35 a decade ago in 2010 
and 86 in 1970,’ Wang wrote.”

CIRCUIT COURT STRIKES DOWN BAN AGAINST “CONVERSION THERAPY” 
(Friday Church News Notes, January 8, 2021, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) - 
The following is excerpted from “Court Strikes Down,” PJMedia, Nov. 25, 2020: “Last week, a panel on the 
11th Circuit Court of Appeals effectively struck down two Florida bans on sexual orientation change efforts 
(SOCE) that sought to ban counselors from putting minors through ‘conversion therapy.’ The court ruled 
that the laws violated the First Amendment by restricting free speech. While LGBT activists have rightly 
condemned the historic abuses of ‘conversion therapy’ in the past, modern SOCE therapists use patient-
directed talk therapy, not ‘shock therapy.’ When the City of Boca Raton and the County of Palm Beach 
banned SOCE counseling, licensed marriage and family therapists Robert Otto and Julie Hamilton sued, 
seeking an injunction to prevent the city and county from enacting their bans. ... The therapists argue that 
‘their clients typically have sincerely held religious beliefs conflicting with homosexuality, and voluntarily 
seek SOCE counseling in order to live in congruence with their faith and to conform their identity, concept 
of self, attractions, and behaviors to their sincerely held religious beliefs.’ ... As Judge Grant wrote, ‘The 
ordinances thus codify a particular viewpoint--sexual orientation is immutable, but gender is not— and 
prohibit the therapists from advancing any other perspective when counseling clients.’ ... This involves an 
unconstitutional restriction of free speech. ‘Whether therapy is prohibited depends only on the content of 
the words used in that therapy, and the ban on that content is because the government disagrees with it. 
And whether the government’s disagreement is for good reasons, great reasons, or terrible reasons has 
nothing at all to do with it. All that matters is that a therapist’s speech to a minor client is legal or illegal 
under the ordinances based solely on its content,’ Judge Grant wrote. ... Lawsuits against ‘conversion 
therapy’ bans received a new lease on life thanks to NIFLA v. Becerra. In that decision, Justice Clarence 
Thomas explicitly struck down California’s law forcing crisis pregnancy centers to advertise abortion under 
the argument that states can regulate ‘professional speech.’ In striking down California’s law, Thomas 
referenced a case (King v. Governor of New Jersey) involving bans on sexual orientation change efforts. 
Otto v. Boca Raton represents a landmark case for therapy freedom.”

BIGGEST LOCKDOWN IS COMING 
(Friday Church News Notes, January 8, 2021, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) - 
Lockdowns dominated the news for 2020, but the really big lockdown is in the future. Bible prophecy was 
fulfilled literally and precisely in the first coming of Christ, and it will be fulfilled in the same manner in His 
second coming. As a precursor, the Antichrist will lockdown the whole world with his worship program and 
economic control scheme, backed up by the death penalty. It will be a global North Korea. “And he had 
power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause 
that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small 
and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And 
that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his 
name” (Revelation 13:15-17). The Covid pandemic is child’s play compared with the trouble that looms on 
the horizon. Billions of people will die during the Great Tribulation from wars, famine, pestilence, 
earthquakes, and totalitarianism on a scale that will make Stalin and Mao seem like choir boys. It is all 
described in the book of Revelation for those who are interested. It is called “the day of the Lord” because 
it will spell doom for “the day of man.”

EX-MUSLIM CHRISTIAN PASTOR SHAHRAM HADIAN: The Betrayal of America & What’s Next for Christians & Patriots? From WASHINGTON, DC 1/7/21~VIDEO PROOF THAT ANTIFA VANDALIZED THE CAPITOL

The Betrayal of America, & What is Next for Christians and Patriots? Live from Washington DC. Pastor Shahram Hadian - Truth in Love Ministry Rec orded January 7, 2021 To learn more: http://www.tilproject.com To donate: http://www.tilproject.com/donate

Eyewitness: 'Antifa dressed as Trump supporters storming Capitol building'

Battle For Capitol Hill: Antifa Infiltrators Identified Breeching Doors And Windows Of Congress

VIDEO PROOF 

Video taken during the storming of Congress on Wednesday afternoon proves that Antifa infiltrators - and not supporters of President Trump - stormed the Halls of Congress, breaking in doors and windows to gain entry. Additional reporting from the Washington Times supports this assertion. "A retired military officer told The Washington Times that the firm XRVision used its software to do facial recognition of protesters and matched two Philadelphia antifa members to two men inside the Senate. "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...

NY Democrat Citizen Disarmament Zealot Proposes Covid ‘Detention Centers’

ABOVE: If you’re on the list, fist-pumping Assemblyman Perry has plans for you! And he’s doing his utmost with “gun safety laws” to make sure it’s an offer you can’t refuse. (N Nick Perry/Facebook)

BY DAVID CODREA

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/01/ny-democrat-citizen-disarmament-zealot-proposes-covid-detention-centers;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “Covid camps? Put disease ‘carriers’ in DETENTION CENTERS, proposed New York law suggests,” RT News reported Saturday. “Authored by a Democratic member of the New York State Assembly N. Nick Perry, Bill A416 calls for the ‘removal and/or detention’ of individuals who are identified as a ‘case, contact or carrier’ of a contagious disease.”

RT News? Aren’t they Russian? Doesn’t that mean they have an anti-American agenda, and anyone citing them is being their dupe?

My experience with them has been they’re just as good – if not better – than our homegrown DSM (Duranty/Streicher Media). They gave a forum for friend and colleague, the late Mike Vanderboegh, and me to have our say on the subjects of the militia keeping tyranny in check, and on open carry (even if they did mispronounce my name), subjects no domestic establishment outlet want to present unless they control the narrative.

Still, some will no doubt cling to the logical fallacy of discrediting the report based on who the messenger is, so don’t listen to them; listen to the language of the bill itself:

“Upon determining by clear and convincing evidence that the health of others is or may be endangered by a  case,  contact or carrier,  or suspected case, contact or carrier of a contagious disease that, in the opinion of the governor, after consultation with the commissioner,  may pose an imminent and significant threat to the public health resulting in severe morbidity or high mortality, the governor or his or her delegee,  including,  but not limited to the commissioner or the heads of local health departments, may order the removal and/or detention of such a person or of a group of such persons by issuing a single order,  identifying such persons either by name or by a  reasonably specific description of the individuals or group being detained. Such  person or group of persons shall be detained in a medical facility or other appropriate  facility  or  premises  designated by the governor or his or her delegee…”

This being New York, determinations will be made by the same “authorities” who arbitrarily restrict some while the powerful celebrate; whose policies place some populations, such as the elderly in nursing homes, at extreme risk while releasing recidivist criminals back into the general population out of political “concern” for their safety; and who prioritize and value addicts over the productive.

It’s not like Americans aren’t starting to question the hell out of what their governments are telling them, especially when they see Covid “death counts” inflated when people testing for the virus pass on from other causes; when the accuracy of the tests themselves are in question; when reports of severe medical reactions are becoming more frequent; and when we see healthcare professionals – hardly doctrinaire “anti-vaxxers” –  are refusing the vaccine.

Clearly, there are plenty of questions that can’t be answered because no one really knows yet. But here is what can be answered, with certainty, if this obscene, tyrannical, and anti-American New York bill becomes enforceable law: Those are ultimately enforced at gunpoint. That means if you don’t want to go, they’re not giving you a choice. Likewise, if you want to leave the facility, expect armed “camp guards” to say “No.”

“Fortunately,” for New York, both Gov. Cuomo and Assemblyman Perry are both big advocates of what the totalitarian-minded like to call “commonsense gun safety laws.” Particularly, as Perry explains, against “weapons of mass destruction” (unless in the hands of enforcers, of course).

Any questions about who rules whom? Everyone is clear on where the raised fist originated?

Just make sure you wear your masks and practice social distancing when the “conductor” yells “All aboard!” to take you to the “detention center”!


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea

 

The Candace Owens Show: Canceled on Campus

One student's story of harassment for trying to start a campus group promoting Western values.

BY PRAGER UNIVERSITY

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/01/candace-owens-show-canceled-campus-prager-university/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Students who hold conservative ideas are shunned on college campuses today. Nick Engstrom, a student 
at Trinity College, shares with Prager University's Candace Owens how he was harassed and received 
death threats for simply trying to start a group promoting Western values. Don’t miss his powerful story 
below:

America’s Frontline Doctors Unveil Petition to Protect Medical Privacy and Prevent Mandates in COVID-19 Vaccine Policymaking

SEE: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/americas-frontline-doctors-unveil-petition-to-protect-medical-privacy-and-prevent-mandates-in-covid-19-vaccine-policymaking/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Effort attracting support from Americans concerned about the safe administration of new experimental vaccines and possible mandates

Los Angeles, CA – With the approval of experimental COVID-19 vaccines raising new questions about safety, transparency, and unnecessary mandates, America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today announced the launch of its latest sound-science initiative, an online petition known as Stop Medical Discrimination. The petition, which is already earning support from more than 40,000 concerned Americans, urges policymakers and the private sector to guard against mandates that restrict freedom and infringe on patient privacy and choice.

The petition reads, “All people deserve medical privacy and equality. … People should never be pressured to comply with taking an experimental vaccine. This is becoming a very real danger. The coercion can be implemented by government regulation or through policy directives by large corporations, private entities, including airlines, employers, schools, and other institutions. Such mandates are unethical and would be an assault on Americans’ medical privacy.” AFLDS hopes to present the signatures to policymakers and private entities at a later date. So-called “vaccine passports,” test-and-trace systems, race-based vaccination directives, and similar public health requirements run afoul of medical ethics and present real threats to personal privacy as well as freedom of movement and association.

Dr. Simone Gold, Founder of AFLDS, said, “The development of a vaccine should be lauded, but Americans should not blindly accept an experimental drug for an illness with a 99.7% survival rate. America’s Frontline Doctors is calling for greater transparency for concerned citizens and better data for policymakers before we embark on the largest experimental vaccination program in history. We are offering this public petition in the spirit of Jonas Salk, a pioneer in medical technology who adhered to the highest scientific and ethical standards and saved millions of lives as a result.”

Dr. Gold has been particularly outspoken against lockdown orders that are having a significant health and economic impact on millions of Americans. AFLDS was also critical of federal health experts’ decision to relegate those 65 and over to lower priority for vaccine distribution until the CDC advisory committee’s dramatic reversal on Sunday.

“We cannot so readily cast aside individual civil liberties and doctor-patient decision-making to serve the agenda of any single group, including politicians, the media, and corporations. Instead, we must provide more information about these drugs to the public and ensure our administration of the vaccines is based on science. Americans have faced the consequences of harsh government mandates throughout this pandemic. Regulators have consistently used conflicting or inaccurate information as justifications for their mandates. AFLDS encourages all Americans who care about freedom from coercion to sign our petition today,” said Gold.

Learn more about the Stop Medical Discrimination petition by visiting its website here.

__________________________________________________________________________

How Do I Get HCQ (HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE)? – America's Frontline Doctors

SEE: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/how-do-i-get-hcq;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Five Steps To Obtain Hydroxychloroquine:

  1. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) can only be obtained by prescription in the USA. If you live in a green state, your own physician can prescribe it and your own pharmacy can fill it. However, we know this often does not happen. You can attempt that or you can use our telemedicine service, which is available in all 50 states to anyone with a USA address.

  2. AFLDS physicians are available via telemedicine. This is a short consultation via the internet with a physician who is HCQ-knowledgeable. Our physicians know that HCQ and Zinc are effective both prophylactically and when used early. The telemedicine physician will review your history and almost all patients can safely take the medications.

  3. Click on the Contact A Physician button. Fill out the form and pay $90. The physician will call you typically within 24 hours, occasionally 48 hours. Please keep your phone with you.

  4. If you miss the call, you can either wait for the second call (which will come), send an email to info@speakwithanmd.com, or call their customer service at (855) 503-2657.

  5. After your consultation, the physician will order the medication from the pharmacy, which will overnight deliver the prescription to you. Depending upon the time the order was placed, it will arrive the next day or within one additional day. We have chosen this method because many pharmacies are inappropriately refusing to fill prescriptions. The pharmacy will text or call you within 1-3 hours of your physician consultation. If you have questions for the pharmacy, please contact Ravkoo Pharmacy: 863-875-5700.

 
 

Top U.S. Media Outlets “Compromised” by Communist China

Sponsored by CUSEF, the webinar explores the challenges to U.S.-China educational collaboration and how to sustain and even advance the significant progress that has been made over the past 40 years.

ALSO SEE: https://www.isi.edu/centers/serc/home

BY ALEX NEWMAN

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/top-u-s-media-outlets-compromised-by-communist-china/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A huge list of left-wing establishment media outlets have troubling ties to the mass-murdering Communist dictatorship ruling over mainland China, according to newly released documents. One leading commentator who first broke the story argued that it showed Western media was “compromised.” The outlets involved in the scandal include powerhouses such as CNN, the New York Times, Fox News, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, MSNBC, and many major newspapers across the country. Millions of dollars have been paid by the regime to top U.S. media outlets, too.

According to documents obtained by the National Pulse, a shadowy Beijing-backed outfit known as the China-United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF) has been treating key U.S. media personalities and “journalists” to exclusive private dinners and even trips to Communist China. Among other major concerns, CUSEF was founded by the vice-chairman of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), which U.S. authorities have identified as a critical part of the Chinese Communist Party’s “United Work Front.”

The regime’s “United Front Work” department is a crucial branch of the regime handling its overseas influence operations. The U.S. government’s U.S.-China Security and Economic Review Commission (USCSERC) noted in an official report that the CCP uses United Front work “to co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition to the policies and authority of its ruling Chinese Communist Party.” This would be completely in line with efforts to manipulate the American media, which, aside from being naïve, has a bizarre soft spot for communism.

Using United Front, the CCP selects a wide range of targets for manipulation — especially those in a position to support or oppose the mass-murdering regime’s objectives, such as media outlets. “The United Front strategy uses a range of methods to influence overseas Chinese communities, foreign governments, and other actors to take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing’s preferred policies,” the 2018 U.S. government report on China’s Overseas United Front Work continues.

In an interview with The New American magazine last year, investigative journalist Joshua Philipp with The Epoch Times, who investigated the United Work Front, explained that its operatives in the United States were terrorizing dissident Chinese in America. Some of those attacks included physical violence by Communist Chinese operatives, he explained. The regime also targets leaders in Chinese communities overseas to help expand Beijing’s influence in nations such as the United States.

With funding from CUSEF, another key outfit involved in the wining and dining of “journalists” is BLJ Worldwide, a lobbying and “communications consultancy.” On its website, the controversial firm boasts that it is “proud” to “work with numerous nations and governments, among them some of the largest and most influential on Earth.” It uses its “powerful global network” that includes “thought leaders and media.” Whether the mass-murdering dictatorship enslaving China is among BLJ’s clients was not immediately clear, but one of its two listed vice-presidents serves “governmental, corporate, and nonprofit clients based in the U.S., China,” and other nations.

Indeed, according to 2011 disclosures made under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) cited by Axios, CUSEF paid BLJ $20,000 each month to promote pro-Beijing propaganda in America. This included sending journalists and journalism students to China to give them a “positive look at China’s accomplishments.” This was done to supposedly “educate the next generation of U.S. journalists on China and U.S.-China relations while they are still honing their craft,” the public filings revealed.

Another element of the BLJ package for CUSEF included crafting a “short-medium term U.S. campaign to influence key constituencies (politicians, academics, and experts) as well as general public opinion regarding China’s true efforts and intentions in Tibet,” where the regime in Beijing is engaged in what critics have referred to as “cultural genocide.” This scheme was supposed to help analyze how “leading United States high-school textbooks” portrayed Tibet and China, then help peddle Beijing’s talking points as recommendations for “countering the tide of public discourse.”

According to CUSEF’s federal disclosures required under U.S. law, the goal of the campaign is to “effectively disseminate positive messages to the media, key influencers and opinion leaders, and the general public” about the Chinese regime. “In order to develop favorable coverage in key national media, BLJ will continue to organize and staff ‘familiarization trips’ to China,” CUSEF added. “This includes recruiting top journalists to travel to China, selected for effectiveness and opportunities for favorable coverage.” It paid off, with the CCP getting its propaganda pushed in dozens of top outlets and hundreds of “news” and opinion pieces across America.

As this magazine has been documenting for years, CUSEF is also bribing American universities and educational institutions. As The New American reported this weekend, CUSEF is also flying top American politicians to China to be wined and dined. The list of politicians who have made the trek include congressmen, senators, governors, mayors, and prominent state lawmakers from both parties. Reports created by these politicians on their trips were then distributed with the help of CUSEF lobbyists to other political leaders and opinion molders.

A related scandal involving Communist Chinese propaganda and establishment media outlets in the United States is also brewing. Last June, CCP mouthpiece China Daily filed a disclosure with the U.S. Department of Justice admitting that it had paid $19 million U.S. dollars to top American “news” organizations. That includes about $12 million to leading newspapers that serve as mouthpieces for the globalist establishment and now, Communist China, such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.

The China Daily paper, a wholly-owned propaganda mouthpiece for the murderous regime in Beijing, paid U.S. media outlets some $2 million just in 2020 to promote CCP talking points. It paid almost $20 million throughout the Trump administration’s term in office so far, revealed official disclosures filed with U.S. authorities and required by federal law. Other newspapers listed as being on Beijing’s payroll include the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago TribuneBoston GlobeSeattle TimesHouston Chronicle, and Foreign Policy.

According to a report by Judith Bergman at the conservative-leaning Gatestone Institute, the strategy being pursued by the CCP propaganda machine is to buy huge “ads” in these newspapers in the form of “China Watch” inserts. These are carefully crafted to look like “news” coverage in the newspaper, misleading casual readers into believing the paid CCP propaganda is actually a news report by one of the newspapers on Beijing’s payroll.

“The practice does not seem to have caused any sort of actual uproar in those media circles that engage in it,” observed Bergman. “This reticence is odd … because so many journalists and editors consider themselves as standing up against racism, ethnic and religious discrimination, and human rights abuses. Taking money from the Chinese Communist regime in exchange for spreading its propaganda would seem to indicate that this stance is simply empty posturing.”

On the Wall Street Journal “China Watch” website, which has not been updated for months but still features content from their CCP “partner,” a broad range of paid propaganda pieces glorifying the mass-murdering dictatorship and parroting its dishonest narrative can be found. And unless one looks closely, the content appears almost indistinguishable from a regular news article. The same is true for the many other U.S. media outlets that publish the paid CCP propaganda.

Would WSJ and other major American newspapers accept paid propaganda from Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist regime, which slaughtered millions of innocent people? If not, why do they run propaganda from the CCP regime, which has murdered over 100 million, not including unborn babies? The barbarism and savagery of the two regimes is off the charts, and top Communist Chinese officials have made clear that they intend to supplant the United States — and even destroy it with nuclear weapons under certain scenarios.

The coopting of Western media is all part of a coordinated strategy by Chinese dictator Xi Jinping. “China needs to strengthen media coverage … and use innovative outreach methods … to tell a good Chinese story and promote China’s views internationally,” Xi was quoted as saying at the National Meeting on Propaganda and Thought Work in August 2013. He has echoed those points repeatedly since then, including telling a 2018 National Meeting on Ideology and Propaganda how important it was to improve “international communication” to present “good images” of China while raising the regime’s “soft power” and the influence of its “culture.”

Aside from co-opting Western “presstitutes,” as the Western media has come to be ridiculed by critics for behaving like prostitutes, Beijing also has its own massive propaganda megaphone with global reach. Xinhua, an intelligence front masquerading as a news agency, has agents all over the world spread out across hundreds of bureaus gathering intelligence and disseminating CCP lies worldwide. Whistleblowers have been trying to expose this threat for almost a decade, but of course, the CCP-compromised Western media has largely failed to report it.

According to a 2018 Pentagon report, the regime has even been buying up radio stations — including American stations — using subsidiaries to conceal the ownership. “These radio stations broadcast pro-China content but have not registered as agents of a foreign government under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA),” explained the Defense Department report, headlined “Assessment on US Defense Implications of China’s Expanding Global Access.”

The new revelations follow a recent leak of names of almost two million Communist Party of China members from the Shanghai area representing about two percent of the party’s total membership. The list, only parts of which have been published, already revealed that there are hundreds of CCP operatives in sensitive posts in Western governments, banks, embassies, defense contractors, pharmaceutical companies, and universities. The establishment media has been almost totally silent, for obvious reasons. More disclosures are expected in the weeks ahead.

There exists a massive array of powerful organizations in the United States working to build up Communist China — and especially its economic and military power. One of the most powerful but obscure is the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, which has a leadership that reads like a who’s who of pro-Beijing powerhouse figures in the United States. The roster includes former U.S. Secretary of State Henry “New World Order” Kissinger, former U.S. Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, former U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, and more.

With the obvious fact that America’s top propaganda outlets posing as “news” organizations are compromised by the world’s most murderous dictatorship, it is perhaps no surprise that those same “news” organizations refused to expose the Biden and Harris families’ myriad corrupt ties to that dictatorship. But as The New American magazine has been reporting for many years, the Deep State and the mass-murdering regime are essentially partners in the quest to undermine America and freedom as they impose what they all openly describe as the “New World Order.”

If not stopped, the “New World Order” that globalist elites and Beijing are seeking to build will look a lot like Communist China — and America’s sellout journalists, who will lose all press freedoms guaranteed under the First Amendment, will bear a large part of the blame.

Related articles:

Chinese Spying in the United States

China: Staking Claim in the New World Order

Leak: Communist Chinese Infiltrated West’s Pharma, Defense, Banks

These High-Level U.S. Politicians Took Trips to China Paid for by Communist-Linked Group

Chinese Imprison Reporter for Reporting on Failure to Contain COVID-19

Communist China Uses “Journalists” as Spies, Ex-Xinhua Writer Confirms

Video Shows Chinese Professor Talking About American “Elite” Traitors Who Work for Beijing

Obama Steps Up U.S. Training of Communist Chinese Military

Kamala Harris’ Husband’s Firm Makes Big Money Working for China

Merkel and Communist China Defend “World Order” at Davos

 

Washington DC Mayor BANS 2nd Amendment For January 6th Rally BECAUSE OF FIRST AMENDMENT?

Members of the public are reminded that DC CODE: § 7-2509.07 expressly prohibits anyone from carrying a firearm within 1,000 feet of any First Amendment activity, to include members of the public who have been issued a Concealed Carry Permit in the District of Columbia.

ALERT: LEFT-WING ‘SHUT DOWN DC’ SENDS MOB TO CONFRONT ELECTION ATTORNEYS

ALERT: Left-wing ‘Shut Down DC’ Sends Mob to Confront Election Attorneys

BY RENEE NAL

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/alert-left-wing-shut-down-dc-sends-mob-to-confront-election-attorneys/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“We have divided up the list of lawyers who work at the firm so that together we can contact a huge number of people – and this is your assigned person.” – Shut Down DC Mailing, November 13, 2020

The militant left-wing group Shut Down DC is doxxing specific attorneys in a mass email sent on November 13, 2020. In the email, Shut Down DC provides supporters with a unique “assigned” attorney to harass with form letters and pre-scripted phone calls.

Shut Down DC, along with their many allies in big tech, the mainstream media and the democrat-funded Lincoln Project, have launched a full-on attack on law firms and individual attorneys for daring to take on cases that may possibly bring wrong-doing to light, as reported at RAIR Foundation USA.

Shut Down DC asks supporters to join them in “visiting [law firm] King & Spalding” and to assist in their “virtual campaign” where they provide supporters with their “assigned” attorney’s name, phone number and email address. The left-wing group also reminds supporters that they can participate in shaming attorneys on social media.

“I am very concerned that King & Spalding is pursuing frivolous lawsuits for the Trump campaign that are undermining our democracy and attempting to silence the voices of Black and brown voters,” the juvenile and amateur form letter reads in part. “You are complicit in Trump’s effort to bully and cheat his way through this election and impede a stable and safe transfer of presidential power,” the letter continues.

Here is a screenshot of the mass mailing, sent through the Action Network, which describes itself as “a mission-driven organization dedicated to building power for the progressive movement…”

Screenshot from email

The mainstream media has thrown away all semblance of objectivity and journalistic integrity, with some even threatening attorneys that if they work with the Trump Administration, they may not have a job in the future, like this menacing message from The Atlantic:

Image
Threatening Message to Attorneys: If you work with Trump, you might not keep your job

The authors of the Atlantic piece, Bradley P. Moss and Joanne Molinaro, are rabidly against the President and have been from the beginning. Moss, who obsessively tweets about the President, referred to claims of voter fraud as “baseless and pathetic” and Molinaro even wrote a poorly-written open letter to President Trump bashing him for making her mad at her boyfriend and having white voters, or something.

While the complicit left is counting on the ignorance of their base, there is a constitutional process that must be completed. The mainstream media is not constitutionally authorized to call elections.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo explains:

“We’re gonna count all the votes. When the process is complete, there’ll be electors selected. There’s a process. The Constitution lays it out pretty clearly.”

Watch attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani discuss the compelling evidence of potential voter fraud that is being scrutinized in Pennsylvania and Michigan:

Support our work at RAIR Foundation USA! We are a grassroots activist team and we need your help! Please consider making a donation here: https://rairfoundation.com/donate/

 

AS PER DATA SCIENTISTS: Georgia data reveals 30,000+ Trump votes removed, another 12,173 switched to Biden

Georgia election data indicates at least 30,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump and another 12,173 votes were switched to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, data scientists testified on Dec. 30 during a state Senate hearing.

The Georgia Senate Subcommittee held a hearing on December 30th and called Rudy Giuliani to testify based on his investigation. Rudy then gives one of the best, if not the best, summation of the facts as he sees them in about 15 minutes. Testimony provided here, in full, unedited as a public service. Nothing but straight testimony of what was said. Each person can judge the validity on their own.

Pro-Life Group That Recorded Planned Parenthood Undercover Ordered to Pay $13 Million in Legal Fees

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: https://christiannews.net/2021/01/01/pro-life-group-that-recorded-planned-parenthood-undercover-ordered-to-pay-13-million-in-legal-fees/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

SAN FRANCISCO — In addition to the $2 million in damages awarded to Planned Parenthood by a jury last year, a federal judge has ruled that the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), led by David Daleiden, must pay more than $13 million in attorneys fees to the abortion and contraception giant.

Planned Parenthood had originally requested over $14 million in attorneys fees for work done by 12 of the more than 130 lawyers who assisted with their legal action against Daleiden and colleague Sandra Merritt.

“Viewing the ample evidence plaintiffs submit regarding the time they spent on the categories of tasks in each phase of this highly contested litigation, and relying on my own knowledge and understanding of the unusually significant time required to develop and try this case, I have a sufficient basis to conclude that the hours plaintiffs seek are reasonable,” wrote U.S. District Judge William Orrick III.

He reduced the amount requested by $1 million, deducting payment requested for in-house counsel, and also declined to grant Planned Parenthood’s request for $37,500 in reimbursement for security costs for witnesses who spoke at trial.

Read Orrick’s Dec. 22 order in full here.

As previously reported, Daleiden and Merritt attended abortion industry conferences from 2013 to 2015 under the names Robert Sarkis and Susan Tennenbaum and with the impression that they were representatives of a company they called BioMax Procurement Services.

They recorded their conversations as they sought to learn about Planned Parenthood’s abortion practices and harvesting partnerships.

CMP then publicly released video footage of the undercover investigation, showing various Planned Parenthood leaders and representatives of biomedical companies callously discussing extracting unborn children from the womb so that their body parts can be collected and sold for research.

“We’ve been using them for over 10 years, really a long time, [and we] just kind of renegotiated the contract,” Katherine Sheehan, the medical director for Planned Parenthood Pacific Southwest, said of Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR) in one video. “They’re doing the big collections for government-level collections and things like that.”

“I literally have had women come in and they’ll go to the OR and they’re back out in three minutes, and I’m going, ‘What’s going on?’” Parrin Larton of ABR also explained. “Oh yeah, the fetus was already in the [birthing] canal. Whenever we put her in the stirrups, it just fell out.”

“But most of the time, it is not intact,” she added. “The abdomen is always ripped open.. … Everything will just get ripped up, you know. Whenever we have a smooth portion of liver, we think that’s good, because most of the time, just the instruments they go in to pull and it’s just whatever presents first.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee released a report in light of the videos outlining its finding that ABR, StemExpress and Novogenics Laboratories purchased the bodily organs of aborted babies from California Planned Parenthood locations, and then resold them at substantially higher prices.

“[I]n June of 2014, an ABR technician obtained a 20-week-old fetus at a Planned Parenthood clinic, for which it paid $60,” the committee outlined. “From that one fetus, ABR sold its brain to one customer for $325, both of its eyes for $325 each ($650 total) to a second customer, a portion of its liver for $325 to a third customer, its thymus for $325 and another portion of its liver for $325 to a fourth customer, and its lung for $325 to a fifth customer.”

But Planned Parenthood accused Daleiden of initiating a smear campaign to try to harm its organization and soon sued CMP over the matter, alleging fraud, trespass, breach of conduct, and eavesdropping as part of a conspiracy under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

Both Daleiden and Merritt were also leveled with numerous criminal charges, which California Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed against them. The charges could land them both in prison for a decade, if prosecutors are successful.

In November 2019, a jury awarded Planned Parenthood over $2 million after determining that Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress caused “substantial harm” to the organization. Orrick, who presided over the case, reportedly instructed the jury to find Daleiden guilty of trespass.

He also told jurors that they could not take into account any information that Daleiden discovered during his investigation but only what he knew before launching the undercover project.

“The First Amendment is not a defense to the claims in this case for the jury to consider,” Orrick additionally wrote prior to the trial, according to Courthouse News. “Defendants’ argument that they were citizen journalists was admissible as context for the defendants’ case, not as a legal defense.”

Jurors consequently concluded that Daleiden’s actions constituted the malice and fraud elements required in order to award Planned Parenthood punitive damages, settling on a payment of $870K. Another $470K in compensatory damages was granted for “security upgrades” and screening, and CMP estimates the total damages, when RICO is factored, to be nearly $2.3 million.

Daleiden’s attorneys have appealed that decision.

Courthouse News reports that the attorneys believe that the ruling will be overturned and that CMP will not have to pay any fees to Planned Parenthood.

“We think there’s no basis for Planned Parenthood to be awarded any fees,” attorney Paul Jonna of the firm LiMandri & Jonna LLP told the outlet. “We think there are a number of very serious issues on appeal that will result in reversal, and that there will be ultimately no fees paid to Planned Parenthood.”

This past September, Daleiden sued Planned Parenthood for defamation as it claimed that the video footage he released exposing the organizations’ practices were a “fake smear campaign.”

 

 

Walmart Goes After ‘#SoreLoser’ Sen Josh Hawley for Questioning Election Integrity and Immediately Regrets It

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2020/12/31/walmart-goes-after-soreloser-sen-josh-hawley-for-questioning-election-integrity-and-immediately-regrets-it-n1295553;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Leftists working in America’s corporations and schools appear to have no compunction about using the power and prestige of their employer to amplify their personal politics. Now it’s Walmart’s turn.

Google employees openly lament over the 2016 election results and vow never to let it happen again. They manipulate searches and messages to do just that in 2020. Teachers think nothing of flipping off the president or the “teacher of the year” wishing death upon a Senate majority leader. They feel secure knowing that they’re surrounded by like-minded people and will suffer little-to-no consequences for their uncivil actions.

On Wednesday, it was Walmart’s turn. Someone in the company’s social media department decided it was no big deal to try to big-foot a US Senator for standing against ratifying the electoral college votes for the presidential election. They used the prestige of the company for which they work to mock Senator Josh Hawley and people who support President Trump.

It didn’t go well for the retail behemoth in the end. Hawley had the foresight to screenshot the tweet from Walmart in response to his message about election integrity.

Millions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard. I will object on January 6 on their behalf.

To which the official corporate Walmart Twitter account responded in a decidedly unprofessional, nay sophomoric, way.

Go ahead. Get your 2 hour debate. #Soreloser

And it was on.

Hawley responded:

Thanks @Walmart for your insulting condescension. Now that you’ve insulted 75 million Americans, will you at least apologize for using slave labor?

Hawley’s attack on Walmart’s dependence on cheaper products from China, which uses slave labor to make some products, wasn’t his coup de grâce. Yet.

The Missouri Senator went on.

Or maybe you’d like to apologize for the pathetic wages you pay your workers as you drive mom and pop stores out of business.

That’s got to smart a little.

Walmart has traditionally been a more Republican-leaning corporation but it’s now turned purple and obviously has turned its back on issues that are of import to all Americans, not just red-staters.

Walmart should take a page from NBA great, Michael Jordan, who once famously said, “Republicans buy sneakers, too.”

Though Jordan said it in jest, he wasn’t wrong.

There were 74 million people in the Trump camp on election day 2020. Most of them were Republicans, some were Democrats and others were independents. You can bet many of those people have shopped at a Walmart at one time or another.

Walmart just told them it doesn’t want their business. The message didn’t go over well. Twitter user Mindy Robinson weighed in.

You know what? F-Walmart and their slave labor produce cheap sh*tty products. We need American-made options for all manufactured goods starting RIGHT NOW.

Let’s phase out our dependence on China by taxing their products to oblivion! #CancelChina #BoycottWalmart

And a guy named Brian urged people to shop at small businesses – if you can find any that are allowed to be open during COVID.

Thank you @hawleymo! As for Walmart, time to shop at small businesses!

Some lashed back at Hawley for “insulting” 80 million voters who apparently think the election was totally on the up and up, even though their candidate barely actively campaigned.

During the COVID lockdowns, big box stores, of which Walmart is a part, have been deemed essential and allowed to stay open. CNBC reporter Rick Santelli pointed out the fundamental unfairness, not to mention lack of science, at keeping smaller stores closed while allowing big stores, with the same ratio of people to space, to stay open. Walmart has made billions during the lockdown because government has shut down what remains of its competition and the company has gobbled up market share. In August, Walmart announced its online sales were up by 97%.

Indeed, the unfairness has become the subject of memes.

I say for phase 3 we close down Walmart, Costco, & other big retail stores for 6 months & let have small businesses have a chance at making record profits.

Democrats and unions, but I repeat myself, over the years have unleashed a blitzkrieg of websites, movies and direct actions against the corporation for not using unionized employees. Walmart Watch/Change WalmartWalmart Sucks were part of the campaign by Democrat groups to hurt the company and force them to bend to the Left.

The memes about the “people of Walmart” started as one such effort and grew into its own franchise. The photos were a way of mocking hayseed Walmart shoppers – and by extension commenting on the lower social status of the store –  because on the ladder of victimhood, hating Walmart ranks higher than shaming people who shop at a cheaper, non-union store.

Who stood up for Walmart? People who support free enterprise. Not Democrats.

How soon they forget.

Walmart responded with an aw, shucks, that was just a mistake by some free radical pinging off the walls of our social media office.

The corporate headquarters, which originally sent out the initial attempted slap down of Senator Hawley, wrote that it never intended to involve itself in election politics and issued a non-apology-apology to the Missouri Republican.

The tweet published earlier was mistakenly posted by a member of our social media team. We deleted the post and have no intention of commenting on the subject of certifying the electoral college. We apologize to Senator Hawley for this error and any confusion about our position.

Maybe many Trump-voting “people of Walmart” haven’t noticed this tell by the retail behemoth, but seeing as how Hawley is the biggest name out there in Congress opposing codifying this flawed election, maybe they have.

 

VA Senator RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR: Trump Must Pursue ALL Options to Stop the Steal

In this interview with The New American's Alex Newman, Virginia Senator Amanda Chase (Republican) explains that the 2020 election fraud by the Marxist-controlled Democrat Party must be opposed and defeated. For her vocal comments on this issue, Senator Chase has been targeted by the far-left establishment media, but she is not standing down. Instead, she's doubling down, running for governor of Virginia on a platform of restoring the Constitution and ensuring election integrity. 🇺🇸 The New American: http://www.thenewamerican.com/

Court Strikes Cuomo’s COVID Order on Churches, Synagogues

BY TYLER O'NEIL

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/12/28/a-direct-and-severe-violation-court-strikes-cuomos-covid-19-orders-on-churches-synagogues-n1289774;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Monday, a panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction against Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D-N.Y.) COVID-19 orders placing strict limits on houses of worship in hot spots. The 2nd Circuit panel agreed with the Supreme Court that Cuomo’s order likely does not satisfy the high standard of strict scrutiny and therefore violates the First Amendment.

“No public interest is served by maintaining an unconstitutional policy when constitutional alternatives are available to achieve the same goal,” Judge Michael Park wrote in the opinion. “The restrictions challenged here specially and disproportionately burden religious exercise, and thus ’strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty.’ Such a direct and severe constitutional violation weighs heavily in favor of granting injunctive relief.”

In the 3-0 decision, the panel upheld the claims of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, the Orthodox Jewish group Agudath Israel of America, and two synagogues. The ruling enjoined Cuomo’s October 6 order capping attendance at “houses of worship.”

Cuomo capped attendance at either 10 people or 25 percent capacity, whichever is lesser, in “red” zones, and 25 people or 33 percent capacity in “orange” zones, even in buildings that seat hundreds.

While previous rulings had supported Cuomo’s order, the Supreme Court granted an injunction against the order by a 5-4 majority.

“In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, we hold that the Order’s regulation of ‘houses of worship’ is subject to strict scrutiny and that its fixed capacity limits are not narrowly tailored to stem the spread of COVID-19. Appellants have established irreparable harm caused by the fixed capacity limits, and the public interest favors granting injunctive relief,” the 2nd Circuit panel ruled.

In the opinion, Park noted that Cuomo “has not asserted that his categorization of businesses as ‘essential’ or ’non-essential’ was based on any assessment of COVID-19 transmission risk.” He also argued that Cuomo did not use data or compare religious worship with “essential” activities.

Cuomo has claimed that the Supreme Court’s ruling had no practical effect because some restrictions were lifted as COVID-19 outbreaks eased.

Avi Schick, a lawyer for Agudath Israel, said Monday’s decision “will be felt way beyond the COVID context. It is a clear statement … that government can’t disfavor religious conduct merely because it sees no value in religious practice.”

Randy Mastro, the diocese’s lawyer, said the diocese was “gratified,” and will welcome parishioners to mass “under strict protocols” that keep them safe.

Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

Cuomo Compared Orthodox Jews to the KKK. Now a Jewish School Is Taking Him to Court
Ralph Northam Drops Draconian COVID Restrictions on Churches Under Legal Duress
Barr: COVID Lockdowns Are ‘Greatest Intrusion on Civil Liberties in American History’ Besides Slavery
As Rioters Destroy New York, Cops Kick Jewish Families Out of a Playground
 

Dominion tells Mellissa Carone to stop spreading misinformation about the fraudulent elections

BY DAVE BOUCHER

SEE: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/28/dominion-tells-mellissa-carone-stop-spreading-misinformation/4063244001/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The company that designed election equipment used in Detroit, Antrim County and many other jurisdictions across the country wants a former contract employee and others with ties to Michigan to stop spreading election misinformation

Last week, attorneys representing Dominion Voting Systems sent cease-and-desist letters to a litany of people tied to the campaign of President Donald Trump, including several with ties to Michigan:

  • Mellissa Carone, a former contract employee who worked for Dominion in Detroit. She has made a series of debunked and refuted fraud allegations involving Dominion and Detroit. 
  • Russell James Ramsland Jr., a self-proclaimed cybersecurity analyst who has worked with the Trump campaign to create several deeply flawed analyses about the election in Michigan and other states.
  • Matthew DePerno, an attorney representing a man who sued Antrim County over a marijuana-related election issue. Through the lawsuit, a judge allowed a team affiliated with Ramsland to review Dominion machines used in Antrim County. 

More:Fiery Giuliani tells Michigan lawmakers election stolen, offers no credible evidence

More:Detroit elections expert defends TCF operations, refutes allegations during Senate hearing

The legal requests are part of a broader strategy aimed at combating misinformation spread by Trump allies that the voting systems company played a role in a conspiracy to steal the election from Trump.

All three letters indicate litigation is "imminent," but that's no guarantee anyone will be sued. Dominion asks everyone to hold on to a wide array of documents and evidence of communications with, among others, members of President Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the media. The broad requests state they need to preserve this information, even if it wasn't published. 

Witness Melissa Carone speaks at left as President Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani questions witnesses regarding alleged election irregularities in front of the Michigan House Oversight Committee Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2020 during a meeting in the Anderson House Office Building in Lansing.

"Without a shred of corroborating evidence, you have claimed that you witnessed several different versions of voter fraud — ranging from one story involving a van, to other accusations that votes were counted multiple times. You published these statements even though you knew all along that your attacks on Dominion have no basis in reality," reads the letter to Carone, from attorneys Thomas A. Clare and Megan L. Meier of Clark Locke LLP. 

The allegations from Carone, Ramsland and others are far-fetched and have been repeatedly debunked. President-elect Joe Biden received 154,000 more votes in Michigan than Trump, and more than enough Electoral College votes to earn the presidency. 

Sidney Powell, an attorney favored by Trump even after she was disavowed by his campaign, has alleged in lawsuits that Dominion is tied to confederates of late Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez and is a key part of the international scheme to steal the election. 

Dominion CEO John Poulos recently testified under oath at a Michigan Senate hearing, where he rebutted claims made by Powell and others. 

More:Trump mean-tweets Nessel after AG suggests sanctions for election conspiracy lawyers

More:New Supreme Court filing includes blatantly wrong information about Michigan

Carone, who worked on a one-day contract for Dominion in Detroit at the TCF Center, gained international attention after she joined Trump campaign attorney Rudy Giuliani at a Michigan legislative hearing in November. That includes a skit on Saturday Night Live and some national television interviews. 

During the hearing, Carone alleged as many as 100,000 absentee ballots were counted twice and seemed to imply Dominion was involved in some sort of conspiracy. Her accusations have repeatedly been refuted by courts, elections experts and by lawmakers. 

Carone did not immediately respond to emails and phone calls from the Free Press Monday seeking comment. She told the Detroit News she is not concerned about the letter and stated Dominion is "scared of me." 

In numerous reports offered by Ramsland as purported proof of fraud, he and his associates have made basic and blatant errors. In one report, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in several Michigan precincts. In another, he confused voting precincts in Minnesota with Michigan towns.  

More:Trump tweet wrongly suggests there were defects with Michigan voting machines

More:Antrim County hand tally affirms certified election results

He also issued a report wrongly indicating there was an "error rate" of more than 68% with the Dominion machines used to count ballots in Antrim County. A hand recount of every ballot cast in Antrim County led to only 12 additional votes for Trump. 

"You issued a report last month falsely claiming that Dominion machines are 'intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.' This is patently false," the letter to Ramsland states. 

Ramsland did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment. 

DePerno and several other attorneys around the country also received a letter from Dominion, accusing them of being "architects and drivers of the ongoing misinformation campaign against Dominion." DePerno represents William Bailey, an Antrim County man who sued over the vote count in a local marijuana proposal. 

Through the lawsuit, DePerno successfully argued a team should be allowed to inspect the Dominion voting machines used in the county. DePerno has said Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is lying about the situation in Antrim County and the results of the review of the Dominion machines was enough to warrant overturning all election results in the state. 

DePerno did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment. 

Michigan's 16 delegates to the Electoral College already cast their ballots for Biden. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer sent the certified slate to Congress. Biden will be sworn in on Jan. 20. 

 
1 27 28 29 30 31 40