A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) The federal government says it is beefing up its military presence in Eastern Europe in order to “protect its allies against Russia.” However, internal documents show that what American “protection” actually means in practical terms is to conduct horrific biological experiments on allied troops.
It has been revealed that the Pentagon exposed about 4,400 Ukrainian soldiers and 1,000 Georgian soldiers to biological experiments with potentially lethal outcomes. According to leaked documents, all volunteer deaths were to be reported within 24 hours in Ukraine and 48 hours in Georgia.
“Both countries are considered the most loyal U.S. partners in the region with a number of Pentagon programs being implemented in their territory,” writes Bulgarian investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, as relayed by Arms Watch.
“One of them is the $2.5 billion Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Biological engagement program which includes research on bio-agents, deadly viruses and antibiotic-resistant bacteria being studied on the local population.”
The Pentagon’s “Project GG-21,” as it was code-named, is set to last for five years with a possible three-year extension. The project’s description explains that it involves spreading “arthropod-borne and zoonotic infections among military personnel in Georgia.”
Blood samples were collected from 1,000 military recruits at the time of their military registration and physical exam at the Georgian military hospital in Gori. The samples were then tested for antibodies against the following 14 pathogens:
Bacillus anthracis Brucella CCHF virus Coxiella burnetii Francisella tularensis Hantavirus Rickettsia species TBE virus Bartonella species Borrelia species Ehlrichia species Leptospira species Salmonella typhi WNV
The 10 ml blood draw samples are to be stored indefinitely at the NCDC (Lugar Center) or USAMRU-G, and aliquots could be sent to the WRAIR (Walter Reed Army Institute of Research) headquarters in the United States for future research.
“Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) is the largest biomedical research facility administered by the U.S. Department of Defense,” explains Arms Watch. “The results of the blood testing will not be provided to the study participants.”
In conducting these heinous experiments, special bilateral agreements were formed to protect the U.S. deep state from all liability
The Lugar Center has become infamous for controversial activities, including laboratory incidents and scandals involving U.S.-based drug giant Gilead, which ran a hepatitis C experimentation program in Georgia that resulted in at least 248 patient deaths.
The Georgian GG-21 project is funded by the Pentagon’s DTRA and implemented by American military scientists from a special U.S. Army unit code-named USAMRU-G, which operates in the Lugar Center.
“They have been given diplomatic immunity in Georgia to research bacteria, viruses and toxins without being diplomats,” reports indicate. “This unit is subordinate to the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR).”
“Documents obtained from the U.S. Federal contracts registry show that USAMRU-G is expanding its activities to other U.S. allies in the region and is ‘establishing expeditionary capabilities’ in Georgia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Latvia, and any future locations. The next USAMRU-G project involving biological tests on soldiers is due to start in March of this year at the Bulgarian Military Hospital in Sofia.”
The Ukrainian project was similarly code-named as UP-8 and involved the spread of the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus and various hantaviruses. It began in 2017 and was extended a few times until 2020.
For that research, blood samples were collected from 4,400 healthy soldiers in Lviv, Kharkiv, Odessa, and Kyiv. Of these, 4,000 samples were tested for antibodies against hantaviruses and the remaining 400 for antibodies against CCHF.
Like the Georgian project, the Ukrainian one revealed no details other than to report all deaths within 24 hours.
As of July 30, 2020, DTRA had allocated $80 million for biological research in Ukraine. The U.S.-based Black & Veatch Special Projects Corporation was tasked with running the program there.
Another DTRA contractor operating in Ukraine is CH2M Hill was awarded a special $22.8 million contract from 2020-2023 to reconstruct and outfit with equipment from two biolaboratories: the State Scientific Research Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary-Sanitary Expertise (Kyiv ILD) and the State Service of Ukraine for Food Safety and Consumer Protection Regional Diagnostic Laboratory (Odesa RDL).
Both the Georgia and the Ukraine projects fall under the protection of special bilateral agreements that shield the U.S. government, its personnel, contractors, and contractors’ personnel from liability for “damage to property,” as well as “death or injury to any persons in Georgia and Ukraine, arising out of activities under this Agreement.”
“If DTRA-sponsored scientists cause deaths or injuries to the local population they cannot be held to account,” Gaytandzhieva writes.
“Furthermore, according to the US-Ukraine Agreement, claims by third parties for deaths and injuries in Ukraine, arising out of the acts or omissions of any employees of the United States related to work under this Agreement, shall be the responsibility of Ukraine.”
These revelations make the situation in Ukraine a whole lot more complex than just “Vladimir Putin is a madman,” which is what the Western media wants everyone to think.
Ukraine, Georgia, and the other countries where the Pentagon has been operating biolabs and conducting biological experiments on soldiers are hotbeds of biological terrorism being perpetrated by the U.S. government. The United States, in other words, is a terroristic threat.
“What is happening is terrible!” wrote someone in response to Gaytandzhieva’s work. “These studies and the data from the investigation of our compatriot must reach all people in Eastern Europe!”
Another thanked Gaytandzhieva for telling the truth instead of pushing Western propaganda.
More related news coverage can be found at Evil.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Dr. Theresa Long, a medical officer with the United States military, has testified in court that she was ordered by a superior to suppress Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” injuries following the Biden regime’s mandate.
Long and two other medical professionals observed a spike in cancer cases, neurological disorders, and miscarriages immediately after Biden’s jab mandate was enacted. They were told, however, to keep this damning information under wraps.
The other two who supported Long in arriving at these findings are Dr. Samuel Sigoloff and Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, who are being represented by Thomas Renz, a member of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) legal team.
“I have so many soldiers being destroyed by this vaccine,” Long said in court.
“Not a single member of my senior command has discussed my concerns with me … I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by talking about it. I’m okay with that because I am watching people get absolutely destroyed.”
Liberty Counsel is currently representing 30 members of the military who are fighting back against the military’s jab mandate. They recently presented their case to Judge Steven Merryday, who granted a preliminary injunction to two military plaintiffs, allowing them to sidestep the injection mandate.
Judge in case says DoD’s position is “frail;” government agency “acting as though they are above the law”
During the hearing, which took place on March 10, the Department of Defense (DoD) requested for this injunction to be waived while the case is being appealed. Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver also says the DoD is refusing to send witnesses to be cross-examined, which points to a possible cover-up.
“They send these declarations that some JAG attorney writes, and somebody in the military signs off on them,” Staver says.
He also explained that the DoD is presenting information in court that is flat-out “outdated, wrong, and would really be subject to dismantling under cross-examination.”
Judge Merryday, Staver claims, has already chastised the DoD, saying the government agency has a “frail case” and is “acting as though they are above the law.”
Out of 3,212 applications in the Marines requesting a religious exemption, only two have been accepted, according to reports. When pressed for information as to why this number is so dismally low, Capt. Andrew Wood responded with:
“Due to privacy considerations, we are unable to discuss the specifics of any individual requests.”
Some 45 Marines, meanwhile, were discharged last week after refusing to submit to the experimental injections. In total, there have now been 334 discharges over refusal to get jabbed.
In a statement about this, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. David Berger parroted Big Pharma talking points:
“You have to ask each individual Marines their reason why,” Berger said during an appearance at the Aspen Security Forum.
“But I think we’re challenged by disinformation … that still swirls around about where the genesis, how did this vaccine get approved, is it safe is it ethical – all that swirls around on the internet and they see all that they read all that.”
In other words, the Marines, and the rest of the Armed Forces, for that matter, have been turned into “appendages for the hellish Orwellian technocracy that is rising due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” to quote one source.
“In the past, this would have been enough to stop all vaccinations,” noted a commenter at Natural News about the torrent of jab injuries being reported.
“Instead, the ‘stupids’ insist on pushing forward with the shots. Those who have been permanently harmed by these vaccines will expect rightly so government help. This alone will destroy the United States economy. What kind of country will be left after these payouts will be anybody’s guess.”
More related news about Biden’s covid jab mandates can be found at Fascism.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) The “moderators” at Cornell University‘s arXiv server, an open-access archive and free distribution service for scientific material, have been censoring scientific studies that they claim contain “inflammatory content and unprofessional language.”
A “preprint server” for preliminary versions of scientific studies that are moderated but not yet peer-reviewed or published, arXiv is supposed to be neutral when it comes to what gets published. The reality, however, is that arXiv is selectively censoring studies and even banning scientists for publishing work with “controversial” viewpoints.
In one instance, researchers tried to publish a study presenting an opposing viewpoint to another study about room temperature superconductivity. Those researchers aligned with the opposing point of view study are reportedly now “in hot water” on arXiv for daring to buck the “consensus.”
The server also proceeded to ban University of California San Diego (UCSD) theoretical physicist Jorge Hirsch from posting anything on the platform for six months as punishment for his conflicting viewpoints.
“Hirsch was the author of a number of the papers that sought to represent a different point of view on a particular topic – from a paper published in October 2020 in Nature, authored by a team led by University of Rochester physicist Ranga Dias,” reported Reclaim the Net.
“As scientists do, Hirsch was skeptical of the results of the study and asked for raw data from Dias, some of which was, after many rejections, eventually provided by a co-author. The relationship between the scientists soured, and it became evident in their subsequent papers.”
Hirsch would go on to produce two papers of his own based on the data, only to have both of them blocked by arXiv administrators, who also removed another one by Dias. Many studies have also been retracted due to fake peer reviews.
“The explanation for the latter was ‘inflammatory content’ and bad language – but Hirsch says both he and Dias should not be prevented from publishing papers, since that means preventing scientists from working,” Reclaim the Net added.
“Hirsch thinks the bans and removals are ‘very unfair’ and has called on arXiv not to put its ‘arbitrary self-righteous decorum standards’ above scientists’ right to conduct unstifled debate and have their arguments ‘judged on their merits.'”
How much published “science” is actually real science?
In its defense, arXiv, which hosts over two million preprints, and its 200 moderators say that censorship is necessary to ensure that only papers with the “correct” conclusions get published.
“If we allow this stuff, what is the difference between arXiv and Twitter?” asked University of Oxford physicist Paul Fendley, who sits on arXiv’s advisory committee.
Concerning fraudulent peer reviews and other problematic elements of modern “science,” Dr. Marcia Angell, M.D., gave a lecture unpacking how special interests tamper with “science” to ensure that only certain narratives go public.
Angell attended Harvard Medical School and is a retired editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). She has been blowing the whistle on this subject for many years, even when it was unpopular and “conspiratorial” to do so.
“Science these days is more about the art of lying than about verifiable truth and facts,” wrote someone at Natural News.
“So much for the belief in peer review and the honesty and integrity of journals,” expressed another.
As for arXiv, that repository is following in the footsteps of Big Tech by flat-out censoring “controversial” science while apparently propping up status quo pseudoscience.
The moral of the story: be careful what you accept as “science” because it might not be what it seems.
You will find more stories like this one at Censorship.news.
The CDC falsely reported deaths of children from Covid-19. Pfizer Documents show extreme harm from the vaccine, yet CDC and FDA falsely claimed it was safe and effective.
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
For researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organization Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. Read the full investigation: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n...
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.” – Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the inventor of the core mRNA vaccine technology platform, and Dr. Ryan Cole, a Mayo Clinic trained Pathologist who is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, are fighting to save children from the detrimental effects of the Covid vaccines.
The two medical experts were featured at four sold-out One Washington events. The event organizer is a non-profit organization that is helping equip parents, lawmakers, and activists to counter moves by the state Board of Health to add the Covid vaccine to the required shots for public school children.
Both doctors are tired of seeing young children die or suffer permanent damage from a “vaccine” that “does not work for a virus that is no longer here and most of them have already recovered.” Yet, the courageous medical experts, who have been smeared and maligned by big pharma, left-wing politicians, and media, continue to risk their careers to save children.
Covid Vaccines Are A Great Risk To Children
At the event, Dr. Malone warned parents that before they opt to inject their children with the Covid vaccine, a decision that is “irreversible” and potentially permanently damaging, to listen to the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine. The vaccine is based upon mRNA vaccine technology created by Dr. Malone:
There are three issues parents and grandparents need to understand, explains Dr. Malone:
The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins can cause permanent damage to children’s critical organs. These types of injuries include:
Damages to their brain and nervous system
Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
Their reproductive system, and
These vaccines can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable
You can’t fix the lesions within their brain
You can’t fix heart tissue scarring
You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and
This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
We need at least 5 years of testing and research before we can really understand the risks
Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later
Ask yourself if you want your child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history.
One final point is that the reasons they’re giving you to vaccinate your child are lies.
Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to saving your family if not the world from this disease. They generate broad natural immunity. That is our best recourse to keep this virus from further evolving into a superbug.
In summary: there is no benefit to your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that, as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of your lives. If your child is damaged, you can not sue the pharmaceutical companies or government. You are the one who is going to have to take care of your child and deal with it emotionally for the rest of your life.
The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.
As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation is to resist and fight to protect your children. That is why I am here. I am trying to save children’s lives; this is the hill I will die on.
Fauci Does Not Want Autoposies Performed
Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), did not want autopsies to be done on the bodies of Covid patients.
However, pathologist Ryan Cole said at the event that a nine-year-old had died from the vaccine on his table. “Dead,” Cole said. He added that he does not want to see another child on his table who has died after the vaccine. The pathologist said autopsies are finally being performed.
In the same place where the nine-year-old lived, a healthy 22-year-old wrestler also died after his third shot. It will soon be on Cole’s table so that he can determine the cause of death.
“We were told: do not do autopsies, don’t look, and that is what your government is giving you for data. Don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t look, these are not the droids you are looking for, everything is safe and effective, go jab up the children with a shot that does not work for a virus that is no longer here and most of them have already recovered,” said Cole. He added that doctors who ask questions must fear their careers being destroyed.
Dr. Cole echoed the sentiments of his friend and colleague, Dr. Malone; fighting for children’s safety is also a hill he is willing to die on. The doctor stressed that they are fighting for a generation that “should not be harmed for something they do not need.”
The pathologist also stressed that natural immunity is “far better than a vaccine ‘therapy.'” There are 150 studies published on this at Brownstone Institute by their colleague, Dr. Paul Alexander.
Cancer Spreads Like Wildfire
RAIR Foundation USA had previously reported on Dr. Cole, who warned that the Covid vaccines are also responsible for increased cancer cases.
After he spoke out about the risks of the corona vaccines, ‘numerous’ oncologists contacted him. The doctors reported they are “seeing the weirdest cancers, and cancers that we have been able to keep in check and treat, taking off like wildfire – going stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, just like that.”
In part 1 of this bombshell exclusive, Candace sits down with Dr. Robert Malone to discuss the effects of the vaccine on women's fertility, the corruption of Big Pharma, and the truth about how medical data is manipulated. This is the interview that Big Tech doesn't want you to see.
‘PFIZER USED TOXIC INGREDIENT’ 99% of the vaccine; also masks, test swabs
Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘PFIZER USED TOXIC INGREDIENT’ (Ep. 2050 - 3.17.22). The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash
In this Dr. Jane Ruby Show, Dr. Jane talks with UK Nurse and Activist, Kate Shemirani who’s been called Britain’s most dangerous woman and notorious anti-vaxxer, her research led her away from modern allopathic medicine and a search for answers after her own diagnosis of cancer, she became a personal nutrition advisor and now works on UK radio as a leading voice against British tyrannical government; and then Dr. Jane meets with Greta Crawford who escaped the death protocol in a Texas hospital and now leads a rally in Wisconsin; the show ends on a hopeful optimistic note encouraging personal health and mindset to survive and thrive in the aftermath of the covid scam and tyrannical overreach.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Due to state laws in several states banning abortions either after a heartbeat is detected or after a certain number of weeks of pregnancy, Citigroup has taken the step of covering travel expenses for employees who go out of state for abortions. The bank announced Tuesday that the new policy is “in response to changes in reproductive healthcare laws in certain states in the US.”
Citigroup — the third-largest banking institution in the United States — made its announcement in a public filing ahead of its annual shareholders' meeting in April. And while the filing does not specifically mention abortion, it states that the policy of covering travel expenses was put in place to “facilitate access to adequate resources.”
And while Citigroup may have conspicuously left any direct mention of abortion out of the filing, the use of euphemism is hard to miss. By stating that the bank is covering employees' travel expenses to “facilitate access to adequate resources” “in response to changes in reproductive healthcare laws in certain states in the US,” Citigroup could not have been more clear if the filing has said, “We want to be known as the abortion bank.”
Citi will cover transportation and lodging for employees who need to leave states such as Texas for abortions, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Citigroup — which is considered a systemically important bank by the Financial Stability Board and is commonly cited as being “too big to fail” — was part of the U.S. government’s 2008 bailout of financial institutions. Since then, Citigroup has been no stranger to controversy. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Citigroup was — as of 2008, when the U.S. government bailed it out — the 16th-largest political campaign contributor in the United States. In 2014, of the 57 Democrats supporting the 2015 spending bill, 34 had received campaign cash from Citigroup’s PAC at some point since 2010. The line between Citigroup and the government is blurry indeed. And the line between Citigroup and the establishment is so faint it can scarcely be seen at times. The government bailed Citigroup out and Citigroup began buying the government off. Nice arrangement, if you can get it.
Buried in a filing released Tuesday night, the bank disclosed it will now cover travel costs for employees seeking an abortion after several states including Texas implemented or proposed a near-total ban on the procedure. The New York-based bank will pay expenses, such as airfare and lodging, that employees may incur if forced to leave a state for an abortion.
Of course, the idea that anyone could be “forced to leave a state for an abortion” is ridiculous. No one is ever “forced” to get an abortion, much less leave a state to do so. Abortion is — by its very nature — an elective surgery designed to kill an unborn human person.
The backlash from Texas Republicans who see the new Citigroup policy for what is was immediate.
Matt Rinaldi — who serves as chairman of the Republican Party of Texas — said, “Citigroup’s decision to finance the murder of unborn children with a heartbeat is appalling, but not surprising, considering its past adoption of far-left causes.” He added a call for Republicans to avoid entrusting their finances with Citibank and other companies that are hostile to them and their values.
And Texas land commissioner running for the Republican nomination for attorney general, George P. Bush (yes, of those Bushes) said, “The ‘travel benefits’ offered by Citigroup is nothing more than a PR stunt by a ‘woke’ company to support a culture of death,” adding, “Texas is a pro-life state, and if elected Attorney General, I will hold actors who attempt to find loopholes in our laws accountable.”
Bush’s warning that he will “hold actors who attempt to find loopholes in our laws accountable” may not be a hollow threat. The Texas law allows citizens to sue anyone who aids another in obtaining an abortion. And Bloomberg cited Columbia University law professor Carol Sanger as saying that the bank will be opening itself and its human resources employees up to “aiding and abetting” liability under the Texas law. She said the bank may be gambling it won’t get sued “because nobody has been sued yet” under the statute’s enabling provision.
While other financial institutions (and other major employers) in Texas are likely watching Citigroup’s policy closely to see how it pans out for them, most other large employers in Texas are sitting tight. In fact, as Bloomberg reported, most are staying mum:
Indeed, banks operating in Texas were mostly quiet on Citi’s move. JPMorgan Chase & Co. didn’t have an immediate comment. Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley all didn’t respond to requests seeking comment. Some of the state’s biggest employers — American Airlines Group Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., Exxon Mobil Corp., Halliburton Co., AT&T Inc. and Toyota Motor Corp. — didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
One exception to that rule of silence is Wells Fargo. A spokesperson for the bank simply said, “We do not have a travel benefit for abortion services at this time,” indicating a desire to leave that door open for the future.
But some companies known for their liberal stances have taken the Citigroup approach on this and other “Culture War” issues. As Bloomberg reported:
Some CEOs have tried to openly navigate the culture wars as they strive to retain talent. Match Group Inc. CEO Shar Dubey, whose Dallas-based company owns some of the biggest dating apps, said last year she was creating a fund to help cover the costs for employees and dependents who need to seek care outside the state. Lyft Inc. and Uber Technologies Inc. pledged to pay legal fees for drivers sued under the Texas law.
Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said in September the company would offer assistance to employees who wanted to leave Texas in response to the anti-abortion law. On March 12, dozens of companies including Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Dow Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, took out an ad in the Dallas Morning News urging the state to scrap Abbott’s order on transgender kids.
As this unfolds, one thing is certain: The companies that are coming out in favor of these and other liberal policies and practices are unashamedly drawing a line in the sand and then boldly crossing it to declare their position. As this unfolds and the Supreme Court hands down a decision that is expected to return the abortion issue to the states, America is going to be segmented by Abortion States and Life States. It will be interesting to watch these “woke” companies try not to become broke companies if the residents of the Life States don’t want to work for them or do business with them.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
March 7, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a roundtable discussion about COVID treatment, early treatment suppression, vaccine risks, the collateral damage from school closures and lockdowns, and more
March 8, 2022, the Florida Department of Health updated its guidance, formally recommending against COVID vaccination for healthy children, 5 to 17. Florida is the first state to go against CDC vaccine recommendations
Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo stressed that, as we move forward, we must insist on holding decision-makers accountable for their harmful public health decisions. “Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit,” Ladapo said
According to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, one of the most egregious mistakes made was to ignore the fact that there’s a thousand-fold difference in risk between the lowest and highest risk groups. Children are at virtually no risk of dying from COVID, yet children have been forced to bear the burden of disease prevention. “Almost from the very beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seem like they were tailor-made to harm children,” he said
According to Dr. Sunetra Gupta, what we’ve seen over the past two years is an “inversion of the schedule of uncertainty.” Doubt was cast on things that were certain, while certainty was claimed for things we had no clue about. Decision-makers chose to do the very things we knew, for certain, would cause harm. They inverted the precautionary principle to minimize harm and chose to maximize harm instead
March 7, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a roundtable discussion1 about COVID treatment, early treatment suppression, vaccine risks, the collateral damage from school closures and lockdowns, and how to end the COVID theatre once and for all. Panelists included physicians, scientists and academics from around the U.S., including:
Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, a former National Institutes of Health-funded researcher
Dr. Robert Malone, a molecular virologist, bioethicist, vaccine researcher, and co-developer of the mRNA vaccine platform
Dr. Tracy Hoeg, Ph.D., an epidemiologist
Dr. Jill Ackerman, a family physician
Dr. Christopher D’Adamo, Ph.D., an epidemiologist, and integrative medicine specialist
Dr. Shveta Raju, an internist
Dr. Harvey Risch, Ph.D., professor of epidemiology trained in mathematical modeling of infectious diseases
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Ph.D., professor of health policy at Stanford, research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for focused protection of the most vulnerable2
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., former professor of medicine at Harvard University, now senior scientific director of the Brownstone Institute, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in vaccine safety evaluation, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration
Dr. Joseph Fraiman, a rural emergency physician and clinical scientist, specializing in harm-benefit analysis
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Ph.D., Oxford University professor, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious disease, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration
We Must Hold Decision Makers to Account
As noted by Ladapo, one of the things we must remember and remain intent upon as we move forward is to hold people accountable for their public health decisions. Two years after the “two weeks to slow the spread,” we have ample evidence proving the decision-makers “didn’t know what they were talking about,” Ladapo says.
They abused their power, they manipulated data, they lied, and they now want us all to forget what they said and did. We cannot let them get away with it. Many errors were made, and those responsible must be held to account.
“Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit,” Ladapo says. “We cannot let them forget. We have to hold them accountable. We have to let the country, the world, know what the truth is — because it’s the right thing to do, and because it can happen again if we don’t.”
Thousand-Fold Difference in Risk Was Ignored
Bhattacharya was one of the first to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 in 2020, and he found that by April, the infection was already too prevalent for lockdowns to have any possibility of stopping the spread.
He points out that one of the most egregious mistakes made was to ignore the fact that there’s a thousand-fold difference in risk between the lowest and highest risk groups. Children and teens are at virtually no risk of dying from COVID. Overall, the risk of COVID is primarily relegated to the very old and those with multiple comorbidities.
Bhattacharya has called the COVID-19 lockdowns the “biggest public health mistake ever made,”3 stressing that the harms caused have been “absolutely catastrophically devastating,” especially for children and the working class, worldwide.4
In some areas of the world, children have not been in school for two years, and the ramifications of that will likely reverberate for decades. Public health has also been negatively impacted by lockdowns and other measures — measures which Bhattacharya states were based on fear, not fact.
Stunning Denials of Science
Kulldorff, in his opening remarks, points out what he believes is one of the most stunning parts of this pandemic, and that is the denial of the basic science of natural immunity. Even doctors and hospitals that “should know better have demanded vaccine mandates for people who have already had COVID,” he says.
Perhaps even worse, hospitals have fired staff who have had COVID and have natural immunity, simply because they did not want to get the experimental jab. Those with natural immunity are not just less likely to get COVID again, they’re also far less likely to spread it to others. This makes them among the most valuable staff members a hospital can have, yet they were routinely discarded.
“That goes against basic principles of public health,” Kulldorff says. “And to have a director of the CDC who questions natural immunity, which we have now, is sort of like having a director of NASA who questions whether the earth is flat or round. It’s just mindboggling that we’ve come into a situation like that.”
Fraiman, whose clinical research expertise includes risk-benefit analysis, also expresses disbelief and frustration over the scientific censorship we’ve seen in the last two years. He points out that many of his colleagues are simply too afraid of getting fired to speak the truth.
DeSantis, similarly, highlights how incredibly difficult it has been to publish and find research that contradicted the official narrative, and even when available, the mainstream media would refuse to acknowledge it, whereas they would endlessly publicize speculation and statements of opinion that had no basis in fact or science, but supported — however flimsily — the official narrative.
I would add that so-called fact-checkers have even gone so far as to “fact check” scientific peer-reviewed publications,5,6,7 labeling them as “misinformation” or outright “false,” resulting in their being censored on social media!
That’s an astounding development. It does not bode well for science when noncredentialed individuals with zero experience in the topic at hand are given the authority to decide the “truthfulness” or accuracy of scientists’ work.
The Inversion of the Precautionary Principle
Gupta, who has some 30 years of expertise in mathematical modeling of infectious disease, points out that what we’ve seen over the past two years is an “inversion of the schedule of uncertainty.” In short, doubt was cast on things that were rather certain — so-called “unknowns were not unknown,” Gupta says — while certainty was claimed for things we had no clue about.
“The powers that be told us the measures and restrictions would work, but we didn’t know they would work,” she says. Moreover, we didn’t know what their purpose actually was. “It was a rather incoherent set of goals,” she says. One thing we knew for certain was that lockdowns and other restrictions “would have enormous cost,” she says.
“That was the one thing we were certain about, yet that’s what we went ahead and did. We inverted the precautionary principle of trying to minimize harm, by doing the one thing we knew would cause harm.”
I would add that the scale of that harm was never calculated or addressed at any point along the way. It’s as though it didn’t matter how great the harm was, as long as there was the appearance that we were doing everything in our power to prevent COVID.
Plausibility Versus Science
Risch brings up a similar point, saying we’ve seen a lot of misdirection. What’s been conveyed to the public have been things that are plausible, but not scientific. “There’s a big difference between things that seem plausible and things that are scientific,” he says.
For example, lockdowns are a plausible countermeasure, but they’re not based in science. In fact, all the science we have, shows them to be harmful, with little or no benefit whatsoever. “The same has been true for medications,” Rish says.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration put out warnings saying that hydroxychloroquine should not be used in outpatients, even though they had no data on outpatient use of the drug. They only had data on in-hospital use, and the two situations are not comparable.
Early COVID symptoms are completely different from symptoms of later-stage, severe infection and the two stages require completely different treatments. Hydroxychloroquine only works well when used very early. It’s not useful in the later stages, and frontline doctors were well aware of this.
No Justification for Mandating Vaccines for Children
Malone — speaking on behalf of the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists,8 which currently has some 17,000 members — stressed that, in terms of COVID policies, the Alliance has “made a series of very clear, unambiguous statements.”
“There is no justification for mandating vaccines for children. Full stop,” he says. “We’re of the strong opinion that if there is risk there must be choice. This is fundamental bioethics 101.”
As noted in the second Physicians Declaration9 by dated October 29, 2021, children’s clinical risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection is negligible, and long-term safety of the shots cannot be determined prior to the enactment of mandatory vaccination policies. Not only are children at high risk for severe adverse events, but having healthy, unvaccinated children in the population is crucial to achieving herd immunity. Malone continues:
“No. 2, as far as we’re concerned, there is no medical emergency now, and there is therefore no justification for the declaration of medical emergency and the suspension of rights ...”
The Alliance also condemns “the hunting of physicians and the restriction of physicians’ ability to prescribe and treat with early treatment.” With regard to vaccines, Malone also highlights the fact that while a Pfizer/BioNTech COVID injection has been approved by the FDA, that product is not available.
So, there is NO FDA-approved COVID “vaccine” on the market in the U.S. The only products available in the U.S., for children and adults alike, are emergency use authorization (EUA) products, for which liability is waived.
Now, in order for the COVID injections to qualify for EUA, there could not be any other treatments available, which appears to have been the driving factor behind the suppression of early treatment with repurposed drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
Mask Mandates Have Not Had Any Benefit
Speaking to the issue of mask mandates, Hoeg has published several studies, looking at the effects of universal mask-wearing. One of them assessed compliance and outcomes in the Wisconsin school system. On average, 92% of children complied with the mask-wearing, and only seven students out of 7,000 caught COVID during the 2021 school year.
This was used by the media to proclaim that masks work. The problem is, there was no control group, and the low infection rate could have been due to anything. Hoeg points out we have studies from Scandinavia, where masks were not worn, and they too had extremely low infection rates among children.
Again and again, we’ve seen that children just aren’t susceptible to COVID, especially not severe infection. So, low incidence really says nothing about the effectiveness of masks.
DeSantis also notes that neighboring schools — one that had a mask mandate and another that did not — had no discernible difference in infection rates, which he believes is rather compelling evidence that mask mandates have no benefit. What’s more, of the two largest randomized controlled trials, both showed that masks do not prevent the spread of infection.
According to Hoeg, we’ve inverted the precautionary principle with respect to mask-wearing as well. Without any high-quality evidence of benefit, we’ve chosen to mask children even though we know there are harms. They interfere with communication, impede learning, hinder breathing, promote bacterial infections and more.
The Collateral Damage Has Been Immense
As noted by Fraiman, any time you consider a public health measure, you have to conduct a thorough risk-benefit analysis. Who may benefit and to what degree? What are the harms, who will be harmed the most, what’s the extent of the collateral damage? Do the benefits outweigh all of the risks?
In the case of school closures, “the collateral damage has been immense,” Fraiman says. Physical and mental health has been impacted. According to Fraiman, there’s been a doubling of obesity and diabetes, for example, during the pandemic. There’s been a dramatic increase in anxiety, depression, and stress.
Recent statistics show a shocking spike in fentanyl overdose deaths among high school-aged adolescents in the U.S. during 2020 and 2021. The following graph, from a December 24, 2021, preprint article10 posted on medRxiv and tweeted11 out by Dr. John B., a scientist, illustrates the situation better than words.
According to the authors:12
“Adolescent overdose mortality saw a sharp increase between 2019 and 2020, from 2.35 per 100,000 to 4.58 per 100,000, representing a 94.3% increase, the largest percent increase of any 5-year age group ...
Trends were driven by fatalities involving IMFs [illicitly-manufactured-fentanyls], which nearly tripled from 2019 to 2020, and represented 76.6% of adolescent overdose deaths in 2021 ... Our results should also be understood in the context of rising rates of adolescent mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
“I think it’s quite clear that the collateral damage outweighed any benefit that was there,” Fraiman says. “So, I think we need to take a more systems-level approach before embarking on this kind of policy the next time.”
Was Harming Children Intentional?
Bhattacharya adds, “Almost from the very beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seem like they were tailor-made to harm children.” Lower-income children were disproportionally harmed by lockdowns and school closures. “The effect on these kids has been catastrophic,” he says.
He cites a study that calculated that, as a result of the school closures during the spring of 2020, children in the U.S. will lose 5.5 million life years. Lost learning literally ripples through the child’s entire lifetime. They lead less healthy and shorter lives and are more likely to be steeped in poverty.
In some areas of the world, schools have been closed for nearly two years. As noted by Bhattacharya, we’ve “robbed an entire generation of their birthright.” Mask mandates have made the impact on children even worse.
He points out that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the only public health agency in the world that still recommends masking toddlers, “with literally not a single study showing it has any consequence on the spread of the disease.”
“The only reason they continue to mask [toddlers] is because [the toddlers] are powerless,” he says. “We’ve adopted this idea that children are the central problem; children are the ones who should bear all the burden of infection control.
In fact, that’s not true. It has revealed the values we have as a society, and it’s not a pretty picture. None of this has actually worked to protect the vulnerable. Still, 80% of the deaths are in people over 65. What have these restrictions on children bought? Not very much, if at all. And it’s caused tremendous harm that we’re going to have to address for years to come.”
Florida Recommends Against COVID Shots for Healthy Children
In late February 2022, Ladapo and DeSantis also updated the state’s policy on masks, formally discouraging mask-wearing.13 Toward the end of the roundtable, Ladapo announced the Florida Department of Health would also formally recommend against COVID shots for healthy children, aged 5 to 17,14 as they “may not benefit from receiving the currently available COVID-19 vaccines.”
During the roundtable, risks such ass myocarditis were also discussed. Florida is the first state to go against the CDC’s vaccine recommendations. In a statement published with the new guideline, March 8, 2022,15 Ladapo said:
“Based on currently available data, the risks of administering COVID-19 vaccination among healthy children may outweigh the benefits. These decisions should be made on an individual basis, and never mandated.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Alexis McGill Johnson posted an image of ice cream truck the company used to promote abortion rights at South by Southwest (SXSW)—an annual festival of film, media, music performances, and conferences that takes place in Austin Texas.
On the second day of the festival, March 12, 2022, Johnson posted the image on Twitter, saying, “Ice cream, you scream, we all scream for abortion rights!”
“Catch us around SXSW and stop by to grab some free Bans Off swag, condoms, and education on the cold-hearted policies of the Texas legislature,” she wrote.
The truck is reminiscent of one that someone might see driving around neighborhoods playing an enticing children’s tune in order for them to beg their parents to buy them an ice cream treat.
Bright white with popping pink graphics, the ice cream truck flies an American flag attached to its driver’s side, and passenger’s side mirrors contain logos referencing both abortion and women’s rights.
One logo calls out Texas politicians, saying, “Ice cream as cold as TX politicians,” which is a reference to the state’s controversial “heartbeat ban” that went into law in September 2021. At the end of 2021, the Supreme Court upheld the Texas law that bans abortion after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which is usually before most women even know they are pregnant. New data released in February estimates that the new ban is saving 100 lives a day.
Other logos in the shapes of candy read, “Don’t Tread on Me,” “My Choice,” “Don’t Mess With Texas Women,” and “My Body.” A large image of ice cream comes next to a condom and a pregnancy test asking people to “join the fight to defend abortion access” while encouraging people to text a number.
The menu that would normally display images of ice cream treats was replaced with images of condom wrappers made to look like ice cream bars. “Ribbed, Glow in the Dark, Sponge (made to look like Sponge Bob SquarePants), Bubblegum, Studded, and Spidey (depicting an image of Spider-Man) were all names listed as the flavor of condoms.
With hashtag #BansOffOurBodies, a campaign started to fight back against reproductive healthcare, the truck drove around SXSW as Johnson and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas’ president Ken Lambert handed out ice cream, Bans Off Our Bodies swag, and condoms.
An image posted by Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas on Twitter shows a young child handing out Planned Parenthood swag to supporters.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) One of the largest military installations in the world, Fort Bragg is home to approximately 54,000 military personnel and includes the Special Forces, the Airborne Corps, and the Joint Special Operations Command. In just 18 months, Fort Bragg lost over 80 soldiers from “sudden” and “unexplained” causes. According to officials, 33 of the fatalities are of “undetermined” causes. Fort Bragg cannot explain why dozens of soldiers are dying in their own bunks.
During that same eighteen-month period, three Fort Bragg soldiers died in overseas combat. This means soldiers stationed at Fort Bragg are twenty-seven times more likely to die unexpectedly on their home base than in overseas combat!
Fort Bragg stops reporting soldier deaths after dozens found dead in their bunks
An investigative reporter for Rolling Stone Magazine, Seth Harp, has been looking into this medical anomaly. On February 9, 2022, Seth reported the death of 83 soldiers at Fort Bragg in the 18 months ending in June 2021. Fort Bragg stopped reporting the fatalities after June 2021, but the bodies continue to pile up. Out of the 83 “sudden and unexpected” fatalities, eleven of them were determined to be from natural causes.
Harp wrote: “Fort Bragg soldiers have been turning up ‘unresponsive’ in their barracks on a disturbingly regular basis since the beginning of 2020, including Caleb Smither, Terrance Salazar, Jamie Boger, Joshua Diamond, Matthew Disney, Mikel Rubino, Michael Hamilton, and numerous others who have not been named.”
Drugs were involved in the deaths of Joshua Diamon and Matthew Disney. The two were found dead on the same day in June 2021, just two weeks after airborne master sergeant Martin Acevedo III was caught trafficking cocaine.
Drugs are only a small part of the problem. In January of 2021, Army Captain Robert Latham died suddenly of an “apparent heart attack.” The 32-year-old was previously in top physical condition. A Green Beret named Calvin Rockward passed away from a “sudden, unexpected medical event.” The 38-year-old was in excellent physical condition, too.
According to Seth, nine more young and fit soldiers were found “unresponsive” in their bunks. The U.S. Army and Fort Bragg refuse to investigate or report on the surge in deaths, disrespecting the soldiers and their families. Could there be a serious drug problem going on at Fort Bragg? Could these deaths indicate a surge in suicides and overdoses?
The military continues to be assaulted by mandates that harm soldiers physically and mentally. The vaccine mandates damage combat readiness while banishing the strongest, healthiest freedom fighters from the ranks.
Military’s medical database explodes with 1,000% increase in medical issues in 2021
The Military Health System began administering the spike protein mRNA vaccine to military service members on December 14, 2020. Since then, the military has administered more than 6.4 million doses, fully inoculating 90.1 percent of active-duty service members with the two-dose protocol. What role do these bioweapon shots have on the number of “unexpected” and undetermined deaths? Why is Fort Bragg less safe than it was before the mask, testing, and vaccine mandates?
The Army is failing to keep soldiers combat-ready, and this is evidenced by the military’s own medical surveillance system. The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) is used to detect surges of injury and illness in the military to make sure that all individuals are combat-ready. The DMED is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s “web-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS).”
In January 2022, attorneys Thomas Renz and Leigh Dundas retrieved the DMED data from military whistleblowers, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long. The data was provided to Senator Ron Johnson at a historic round table meeting with doctors and lawyers.
According to the data, the five-year average for medical issues in the military was 1.7 million codes. After the COVID-19 vaccine protocol was mandated on the military, the number of medical issues spiked to 22 million in the first 10 months of 2021 – a 1,000 percent increase! Many of the issues are directly related to the covid-19 vaccines, including Bell’s palsy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolisms, and neurological disorders. One of the military doctors testified: “It is my professional opinion that the major increases incidences of the above-discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.'”
The Commander-in-Chief, the Secretary of Defense, the Department of Defense (DoD), and the highest-ranking commanders are culpable for unlicensed medical malpractice and mass murder and must be held responsible for their unethical actions of coercion and discrimination, which were used to force dangerous experiments on soldiers that injured, sickened, disabled and killed many. For the latest update on stopping the mandates in the military, read Liberty Council’s updates on the Navy SEAL 1 v. Austin case.
The secrets of the deadly injection and Big Pharma affiliates like Pizer are rapidly unfolding. Expert Dr. Christina Rahm joined the Stew Peters Show Tuesday to expose the inner workings of Big Pharma’s plandemic, their preparations, cures, and tactics. Dr. Rahm warns about smallpox and rabies outbreaks, the Deep State, and more genetically engineered warfare due to hit the world.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“No one person should have unilateral authority to make decisions for millions of Americans,” says Paul.
QUICK FACTS:
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) on Monday introduced an amendment to remove Dr. Anthony Fauci as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), two years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic,Breitbart Newsreports.
Paul’s amendment would restructure the position and eliminate Fauci altogether.
The amendment would also replace Fauci’s current post with three other positions that will lead to three new institutes: the National Institute of Allergic Disease, the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the National Institute of Immunologic Diseases.
“No one person should have unilateral authority to make decisions for millions of Americans,” Sen. Paul stated.
“To ensure that ineffective, unscientific lockdowns and mandates are never foisted on the American people ever again, I’ve introduced this amendment to eliminate Dr. Anthony Fauci’s position as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and divide his power into three separate new institutes,” he added.
“This will create accountability and oversight into a taxpayer-funded position that has largely abused its power, and has been responsible for many failures and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
No one person should have unilateral authority to make decisions for millions of Americans.https://t.co/I3g6pbm6nW
“Each of these three institutes will be led by a director who is appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate for a 5-year term,” Paul’s press release reads.
Paul contends such a move would be consistent with NIAID’s mission statement which asserts that the organization “conducts and supports basic and applied research to better understand, treat, and ultimately prevent infectious, immunologic, and allergic diseases.”
“We’ve learned a lot over the past two years, but one lesson, in particular, is that no one person should be deemed ‘dictator-in-chief,’” Paul said in a statement.
BACKGROUND:
“I’ve been a physician for over 33 years,” Paul wrote in a piece Monday for Fox News Digital.
“In all my years studying and practicing medicine, I had never encountered someone with the gall to proclaim himself ‘the science’and portray anyone opposing him as ‘attacking science.’ That is, until Dr. Fauci became the COVID dictator-in-chief.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News)Anotherdeadly “side effect”of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” has been unearthed, and it spells disaster for future generations.
It turns out that the experimental drugs trigger “germline modifications” to female eggs and male sperm. To make a long story short, Fauci Flu shots appear to cause female infertility in the next generation.
Before the mRNA (messenger RNA) injections from Moderna and Pfizer had even been released, anonymous posters claiming to be a Moderna process engineer and a Moderna industrial engineer leaked information about how the drugs work.
Most of the mRNA, these people revealed, ends up in the liver or gonads. The effects of it in the reproductive organs, it was further explained, are recessive, meaning “in the next generation female offspring have premature ovarian failure.”
It was recently revealed that Pfizer knew about the fact that mRNA injections “leak” into ovaries, and now we are beginning to see a clearer picture of what is happening to people’s bodies in the process.
“This was actually well written using proper trade jargon,” wrote Igor Chudov on his Substack about how the anonymous poster who revealed all this is clearly in the know. “This was written in 2020 BEFORE anything became known about dangers of mRNA vaccines and the terms used were not on the radar.”
“Many allegations of this post actually check out,” Chudov added. “Specifically, LINE-1 reverse transcriptase interacts with vaccines, and DNA reverse transcription does convert mRNA into DNA in human cells … This stuff is very hard to make up without knowing.”
It appears as though covid “vaccines” were designed to make recipients’ offspring unable to reproduce
The most significant allegation is that a purposely mutated version of the gene CDKN1B ends up in the gonads (ovaries and testes). The mRNA payload is so high that the DNA of eggs and sperm gets modified, introducing a CDKN1B mutation.
The only way this would show up is if both parents’ germ cells, meaning the egg and the specific sperm cell that fertilizes it, are carrying CDKN1B.
“The possible result of this alleged mutation is that female offspring of vaccinated people would be prone to ‘Premature Ovarian Failure’ and thus would not be able to reproduce,” Chudov explains.
Andreas Oehler from Live to Fight Another Day Substack added more to the conversation by pointing out that both CDKN1B and CYP19A1, which were also mentioned in the leak, are implicated in female infertility problems.
We also now know that the injections contain a “hidden additive,” according to Oehler, that specifically upregulates LINE-1.
Melissa Strickler, a former Pfizer quality control manager, and whistleblower, came forward back in October to explain that the manufacturing process for that company’s injection is “unusual,” deviating from the usual norms.
“The compounding room has no idea what are the components they are mixing into the ‘product,'” Oehler writes, making mention of “highly sensitive trade secret adjuvants being added” to the vials.
“This secrecy about what goes into the vials is unprecedented. Furthermore, the vaccine manufacturers are not controlled by any independent bodies as to the quality control, the vials being shipped directly to the vaccine administration locations. This lends credence to the assertion that the mRNA vaccines may contain undisclosed constituents.”
It turns out that Big Pharma has been secretly adding female fertility-harming substances to drugs for many decades. In collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the drug industry has been making women infertile through “medicine.”
Are Chinese Virus injections just another depopulation plot? Is there even more to it than that, still to be uncovered?
The latest news coverage about the health damage caused by Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” can be found atChemicalViolence.com.
During a news conference in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian echoed Russian allegations regarding U.S. involvement in developing bioweapons in laboratories in Ukraine.
“According to the data released by the U.S. itself, the U.S. has 26 biological laboratories and other related facilities in Ukraine which has indeed attracted great attention,” said Zhao. “All dangerous pathogens in Ukraine must be stored in these labs and all research activities are led by the U.S. side. Without U.S. approval, no information shall be released to the public.”
Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Vladimirovna Zakharova earlier said the Kremlin has discovered that Ukrainian forces are attempting to cover up evidence of “military biological programs.”
“According to reports, a large quantity of dangerous viruses are stored in these facilities,” said Zhao. “Russia has found during its military operations that the U.S. uses these facilities to conduct bio-military plans.”
Zhao said Beijing is calling on “relevant sides to ensure the safety of these labs.”
“The U.S., in particular, as the party that knows the labs the best, should disclose specific information as soon as possible, including which viruses are stored and what research has been conducted,” added Zhao.
White House in full denial regarding U.S.-backed biolabs in Ukraine
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki called Russia and China’s claims of the U.S. having a global network of research facilities for biological weapons “preposterous.”
“Now that Russia has made these false claims, and China has seemingly endorsed this propaganda, we should all be on the lookout for Russia to possibly use chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine, or to create a false flag operation using them,” said Psaki. “It’s a clear pattern, and no one should fall for it.”
“It’s exactly the kind of disinformation operation we’ve seen repeatedly from the Russians over the years in Ukraine and in other countries around the world, which have been debunked conclusively, and an example of the types of false pretexts we have been warning the Russians would invent,” continued Psaki. “The United States is in full compliance with its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons Convention and does not develop or possess such weapons anywhere.”
The United Nations’ Biological Weapons Convention prohibits the development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling, and use of biological and toxin weapons. The U.S. ratified the treaty in 1975. Russia, as the Soviet Union, and Ukraine, as the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, also ratified the treaty in 1975.
John Kirby, press secretary for the Pentagon, called Russia and China’s claims “malarkey” and “classic Russian propaganda.”
“We are not developing biological or chemical weapons inside Ukraine,” said Kirby. “It’s not happening.”
But Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland recently testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that there are biolabs in Ukraine.
According to her testimony: “Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”
Nuland’s testimony proves that both the White House and the Pentagon are lying about the bioweapons research facilities in Ukraine.
Zhao has called the White House and the Pentagon’s denials of the existence of the biolabs in Ukraine an attempt to “stonewall” any proper investigation.
Learn more about the U.S.-backed and funded bioweapons labs in Ukraine at Bioterrorism.news.
Listen to this episode of the “Health Ranger Report” as host Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about the confirmation of U.S. bioweapons labs in Ukraine, and how the Deep State is preparing to use them to stage false flag events.
Yes the U.S. funded bioweapons in Ukraine and anyone who says they didn’t is a liar. Also, Pfizer Documents seem to show criminal activity. These people lie to themselves and think they are good. They don’t think of themselves as evil. But, I do not let them deceive themselves and I expose their evil ways.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Has the Pentagon been spending untold millions of American taxpayer dollars to build race-specific bioweapons in Ukraine? The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation says it has proof to think so.
In a recent announcement, Igor Kirillov, head of the Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Protection Troops of the Russian Armed Forces, revealed that the United States military-industrial complex has not only been conducting bat coronavirus-related “experiments” in Ukraine, according to uncovered evidence but has also been trying to develop bioweapons that selectively target certain ethnicities – and all under the guise of “research.”
“The available documents confirm numerous cases of the transfer of biological samples of Ukrainian citizens abroad,” Kirillov stated. “With a high degree of probability, we can say that one of the tasks of the United States and its allies is the creation of bioagents that can selectively affect various ethnic groups of the population.”
As we reported, the Pentagon has been operating biolabs all over the world, including in Ukraine.
According to Kirillov, some 350 cryo containers filled with blood serum samples were transferred from the Public Health Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine to a reference laboratory for infectious diseases at Australia’s Doherty Institute. This was done under the pretext of identifying antibody titers.
The Russian Defense Ministry obtained documents confirming that this high-risk biological research in Ukraine is, in fact, being led by the United States. Kirillov said the documents show that the U.S. Department of Defense funded this research.
Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland confirms existence of Ukrainian biolabs
In a recent testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland admitted that these biolabs exist, though she made sure to call them “research” facilities, never once mentioning the word bioweapons.
Kirillov said that Nuland did, however, “indirectly” confirm that the U.S. has, in fact, been participating in Ukrainian biological research when she stated that Washington, D.C., is “concerned” about Russia taking over these biolabs.
“The biological research funded by the US in Ukraine, according to Kirillov, included the projects ‘UP-2, UP-9, UP-10, aimed at studying the pathogens of anthrax and African swine fever,'” reported InfoWars.
“The UP-4 project, in particular, is said to have been in development in laboratories in Kyiv, Kharkov, and Odessa, and was scheduled until 2020.”
Kirillov also said that the Pentagon has shown interest in insect vectors that are capable of spreading dangerous infectious diseases. More than 140 containers filled with ectoparasites from bats, including fleas and ticks, were captured and transferred from the biological laboratory in Kharkov, he noted.
“According to the available information, the Americans have already managed to evacuate most of the documentation from the laboratories in Kyiv, Kharkov, and Odessa, including databases, biomaterials, and equipment to the Lvov Research Institute of Epidemiology and Hygiene and to the American Consulate in Lvov,” Kirillov added.
“It is possible that part of the collection will be moved to Poland.”
Biolabs in Georgia, Kirillov added, are also working on projects involving bats as carriers of bioweapons. This is a stark similarity to what was happening at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, which is believed to be where the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) originated.
Russian Major General Igor Konashenkov expressed similar concerns about the Ukrainian biolabs, warning that U.S.-funded projects there involve the use of bat coronaviruses that can be spread via wild birds that migrate between Russia, Ukraine, and other countries.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, meanwhile, denied all of this, claiming that it is “preposterous.”
“It’s the kind of disinformation operation we’ve seen repeatedly from the Russians over the years in Ukraine and in other countries, which have been debunked, and as an example of the types of false pretexts we have been warning the Russians would invent.”
The latest news about this subject can be found at WWIII.news.
Two of the world’s top doctors in their fields, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough, both believe that the COVID pandemic response has been grossly politicized, which resulted in a tragedy of loss of human life.
The core problem is that the government controls healthcare, said Dr. Malone. The politicians dictating doctors on what kind of procedures and medicines to prescribe to their patients is favored by the Big Pharma, insurance companies, and big hospital chains, “but it is absolutely not the kind of medical care American people want,” stressed the doctor.
The doctors also touched on the public health agencies such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) withholding important data on COVID vaccines’ safety and efficacy, and COVID infections and hospitalizations rate. That, the doctors said, constitutes a medical fraud, and called on the government insiders to blow the whistle on what is truly going on within the federal government.
Dr. Robert Malone is a holder of the nine original mRNA vaccine patents, which were originally filed in 1989, including both the idea of mRNA vaccines and the original proof of principle experiments and RNA transfection. Dr. Malone has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications which have been cited over 12,000 times.
Dr. Peter McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, who manages the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine.
If they can take Cyrus from his loving parents then they can take any child from any parents for any reason. Cyrus is loved by his family more than any family I have witnessed.
Idaho gubernatorial candidate Ammon Bundy arrested at St. Luke's Meridian
Ammon Bundy, independent candidate for Idaho governor and a leader of the “People’s Rights” movement, faces a misdemeanor trespassing charge in Meridian. Ada County Jail records show Bundy, 46, was booked into jail at 1:15 a.m. Saturday, then released. Meridian Police had arrested him on suspicion of “first offense trespass – failure to depart.” A statement from Bundy's campaign, posted on Twitter, says he was arrested in front of St. Luke’s Meridian Medical Center “for the crime of disagreeing with the hospital and CPS.” According to the statement, Bundy had arrived at the hospital in support of a family whose baby had been “medically kidnapped” due to a missed non-emergency doctor’s appointment. The Meridian Police Dept. said in a news release issued later Saturday morning that police on Friday received an Idaho Health and Welfare referral about a ten-month-old child who had been admitted to the hospital on March 1 "after medical personnel determined the child was suffering from severe malnourishment." The child was discharged into the care of its parents on March 4, after the child was able to gain enough weight. However, during a follow-up appointment, Meridian Police said, it was determined that the child had again lost a significant amount of weight, but the parents canceled the next follow-up appointment and could not be located. Meridian Police had been advised that the child's condition could lead to severe injury or even death if left untreated. Meridian Police said Health and Welfare was able to contact the child’s father, who agreed to bring the child in for an examination, but then failed to show up. When officers attempted to contact the parents and check on the child at a home in Meridian, the people inside refused to let officers check on the child's welfare. Meridian Police received a warrant to enter the home but discovered the parents and the child had left before officers could check on the child. Garden City Police located a vehicle driven by the father of the child and conducted a traffic stop on Chinden Boulevard. That's when Meridian Police took the child into custody, then took the child to St. Luke's Meridian. According to Meridian Police, Bundy "and several of his followers" showed up to St. Luke’s Meridian and refused to leave the property when asked to do so. In addition to Bundy, officers also arrested Wendy Kay Whitaker, 69, Miranda Chavoya, 23, and Marissa Anderson, 21. Police accuse Whitaker of attempting to interfere in Bundy's arrest and also refusing to leave St. Luke's property. Chavoya and Anderson were arrested on suspicion of resisting or obstructing at the scene of the traffic stop in Garden City. All of those arrested are out of jail at this time. Saturday’s arrest may have been the first time Bundy was accused of trespassing at St. Luke’s, but it was not the first time Bundy has been arrested for trespassing. Court records show a jury trial is set to begin Monday, March 14, for a case in which Bundy is charged with two counts of trespassing -- second offense -- following an arrest on April 8, 2021, at the Idaho State Capitol. He was found guilty of a first misdemeanor trespassing offense and sentenced to 40 hours of community service for refusing to leave an auditorium at the capitol during the August 2020 special session. In July 2021, Bundy kicked off a campaign for governor of Idaho. At the time, he was pursuing the Republican nomination. However, he announced in February that he would instead run as an independent. As an independent, Bundy will not be subject to the upcoming May primary election. He is on the Idaho Secretary of State's unofficial list of candidates who have filed to run for office this year.
Gubernatorial candidate for Idaho Ammon Bundy is no stranger to a good fight. He now finds himself in the middle of yet another, this time concerning parental rights and medical tyranny. One America's Dana Cohen caught up with Bundy for more details.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“Great Reset”-advancing World Economic Forum lists four major vaccine manufacturers as official partners on organization website.
QUICK FACTS:
Vaccine manufacturers Pfizer Inc., Moderna Inc., AstraZeneca Plc., and Johnson & Johnson Inc. are listed on the “Partners” page on the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) website.
Leading pharmaceutical companies Roche, Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi are also official partners of the WEF.
COVID VACCINE MANUFACTURERS PARTNERED WITH WEF:
Pfizer is listed as an official partner of the World Economic Forum.
The WEF’s parter page describes Pfizer as “one of the world’s largest research-based pharmaceutical companies.”
Pfizer “discovers, develops, manufactures and markets many of the world’s best-known consumer brands as well as prescription medicines for humans and animals,” the WEF page reads.
Moderna is also listed as an official partner of the World Economic Forum.
The WEF describes Moderna as a “pioneering messenger in RNA therapeutics, an entirely new in vivo drug modality that produces human proteins or antibodies inside patient cells, which are in turn secreted or active intracellularly.”
The WEF page describes the pharmaceutical company as an “international healthcare business engaged in the research, development, manufacturing, and marketing of prescription pharmaceuticals and the supply of healthcare services.”
“It has healthcare sales of over $22 billion and leading positions in sales of gastrointestinal, oncology, cardiovascular, neuroscience, and respiratory products. It is listed on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Global and European and the FTSE4Good Index,” the WEF partners page goes on to say.
Johnson & Johnson is an official partner of the WEF.
The WEF partners page says J&J “believes good health is the foundation of vibrant lives, thriving communities, and forward progress.”
“As one of the world’s largest and most broadly-based healthcare companies, it is committed to using its reach and size for good. Johnson & Johnson strives to improve access and affordability, create healthier communities, and put a healthy mind, body, and environment within reach of everyone, everywhere. It blends heart, science, and ingenuity to change humanity’s health trajectory.”
World Economic Forum partners, such as Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and J&J, are “leading global companies developing solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. They are the driving force behind the Forum’s programs,” says the organization.
One of the Forum’s most far-reaching initiatives is the “Great Reset,” which aims to cause the world to “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies.”
“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism,” writes WEF chairman and founder Klaus Schwab.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently paid a visit to a New Hampshire Planned Parenthood clinic to tout the Biden administration’s “unwavering support” for taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, which he had already proven by delivering $500,000 to Planned Parenthood of Northern New England (PPNNE) after a Granite State body denied it and other abortion providers $1 million in taxpayer cash.
In January, the Republican-dominated New Hampshire Executive Council (NHEC) rejected $1-million worth of state “family planning” contracts with health clinics that also perform abortions, among them PPNNE. A 2021 state law prohibits the government from “subsidiz[ing] abortions, either directly or indirectly,” and there is no way for the state to give money to an abortion provider, even for other purposes, without funding abortions.
The Biden administration immediately rode to Planned Parenthood’s rescue, providing it with a half-million-dollar “dire needs” grant. This should come as no surprise given the administration’s “consistent support for protecting access to safe and legal abortion,” as HHS put it in a press release, not to mention that, according to Newsweek, Planned Parenthood spent a “record-breaking” $45 million to get Joe Biden into the White House and then “recommended nearly 200 people for key positions” in his administration.
“We’ve got your back,” Becerra said during his March 4 appearance at the Manchester, New Hampshire, Planned Parenthood clinic. “And there have been some challenging times. I don’t think they’re over, but you hung in there, and we hope to make a commitment to you that we’re not going to leave.”
After touring the facility, Becerra led a roundtable discussion with New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, all of whom are pro-abortion Democrats.
According to WMUR, “The delegation voiced disappointment in the loss of the bipartisan pro-choice consensus that held sway at the State House from Roe vs. Wade until recent years.”
In fact, in a press release from Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), every one of them described the NHEC’s decision and efforts in other states to restrict abortion as “partisan” — as if Democrats weren’t almost uniformly in favor of unrestricted abortion at taxpayer expense.
“As Republicans from Mississippi to New Hampshire wage an all-out assault on women’s reproductive care, it is critical to stand up for women’s health and provide federal support to ensure family planning providers like Planned Parenthood … can meet the urgent needs in our communities,” said Shaheen. “It’s shameful that partisan politics are compromising women’s access to safe and affordable healthcare — something I never thought I would see in the ‘Live Free or Die’ state.”
“As partisan politicians in New Hampshire and across the country seek to undermine women’s access to healthcare, I will continue working with the delegation and advocates across our state to protect women’s reproductive freedom,” said Senator Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.).
Representative Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) joined the chorus: “It could not be more important that we fight to protect the right to safe, legal, and accessible abortions and family planning services that have come under continued partisan attack across the country and here in New Hampshire.”
Abortion isn’t the only reason the Biden administration wants to help Planned Parenthood. The nation’s largest abortion provider is also its second-largest dispenser of hormones intended to turn males into females — to the extent that is possible — and vice versa. That likely explains the presence of Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel (nee Richard) Levine at Becerra’s appearance. Moreover, in Shaheen’s press release, Becerra referred to “attacks on abortion and gender-affirming care.”
Similarly, Kayla Montgomery, vice president of public affairs for PPNNE, said in the press release that her organization was “grateful for the dedication and leadership of the Biden-Harris Administration and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, who work tirelessly to ensure continued access to the full range of reproductive health care — including safe, legal abortion and gender-affirming care — no matter what.”
“We are in a crisis moment,” she asserted in Manchester. “We know that the Supreme Court is going to make a ruling soon that could possibly decimate abortion access in this country. We know that when that happens, 26 states could move immediately, or soon, to ban abortion.”
And that, of course, would mean the end — or at least the serious downsizing — of Planned Parenthood.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) The news coming out of Ukraine regarding Russia’s invasion has often been sketchy and even unreliable, which is nothing new given Western media’s penchant for literally politicizing everything, including war.
The American media is no different, of course, and in fact, one could argue that most left-wing U.S. outlets are literally nothing more than propaganda sources for whatever interests the current Democrat-controlled regime embraces.
So it should come as no surprise that the regime media immediately downplayed initial reports that the United States, during the latter years of the George W. Bush administration and with bipartisan assistance from the late Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), built a bio lab in Ukraine designed to handle dangerous substances.
Earlier this week, “a spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, claimed that Moscow has uncovered evidence of a U.S.-backed bioweapons program in Ukraine that includes the development of plague and anthrax,” The Western Journal reported.
“Recently found documents show that components of biological weapons were made in Ukraine’s laboratories, with funding from [the U.S. Department of Defense], in direct proximity to Russia,” a tweet from the U.K.’s Russian Embassy noted further.
— Russian Embassy, UK (@RussianEmbassy) March 9, 2022
Naturally, U.S. and Ukrainian officials quickly and vehemently denied the Russia allegations; after all, we’ve been conditioned to automatically distrust everything any Russian leader says.
A spokesperson for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, “Ukraine strictly denies any such allegation,” while a Pentagon spokesperson added: “This absurd Russian misinformation is patently false.”
Got it? The masters of misinformation — the U.S. deep state — when exposed, call everything everyone else says ‘misinformation’ because that’s the modus operandi.
But who’s correct?
With that, China comes to mind, as The Western Journal points out, noting that “China just so happens to be the location of the lab that received funding from the U.S. in the years leading up to the pandemic and just so happened to be researching weaponized coronaviruses at the time the pandemic started.”
“Russia has found during its military operations that the U.S. uses these facilities to conduct military plans,” spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Tuesday, according to Real Clear Politics.
“The U.S. has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification,” the ministry then tweeted.
The US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification. pic.twitter.com/vEiytBRKuo
Now, can China be believed? After all, the Chinese Communist government has lied throughout the COVID-19 pandemic about where the virus actually came from — it is Level 4 lab in Wuhan — and how it escaped. Beijing also covered up how soon the virus began to spread and allowed it to essentially escape to the world…just as then-President Donald Trump’s government was winning its trade war.
As it turns out, in this case, probably.
Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland testified this week during a Senate hearing that the government is actively working to protect Ukrainian research labs from the Russians, Real Clear Politics reported.
Nuland, an Obama regime alum who has been accused of fomenting a coup in Ukraine in 2014 and helping a neo-Nazi-loving regime take power, was asked directly by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.): “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?”
Her answer was telling.
“Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we’re now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of, so we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach,” Nuland responded.
Rubio then did something typical of our ‘Beltway/Deep State first, always’ representatives: He redirected Nuland so she could implicate Russia if anything happened to the labs.
“I’m sure you’re aware that the Russian propaganda groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they have uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country, and with NATO’s coordination,” Rubio noted before asking: “If there is a biological or chemical weapon incident or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100 percent it would be the Russians that would be behind it?”
“There is no doubt in my mind, senator,” Nuland stated. “It is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they are planning to do themselves.”
Glenn Greenwald, one of the few real investigative journalists today, caught that exchange and pointed it out.
Ukraine has “biological research facilities,” says Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland, when asked by Sen Rubio if Ukraine has biological or chemical weapons, and says she’s worried Russia may get them. But she says she’s 100% sure if there’s a biological attack, it’s Russia. pic.twitter.com/uo3dHDMfAS
Really good cleanup by Rubio: interrupting Nuland’s bizarre confession, which he did not expect, and immediately directing her to say that if there’s a biological attack, it must be Russia.
Why is she so concerned Russia would seize such a benign “biological research facility”?
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) An investment firm founded by Hunter Biden was discovered to have provided funding to U.S. biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine. The revelation came amid U.S. officials initially denying and eventually admitting the presence of such facilities in the besieged country.
According to the Gateway Pundit, investment company Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP) funded San Francisco-based Metabiota as early as 2014. RSTP’s website also showed Metabiota as one of the companies it has invested in. Metabiota then partnered with Black & Veatch (B&V), a company with ties to the Department of Defense, to set up the labs in Ukraine.
Specializing in “detecting, tracking and analyzing potential disease outbreaks,” Metabiota became a subcontractor for B&V in 2014. The San Francisco firm’s contract with B&V worth $18.4 million involved running facilities in both Ukraine and Georgia. Both companies even shared an office in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv, according to a job posting.
Representatives of Metabiota and B&V later met with their counterparts from U.S., Poland, and Ukraine. The 2016 meeting held at the Ukrainian city of Lviv discussed biological security, safety, and surveillance.
During a March 7 press conference, Russia alleged that the U.S. operated facilities in Ukraine for creating bioweapons against the Russian population. Maj. Gen. Igor Kirillov, chief of the Russian Armed Forces’ radiation, chemical, and biological defense division, named Black & Veatch as the firm “involved in the implementation of the projects.” (Related: Russia says Ukraine is littered with U.S.-financed bioweapons labs.)
The American and Ukrainian governments both dismissed Kirillov’s claim as a “conspiracy theory,” with Washington insisting that it does not fund biolabs in the eastern European country.
However, Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland later acknowledged the existence of the Ukrainian biolabs. She said that the U.S. is working alongside Kyiv to ensure the facilities do not “fall into the hands of Russian forces.” Many took Nuland’s comments as a confirmation that the U.S. did operate bioweapons laboratories, despite prior claims of “conspiracy theories.”
Biden, Rosemont links to corruption go deeper
RSTP and Biden’s links to purported corruption are not just limited to the biological weapons facilities funded by the investment firm. A September 2020 report by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) elaborated on this matter.
According to the report, RSTP received $3.5 million from Russian businesswoman Elena Baturina. She wired the amount to an RSTP bank account back in February 2014 as part of a “consultancy agreement.” Baturina, the wife of former Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov until his death, was accused of profiting from city contracts awarded by her husband during his tenure. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev fired Luzhkov in 2010 over these allegations.
Aside from this $3.5 million payment, Baturina sent 11 other wires amounting to $391,968 to a bank account belonging to technology company BAK USA between May and December 2015. Nine of the 11 wires, amounting to $241,797, were initially sent to an RSTP account before being transferred to the Buffalo, New York-based technology firm.
The report added that Biden co-founded RSTP with his associate Devon Archer and Christopher Heinz – the stepson of Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry – in 2009.
Outside of RSTP, Biden was also linked to Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky during his tenure as a board member of the gas company Burisma. The presidential son “formed significant and consistent financial relationships” with the former Ukrainian minister of ecology and natural resources. Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, used his ministerial position to favor the younger Biden’s firm in awarding government contracts.
This relationship later paid off as Biden’s father, President Joe Biden, threatened to withhold a loan to Ukraine unless the top prosecutor investigating Burisma was terminated. The elder Biden issued the threat during his tenure as vice president in the Obama administration.
