January 6, 2021: The Day of the Electoral Epiphany

BY DAVID SOLWAY

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/columns/david-solway-2/2021/01/02/january-6-2021-the-day-of-the-electoral-epiphany-n1300844;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

January 6 marks the festival of the Christian Epiphany commemorating the visit of the Magi—the three “wise men” of popular parlance—bringing gifts to the Christ child. It is also the day on which the presidency of the United States will be determined as the “wise men” of Congress meet to certify or decertify the vote of the Electoral College. The question is whether the current legitimate president will be recognized or whether a pretender to the throne, a false messiah, or, to put it bluntly, a corrupt grifter benefitting from the largest electoral fraud in American history will be confirmed in his stead.

Three facts should be obvious.

The first is that the list of Donald Trump’s accomplishments as president is a long one: the Middle East peace treaties, wage gains for low wage earners, elimination of the ISIS Caliphate, low unemployment (pre-COVID), Operation Warp Speed, energy independence, rapid economic recovery, reduction of economy-strangling regulations, pushback against Chinese Communist subversive tactics (including his recent release of Chinese bounty intel), returning manufacturing and industry to the homeland, immigration sanity, forcing NATO allies to pay their fair share of military expenses, the renegotiating of trade deals in America’s favor, in short, the policy of America First—to mention only a few of his extraordinary achievements.

Second, he has been routinely and viscerally misrepresented and traduced by a hostile and corrupt media consortium that has suppressed or sullied a record any responsible president would be proud of. Clearly, we no longer have a fair and trustworthy press but a Soviet-style propaganda machine trading on lies, unceasing vitriol and relentless ad hominem attacks on a sitting president.

Third, the evidence of massive and unprecedented electoral fraud that may well cost Trump the election is undeniable: preventing inspectors from observing the vote count, accepting illegal mail-in ballots and invalid (without dates) absentee ballots, random assignment of ballots, vote dumping, ballot box stuffing, votes exceeding the number of estimated voters, registering 120-year-old voters, transference of votes from Trump to Biden in battleground states, suitcases filled with ballots dragged out from beneath a covered table after mandated poll observers were told to leave, thousands of affidavits attesting to illegitimate activities, election rules drastically changed, hackable and manipulated voting machines and practices, and so on. The documentation is everywhere. Pennsylvania election numbers don’t add upoutcome-determinative fraud occurred in GeorgiaRepublican ballots were misprinted in several swing states. The fraud, which is, in effect, an integral part of a premeditated coup d’état and “the biggest political scandal in U.S. history,” cannot be doubted or dismissed except by committed partisans of the Democratic Party, #NeverTrumpers, insurrectionary cadres like Antifa and BLM, useful idiots, and data-censoring corporate magnates frustrated by an honest broker in the Oval Office.

Trump has been faulted for his brusque rhetorical style, for his lack of polish, for his incessant Twittering, for his thin-skinned reaction to criticism, for his hands, for his hair, for his past—indeed, for anything his adversaries can think of. Certainly, he is not flawless, but I suspect his only significant fault is possibly his misjudging the vast extent of the “swamp,” and not acting early enough to counter its malignance. 

For the swamp is everywhere: in Congress, in the intelligence agencies, in the education establishment K-12 to post-graduate (including the professoriate and academic administration), in state legislatures, in the judiciary, in many of the churches, in the media gutters and high-tech platforms, in communal organizations and in a considerable portion of the nation. Perhaps Trump should have invoked the Insurrection Act. Perhaps he should have challenged Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act earlier in his term. Perhaps he should have fired the problematic elements and Obama holdovers in the military leadership and replaced them with reliable personnel. Perhaps he should have relied on executive privilege to ensure that the plotters who spied on his campaign and who used extraconstitutional means to remove a duly elected president be charged in criminal court or according to the Articles of the Constitution (Article II, Section 1). He should definitely have investigated the electoral apparatus and adopted preventive measures years before the current election. Then again, he is one man against a veritable world.

In this respect, I recall a lecture given by the celebrated education author and psycholinguist Frank Smith, which I attended when guesting at Brigham Young University. Smith was lamenting the state of the culture, which he felt had grown so decadent, divisive, and mendacious that it could no longer be salvaged. “We’re on the Titanic,” he said, “and we’re going down. Save yourself if you can. Jump ship.” The problem, so far as I could see, was that there was nowhere to jump. Everything is the Titanic: the sea, the land, the lifeboats, even the iceberg. The only solution, within the terms of the metaphor, was to keep bailing in order to maintain the ship afloat, in the hope that a competent crew could be dispatched to repair the damage before the foundering.

Similarly, as noted, the swamp is everywhere, giving off its fetid neo-Marxist/Globalist stench. Another four years of a Trump presidency will serve to drain it further, and perhaps make political life somewhat more bearable, but the swamp will continue to pollute the constitutional order of the nation. The battle is endless against the abominations who inhabit the swamp, the Shambling Mounds, the Green Hags, the Bullywugs, the Stirges, and especially the Mud Mephits and Yuan-tis. But this is more than a Dungeons & Dragons gaming session; it is a war for survival. Should Trump be re-elected, he will need all the help he can get when, as Adventurer-in-Chief, he enters the swamp to confront its foul denizens.

As Lee Smith writes in his recent The Permanent Coup, detailing the “desperate measures” of America’s domestic enemies, “The coup aimed at toppling Donald Trump will not end in November 2020, whether he is reelected or not…because it is aimed mainly at Americans…it’s weaponized to destroy anyone the left perceives as its enemy.” Trump and a few loyal allies are all America has as a bulwark against the advancing fen, in an effort to keep it at bay and reduce its lethality. Should a spurious and criminal election fail to be overturned, the swamp will inundate the land and there will be no Ark to ride it out, no Titanic to keep afloat.

In his Agony and Eloquence: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and a World of Revolution, American historian Daniel Mallock reflects: “Every generation has its own times that try the souls of men and women. The present belongs to the living” who must honor the gift deeded to them by great and patriotic men like Adams and Jefferson, nation-builders like Washington and Lincoln. “Every generation writes its own history,” he continues, “Our interpretation will change but the truth of the matter will not; it is our responsibility to weigh the evidence and know the difference between the shadows of our prisms and the sometimes-dim light of historical truth.” The “dim light” also occludes our vision, not only of historical truth but of present reality, thanks to the efforts of an obscurantist media and the derelictions of our public institutions. Nevertheless, “it is our responsibility to weigh the evidence” of electoral malfeasance and institutional complicity to arrive at “the truth of the matter” and to act upon it

This January 6 is the critical moment in the modern history of the United States. The secular Epiphany will “show forth” whether there will be anything to celebrate or whether it will manifest as a terminal mockery of the will of the majority of the  American people and the virtual end of the American Republic.

If a Won Election Is Not Reported, Is It a Won Election?
 

Lin Wood Files EMERGENCY PETITION – ACCUSES John Roberts!

Lin Wood has filed an Emergency Petition to the Supreme Court to overturn the dismissals of his federal lawsuits and to pause the upcoming senate runoff election. He also tweeted some SPICY takes and accusations against Chief Justice John Roberts. Petition for Mandamus: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qs2n8cucvjx... Lin Wood Tweets: https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1...

Legal Memo Outlines Strategy for Trump to Succeed: Having Supreme Court Hear Election Dispute

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/26/legal-memo-outlines-strategy-for-trump-to-succeed-having-supreme-court-hear-election-dispute-n1286650;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Western Journal has published a legal memo written by William J. Olson & Patrick M. McSweeney that, they say, “outlines a possible legal strategy for the Trump campaign to follow in the coming weeks.” The legal memo was reportedly sent to President Trump prior to it being published on The Western Journal.

The authors of the memo contend that by refusing to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court” abdicated its constitutional duty to resolve a real and substantial controversy among states that was properly brought as an original action in that Court,” resulting in intense criticism that they had evaded “the most important inter-state constitutional case brought to it in many decades, if not ever.”

“However,” the authors say, “even in its Order dismissing the case, the Supreme Court identified how another challenge could be brought successfully — by a different plaintiff.”

Just because Texas did not persuade the Justices that what happens in Pennsylvania hurts Texas does not mean that the United States of America could not persuade the justices that when Pennsylvania violates the U.S. Constitution, it harms the nation. Article III, § 2, cl. 2 confers original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court in any case suit brought by the United States against a state. Thus, the United States can and should file suit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. Like the Texas suit, that new suit would seek an order invalidating the appointment of the electors appointed by those four defendant States that refused to abide by the terms of the Presidential Electors Clause.

Olsen and McSweeney say that if this happened, it would “leave it to the state legislatures in those four states to “appoint” electors — which is what the Constitution requires. The United States suffered an injury when those four states “violated the Constitution by allowing electors who had not been appointed in the manner prescribed by the state legislature.”

So, is this the next step for the Trump legal team? Trump legal adviser Jenna Ellis shared this legal strategy memo on Twitter, urging her followers to read it, so this strategy is definitely on their radar.

This still leaves us asking, “Is there hope?”

It’s the season of miracles, so never give up.

Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trump and the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama. You can follow Matt on Twitter @MattMargolis

FLASHBACK: Millions Signed Petition Urging Electors to Vote for Hillary After Trump Won in 2016
KERIK: Biden Received ‘Mathematically Impossible’ Spike in Votes When Suspicious Ballots Counted in Georgia
Georgia Governor Calls For ‘Signature Audit’ After Ballot-Counting Video Presented at Hearing
CLAIM: Dominion Exec Bragged That He Made Sure ‘Trump Is Not Gonna Win’ on Conference Call
 

DAVID CLOUD’S “WAY OF LIFE” RECENT ARTICLES

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies to Senate Committee about Ivermectin, Dec. 8, 2020

Appearing as a witness on Dec. 8, 2020, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs—which held a hearing on “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution”— Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), called for the government to swiftly review the already expansive and still rapidly emerging medical evidence on Ivermectin.

The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover. Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a “miracle drug” against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities—the NIH, CDC, and FDA—to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19.

TOP DOCTORS RECOMMEND IVERMECTIN AS A WONDER DRUG FOR COVID-19 

(Friday Church News Notes, December 25, 2020, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) -

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

We are keen to avoid quackery on all fronts, theological, political, and medical. The Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), which is not quackery, is recommending the use of Ivermectin as a “miracle cure” and “wonder drug” for prevention and early treatment of Covid-19. We don’t know if it is true that no one who takes Ivermectin will get Covid, but it is obvious from the studies so far that it has a major effect. On Dec. 8, 2020, Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the FLCCC appeared before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs in Washington, D.C., to testify of the group’s scientific findings. Dr. Kory said, “We are a group of one of the most highly published physicians in the world. We have nearly 2,000 peer-reviewed publications among us. Led by Professor Paul Marik, who is our intellectual leader, we came together early on in the pandemic, and all we have sought is to review the world’s literature on every factor of this disease, trying to develop effective protocols. I was here [before the Senate committee] in May, and I recommended that it was critical that we use corticosteroids in treating this disease, when all of the national and international health care organizations said we cannot use those. That turned out to be a life-saving recommendation. I’m here again today with a new recommendation. ... We have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact, and when I say ‘miracle’ I do not use that term lightly. I don’t want to be sensationalized when I say that. This is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last three months. When I am told that we are touting things that are not FDA recommended, let me be clear, the NIH [National Institutes of Health], their recommendation on Ivermectin, which is to not use it outside of controlled trials, is from August 27. We are now in December. This is three to four months later. Mountains of data have emerged from many centers and countries from around the world showing the miraculous effect of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. ... Our manuscript details all of this evidence. ... We now have four large randomized controlled trials totaling over 1,500 patients, each trial showing that as a prophylaxis agent it is immensely effective. ... In early outpatient treatment, we have three randomized control trials and multiple observation as well as case series showing that if you take Ivermectin the need for hospitalization and death will decrease. ... We have four randomized control trials there, multiple observation trials, all showing the same thing. You will not die, or you will die at much, much lower rates, statistically significant, large magnitude results if you take Ivermectin. It is proving to be a wonder drug. It has already won the Noble prize in medicine in 2015 for its impact on global health in the eradication of parasitic diseases. ... Our manuscript has been submitted for peer review, but please recognize that peer review takes months, and we don’t have months. We have 100,000 patients in the hospitals right now dying. I am a lung specialist. I am an ICU specialist. I’ve cared for more dying Covid patients than anyone can imagine. They’re dying because they can’t breathe. ... They are on high velocity oxygen delivery devices, non-evasive ventilators, and/or they are sedated and paralyzed and attached to mechanical ventilators that breathe for them. ... By the time they get to me in the ICU, they are dying, they are almost impossible to recover. Early treatment is key. ... Any further deaths are going to be needless deaths. I cannot keep caring for patients when I know that they could have been saved with early treatment, and that drug that will treat them and prevent the hospitalization is Ivermectin.” Dr. Kory called upon the government’s medical authorities--the NIH, CDC, and FDA--to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19. Following are the links to Dr. Kory’s interview, Dr. Hector Carvallo’s interview, and the FLCCC’s protocol for use of ivermectin as a prophylaxis: Video [Reddit]


SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN RESTRICTIONS ON COLORADO AND NEW JERSEY CHURCHES 

(Friday Church News Notes, December 25, 2020, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org , 866-295-4143) -

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The following is excerpted from “Supreme Court Slaps Down,” The Federalist, Dec. 15, 2020: “The Supreme Court sided with a rural Colorado church Tuesday that challenged the state Democrat governor’s COVID rules restricting building capacity in some parts of the state. The 6-3 decision overturned lower court rulings that had upheld Gov. Jared Polis’s church gathering limits to a maximum of 25 percent or 50 people, whichever is fewer, and ordered lower courts to re-examine the case. ‘Today in Colorado it is perfectly legal for hundreds of shoppers to pack themselves cheek by jowl into a Lowes or other big box store or patronize any one of the thousands of other retail establishments that are not subject to draconian numerical limits,’ church attorney Barry Arrington told National Review. The case was brought by the High Plains Harvest Church north of Denver, arguing the state was unlawfully targeting religious institutions by imposing harsher restrictions on churches than shopping centers. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court also handed down its ruling on a New Jersey case brought by a Catholic priest and a rabbi. This ruling overturned limits on religious gatherings in houses of worship, wiping out executive rule-favoring opinions in the lower courts. The cases upholding religious liberty come on the heels of rare public remarks by Justice Samuel Alito criticizing coronavirus lockdowns this year as placing ‘previously unimaginable’ restrictions on American freedom. ‘We have never before seen restrictions as severe, extensive and prolonged as those experienced for most of 2020,’ Alito said in a virtual speech to The Federalist Society. ‘The COVID crisis has served as sort of a constitutional stress test.’” PJMedia added, “This would appear to open the door to churches nationwide to decide their own COVID policies. ... The arrival of Justice Amy Coney Barrett on the court has proven to be a godsend to religious liberty” (“Supreme Court,” PJMedia, Dec. 15, 2020).

Supreme Court Gives Trump HUGE WIN as John Roberts Accused of FEARING RIOTS!!!

★★★ A NEW CONSERVATIVE AGE IS RISING ★★★

The Supreme Court Gives Trump a HUGE WIN all as John Roberts is being Accused of FEARING RIOTS! In this video, we’re going to take a look at the HUGE win for President Trump with regard to illegal aliens and redistricting, how John Roberts is being called out as a coward by a growing number of voices, and what’s really behind the corruption of our courts and what we really need to do about, you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Reports Claim “Anti-Trump” SCOTUS Justice Roberts Afraid To Hear Election Fraud Cases Due To Liberal “Riots”

MORAL COWARDICE: JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS "SCREAMING THROUGH THE WALLS"; EXPRESSES FEAR OF RIOTS IF HE DID THE RIGHT THING AS TO TEXAS ELECTION FRAUD CASE. ROBERTS & BREYER NEED TO RESIGN IMMEDIATELY!

BY KELEN MCBREEN

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/reports-claim-anti-trump-scotus-justice-roberts-afraid-to-hear-election-fraud-cases-due-to-liberal-riots/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Multiple sources are claiming Supreme Court Justice John Roberts is an “anti-Trumper” who is actively working to ensure President Trump isn’t re-elected.

A video going viral online shows Arizona State Senator Eddie Farnsworth citing a Supreme Court staffer who allegedly heard SCOTUS judges yelling behind closed doors during a heated argument.

Farnsworth describes a statement made by a “Current staffer for one of the Supreme Court Justices.”

“He said the justices, as they always do, went into a closed room to discuss cases or to debate,” Farnsworth explained. “There are no phones, no computers, no nothing. No one else is in the room except the nine justices. It’s typically very civil.”

He continued, saying, “They usually don’t hear any sound, they just debate what they’re doing. But, when the Texas case was brought up, he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up. The words that were heard through the wall when Justice Thomas and Justice Alito were citing Bush vs Gore, from John Roberts, were,

‘I don’t give a ***** about that case, I don’t want to hear about it. At that time we didn’t have riots.’ So, what he was saying is he was afraid of what would happen if they didn’t do the right thing.”

“I’m sorry, but that is moral cowardice,” Farnsworth declared. “We in the SREC, I’m an SREC member, we put those words in very specifically, because the charge of the Supreme Court is to ultimately be our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty. So, I think we should leave these words in because I want to send a strong message to them. Thank you.”

Corroborating this account is an interview with Pastor Rodney Howard-Browne, a Trump insider, who told the Strange Report podcast about the Supreme Court clerk’s experience before Farnsworth spoke out.

According to Howard-Browne, “The clerk said, ‘The justices are normally calm. They meet behind closed doors, and you never hear anything, but it was a screaming match. You could hear it all down the hallway.'”

“He said they met in person… they didn’t trust the telephonic meeting,” Howard-Browne told Strange Report. “Chief Justice Roberts was screaming, ‘Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?’ And then Roberts went on to say [to Justice Neil Gorsuch], ‘Don’t tell me about Bush versus Gore. We weren’t dealing with riots then, and you’re forgetting what your role is. And I don’t want to hear anything from the two junior justices.'”

The clerk alleged that Roberts continued, saying, “I will tell you how to vote,” with Justice Clarence Thomas supposedly answering, “This will be the end of democracy, John.”

“When they left the room, Roberts and the liberals and Kavanaugh had big smiles; Alito and Thomas [were] visibly upset; ACB and Gorsuch didn’t seem fazed at all,” according to Howard-Browne’s source.

“So obviously, it’s clear that Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by Antifa, the left-wing rioting,” the pastor concluded. “And, of course, that’s the problem that we’re dealing with. Apart from the corruption that’s in our courts, and the judges that are legislating from the benches, and all the corruption that we’re dealing with here with the voting fraud and the scandals of what’s taking place. This would be ultimately the scenario that I could just see unfolding in the Supreme Court.”

In addition to these claims, Trump attorney Lin Wood wrote on Twitter Thursday, “This may be the most important tweet of my life.”

He continued, “Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately. They are ‘anti-Trumpers’ dedicated to preventing the public from knowing the TRUTH of
Trump’s re-election.”

Elaborating, Wood claimed Roberts was heard discussing Trump in a phone conversation, saying, “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.”

“Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out,” Lin wrote.

The POTUS attorney added, “This is a sad day for our country but a day on which we must wake up & face the truth,” and told Americans, “Roberts is the reason that SCOTUS has not acted on election cases. Others involved.”

Changing the direction of his Twitter rant, Wood said he’s “long had questions about ‘the John Roberts’ on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray.”

“The documentation of my claims about Justices Roberts & Breyer has been placed in hands of several third parties,” Wood added. “When one cannot attack message, all too often messenger is attacked. But TRUTH cannot be denied. It cannot be destroyed. I have made sure of that TRUTH.”

Infowars has reached out to Lin Wood to inquire about the documentation of his claims, but has yet to receive a response.

One final tweet on the subject by Wood explains that if he gave the wrong date for the alleged phone call where Justice Roberts said Trump would “never be re-elected,” that the judge can give the exact date himself.

“While you have his attention, ask him some other questions. He owes The People answers. He owes us TRUTH,” Lin wrote.

 

Attorney Jenna Ellis on Trump Team Legal Options, Supreme Court Decision & Starting Recall Petitions

Today we sit down with constitutional law attorney Jenna Ellis, a member of the Trump campaign legal team, to get an update on their legal efforts, and what she expects the future holds. This is American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸, and I’m Jan Jekielek.

Why SCOTUS Punted, and What Happens Next

Why SCOTUS Punted, and What Happens Next

BY BOB ADELMANN

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/why-scotus-punted-and-what-happens-next;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Upon learning that the Supreme Court wouldn’t consider the lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to challenge the election fraud perpetrated in four key battleground states, President Trump tweeted: “The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America.” He called it a “disgraceful miscarriage of justice.”

Paxton agreed. The justices didn’t even bother to hear any of the arguments he claimed to justify suing those four states. He angrily asked rhetorically:

If my people are harmed, which I view them as having been harmed, by the fact that other states didn’t follow their election laws and didn’t follow the Constitution, how do I address the fact that my voters are affected by a national election, that potentially was not done correctly, where there was fraud, and in that state law and federal law were not followed?

The high court issued a nonsensical explanation:

Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

It was a classic waffle, as the concept of “standing” — “cognizable interest” — has been carefully defined in Whitmore v. Arkansas, decided by the Supreme Court in 1990:

To establish an Article III case or controversy, a litigant first must clearly demonstrate that he has suffered an “injury in fact.” That injury, we have emphasized repeatedly, must be concrete in both a qualitative and temporal sense.

The complainant must allege an injury to himself that is “distinct and palpable,” … as opposed to merely “abstract,” … and the alleged harm must be actual or imminent, not “conjectural” or “hypothetical.”…

Further, the litigant must satisfy the “causation” and “redressability” prongs of the Article III minima by showing that the injury “fairly can be traced to the challenged action” and “is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.”

As attorney Andrea Widburg noted in American Thinker, “Texas met those requirements, showing an ‘injury in fact’ that is ‘distinct and palpable,’ that ‘can be traced to the challenged action’ and that can be ‘redressed by a favorable decision.’

So, with the high court’s flimsy excuse exposed, what is its real motivation behind its decision? Dick Morris thinks they were intimidated by the Biden campaign:

The Supreme Court is after justice, of course, but primarily they are after making sure the Supreme Court survives — that’s their institution and that’s their duty.

I believe the Supreme Court was sent a message by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party during the election.

And the message was: “If you overturn this election, we will pack you, and make your Court basically meaningless.”

Retired Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz said that, in his opinion, the court just didn’t want to deal with an issue fraught with political overtones:

This Supreme Court decision sends a message. The majority included the three justices appointed by President [Donald] Trump, and they all said, “We’re not going to hear the Texas case. We’re not going to get involved in this election.”

I think this sends a message. It’s not a legal message, but it’s a practical message: the Supreme Court is out of this game.

What happens next? Trump attorney Sidney Powell thinks the situation merits exercising an Executive Order the president issued in 2018: No. 13848, titled “Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.”

Per that order, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) “shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election.” The director must present his findings to the president no later than 45 days after the election. That would be Friday, December 18.

Said Powell:

[EO 13848 gives the president] “all kinds of power … to do everything from seize assets to freeze things, demand the impoundment of the machines.

Under the emergency powers, he could even appoint a special prosecutor to look into this, which is exactly what needs to happen.

Every machine, every voting machine in the country should be impounded right now. There’s frankly more than enough criminal probable cause to justify that, for anybody who’s willing to address the law and the facts purely on the basis of truth and not politics, or corporate greed, or global wealth.

And then there’s Section 252 of the Insurrection Act of 1807, which states:

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

As Stephen Meister pointed out in the Epoch Times:

The president’s invocation of the Insurrection Act isn’t a declaration of martial law. The Constitution isn’t suspended. The writ of habeas corpus isn’t suspended. The president would be using troops to enforce the law, not override it.

How that would play out remains to be seen. Suffice to say, the president has numerous options available to him to keep Biden from fraudulently assuming the office of the presidency of the United States on January 20. 

 

 

WASHINGTON, D.C.: Christians, CATHOLICS & JEWS Protest FRAUD FILLED Election With ECUMENICAL INTERFAITH Jericho TRUMP March~SPEECHES BY GENERAL FLYNN, ALEX JONES & OTHERS DELIVER POSITIVE ENCOURAGEMENT THROUGH FAITH

A CATHOLIC ORGANIZED RALLY THAT WOULD PLEASE THE ECUMENICAL, INTERFAITH, UNIVERSALIST, COMMUNIST POPE; BUT NOT BIBLE BELIEVING FUNDAMENTAL EVANGELICALS

LET THE ONE WORLD "CHURCH" ROAR? 

Jericho March Stop the Steal

EXCERPTS FROM: https://jerichomarch.org/about/:

This Election Jericho March™ will culminate in a massive national peaceful prayer rally protest in Washington, D.C. on Dec. 12, 2020 called “Let the Church ROAR!” where we will march around the U.S. Capitol seven times to send a very clear message to national and state leaders as they hear patriots and people of faith roar in support of election integrity, transparency, and reform. We will be hearing from national faith leaders, worship leaders, and others. 

Our first Jericho March™ is for election integrity, transparency, and reform to preserve free and fair elections in America for this generation and generations to come — free from any corruption or interference, both foreign and domestic. America is a city on a hill and light to other nations, and God’s favor is still upon her. We are proud of the American system of governance established by our Founding Fathers and we will not let globalists, socialists, and communists destroy our beautiful nation by sidestepping our laws and suppressing the will of the American people through their fraudulent and illegal activities in this election.

Mainstream Media, Big Tech, and corrupt political machines want the world to believe that the 2020 election is over. We have a clear message to them: You do not call elections and this election is far from over. You try to censor the truth, but we know the truth, and our God will reveal the truth,

“For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.”
(Lk. 8:17)

_______________________________________________________________________

ECUMENISM EXPOSED AS PER LUKE 8:17 ABOVE:

SEE EXCERPTS FROM: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/what-i-saw-at-the-jericho-march/:

Then onto the stage came one Fr. Greg Bramlage, a Colorado priest who says he is an exorcist. He shamanically prayed down heaven to deliver America from demons. These were real deliverance prayers. He is saying, in effect, that to oppose Trump and his re-election is to be an agent of Satan. This was the first time I got really angry. As regular readers know, I believe in the power of exorcism. I believe the demonic is real. But there was this Trumpy priest deploying holy prayers of deliverance from the demonic on behalf of a politician, and did it in a way that logically locates doubters within the shadow of Mordor. It felt sacrilegious. I wondered what Protestants in this crowd thought about the Catholic priest addressing prayers to Mary, the saints, and the angels. Following him was an opera singer belting out “Ave Maria.” Trumpy ecumenism is a fascinating religious development. This isn’t simply a revival of the old Chuck Colson/Richard John Neuhaus “Catholics & Evangelicals Together.” This is something much more intense. Later in the day, a Catholic priest blessed a framed image of Our Lady of Guadalupe that they plan to give to Melania Trump. Again, what did the Evangelicals think of that? I believe that it is good for Christians to work together on political and social causes of mutual concern. But if I believed what Evangelicals believe, I would have a lot of trouble affirming, by my presence, those kind of Catholic prayers. But maybe common love for Trump overcomes these theological divisions.

Then a woman who heads a pro-Trump organization in Virginia came onstage to instruct the crowd: “We have to align our spirituality to our politics.”

Yes, it is bonkers. All of it. But you would be wrong to make fun of it and blow it off. This phenomenon is going to matter. Divinizing MAGA and Stop The Steal is going to tear churches to bits, and drive people away from the Christian faith (or keep them from coming in the first place). Based on what I saw today, the Christians in this movement do not doubt that Trump is God’s chosen, that they, by following him, are walking in light, and whatever they do to serve Trump is also serving God. They have tightly wound apocalyptic religion to conservative politics and American nationalism.

“We have to align our spirituality to our politics,” said the speaker today. Notice that she didn’t say “align our politics to our spirituality.” Politics determines spirituality. (?)

SEE ALSO: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/12/12/christians-to-march-around-supreme-court-swing-state-capitols-seven-times-like-jericho-n1205940

Trump supporters gather for the Stop the Steal rally at Freedom Plaza in Washington on December 12, 2020. Photo by Yuri Gripas/ABACAPRESS.COM.

Gen. Flynn: SCOTUS doesn’t decide, we decide the election of president of the United States 

General Michael Flynn’s FULL Speech At DCs Jericho March Rally For President Trump 12/12/2020

Alex Jones Speaks At The Massive Trump Stop The Steal Rally In Washington DC 12/12/20

EXCELLENT CHRISTIAN SPEECH YOU MUST SEE:

 

 

 

Over 100 House Republicans Sign Brief Supporting Landmark Texas Election Lawsuit

Over 100 House Republicans Sign Brief Supporting Landmark Texas Election Lawsuit

BY LUIS MIGUEL

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/over-100-house-republicans-sign-brief-supporting-landmark-texas-election-lawsuit/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Is this the opening President Trump’s supporters have been looking for?

Over 100 Republican members of the House of Representatives on Thursday signed an amicus brief supporting the Texas lawsuit aimed at overturning the election results in the battleground states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that the states unconstitutionally changed their state election statutes to enable mail voting.

“This brief presents [our] concern as Members of Congress, shared by untold millions of their constituents, that the unconstitutional irregularities involved in the 2020 presidential election cast doubt upon its outcome and the integrity of the American system of elections,” states the brief, signed by 106 GOP lawmakers.

The effort was led by outgoing Republican Study Committee Chairman Mike Johnson (La.), one of the president’s closest allies in the House, who served on his impeachment defense team.

“President Trump called me this morning to let me know how much he appreciates the amicus brief we are filing on behalf of Members of Congress. Indeed, ‘this is the big one!’” Johnson tweeted on Wednesday.

Prominent Republicans who signed the brief include Minority Whip Steve Scalise (La.); Representative Jim Jordan (Ohio), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee; Representative Andy Biggs (Ariz.), chair of the Freedom Caucus; and Representative Jim Banks (Ind.), the incoming Republican Study Committee chairman.

Notably absent among the signatures were House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) and GOP Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (Wy.). McCarthy twice on Thursday declined to comment when asked by reporters if he supports the lawsuit.

“The president has a right for every legal challenge to be heard. He has the right to go to the Supreme Court with it, yes,” McCarthy said.

The Trump campaign is also on board with the lawsuit; the president has reportedly asked Senator Ted Cruz, a former Texas solicitor general, to argue the latest case before the Supreme Court.

But not all Republicans on Capitol Hill are on board. “Respectfully, I will not join because I believe the case itself represents a dangerous violation of federalism and sets a precedent to have one state asking federal courts to police the voting procedures of other states,” wrote Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas) in a series of tweets.

Senator John Cornyn of Texas, a member of the GOP leadership team, has also questioned the lawsuit’s merit. “You know, it’s very unusual because when a state sues a state, the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction,” Cornyn told CNN, “so you don’t have to go through the ordinary procedure. I read just the summary of it, and I frankly struggle to understand the legal theory of it.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued on Tuesday on behalf of Texas and 18 other states, including Florida, Utah, South Carolina, and West Virginia. Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich (R) filed a separate brief in support of the case.

“Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, government officials in the defendant states of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (collectively, ‘Defendant States’), usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes,” reads the suit, which, because it involves one state suing another, has original jurisdiction in the U.S. Supreme Court.

“They accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity,” Paxton added, and went on to call on the high court to “declare that any electoral college votes cast by such presidential electors appointed in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and cannot be counted.”

What makes this case favorable for the president and his supporters is that it deals with questions of constitutionality, rather than tackling the subject of voter fraud directly, something the justices on the Supreme Court were likely loath to do. Furthermore, the fact that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction here removes the potential delay of having to go through a lengthy appeals process in lower courts.

The mainstream media has tried its best to sweep this story under the rug. Now that they find themselves forced to cover it due to all the states that have joined the suit and the members of Congress who signed onto the brief, they want only to paint it as ludicrous, as in a CNN article titled “Why this Texas ‘election fraud’ lawsuit is a total and complete joke.”

It remains to be seen who will really have the last laugh when this is all through.

_______________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

Pennsylvania Will JOIN Texas Lawsuit AGAINST Pennsylvania! This is HUGE!!!

 

Trump to intervene in Texas Supreme Court election case; Multiple states back Texas lawsuit

YouTube announces unprecedented censorship policy; will delete any and all videos which mention election fraud

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/09/youtube-says-it-will-start-deleting-content-alleging-2020-election-voter-fraud-n1199954

EXCERPT FROM YOUTUBE AS IN ABOVE SOURCE:

"We also work to make sure that the line between what is removed and what is allowed is drawn in the right place. Our policies prohibit misleading viewers about where and how to vote. We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election. However in some cases, that has meant allowing controversial views on the outcome or process of counting votes of a current election as election officials have worked to finalize counts.

Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections."

SCOTUS Orders Response to Texas Lawsuit by December 10, 2020 on or before 3 PM EST

THIS IS THE BIG ONE! The Supreme Court Will DETERMINE the FATE of the 2020 ELECTION!!!

★★★ A NEW CONSERVATIVE AGE IS RISING ★★★

THIS IS THE BIG ONE! The Supreme Court Will in fact DETERMINE the FATE of the 2020 ELECTION! In this video, we’re going to take a look at how the bombshell lawsuit filed by the Texas attorney general is being received, how both President Trump and a number of other states appear ready to join in on the lawsuit, and how many are saying that this is it, this is the lawsuit that we’ve been waiting for that will decide the election once and for all; you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Trump to Join Texas Election Lawsuit at the Supreme Court

BY TYLER O'NEIL

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2020/12/09/the-big-one-trump-will-join-texas-lawsuit-to-block-unlawful-election-results-in-swing-states-n1200952;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump announced he would join the explosive case Attorney General Ken Paxton (R-Texas) filed at the Supreme Court this week. No fewer than seventeen other states also urged the Supreme Court to take up the case. Paxton’s case urges the Court to block swing states from certifying “unlawful election results,” to remand the election to state legislatures for review, and to direct the legislatures to reverse the unlawful actions of election officials by choosing Electoral College electors themselves.

“We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one,” the president announced on Twitter. “Our Country needs a victory!”

It remains unclear exactly how Trump and his legal team aim to intervene in the case. Should the Supreme Court grant certiorari and take up the case, Trump could file an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief, but the promise to “intervene” seems more aggressive than that.

On Wednesday, Missouri led a group of 17 states in filing a brief that echoes the Texas claims. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia joined the Missouri brief.

“The Bill of Complaint alleges that non-legislative actors in each Defendant State unconstitutionally abolished or diluted statutory safeguards against fraud enacted by their state Legislatures, in violation of the Presidential Electors Clause,” the brief states, Fox News reported.

“All the unconstitutional changes to election procedures identified in the Bill of Complaint have two common features: (1) They abrogated statutory safeguards against fraud that responsible observers have long recommended for voting by mail, and (2) they did so in a way that predictably conferred partisan advantage on one candidate in the Presidential election,” the brief alleges.

Paxton’s case contests the results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

“As set forth in the accompanying brief and complaint, the 2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities in the Defendant States,” Paxton argues in the brief. The Texas brief lists three kinds of violations of federal law:

Non-legislative actors’  purported amendments to  States’ duly enacted election laws, in violation of the Electors Clause’s vesting State legislatures with plenary authority regarding the appointment of presidential electors.

Intrastate differences in the treatment of voters, with more favorable allotted to voters – whether lawful or unlawful – in areas administered by local government under Democrat control and with populations with higher ratios of Democrat voters than other areas of Defendant States.

The appearance of voting irregularities in the Defendant States that would be consistent with the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in those States’ election laws.

These three broad claims echo many of the Trump campaign’s lawsuits challenging the presidential election results in those states.

EXPLOSIVE: Texas Asks Supreme Court to Block ‘Unlawful Election Results’ in Swing States

The Electors Clause in the U.S. Constitution states that only state legislatures may direct how states choose electors in the Electoral College. Election officials allegedly violated that clause by altering election procedures in violation of state law (enacted by the legislatures), ostensibly in order to help people vote during the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.

State elections officials also treated some voters more favorably in more Democratic-leaning areas of states, helped in that effort by the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), an organization that directed funds to election officials in such areas.

Finally, while many election officials relaxed voting standards in order to help voters worried about COVID-19, those relaxed standards made potential fraud more likely.

“All these flaws – even the violations of state election law – violate one or more of the federal requirements for elections (i.e., equal protection, due process, and the Electors Clause) and thus arise under federal law,” Paxton’s brief argues, citing Bush v. Gore (2000).

Texas “respectfully submits that the foregoing types of electoral irregularities exceed the hanging-chad saga of the 2000 election in their degree of departure from both state and federal law.”

Importantly, Paxton claims that “these flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.”

The lawsuit asks the Supreme Court to block certification of election results, to direct swing-state legislatures to review the results, and direct the legislatures to award electors based on legal ballots only. Such an order would fall in line with the legislative strategy President Donald Trump’s attorneys Jenna Ellis and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani have supported.

On Monday, Ellis outlined the strategy, predicting that state legislatures in Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan will independently investigate the election results and flip the electors from Joe Biden to Trump.

Republicans hold an edge over Democrats in each of the states mentioned. Ellis mentioned Arizona (11 electoral votes), where Republicans control the House (31 seats to 29 seats) and the Senate (17 seats to 13 seats). Both Ellis and Paxton noted Georgia (16 electoral votes), where Republicans control the House (103 seats to 75 seats) and the Senate (35 seats to 21 seats); Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes), where Republicans control the House (113 seats to 90 seats) and the Senate (28 seats to 21 seats); and Michigan (16 electoral votes), where Republicans control the House (58 seats to 52 seats) and the Senate (22 seats to 16 seats). Paxton mentioned Wisconsin (10 electoral votes), where Republicans control the State Assembly (63 seats to 35 seats) and the Senate (19 seats to 14 seats).

If the legislatures in states Jenna Ellis named flip for Trump, that would represent 63 electoral votes, flipping the election from 306 electoral votes for Biden and 232 for Trump to 295 electoral votes for Trump and 243 for Biden. If the legislatures in states Paxton named flip for Trump, that would represent 62 electoral votes, flipping the election from 306 electoral votes for Biden and 232 for Trump to 294 electoral votes for Trump and 244 for Biden.

Heritage Foundation election expert Hans von Spakovsky noted the strength of Texas’ claims, but he warned that the Supreme Court “may be extremely leery and disinclined” to take up the “unprecedented lawsuit.”

“Texas does a good job of describing what happened in each state and why the actions of government officials making unauthorized, unilateral changes in the rules may have violated the Constitution and affected the outcome of the election,” von Spakovsky notes. “But by almost any measure, this is the legal equivalent of a Hail Mary pass. While the questions raised are serious ones, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will address them at this time.”

Trump may intend to add gravitas to the Texas suit, but his move to intervene may make the lawsuit appear even more political. I would like to see the Supreme Court take up this case, but the Court rejects far more cases than it takes up, and many justices are leery of getting involved in election matters.

TX v State Motion 2020-12-0… by Breitbart News

Editor’s Note: Want to support PJ Media so we can continue telling the truth about the 2020 election? Join PJ Media VIP TODAY and use the promo code LAWANDORDER to get 25% off your VIP membership.

Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

EXPLOSIVE: Michigan Illegally Counted or Ignored 500K Ballots, Lawsuit Claims
VIP: Did Mark Zuckerberg Steal the 2020 Election?
Team Trump: Evidence Shows ‘More Than Double’ the Vote Margin in Swing States Is From Illegal Ballots
10 Reasons Pennsylvania’s Election Results May Be ‘Irredeemably Compromised’
Jenna Ellis: Swing-State Legislatures Will Reject ‘False Corrupt Results,’ Switch Electors to Trump
 

 

Breaking: SCOTUS Orders Response to Texas Lawsuit~OTHER STATES SHOW INTEREST IN JOINING LAWSUIT

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we cover the breaking news that the Supreme Court has ordered Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin to respond to the State of Texas' lawsuit by 3pm tomorrow. (Dec. 10, 2020). This election lawsuit alleges violations of fundamental Constitutional protections and is clearly outcome determinative.

Texas Drops BOMBSHELL Lawsuit Challenging ELECTION as Congress Rejects Biden as President-Elect!!!

★★★ A NEW CONSERVATIVE AGE IS RISING ★★★

Texas Drops a BOMBSHELL Lawsuit Challenging the ELECTION Results as a Congressional Committed Rejects Biden as President-Elect! In this video, we’re going to look at the amazing lawsuit filed by the attorney general of Texas, how it plays into Rudy Giuliani’s strategy for President Trump’s reelection, and how a congressional committee failed to pass a resolution acknowledging Sleepy Joe Biden as president-elect; you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Trump Team Lays Out Path to Victory, Demolishing Media Lies~SIDNEY POWELL, ESQ. SAYS TRUMP GOT 80 MILLION VOTES~FOX NEWS CALLS GIULIANI A LIAR

Trump Team Lays Out Path to Victory, Demolishing Media Lies

BY ALEX NEWMAN

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/trump-team-lays-out-path-to-victory-demolishing-media-lies/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Despite the establishment media’s denial of reality, President Donald Trump’s powerhouse legal team outlined multiple clear and viable paths to a Trump victory in the 2020 election. All of them include exposing and overturning the massive levels of voter fraud, with at least six states currently in play, Trump’s attorneys explained. Even more than the fraudsters, the president’s lawyers torched the establishment-media propagandists who are shamelessly lying to the American people by claiming the election is over and there is no evidence of widespread fraud. In reality, as Trump’s attorneys proved at a press conference in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, both of those claims are absolutely and provably false.

Before the press conference began, President Trump announced on social media that his attorneys would be outlining a “very clear and viable path to victory” in the 2020 election. Throughout the press conference, Trump’s attorneys referenced a map highlighting the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. Overturning the fraudulent results in just a couple or a handful of those states would put Trump back in the White House for four more years. “Pieces are very nicely falling into place,” added the president, who has been censored by the far-left leaders of Big Media and Big Tech social-media firms such as Twitter and Facebook.

Taking the lead at the press conference was former U.S. Attorney and New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, famous for taking on the mafia and other powerful characters from the criminal underworld. In a press conference from Capitol Hill, flanked by other key members of the Trump team, Giuliani laid out seemingly never-ending evidence of fraud that he said was more than enough to overturn fraudulent results across multiple states. While most analysts have focused on the growing evidence of fraud in states such as Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona, Giuliani also said there may be enough evidence to flip New Mexico and potentially even Virginia.

Giuliani spent much of his time outlining the team’s case. “What I’m describing to you is a massive fraud,” Giuliani said. “They were good. But not that good. They made mistakes. Like all crooks do. And we caught them.” From the New York Times to Jimmy Carter, those on the left and far-left have long warned that mail-in ballots and voting were susceptible to fraud, Giuliani explained. Now, they have officially been proven correct, with evidence of fraud in the mail-in voting process becoming overwhelming and unprecedented in American history.

Pennsylvania was among the worst examples. “The number of voter fraud cases in Philadelphia could fill a library,” Giuliani said, adding that there have been multiple recent convictions there for vote fraud. Among other facts, Giuliani said more than 17,000 provisional ballots were cast in Pittsburgh alone. This, Giuliani suggested, was powerful evidence of fraud — especially because some 15,000 of those provisional ballots were for people who were told they had already voted. The most likely scenario is that the fraudsters sent in large numbers of phony Democrat ballots, and then gave provisional ballots to anyone who showed up in person to cast a vote.

Many witnesses, under penalty of perjury, will testify that Democrat bosses ordered officials to participate in vote fraud, and give provisional ballots to those who arrived and wanted to vote after fraudulent votes had been cast on their behalf, Giuliani continued. Other witnesses will testify about the fact that they were prevented from watching the vote counting, despite a court order and laws requiring that observers be allowed to observe the process. These “irregularities” occurred in multiple key districts and states, according to Trump’s attorneys, suggesting coordination and conspiracy.

One witness cited by Giuliani swears that she was told to alter the dates on absentee ballots, not ask for ID from voters despite laws requiring it, and that she was taught to coach voters on how they should vote. Other witnesses said under oath that they witnessed the same Biden ballots being run through voter machines multiple times by poll workers. Giuliani went through many more such examples across multiple states that he said would be more than enough to overturn the fraud.

Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are all likely to go to Trump once the facts are laid out, too. “The recount being done in Georgia will tell us nothing,” Giuliani said, noting that the envelopes the ballots came in had already been tossed out and therefore could not be considered valid. Just in Michigan, Trump’s team has well over 200 affidavits offering evidence of fraud under penalty of perjury. “If you count the lawful votes, Trump won Wisconsin,” Giuliani said. Lawsuits will probably be filed in Arizona as well. Even New Mexico and potentially Virginia could be flipped based on the evidence now pouring in.

After discussing all of the affidavits and other evidence, and throughout his remarks, Giuliani slammed the establishment media for lying and attempting to deceive the American people. For instance, the claim that there is no evidence of fraud — a claim that has now quietly morphed into no “compelling” evidence of “widespread” fraud — is absolutely false. In fact, affidavits and other evidence laid out by Giuliani and the other lawyers are the very definition of evidence, he said, accusing the media of “lying” repeatedly and flagrantly. However, the whole team seemed confident that the lies and the media propagandists behind them would be exposed.

Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, meanwhile, focused on the fraud that took place through the use of Dominion Voting Systems computer programs and hardware. Among other concerns, Powell noted that the scandal-plagued company was using software created in Venezuela at the direction of the late mass-murdering Socialist dictator Hugo Chavez, who was infamous for rigging elections with help from voter machines and the murderous regime in Havana. “The leaders of Dominion are nowhere to be found,” she said. “They are moving their offices overnight. Their office in Toronto was shared with one of the George Soros entities.”

“President Trump won by a landslide,” she said. “We are going to prove it.”

According to Trump Recount Committee member Brian Trascher during a November 18 interview on Newsmax, servers in Germany belonging to Dominion have already been seized and are now being analyzed for evidence. “Now that we have seized the servers for Dominion that were over in Germany, we’re starting to get some raw data off of that,” Trascher said. “I want everybody to listen to me. The things that are going to come out are going to shake the globalists to their very core.” He warned that once it became clear to the Deep State and the Left that Trump would secure another term, terror mobs would be unleashed in American cities to terrorize and destroy.

True to form, the media continued to lie blatantly. For instance, Bloomberg, the propaganda megaphone of globalist billionaire Michael Bloomberg, claimed that Trump’s attorneys “offered no new allegations of fraud and presented no evidence for their claims.” In reality, as anybody who watches the video of the press conference can confirm, Trump’s legal team outlined multiple new allegations and presented enormous amounts of evidence, including reading directly from sworn affidavits filed by witnesses to the fraud. Witness testimony is among the most powerful evidence used in courts of law.

Bloomberg also falsely reported that Giuliani refused to share names of witnesses against the conspiracy. In reality, he named several, including a Democrat, Jessie Jacob of Detroit, who is swearing under oath about the fraud she saw and is simply seeking honest elections. At this point, the media is literally just openly and flagrantly lying — lies that can be easily discredited by anyone with access to the Internet to watch the press conference. In fact, even as fake-media outlets claim officials agree there was no widespread fraud, there was so much fraud that even the head of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) called the 2020 election “illegitimate.”

The New American magazine has been covering the evidence of vote fraud since the election, and will continue to do so. In another recently published article, this magazine outlined how Trump could win by having legislatures in fraud-ridden states send Trump delegates to the Electoral College. Another option would be to ensure that no delegates are certified and seated from the states plagued by fraud. If successful, that would deprive Biden of the 270 Electoral College votes, sending the election to Congress under the 12th Amendment. Under that scenario, where each state’s delegation gets one vote, Trump would likely win, since most states are Republican.

In short, despite the media lies, the election is far from over.

Related articles:

Massive Vote Fraud Across U.S. as Trump Decries Attempted Coup

Stopping the Steal at the Electoral College

ELECTION STEAL – General exposes the REAL vote fraud the media are hiding: CIA computer program flips votes

Sydney Powell: Trump got “at Least 80 Million Votes”

Georgia Monitor Finds 9,626 Vote Error That Favored Biden

____________________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://thenewamerican.com/sydney-powell-trump-got-at-least-80-million-votes

FOX NEWS REPORTER KRISTIN FISHER

Giuliani claims viable path to victory despite lack of evidence?

SEE: 

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rudy-giuliani-voter-fraud-evidence-liar/2020/11/19/id/997924/

AND TUCKER CARLSON OF FOX NEWS ALSO CLAIMS LACK OF PROOF:

Sidney Powell: FOX NEWS' Tucker Carlson 'Insulting, Demanding, and Rude'

sidney powell speaks at press conference

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/sidney-powell-tucker-carlson-trump-election/2020/11/20/id/997986/

 


Sidney Powell, Who Promised to ‘Release the Kraken,’ Joins Trump Legal Team

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/election/matt-margolis/2020/11/15/sidney-powell-who-promised-to-release-the-kraken-joins-trump-legal-team-n1147687;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Despite the media claiming Trump has acknowledged that Biden “won” the election, President Trump clearly signaled the opposite Saturday night when he announced the addition of Sidney Powell to his campaign’s legal team.

“I look forward to Mayor Giuliani spearheading the legal effort to defend OUR RIGHT to FREE and FAIR ELECTIONS! Rudy Giuliani, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis, a truly great team, added to our other wonderful lawyers and representatives!”

Sidney Powell entered the national spotlight when she became the defense attorney for former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, dramatically changing the trajectory of his legal fortunes.

On Friday, Powell told Lou Dobbs of Fox Business that she is going to “release the Kraken,” and that she “can hardly wait to put forth all the evidence we have collected on Dominion.”

“President Trump won this election in a landslide,” Powell told Dobbs. “It’s going to be irrefutable. Patriots are coming forward every day, all day, faster than we can collect their information.”

“We’ve got statistical evidence of just hundreds of thousands of votes just being put in and replicated,” she added, before she called for a  “massive criminal investigation,” which she says will “affect millions of voters and elections.”

“People need to come forward now and get on the right side of this issue and report the fraud they know existed in Dominion Voting Systems because that’s what it was created to do,” she continued. “It was its sole original purpose, it has been used all over the world to defy the will of people who wanted freedom.”

Dobbs then responded by noting that there have been multiple attempts to “overthrow his presidency” and asked Powell if she agrees the alleged voter fraud that occurred in the presidential election was part of it.

“Oh, absolutely,” she replied. “It’s been organized and conducted with the help of Silicon Valley people, the big tech companies, the social media companies, and even the media companies. And I’m going to release the Kraken.”

Watch below:

_________________________________________________________________________

WHAT DOES SIDNEY POWELL MEAN RELEASE THE KRAKEN REGARDING ELECTION FRAUD?



Well, Sidney Powell said She Would Release the Kraken And She Did on Sunday Morning Futures! 

Barr Will Help Trump Release The Kraken

Trump Attorney Rudy Giuliani Says Election will Be Overturned: "We Have Proof I Can't Disclose Yet"

 

H.R. 8424: Supreme Court Term Limits & Regular Appointments Act Taking Aim at SCOTUS

Judges Court Gavel Law Legal

BY JOHN PETROLINO

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2020/11/hr-8424-supreme-court-term-limits-regular-appointments-act/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

New Jersey – -(AmmoLand.com)- As the crack of freedom rings out across the nation in the wake of our election for President of the United States, all kinds of bills are popping up for the next legislative session.

It's clear that the people have spoken and Joe Biden is our president-elect!!… I jest, as we are wading into some of the muddiest waters in election history of most everyone’s lifetimes.

The crack of freedom is not only undermined by the continual speculation on what the actual results are but that this is or was, in fact, a very close race. What may come from Trump’s challenges to the election results remains to be seen.  However, we need to be posed and positioned for an anti-freedom Biden Presidency.

The country is fairly split, and anti-freedom lawmakers should not be clicking their heels saying “the people have spoken” and thus introduce laws that would limit any rights of the people, specifically the 2nd Amendment.

More and more people are embracing firearm ownership and many of them may have voted for Biden.

It seems across the nation that lawmakers are emboldened by a Biden win, and all kinds of new legislation have been introduced.  With these bills being proposed on the state and national level, of course, freedom limiting measures are being brought up.  Beyond the legislative, there are murmurs that Biden’s team has already met with the head of the ATF with plans to do what?  Speculation says the banning of arm-braces, a concern that was uncovered in a recent NJ state OPRA request shows the anti-gun group Moms Demand Action in correspondence with New Jersey policymakers (see OPRA W160618 Moms Demand Action Phil Murphy New Jersey 6-25-2020).  Further, the regulation of 80% lowers, to make “ghost guns” unavailable might be on the menu.  Rumors are flying.

What a Biden presidency would mean to the 2nd Amendment and what gets done executively remains to be seen, but we should take his word at it that he’s no friend to lawful gun ownership.  The ATF has been running out of their lane as it is, and what other damage they’re going to do is up in the air.  This is further compounded by legislation introduced to increase the scope of the ATF’s abilities to regulate.

Would a Biden presidency mean the United States entering back into the UN Small Arms Treaty (a scary proposition)?

One thing that continues to be clear, is the progressive agenda and its assaults on the system when America does not go their way.  The progressive agenda does not try to work within the rules like Trump does with his vote count challenge that is within the rules. No, instead, they try to change them to favor one agenda.

Enter H.R. 8424: Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act of 2020

Scene in HR 8424, the Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act of 2020, introduced September 29, 2020.  Interestingly enough, this bill did not pop up in the wake of this year’s election, as many have, but only a scant 11 days after the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Not only is the introduction of this legislation telling because it’s a clear way to try and change the goal post concerning Supreme Court Justices, but it also highlights how disgusting and distasteful some could be by bringing such a bill up not even a full fortnight after RBG’s passing.

The bill proposes that Supreme Court Justices only serve 18-year terms and that every two years the president will get a chance to appoint two new justices.  The current court would be exempt from these provisions, so this is clearly a long game that is being played.  On a personal level, I’m not sure how I feel about the idea of justices having term limits, sure, this could be a good thing, potentially a bad thing.

I think before turning their sights on the courts, congress should be discussing instituting term limits for themselves, prior to projecting on another branch of the government.  A little housekeeping perhaps?

The troubling part of the proposed bill is not so much the 18-year terms, and again, arguments can be made either way on that.  But rather, the more troubling thing is the bill is a direct retaliation and response to the Garland appointment that did not see the light of day, and how Trump was able to fill that seat.  The stonewalling of Garland can be talked about for years to come, and the more progressive-leaning individuals, as they lick their wounds on that loss, had a new nightmare come to fruition, the death of RBG right before the election.

In all rights, RBG should have retired under Obama’s watch if she was particularly worried about securing her seat with a justice that would support policies similar to her own (legislating from the bench).  She rolled the dice and lost. Regardless, the Senate followed the rules, as they did during the Garland appointment, it's just the rules that did not suit progressives.

The dangerous provision of HR 8424 is this:

If the Senate does not exercise its advice and consent authority with respect to a President’s nominee to the Supreme Court within 120 days after the nomination, the Senate shall be deemed to have waived its advice and consent authority with respect to such nominee, and the nominee shall be seated as a Justice of the Supreme Court.

This is clearly an agenda to move the goal post on the selection of Supreme Court Justices when there is an upcoming election.  Let’s change the rules to suit our needs so this never happens again.  When the shoe is on the other foot, conservatives do what they usually do, pick themselves up by their bootstraps, and carry on.

In a United States that did not have judges and justices trying to legislate from the bench, maybe this would not be a bad thing?  I don’t know.  But what I do know is that justices and judges are legislating from the bench all the time, not looking into the history, text, and tradition of the Constitution, rather leaning on “feelings.”  We cannot continue to have a country that has the executive branch or judicial branch create laws.  We must maintain a system to protect what little is left of this ideal.  That means constitutionalists in the courts.  Strong and originalist judges and justices, at this juncture, are the only stop-gap the US has to safeguard against executive overreach and malfeasance of the law in lower courts.

I don’t think HR 8424 will make it anywhere, as most bills don’t.  However, we’d be remiss to not at least point out what is in the playbook.  About those term limits that Donald Trump wants/ed in a second term?

Limits That Donald Trump Wanted In A Second Term
Term Limits in a Donald Trump Second Term

Maybe we should be writing our legislators to impose limits on how long members of Congress can stay in office.


John Petrolino is a US Merchant Marine Officer, writer, author of Decoding Firearms: An Easy to Read Guide on General Gun Safety & Use and NRA certified pistol, rifle, and shotgun instructor living under and working to change New Jersey's draconian and unconstitutional gun laws. You can find him on the web at www.johnpetrolino.com on twitter at @johnpetrolino and on instagram @jpetrolinoiii .

John Petrolino
John Petrolino
 

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Alito: ‘You Can’t Say That Marriage Is a Union Between One Man and One Woman’ in America Today

Justice Alito Discusses: Abortion, Speech, Assembly, Religion, Guns, Supreme Court

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito made compelling remarks on variety of important topics, including recent threats against the Supreme Court by politicians. This video condenses the content, but the full speech can be viewed here: https://youtu.be/tYLZL4GZVbA?t=940

BY TYLER O'NEIL

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/11/13/religious-freedom-free-speech-are-under-assault-in-the-covid-constitutional-stress-test-alito-warns-n1142962;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In a Federalist Society speech on Thursday, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito raised the alarm about threats to religious freedom, free speech, and the rule of law — threats exacerbated in the “constitutional stress-test” of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic. These threats are by no means limited to lockdown restrictions and COVID-19 issues, but the virus has highlighted them.

“The pandemic has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty,” Alito said. “I am not diminishing the severity of the virus’s threat to public health, and putting aside what I will say shortly about a few Supreme Court cases, I’m not saying anything about the legality of COVID restrictions. All that I’m saying is this… we have never before seen restrictions as severe, extensive, and prolonged as those experienced for most of 2020.”

Alito mentioned many “live events that would otherwise be protected by the right to freedom of speech” that state and local governments have prohibited, including the fact that churches were closed on Easter Sunday by government fiat.

“The COVID crisis has served as a sort of constitutional stress-test. And in doing so it has highlighted disturbing trends that were already present before the virus struck,” the justice argued.

Alito first highlighted “the dominance of lawmaking by executive fiat rather than legislation.” He rightly traced this idea back to “the vision of early twentieth-century progressives and the New Dealers of the 1930s … that policy-making would shift from narrow-minded elected legislators to an elite group of elected experts, in a word, that policymaking would become more scientific.”

For instance, a Nevada law gives the state’s governor extraordinary powers. If the governor finds that there is “a natural, technological, or manmade emergency or disaster of major proportions, the governor can perform and exercise such functions, powers, and duties as are necessary to promote and secure the safety and protection of the civilian population.”

Yet the Supreme Court has a duty to step in “whenever fundamental rights are restricted.”

Along those lines, Alito warned that religious freedom has grown increasingly out of favor.

Barr: COVID Lockdowns Are ‘Greatest Intrusion on Civil Liberties in American History’ Besides Slavery

“It pains me to say this but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right,” he lamented. He briefly mentioned the Supreme Court case Employment Division v. Smith and Congress’s passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The House of Representatives unanimously passed the bill, while the Senate passed it, 97-3. President Bill Clinton signed it into law.

“Today, that widespread support has vanished. When states have considered or gone ahead and adopted their own versions of RFRA, they have been threatened with punishing economic boycotts,” Alito said.

He also briefly covered recent Supreme Court cases illustrating the threat to religious freedom.

Alito mentioned the Little Sisters of the Poor, “women who have dedicated their lives to caring for the elderly poor, regardless of religion.” Some of their beneficiaries have testified that the Little Sisters “will keep you alive for ten years longer.”

“Despite this inspiring work, the Little Sisters have been under unrelenting attack for the better part of a decade. Why? Because they refuse to allow their health insurance plan to provide contraceptives to their employees. For that, they were targeted by the prior administration,” the justice noted.

The Obama administration threatened the Little Sisters with hefty fines “if they did not knuckle under and violate a tenet of their faith.” While the group of nuns won a Supreme Court case last spring, the case went back to the Court of Appeals. President Donald Trump created a religious freedom exemption in the contraception mandate, but Joe Biden has pledged to drop that exemption.

In another case, the State of Washington required pharmacies to carry all contraceptives, including the morning-after pill. The Christian pharmacy Ralph’s refused to carry that abortifacient pill, but it gladly referred women to nearby pharmacies that did carry it. The state decided that this work-around was not enough.

Alito also mentioned Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop who notoriously refused to bake a cake celebrating a same-sex wedding. He cited a member of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission who said that freedom of religion had been used “to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust, we can list hundreds of situations where freedom of religion has been used to justify discrimination.”

“For many today, religious liberty is not a cherished freedom. It’s often just an excuse for bigotry, and it cannot be tolerated,” Alito warned.

He mentioned that not a single employee of the Little Sisters has asked for contraception, no woman lacks contraception because of Ralph’s, and no same-sex couple has failed to get a cake because of Jack Phillips.

“A great many Americans disagree, sometimes quite strongly, with the religious beliefs of the Little Sisters, the owners of Ralph’s, and Jack Phillips. They have a perfect right to do so. That is not the question. The question we face is whether our society will be inclusive enough to tolerate people with unpopular religious beliefs,” the justice noted.

Alito cited Harvard Law professor Mark Tushnet, who notoriously wrote, “The culture wars are over. They lost, we won.” Terrifyingly, the professor compared social conservatives to the defeated Axis powers in World War II.

“My own judgment is that taking a hard line (‘You lost, live with it’) is better than trying to accommodate the losers, who – remember – defended, and are defending, positions that liberals regard as having no normative pull at all,” he argued. “Trying to be nice to the losers didn’t work well after the Civil War, nor after Brown. (And taking a hard line seemed to work reasonably well in Germany and Japan after 1945.)”

This hostility to traditional religion has bled into COVID-19 restrictions.

Alito referenced a Supreme Court decision on Nevada’s restrictions upholding the state’s double standard on casinos and houses of worship. The governor opened casinos — some of which are truly humongous — at 50 percent capacity while restricting religious services to 50 people or fewer. “If you want to worship and you’re the 51st person in line, sorry, you are out of luck. The size of the building doesn’t matter, nor does it matter if you wear a mask or stay 6 feet apart.”

“The state’s message is this: forget about worship and head for the slot machines or maybe a Cirque du Soleil show,” Alito said.

“Take a quick look at the Constitution. You will see the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment which protects religious liberty. You will not find a craps clause, or a blackjack clause, or a slot machine clause,” the justice quipped. “Nevada was unable to provide any plausible justification for treating casinos more favorably than houses of worship, but the Court nevertheless deferred to the governor’s judgment, which just so happened to favor the state’s biggest industry and the many voters it employs.”

Biden Staffer: Traditional Religious Beliefs Should Be ‘Taboo’ and ‘Disqualifiers’ for Public Office

The justice contrasted this “blatant discrimination” against religious freedom with a Maryland district judge’s decision to strike down an FDA rule providing that women who want medication abortions must go to a clinic in person to access them. The judge struck down this rule in the name of protecting women from COVID-19, even though Gov. Larry Hogan (R-Md.) had allowed people to go to gyms, casinos, and hair and nail salons in a limited reopening at the time.

Alito also warned that “support for freedom of speech is also in danger and COVID rules have restricted speech in unprecedented ways.”

While coronavirus lockdowns have shut down attendance at speeches, conferences, lectures, rallies, and more, “even before the pandemic, there was growing hostility to the expression of unfavorable views.”

Alito quipped that there are “seventy times seven” things that Americans cannot say if they are students or professors at a college or university, or employees speaking for a corporation.

“You can’t say that marriage is a union between one man and one woman. Until very recently, that’s what the vast majority of Americans thought. Now, it’s considered bigotry,” he warned.

“That this would happen after our decision in Obergefell [the 2015 case striking down state laws on marriage] should not have come as a surprise. Yes, the opinion of the Court included words meant to calm the fears of those who cling to traditional views on marriage. But I could see, and so did the other justices in dissent, where the decision would lead,” Alito warned.

He quoted his own dissent in the case, “I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes. But if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and being treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.”

“That is just what is coming to pass,” the justice lamented. Indeed, in one recent case, the Kroger Company fired two women in Little Rock, Ark., who refused to wear a rainbow-colored heart emblem on an apron because they did not want to endorse LGBT activism.

Religious freedom and free speech are indeed under assault in America today, and even if the coronavirus pandemic fades away tomorrow, these threats to fundamental rights will persist.

Editor’s Note: Want to support PJ Media so we can continue telling the truth about the 2020 election? Join PJ Media VIP TODAY and use the promo code LAWANDORDER to get 25% off your VIP membership. 

Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

Don’t Want to Wear an LGBT Pride Emblem? You’re Fired.
Why Biden Is a Threat to Traditional Christians and Religious Freedom
Democrats Give Away the Game: They Want the Supreme Court to Unilaterally Amend the Constitution
Biden Pledges to Gut Religious Freedom Protections, Saying They Give ‘Hate’ a ‘Safe Harbor’
Justice Alito’s Ominous Warning About Democrats Threatening to ‘Restructure’ the Supreme Court
 

March on DC, Stop the Steal, Defend the President, & Defeat the Deep State

Million MAGA March Saturday, November 14, 2020, 1301 Pennsylvania Ave, at 12pm.

BY F. RIEHL

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2020/11/million-maga-march-on-dc-stop-the-steal;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Washington, DC – -(AmmoLand.com)- President Trump is a fighter, but he needs us to stand with him and fight too! Oath Keepers and Patriots, duty calls!

We must all march on Washington D.C. and directly back-up and defend President Trump as he fights against the ongoing coup that is attempting to steal the election. Start rolling toward DC now! Join in on:

Million MAGA rally scheduled in Washington D.C. this Saturday, November 14, 2020, 1301 Pennsylvania Ave, at 12pm.

Infowars Stop the Steal Caravan! Owen Shroyer is leading a caravan of patriots across the nation to converge on D.C. this Friday and Saturday, to converge and join in with the other rally initiatives, all standing together on Saturday. Go to www.stopthestealcaravan.com to learn more.

WE WILL BE THERE, in D.C., and we urge YOU to be there!

Oath Keepers Volunteer Security Op For Washington D.C.

Oath Keepers is sending some of our most experienced LEO and military combat veterans into D.C. to help keep patriots safe this Saturday, and in the days to come. Oath Keepers is linking up with the Infowars Stop the Steal Caravan and with the organizers of the Million MAGA event, and we will do all we can to assist with volunteer security on the ground inside D.C.

Oath Keepers will also have some of our most skilled special warfare veterans standing by armed, just outside D.C., as an emergency QRF in the event of a worst-case scenario in D.C. (such as a “Benghazi” style assault on the White House by communist terrorists, in conjunction with stand-down orders by traitor generals).

Our men will be standing by, awaiting the President’s orders to call us up as the militia, which would override D.C.’s ridiculous anti-gun laws (by federal statute, all Americans from age 17-45 are subject to being called up as the militia by the President, and all military veterans are subject to being called up until age 65 because of our training and experience). – Stay tuned for further details.

We call on all our LEO, military, Fire, EMS, and search and rescue brothers and sisters nationwide to also volunteer, either for the inside D.C. security op, or for the outside D.C. contingency QRF. You do NOT have to be an Oath Keepers member to volunteer, but you do need to be a trained professional. All military and LEO veterans are encouraged to volunteer (we will put you to work!), but we especially need combat arms veterans, SWAT and riot trained LEOs, EMS, Fire, intel personnel, logistics, EOD, etc. You must be cool and calm under pressure, disciplined, and a quiet professional.

NOTE: For the volunteer security op inside D.C., to protect rally attendees, we also invite the participation of other patriot groups, such as bikers, who are not prior service but who have training, backgrounds, or experience that give them a capacity to effectively deal with unlawful physical violence by leftist terrorists. But, again, you must be calm under pressure and committed to the ethos of the quiet professional. We have found that it un-nerves the leftists to have to deal with stone-faced patriots who don’t react to them running their mouths, but who are eminently capable if things turn physical. Remember, the eyes of the nation, and the world, are on us.

To volunteer, email us at: dcvolunteers@oathkeepers.org

  • Please also cc our backup volunteer email: dcvolunteers@protonmail.com
  • Please let us know what state you are from, and whether you want to serve inside D.C. or on the outside QRF, or both.

You will go through a comprehensive vetting process, including in-person. Again, we welcome the participation of like-minded groups and their leadership, whether veteran groups, three percenters, bikers, etc. Please have your leadership contact us and we will work with you, as we have on many past operations.

If you can’t make it to D.C. in person, please donate to support those who can. We have brave veterans who are traveling there from across the nation, and they need your support to maintain their watch until we prevail. Go here to donate:

All Patriots Must March On D.C. Now!

We encourage ALL patriots to join together in D.C., beginning this Saturday, November 14, 2020. (NOTE: You do NOT have to be vetted to attend the protests/rallies. Just show up. Vetting is only for those who want to be part of the Oath Keepers security op. Nor do you need to be prior service. ALL patriots need to show up). Understand that this Saturday’s march/rally is just the beginning, and there needs to be a strong, ongoing patriot presence in D.C. going forward.

At a Stop the Steal protest in VA this past Sunday, we met elderly ladies who have been protesting in D.C. If they are brave enough to enter D.C. to stand up, so can you. Show up. Those of us who are more able-bodied will help keep you safe.

This election was stolen and this is a communist/Deep State coup, every bit as corrupt and illegitimate as what is done in third world banana republics. We must refuse to EVER recognize this as a legitimate election, and refuse to recognize Biden as a legitimate winner, and refuse to ever recognize him as the President of the United States. This election was stolen by corrupt, law-breaking Democrat partisans on the ground, and by the manipulation of the CIA created HAMMR (“Hammer”) and Scorecard programs.

What President Trump Must Do To Defeat The Deep State Coup

A. President Trump must refuse to concede. No matter what, he must not concede. This election was stolen by domestic enemies. Period. President Trump must refuse to recognize it as legitimate because it is not legitimate. He must follow the advice Hillary Clinton gave to Biden – to refuse to concede, no matter what. But by President Trump refusing to concede, he is stopping a coup rather than engaging in one.

B. President Trump MUST declassify ALL of the dirty secrets in the files of the CIA, NSA, FBI, ODNI, etc. on all of the compromised political, legal, academic, business, media, social elites, etc. He needs to order our Special Operations troops in SOCOM to take lead on securing all facilities where all the data is stored, and he must have SOCOM intelligence officers take lead on following his orders to IMMEDIATELY declassify all of the files on compromised American elites, so we can defeat the Deep State. The dirty secrets – who is a pedophile, who has taken bribes from Communist China and other foreign enemies, who has engaged in murder, etc, are the swam water that the swamp creatures swim in. It is how they are all both controlled and protected. So long as they obey the Deep State, they are immune from exposure and prosecution. If they dare to refuse to obey the Deep State, they can be destroyed by it in a matter of seconds. That is how the Deep State controls people. That is the root of its power (along with the Federal Reserve control on the financial system). And President Trump must strike at the root.

C. President Trump must do a MASS “WIKILEAKS”/SNOWDEN STYLE DATA DUMP. Both Julian Assange and Eric Snowden were heroes in the fight against the Deep State precisely because they dared to do what the Deep State fears most – exposure. The Deep State can throw such patriots into prison. But, it can’t stop the President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief, from declassifying and dumping ALL of the Deep State’s dirty laundry. He has absolute authority to declassify anything he wants, and to disclose it to the American people. And he needs to do that for corrupt, compromised elites of both major parties. There are GOP traitors too, and they have undermined and worked to destroy our nation from within, right along with the domestic enemies within the Democratic Party and the communist left that is not dominating that party. Expose them all, once and for all. And may the heavens fall (it will be the Deep State that falls).

This is his final, last chance to actually drain the swamp.

What We The People Must Do

A patriot from Serbia, who also loves America, shows us the way:

“What we have done, and what you probably need to do:

  • Peaceful protests, good, well played round 1
  • A complete civil disobedience, they are not your representatives. They are FOREIGN puppet government.
  • Connect with the local police and start organize by neighborhoods to stay safe (we didn’t need this step)
  • We swarmed the streets and started confronting the opponents. I know, not nice, but it must be done if the institutions stop to exist
  • Millions gathered in our capital. There were no barricades strong enough to stop them, nor the police determined enough to stop them
  • Police and Military aligned with the people after few hours of fist-fight
  • We stormed the Parliament
  • And burned down fake state Television!

WE WON!

However, we made a mistake. We have not removed ALL of his people from their positions.

That was the only mistake.

They are going to fight to the end, you must do the same.

Take that glorious flag from the chest. That old flag your ancestors flew while fighting for liberty.

Kiss your old Garand, and your Bible.

Do what you need to do.

You have it in your genes.

Make your grand-parents proud, and make your future grandsons proud.”

“GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

The man knows of what he speaks!

STAND NOW, OR KNEEL FOREVER.

We must stand, and we WILL stand. Last night, on a conference call with Oath Keepers from around the country, I urged them to stop at Arlington National Cemetery on their way to D.C. to visit their brothers and sisters and to reflect on all they gave for this nation – many of them giving their lives, with many of them dying in their teen years. They passed the torch of freedom to us. Now it is our watch, and now it is our time to stand in the breach. As the late, great cowboy patriot LaVoy Finicum said:

“It doesn’t matter how it ends, It Matters How You Stand“

On your feet! Stand up, hook up, check equipment … and shuffle to the door my brothers and sisters.

Stewart Rhodes
Founder of Oath Keepers
U.S. Army Airborne disabled veteran; volunteer firefighter veteran.Yale Law School graduate; former member of Rep. Ron Paul’s D.C. staff.


Oath Keepers

About Oath Keepers:

Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore, with the support of like-minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with us, to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us, God. Our Oath is to the Constitution.

For more information, visit www.oathkeepers.org.




TRUMP Press conference in Philadelphia: Giuliani Nov. 4TH-ELECTION 2020~Voter Fraud LAWSUIT

Trump Press conference in Philadelphia Giuliani Nov. 4th - election 2020 - Voter Fraud Law Suit - THIS IS VERY HARD TO FIND IN FULL TRANSCRIPT REVEALING PENDING LAW SUIT FOR ELECTION 2020
Eric Trump: (00:00) There is video after video of them passing out collateral material in polling sites all over Philadelphia. They’re trying to cheat. They’re trying to cheat. They have three by five printed, big posters in polling locations, all over the city, saying to vote for Biden and Harris, which is totally illegal. They’re passing out flyers. The supervisors of elections, we have them on video, certain ones wearing literally Biden Harris face masks in polling locations, which is totally illegal. And now they won’t let, and we brought one great gentleman here with us today, Jeremy, who’s a poll watcher down at the convention center. They won’t even let him watch as they count the ballots. They put them behind a fence, 40, 50 yards away where they actually can’t see the counting happening. Guys, this is fraud. This is absolute fraud. We’ve seen it in Philadelphia before. They’re trying to make a mockery of the election of this country.
Eric Trump: (00:58) My father is up by almost half a million votes in this state, with 86% reported and plenty of red counties left to go, plenty of red counties left to go. We’re going to win Pennsylvania, but they’re trying to cheat us out of it because they know it’s their only path to victory. They know it’s the only path to victory. And so we came here today. We met with all our lawyers. We are going to file suit in Pennsylvania. It’s a shame that we have to do that. It’s the last thing that we wanted to do. It’s the last thing my father wanted to do, but this is rampant corruption and it can’t happen...
Rudy Giuliani: (01:46) Thank you very much, Eric. It is very, very sad that we’re here in the city that’s really the birthplace of our democracy. And this is among one of the most anti-democratic things I’ve ever seen or encountered. And it’s not just here in Philadelphia, this is going on all over the country. We have filed a lawsuit. The lawsuit actually required that when these mail in ballots, that you know are highly suspicious anyway, this form of balloting has always been considered the most prone to fraud.
Rudy Giuliani: (05:22) … Detroit, Michigan. Again, let me be specific what it is, this whole new thing that never happened before in our country, these mail-in ballots, which has been a cause of real concern for everyone because they can easily be fraudulent. Well, one of the things that the law attaches to that is the rights of both parties to observe the ballot. The way we do with absentee ballots. You make certain it’s properly signed on the outside, there’s a signature. You make sure that it’s properly postmarked. You make sure that it’s properly addressed, and then you pass on it. A number of these are often challenged by the Democrat representative or their Republican representative. We never got a chance to look at a single one of them.
Rudy Giuliani: (06:09) The gentlemen here who did this for us, says about 100,000 ballots went through that process in the 20 plus hours in which they wasted his time by not allowing him to see a single ballot. Well, that’s 120,000 ballots that should just be taken out of the count. So you want to look at that number, that 120,000 should come out. And this is an area in which Biden is getting 60, 70% of the vote. I don’t know if this is going on in any other place, but it is going on with enough frequency in Wisconsin that we’ve brought suit, and now we’ll have to look into three other places. What it says to me is this is a concerted effort of the crooks that run the Democratic party. And you know, these big city machines are crooked. You know that.
Rudy Giuliani: (07:02) 20 years, 30 years, 40 years, 50 years, a hundred years of one party rule leads to corruption of all kinds. Voter fraud is one of the biggest, because that’s how you keep your power, but we’re not going to let them get away with it. They’re not going to steal this election. This election gets decided by the people, these people, the elite, they don’t care about the people. The people are the deplorables, the chumps, they’re not important. To President Trump, he’s the whole reason that he ran for office. And he’s the whole reason for which he’s carrying on this campaign, so that your vote can mean something, so that your vote doesn’t get wiped out by 100,000 fraudulent, meaningless paper ballots that no one gets to observe. So we are going to continue the lawsuit here. We’re going to bring a second one and then we’re going to bring a federal lawsuit. And we’re going to take a very good look at whether we bring this nationally. We certainly are going to bring it here, and in Wisconsin. Quite possibly, we’ll do a national lawsuit and really exposed the corruption of the Democratic party.

Ronna McDaniel Presents 131 Affidavits, 2,800 Incident Reports of Alleged Voter Fraud in MI~Media Still Demands ‘Evidence’

BY MEGAN FOX

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/election/megan-fox/2020/11/09/ronna-mcdaniel-presents-131-affidavits-2800-incident-reports-of-alleged-voter-fraud-in-mi-media-still-demands-evidence-n1134171;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

During a press conference Monday, GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel presented evidence of alleged voter fraud in Michigan that Republicans think could have tipped the scales for Joe Biden.

“In Wayne County, Republican poll watchers were denied their legal right to monitor the election and purposefully kept in the dark…there are thousands of reports of poll watchers being intimidated and unable to do their job and as of  4 p.m. this afternoon, 131 affidavits have been completed just in Michigan with over 2,800 incident reports that have been submitted to us since election day. Two new lawsuits were filed today by people who were working in Detroit and a whistleblower [came forward].”

McDaniel detailed the claims of many of the affidavits. “I hope you look at these affidavits,” she told the press. “And I hope you hear from the people who were there [in Detroit].” She also urged the media to care about the reports of voter fraud and intimidation instead of just ignoring or suppressing them as they have been doing and moving on with the news cycle as if their declaration of a win for Biden is the final word on the matter.

“So just after a week after the polls close, Democrats and the media want to ignore these irregularities,” McDaniel said. “Even one instance of voter fraud should be too many for all of us.”

Watching the news these days is a lot like watching a Monty Python skit because immediately after McDaniel gave her evidence and told the press where to find the affidavits, they demanded that she show “evidence” of the alleged fraud.

“Do you know that fraudulent votes were actually cast?” said one intrepid news person. Kayleigh McEnany responded, “Ronna just told you there were 131 affidavits filed in just Michigan alone. We are aware of the reports of thousands of votes cast in Nevada that were not eligible…right now we would point you to that. That information is publicly available.”

Lawsuit: Poll Workers Allege Voter-Coaching, Back-Dating, Cheating Occurred in Detroit Election Centers

McDaniel jumped back in to add that the whistleblower in Michigan has sworn an affidavit alleging: being told by a supervisor to backdate ballots that came in after the legal deadline; witnessing poll workers encouraging voters to vote straight Democrat; and even poll workers going into the booths with voters. These allegations of illegal votes being counted must be examined through the legal process. The press conveniently continued to ignore the evidence presented to them and pretended McDaniel never said it. “Why aren’t you worried about these irregularities?” McDaniel asked over a member of the press heckling her with stupid questions.

“Do you have any evidence you can show us today that illegal ballots were cast?” a member of the press asked AGAIN. An exasperated McDaniel replied that backdating ballots is illegal and that would mean they were cast illegally. The press did not seem to grasp any of it. And I would bet cash money that none of the mainstream press investigates any of the affidavits or incident reports submitted to the court. Instead, they will continue to gaslight us, claiming that there is “no evidence.” This is the narrative they will go with on the evening news and half of America will never hear of the 131 affidavits taken under oath or the 2,800 incident reports of alleged voter fraud.

You can watch this idiocy here.

If McDaniel had shown them live footage of illegal ballots being cast they would have continued to ask, “Where’s the proof?”

The entire thing reminds me of this Monty Python skit.

What do you think are the odds that even one of these reporters will follow up on the affidavits McDaniel presented and report anything in them?

 

Deep State & Joe Biden’s Most Extensive Voter Fraud Operation

In this episode of Behind The Deep State, host Alex Newman exposes how elements of the Deep State and the Fake News legacy media are ignoring allegations and evidence of potential voter fraud to illegally unseat President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence in order to install globalists Joe Biden and Kamala Harris into the presidency and vice-presidency, respectively. Newman goes through clips from Project Veritas of one USPS whistleblower exposing how mail-in ballots were backdated and put through the express system in Michigan, how the USPS sent extra ballots to wrong or previous addresses in Nevada, and how Republican poll watchers and observers in Detroit were barred from observing the ballot counts. Newman further emphasis the need to expose these Deep State schemes and to investigate every and all allegations of potential voter fraud. 📰 Full Article: https://bit.ly/massive_vote_fraud

▶️ More Videos: Trump is the Target of "Color Revolution" Coup https://youtu.be/MQlPX2okv00 Deep State Highjacks Election into full-blown 'Color Revolution' https://youtu.be/AyAFL7kUG4M 🇺🇸 The New American: http://www.thenewamerican.com/

1 4 5 6 7 8