Pentagon HALTS Biden Transition Briefings as Patriot Militias Are INFILTRATING Government!!!


The Pentagon HALTS Biden Transition Briefings as Patriot Militias Are indeed INFILTRATING Government at all levels! In this video, we’re going to take a look at the shocking announcement that the Pentagon is keeping Biden out of military briefings, how members of the Oath Keepers are winning elections and holding office across the country, and how a new political alliance is forming that promises to make America more conservative than ever, you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Democrats FURIOUS After Trump Admin Stops Biden Transition Briefings Amid Report Of MAJOR Hack On US

Reports Claim “Anti-Trump” SCOTUS Justice Roberts Afraid To Hear Election Fraud Cases Due To Liberal “Riots”




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Multiple sources are claiming Supreme Court Justice John Roberts is an “anti-Trumper” who is actively working to ensure President Trump isn’t re-elected.

A video going viral online shows Arizona State Senator Eddie Farnsworth citing a Supreme Court staffer who allegedly heard SCOTUS judges yelling behind closed doors during a heated argument.

Farnsworth describes a statement made by a “Current staffer for one of the Supreme Court Justices.”

“He said the justices, as they always do, went into a closed room to discuss cases or to debate,” Farnsworth explained. “There are no phones, no computers, no nothing. No one else is in the room except the nine justices. It’s typically very civil.”

He continued, saying, “They usually don’t hear any sound, they just debate what they’re doing. But, when the Texas case was brought up, he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up. The words that were heard through the wall when Justice Thomas and Justice Alito were citing Bush vs Gore, from John Roberts, were,

‘I don’t give a ***** about that case, I don’t want to hear about it. At that time we didn’t have riots.’ So, what he was saying is he was afraid of what would happen if they didn’t do the right thing.”

“I’m sorry, but that is moral cowardice,” Farnsworth declared. “We in the SREC, I’m an SREC member, we put those words in very specifically, because the charge of the Supreme Court is to ultimately be our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty. So, I think we should leave these words in because I want to send a strong message to them. Thank you.”

Corroborating this account is an interview with Pastor Rodney Howard-Browne, a Trump insider, who told the Strange Report podcast about the Supreme Court clerk’s experience before Farnsworth spoke out.

According to Howard-Browne, “The clerk said, ‘The justices are normally calm. They meet behind closed doors, and you never hear anything, but it was a screaming match. You could hear it all down the hallway.'”

“He said they met in person… they didn’t trust the telephonic meeting,” Howard-Browne told Strange Report. “Chief Justice Roberts was screaming, ‘Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?’ And then Roberts went on to say [to Justice Neil Gorsuch], ‘Don’t tell me about Bush versus Gore. We weren’t dealing with riots then, and you’re forgetting what your role is. And I don’t want to hear anything from the two junior justices.'”

The clerk alleged that Roberts continued, saying, “I will tell you how to vote,” with Justice Clarence Thomas supposedly answering, “This will be the end of democracy, John.”

“When they left the room, Roberts and the liberals and Kavanaugh had big smiles; Alito and Thomas [were] visibly upset; ACB and Gorsuch didn’t seem fazed at all,” according to Howard-Browne’s source.

“So obviously, it’s clear that Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by Antifa, the left-wing rioting,” the pastor concluded. “And, of course, that’s the problem that we’re dealing with. Apart from the corruption that’s in our courts, and the judges that are legislating from the benches, and all the corruption that we’re dealing with here with the voting fraud and the scandals of what’s taking place. This would be ultimately the scenario that I could just see unfolding in the Supreme Court.”

In addition to these claims, Trump attorney Lin Wood wrote on Twitter Thursday, “This may be the most important tweet of my life.”

He continued, “Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately. They are ‘anti-Trumpers’ dedicated to preventing the public from knowing the TRUTH of
Trump’s re-election.”

Elaborating, Wood claimed Roberts was heard discussing Trump in a phone conversation, saying, “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.”

“Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out,” Lin wrote.

The POTUS attorney added, “This is a sad day for our country but a day on which we must wake up & face the truth,” and told Americans, “Roberts is the reason that SCOTUS has not acted on election cases. Others involved.”

Changing the direction of his Twitter rant, Wood said he’s “long had questions about ‘the John Roberts’ on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray.”

“The documentation of my claims about Justices Roberts & Breyer has been placed in hands of several third parties,” Wood added. “When one cannot attack message, all too often messenger is attacked. But TRUTH cannot be denied. It cannot be destroyed. I have made sure of that TRUTH.”

Infowars has reached out to Lin Wood to inquire about the documentation of his claims, but has yet to receive a response.

One final tweet on the subject by Wood explains that if he gave the wrong date for the alleged phone call where Justice Roberts said Trump would “never be re-elected,” that the judge can give the exact date himself.

“While you have his attention, ask him some other questions. He owes The People answers. He owes us TRUTH,” Lin wrote.


SARAH CORRIHER: Vaccine Elitists Like Ben Shapiro

The elitists amongst us are preparing to forcibly intervene with the most rushed and least tested medical therapy in the history of the world. If it goes horribly wrong for your family, you cannot sue the pundits who promoted it, the government that fast-tracked it, or even the manufacturers themselves. Meanwhile, we (the plebs) are to become the forced test subjects in the experimental group, and we must never question "the science". Get reliable notification options and further information at Sarah's home site:

POLICE STATE DEMOCRAT REP. BILL Pascrell, JR. Demands Removing ‘Treasonous’ Republicans from Congress

NJ Chamber of Commerce Congressional Dinner

First, we confiscate your guns and then we put you on trial for opposing us. OK? (Bill Pascrell for Congress/Facebook)



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

U.S.A. – -( “BREAKING: I’m demanding that the 126 Republicans who have endorsed a malignant lawsuit to overturn the will of the people and undermine our democracy not be seated in Congress,” New Jersey Democrat Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. tweeted Friday. He was announcing his letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi in which he made clear his definitions of “insurrections,” “treasonous” and “traitors” extend to anyone he politically opposes.

The excuse given for his latest public tantrum was the lawsuit filed by the State of Texas (and joined by 17 states) challenging the legality of voting procedure changes by Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The Supreme Court declined to hear the case citing “lack of standing,” with Justices Alito and Thomas stating they would have “grant[ed] the motion to file the bill of complaint.”

While Roberts being a weasel was no surprise, the decision to punt points to future disappointments we can expect from Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. It also seems to corroborate establishment fears of retaliation by court-packing, and to speculation that many are terrified cities will burn if a Biden “victory” is ultimately proven fraudulent to enough citizens.

“Donald Trump and other prominent Republicans have commenced a daily assault on the legitimacy of the election that includes filing dozens of frivolous lawsuits seeking to have the results invalidated,” Pascrell complains in his letter. “Tragically, Members of our House of Representatives are supporting and amplifying these attacks on democracy, now culminating in 126 House Republicans joining a malignant lawsuit filed by the state of Texas…”

As for “frivolous,” that depends on who you’re talking to.

18 states thought the Texas complaint was valid, and daily revelations continue to raise disturbing questions that deserve thorough and impartial investigations (or as Pascrell characterizes them, acts of treason).

“As you know, Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution gives each chamber of Congress ultimate authority to decide its membership, positing that ‘[e]ach House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members.’” Pascrell declares. He’s muddying the waters here, deliberately, one suspects, to make his supporters believe the majority has lawful authority to boot minority members.

Not so, says the National Constitution Center in its “Common Interpretation”:

“While the House and Senate may decide contested elections, they may not disqualify otherwise duly elected persons who meet Constitutional qualifications for membership.”

So what authority would Pascrell use?

“The courageous Reconstruction Congress implanted into our governing document safeguards to cleanse from our government ranks of any traitors and others who would seek to destroy the Union,” he says, then citing the Fourteenth Amendment  prohibition on holding federal or state executive or judicial offices by anyone who “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof…”

“Stated simply, men and women who would act to tear the United States government apart cannot serve as Members of the Congress,” Pascrell declares. “The fate of our democracy depends on us meeting that moment.”

To paraphrase Seinfeld’s Soup Nazi, if you’re  a Republican who thinks the “official” election tallies stink, “No representation for you.”

Note Pascrell keeps referring to “our democracy,” even though the word appears nowhere in the Constitution, which instead proclaims “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…”

Guarding against the dangers of mob rule, the Bill of Rights defined some of the areas where the individual would be immune to the will of the collective. That means no matter how many of us disagree with you, we cannot lawfully use force to shut you up, to suppress your political views, or to make you worship in the way WE see fit. We cannot break into your house and search your property without cause and a legal warrant. We cannot torture you into confessing to a crime. Barring behaviors on your part that disqualify you, we cannot strip you of your ability to keep and bear arms (which, if you think about it, is useless unless you’re also locked up). No matter how many of us vote on it.

Pascrell doesn’t much go in for the Second Amendment and we’re starting to see why. So leave it to him to call the First Amendment-articulated right to peaceably petition the government for the redress of grievances as treason. Leave it to Pascrell to demand ejecting from Congress the only representatives the Constitution called for to be democratically elected (Senators were intended to be elected by state legislators until the Seventeenth Amendment took away another vital check and made ultimate rule by high population urban areas inevitable).

By defining the most basic of American values as treason, Pascrell turns the meaning on its head. Again, that Constitution he keeps deliberately misrepresenting tells us what the term really means (Article III, Section 3, Clause 1):

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort…”

If anyone is doing that, it’s politicians like Pascrell seeking to undermine “the security of a free State” by “infring[ing]” on “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”

By first declaring President Donald Trump “has engaged in … treason” and demanding the prosecution of him and his “enablers,” Pascrell has in effect endorsed executing the president. That’s not hyperbole if you look at what United State Code says:

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death…”

By using that same language to describe lawsuit-supporting Republican Representatives, Pascrell subjects them to more than mere exclusion from the House—they too, if guilty, would be subject to the same penalty. As would any citizen who agrees with them and supports what they support. If that includes you, Pascrell considers you guilty of the capital crime of treason.

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable,” a Democrat president from an earlier era noted. John F. Kennedy, a Life Member of the National Rifle Association, also had this to say about the Second Amendment:

“By calling attention to ‘a well regulated militia,' the ‘security' of the nation, and the right of each citizen ‘to keep and bear arms,' our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.”

Pascrell wants to make a peaceful revolution impossible. And he’s moving the “fears of governmental tyranny” from “extremely unlikely” to “We’re he-re…”

What the hell, I’m in.  You?

Also see: NJ Democrat’s Demand for Prosecution of Trump ‘Enablers’ Ups the Stakes for All

About David Codrea:
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea



Emails: Hunter Biden Left $400K Off 2014 Income Tax Return. False Return Filed.

Emails: Hunter Biden Left $400K Off 2014 Income Tax Return. False Return Filed.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Hunter Biden’s famous laptop yielded another revelation about the “president-elect’s” son last week, but once again the media mostly ignored it.

Biden The Younger didn’t report $400,000 from Burisma Holdings on his 2014 income tax return, NBC News reported.

Burisma Holdings is the energy company that hired Biden despite his complete lack of knowledge about the energy business and his record as a drug addict.

And Burisma is also the nexus of the Biden-Burisma influence-peddling scheme. In 2016, then Vice President Joe Biden forced Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma, which employed Hunter at the time.

Though the connection between Biden senior’s move against the prosecutor and his son’s employment at Burisma is obvious, the media called suggestions of influence peddling a “debunked conspiracy theory.”

And now, they’re ignoring another Biden scandal: filing a false tax return.

The Email

The report from NBC is clear and succinct: Hunter Biden cheated on his taxes:

Hunter Biden’s former business partner sent him an email in 2017 saying he did not disclose on his tax returns $400,000 in income from the Ukrainian natural gas company where he sat on the board, according to a copy of the email obtained by NBC News.

The message from Eric Schwerin, then president of Rosemont Seneca Partners, says Hunter Biden would need to “amend” his 2014 returns to reflect the “unreported” income, according to the copy of the email.

“In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income,” says the email dated Jan. 16, 2017.

The email goes on to note that Hunter Biden, who is now the subject of a federal tax probe, netted more than $1.2 million for the year. The earnings include the $400,000 from Burisma as well as income from Rosemont Seneca Advisors and a legal firm.

NBC received the email from Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani’s attorney, Robert Costello. Costello’s copy came from the hard drive of Biden’s now famous laptop. 

NBC did not know what Hunter Biden did about the tax problem. Nor did it explain how Biden’s tax accountant — it’s safe to say he has one — made the mistake if that is what the omission was. Or did Biden try to hide the income? Unsurprisingly, his attorney clammed up.

Biden owed interest and penalties on the unpaid taxes. If he has not amended the false return, those fees have grown substantially.

Prosecutors Probe

Last week, The New American again reported that Biden is the target of a federal money-laundering probe.

That story broke in October, but the leftist media ignored it. They wanted Joe Biden in the White House.

As CNN described the probe, ongoing since 2018, “investigators appear to be focused on Hunter Biden’s business activities connected to China. Some of his business dealings in China are publicly known through interviews and documents released in September by Senate Republicans on the Finance Committee and the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs.”

Continued CNN:

After his father left office in 2017, Hunter Biden worked on securing a deal with CEFC China Energy to invest in US energy projects, according to documents released by Republicans.

At least one of the matters investigators have examined is a 2017 gift of a 2.8-carat diamond that Hunter Biden received from CEFC’s founder and former chairman Ye Jianming after a Miami business meeting, one person briefed on the matter said. In 2019, Biden provided the New Yorker magazine an account of receiving the diamond from Ye. He told the New Yorker that he felt uncomfortable receiving the diamond and gave it to other associates, and that he doesn’t know what they did with it. “I knew it wasn’t a good idea to take it. I just felt like it was weird,” he said in his New Yorker interview.

Well, the other “weird” thing is why CEFC, an energy company, would partner with a manifestly unqualified dope fiend. Maybe for the same reason Burisma hired him: his last name.

That said, more news about the Biden-China Connection surfaced on Wednesday. Fox News published the contents of more emails that connect the Bidens to Communist China, as TNA reported.

Those emails confirm testimony from Hunter Biden’s former business partner, Tony Bobulinski. He met with Joe Biden to outline his work for the family in its joint venture with the Chinese Reds. That company was called Sinohawk.

The Bidens’ Asiatic adventures aside, the laptop’s revelations include these:

What federal agents have done about the photos of underage girls and Biden’s illegal drug use is unknown.


Trump Administration to Withhold Medicaid Funds From California Over Insurance Abortion Mandate



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Trump administration will be withholding Medicaid funds from the state of California over its refusal to remove the mandate that requires pro-life churches and Christian groups to fund abortions in their healthcare plans.

On Tuesday, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar announced the Trump administration will be withholding $200 million per quarter from California until it removes the abortion-funding requirement.

Life News reports churches in California, pro-life groups, and religious organizations have been fighting the abortion mandate since 2014, when the California Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) reclassified abortion as a “basic health service” under the Affordable Care Act and required all insurance plans in the state to cover elective abortions without exemptions for churches.

“Health care is designed to save lives and protect our health,” National Right to Life president Carol Tobias opined. “The state of California’s coercive policies have meant that nearly every health insurance plan, no matter if an individual works for a business, a church or religious school, is required to pay for an elective abortion.”

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and Life Legal Defense Foundation filed formal complaints with the Department of Health and Human Services against the DMHC in 2014 citing federal conscience law violations. “If the state can force a church to pay for the very thing they counsel against, in violation of their constitutionally protected religious beliefs, then no American is secure,” asserted Jeremiah Galus of ADF.

“Churches should be free to serve their communities according to their religious beliefs without unjust government edicts that force them to violate those beliefs,” he continued. “California has no right to dictate what pastors or churches believe on moral and cultural issues. Yet, with the stroke of a pen — and without consulting the public — the state-mandated that churches must pay for the taking of innocent human life.”

ADF has also filed several lawsuits against the DMHC. The ADF presented oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last month.

“We are asking the 9th Circuit to invalidate this unconstitutional mandate because California officials are required to follow the law and legal precedent, not the dictates of groups that have an axe to grind against religious organizations that don’t share their views on abortion,” said Galus.

Through its battle against the DMHC, ADF learned the mandate was prompted by demands from Planned Parenthood to “fix” it so that the health plans of religious entities would be required to include abortion. In a series of e-mails discovered by the ADF, it was revealed that Planned Parenthood threatened to promote a legislative “solution” if the DHMC did not act otherwise, Life News reports.

Unfortunately, the Obama administration’s investigation of the mandate predictably found no violation of the law.

But the pro-life Trump administration had warned that it would be taking action if California refused to remove the mandate. “If California wants to provide abortion services, it can do so,” said Roger Severino, who directs the Office for Civil Rights in the Department of Health and Human Services. “What the state is not free to do is force people to pay for other people’s abortions.”

Severino said in January, “Just as a government shouldn’t force a kosher deli to serve ham, you shouldn’t require nuns to pay for abortion, and even more so because it involves the taking of a human life.”

The Trump administration followed through with its threat on Tuesday. “We have informed California that this policy clearly violates federal conscience laws, but the state refuses to fix the issue and comply,” Azar said, according to the Epoch Times. “Accordingly, we plan to withhold $200 million in federal Medicaid funds from the state in the first quarter of 2021, and unless California amends its policies, we will seek to withhold an additional $200 million every quarter until it complies.”

Azar also announced the Department of Justice will be filing its own separate pro-life conscience lawsuit.

Not surprisingly, California Governor Gavin Newsom took to Twitter to rally opponents by citing COVID and appealing to the Left’s hatred of all things deemed “patriarchal,” however absurd. “Nothing like the ‘pro-life’ party eliminating healthcare during a GLOBAL PANDEMIC,” the governor wrote. “California will survive without this $$ for now — but their frail, pathetic patriarchal system they are so desperate to protect won’t.”

But President Trump’s actions garnered support from the pro-life community. Tobias said, “We thank the Trump administration and the Department of Health and Human Services for protecting the rights of Californians who do not want to pay for or participate in healthcare plans that pay for abortions.”

The Christian Medical Association told Life News it was grateful for the actions taken by the administration. “This radical trampling of conscience is contrary to our most fundamental, Constitutional freedoms of thought, speech, and exercise of faith,” CMA Director of Federal Government Relations Jonathan Imbody said.


Group of House Republicans Call on Trump to Veto $1.4 Trillion Omnibus Spending Bill



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A number of House Republicans want President Trump to veto a $1.4 trillion omnibus spending bill being worked out in Congress, deriding it as an example of Washington “swamp politics.”

In a letter signed by 14 of the chamber’s Republicans, including Representatives Andy Biggs of Arizona and Chip Roy of Texas, the lawmakers described the measure as a “massive take-it-or-leave-it bill, negotiated behind closed doors, that expands government, spends at record levels well above 2011 base cap levels, and funds unnecessary or even harmful federal programs.”

Negotiations are set to continue Thursday as lawmakers attempt to reach an agreement on the massive spending bill and prevent a government shutdown while they simultaneously try to finalize a separate coronavirus stimulus bill.

“I’m hopeful by tonight … we will have an agreement on the omnibus,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) on Wednesday, although the day ended without a deal.

Sources told Fox News that another interim spending bill may be needed to avoid a shutdown after the Friday deadline, citing unresolved policy issues.

There is reportedly a plan to put the $900 billion coronavirus aid package on top of the $1.4 omnibus to create a bill with an approximately $2.3 trillion price tag. Such legislation, however, would be huge and require time on the part of legislators in order to become familiar with the bill.

The Republican signatories of the letter worry the omnibus bill will increase the national debt. They blame House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), arguing that the proposal “fully funds an agenda rejected by the American people” and stressed the fact that Democrats’ House majority significantly shrunk thanks to November’s election.

They also pointed to the president’s promise in 2018 that he “would never sign another bill like this again” when he signed that year’s omnibus spending bill.

“This bill promises to be even larger, exemplifying everything that is wrong with the swamp politics of Washington, D.C.,” the lawmakers said.

The Republicans take issue both with the legislation’s content and cost, arguing the federal government should work to save money since it’s simultaneously passing COVID-19 stimulus.

They wrote to President Trump:

Supporting this is a vote to fund an education system that is failing to educate our children while teaching them that America is evil, it is a vote to fund grants to states that run a badly broken election system; it is a vote to fund a healthcare system that empowers insurance companies at the expense of hard-working Americans; it is a vote to underfund border security and empower cartels; it is a vote to continue war without so much as a debate much less a vote on a new AUMF for our men and women in uniform; it is a vote to fund Planned Parenthood; and, among many other things, it is a vote to send money to state and local agencies that are perpetuating the shutdowns that are destroying our way of life.

Our country will be better off if you veto this omnibus appropriations bill for fiscal year 2021.

Is the president willing to go to war over the uniparty while he’s also in a bitter fight to win a second term despite voter fraud being perpetuated by the failure of many of the nation’s institutions — from the courts to state legislators — to perform their constitutional duties?

The establishment certainly wants the omnibus and COVID-19 relief bills passed. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said fiscal conservatism should be thrown to the wind in light of the pandemic.

“The case for fiscal policy right now is very, very strong and I think that’s widely understood,” Powell said following a Federal Reserve meeting, adding that “the time to focus on [budgetary concerns] is when the economy is strong, unemployment is low and taxes are pouring in and there’s room to get on a sustainable path because the economy is doing well.”

Although the stock market remains at all-time highs, unemployment is expected to grow as state and local governments order new business closures to prevent the spread of coronavirus as the mainstream media stokes fears with fear-mongering stories such as the recent one about a White House security director who allegedly lost his leg due to COVID-19.

President Trump has played ball with his own party for years now, but they have repeatedly refused to return the favor. When it comes to this spending monstrosity, fiscal conservatives hope, the president should forget the establishment and stand by his principles.


Fox: New Emails Confirm Biden-China Connection Exposed by Whistleblower Bobulinski

Fox: New Emails Confirm Biden-China Connection Exposed by Whistleblower Bobulinski



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

We always knew it, but now we have more proof that Tony Bobulinski told the truth about the Biden-China connection.

Fox News has uncovered emails from 2017 in which Hunter Biden begs the Chinese for $10 million. Even better, he extended “best wishes from the entire Biden family,” which would include his father, then former vice president and now the presumptive president-elect.

One letter went to Ye Jianming, the chairman of CEFC, a bankrupt Chinese energy company.

In some sense, the emails are nothing new. But they do confirm Bobulinski’s vivid testimony about the Biden family’s Chinese connection, which should have ended Joe’s candidacy.

Send Money Now

In October, Bobulinski, a former Navy officer, blew the whistle on the Bidens and confirmed Joe Biden’s knowledge of his son’s activities. Now, though, more emails show just what the Bidens nearly collected.

Though the $10 million transfer never went through, Fox reported, Hunter was desperate for it.

On June 18, 2017, Hunter Biden asked CEFC’s Zhao Runlong to “translate my letter to Chairman Ye, please extend my warmest best wishes and that I hope to see the Chairman soon.”

That letter, dated June 17, and attached to the email, included the usual schmoozing.

“I hope my letter finds you well. I regret missing you on your last visit to the United States,” he wrote. “Please accept the best wishes from the entire Biden family as well as my partners.”

Reported Fox:

Biden went on to update Ye, saying that they have “concluded the establishment of SinoHawk Holdings,” the Biden joint venture with CEFC, and said he looked “forward” to introducing him to his business associate Tony Bobulinski, who he wrote would “act as the CEO.”

“He is a very close friend of James Gilliar and the Biden family and joined our team to focus on the execution of things as a partner,” Biden wrote. “He has invested capital all over the world for some of the world’s wealthiest families.”

Then came the pitch to get the check in the mail: “I would appreciate if you will send that quickly so we can properly fund and operate Sinohawk.”

Ye answered Biden on July 10. “I will continue to pay attention and give my support,” Ye wrote after the usual pleasantries. “I have arranged Director Zang and Gongwen Dong to expedite the charter capital input to SinoHawk.”

Senate Report, $5M Transfers

The Senate Homeland Security and Finance committees explained that Ye and other Chinese officials were tied to the communist government and Peoples Liberation Army.”

“Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in questionable transactions/cash flow,” the report said.

Fox also provided more details about Bobulinski’s emails and text messages about the $10 million payment:

According to the messages reviewed by Fox News, which range from June 25, 2017, through mid-July 2017, the $10 million transfer was delayed for weeks. Several text messages suggest the delay was due to visa issues, including one email sent by President-elect Biden’s brother, Jim Biden, who was involved in the joint-venture. 

“Just got off the phone with Zaho[sp], Still dealing with Visa issues, they still haven’t filled out proper paperwork submissions, re entry. Still want my personal advise,” Jim Biden appeared to write in an email to Bobulinski on July 10, 2017. …

In another message, dated July 10, 2017, between Bobulinski and “Zhao- Shanghai CEFC,” Zhao stated: “I do not want to throw a damp over such a capable executive like you.” 

“This is the dark side of the Chinese business,” Zhao wrote. “But I think you deserve to know it… if I am telling you what you already know just ignore it.”

A source familiar with the documents told Fox News that the Zhao whom Bobulinski had been texting was the same Zhao who spoke with Jim Biden, and whom Hunter Biden sent the initial letter, requesting he translate for Ye. Zhao Runlong has been listed in a LinkedIn profile as the “Chief Interpreter, Corporate Event Coordiantor, Business Liaison of Beijing Branch· ‎CEFC China Energy Company Limited.”

On July 18, 2017, Bobulinski asked that the “$10 MM be sent in 2 $5 MM tranches but @ the same time, $5 MM to savings and $5 MM to checking. That is what we prefer.”

Again, the $10 million transfer never happened, Fox reported. But reprising the Senate report, the network noted that Hudson West III, a firm that Hunter Biden opened with Chinese associates, received $5 million from CEFC on August 8.

The report also said this:

The same day the $5 million was received, and continuing through Sept. 25, 2018, Hudson West III sent frequent payments to Owasco, Hunter Biden’s firm. These payments, which were described as consulting fees, reached $4,790,375.25 in just over a year.

The emails also show that Hunter Biden leased an office, the sign for which would read “The Biden Foundation” and “Hudson West (CEFC US),” yet “the lease will remain under my company’s name Rosemont Seneca,” Biden wrote, the business venture ensnared in the Biden-Burisma influence-peddling scheme

The latest emails confirm what Bobulinski said before about his dealings with the Bidens, not least that Joe Biden, is the “big guy” that emails say will get 10 percent of Sinohawk.

Bobulinski said he met Joe Biden, and that Biden lied when claiming ignorance of Hunter’s strangely lucrative international business dealings.


Michigan fraud witness debunks Dominion CEO testimony, says Poulos falsely denied internet connection & ballot dumps

ABOVE: Melissa Carone, who was working for Dominion Voting Services, speaks in front of the Michigan House Oversight Committee in Lansing, Michigan on December 2, 2020. – The president’s attorneys, led by Rudy Giuliani, have made numerous allegations of election fraud. (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images)


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:01 PM PT – Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Michigan’s top witness of election fraud debunked recent claims that Dominion CEO John Poulos made while under oath to a State Senate Committee.

“He stated none of the machines were connected to the Internet,” election fraud witness Melissa Carone said. “[There is a] 53-minute audio recording of the Dominion training session, in which they admit that all of their hardware is connected to the internet.”

Melissa Carone said the Dominion CEO also lied by saying that election workers had ballots locked in steel boxes. In reality, she said, they had access to the ballots and even ran them through machines several times.

Additionally, Carone added Poulos falsely denied ballot dumps at Detroit’s TCF Center. She noted there is documented evidence of the ballot dumps.

“These pictures are crazy,” Carone said. “They are from outside the Department of Elections on the third and the fourth and there are Penske moving trucks. The back of them are open.”

She noted that trucks belonging to the city of Detroit were allegedly parked behind the moving trucks to guard them.

MORE NEWS: Dominion CEO Poulos Denies Vote Manipulation Despite Evidence


'Sassy' Dominion IT Whistleblower Melissa Carone Has Secret Video Evidence!


Trump URGED to Declare MARTIAL LAW as Congress Poised to BLOCK ELECTORS!!!


A number of Ex-Military Officers Want President Trump to Declare MARTIAL LAW as Congress is Getting Poised to BLOCK ELECTORS! In this video, we’re going to take a look at the latest front that’s opening up in this battle for electoral integrity, we’re going to look at the latest calls on President Trump to invoke emergency powers with new revelations of foreign interference in our election, and how a number of congressmen are rising up promising to block the electoral college and throw this election over to congress, almost guaranteeing President Trump’s reelection; you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Twitter Says It Will REMOVE All Posts Claiming Vaccines Can Harm People

Despite widespread reports of health workers having allergic reactions to Pfizer shot



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Twitter has declared that it will remove all posts that suggest there are any “adverse impacts or effects of receiving vaccinations,” despite reports already emerging of health workers getting sick from taking Pfizer’s coronavirus shot.

Twitter announced that beginning next week it will memory-hole any posts that “invoke a deliberate conspiracy” or “advance harmful, false, or misleading narratives” about vaccines.

“Using a combination of technology and human review, we will begin enforcing this updated policy on December 21, and expanding our actions during the following weeks,” the company proclaimed.

Twitter added that it will be monitoring posts about vaccinations “in close consultation with local, national, and global public health authorities around the world.”

Nurses across the country are refusing to take the COVID Vaccine as Big Pharma’s propaganda machine pushes it on the masses.

The tech company will also wipe any posts that suggest vaccines “are used to intentionally cause harm,” or “control populations,” or are “unnecessary.” 

The statement also notes that posts will be scrubbed if they contain “false claims which have been widely debunked about the adverse impacts or effects of receiving vaccinations.”

Exactly what “debunked” means was not clarified. Presumably, it means any claims about vaccines that Twitter disagrees with.

The New York Times and others reported Wednesday that healthcare workers in Alaska have been hospitalized with a serious allergic reaction after taking Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

The development follows reports last week from Britain where some healthcare workers reported serious allergic reactions to the vaccine, prompting Britain’s medical regulator to issue a warning people with a history of allergies not to take the shot.

There is a mountain of documented evidence that some vaccines can cause harm and have adverse effects, and compared to previous vaccines, the coronavirus shot is relatively untested, indeed six people even DIED during the rush to develop it.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators also revealed that some people who got Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine during its trial have since developed Bell’s palsy, a form of facial paralysis.

Both the US and UK governments have rolled out technology specifically to monitor adverse effects of the vaccine, because they know there will be many, many cases.

Yet Twitter appears to be decreeing that any suggestion the shot could cause damage will be met with strict censorship.

Where it cannot prove something has been “debunked” and remove the post entirely, Twitter says it intends to attach “warning” labels to tweets that “advance unsubstantiated rumours, disputed claims, as well as incomplete or out-of-context information about vaccines.” 

Last month, Twitter declared that it will send warnings to everyone who likes a post the company deems to contain “misleading information”.