Germany: Muslim migrant hailed as model of integration and called ‘Ambassador of Saxony’ beats woman to death with hammer
YOUNG MOTHER'S SKULL SMASHED IN REVENGE BY "ASSIMILATED" MUSLIM
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
One of the most commonly repeated elements of the Leftist/Islamic supremacist rap sheet against me, supposedly establishing that I am an “anti-Muslim extremist,” is that I said that there was no reliable way to distinguish between peaceful Muslims and jihadists, and no distinction between the two in Muslim communities. This statement doesn’t mean that all Muslims are terrorists; it means that peaceful Muslims aren’t separating themselves from the terrorists. All too many jihadis have operated freely in American mosques without being put out. After a Muslim who supported the Islamic State shot a police officer in Philadelphia, the local mosque leaders initially denied knowing him, but then it turned out they were lying, and the jihadi attended the mosque frequently. The same thing happened after jihadis attacked our free speech event in Garland, Texas: the mosque they attended in Phoenix denied knowing them, but it turned out they were regular members.
In a similar vein, this Edris Z. was hailed as “Ambassador of Saxony” for his success in assimilating into German society. But it seems as if he still carried within him some of the attitudes and assumptions created by a culture of violence that mandates the beating of women “from whom you fear disobedience” (Qur’an 4:34). Yet no one could have predicted that this would happen, as there is, here again, no reliable way to distinguish between peaceful Muslims and violent ones. Instead of heaping abuse upon those who point this out, genuinely peaceful Muslims should be working hard to establish such a distinction.
“Young mother’s skull smashed in revenge: “Ambassador of Saxony” is silent in court,” translated from “Junger Mutter aus Rache Schädel eingeschlagen: ‘Botschafter Sachsens’ schweigt vor Gericht,” by Alexander Bischoff, TAG24, October 7, 2020 (thanks to Medforth):
Leipzig – For the public prosecutor, it was a coldly planned revenge murder. The trial against Edris Z. (31), who is said to have killed a young mother in the Auwald forest in April (TAG24 reported), began before the Leipzig regional court on Wednesday. The refugee aid worker had previously denounced the Afghan-born man under the Protection Against Violence Act – apparently this was her death sentence!
Edris Z. enters the courtroom in the morning, hiding his face behind a folder. Four judicial officers guard him. In front of the courthouse, almost 100 people are demonstrating against femicides at the same time – this is the political term for the killings of women because of their gender.
Without a word, the Afghan, who emigrated to Germany with his parents in 1995, takes a seat next to his lawyers. In 2006, the accused was described by former Saxon Prime Minister Georg Milbradt (75, Christian Democratic Union) as an “ambassador of Saxony” as a prime example of successful integration, and he was granted German citizenship in 2015.
Flashback: On the morning of April 8, Myriam Z. (37 years old) put on her baby carrier, carefully put her two and a half month old daughter Ava in it, and went for a walk in the southern Auwald forest.
According to the indictment, Edris Z. was also staying there. Not by chance. But with a hammer in his backpack and the plan to kill someone.
Edris and Myriam were once a couple. Both worked as social workers in refugee aid. The young Afghan never got over the fact that the self-confident woman separated from him at some point. According to the investigation, Edris Z. has been stalking his ex-girlfriend since then.
And he became violent: When Edris Z. saw Myriam in the company of another man in August 2018, he is said to have attacked him.
The prosecution mentions a wild biting attack, and the accused is also alleged to have attempted to gouge out the eyes of the migrant rival (25 years old) with his fingernails. The victim suffered severe injuries to his eyes and bite wounds all over his body, and a piece of his ear was also missing afterwards.
Was Myriam’s anti-violence complaint doomed?
Myriam then reported the stalker and obtained a ban on Edris Z. via the Violence Protection Act.
Apparently that was her death sentence. In the murder charges, prosecutors assume that Z. killed his ex-girlfriend in order to punish her for having reported him.
The stalker therefore approached the young mother from behind and smashed her skull with the hammer.
Even when Myriam fell to the ground, she lay down protectively over her baby and therefore had no free hand to protect her head, but the defendant is said to have continued to thrash her. The prosecution lists at least ten blows, including four on the head, in relation to the forensic examination.
