A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
John Heilemann, the substitute host of Nicole Wallace’s Deadline: White House program, argues that forcing Americans to view pictures of dead children and babies is the only way to effectively steamroll the country’s constitutionally enshrined right to bear arms.
After offering resounding approval for The Atlantic‘s proposal that public school children not be allowed to return this fall unless Congress passes more gun control laws, Heilemann offered his own “dramatic proposal” that he claims he has been hearing “a lot” lately from people he knows.
“We need the American people to see what these children’s bodies look like when they’ve been hit, when they’ve been hit by these bullets, and make them face the ugliness of it,” Heilemann said.
“It’ll be a shocking moment, but the only kind of thing that might shock the system enough to get action.”
Shock and awe, in other words, is Heilemann’s proposal for eliminating Americans’ gun rights, calling them “fresh tactics that we’re desperately in need of.”
Don’t let either side of the political aisle manipulate you with shock and awe fear tactics
Guest Dave Cullen, a gun-grab advocate, and author who also appeared on the segment offered his agreement with Heilemann’s proposal.
“I think we desperately need some new, fresh tactics and creative thinking,” Cullen said. “And, I like this!”
Everyone who appeared on the segment was in full agreement with MSNBC‘s
extreme proposal, even though doing this would violate the privacy rights of said children and their families.
Ironically enough, Heilemann and Cullen’s proposal is actually not new or fresh at all. Back in the day during the war in Iraq, Walter Cronkite made a similar proposal that images of the dead bodies of American soldiers needed to be plastered all over the television in order to turn more people against the war.
Both sides of the political aisle, it turns out, love to use gruesome imagery of death as a means to push an agenda. The right was seen doing this most recently by blaming the Uvalde mass shooting on cannabis.
The MSNBC segment pushing more dead child imagery as a means to erase the Second Amendment was sponsored in part by Amazon, Xfinity, GlaxoSmithKline, which manufactures Flonase, and Servpro.
A full transcript of what was said during the MSNBC segment is available at Newsbusters.
“This is just like how all the world’s resources were put into keeping us ‘safe’ from some bat virus from Wuhan to the point that the solution caused greater suffering than the disease,” wrote another about how gun control would do nothing to stop shootings regardless.
“I expect we will all have to forever put up with a new solution to the shootings that will make normal life impossible.”
Many others pointed out that the Second Amendment is non-negotiable, regardless of how many dead children the corrupt media decides to show during its barely watched “news” segments.
“These so-called elites think they will live forever, but I’ve got news for them: their time is coming,” wrote another about the tyrants trying to take away everyone’s guns.
“There will be a reset for certain, but not the reset these maggots want.”
More related news about the deep state’s efforts to take away Americans’ gun rights can be found at SecondAmendment.news.
A new pilot program in Wales has replaced all meat on school lunch plates with “plant-based” and insect-based alternatives, including “spaghetti with beetle Bolognese.”
Crickets and mealworms make up a bulk of the food items now being fed to Wales schoolchildren, who are being treated like animals rather than humans. Instead of getting human food, these children are now consuming food items better fit for chickens and reptiles.
The globalists, as reported by the Rair Foundation “intend to motivate students and parents to get away from meat to protect the climate.”
“In addition, they hope to brainwash five to eleven-year-old students with their environmental lies to control their food choices.”
It all centers around a new “sustainable” model of food production that deprives ordinary people of access to the things that people have eaten since the beginning of time.
This new world order food system will only allow non-meat alternatives such as soy patties, cricket lasagna, and other abominations, as decreed and dictated by those at the top of the pyramid who will never eat this same garbage themselves.
Climate change psy-op is about eliminating fossil fuels, meat, and civilization itself
The tyrants at the World Economic Forum (WEF), including Mr. “Great Reset” himself, Klaus Schwab, are finally seeing their plans come to fruition with programs such as this.
For a very long time, they and their lineages have been architecting a new world in
which humans are no longer allowed to live, eat or even breathe as they always have. And they are using the myth of “climate change” as their excuse.
Decades of global warming propaganda, which infiltrated Western schools and reprogrammed an entire generation into fearing things like carbon dioxide (CO2), is now bearing the rotten fruit that the “elite” always intended: the elimination of meat and other life-sustaining foods.
Many “plant-based” foods are little more than genetically engineered (GMO) fake foods posing as “natural.” These so-called foods are highly toxic and do not provide the same level of nutrition – if any at all – that traditional foods such as meat long have for the human race.
Not only that, but large corporations will now generate billions of dollars in new profits from the government-sponsored food campaigns that will continue to transition humanity away from real food and straight into a new plant-based, meatless Soylent reality.
“Two years ago, the European Union (EU) classified insects as ‘novel foods,'” Rair further explains. “In other words: the preparations for insect food have been underway for a long time. As a result, edible insects are increasingly sold across the EU.”
“The UK Food Safety Authority (FSA) will provisionally allow trade in edible insects in supermarkets and retailers starting in June, with full approval expected next year. Evaluation is currently underway for crickets for human consumption; mealworms are also expected to be submitted soon.”
The pilot program, which is being run by Cardiff University and the University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), includes a study that specifically aims to come up with the best approaches for “convince[ing] the young generation and their parents of edible insects’ environmental and nutritional benefits to reducing global meat consumption.”
In the end, what remains of humanity within this new meatless paradigm will be considered “sustainable citizens” that exist to perpetuate an “ethical food future.” Carl Evans, the headmaster at Roch Community Primary School in Pembrokeshire, says he is excited to “support the children in developing a sustainable and ethical citizenship.”
To keep up with the latest news about the global transition away from meat, be sure to check out Genocide.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Academic researcher and author JR Nyquist has conducted a bombshell interview with “Mr. Wang” from LUDE Media — the same group that acquired a secret audio recording from high-level CCP / PLA military leaders in Southern China — that reveals China and Russia are teaming up to eliminate the United States and occupy North America.
Today’s podcast (below) discusses the details of this plan. The transcript of the full interview between Nyquist and LUDE Media (Mr. Wang is the direct interviewee) is available at the JRnyquist.blog website.
The summary of that interview is stated here, from the website: (emphasis ours)
According to Mr. Wang, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is financing Russia’s war in Ukraine. However, he says, Russia’s best forces are not being used in Ukraine. They have been deployed in the Far East, prepared for action against America.
According to Lude media sources, China will try to use nuclear blackmail and unrestricted warfare to collapse the United States while forcing Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea under Chinese control. Failing this, China and Russia will launch a full-scale war against the United States. The Russian and Chinese fleets will be united – not in the same ocean – but by attacking the same continent, North America. The Russians will attack through the Arctic, the Chinese through the Pacific.
According to Mr. Wang, the lockdowns in China have been used to hide the deployment of mobile ICBMs and other weapons. Streets have been cleared and highways closed for this purpose. To avoid satellite detection, missile convoys have been disguised as medical or COVID convoys. Lude Media has reported that Russia and China have an agreement to invade and occupy North America, dividing the territory between them.
According to details from the interview:
China is funding Russia’s war in Ukraine. (This alone is a huge shocker.)
China used the fake covid lockdowns to clear the streets in order to efficiently move military assets through major Chinese cities in preparation for the attacks on the USA / loading ships with military gear, etc.
Military equipment is disguised as covid response equipment such as ambulances or public health vehicles.
The PLA is using civilian communications frequencies rather than military frequencies in order to throw off America’s military surveillance capabilities.
China plans to blockade Taiwan rather than invade it at first. The blockage will prevent Taiwan from receiving supplies of food, fuel, medicine, and military assistance. Taiwan will later surrender after the USA is defeated, according to the CCP’s plan.
Once Taiwan is blockaded, China will use “unrestricted warfare” and “nuclear blackmail” to try to isolate the United States while attempting to control the political spheres of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, asserting control over their exports and thereby denying such exports to the United States. This move, if successful, would collapse the US economy virtually overnight. The supply chain of spare parts, electronic components, and consumer goods would immediately vanish.
“Unrestricted warfare” includes cyber attacks, financial attacks such as denouncing the dollar and selling off all US Treasury debt, biological weapons attacks, information warfare attacks, and even EMP attacks to disable the US power grid.
Russia’s best military troops have not been deployed in Ukraine but are being positioned for war against the United States and Canada. This means Russia has reserved its most capable troops for the real war with the USA.
Russia has not yet used its most powerful weapons in Ukraine, which could be deployed against the United States: 1) Its nuclear-capable submarine fleet, and 2) ICBMs such as the Sarmat-II system which delivers 10-15 MIRVs (re-entry nuclear vehicles) and can evade anti-ICBM capabilities by the USA.
China is manufacturing weapons for Russia in a factory that is claimed to be “a subdivision of Norinco Company” (China North Industries Corporation). This is another way in which China’s economic might is powering Russia’s military efforts.
Watch my interview with Dr. Yan and JY Nyquist from two weeks ago to learn more background information about China’s plans to attack America:
Importantly, China expects to absorb a retaliatory nuclear strike from the US military after China unleashes its attack against the USA. Chinese leaders reportedly don’t care if they lose millions or even tens of millions of civilians in such attacks. They are already calculating this into their plan.
We learned from the audio that was previously released that China expects civil unrest in many of its cities and plans to use PLA special forces military troops to immediately put down protesters in areas such as the Guangdong province.
My analysis: China’s “nuclear blackmail” could involve China launching a nuclear missile that strikes an unpopulated area of America — such as a desert area of Nevada or New Mexico — or perhaps setting off a nuke in the Pacific Ocean off the West Coast as a demonstration of its nuclear capabilities. In the interview, it is revealed that China plans to use tactical nuclear weapons to take out US Navy assets such as aircraft carriers and destroyers/battle groups.
The continental United States will be attacked from the North, South, East, and West
Combined with previous sources and intel we’ve received, we now know how the attack against the continental United States will be waged:
From the North: Russian and Chinese troops cross from Canada into Washington and other northern states. (Canada will quickly surrender to Russia or China thanks to traitorous Trudeau.)
From the South: Chinese troops working with drug cartels invade US southern states along human smuggling routes.
From the West: Chinese troops bombard National Guard bases in California with offshore artillery or tactical nuclear weapons, then carry out a beach landing and seize the ports, after which larger ships dock and unload battle equipment for the full-scale war.
From the East: Russia detonates its Poseidon underwater drones, unleashing a tidal wave of radioactive water that will inundate the entire East Coast, taking out Naval infrastructure in Norfolk, rendering Washington D.C. uninhabitable, and wrecking Wall Street and New York City, among other places. It’s also not a good day to live in Miami.
As all this is happening:
China will cut off all exports to the United States from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and China itself. America’s economy and industry will instantly collapse.
China will attack America with cyber warfare, kamikaze drones launched from Mexico, and attacks on the power grid infrastructure.
China will activate its embedded civilians who are already inside the CDC, FDA, universities, corporations, and government bodies, and they will initiate mass sabotage operations to bring America down.
Other Chinese agents will activate across the country, arming up with mortars, ground-to-air missiles, and firearms, then targeting and taking out infrastructure such as refineries, power substations, police stations, military bases, airports, and sea ports.
Russia will likely launch EMP weapons to plunge Western Europe into a 19th-century existence, then Russia will rapidly move westward into NATO countries, conquering them with its highly efficient ground war capabilities.
Remember that Russia’s attack on Ukraine caused the USA to ship the vast majority of its anti-tank weapons, Stinger missiles, and other equipment to Ukraine, leaving the continental United States highly vulnerable. This was all by design. Russia’s war against Ukraine is effectively a grand, global “fixing operation” to occupy America’s limited military resources in Europe while China prepares to invade from the Pacific.
Americans are oblivious, and leaders are clueless about what’s coming
If China and Russia make good on this plan, America is finished. The once-great American empire will fall within weeks, and Chinese troops will quickly threaten most of the western half of the United States.
The USA will find itself in a guerilla war against occupying Chinese and Russian troops, with all global supply chains completely cut off and the domestic population facing mass starvation, economic collapse, and treason from within as state and federal government officials finally reveal they’ve been working for the CCP all along (nearly all Democrats in power are agents of the CCP, including the traitor Joe Biden).
The dollar will almost instantly collapse, and all the life savings of all Americans will go to zero. Pensions will cease to function, social security will vanish and the stock market will experience such a bloodbath that trading will be suspended indefinitely. Wall Street may never resume operations again.
Tens of millions of Americans will be slaughtered or starve to death in the first six months of this new war, and the disarmed libtard cities and states will be easily conquered, with mass executions of their inhabitants carried out by occupying foreign troops. (Obama will be cheering the entire time since this has been his plan all along.)
All the lunatic Leftists who have been begging for communism will get exactly what they asked for, it turns out.
Expect mass resistance, however, as Chinese troops encounter more conservative, heavily armed areas such as Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, and rural areas of Colorado, Montana, and New Mexico. If China makes it to Texas, it will likely be stopped there by heavily armed Texans who are fighting for their very lives and homeland. (The same goes for Idaho and even rural Washington, for that matter.)
China ultimately needs to conquer America’s breadbasket in order to seize the farmlands and produce food for its expanding empire. But holding the Midwest may prove to be an impossible task, given the widespread ownership of AR-15s, 50 cal Barrett rifles, and long-range hunting rifles that are widely dispersed throughout the region. This is why Joe Biden and the treasonous Democrats are making a last-ditch effort to take the guns away from the American people, just before China’s invasion. They want America to be disarmed so it can be more easily conquered.
Prepare for America to be a battleground. And for those waiting around for Trump to “win” in 2024 and then make everything right, you’re living in a delusional dream world. Unless the CCP is stopped soon, there will be no elections in 2024. There won’t even be a United States of America as it exists today. To save America, Joe Biden, and all the criminal, treasonous Democrats who rigged the elections must be arrested and removed from power immediately. Arrest all the treasonous Pentagon generals who deliberately made America vulnerable. Shut down the criminal FBI and restore constitutional law in America. Then we might have a chance.
I cover all this and much more in today’s Situation Update podcast via Brighteon.com:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
If the globalists have their way, unelected officials at the World Health Organization will be able to impose vaccine mandates, lockdowns, and other “health” measures globally.
Under the leadership of a Communist Chinese-backed “former” Marxist terror leader, the UN World Health Organization (WHO) and the Biden administration are plotting an unprecedented power grab to build a planetary biomedical police state. Think Shanghai during the lockdown, but worldwide. Leading experts argue that this is truly the emergence of the “New World Order” discussed by Biden and others.
Already, the WHO claims all sorts of draconian authorities, including powers to work with UN member states in quarantining villages or nations, locking down societies, forcing medical “treatments” such as vaccines, and generally crushing medical freedom. When Ebola was spreading, for instance, the Obama administration sent thousands of U.S. troops to help the UN enforce medical martial law in the Ivory Coast.
Under changes proposed to the WHO’s “International Health Regulations” by the Biden administration that were considered at the World Health Assembly’s 75th meeting, the dictator-friendly global “health” body would have gained the power to carry out its wishes without even the approval or consent of the targeted nation. Not surprisingly, neither the WHO nor the Biden administration planned to consult the U.S. Senate on the matter.
“The fifth priority is to urgently strengthen WHO as the leading and directing authority on global health, at the center of the global health architecture,” declared WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus while outlining his plans to the WHO Executive Committee on January 24, 2022. “We are one world, we have one health, we are one WHO.”
When considering all of the issues that have been declared a “public health crisis” by governments, the unlimited scope of the power grab becomes even more daunting. U.S. Centers for Disease Control boss Dr. Rochelle Walensky, for example, recently declared that “gun violence” was a public health crisis. Climate change, alleged by the UN and tax-funded scientists to be caused by human emissions of CO2, has also been repeatedly cited as the world’s most “urgent” public health crisis. And since 2020, numerous American states and governments have even declared racism to be a public health crisis.
In short, virtually anything and everything could fall under the jurisdiction of global “health” bureaucrats if the agenda proceeds. But despite the enormity of the usurpation, and the drastic implications for freedom and self-government around the world, the establishment media have been largely silent on the issue. Still, concern grew quickly as more and more experts and activists spoke out, culminating with multiple U.S. lawmakers, governors, and top cable television hosts speaking out.
In an interview with The New American, mRNA scientist and pioneer Dr. Robert Malone called the Biden administration’s involvement an “impeachable offense.” International law professor Francis Boyle, meanwhile, told The New American that this unconstitutional power grab by predatory “criminals” needed to be resisted at all levels.
Because the word spread quickly, and opposition was so intense, globalist forces seeking to ram the amendments through under cover of darkness were not as successful as they had hoped, early reports suggest. In fact, multiple governments — especially the anti-communist government of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro — blasted the Biden-backed scheme. And so, activists opposed to the WHO power grab were able to hold back some of the agenda — for now.
However, experts say it is only a matter of time before the effort is resurrected. Indeed, in September, governments will have an opportunity to submit proposed amendments that will be considered at a November WHO meeting, journalists covering the proceedings said. And the entire process is so opaque, as are other workings of the WHO, that conflicting reports from Reuters and other sources do not even make clear what exact changes were made to the amendments prior to them being approved at the end of May.
There were originally two key routes of attack being pursued by the WHO and its allies. In June (after this magazine goes to press), a dangerous “pandemic treaty” is set to be considered, giving the WHO new “teeth” to enforce its dictates. In a public statement about its plans for the International Pandemic Treaty, the Council of the European Union explained that further empowering the WHO was the objective.
Among other goals, the decision-making EU body called for the international treaty to ensure “a stronger international health framework with the WHO as the coordinating authority on global health matters.” The regional government ruling over the formerly sovereign nations of Europe also said the objective of the global agreement was to cement “the ‘One Health’ approach, connecting the health of humans, animals and our planet.” Sanctions on non-compliant nations were also a major goal.
Even before that, the Biden administration and others were seeking to prepare the way with a series of 13 controversial amendments to the WHO’s so-called International Health Regulations (IHR). The details of the amendments were only released publicly — and very quietly — a couple of months before they were set to be considered. Reports suggest the amendments that ended up being approved were less extreme than the originals sought by the Biden administration, but the truth remains murky.
The health regime created under the IHR, which was approved by the World Health Assembly in 2005 (the original was adopted in 1969), is already draconian in its current state. Indeed, these regulations are what supposedly empowered the disgraced global organization to “recommend” the totalitarian policies it deployed worldwide in response to Covid. Much of the leadership in the global war on freedom over the last two years came from the WHO and the puppet masters behind the scenes — Bill Gates and the Communist Party of China.
But under the amendments proposed by the Biden administration and considered in late May, it would have gone from bad to catastrophic. Among other concerns, the WHO would have acquired new powers to impose its will on nations and peoples against their will. Indeed, under the original language, the WHO would be able to declare a “health emergency” in any nation, with virtually no limits, going far beyond even actual pandemics, as long as it “could present significant harm to humans.” In short, a blank check for the WHO.
One of the most significant changes would remove language from the WHO’s international health agreement requiring a government to consent to the WHO’s determinations before action is taken. Under the new language, all that would be necessary is for the WHO boss to claim there is “a public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC). Even a claimed suspicion of such an “emergency” would be enough to get the gears of tyranny turning.
WHO critic: Dr. Peter Breggin has acknowledged that he once dismissed as “conspiracy theory” the globalist power grab he is now warning against.
Once it declares an emergency, the WHO would be authorized to partner with a dizzying array of global agencies and organizations such as the UN and more under the guise of protecting “health.” That includes UN agencies overseeing food, agriculture, aviation, the environment, and much more. In short, a full-on assault on a nation by a range of would-be global government agencies is in the cards for defiance of the WHO.
The power grab would also accelerate the process of turning the head of the WHO into a global health dictator, numerous critics say. That is especially troubling considering that WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, installed by the regime in Beijing, is a former politburo member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, an Ethiopian ethno-Marxist terror group designated a terrorist organization by governments around the world. Countless critics have called for him to be prosecuted for ghastly crimes perpetrated by the terror group he helped lead, and later the brutal Ethiopian regime he served at a high level.
Leading Psychiatrist Speaks Out
Ahead of the World Health Assembly’s meetings that considered the amendments, a veritable battery of experts spoke out. One of those critics, Dr. Peter Breggin, a leading medical voice sounding the alarm about the power grab, told The New American that just a few years ago he would have viewed this all as a “conspiracy theory.” Then he investigated the global elites and wrote the bestselling book Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey.
Dr. Breggin, a Harvard-trained psychiatrist known as the “Conscience of Psychiatry” for his efforts to rein in abuses in the industry, said the World Health Organization's power grab is a threat to America. “If passed, the Biden administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States,” he warned.
According to Dr. Breggin, the same threat applies to the sovereignty and self-government of all of the UN’s 193 member states, representing virtually the entire global population. In an interview with The New American, he suggested this was a major step in the direction of global government, led by a global “predator class.” The proposed changes would put “enormous new powers” in the hands of “unelected technocrats” — powers that “would be exercised whether the target nation agreed or not,” he explained.
“The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes,” warned Dr. Breggin, adding that these measures could include economic and financial attacks orchestrated by the WHO and its partners. Many of those ideas are being pursued in the International Pandemic Treaty, too.
But these attacks would hardly be limited to genuine pandemics. “Under WHO’s approach, it would be difficult to find any important national issue that was not a potential health problem,” warned Dr. Breggin, pointing out that the Communist Chinese regime and Bill Gates were the largest influences at the WHO. Under the Biden-backed amendments, the “WHO will have free rein for using these expansive definitions of health to call a crisis over anything it wishes in any nation it desires.”
If the WHO ultimately succeeds in advancing its agenda, he added, the most important use of these arbitrary authorities would be against the United States — at least if the American people were ever to elect another anti-globalist government such as the Trump administration — so that the WHO could bring the nation to heel. Under Trump, the U.S. government announced its exit from the WHO and defunded it, though the Biden administration promptly reversed that upon taking office.
“We need to face that these American-sponsored amendments are a great step toward America voluntarily forfeiting its sovereignty to the New World Order or Great Reset,” added Dr. Breggin. “Our success or failure in stopping the ratification of these amendments will establish the pattern for the future, including WHO’s ongoing effort to make legally-binding treaties that rob nations of their sovereignty.”
While it seems that some of the most extreme usurpations were defeated, for now, experts told The New American that the same forces behind those amendments would be seeking to get them approved in the upcoming pandemic treaty or some other instrument. But it is even worse than a loss of sovereignty. Instead, it amounts to handing power over all of humanity to a global class of predatory elites interested not in health, but in power and money, Dr. Breggin said.
“In reality, they will be forfeiting their sovereign powers to the global predators who rule the UN and WHO, including the Chinese Communist Party and supporters of the Great Reset, like Bill Gates, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab, and giant foundations and corporations — all of whom benefit from weakening or destroying the sovereignty of the Western nations,” continued Breggin. “Western civilization, and mainly the United States, is all that stands in strong opposition to the globalist takeover of the world, called the New World Order or the Great Reset.”
Already, the WHO and its allies — and the global predators behind the whole machine — have shown their awesome powers. During the Covid crisis, the global agency was the key mechanism for unleashing and coordinating the unprecedented assaults on freedom around the world, Breggin explained.
“WHO was highly effective during Covid-19 in implementing the aims of the global predators, led by the groups around Bill Gates and the Chinese Communist Party, in their organized assault and terror campaign against the Western democracies,” Dr. Breggin said. “This purposely resulted in the vast weakening of any potentially anti-globalist, freedom-oriented, patriotic nations, including the U.S., Great Britain, Australia, Canada, and others. That success may explain why the global predators chose WHO to now deliver a major and potentially lethal death blow to the sovereignty of the world’s nations.”
If not stopped, the ongoing power grabs would make all of its orders of magnitude worse, he said.
WHO Insider Speaks Out
In an interview with The New American, Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, a prominent epidemiologist and international health scientist in Geneva and a former WHO official turned whistleblower, also warned that the WHO was the leading force behind the tyranny that enveloped the globe during Covid.
In defiance of its own IHR, which Dr. Stuckelberger taught at the university level, the WHO used fearmongering to “issue directives that were totally not commensurate to the situation,” she said. If the amendments eventually pass, or if they are adopted in the looming treaty, it will get even worse. It all shows that the WHO and its backers such as Gates “have moved now, clearly, into global governance,” Dr. Stuckelberger said. “The way they are handling WHO is not like coordinating member states that can decide for themselves.”
The global model truly came into view over the last two years. “Before, in the IHR, we trained [students] that everything should be customized to countries,” she said. But now, “they have brought everybody to obey one governance, to obey a single standard.” “WHO is now more and more taking power of the world together as the only organization to be able … to direct any epidemic preparedness plan or pandemic intervention plan,” she added.
The dystopian developments are moving from rhetoric to reality. At the WHO’s extraordinary World Health Assembly meeting late last year, member governments were given a document headlined “A Guide to a Pandemic Treaty.” Member states voted to accept the procedures to develop that treaty, which is now underway.
“They are so sneaky,” Stuckelberger said just before the recent meeting. “They are going to take the instrument that will be adopted the quickest, and the instrument likely to be adopted the quickest is the International Health Regulations.” Plan A, the amendments, did not succeed fully, it seems. But the battle is far from finished.
The WHO “Constitution” — something governments have — is likely in place to help turn the agency into a true global authority with governmental powers, Stuckelberger said. And the outfit’s constitution purports to enshrine a “fundamental right” to the “highest attainable standard of health.” It also calls for the “fullest cooperation of individuals and States.” Again, this is basically a blank check for intervention in people’s lives.
In Article 21 of the WHO Constitution, the World Health Assembly is empowered to “adopt regulations” on everything from “sanitary and quarantine requirements” to “standards” for diagnosing diseases. This is what made possible the global tyranny that enveloped the world in early 2020, as well as the unreliable PCR Covid tests that fed the narrative, said Dr. Stuckelberger, who served as president of the WHO’s Geneva International Network on Ageing.
“We have to be liberated from the United Nations,” said Stuckelberger before urging everyone to contact their elected officials, attorneys, and others in a bid to derail the WHO power grab.
Seeking Even More Powers
With the WHO power grab in late May having been dealt a blow, the next major WHO threat to medical freedom, national sovereignty, and self-government is approaching fast. It comes from the proposed “International Pandemic Treaty” being worked on now behind the scenes.
Under the guise of controlling future pandemics, this global agreement would also hand vast new powers to the global “health” organization. Multiple experts say the worst of the controversial amendments will be resurrected as the treaty is negotiated. And advocates of the treaty are openly proposing to turn the WHO into a sort of global health ministry with vast powers over every person and government on Earth.
Even actual sanctions on nations whose governments defy their would-be WHO overlords are now being peddled. For instance, WHO boss Tedros claimed that “maybe exploring the sanctions may be important.” Meanwhile, German Health Minister Jens Spahn argued: “that countries that fail to follow up on their commitments to the WHO should face sanctions.” This sentiment is widespread among global elites. Basically, nations will submit to the WHO, or face the wrath of the world.
WHO whistleblower: Epidemiologist Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, a former WHO official, is sounding the alarm about how WHO is using fear-mongering to impose global governance.
Indeed, less than a year ago, an “independent” UN panel of high-level globalists convened by the WHO chief claimed the health agency “needs to be empowered — financially, and politically.” This empowerment should include making the WHO more independent, creating new “capacities” (powers) at the global level, and establishing a “new international system for surveillance.”
The UN report, which suggests Covid damage could have been mitigated with more global tyranny, also seeks to bring in the “precautionary principle.” Similar to the “climate” narrative, the precautionary principle involves implementing policies — in this case, medical tyranny — as a precaution against potential dangers rather than in response to a proven threat. Ironically, that same WHO repeatedly claimed Covid was not transmissible between humans, just long enough for it to spread around the world.
Offering broad insight into the objectives, the report celebrated regimes such as the Communist Chinese dictatorship for their authoritarian response to Covid. Numerous globalist bigwigs working with the WHO and Beijing such as Gates and Schwab have repeatedly praised the barbaric Covid response by Beijing while condemning jurisdictions that respected individual rights and the rule of law. This was all foreseen as far back as 2010 in the Rockefeller Foundation’s “scenario,” dubbed Lockstep, involving a hypothetical future pandemic that featured incredible similarities with the response to Covid.
Even as these battles are raging, totalitarians are already scheming on even more draconian powers over basic rights such as free speech. The WHO itself has been working to silence what it considers “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “conspiracy theories” for years. “We’re not just battling the virus,” said WHO Director-General Tedros in the summer of 2020. “We’re also battling the trolls and conspiracy theorists that push misinformation and undermine the outbreak response.”
The WHO was “working closely” with Big Tech firms to censor the web, it boasted. In fact, the CEO of YouTube bragged about it, too. “Anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy,” YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki told CNN in April of 2020, early in the Covid pandemic. “And so ‘remove’ is another really important part of our policy.” Ironically, the WHO has urged health professionals to peddle demonstrable lies to parents in order to promote vaccines.
Opposition Grows as Legal Questions Swirl
In a memo to the WHO, U.S. Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs Loyce Pace cited almost 50 other governments that support the Biden administration’s proposed amendments. These include the member governments of the European Union, along with numerous other governments including those in India, Australia, Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom, and more.
However, massive global opposition, including a threat to withdraw from the WHO by Brazilian authorities, led to a temporary and limited retreat — this time. A coalition of almost 50 African governments also argued that the amendments were being rushed too quickly and without adequate consultation with their governments. In the end, a series of watered-down “replacement” amendments were reportedly approved, despite policy stating that they must be made available months in advance. But the threat of a major power grab being enshrined in “international law” still looms large.
Because of the existing international agreement updated by WHO member states almost two decades ago, the UN WHO considers any new updates to its International Health Regulations to be binding on all nations and all of humanity, legal experts say. Similar machinations were used to impose UN “climate” schemes on the planet without ratification by the U.S. Senate. And a similar process may be attempted to impose the “treaty” being worked on now.
However, there are several constitutional issues at hand as far as the United States is concerned. For one, the states that created the U.S. government never delegated these types of powers over “health” to the government they established. If the U.S. government lacks a specific authority or power, it certainly cannot hand a power it does not rightfully possess over to another body such as the WHO — at least not without a properly ratified constitutional amendment.
In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed as recently as 1957 in the case Reid v. Covert that the U.S. government could not grant new powers to itself — or delegate those powers to other bodies — merely by adopting international agreements. Thomas Jefferson, a key architect of America’s constitutional system, understood that as well. “I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of the treaty-making power as boundless,” he explained in 1803. “If it is, then we have no Constitution.”
Neither the WHO nor the Biden administration’s Department of Health and Human Services responded to requests for comment.
In an interview with The New American, journalist and commentator James Rogusky, among the first to sound the alarm on the amendments and a leading source of the global opposition, called on people to resist the WHO agenda while it is still possible. “The time to speak out and stand for your rights is now,” he explained. He argued that the defeat of almost all the originally proposed amendments was a “stunning defeat” for the globalist agenda. But of course, the war is far from over.
In an effort to derail the WHO’s power grab, The John Birch Society, the parent organization of this magazine, launched a grassroots effort encouraging state lawmakers across America to nullify the schemes at the state level. “Rather than sitting back and being complacent, state legislators must take bold action to nullify any WHO agreement,” the Society said in a mass email to its legislative-alert subscribers.
“Nullification of the WHO’s pandemic treaty wouldn’t be the first time the states have taken such bold action,” the organization’s alert continued. “Among multiple other examples, Alabama in 2012 enacted a strong law banning the implementation of the UN’s Agenda 21 (now Agenda 2030) in the state. Multiple other state legislative chambers passed similar bans.”
Urging activists to contact their lawmakers, the group, which has chapters nationwide, called for strong laws to prohibit the implementation and enforcement of the WHO scheme. This could include ensuring that no state or local officials can participate in the enforcement of any actions originating from the WHO or under the authority of its illegitimate agreements.
Multiple lawmakers responded to the opposition. In Kansas, for example, the state Senate adopted a resolution warning that the WHO power grabs “are strongly disapproved as they will ultimately hand over the United States’ national sovereignty and authority to the WHO and place our democratic nation in the control of an unelected international organization that is wholly unaccountable to the people of this country.”
At the federal level, lawmakers also moved quickly. For instance, a dozen lawmakers joined as cosponsors of H.R. 419, known as the No Taxpayer Funding for the World Health Organization Act, to defund the controversial global body. In late May, Senators Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) urged the administration to remove the U.S. government from the WHO due to its “abysmal lack of competence.” The House Freedom Caucus also called on Biden to immediately resume the U.S. withdrawal or “at the very least” take aggressive action against its corruption and stop trying to empower it.
Not mincing words: In an interview with The New American, Dr. Robert Malone called President Joe Biden’s role in trying to cede U.S. sovereign powers to the WHO regime an “impeachable offense.” (Photo credit: AP Images)
In an interview on Fox News, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) lashed out at the scheme to impose a “world government” under the guise of “health.” “The WHO has announced that they are forming a treaty, it’s going to be this treaty for the next pandemic, but in the next pandemic, it’s not going to be a Washington-based mandate on vaccines, or a Washington-based social distancing or masks, it’s going to be an international one,” he said.
It gets even creepier, Senator Paul warned. “And they actually want to track everybody with a QRS code,” he said, suggesting jokingly that the WHO wanted to put it on the back of peoples’ necks. “But it’s no laughing matter. It is very worrisome. Whenever they talk about it, they have absolutely no concern for privacy, they have no concern for the individual.”
U.S. Senator Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who recently was interviewed by The New American about his plan to stop socialism in America, introduced a bill ensuring that public-health policy is made domestically and not by the WHO and Communist China. “The WHO’s radical ‘pandemic treaty’ is a dangerous glob--alist overreach. The United States of America must never give more power to the WHO. The WHO is a puppet for Xi Jinping, controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, and helped Beijing cover up the origins of COVID-19,” Scott said. “We must quickly pass this bill to ensure that public health matters in the country remain in the hands of Americans, not globalist puppets working for Communist China.”
In an interview with The New American magazine about a bill to cut ties to the entire UN and not just the WHO, Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) expressed support for getting out of the UN entirely. “It’s full of dictators, and it’s also something that I don’t think our sovereign government should defer to,” he explained. Legislation to do just that, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act, has been regularly introduced in Congress for decades and is currently pending as H.R. 7806.
Derailing the WHO’s draconian power grabs — especially the looming pandemic treaty — would be a good step in the direction of neutralizing the ever-increasing threat of globalism and international tyranny. However, over the long term, small victories in battles such as this one will not be enough. A full restoration of sovereignty must be the ultimate objective — and this massive attack on humanity by the WHO may be the perfect catalyst to supercharge the movement to stop globalism for good.
Alex Newman is a senior editor for The New American