Let in “MILLIONS” of Refugees: Left & CATHOLIC BISHOPS Using Afghan Debacle to Change America’s Population
Afghans at the international airport in Kabul
BY SELWYN DUKE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
First, the globalists invaded Afghanistan — now they want to use this as an excuse to have Afghanistan invade us. As journalist Spencer Ackerman (oxymoronically identified as a “national security reporter”) put it recently, he wants the Biden administration to increase Temporary Protected Status access and admit Afghan “refugees by the millions.”
Well, fellow immigrationist Rahm Emanuel did say, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.”
With the Taliban having rapidly but predictably taken over Afghanistan following the United States’ withdrawal, there’s an urgent call to rescue Afghans who aided the Americans and now, consequently, will be targeted for death. Providing safe haven to this small number of people is a moral imperative, too. Even so, it must be done carefully.
But this isn’t good enough (bad enough?) for Ackerman, and he isn’t alone in his wave-migration prescription, made Tuesday on MSNBC. In fact, you should know that “all the clever people are saying exactly the same thing,” reported Fox News host Tucker Carlson last night. “‘The US Should Take as Many Afghan Refugees as it Can,’ demands a recent headline in New York magazine.”
“How many refugees is that? And is it really a good idea to do that for us?” he continued. “Don’t ask. You’re not allowed to ask that question because asking is racist.”
Carlson then played clips of media propagandists Nicolle Wallace, Don Lemon, weightlifter Chris Cuomo, and immigrant Fareed Zakaria waxing “woke,” calling opposition to refugee inundation “fear-mongering and racism,” antipathy toward “brown people,” and “xenophobia.” (Actually, it’s xenophilia that’s killing us.)
Taking a leaf from my book — I often point out that Arabs are Caucasian — Carlson then mentioned how laughable the racism claim is. “Your average green-eyed Pashtun is as pale as anyone sitting on the set right now,” he said. “Essentially, they’re bearded white guys.”
Oh, we know one effect: Their presence will help socialists in swing states because statistics show that, upon naturalization, such people vote heavily Democrat. Yet there are other effects we don’t really have to guess at because another Western civilization, Europe, has already experienced inundation with Afghan (and other Muslim) migrants. Carlson related these effects, stating that
one Saturday night last month, authorities discovered the body of a 13-year-old girl next to a tree in Vienna, Austria. She had been drugged and raped and murdered. It took a few days, but by Monday, authorities announced they had arrested two asylum seekers from Afghanistan for the rape and murder. Shortly after that, the chancellor of Austria identified the problem. The problem is Austria’s refugee policy. “I find it intolerable for people to come to us, say they are seeking protection and then commit cruel, barbaric crimes in Austria.”
Yeah, but now they’re getting used to it because it’s been happening with increasing frequency throughout Western Europe for years now, six years. And every honest person knows that. Maybe the dummies on cable news don’t know it, but people who live there do. Cheryl Benard knows it. Cheryl Benard, by the way, has been an advocate for refugees for decades. She’s not against immigration. She’s for it. But over time, she’s concluded that the West simply is not capable … of successfully assimilating many Afghan refugees.
… By every measure, Afghan resettlement in Europe has been an utter failure. Why is that? Maybe we should pay some attention. Afghan refugees, Benard wrote, are notorious for barbaric attacks, attacks that left-wing politicians in Europe frequently cover up for fear of being called racist. For example, “A gang of 50 Afghans who terrorized women in the neighborhood of the Linz train station were brushed off by a government official with the remark that this was an unfortunate consequence of bad weather.” You could see that happening here, by the way.
In another instance, just last summer, an Afghan migrant was arrested in Germany for raping an 11-year-old girl. Authorities released him from jail in just a few days. They said he was not dangerous and anyone who disagreed with that was a racist, of course. The migrant then proceeded to rape another girl. This time she was 13 years old.
Statistics show these are not just anecdotes; it happens a lot. Ask anyone who lives there who is honest. Germany’s government just conducted a study showing that rates of violent crime in Germany — those rates had been declining for years, by the way — shot up abruptly in 2015. And that was the moment when refugees from Afghanistan and Syria arrived in Germany. More than 90 percent of the new crimes in Germany, the German government has found, were committed by asylum seekers .
Moreover, Mideast migration has led to the development of “no-go zones” in European nations; these are primarily Muslim areas where civil law has broken down and been, at least in part, supplanted by Sharia law and where civil authorities often fear to tread. And while the immigrationists once dismissed such zones as a “right-wing myth,” German chancellor Angela Merkel herself admitted in 2018 that they exist.
No one has to tell this to Dr. Mudar Zahran. A leader of the Jordanian Opposition Coalition now living as an asylee in the United Kingdom, Zahran opposes mass Muslim migration into the West. In fact, despite describing himself as an “orthodox Muslim,” he said in a 2015 Glazov Gang interview that there’s a “genuine problem with Muslims in Europe”; he also characterized that year’s wave migration into the continent as “the soft Islamic conquest of the West” and insisted that the newcomers’ presence must not become “permanent” (video below).
In reality, Afghans may make for the least assimilable of all (im)migrants. Afghanistan is a tribal society rife with violence, where disputes are often settled via blood feuds. Bacha bazi (“boy play”), ritualized pedophilia/pederasty, is common, and the victims may grow up to be psychologically scarred victimizers. Daughters may be denied education or healthcare and may even be sold to settle debts, while sons may be encouraged to carry out suicide attacks.
In fact, girls may be executed by their own relatives for minor infractions against the tribe, as narcissism is operative; meaning, embarrassment being more of a motivator than guilt, murder is preferable to losing face. Yet here’s the point to ponder:
Westerners’ normal lifestyles — e.g., their behavior, women’s dress — constitute major infractions to these tribes. Combine this with how the Koran teaches that Kaffirs (non-Muslims) are fair game for rape and plunder, and, well, assimilation may not be in the cards.
But, then again, none of this matters to the immigrationists. Migrants aren’t moved into their neighborhoods, after all, and you have to break a few eggs to scramble a nation into pieces — and into a piece in the globalist jigsaw puzzle.
_______________________________________________________
U.S. Catholic Bishops Urge Biden to Act with ‘Utmost Urgency’ to Bring 30,000 Afghan Refugees Here
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Biden’s handlers are talking about bringing 30,000 Afghan refugees into the country and the U.S. Catholic Bishops are excited. Bishop Mario E. Dorsonville, auxiliary bishop of Washington and chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on Migration, and Bishop David J. Malloy of Rockford, chairman of the USCCB’s Committee on International Justice and Peace, issued a statement calling on the government to hurry, and make the arrival of these unvetted migrants from a jihad terror hotspot a top priority. What could possibly go wrong?
With admirable understatement, Dorsonville and Malloy wrote: “We have known that the withdrawal of American forces and evacuation of vulnerable Afghans, including those who supported our military or worked with NGOs and other organizations, would be a complicated process that had the potential for instability in Afghanistan.”
“A complicated process that had the potential for instability” is a nice way of saying “an appalling human catastrophe of poor planning, wishful thinking, and woke politics,” so give the two bishops points for diplomacy. But they want action: “The images and videos coming out of the country are difficult to view, as people make life or death decisions in desperation. We are particularly concerned for all those requiring evacuation, as well as Afghan women and girls, who risk losing opportunities gained over the last two decades and now face potential mistreatment.”
The bishops announce that the Church is ready to help: “For the past few weeks, staff from the USCCB, Catholic Charities, and other partners have been at Fort Lee in Virginia, assisting the U.S. government in the welcoming and resettlement of SIV applicants and their families. We will continue that work as long as necessary until those who are in harm’s way are brought to safety.”
But time is of the essence: “The government’s goal to relocate as many as 30,000 SIV applicants to the United States remains a monumental task that hangs in the balance. We know that time is of the essence to help our brothers and sisters in need, and we call on our government to act with the utmost urgency, considering all available avenues to preserve life. We also join the Holy Father in praying for peace in Afghanistan—‘that the clamor of weapons might cease and solutions can be found at the table of dialogue.’”
Dorsonville’s urgency stems in part from his belief that we haven’t brought in enough migrants. Last April he complained: “The number of refugees who will be welcomed this year is far short of what we can do as a country and is not an adequate response to the immense resettlement need.” At that time, Business Insider pointed out that “the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Migration and Refugee Services is one of nine nonprofit organizations that partner with the US government to meet the needs of refugees who arrive in the country.” And significantly, the USCCB noted Tuesday that “the President authorized use of up to $500 million from the Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for meeting the urgent needs of Afghan refugees and SIV applicants.”
It is highly profitable to partner with the U.S. government. Behind their high-minded rhetoric, the U.S. Catholic bishops have hundreds of millions of reasons to call for more “refugees” and disregard the safety and security of the American people. Capital Research Center reported in 2018 that “the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is the largest. As Table III shows, in FY 2018 USCCB received $47.7 million for resettlement purposes. However, USCCB participates in other federal grant programs and that year received a total of $363.9 million from the federal government. And 2018 was a slow year. In FY 2017, USCCB received $531.5 million.”
Indeed. LifeSite News reported in 2017: “Over the past nine years, the USCCB has received a total of $534,788,660 in taxpayer dollars for refugee resettlement programs.” Capital Research Center notes that the USCCB “administers programs as diverse as Global AIDS, Food For Peace Development Assistance, USAID Foreign Assistance, and even the John Ogonowski and Doug Bereuter Farmer-to-Farmer Program, which provides volunteer technical assistance to farmers in developing countries.”
With that kind of money involved, is it any surprise that the bishops want Biden’s handlers to act with urgency on Afghan “refugees,” and show no concern whatsoever for the possibility that they might be facilitating the entry of criminals and jihad terrorists?
There is another consideration that the bishops are ignoring as well. What about one’s obligations to one’s own community, to try to preserve their freedom and the stability of one’s society? Could “refugee” intake be limited on that basis? That would be selfish, Mario Dorsonville would likely say. Do the U.S. Catholic bishops feel any obligation to support measures that would protect Americans from jihad attacks? Apparently not. The message that the bishops are sending to Americans is simple: drop dead.
