POLICE STATE N.J. & U.S. GUN BAN GROUPS PILE ON IN MAGAZINE BAN CASE

POLICE STATE N.J. & U.S. GUN BAN GROUPS PILE ON IN MAGAZINE BAN CASE 
BY SCOTT BACH
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/07/n-j-and-u-s-gun-ban-groups-pile-on-in-mag-ban-case/#axzz5LRytpMkrrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Gabby Giffords



Giffords Law Center and Everytown For Gun Safety filed their own opposition to the injunction motion, arguing among other things that standard capacity magazines are best suited for military use.

New Jersey – (Ammoland.com)- July 11, 2018. ANJRPC’s federal lawsuit to overturn Governor Murphy’s firearms magazine ban is starting to pick up speed. There has been a flurry of activity since the court scheduled an expedited hearing on Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs’s request for an injunction (to halt enforcement of the ban until the case is decided).
The State of New Jersey was first to oppose the injunction motion, arguing among other things that the newly banned magazines are “dangerous and unusual weapons” not protected by the Second Amendment, which pose a danger to the public even in the hands of law-abiding citizens. The State also argues that the banned magazines are not needed for self-defense, but are “perfectly suited for illicit use.”
“Claiming that banned magazines are not needed for self-defense while simultaneously exempting their use for the protection of lawmakers is outrageous and the height of hypocrisy,” said ANJRPC Executive Director Scott Bach. “This elitist double standard is irrational, indefensible, and shows the utter contempt New Jersey has for its ‘subjects,’” said Bach.
Piling onto the State’s papers, the Giffords Law Center and Everytown For Gun Safety filed their own opposition to the injunction motion, arguing among other things that standard capacity magazines are best suited for military use, that NJ’s prior regulation of magazine capacity for several decades makes the new ban presumptively valid, and that the ban will make mass shooting incidents “less lethal.”
On July 9, Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs ripped all of these arguments to shreds in a reply brief filed in the case.
Click here to see all the key filings in Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs’s magazine ban lawsuit.
This case was filed in cooperation with the National Rifle Association. “We thank the NRA for its incredible support and guidance, which made this aggressive lawsuit challenging the magazine ban possible,” said Bach.
Please watch for future updates and alerts.
SUPPORT THE LAWSUIT CLICK HERE TO DONATE!
Please forward this email to every gun owner you know, and if you don’t already receive alerts from ANJRPC, please subscribe to our free email alerts for the latest Second Amendment breaking news and action alerts.
Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs
About Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs:The Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, Inc. is the official NRA State Association in New Jersey. Our mission is to implement all of the programs and activities at the state level that the NRA does at the national level. This mission includes the following: To support and defend the constitutional rights of the people to keep and bear arms. To take immediate action against any legislation at the local, state and federal level that would infringe upon these rights. Visit: www.anjrpc.org

TWELVE GERMANS MUST WORK & PAY TAXES IN ORDER TO FUND THE COST OF JUST ONE MIGRANT

TWELVE GERMANS MUST WORK & PAY TAXES IN ORDER TO FUND THE COST 
OF JUST ONE MIGRANT 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This entire Muslim migrant enterprise was sold to Europeans with the claim that the migrants would replace Europe’s aging workforce. Instead, this. Non-Muslims paying for the upkeep of Muslims is a Qur’anic dictate:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).
The caliph Umar said the jizya payments from the dhimmis were the source of the Muslims’ livelihood:
“Narrated Juwairiya bin Qudama at-Tamimi: We said to `Umar bin Al-Khattab, ‘O Chief of the believers! Advise us.’ He said, ‘I advise you to fulfill Allah’s Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)’” (Bukhari 4.53.388)
Anjem Choudary said in February 2013:
“We are on Jihad Seekers Allowance, We take the Jizya (protection money paid to Muslims by non-Muslims) which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the Kafir (non-Muslim), isn’t it? So this is normal situation. They give us the money. You work, give us the money. Allah Akbar, we take the money. Hopefully there is no one from the DSS (Department of Social Security) listening. Ah, but you see people will say you are not working. But the normal situation is for you to take money from the Kuffar (non-Muslim) So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance.”
“It takes twelve Germans to work and pay taxes in order to fund the cost of just one migrant,” Voice of Europe, July 12, 2018:
One of the biggest secrets in Europe is the real cost of migration and especially the cost of one migrant. Our attention was brought to an article from Germany, in which the costs are calculated. The results are shocking.
Around 1.7 million people applied for asylum in Germany since 2014, but anyone who asks the government for the costs will be sent into a labyrinth of statistics and numbers, the German author writes….
Citing Development Minister Gerd Müller, one million refugees cost the German government, states and municipalities around 30 billion euros a year.
To put it another way: assuming Minister Müller’s calculation, each person seeking protection in Germany costs 30,000 euros per year or 2,500 euros per month.
This corresponds to the tax burden of twelve average earners (3,000 euros per month, tax class III). For an unaccompanied juvenile migrant the costs can go up to 5,000 euros per month, the author writes.
But the numbers for the ‘average refugee or migrant’ could be even higher – because of the many new long-term unemployed….

GAY “CHRISTIAN” WOODSTOCK TAKING PLACE THIS WEEKEND

GAY “CHRISTIAN” WOODSTOCK TAKING PLACE THIS WEEKEND 
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2018/07/13/gay-christian-woodstock-taking-place-this-weekend/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The “Wild Goose Festival” is a four-day extravaganza of music, interactive story-telling, “reconciliation yoga,’” and “progressive Christian mysticism.” In other words, is a big, gay, fake-Christian Woodstock.
Taking place July 12-15, the Wild Goose festival boasts a whole gaggle of evangelical and gay-affirming speakers that include Jen Hatmaker, Tony Campolo, Frank Schaeffer, Shane Claiborne, and Brian McLaren. It is being held in Hot Springs, North Carolina as reported by Juicey Ecumenism,  The Institute of Religion and Democracy blog.
According to their press release dated July 12, 2018:
This year’s “Wild Goose” festival will feature Jen Hatmaker, an Evangelical author who liberalized her views on same-sex marriage, self-described “Christian-Atheist” Frank Schaeffer, “progressive Christian mystic” and United Methodist pastor Roger Wolsey, among other “spiritually non-traditional” speakers. Breakout sessions will highlight “Queerology,” “Reproductive Justice is…,” and “A Practical Guide to Getting Elected.”
“Wild Goose” is loosely patterned on Great Britain’s Greenbelt festival, Burning Man, Lightning in a Bottle, and SXSW.
IRD Evangelical Program Director Chelsen Vicari commented:
Wild Goose is a bizarre attempt to refashion Christianity for disgruntled Progressive Christians attracted to postmodern sexual relativism, mysticism, and New Age. [It] pushes against the boundaries of orthodox Christianity by experimenting with mysticism and vague spirituality. Sadly, some disillusioned young Evangelicals find this distorted version of Christianity alluring.
She continued:
Of all the progressive Christian events I’ve monitored on behalf of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, Wild Goose is the most troubling in my view. But the truth is no matter how modern the meditation practices or interactive the story-telling, progressive Christianity remains unfashionable as its leading denominations continue in decline.
[Editor’s Note: A previous version of this article mistakenly reported that The Institute of Religion and Democracy was hosting the Wild Goose Festival. The article has been corrected to reflect that it was a press release reporting on the Wild Goose Festival event.]
_______________________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:

DO YOU NEED CONCEALED CARRY FIREARM INSURANCE? LAWYER ANDREW BRANCA JOINS JOHN LOVELL, TRAINER, FOR ADVICE

DO YOU NEED CONCEALED CARRY FIREARM INSURANCE? LAWYER ANDREW BRANCA JOINS JOHN LOVELL, TRAINER, FOR ADVICE 
Should you get CCW insurance in case the worst should happen and you need to defend yourself with a gun? If so, which CCW insurance is the right call for you? In this video, Andrew Branca, the author of The Law of Self Defense answers these questions. Andrew Branca has been a lawyer for 25 years, a Master competitive shooter, a former student of mentee of Massad Ayoob, a renowned author, and hosts the Law of Self Defense Show. In this video we also compare the following insurance options: (1) CCW Safe Insurance, (2) USCCA Carry Insurance, and the Armed Citizen’s Legal Defense Network Insurance. Additionally, we give mention to Carry Guard insurance.

Recoil magazine’s – http://www.lawofselfdefense.com/recoil

Law of Self Defense BOOK – https://amzn.to/2KBWYxS

Weekly free “Law of Self Defense Show”: http://www.lawofselfdefense.com/show
xThe Law of Self Defense Patreon page, with free and paid content:
http://www.lawofselfdefense.com/patreon

Recommended Reading – https://warriorpoetsociety.us/reading…

Warrior Poet Store – https://warriorpoetsociety.us/store/

Recommended Gear – https://www.amazon.com/shop/johnlovel…

SUPPORT the Channel – http://patreon.com/warriorpoetsociety

TRAIN with John Lovell – http://warriorpoetsociety.us

http://INSTAGRAM.com/warriorpoetsociety
http://FACEBOOK.com/warriorpoetsociety
http://SNAPCHAT.com/add/thewarpoet
http://TWITTER.com/johnlovell275

_________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
http://www.secondcalldefense.org/
________________________________________________________

SEE PDF VERSION OF CHART BELOW 
HERE FOR PRINTING:

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usaft/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/22154008/USCCA-Comparison-Chart-20180322.pdf

UK LABOUR TOP DOGS SLAM TRUMP AS “ISLAMOPHOBIC” FOR CRITICIZING LONDON MAYOR SADIQ KHAN~BUT TRUMP CAN’T BE THROWN INTO PRISON WITH MUSLIMS WITHOUT TRIAL

UK LABOUR TOP DOGS SLAM TRUMP AS “ISLAMOPHOBIC” FOR CRITICIZING 
LONDON MAYOR SADIQ KHAN 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/07/uk-labour-top-dogs-slam-trump-as-islamophobic-for-criticizing-sadiq-khanrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“The chattering-class concern with Islamophobia is not about protecting Muslims from genuine discrimination or violence (both of these things are already illegal), but rather is about ringfencing Islam and all Muslims from criticism, surrounding this one religion with a blasphemy-deflecting forcefield. So any commentary on Islam or even on influential Muslims can be casually batted aside as ‘phobic’.”
Yes. This has been going on for years, and is already quite far advanced.
“It isn’t Islamophobic to criticise Sadiq Khan,” by Brendan O’Neill, Spiked, July 13, 2018:
…Trump is saying that Sadiq is ‘responsible for terrorism’, says Labour’s shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry. He didn’t say that, though. He simply said Sadiq has done a bad job on terrorism – the same way many, many people said Tony Blair did a bad job on terrorism and may even have stoked it up with his foreign interventions. Trump’s comment on Sadiq is ‘Islamophobia and it is racist’, Thornberry said.
Labour MP David Lammy said, ‘The real reason Trump blames my friend Sadiq Khan for the terror attacks last year’ – he didn’t do that! – ‘is simple. He hates that London chose a Muslim mayor.’ Lammy offers no evidence for this. But why should he? In the increasingly grating grievance politics of identity and victimhood, proof counts for nought and inference is always enough. Criticise Islam, you hate Muslims. Wonder about the wisdom of mass immigration, you’re racist. It’s automatic. Maybe I’m racist for criticising David Lammy.
Dawn Butler, Labour spokesperson on equality, slammed Trump’s ‘ugly dog-whistle politics’. In short, she can’t prove that his comments on Sadiq were racist, but she can imply that they contain some kind of secret code that will be audible to more vulgar Britons – the ‘dogs’ in that analogy – who will have their innate ‘Islamophobia’ stirred up by their American master. This genuinely prejudiced view – that Trump could provoke the uncouth underbelly of British society to acts of hatred or violence – is now widespread online.
Everything about this dash to brand Trump an Islamophobe for criticising the London mayor is worrying. It confirms that the chattering-class concern with Islamophobia is not about protecting Muslims from genuine discrimination or violence (both of these things are already illegal), but rather is about ringfencing Islam and all Muslims from criticism, surrounding this one religion with a blasphemy-deflecting forcefield. So any commentary on Islam or even on influential Muslims can be casually batted aside as ‘phobic’. Even worse, today’s spat shows that now political debate, never mind differences on religion, can be demonised with the Islamophobia brand. Is it Islamophobic to criticise Sadiq? Must we all hold our tongue because he is of Asian and Muslim origin? Isn’t that, erm, a little racist – treating a brown-skinned politician more gently and cautiously than you would a white one?
And this is worrying because of what it tells us about the Corbyn-led Labour Party: that it has been swallowed up by the infantile politics of grievance, identity and offence-taking. These are no longer traits limited to the so-called ‘snowflake’ generation or people in academia – rather, political parties themselves now embrace and weaponise overblown identitarian sensitivity and self-pity in order to chill political criticism, silence certain opinions, and exercise greater control over what it is permissible to say in public life. People are using Trump’s visit to talk up the division and crisis he has apparently visited upon the American republic, but right now I am more worried by the insight we are getting into the further drift of British political life into the elitism and censoriousness of identity politics.

MARYLAND: GOVERNMENT THUGS MEDICALLY KIDNAP CHILD FROM NEW MOM

GOVERNMENT THUGS MEDICALLY KIDNAP CHILD FROM NEW MOM
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/government-thugs-medically-kidnap-child-new-mom/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
(Natural News) Another state-sanctioned kidnapping of a child has taken place in the “land of the free.” A Maryland couple recently had their newborn daughter forcibly stolen from them by Child Protective Services (CPS) after a pair of rogue pediatricians decided to report them to the state for alleged neglect – though no neglect was taking place.
It all began when first time parents Jennifer Guskin and Scott McFalls home-birthed their precious daughter Iris, who was born slightly underweight. As any good parents would do, the couple sought out answers from multiple pediatricians, none of whom were competent enough to notice that the young girl had a tongue and lip tie.
They continued their search until finding a doctor who seemed knowledgeable and understanding, but it was already too late. Because Iris was born at home somewhat unexpectedly, CPS was immediately alerted in accordance with Maryland state law. Everything from this point on would go downhill until Iris was ultimately seized from her loving parents and taken into state custody.
Wanting to do things as naturally as possible, Iris’ mother decided it was best to breastfeed her daughter on demand – meaning whenever Iris was hungry, Jennifer would feed her. But several pediatricians disagreed, urging Jennifer to feed Iris formula as well, which the little girl couldn’t stomach and repeatedly vomited up.
After going back and forth and cycling through several pediatricians, Jennifer continued to feed Iris naturally, giving her as much natural food as possible, only to see that her daughter was still not gaining weight. So they continued their search for answers, only to eventually receive an unexpected visit from CPS.
Support our mission and enhance your own self-reliance: The laboratory-verified Organic Emergency Survival Bucket provides certified organic, high-nutrition storable food for emergency preparedness. Completely free of corn syrup, MSG, GMOs and other food toxins. Ultra-clean solution for years of food security. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store.
One of the pediatricians whom the couple had “fired” for failing to help their daughter apparently called CPS to report “concerns about Iris’ weight.” This same pediatrician also accused the couple of “missing (their) appointment,” which was a lie as they had already indicated that they were seeking out a new pediatrician.
During this time, Jennifer and Scott had found yet another pediatrician who made similar recommendations about giving Iris formula, despite the fact that she wouldn’t drink it. This pediatrician didn’t seem to have any pressing concerns about Iris during the initial visit, and yet this is right around the time when things went strangely south.

CPS routinely steals children under false pretenses

The pediatrician in question called Jennifer and Scott later in the day after their visit, warning them that Iris wouldn’t “survive the week,” and that they should bring her to the emergency room several days later. Common sense would dictate that if a child’s life was in immediate danger that her parents should take her to the ER immediately, not on some future date – this strange situation prompting Jennifer and Scott to seek out yet another pediatrician.
But they wouldn’t get that far, as CPS would show up at their house just one day after the date they were told by that same pediatrician to take Iris to the ER. CPS officials accompanied by local law enforcement attempted to seize Iris right then and there with neither a warrant nor a judge-signed court order, to which they declined.
While all of this was happening, Jennifer and Scott finally figured out what was wrong, receiving input from people online during a Facebook Live recording that Iris had tongue and lip tie, and that this was preventing her from receiving proper nutrition from her mother’s breastmilk – something that none of the pediatricians they consulted bothered to notice.
In other words, it wasn’t on Jennifer and Scott that their baby was underweight. But they were still targeted by CPS, which used the excuse of “failure to thrive” to eventually take baby Iris from her parents, even though they did nothing wrong – not to mention the fact that Jennifer was a victim of sex trafficking as a child, having been separated from her own family. And as we’ve reported on previous occasions, this type of situation happens all the time, and typically with the excuse of “protecting children.”
Be sure to read Jennifer and Scott’s horrific experience in full at this link.
__________________________________________________________

Mother Who Was Sexually Trafficked as a Child in Foster Care Has Her Own Baby Medically Kidnapped – Fears for Her Safety

BY: Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Guskin Jennifer and Iris
Jennifer Guskin and baby Iris. Photo provided by family.
by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
A Maryland couple followed the advice of their doctors, and now their baby has been taken away from them by Child Protective Services.
First time parents, Jennifer Guskin and Scott McFalls, were concerned about their baby’s weight, but none of the three pediatricians they consulted noticed that baby Iris had a tongue and lip tie.
By the time they found a doctor who figured it out, CPS had already decided to take their baby from them.
It is the kind of nightmare scenario that could happen to any family. Doctors may not always be able to figure out why a child isn’t gaining weight, but as soon as the baby is diagnosed with failure to thrive, Child Protective Services is often quick to blame the parents and seize the child.
Jennifer told Health Impact News:
It seems like the doctors were more interested in working with CPS than actually finding out why she wasn’t gaining weight.
Unlike most families, Jennifer Guskin and Scott McFalls know all too well what kinds of horrors possibly face children taken by CPS and put into foster care. Jennifer was adopted as a baby herself, and she has recently gone public with horrific details about her childhood and how she became a victim of child sex trafficking and experimentation.
Jennifer and Scott recognize the danger that their baby is in, and that thought terrifies them.

Accidental Homebirth

Jennifer and Scott have been together for 10 years, and they live in the home that Scott grew up in and bought from his parents. Their pregnancy was a surprise. Once they got used to the idea that they were going to be parents, they determined to do things as safely and naturally as possible.
They fixed up the nursery and ordered diapers and wipes that are chemical-free. They eat organic as much as possible. Jennifer planned to have a natural birth in a hospital and to breastfeed. She writes:
Breast milk is the healthiest form of food for an infant, and it builds a closeness that can never truly be undone. It’s health for mother and child’s not just physical health, but mental, emotional and even spiritual well being.
She didn’t realize she was in labor. She thought it was just something she ate, until the baby started to come. They called 911 and she gave birth to Iris at home.
The baby latched on for her first feeding in the ambulance on the way to Howard County General Hospital. All was good.
Iris was tiny but healthy, weighing in at 5 lbs 12 oz.
Guskin newborn
Newborn baby Iris started out life small. She was full-term, but weighed only 5 lbs 12 oz.
Because Iris was born at home, it triggered a call to open up a CPS case. Jennifer says social workers told her that it was state policy in Maryland that CPS gets a call for every homebirth to do a walk through of the home “to make sure it’s prepared for a baby.”
The walk through went well, and social workers told the parents that the case would be closed by the end of the month.

Breastfeeding Sabotaged by Poor Medical Advice

Jennifer said that she breastfed on demand, but she supplemented with formula during the first couple of weeks, because hospital staff had told her that she would need to do so until her milk came in.
Anyone who has studied lactation knows that this is not how breastfeeding works. It is supply and demand.
The more milk that is removed, the more milk is signaled for the body to produce the next day. Every bottle of formula, especially in the first few weeks when the supply is being established, tells the mother’s body that it doesn’t need to produce that amount of milk.
Jennifer didn’t realize that this advice would sabotage her milk supply. Iris didn’t like the formula and would spit it out. She gained back to her birth weight by the time she was a week old.
At her one week visit, with pediatrician Dr. Alvaro Ramos, Jennifer says that the doctor asked if there was any soreness with breastfeeding. She said that there was, but it was not something she was complaining about. She was determined to push through it, but she says that he recommended nursing less frequently. According to the medical records, the doctor:
discussed breastfeeding/adjust feedings to every 2 hrs as opose [sic] of on demands.
That advice was counter-intuitive to Jennifer, but she complied with his recommendation. Over the next few weeks, Iris grew in length and head circumference, but gained weight very slowly.
She was meeting her other developmental milestones, but her slow weight gain concerned her parents. They asked about it at every doctor visit, only to be told not to nurse as often and to space out feedings to two to three hours.
As time went on, Jennifer asked about going back to feeding on demand, but according to medical records, the doctor continued to recommend scheduled feedings.
By March 2, the parents decided to stop seeing Dr. Ramos and find another pediatrician.
Iris was described as an alert, happy baby. She rarely cried because either Jennifer or Scott held her most of the time. She had 10 to 12 wet diapers a day and a bowel movement every other day. There are no reports of dry skin or sunken fontanels. All of these are indicators that baby is getting enough milk, except for the fact that she was not gaining weight.
Clearly, something wasn’t right. Jennifer and Scott knew it, and they sought out answers.
Guskin Smiling Iris and Scott
Iris smiles as her daddy holds her. Photo provided by family.
Meanwhile, Dr. Ramos called Child Protective Services to report his “concerns about Iris’ weight gain and missing appointment,” the appointment they “missed” because the family decided to find another pediatrician. Dr. Ramos also called Jennifer’s number numerous times to repeat the PKU test.
Scott later expressed concern that the doctor’s office kept losing the PKU test and needing repeat heel sticks to get the baby’s blood. The blood samples collected from newborns goes into a national DNA database, something that many parents are not comfortable with. See:

Loss of Privacy: Government Collecting and Storing DNA Samples of Newborn Babies – Available to Law Enforcement and for Medical Research

It took a month for them to be able to get in to see another pediatrician. They had an appointment with Dr. Cheryl Parks of Blackwell White Pediatrics on Monday, April 2, 2018.
That doctor, as well, reportedly told Jennifer to schedule feedings and space them out at least every 2 to 3 hours. She also recommended supplementation with formula. During the visit, the doctor did not communicate any real concern. Later that day, she called Jennifer and left a message concerning supplementation with formula.
Things got strange after that, Jennifer reports:
A few hours after that, she called again to say that she didn’t think Iris would survive the week and we should bring her to the ER on Thursday.
The doctor told her to wait till Thursday, because she would have someone there who could evaluate her on Thursday, specifically.
That seemed very odd, because if it were truly an emergency, wouldn’t they have needed to take Iris to the ER that night, or at least the next day?
A real emergency would not wait 3 days. Jennifer and Scott decided then and there to seek a second opinion. They told Dr. Parks that her services were no longer needed.
Nowhere in any of the medical records is there any mention of advice to increase nursing or skin-to-skin contact. There is no mention of breast compressions being recommended, and the possibility of a foremilk/hindmilk imbalance was apparently not considered.
Jennifer says she was never counseled to utilize any of the herbs that are traditionally recommended to increase milk supply such as fenugreek or blessed thistle.
The tried and true methods of increasing a breastfeeding mother’s milk supply seemed to be notably absent.

CPS Shows up with the Police to Seize Baby with No Warrant – But Medic Clears Baby’s Health After 5 Hour Standoff

Jennifer and Scott immediately began searching again for a pediatrician, and Jennifer went back to nursing on demand. She was fine with her baby nursing “all the time” if that was what it took. They knew that their baby was small, and they were searching for answers.
They consulted an online lactation consultant and watched Iris closely for any signs of dehydration or illness.
They were stunned at the knock on their door on Friday evening, April 6, at 6 p.m. Two social workers and 4 Baltimore County police officers showed up with a “writ” from CPS saying that they were there to take the baby.
There was no warrant or court order – nothing signed by a judge.
The doctor had called CPS telling them that the baby would be dead by the end of the week. It was a harrowing ordeal that lasted almost 5 hours. They recorded most of the ordeal on Facebook Live. (View here.)
Most of the police officers acted compassionately, and they were able to negotiate for a medic to come to evaluate the baby.
The medic said that the baby was indeed very underweight, but, otherwise, she was doing well. She would certainly need to be evaluated by a doctor soon, but she did not appear to be in any immediate danger.
The police decided not to take the child out of the home that day.
The social workers did not appear to be happy with the decision. Records show that they had come to the home with the intent of seizing Iris.

Vaccines Refused – Parents Threatened by Doctor

That Monday, they saw yet another pediatrician, Dr. Teresa Fuller. She recommended supplementing with formula every 3 hours, and they scheduled a follow up appointment in 3 days.
Baby Iris was not vaccinated, which presented a problem to Dr. Fuller. Jennifer told her that she would not agree to any vaccinations until her baby was gaining weight appropriately. Dr. Fuller informed her that if she continued to refuse vaccines, she would be dismissed from the practice.

Baby Had Tongue and Lip Tie

During Friday night’s Facebook Live recording, numerous people mentioned the possibility of tongue and/or lip tie. Monday afternoon, after the pediatrician visit, Jennifer took Iris to pediatric dentist, Dr. Robert Marcus.
None of the 3 pediatricians looked for or noticed that Iris had both a tongue and lip tie.
La Leche League, a recognized authority on breastfeeding, says that a short frenulum can cause pain, soreness, and plugged ducts in the mother and can cause slow weight gain in the baby. The baby may want to nurse constantly and still have difficulty gaining weight. (Source.)
The signs were there that this was a problem, but they were missed. No one checked for the tell-tale “heart-shaped tongue.”
It is not uncommon for doctors and nurses to overlook the possibility of tongue or lip tie. Mothers and babies suffer needlessly, and the milk supply may never be established adequately, resulting in babies being labeled “failure to thrive.”
“Failure to thrive” is increasingly a diagnosis used by Child Protective Services to take babies from their parents.
The solution is relatively easy. Dr. Marcus performed the frectomy, the surgical clip of the frenulums, on Monday, April 9.
Jennifer was relieved when she finally found out what was wrong. There was a reason for her baby’s slow weight gain, and it was something that could be fixed. If the tongue and lip tie are diagnosed early enough, breastfeeding generally resumes quickly.
Iris, however, was already more than 3 months old. La Leche League notes that it can take a week or two after frenectomy for baby to “adjust to his tongue’s greater mobility.”
One has to wonder how differently things would have turned out if the doctors had originally checked for tongue tie. What if the first pediatrician had tried to discover what was causing Iris not to gain weight instead of recommending spacing out feedings?
She and Scott took Iris to Greater Baltimore Medical Center (GRMC) that Thursday, April 12, for a follow-up evaluation. Doctors were very concerned about her weight and began supplementing via a feeding tube.
Iris was not really given a chance to relearn how to breastfeed effectively. A supplemental nursing system is an effective method by which a baby can learn how to suckle at the breast, but there is no mention of this solution in the medical records until they had been at the hospital for an entire week. It was finally started on April 20. Iris responded well.
She balked at first at being fed formula. Her mother said that she would spit it out.
The baby began gaining weight, and she was medically cleared to leave the hospital by April 23.
The hospital had a list of goals for discharging Iris, including conditions that the parents had to meet or agree to in order for them to take their baby home. The only one they did not agree to was to leave the baby in the room without them in order to meet with CPS and hospital staff for a team meeting. Jennifer and Scott refused to allow Iris out of their sight because they were afraid that CPS would take her.
They had every reason for that fear.

Child Abuse Specialist – Never Examines Child but Makes Recommendations

A report by Dr. Michelle Chudow, Director of the Child Protection Team at GRMC, appears to have played a big part in what happened next.
chudow_michelle_320
Dr. Michelle Chudow – Director of GBMC Child Protection Team, Photo source.
On April 25, CPS medically kidnapped Iris and kicked her parents out of the hospital.
The Shelter Care Authorization paper states as grounds for her seizure:
Caregivers, Jennifer Guskin and Scott McFalls are refusing to agree to follow through with the discharge agreement for Iris’ intensive follow up for medical care.
The document lists the plan that the parents allegedly refused to agree to.
However, the medical records clearly state that “Mom and Dad [are] in agreement with POC [plan of care].”
Dr. Chudow was consulted by CPS since Monday, April 9, the day that the baby’s tongue and lip tie were addressed. She admits in her report:
Of note, I have not examined this patient myself as of the writing of this note, nor have I had any direct interaction with the patient’s family.
She states that the parents “accused the SW of trying to take the baby away from the parents” on April 6, which is exactly what the records show the social worker was attempting. The parents’ fear was accurate.
Chudow took issue with Jennifer being caught co-sleeping with her baby:
The patient’s mother has been asked repeatedly to not place the baby on her breast in between defined feeding times, in order to fully monitor her intake, and to increase her ability at self-soothing, yet multiple nurses have commented that almost every time they walk in the room, the baby is on her mother’s breast.
She stated that she was concerned that if the parents are allowed to take their baby home, she might fall behind on her development.
Guskin babe in arms
Photo supplied by family.
Another major issue that Dr. Chudow seemed to have was Jennifer’s comments that:
CPS is trying to steal her baby for the purpose of trafficking the infant or in order to receive a bonus at work.
The patient’s mother even mentioned one time that she, herself, was sexually trafficked as a child….
Jennifer is on disability for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder because of the things that she has experienced, but an evaluation in the hospital for Postpartum Depression rated her at low risk for that. She has no other psychological diagnosis.
That evaluation apparently did not convince the Child Abuse Specialist. Dr. Chudow wrote that she was afraid that Jennifer has an underlying psychological illness that prohibits her from:
being able to trust and engage with both medical and child protection personnel, and not allow her to see past her own paranoid delusions regarding people trying to steal and traffic her infant. [Emphasis added]
In other words, without any evidence to the contrary, the horrors that Jennifer experienced growing up, things for which she has a recognized disability of PTSD, are chalked up as being “paranoid delusions,” used as justification for taking her child.

Mother Trafficked as a Child and Suffered Unimaginable Horrors  – “A Human Experiment”

Not long before Child Protective Services and the police showed up on their doorstep, Jennifer Guskin released the first two in a set of YouTube videos in which she had began to talk about some of what she went through growing up in foster care, and part of a nationwide pedophile sex trafficking operation.
The videos describe allegations of unimaginable horrors of child sex trafficking and experimentation, and a pedophilia network that allegedly reaches to highest levels of government and society.
WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT ABOUT TOPICS SUCH AS CANNIBALISM, CHILD SEX, TORTURE, MURDER, ETC. NOT SUITABLE FOR CHILDREN
They are on YouTube on her channel, “AHumanExperiment.”
These videos reveal a dark underbelly of corruption and evil on a level that most of us cannot even fathom. They are things that should never happen to another human being, let alone small children and babies.
When a victim, such as Jennifer, decides to go public with such atrocities, most of the public, which is totally unaware that such things are happening in the U.S., will have a hard time believing that these accounts are true. The abusers and perpetrators of these child sex trafficking networks use their influence and power to silence the abused, and it is often difficult or impossible to expose them.
But during the past year or so, some of this information is finding its way to the public. Last year, for example, Dr. Phil had a woman on his show that explained how she was sold into the world of sex trafficking as a baby, and that it was the only life she knew. (See: Woman Claims Parents Sold Her To An International Sex Trafficking Organization – At Birth)
Here at Health Impact News, we have heard such stories for years, but only since last year have we been able to publish any actual cases of this happening in the U.S., as we (and other media sources) were able to publish the case of David Frodsham in the military town of Sierra Vista, Arizona, where he was arrested and convicted for running a child pornography pedophile ring out of his state-approved foster home in June of 2017. (Story here.)
The fact that the U.S. foster care system is the #1 recruitment source for putting children into pedophilia child sex trafficking networks is not even disputed any longer. To learn more about this, see our previous stories:

Attorney Reporting in Newsweek: Foster Care is a System Set Up to Sex Traffic American Children

Publicly Open Pedophile Running for Office in Virginia Reveals How Foster Care is a Pipeline to Adopt Children as “Sex Toys”

Texas Judge: CPS Still Unconstitutional – Foster Care Sexual and Physical Abuse Still the Norm

Massachusetts State Auditor Finds Widespread Rape and Sexual Abuse in Foster Care but DCF Officials Won’t Report It

Arizona Foster Care System Revealed as Pedophile Ring: Former Foster Child Tortured for Years Sues for $15 Million

Texas Sheriff Blasts CPS for Allowing Man Accused of Sexual Abuse to Foster 180 Girls

“Pedophile Farm” Alleged in Lawsuit Against Washington Foster Care Home for Boys

Florida Foster Parents Charged with Hundreds of Sex Crimes Against Children in Alabama

Child Sex Trafficking through Child “Protection” Services Exposed – Kidnapping Children for Sex

The U.S. Foster Care System: Modern Day Slavery and Child Trafficking

Child Kidnapping and Trafficking: A Lucrative U.S. Business Funded by Taxpayers

Jennifer and Scott fear that their baby might be subjected to some of the same atrocities that Jennifer went through. Jennifer says:
For all I know, they’re planning to put her [Iris] through the same thing.
That is why I am fighting so desperately to get her back.
On the night that CPS came to their house in the first attempt to take Iris, Scott said:
We live in the state of Maryland, right next to good old DC, “human trafficking central.” So you’ll forgive me if I don’t want to let CPS walk off with my 3-month-old daughter.

9 Vaccines Given to Baby Who Went into “Full Code”

Iris was discharged from the hospital 2 days after CPS took her. Before they released her, they gave her a total of 9 vaccines, without her parents’ consent.
  • Pediarix – diphtheria, hepatitis B, pertussis (acellular), polio, and tetanus vaccines
  • DTaP – diptheria, tetanuss, and pertussis (acellular) vaccines
  • Hib – Haemophilus influenzae type b
Jennifer was shocked to see in the medical records that her baby went into “Full Code” for which CPR was administered, the same day that she was given all the shots.
No one will elaborate on what happened to her daughter.
Yet, CPS and Iris’s guardian insist that they need to give her a second round of vaccines. Jennifer refuses to consent unless and until they get the full medical records and find out what happened to cause her baby to need CPR.
She said that when they were allowed to see Iris 2 days later, she seemed lethargic.
She was swollen, shaky, not making eye contact, or holding her head up the same way she was before. Her coordination had suffered and she had bruises on her hands, indicative of IVs. I knew on sight that they vaccinated her against our wishes, and she had an extremely bad reaction.
Guskin baby hand
Why was baby Iris given an IV after she was taken from her parents? Why did she need CPR? Was it due to multiple vaccines given to her? Photo provided by family.

Next Court Date Is Months Away

The CPS investigation has closed. They still accuse the parents of refusing to agree to the conditions for release despite evidence to the contrary.
Iris was placed with a family member, but Iris’s parents do not believe that their daughter is safe.
The next court hearing is scheduled for October 25, but Jennifer and Scott plan to request an emergency hearing.

How You Can Help

They are begging for help to save their daughter. In one of the videos, Jennifer pleads:
If anybody can help, please help…. I don’t want her going through the same things I did. Nobody deserves to go through that…. I can’t let them hurt my daughter!
Larry Hogan is the Governor of Maryland. He may be reached at (410) 974-3901 or contacted here. The official governor’s office website contains contact information for the National Human Trafficking Hotline – 1-888-373-7888.
Deloris Goodwin Kelley is the State Senator for the family’s district. She may be reached at (410) 841-3606 or contacted here.
There are 3 delegates representing their district in the House of Delegates:
Benjamin T. Brooks, Sr. may be reached at (410) 841-3352 or contacted here.
Jay Jalisi may be reached at (410) 841-3358 or contacted here.
Adrienne A. Jones may be reached at (410) 841-3391 or contacted here.

TRUMP AMBASSADOR LOBBIES U.K. TO RELEASE TOMMY ROBINSON!~”FREE TOMMY” PROTEST & PRO TRUMP RALLIES IN LONDON BRING OUT THOUSANDS~GEERT WILDERS STOPPED FROM ENTERING U.K., BUT DELIVERS SPEECH ON WIDESCREEN

TRUMP AMBASSADOR LOBBIES U.K. 
TO RELEASE TOMMY ROBINSON! 
Tommy Robinson has awakened
a nationalist populist giant!!!
 Trump’s Ambassador Lobbied Britain

For Tommy Robinson

Detailed Report by Brittany Pettibone

Pro-Trump rally in London – 
Freedom of speech talk with Geert Wilders – 
Le Quatorze Juillet-Bastille Day 14 July 2018

Tensions and tempers run high on pro-Trump, 
pro-Tommy Robinson rally
Free Tommy Robinson’ supporters and pro-Donald Trump marchers come together in Whitehall for a joint rally in support of the visit of the US President. They called for the release of English Defence League founder Robinson who was jailed for 13 months for breaking contempt of court laws.

FREE TOMMY ROBINSON DEMO: 
THE CROWD ARRIVES IN THE THOUSANDS




PRESIDENT TRUMP PARTICIPATES IN A JOINT PRESS CONFERENCE WITH PRIME MINISTER THERESA MAY OF THE U.K.

PRESIDENT TRUMP PARTICIPATES IN A JOINT PRESS CONFERENCE WITH PRIME MINISTER THERESA MAY OF THE U.K.
BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, ENGLAND

Trump says UK is “losing its culture” due to migrant influx, May praises migrants’ “fantastic contribution”

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/07/trump-says-uk-is-losing-its-culture-due-to-migrant-influx-may-praises-migrants-fantastic-contribution



Nigel Farage on Trump’s ‘bombshell’ Brexit intervention

Former UK Independence Party leader reacts to the president’s comments
on Prime Minister Theresa May.
Trump: Brutal Honesty About May’s Betrayal 

of BREXIT & Britain

If UK Prime Minister May’s plan goes through, it will not only kill trade with the US & Britain, it will also leave Britain in a far worse position with the EU — EU regulation of trade without representation in Brussels.

Trump Exposes Brexit Betrayal by Globalists

BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Donald Trump blasted the so-called “soft” Brexit deal negotiated by British Prime Minister Theresa May that will keep the United Kingdom under the boot of the European Union, with the U.S. leader saying that was not what the British people voted for in the historic 2016 referendum. Trump also warned that the agreement, which critics say is not an actual British exit from the EU, will likely kill a proposed lucrative trade deal with the United States offered by his administration. But all hope is not lost. In response to the betrayal of the people by May, multiple senior U.K. officials including Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson resigned. And in public comments, Trump said Johnson, a leading voice for a real Brexit, would make a “great prime minister.” Globalists were outraged.
Trump gave the exclusive interview to The Sun, a British publication owned by News Corporation boss Rupert Murdoch, shortly before leaving on a trip to Europe. It was published on July 13, as Trump was arriving in the United Kingdom to meet with Prime Minister May, Queen Elizabeth II, and others, after a trip to a NATO summit. Throughout his European tour, the president has been brutally honest. Among other comments that caused shockwaves among euro-globalists and the establishment, Trump blasted German authorities for sending billions of dollars to Putin's government and becoming dependent on Russian oil while expecting U.S. taxpayers and troops to protect Germany from the Kremlin. The president also slammed the mass immigration that he said was undermining Europeans' cultures, identities, and societies.
His comments attacking May's “soft” Brexit were the equivalent of dropping a bomb into British politics. As The New American has been warning practically since the vote to secede from the EU superstate, globalists have done everything possible to sabotage the British people's historic effort to reclaim their right to self-government. Even though more people voted for Brexit than have ever voted for anything in British history, globalists at all levels of society — government, Big Business, bureaucracy, Parliament, media, shadowy organizations such as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and more — have worked to derail it in every way. And until Trump exposed the fraud, with May's pseudo-Brexit deal with the EU, globalists thought they had succeeded. Basically, May's plan would keep Britain in the EU in all but name.
But Trump refused to stay quiet about the betrayal. In the interview with The Sun, the president said that the proposed deal was “very unfortunate” and that May had done the “opposite” of what he had recommended in talks with her. By extending an offer to secure a favorable bilateral trade deal, the Trump administration had already destroyed the EU's most important leverage over the British people. As Eurocrats sought to extort tens of billions of pounds from U.K. taxpayers while keeping them under EU “laws” created by unelected bureaucrats, the superstate's primary threat was that they would block free British access to European markets. But by securing a deal with America, and being allowed to trade with Europe on the same terms as anyone else, Britain could have flourished like never before.
Now, that may all go down the tubes thanks to May's “soft” Brexit scheming. “If they do a deal like that, we would be dealing with the European Union instead of dealing with the UK, so it will probably kill the deal,” Trump explained. “If they do that, then their trade deal with the US will probably not be made.” In fact, it may be even worse than just killing a potential trade deal with Washington. According to Trump, May's plan “will definitely affect trade with the United States, unfortunately in a negative way.” Trump warned that the U.S. government is already having “enough difficulty” with the EU, and that his administration intends to stop it. “We are cracking down right now on the European Union because they have not treated the United States fairly on trading,” he said, adding that May's proposed deal would “probably end a major trade relationship with the United States.”
Trump also implied that May and her globalist allies were betraying their people by subverting their vote to secede. “The deal she is striking is a much different deal than the one the people voted on,” Trump explained, pointing to the 800-pound gorilla in the room that globalists were hoping nobody would notice. “It was not the deal that was in the referendum. I have just been hearing this over the last three days. I know they have had a lot of resignations. So a lot of people don’t like it.” He also said that the deal would “absolutely” cause him to walk away from the negotiating table. “I think what is going on is very unfortunate,” Trump added. At a press conference in Brussels, Trump echoed his concerns. “I don’t know if that’s what they voted for,” he said about the fake Brexit deal pushed by May,
The Sun said Trump's attacks on the phony Brexit deal would “pour nitroglycerine on the already raging Tory Brexiteer revolt against the PM.” The “Tory Brexiteer revolt” refers to the growing uprising among pro-Brexit Conservative Party lawmakers and officials who refuse to participate in the fraud May and her globalist allies are trying to perpetrate against the British people. The prime minister, though, who was publicly opposed to Brexit before the vote, falsely claimed that the deal was in fact a legitimate Brexit. “We have come to an agreement at the proposal we’re putting to the European Union which absolutely delivers on the Brexit people voted for,” she claimed in a statement after Trump's comments were published. “They voted for us to take back control of our money, our law and our borders and that’s exactly what we will do.”
However, few believe that, and May's government is teetering on the edge of collapse after the stunning betrayal. And there are growing rumblings among lawmakers and the people that she should resign in disgrace. One widely touted potential replacement would be Boris Johnson, the former foreign secretary who resigned in disgust rather than participate in May's fraud on the British people. Trump described Johnson as a “a very talented guy” and said “I like him a lot.” “I have a lot of respect for Boris. He obviously likes me, and says very good things about me,” Trump added. “I was very saddened to see he was leaving government and I hope he goes back in at some point. I think he is a great representative for your country.” While careful to say he was not trying to pit May and Johnson against each other, Trump said he thought Johnson “would be a great prime minister.” “I think he’s got what it takes,” the president added.  
British critics were outraged about Trump's comments. Labour Party boss Jeremy Corbin, a radical leftist who reportedly collaborated with mass-murdering communist regimes during the Cold War, slammed Trump and questioned whether his mother had taught him manners. London's controversial Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, who has presided over surging crime rates, ripped Trump as well, expressing outrage after Trump said the mayor had done a “very bad job on terrorism.” Other political figures on the far left went ballistic, spewing false accusations against Trump and claiming that a “racist” should not be allowed to meet the British queen. But Trump took it all in stride, and reiterated that The Sun had omitted many of the positive things he said about May and the United Kingdom.  
But Trump's comments represent a total shift from the rhetoric of globalist former President Barack Hussein Obama, who warned Brits before Brexit that they should stay in the EU or face serious consequences. The ex-president also threatened ahead of the vote that if they declared independence from Brussels, the Brits would be “at the back of the queue” in negotiating any trade deals with America. Ironically, though, polling suggested that Obama's half-baked interference in the historic U.K. vote only strengthened the pro-secession movement. By contrast, Trump, who was then a candidate for president, predicted that Brexit would succeed and encouraged the British people to reclaim their nation from globalists in Brussels. Of course, he was proven correct.    
After the interview appeared online, Trump said in a press conference that The Sun had omitted many of his comments praising Prime Minister May. “I didn’t criticize the prime minister,” Trump explained. “I have a lot of respect for the prime minister and unfortunately there was a story that was done which was generally fine but it didn’t put in what I said about the prime minister and I said tremendous things. Fortunately we tend to record stories now so we have it for your enjoyment if you'd like it. We report when we deal with reporters. It is called fake news.” During the interview with The Sun, Trump also ridiculed the “fake news” purveyors at the Washington Post, dismissing the increasingly shrill anti-Trump hysteria factory as a “lobbyist for Amazon.” Establishment bigwig Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, bought the Post and accelerated its transformation into a transparent propaganda megaphone for globalism and dishonest anti-Trump extremism.  
Unfortunately, the British people have been betrayed by globalists yet again. But fortunately, the story does not have to end here. And with President Trump on their side, the people of Britain can reclaim their sovereignty, boost their prosperity, restore self-government, and ignore the increasingly deranged threats from a totalitarian EU that refuses to accept the will of the people. Just Trump's public comments exposing the fraud may well crush the plans of globalist insiders to keep the British people under Brussels' boot. But the Brits and the American people must continue to educate themselves and organize if they hope to preserve and protect their liberties. Globalists have already shown that they will use deception and immorality to advance their agenda. But patriots and liberty-minded people everywhere can defeat them using the truth.
Related articles:

CONGRESSMEN RIP AND SLAM FBI AGENT PETER STRZOK IN EXPLOSIVE EXCHANGE REGARDING POLITICAL BIAS

'The Evil Face of the Deep State': The Disturbing Faces of Peter Strzok
Peter Strzok
CONGRESSMEN RIP AND SLAM 
FBI AGENT STRZOK

GOP Lawmakers Threaten Strzok With Contempt 

Of Congress / Alex Jones Tells Globalists 

To Move Out of The Way

Peter Strzok testifies to congress while the democrats at the hearing protect him. Alex sings “Move B****” to the scum like Hillary Clinton and Peter Strzok that hate America.
Would you trust this man? Would you trust the FBI that protects him? Does Sessions not even know Strozk still has above Top Secret clearance after Sessions said he didn’t? David Knight on what the testimony tells us about the current state of politics, DOJ & FBI.

Gohmert ROASTS & Uses Strzok’s Wife 

To Prove He’s A LIAR
Gohmert ROASTS & Uses Strzok’s Wife To Prove He’s A LIAR [2018]

Louie Gohmert ripped embattled FBI agent Peter Strzok for cheating on his wife and accused him of lying to Congress.

Strzok Blows a Fuse When Asked About Obama And Hillary – Shocking

Darrell Issa forces Strzok to read back some of the anti-Trump text messages that he sent to Lisa Page…

“Let’s See What’ll You Do In Prison With That 

Smile?”, Matt Gaetz DEMOLISHES Smirking Strzok

‘I DON’T GIVE A DAMN WHAT YOU APPRECIATE’: GOWDY BLASTS PETER STRZOK

Agent denies anti-Trump text messages during 2016 election prove bias

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/i-dont-give-a-damn-what-you-appreciate-gowdy-blasts-peter-strzok/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy took off the gloves Thursday as he questioned biased FBI agent Peter Strzok about being kicked off the Russia probe
At one point Gowdy tells Strzok he “doesn’t give a damn” how the agent feels about how he worded a question. Here’s a transcript of the tense exchange:
GOWDY: Your testimony is Bob Mueller did not kick you off because of the content of your text, he kicked you off because of some appearance that he was worried about?
STRZOK: My testimony — what you asked, and what I responded to – was that he kicked me off because of my bias. I’m stating to you, it is not my understanding that he kicked me off because of any bias. That it was done based an appearance. If you want to represent what you said accurately, I’m happy to answer that question, but I don’t appreciate what was originally said being changed.
GOWDY: I don’t give a damn what you appreciate, Agent Strzok. I don’t appreciate having FBI agent unprecedented level of animus working on two major investigations during 2016.
Several text messages from Strzok to his mistress Lisa Page showed the FBI agent, who led the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private email server, held an anti-Trump bias during the election, saying at one time, “there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.”
Check out the entire 15-minute exchange:
COMPLETE 28 MINUTE EXCHANGE IN HIGH DEFINITION:
SEE ALSO: 
Judge Jeanine Pirro: Strzok is the personification 
of the deep state
 Peter Strzok’s ‘insurance policy’ is the Russia collusion investigation.

LIBERAL NY GOVERNOR CUOMO BLASTS “EXTREME CONSERVATIVE” POLITICIANS FOR IMPOSING “THEIR VIEW OF WHAT GOD SAYS SHOULD BE DONE”

LIBERAL NY GOVERNOR CUOMO BLASTS “EXTREME CONSERVATIVE” POLITICIANS FOR IMPOSING “THEIR VIEW OF WHAT GOD SAYS SHOULD BE DONE”
BY HEATHER CLARK
NEW YORK — Fearing potential ramifications of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, liberal New York governor Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order on Monday ensuring that contraceptives are free under all insurance plans in the state. He also decried in speeches what he called “extreme conservative” politicians, describing them as those who “have their views about what religion is right and wrong, what lifestyle is right and wrong, what sexuality is right and wrong,” and impose on the people by law “their view of what God says should be done.”
“Whereas, with the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy from the United States Supreme Court and the growth of attacks by the federal government on access to comprehensive reproductive health, it is more critical than ever to protect access to reproductive rights,” the order reads.
It suggests that the State will defy any federal acts it opposes surrounding the issue, and will codify provisions within its own laws.
“New York is committed to not only protecting, but expanding full, affordable, and timely access to contraceptives, including emergency contraceptives, regardless of federal actions,” the order outlines.
According to a press release from Cuomo’s office, the executive order will ensure that there are no co-pays for contraceptive drugs and devices, and that one year’s worth of contraceptives are dispensed at a time.
“In the face of this federal assault, New York is going to protect itself because this state has always been the progressive capital of the nation,” Cuomo remarked in a statement. “This is the time where every New Yorker has to say, you’re not taking women’s … reproductive rights away. We’re going to protect ourselves because this is the state that has always stood up for what’s right.”
The governor signed the order after delivering a speech at the Manny Cantor Center, in which he lamented that overturning Roe v. Wade is on the conservative agenda. He spoke to crowds both Monday and Tuesday, decrying what he called “extreme conservatives” in the government.
“This is their view of the world. This is their view of religion. This is their view of what God says should be done. And their view of what God says should be done is the view they’re going to impose on you by law,” he stated prior to signing the order.
“What a great act of hypocrisy … Conservatives always argued limited government; states’ rights. Pull pack the federal government …. until they took control of the federal government,” Cuomo asserted. “Then, the federal government is omniscient and omnipresent, (and) the federal government should dictate the law of the land to everyone. Not in New York state.”
“They have their views and they’re going to impose their views on you,” he similarly said on Tuesday. “They have their views about what religion is right and wrong, what lifestyle is right and wrong, what sexuality is right and wrong, who should be an immigrant and who’s right and who’s wrong. They have their views, and in a great act of hypocrisy, they are going to use the federal government to impose those views on you.”
He told those gathered that elections matter, as they affect the “fundamental values of who we are and what we believe and how we live.” Cuomo also remarked that the actions of those in power are a “daily shock to our system … because it is totally repugnant to everything we are and what we believe,” and called upon those gathered to push back and rebel.
“New York has to pass a law that codifies Roe v. Wade before they overrule it,” Cuomo stated, opining that the world has become a “crazier place” in that it is now possible that the 1973 ruling could be overturned.
He called upon Republicans in the New York legislature to join Democrats in passing the Reproductive Health Act, which would codify Roe into state law.
“Come back and pass Roe v. Wade for New York. There are no excuses,” Cuomo stated. “And if you do not come back and vote, that is your answer. You are telling the women and men of this state you are anti-choice. … No one gets a pass. There is no amnesty. You are either with us, or you’re against us. And in the words of President Trump, if you are against a woman’s right to choose, ‘you’re fired!’”
View Cuomo’s speeches in full here and here.
As previously reported, while many argue that abortion is the right of a mother to do what she wants with “her body”—or the child in her womb—Scripture teaches that men and women are to glorify God with their bodies, and no longer live in autonomy unto themselves, but to give their all to Him.
2 Corinthians 5:15 reads, “He died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him which died for them and rose again.”
1 Corinthians 6:20 also states, “For ye are bought with a price: therefore, glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
Romans 6:13 and 19 instruct, “Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God. … [F]or as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity, even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.”
1 Thessalonians 4 3:-8 likewise teaches, “For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication—that every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honor, not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God. … For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness. He therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also given unto us His Holy Spirit.”

TRUMP RELEASES CORDIAL LETTER FROM KIM JONG UN OF NORTH KOREA

Trump Releases Letter from Kim Jong Un
TRUMP RELEASES CORDIAL LETTER FROM KIM JONG UN OF NORTH KOREA

North Korean leader calls summit the ‘start of a meaningful journey’

BY MIKAEL THALEN
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/trump-releases-letter-from-kim-jong-un/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
U.S. President Donald Trump released on Twitter Thursday a letter from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
“A very nice note from Chairman Kim of North Korea,” Trump said. “Great progress being made!”
In the letter, dated July 6, Kim thanks Trump for attempting to improve relations between Washington and Pyongyang.
“The significant first meeting with Your Excellency and the join statement that we signed together in Singapore 24 days ago was indeed the start of a meaningful journey,” the letter begins. “I deeply appreciate the energetic and extraordinary efforts made by Your Excellency Mr. President for the improvement of relations between the two countries and the faithful implementation of the joint statement.”
Kim also discusses the potential for future trust building as the two countries attempt to work towards the goals outlined at the summit in Singapore last month.
“I firmly believe that the strong will, sincere efforts and unique approach of myself and Your Excellency Mr. President aimed at opening up a new future between the DPRK and the U.S. will surely come to fruition,” Kim said. “Wishing that the invariable trust and confidence in Your Excellency Mr. President will be further strengthened in the future process of taking practical actions, I extend my conviction that the epochal progress in promoting the DPRK-U.S. relations will bring our next meeting forward.”
Trump’s release of the letter comes as the future between the U.S. and North Korea still remains uncertain.
Just this week the Trump administration asked the United Nations to reprimand China and Russia for allegedly defying sanctions by selling oil products to North Korea.
North Korea also accused the U.S. of “extremely troubling” behavior earlier this month after a U.S. delegation led by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo allegedly pushed for unilateral denuclearization during two days of talks in Pyongyang. Pompeo was also kept from meeting with Kim during the talks.
South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency also reported Thursday that North Korean officials failed to show up to a planned meeting with U.S. officials at the DMZ to discuss returning the remains of deceased U.S. soldiers from the Korean War.
While the Trump administration has pushed for North Korea to denuclearize up front, the Kim regime has been adamant in carrying out a phased process in which both sides make concessions.
And although Kim voluntarily ceased nuclear weapons testing and long-range missile launches, after declaring both no longer necessary, North Korea still remains unbound in terms of weapons production.
Commercial satellite imagery captured before and after the Singapore summit shows North Korea has continued to expand both the Yongbyon Nuclear Research Facility and a key missile production site.
U.S. intelligence assessments also claim Pyongyang is still buildingsupport equipment and launchers for ballistic missiles while nuclear weapons fuel production remains ongoing at multiple secret sites.
Trump remains optimistic that the summit will produce a lasting and peaceful outcome on the Korean Peninsula.
The president stated on Twitter last week that he has “confidence that Kim Jong Un will honor the contract we signed…”

THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH’S ROYALLY ANTI ISRAEL GENERAL CONVENTION

THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH’S ROYALLY 
ANTI ISRAEL GENERAL CONVENTION 
BY PROPHECY NEWS WATCH
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/episcopal-churchs-royally-anti-israel-general-convention/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The Episcopal Church under Presiding Bishop Michael Curry is in the midst of hosting a royally anti-Israel 79th General Convention in Austin, Texas.
 Centered on the theme from Bishop Curry’s royal wedding sermon on the #WayOfLove, the General Convention attendees are educating themselves on Israel using resources from a predominately anti-Israel perspective. They are also voting on over a dozen resolutions with language targeting Israel and using an expedited process to do so.
 Apparently, for the royal wedding bishop and the Episcopal Church, “love is the way” until it comes to loving Israel, the Jewish state.
 The Episcopal News Service (ENS) described the shift occurring in the Episcopal Church in their June 5, 2018 article titled, “General Convention to Consider New Approach to Israel-Palestine Issues Promoting Open Debate.” ENS’ David Paulsen reported that Presiding Bishop Michael Curry and House of Deputies President Rev. Gay Clark Jennings had formed an “Israel and Palestine Working Group” and accepted three of the group’s recommendations.
 The first recommendation encouraged “all members of the House of Bishops and House of Deputies … to review a resource list assembled by the working group.” Despite an official “diverse opinions and narratives” disclaimer, this list of resources provided a predominately anti-Israel perspective.
 While the resource list did include a few pro-Israel resources, including AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, the majority of resources listed — especially those first in the list — are well-known as adamantly anti-Israel.
 These included Friends of Sabeel North America, Kairos Palestine, Mitri Raheb, Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, and the Telos Group. Notably, the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement, Breaking the Silence, B’Tselem, If Not Now, J Street, and Jewish Voice for Peace were also listed resources.
The second recommendation made Israeli-Palestinian issues a “special order of business,” to “allow hearings and discussions to take place early in [the] General Convention and ensure debate isn’t sidelined by procedural barriers.” The final recommendation designated the House of Deputies as the first legislative body to take “initial action for each resolution pertaining to Israel and Palestine [sic].”
 Bishop Curry praised the “Israel and Palestine Working Group” by stating: “I am so grateful to the task force for their work. Their work will make it possible for the convention to have a thoughtful, prayerful discussion and consideration of the humanitarian concerns in Israel Palestine [sic]. In so doing may we pray and work for the peace of Jerusalem.”
 Using peacemaking talk while targeting Israel is nothing new for Bishop Curry. After all, in 2016 he attended a conference officially titled “Pursuing Peace and Strengthening Presence: The Atlanta Summit of Churches in the USA and the Holy Land,” which was co-hosted by the Palestinian Authority and former President Jimmy Carter. On behalf of the Episcopal Church, Curry signed the anti-Israel blueprint known as the Atlanta Summit document.
 Point-by-point, Bishop Curry is now leading the Episcopal Church in their implementation of the Atlanta Summit document’s agenda, which includes anti-Israel church resolutions and support for BDS. Friday’s joint hearing on the proposed anti-Israel resolutions demonstrated the depth of anti-Israel sentiment present at the General Convention.
 Speaking at the hearing, Katy Dickinson, a church deputy from California, described the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a family fight with “two sides.” The Episcopal News Service (ENS) quoted her: “‘It’s mostly Israel’s problem,’ she said, but Hamas also is firing missiles and needs to be part of the solution.”
 Tarek Abuata also spoke at the hearing. Having previously worked for the Palestinian Authority’s Negotiations Support Unit, he is currently the executive director of Friends of Sabeel North America (FOSNA), an organization well-known for its anti-Israel animus.
 With typical FOSNA rhetoric, Abuata responded to Dickinson’s description of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as simply a family fight: “It is not a fight. It is not a family fight when my father has been abusing my mother and raping her for 70 years.”
 David Paulsen of ENS reported that those testifying about “15 total resolutions on issues related to Middle East peace … spoke of Palestinians’ homes being bulldozed, of Palestinian children being ripped from their families and jailed, of the ‘racist extremism’ that had turned Palestinians into second-class citizens in their own homeland.
 Their testimony described the Palestinian territories, particularly Gaza, as a ‘nightmare,’ ‘concentration camp,’ ‘prison camp’; and the equivalent of the Jim Crow era of segregation in the United States or the former system of apartheid in South Africa.”
 ENS also reported, “Several pro-Palestinian organizations mobilized individual representatives and groups of people to testify, helping to tilt the balance of views in favor of approving resolutions calling for a tougher stance against Israel and greater promotion of peace. A small but forceful minority spoke in defense of Israel or to assert that this decades-old conflict defies easy assignment of blame.”
 While Bishop Curry has cited “Jesus of Nazareth who said blessed are the peacemakers,” he has led the Episcopal Church to streamline the process for passing resolutions that are anything but peaceful.
 Given Bishop Curry’s support for a statement that provided cover for Hamas and another that sought to implement a Palestinian Authority strategic agenda, the Episcopal Church he leads seems on track to pass resolutions that will do nothing to advance genuine peace in the Middle East or significantly improve the lives of Israelis and Palestinians.
 These controversial resolutions under consideration instead threaten to fracture and further divide the Episcopal Church — alienating those genuinely seeking peace in the Middle East and the Way of Love.
 Originally published at Algemeiner.com – reposted with permission.
Publisher’s comments: Please note the following scriptures that tell of a time when Israel will be totally surrounded by her enemies and they will descend on her to destroy her.
 Zec 12:1-4  The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
2  Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.
3  And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.
4  In that day, saith the LORD, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness.
“Please note in v- 3 that it says, “though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.”  It doesn’t say that all the people will, but “though”, like, “if” they are. Then God will destroy those nations. But according to Mt 25:31-46 there will be a judgment of nations when the Lord Jesus returns to set up His Kingdom.  There will be Goat nations and Sheep nations.  The sheep nations will be those who give Israel refuge and comfort during the tribulation period.  Those nations will be permitted to go into the Kingdom (1,000 year reign of Christ).  Unless America refuses to follow wicked religious leaders like these Episcopalians and others in the main line denominations that are taking the same position along with the Democrats, the U.S. will be numbered with the goat nations.  Thank God for Pres. Trump and the Republicans who are standing with Israel at this time with the encouragement of most of the Evangelical and fundamentalist preachers.  The only hope for America is to continue to stand by Israel.  Gen.12:3.)”

60 MILLION ABORTIONS LATER: A.F. BRANCO’S CARTOON ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS CLAIMING KAVANAUGH CONFIRMATION TO SUPREME COURT WILL RESULT IN THE DEATH OF MILLIONS

Kavanaugh Pick Panic

Ghoulies: Parade of the Aborticrats ~ WARNING Really F’d Up Liberal 
VIDEO Stunt

BY MICHELLE MALKIN
SEE:https://www.ammoland.com/2018/07/ghoulies-parade-of-the-aborticrats/#axzz5L9Qs8eR8republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- I thought we had seen it all from radical feminists — and what we’ve seen is way, way more than anyone other than a gynecologist needs to see.
Six years ago, Code Pink zealots traipsed across the fruited plain in giant female reproductive organ costumes demanding “respect” for women’s bodies and women’s abortion rights. They called themselves “dancing vaginas.”
Last January, militant femmes converged on the National Mall donning pink pussy hats, twirling nipple umbrellas, chanting, “Build a uterine wall!” and waving defiant posters that boasted “I DON’T REGRET MY ABORTION.”
Last fall, actress Martha Plimpton (of “Goonies” fame long, long ago) bragged publicly that her first and “best” abortion took place at a Seattle Planned Parenthood. Plimpton promotes a movement to #ShoutYourAbortion. Adoring fans cheered and laughed as she assured them it was “heads and tails above the rest” of her multiple abortions. “If I could Yelp review it,” she cracked, “I totally would.”

Goodbye, “Goonies.” Hello, ghoulies.

Nothing to date, though, can top the Independence Day holiday display of grotesqueries committed in the name of “choice.” On the day we should unite as a nation to celebrate life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, prominent Aborticrats and their Hollywood court jesters were throwing a parade — literally — over the mass slaughter of the unborn.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer tweeted: “Today, I am celebrating the FREEDOM of women to make their own health care decisions, as established by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade.”
Schumer has lied about Planned Parenthood providing “mammograms, maternity care, cancer screenings & more.” As pro-life Live Action’s Lila Rose reported, “The reality is, Planned Parenthood does zero mammograms, performs less than two percent of women’s cancer screenings in the U.S., offers virtually no prenatal care, yet does over a third of the nation’s abortions — 887 abortions every day.” One of NARAL and Planned Parenthood’s most ardent champions, Schumer high-fived colleagues in January after spearheading efforts to kill a bill banning late-term abortions past 20 weeks.
Three bloody cheers for butchery!
Riding the same wicked wavelength, “comedian” Michelle Wolf starred in a patriotic holiday special last week on Netflix to lead “The Break’s” 10th Annual Salute to Abortion.
“Some people say abortion is ‘killing a baby.’ It’s not. It’s stopping a baby from happening,” she jibed. “It’s like ‘Back to the Future’ and abortion is the DeLorean. Everyone loves DeLoreans.”
Accompanied by a marching band, the Netflix star rallied: “Women, don’t forget: You have the power to give life, and men will try to control that. Don’t let them!” Tossing red, white and blue confetti, she shrieked:
“God bless abortions, and God bless America!”
The shock is not that this desperately thirsty clown can cackle callously about killing for cheap laughs. The real outrage is that she would be nowhere without the seal of approval of the White House Correspondents’ Association, which gave her a coveted platform just a few months ago to jape:
“Mike Pence is also very anti-choice. He thinks abortion is murder, which, first of all, don’t knock it till you try it! And when you do try it, really knock it. You know, you gotta get that baby out of there.”
Where are the demands for the Beltway press corps that giggled through that macabre monologue to disavow the She-Wolf?
Where are the compassionate liberals speaking up for women and men suffering from abortion regret or grisly botched procedures? What about the countless minority victims of predators posing as “reproductive health providers”?
Who will memorialize the unborn babies and moms who suffered at the hands of serial abortionist killer Kermit Gosnell? Who will shout the name of Tonya Reaves, a black female patient at Planned Parenthood’s Loop Health Center in Chicago, who died after the staff performed a careless abortion on her and neglected her for more than five hours while she bled to death?
The same hysterical voices shrieking, “Where have all the children gone?” last week at the border have nothing to say about the nearly 60 million lives snuffed out on U.S. soil since Roe v. Wade.
Silence is complicity.
Silence equals death.

Michelle MalkinMichelle Malkin

About: Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin is host of “Michelle Malkin Investigates” on CRTV.com. As well as the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” & “Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild“. Her email address is writemalkin@gmail.com.


ANTHONY KENNEDY: AMERICA’S FIRST “GAY JUSTICE”

ANTHONY KENNEDY: AMERICA’S FIRST 
“GAY JUSTICE” 
BY DAVID CLOUD

(Friday Church News Notes, July 13, 2018, www.wayoflife.org, fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) – republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The following is excerpted from “The First Gay Justice,” CBNNews, Jun. 28, 2018: “Washington is abuzz over the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. While some have called him a moderate voice on the bench, his record shows he’s actually been a primary force for progressives, giving liberals numerous wins on the social issues that have discouraged many American Christians for decades. Kennedy was actually not Ronald Reagan’s first choice for the Supreme Court—he was his third. But Kennedy became a justice on the highest court in the land after the Senate rejected Judge Robert Bork—Reagan’s first choice—and after his second choice, Judge Douglas Ginsburg, withdrew his name in the wake of criticism over his personal and ethical conduct. But Reagan likely never anticipated the crucial tie-breaker role that Kennedy would come to fill on the court, or the way he would propel gay rights and abortion rights forward. Kennedy, 81, spent his last decade on the court as the key swing vote on an ideologically split court after Sandra Day O’Connor retired in 2006. He also went on to author the Supreme Court’s most significant gay rights cases including the biggest—2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges—which decreed that same-sex couples can marry anywhere in the United States. Kennedy wrote three other majority opinions favoring LGBT rights. … In 2003, he led the court in striking down state bans on gay sex; and in 2013, he wrote that legally married gay couples must receive the same federal benefits as other married couples. Michael Dorf, a Cornell University law professor, declared in 2013, ‘Kennedy has now firmly secured his place in history as the first gay justice.’ Kennedy also made a significant decision to uphold the country’s landmark abortion ruling, Roe v. Wade. In 1992, he was part of a majority that upheld Roe which declares a constitutional right to abortion. He initially was part of a group of justices that wanted to effectively overrule Roe. He also switched sides in 1992 to end up supporting a ban on prayer in public schools. … Kennedy’s retirement paves the way for the president to choose his second Supreme Court justice and shape the court for years to come. It’s a moment that both conservatives and liberals can agree upon with respect to its significance.”

MUSLIM PARTY LEADER TELLS DUTCH TO LEAVE THEIR OWN COUNTRY IF THEY DON’T LIKE DIVERSITY

Tunahan Kuzu 
Dutch Citizens Told To Submit To Islam 
Or Leave Country
Dutch citizens are being pressured to accepted massive Muslim immigration or else.
MUSLIM PARTY LEADER TELLS DUTCH TO LEAVE THEIR OWN COUNTRY IF THEY DON’T LIKE DIVERSITY
“They should get lost!”
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://www.prisonplanet.com/muslim-party-leader-tells-dutch-to-leave-their-own-country-if-they-dont-like-diversity.htmlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The leader of the Muslim DENK party in the Netherlands has caused controversy by telling Dutch citizens to leave their own country if they don’t like the increasing number of Muslim migrants populating Dutch cities.
“If they don’t like a changing Netherlands in which people with different cultures live… like in the city of Zaandam or the neighborhood of Poelenburg, they should get lost,” Tunahan Kuzu said during an interview.
Anti-mass immigration politician Geert Wilders responded to Kuzu by telling him to go home to Turkey.
In the 2017 Dutch election, Kuzu’s party, which refuses to recognize the Armenian genocide, attracted 200,000 votes, enabling it to gain three seats in parliament.
What Kuzu is specifically referring to when he speaks of “a changing Netherlands” remains unclear.
Maybe he’s referring to how every year a thousand underage Dutch girls are trafficked into sex slavery by pimps with migrant backgrounds.
Maybe he’s referring to school children being indoctrinated into the new diversity-friendly environment by being made to pray in mosques.
It’s great that these kids are learning about other cultures while they visit the Middle East.

Oh wait, this is Holland.

Maybe he’s referring to graffiti scrawled on the wall of a primary school that read, “Cancer Wilders is gonna die,” a reference to the anti-immigration politician, “attack Jews,” “kill all Jews,” “Jews gonna die,” or the term “ISIS”.
Graffiti on a primary school in the Netherlands. This is the cultural enrichment Europe has invited in.
Maybe he’s referring to the fact that violent homophobic attacks on gay people in Holland by Muslim migrant youths are increasing.
Maybe he’s referring to the fantastic economic benefits that Muslim migrants bring to the Netherlands, like the 85% of “refugees” who remain unemployed and on welfare since they arrived in the country in 2014.
Maybe he’s referring to Holland’s Turkish population, who occasionally stage riots in support of Islamist dictator Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
In any case, the message is clear, get on board with the new way of doing things, or get out of the country.
If these rioting Erdogan-supporting Islamists are so patriotic about Turkey, why did they all move to the Netherlands? 🤔
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: 
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 11:54 am

THE RISE OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION IN THE WEST

THE RISE OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION 
IN THE WEST 
ISLAMIC PRACTICE DONE BY SHAMING GIRLS OF ALL AGES 
REPORT BY BRITTANY PETTIBONE
My Political Website: http://brittany-pettibone.com
Subscribe to my Newsletter:
http://eepurl.com/ddT54P

Support my new ‘Patreon’ via my Website: https://brittany-pettibone.com/patreo…
Tip via PayPal:
https://www.paypal.me/BrittanyPettibone

SEND MAIL:

PO Box 278
Post Falls, IDAHO, 83877

FOLLOW:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BrittPettibone
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/brittany.a.p…
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/brittpettib…
Author Website:
http://tspettibone.com

GESTAPO POLICE STATE NJ ATTEMPT TO CONFISCATE RESIDENT’S GUNS WITHOUT A WARRANT OR JUSTIFIABLE/PROBABLE CAUSE~ONLY BASED ON SNITCHERS AS IN NAZI GERMANY

Gun Confiscation Squads
NAZI GERMANY REVISITED IN NEW JERSEY
“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. “
GESTAPO POLICE STATE NJ ATTEMPT TO CONFISCATE RESIDENT’S GUNS WITHOUT A WARRANT OR JUSTIFIABLE/PROBABLE CAUSE~ONLY BASED ON SNITCHERS 
AS IN NAZI GERMANY
SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CONVERSATION 
ABOUT POOR SCHOOL SECURITY 
OVERHEARD & REPORTED
FATHER & MOTHER BULLIED & INTIMIDATED BY POLICE
“SWAT TEAM” AT 10 P.M.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Millstone Township, New Jersey – -(Ammoland.com)- An Army veteran father says State Police tried to confiscate his firearms without a court order or warrant just because his son was overheard discussing school shooting news with a classmate.
Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.'s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.
The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.
The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.
After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.
“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.
Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there's no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”
The troopers searched his son's room and found nothing, Cottrell said.
“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn't have access to them and it's on neutral ground and everything and everybody's happy.”
Major Brian Polite, a spokesperson for the New Jersey State Police, stated that the troopers that conducted the investigation determined there was no need for the weapons to be seized. He also said he could not comment on whether the incident was related to the new gun laws.
“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don't know their rights.  ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student's home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.
Cottrell said if the school had contacted him and talked about what had happened instead of going to the police first, “it would have been worked out right then and there.” He said he also would have understood if he'd gotten a call from the State Police to learn more, instead of the late night visit to his home.
______________________________________________________________________
New Jersey Gun ‘Appeasement’ Still Results in 
Citizen Disarmament
BY DAVID CODREA
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:


If a confiscation order had gone out, how many of these New Jersey LEOs do you think would refuse to carry them out? (New Jersey State Police/Facebook profile photo)

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- “To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn't have access to them and it's on neutral ground and everything and everybody's happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)
“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there's no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”
Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.
“[T]he troopers conducted an investigation and determined there was no need for the weapons to be seized,” New Jersey State Police spokesman Major Brian Polite stated. It sounds like Cottrell moved the guns offsite as a preemptive protective measure to preclude an escalation should the cops change their minds. But I doubt “everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell can’t be happy, not really. And neither is the State of New Jersey, which based on its actions wants everybody’s guns – at least those in private hands. They've made it clear they’ll keep moving toward that goal, one Intolerable Act infringement at a time.

Leonard Cottrell Jr., 40, of Millstone, NJ. (Courtesy of Leonard Cottrell) Leonard Cottrell Jr., 40, of Millstone, NJ. (Courtesy of Leonard Cottrell)

This is the reason I support Oath Keepers. We are fast approaching a time where, depending on the state you live in, confiscation orders are increasingly likely. While many in “law enforcement” will no doubt obey such orders, it is to our advantage to encourage those who will not, and to get others thinking about the oath they took when they became sworn officers, and what that really requires of them.
Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.
That’s an analogy I wish more of our “gun rights leaders” in state and national groups would act like they understand.
About David Codrea:David Codrea
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.
In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

JOHN LOVELL, CHRISTIAN, VETERAN, MISSIONARY, FIREARMS TRAINER ON GOD & GUNFIGHTING

JOHN LOVELL-GOD & GUNFIGHTING
For everyone who risks their lives in defense of others, be it a soldier, cop, contractor, fireman, or just a brave citizen, all of us must wrestle with life’s most difficult questions. How are we to be able to stare into the face of death and not be overcome with fear? What happens to someone when they die? What is worth dying for? Is it right to kill? Is there a God, and if so, what does that God want from us? Failure to confront these questions ahead of time can be disastrous because we may lack the mindset required to prevail.

Warrior Poet APPAREL – https://warriorpoetsociety.us/store/

Recommended Gear – https://www.amazon.com/shop/johnlovel…

SUPPORT the Channel – http://patreon.com/warriorpoetsociety

TRAIN with John Lovell – http://warriorpoetsociety.us

https://www.FULL30.com/channels/warri…
http://INSTAGRAM.com/warriorpoetsociety
http://FACEBOOK.com/warriorpoetsociety
http://SNAPCHAT.com/add/thewarpoet
http://TWITTER.com/johnlovell275

YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
PART 1 OF 2
PART 2 OF 2
John Lovell-Self Defense and ‘Turning the Other Cheek’
Tactics Instructor John Lovell talks about ‘Self Defense and “Turning the Other Cheek”‘. This video may be about upsetting, but it should at least get us thinking. There is a time for peace and a time for war. A time to fight, and a time to turn the other cheek. This video is from a Christian viewpoint, let the viewer beware.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP RIPS APART NATO SECRETARY STOLTENBERG ON GERMANY/RUSSIA OIL & GAS PIPELINES AT PRESS CONFERENCE

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP RIPS APART 
NATO SECRETARY STOLTENBERG 
ON GERMANY/RUSSIA OIL & GAS PIPELINES 
AT PRESS CONFERENCE
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
MEMBER COUNTRIES “DELINQUENT” ON PAYMENTS TO NATO; ARREARS GO UNPAID
“UNFAIR TO AMERICAN TAXPAYERS”

Trump And Farage Call Out NATO Members For “Freeloading Off American Tax Payers”

The UK and US pays close to half of all NATO costs for defense even though the EU wants to build it’s own army. Only 6 of 29 members are paying 2% of GDP for defense.

President Trump Holds a Press Conference


TRUMP ISSUES FULL PARDONS TO OREGON RANCHERS CONTROVERSIALLY CHARGED UNDER ANTI-TERROR LAW

GRANTS OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY
TRUMP ISSUES FULL PARDONS TO OREGON RANCHERS CONTROVERSIALLY CHARGED UNDER ANTI-TERROR LAW

Trump has so far issued five pardons

BY BEN WARREN
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/trump-issues-full-pardons-to-oregon-ranchers-forced-back-into-prison-under-anti-terror-law/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Trump pardoned the two ranchers whose re-incarceration sparked the 2016 armed takeover of an Oregon national wildlife refuge.
Dwight and Steven Hammond’s pardon was overdue and unjust according to the White House’s press secretary, Sara Sanders.
“The Hammonds are devoted family men, respected contributors to their local community, and have widespread support from their neighbors, local law enforcement, and farmers and ranchers across the West,” said Sanders. “Justice is overdue for Dwight and Steven Hammond, both of whom are entirely deserving of these Grants of Executive Clemency.”
The two Hammond brothers were convicted of arson on federal land in 2012 after conducting a controlled burn and served less time than demanded by a 1996 anti-terrorism law.
Later, in 2015, a judge resentenced the Hammond brothers to serve the mandatory minimum sentence of five years which sparked an armed protest in Oregon’s Malheur National Wildlife Refuge from Jan 2. to Feb. 11, 2016.
The protest was organized by Ammon Bundy and a dozen others who said the Hammond brothers were victims of federal overreach.
A White House official statement did not refer to the fire as arson, but rather a fire that leaked to a small portion of neighboring land.
“The Hammonds are multi-generation cattle ranchers in Oregon imprisoned in connection with a fire that leaked onto a small portion of neighboring public grazing land,” said White House. “The evidence at trial regarding the Hammonds’ responsibility for the fire was conflicting, and the jury acquitted them on most of the charges.”
Furthermore, an official from an agriculture advocacy group celebrated the pardon and blasted the decision to force the brothers to return to prison.
“I’ve had great attorneys tell me this is the most malicious prosecution they’ve ever seen,” said the official. “The travesty is what they were tried under. Not whether they started a fire.”
The president has five pardons under his administration that include documentary filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza and former Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio.
DAVID KNIGHT OF INFOWARS REPORTS:
ALEX JONES OF INFOWARS REPORTS:
1 538 539 540 541 542 795