CHRISTINE FORD RAISES OVER $750,000 THROUGH GOFUNDME CAMPAIGNS

CHRISTINE FORD RAISES OVER $750,000 THROUGH GOFUNDME CAMPAIGNS

As of the early morning of September 28th, the “Help Christine Blasey Ford” campaign total stood at $473,622 of a $150,000 goal

BY Chris Menahan | Information Liberation
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/christine-ford-raises-over-750000-through-gofundme-campaigns/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Judge Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford has raised over $750,000 through multiple GoFundMe campaigns to cover “expenses” related to her testimony.
As of the early morning of September 28th, the “Help Christine Blasey Ford” campaign total stood at $473,622 of a $150,000 goal.
The “Cover Dr. Blasey’s security costs” campaign has raised $209,987 of a $175,000 goal.
A host of other similar campaigns for Ford raised around another $100,000.
Ford did manage to work a plug in for her GoFundMe campaigns during her testimony:

“Her lawyers have paid for her polygraph … as is routine,” Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers tell prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who is asking questions for GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Hopefully, she can use the funds to buy much-needed coffee!

VIDEO: Christine Blasey Ford gets her request for coffee personally delivered to her by @CoryBooker while she sat at the witness table in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

GANG RAPE ACCUSER SHOOK DOWN NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO.; LAWYER WAS DEBRA KATZ, PART OF LEGAL TEAM WHICH CHRISTINE B. FORD IS USING “PRO BONO” & VICE CHAIRWOMAN OF SOROS FUNDED “POGO”

GANG RAPE ACCUSER SHOOK DOWN 
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO.; 
LAWYER WAS DEBRA KATZ
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30190-gang-rape-accuser-shook-down-new-york-life-lawyer-was-debra-katz?vsmaid=1265&vcid=3987republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Now that news reports have uncovered some unwelcome details about Julie Swetnick, the woman who claims U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is a gang rapist, it appears her attorney, Michael Avenatti, doesn’t have the credible witness he promised.
Swetnick is a veteran tax dodger, and invited a restraining order from a man and his family because she harassed them.
But the government and an old boyfriend aren’t the only victims of the vengeful woman, and it’s more than suspicious who her attorney in that case was.
Lawsuit
According to the Wall Street Journal, Swetnick sued New York Life Insurance for — wouldn’t you know it — discrimination.
“Roughly a decade ago,” WSJ reported, “Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter.”
The company settled with Swetnick.
Swetnick worked for the insurance behemoth for less than two years, the newspaper reported, and does not include the position on her résumé.
The New American detailed Swetnick’s other problems earlier today.
Apparently, she has trouble filing her taxes: “In 2015, the state of Maryland filed an interstate lien against her property in the District,” the Washington Post reported, including more than “$32,000 in unpaid taxes from 2008, and another $27,000 in interest on the seven-year-old debt.”
The bill was settled, but in 2016 the feds nailed her on $40,000 unpaid taxes in 2014, placing a lien on the property in 2017.
Beyond that, a former boyfriend hit Swetnick with a restraining order. She had threatened his wife and family.
“I know a lot about her,” the man said. “She’s not credible at all. Not at all.”
That’s not what Avenatti told the world when he leveled the outrageous charge a few days ago. Of course, he has something of a credibility problem himself.
The anti-Trump lawyer, who some say plans to run for president, faces financial troubles similar to his client’s. A bankruptcy judge has blocked him from spending fees of $10 million from 54 cases, one of which is that of his premier client, Stormy Daniels, the porn queen.
Debra Katz, Resistance Member
But back to Swetnick’s shakedown of New York Life. Her attorney? Debra Katz, who represents Christine Blasey Ford, Kavanaugh’s first accuser.
Katz, as is well known by now, toils for a group funded by the subversive political philanthropist, George Soros. As Front Page Magazine reported, she is the vice-chairman of POGO, the Project on Government Oversight, a leftist outfit that supposedly tracks government waste and abuse.
Representing POGO, she signed a letter asking the Judiciary Committee to demand the release of records relating to Kavanaugh. As interesting as the Soros connection is, it’s not as disturbing as Katz’s behind-the-scene skullduggery in getting a reporter for the NBC affiliate in Washington, D.C. pulled from a story.
Fox reporter Doug McKelway revealed on Twitter yesterday his belief that the radical lawyer had him pulled from a story.
Tweeted McKelway, “My Debra Katz story. In the mid 1990s, I was anchoring for NBC4 in DC. She sent a fax to us alerting us to a racial discrimination suit she was filing against Bank of America. It was late Friday afternoon. I read the suit. It was incredibly weak, smelled of a shakedown attempt.”
What happened next, as McKelway explained in three more tweets, proved it:
Went to her office with camera. Got miked up. I told her it smelled of a shakedown attempt, and I was familiar with the technique of late Friday accusation, too late for deep pocketed organization to respond with its multi-layered PR office in some distant city. The story would …
Stew over the weekend, prolly result in a settlement, sparing her the hard work of trial preparation. She then …
Ripped the mike off, called my lefty news director, who then called me, and pulled me off the story. It’s riveted in my memory. Always thought she was sleazy, and I guess my news director was, too.
Katz is a #MeToo legal adviser, and most importantly, considers herself a member of the anti-Trump Resistance, as video of her bellyaching about the nomination of Jeff Sessions to be attorney general well showed: “We are going to fight back. We are going to resist. We will not be silenced.”
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

KAVANAUGH, GRAHAM EXPOSE DEMOCRATS: IT WAS A HIT JOB~MISSING: IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF TRAUMA OF ALLEGED “RAPE” MEMORIES NOT BURNED INTO FORD’S “HIPPOCAMPUS” AREA OF HER BRAIN

UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM OF ATTEMPTED RAPE
KAVANAUGH, GRAHAM EXPOSE DEMOCRATS: 
IT WAS A HIT JOB 
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30193-kavanaugh-graham-expose-democrats-it-was-a-hit-job?vsmaid=1265&vcid=3987republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
When psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, she came with one purpose: to repeat her unsubstantiated claim of attempted rape.
She cried, and the Democrats “believed.” They tossed softball questions. They attacked not one of the several disputable claims in her story.
When the accused, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, took the same seat, he came to clear his name.
He cried, too. But the Democrats didn’t believe. They forced him through a gauntlet of nasty, insulting, derogatory, imperious, irrelevant, and embarrassing questions of secret codes, drinking, and flatulence.
It took South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, a man thought by some to have the backbone of a jellyfish, to call the hearing what it was: a farcical charade to gain power.
Ford Let Off the Hook
Republicans did not question the disheveled Ford after her lachrymose, evidence-free statement that fingered the judge. Committee Chairman Charles Grassley turned that job over to a prosecutor from Maricopa County, Arizona, Rachel Mitchell. She asked matter-of-fact questions of Ford that did not challenge her claim, which needs no repetition here.
The prosecutor did prove that Ford lied about her fear of flying. She couldn’t fly to D.C., she had said, because Kavanaugh’s attack left a debilitating claustrophobia that requires having an escape route from a closed space. She can’t escape a jet, and thus could not fly in for the hearing. But she does fly to Washington, D.C., to see family once a year, and can oft be found flying the friendly skies for academic junkets and vacations all across the planet, including to the South Pacific.
Ford pulled out her Ph.D., offering a science lesson. She can’t be mistaken because the putative laughter of Kavanaugh and his friend, Mike Judge, are “indelible in the hippocampus,” where the brain stores long-term memories. But the trauma did not burn other memories into her hippocampus, such as the location of the horror house, or details about what had to have been an awful ride home, such as who drove.
The prosecutor did what she was hired to do: Protect all the awful GOP white men from charges of bullying a “survivor.”
From the Democrats came one nauseating “I-believe-you” question after another. When Ford rose to leave their toasty embrace, nothing had changed.
She offered no evidence.
Memory gaps persisted.
Contradictions remained.
But Democrats believed.
Kavanaugh Unloads
Having suffered one smear after another in two weeks, Kavanaugh delivered an angry, blistering statement. “When I did at least O.K. enough at the hearings that it looks like I might actually get confirmed, a new tactic was needed,” he said. “Some of you were lying in wait and had it ready.”
It was a hit job, he said:
And then, and then, as no doubt was expected, if not planned, came a long series of false last-minute smears…. Crazy stuff. Gangs, illegitimate children, fights on boats in Rhode Island…. This has destroyed my family and my good name….
This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups….
I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process. You have tried hard. You’ve given it your all. No one can question your efforts. Your coordinated and well-funded efforts to destroy my good name and destroy my family will not drag me out. The vile threats of violence against my family will not drive me out. You may defeat me in the final vote, but you’ll never get me to quit. Never.
I’m here today to tell the truth. I’ve never sexually assaulted anyone. Not in high school, not in college, not ever.
Kavanaugh was on the verge of tears through much of his statement. Witnesses refute Ford’s claim, as does the only extant evidence on paper. His 1982 calendar shows not only what he did every night but also that he was away every weekend.
Republicans let the prosecutor do their work for them again, while the Democrats asked futile questions about secret codes in yearbooks, drinking, flatulence, and why the nominee won’t just ask the president to stop his nomination until the FBI can “investigate.”
Graham’s Fury
Senator Lindsey Graham’s explosion summed up the Democrats’ effort: “If you wanted an FBI investigation you could have come to us. What you want to do is destroy this guy’s life, hold this seat open, and hope you win in 2020. You’ve said that, not me.”
“You’ve got nothing to apologize for,” he said, pointing at Kavanaugh. “When you see [Justices Sonia and Elena] Sotomayor and Kagan, tell them that Lindsey said hello ’cause I voted for them, I would never do to them what you’ve done to this guy. This is the most unethical sham since I’ve been in politics and if you really wanted to know the truth, you certainly wouldn’t have done what you did to this guy.”
“Boy y’all want power, God I hope you never get it.”
_______________________________________________________________

CHRISTINE B. FORD’S LETTER TO SENATOR FEINSTEIN IS SUSPECT, NOT WRITTEN BY FORD HERSELF

SEE ALSO:
https://www.infowars.com/report-14-glaring-errors-highlighted-in-fords-letter-to-feinstein/
EXCERPTS:

A special Mike Adam’s report on the supposed evidence against Brett Kavanaugh.

DEMOCRAT SENATORS MANIPULATE MENTALLY UNSTABLE PROFESSOR TO CRUCIFY, MALIGN JUDGE KAVANAUGH WITH SLANDEROUS CHARGES OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, RAPE; DEMAND FBI INVESTIGATION TO STALL/DELAY/PREVENT NOMINATION TO SUPREME COURT


DEMOCRAT SENATORS MANIPULATE MENTALLY UNSTABLE PROFESSOR TO CRUCIFY, MALIGN JUDGE KAVANAUGH WITH SLANDEROUS CHARGES OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, RAPE; DEMAND FBI INVESTIGATION TO STALL/DELAY/PREVENT NOMINATION TO SUPREME COURT
UNCALCULABLE EVIL REPERCUSSIONS FOR UNITED STATES FORESEEN BY REPUBLICANS
Christine Blasey Ford’s opening statement 

Brett Kavanaugh Opening Statement: This is a ‘National Disgrace’ 9/27/18

Kavanaugh: This is a political hit job, Dems are destroying my family & reputation
President Trump says he stands completely by his Supreme Court nominee, following Thursday’s hearing with Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. In a tweet Thursday, the president said Judge Kavanaugh showed America why he was nominated and described his testimony as powerful, honest, and riveting. One America’s Luke Glaze recaps the testimony of Kavanaugh and his accuser.

“My Name Has Been Permanently Destroyed” Brett Kavanaugh Gets Fired 

Up During Opening Statement

Senator Graham EXPLODES at Durbin Kavanaugh Senate Hearing of Dr. Ford Accusation in

 Testimony

Senator Lindsey Graham Graham UNLOADS on Democratic Senator Dick Durbin for Going after Judge Brett Kavanaugh at Senate Hearing of Accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Accusation for Supreme Court
Lindsey Graham SLAMS Democrats Unethical Sham At Kavanaugh Hearing 9/27/18
Lindsey Graham RIPS Unethical Sham At Kavanaugh Hearing 9/27/18. A livid Sen. Graham Lindsey (R-SC) disregarded the Republicans’ attorney to speak himself, shouting that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has “nothing to apologize for” in the “most unethical sham since I’ve been in politics.” “This is hell!” he yelled, saying that the Democrats are comparing Kavanaugh to BC.
“You’re supposed to be BC when you’re a junior and senior in high school, and all of a sudden you got over it,” Graham asked with incredulity. “It’s been my understanding that if you ug women and them for two years in high school, you probably don’t stop.”
He went on to attest for Kavanaugh’s integrity, calling him the “nicest person.”
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-SC): Since I’ve been in politics and if you really wanted to know the truth, you sure as hell wouldn’t have done what you’ve done to this guy. Are you a ?
BRETT KAVANAUGH: No.
GRAHAM: I cannot imagine what you and your family have gone through. Boy, you all want power. God, I hope you never get it. I hope the American people can see through this sham.
That you knew about it and you held it. You had no intention of protecting Dr. Ford. none. She’s as much of a victim as you are.
God, I hate to say it because these have been my friends, but let me tell you when it comes to this, you’re looking for a fair process, you came to the town at the wrong time, my friend…
This is going to destroy the ability of good people to come forward because of this cp. Your high school yearbook. You have interacted with professional women all your life, not one accusation. You’re supposed to be BC when you’re a junior and senior in high school. And all of a sudden you got over it. It’s been my understanding that if you drug women and rape them for two years in high school, you probably don’t stop.
Here’s my understanding. If you lived a good life, people would recognize it like the American Bar Association has the gold standard.
‘His integrity is absolutely unquestioned. He is very circumspect in his personal conduct, harbors no biases or prejudices. He’s entirely ethical. He’s a really decent person. He is warm, friendly, unassuming. He’s the nicest person.’

Lindsey Graham HEATED Press Conference After Dr Christine Ford Testifies 9/27/18

Lindsey Graham Emotional Speech: I Am Going To Vote Yes For Kavanaugh 9/28/18
As the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation process continued today, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) made it clear he was still angry about the whole thing. He started by saying, “I know I’m a single white male from South Carolina and I’m told I should shut up, but I will not shut up, if that’s okay.” Graham alluded to his past criticisms of President Donald Trump before trying to work with him in the past year, telling Trump he did a “good job” on the Supreme Court. Graham said the reason Kavanaugh is different from Neil Gorsuch because “Gorsuch is an even swap for Scalia, but this is high stakes stuff. Right? This is the seat where the guy in the middle is at risk.”
He said elections have consequences but defended the decision to hold up Merrick Garland. Graham said every victim of needs to be heard before talking about Kavanaugh’s testimony yesterday:
“I’ve never heard a more compelling defense of one’s honor and integrity than I did from Brett Kavanaugh. He looked me in the eye, everybody in the eye, and he was mad and he should have been mad. He could tell you where he was at and what he was doing during high school in a way that just blew me away. Brett Kavanaugh and women. If you’re a when you’re a sophomore and junior in high school, you don’t let it go. Every woman who actually knows Brett Kavanaugh has come forward to say he is not that kind of guy. He has been at the highest level of public service under tremendous scrutiny, six FBI investigations and we missed the sophomore junior . We didn’t miss it. It’s a bunch of garbage.”
As for Christine Blasey Ford‘s allegations, Graham said, “I feel sorry for her and I do believe something happened to her and I don’t know when and where, but I don’t believe it was Brett Kavanaugh.”
“I feel really bad that she wanted to remain anonymous and could not,” he continued. “The one thing I know for sure is that Dianne Feinstein would not do this and did not do this. But I know for sure somebody did. It wasn’t chatter from a friend. Three groups had this letter that was requested to be anonymous. Dianne Feinstein and her staff, the congresswoman from California and her staff, and the lawyers. Somebody betrayed her trust and if you can’t figure out why, you shouldn’t be driving. To delay this hearing, to send a motion to the destruction of this man to keep this seat open past the election.”
South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham says he will speak despite people thinking a “single, white male” such as himself should “shut up.”
Graham was extremely emotional at one point during the hearing yesterday, accusing his Democratic colleagues of making this a purely political issue. At a much more measured register, he is now explaining why Democrats holding up Kavanaugh’s nomination is different from the Republicans holding up Merrick Garland’s nomination under Barack Obama. He says it is about the available seats being different. The seat available now belonged to Anthony Kennedy, who was considered the court’s crucial swing vote. Garland, meanwhile, would have replaced the seat of conservative Antonin Scalia. More from Graham: “I feel sorry for her [Dr Ford]. I do believe something happened to her. But I do not believe it was Brett Kavanaugh.” He then repeats the alarming, and untrue, claim he made yesterday that it is not in the character of someone who people describe as nice to commit. Kind behavior does not preclude someone from committing. Graham says he does not believe Diane Feinstein leaked Dr Ford’s allegations. “This has never been about the truth,” Graham says. “This has been about delay and destruction.”

Lindsey Graham Unleashes on the Tyrannical Senate Democrats

“That moment during that hearing may have been the most important moment during the entire hearing… What Lindsey Graham did right there is put his Republican colleagues on notice that if they do not vote for Judge Kavanaugh, they have legitimized a search-and-destroy tactic.” —Grant Stinchfield, NRATV
“SHUT THIS UP!” Brett Kavanaugh Tells Senator Leahy To Let Him Finish Talking

John Cornyn SLAMS Michael Avenatti & Accuser Julie Swetnick’s Claims 9/28/18

“All Of Her Witnesses Denied Her Story” Ted Cruz 

RIPS Democrats For Mud Slinging Kavanaugh’s Name

Democrats Walkout on Senate Committee Vote on Kavanaugh

Democratic Senators Walked Out after Refusing to Vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination when Senate Judiciary Committe holds a meeting to vote for President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh (9/28/18) on September 28, 2018.

The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on whether to advance the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme (9-28-18).

Democratic Senators Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) walked out of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing room Friday after the committee set a 1:30 p.m. vote on sending Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination to the full Senate.

Republican Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, called for a vote that would set up a later vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination by the committee. Democrats tried to make points of order as the roll was called over their protests. Each of the 11 Republicans approved setting the vote.

When the roll for Sen. Cory Booker, D-New Jersey, and Harris was called, both were silent. They were shaking their heads, but didn’t make a sound.

Brigitte Gabriel’s Thoughts on the Kavanaugh Smear Campaign


ALEX JONES FULL SHOW: AS PREDICTED, 3RD JUDGE KAVANAUGH ACCUSER LAUNCHES GANG RAPE ACCUSATION

JULIE SWETNICK’S FULL STATEMENT IN PDF:
SEE: https://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2018/09/26/1537984515-swetnickstatement.pdf
ALEX JONES FULL SHOW: AS PREDICTED, 
3RD JUDGE KAVANAUGH ACCUSER LAUNCHES 
GANG RAPE ACCUSATION

The globalist establishment is desperate 

to maintain their stranglehold on America, 

but as their claims get more outlandish 

America turns against them

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/watch-live-as-predicted-3rd-accuser-launches-gang-rape-accusation/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A third rape accuser has been rolled out against Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation hearing scheduled for Friday.
In this new video, Paul Joseph Watson unveils 
The Truth About Kavanaugh. Don’t miss it!
EX SECRET SERVICE AGENT DAN BONGINO: 
Avenatti Has Absolutely Earned His Nickname of “Creepy Porn Lawyer” 

New Kavanaugh Accuser Says Nominee Abetted Gang-Rape, Groped Girls, and Spiked Punch With Drugs at High-School Parties

The allegations were released on Twitter this morning by lawyer Michael Avenatti, who is asking for an FBI investigation.

BY ELIZABETH NOLAN BROWN
SEE: http://reason.com/blog/2018/09/26/swetnick-says-kavanaugh-aided-gang-raperepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A woman who allegedly partied with Judge Brett Kavanaugh as a teenager has come forward with serious allegations about him and his former classmate Mark Judge. According to the sworn declaration from Julie Swetnick, both Kavanaugh and Judge abetted the drugging and gang-raping of girls at parties in the early 1980s. Swetnick also implies that Kavanaugh and Judge participated in the assaults themselves.
As Georgetown Prep students, both Judge and Kavanaugh were known to “‘spike’ the ‘punch’ at house parties” with “drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say ‘No,'” Swetnick says in the declaration, which was released on Twitter this morning by lawyer and recent TV news fixture Michael Avenatti.
Swetnick says she “witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh, and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could be ‘gang raped’ in a side room or bedroom by a ‘train’ of numerous boys” and that she has “a firm recollection of boys being lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”
Around 1982, Swetnick states, she herself was a victim “of one of these ‘gang’ or ‘train’ rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present.” (It is unclear whether she is saying that Kavanaugh or Judge personally assaulted her.) She adds that she believes she was drugged via Quaaludes dropped into her drink.
Kavanaugh called Swetnick’s claims “ridiculous” and “from the Twilight Zone,” adding that he doesn’t know who Swetnick is and “this never happened.”
NEW / from Judge Kavanaugh, via White House, on latest accusation: “This is ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone. I don’t know who this is and this never happened.”
Swetnick says she told others about the incident at the time and knows of other witnesses who can confirm her statements.
“We demand an immediate FBI investigation into the allegations,” Avenatti tweeted this morning. “Under no circumstances should Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed absent a full and complete investigation.”
Swetnick—a graduate of Gaithersburg High School in Maryland and a former employee of the Department of Defense, the U.S. Mint, the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. State Department, with several active security clearances—says she first met Kavanaugh and Judge in 1980 or 1981 at a house party. She describes the pair as “joined at the hip” and says she “consistently saw them together in many social settings.” She estimates that she attended “well over ten house parties” from 1981 to 1983 where both were present.
Avenatti is on The View right now and was asked if his client is accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault on her.

Avenatti dodges and doesn’t answer the question.

“On numerous occasions at the parties, I witnessed Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh drink excessively and engage in highly inappropriate conduct, including being overly aggressive with girls and not taking ‘no’ or an answer” as well as “fondling and grabbing girls without their consent,” Swetnick says in the declaration. She continues:
I observed Brett Kavanaugh drink excessively at many of these parties and engage in abusive and physical aggressive behavior toward girls, including pressing girls against him without their consent, “grinding” against girls, and attempting to remove or shift girls’ clothing to expose private body parts. I likewise observed him be verbally abusive toward girls by making crude sexual comments to them that were designed to demean, humiliate, and embarrass them.
After calling Kavanaugh a “mean drunk,” Swetnick says that she not only witnessed this behavior herself but heard about it from other women and that his claims in a recent Fox News interview about being virginal and mostly sober during his high school years are “absolutely false and a lie.”
Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford—the first woman to accuse Kavanaugh of sexually predatory behavior in high school—are both scheduled to be questioned before members of the Senate Judiciary Committee tomorrow.
On Wednesday afternoon, President Trump commented on the latest allegations against Kavanaugh, tweeting:
Avenatti is a third rate lawyer who is good at making false accusations, like he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is just looking for attention and doesn’t want people to look at his past record and relationships – a total low-life!
This post was updated to add responses from Brett Kavanaugh and from President Trump.
_______________________________________________________________

AVENATTI’S FREAK SHOW

Creepy porn lawyer presents a woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of gang rape.

EXCERPTS:
On the eve of a historic Supreme Court confirmation hearing, two more women have materialized out of thin air to accuse President Trump’s high court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual improprieties – bringing the total number of accusers to four.
Even more eleventh-hour character-assassination attempts may be coming given the enraged Left’s determination to prevent the judge’s ascent to the Supreme Court at all costs. Whether the claims are true is irrelevant to these people. Only the seriousness and luridness of the charges matter as they get aired over and over again in the 24-hour news cycle. They don’t care about the victims they create. Only the headlines.
The new allegations surfaced yesterday as the Senate Judiciary Committee battens down the hatches for a hearing today to receive oral evidence from the first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, 51, who claims Kavanaugh, 53, tried to rape her decades ago when he was a high school student.
The third accuser is Julie Swetnick, a 55-year-old certified systems engineer, who on Wednesday claimed that in the early 1980s Kavanaugh and others spiked the drinks of young women at high school parties with intoxicants to clear the way for them to be gang-raped.

TWITTER REFUSES TO SUSPEND ANTIFA ACCOUNT THAT ENGAGED IN DOXXING, THREATS & TARGETED HARASSMENT

TWITTER REFUSES TO SUSPEND ANTIFA ACCOUNT THAT ENGAGED IN DOXXING, THREATS & TARGETED HARASSMENT

But Alex Jones was perma-banned for being rude to a CNN reporter

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Twitter, the company that perma-banned Alex Jones for being rude to a CNN reporter, has refused to suspend an account that openly engaged in doxxing, threats and targeted harassment.
The ‘Smash Racism DC’ group, which was founded by an Antifa-supporting professor who has encouraged his Twitter followers to “assassinate Mike Pence” as well as to kill cops and local politicians, was responsible for the harassment of Senator Ted Cruz and his wife in a DC restaurant on Monday night.
Following the confrontation, which was at least equal in its malice to Alex Jones’ confrontation of CNN’s Oliver Darcy, the Smash Racism DC account openly doxxed political commentator Gavin McInnes, posting his phone number which resulted in McInnes receiving death threats.
In a separate tweet, the group declared, “You are not safe. We will find you. We will expose you. We will take from you the peace you have taken from so many others,” which is clearly a violation of Twitter’s rules on targeted harassment, which state, “You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so.”
The Smash Racism DC’s banner image features an Antifa flag, a group that has been designateda domestic terror organization by the DHS and the FBI.
Despite multiple clear violations of Twitter’s rules, the Smash Racism DC account is still online, as is the account of the group’s founder, Mike Isaacson, despite Isaacson tweeting multiple violent threats against politicians and police officers.
The tweets above were deleted, but the account itself remains active.
Compare this to Alex Jones, who was permanently banned by Twitter for being rude to a CNN reporter during an exchange outside a Congressional hearing in DC.
Compare Twitter’s response to that metered out to actor James Woods, who remains locked out of his account because he posted a satirical meme.
Apparently, satirical memes and coarse language are bannable offenses, but open threats of violence, targeted harassment and doxxing won’t get you suspended or banned by Twitter (so long as you have the right politics).
This once again completely debunks the notion, trotted out yet again by the mainstream media after Trump’s recent executive order targeting Big Tech was announced, that there is no social media bias against conservatives.
Yes, there clearly is. It happens on a daily basis and this is yet another example.
Infowars is the most censored broadcast in the west. Please support us by downloading the Infowars app before its banned!

“DRAGONFLY”, GOOGLE’S COMMUNIST SEARCH ENGINE REVEALED~BASED ON CHINESE “SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE”, CENSORSHIP, TRACKING, SPYING ON USERS

Top Google Scientist Quits Over Plan for Censored Chinese Search Engine
“Right before your very eyes,
a counter-government is forming.”

The NWO’s Desperate Chinese Censorship Gambit

The Chinese censorship model being hastened by the technocrats, their minions in the U.S. Congress and the EU’s bitter clingers of the New World Order nightmare.

GOOGLE’S COMMUNIST SEARCH ENGINE REVEALED~BASED ON CHINESE 
“SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE”, CENSORSHIP, TRACKING OF USERS
Right before your very eyes, a counter government is forming. Basing its control of your fellow citizens on content guidelines, vague hate speech penalization, and an emerging social credit system. In direct violation to our BIll of Rights. And this new Silicon Valley Technocracy is only getting started.

TEch Crunch reported on former Google research scientist Jack Poulson who rose a red flag concerning Google’s Project Dragonfly. Poulson stated “As has been widely understood, by human rights organizations, investigative reporters, Google employees, and the public, Project Dragonfly directly contradicts the AI Principles’ commitment to not ‘design or deploy’ any technology whose purpose ‘contravenes widely accepted principles of […] human rights.’ ”

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:
_________________________________________________________________

Dragonfly, Privacy Issues Keep Google in the Headlines

Google has been in the headlines recently, and the news was not good. The technology company left the Chinese market eight years ago to protest Beijing’s censorship, but now appears ready to return with a new search engine. But the project is shrouded in secrecy, even as Google’s employees demand transparency. Meanwhile, the company tries to defend itself against accusations it has been invading user’s privacy, despite claiming it doesn’t. Faiza Elmasry has the story. Faith Lapidus narrates.
Originally published at –
https://www.voanews.com/a/googles-dra…

Google, Project Dragonfly & The Communist 

Chinese! Why CEO Sundar Pichai is a 

COMPLETE Hypocrite!

Google and the communist Chinese government have been in cahoots building a system that will censor anything deemed negative by the ruling party. Make no mistake, this may just be China today, but this will go global as the cabal aim to kill free speech everywhere.

SOROS TAKES HUNGARY TO COURT FOR BREACHING “HUMAN RIGHTS” WITH ANTI MASS MIGRATION LAWS

SOROS TAKES HUNGARY TO COURT FOR BREACHING “HUMAN RIGHTS” WITH 
ANTI MASS MIGRATION LAWS
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The progressive Open Society Foundations, run by Hungarian-American billionaire 
George Soros, announced Monday it was taking the Hungarian government to court 
over its laws that seek to stop illegal mass migration on grounds that they deny civil 
society groups their ‘human rights’.
Globalists do not consider every human to be deserving of human rights, regardless of race and religion. The astronomical number of human rights abuses that believers in Islamic doctrine commit against infidels, apostates, gays and women should be a matter of concern for genuine proponents of human rights.
Mass migration has permitted people who do not believe in human rights, democratic rule, pluralism, and equality of rights before the law to enter Europe in large numbers. Hungary is right to resist.
“Soros Takes Hungary to Court over Anti-Mass Migration Laws for Breach of ‘Human Rights,’” by Victoria Friedman, Breitbart, September 24, 2018:
The progressive Open Society Foundations, run by Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros, announced Monday it was taking the Hungarian government to court over its laws that seek to stop illegal mass migration on grounds that they deny civil society groups their ‘human rights’.
The OSF called on the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, to “defend Hungarian democracy” in a statement published Monday.
The pro-open borders civil society group alleges that “Hungary’s ‘Stop Soros’ legislation violates its rights to freedom of expression, association, and assembly that are guaranteed by Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights” and demands the laws are repealed.
The Stop Soros legislation, which came into effect on July 1st, makes it illegal to assist illegal migration, with penalties including a potential prison sentence. The laws also introduced a 25 percent tax on non-governmental organisations that support illegal migration, directly affecting the work of the OSF and its refugee rights group the Hungarian Helsinki Committee.
In response, a government spokesman told Reuters: “The government stands by the Stop Soros package of laws…. as the legislation serves the will of the Hungarian people, and the security of Hungary and Europe.”
“The Soros organisation attacks the Stop Soros package with all possible means as the legislation stands in the way of illegal immigration. The aim of George Soros and organisations supported by him is to flood Europe with migrants,” he added.
The lawsuit is the latest in a series of attacks against the conservative Fidesz-led government, which since the height of the European migrant crisis has worked to reduce illegal mass migration, protect the continent’s external borders, and assert its rights to put the needs of Hungarians first, above the demands of the European Union to accept third world migrants….

THE “NEW” (OLD) PERTUSSIS VACCINE BLAME GAME-BARBARA LOE FISHER EXPOSES THE THREAT TO YOUNG CHILDREN & ADULTS

THE PERTUSSIS VACCINE BLAME GAME-BARBARA LOE FISHER EXPOSES THE THREAT TO YOUNG CHILDREN & ADULTS
BY BARBARA LOE FISHER
SEE: https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/September-2018/the-pertussis-vaccine-blame-game.aspxrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
To activate and view hyperlinked references, please click here once and then click any superscripted number below to access a hyperlinked reference, or scroll down to the bottom of the article to view all hyperlinked references.
It is a primitive bacterial vaccine licensed in 1914. 1 It has not been given to babies in America for 20 years. It is the vaccine that had brain damaged so many children and caused so many vaccine injury lawsuits 2 that Big Pharma used it to blackmail Congress into giving vaccine manufacturers a partial product liability shield in 1986, which the U.S. Supreme Court made even bigger in 2011. 3
I’m talking about whole cell pertussis vaccine in DPT, a crude brew of whole B. pertussis bacteria heated and washed with formaldehyde 4 but still full of neurotoxic aluminum 5 and mercury 6 along with shock-inducing endotoxin, 7 8 as well as brain damaging bioactive pertussis toxin, 10 11 a toxin so lethal that researchers use it to deliberately induce acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in lab animals. 12 13 14  Whole cell pertussis vaccine: the most reactive vaccine still given to infants and children in developing countries because it costs drug companies just pennies to make a dose of it. 15 Whole cell pertussis vaccine, the one that put pressure on the B. pertussis bacterium to mutate into vaccine resistant strains beginning in the 1950s. 16 17

Vaccinologists Beating the Drum to Bring Back Toxic DPT Vaccine

drum
Now some vaccinologists are beating the drum to bring back that nasty old vaccine and give it to newborn babies in America. 18 19 They say they think the toxin-filled whole cell pertussis vaccine in DPT works a little better at preventing whooping cough a little longer than the purified acellular pertussis vaccine in DTaP. They want to “prime” little six to eight-week old babies with ALL the bioactive toxins in the whole cell pertussis vaccine’s crude brew.  Apparently they think it is worth the risk to pretend like they have fixed the problem.
In the 1980s, parents of DPT vaccine injured children worked for more than a decade to get the less reactive DTaP vaccine licensed in America because we knew Japan had been using it since 1981 with no reported whooping cough outbreaks and far fewer serious reactions. 20 As public outrage about the reactivity of whole cell pertussis vaccine grew and DPT vaccine injury lawsuits piled up, in 1996 U.S. public health officials finally licensed a purified acellular pertussis vaccine for infants. 21 22 23

Liability Free Vaccine Industry Wants to Re-write History

But they never forgave parents of vaccine injured children for making it happen and, by 1998, they had branded vaccine safety advocates as “anti-vaccine.” 24 25 Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared FDA licensed vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and handed drug companies a free “get out of jail” pass for vaccine injuries and deaths, 26 it is starting to look like the goal all along was to eventually bring back the old pertussis vaccine so the vaccine industry never again will have to spend another dime to improve a vaccine the FDA has licensed as “safe.”
The attempt to rewrite history has begun, and the strategy is to rehabilitate the bad reputation of whole cell DPT vaccine so the clock can be turned back.
Vaccinologists may want to rewrite history, but it is harder to do when the facts are so well documented in the medical literature. 27 For those who want to get educated about the history of pertussis and pertussis vaccination, the online Library of Medicine is a great place to start. 28
Pertussis Fact Number One: Described as the “100 day cough,” B. pertussis disease has been around since at least the 16th century, and it can be especially serious for babies who cannot breathe when the sticky mucous produced by the gram negative bacteria clogs their tiny airways. The World Health Organization estimates that globally 85 of children have gotten three pertussis shots, but every year there are about 160,000 children under age five who die from pertussis complications like pneumonia, and over 60 percent of these children live in Africa. 29 30 Mortality from infectious diseases is always higher where people live in poverty, with crowding and poor sanitation, industrial pollution, substandard nutrition, and lack of access to health care facilities. 31
screaming baby
In 2017, there were 15,808 cases of pertussis reported in America with 13 deaths, 32 although most cases of whooping cough are never identified and reported to the government. That’s because you can be infected with pertussis and show few or no symptoms, whether you have been vaccinated or not. 33 34
Pertussis Fact Number Two: After recovering from a pertussis infection, natural immunity is thought to last between seven and 20 years and artificial immunity has been estimated to wane as early as two years after getting vaccinated with either whole cell or acellular pertussis vaccines. 35 36 37 Vaccinated and unvaccinated people can get two or three pertussis infections during their lifetime, and immunity can be asymptomatically boosted after the first infection.
Pertussis Fact Number Three: As early as 1965 and all through the 1980s and 1990s, public health officials in the U.S. and Europe knew that whole cell pertussis vaccine in DPT was not preventing infections in many vaccinated children and previously vaccinated adults. 38 39 40 41 42 43 Just like before DPT vaccination programs, pertussis increases continued to be reported in cycles of three to five years, 44 45 46 47 48 49 including in the U.S. where 95 percent of children had gotten three to five DPT shots. 50 51
It was obvious more than 30 years ago that whole cell pertussis vaccine in DPT was not only highly reactive, but was marginally effective.
Pertussis Fact Number Four:  Between 1986 and 1996, multiple clinical trials confirmed that the less reactive acellular DTaP vaccine demonstrated superior efficacy and effectiveness compared to the old and more reactive DPT vaccine. 52 53 54 55 Even so, whooping cough outbreaks continued in the 21st century both in countries that had made the switch to the improved one and in countries that stayed with the more reactive old one.56 57 58 59 60 By 2006, U.S. health officials recommended booster doses of acellular Tdap vaccine for teenagers. 61  Then, in 2010, the Tdap booster shot was found to be only about 66 percent effective. 62
Frustrated by continuing reports of whooping cough cases in vaccinated children, by 2012 the false narrative being forwarded in the U.S. media was to blame whooping cough outbreaks on acellular DTaP vaccine, 63 while also pointing a finger at a tiny minority of unvaccinated children and the availability of personal belief exemptions in state vaccine laws. 64 65
Vaccinologists in the U.S. piled on the acellular vaccine 66 67 68 69 70 and, when FDA researchers reported in 2014 that infant baboons given whole cell pertussis vaccine cleared pertussis infection more rapidly than those given acellular vaccine, 71 the drum beat to resurrect whole cell DPT began to get louder. 72 73 74 75 76
cauldron
In July 2018, the obedient US media hyped a small study out of California promoting the idea that whole cell pertussis vaccine stimulates a broader type of immunity that lasts longer than acellular pertussis vaccine. 77 The by-now familiar refrain was that it would be better to give babies a couple of doses of the old admittedly more reactive whole cell pertussis vaccine followed up by booster doses of acellular vaccine.
The public was being softened up to accept the unacceptable.
Pertussis Fact Number Five: It is important to remember that both the old and newer pertussis vaccines only provide temporary immunity that wanes within two to five years.  Vaccinated people can become “silent reservoirs” of subclinical pertussis infection and transmit whooping cough without even knowing it. 78 79 80
That is because there is a big difference between a vaccine that prevents infection and a vaccine that prevents disease and symptoms of infection. 81 This difference explains why pertussis vaccine induced herd immunity has always been a myth, an illusion created when asymptomatic boosting of pertussis immunity through natural infection occurs in highly vaccinated populations.82 83 84 85
But wait, there is more.
Everybody knows about how the indiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to virulent antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, which evolved to evade those miracle drugs that do save lives when doctors prescribe them properly.  Well, the same thing has happened with the B. pertussis bacterium, which started evolving to become vaccine resistant soon after public health officials and pediatricians prescribed multiple doses of whole cell DPT vaccine for all children.
superbug
As I explained in my 2016 commentary, Pertussis Microbe Outsmarts the Vaccines As Experts Argue About Why,bench scientists have been publishing scientific evidence for more than 20 years that vaccine-resistant B. pertussis strains began to emerge after whole cell pertussis vaccine was licensed in the late 1940s and before acellular pertussis vaccine was licensed in the mid 1990s. 86 Public health officials at the CDC and around the world admitted in 2014 that “most mutations in genes encoding acellular vaccine components arose in the period in which the whole cell vaccine was used.” 87

Pertussis Vaccines Don’t Contain Circulating B. Pertussis Strains

The science on that point is clear: The B. pertussis bacterium adapted to whole cell pertussis vaccination programs to survive, and now that evolutionary process is accelerating. 88 89 Today, none of the whole cell or acellular pertussis vaccines doctors routinely administer to children and pregnant women contain the mutated B. pertussis strains widely circulating and causing whooping cough in human populations. 90 91
The inconvenient truth is that mutated, vaccine resistant pertussis strains are being identified more often in vaccinated persons than in unvaccinated persons. 92
So why would any rational thinking person with an ounce of moral integrity suggest that subjecting newborn babies to the more reactive pertussis vaccine is the solution to preventing whooping cough, when none of the pertussis vaccines contain the new pertussis strains causing whooping cough today?

Vaccinologists and Basic Science Knowledge Gaps

After a century of pertussis vaccination programs, vaccinologists still do not know how pertussis infections – or many other infections – stimulate long lasting cell mediated and humoral immunity in the body. 93 That lack of basic scientific knowledge is why they don’t know how to make vaccines that provide long lasting artificial immunity and why they don’t have correlates for immunity to accurately measure what kind of immunity vaccines do or do not provide. 94 95
blind doctor
After a century of global vaccination, vaccinologists also admit they still do not understand why and how natural infections or vaccines cause complications that can lead to brain damage and death and they don’t know how to accurately identify who is more susceptible to harm. 96 9798 That is why they don’t know how to make vaccines that are free from serious side effects. 99 100
And after a century of laws requiring infants and children to get a growing list of old and new vaccines, there is little effort being made to find how many of those vaccines have caused or will cause microbes to evolve into more virulent, vaccine resistant forms. 101 102 103 104

Doctors and Patients Kept in the Dark

Vaccination is often hailed as the greatest achievement in the history of medicine, but doctors giving vaccines and people getting them have been kept in the dark about just how much is not known about vaccine risks and failures. So when a healthy child or pregnant women gets vaccinated and dies, or is never well again, doctors kept in the dark are conditioned to tell mothers kept in the dark that the vaccine or combination of vaccines just given had nothing to do with it.
Vaccine policy and law has preceded the science and it is especially true when it comes to pertussis vaccination. You only have to read articles in the medical literature about long standing problems with pertussis vaccine toxicity and potency tests to find out how much vaccinologists don’t know about the safety and effectiveness of pertussis vaccines. 105 106

Whole Cell DPT Vaccine: Most Reactive Vaccine on Market Today

For young parents, who may not be familiar with the bad side effects of whole cell DPT vaccine, you can learn more by accessing hyperlinked references to the medical literature at the end of this commentary. To give you an idea about what you will learn, following are a few facts about the old whole cell pertussis vaccine that stopped being given to infants in America in the late 1990s:
  • In 1933, the whole cell pertussis vaccine was reported to kill infants without warning. 107
  • By the 1960s, the medical community knew that whole cell pertussis vaccine could cause convulsions and brain damage in children. 108 109
  • By 1981, there was little doubt that whole cell pertussis vaccine is the most reactive vaccine ever given to infants and children, second only to smallpox vaccine. 110 111 112
vaccine roulette
In 1982, the eyes of parents in America were opened by the award winning television documentary DPT: Vaccine Roulette, followed by parents founding the organization known today as the National Vaccine Information Center and the publishing of the book DPT: A Shot in the Dark in 1985. 113 The reactivity of DPT vaccine was out in the open and mothers were sharing their first hand  experiences of how they watched their babies suffer terrible DPT vaccine reactions.
Between 50 and 80 percent of babies who get whole cell DPT shots run fevers, and experience pain, redness and swelling at the site of the injection, and many of them are more fussy or lose their appetite for a day or two. 114 If DPT vaccine reactions were confined to sore arms and legs or low fevers and a little extra fussiness, there would never have been a call by parents to make that old vaccine less reactive.
No, the fact is that, for nearly a century, whole cell pertussis vaccine has been notorious for causing far more serious reactions like high-pitched screaming (also known as the encephalitic cry) 115 and hypotonic/hyporesponsive episodes (also known as collapse/shock), 116 and febrile or afebrile convulsions (also known as seizures) 117 118 and brain inflammation (also known as encephalitis, encephalomyelitis and encephalopathy). 119 120 121 Between 25 and 60 percent of children who develop acute encephalitis or encephalopathy or have convulsions, including febrile convulsions – for any reason – are left with some kind of brain like personality changes, developmental delays and learning disabilities, ADHD, seizure disorders, lower IQ, speech, motor and behavior disorders and other disabilities. 122 123 124 125 126
worried parents

The Science Is Clear: DPT Injures and Kills More Often Than DTaP

  • A 1981 U.S. study funded by the FDA and conducted at UCLA found that 1 in 875 DPT shots was followed by a convulsion or collapse/shock reaction. 127 Some of the children in that study were left with neurological problems and low IQs.
  • The 1981 British National Childhood Encephalopathy Study (NCES) estimated that the risk for a previously healthy child developing a serious neurological problem within seven days of DPT vaccination was 1 in 110,000 DPT shots and the risk of chronic brain dysfunction was 1 in 310,000 DPT shots. 128 Some of the children in that study were left with brain damage manifested by “neurologic, motor, sensory, educational behavioral and self-care dysfunctions.” 129
  • In 1985, CDC officials reported that children who experienced a neurological problem after DPT vaccination had a 7 times greater risk if they had a personal history of convulsions and a 4.5 times greater risk if they had a family history of convulsions. 130
  • In 1991 and 1994, two Institute of Medicine committees analyzed the scientific evidence and confirmed that DPT vaccine can cause acute encephalopathy and brain damage in previously healthy children. 131 132
  • Most developing countries still use whole cell DPT and, in 2018, Brazil reported that adverse events following DPT and DPT-Hib shots account for more than 75 percent of reported childhood vaccine reactions; 133
  • In the U.S. vaccine injury compensation program (VICP), DPT vaccine is the vaccine with the most injury claims filed, including for death, and it is the second most compensated vaccine injury claim, with influenza vaccine now in first place. 134
  • DTaP vaccine still generates a significant number of adverse reaction reports 135 136 but, with few exceptions, multiple studies confirm that DTaP vaccine is up to two-thirds less reactive than DPT vaccine. 137 138 139 140141
To all those doctors out there who think you have a problem with public trust in vaccine safety today, 142 143 just wait until you try to strong arm mothers and fathers in America to give their newborn babies that nasty old whole cell pertussis vaccine.
But wait, there is more.
family
In 2015, the World Health Organization issued a new pertussis vaccine position paper to give doctors in every nation their marching orders. 144 In that paper, global public health officials rejected nearly a century of scientific evidence documenting the toxicity and risks of whole cell pertussis vaccine. They said that, except for anaphylaxis, there are no contraindications to giving children any type of pertussis-containing vaccine.
No contraindications. No medical exemptions. Not for children who are sick at the time of vaccination or have suffered high pitched screaming, collapse, convulsions and brain injury within hours, not for children who almost died after vaccination.
Who paid for this scientifically illiterate position paper that cruelly devalues the lives of individual children? The four top funders of the World Health Organization are the U.S. government, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the British government and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, which includes the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world. 145
If this can be done with pertussis vaccine, it can be done with every future vaccine that Pharma is creating and governments will recommend and mandate, from cytomegalovirus and strep B to syphilis and HIV. 146 147 148 149

The End Game: Forced Vaccination, No Exceptions

This is the End Game being played out on the world stage that I have been warning since 1993 was coming, the day when every vaccine that the pharmaceutical industry creates and government health officials recommend will be forced on you and your children. 150 151 No questions, no mercy, no exceptions.
We, the people, are the barrier that stands between our children and grandchildren and the toxic whole cell pertussis vaccine the vaccine industry wants to bring back to America so they can rewrite history and turn the clock back.
united
Before the drum beat gets any louder, 152 it is up to each one of us to stand up and defend freedom of thought and speech and conscience in America so we can protect our right to know and freedom to make voluntary vaccine decisions for ourselves and our children.

Nobody Will Save You But You

Nobody will save you and your family from what is coming tomorrow except the action that you, personally, take today. Please share this commentary with your family and friends and make an appointment to speak with your elected representatives. Sign up to use the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal and join with other concerned citizens in your state who want to stop the liability free vaccine industry from continuing to exploit the health of our children and our nation.
It’s your health. Your family. Your choice.
Click the plus sign at the bottom of this page to view and/or post comments on our commentary.

Click to View and Access References 
_______________________________________________________________________

Dear Friends,
 
Did you know that some vaccinologists are calling for the toxic old whole
cell pertussis vaccine to be brought back to America and given to newborn 
babies?
 
Yesterday, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) issued a  press release during  Vaccine Awareness Week co-sponsored by NVIC and Dr. Joseph Mercola. We are warning that pertussis vaccine failures are being used as an excuse to call for infants to be subjected to the risks of the crude DPT vaccine that hasn’t been given to babies in America for 20 years.
 
Read or watch NVIC’s thoroughly referenced video commentary on NVIC.org and Mercola.com that talks about the history of pertussis vaccine failures (and risks) and explains why this could happen.
 
Right now, every donation the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) receives-until October 1 -will be doubled up to a total of $100,000.
 
That’s right, thanks to the generous support of Dr. Mercola and Mercola.com, your gift to NVIC will be automatically increased.
 
 
 
 
Your tax-deductible investment will help NVIC counter the increasingly aggressive efforts by pharmaceutical companies, medical trade groups and the government to restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions in 2019.
 
It is critical for you to act now to protect your legal right to make informed, voluntary vaccine choices.
 
Since 1982, NVIC has worked to…
  • Prevent vaccine injury and death through public education;
  • Provide counseling to those reporting vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths to NVIC;
  • Advocate for the legal right of all Americans to exercise freedom of thought and conscience when making vaccine decisions for themselves and their children.
 

  

Please make a tax-deductible donation to NVIC by October 1, 2018 and holistic health pioneer and vaccine choice champion Dr. Mercola will double match your donation dollar for dollar up to a total of $100,000.
   
By joining or renewing your commitment to the growing vaccine freedom of choice movement today, you WILL make a difference.
 
Thank you for your voice, for your vigilance, and your prayers.
 
For truth and freedom,

  

       

 
 
    
Barbara Loe Fisher                    
Co-founder and President   
            

       
 
     
 
Kathi Williams
Co-founder and Vice President  
 
P.S. — Please read and watch the referenced video commentary on pertussis vaccine failures and the call by some vaccinologists to bring whole cell pertussis vaccine back to America. Let us hear from you during Vaccine Awareness Week when every charitable donation you make to NVIC by October 1, 2018 will be double matched, dollar-for-dollar up to a total of $100,000.
 

  


PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONSIDERING SEIZURE OF GUNS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS

PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONSIDERING SEIZURE OF GUNS 
WITHOUT DUE PROCESS 
“The Pennsylvania House of Representatives is coming back into session this week after their summer break and gun control might be the first thing on their agenda. House Bill 2227 would implement what the bill calls ‘extreme risk protection orders,’ which would allow law enforcement to seize and hold firearms from lawful gun owners with no due process.” —Dana Loesch

FEDS STILL IMPLEMENTING OBAMA POLICIES THAT FAVOR MUSLIM STUDENTS, PROMOTE CAIR

FEDS STILL IMPLEMENTING OBAMA POLICIES THAT FAVOR MUSLIM STUDENTS, PROMOTE CAIR 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/09/feds-still-implementing-obama-policies-that-favor-muslim-students-promote-cairrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Federal officials are being urged to drop Obama administration policies that give special treatment to Muslim students in violation of the Constitution.
Even worse than the Obama administration’s preferential treatment of Muslims, CAIR (an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case) is being promoted…..
The organization is asking the government to rescind policies in which schools “single out a religious sect for preferential treatment or otherwise classify on the basis of religion” and allow “sectarian organizations like CAIR to advance their political or religious agenda in schools.
CAIR has claimed “that after President Donald Trump’s election, a ‘plague’ of Muslim bullying had swept through district schools.”
The truth was that in 2015 and 2016 there were only two reported incidents of bullying related to Muslim students, the letter says….On the other hand, the district reported 11 incidents of anti-Semitic bullying.
A ratio of 1 to 5.5.
“Obama policies favoring Muslim students must go, feds told,” by Bob Unruh, WND, September 22, 2018:
Federal officials are being urged to drop Obama administration policies that give special treatment to Muslim students in violation of the Constitution.
The request comes from the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which is opposing in court several school districts over practices favoring Muslims.
The group’s letter is addressed to John Gore, the acting assistant attorney general in the civil rights division of the Justice Department, and Kenneth Marcus, the assistant secretary for civil rights in the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights.
The organization is asking the government to rescind policies in which schools “single out a religious sect for preferential treatment or otherwise classify on the basis of religion” and allow “sectarian organizations like CAIR to advance their political or religious agenda in schools.”
It also should define “bullying” and “harassment,” and focus “on an alleged bully’s objectively offensive conduct rather than his motive or intent.”
The letter explains: “To be clear, school districts do have a wide range of constitutionally sound measures to address violence, threats, and abuses. But schools should ensure an equally safe and welcoming educational environment for all students, regardless of religion.”
The letter points out that the current practices, implemented under Obama, include a “Fact Sheet” on how to combat discrimination “against Muslim students.”
There’s also a guidance called “Twenty Plus Things Schools Can Do to Respond to or Prevent Hate Incidents Against Arab-Americans, Muslims, and Sikhs,” which tells schools to identify special concerns of students with those religions and create “cultural awareness learning opportunities” about them.
“In addition, the DOJ has ‘sponsored a series of webinars,’ including ‘Strategies for Educators, Counselors, and Community Members to Bulid Protective Factors for America’s Muslim Youth.”
However, the letter argues, the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause “prohibit the government from officially preferring one religious group to another.”
‘To that end, the government ‘may not adopt programs or practices which aid or oppose any religion.’”
If fact, the FCDF explained, the government does “not have any similar policies directing school districts to protect Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, or atheist students from bullying.”
“The government should not be encouraging schools to divide students along religious lines,” said Daniel Piedra, FCDF’s executive director. “No doubt educators have a grave responsibility to protect students from bullying, including Muslim students, but the Constitution prohibits school districts from adopting any program that favors or disfavors a particular religion.”
The letter notes the issue is at the center of one of FCDF’s current cases.
Five families and two advocacy groups sued San Diego’s public school district in 2017 because of its “anti-Islamophobia initiative.” The district claimed there was wide-spread bullying of Muslim students.
“In doing so, the district school board relied on surveys provided by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an Islamic advocacy organization. CAIR claimed that after President Donald Trump’s election, a ‘plague’ of Muslim bullying had swept through district schools.”
But the truth was that in 2015 and 2016 there were only two reported incidents of bullying related to Muslim students, the letter says.
“On the other hand, the district reported 11 incidents of anti-Semitic bullying.”….

NUMBER OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN U.S. MUCH HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS ESTIMATES

NUMBER OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN U.S. MUCH HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS ESTIMATES
BY RAVEN CLABOUGH
According to a study by two Yale professors and an MIT instructor, there are approximately 22.1 million illegal aliens living in the United States, more than twice previous estimates. This underscores the enormity of the illegal-immigration crisis.
Ironically, the researchers had actually set out to disprove the 11.3 million figure that is often used when referring to the number of illegal immigrants living in the United States. They admit to being shocked by their findings, which showed the figure to be significantly higher.
“Our original idea was just to do a sanity check on the existing number,” said Edward Kaplan, a professor of operations research at Yale School of Management, according to a report at Yale Insights. “Instead of a number which was smaller, we got a number that was 50% higher. That caused us to scratch our heads.”
The researchers explain that the 11.3 million figure was based on data in the Census Bureau’s annual American Community Survey, but the information was derived from a flawed research method. Mohammad Fazel-Sarandi, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, points out it’s unfortunately been “the only method used for the last three decades.”
Jonathan Feinstein, professor of economics and management at Yale, added, “There’s a number that everybody quotes, but when you actually dig down and say, ‘What is it based on?’ you find it’s based on one very specific survey and possibly an approach that has some difficulties. So we went in and just took a very different approach.”
Using alternative methods, the researchers embarked on a mission to learn whether 11.3 million illegal immigrants did, in fact, reside in the United States. The researchers understood that many undocumented immigrants will do what is necessary to stay under the radar and therefore, they reviewed different data to determine the actual figure.
“The analysis we’ve done can be thought of as estimating the size of a hidden population,” Kaplan says. “People who are undocumented immigrants are not walking around with labels on their foreheads. Neither are populations of homeless people, neither are populations of drug users, and neither are populations of terrorists. Yet for policy, it is very important to know the size of these hidden populations because that sets the scale of the problem in each of these different policy areas.”
Yale Insights reports:
The approach in the new research was based on operational data, such as deportations and visa overstays, and demographic data, including death rates and immigration rates. “We combined these data using a demographic model that follows a very simple logic,” Kaplan says. “The population today is equal to the initial population plus everyone who came in minus everyone who went out. It’s that simple.”
Yale Insights writes that even with parameters aimed at producing a more conservative estimate, the number of undocumented immigrants would sit at 16.7 million, still a marked increase from the generally accepted figure.
The researchers note that gathering the data was simple but inserting it into a mathematical model was far more strenuous and that the best estimate could still only be presented as a range. They reportedly ran 1,000,000 simulations of the model and reached a 95-percent probability range placing the figure anywhere from 16 million to 29 million, with 22.1 million as the mean.
But while the researchers found the number to be significantly higher than 11.3 million, they did confirm that the period of greatest growth took place in the 1990s and early 2000s. Since 2008, the population size has been stable, they found. Census data show the same trend, but the difference is that the Census data has only captured a portion of the undocumented population.
“The trajectory is the same. We see the same patterns happening, but they’re just understating the actual number of people who have made it here,” said Fazel‐Zarandi. “They are capturing part of this population, but not the whole population,” he added.
“We wouldn’t want people to walk away from this research thinking that suddenly there’s a large influx happening now. It’s really something that happened in the past and maybe was not properly counted or documented,” he explained.
The researchers emphasize that their research is not politically motivated. Rather, they were interested in finding the most accurate information.
“Our purpose is just to provide better information,” said Feinstein. “This paper is not oriented towards politics or policy. I want to be very clear: this paper is about coming up with a better estimate of an important number.”
But while the intentions behind the study may not have been political, the findings do certainly have political ramifications, particularly when estimating the cost of illegal immigration to the American taxpayer.
In 2017, for example, FAIR’s “The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers” report found that the total cost of illegal immigration was $135 billion a year and that illegal immigrants only paid $19 billion a year in taxes, leaving local, state, and federal governments a burden of $116 billion annually.
That report was highly criticized because it was based on an estimate of approximately 12.5 million undocumented immigrants, one million more than the accepted figure. However, if the figure is closer to 22 million, as the new study finds, the financial burden of illegal immigration increases dramatically.

PROJECT VERITAS UNMASKS #DEEP STATE : IRS OFFICIALS SAYING “YOU SHOULD GIVE INCREASED SCRUTINY” TO CONSERVATIVES

PROJECT VERITAS UNMASKS #DEEP STATE : IRS OFFICIALS SAYING “YOU SHOULD GIVE INCREASED SCRUTINY” TO CONSERVATIVES 
“I don’t give a s**t if that is a crime”

See the full report: https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/0…

Officials at the IRS in Austin and DC spill the beans about the 2013 IRS Lois Lerner scandal, targeting conservative non-profits, celebrating potentially illegal activity, and admit “mistakes were made.”

Newsletter: https://www.projectveritas.com/sign-u
Website:
http://projectveritas.com/
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas
Buy James O’Keefe’s book:
http://www.americanpravdabook.com

________________________________________________________
IRS Tax Examiner: Target Conservative Groups Because They Are “… just f***ing fronts for the Koch brothers.”
Deleting IRS Emails is “… so cool… [conservatives] could not hold any evidence against… ” Former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen “…I don’t give a s**t if that is a crime.”
IRS Attorney on Lerner Scandal: “All that stuff we saw in the news, yeah mistakes were made.”
IRS is Comfy Gig, Democratic Socialist of America Gets “… a lot of paid time off and sick days” to Use for Activism
Contempt for America: “Unfortunately, I am not allowed by the bylaws of my union to go against the Constitution.”

This is a breaking news story. Refresh the page for updates. 
UPDATE: Sep 25, 2018, 2:36 PM | Project Veritas attorney Ben Barr submitted this complaint to the Department of Justice regarding the findings of this investigation.
(Washington DC) Project Veritas has released the fourth story in a series of undercover reports which unmask the Deep State. This report features two Internal Revenue Service (IRS) officials who candidly discuss the IRS’s unfair treatment of conservative non-profit groups. The two officials in the report are Thomas Sheehy, an IRS tax examiner and member of the Austin Democratic Socialists of America in Texas, and Jerry Semasek, an IRS attorney in Washington, DC.
The Austin Democratic Socialists of America is a socialist group that works to advance ‘progressive issues’ in Austin, Texas.
Flagrantly Targeting Conservative Groups
Sheehy boasts about and appears to justify former disgraced IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, who was mired in scandal for losing tens of thousands of emails regarding the Lois Lerner controversy. The Lois Lerner controversy occurred in 2013 and involved revelations showing that the IRS unfairly scrutinized conservative groups.
SHEEHY: “John Koskinen. He got a lot of flak for giving increased scrutiny to these Tea Party groups. Conservatives got really mad at him, he was so cool though because he deleted all the emails, so they could not hold any evidence against him.”
Sheehy continues:
SHEEHY: “Yeah, I don’t give a s**t if that is a crime for doing that because… you should give increased scrutiny to those groups because a lot of them are just f***ing fronts for the Koch brothers or whatever.”
Mistakes Were Made
In a separate meeting, attorney Semasek discloses to Project Veritas multiple times that “mistakes were made,” during the 2013 scandal when conservative non-profits were targeted when applying for tax-exempt status.
SEMASEK: “… you know what, for what it’s worth, on the record, I know people in Tax Exempt Government Entities. All that stuff we saw in the news, yeah mistakes were made”
Attorney Semasek, who worked for the IRS during the 2013 scandal, continued:
SEMASEK: “… The law requires that an organization can’t be political, it can’t be partisan to be tax exempt… Those employees in Cincinnati Ohio started to separate them and put them in a pile. And it turns out that they were like the Tea Party group of people. And I think they did, like Lois Lerner and maybe some of her employees were more liberal leaning or Democrats so I don’t know if they disallowed them, but they required them to produce more documentation to try to prove that they weren’t partisan.”
He repeated that mistakes were made:
SEMASEK: “… and that was bad. I think, from what people tell me, that really know about, there were mistakes made, but the problem with what happened… And again, there were mistakes made, and I think probably some people that were advised against conservative groups did make some mistakes.”
Socialist Abuses Work Benefits
Sheehy, like individuals featured in the previous reports in this series, is also a member of a political activist group. Sheehy implies that he abuses his work benefits, including paid time off and sick days in order to engage in socialist activism for Austin Democratic Socialists of America.
SHEEHY: “I will say, I just really like the benefits. I get a lot of paid time off and sick days. So, like, for DSA stuff, I can just honestly… I will just stay late for a period. So, I will just call in for the next day.”
SHEEHY: “I mean, as long as like the manager doesn’t find out and you don’t explicitly say “hey I’m calling in sick to do Democratic Socialist of America work” then I mean like yeah. You know, you just gotta, you just gotta like sort of manage, you know, when and where you’re like doing, like, the work you do.”
More Democratic Socialists of America at IRS
Sheehy reveals there are more socialist activists at the IRS, referring to a friend of his who works on national communications for the Democratic Socialists of America, as well as writing bylaws for the political organization.
SHEEHY: “My friend Chris, like he does a lot of like tech stuff. He even runs the f**kin’, I was looking over his shoulder once at the electoral forum and I noticed that he actually is on the national social media working group. So, he helps run the national twitter account. He also runs our local twitter account. He also is one that does all the bylaws and stuff…. he also works for the IRS.”
Sheehy remarks about his disdain for the Constitution of the United States.
SHEEHY: “Unfortunately, I am not allowed by the bylaws of my union to go against the constitution.”
JOURNALIST: “Would you?”
SHEEHY: “Yeah.”
Deep State Unmasked
This is the fourth release in a series Project Veritas began publishing in September 2018 unmasking corrupt actors in the federal government. Project Veritas will publish more undercover video of federal employees shedding light on the Deep State resistance.
Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe added:
“As our deep state investigation continues to unfold, four government agencies have responded resulting in the removal of two federal employees from their job duties. Stay tuned to see which Government Agency we unmask next.
See the other videos in this series:
See the responses and statements made by government agencies following these stories’ publication.

PRESIDENT TRUMP SPEAKS AT U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY

PRESIDENT TRUMP SPEAKS 
AT U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY 
Donald Trump spoke at the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday morning. President Donald Trump‘s Tuesday speech at the United Nations General Assembly marked a shift in tone on NK as he moved away from rhetoric and expressed praise for dictator Kim.
“I would like to thank chairman Kim for his courage and for the steps he’s taken, though much work remains to be done,” Trump said. “I also want to thank the many member states who helped us reach this moment.” The U.N. General Assembly laughed at Trump within the first minute of his speech before the body, after a particularly lofty brag about his administration’s accomplishments.
“In less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country,” Trump said.

Trump Silences The Laughter At The UN

The hornet’s nest of globalists swarming within the United Nations assembly laughed openly at President Donald Trump after he informed the assembly of his administration’s America first progress in just two years.

The reaction didn’t stop Trump from zeroing in on his Administration’s aggressive stance towards the Iranian regime’s threat to peace.

Trump to UN: “We Reject the Ideology of Globalism”

BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/30174-trump-to-un-we-reject-the-ideology-of-globalism?vsmaid=1217&vcid=3987republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In his second speech to the United Nations, President Donald Trump delivered a stinging rebuke to globalism and “global governance,” calling on responsible nations everywhere to defend their national sovereignty from all attacks. The U.S. president also ridiculed key globalist institutions such as the disgraced UN “Human Rights Council” and the Orwellian “International Criminal Court.” Instead of globalism, Trump called for patriotism. Instead of global governance, he touted unique nations protecting their own cultures, traditions, and sovereignty. Obviously, the globalists and tyrants in the room were not amused. Some even laughed out loud, literally. But if Trump plays his cards right, he and the American people will have the last laugh.  
After blasting various globalist institutions and schemes, including UN bureaucracies and the mass migration agenda, Trump got to the point. “America is governed by Americans,” he said. “We reject the ideology of globalism, and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism.” Trump gave a powerful nod to nations, too, noting that everyone in the room was the emissary of a “distinct culture, a rich history, and a people bound together by ties of memory, tradition, and the values that make our homelands like nowhere else on Earth.” That is why “America will always choose independence and cooperation over global governance, control, and domination,” he said, vowing that the United States would respect the right of all nations to pursue their destiny without telling them how to “live or work or worship.”
“We only ask that you honor our sovereignty in return,” he said.
Trump profusely praised patriotism — and the concept of nationhood itself — as one of the foundations for progress, peace, freedom, magnificent art, scientific breakthroughs, and prosperity. “The whole world is richer, humanity is better, because of this beautiful constellation of nations, each very special, each very unique, and each shining brightly in its part of the world,” the president explained in a dramatic contrast to his predecessors globalist rhetoric. “Sovereign and independent nations are the only vehicle where freedom has ever survived, democracy has ever endured, or peace has ever prospered. And so we must protect our sovereignty and our cherished independence above all.”
Urging other nations to pursue their own unique futures, Trump also outlined a powerful vision for America among the constellation of nations. “As for Americans, we know what kind of future we want for ourselves. We know what kind of a nation America must always be,” he said. “In America, we believe in the majesty of freedom and the dignity of the individual. We believe in self-government and the rule of law. And we prize the culture that sustains our liberty -– a culture built on strong families, deep faith, and fierce independence. We celebrate our heroes, we treasure our traditions, and above all, we love our country.”
But beyond globalism, there are other threats to national independence, too, Trump warned. “Around the world, responsible nations must defend against threats to sovereignty not just from global governance, but also from other, new forms of coercion and domination,” Trump continued. At the top of his list was energy, a jab at the stranglehold that Moscow has acquired over certain European nations — “former” communist Angela Merkel’s Germany in particular — due to their dependence on Russian oil. “In America, we believe strongly in energy security for ourselves and for our allies,” he said, adding that America was now the largest energy producer and was ready to export those resources. Trump also blasted OPEC for “ripping off the rest of the world.”   
Among other accomplishments, Trump celebrated concrete actions taken by the U.S. government in defense of American sovereignty since he took office. For instance, speaking of the dictator-dominated UN “Human Rights Council,” which is literally made up of mostly tyrants and Third World autocrats, Trump said it was a “grave embarrassment to this institution, shielding egregious human rights abusers while bashing America and its many friends.” It refused any reforms despite repeated warnings, he said. And so, the United States took what Trump described as the “only responsible course”: “We withdrew from the Human Rights Council.”
The U.S. president also lambasted the self-styled “International Criminal Court,” saying the U.S. government would provide no support or recognition to the body. “As far as America is concerned, the ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy, and no authority,” he said. “The ICC claims near-universal jurisdiction over the citizens of every country, violating all principles of justice, fairness, and due process. We will never surrender America’s sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable, global bureaucracy.” The U.S. government has never ratified the agreements creating the global kangaroo court, and yet it continues to pretend like it can put Americans on trial. In recent weeks, the administration warned that any effort to prosecute an American in the discredited “court” would be met with firm resistance, including criminal prosecution and sanctions against all involved.
Going a step further, the president blasted some of the crucial mechanisms used by the Deep State to advance its globalist agenda. On the mass importation of Islamic immigrants into the West by the UN under the guise of humanitarianism, for example, Trump highlighted an alternative long touted by genuine humanitarians and critics of open borders. “I commend the people of Jordan and other neighboring countries for hosting refugees from this very brutal civil war,” Trump said, referring to the ongoing war in Syria. “As we see in Jordan, the most compassionate policy is to place refugees as close to their homes as possible to ease their eventual return to be part of the rebuilding process. This approach also stretches finite resources to help far more people, increasing the impact of every dollar spent.” Estimates suggest it costs 20 to 50 times more to “re-settle” a refugee in America or Western Europe than to keep him or her close by.
On the massive illegal immigration swamping the United States and Europe — a key vehicle that even national leaders have said is aimed at undermining nationhood and national identity — Trump also spoke out, calling “uncontrolled migration”  a threat to national sovereignty, security, and prosperity. “We recognize the right of every nation in this room to set its own immigration policy in accordance with its national interests, just as we ask other countries to respect our own right to do the same — which we are doing,” he said, adding that the U.S. government would not participate in the UN’s new “Global Compact on Migration” that aims to globalize migration policy and flood the West with endless numbers of migrants. “Migration should not be governed by an international body unaccountable to our own citizens.”
Pointing to the imploding and brutal socialist regime enslaving Venezuela and its murderous Cuban sponsors — some two million victims have already been forced to flee the starving but oil-rich nation — Trump also slammed statism, socialism, and communism as a threat to everything decent and good. “Virtually everywhere socialism or communism has been tried, it has produced suffering, corruption, and decay,” Trump warned, calling on the nations of the world to condemn Venezuela’s oppressive rulers. “Socialism’s thirst for power leads to expansion, incursion, and oppression. All nations of the world should resist socialism and the misery that it brings to everyone.”
On trade policy, Trump vowed that globalist “free trade” agreements would no longer be allowed to continue facilitating the looting of America. Blasting “discredited ideologies,” Trump said America would support fair and reciprocal trade. “The United States will not be taken advantage of any longer,” he warned assembled government leaders. “For decades, the United States opened its economy — the largest, by far, on Earth — with few conditions…. Yet, other countries did not grant us fair and reciprocal access to their markets in return. Even worse, some countries abused their openness to dump their products, subsidize their goods, target our industries, and manipulate their currencies to gain unfair advantage over our country. As a result, our trade deficit ballooned to nearly $800 billion a year. For this reason, we are systematically renegotiating broken and bad trade deals.” He touted the new U.S.-Mexico trade deal and the South Korea-U.S. deal as examples.
Trump took direct aim at the communist Chinese regime’s “trade” machinations, too. “Countries were admitted to the World Trade Organization that violate every single principle on which the organization is based,” he said. “While the United States and many other nations play by the rules, these countries use government-run industrial planning and state-owned enterprises to rig the system in their favor. They engage in relentless product dumping, forced technology transfer, and the theft of intellectual property. The United States lost over 3 million manufacturing jobs, nearly a quarter of all steel jobs, and 60,000 factories after China joined the WTO. And we have racked up $13 trillion in trade deficits over the last two decades.”
“But those days are over,” Trump said. “We will no longer tolerate such abuse. We will not allow our workers to be victimized, our companies to be cheated, and our wealth to be plundered and transferred. America will never apologize for protecting its citizens.” As part of that, Trump spoke of massive new tariffs he is imposing on Chinese imports, saying, “China’s market distortions and the way they deal cannot be tolerated.” Among the measures being implemented are stronger controls over threats to national security from foreign investment in sensitive industries and sectors. In recent months, Trump has also threatened to blow up the architecture of globalist “free trade,” too, although so far those threats have not materialized in reality.   
However, for whatever reason, the president also gave several subtle nods to globalism. For instance, he spoke of working with the “Gulf Cooperation Council,” an emerging European Union-style regime on the Arabian peninsula that fits neatly into the Henry “New World Order” Kissinger vision of globalist regional governments merging into a global order. Trump also praised the alleged UN work that supposedly helps people “build better lives,” as if other organizations or churches could not do far better for a fraction of the cost. But despite that, Trump vowed to keep working to change the way UN contributions are assessed. He said he would work toward a “voluntary” system of contributions rather than “assessed” ones so that the U.S. government can “target American resources to the programs with the best record of success.” He did not specify which programs those might be.  
On the wars and neoconservatism, his speech likely left something to be desired for non-interventionists, as well. Speaking of Syria, he called for the “the United Nations-led peace process be reinvigorated.” And he threatened to intervene in Syria if Assad used chemical weapons, despite massive amounts of evidence showing the previous attacks were likely false flags orchestrated by globalist-backed al-Qaeda forces waging war on the Assad regime. Finally, Trump sounded like he was being persuaded to bang the war drums against Iran again, suggesting neoconservative John Bolton, a member of the global government-peddling Council on Foreign Relations who now serves as Trump’s National Security Advisor, played a large role in writing parts of the speech.
But Trump concluded his speech much like it began — with a rousing defense of sovereignty and nationhood, as well as a call for nations and peoples to be thankful to God. “So together, let us choose a future of patriotism, prosperity, and pride,” he said. “Let us choose peace and freedom over domination and defeat. And let us come here to this place to stand for our people and their nations, forever strong, forever sovereign, forever just, and forever thankful for the grace and the goodness and the glory of God. Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the nations of the world.”
Obviously, globalists everywhere — especially within the establishment media and the within the globalist institutions of “global governance” at the UN and beyond — were furious with the speech. Some could barely contain their rage. Others acted as if it was a joke, with some attendees at the speech actually laughing when Trump touted his administration’s accomplishments. But regardless of what globalists and the establishment want, elections and opinion polls around the world show that patriotism is rising as globalism becomes increasingly toxic and discredited with the people. Americans and all those who value liberty must remain active to build on the momentum.
Related articles:

SELECTED ARTICLES FROM LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS RESEARCH ABOUT CONTEMPLATIVE MYSTICISM, DECEPTION, APOSTASY, NEW AGE PRACTICES, UNIVERSALISM

LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS RESEARCH ARTICLES SEPTEMBER 2018
SEE: https://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/newsletters/2018/newsletter20180924.htmrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

To Lighthouse Trails:

Walk to Emmaus logoWalk to Emmaus logo from the Upper Room website (used in accordance with the US Fair Use Act for the purpose of critique, review, and education)

I’m grateful to God for helping me come across your site tonight! I found out the Walk to Emmaus was demonic when I went on the walk this last weekend. It was the most horrible thing I’ve been through in my life. I believe God was protecting me while I was there. I thought I was going on a restful retreat. That’s what my church convinced me of anyway. I was in total hurt and shock by the end of the first day! I begin to agonize to leave the place. Too much to list here what went on while I was there.
Anyway, my church has segregated themselves from me because I refused to give my “happy testimony” about the walk. They think I’m a problem now. Much more to the story. I came home Sat. night feeling like I had just come home from the pits of hell. Everyone else that went said they had a great experience . . . weird. I don’t get it, and they seem different than the people I knew and cherished before the walk. I’m saddened by all this . . . my eyes have definitely been opened to the huge scale deception that’s taking our churches by storm! I didn’t even know any of this about this gigantic scheme until I went on the walk! I knew it was the last days. I knew about NWO [new-world order]. But I didn’t know about this particular infiltration.
Thank you for your work! My prayers are with you!!
Kayla
LTRP Comment: The following is a short article Lighthouse Trails previously wrote about Upper Room’s Walk to Emmaus with a mention of Tres Dias.

Walk to Emmaus and Tres Dias – A Walk to Deception

The Walk to Emmaus is a program put on by Upper Room Ministries. Upper Room promotes Spiritual Formation (i.e., contemplative spirituality), and if you want to understand the dynamics of Walk to Emmaus, then understanding the spirituality of Upper Room will help you:

“The Walk to Emmaus is an adaptation of the Roman Catholic Cursillo Movement, which originated in Spain in 1949.”-  from the Walk to Emmaus website
Walk to Emmaus is widely spread. It is estimated that over half a million persons have experienced a Walk to Emmaus weekend and today the Movement counts more than 300 communities distributed all over the United States as well as all over the world.1

Mantra Meditation is promoted at Upper Room Ministries also:

“Mantra — The word comes from Sanskrit. Its two-syllabus mean: man or mind and tra or deliverance. A mantra is sound vibration that is intended to deliver the mind from distractions and a focus on the material world. A mantra is repeated like a chant and has a spiritual effect associated with the physical vibration. A mantra can be as simple as one syllable ‘OM’ or as more complicated such as, ‘OM SRI RAM JAI RAM JAI JAI RAM’.” From the Upper Room website (link now removed)

Tres Dias is an offshoot of the Cursillo Movement and should be avoided as well.
List of places that do Walk to Emmaus
The Walk to Emmaus (The Upper Room) website
Chrysalis Walk to Emmaus
Book Alert: Soul Feast by Marjorie Thompson
Please Contemplate This by T.A. McMahon (Berean Call)
______________________________________________________

Welcome to the New (Contemplative) Christianity – Just Breath In . . . Breath Out
Pastor Ken Shigematsu showing Christians how to practice one form of contemplative prayer. (photo from a 2-second clip of the Charisma video; used in accordance with the U.S. Fair Use Act)

The acceptance of contemplative prayer has hit an all-time high in the church. And is it any wonder? Christian media, Christian publishers, pastors, mission societies, Bible societies, authors, radio hosts, youth leaders, women’s group leaders, and Christian ministry leaders are all promoting it more than ever.  The video below that was posted on Charisma Magazine’s website on September 10th is yet another example of how Christian media (Charisma being one of the most popular Christian magazines today) is doing their part to get masses of Christians  involved with contemplative prayer (remember our recent article on YWAM’s goal to get all YWAMer’s doing contemplative prayer).
The Charisma article titled “The Ancient Spiritual Prayer Today’s Church Fails to Practice” states: “[Pastor] Shigematsu offers an easy step-by-step guide on how to do contemplative prayer in this video.”
The pastor who is featured on this video is Pastor Ken Shigematsu. Shigematsu is the author of God in My Everything: How an Ancient Rhythm Helps Busy People Enjoy God (2013) and Survival Guide for the Soul (2018, foreword by Ann Voskamp). In what he calls a “spiritual ecosystem,” Shigematsu provides a who’s who of New Age sympathizers and Catholic mystics in God in My Everything, that includes Thomas Merton, Evelyn Underhill, Kathleen Norris, Marva Dawn, Basil Pennington, Richard Rohr, Gerald May, Dorothy Bass, Parker Palmer, Joan Chittister and many of the usual evangelical/Protestant suspects such as Dallas Willard, Eugene Peterson, Richard Foster, Ruth Haley Barton, and Gary Thomas. In that book, Shigematsu makes no apologies for encouraging Christians to practice various meditation exercises to help calm the mind.
Survival Guide for the Soul is a continuing saga of his earlier book God in My Everything with gleanings from many of the same sources but also added to the mix is contribution from mystics such as David-Steindl Rast, Henry Nouwen, Walter Brueggemann, Thomas Keating, Anne Lamott, John Ortberg, and Dorothy Day.* In Survival Guide, Shigematsu boasts that “The spiritual direction movement is growing, and there are now more than six thousand spiritual directors under the banner of Spiritual Directors International, most of whom serve in North America” (ch. 9, endnote #15). The spiritual direction movement is one of the outgrowths of the contemplative prayer/Spiritual Formation movement (i.e., every contemplative Christian needs a spiritual director to guide and direct his or her esoteric experiences to help  avoid any dangerous altercations with devils and demons, which Richard Foster says can occur when practicing contemplative prayer).
If you are someone who is aware of the dangers and the true panentheistic, interspiritual nature of contemplative prayer, you have probably noticed that contemplative spirituality has moved from its infancy stage in the church to what appears to becoming the norm. Because the “big” guys in Christianity (e.g., Rick Warren, Christianity Today, YWAM, Charisma, Focus on the Family) are pushing fast forward to get the church through this mystical paradigm shift and the “little guys (e.g., Lighthouse Trails, The Berean Call) are written off as negative, divisive, and only worthy of being ignored and seen as being out of sync, contemplative spirituality (which encompasses all things emergent) will become the “new” Christianity, and all one has to do to get there is  . . .  breath in  . . . and breath out.

To see the video on the Charisma site, click here. 
*Most of the names mentioned in this article can be found on the Lighthouse Trails Research Project blog and in many of our published resources. Just use the blog’s search engine to look up the names.
Related Article:
The Christian of the Future-by Ray Yungen
______________________________________________________________

Some Thoughts Worth Considering 
on “Pub Theology”

LTRP Note: Recently, a father called us very concerned about the growing popularity of “Pub Theology.” He asked if we had any information about it. The late Larry DeBruyn wrote the following article in 2009 and gave permission for Lighthouse Trails to post it. Since 2009, Pub Theology has indeed increased greatly in popularity, especially among evangelical millennials. Type “Pub Theology” (in quotes which narrows the results) into Google, and it comes up over 43,000 times! DeBruyn’s article offers some valid (and Scriptural) advice and insight on Pub Theology.
“EMERGENT INEBRIATES: Some Thoughts on Pub Theology”
By Larry DeBruyn
As he begins to rip into “a screaming guitar solo,” a band member sarcastically yells out at the audience, “Let’s go to church boys!”[1] Welcome to Pub Theology. As the reporter describes it, Pub Theology is “a Sunday night show that’s one part church and one part party.” Among other posters on the barroom walls, one alludes to the final verse of the biblical chapter on love. It reads, “Faith, Hope, Love and Beer” (The biblical text reads, “But now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love” 1 Corinthians 13:13, NASB).
Being “shaggy-haired, body-pierced and colored with assorted body art,” members of the Sunday evening pub rock group double as members of a mega-church’s “worship team” on Sunday mornings. Confessing to love both Jesus and rock ‘n’ roll, band members will burn through a pack of cigarettes and exhort the audience to visit the bar and buy beer during Sunday night “church.” Initially skeptical about hosting Pub Theology on Sunday nights, the bar owner now admits the band has turned an otherwise dead night into a profitable evening.
Regarding this new outreach–the mega-church’s ministerial staff approve of doing Pub Theology–one of the band’s members says: “We want to be sincere and authentic and be who we really are, whether that is wearing jeans and a T-shirt or having a beer. I think that is real” he continues, “and I don’t think it is wrong or that God is unhappy about that.” Relates another band member: “I can drink a beer and smoke a cigarette and play some of my favorite songs and hang out with my friends and maybe meet someone and tell them about Jesus.”
Interestingly, most of the band members were raised in religious homes. In fact, two of its members are former PKS (That’s an acronym for “preacher’s kids.”). Having been a former pastor, their father has now become the band’s “roadie” (That’s a term which refers to the managers and technicians traveling with the band.). The members account for the band’s existence and approach to ministry for reason of their holier-than-thou Wesleyan upbringing–you know, “I don’t drink, I don’t smoke, I don’t go to R-rated movies, I don’t dance.”
On this point, and as a rebellious child of the 60s who too was raised in the legalistic environment of Western Michigan, let me say that I understand and somewhat sympathize with the band members’ rejection of legalism. But all rebels ought to be cautioned that, “rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry” (1 Samuel 15:23). Yet God doesn’t make Christians from the outside in, but rather from the inside out. Though one’s Christianity is defined by inner faith not outer works, Paul did write that Christians are God’s “workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10). So we must not assume the opposite attitude from legalism, that of antinomianism (i.e., that God’s grace cancels out any need to obey His moral and spiritual law). For as Paul asked: “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” (Romans 6:1-2). Contradicting antinomianism the writer of Hebrews orders us to, “Follow . . . holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled” (Hebrews 12:14-15).
Nevertheless, the casual and alcoholically lubricated atmosphere of Pub Theology raises an important issue, for as the reporter asks, “Does Pub Theology produce any lasting effects, or is it just a casual encounter with church in a bar—a spiritual one-night stand?” All the band’s claims of “doing ministry” notwithstanding—they do field questions about Christianity from the audience and callers-in, give inebriated individuals rides home, and have even seen one rescued drunk baptized a few days later in their church—Pub Theology shows every symptom of being a carnal “one-night-stand.” (Note: I do not use the word spiritual.)
First, Pub Theology is not church. If it is, then where’s the reading of Scripture, the apostles’ teaching, prayer and observance of the Lord’s Table? (Acts 2:42) But on this point, we can be certain that the band will avoid any impression of being too “churchly or preachy.” But beer steins are no substitute for communion cups. In fact, to the true church, the apostle Peter announced that, “the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries” (1 Peter 4:3).
Second, Pub Theology is not theology. Reportedly, the band’s opening song was Joan Osborne’s one-hit wonder, “What if God was one of us?” The lyrics add, “Just a slob like one of us.”[2] Imagine . . . God being a slob like the rest of the inebriated crowd at the bar. Given such a humanizing of God, what we’re dealing with is not Pub Theology, but pub idolatry. “And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things” (Romans 1:23). Do you think Joan Osborne’s lyrical questions in any way resemble or affirm the great Christological passages of the New Testament? (John 1:1 ff.; Colossians 1:15-17; Philippians 2:5-11). By the way, these cited passages are comprised of theological statements extracted from early Christian hymns. Would the pub theology band sing them? I’d think they’d estimate that the lyrics of these biblical hymns are far too dogmatic, stodgy, and preachy for the “boys” at the bar!
Third, Pub Theology is not Christian outreach. To attain a “spiritual” end, it employs carnal, fleshly, and worldly means. But the apostle Paul wrote to the Ephesians, “And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:18-19). If the song “What if God was one of us?” gives any indication, probably none of the other music the band plays includes “psalms, and hymns, and spiritual songs.”
The apostle Paul would not have employed carnal means to attain spiritual ends. You can’t fight fire with fire. He wrote:

For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God.  (2 Corinthians 10:3-5; compare Galatians 5:21 where Paul labels “drunkenness” a work of the flesh).

So we conclude: Given the atmosphere surrounding Pub Theology, the description of love as it exists on a poster at “Sunday-night-church-in-a-bar” might be parodied to read: Now abide these four, “faith, hope, love, and beer,” but the greatest of these is beer!
Pastor Larry DeBruyn
Used with permission from Larry DeBruyn in 2009. Larry DeBruyn passed away in 2017.
Original posting – October 5, 2009
ENDNOTES
[1] Unless otherwise noted, all quotations are taken from Robert King, “Faith, Hope, Love, Beer,” The Indianapolis Star, September 27, 2009, A1, A14. Article may be viewed online. See Faith & Values, Robert King, “Pub Theology conveys Christian message in Broad Ripple,” IndyStar.com, September 27, 2009, http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909270384.
[2] Lyrics online at: http://www.lyricsondemand.com/onehitwonders/ifgodwasoneofuslyrics.html.
Photo from bigstockphoto.com; used with permission.
________________________________________________________________

Key Players and Buzz Language 
of the Social-Justice “Gospel”

The following two lists are from Mary Danielsen’s booklet,The Dangerous Truth About the Social-Justice “Gospel” (see article below). It’s good to be aware of both the names and the language. (see video clip at bottom of these lists)

Some Key Players in the Social Gospel Movement*

Bill Hybels
Bono
Diane Butler Bass
Greg Boyd
Henri Nouwen
Ian Morgan Cron
Jim Wallis
Joan Chittister
Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove
Leonard Sweet
Lynne Hybels
N.T. Wright
Phyllis Tickle
Richard Foster
Richard Niebuhr
Richard Rohr
Rick Warren
Ron Sider
Shane Claiborne
St. Thomas Acquinas
Thomas Merton
Tony Blair
Tony Campolo
Tony Jones
Walter Rauschenbusch

Some Buzz Words in the Social Gospel Movement

Activist
Awakening
Biphobia
Christian Palestinianism
Colonialism/Imperialism
Common Ground
Conflict Resolution
Consumerism
Cultural Relevance
Dialogue
Distribution of wealth
Diversity
Environmental Stewardship
Ethnocentrism
Faith-based initiative programs
Feminism
Gay
Gender identity
Homophobia
Islamophobia
Justice
Missional
Multiplicity
Politics of Jesus
Progressive Christians
Progressive politics
Reconciliation
Red Letter Christians
Revolution
Social gospel
Social justice
Solidarity
Stewardship renewal
Tolerance

*Most of these names can be found on our site. Just type a name into our search engine on either the blog or the research site.
Below is a 10-minute video clip of one of Roger Oakland’s “Emerging Church lecture series.”

_____________________________________________________________

Rob Bell’s ‘Love Wins’ Revealed ‘Startling’ Multitudes of People Backing Universalism: Professor

BY STOYAN ZAIMOV
SEE: https://www.christianpost.com/news/rob-bells-love-wins-revealed-startling-multitudes-of-people-backing-universalism-professor-227433/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A modern Christianity professor and author who opposes universalism admitted that he was “startled” by how many people came out supporting the belief following Rob Bell’s 2011 book, Love Wins.
Michael McClymond, the author of The Devil’s Redemption: A New History and Interpretation of Christian Universalism, said in an interview with The Gospel Coalition posted last week that ever since he was a student he has been engaged with biblical studies on the topic of salvation.
“Several years ago what really surprised me was not Rob Bell’s book, Love Wins (2011), with its well-worn and hackneyed arguments. Instead, I was startled by the multitude of people I thereafter encountered holding that universalism was biblical and evangelical teaching,” said McClymond, who teaches at Saint Louis University in Missouri.
Bell is the founder and former pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church in Michigan, and has attracted significant controversy over his questioning of the traditional understanding of eternal punishment.
Although he is often associated with the term by critics, Bell has in the past insisted that he is not a universalist.
“No, if by universalist we mean there’s a giant cosmic arm that swoops everybody in at some point whether you want to be there or not,” Bell said back in 2011.
“That violates the laws of love and love is about freedom, it’s about choice, it’s about do you want to be there? Because that’s what would make it Heaven,” he added.
When it comes to the exclusivity and inclusivity of Christ, Bell said, “I think what happens is, especially for followers of Jesus, is there are sort of His exclusive claims that are often at the expense of the other things that He says … be careful because I’m doing something for everybody.”
He added: “How exactly that pans out, that’s God’s job.”
As he has in previous interviews on the subject, McClymond said that Christian universalism has grown in certain pockets of the church, however.
“The point I wish to make is that universalism is the way that many religiously believing people — and contemporary academic theologians especially — would like for the world to be. The world as we might wish it to be is one in which God’s grace extends to all persons without exception, and all persons freely and positively respond to it,” the professor argued.
When it comes to people who are tempted toward universalism, he said: “Human salvation is inherently a good thing, and thus salvation for all — if it turned out that way — would not be something that any Christian would or should object to. The New Testament calls on believers to share the Good News and to evangelize among all nations, and to do so under the most difficult of circumstances.”
He added, however, that as a theological author, he would “shudder at the thought of giving anyone false hope and false comfort, which in the book of Jeremiah is a distinguishing mark of the false prophet.”
“Beginning with God’s command to Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree in the garden, the whole of Scripture contains a message concerning ‘two ways’ — a way leading to life or reward, and another way leading to death or punishment. Because this idea of the ‘two ways” is so deeply rooted in the Bible, I would say that a church congregation that is Bible-preaching and Bible-reading will simply not entertain the idea of universalism,” he added.

BIG TECH HAS DEFINED CONSERVATISM AS “HATE SPEECH”~CONTINUES CENSORING MORE INDIVIDUALS & BUSINESSES


Big Tech Has Defined Conservatism as "Hate Speech"
BIG TECH HAS DEFINED CONSERVATISM AS “HATE SPEECH” 

How to silence your political opposition using this one simple trick

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/big-tech-has-defined-conservatism-as-hate-speech/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
By corralling basic conservative opinions and beliefs under the umbrella of “hate speech,” social media giants have invented a new ploy to censor conservatives while claiming they are not censoring conservatives.
Nationalism, patriotism, populism, and Christianity are all now being treated as “hateful” by Big Tech.
These companies then engage in a form of legalese where they assert they are not banning people for their personal or political opinions, but because of violations of terms of service.
But the truth is that merely holding and expressing nationalist, populist, patriotic or Christian opinions and beliefs is deemed a “violation” because such beliefs have been subjectively defined as “hateful”.
For example, PayPal announced it was banning Infowars last week because Infowars had “promoted hate and discriminatory intolerance”.
In real terms, this meant that we had opposed the teaching of transgenderism to young children in schools and criticized political Islam.
Alex Jones was also de-platformed by every major Big Tech firm over spurious claims of “hateful” content that were never specifically quantified.
As the leaked Google meeting video illustrates, since November 2016, Big Tech vowed to use its vast power to squelch a movement that Silicon Valley elitists convinced themselves is based on “racism,” “xenophobia” and “extremism”.
By broadening the definition of “hate” to include any argument that challenges far-left progressive dogma, Big Tech has created an environment where the expression of any criticism of sexual lifestyles or belief systems, even if it doesn’t target individuals, can be defined as “harassment” or “hateful”.
This new definition has also been cemented with the aid of Democratic lawmakers like Congressman Ted Deutch (D-FL), who demanded Facebook and YouTube ban Alex Jones and Infowars for ‘offensive’ and ‘hateful’ content for weeks before it happened.
The “hateful” tag also just happens to be very similar to the “harmful” term utilized by the Communist Chinese government to justify its purge of dissident content.
“China has shut down more than 4,000 websites and online accounts in a three-month campaign against “harmful” online information,” reports ChannelNewsAsia, adding that examples of “harmful” behavior include “spreading rumours” and spreading “improper values”.
Just like the term “hate,” these terms are so vague that virtually anything could be defined as “harmful” or “improper,” which in this case includes dissidents who criticize the government on social media.
Now we see the emergence of “hate facts,” where conservatives can accurately quote crime statistics about minority groups which are provably true, yet publicly sharing such facts becomes a bannable offense because they could be seen to portray minority groups in a negative light.
Tommy Robinson was suspended by Twitter for accurately pointing out that up to 90% of grooming gang culprits in the United Kingdom come from Bangladeshi or Pakistani communities. Despite this being an objective fact, merely expressing it became verboten because it contradicted with the progressive narrative that immigration can only ever be positive.
Mastercard also terminated its agreement with Robert Spencer over vague, non-defined claims that Spencer had posted “illegal content” and promoted violence, an assertion backed up with no actual examples whatsoever.
In reality, Spencer’s crime was to oppose radical Islam, the most violent belief system on the planet.
Until prominent conservatives and Trump administration officials realize that Big Tech is overtly hostile to the mere expression of basic conservative beliefs and is busy creating an environment where they will become increasingly less tolerable, the silencing of voices on the right will only accelerate.
____________________________________________
FINALLY: Executive Order To Investigate Big Tech
Brittany Pettibone Reports:
_______________________________________________
Jack Dorsey of Twitter Confronted In Front Of Congress
 by Laura Loomer
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
AND:
________________________________________________________

PayPal Dumps Alex Jones; Still Handles SPLC

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
PayPal finally joined other Big Tech giants in attacking Alex Jones and his Infowars empire, dumping the conservative conspiracy theorist from its site.
The leftist Internet purchasing platform, which handles buying and selling goods online, targeted Jones because he retails “hate speech.” This, we are told, violates PayPal’s policies.
The money-changing giant joined Apple, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter in waging war against Jones. The generalissimo in charge of the campaign was CNN’s senior media writer, Oliver Darcy.
No Policy Violation PayPal’s notice gave Jones 10 days to find a new vendor to handle payments, The New York Times reported. “PayPal handles all transactions, including credit cards, for the Infowars online store.”
Yet Paypal admitted Jones did nothing wrong. “PayPal said it had made its decision not because of any policy violation but because Infowars’ ‘promotion of hate and discrimination runs counter to our core value of inclusion.’”
Said PayPal, “Our values are the foundation for the decision we made this week.”
PayPal, it seems, has joined the other tech giants in a war to destroy Jones.
As The New American reported in multiple articles, Facebook and YouTube banned Jones, followed by Twitter, which had suspended him for only seven days after his tussle with leftist Darcy and Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) on Capitol Hill. That dust-up provoked Apple into dropping Jones’s Infowars app from its store. Before, Apple had stopped Jones from hawking his wares on iTunes.
Leading this charge was Darcy, an owlish fellow terrified into speechlessness when Jones confronted him on Capitol Hill. Darcy had harassed Facebook officials about Jones, repeatedly demanding answers to questions he had no business asking.
Questionable Groups Still On PayPal With Jones gone, PayPal can now concentrate on other organizations that use its platforms to raise money to peddle hatred, violence and murder.
Black Lives Matter chapters across the country raise money on PayPal. Yet BLM activists have waged an ideological war against police. A police officer in Baton Rouge sued BLM after someone at a BLM rally hit him in the head with a rock. A judge dismissed the suit on a technicality, but BLM was, ultimately, the organizer of the rally where the policeman was injured.
Another “charity” for which PayPal handles donations is Planned Parenthood, the federally-subsidized baby-killing operation. The organization retails extremist rhetoric to vilify those who oppose the mass murder of the unborn. PP performs some 321,000 “terminations” annually.
As well, PP sold fetal remains to two companies that pled guilty to retailing the macabre goods on the international market, and the House Select Panel on Infant Lives found that PP ran a major wholesale operation to profit on the fetal remains.
PP repeatedly lied to deny the truth. And its leftist allies helped.
PayPal Helps Fund SPLC Hate Another of PayPal’s beneficiaries is the Southern Poverty Law Center, the discredited leftist hate group that recently settled a defamation claim because it had falsely accused a Muslim of being an “extremist.” The settlement included a confession of wrongdoing and retraction.
SPLC’s record of smearing what it terms “extremists” is a long one. Two of its recent victims, as The New American reported, were Robert Spencer, who runs the Jihad Watch website, and David Horowitz.
Beyond them, however, SPLC’s smear of the Family Research Council (FRC) led to violence.
Relying on the SPLC’s designation of FRC as an anti-gay “extremist" organization, a terrorist walked into FRC's headquarters in Washington, D.C., and opened fire. The shooter told authorities that he relied on SPLC’s designation to choose FRC, and that he planned other attacks against conservatives.
Beyond that, SPLC has stashed nearly $100 million in offshore tax-free bank accounts.
A visit to the SPLC’s donation page shows that PayPal still handles the hate group’s donations, despite its long record of hate speech and smearing of conservatives, and ultimately, a “report” that encouraged a terrorist to attack a mainstream Christian group.
Perhaps PayPal should ban BLM, PP, and SPLC given that their “promotion of hate and discrimination runs counter to [their] core value of inclusion.”

GLOBALISTS & COMMUNISTS CONVERGE AT DAVOS SPONSORED TECH SUMMIT IN CHINA

The Summer Davos opened in the Chinese city of Tianjin on Wednesday. The theme of this annual meeting is “shaping innovative societies in the fourth industrial revolution.” During the summit, policymakers and business leaders will primarily focus on helping developing countries adopt revolutionary technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning while mitigating potential risks associated with them.
GLOBALISTS & COMMUNISTS CONVERGE AT DAVOS SPONSORED TECH SUMMIT IN CHINA 
BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
President Donald Trump has initiated a new round of tariffs on China, in response to what he has described as “economic aggression” against the United States by the Beijing regime. Meanwhile, top leaders of the U.S. and global business, technology, and banking communities were in China last week celebrating with the communist aggressors.  From September 18-20, the World Economic Forum (WEF) held its 12th Annual Meeting of the New Champions, under the theme, “Shaping Innovative Societies in the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” in Tianjin, China. The WEF has become a leading evangelization chorus for a New World Order, a globalist scheme for world government that has become the shared vision of billionaire elites at Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Facebook, and Google, as well as their corporate counterparts in China.
Listed as “partners” for the event were such western corporate giants as Allianz, Bain & Company, Bank of America, Barclays, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, BlackRock, BP, Chevron, Cisco, Citi, Credit Suisse, Dell Technologies, Deloitte, Deutsche Bank, Facebook, GE, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, Mitsubishi, Morgan Stanley, PayPal, PepsiCo, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, Thomson Reuters, UPS, Visa, Volkswagen, and Zurich Insurance Group. Joining them in this venture were Chinese titans Alibaba, Dentsu Group, China Minsheng Investment Group, Hanwha Energy Corporation, Huawei Technologies, Tsinghua Holdings Co., and more.
The three-day confab featured dozens of presentations, speeches, and panels on a wide range of topics by some of the world’s notables in science, technology, business, finance, education, culture, and politics. Notably absent from the WEF program, however, were any presentations dealing with China’s religious persecution, imprisonment of political dissenters, torture, genocide, censorship, internet policing, Orwellian surveillance, cyber espionage and sabotage, intellectual property theft, and numerous other totalitarian features of China’s communist dictatorship. That’s not surprising. After all, we wouldn’t want unnecessary mention of such embarrassing, mundane matters to sour the melodic clink of champagne glasses and the ka-ching of cash registers, would we?
Emperor’s New Clothes
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang kicked off the conference with a keynote speech and then sat down on stage for a question and answer session with WEF founder and chairman Klaus Schwab. The questions from Schwab and other participants were beyond polite, revealing an audience of cowards and sycophants unable and/or unwilling to muster a single challenging question concerning the 800 pound gorilla in the room that everyone pretended not to see: Communist China’s relentlessly oppressive Gestapo State and its continuing horrendous violations of human rights. This was an “Emperor’s New Clothes” moment, but there was no guileless child in attendance to point out the naked truth to the willfully blind adults.
The closest Li got to a challenging question was a timid query about China’s progress on “IPR,” meaning intellectual property rights. This gave him an opportunity to launch into a rhapsody about China’s innovation, government reform and “contributions to the progress of humanity.”
“As China embraces the world with open arms,” Li Keqiang expounded grandiloquently, “we also welcome entrepreneurs, scientists and people in other sectors around the world to participate in China’s development with an open mind, so that together, we can make joint contributions to the progress of humanity. Let me reassure you that China is firmly committed to protecting IPR, as we know that innovation is supported by ideas, which generates property rights.”
That all sounds very nice and undoubtedly soothes whatever consciences the WEF elites have, but Chinese leaders have been mouthing the same nothings for decades, always promising to reform, but never delivering. As James Murphy reported for The New American on June 21 and 22, (see here and here), new reports from federal agencies and intelligence officials show that, far from reforming, Beijing is doubling down on many of its most troubling trade practices and forms of economic aggression. He quotes a recent U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report that notes “China appears to be conducting a campaign of commercial espionage against U.S. companies involving … human infiltration to systematically penetrate the information systems of U.S. companies to steal their intellectual property, devalue them and acquire them at dramatically reduced prices.” He cites also a 200-page report issued in March by the Office of the United States Trade Representative detailing the unfair and underhanded trade policies of the Chinese government.
Naturally, the American “mainstream” news media were either AWOL on the WEF summit, or were complicit in presenting it, essentially, as rip-and-read PR releases from China’s Communist Party propagandists.
Among the articles CNBC carried on the Tianjin conference, for instance, was one titled “Everyone could learn from China’s tech policies, World Economic Forum says,” by CNBC staff writer Evelyn Cheng. “The World Economic Forum is looking to China for ideas on how governments can appropriately regulate the technologies of the future,” Cheng writes. “The organization, which runs the annual conference of world leaders in Davos, Switzerland, announced Wednesday it is launching a hub in Beijing for government officials, businesses and academics to come up with suggestions for future policies on developments such as artificial intelligence.”
“The group in the communist country will mark the third location of the Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which opened in San Francisco in March 2017,” Cheng reports, noting that a WEF hub was opened in Tokyo in July, and another is scheduled to open in Mumbai, India, in October.
“We can’t use 20th century models for 21st century technology,” Murat Sonmez, head of the WEF’s Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, said in an interview with CNBC. “We have a lot to learn from China as well,” he said. “China represents a huge opportunity for the rest of the world to see what’s coming.” A lot to learn from China’s mass-murdering, genocidal, police state communist overlords? That is “what’s coming,” according to the WEF planners”? And we should happily embrace this 21st Century model?
Like most of the rest of the “journalists” reporting on the WEF event, Cheng does not reveal even the slightest glimmer of concern that the economic movers and shakers of the western world are head-over-heels in love with China’s totalitarian model of government. She makes little effort to temper this infatuation with readily available facts regarding the dystopian “future” that is already a reality in the People’s Republic of China.
Cheng, apparently, has some inkling of this reality, but any sensible inclination she might have in the direction of concern about the impact of omnipotent government on human freedom, is obviously overcome by a sense of duty to conform to the party line. “While China is one of the most controlling states in the world,” she writes, “the national government has let some sectors such as internet companies thrive relatively unrestricted.”
China is indeed “one of the most controlling states in the world,” but the remainder of the sentence following that clause is doubly deceptive. First of all, for the many uninformed readers who are unfamiliar with life in China, it seems to imply that internet usage there is “relatively unrestricted.” However, surely Ms. Cheng is fully aware of the draconian internet censorship imposed by the Great Firewall of China.
The Communist Party-run government allows certain internet companies to “thrive relatively unrestricted” because they are “National Champions” that are given special treatment in order to serve the state. Many of these privileged corporations are state owned enterprises (SOEs), which means they are literally extensions of the communist government. Besides being shielded from competition, they are lavishly funded, exempted from many taxes and regulations, and assisted by all the agencies of government. Other Chinese companies may officially not be  SOEs and may advertise themselves as “private,” but have close ties, nonetheless, to the Communist Party power structure and enjoy assistance, exemptions, and privileges not available to truly private companies in a genuine free market. Besides, in China’s opaque economy, it is impossible to know what the actual relationships are among corporate leaders and government officials. Thus, Chinese internet giants Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, Sina, QQ, and Taobao — all ostensibly private companies –are protected from foreign competitors, who are blocked from operation in China. Tencent’s Pony Ma Huateng, Alibaba’s Jack Ma, Baidu’s Robin Li Yanhong and other Chinese tech billionaires will continue to enjoy their privileged status as long as they continue to serve the Party. Should they step out of line, they would soon learn the truth of the old adage, “Today’s peacock, tomorrow’s feather duster.” Over the past several years, a string of princelings and peacocks have disappeared into Chinese prisons. Some have even been executed. Such are the perils that go with being a “National Champion” in Communist China. Heedless of these perils, the corporate elites of the WEF continue to eagerly embrace the ideas of central planning and government-corporate collaboration at the heart of China’s despotic system.
In 2017, President Xi Jinping became the first Chinese head of state to attend the World Economic Forum’s annual big bash in Davos, Switzerland. This year, in its pivot to Asia, the WEF also held a conference in Hanoi with ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) September 11-13. The extravaganza was hosted by the Communist government of Vietnam, which rivals China both in repressive prowess and in its eagerness to have western companies and governments build the economic and technical bases that they are already using against us, and that they intend to weaponize against us even further in the future.
Next week, the WEF will be holding its Sustainable Development Impact Summit in New York City, September 24-25. The WEF summit has been deliberately timed to promote the United Nations schemes for global control and to undercut President Trump’s agenda when he addresses the UN General Assembly. According to the WEF website, “The second annual Sustainable Development Impact Summit takes place in New York on 24-25 September to drive solutions for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Paris Agreement on climate change.” It has also announced it will be using the event to push for the UN Global Compacts for Migration and on Refugees.
President Trump, of course, is out of step with the WEF elites on all of these issues. So, expect the WEF to use the two-day event as an opportunity to marshal a huge contingent of “experts” who will flood the Fake News channels and op-ed pages with condemnations of Trump’s America First agenda, and propaganda in favor of the UN’s program for “global governance.”
Related articles:

KAVANAUGH AND LAST-MINUTE ACCUSATIONS~DEMOCRATS PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS~THE FEMINIST CULT OF VICTIMHOOD

‘I Fear for Lady Justice’: Judge Jeanine Slams Democrats’ Handling of Kavanaugh Allegation

In her Opening Statement on Saturday, Judge Jeanine Pirro weighed in on the controversy surrounding Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
Democrats have gone too far to stop Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination: RNC chairwoman

Mitch McConnell Slams Democrats “Weaponization of Unsubstantiated Smears” Against Kavanaugh 

Sen. Cruz Shouted Out of Restaurant, Demonstrators Protest Kavanaugh

KAVANAUGH AND LAST-MINUTE ACCUSATIONS~DEMOCRATS PULL OUT 
ALL THE STOPS 
BY JOSEPH KLEIN
Democrats are pulling out all the stops and enabling salacious last-minute accusations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh in order to sink his candidacy. Now that Christine Blasey Ford has finally agreed to testify this Thursday at an open hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding her charge that Judge Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a long-ago high school party, these new charges have suddenly emerged from left field.
On Sunday, a former classmate from Judge Kavanaugh’s time at Yale accused the Supreme Court nominee of exposing himself to her at a party. The New Yorker has just published an article written by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer, based on information that was reportedly sent to at least four Democratic senators. The article recounted a claim by Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Brett Kavanaugh’s, concerning “a dormitory party gone awry.” As the article acknowledged, however, “her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident.” The article goes on to say that in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, Ms. Ramirez was “reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.” It was only after “six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney” that Ms. Ramirez was suddenly able to pinpoint Judge Kavanaugh as having committed an unsavory act, even though she admitted being “foggy” at the time. The New Yorker article also noted that the magazine “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.”
Meanwhile, the ever-present Michael Avenatti, attorney of porn star Stormy Daniels, tweeted that he had information from anonymous sources that Judge Kavanaugh and his friend had “targeted” women with drugs and alcohol at parties to facilitate “gang rape.” 
Haters of Judge Kavanaugh are turning the process of Senate confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee into something worse than a travesty. His opponents in the Senate have transformed their “advise and consent” function into a campaign of no-holds-barred character assassination.


While Judge Kavanaugh weathers these latest accusations, which he adamantly denies, his real test will be on Thursday, assuming that Christine Blasey Ford will follow through on her agreement to testify at an open hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Her attorneys stalled for a week before making the announcement that Ms. Ford would testify despite certain “unresolved” issues. Among the issues Ms. Ford’s attorneys have raised was the refusal of the committee to subpoena one of the purported witnesses, Mark Judge, who Ms. Ford reportedly claims was involved in the alleged incident, as well as “who on the Majority side will be asking the questions, whether senators or staff attorneys.”
A week has already gone by since Ms. Ford went public with her story in an interview with the Washington Post while Ms. Ford and her attorneys stalled for time. They raised one procedural issue after another while claiming that the committee majority was “bullying” Ms. Ford. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-I) has bent over backwards to accommodate Ms. Ford’s preferred scheduling for her appearance. He extended the deadline several times for her to come to a decision on whether to testify at all. He had offered various options for her to testify publicly or privately or to be interviewed by committee staff in her home state of California, whichever setting would make her more comfortable. However, in Senator Grassley’s e-mail thanking Ms. Ford for finally agreeing to a time certain for her testimony, Senator Grassley correctly reminded her attorneys that “the committee determines which witnesses to call, how many witnesses to call, and what order to call them and who will question them. These are non-negotiable.”
While the negotiations with Ms. Ford’s attorneys for her testimony were underway, Democrats were sitting on the latest allegations, ready to pounce as soon as Ms. Ford’s accusation was about to be heard. Some Democrats are already using the Ramirez episode to push anew for a fresh FBI investigation and to postpone Thursday’s scheduled hearing.
Ideally, if the Democrats cannot apply enough pressure to force a withdrawal of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination through their relentless campaign of character assassination, they want to push any Senate votes until after the midterm elections at the earliest. Then they will claim that the newly elected senators should be involved in the confirmation decision. In the meantime, Judge Kavanaugh’s adversaries in the Senate, the mainstream media and progressive circles continue to bludgeon Judge Kavanaugh in the court of public opinion. All of their stratagems are an obvious attempt to buy time in order to persuade any wavering senators that Judge Kavanaugh is too tainted by sexual assault charges – whether proven or not – to sit on the Supreme Court.
Proof does not matter to those wanting to bring Judge Kavanaugh down at any cost. Regarding Ms. Ford’s accusation, they know that the proof so far is non-existent, aside from Ms. Ford’s own assertions contained in her confidential letter given to Senator Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, last July, and in her Washington Post interview. While a redacted version of Ms. Ford’s letter has been published, Senator Feinstein has refused to date to give even Senator Grassley a copy of the completely unredacted version. The FBI has already conducted 6 background checks, no federal crime is alleged, and there is no forensic evidence to investigate after 30 years at a site that Ms. Ford cannot even identify.
What we do know so far tends to undercut the credibility of Ms. Ford’s accusation. Ms. Ford cannot corroborate her decades-old charge of sexual assault against Judge Kavanaugh. Whatever corroboration Ms. Ford was hoping for from “witnesses” she claimed were at the alleged party is non-existent. The individuals she reportedly named in her unredacted confidential letter given to Senator Feinstein have either denied being at such a party or do not recollect what Ms. Ford has alleged. Moreover, by her own admission to the Washington Post, Ms. Ford “said she does not remember some key details of the incident.” She does not remember, for example, where it happened, how the party came together in the first place, or how she got home after the alleged incident. She believes the alleged incident occurred during the summer of 1982, but reportedly could not be more precise on the day or even the month of the party.
Afraid that Ms. Ford’s sexual assault allegation could be readily challenged and anxious to establish some sort of pattern of sexual misconduct beyond this single alleged incident, the Kavanaugh haters have latched onto Ms. Ramirez’s story.
The New York Times published an op-ed column last week by a psychiatrist, Richard A. Friedman, who cited neurological science to conclude that Ms. Ford’s claim that she has “a vivid memory of an attack that took place when she was 15” is “credible.” The reason, he wrote, is that “memories formed under the influence of intense emotion — such as the feelings that accompany a sexual assault — are indelible in the way that memories of a routine day are not.” The only problem with Dr. Friedman’s thesis is that Ms. Ford has apparently forgotten such key details surrounding the alleged sexual assault as when and where it happened and how she got home. Moreover, when Ms. Ford finally told someone about the incident in any detail some 30 years later in 2012, during a couples therapy session with her husband, she did not name Judge Kavanaugh specifically, according to the therapist’s notes that Ms. Ford had provided to the Washington Post in connection with her interview. The Washington Post reported that the therapist’s notes it reviewed “do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students ‘from an elitist boys’ school’ who went on to become ‘highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.’”
Ms. Ramirez’s story is even less credible. It took an attorney and six days of very belated reflection to help revive her memory of an incident she claimed happened while she herself was very drunk.
Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), one of Judge Kavanaugh’s fiercest critics who told men to “shut up” regarding Ms. Ford’s allegations, said she doubts Judge Kavanaugh’s credibility because of “how he approaches his cases.” Aside from mischaracterizing the constitutional textualist reasoning underlying Judge Kavanaugh’s opinions, she is saying that she does not believe Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of the sexual misconduct allegations lodged against him because of the opinions he wrote that she does not like. Such circular “reasoning” would be amusing if it were not so emblematic of what one writer called “Kavanaugh Derangement Syndrome.” Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) is also suffering from the same syndrome. She said Thursday regarding Ms. Ford: “I believe her because she is telling the truth and you know it by her story.”
Ms. Ford’s supporters are exploiting the “Me Too” movement to declare Judge Kavanaugh guilty simply because Ms. Ford is a woman who has made what they call, without any corroborating evidence to date, a “credible” charge. The same would presumably be the case for Ms. Ramirez. They argue that since the Senate Judiciary Committee is not a criminal judicial trial, but rather a legislative hearing for confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee, the normal burden of proof shouldered by the accuser should not apply. Judge Kavanaugh should have to prove that he is not guilty, they are in effect insisting. This is another case of Kavanaugh Derangement Syndrome.
Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the normal burden on the prosecution in a criminal case – to prove the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt – is not applicable regarding the charge against Judge Kavanaugh since he is not a defendant in a criminal trial. However, that should not flip the burden of proof onto Judge Kavanaugh altogether. Judge Kavanaugh is being subjected to charges of a criminal nature that could not only deprive him of a seat on the Supreme Court for which he is otherwise eminently qualified. Ms. Ford’s unsubstantiated accusation can completely destroy Judge Kavanaugh’s life by causing irreparable damage to his reputation for integrity and good character and to his career, which he has built up during decades of public service. His family’s lives have been completely upended. Placing the burden on Judge Kavanaugh to prove that he was not involved in an uncorroborated incident from years ago, about which even his accuser does not recall key details, turns the fundamental constitutional principle of due process upside down. Ms. Ford should have the burden to prove her accusations by at least a preponderance of all the evidence presented.
This charade must come to an end. No more extensions for Ms. Ford to come forward and testify. If Ms. Ford does not follow through with her agreement to testify in an open Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this Thursday and do so upon the conditions set by the committee, she should go home while the committee proceeds to an immediate vote on Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. If Ms. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh do testify, the senators deciding on whether to confirm Judge Kavanaugh as well as the American public following the testimony must remember one cardinal rule. In a nation guided by fairness and law, a person is innocent until proven guilty. Sadly, many of Judge Kavanaugh’s haters have thrown that rule aside.
If Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination is pulled as a result of the smears and character assassination, President Trump should immediately nominate someone on his short list such as Amy Coney Barrett and the Senate Republican majority should then push through the new nominee’s confirmation as soon as possible. Delay is not an option.
________________________________________________________________

Another Witness Denies Kavanaugh Accuser’s Claim, 

as Testimony Is Set for Thursday

EXCERPTS:
“One of Ford’s excuses for the delay was that she is claustrophobic and fears flying and must drive or take the train from California.”
“Shockingly, Grassley not only permitted Ford’s attorney to control when Ford would testify, but also surrendered the right to control the hearing itself, as the Times reported: “While the negotiations over Dr. Blasey’s testimony seemed to gain momentum, they could still falter over the details, which include who will question her.””
“Keyser’s attorney answered: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.””
______________________________________________________________

Who Will Testify First? Kavanaugh or His Accuser?

________________________________________________________

STOP APPEASING THE DEMOCRATS

Appeasing an aggressor invites only more aggression.

EXCERPT:
“But in the face of this naked ploy to bork Kavanaugh and derail the confirmation process for partisan advantage, the Republicans seem to be reverting to their customary preemptive cringe. All the Dems have to do is squeal “sexism” and Republicans start negotiating and offering concessions. Of course, after each concession comes another demand.”
______________________________________________________________

THE FEMINIST CULT OF VICTIMHOOD

Protesters play political dress-up to deny reality.

BY DAWN PERLMUTTER
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/271385/feminist-cult-victimhood-dawn-perlmutterrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Christine Blasey Ford is the latest poster child in the feminist cult of victimhood. She achieved that status by claiming she was physically attacked at a high school party by Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh three decades ago. She immediately became the perfect useful idiot whose false memories and false allegations are being fully exploited to postpone the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. She is the latest symbol of oppression among anti-Trump women activists. Instead of characteristics like honor, integrity and courage, feminist heroines must first and foremost be victims, real or imagined.
The current feminist movement has become a cult of angry miserable women recruited by the guru of man hating misery Hillary Clinton. There are certain predisposing factors that facilitate recruitment into cults. These factors typically include: a desire to belong, impaired capacity for critical thinking, disillusionment, dissatisfaction, idealism, lack of self-confidence and a desire for meaning in one’s life. Thousands of vulnerable unhappy women were ripe for recruitment into the cult of women activists. Now thoroughly indoctrinated in anti-Trump hatred they have been brainwashed, organized and unleashed on the public. Their goal is to destroy the Trump administration, their strategy is resistance and their tactics are accusation, disinformation, and extortion. Christine Blasey Ford’s attempt to politically assassinate Kavanaugh can be likened to the Manson cult followers who were sent out to start ‘Helter Skelter’, an apocalyptic race war initiated by murdering influential white people.
Cults often like to create a recognizable visual identity. This is often accomplished with uniform clothing that functions as a recognizable symbol of the group. The latest popular outfit of women’s rights activists are full length scarlet robes and puritanical white bonnets. Always seeking attention these women have hung up their Women’s March ‘pussy hats’ to dress up as characters from ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’. Groups of feminist protesters have been dressing in creepy cult-like ankle-length red dresses and cloaks, red gloves and white bonnets during protests in courthouses, government building and other public places. The uniforms signify their new-found identity and purpose in life in their Anti-Trump sisterhood.
The red cloak cult uniforms are the same costumes worn in Margaret Atwood’s 1985 novel-turned TV series The Handmaid’s Tale. The novel is set in a near-future theocratic dictatorship called the Republic of Gilead, where the North American population is significantly decreasing. It is a patriarchal religious society that imposed severe limits to freedom and women’s rights in an effort to increase fertility rates. There is a strict caste system and women are the property of and subordinate to their husband, father, or head of household. They are not allowed to vote, hold a job, read, possess money, or own anything, among many other restrictions. Handmaids sole function is to have babies and they are forced to participate in ritualized rape ceremonies. Red robed protesters equate the Trump Administration to the fictional Republic of Gilead and cite the Handmaid’s Tale as a cautionary tale about what happens when women lose their reproductive rights.
Women activists around the world are wearing the red robes as a visual symbol for women’s rights, abortion rights and the fight against policies and politicians they accuse of restricting those rights. In the U.S. their primary target is the Trump administration. They have specifically targeted Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh. On September 4th a dozen activists dressed in handmaids’ uniforms stood outside Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing room to protest his ‘anti-abortion, anti-healthcare, and anti-women views,” noting that he is an “extremist ideologue who, if confirmed to the Supreme Court, will take away women’s basic rights.” These statements and others including Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations clearly demonstrate that many of these women have trouble distinguishing reality from fiction.
Feminists love symbolism especially if they can wear it. It makes them feel important, sophisticated and of course makes playtime more fun. The Handmaids Tale is chock full of symbolism. The clothing, language and iconography from the book and TV series support all their favorite grievances; class, race and gender discrimination, subjugation of women, reproductive rights, a tyrannical religious patriarchal society and much more. Fortunately, part of their protests involves remaining silent as a method to give the demonstration more impact and to symbolize that women of the future may not have a voice. The positive thing about these silent protests is that the rest of us do not have to be subjected to their big mouths, illogical arguments, slogans and vulgar comments, all of which were on full display at the Women’s Marches. Another benefit of the red robe uniform is that it covers the women. We are not exposed to 200-pound middle aged women squeezing into a handmade giant vagina outfit or parading around topless with slogans written across their naked chests.
These privileged neurotic women seem to have an endless amount of spare time to whine, complain and design new protest costumes. They are like real life Barbie dolls that can’t wait to wear the hottest new protest outfit. Perhaps while sewing their daughter’s latest princess costume they decided they wanted to play dress up also. Because that is what children do. Live in make-believe worlds, engage in magical thinking and are always looking for imaginary monsters under their bed. They invent stories to support their fantasy oppressions regardless of whose life they ruin. They crave attention the way drug addicts crave heroin and they get recruited into cults to give their boring lives meaning.
While these so-called feminists are playing dress up to symbolize fake oppression based on Hollywood fiction, real women are forced to wear robes, cover their heads and keep silent. In real life the handmaids robe is called a burqa, niqab, abaya, chador or hijab and women are forced to wear it every day of their life not just during protest playtime. If they take it off they are beaten, blinded, doused in acid, mutilated and murdered. These women are living under real patriarchal tyrannies, not some futuristic Hollywood novel. Feminist protesters get to go home and take off the uncomfortable restrictive costumes that they wore for three hours while millions of women do not have that freedom of choice.
While Christine Blasey Ford is seeing a therapist over her imaginary rape, there are hundreds of victims of refugee rape gangs, honor violence and sexual trafficking that suffer real trauma from real rape, torture and slavery. Some of these horrors have been detailed in The Refugee Rape Gangs of Sweden and Hijab Shame: Rape, Murder and Loss of Face. Christine Blasey Ford is the epitome of the modern feminist movement, she is a selfish neurotic privileged child. Women in the cult of victimhood all seem to suffer from arrested development and are thoroughly enabled by the liberal press who similarly prefer fiction to reality. The liberal media has published dozens of articles on the handmaid’s protests describing them as “one of the most powerful current feminist symbols of protest” encouraging their infantile grievances. The same liberal media is fully supportive of Christine’s delusions yet refuse to report on Muslim rape gangs, female genital mutilation, child marriages, honor killings and lack of basic human rights for fear of being politically incorrect.
Christine Blasey Ford’s 1995 dissertation was entitled ‘Measuring Young Children’s Coping Responses to Interpersonal Conflict’. Interesting topic since it appears that she is dealing with her own childhood coping mechanisms. As a psychologist she should know that there is a significant distinction between repressed memories in cases of alleged sexual abuse and false memories. She apparently is just one of the many women activists in the feminist cult of victimhood who invent past trauma and hurl accusations as a method to seek attention and relief from their own unhappiness. These perpetual victims always blame their misery for what they think some man did to them or what the world owes them. President Trump represents every man that disappointed them; their husband, boyfriend, father, brother, son, boss, therapist, teacher, etc. They project all their bitter, angry, bottomless black pit of discontent onto President Trump because his policies compel them to grow up, face reality, take responsibility and contribute to society.
Handmaid protesters are part of a larger organization called the Handmaids Coalition. The coalition is a collection of activist groups that have staged women’s rights protests while wearing the red cult uniforms. Their Facebook page just updated its profile picture to a large pink button that reads “I believe Christine Blasey Ford”. The page claims that Christine has received death threats and had to hire private security. This increases her victimhood street cred which gives her more status in the cult. Subsequently the Handmaids Coalition created a fund to cover her security expenses. These delusional feminists continue to portray Christine Blasey Ford as a victim while refusing to acknowledge the harsh realities of real victims of rape and human trafficking. Ironically, the Handmaids Coalition motto is ‘fighting to keep fiction from becoming reality’, which effectively summarizes their philosophy of life and the problem with it.

TRUMP PLANNING MASS ARRESTS, MILITARY TRIBUNALS FOR DEEP STATE TRAITORS

EMERGENCY REPORT: Trump Planning Mass Arrests, Military Tribunals for Deep State Traitors

NEW WORLD ORDER: 

The Main Goal of THE Deep State

With Project Veritas exposing the Deep State through the infiltration of the radical leftists at the Democratic Socialists of America, we explore the Deep State’s end goal: a New World Order in in this episode of Analysis Behind the News.
eMERGENCY REPORT: TRUMP PLANNING MASS ARRESTS, MILITARY TRIBUNALS FOR 

DEEP STATE TRAITORS

Comey, McCabe, Clinton and Obama in the administration’s crosshairs

BY MIKE ADAMS
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/emergency-report-trump-planning-mass-arrests-military-tribunals-for-deep-state-traitors/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
As the documents cited here clearly show, President Trump is planning to carry out mass arrests of deep state traitors, including Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, James Comey and even Barack Obama.
This is fully covered, with accompanying documentation from the U.S. Federal Register, in the links and video below. (This author is fully supportive of this effort to save America and arrest the traitors.)
The confirmation of Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court is the key to getting this done in a timely manner, which explains why the deranged Left is going to such outrageous extremes to fabricate false allegations against Kavanaugh and stage coordinated, well-funded protests to try to block the U.S. Senate from confirming him.
Once Kavanaugh is on the court, it will add the necessary support for constitutional “emergency powers” that concentrate power in the executive branch of government (currently headed by President Trump) during times of war and national emergencies.
FACT: The United States has been operating under a state of declared war since September, 2001, following the 9/11 attacks.
FACT: The United States has been operating under a declared national emergency, signed by President Trump, since December 20, 2017 (see proof document, below).
In this detailed video analysis, I lay out the evidence for President Trump’s plan to issue mass arrests of deep state traitors, then try them for treason under military tribunals. This is justified and lawful because the acts being committed against the United States of America by deep state traitors are acts of treason during a time of declared war. It is no coincidence that President Trump has deliberately funded the U.S. Pentagon with its most massive budgets ever conceived. This is because the Pentagon has agreed to run the military arrests of deep state traitors, under the direction of the Commander-In-Chief, President Trump.
President Trump, I believe, has decided to go to bat for America and utterly destroy the anti-American deep state crime ring that has been working for years to destroy this nation and end its national sovereignty. This will be Trump’s legacy. He may not even run for re-election after 2020, since his entire plan to arrest the traitors and restore the rule of law in America will require him to step aside once certain goals are accomplished (see detailed explanation below).
Note that in order to accomplish this, President Trump will need to declare temporary martial law. He will need our support during this time to maintain order and civility across the nation as the arrests and trials of deep state traitors are under way. We should all expect mass violence and chaos from the Left, which is following the “Rules for Radicals,” a blueprint for communist revolts and violent overthrow attempts of governments.
See the documents for yourself… this is all posted on the U.S. Federal Register government website
Here are the links to the documents cited in this comprehensive video:
Document #1Executive Order 13818, signed December 20, 2017. “Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption”
This document specifically describes the crimes of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, James Comey and Robert Mueller under the “corruption” section, alluding to the Uranium One scandal and Obama’s multi-billion dollar money laundering operation that handed nuclear weapons capabilities to Iran. It says that the executive order targets, “any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General… to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in… corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery…”
This describes precisely what Clinton, Comey, Mueller, Obama, Brennan, McCabe and others carried out under the Obama regime. These are more than just felony federal crimes; they are acts of treason against the United States of America, carried out during a time of declared war.
From that document, here is President Trump’s declared national emergency:
I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
Document #2Executive Order 13618, signed July 6, 2012 by President Obama. “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions”
This executive order grants the President absolute control over all U.S. media, including internet tech giants (social media), news networks and news websites. It specifically names:
…communications that support Continuity of Government; Federal, State, local, territorial, and tribal emergency preparedness and response communications; non-military executive branch communications systems; critical infrastructure protection networks; and non-military communications networks, particularly with respect to prioritization and restoration…
Document #3Executive Order 13825, signed March 1, 2018. “2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States”
Although much more difficult to read, this document essentially establishes the preservation of the government’s right to prosecute crimes of treason and deep state collusion against America, all of which may be prosecuted via military tribunals under existing U.S. law.
This would allow deep state traitors to be arrested by military police and subjected to military trials run by the Pentagon, completely bypassing the corrupt court system which has been deliberately stacked with complicit deep state traitors and “resistance” judges.
To accomplish this, President Trump must announce temporary martial law
For the record, I wholly support this effort to arrest and prosecute the thousands of deep state traitors who have become a cancer upon America. Were you aware that James Comey was a communist? John Brennan, of course, has remained a communist for his entire adult life, and Barack Obama was a radical Muslim who despised America and worked every day to undermine it through a variety of nefarious means (including allowing U.S. military encryption technology to be captured by Iran via the U.S. drone “GPS spoofing” incident).
For starters, Barack Obama personally authorized the illegal “spygate” spying on Trump campaign officials. Barack Obama also allowed China to hack 21 million U.S. military personnel records, effectively dumping the entire U.S. Pentagon database into the hands of Communist China.
For a full, detailed explanation of Obama’s treasonous crimes against America, watch this extremely important video from REAL.video (it has been banned from YouTube for obvious reasons):
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Brennan, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, Peter Strzok and a long list of other traitors have been conspiring for years to destroy America from within and see it replaced with a communist regime run by authoritarian globalists. Tech giants like Apple, Google and Facebook are all part of the plan, which is exactly why you’ve seen every one of them working closely with China to roll out authoritarian techno-tyranny infrastructure systems that plan to enslave every citizen of the world, making them powerless and obedient to a globalist technocracy that runs the “one world government.”
Trump’s plan to rescue America from the globalists will require temporary martial law
In order to halt this global dictatorship and defend America against traitors who are working to destroy it, President Trump must carry out the following actions:
1) Achieve the release of the declassified, unredacted deep state documents from within the FBI and DOJ that will reveal the full extent of deep state treason against America. (The FBI and DOJ are currently stalling this effort, furthering their treason against America and proving they have a lot to hide.) Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff and Warner have already committed acts of treason in calling on the FBI and DOJ to defy this presidential order.
2) Invoke the national emergency powers which are constitutionally granted to the executive branch of government. (Technically, this already happened in 2017.)
3) Invoke President Obama’s executive order 13618 and seize control of Google, Facebook, CNN, Washington Post and the New York Times to halt the treasonous lies, coordinated election fraud and political coup attempt which is being run by all these traitors of America.
4) Use all controlled communications channels to publicly declare the details of the crimes (and criminal actors) which have been committed against America. Disclose everything to the America people about how their country had been overrun and destroyed from within.
5) Order military police to find and arrest thousands of deep state traitors who have been deliberately undermining America from within. This will include hundreds of people inside the FBI and DOJ, plus hundreds more in the State Department and other agencies. Arrests must also include traitorous, corrupt federal judges who have deliberately undermined America by, for example, blocking Trump’s constitutional travel ban to protect America from enemy terrorists. Many traitors will attempt to flee the country, of course, and they will need to be located and brought to justice like former Nazi war criminals.
6) Issue an executive order demanding national voter ID for all future elections. No longer will America tolerate democracy being stolen by the votes of illegals who are granted voting rights by California and other complicit, anti-America states or cities.
7) Suspend elections during the military tribunals, but lay out a timeline for the restoration of elections and nationwide voting (with voter ID in place) to restore the rule of law and give America back to the American people.
8) Deploy the U.S. military along the southern border. Use the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to build the wall.
9) Promise to resign the presidency once the rule of law is restored in America, signaling to the American people that Trump plans to hand over power to the next elected President within a reasonable time period. Americans will rightly be concerned about martial law morphing into a military dictatorship. Trump needs to assure the American people that his job is to destroy the deep state, restore the rule of law, then get out of the way and retire as the greatest U.S. President in history — the President who saved America from traitors and communists.
The American people will not tolerate a permanent military dictatorship in America, but they will tolerate temporary martial law needed to drain the swamp, arrest the traitors and restore the rule of law.
During this time, by the way, the entire FBI likely needs to be disbanded and rebuilt from scratch. The agency’s credibility has been utterly destroyed by the actions of James Comey, Peter Strzok and others.
Watch the full video explaining all this in detail:

ACTIVISTS CALL FOR NEED TO ADDRESS NORTH KOREAN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES

FILE - Phil Robertson, deputy director of Human Rights Watch's Asia division, attends a press conference in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, March 12, 2015.
FILE – Phil Robertson, deputy director of Human Rights Watch’s Asia division, attends a press conference in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, March 12, 2015.
ACTIVISTS CALL FOR NEED TO ADDRESS 
NORTH KOREAN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
BY STEVE MILLER
SEE: https://www.voanews.com/a/korean-human-rights-and-unification/4584410.htmlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
South Korean President Moon Jae-in claimed success following his three-day summit in North Korea last week, where he was able to secure agreements from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on a variety of inter-Korean projects and revitalize denuclearization talks. However, as the president openly speaks about a new era of peace and prosperity, absent from the discussion has been the North’s human rights abuses.
A 2014 United Nations Office of Human Rights’ Commission of Inquiry report found “systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations” in North Korea that in many instances constituted crimes against humanity.
“The gravity, scale and nature of these violations reveal a state that does not have any parallel in the contemporary world,” it added, calling North Korea a state that “seeks to dominate every aspect of its citizens’ lives and terrorizes them from within.”
In a statement, South Korea’s presidential office said President Moon will relay the outcomes of the third inter-Korean at the 73rd United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) and plans to work closely with the international community to develop a new vision of peace and prosperity on the Korean peninsula.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pose for photographs on the top of Mt. Paektu, North Korea, Sept. 20, 2018.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pose for photographs on the top of Mt. Paektu, North Korea, Sept. 20, 2018.

Moon’s office added South Korea is ready and willing to assume “key roles on the major issues facing the international society such as peace and security, human rights, development, and humanitarian assistance, and climate change; we would like to increase the cooperation with UN and global society.”
Human rights not part of current discussions
But human rights advocate tell VOA that while positive steps toward peace, reconciliation, and eventual reunification of the peninsula are positive, human rights discussions are not part of the agenda.
Despite the agreements reached between the South and North outlined in the April Panmunjom and September Pyongyang Declarations, Executive director Greg Scarlatoiu with the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea said human rights policies aren’t involved in Seoul’s approach to reconciliation with the North.
“There is absolutely no mention of North Korea’s abysmal human rights violations,” said Scarlatoiu.
Phil Robertson, Deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch, did note one exception, “the important humanitarian reunification between the separated families.”
South Korea’s Ministry of Unification administers the Council on North Korean Human Rights and “works closely together with other agencies.” The ministry said it will “establish the basic plan for the promotion of human rights in North Korea, and its implementation plan, and carry out relevant policies systematically.”
In an email to VOA, the unification ministry writes, “The government places emphasis on human rights in the notion of universal value and ethnicity, and strives to continuously improve the quality of life for North Koreans.”
“The [Pyongyang] Joint Declaration of September contains numbers of agreements on inter-Korean exchanges and easing military tensions. If the agreements are well carried out, it will contribute to not only the improvement of inter-Korean relations and peace settlement on the Korean peninsula, but also the improvement of human rights of North Korean people,” the message said.
Pressure needed
But rights advocates say more needs to be done and suggest increased international pressure is needed to ensure that in future discussions with North Korea, human rights issues are discussed.
Robertson said that in talks with North Korea, “There has to be a larger context.”
Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, talks to journalists during a press briefing on a project titled "Nothing for Our Land," July 17, 2018, in Yangon, Myanmar.

Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, talks to journalists during a press briefing on a project titled “Nothing for Our Land,” July 17, 2018, in Yangon, Myanmar.

When you talk about “long-term prosperity and peace… getting the North Korea – South Korea issue and Korean reunification right is the key element,” but with a history of severe human rights violations on the peninsula, said Robertson, “Human rights can’t just be left off the table.”
Scarlatoiu added that avoiding such topics at the start of negotiations makes it difficult to raise them later.
“I don’t know how president Moon is going to move to a position where he raises human rights concerns, after giving all of these speeches lauding the leader of North Korea for his accomplishments,” he said.
While the Ministry of Unification can’t identify specific agenda items for future inter-Korean talks, it said “through the [Panmunjom] Declaration, the government (together with the North) has agreed to endeavor to resolve the humanitarian issues that resulted from the division.”
The unification ministry said the government will “find practical measures to enhance human rights of North Koreans,” although the ministry gave no details on how it plans to achieve that goal.
Robertson asserts there has been a lack of advancement in addressing North Korean human rights issues by the South Korean government.
“The North Korean human rights act was passed by the South Korean Parliament two years ago,” said Robertson, “and still two years later, we have no real progress on implementing key aspects of that law.”
“The ultimate measure of reconciliation, peace, and unification of the Korean Peninsula is going to be the impact it has on the Korean people living in the South and in the North,” said Scarlatiou, adding that those goals should not sacrifice attention to human rights.
Lee Ju-hyun contributed to this report.

REPORT: SCALIA ACOLYTE TO OVERSEE MUELLER PROBE

Report: Scalia Acolyte to Oversee Mueller Probe

REPORT: SCALIA ACOLYTE TO OVERSEE MUELLER PROBE

Noel Francisco has argued against government overreach in political investigations

BY KIT DANIELS
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/report-scalia-acolyte-to-oversee-mueller-probe/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Noel Francisco, a Scalia acolyte who has argued against government overreach in political investigations, is expected to oversee the Mueller probe, taking it over from outgoing Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein.
Francisco, the Solicitor General, is the fourth-ranking official at the Justice Dept. and was confirmed for the position in Sept. 2017 by the Senate, which voted mostly along party lines.
Previously, in 1997 Francisco worked as a clerk for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who he referred to as his “dear mentor.”
Francisco is also a member of the Federalist Society, which was tapped by President Trump to provide recommendations for filling court vacancies during his presidency.
Scalia was likewise a member of the society.
Francisco also worked for a private law firm in which he argued cases before the Supreme Court, including the 2016 case Zubik v. Burwell in which Francisco contended that Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate infringed upon religious freedom.
“Although Mr. Francisco has remained mum on the Mueller probe he now stands to inherit, he has argued against government overreach in political corruption investigations,” reported the Washington Times. “He even blasted frequent Trump sparring partner and ex-FBI Director James Comey for “heavy-handed” tactics in the bureau’s probe of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican.”
“Mr. McDonnell’s conviction was vacated by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016.”
1 525 526 527 528 529 798