republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has praised the
victories of the populist Five Star Movement in the Italian referendum
and the election of Donald Trump in the United States, claiming these
developments are just the beginning of the “rebellion”.

Orbán is referring to the taking back of Western countries from
Leftist globalists who have flooded Europe with Muslim migrants who are
responsible for an unprecedented wave of crime throughout Europe,
including widespread sex assaults. In July, Orban stated that migrants were “poison” and “not needed”:

Orban said the migration and foreign policy plans of the
US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump were “vital” for
Hungary…. the US Democrats
supported migration as well as what he described as “democracy export”,
while Hungary – like Trump – opposed both, “making it clear where
Hungary’s interests lie”….The Democrats’ foreign policy is bad for
Europe, and deadly for Hungary,” he said. “The migration and foreign
policy advocated by the Republican candidate, Mr Trump, is good for
Europe and vital for Hungary.”

“Orbán Declares 2017 the ‘Year of Rebellion’”, by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, December 21, 2016:

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has praised the
victories of the populist Five Star Movement in the Italian referendum
and the election of Donald Trump in the United States, claiming these
developments are just the beginning of the “rebellion”.

The Hungarian leader, who is known to be outspoken in expressing his
opinions on mass migration and the migrant crisis claims a kinship with
rising populist leaders and movements across Europe and the United

Mr. Orbán said his party Fidesz was a “self-made story … about ten to
twenty, or thirty guys coming from somewhere, rising up, fed up with
the world that surrounds them” who wanted to change it.

He claimed to see the same attitude in President-Elect Donald J.
Trump, saying in an interview with Hungarian news site that Trump
had what he called a “self-made man mentality.” He went on to add,
“Self-made figures are people who themselves are successful, who do not
begin a sentence with ‘I know people,’ but say, ‘I’ve done that.’ ”

For the Hungarian prime minister, 2016 isn’t the end of the populist
rebellion against globalism and the elites. Asked if he thought the
anti-globalist sentiment would spread he said, “I am convinced that 2017
will be a year of rebellion. Whether they [the globalists] put down the
rebellion or not, that’s another story.”

Orbán cited the victory of the Italian opposition in the recent
referendum and said that despite the defeat for anti-mass migration
candidate Norbert Hofer in the Austrian presidential elections, the
rebellion was growing.

“Next year will be elections in Germany, the Netherlands, France. A
lot of things can happen,” he said. Mr. Orbán said there were two
rebellions going on, one was a revolt of the working and middle class
which led to Brexit and the victory of Donald Trump and the other “…is a
kind of national rebellion.

“The ‘United States of Europe’ advocates, by being stealthy,
encroachments on the sovereignty of individual nations using the issue
of asylum.

“All of this is surrounded by political correctness, containment,
intellectual rebellion against stigma. The rebellion started in 2016,
will be even more enhanced in the future. Therefore, I say that 2017
will be a year of rebellion,” he said.

When asked if he thought it was contradictory for a ruling government
to declare themselves rebels, he said, “The real freedom fighters are
the people.”

He went on to add, “If we believe in Hungary, the Hungarian people,
one inside the other, then we are facing a bright future,” adding that
children should be taught “not to seek the easy way, but go their own
way even when it seems difficult, then the country can be great again.

“America, what is your message? Let’s make Hungary great again!”



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

So much for peace on earth and goodwill to all. Who would have
thought only two decades ago that a nativity scene would need heavily
armed guards? The guards at Canterbury Cathedral situation demonstrates
an inherent clash of values.

Christianity is already virtually wiped out in the middle east by
jihadist thugs and its well on its way on Western soil, unless
Westerners have a change in attitude and wake up.

“So much for peace and goodwill to all men: Machine gun police guard
Canterbury cathedral and its nativity scene as security is stepped up
across the UK in the wake of attack on Berlin”, by Rebecca Camber, Liz
Hull and Andy Dolan, Daily Mail, December 20, 2016:

Within the hallowed grounds of one of the most famous
Christian buildings in England, the traditional Christmas nativity scene
should have been a place of peace and tranquillity.

But yesterday crowds who gathered to appreciate the sacred scene at
Canterbury Cathedral were confronted by the fearful sight of armed
police bearing assault rifles patrolling the manger where the figure of
Baby Jesus lay.

The extraordinary image offers a chilling glimpse of Britain braced
for a possible terrorist attack just days before Christmas in the wake
of atrocities in Berlin and Turkey.

Security was stepped up dramatically around the UK yesterday after a
total of 12 people were killed and 58 injured when a truck was driven
into crowds at a Christmas market in Berlin, hours after a Russian
Ambassador was assassinated in Turkey on Monday night.

Within hours of the carnage which Islamic State claimed
responsibility for, police in Britain responded by throwing a ring of
steel around potential major targets including the Changing of the

In an unprecedented move, Scotland Yard announced that roads around
Buckingham Palace would be closed to vehicles from today and additional
barriers placed around the guard movements over the next three months.

The measure was described as a ‘necessary precaution’ to protect the
substantial number of military personnel and huge crowds drawn to the
spectacle which takes place daily between 10.45am and 12.30pm.

Elsewhere in the country, other forces dispatched scores of officers
to Christmas markets in towns and cities to prevent a copycat attack….

Police say there is no intelligence to suggest an attack in Britain
is imminent.But there are fears that the call from ISIS could lead to a
lone wolf attack from any of the 400 militants who have returned here
from fighting in Syria or Iraq……



 Prince Charles warns against Trump and “the dark days of the 30’s” during Holocaust
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

According to Islamic tradition, when Muhammad migrated from Mecca to
Medina, he wasn’t just “seeking the freedom for himself and his
followers to worship.” He became at that point for the first time a
political and military leader as well as a religious one. He began for
the first time to get Qur’anic “revelations” exhorting Muslims to wage
war against unbelievers.

Just as Charles is ignoring the historical context and circumstances
of Muhammad’s hijrah, so now he is also ignoring the manifest fact that
all too many Muslim migrants are not “seeking the freedom…to worship,”
but are coming to Europe to conquer and Islamize the land, emigrating,
after Muhammad’s pattern, “for the sake of Allah” (cf. Qur’an 4:100).

Charles also says: “We are now seeing the rise of many populist
groups across the world that are increasingly aggressive towards those
who adhere to a minority faith.” This is the familiar “Muslims are the
new Jews” theme. This is a common Leftist talking point. Many, many
others have made this claim before Chomsky, including Noam Chomsky; Bernie Sanders; the notorious non-Muslim Islamic apologist Karen Armstrong; Jeffrey Goldberg, the journalist at The Atlantic who some time ago interviewed Barack Obama about why he won’t call Islamic terrorism Islamic; liberal media pundit Reza Aslan; Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Keith Ellison; Nicholas Kristof, one of the New York Times’ Mideast pontificators; Canadian Muslim leader Syed Sohawardy; and Philadelphia chapter leader of the Council on American-Islamic Relations Jacob Bender. Many others have repeated it.
The blazingly brilliant Daniel Greenfield takes it apart in this video.
The idea that Muslims are the new Jews is put forward by the Left,
but it also has opponents on the Left. In 2014, as part of his ongoing
awakening to the nature and reality of the jihad threat, Bill Maher noted:

Jews weren’t oppressing anybody. There weren’t 5,000
militant Jewish groups. They didn’t do a study of treatment of women
around the world and find that Jews were at the bottom of it. There
weren’t 10 Jewish countries in the world that were putting gay people to
death just for being gay.

Indeed. Further, no one is calling for or justifying genocide of
Muslims. No individual or group opposed to Islam is remotely comparable
to the National Socialists. Not that facts have ever gotten in the way
of a good meme.
Maher isn’t alone on the Left in having pointed out the absurdity of
likening opposition to jihad to the lead-up to the Holocaust. The late Christopher Hitchens also refuted this idea when writing a few years ago about the notorious Ground Zero Mosque proposal:

“Some of what people are saying in this mosque
controversy is very similar to what German media was saying about Jews
in the 1920s and 1930s,” Imam Abdullah Antepli, Muslim chaplain at Duke
University, told the New York Times. Yes, we all recall the
Jewish suicide bombers of that period, as we recall the Jewish yells for
holy war, the Jewish demands for the veiling of women and the stoning
of homosexuals, and the Jewish burning of newspapers that published
cartoons they did not like.

“Prince Charles Urges Brits To Think Of Muhammad This Christmas, Speaks Out Against ‘Aggressive Populism,’” Breitbart London, December 22, 2016:

Britain’s Prince of Wales has spoken out on national
radio in an appeal for persecuted Christians and minorities across the
world, but the Royal also moved to criticize “populist groups”.
Speaking on Thought for the Day,
a short early morning slot on BBC Radio 4 dedicated to faith issues,
the son of Britain’s reigning Monarch urged listeners to think of
persecuted religious figures — singling out Jesus Christ and Muhammad —
this Christmas. He said:

Normally at Christmas we think of the Birth of our Lord
Jesus Christ. I wonder though if this year we might remember how the
story of the nativity unfolds, with the fleeing of the holy family to
escape violent persecution. And we might also remember that when the
prophet Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina he was seeking the
freedom for himself and his followers to worship.

Whichever religious path we follow, the destination is the same – to
value and respect the other person, accepting their right to live out
their peaceful response to the love of God.

The future King spent much of his short radio appearance discussing
the persecution of Christians without going so far as to name the main
source of this persecution — radical Islam. Referring to “insidious
forms of extremism… which aim to eliminate all types of religious
diversity”, the Prince also mentioned the Yazidis who are coming under
extreme persecution from Islamic State, Jews who have been leaving
Europe in record numbers to escape Islamist persecution, and the Muslim
Ahmadis who are treated as apostates by many mainstream Muslims.
Speaking of his recent interactions with persecuted Christians, Prince Charles said:

In London recently I met a Jesuit protest from Syria…. He
told me of mass kidnappings in parts of Syria and Iraq and how he
feared that Christians would be driven en masse from the lands described
in the Bible. He thought it quite possible there would be no Christians
in Iraq in five years.

While he was speaking to promote the receiving of asylum seekers into
Europe, the Prince also criticized what he called “populist” movements.
Britain’s Guardian newspaper claimed
of the comments: “His address will be seen by some as a veiled
reference to the election of Donald Trump in the US, the rise of the far
right in Europe, and increasingly hostile attitudes to refugees in the
The Prince said, implying a relationship between Europe’s growing
pro-borders movement with European Fascism of the last century:

We are now seeing the rise of many populist groups across
the world that are increasingly aggressive towards those who adhere to a
minority faith. All of this has deeply disturbing echoes of the dark
days of the 1930s.
I was born in 1948, just after the end of World War Two, in which my
parents’ generation had fought and died in a battle against intolerance,
monstrous extremism and an inhuman attempt to exterminate the Jewish
population of Europe.
That nearly 70 years later we should still be seeing such evil
persecution is, to me, beyond all belief. We owe it to those who
suffered and died so horribly not to repeat the horrors of the past….


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

You could not make this up if you tried.

Clueless Angela Merkel tried to TRAIN migrants as LORRY DRIVERS ahead of Berlin attack

ANGELA MERKEL tried to force German trade unions to accept
asylum seekers as lorry drivers in a bitter row shortly before the
Christmas market tragedy in Berlin.

The Express, December 22, 2016:

Angela Merkel pressured trade unions to take on refugees as lorry drivers before the terror attack

Twelve people were killed and 48 others injured when a man suspected
of being an asylum seeker and part of the Islamic State terrorist group
drove into a Christmas market in the country’s capital.

Up to £84,000 (100,000€) have been offered to find the 23-year-old
Tunisian Anis Amri, who is believed to be armed and dangerous.

But as the country mourns the tragedy ahead of the festive season, it
was revealed that Merkel had put massive pressure on unions to speed up
the process in which unskilled refugees could be trained as lorry

German leader said in September companies should “consider hiring and
training refugees as lorry drivers” while they are awaiting their asylum
procedure as there is a “big shortage of lorry drivers in the country.”
She said that the plan was to get a change in the
rules to make it cheaper for them to apply for a licence, with the plan
for them to pay just £420 (500€) to swap a Syrian driving licence for a
German one.
Unveiling the plan she said: “We all need to be
ready to implement practical solutions. We have only recently discussed
in the Cabinet the possibilities of allowing a Syrian driving licence to
be converted to a German one for 500€.
Same type of lorry used in the attackCATERS

Merkel wanted Syrian drivers to be able to buy a German licence for £420

of course not every refugee will have 500 EUR, so what we want to do is
set up a loan program where they can borrow the money. Then when they
have been working, they can pay the 500€ back. At the end of the day,
lorry drivers are needed all over the place.”
The Organisation of German Professional Lorry Drivers (BDBK) led the opposition to the plan.
At the time, BDBK chairman Wolfgang
Westermann said: “We give a definite no to use refugees as lorry
drivers. Professional lorry drivers need a thorough and qualified
education. You cannot let everyone drive off in a 40-ton lorry.”
The GPS data of the highjacked lorry used in the
Christmas market attack allegedly showed the difficulties for an
untrained person learning to drive such a lorry.
Police by the Brandenburg gateAFP

The supposed perpetrator of the Berlin attack, Anis Amri, is still at large

manager of the Polish transport company which owns the lorry, said that
the alleged perpetrator most likely did not have experience behind the
Ariel Zurawski said: “The GPS data suggests that somebody first needed to practice his driving.”
He explained that GPS data show that the lorry was driving in an “uncontrolled manner.”


Published on Dec 22, 2016

and hubris. It is all the Democratic Party has left after being shown
the door by the American people. Not the Russians, not a majority of
racist angry white male voters, and not fake news. The Democrats did
this to themselves with the sycophantic assistance of the media saddled
with firm directives coming from the DNC and the treasonous divide and
conquer subversion of George Soros.

Now, in the face of that
defeat. The world fully sees the bitter arrogance and cult like focus of
the shattered Democratic Party. Powerless yet still attempting to push
safety over a cliff.

Donald Trump won 3,084 of the United States
3,141 counties or county equivalents in the American heartland. And it
doesn’t matter how arrogantly the Democrats belittle America’s heartland
anymore. For eight long years Washington D.C. had disconnected itself
from this massive base. And now, it is the Democrats that are paralyzed
by their own reckless clawing avarice.


Published on Dec 22, 2016

evidence is conclusive. Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forged
document. Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse holds an urgent press
conference revealing forensic evidence that proves once and for all that
Donald Trump was right about Obama’s birth certificate. The document is
a fraud. Share this video with those who refuse to accept the
undeniable evidence that Barack Obama is a Ghost President.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The joint U.S.-Canada statement
issued by the White House on Tuesday permanently blocked 115 million
acres of the Arctic Ocean — including all of the Chukchi Sea and the
vast majority of the Beaufort Sea — from energy development.
Said the

Today, President Obama and Prime Minister
Trudeau are proud to launch actions ensuring a strong, sustainable and
viable Arctic economy and ecosystem … free from the future risks of
offshore oil and gas activity….
Today … the United States is designating
the vast majority of U.S. waters in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas as
indefinitely off limits to offshore oil and gas leasing, and Canada will
designate all Arctic Canadian waters as indefinitely off limits to
future offshore Arctic oil and gas leasing.

Early reactions to the statement were predictable: This is the
pronouncement of a petulant child throwing spikes in front of the Trump
administration’s bus.
As Stephen Moore, one of Trump’s transition team
members, laughingly told Lou Dobbs on Fox News Tuesday night: “Trump
will repeal this on Day Two!”

Randall Luthi, president of the oil industry group National Ocean
Industries Association, said “The arrogance of the decision is
unfathomable, but unfortunately not surprising.”

Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski’s response was slightly more
measured: “President Obama has once again treated the Arctic like a
snow globe, ignoring the desires of the people who live, work, and raise
a family there. I cannot wait to work with the next administration to
reverse this decision.”

Erik Milito, of the American Petroleum Institute (API), was equally optimistic about overturning Obama’s pronouncement:

Blocking offshore exploration weakens our
national security, destroys good-paying jobs, and could make energy
less affordable for consumers.
Fortunately, there is no such thing as a
permanent ban, and we look forward to working with the new
administration on fulfilling the will of American voters on energy

A closer look at the statement, however, reveals a much more
dangerous strategy being employed by the White House. It’s not an
executive order, but is based instead upon a law passed in 1953
regarding continental shelf development. Called the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act, it is an act “to provide for the jurisdictions of the
United States over the submerged lands of the outer Continental Shelf,
and to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease such lands for
certain purposes.” Deep within the act is the power granted to the
president to unilaterally withdraw any of those lands at any time:

The President of the United States may,
from time to time, withdraw from disposition any of the unleased lands
of the outer Continental Shelf.

Climate-change lawyers have scoured the act for any provision
allowing for the reversal of such action and finding none are
celebrating Obama’s statement as permanent and beyond the reach of the
incoming president to do anything on Day Two or thereafter. A senior
White House official said the Obama administration is “quite confident”
that the decision could not be unwound by Trump and that efforts to do
so would require congressional action followed by years of litigation.

President Bill Clinton placed a temporary ban on developing certain
offshore areas, which was reversed in 2008 by President George W. Bush.
But that ban was temporary and this one is permanent.

Obama can be chided for an act that appears infantile, in retaliation
for Trump’s victory over Clinton last month. It can be characterized as
a last-minute rebuff to the incoming administration’s determination to
open presently off-limits areas to energy development. It can be
construed as a final bone to be tossed to environmentalists who remain
adamant in their belief that all natural resources such as oil, natural
gas, and coal must remain in the ground “where they belong.” Some have
concluded that this is Obama’s final attempt to secure a permanent and
lasting “legacy” for his administration.

What President Obama has likely done, however, is to leave a legacy
of obstruction, intending to damage America’s ability to become energy
self-sufficient. That’s the legacy that is most likely to endure.


 Congress: Obama Fired Scientist to Advance “Climate” Agenda
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Obama administration fired a top scientist, intimidated other
staff, censored important information from Congress for political
reasons, and waged “a reckless and calculated attack on the legislative
process itself,” U.S. lawmakers concluded in a blistering new report
about Obama’s scandal-plagued Department of Energy.
All of it was done in order to advance Obama’s controversial
“climate-change” agenda, according to congressional investigators. It is
time for some serious changes in management at the U.S. Department of
Energy, members of Congress declared. But even that is not nearly enough
to remedy the damage unleashed by Obama via the unconstitutional

The shocking revelations about the Obama administration’s lawless attempts to pursue its “global-warming” regulatory regime at all costs were exposed in a congressional staff report
released this week by the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and
Technology. According to the document, a top Energy Department (DOE)
scientist, Dr. Noelle Metting, was fired from her job for providing
honest and accurate information to Congress beyond the pre-approved
“talking points” provided by Obama’s minions at the bureaucracy. The
firing had a chilling effect on other scientists and staff, of course.
Lawmakers were outraged. 

“The Committee concludes that the DOE placed its own priorities to
further the President’s Climate Action Plan before its Constitutional
obligations to be candid with Congress,” the lawmakers said in the
report’s executive summary. “The DOE’s actions constitute a reckless and
calculated attack on the legislative process itself, which undermines
the power of Congress to legislate. The Committee further concludes that
DOE’s disregard for separation of powers is not limited to a small
group of employees, but rather is an institutional problem that must be
corrected by overhauling its management practices with respect to its
relationship with the Congress.”

The latest scandal to rock DOE began with a piece of legislation
introduced by liberty-minded Congressman Paul Broun (R-Ga.) to
investigate the impact of radiation on human health. The bill, known as
the “Low Dose Radiation Act” of 2014 (H.R. 5544), would have required
the DOE to use funds it already had to review the science on low-dose
radiation and its effects. Among other reasons why such an effort was
called for, lawmakers said, was because the out-of-control regulatory
bureaucracies were operating on the unproven and likely false assumption that, because high doses of radiation are harmful, low doses must also be.

Rather than working to figure out whether its assumptions on the
alleged dangers of low-dose radiation were justified, however, the Obama
DOE preferred to waste the tax money appropriated to it by pushing
global-warming hysteria. “Instead of working to understand the value of
the [Low Dose Radiation Research Program] LDRRP for emergency
situations, DoE Management engaged in a campaign to terminate research
programs that could divert funds from the president’s Climate Action
Plan,” the report explains. Basically, Obama wanted the tax money to
promote his increasingly discredited warming alarmism, not to do what
the American people wanted as expressed through their elected
representatives — and his minions were apparently willing to break the
law to do it. 

And so, the Obama administration set out to derail the bill in likely
violation of the Anti-Lobbying Act, fire the scientist in question, and
intimidate all of the other agency employees into going along with the
White House agenda. Indeed, Energy Department e-mails handed over to the
House Committee as part of the investigation revealed that the Obama
agency was involved in a “premeditated scheme by senior employees” to
“squash the prospects of Senate support” for Congressman Broun’s
legislation and for the Low Dose Radiation Research Program,
investigators concluded.  

In a 2014 briefing for lawmakers about the program, Dr. Metting, who
led the program, provided information that went beyond what her
superiors wanted Congress to know. And so, Obama officials “removed Dr.
Metting from federal service for allegedly providing too much
information in response to questions posed by” lawmakers, according to
the report. Investigators later found that her removal from federal
service was “retaliation” by Obama officials because the scientist
“refused to conform to the predetermined remarks and talking points
designed by Management to undermine the advancement of” Broun’s bill.

And it gets even worse. According to the report, the House Committee
also discovered that Obama’s DOE leaders “failed to exercise even a
minimal standard of care to avoid chilling other agency scientists as a
result of the retaliation against Dr. Metting for her refusal to censor
information from Congress.” In other words, it seems that Obama’s
minions at the DOE wanted to make sure that everyone else got the
message loud and clear: Promote the Obama line and do not give Congress
information it seeks, or lose your job. Other members of Obama’s cabinet even launched witch hunts against federal scientists who disagreed with the imploding climate alarmism.

Lawmakers expressed outrage about the DOE antics. “Instead of
providing the type of scientific information needed by Congress to
legislate effectively, senior departmental officials sought to hide
information, lobbied against legislation, and retaliated against a
scientist for being forthcoming,” Science, Space and Technology
committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said in a statement. “In this
staff report based on lengthy record before the committee, much has been
revealed about how senior level agency officials under the Obama
administration retaliated against a scientist who did not follow the
party line.”

In the future, though, that has got to stop, Smith continued. “Moving
forward, the department needs to overhaul its management practices to
ensure that Congress is provided the information it requires to
legislate and that federal employees and scientists who provide that
information do so without fear of retribution,” explained the committee
chief, who has long been critical of the Obama administration’s
“global-warming” antics (and especially the pseudo-treaty known as the
“Paris Agreement” that Trump vowed on the campaign trail to “cancel”
upon taking office). Smith and the GOP majority could, of course, defund
the department entirely.

The Energy Department has been embroiled in scandal practically for
Obama’s entire time in office. Perhaps the most well-known scandal
involved the Obama administration showering tax funds on its “green” cronies in sham companies such as Solyndra. The “solar panel” company received half of a billion U.S. dollars from taxpayers, then declared bankruptcy. Among the chief beneficiaries of the Obama administration’s lawless
Solyndra scam were Goldman Sachs, whose executives were Obama’s largest
campaign donors in 2008, as well as George Kaiser, another leading
Obama fundraiser. Taxpayers were left holding the bag.

Similar examples of Obama’s “green” cronyism abound, and drew outrage from Congress.
“The failure of several companies that received loans under the
program, including Solyndra’s August 2011 bankruptcy, led to the loss of
hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds,” explained a 2012
letter from lawmakers to Obama blasting the schemes. “The newly-obtained
documents show that senior members of the administration were aware of
substantial risks to taxpayers and objected to the way the funds were
being distributed. They were overruled.” 

Most recently, the Obama Energy Department has come under fire for
refusing to provide the names of the department’s “climate” scientists
to President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team. Critics of the Obama
administration and its long record of manipulating data to promote outlandish global-warming alarmism suggested that DOE leaders fear a widely anticipated “swamp draining” may end up holding fraudsters accountable. Trump
vowed to stop the “climate” scam and has long referred to the man-made
global-warming theory as a “hoax” and even bovine excrement.

Former Texas Governor Rick Perry, a Republican who
forgot the name of the department when providing a list of agencies he
would seek to abolish as president, is set to serve as Energy Secretary
the incoming Trump administration. So it is possible that lawmakers
will get their wish on reforming management at the massive bureaucracy,
which has close to a $30 billion yearly budget, more than 10,000
employees, and almost 100,000 contractors. But even wholesale management
reforms are not nearly enough to deal with the problems caused by
Obama’s lawlessness and his pursuit of a radical anti-Constitution
agenda. More serious efforts are needed.

The U.S. Constitution does not delegate any authority to the federal
government to meddle in energy markets, push global-warming alarmism,
hand tax money to cronies (“green” or otherwise), or any other such
activities. Therefore, the Energy Department and virtually all of its
functions are unconstitutional, with the exception of maintaining
America’s nuclear arsenal, a task that could easily be folded into the
Defense Department. Americans should keep pressing Congress to abolish
the entire department, and several more along with it, as the damage on
America inflicted by Obama is reversed. 

Related articles:

Obama “Green Energy” Scandals Widen as Lawmakers Probe Deeper

Oops! Trump Names Rick Perry as Energy Secretary

As Climate Theories Implode, Obama & Co. Launch Witch Hunt

The Real Green in Fedgov’s “Green Energy”

The Effects of Low-dose Radiation

Fukushima: Just How Dangerous Is Radiation?

EPA Boss Urges School Kids to “Bug” Parents on Green Agenda

With Ice Growing at Both Poles, Global Warming Theories Implode

Obama Seeks to Protect UN Climate Regime From a President Trump

To “Save Our Planet,” Obama Tramples Congress and Constitution

Climate Alarmists Have Been Wrong About Virtually Everything


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Frosty
December 23
, 2016
week, Muslims killed nine and wounded 48 in a truck attack in Berlin,
Germany. Another Muslim executed a Russian diplomat with eight shots
to his back at point blank range. German authorities reported they
thwarted two planned attacks in the past week.
the past four decades, Muslims in all Western countries continue their
prime directive dictated by the Quran: “Convert or kill all
methods: 9/11 mass murder attacks. Also, lone wolf attacks. They infiltrate
governments with their operatives, i.e., Barack Obama and his 10 Muslim
aides in the White House, hijra or “seeding” host countries
with Muslim immigrants to eventually install Sharia Law. They employ
beheadings, be-handings and honor killings that terrify women worldwide.
Muslims kill gays, and kill anyone who remains an infidel or non-believer.
Worse, you never know which Muslim will kill at what time or place.
confronted with reality, Muslims kill the truth, they kill the truth
messenger and they kill anyone who disagrees with them.
it take a Paris, France slaughter once a week to help civilized leaders
to deport all Muslims? Will it take a Brussels, Belgium airport bombing
once a month to convince leaders to rid their countries of Muslims?
How about a Nice, France barbaric attack at weekly intervals to finally
help all Western countries to come to the simple conclusion: Muslims
and Islam—Incompatible with 21st century humanity.
1.5 billion “moderate” Muslims do nothing to stop the
terror. They don’t speak up. They do not condemn. They don’t
lead their religion out of the Dark Ages. Muslim mosques all over
Europe store weapons while imams instigate terror attacks. Worse,
they spew incredible hate toward all other religions.
the USA, Muslims commit barbaric acts regularly. Whether it’s
honor killings of women or female genital mutilation or arranged marriages
or threats to gays—the US State Department and FBI counter terrorism
agencies remain on full alert to stop Muslims from terrorizing America
they can never stop lone wolf Muslim killers. That’s why we
face another Orlando, Florida slaughter or a San Bernardino or more
Ohio State University stabbings.
why Muslim Barack Obama jumped the Syrian migrant level into the USA
by 339 percent in the month of December. He wants as many violent
Muslims to enter America before his time in the power ends. (Source:
Fox News, December 21, 2016, Hannity)
don’t make any bones about it: they expect to conquer America
or die trying. Muhammad gave them 72 virgins as a sexual reward in
heaven for their jihad.
the sacred months have passed, then kill the infidels wherever you
find them. Capture them. Besiege them. Lie in wait for them in each
and every ambush but if they repent, and perform the prayers, and
give zacat then leave their way free.” Quran Chapter 9:5
2002, John Muhammad, the Beltway Sniper, lay “in wait”
for various infidels and killed 17 of them. Since then, from Boston
to San Bernardino—Muslims carried out killing sprees.
Allah revealed to the angels, ‘Truly I am with you. So, keep
firm those who have believed. I will strike terror into the hearts
of those who have disbelieved. So, strike them at the necks and cut
off their fingers.’” 8:12
the Muslim who beheaded his co-worker Colleen Hufford in Moore, Oklahoma
on September 26, 2014? The liberal media claimed Jah’Keem Yisreal
committed workplace violence instead of jihad.
dictates become painfully real for individuals who suffer death or
injury whether the Boston Marathon bombers or
White Cloud, Minnesota mall knife-wielding Muslim or the Fort Hood
killer Major Hassan pretending to be a U.S. Army officer.
are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has made
one superior to the other and because they spend to support them from
their means. Therefore, righteous women are obedient and they guard
in the husband’s absence what Allah orders them to guard. And,
as to those women from whom you fear disobedience, give them a warning,
send them to separate beds, and beat them.” 4:34
aren’t feminists in all countries demonstrating to stop all
Muslim immigration? How do first world women accept Muslim men who
force their women into black bags and stone them to death for being
raped? How about the 20,000 honor killings annually in Muslim dominated
countries? Anyone got a problem with that ritual?
do you defend from such barbarism in the 21st century?
we already suffer 3.3 million Muslims within our country, we must
defend against them harshly and effectively.
we Americans demand all Muslim immigration stopped. We as a people
must deport any Muslim or Muslim organization that advocates Sharia
Law. Start with C.A.I.R. and the Islamic Society of America, Muslim
Brotherhood and others. We must monitor all mosques with mandated
video coverage. We must deport anyone who espouses individual or collective
violence toward our citizens. Ban the Burka or hijab that destroys
a woman’s right to her individuality. Deport or jail any Muslim
imam who speaks or organizes anyone toward violence. Do not allow
Muslims into the military, period.

that any Muslim that commits female genital mutilation, an honor killing
or arranged marriage to be jailed and deported after time served.
other words, make America so harsh against this violent, barbaric
and incendiary religion—that they repatriate themselves back into
their own countries—where they can practice their barbarism without
Adnre Servier said, “Islam was not a torch, but an extinguisher.
Conceived in a barbarous brain for the use by a barbarous people,
it was, and it remains, incapable of adapting itself to civilization.
Whatever it has dominated, it has broken the impulse toward progress
and checked the evolution of society.”

solution: Islam mandates a violent political-economic-religious system
diametrically opposed to a free republic and in violation of our U.S.
Constitution. Demand the prohibition of Islam in America. Enforce
the McCarren-Walter Act of 1952.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 HOUSTON — A megachurch in Texas 
recently turned its annual Christmas production in its worship center 
into a circus—literally, complete with a ringmaster, tricks and 

The Second Baptist Church of Texas, led by Dr. Ed Young,
Sr., presented “Christmas Under the Big Top” at its Woodway campus from
Friday to Tuesday, with tickets ranging from $10 to $25. The 90-minute
drama centered on a storyline about a fictional effort to save a
financially-struggling circus by putting on a Christmas show.

In addition to much singing and dancing, the program also
featured a Stomp-like trash can drumming peformance, and plenty of
circus tricks, from juggling to acrobatics to Cyr wheel spinning. Styles
of music varied from traditional to big band, to hip-hop and rock. A
segment of the production also included a living nativity, and a brief
message about life’s “distractions” from the meaning of Christmas was
delivered near the conclusion.

“The days of the traveling, family circus may be long gone,
but don’t tell that to the Robichauxs,” a description of the
storyline outlined on the Second Baptist website.
“For four generations, they have captivated the hearts and minds of
young and old alike with their high-flying antics and death-defying
stunts. But times are changing, and the patriarch, Arthur Robichaux,
must find a way to keep the circus alive in the midst of today’s
ever-changing entertainment landscape.”

“At his wit’s end, Arthur considers throwing in the towel
when his son, Max, surprises him by coming home for Christmas. Can
Arthur and Max save their beloved family circus?” it asks.

Second Baptist also released a video
promoting the event, inviting viewers to “[c]elebrate the true meaning
of Christmas with us.” The video featured clips from previous
performances, including fire-breathing and unicycling.

“For the past five years, Second Baptist Church has shared
the story and joy of Christmas with over 100,000 people across Houston,
featuring live music, dancing, aerobatics and so much more,” the
announcer states. “Come be a part of this Houston holiday tradition as
we celebrate the birth of Christ and take you on a new adventure.”

Luke Benward of Disney’s “Good Luck Charlie” and “Girl Meets
World” was one of the stars of the show, along with his father Aaron,
known for being one-half of the 1990’s CCM duo Aaron Jeoffrey.

Many praised the presentation as being quality entertainment.

“It’s not quite Cirque du Soleil, but it’s way (way, way) bigger than any church show I’ve ever seen,” one blogger commented.

“This was truly a magical celebration with a beautiful
message,” another said. “The show was full of non-stop entertainment
from the musical numbers to the acrobats. I loved the drumline and the
ariel dancers just took my breath away!”

However, others believe that such concepts are a far cry
from the Church in Acts, and are a distraction from the core functions
of the Church—even if outside of the normal service hours.

“‘Christmas Under the Big Top’ is another example of the
Church focusing on entertainment rather than the purposes which our Lord
established for His Church,” David Whitney, pastor of Cornerstone
Evangelical Free Church in Pasadena, Maryland, told Christian News
Network. “When Jesus said, ‘I will build My Church and the gates of Hell
will not prevail against it,’ did He have a circus in mind?”

He said that the Church seems to have “lost its way on the
road to the Heavenly City and instead has taken the side road to
Hollywood,” noting that the command of Christ was to make disciples
through preaching and teaching—not to amuse.

“The commission Christ gave His disciples was to go make
disciples of all nations. That disciple-making task involves the
preaching of the Word of God, administering the ordinances and
conducting public worship,” Whitney explained. “When the Church loses
this focus, it becomes simply one more entertainment venue vying for the
time and treasure of an audience.”

“In 1 Corinthians 14:23 Paul asks the question regarding
speaking in tongues, ‘What will the non-Christian think when he comes in
our midst?’ I guess the answer in Houston is, they would think the
Church is a circus,” he said.

Second Baptist Church did not respond to a request for comment.

(View the production here.)



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — The office of Alabama
Gov. Robert Bentley has confirmed that Bentley interviewed suspended
state Chief Justice Roy Moore for a potential congressional seat this

The seat would replace U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions, who was
selected by President-elect Donald Trump to serve in his cabinet as
attorney general.

“He would consider it an honor if appointed to the office of
U. S. Senate,” Moore’s wife, Kayla Moore, told the Montgomery

Bentley spokesperson Yasamie August told the outlet that
Moore was “one of the top picks” from a survey sent to the Alabama
Republican Executive Committee, which consists of 400 members. The
survey asked members last month to submit a nomination for Sessions’

“The person who replaces Senator Sessions must uphold the
Constitution, value the rights of the Second Amendment, the rights of
the states, support pro-life issues, implement a strong national
security policy, support domestic job creation and, most importantly,
always put Alabama first,” the instructions read.

In addition to Moore, Bentley interviewed seven others,
including U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Huntsville; Senate President Pro Tem
Del Marsh, R-Anniston; Sen. Arthur Orr, R-Decatur; Sen. Cam Ward,
R-Alabaster; Sen. Bill Hightower, R-Mobile, and Sen. Trip Pittman,
R-Montrose. House Ways and Means Education Chairman Bill Poole,
R-Tuscaloosa, was also interviewed as well.

After Bentley selects a replacement for Sessions, the matter will then go up for a public vote.
 As previously reported, Moore is currently appealing his suspension from the Alabama
Supreme Court for allegedly instructing probate judges not to issue
same-sex “marriage” licenses months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling
of Obergefell v. Hodges.

Moore asserts that his memo was only a status update
advising that his colleagues had not yet rescinded an order from March
2015 that prohibited judges from issuing the licenses. He says he
specifically noted that his words did not weigh in on Obergefell.

“I am not at liberty to provide any guidance to Alabama
probate judges on the effect of Obergefell on the existing orders of the
Alabama Supreme Court. That issue remains before the entire court,
which continues to deliberate on the matter,” Moore wrote on Jan. 6.

The Alabama Court of the Judiciary (COJ) did not believe
Moore and found him guilty of ethics charges, contending that he had
told judges to act contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling. But
because the COJ did not have the required unanimity to remove Moore from
the bench, it therefore voted to suspend Moore for the remainder of his

Moore says that the punishment is wrongful as it was a crafty way to get around not having the mandated unanimity for removal.

“It’s a de facto removal,” he stated in October. “To have
the Court of the Judiciary say that we can’t remove you because we
didn’t have the votes, but we can suspend you for two-and-a-half years
nearly (the rest of Moore’s term), that’s completely improper.”

“It has to be reversed for the sake of the judges and
justices in our state or we’re going to warp the law and just let them
skip over a unanimous vote for removal and say they can remove you for
the rest of your term,” Moore opined.

This week, eight judges filed an amicus brief in support of Moore, echoing his sentiments about the suspension.

His case is expected to be heard next year by a special appeals court.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A new bill introduced in the California Senate promises to guarantee
“children’s rights.” But it really amounts to eviscerating parents’
rights and empowering the state — to raise your kids in its own image.
And with 38-million-strong California being a trendsetter, the
legislation’s success could mean it would soon appear in a government
near you.

Dubbed the “Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California,” the measure was, InfoWars Jon Rappoport tells us,

Introduced by the notorious [Dr.] Richard
Pan, the mover and shaker behind the mandatory vaccination law in CA —
[and] this new one, SB18, is a grab-bag of generalities basically giving
over care of children to the State.
Catch the flavor of the wording. It
emerges like swamp gas: “The Legislature finds and declares that all
children and youth, regardless of gender, class, race, ethnicity,
national origin, culture, religion, immigration status, sexual
orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them to
protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to,
the following: The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act
in their best interest. The right to form healthy attachments with
adults responsible for their care and well-being. The right to live in a
safe and healthy environment. The right to social and emotional
well-being. The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive,
physical, and social development. The right to appropriate, quality
education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood. The
right to appropriate, quality health care.”
As if all these outcomes could be delivered to children on a silver platter.
And the State would make it so.

The state’s victory is in the vagueness. For example, what
constitutes a child’s “best interest”? Will this mean exposing him to
explicit sex education, including the “transgender” agenda; to
“tolerance training” relating the “all values are equal” notion that
“truth” is relative; and to “freedom” from necessary discipline? These
things are in fashion, after all.

Second, how can the “right” to “emotional well-being” be guaranteed
when even adults often have trouble achieving such? And how can liberals
claim to be guarantors of it? Studies have shown
they suffer from mental illness (and what is thus labeled) more often
than conservatives do, a phenomenon I observed during my many years
working with children. I virtually never saw a youngster from a
conservative home diagnosed with “ADHD,” for example, and this is no
surprise. As family psychologist John Rosemond has pointed out, ADHD
behavior is simply typical toddler behavior extended into later
childhood by permissive (read: liberal) parenting.

And what is proper “social development” and what would
“opportunities” to attain it be? Would this involve encouraging early
dating; exposure to (corruptive) popular culture; interaction with a
“diverse” set of peers, where one bad apple can spoil the bunch; and
inculcation with globalist ideas to create good little “citizens of the

There’s also another agenda here. As the website Modern Alternative Health points out,
“Most likely, the state defines ‘optimal cognitive, physical, and
social development’ as occurring within the public school system. Pan
has not been shy about his opposition to homeschooling, and this point
may be used to remove or severely restrict the right to homeschool.”

No doubt. Statists are unanimous in their opposition to homeschooling; the Big Brother governments in Germany and Sweden,
which persecute homeschoolers, are good examples. And why is no
mystery. Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle stated, “Give me a child
until he is seven and I will show you the man” and Abraham Lincoln
observed, “The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be
the philosophy of government in the next.” Of course, the philosophy of
the school room today cannot be the philosophy of government tomorrow
unless you get students in the schoolroom in the first place.

Yet what’s truly dangerous about SB18 is, again, it’s vagueness,
which gives bureaucrats great latitude to interpret its provisions as
they see fit. Just consider the following provision:

(b) It is the intent of the Legislature
in enacting this act to expand and codify the Bill of Rights for
Children and Youth of California created by Assembly Concurrent
Resolution No. 80 (Res. Ch. 101, Stats. 2009), to establish a
comprehensive framework that governs the rights of all children and
youth in California, outlines the research-based essential needs of
California’s children, and establishes standards relating to the health,
safety, well-being, early childhood and educational opportunities, and
familial supports necessary for all children to succeed.

Modern Alternative Health analyzes this passage thus:

This point basically sums up what they’ve
said so far. This law doesn’t do anything, except give them permission
to create standards and programs to enforce those standards. We won’t
know exactly what they’re going to come up with or to what extent
they’ll enforce them until after this law is passed.
It is not acceptable to pass a law like
this that has such vague and sweeping implications with poorly-defined
parameters. Especially not in California, where parental rights have
been stripped increasingly over the last 5 years.

The bill continues in this open-ended vein, stating in SEC. 2 that it
is “the intent of the Legislature … to enact appropriate legislation to
accomplish all of the following”: “Develop and put forth research-based
policy solutions,” “Determine the amount of revenue and resources,” and
“Identify and obtain the revenue and resources … necessary to ensure
that the Bill of Rights for Children and Youth of California, in its
totality, is applied evenly, equitably, and appropriately to all
children and youth across the state.”

What will these “research-based policy solutions” be? How much will
this agenda cost and how will it be paid for? The government doesn’t
say, but apparently has carte blanche with the “solutions” and a blank
check with the budget. It’s as with Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi infamously saying
about ObamaCare, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out
what’s in it.” Except in this case you’ll keep finding out, again and
again and again, as the “solutions” continuously change and the price
tag ever grows with SB18 measures that can morph like the shape-shifting space alien in The Thing.

And who may cash in on this pot of gold? Most suspicious is that one
of the entities behind the bill is The Silicon Valley Community
Foundation, Jon Rappoport informs,
“a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION” and “runs 1800
philanthropic funds.” It has a list of big-money corporate partners,
too. As he also writes, “For some reason, this huge Foundation is
pushing a children’s bill of rights that … will eventually make the
State the top-dog controlling force over all children in California. You
can bet these corporate partners will reap profits. Beyond that, this
is their version of a MASSIVE social engineering program.”

It’s the state’s version, too. The good news is that the bill is
still in its early stages and wouldn’t take effect until 2022, so
there’s still some chance to scuttle it if people fight hard. And
hopefully they will because, with SB18, the red flags are everywhere.
The only telling promise we haven’t yet heard is, “If you like your
child, you can keep your child.”