LANSDALE, PENNSYLVANIA: LIBRARY TO HOST “DRAG QUEEN STORY FUN TIME” FEATURING MAN WHO GOES BY STAGE NAME “ANNIE CHRIST”

Annie Christ – 365 Days of Drag Names

LANSDALE, PENNSYLVANIA: LIBRARY TO HOST 
“DRAG QUEEN STORY FUN TIME” FEATURING MAN WHO GOES BY STAGE NAME “ANNIE CHRIST”
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
LANSDALE, Pa. — A prayer gathering and rally is scheduled for Saturday outside of a Pennsylvania library in response to a “Drag Queen Story Fun Time” for children that will feature a man who goes by the stage name “Annie Christ”—a play-on-words of Anti-Christ.
“Trusted officials and library staff are promoting a foul-mouthed adult entertainer named ‘Annie Christ’ (a discriminative attack on Christianity) as a role model to our small children, and we must take action. Why is our library taking on such a politically controversial issue—especially when receiving our tax dollars?” asks the page for the prayer gathering.
According to reports, Eric Torres of Philadelphia chose the name “Annie Christ” for his stage name out of his “love of gothic themes, horror movies, and bands such as NIN.” His Instagram page features a mix of photos from his everyday life as Eric—such as his interest in mudding—and his alter persona as a drag performer—some of which are gory, some with grandiose wigs and makeup, and one where Torres painted an upside down cross on his forehead.
One video posted to YouTube shows “Annie Christ” performing to the song “You Can Touch My [Breasts],” with men in attendance reaching out and doing so.
Torres is scheduled to read to children at the Lansdale Public Library on Saturday for “Drag Queen Story Fun Time”. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, it was Torres who reached out the library to reserve a room for the event. The library, after conducting a background check, agreed.
Library director Tom Meyer told the outlet that he has received a number of calls of complaint, but also remarked that he believes the event has much support and will perhaps exceed capacity.
“There’s definitely more complaints about this than any other event we’ve done,” he stated. “But the amount of support for having it is also overwhelming.”
“One of the tenets of our mission here is to celebrate cultural diversity in the community, and I think a lot of the parents are interested in that and also the message of the story time, about acceptance and inclusion,” Meyer remarked.
Lansdale Mayor Garry Herbert and Councilman Leon Angelichio also defended the children’s event with Annie Christ.
“I feel that the purpose of the event is to promote acceptance and equality, and that’s a message that we should be teaching to our children all the time,” Herbert told North Penn Now. “So I have no problem with the event, and I have no problem with the protesters that want to peacefully protest an event that they disagree with.”
“I am proud to stand behind our library as an organization that provides opportunities in its public spaces for all groups, regardless of their origin, age, background or views. The mission of our library is to offer opportunities to challenge censorship, not to bow down to it,” Angelichio said.
“To bow down to a protest founded in fear would absolutely tarnish the strides we’ve taken in Lansdale to be a community where everyone is welcome.”
Angelichio was referring to a “human relations” ordinance that was passed by city council last year. It reads:
“The Borough Council of the Borough of Lansdale hereby declares it to be the public policy of the Borough to foster equality and equal opportunity for all citizens, regardless of actual or perceived race, color, age, religious creed, ancestry, sex, national origin, handicap or use of guide or support animals because of blindness, deafness or physical handicap of the user or because the user is a handler or trainer of support or guide animals, or because of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression in all matters effecting employment, housing and commercial property and public accommodation, and to safeguard the right of all persons to remain free of discrimination or discriminatory practices in any of the foregoing aspects of their lives.”
However, prayer gathering and rally organizer Steve Piotrowski believes that the event is discriminatory against Christians. He points to a drawing on Torres’ Instagram that features an upside-down cross with the word “Christ,” as well as several pentagrams.
“Here is a picture of Annie Christ attacking Christianity while promoting Satanism,” he wrote. “This is wrong, this is hateful, this is discrimination, and we are calling for local community leaders, residents, religious institutions, and business owners to speak up against it.”
petition has been launched to call for the cancellation of the event. Conversely, supporters of the story hour have classified the opposition as “hate,” and claim that Christians should not judge.
“Most hate in this world seem to be from the people who claim to love Jesus the most! What happen to do not judge?” one commenter wrote.
Piotrowski says that he doesn’t hate Torres, but disagrees with such an event being for children.
“I want ‘Annie Christ’ to know that we love him, and we don’t hate him, but we do not approve of what he is doing on Saturday,” he told reporters. “We want to lovingly let ‘Annie Christ’ know that there is a way to receive eternal joy, and his identity can be found without confusion, but only in Jesus Christ.”
The Pennsylvania Pastors Network has likewise expressed concern about the story time.
“The fact that we have even been forced to address such a matter as a story time for children provided by men dressed in drag is a tragic commentary on our culture,” Executive Director Gary Dull told Charisma News. “We pray for clarity, truth and the protection of children in this dire situation.”
Torres plans to read the books “Naked Mole Rat Gets Dressed” and “Sparkle Boy” to children.
_____________________________________________________________

PA PASTORS NETWORK ASKS ALL RESIDENTS IN LANSDALE TO PEACEFULLY GATHER AT THE SATURDAY, FEB. 2 EVENT TO PROTEST THE INDOCTRINATION OF CHILDREN

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Drag Queen “Annie Christ,” who dons satanic symbols and performs lewd sexually charged nightclub shows (see video here), is scheduled to be at the Lansdale Public Library this Saturday, Feb. 2, from 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. to present “Drag Queen Story Time” to children.
Taxpayers who fund the library are urging Meyer and all elected borough officials to cancel the drag queen story hour. The library reserves the right to cancel the event and the Pennsylvania Pastors Network Executive Director Gary Dull says it is in the best interest of the public, children and taxpayers to do so.
“This toxic spread of a damaging agenda has come to Pennsylvania and is targeting our children,” said Dull, who also serves as pastor of Faith Baptist Church of Altoona. “Where is the common sense in this? With the serious problems that children in this generation are experiencing—drug use, high-anxiety, suicide and depression—why would parents and elected officials willingly put children in front of a drag queen to confuse them even more? This should be a matter of grave concern for every person who cares about children. The LGBTQ agenda demands dominance and wants to silence those who would dare speak out on cultural issues. The public library is not a place for activism, and a children’s story hour certainly isn’t the place to push a confusing message delivered by a confused individual. The fact that we have even been forced to address such a matter as a story time for children provided by men dressed in drag is a tragic commentary on our culture. We pray for clarity, truth and the protection of children in this dire situation.”
WHAT: To stand up for truth in the Lansdale, Pa., community, and others around the state, specifically to protest the “Drag Queen Story Hour” geared toward children.
WHERE: Lansdale Public Library, 301 Vine Street, Lansdale, PA 19446
WHEN: Saturday, Feb. 2, from 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. 
HOW: Learn how to voice your concerns to library leadership here.
_______________________________________________________

Antichrist Annie Christ Story Hour

BY ROD DREHER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Annie Christ, the suburban Philly drag queen who will be reading stories to children at the public library (Annie Christ Instagram)
When a local drag queen named Annie Christ wanted to book a room at the Lansdale Library to host a story hour, staff did the state’s required background check and reserved a room for this Saturday, Feb. 2. After all, drag queen story hours have become a trend in libraries across the country and around greater Philadelphia.
Then, the phone calls began.
“There’s definitely more complaints about this than any other event we’ve done,” said beleaguered library director Tom Meyer. “But the amount of support for having it is also overwhelming.”
He estimates about 50 phone calls have come in, many of them from outside the area, expressing concerns. He figures maybe a dozen protesters will show up, based on Facebook activity — but he also expects so many families to attend he’ll have to start turning people away after the room hits its 64-person capacity.
A drag queen who goes by the name “Brittany Lynn” is hosting a children’s event at the Please Touch children’s museum. A drag queen at the Please Touch museum. Wow:
Brittany Lynn said the reason families love the story hour is it opens up conversations.
“We’re not pushing any agenda. We’re just giving a view of diversity and acceptance that isn’t so heteronormative,” the performer said.
Of course, no agenda there. What kind of Christofascist could possibly imagine that there’s an agenda present in these things? And I can’t imagine why some folks in the Philly region are troubled by a public library hosting a children’s story hour led by a drag queen named “Annie Christ” (Antichrist — get it?).
Life in post-Christian Weimar America, folks. Drag queens named Antichrist invited to read stories to children in public libraries.
Here, in this NSFW video, is Annie Christ performing 
“You Can Touch My Boobies”:

________________________________________________________________

Library to Host 'Drag Queen Story Fun Time' despite opposition-0

Library to Host 'Drag Queen Story Fun Time' 

despite opposition

Lansdale Library Featuring Man Who Goes by Stage Name 'Annie Christ'. Local Christian groups call for the event to be cancelled.

BY KATHLEEN CORTEZ
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Lansdale, PA. - This Saturday at 10:30am at the Lansdale Public Library, Eric Torres whose stage name is "Annie Christ", will be reading two books to local children and parents. Torres plans to read the books "Naked Mole Rat Gets Dressed" and "Sparkle Boy".
Annie Chirst has been deemed "Lansdale's Resident Drag Queen". A sample of posts from Torres's facebook page include "The only thing worse than the zombie toddler in Pet Semetary, was the family that brought an actual toddler to the 10:30 PM showing of Pet Semetary last night. Nobody paid $10 to hear how weak your pullout game is".
According to reports, Eric Torres of Philadelphia chose the name "Annie Christ" for his stage name out of his "love of gothic themes, horror movies, and bands such as NIN." His Instagram page features a mix of photos from his everyday life as Eric—such as his interest in mudding—and his alter persona as a drag performer—some of which are gory, some with grandiose wigs and makeup, and one where Torres painted an upside down cross on his forehead.
Naturally this has sparked outrage and protest. President & CEO of Pennsylvania Family Institute, Michael Geer, along with concerned locals has called for the signing of a petition (https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u...) to cancel the event. These "Drag Queen Story Hours" have been spreading to libraries across the country, and target toddlers and young children, encouraging acceptance and embrace of transgender ideology and inappropriately introducing them to sexual themes and ideas".
Accoring to reports, The Pennsylvania Pastors Network has likewise expressed concern about the story time. "The fact that we have even been forced to address such a matter as a story time for children provided by men dressed in drag is a tragic commentary on our culture," Executive Director Gary Dull told Charisma News. "We pray for clarity, truth and the protection of children in this dire situation."
While the library has received numerous calls of complaint about the event, Library director Tom Meyer, plans to go forward with the show. Lansdale Mayor Garry Herbert and Councilman Leon Angelichio also defended the children's event with Annie Christ. "I feel that the purpose of the event is to promote acceptance and equality, and that's a message that we should be teaching to our children all the time," Herbert told North Penn Now. "So I have no problem with the event, and I have no problem with the protesters that want to peacefully protest an event that they disagree with."
According to The Voice, Annie Christ said he hasn't spent much time looking into what protesters are saying about the event. "It's not about them. Of all the things going on, the one thing that has me most nervous is knowing I have to keep the attention of a bunch of kids for an hour," he joked. "I did this because I wanted to tell kids that it's OK to be different, that it's OK to have your own thoughts and ideas about what you want to look like, how you want to live. That's all that matters."
Christian and locals plan to have a peaceful protest the day of the event. Steve L. Piotrowski has organized a prayer rally(https://www.facebook.com/event...) . "This evil event is not God-honoring," he said. "We strongly believe that it is very dangerous to use publicly funded libraries and government in general to promote radical ideas that defy science and normal ideas about gender. We are concerned that the library is taking on such a politically controversial issue, especially when receiving tax dollars."
Despite a large amount of protest the event is planned to continue as scheduled. The police will be on hand to assure a peaceful assembly on both sides.

CDC’s CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY TED KUNTZ~CDC IS SELLING VACCINES WHILE CLAIMING TO REGULATE VACCINE INDUSTRY

CDC’s CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY TED KUNTZ~
CDC IS SELLING VACCINES WHILE CLAIMING TO REGULATE VACCINE INDUSTRY
BY TED KUNTZ
SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/01/cdcs-conflict-of-interest-ted-kuntz/;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In most cases, the safety testing is done by the vaccine manufacturer. Occasionally, the CDC in the United States funds studies. But, again, what you’ve come to recognize when you pull back the curtain a little bit and investigate is that you… we have this perception of the Centers for Disease Control as an independent government body whose job is to regulate the safety of these medical processes. What we often aren’t told is that the CDC is also in the business of selling vaccines. They sell about $4 billion worth of vaccine every year, and they have patents on over 50 vaccines. And so they’re both a regulatory agency and they’re a major player in the vaccine market. So you’ve got the fox guarding the henhouse and the fox says everything’s okay.

SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA: ANTI-AMERICAN LEFTISTS SHOUT DOWN WOMAN RECITING ‘RACIST’ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AT COLLEGE BOARD MEETING

THE SHORT HISTORY OF FRANCIS BELLAMY’S “PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE” AS DISTORTED BY COLLEGE BOARD TRUSTEE & PRESIDENT, WELL INDOCTRINATED INTO SOCIALIST INTERPRETATIONS OF AUTHOR’S INTENT 
EXCERPTS:
His original Pledge read as follows:
“I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
The recital was accompanied with a salute to the flag known as the Bellamy salute, described in detail by Bellamy. During World War II, the salute was replaced with a hand-over-heart gesture because the original form involved stretching the arm out towards the flag in a manner that resembled the later Nazi salute. (For a history of the pledge, see Pledge of Allegiance).
In 1954, in response to the perceived threat of secular CommunismPresident Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words “under God,” creating the 31-word pledge that is recited today.
Anti-American Leftists Shout Down Woman Reciting ‘Racist’ Pledge of Allegiance at College Board Meeting
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA: ANTI-AMERICAN LEFTISTS SHOUT DOWN WOMAN RECITING ‘RACIST’ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AT COLLEGE BOARD MEETING

Woman fights back tears to say pledge, as enemies of America scream at her

BY ADAN SALAZAR
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/anti-american-leftists-shout-down-woman-reciting-racist-pledge-of-allegiance-at-college-board-meeting/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Leftists attending a community college board meeting screamed at a woman who defied board rules by daring to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
The incident took place last Thursday during a Santa Barbara Community College board meeting, where Board of Trustees President Robert Miller had passed a decree banning the pledge at the start of public meetings.
When Celeste Barber challenged Miller’s decision, he wrote her a letter claiming the pledge had a history “steeped in expressions of nativism and white nationalism” and “bigotry.”
Miller’s letter was provided to Breitbart News, courtesy of Barber:
“I decided to discontinue use of the Pledge of Allegiance for reasons related to its history and symbolism. Our flag is a powerful symbol of freedom and our system of government, but I prefer to pledge allegiance to our constitution, instead of a physical object. Indeed, when sworn in, each Trustee takes an oath to support and defend the U.S. and California constitutions.
I also object to the phrase “one nation under God.” The First Amendment not only protects freedom of speech and religion, it also expressly prohibits laws that establish a religion. The U.S. Supreme Court has expressly extended those rights to those who express no belief in God. Thus, I disagree with the 1955 act of Congress to add this phrase to the Pledge of Allegiance.
Moreover, I have discovered that the Pledge of Allegiance has a history steeped in expressions of nativism and white nationalism. The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1890 by Francis Bellamy, a former Baptist minister.
Among other reasons, he wrote it in reaction to the increasing numbers of immigrants entering the United States in the late 19th century and early 20th century. In support of the Pledge, Mr. Bellamy expressed concern about the “races which we cannot assimilate without a lowering of our racial standard.”
As one commentator noted, “[w]hile the language contained in the pledge is not overtly nativist or xenophobic, the spirit that animated its creation was steeped in this sort of bigotry.””
As Barber addressed the board attempting to explain the significance of the pledge, she was continually interrupted by leftist protesters – who were reportedly there for an unrelated reason – to the point that the meeting was almost adjourned.
“I’m here to speak about the board president’s decision to discontinue the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Trustees public meetings,” Barber explained. “When you recite the Pledge of Allegiance you are recommitting your oath to uphold and defend our country’s Constitution.”
Barber cited her family’s time in Germany during the Cold War, and her father’s military service as two reasons the pledge is important to her.
As her speaking time concluded, Barber ended by lifting a small American flag above her head and reciting the pledge, at which point leftists began shouting and screaming at her.
But Barber fought back tears and completed the pledge, as the hissing leftists threw temper tantrums and stomped their feet in efforts to drown her voice out.
The full video of the meeting is available below:
PHOTOS
BELLAMY MAY HAVE BEEN A SOCIALIST OR EVEN A MILITARIST, BUT IT’S A STRETCH TO SAY HE WAS FOR INDOCTRINATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN INTO COMMUNISM, NAZISM OR RACISM
The Pledge of Allegiance - ppt download

Cultural Terrorists Are Quietly 
Destroying History
The left and its Orwellian scourge of erasing American history crept into the Texas State Capitol. Dallas Representative Eric Johnson was triggered by a plaque commemorating the Children of The Confederacy. So the ironically named State Preservation Board led by Governor Abbot and Lieutenant Governor Patrick unanimously voted to take it down, with zero feedback from the public.
Image result for CHILDREN OF THE CONFEDERACY PLAQUE REMOVED

NEW YORK: AFTER SIGNING OF BILL ALLOWING ABORTION UP UNTIL BIRTH, GROUP PUSHES TO LEGALIZE ASSISTED SUICIDE

In the photo, from left to right: 
Corinne Carey and Amanda Cavanaugh of Compassion & Choices New York; Richard N. Gottfried, Chair of the Assembly Health Committee; 
Dr. David Pratt of Schenectady; 
and Bonnie Edelstein of Death with Dignity–Albany
 Sen. Diane Savino (D-Staten Island) said Mayor de Blasio seems to be picking up on the fact that he needs to be “more responsive to the communities and to the local elected officials.”
ABOVE: DEMOCRAT N.Y. SENATOR DIANE SAVINO OF STATEN ISLAND

Contact Senator Diane J. Savino’s Office

DISTRICT OFFICE

36 Richmond Terrace Suite 112

Staten Island, NY 10301

Phone: (718) 727-9406
Fax: (718) 727-9426

map

DISTRICT OFFICE 2

2872 West 15th Street

Brooklyn, NY 11224-2602

Phone: (718) 333-0311
Fax: (347) 492-3263

map

ALBANY OFFICE

188 State Street315 Legislative Office Bldg

Albany, NY 12247

Phone: 518-455-2437
Fax: 518-426-6943

map

EMAIL ADDRESS:






Assemblywoman Amy Paulin
ABOVE: DEMOCRAT N.Y. ASSEMBLYWOMAN 
AMY PAULIN OF WESTCHESTER
District Office
700 White Plains Rd. 
Suite 252
Scarsdale, NY 10583
914-723-1115
Albany Office
LOB 422
Albany, NY 12248
518-455-5585
AFTER SIGNING OF BILL ALLOWING ABORTION UP UNTIL BIRTH, GROUP PUSHES TO LEGALIZE 
ASSISTED SUICIDE IN N.Y.
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
ALBANY, N.Y. — A week after New York governor Andrew Cuomo signed a bill codifying the “right” to an abortion in state law—and allowing abortion up to birth in cases where the baby is not expected to survive or to “protect” the health or life of the mother—a group has again launched a campaign to legalize physician-assisted suicide in the state following the reintroduction of a bill surrounding “medical aid in dying.”
The New York chapter of the group known as Compassion & Choices held a press conference and rally at the state capitol building on Monday to call for the passage of Assembly Bill 2694, which was filed last week by Senator Diane Savino, D-Staten Island, and Assemblymember Amy Paulin, D-Westchester.
The effort is not new, as the bill had likewise been introduced in years past, but Compassion & Choices has renewed its call to pass the legislation in New York State.
“Every press conference, I can’t help but think about my sister … who on her dying bed when she was stricken with ovarian cancer, would be yelling out, ‘When am I going to die already?’” Paulin stated. “My sister would have chosen life. That’s the irony. Aid in dying patients would choose life, but their cancer, their disease, their bodies are choosing otherwise.”
“And who would not want to be able to make choices when you are the most vulnerable, when you are the most at risk, and when you are suffering in pain?” she asked. “… When there are no meds that can help alleviate that, when you know that you are going to die within a week, within days, within minutes, you want to relieve yourself of that pain. And the only thing you can do many times is this option. Why wouldn’t we give it to the residents of our state like they have done in other places?”
A. 2694 allows for physicians to prescribe fatal medication to adults who have a terminal illness, defined as an “incurable or irreversible illness or condition” that will “within reasonable medical judgment, produce death within six months.”
Under the measure, the patient is required to submit both an oral and written request to die to his or her attending physician. The written request must be signed by two witnesses, who attest that the person made the decision of their own volition and without coercion, and one may not be a relative or the employee of the facility where the patient is receiving treatment.
The attending physician is also mandated to discuss all of the available options with the individual, including palliative care and hospice. The physician may not write the prescription without first “offering the qualified individual an opportunity to rescind the request.”
The patient is permitted to decline to inform their family that they have chosen to die via a lethal prescription.
While part of the goal of Monday’s press conference was to announce the results of a stated poll by WebMD/Medscape, which claims that doctors in New York state support having the option of physician-assisted suicide 56 to 26 percent, the New York Alliance Against Assisted Suicide noted in a press release that the Medical Society of the State of New York (MSSNY) still opposes doctor-prescribed death.
“Despite shifts in favor of physician-assisted suicide as evidenced by its legality in an increasing number of states, physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia have not been part of the normative practice of modern medicine,” MSSNY writes on its website. “Compelling arguments have not been made for medicine to change its footing and to incorporate the active shortening of life into the norms of medical practice.”
“Although relief of suffering has always been a fundamental duty in medical practice, relief of suffering through shortening of life has not. Moreover, the social and societal implications of such a fundamental change cannot be fully contemplated,” it outlines. “MSSNY supports all appropriate efforts to promote patient autonomy, promote patient dignity, and to relieve suffering associated with severe and advanced diseases. Physicians should not perform euthanasia or participate in assisted suicide.”
Diane Coleman, the president of Not Dead Yet, also expressed concern that because of the cost of healthcare, some might choose assisted suicide because it is the cheapest way out.
“We live with a profit-driven healthcare system facing tremendous cost-cutting pressures. Assisted suicide is the cheapest ‘treatment,’” she sad in a statement. “These bills grant legal immunity to doctors and others who assist suicides of people who may have a terminal condition. They do not prevent mistakes, coercion or abuse and, therefore, endanger the lives of old, ill and disabled people.”
In addition to A. 2694, Assembly bill 30 has been filed, which would direct the commissioner of the State Department of Health to to “conduct a study relating to medical aid in dying,” and Senate bill 647 would prohibit insurance companies from covering the lethal drug so as to avoid swaying the ailing patient.
Physician-assisted suicide is currently legal in seven states—California, Colorado, Montana, Hawaii, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington—as well as the District of Columbia.
While there is much talk about bodily autonomy surrounding both the issue of abortion and physician-assisted suicide, Scripture states in 2 Corinthians 5:15, “He died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him which died for them, and rose again.”
Job 14:5 also outlines, “Seeing [man’s] days are determined, the number of his months are with Thee, Thou hast appointed his bounds that he cannot pass.”
_______________________________________________________________
“A GENTLE DEATH”
SEE: https://compassionandchoices.org/resource/a-gentle-death/
_______________________________________________________________

New York Passes Radical Abortion Law, But World is Becoming More Pro-Life!!!

New Abortion Law in New York is Outrageous!

How To Schedule Abortion At Nine Months Pregnant!

Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver challenges the Democrat talking point that “late-term abortions are only available for medical emergencies” by showing she was able to schedule an abortion appointment in her 9th month of pregnancy simply using the vague excuse of depression.


AUSTRIA REELING FROM MIGRANTS’ MURDER OF WOMEN~WHEN PATRIARCHY & MISOGYNY AMONG FOREIGNERS SPAWN KILLINGS

AUSTRIA REELING FROM MIGRANTS’ MURDER OF WOMEN~WHEN PATRIARCHY & MISOGYNY AMONG FOREIGNERS SPAWN KILLINGS
BY STEPHEN BROWN
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272710/austria-reeling-migrants-murder-women-stephen-brownrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
It is definitely not how Austrians wanted to begin the New Year.
In a bloody start to 2019, four women have been brutally murdered in the peaceful Alpine nation of almost 9 million people in just over two weeks, shaking the country to its core.
With an additional two murders of women committed last December, the tally of this “femicide,” as it is being termed, stands at six in a little over five weeks. (There have been no male murder victims.) And this in a country with the very low murder rate of only .66 per 100,000 people! (The United States, by contrast, has 5.35)
What is conspicuous to Austrians about these terrible tragedies is that all the women-killers, except one, are not native Austrians. (Non-Austrians are only 15 percent of the population.) Another visible factor is most murders were committed by partners or ex-partners of women who were about to leave, or had left, relationships with their killers.
“It is striking that many foreigners and asylum seekers are found over proportionally among the suspects. That suggests that this group is particularly misogynistic and patriarchist oriented,” said social scientist Birgitt Haller of the Institute for Conflict Research in Vienna.
Police concur. They report that sometimes when called to a migrant home where the husband is physically abusing his wife: “Then he doesn’t understand at all why he is not allowed to hit his wife and why he has to leave the apartment.”
Vice-Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache of the ruling conservative Freedom Party of Austria (FPO), horrified by the killings, says the fact most of the criminals have a migrant background “is not permitted to be withheld.” 
“That is why it would be completely false to speak of an increase in violence among Austrians,” Strache said.
Unfortunately for the people in the land of the edelweiss, and especially for women, it does not appear conditions are going to soon improve. In fact, Austrians can only expect them to get worse, as murder rate statistics indicate. There were 40 murders in Austria in 2015, 17 of them women (42.5%). This increased to 49 in 2016, 28 of them women (57.1%), and again to 62 in 2017, with 36 being women (58%).
Last year, there were 74 murders in Austria, including 44 (60%)  women, a new record. But the growing number of murders also matches the general upward trend in crime in the county. Knife attacks, for example, have gone up 300 per percent in the last ten years.
It is the number of female murder victims, however, that distinguishes Austria. In seven of the last ten years, more women have been murdered than men, in two years the numbers were even and only one saw more men killed than women. As well, there are only three countries in Europe where more women are killed: Iceland, the Czech Republic and Switzerland.
But bare statistics do not convey the beauty of the lives extinguished, two of whom were only 16, the despicableness of their killers and the horror of their crimes.  
The first victim was one of the 16-year-olds, Michelle, a native Austrian living in Steyr. Her 17 year-old Afghan ex-boyfriend, Saber, murdered her last December 9. He had come to Austria two years earlier as an underage asylum seeker and lived in a hostel for underage migrants.
Saber was described as controlling and forbid Michelle contact with other boys. She broke up with him, however, when she discovered he had another girlfriend. In what may have been an attempted reconciliation, Saber was visiting Michelle in her room when he stabbed her to death.
To escape immediate discovery, Saber then barricaded the bedroom door with a chest, fleeing out the window, leaving Michelle dying on her bed under a pile of laundry. Michelle’s mother and sister made the horrifying discovery only hours later.
Saber had apparently admitted to Michelle’s brother he had killed a person back in Afghanistan. If confirmed, he can’t be deported, however, since that country has the death penalty. Ironically, as an underage teenager, the most jail time Saber will get in Austria in exchange for Michelle’s precious, young life is fifteen years
The next murder occurred on Christmas Eve in Vienna. A man, originally from India, drowned his wife in the bathtub. Then he took a pair of scissors and cut her forearms to make it look like suicide. “Raging jealousy” was the apparent motive.
The third occurred January 8 in Amstetten. A Turk stabbed his wife 38 times in front of their three children on the street. She had intended to leave him. The man was known as an Islamic fundamentalist and was in the sights of the intelligence service. He would try to convert people and go around lecturing smoking women. At Christmas markets, he would knock ‘gluhwein’, a traditional mulled wine drink, out of people’s hands, saying the drinks were “un-Islamic.” He also had had 30 complaints made against him concerning disturbing the peace, but police could not act because he was not violent.
The fourth female murder occurred the same day. An unemployed, native Austrian man, described as “eccentric,”stabbed his ex-girlfriend to death in front of her apartment building, striking her six times.
The fifth murder witnessed the death of the second 16-year-old, Manuela, on January 13. Her ex-boyfriend, a 19-year-old Syrian asylum seeker, Yazan, strangled her to death in a park, covering her body afterwards with leaves and branches. Manuela’s mother, worried when her daughter did not return home, discovered her lifeless form when looking for her. Yazan had already been in trouble with police “many times” and had two convictions.
The last murder occurred on January 15 when an Ethiopian man stabbed his sister to death in Vienna’s main train station. The sister had come from London to save him from the drug scene he had fallen into. After an argument in the ticket hall, the man fled to a lower level, his sister following. He then turned and stabbed her. The man was suffering from a broken relationship, in which he felt the woman had treated him badly.  
The former socialist government, who allowed the migrant wave into Austria in 2015, is being heavily blamed for the women murders. Strache holds all those who initially cheered the then unregulated, massive influx, and, more specifically, the former SPO (Socialist Party of Austria) chancellor, Werner Faymann, directly responsible.
Roman Haider of the FPO’s national council speaks of the SPO’s 2015 “welcoming culture” as “completely false,” saying “these crimes against our women and children are to be attributed” to it.
“Where the journey of the SPO welcome train is heading, one can experience almost daily now in the media,” he said. “The senior conductor and short-time chancellor opened the borders and led the migrants right across our country at the expense of the taxpayer, unregistered and uncontrolled, as well noted.”

TRUMP WARNS EUROPEAN UNION NOT TO EVADE U.S. SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

TRUMP WARNS EUROPEAN UNION NOT TO EVADE 
U.S. SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/trump-warns-eu-not-to-evade-us-sanctions-against-iran;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“The White House is putting the Europeans on notice, saying that if they try to do an end-run around U.S. sanctions on Iran, they will be subject to stiff fines and penalties.” Iran is a rogue nation with jihadist proxies operating worldwide; it aims to obliterate Israel. No Western nation should be appeasing it. Unfortunately, Barack Hussein Obama did just that, apparently trusting that his appeasement strategy would contain Iran.
Another well-known fact is that globalists are eroding democratic institutions with their suicidal open-border policies, curbing free speech, arrogating ever more power to the anti-democratic United Nations — and doing business with the likes of Iran. So it’s no surprise that “unfazed, the European Union is marching forward with the plan, which, if implemented, could further strain trans-Atlantic relations.” This excludes the nations of the EU that make up the Visegrad group (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia), as well as Austria and Italy, which have stood for freedom.
It’s now a faceoff: according to Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark), “the choice is whether to do business with Iran or the United States….I hope our European allies choose wisely.” Let’s hope no one holds his or her breath regarding the wisdom of most EU countries.
“Trump Warns Europeans Not to Try to Evade Iran Sanctions,” Associated Press, January 28, 2019:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is closely eyeing efforts in Europe to set up an alternative money payment channel to ease doing business with Iran and avoid running afoul of sanctions the U.S. has levied on the Islamic republic.
The White House is putting the Europeans on notice, saying that if they try to do an end-run around U.S. sanctions on Iran, they will be subject to stiff fines and penalties. Unfazed, the European Union is marching forward with the plan, which, if implemented, could further strain trans-Atlantic relations.
A spokeswoman for EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said preparations for the alternative system were “at an advanced stage.”
“I hope that we can announce the launch very soon,” Maja Kocijancic told reporters late last week in Brussels.
Getting out ahead of a possible announcement, a senior administration official told The Associated Press on Friday that the U.S. will fully enforce its sanctions and hold individuals and entities accountable for undermining them. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue.
“The choice is whether to do business with Iran or the United States,” Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., told the AP. “I hope our European allies choose wisely.”
The U.S. joined China, France, Germany, Russia and Britain in signing a pact with Iran in 2015 that offered to lift economic sanctions in exchange for Tehran’s pledge to rein in its nuclear weapons program….

OB/GYNs, NURSES SPEAK OUT AGAINST NEW YORK ABORTION LAW-IT IS NEVER NECESSARY TO KILL BABY FOR HEALTH, LIFE OF MOTHER

One of those firing back at Cuomo and New York state’s gleeful Democrats is Dr. William Lile, an OB-GYN whose website, prolifedoc.com, makes his stand on abortion very clear.
Lile made a video that now on YouTube in which he said New York leaders are wrong to be celebrating death.

“If they’re a patient they’re a person, and if they are a person they deserve our protection,” he said. “I’ve been in private practice almost 20 years and I’ve delivered almost 4,000 babies with two primary rules: We want to have a healthy mom and we want to have a healthy baby,” he said.
Picture


OB/GYNs, NURSES SPEAK OUT AGAINST NEW YORK ABORTION LAW-IT IS NEVER NECESSARY TO KILL BABY FOR HEALTH, LIFE OF MOTHER 

BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A number of pro-life obstetricians and nurses nationwide have spoken out against the New York Reproductive Health Act signed into law by Gov. Andrew Cuomo last week, which not only codifies the “right” to an abortion, but also allows mothers to obtain an abortion past the 24-week mark and without limitation if the child in their womb is not expected to survive, or to “protect” the mother’s health or life.
“Every individual who becomes pregnant has the fundamental right to choose to carry the pregnancy to term, to give birth to a child, or to have an abortion,” the Reproductive Health Act, signed into law on Tuesday, reads in part. “A health care practitioner … may perform an abortion when … the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”
The language reflects the 1973 Supreme Court ruling of Roe v. Wade, in which Justice Harry Blackmun, nominated to the bench by Republican president Richard Nixon, wrote, “If the State is interested in protecting fetal life after viability [written in the ruling to be as early as 24 weeks], it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother.”
“I want to clear something up so that there is absolutely no doubt,” Dr. Omar Hamada of Tennessee, who outlined that he has delivered more than 2,500 babies, wrote on social media on Wednesday. “There’s not a single fetal or maternal condition that requires third trimester abortion. Not one. Delivery, yes. Abortion, no. There is absolutely no medical reason to kill a near term or term infant. For any reason.”
“If there’s a problem—and there are problems in the third trimester, both with the babies and with the mom that require delivery—just deliver the baby. We don’t have to kill it,” Hamada further explained to Fox News.
Dr. David McKnight, also of Tennessee, likewise said that if a concern arises, the baby is simply delivered via C-section. There is no need to kill the child to save the mother.
“As a board-certified practicing OB/GYN physician for over 30 years, I need to say publicly and unequivocally, that there is NEVER a medical reason to kill a baby at term,” he remarked. “When complications of pregnancy endanger a mother’s life, we sometimes must deliver the baby early, but it is ALWAYS with the intent of doing whatever we can to do it safely for the baby too. The decision to kill an unborn baby at term is purely for convenience. It is murder.”
NICU nurse Olivia Scherlacher said that the concept of the “health of the mother” could mean a variety of things, such gestational diabetes or preeclampsia, or even the mental health of the woman, and similarly stated that if significant medical issues arise, the baby is simply taken early.
“The major problem with [the Reproductive Health Act] is that ‘the patient’s life or health at risk’ can mean so many different things,” she remarked on social media. “It’ll be abused and people will say they’re mentally unstable and need to abort their baby, or the baby is giving the mother gestational diabetes, or the baby is giving the mother high blood pressure or even preeclampsia.”
“But almost all of the conditions that put the mother’s life or health at risk can be solved by delivering the baby early by C-section when the risk gets too high, and very often these babies survive and grow up to be perfect,” Scherlacher outlined. “It is heartbreaking to me to see this [law] happening when I hold little 24-weekers in my hands and watch them grow, help them breathe, and help them jump all the hurdles.”
Dr. Bill Lile of Florida, who has delivered nearly 4,000 babies over the past 20 years, likewise noted that babies in NICU born as early as 24 weeks can survive if they need to be removed from their mother’s womb, and that third trimester abortion is therefore never necessary.
“We can have babies in our NICU doing great at 24 and 25 weeks gestation,” he stated in a video posted to YouTube. “Are there reasons we need to deliver babies early sometimes? Yes. But not [to] take their lives in the process. Deliver them and let them survive and thrive in our NICU. To take the lives of these babies in the womb breaks my heart.”
Speaking as well on the personhood of the child, and the medical advances that allow doctors to operate on babies even in the womb, Lile noted that the unborn can receive blood transfusions as early at 19 weeks, and that heart surgery can be performed as early as 22 weeks. Spina bifida has also been corrected in the womb as well, as recent news reports indicate.
“If they are a patient, they are a person, and if they are a person, they deserve our protection,” he stated.
“Don’t believe the lies. There is no need for late-term abortion. There is no need for an emergency abortion. There is no need for #abortion. Period,” said Sarah Cleveland, who has served as an ultrasound technician for more than 15 years.
While there is no such thing as an emergency abortion, she stated, emergency C-sections are common.
“If there is a true emergency (high blood pressure due to pregnancy, for example) doctors will, in fact, end the pregnancy to save the mother. It is called an emergency C-section. The baby is out—maybe very early, but the baby is out—and cared for. The pregnancy has ended and Mom can be cared for,” Cleveland explained.
“Isn’t that the so-called point of why pro-choicers advocate for abortion? That they need to be able to ‘terminate the pregnancy to save the life of the mother’?” she asked. “Well, here ya go. Emergencies ending in C-sections, ending the pregnancy and saving the mother, happen all the time.”
Cleveland noted that late-term abortions take two to three days and that no true “life-threatening emergency takes three days to treat as an outpatient procedure,” as the woman would not be able to wait that long if she were in jeopardy of dying.
“You know what doesn’t happen all the time? As in, like, never? An emergency abortion. There is NO SUCH THING,” she declared. “Never in the 9 years while working in a large hospital, often in the ER, did I hear the words, ‘Quick! Get me forceps and suction! This woman needs an emergency abortion STAT!’ Why did I never hear these words? Because emergency abortions don’t exist.”
As previously reported, one of the numerous reasons that the organization New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms had spoken out against the Reproductive Health Act was because of the legislation’s expansion into the “health” of the mother, which it believes is a broad term that could be utilized for virtually any reason.
It pointed to the 1973 Supreme Court case of Doe v. Bolton, which determined that “medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors—physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age—relevant to the well-being of the patient. All these factors may relate to health.”
As also previously reported, former U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop once stated the same information as the medical professionals who have spoken out over the past week—that the life or health of the mother is never a reason for an abortion as doctors will simply deliver the baby in order to save both lives.
“Protection of the life of the mother as an excuse for an abortion is a smoke screen. In my 36 years of pediatric surgery, I have never known of one instance where the child had to be aborted to save the mother’s life,” he said. “If toward the end of the pregnancy complications arise that threaten the mother’s health, the doctor will induce labor or perform a Caesarean section.”
“[The doctor’s] intention is to save the life of both the mother and the baby,” Koop continued. “The baby’s life is never willfully destroyed because the mother’s life is in danger.”
______________________________________________________________

The New York City Abortion Law: 

Meet The New Sanctioned Face Of Evil

Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a disgusting new abortion law in New York that allows abortions up to the 9th month of pregnancy. Owen Benjamin exposes the face of evil as this law is celebrated by the left.

New York Passes Radical Abortion Law, 

But World is Becoming More Pro-Life!!!

New Abortion Law in New York is Outrageous!

How To Schedule Abortion At Nine Months Pregnant!

Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver challenges the Democrat talking point that “late-term abortions are only available for medical emergencies” by showing she was able to schedule an abortion appointment in her 9th month of pregnancy simply using the vague excuse of depression.


GLAZOV MOMENT: TLAIB’S GUEST PRAISED MURDERER OF 4 YEAR OLD JEWISH GIRL


GLAZOV MOMENT: TLAIB’S GUEST PRAISED MURDERER OF 4 YEAR OLD JEWISH GIRL 
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/glazov-moment-tlaibs-guest-praised-murderer-of-4-year-old-jewish-girlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I focus on Tlaib’s Guest Praised Murderer of 4-Year-Old Jewish Girl, and I unveil what the establishment media will never tell you about its new anti-Trump Muslim hero.
Don’t miss it!
I will be speaking at Beverly Hills Hotel on Feb. 6 about my new book: Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring UsRegister HERE. Order the book HERE.
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.
__________________________________________________________

REP. TLAIB’S ANTISEMITISM PROBLEM IS GETTING WORSE

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/272717/rep-tlaibs-antisemitism-problem-getting-worse-daniel-greenfieldrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Rep. Rashida Tlaib followed a familiar path to lefty celebrity, ranting as loudly as anyone could about Trump. The rants were loud enough that the Democrats had no interest in addressing the very serious problem with her candidacy. Or that of Rep. Omar.
Now the latest Daily Caller report shows how closely Tlaib is linked to hateful bigots.
Tlaib’s connections to “Palestinian” activists have already led to her linkage to a terror supporter who praised the murderer of a 4-year-old Jewish girl. But these latest linkages are even uglier.
Tlaib is a member of the Facebook group “Palestinian American Congress,” where members often demonize Jews. The group’s founder, Palestinian activist Maher Abdel-qader, was a key fundraiser for Tlaib and organized campaign events for her around the country.
While anyone can be a member of a group, Tlaib has close ties to Maher and Maher is about as anti-Semitic as it gets.
In January 2018, Abdel-qader shared an anti-Semitic video that claimed Jews aren’t actually Jewish, and invented their historical claim to Israel and secretly control the media.
The video, which described Jews as “satanic,” also questioned whether 6 million Jews actually died in the Holocaust.
“Research the truth about the Holocaust, and you’ll definitely start to question what you thought you knew,” the video’s narrator says.
And Maher is closely linked to Tlaib.
In March 2018, Tlaib presented Abdel-qader with a medal showing her appreciation for his help with the campaign, according to Voices of New York, a project of the City University of New York (CUNY). She posted multiple pictures of herself with Abdel-qader on Facebook during the campaign and emphasized how important his support was to her.
Abdel-qader took credit on Facebook for organizing fundraisers for Tlaib among Arab-Americans, pulling in hundreds of thousands of dollars for her campaign. Photos he’s posted on social media show him speaking at Tlaib campaign events.
As we’ve already seen with the Dem embrace of Farrakhan and the media whitewashing of the Hebrew Israelites, the left has no problem with anti-Semitism as long as it comes from their political allies. But this is the ugly flavor of anti-Semitism being mainstreamed on the Left.
And it should serve as a warning.
______________________________________________________________

UK: AT LEAST 15 CHURCHES GET LETTER WARNING THEM TO STOP ALL SERVICES OR FACE BOMBINGS & STABBINGS

UK: AT LEAST 15 CHURCHES GET LETTER WARNING THEM TO STOP ALL SERVICES OR FACE BOMBINGS & STABBINGS
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/uk-at-least-15-churches-get-letter-warning-them-to-stop-all-services-or-face-bombings-and-stabbingsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Islamic law forbids Christians to make public display of their religion. Could that have something to do with this? Perhaps not, but what other group thinks Christian worship is immoral and wrong in itself, and has a theology of force and violence?
“‘Petrol bomb’ threats sent to churches and supermarkets,” BBC, January 16, 2019 (thanks to David):
More than a dozen churches have been sent “threatening letters” bearing a West Midlands postmark, with one letter warning of a petrol bomb attack.
West Midlands Police is investigating and said churches and supermarkets in the region and further afield had been targeted “over a period of months”.
In one handwritten letter, threats were made to “petrol bomb” services and stab congregation members “one by one”.
A priest from Sheffield described the letter he had received as “horrifying”.
Each letter bears a West Midlands postmark, the BBC understands.
Parish priest Father Andrew Browne, of St Mary’s Church in High Green, Sheffield, received a letter on 4 January.
He said: “It looked like just an ordinary handwritten letter on the outside.
“But when I opened it and read what it said, the horror of what it could entail became clear.”
Fr Browne said he was told at least 15 letters had been received by churches nationally during a Bishops’ conference last week.
He added West Midlands Police took over the investigation from the South Yorkshire force after discovering all the letters originated from the region….

SALAM WEB: AT LAST A NEW WEB BROWSER COMPLIANT WITH ISLAMIC VALUES & SHARIA

At last: New web browser is compliant with Islamic values

BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/at-last-new-web-browserrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Why is this needed? Microsoft Edge isn’t enough?
“Halal internet? This browser promises to be compliant with Islamic values,” by Yudith Ho, Bloomberg, January 28, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A Malaysian startup is betting that there’s plenty of pent-up demand for a new browser that’s compliant with Islamic values, at a time of mounting concerns over privacy, bias and online abuse over the internet.
SalamWeb, a mobile browser, is designed to deliver a Muslim-friendly web experience. The app, which includes messaging, news and other features, is aimed at users in Malaysia and Indonesia, according to Hasni Zarina Mohamed Khan, managing director at Salam Web Technologies MY Sdn.
Her goal is to eventually capture 10 per cent of the 1.8 billion global Muslim population. She pointed to some of challenges facing the web, as the world’s largest technology companies from Google to Facebook Inc. face criticism for doing too little to address harmful content and false information. Human rights group Amnesty International looked at abusive interactions and concluded that Twitter is a “toxic place for women.”
“We want to make the internet a better place,” Hasni Zarina said. “We know the internet has the good and the bad, so SalamWeb offers you a tool to create this window that lets you go to the internet to see the good.”
SalamWeb relies on community-vetted content filters that mark web pages as appropriate, neutral or inappropriate, while warning users when they approach sites with gambling or pornography. It also has Muslim-specific functions, such as prayer times and an indicator for Qibla, or the direction that a Muslim must face when praying….

______________________________________________________________

SalamWeb – The World’s First Shariah Certified Digital Ecosystem

SalamWeb is the world’s first Shariah certified digital ecosystem. It is a revolution in the digital world tailored to meet the needs of today’s global Islamic generation. Covering the many features often searched for on the Internet, it starts off with a unique shariah-certified browser that not only protects users from harmful content but also provides a safe digital space for those who are concerned of what is shared on the Internet.
SalamWeb with Datuk Dr. Mohd Daud Bakar
SalamWeb is the world’s first Shariah certified web browser and digital ecosystem endorsed by Amanie Shariah Supervisory Board. In conformity with Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation’s (MDEC) Islamic Digital Economy Mi’yar.
SalamWeb – All The Tools You Need To Optimise Your Digital Life 
Introducing SalamWeb – the world’s first Shariah certified web browser.
All your daily essentials in one place!

IRANIAN AYATOLLAH: “UNTIL WE TURN THE WHITE HOUSE INTO A SHIITE ISLAMIC CENTER, WE’LL ALL SHOUT “DEATH TO AMERICA”

IRANIAN AYATOLLAH: “UNTIL WE TURN THE WHITE HOUSE INTO A SHIITE ISLAMIC CENTER, WE’LL ALL SHOUT “DEATH TO AMERICA” 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“With our hopes high, we are fighting and awaiting the day when the banner of “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger” will fly all over planet Earth and the one global and just rule of the Mahdi will be established.”
This man is the representative of Iran’s Supreme Leader in Fars Province. 
But remember: those who call attention to such aspirations are racist, bigoted “Islamophobes.”
“Ayatollah Lotfollah Dezhkham, Khamenei’s Representative in Fars Province: We Will Shout ‘Death to America’ until We Turn the White House into a Shiite Islamic Center,” MEMRI, January 25, 2019:
Ayatollah Lotfollah Dezhkham, Khamenei’s representative in the Fars Province of Iran, delivered a Friday sermon in the city of Shiraz on January 25, 2019. Ayatollah Dezhkham said that the Iranian people are fighting and awaiting the day when the banner of Islam will fly all over the planet and the Mahdi establishes his global rule. He said that the economic sanctions are evidence that the U.S. and President Trump are terrified of Iran, and added: “Until we turn the White House into a Hussainiya [Shiite Islamic center], we will all continue to shout: ‘Death to America!’” The crowd subsequently chanted: “Death to America!”
Ayatollah Lotfollah Dezhkham: With our hopes high, we are fighting and awaiting the day when the banner of “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger” will fly all over planet Earth and the one global and just rule of the Mahdi will be established. Who says that the time for these things has passed? This is what the Islamic Revolution has brought. Today, the enemies have realized that those who oppose them are strong. Allah be praised, they are terrified. If America had not been terrified, it would not have imposed such comprehensive sanctions, which target even the bread that people eat. If Trump is not afraid, he should let us sell our oil undisturbed and bring dollars easily [into Iran]. You poor thing! You are terrified! He is only pretending and acting like a bully. He is afraid of the Iranian people. The loud cry of the Iranian people epitomizes the fight against global arrogance, and makes them tremble in fear… Until we turn the White House into a Hussainiya [Shiite Islamic center], we will all continue to shout: “Death to America!”
Crowd: Death to America! Death to America! Death to America! Death to America!

_______________________________________________________________

THE “PEACEFUL”, “JESUS LOVING” JIHADIST SPEAKS

PARENTAL RIGHTS ATTACKED: FOX NEWS CLAIMS DOCTORS GIVING VACCINE EXEMPTIONS SHOULD BE IMPRISONED~BILL GATES, DR. NANCY MESSONNIER, CDC DOING VACCINE SURVEYS BY PHONE


 
EUGENICS & THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE 
FOR YOUR FAMILY’S DEMISE:
FOX NEWS CLAIMS DOCTORS GIVING VACCINE EXEMPTIONS SHOULD BE IMPRISONED

The attack on Americans who are skeptical of vaccines has only begun

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/fox-news-claims-doctors-giving-vaccine-exemptions-should-be-imprisoned/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A doctor on Fox News is claiming that any doctor that gives parents an exemption from vaccinating their children should be prosecuted.
Alex reveals the elite’s dark agenda to use vaccines to cull the population.
Rod Rosenstein’s sister presides over the secret vaccine court that decides if claims of physical damage on children by vaccines are valid or not.
Alex exposes the globalist agenda to use government agencies to cover up their crimes against the population.
_______________________________________________

INFOWARS – Rod Rosenstein’s Sister Runs Vaccine Cover-Up

Rod Rosenstein’s sister presides over the secret vaccine court that decides if claims of physical damage on children by vaccines are valid or not. Alex exposes the globalist agenda to use government agencies to cover up their crimes against the population.

Rod Rosenstein has a Sister who 

HEADS THE VACCINE DAMAGE COURT

SEE: http://truckingboards.com/bb/threads/rod-rosenstein-has-a-sister-who-heads-the-vaccine-damage-court.90473/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
His sister, Dr. Nancy Messonnier, is the director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases [NCIRD] at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Messonnier has a long career at the CDC going all the way back to 1995. For the past decade, she has consistently held leadership positions as a vaccine official. She has been director of NCIRD since March 2016 after serving as deputy director from October 2014. Before that, she was chief of the Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch in NCIRD’s Division of Bacterial Diseases.

Messonnier was already NCIRD director at CDC when agency employees were “crying in the hallways” over Trump’s victory. And Trump’s statements over the years have given them plenty of reasons to cry.

https://www.autisminvestigated.com/vaccine-chief-raid-trump-lawyer/

This is SO ****ED UP FOLKS

They poison us and I guarantee

ROD and his SISTER 

DO NOT TAKE THE SHOTS
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
EXCERPT: He has one sister, Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
AND:
______________________________________________________________

National Immunization Surveys, Phone Call, 

CDC Now Calling People

Have you been called by 312-578-7022 or 312-578-7029 (Caller ID CDC NATL IMMUN or NORC UCHICAGO) or received a letter from Dr. Nancy Messonnier, Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), about the National Immunization Surveys (NIS), including the NIS-Child, NIS-Teen, or NIS-Child Influenza Module (NIS-CIM)?
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-mana…
_____________________________________________________________

SPIRITUAL ABUSE QUESTIONNAIRE: HOW TO KNOW IF YOU ARE BEING SPIRITUALLY ABUSED OR DECEIVED

SPIRITUAL ABUSE QUESTIONNAIRE: HOW TO KNOW IF YOU ARE BEING SPIRITUALLY ABUSED OR DECEIVED
BY CHRIS LAWSON
SEE: https://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/newsletters/2019/newsletter20190128.htm#101;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Below is a portion of the content of Chris Lawson’s booklet, How to Know if You Are Being Spiritually Abused or Deceived—A Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire. The full booklet has 101 questions. To order copies of this booklet, click here. 
bkt-cl-sa-sHow to Know if You Are Being Spiritually Abused or Deceived—A Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire

Do you know a loved one, a neighbor, or a co-worker who is in a cult or an abusive church or group? Or perhaps you yourself are in such a situation. The Spiritual-Abuse Questionnaire in this booklet will help shed light on this issue.
Spiritual abuse occurs when a leader, a church, or a belief system, whether well-intentioned or not, dominates, manipulates, or castigates individuals and even entire families through fear tactics, mind control, or some other psychological or emotional abuse.
Sadly, the mask of spiritual abuse deception can be worn by anyone. The following two Scriptures are reflective of what happens when the position of authority is abused within a spiritual/church setting (e.g., self-exaltation, heavy-handed leadership, etc).

The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means [by their own authority]; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof? (Jeremiah 5:31)
I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not. Wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with malicious words: and not content therewith, neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth them out of the church. (3 John 9-10)

It is my hope that this booklet will help people who have been through or are experiencing things similar (or worse) to what my family and I personally experienced years ago.
If you have been spiritually abused, take heart; the true Jesus desires to help and heal you as He has helped countless others.

Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire

This questionnaire is designed to help the reader think through a number of areas he or she may have never seriously considered before. As you read each question, circle either YES or NO. When you reach the end, go back through the list and prayerfully consider the questions you have answered YES to.
Answering YES to any of the following questions may be an indication of an unhealthy problem in your group or with your leaders. Answering YES to more than just a few questions is a definite cause for concern.
If this is the case, it is recommended that you take a much closer look into your group or organization’s history, purpose, and goals. Observe closely the methods, activities, and lives of the leaders. Are they using abusive and manipulative tactics on people?
The basic Yes or No questions of this questionnaire enable the reader to think critically on his or her own—something generally not allowed in abusive systems.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Please note also that while this booklet can be a useful tool in helping to bring clarity to difficulties in a church or ministry, the questions offered here should also be tempered with careful thought and godly counsel. Answering yes to just a few questions does not automatically mean you are in a cult or abusive situation. One thing for certain is that every church or group is composed of fallible people who are not always as loving as they should be. Nor should we expect to be in a place where there is no authority over us. Be reflective, therefore, to your answers to the following questions with the goal of being fair to both your church or group and to yourself.

QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CHURCH OR GROUP’S LEADERS

  1. Are you in any way fearful of your leader(s)? YES / NO
  2. Does your church or group revolve around one main charismatic personality who is the final arbiter of “truth”? YES / NO
  3. Do your leaders make claims of being “Anointed,” having “Elijah’s Mantle,” having “Apostolic Authority,” etc.? YES / NO
  4. Does the main leader or the leaders in your church or group always insist that they are right? YES / NO
  5. Does your group, church, or movement employ a corrupted modern-day version of the Moses/Aaron style of leadership where the pastor/leaders allegedly—by themselves—hear directly from God, like Moses? (This form of leadership is unlike the balanced plurality of elders found in the New Testament.) YES / NO
  6. Does the pastor/leader of your group, church, or movement surround himself with “people-pleasers” rather than with qualified men whose personal and public lives maintain the biblical leadership characteristics as found in I, II Timothy and Titus? YES / NO
  7. Is your group, church, or movement set up like a pyramid, with a hierarchy—with one single man at the top? YES / NO
  8. Are you discouraged or prohibited from freely asking questions about the background of your leader(s) and your group? YES / NO
  9. If so, are you looked down upon and considered to be divisive? YES / NO
  10. Would you be rebuked or chastised/punished by your leader(s) if you researched the background and history of the group and its leader(s)? For instance, would doing a background check on your leader be considered “disloyal” or “sinful”? YES / NO
  11. Are you discouraged or prohibited from freely discussing teachings, “prophecies,” or so-called new revelations that your group leader(s) has/have stated in the past or present? YES / NO
  12. Are you allowed to ask your leader(s) questions regarding their background in ministry, education, teaching, policies, etc.? If not, why? YES / NO
  13. Do you view those who are assisting your group or church pastor/leader as ones who simply “do what they are told” rather than people who can rationally think for themselves and if need be would not be afraid to confront the main leader(s) if questionable practices/teachings arise? YES / NO
  14. Are the leaders of your group, church, or organization above reproach (without blame) in morals, ethics, teaching, and the handling of your group’s finances? How do you know? YES / NO
  15. Do any of your leaders have a criminal record? YES / NO
  16. Would your leader(s) allow you to freely ask questions or research their background in order to find out if they have a criminal record? If not, why? YES / NO
  17. Has anyone in your group ever tried to persuade you to NOT research the personal background of the leaders? YES / NO
  18. When issues are brought up about abusive situations, do your leaders say, “You just need to have more faith!” or, “You are being disloyal to leadership!”? YES / NO

QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR GROUP AND ITS TEACHINGS

  1. Do you feel your group twists or takes Scripture out of its historical context and consistently or often misapplies Bible verses? YES / NO
  2. Does your group or church “allegorize” and “spiritualize” Scripture instead of utilizing a literal, grammatical, historical approach to interpreting documents, like you would in any legitimate Bible college or court of law? YES / NO
  3. Are you told what you will believe; and is questioning authority and doing further research on your own, aside from the group, discouraged or frowned upon? YES / NO
  4. Are you guided through the Bible by your leaders but at the same time not allowed to study the Scriptures on your own, apart from the group or organization’s own published materials? YES / NO
  5. Do your leaders claim to receive “new revelations,” a special “anointing,” and so-called “words” or messages from God? YES / NO
  6. Do your leaders withhold or avoid providing you and your group with a written “Statement of Beliefs” or “Statement of Faith”? YES / NO
  7. If you attend a group that is a recognized charity organization, have the leaders illegally withheld from you the organizations written bylaws when you have asked for a copy? YES / NO
  8. Is it difficult to get a straight answer from the group leader(s) on the group’s teachings? YES / NO
  9. Is your group secretive about any of its teachings, practices or meetings? YES / NO
  10. Does your group take “oaths” or have you commit to unrealistic expectations? YES / NO
  11. Are your leaders ever “harsh” in tone with you, or do you ever feel like an animal that is “driven hard”? YES / NO
  12. Have you been taught, told, or commanded not to share any of the teachings, doctrines, or practices that your group is involved in? YES / NO
  13. At any time of involvement with your group, have you ever been instructed to cut all ties with the past, with relatives (spouse, children, in-laws, etc.), or with friends? YES / NO
  14. Do your leaders favorably quote and endorse known false teachers and false teachings in their own sermons/teachings, messages, and materials? YES / NO

QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR GROUP OR CHURCH’S POLICIES

  1. Does your group have any written or unwritten policies that allow leaders to use threats, pressures to conform, bribes, intimidation, verbal abuse, out-loud shaming, physical abuse, sexual abuse, or substance abuse, etc.? YES / NO
  2. Is foul language (cussing) or public humiliation used in any way as part of the public or private teaching within your group? YES / NO
  3. Would you say that your church or group has an extreme policy or guidelines for “disciplinary actions”? YES / NO
  4. Is, or could, your group’s policy on “discipline” be dangerous, illegal, or abusive in any way? YES / NO
  5. Do you think law enforcement officials would have a problem with the disciplinary guidelines and/or practices of your church, group, or organization? YES / NO
  6. Does your group restrict you from “visiting” other churches? YES / NO

QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR GROUP’S LITERATURE AND MULTIMEDIA

  1. Do you rely completely, without question, upon the literature and information that your church/group gives you—for your own spiritual growth? YES / NO
  2. Will you be disciplined if you ever, at any time, listen to, read, or view literature and multi-media materials that are not from your group, church, or organization? Materials could include such things as books, journals, tracts, magazines, newsletters, CDs, DVDs, audio cassettes, videos, websites, etc. YES / NO
  3. Are you only allowed to use study aids, books, etc. that are from your group or organization? YES / NO
  4. Have your leaders ever told you that all Bible study materials outside of your group are considered worldly, bad, apostate, “of the devil,” or evil? YES / NO

QUESTIONS ABOUT MORALS AND ETHICS, HEALTH, AND CONSCIENCE

  1. Are you emotionally dependent on or require the “approval” of your leaders for what you do—what you eat, what you wear, where you go, what you say, who you spend time with, who you marry, the music you listen to, etc.? YES / NO
  2. Do you feel as though your life (or ministry) is being “micromanaged” by others? YES / NO
  3. Are your leaders cruel, vindictive, intimidating, or overbearing? YES / NO
  4. Do any of your leaders justify sexual immorality by telling you or anyone else things like “God told me it is okay for us to do this,” or “The Lord revealed this to me,” or “No one will ever know”? YES / NO
  5. Have you ever been instructed, led, forced, or coerced into any type of sexual activity with any of your group’s leaders—or anyone else in the church, group, or organization? YES / NO
  6. Are you or have you ever been commanded, forced, coerced, extorted, or manipulated into financial giving, tithing, “sowing your seed-faith offering,” etc.? YES / NO

QUESTIONS ABOUT MAKING PERSONAL CHOICES

  1. Do you feel you are manipulated when making personal choices about diet, clothing, time commitments, church/group service, tithing, friendships, dating, spouses, purchases, etc.? YES / NO
  2. Are choices ever made by any of your leaders that go against your own conscience? YES / NO
  3. Do authority figures within your group ever demand answers from you or use threats to get their way? YES / NO
  4. Do your leaders or the group-dynamics implemented in your group make you feel as though you cannot come and go as you please; meaning, you feel as though you’re expected to be at all or most of the meetings, and if you are not, you are in trouble? YES / NO
  5. If you are experiencing abuse in any way, very likely you are fearful or nervous about leaving your group, church, or organization. Are you fearful in any way that if you left, you would be hounded and harassed? YES / NO
  6. Do your leaders, or the group itself by consensus, make choices to involve you in things that you don’t like or would prefer not to be a part of? YES / NO
  7. Are you pressured, manipulated, or coerced into making decisions—any decisions at all—regarding anything with the group and its leaders, members, and activities? YES / NO
  8. Do you feel guilty or “dirty” after making decisions because . . . “that is just what our group does”? Or, is the proverbial “red flag of conscience” waving inside of your heart and mind saying, “This is just not right at all,” or, “This is weird” or, “We should not be doing or allowing this!”? YES / NO
  9. Is pressure put upon you in any way to avoid “outside information” about your group—like online reviews, assessments, and critical essays that contain quotes from your leaders and/or your organization’s published resources? YES / NO
  10. Are you fearful that if you make an accidental “wrong choice” your leaders will punish you or purposefully humiliate you in front of your peers, family, or the group/church congregation? YES / NO
  11. Have you ever been punished or abused in any of the following ways: Physically abused, out-loud verbal shaming in front of others, given the non-verbal “silent treatment,” given coded non-verbal abuse such as “the look,” financially mistreated or extorted and as a result suffered financial repercussions, sexually abused in any way, emotionally manipulated, purposefully betrayed, been the victim of sexual innuendos, spousal divisiveness, etc.? YES / NO
  12. Are spoken or unspoken must-obey “dress code rules” implemented in your group, and, if broken, will this lead to “disciplinary action”? (This is beyond simple personal modesty in dress in social, cultural, and cross-cultural settings.) YES / NO
  13. If you are a woman, are you taught or commanded that you absolutely must wear long skirts, have long hair, avoid all make-up, and wear a head covering in order to please God? Will you be chastised or considered “carnal” if you do not comply with these rules? YES / NO
  14. If you are a woman, do your group leaders tell you that you are to submit to your husband no matter what he does to you or tells you to do even if it is illegal or physically, sexually, or emotionally abusive to you or your children? YES / NO
  15. If you are a husband and father, are your church leaders overly involved in telling you what to do with your wife and children (beyond the normal parameters of biblical counseling and advice)?

This has been a portion of this booklet. In the full booklet, there are 101 questions. You may purchase a copy of the booklet in its entirety by clicking here. The cost for one booklet is $1.95 (quantity discounts for 6 or more copies)

CHARADE!: MUSLIMS REASSURE CHRISTIANS: WE REVERE AND LOVE JESUS, TOO~THE TRAP OF SLY APOLOGETICS FOR ISLAM


MUSLIMS REASSURE CHRISTIANS: WE REVERE AND LOVE JESUS, TOO~THE TRAP OF SLY APOLOGETICS 
FOR ISLAM  
BY HUGH FITZGERALD
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272614/muslims-reassure-christians-we-revere-and-love-hugh-fitzgeraldrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
What do Muslims think of Jesus? It’s a question Dr. Sabeel Ahmed said he gets often.
To help educate people on the significance of Jesus in Islam, Ahmed’s group, The Humanitarians, a Muslim interfaith organization, is launching a monthlong campaign that includes billboards along high-trafficked areas in Arizona along with radio ads.
Ahmed, the group’s founder and outreach coordinator, said the intent is to highlight similarities between Islam and Christianity and bring people together during the holidays.
“We want to educate people on who we (Muslims) are and who we are not and show people that there are more similarities between the faiths than differences,” Ahmed said Tuesday during a news conference at the Islamic Community Center of Tempe.
Ahmed said Muslims recognize Jesus as one of Allah’s prophets. His mission, Ahmed said, was to invite people to worship God.
Note that since Christians regard Jesus as the Son of God, Muslims regard them as guilty of shirk, or polytheism, which for Muslims is the worst possible sin — or as some preachers, such as Nassim Abdi of Sydney have put it, is “worse than any sin.” I doubt that Ahmed will be telling his Christian audiences about why Muslims consider them guilty of shirk.
He said there are six articles of faith in Islam that include believing in all of God’s prophets. That includes Jesus, he said.
“If you don’t believe in Jesus, then you cannot be Muslim,” he said.
But the Muslim belief in Jesus as one more of the prophets in Islam — there are 124,000 prophets, according to Muhammad himself, though Jesus is the most revered prophet after Muhammad — has nothing to do with, and stands in opposition to, the Christian belief in Jesus as the Son of God. For as Sabeel Ahmed carefully does not tell his audiences, if you believe in Jesus as divine, “then you cannot be Muslim,” and you are, as noted above, guilty of “shirk,” which is “worse than any sin.” This is an ideological abyss that Sabeel Ahmed hopes his Christian friends won’t notice.
Muslims, like Christians, believe Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary, Ahmed said. They believe there is a creator and a higher power. Muslims also believe there is an afterlife and that people are accountable to God for their actions on earth.
Muslims are monotheists, and believe in an afterlife. This we are endlessly told by Islamic apologists. But what Sabeel Ahmed leaves out is the nature of that afterlife, and of how a Muslim can best achieve entry into Heaven, which is a very different place from the Christian Heaven. The Muslim Heaven is a sensual paradise with 72 virgins. And the surest way to enter it and enjoy its delights is to be a martyr, or shahid, dying while conducting violent Jihad against the Unbelievers. That is not information Sabeel Ahmed wishes to share with his audiences of trusting and unwary Christians.
Ahmed said Jesus is mentioned 25 times in the Quran, and that Mary, who is mentioned in the Quran 32 times, is the only woman mentioned by name in the religious text.
Again, the Muslim Mary (Maryam) is very different from the Christian Mary. She is revered; she has Sura 19 named after her; she is mentioned 32 times in the Qur’an –all of this is a staple of Muslim propaganda, that is used to impress Christians, and to conceal the basic difference: in Islam, Mary, no matter how revered, is not the mother of the Son of God.
There are more miracles related to Jesus in the Quran than there are in the Bible, Ahmed said.
More Taqiyya to keep us from focusing on the essential difference between Islam and Christianity. Jesus may in Islam be responsible for some miracles, but that does not make him divine, or the Son of God. He was appropriated by the early Muslims, downgraded to being a mortal man and a prophet. To worship him as the Son of God is inadmissible shirk.
The Arizona chapter of The Humanitarians bought two billboards on Interstate 10 — one near Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and another in Tucson near Prince Road.
The billboards, which Ahmed said cost $10,000, state in bold, white letters three Islamic beliefs about Jesus: Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary; he is honorable and blessed; and God supported Jesus with the Holy Spirit.
The billboards were unveiled last week and will be up for a month, Ahmed said.
What do you think would happen if some group of Islamocritics tried to rent billboards which simply read as follows:
Qur’an 3:110: “Muslims are the best of peoples.”
Qur’an 98:6: “Non-Muslims are the most vile of created beings.”
Qur’an 5:51: “O you who believe! Do not take Jews and Christians as friends, for they are friends only with each other.”
Qur’an 8:12: “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.”
In the hadith of Bukhari (4.52.220), Muhammad claims: “I have been made victorious through terror.”
Nothing here is made up; everything is quoted just as it is written in the Qur’an and, in the last example, recorded in the “reliable” (Sahih) hadith of Bukhari.
Despite the absolute fidelity to its sources in the Islamic texts, is there anyplace in this country where such a billboard could be put up? No. Truth is no defense, when it comes to protecting the image of Islam. Free speech does not matter. Anyone who selects such verses is clearly trying to place Islam in a bad light. It isn’t fair, it isn’t right, it’s Islamophobia. No such billboards will ever be seen.
As part of the campaign, the group also is running radio ads from Dec. 24-26 and doing a big push on social media. It has held open houses at different mosques and members are speaking at K-12 schools and universities.
Members of Sabeel Ahmed’s group are speaking to many audiences, including K-12 schoolchildren. Are school boards monitoring these appearances, this early childhood indoctrination? Are school boards, teachers, parents not alarmed? Do they think such propaganda efforts by smiling Muslim apparatchiks, well-versed in taqiyya, should be allowed in public schools, especially among the very young?
He said the group has received about 40 calls from Arizona residents interested in learning more about Islam and the similarities between the different religions.
Similar campaigns are happening in other cities nationwide, he said.
Ahmed said while unity should be celebrated year-round, The Humanitarians chose to launch this campaign in December because people are more spiritual during this time of year. He said Jesus is also a central figure in Christian holidays.
It sounds almost as an afterthought: “Jesus is also a central figure in Christian holidays.” You bet he is.
“We want to let Christians know how much we love, admire and respect Jesus,” Ahmed said.
Of course he does. What better way to reassure Christians about Islam than by Muslims stressing their “love” for Jesus in the Qur’an? Nothing will be said about how Muslims deny that Jesus was the Son of God, and that they regard Christians, for believing that Jesus was divine, as guilty of “shirk” or polytheism.
He said he hopes that once groups see there are more similarities than differences, they can work together to tackle other issues such as poverty, racism, gun violence and extremism.
The “similarities” consist of precisely this: Islam and Christianity are both monotheisms, and both claim to be “abrahamic faiths.” Abraham is seen by Muslims as their forefather, the physical ancestor — father of Ishmael, grandfather of Esau — of the Arab people, while for Christians, Abraham is seen as their spiritual ancestor. They are both “abrahamic faiths,” but in very different ways.
“First we have to do away with the fear of the unknown. Second, we have to educate each other on the commonalities of the faiths. And once we overcome that barrier, we can join together to better humanity,” Ahmed said.
Sounds good. But why stick only to educating about “commonalities”? Why not a free and frank discussion of all the ways Islam is different from, and Muslims contemptuous of, Christianity and Judaism, with which it supposedly has so much in common? That would require going off the interfaith script, and these days, that’s a tall order.
The Rev. Larry Fultz, director of the Arizona Interfaith Movement, said while he was not aware of the campaign, it’s a message he supports.
He said especially during such politically divisive times, celebrating the similarities between different groups is important.
If “celebrating the similarities” by Muslims means deliberately misleading Christians as to what Islam teaches about Christianity and Christians, then such “celebration” is to be deplored, and is not “a message” that the innocent Rev. Larry Fultz, up to his ears in interfaith (mis)understanding, should support. Instead, he might devote some time — he owes it to his flock and to himself — to studying the Qur’an and Hadith. No more pleasing interfaith pieties, please — we’ve had quite enough of that. Only the truth, however disturbing, will do.
“Anything that any group is doing to encourage dialogue, I’m for it. That’s our mission, to find things we have in common,” he said.
No, “finding things we have in common” is not your mission. Your mission is to find out the truth about what Islam inculcates, especially its view of non-Muslims, and the duty to wage Jihad against them — and then to educate your own parishioners. Feel-good support for those who are engaged in Taqiyya is a betrayal of that, your true mission.
Start your study of Islam straight from the scripture’s mouth, Rev. Fultz, by reading Qur’an 2:191-194, 4:89, 8:12, 8:60, 9:5, 9:29, 47:4. These are a handful of the 109 versus that command Believers to engage in violent Jihad, to “smite at the necks”  and to “strike terror” in the hearts of the Unbelievers. Then take a look at 4:34, to learn about how a Muslim man may “beat” his disobedient wife. Finally, take a look at Qur’an 3:110, that describes Muslims as the “best of peoples,” and then read Qur’an 98:6, where Unbelievers — that is, all non-Muslims — are described as “the most vile of created beings.” That’s a mere ten verses of the Qur’an, a kind of starter-kit for a self-directed course on Understanding Islam. There’s more, of course, in the Hadith. There’s the story of Muhammad’s consummating his marriage to Aisha when she was nine years old and he was 54. There’s the delight he expressed upon hearing of the murders of three people — Asma bint Marwan, Abu ‘Afak, Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf — who had mocked him. There’s his participation in the slaughter of 600-900 prisoners of the Banu Qurayza. There’s his buying, selling, and trading of slaves. There’s Muhammad’s remark that “War is deceit,” and his famous claim that “I have been made victorious through terror.” It’s a course of study that all ministers, priests, and rabbis should undertake before they make pronouncements about Islam to their flocks. Whereof they do not know, thereof they should not speak. The knowledge about Islam that they acquire through their own study, rather than relying on Muslims  eager to present their sanitized version of the faith, should dampen their enthusiasm for those interfaith gatherings — you know the kind — that no matter where they start from, always end up as sly apologetics for Islam.
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

Glazov Moment: Jihadist Psychopath’s “We Love Jesus” Charade

Glazov Moment: Jihadist Psychopath’s “I am the Victim” Charade

SEE ALSO:

UK DEPORTS CHRISTIAN TO PAKISTAN DESPITE HIS RECEIVING BEATINGS & THREATS FROM MUSLIMS THERE

UK DEPORTS CHRISTIAN TO PAKISTAN DESPITE HIS RECEIVING BEATINGS & THREATS FROM MUSLIMS THERE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/uk-deports-christian-to-pakistan-despite-his-receiving-beatings-and-threats-from-muslimsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
They knew this was going to happen before they deported him. But they still deported him. Not to have done so would have been “Islamophobic.”
“Christian ‘beaten and threatened by Islamic extremists’ in hiding after UK deportation,” by Eno Adeogun, Premier, January 25, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A Christian man deported from the UK to Pakistan earlier this month is living in fear of his life.
41-year-old Asher Samson had been in a lengthy legal battle to stay in the UK since he arrived in 2004 after suffering persecution.
He claimed he had been beaten and threatened with execution by Islamic extremists in Pakistan.
Premier was able to speak to Mr Samson earlier this month as he waited to be transported to a detention centre. However the leader of the church he attended before his removal confirmed that his application to remain had been denied.
Rev Lorraine Shorton from Hall Green United Community Church said on Premier’s News Hour: “I’ve received some messages from him. He’s very scared, he’s fearful for his life.
“He’s in hiding in Pakistan and his family are terribly worried for him.”
This comes as new research from the Catholic Church has found that 187 Christians are facing blasphemy charges in Pakistan.
Rev Lorraine said it was essential that Asher’s case be reopened.
Sharing her message to the Home Office, she said: “I would ask them to look again and bring Asher home to where he is safe.
“Jeremy Hunt on the 18th January – just this week, was talking with the Open Doors UK charity and said, ‘no one should face persecution for their faith where ever they are’ and that includes Christians.
“But the UK is sending people back to these countries where their lives are in danger. Pakistan is number five on the World Watch List for extremism against Christians and it’s just disgraceful really that we’re sending people potentially to their death.”…

IN CENTRAL AMERICA, POPE ENCOURAGES THE POOR TO GO TO AMERICA; CALLS IMMIGRATION LAWS “CRAZY”

IN CENTRAL AMERICA, POPE ENCOURAGES THE POOR TO GO TO AMERICA; CALLS IMMIGRATION LAWS “CRAZY” 
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/01/23/in-central-america-pope-encourages-the-poor-to-go-to-america-calls-immigration-laws-crazy/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Let’s be clear; the Pope has always been a globalist. And by “the Pope,” I mean any Pope. After all, the term “Catholic” means universal, and the Roman Catholic church has always wanted a one-world government under the auspices of their power. The Vatican is a political Nation-State that wants the world united under its authority, and it has found the perfect tool to unite the world under its globalist aspirations with its Jesuit and Marxist pontiff, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, also known as Pope Francis.
However, standing between Roman Catholicism and globalism is Protestantism and its great champion, the United States. Also standing between Roman Catholicism and globalism is the Nation-State, a form of governance that federalizes power in a specific nation with unique language, culture, and borders. The Nation-State is the single greatest bulwark of individual liberty and personal freedom in the world (because the Nation-State exists for the sole purpose of protecting the liberty of its Citizens), and it cannot be allowed to stand intact if globalism is to prevail.
Pope Francis, like all globalists, seeks to dismantle every Nation-State from the world and remove them as an obstacle to global control. To do that, however, they must prevent the Nation-State from having their own language, culture, and borders.
Francis – yet again – took an opportunity to throw shade at the American president and America’s right to have its own sovereign borders. In a trip to South America today, Francis claimed that migration has “made us crazy” and insinuated that having a border wall is an act of insanity.
Beginning in 2016 when Francis denounced anyone who wants to build a wall to keep out migrants as “notChristian,” he has continually claimed that having a wall is unChristlike. 
Ironically, Francis’ comments seem to ignore the words of his host, Archbishop Jose Domingo Ulloin of Panama – where the Pope made the comments – who claimed that “young people often fall into the hands of drug traffickers and so many other realities that our young people face.”
Rather than offer suggestions for how the wealthy Roman Catholic church could help Central America – which has been ravaged by pedophile priests – Francis insinuated that their only hope would be for the poor to migrate to the United States to be taken care of by our welfare programs.
Francis will remain in Panama for the World Youth Day event where 150 thousand or so will attend. Many more will stick around for an extra vigil and a final Mass on Sunday. Foreign policy experts believe that Francis will use several of his planned addresses to encourage the youth of Central America to come to the United States to seek “better opportunities.”

NO SURPRISE: “NO PERSONHOOD” RHA STRIPS NEW YORK PENAL CODE OF CRIMES AGAINST PREGNANT WOMEN

NO SURPRISE: “NO PERSONHOOD” RHA 
STRIPS NEW YORK PENAL CODE OF CRIMES 
AGAINST PREGNANT WOMEN
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/01/24/no-surprise-no-personhood-rha-strips-new-york-penal-code-of-crimes-against-pregnant-women/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
[New York State Senate] ALBANY, NY— Senator Sue Serino today joined Livia Abreu—an Army veteran who tragically lost her unborn daughter as a result of a terrible domestic violence attack—at a press conference calling for the passage of legislation that would restore important protections for victims of domestic violence that will be removed when the Reproductive Health Act (RHA) becomes law.
“Contrary to popular rhetoric, the Reproductive Health Act does not simply codify the current law of the land, it is an extreme proposal that goes far beyond the current standard, allows non-doctors to perform abortions up until the day of birth, and it removes critically important legal protections for pregnant victims of domestic violence,” said Senator Sue Serino. “I am incredibly grateful for Livia’s courage in telling her story to advocate on behalf of victims across the state. To deprive a pregnant domestic violence victim of the justice she and her unborn child deserve is particularly reprehensible and the ‘Liv Act’ will ensure that these dangerous perpetrators are held fully accountable for their heinous crimes.”
The bill, introduced by Senator Cathy Young, has been named the ‘Liv Act,’ in honor of Abreu, a courageous military paratrooper who was 26 weeks pregnant when her ex-boyfriend stabbed her multiple times and caused the tragic loss of her daughter. After the brutal attack, Abreu’s assailant heartlessly left her on the floor for a half-hour in her own blood. She bravely crawled from her apartment to a neighbor’s home for help.
Specifically, this legislation addresses a major injustice and flaw in the Reproductive Health Act (S240), which strikes from current law the criminal charges that are applied to perpetrators like Liv’s ex-partner who specifically commit acts of violence against pregnant women. The bill establishes the crime of ‘assault on a pregnant woman’ by expressly recognizing that violence against them is a felony, and it would apply when there is violence done to a pregnant woman, even if it does not involve the loss of her pregnancy.  I
In a statement following the press conference, Abreu said:
The Reproductive Health Act is, in my opinion, extreme and filled with gaps. It does not codify Roe v. Wade in the state of NY. In fact what it does is decriminalize abortion in all aspects, including abortion as a product of an assault on a pregnant female. Essentially, if this bill passes today and becomes law it will remove abortion as a crime from the penal code as a whole. Oscar Alvarez is currently facing abortion charges in the 1st & 2nd degrees. The passing of RHA will likely exonerate him from those charges. Which will in turn lessen his sentence now that a judge has decided the case is going to trial and the new law will take effect prior to that date. Let that sink in. He will likely be convicted of the crimes he committed against me, but the loss of my daughter will be a non-factor to the law because she wasn’t “born and alive.” That’s language used in the RHA bill. To clarify, I am neither pro-choice nor pro-life, I am very much neutral, because most things are never simply black or white. Choosing one side or the other will make me an extremist, and that I am not. I understand that there are circumstances in which a difficult decision must be made in order to save a life. However, I find it completely unacceptable for pregnant women & their unborn babies to be left unprotected under the law. I’m thinking about the many women who could be faced with a situation like mine. Domestic Violence & Assault cases on pregnant women continue to rise. I pray that it doesn’t, but what happened to me will likely happen to someone else. I cannot imagine living in a world where harming and/or killing an unborn child as a product of an attack on a pregnant woman is not a crime… A world where mothers have been stripped of & have to bury and mourn their unborn child but the person responsible is not held accountable for it. Read the bill if you haven’t already.
With RHA enacted, the criminal and civil laws here in the state would fail to adequately recognize the harm experienced by Liv and other victims here in New York. Passage of the ‘Liv Act’ would ensure that a criminal statute would still exist in New York that would recognize that violence done to a pregnant woman puts her reproductive freedom at stake.
[Editor’s Note: This article was written by New York State Senator Sue Serino and originally published at The New York State Senate. Title changed by P&P]
______________________________________________________

How To Schedule Abortion At Nine Months Pregnant!

Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver challenges the Democrat talking point that “late-term abortions are only available for medical emergencies” by showing she was able to schedule an abortion appointment in her 9th month of pregnancy simply using the vague excuse of depression.

FACEBOOK BANS PULPIT & PEN PUBLISHER FOR SAYING “TRANSGENDERISM” IS A MENTAL ILLNESS~SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BAN ON “TRANSGENDER” SOLDIERS

FACEBOOK BANS PULPIT & PEN PUBLISHER FOR SAYING “TRANSGENDERISM” IS A MENTAL ILLNESS
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/01/26/facebook-bans-pulpit-pen-publisher-for-saying-transgenderism-a-mental-illness/;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Last month, Facebook banned me for 30 days for calling Bruce Jenner a man. You can read about it in this article, Facebook Bans Pulpit & Pen Publisher for Calling Bruce Jenner a Man, which received more than 29 thousand Facebook shares of people who didn’t think that stating facts was particularly hateful. Within a few days of being released from ‘Facebook jail,’ the social media giant banned me again for stating yet another fact; those claiming ‘transgenderism’ are mentally ill.

The post I made was sharing this article, which was simply reporting the news that the U.S. Supreme Court would allow the Commander in Chief to do his job, and use his best judgment in providing a capable fighting force. No doubt, Facebook probably considers the Supreme Court decision or our President’s decision to ban ‘transgender’ people from the military to be hate speech in and of itself. The article was a re-post of what was first written at LifeSite News.
However, what Facebook probably took exception with was my comment at the top, “We should never want to send the mentally ill to war zones. It is not humane or loving.
What kind of heartless person would disagree with that?
Of course, what no doubt violated Facebook’s capricious, ever-changing, politically correct “community standards” was the scientific declaration that thinking you’re the wrong gender is mentally ill.
But…enter science.
The American Psychiatic Association lists Gender Dysophoria as a mental health disorder. I didn’t make that up. It’s currently listed as a mental health disorder by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
I don’t need a textbook to tell me if you think you’re a duck, and you’re not a duck, you’re mentally ill. And I don’t need a textbook to tell me if you think you’re a man, and you’re a woman, you’re mentally ill. But let me ask you, who do you think is a better expert on mental illness, Facebook or mental health professionals?
Since when is medical science “hate speech”?
I appealed the decision, and Facebook again insisted it was hateful. Facebook then asked for feedback regarding their decision. I responded…

What Facebook is doing is clarifying that in their opinion, science doesn’t accord with Facebook “community standards.”
For the matter of record, I need to clarify that when the American Psychiatric Association goes the way of the World Health Organization and removes this tragic mental illness from the list of disorders, it won’t change the fact that it’s still a mental disorder.
Finally, let me add that even though gender dysphoria is a mental illness, it doesn’t mean that it’s not primarily a spiritual illness. The Fall of man and its various outworkings of depravity affects man totally, including mind, body, and spirit. In this case, indwelled sin even affects someone psychologically to the point they become a living, breathing lie about God’s creation.
When people argue that Christians are somehow against science, remind them that it’s Facebook that thinks science is hate speech.
[Contributed by JD Hall]
___________________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

Another Victory for America, as Supreme Court Upholds Ban on “Transgender” Soldiers

KATE BROWN, OREGON GOVERNOR, SUPPORTS “UNIVERSAL” GOVERNMENT VISITS FOR ALL NEWBORNS & THEIR PARENTS

“OPENLY BISEXUAL”
“She is bisexual and is the country’s first openly bisexual statewide officeholder and first openly bisexual governor.”
KATE BROWN, OREGON GOVERNOR, SUPPORTS “UNIVERSAL” GOVERNMENT VISITS 
FOR ALL NEWBORNS & THEIR PARENTS
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/oregon-governor-supports-universal-govt-visits-newborns-parents/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes: 
OREGON, January 24, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – News from Oregon that Governor Kate Brown is on board with a bill which would establish “universal” invasive home visits by state employees to all households with newborns is causing shockwaves throughout the nation.
While the proposed legislation, known as Senate Bill 526, remains in a nascent form with very few published details, it has nonetheless generated great excitement among progressive statists while sending chills down the spines of parents and families who fear increased government interference in their private lives.
The controversial bill directs the Oregon Health Authority “to study home visiting by licensed health care providers.” It has also been given “emergency” status, meaning that action must be taken before the end of this year.
The “emergency” designation has an oddly ominous tone, stating that the measure is “necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety,” so “an emergency is declared to exist.”
The language of the bill that is available has some concerned that these “universal” visits could be mandatory, even though state authorities are denying it.
“What’s the big emergency?” asked Paula Bolyard in an opinion piece penned for PJ Media.
“Apparently, the state of Oregon is concerned that some parents are raising their children without the watchful eye of Big Brother monitoring their every move – a big no-no in the view of the progressive left,” continued Bolyard.
“It’s frightening to think about what would happen to parents who refuse such visits,” noted Bolyard. She added:
As someone who has been involved in the homeschooling movement for more than 20 years, I have seen many attempts to increase the oversight of children taught at home by requiring home visits by a teacher or social worker. The basic premise behind these attempted power grabs is that parents cannot be trusted with the care of their own children — that an agent of the state is the only one qualified to ensure that children are being properly cared for. Without such surveillance, proponents argue, children are at risk for abuse and neglect, something they believe government agents can prevent, despite volumes of evidence to the contrary. In Oregon, in fact, children in the foster care system are abused at twice the national rate. One wonders how a state that can’t handle the children currently in its care could possibly manage to surveil an additional 40,000 children per year, let alone pay for such a program (answer: it can’t).
The proposed bill is a continuation of policies straight out of the Obama White House which aggressively sought to nudge Americans toward accepting ever-increasing government involvement in their private lives.
With the introduction of its Julia website, the Obama Administration demonstrated how a person could be wholly government dependent, from birth until death. The site was short-lived as Americans recoiled from its premise, with even CNN calling it the “Wrong vision for America.”

Statists do not trust parents to raise children without government’s invasive guidance

Patrick Allen, Director of the Oregon Health Authority, made it clear in a statement to the Beaverton Valley Times that this is not just about helping parents and children living on the edge, who might need recourse to government aid.
“This isn’t something for people in trouble,” said Allen.
“When the program is complete, every new parent — this includes adoptions — would receive a series of two or three visits by someone like a nurse or other health care practitioner,” noted Allen.
“Can we really trust that medical professionals employed by the government who come into our homes are going to actually benefit our children and families?” asked an essay in Health Impact News.
“Is this proposed bill for universal home visits possibly just another way for the State to collect funds, and to potentially remove children from their homes and place them into the lucrative foster care and adoption system?” the essay also asks.
Tellingly, at the head of the essay is a picture of a doctor standing in front of seated family, titled, “Government Approved Family.”
“If the program becomes reality, all families — regardless of income or area of residence — could see three visits from a nurse. They likely could come when the baby is 3 days old; 2 weeks old; and 2 months old,” said Dr. Alanna Braun of Oregon Health & Science University and member of the Oregon Pediatrics Society in an interview.
The program would also allow nurses to monitor moms for signs of postpartum depression and “check to make sure there’s a safe place for the baby to sleep and to be bathed and more,” according to the outlet to which Braun spoke.
She continued:
At the three-day mark, the visit could focus on such basics as weight loss.
At two weeks, the baby’s weight again could be checked. Babies could get the “heel stick,” the pinprick drawing of blood that checks for metabolic indicators of problems which, at that point, show no outward symptoms.
At two months, nurses and families could discuss the many vaccines that [babies] face.
Health Impact News cautions that “parents today face a very real risk of losing their children to Child Protection Services if they dare to question a doctor’s advice regarding medical procedures, or even wanting to seek a second medical opinion.”
Bolyard said that the home visits aren’t just about the health of the newborns, and that the state’s representative would also be observing and making judgements about the parents.
“Government agents monitoring the homes of law-abiding parents who have not been accused of a crime without a warrant is an unconscionable violation not only of parental rights and individual liberty but also a trampling of the Fourth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Constitution,” warned Bolyard in her PJ Media commentary.
“The bottom line is that the statists pushing these policies do not trust us with our own children,” concluded Bolyard. “It’s not enough for them to have their hooks in them 180 days a year, feeding them propaganda from the first day of kindergarten through the end of high school. They now want access to them from the day they are born — and they will succeed if parents don’t rise up and tell the government nannies to back off.”
As currently conceived, if the plan becomes law, it would be rolled out over the course of four years.
___________________________________________________________

Oregon Lawmakers Push for Government Surveillance Of Newborns

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/oregon-pol…
The state of Oregon could be the first in US history to require all parents of newborns to submit to universal home visits by agents of the state.


OHIO: WHY HASN’T MUSLIM JEW HATER “PALESTINIAN” DR. LARA KOLLAB’S MEDICAL LICENSE BEEN REVOKED BY THE MEDICAL BOARD?

ANOTHER SET OF LIES, TYPICAL OF MUSLIMS:

 HER ANTI-SEMITIC TWEETS & POSTS WERE DURING & AFTER HER MEDICAL SCHOOL, & AS A “LICENSED DOCTOR”; NOT BEFORE

In Kollab’s social media posts, the doctor compared Jews to “dogs” and “Nazis,” expressed having no sympathy about the Holocaust, invoked Allah to kill Jews, and threatened to give Jewish patients the wrong medications, among many other statements.

Lara Kollab, the former Cleveland Clinic resident accused of anti-semitic social media posts.

SEE HER ACTIVE “TRAINING CERTIFICATE” LICENSE: 


Robert Spencer in PJ Media: Why Hasn’t Dr. Lara Kollab’s Medical License Been Revoked?

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/robert-spencer-in-pj-media-why-hasnt-dr-lara-kollabs-medical-license-been-revokedrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
She tweeted about killing Jews, and then apologized — after she got caught. My latest in PJ Media:
The Jerusalem Post reports that the “Jewish-American advocacy group Proclaiming Justice to the Nations [PJTN] filed a complaint with the state of Ohio Medical Board insisting the medical license of Dr. Lara Kollab [be revoked] after it was revealed she tweeted she would provide Jewish patients under her care with the wrong type of drugs.”
That’s good, but why did a complaint have to be filed at all? Why hasn’t the Ohio Medical Board revoked her medical license already?
Kollab was, up until quite recently, a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. But then Canary Mission published a report on her fiendishly hateful anti-Semitic tweets, including one in which she declared that she would “purposely give all the yahood [Jews] the wrong meds.” In another tweet, she wrote: “Studying for my med micro final, came across this. Clearly, I pay attention in class and write very useful notes.” Accompanying that tweet was a handwritten note that read: “People who support Israel should have their immune cells killed so they can see how it feels to not be able to defend yourself from foreign invaders.”
Kollab’s Twitter feed was a cesspool of hatred for those she called “Jewish dogs.” In another tweet, she said: “walking through the streets of palestine is funny- every person who gets mad says something along the lines of ‘Allah yo5odhom el yahood’ [Allah will take them, the Jews] ” She reveled in her own hatred: “so basically every mseba [insult] I say is directed at the yahood [Jews] haha. even if I do something really stupid I say ‘hebel yihbilhom el yahood’ [stupid stupid Jews] hehe.”
It isn’t surprising that a devout and observant Muslim would have a seething hatred of Jews. The Qur’an tells Muslims that the Jews are the strongest of all people in enmity toward them (5:82), are accursed by Allah (9:30), and are always scheming against the Muslims (2:79; 3:75-3:78, 3:181, etc.). There is a great deal more anti-Semitic material in the Qur’an and Sunnah. These and other Qur’anic passages likely provide some insight into Kollab’s mindset.
But in the Hippocratic Oath, doctors pledge that they will “do no harm or injustice” to their patients. Kollab not only repeatedly expressed her vehement hatred for Jews, but actually stated explicitly that she would give them the wrong medicine in order to do them harm.
So why did this complaint need to be filed? Why hasn’t her medical license been revoked already?
Because she apologized.
“As a girl in my teens and early twenties,” she explained, “I had difficulty constructively expressing my intense feelings about what I witnessed in my ancestral land. Like many young people lacking life experience, I expressed myself by making insensitive remarks and statements of passion devoid of thought, not realizing the harm and offense these words would cause.”
Laying it on thick, she added: “These posts were made years before I was accepted into medical school, when I was a naïve, and impressionable girl barely out of high school. I matured into a young adult during the years I attended college and medical school, and adopted strong values of inclusion, tolerance and humanity. I have learned from this experience and am sorry for the pain I have caused. I pray that the Jewish community will understand and forgive me. I hope to make amends so that we can move forward and work together towards a better future for us all.”
As heartfelt and sincere as this may seem, it is noteworthy that Kollab never saw fit to say anything like it until her hate-filled tweets came to light. If she really had this change of heart, why didn’t she delete her old tweets and apologize for them before Canary Mission found them? Her apology has the look of damage control rather than a genuine change of heart.
Is the Ohio Medical Board prepared for the possibility that Lara Kollab’s apology is insincere?
Will the Ohio Medical Board be held accountable if it allows her to continue practicing medicine, and one of her Jewish patients is injured or dies while under her care?…
Read the rest here.
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO: https://www.breitbart.com/health/2019/01/06/aclj-ohio-board-should-revoke-license-of-doctor-who-threatened-to-give-jewish-patients-wrong-meds/; EXCERPT: “You can’t threaten to harm your patient,” said Dr. Arthur Caplan, the Director of the Medical Ethics Division at the NYU School of Medicine, “It breaks two rules of the core tenants of medical ethics: do no harm, and put your patient’s interests first.” “You can probably be online with all kinds of political views, even hateful views,” continued Caplan, “but the line that you can’t cross is threatening to mistreat or commit malpractice against a patient. That should cost [Kollab] her license.”
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE JOINED WITH THE ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA IN THIS COMPLAINT: 
https://c391070.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/pdf/Ohio-Medical-Board-Letter-1-4-19_Redacted.pdf


AND ALSO:

PHYSICIAN JEW-HATRED ALIVE AND WELL IN AMERICA

Muslim “doctor” threatens to poison Jewish patients.

EXCERPTS:
Here are a few examples from her splattering of tweets:
“Our aim is to defeat the Zionist State through force.”
“May Allah kill the Jews to we stop being forced to the unclean ones.”
 “I hate Israelis. They should all die.”
“Zionism is the exploitation of Jewish suffering for political gain at the expense of others.”
“Haifa is nice but it’s full of Jewish Dogs””
“Every insult I say is directed at the Yahood. Haha. Even if I do something stupid, I say, stupid, stupid Jews.”
“I wish I could get paid for bashing Israel all day online. Oh, what a beautiful life that would be.”
“It’s annoying to go to school in a city full of Jews…”
“Anyone who says Jews are interested in peace are lying scumbags.”
When told she would have to write a school paper on the Holocaust, she said she’d be “Brutally unsympathetic” hashtag: #SorryNotSorry.
Lara also sent out tweets asking for Palestinian Islamic terrorists to be freed from jail. 
But the tweets that were the final straws to do her in were:
“I’ll purposely give all the Yahood  the wrong meds”
And another professed:
 “everyone who supports Israel should have their immune cells killed so that they can see what it feels like not to be able to defend yourself against foreign invaders.”

DAYS AFTER ENSHRINING “RIGHT” TO KILL PRE-BORN, NEW YORK GOVERNOR CUOMO SIGNS BILL MAKING “GENDER IDENTITY” A DISCRIMINATION HATE CRIME

DAYS AFTER ENSHRINING “RIGHT” TO KILL PRE-BORN, NEW YORK GOVERNOR CUOMO SIGNS BILL MAKING “GENDER IDENTITY” A DISCRIMINATION HATE CRIME 
BY HEATHER CLARK
NEW YORK, N.Y. — Just days after enshrining in New York law the “right” for mothers to have their unborn children murdered, and in some cases, even up until birth, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has now also signed a bill into law that makes discrimination on the basis of “gender identity” a hate crime. He also signed legislation that prohibits mental health professionals from counseling youth to turn from homosexuality and transgenderism, but does not apply when children are counseled in “acceptance [and] support” of such lifestyles.
Saying “God bless you” to those behind the creation and the passage of the bills, who were cheered and applauded by those in attendance at the signing ceremony on Friday, Cuomo told those gathered that the legislation he has signed in recent days puts forward a “different set of social values than what we see in Washington.”
“They say in Washington, ‘We’re going to appoint Supreme Court justices who can roll back Roe v. Wade, because we want to take us back 47 years ago …’ We say, ‘No. No. You want to take us back, we’re going forward. We’re going to pass a woman’s right to choose and put it into the law,’” he declared. “And I want a constitutional amendment so that no legislature or governor can change it.”
“The Supreme Court says, ‘You can discriminate against transgenders in the military.’ That’s what they said last week. We say today, ‘No, you can’t. You cannot discriminate against people by gender identity, period,’” Cuomo stated, again being met with enthusiastic applause.
He noted that New York was the first “big state” to pass a law legalizing same-sex “marriage,” and that the state this week was going one step further to ban discrimination, as well as conversion therapy, which he called a “farce.”
“And I want everyone in this room to be proud of what we have done [among] our leadership on this issue together. There is no state that has been more aggressive in advocating and achieving rights and acceptance for the LGBT community than the state of New York,” said Cuomo, standing in front of a series of flags that included a homosexual and transgender flag. “This is New York at its best. … Hate is not the strongest four-letter word; love is the strongest four-letter word.”
The Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA) declares to be a hate crime any offense that was committed with “in whole or in substantial part because of a belief or perception regarding the … gender identity or expression … or sexual orientation of a person, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct.”
In addition to physical assault, the law also outlaws the “harassment or annoyance” of another person due to their gender identity, as it outlines that “person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the first degree when with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, because of a belief or perception regarding such person’s … gender identity or expression … regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct.”
“Being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender is not a disease, disorder, illness, deficiency, or shortcoming,” reads Senate Bill 1046. “New York has a compelling interest in protecting the physical and psychological well-being of minors, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth, and in protecting its minors against exposure to serious harms caused by sexual orientation change efforts.”
Mental health professionals who assist youth who may be struggling with temptations toward the same sex or who feel that they identify as the opposite sex will be considered to have engaged in “professional misconduct,” and may face penalties that can include censure and reprimand, suspension of their license, the requirement to receive training and education, fines or a complete loss of their license.
The legislation notes that the prohibition does not apply to “counseling for a person seeking to transition from one gender to another, or psychotherapies that provide acceptance, support and understanding of patients for the facilitation of patients’ coping, social support, and identity exploration and development, including sexual orientation inventions … [that] do not seek to change sexual orientation.”
The bill was presented in the Assembly by Deborah Glick, D-Manhattan—who identifies herself as “the first openly lesbian or gay member of the New York State legislature”—and in the Senate by Brad Hoylman, also of Manhattan.
The measure overwhelmingly passed both houses this month, being approved by the Assembly 134 to 3, followed by the Senate 57 to 4.
“You can not change who a person is,” Glick told the news outlet Governing.
This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates. 


SEE ALSO:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/31314-pro-abortion-lawmakers-in-vermont-hope-to-follow-in-new-york-s-steps?vsmaid=3155&vcid=3987
______________________________________________________________

New York Passes Radical Abortion Law, 

But World is Becoming More Pro-Life!!!

New Abortion Law in New York is Outrageous!

How To Schedule Abortion At Nine Months Pregnant!

Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver challenges the Democrat talking point that “late-term abortions are only available for medical emergencies” by showing she was able to schedule an abortion appointment in her 9th month of pregnancy simply using the vague excuse of depression.
1 2 3 6