TRUMP SLAMS DEMOCRATS FOR VACATIONING IN LUXURY IN PUERTO RICO WHILE HE IS “IN THE WHITE HOUSE, WAITING” & WORKING DURING THE CHRISTMAS/NEW YEAR’S PERIOD

 Trump Slams Dems For Vacationing While He Is "In The White House, Waiting"
TRUMP SLAMS DEMOCRATS FOR VACATIONING 
WHILE HE IS “IN THE WHITE HOUSE, WAITING”
 Democrats sunning themselves in Puerto Rico, watching Hamilton and partying
BY STEVE WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

President Trump has hit out at Democrats for leaving
Washington and taking vacations while he awaits their cooperation on
reopening the government.

Trump fired off a tweet Sunday, noting that “The Democrats are everywhere but Washington as people await their pay.”

I’m in the White House, waiting. The Democrats are everywhere but Washington as people await their pay. They are having fun and not even talking!
 Trump was following up on a previous tweet asking Democrats to return from vacationing:

We have a massive Humanitarian Crisis at our Southern Border. We will be out for a long time unless the Democrats come back from their “vacations” and get back to work. I am in the White House ready to sign!
 The President was referring to the fact that some congressional
Democrats spent the weekend in Puerto Rico, while the shutdown became
the longest on record.
As The Washington Examiner
reported, over 30 Democrats headed to the Caribbean island  with 109
lobbyists and corporate executives in tow, claiming that they were
scheduled to discuss their “shared priorities.”
Those priorities included seeing the Broadway show Hamilton and attending at least three parties.

While the government shutdown drags on, dozens of Congressional Democrats are staying at $289/night hotel in Puerto Rico this weekend and watching $350/ticket showings of Hamilton. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-than-30-members-of-congress-will-visit-puerto-rico-during-hamiltons-opening-week/ 
 Sen. Bob Menendez was spotted on the beach, discussing his own priorities:
 https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/BobMenendezPR-1200x630.jpg
Spotted: Sen. Bob Menendez on the beach at a resort in Puerto Rico on Day 22 of the partial government shutdown. Reports say dozens of Dems are in PR for the CHC BOLD PAC winter retreat — including meetings on Maria cleanup, and a party with PR’s “Hamilton” cast.

Of course, the leftist media has not reported on any of this, instead blaming Trump for the shutdown gridlock.
The
White House also slammed Democrats, with Press Secretary Sarah Sanders
accusing Democrats of “partying on the beach instead of negotiating a
compromise.”

Democrats in Congress are so alarmed about federal workers not getting paid they’re partying on the beach instead of negotiating a compromise to reopen the government and secure the borderhttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-fly-to-puerto-rico-amid-ongoing-government-shutdown 
 In an interview with Fox News, Trump told Jeanine Pirro that he does
not want to have to call a national emergency at the southern border.
“I’d
rather see the Democrats come back from their vacation and act. They’re
not acting, and they’re the ones that are holding it up,” he said. “It
would take me 15 minutes to get a deal done, and everybody could go back
to work. But I’d like to see them act responsibly, and they’re not
acting responsibly, and that’s it. I’m in the White House, and most of
them are in different locations. They’re watching a certain musical in a
very nice location.”

 Trump followed up the tweet Monday, again asserting that the shutdown could be ended within 15 minutes:
Nancy and Cryin’ Chuck can end the Shutdown in 15 minutes. At this point it has become their, and the Democrats, fault!

I’ve been waiting all weekend. Democrats must get to work now. Border must be secured!

“Dems in Puerto Rico as Shutdown hits day 24.” @foxandfriends
_______________________________________________________________
“PARTY OF THE PEOPLE” 
PARTYING IN THE LAP OF LUXURY,
PLAYING BEACH BLANKET BINGO
 Dems fly to Puerto Rico on chartered jet, meet with lobbyists, see Hamilton, as shutdown continues
 Democrats vacation with lobbyists 
amid government shutdown
 Dozens of Democrats are coming under fire for vacationing with lobbyists
in Puerto Rico,
while thousands of federal employees lose out on a
paycheck and the government shutdown stretches into its third week. One
America’s Jack Posobiec breaks down the sponsors of the group that
hosted the festivities. 
Visit us at:

Website: https://www.oann.com

30-40 DEMOCRATS & 109 LOBBYISTS FLOWN TO PUERTO RICO VACATION ON A PRIVATE CHARTER,
BYPASSING TSA!
IMAGINE THE “CARBON FOOTPRINT” 
FOR THIS ESCAPADE?
Malkin: Dems Visit Puerto Rico While Trump Is ‘Working Overtime’ on Border Security, 
Ending Shutdown
 Syndicated columnist and author Michelle Malkin said the optics are bad
for Democrats after about 30 lawmakers traveled to Puerto Rico 
with
their families and lobbyists — for a winter retreat.
 

RAHAF’S SAUDI FAMILY WILL NEVER, EVER STOP COMING AFTER HER FOR RENOUNCING ISLAM

 
 ARRIVING IN CANADA
A teenage girl who fled her home in Saudi Arabia due to her “abusive”
family has been praised as a “very brave new Canadian”.

18-year-old Rahaf Mohammed Alqunun was welcomed to Toronto by the
Canadian Foreign Minister, Chrystia Freeland, as she arrived in the
country after being granted asylum. 

 Sky’s Hannah Thomas Peter reports.
 Rahaf al Qunun pledges to use her freedom 
to help others
 In her first interview since arriving in Canada as a refugee, Saudi
refugee Rahaf Mohammed al Qunun talks to the ABC’s Sophie McNeill about
what it’s like being a woman in Saudi Arabia, why she thinks there will
be many more women fleeing 
the regime, and her hopes for the future.
 Saudi teen granted asylum in Canada 
gives public statement 
 Rahaf Mohammed, the Saudi teen who was granted asylum in Canada, made a
statement to the media and the public Tuesday morning.

After a frantic 10 days that saw the Saudi Arabian teen flee her family,
barricade herself in a Thai hotel room, galvanize international support
over social media and ultimately be granted asylum in Canada, Mohammed
held a brief press conference on Tuesday in Toronto to thank Canadians
for welcoming her.

FULL PRESS CONFERENCE
 RAHAF’S SAUDI FAMILY WILL NEVER, EVER STOP COMING AFTER HER FOR RENOUNCING ISLAM 
 The Saudi teen remains in real and terrible danger because she has renounced Islam
BY PHYLLIS CHESLER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
Reprinted from Israel National News
Rahaf Mohammed Alqunun, a Saudi teenager, has just tried to save her
own life—and in so doing, has risked death for shaming her family and
her country. 


Rahaf fled her family vacation in Kuwait, took a plane to
Bangkok, barricaded herself in her hotel room at the airport and began
posting about her plight on social media.  She demanded political asylum.

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition. In this case, the ammunition is digital and governmental.
Via her smartphone, Rahaf claimed that she had renounced Islam and
that her family would surely kill her if she was returned to them. Rahaf
obtained 90,000 followers on Twitter. The media began to cover her plight.


The Thai government had been about to deport her back to the family
which Rahaf claimed had beaten and imprisoned her for up to six months
at a time for minor, alleged offenses. And then, it changed its mind and
allowed Rahaf to meet with an official from the UN’s refugee agency
(U.N.H.C.R.).

Rahaf wanted asylum in either Australia or
Canada and both countries considered her request even as she was being
vetted for “refugee” status.

But make no mistake. She
remains in real and terrible danger. She has shut down her Twitter
account due to death threats.  Her family will never, ever stop coming
after her.

She is a disobedient woman and as such deserves
constant humiliation, beatings, broken bones, solitary confinement, and,
if she is lucky, a forced marriage to a man the age of her grandfather,
who already has three wives and twenty children. She is also an
apostate. This is a capital crime.

By now, her father and
brother are probably already in Thailand. They are both her “guardians”
or “minders” and she has absolutely no western-style “agency” over this matter. They are claiming that she needs “medical attention.”

I have conducted four studies about honor killing globally.
I am now working on a fifth study which seeks to identify the variables
associated with successfully escaping from being honor killed. Rahaf
exemplifies a pattern.
For reasons as yet unknown, Rahaf has
decided that her life is worth preserving and that she no longer has to
absorb the normalized brutalization and subordination that Saudi women
are fated to endure. 

 In addition, she has cannily used the power of
social media to attract attention to her plight. Further, she has been
able to liaison with government, international, or law enforcement
authorities who believe she is in danger—or who know that if they return
her and she is “disappeared” or murdered that they would be viewed as
accomplices by a watchful world.
In this instance, the internet has played a crucial role in her potential salvation.
So many other Saudi women and dissidents were not as lucky. According to Ali Alyami,
the founder of the D.C. based Center for Democracy and Human Rights in
Saudi Arabia (CDHR), other Saudis have tried to save their own lives but
have not been successful. He notes Hamza Kashgari (2012) and Dina Ali
Lasloom, (2017) both of whom tried to escape after being labeled,
respectively, a heretic and a disobedient woman. They were both sent
back to the Kingdom and have not been heard from ever since. Alyami also
notes how many men and women are literally rotting in prison in Saudi
Arabia as dissidents and feminists.

I remember the tragic 1977 case of Saudi princess Mishaal bint Fahd al Saud,
who fell in love with a young man of her own choice and was trying to
escape from the Kingdom. Her fiancé (not her lover) was be-headed in a
botched execution and she was, mercifully, merely shot to death. Being
an al Saud did not spare her. Au contraire.
I remember the forty-seven Saudi women who, in the early 1990s, launched the first Drive-In and who were arrested, fired from their jobs, and placed under house arrest for more than a year.
Today, Eman Al-Nafjian languishes in prison where she is being tortured and sexually assaulted as a campaigner for women’s rights.
The feminist revolutions in the West have caught fire in the East
where some of the bravest people on the planet are demanding their
freedom and dignity.
I hope the world’s governments heed
their cries and grant them political asylum. They are Children of the
Enlightenment and it is the midnight hour.
Rahaf has just
been granted asylum in Canada! I wonder how much it will cost them to
provide security for her for the rest of her life?

_______________________________________________________

 Chrystia Freeland silent on Canadian 
sentenced to death in China
 Ezra Levant of The Rebel.media reports on Canadian Foreign Affairs
Minister Chrystia Freeland posing in photo-op with a young Saudi woman
she rescued from a Bangkok hotel – while remaining silent on China
sentencing a Canadian citizen to death. MORE: https://www.therebel.media/freeland-c…
 

LAURA LOOMER: NANCY PELOSI’S WALL JUMPED BY ALLEGED ILLEGAL ALIENS LED BY RIGHT WING ACTIVIST

 https://www.dailydot.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/laura-loomer-pelosi-protest-2.jpg
 PICTURES OF THOSE KILLED BY ILLEGAL ALIENS
 https://thetruthrevolution.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/pelosi.jpg
LAURA LOOMER: NANCY PELOSI’S WALL 
JUMPED BY ALLEGED ILLEGAL ALIENS 
LED BY RIGHT WING ACTIVIST
 A group of alleged illegal aliens led by Laura Loomer jumped the fence
surrounding Nancy Pelosi’s California mansion and then demanded 
entry to
her home.
 Police Respond To Illegal Aliens Camping 
At Nancy Pelosi’s House
 Laura Loomer hired illegal aliens to raise a tent on Nancy Pelosi’s
property. 
Watch as police confront the workers despite Nancy’s call 
to
welcome all illegals into America.

NOT “SLOWLY BECOMING CATHOLIC” BUT FULLY: SOUTHERN BAPTIST PRESIDENT GREEAR: GOD SAYS WE NEED TO SHUT UP ABOUT THE REFORMATION

SOUTHERN BAPTIST PRESIDENT GREEAR: GOD SAYS WE NEED TO SHUT UP ABOUT THE REFORMATION
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

[Reformation Charlotte] The Reformation was our defining moment as
Protestants. It’s who we are, it’s our history. It was the moment the
gospel was recovered from the grips of the apostasy of the Roman
Catholic religion and made available to the common man. It was the
wellspring of good theology of which we rest our knowledge of God on.
Apart from the Scriptures itself, the Reformation gave birth to the
greatest understanding of Jesus Christ and his saving gospel of grace
that history has ever seen.

7 Remember the days of old;
    consider the years of many generations;
ask your father, and he will show you,
    your elders, and they will tell you.
8 When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance,
    when he divided mankind,
he fixed the borders of the peoples
    according to the number of the sons of God.
Deuteronomy 32:7-8

However, at the Cross Conference a few days ago, JD Greear, president
of the Southern Baptist Convention and pastor of the multi-campus
Summit megachurch in North Carolina, declares that God says we need to
“shut up about the Reformation” because He is “not a God of the past.”

Basically what God says through
Amos is if you’ll let me put it in colloquial language, “will you shut
up about Gilgal and Beersheba?” I’m sick and tired of hearing about
those places because I’m not a God who moved in the past. I’m a God who
wants to move today in your present. I almost think, I’m on dangerous
ground here…I almost think that God is saying to us “shut up about the
Reformation.”

However, at the Cross Conference a few days ago, JD Greear, president
of the Southern Baptist Convention and pastor of the multi-campus
Summit megachurch in North Carolina, declares that God says we need to
“shut up about the Reformation” because He is “not a God of the past.”

Basically what God says through Amos is if you’ll let me put it in
colloquial language, “will you shut up about Gilgal and Beersheba?” I’m
sick and tired of hearing about those places because I’m not a God who
moved in the past. I’m a God who wants to move today in your present. I
almost think, I’m on dangerous ground here…I almost think that God is
saying to us “shut up about the Reformation.”

For your viewing pleasure, here is a link to the entire sermon.

[Editor’s Note: Over-all, this reeks of the Acts 29-ism of Greear’s homeboys. By the way, Greear is wrong on God’s name being defined simply as “I am.” יהוה, or Yahweh, is an omni tempered verb meaning that it could be rendered, I was that I was, I was that I am, I was that I will be, etc as well as the more traditional I am that I am or I will be what I will be. Also, I would remind Greear that God is the “One who was, and is, and is to come” (Revelation 1:8). Either way, it is safe to say – as we’ve reported before – Greear is definitely not Reformed and not a Calvinist]

JOYCE MEYER ALLEGEDLY “REPENTS” OF PROSPERITY TEACHING

 Did she ever realize Jesus never had a place to call his home on this earth?

 Luke 9:58And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.

 Mark 8:34-37 And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel’s, the same shall save it. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

 

JOYCE MEYER ALLEGEDLY “REPENTS” OF 
PROSPERITY TEACHING 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

Joyce Meyer is a lady pastor (1 Timothy 3:2, 1 Timothy 2:12) who holds to Little God Theology – or Kenyonism – and is also known as Word-Faith Theology. All of these are subsets of the so-called Prosperity Gospel, which teaches that Jesus’ atonement provides health, wealth, and prosperity to the believer. In a recent sermon from Meyer, she claims to have at one time let her prosperity teaching “get out of hand” but now has a much more balanced view of prosperity and suffering.
Charismatics are currently promoting the clip as evidence that Joyce Meyer is not a prosperity teacher. You can watch it below, or read the excerpts below that. 


“[In] the Word and Faith movement back in the ’60s and the ’70s, [there was] lot
of teaching in that about prosperity…I thank God for it. God touched my
life back then in a powerful way because I knew I was saved by grace,
but I didn’t know anything about using my faith for anything other than
just salvation. Faith is something God gives you that you need to use
and release in your life. It’s a powerful force, but it’s not just
automatic. You put your trust in God. You put your faith in Him.”

Meyer continues…

“I’m glad for what I learned about
prosperity, but it got out of balance. I’m glad for what I learned
about faith, but it got out of balance. So every time somebody had a
problem in their life, it was because they didn’t have enough faith. If
you got sick, you didn’t have enough faith. If your child died, you
didn’t have enough faith. Well, that’s not right. There’s nowhere in the
Bible where we’re promised that we’ll never have any trouble. I don’t
care how much faith you’ve got. You’re not going to avoid ever having
trouble in your life.”

While charismatics are claiming that Joyce has repented of prosperity teaching, she seems to be referring to her teaching in the 60s or perhaps decades ago, and doesn’t seem to be distancing herself from her most recent prosperity teachings that characterize her career in motivational speaking or the vast income, mansions, and the 23 thousand-dollar gold toilet her prosperity teaching has afforded her.. 

 
 Joyce Meyer’s five-mansion compound. 
 [HT Charisma Mag]
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/01/24/joyce-meyer-claims-to-have-faith-that-
will-raise-the-dead/

Did Joyce Meyer actually recant?

Todd Friel Reports

UNITED METHODIST UNIVERSITY PRESIDENTS CALL FOR POLICIES TO INCLUDE “SACRED WORTH” OF LGBTQ “CHRISTIANS”

 https://dreamprayact.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/frank-et-al.jpg
UNITED METHODIST UNIVERSITY PRESIDENTS 
CALL FOR POLICIES TO INCLUDE 
“SACRED WORTH” OF LGBTQ “CHRISTIANS” 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

(RNS) — Ahead of next month’s special session on sexuality intended
to resolve an issue that has dogged the United Methodist Church for
decades, a group of affiliated college and university presidents issued a
strong call for full inclusion of LGBTQ Christians.

The group, which represents presidents of 93 United
Methodist-affiliated colleges and universities, urged the denomination
to amend its policies and practices to recognize the “sacred worth” of
people regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.

The three-paragraph statement won unanimous approval in a vote taken Friday (Jan. 4) by the National Association of Schools and Colleges of The United Methodist Church.
“We call upon the leaders of the United Methodist Church at this 2019
Called General Conference to honor the past and current practices of
inclusion by amending their policies and practices to affirm full
inclusion in the life and ministry of the United Methodist Church of all
persons regardless of their race, ethnicity, creed, national origin,
gender, gender identity/expression or sexual orientation,” the statement
reads.
The 93 affiliated schools serve more than 260,000 students across the
United States. They include large institutions such as American
University, Boston University, Duke University and Emory University, as
well as dozens of smaller schools such as Randolph College, Otterbein
University and Greensboro College.
At issue is the denomination’s rulebook, the Book of Discipline,
which bars “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from being ordained as
ministers and forbids pastors from marrying them in the church.
The special session called for Feb. 23-26 in St. Louis is intended to
resolve once and for all an issue that has divided the United Methodist
Church despite repeated attempts to resolve it going back to the 1970s.
Last year, the denomination’s Council of Bishops endorsed a plan that
would allow regional decision-making bodies called annual conferences
to determine whether to ordain LGBTQ clergy and allow individual
churches to vote whether to perform same-sex marriages in their
buildings.
While the university presidents did not formally endorse that plan,
they made it clear they want the language on homosexuality in the Book
of Discipline stricken.
“The presidents are really firm about full inclusion,” said Scott D.
Miller, president of Virginia Wesleyan University and a board member of
the National Association of Schools and Colleges of The United Methodist
Church.
“It is my disappointment and the feeling of many of my colleagues
that this has been one of the reasons contributing to a decline in
membership and attendance,” Miller said. “The church has not stayed
current with the people it serves.”
The statement on sexuality issued by the university presidents is
their fourth in the past 13 years. In 2006, 2011 and 2013 the presidents
drafted similar statements calling on the church to offer LGBTQ people
full inclusion.
Sexuality was so divisive a topic during the denomination’s 2016
conference that 56 different legislative petitions were submitted to try
to resolve it. Instead, delegates voted to defer all proposals to a
special Commission on a Way Forward.
Last year, that commission concluded its work and put forth three proposals. The
Council of Bishops endorsed the so-called One Church Plan, which would
allow the most flexibility while keeping the denomination’s various
factions together.
Lacking any resolution, the denomination has been plunged into chaos.
Many regional United Methodist bodies have made their own decisions regarding ordination and marriage of LGBTQ people.
In 2016, the Mountain Sky Conference elected Karen Oliveto, a married
lesbian, as the denomination’s first openly LGBTQ bishop, and dozens of
individual pastors have publicly or secretly celebrated same-sex
weddings. Some have been summoned to church trials and stripped of their
preaching credentials.
But while the United Methodists’ 7 million U.S. adherents might be
inclined to change the rules regarding gays and lesbians, the
denomination is a worldwide body active in 136 countries. Many of its African churches oppose any steps toward LGBTQ inclusion.
Regardless, some university presidents said they would disaffiliate
rather than back down, though that was not mentioned in the statement.
“Some institutions that feel very strongly about inclusiveness could
very well say we no longer wish to be affiliated with a denomination
that, in their view, discriminates against the LGBTQ people,” said
Miller.

[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Yonat Shimron and originally published at Religious News Service]

THOUSANDS OF REQUESTS FOR CHILD & ADOLESCENT BRIDES~AND APPROVAL IS LEGAL IN U.S.

 
THOUSANDS OF REQUESTS FOR CHILD & ADOLESCENT BRIDES~AND APPROVAL IS LEGAL IN U.S. 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

[Lincoln Journal Star] Thousands of requests by men to bring in child
and adolescent brides to live in the United States were approved over
the past decade, according to government data obtained by The Associated
Press. In one case, a 49-year-old man applied for admission for a
15-year-old girl.

The approvals are legal: The Immigration and Nationality Act does not
set minimum age requirements. And in weighing petitions for spouses or
fiancees, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services goes by whether the
marriage is legal in the home country and then whether the marriage
would be legal in the state where the petitioner lives.
But the data raises questions about whether the immigration system
may be enabling forced marriage and about how U.S. laws may be
compounding the problem despite efforts to limit child and forced
marriage. Marriage between adults and minors is not uncommon in the
United States, and most states allow children to marry with some
restrictions.
There were more than 5,000 cases of adults petitioning on behalf of
minors and nearly 3,000 examples of minors seeking to bring in older
spouses or fiances, according to the data requested by the Senate Homeland Security Committee in 2017 and compiled into a report.
Some victims of forced marriage say the lure of a U.S. passport
combined with lax U.S. marriage laws are partly fueling the petitions.
“My passport ruined my life,” said Naila Amin, a dual citizen from Pakistan who grew up in New York City.
She was forcibly married at 13 in Pakistan and applied for papers for her 26-year-old husband to come to the country.
“People die to come to America,” she said. “I was a passport to him. They all wanted him here, and that was the way to do it.”
Amin, now 29, said she was betrothed to her first cousin Tariq when
she was just 8 and he was 21. The petition was eventually terminated
after she ran away. She said the ordeal cost her a childhood. She was in
and out of foster care and group homes, and it took a while to get her
life on track.
“I was a child. I want to know: Why weren’t any red flags raised?
Whoever was processing this application, they don’t look at it? They
don’t think?” Amin asked.
There is a two-step process for obtaining U.S. immigration visas and
green cards. Petitions are first considered by USCIS. If granted, they
must be approved by the State Department. Overall, there were 3.5
million petitions received from budget years 2007 through 2017.
Over that period, there were 5,556 approvals for those seeking to
bring minor spouses or fiancees, and 2,926 approvals by minors seeking
to bring in older spouses, according to the data. Additionally, there
were 204 for minors by minors. Petitions can be filed by U.S. citizens
or permanent residents.
“It indicates a problem. It indicates a loophole that we need to
close,” Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the chairman of the
Senate Homeland Security Committee, told the AP.
In nearly all the cases, the girls were the younger person in the
relationship. In 149 instances, the adult was older than 40, and in 28
cases the adult was over 50, the committee found. Among the examples: In
2011, immigration officials approved a 14-year-old’s petition for a
48-year-old spouse in Jamaica. A petition from a 71-year-old man was
approved in 2013 for his 17-year-old wife in Guatemala.

[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Colleen Long and originally published at the Associated Press]
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/31182-report-child-bride-import-business-is-thriving-in-the-u-s?vsmaid=2924&vcid=3987 

 





WHEATON: THE “RACIST” SPEECH A CHRISTIAN COLLEGE DOESN’T WANT THE PUBLIC TO HEAR

 https://sojo.net/sites/default/files/mainimages/blog/5978664560_ff96125473.jpg
THE “RACIST” SPEECH A CHRISTIAN COLLEGE 
DOESN’T WANT THE PUBLIC TO HEAR
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

[Townhall] This is the tale of two lectures at Wheaton College, a
Christian evangelical college in the suburbs of Chicago. One was given
in September 2017 and the other in November 2018. Though only a year
apart, the responses to the two presentations were universes apart. The
reaction is very telling and tragic for those who believe that a
Christian education is different than a secular one.

The first speech (listen to excerpts here) was given by Dr. George Yancy, a philosophy professor at Emory University (huge thanks to Jamie Dean at World Magazine for an excellent article on this and uncovering actual audio recording). It was sponsored by Wheaton’s Philosophy department and
held in the esteemed Billy Graham Center on campus. It was entitled: “A
Post-Racial America? White Gazes and Black Bodies.” It can only be
described as an expletive-laced, pornographic, racist, anti-biblical
screed. His theme? “To be white is to be racist.”

There was no backlash from Wheaton’s leadership. There were no letters sent out by
any staff or student government leaders denouncing him or raising
concerns about the hostile, f-bomb-laden speech. There was only internal
praise by the school’s own Wheaton Record

Then there’s that second speech.
Wheaton College Republicans courageously invited me to speak about
abortion and race. Keep in mind, there’s never been anyone—ever—to
address racism and the abortion industry at Wheaton.
In fact, no one has
addressed the issue of abortion at their thrice weekly chapels but once (briefly) in many years.
Wheaton, though founded by slavery abolitionists, doesn’t lead
whatsoever on the abolition of abortion. One would think a school that
(sort of) espouses a pro-life worldview, at least on its website (“followers of Jesus Christ will uphold the dignity of human beings, from conception until death…”), would encourage students to put that into action by attending the March for Life Chicago or volunteering at a local pregnancy resource center.
Needless to say, I did not speak in the center named after the
school’s most famous alum. But I did speak to a standing-room only
audience in another Wheaton lecture hall. My multimedia talk was
entitled “Black Lives Matter In and Out of the Womb.”
it was an expletive-free, fact-based, statistics-driven,
Biblically-rooted, deeply personal and grace-filled discussion on the
systemic racism of the abortion industry and the hypocrisy of the pro-abortion #BlackLivesMatter movement. As an adoptee and adoptive father who was conceived in rape,
I challenged students to see the most vulnerable, the most
marginalized, and the most powerless among us as having equal intrinsic
worth and God-given Purpose.

Six days later, I was severely denounced by a campus-wide email sent out by two Wheaton staff members and signed by three student government leaders. My entire message was branded as “offensive rhetoric” that
made “many students, staff and faculty of color” feel “unsafe” on their
campus. And now, the school has cancelled the College Republicans’ next
event, because leadership claims their speaker approval process needs
to change so Wheaton students aren’t exposed to such factivism (aka truth) again.

So a biblical worldview that reminds us we’re created in the image of
God and that we’re one human race, created out of one blood (Acts 17:26), is not in line with Wheaton’s mission?
“Given the history of white supremacy, we ought to be the ones who
fear white people. I mean sh*t, if you’re black you should be scared as
hell here at Wheaton College,” Yancy told students. He also asserted
“that in the end, white people are the n***ers.” That got zero pushback
from Wheaton leadership. Zilch.
“To be white is to be racist,” Yancy repeated over and over. This is what a Christian institution is peddling.
Yancy dug up racist diatribes of people from the 1700s like Immanuel
Kant, Thomas Jefferson (with a revised f-bomb version of Jefferson’s quote about the “oranootan”, now spelled orangutan)
and David Hume. The only modern-day examples he gives are anonymous
rants from online commenters and white supremacists on obscure and
unnamed websites. He never gave any examples of actual racism from
modern-day leaders. No stats—just regurgitations of mainstream media #blacklivesmatter propaganda that divisively color the narrative of police brutality.
He could have invoked plenty of examples of racists in the 20th century in the American Eugenics movement like Frederick Osborn(founder of the American Eugenics Society), Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood), and Henry H. Goddard(psychologist
who coined the term “moron”), but he would have had to talk about all
those “white bodies” touching and destroying “black bodies” through the
undeniable and celebrated form of systemic racism—abortion. But I digress.

[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Ryan Bomberger and originally published at the Townhall]

POPE’S PUPPET, PELOSI, JOYOUS: PRO-LGBT JESUIT PRIEST RETAINED BY DEMOCRATS AS U.S. HOUSE CHAPLAIN

POPE’S PUPPET, PELOSI, JOYOUS OVER APOSTATE JESUIT SOLDIER OUT TO DESTROY AMERICA’S PROTESTANTISM & CONSTITUTION
 https://www.thecompassnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/1817CNS-CHAPLAIN-CONROYWeb2.jpg
PRO-LGBT JESUIT PRIEST RETAINED BY DEMOCRATS AS U.S. HOUSE CHAPLAIN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

[Liberty Voice] Democrats, who now hold the majority of House seats,
have voted that Father Patrick J. Conroy will remain as their chaplain.
They solidified their intent by granting him a new two-year contract.

In April 2018, former Speaker Of The House Paul Ryan asked the Jesuit
Priest to submit his resignation. Conroy agreed and included in the
resignation that it would take effect on May 24, 3018.

Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats and a few Republicans pulled together to
support the priest. As a result, Conroy withdrew his resignation and on
May 3, 2018, and Ryan concluded that the priest would remain chaplain.

In a video found on “YouTube” which is not dated, Conray is seen as
saying that the Catholic teaching and thoughts pertaining to
homosexuality is outdated, and that the Church needs to change with the
times. Conroy continued in the video, stating that humans conceive male
to female, but human sexuality is not about procreation, it is about
more than that.

Ryan’s staff said that the reason the priest was asked to resign was
because of concern regarding a prayer Conroy delivered on Nov. 6 during a
deliberation regarding tax overhaul.

Conroy said in his prayer that he hoped the efforts of Congress
assure that under the new tax law there will be no winners and loser,
but it will be balanced and all Americans will share in it.

Ryan stated he disagreed with his staff’s statements and Conroy was not fired for that reason.

One of the people on the committee to fill the position which would
be vacated by Conroy was Mark Walker (R-North Carolina). He said he
wanted an individual for the position whose was nondenominational,
someone shepherding a multicultural congregation.

Nancy Pelosi released a statement expressing that she strongly
disagreed with the decision Ryan made regarding Father Conroy. She found
it particularly peculiar that Ryan asked for the resignation at the end
of his term knowing he was unable to fire Conroy directly.

The House has no rules on the process to remove a chaplain from their position.

Members of the Congress who opposed Conroy’s dismissal raised
concerns that Ryan was being driven to fire Conroy by evangelical
Republicans whose views differ from the Jesuit’s beliefs. The focus of a
Jesuit is to focus on service to the community and education. They also
have more liberal beliefs in terms of religion compared to those who
consider themselves a traditional Catholic.

To continue reading, click here.

[Editor’s Note: This article was written Barbara Sobel and first pubilshed at Liberty Voice]
________________________________________________________

 House of Representatives Chaplain Patrick Conroy: Catholic Teaching on Homosexuality a “Dead End”
LGBT LIFESTYLE “NOT SINFUL”, ONLY ACTIONS:
 LONGER VERSION:
OwningOurFaith | Father Patrick J. Conroy 
Extended Interview
 Introduction 0:07
Sexuality and Faith 1:09
“Who Am I To Judge” 5:05
How are LGBT Gifts to the Church? 7:16

 
 

“SLOWLY BECOMING CATHOLIC”: SEBTS STUDENT WHISTLEBLOWER TELLS ALL ABOUT SOCIAL JUSTICE TAKE-OVER AT SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY

 SBC “SLOWLY BECOMING CATHOLIC”;
NOW QUICKLY BECOMING SO!
BREAKING: SEBTS STUDENT WHISTLEBLOWER TELLS ALL ABOUT SOCIAL JUSTICE TAKE-OVER 
AT SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

Jon Harris is a recent graduate of Southeastern Baptist Theological
Seminary. After a break from on-campus studies for several years, Harris
reports that the social justice take-over of the seminary in just a few
short years was overwhelming.

To be very clear, Harris alleges that the institution has taken a
“left turn” and that the institution has gone from being known as the
“mission school” to the “social justice school.”

Calling it a “Downgrade,” a term that harkens back to Spurgeon’s
stance against the doctrinal dumbing-down of the Baptist Union, Harris
begins by quoting Scripture and urging viewers not to be taken captive
by heresies and false teachings.

Harris claims that because he’s chosen not to affiliate with the SBC,
he is free to speak out about their newly ‘woke’ social justice
movement – a detriment to the Gospel in his estimation – unlike many
other students or professors who rely on the SBC for income and are
silenced.

As he begins his recalling of the social justice coup at SEBTS, it is
clear that Harris is Scripturally well-informed (as a graduate, he
should be) and takes his doctrine seriously. He makes the accusation
that The Gospel Coalition, Together for the Gospel, Desiring God, SEBTS
and others are “evangelical leftists.”

Harris claimed (at the 10.30 mark) that there are a lot of professors
at the school who are against social justice supplanting the gospel, but are afraid to say anything. We reported this last June in our post, Danny Akin, SEBTS, Threaten to Fire Non-Woke Faculty.

Harris claims that at least three professors believe in evolution
(and one professor called Ken Ham a “charlatan”), that speakers are
sometimes chosen because they give money to the institution, several
professors advocate Molinism, and includes other problematic doctrinal
stances.

But then, Harris got to the crux of his complaint. Over time, he
noticed that speakers seemed to be chosen in chapel because of the color
of their skin, even though they held to aberrant doctrines or doctrines
not believed by Southern Baptists. Harris tried to explain that he went
to seminary to learn about doctrine, not to hear speakers talk about
“the black experience” over and over again.

All the while SEBTS became more concerned about poverty and race
relations, they became less and less concerned about doctrine or issues
like abortion. This seems to have been orchestrated by SEBTS leadership.

The first real moment of concern for Harris was when an adjunct
professor of SEBTS prayed a prayer accusing the police in the Michael
Brown case of “targeting” African Americans and very clearly took the
side of the violent, police-assaulting thug instead. After this, Jon
decided to leave campus.

Upon his return, Harris saw that the seminary had gone all-in on the
topic of social justice. From entire chapel services dedicated to
condemning the Confederate flag to Akin’s promotion of the Openly Secular atheist campaign,
Harris gives a case-by-case analysis of SEBTS’ downgrade. According to
Harris, “It’s more grievous to [SEBTS] have a president who has cabinet
members who are ‘alt-right’ than it is to have a president that pushes
for transgender bathrooms and abortion rights.”

Harris points out that he did not vote for Trump, but noticed the
one-sidedness of SEBTS politics which seems to always lean left instead
of right.

Harris went on to discuss the Department of Kingdom Diversity at
SEBTS and the director’s tacit endorsement of Hillary Clinton in the
last election.

This is an hour and thirty-seven minute expose’ – with first-hand
details from the perspective of a recent SEBTS graduate – of how SEBTS
was completely taken over for the purpose of social justice and is
experiencing, as Harris calls it, “mission drift” away from the Gospel.

And yes, he accuses them of Neo-Marxism.
Watch below.