PRESIDENT TRUMP HOLDS BORDER SECURITY ROUNDTABLE AFTER VISITING SOUTHERN BORDER
PRESIDENT TRUMP HOLDS BORDER SECURITY ROUNDTABLE AFTER VISITING SOUTHERN BORDER
Day: January 12, 2019
BORDER WALL IS AN INEFFECTIVE WASTE, DEMOCRATS SAY~ HERE’S THE REAL WASTE
BORDER WALL IS AN INEFFECTIVE WASTE, DEMOCRATS SAY~ HERE’S THE REAL WASTE
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31164-border-wall-is-an-ineffective-waste-democrats-say-here-s-the-real-waste?vsmaid=2898&vcid=3987;
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Besides their false claim that a wall on the southern border of the
United States would be “ineffective,” Democrats oppose a wall because it
would “waste” taxpayer money.
Thus, they adamantly refused to provide money for a wall in the spending bill the House passed and the Senate didn’t.
Yet amazingly, the Democrats found plenty of money to fund for pet
projects that provide no benefit to the American citizen whatsoever.
The list is long — and instructive. For Democrats, the end game is this: wasting money and open borders.
What They Will Fund
As the Office of Management and Budget noted
of the Democratic spending bill passed in early January, “despite not
meeting the minimum requirements identified by those who are directly
responsible for the Nation’s border security, this package funds a
number of unnecessary programs at excessive levels well beyond what was
put forward in the FY 2019 Budget.”
The Democrats want “funding at levels nearly 20 percent higher than the President’s FY 2019 Budget,” the OMB reported.
Among the goodies the open-borders Democrats want are $12 billion
more for international affairs programs, or 29 percent more than the
president wanted. That includes $2.9 billion more for economic and
development assistance to foreigners in the Middle East.
Why funding to Israel, Syria, and Pakistan is more important the
security at the southern border of our own country is a mystery, as is
the “$700 million more than requested for the United Nations, including
restoring funding for the United Nations Population Fund.”
Of course, that funding contains money, OMB observed,
that would “undermine the President’s Mexico City Policy … which
prohibits the funding of foreign nongovernmental organizations that
promote or perform abortions.”
The House bill also included “$2 billion in excessive Environmental
Protection Agency funding, providing funds beyond the Agency’s core
mission and including funding for programs that can and should be
executed at the local level.”
More unnecessary — and blatantly unconstitutional — spending includes
$7.1 billion for “rental assistance programs” in the Housing and Urban
Development Department, itself a massive unconstitutional agency.
And those are just the worthless programs OMB mentioned.
More Waste, Unconstitutional Spending
Citizens against Government Waste unearths much ridiculous and unconstitutional spending in its annual Prime Cuts Summary.
Among programs that are expending money that could be used to defend
the border are these, which the summary reported in September just weeks
before the border-wall fight began:
• Scrapping one program alone, the Rural Electrification
Administration, could fund nearly two walls. Cutting the REA for one
year would save $8.2 billion, or $41 billion through the next five
years. Given that just about 100 percent of rural America now has
electricity and phone service, why does Congress continue funding a
program born in 1935?
• Stopping improper Medicare payments, the summary shows,
would save $3.6 billion annually, or $18.1 billion through the next
five years, or almost three times what the president wants for border
security.
• Returning to HUD, eliminating Community Development Block Grants —
again, unconstitutional spending — would save $3 billion annually.
• The United States contributes $10 billion annually to the
anti-American United Nations, the creation of communists and
one-worlders after World War II. UN funding should be cut entirely, but
even knocking the U.S. contribution back 25 percent would save $2.5
billion.
• Eliminating sugar subsidies, the summary reports, would save $1.2 billion annually, while cutting dairy and peanut subsidies would save almost $300 million.
Annual savings on these programs? $18.8 billion. That’s enough to build three walls and return $1.7 billion to taxpayers.
Pelosi’s Lie
In her speech on Tuesday night that did not refute a single word of President Trump’s remarks from the Oval Office, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed
that he will not agree to a bill to reopen the government “over his
obsession with forcing American taxpayers to waste billions of dollars
on an expensive and ineffective wall.”
If the wall would be ineffective, perhaps Pelosi and her partner in
immigration crime, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, can explain why
Israel built a (very effective) wall, and why Democrats continue voting
to send foreign aid to Israel given that walls are a “waste” and
“ineffective.”
And perhaps they can explain why they are “forcing American taxpayers
to waste billions of dollars on … expensive and ineffective” programs
that benefit no one.
They can’t. And won’t.
They have two priorities, the first of which is sending tax money to their coalition of angry, anti-American special interests.
But the second, and more important to the wall debate, is this: Keeping the borders open to bring in future Democratic voters.
VICTIMS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION VS. GOVERNMENT WORKERS NOT GETTING THEIR PAYCHECKS
DRUG CARTELS AT SOUTHERN BORDER FUNDING DEEP STATE & DEMOCRATS WITH BRIBES, EXTORTIONS TOWARDS IMPEACHING TRUMP
DRUG CARTELS AT SOUTHERN BORDER FUNDING DEEP STATE & DEMOCRATS WITH BRIBES, EXTORTIONS TOWARDS IMPEACHING TRUMP
MILLIE WEAVER OF INFOWARS REPORTS
MSM is distracting the American people from the real dangers along the
southern border, while money from drug trafficking is being used to fund
deep state operations in the U.S. Millie Weaver joins Alex to expose
the lying fake press that promotes the cartels agenda.
southern border, while money from drug trafficking is being used to fund
deep state operations in the U.S. Millie Weaver joins Alex to expose
the lying fake press that promotes the cartels agenda.
AYNAZ ANNI CYRUS, EX-IRANIAN MUSLIM CALLS JAMIE GLAZOV’S NEW BOOK “JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH” A “MASTERPIECE”
AYNAZ ANNI CYRUS, EX-IRANIAN MUSLIM CALLS JAMIE GLAZOV’S NEW BOOK “JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH” A “MASTERPIECE”
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this new Glazov Gang episode, Ex-Muslim Anni Cyrus Calls Jamie Glazov’s “Jihadist Psychopath” a “Masterpiece.”
As a Sharia survivor, she says that the book deciphers the Jihadist seduction/terror gambit dead on.
Don’t miss it!
[Jamie Glazov will be speaking at Beverly Hills Hotel on Feb. 6 about his new book: Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us. Register HERE. Order the book HERE.]
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.
HORROR AT GROUND ZERO, NYC REVISITED: GIANT SCULPTURE PROCLAIMING “THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLAH & MUHAMMAD IS HIS PROPHET” INSTALLED~MAKES A MOCKERY OF ALL THOSE KILLED BY JIHADISTS
NYC: Giant sculpture proclaiming “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet” goes up at Ground Zero
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/nyc-giant-sculpture-proclaiming-there-is-no-god-but-allah-and-muhammad-is-his-prophet-goes-up-at-ground-zero
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Said Jenkell: “Given the unique and justified sensitivities
surrounding the World Trade Center, it came to my mind to propose to
remove the sculpture showcasing the flag of Saudi Arabia, or relocate it
to a less sensitive location. But there is no way I can do such a thing
as the flag of Saudi Arabia is entirely part of the G20 just like any
other candy flag of this Candy Nations show.”
City officials should move it. Would a giant sculpture containing
Shinto inscriptions be put up at Pearl Harbor? But nothing will be done
about this. To move it would be “Islamophobic,” and the de Blasio
administration would rather have its teeth pulled out with rusty pliers
than do anything that might even give the appearance of “Islamophobia.”
“A Sculpture Celebrating Saudi Arabia Has Been Erected on Ground Zero,” by Davis Richardson, Observer, January 9, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A sculpture celebrating Saudi Arabia’s place in the G20
Summit was erected on the World Trade Center grounds last week, a
stone’s throw away from the 9/11 memorial.
Shaped to resemble a piece of candy, the nine-foot-tall statue
bears the Kingdom’s emerald flag emblazoned with the Arabic inscription,
“There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is the prophet.”
It was
created by French sculptor Laurence Jenkell in 2011 as part of the
larger installation “Candy Nations” which depicts G20 countries as
sugary delights….
“I first created flag candy sculptures to celebrate mankind on an
international level and pay tribute to People of the entire world,”
Jenkell told Observer in a statement. “Given the unique and justified
sensitivities surrounding the World Trade Center, it came to my mind to
propose to remove the sculpture showcasing the flag of Saudi Arabia, or
relocate it to a less sensitive location. But there is no way I can do
such a thing as the flag of Saudi Arabia is entirely part of the G20
just like any other candy flag of this Candy Nations show.”
The installation was curated and installed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey….
Although the installation was originally created in 2011 to convey
“an optimistic message of unity beneath external differences,” its
placement at the World Trade Center raises questions given longstanding
accusations directed toward Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of the
September 11 attacks. In 2003, hundreds of families affected by the 9/11
terror attacks sued the Kingdom over its alleged involvement in
harboring terrorism—given that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi.
Last March, a U.S. federal judge rejected Saudi Arabia’s motion to drop the charges.
_______________________________________________________________
Sculpture Celebrating Saudi Arabia Has Been Erected on Ground Zero
BY PAMELA GELLER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Saudi Arabia was implicated in the 9/11 attacks. The nine-foot-tall
statue bears the Arabic inscription, “There is no god but Allah, and
Mohammed is the prophet.” These are very words of the 9/11 Muslim
terrorists before they slaughtered thousands of innocent Americans. It
is also what is etched on the ISIS black flag of jihad. What a horror.
A Congressional Inquiry’s report refer to evidence of Saudi Arabia substantial involvement in the execution of the attacks. The long-classified U.S. report shows the 9/11 Muslim terrorists were in contact with and received support from individuals connected to the Saudi government.
Related: Top Saudi Officials Aided the 9/11 Jihad Plot
Pamela Geller on Sean Hannity Radio Discussing the US Cover-Up of Saudi Arabia’s role in 9/11
Declassified 9/11 pages show Saudi government involvement
9/11 hijackers:
Saudi Arabia
Ahmed al Ghamdi
Hamza al Ghamdi
Saeed al Ghamdi
Hani Hanjour
Nawaf al Hazmi
Salem al Hazmi
Ahmad al Haznawi
Ahmed al Nami
Khalid al Mihdhar
Majed Moqed
Abdul Aziz al Omari
Mohand al Shehri
Wail al Shehri
Waleed al Shehri
Satam al Suqami
You can learn more about the “Candy Nations” art exhibit at https://www.facebook.com/events/276617983048222 …. #CandyNationsWTC #artexhibition https://twitter.com/_WTCOfficial/status/1075511391426146304 …
A Sculpture Celebrating Saudi Arabia Has Been Erected on Ground Zero
By Davis Richardson • The Observer January 9, 2019:
This statue representing Saudi Arabia is just one of 20 nations
featured in artist Laurence Jenkell’s ‘Candy of Nations.’ Davis
Richardson, Observer
A sculpture celebrating Saudi Arabia’s place in the G20 Summit was
erected on the World Trade Center grounds last week, a stone’s throw
away from the 9/11 memorial.
Shaped to resemble a piece of candy, the nine-foot-tall statue bears
the Kingdom’s emerald flag emblazoned with the Arabic inscription,
“There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is the prophet.” It was created
by French sculptor Laurence Jenkell in 2011 as part of the larger
installation “Candy Nation” which depicts G20 countries as sugary
delights, and has since been featured in over 25 countries. All 20
sculptures are currently on display outside the Oculus shopping center.
The installation was curated and installed by the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey. When reached for comment, the organization
pointed Observer to a December press release announcing the exhibit.
Now read this:
“Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup”
| By Paul Sperry, New York Post, December 15, 2013
After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.
But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’
investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign
support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.
It was kept secret and remains so today.
President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the
800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this
critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank,
except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this
story by comparison is about 1,000 words).
A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion
say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state
involvement in the attacks.
Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can’t reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So
they’ve proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to
declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence
Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September
11, 2001.”
Some information already has leaked from the classified section,
which is based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to
Saudi Arabia, a presumed ally.
The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo
reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government
officials — not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats
and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers
both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the
report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate
in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism,
but an act of war.
The findings, if confirmed, would back up open-source reporting
showing the hijackers had, at a minimum, ties to several Saudi officials
and agents while they were preparing for their attacks inside the
United States. In fact, they got help from Saudi VIPs from coast to
coast:
LOS ANGELES: Saudi consulate official Fahad
al-Thumairy allegedly arranged for an advance team to receive two of the
Saudi hijackers — Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi — as they
arrived at LAX in 2000. One of the advance men, Omar al-Bayoumi, a
suspected Saudi intelligence agent, left the LA consulate and met the
hijackers at a local restaurant. (Bayoumi left the United States two
months before the attacks, while Thumairy was deported back to Saudi
Arabia after 9/11.)
SAN DIEGO: Bayoumi and another suspected Saudi
agent, Osama Bassnan, set up essentially a forward operating base in San
Diego for the hijackers after leaving LA. They were provided
rooms, rent and phones, as well as private meetings with an American al
Qaeda cleric who would later become notorious, Anwar al-Awlaki, at a
Saudi-funded mosque he ran in a nearby suburb. They were also feted at a
welcoming party. (Bassnan also fled the United States just before the attacks.)
WASHINGTON: Then-Saudi Ambassador Prince
Bandar and his wife sent checks totaling some $130,000 to Bassnan while
he was handling the hijackers. Though the Bandars claim the checks were
“welfare” for Bassnan’s supposedly ill wife, the money nonetheless made
its way into the hijackers’ hands.
Other al Qaeda funding was traced back to Bandar and his embassy — so much so that by 2004 Riggs Bank of Washington had dropped the Saudis as a client.
The next year, as a number of embassy employees popped up in terror probes, Riyadh recalled Bandar.
“Our investigations contributed to the ambassador’s
departure,” an investigator who worked with the Joint Terrorism Task
Force in Washington told me, though Bandar says he left for “personal reasons.”
FALLS CHURCH, VA.: In 2001, Awlaki and the
San Diego hijackers turned up together again — this time at the Dar
al-Hijrah Islamic Center, a Pentagon-area mosque built with funds from
the Saudi Embassy. Awlaki was recruited 3,000 miles away to head the
mosque. As its imam, Awlaki helped the hijackers, who showed up at his
doorstep as if on cue. He tasked a handler to help them acquire
apartments and IDs before they attacked the Pentagon.
Awlaki worked closely with the Saudi Embassy. He lectured at a Saudi Islamic think tank in Merrifield, Va., chaired by Bandar. Saudi
travel itinerary documents I’ve obtained show he also served as the
official imam on Saudi Embassy-sponsored trips to Mecca and tours of
Saudi holy sites.
Most suspiciously, though, Awlaki fled the United States on a Saudi jet about a year after 9/11.
As I first reported in my book, “Infiltration,” quoting from
classified US documents, the Saudi-sponsored cleric was briefly detained
at JFK before being released into the custody of a “Saudi
representative.” A federal warrant for Awlaki’s arrest had mysteriously
been withdrawn the previous day. A US drone killed Awlaki in Yemen in
2011.
HERNDON, VA.: On the eve of the attacks, top Saudi
government official Saleh Hussayen checked into the same Marriott
Residence Inn near Dulles Airport as three of the Saudi hijackers who
targeted the Pentagon. Hussayen had left a nearby hotel to move into the
hijackers’ hotel. Did he meet with them? The FBI never found out. They let him go after he “feigned a seizure,” one agent recalled. (Hussayen’s name doesn’t appear in the separate 9/11 Commission Report, which clears the Saudis.)
SARASOTA, FLA.: 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta
and other hijackers visited a home owned by Esam Ghazzawi, a Saudi
adviser to the nephew of King Fahd. FBI agents investigating the
connection in 2002 found that visitor logs for the gated community and
photos of license tags matched vehicles driven by the hijackers. Just
two weeks before the 9/11 attacks, the Saudi luxury home was abandoned.
Three cars, including a new Chrysler PT Cruiser, were left in the
driveway. Inside, opulent furniture was untouched.
Democrat Bob Graham, the former Florida senator who chaired
the Joint Inquiry, has asked the FBI for the Sarasota case files, but
can’t get a single, even heavily redacted, page released. He says it’s a
“coverup.”
Is the federal government protecting the Saudis? Case agents
tell me they were repeatedly called off pursuing 9/11 leads back to the
Saudi Embassy, which had curious sway over White House and FBI responses
to the attacks.
Just days after Bush met with the Saudi ambassador in the
White House, the FBI evacuated from the United States dozens of Saudi
officials, as well as Osama bin Laden family members. Bandar
made the request for escorts directly to FBI headquarters on Sept. 13,
2001 — just hours after he met with the president. The two old family
friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony while discussing the
attacks.
Bill Doyle, who lost his son in the World Trade Center
attacks and heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families, calls the suppression
of Saudi evidence a “coverup beyond belief.” Last week, he sent
out an e-mail to relatives urging them to phone their representatives
in Congress to support the resolution and read for themselves the
censored 28 pages.
Astonishing as that sounds, few lawmakers in fact have bothered to
read the classified section of arguably the most important investigation
in US history.
Granted, it’s not easy to do. It took a monthlong letter-writing
campaign by Jones and Lynch to convince the House intelligence panel to
give them access to the material.
But it’s critical they take the time to read it and pressure
the White House to let all Americans read it. This isn’t water under the
bridge. The information is still relevant today. Pursuing leads
further, getting to the bottom of the foreign support, could help head
off another 9/11.
As the frustrated Joint Inquiry authors warned, in an overlooked addendum to their heavily redacted 2002 report,
“State-sponsored terrorism substantially increases the likelihood of
successful and more lethal attacks within the United States.”
Their findings must be released, even if they forever change US-Saudi
relations. If an oil-rich foreign power was capable of orchestrating
simultaneous bulls-eye hits on our centers of commerce and defense a
dozen years ago, it may be able to pull off similarly devastating
attacks today.
Members of Congress reluctant to read the full report ought to remember that the 9/11 assault missed its fourth target: them.
_______________________________________________________________
UPDATE JANUARY 15, 2019:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/nyc-sculpture-proclaiming-there-is-no-god-but-allah-and-muhammad-is-his-prophet-removed-from-ground-zero