SHARYL ATTKISSON REPORT REVEALS THREATS AGAINST CONGRESSMEN INVESTIGATING AUTISM-VACCINE LINK

 http://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/11/Sharyl-Attkisson.jpg
Attkisson Report Reveals Threats Against Congressmen Investigating Autism-Vaccine Link
BY BARBARA LOE FISHER 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

A Jan. 6, 2018 news report produced
by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson for Sinclair Broadcast
Group revealed that retired congressmen Dan Burton (R-IN) and Dr. Dave
Weldon (R-FL) and current Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL) were pressured by
colleagues or threatened by PhRMA lobbyists to back away from examining
vaccine safety issues, including the reported link between vaccines and
autism.1
The report also revealed that, in 2007, federal government officials
suppressed and then misrepresented the expert opinion of pediatric
neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman that vaccines can cause autism during
U.S. Federal Court of Claims hearings evaluating vaccine-related autism
claims filed in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP).2

“You really need to… back off on this”

The “Vaccination Debate” report was
featured on “Full Measure,” Sinclair’s investigative news show anchored
by Attkisson, who said, “We spoke to 11 current and former members of
Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats
when they raised vaccine safety questions.” Physician and former Rep.
Dave Weldon commented, “It would typically be in a hallway or the street
and people would come up to you and say, “You know, you really need to,
you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the
community or bad for the country or bad for you.”

Attkisson also interviewed Rolf
Hazelhurst, whose now 18-year old son, Yates, suffered severe vaccine
reactions as a child and regressed into chronic poor health that was
eventually diagnosed as autism. Hazelhurst, a criminal prosecuting
attorney, said, “And at first, I didn’t believe it. I did not think
that, I did not believe that vaccines could cause autism. I didn’t
believe it.”

US Government Suppresses Pediatric Neurologist’s Expert Opinion on Autism-Vaccine Link

After Rolf Hazelhurst learned that
Dr. Zimmerman’s expert opinion was discounted and misrepresented by
federal government officials for the purpose of denying federal vaccine
injury compensation to his son3 and thousands of other children with vaccine related autism,4
Hazelhurst told congressional staffers at a 2013 briefing, “If I did to
a criminal in a court of law what the United States Department of
Justice did to vaccine injured children, I would be disbarred and I
would be facing criminal charges.” He and environmental activist
attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. have filed a fraud complaint with the
Justice Department Inspector General about the withholding of
Zimmerman’s expert opinion on vaccine-induced autism in the U.S. Court
of Federal Claims proceedings.

The “Vaccine Court” and the Class Action Omnibus Autism Proceeding

The Secretary of Health and Human
Services is legally represented by Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys
in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“Vaccine Court”) when federal
health officials contest vaccine injury compensation claims filed under
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, a law that was passed by
Congress in 1986 and substantively altered by congressional amendments
between 1987 and 2016.5 The
1986 Act gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers but
protected a vaccine injured person’s right to file a vaccine injury
lawsuit in civil court if federal compensation was denied or was
inadequate to provide for lifetime needs or if it could be proven that
the vaccine manufacturer could have made a vaccine safer (design
defect). In a split decision in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court effectively
barred all vaccine injury lawsuits, including for manufacturer design
defect.6 7

Under the 1986 Act, special masters
are appointed by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to adjudicate federal
vaccine injury compensation claims. The “Vaccine Court” oversaw a
seven-year class action type Omnibus Autism proceeding that concluded in
2009 and threw out more than 5,500 vaccine injury claims for children
with vaccine-related autism.8
The Court rejected the argument made by plaintiff’s lawyers that
vaccine-related autism is caused by mercury preservatives in vaccines
and/or MMR vaccine or a combination of both.9

The gutting of the 1986 Act’s safety
and compensation provisions by congressional amendments, the Department
of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Supreme Court has been
strongly criticized by the National Vaccine Information Center for many
years.10 11 12 The
Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report in 2014
analyzing the VICP’s operation and was critical of how long it took for
compensation claims to be resolved, primarily because most vaccine
injury claims are contested by DHHS.13

Sharyl Attkisson: The Reporter Who Goes Where No One Else Will

A CBS correspondent for more
than 20 years, Sharyl Attkisson is a five-time Emmy Award winner and
recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting and
Pillar Human Rights Journalism Award for “Fearless Reporting in the Face of Government Retaliation.” From 1996-2001, she hosted a half-hour weekly medical news magazine on PBS entitled “Health Week.” She is the best-selling author of the books Stonewalled (2014) and The Smear (2017). After leaving CBS in 2014, Attkisson joined Sinclair to head up the investigative journalism team staffing “Full Measure” to explore government waste, national security and whistleblower reports on government and corporate abuse.14
For more than a decade, Attkisson has authored and produced reports on a number of vaccine safety issues, including these:

She presented a Ted Talk on “Is Fake News Real?” in February 2018.15
Currently, she has a lawsuit pending against the DOJ and FBI based on
First and Fourth Amendment rights alleging improper government
surveillance of a private citizen journalist, including electronic
surveillance of her computer, cyber stalking and cyber attacks.16

View the “Full Measure” report on The Vaccination Debate here

References:
 1 Attkisson S. The Vaccination Debate. “Full Measure” Sinclair Broadcast Group Jan. 6, 2019.
2 Attkisson S. Dr.Andrew Zimmerman’s full Affadavit on alleged link between vaccines and autism that U.S. government covered up. SharylAttkisson.com Jan. 6. 2019.
3 U.S. Court of Claims. Hazelhurst v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Decision: Feb. 12, 2009.
4 U.S. Court of Claims. Docket of Autism Omnibus Proceeding. Jan. 12, 2011.
5 National Vaccine Information Center. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
6 Supreme Court of the United States. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth No. 09-152. Justice Sotomayor with whom Justice Ginsberg joins, dissenting Feb. 22, 2011.
7 National Vaccine Information Center. National
Vaccine Information Center Cites “Betrayal” of Consumers by U.S.
Supreme Court Giving Total Liability Shield to Big Pharma
. NVIC Press Release Feb. 23, 2011.

8 U.S. Court of Claims. Docket of Autism Omnibus Proceeding. Jan. 12, 2011.
9 Hitt M. Vaccine Court Rejects Autism Claims. WebMD Feb. 12, 2009.
10 Fisher BL. Compensating Vaccine Injuries: Are Reforms Needed? U.S. House Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources Sept. 28, 1999.
11 Fisher BL, Williams K, Wrangham TK. Statement for Government Accountability Office (GAO) Inquiry on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) Operation. National Vaccine Information Center July 11, 2014.
12 Fisher BL. End Pharma Liability Shield Endangering Public Health and Human Rights. National Vaccine Information Center Nov. 8, 2016.
13 Government Accountability Office. Vaccine Injury Compensation: Most Claims Took Multiple Years and Many Were Settled through Negotiation. Nov. 21, 2014.
14 Attkisson S. Bio.
15 Attkisson S. Is Fake News Real? Ted Talk Feb. 13, 2018.
16 Attkisson S. Counting down to oral arguments in government computer intrusions. SharylAttkisson.com Jan. 5, 2019.
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

 Over $4 Billion Paid for Vaccine Injuries and Deaths 

GAVIN NEWSOM, NEW CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR DOUBLES DOWN ON SANCTUARY STATE STATUS~ROLLS OUT THE RED CARPET FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS

  

New California Governor Doubles Down on Sanctuary State Status

Gavin Newsom rolls out the red carpet 
for illegal aliens
BY MATTHEW VADUM
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272505/new-california-governor-doubles-down-sanctuary-matthew-vadum; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
Newly inaugurated Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged to make his
home state of California “a sanctuary to all who seek it” in direct
defiance of President Trump’s drive to secure the nation’s border with
Mexico and enforce U.S. immigration laws.

California’s grossly
unconstitutional obstruction of federal immigration laws is about to
get ramped up, Newsom’s speech suggests. The state already has
unprecedented sanctuary laws on its books that shield its 2.4 million
illegal aliens from U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE).
Federal prosecutors are considering filing criminal charges against
elected officials harboring illegal aliens in sanctuary jurisdictions,
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen told the Senate Judiciary
Committee a year ago.

The Trump administration is suing
California over its “sanctuary state” laws that punish compliance with
federal immigration laws and provide legal cover for corrupt officials
to continue brazenly flouting immigration laws and interfering with
federal agents trying to enforce them.

The federal lawsuit
targets three statutes curbing the power of California’s state and local
law enforcement to hold, question, and transfer detainees at the
request of immigration authorities, and punish employers for cooperating
with those authorities. The laws also impose draconian restrictions on
communication between local police and federal immigration enforcement,
including information regarding when criminal aliens are scheduled to be
released from local jails.
Under the longstanding doctrine in
American constitutional law known as “dual sovereignty,” states cannot
be compelled to enforce federal immigration laws, but they are obliged
not to hinder their enforcement.
The so-called sanctuary cities that
form the bulk of the sanctuary movement really ought to be called
traitor cities because they are in open rebellion against the United
States, just like the slave states that seceded from the Union before
the Civil War.
The sanctuary movement gave illegal aliens
permission to rob, rape, and murder Americans by, among other things,
stigmatizing immigration enforcement and characterizing it as somehow
racist. Some left-wingers use the dreadful euphemism “civil liberties
safe zones” to describe sanctuary jurisdictions. The phrase deliberately
blurs the distinction between citizens and non-citizens by implying
illegal aliens somehow possess a civil right to be present in the U.S.

But dealing with the illegal alien problem is the furthest thing from
Democrat politicians’ minds. They view illegals as future Democrat
voters and demonize anyone who supports enforcing federal immigration
laws that could lead to the deportation of their future voter base.

“People’s lives, freedom, security, the water we drink, the air we
breathe — they all hang in the balance,” the leftist politician said
Monday outside the state Capitol in Sacramento.
Children
should not be “ripped away from their parents” at the border or left
hungry while Trump promises to expend billions of dollars on “a wall
that should never be built.”

Newsom (D) became the state’s 40th governor, succeeding Jerry Brown
(D) who was term-limited. Before being sworn in as governor, Newsom was
the state’s lieutenant governor and before that, mayor of San
Francisco.
While Newsom vowed to worsen the nation’s illegal
alien crisis, another leftist, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio (D),
promised this week to provide “free” health care to all his city’s
residents, including illegals. The program, according to one ridiculous
low-ball estimate, will cost only $100 million.

“This is the
city paying for direct comprehensive care (not just ERs) for people who
can’t afford it, or can’t get comprehensive Medicaid — including 300,000
undocumented New Yorkers,” de Blasio spokesman Eric Phillips wrote on
Twitter Tuesday.
Newsom’s pledge came as President Trump’s
negotiations with Democrats over $5 billion needed to fund construction
of the border wall continued to go nowhere
and the federal government continued to be partially shut down for lack
of appropriated funds. Trump has vowed to keep the shutdown going as
long as it takes to secure funding for the wall.
“Just left a
meeting with [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck [Schumer] and [Speaker of
the House] Nancy [Pelosi], a total waste of time[,]” Trump tweeted
Wednesday. “I asked what is going to happen in 30 days if I quickly open
things up, are you going to approve Border Security which includes a
Wall or Steel Barrier? Nancy said, NO. I said bye-bye, nothing else
works!”
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 217 to 185 on
Dec. 20 to approve a temporary spending bill after adding $5.7 billion
in appropriations for the wall. The measure floundered in the Senate and
the partial shutdown got underway Dec. 22. But that was back in the
previous Congress. Now the Democrats control the House.
The
meeting came the day after President Trump took rhetorical aim at his
enemies as he delivered his first-ever prime time address from the Oval
Office in a bold attempt to rally the country in favor of building a
wall on the porous U.S.-Mexico border, his signature campaign promise.

Vice President Mike Pence said the White House has delivered numerous
proposals and offers in three weeks of negotiations, but Democrats
stubbornly refused to support any funding for the wall.
“I can
give you 15 speeches [Schumer] gave, in which he talked about border
security,” Trump said prior to the meeting. “The only reason they’re
against it is because I won the presidency.”

 

STARBUCKS OFFERS SOCIAL JUSTICE, HIV INFECTED NEEDLES~BLOOD, ETC. IN BATHROOMS

 Starbucks to install safe needle disposal boxes after ...
 https://mediaweb.kirotv.com/photo/2018/10/02/needle_1538529246254_13204308_ver1.0_640_360.jpg
STARBUCKS OFFERS SOCIAL JUSTICE, 
HIV INFECTED NEEDLES 
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
I don’t see much social justice in ordinary Starbucks employees
having to clean up the mess that former Attorney General Eric Holder
helped inaugurate after the overpriced terrible coffee place’s meltdown
over accusations of racism.
Maybe Eric can come down there and pick up some of those needles. For social justice.

Starbucks is installing needle-disposal boxes in some bathrooms, as
well as exploring other solutions to workers’ concerns regarding
improperly disposed-of syringes and related health risks.


More than 3,700 people signed a petition on Coworker.org calling for
Starbucks to place needle-disposal boxes in high-risk bathrooms.


Starbucks workers report finding blood and needles in bathrooms, as
well as being pricked by improperly disposed-of needles, risking
exposure to HIV and hepatitis.

Maybe a better
way to address workers’ concerns is to find them jobs at a civilized
coffee place, like Coffee Bean or Bill’s Diner in Montana.

The coffee giant is exploring possible remedies
after employees expressed fears about being pricked by uncapped needles
and experiencing related health risks. Starbucks is testing solutions
including installing sharps-disposal boxes, utilizing heavier-duty trash
bags to prevent needle pokes, and removing trash cans from certain
bathrooms.

Now your $20 latte also comes with extra heroin. The question though is if you have heroin, why do you need Starbucks?

In October, three Starbucks employees in Seattle told local news that
they encountered hypodermic needles on the job nearly every day. They
said they had to take antiviral medications to protect themselves from
HIV and hepatitis.

This is what working for a social justice company looks like.
______________________________________________________________

 STARBUCKS becomes America’s needle infested homeless shelter
 Two year old ‘drank Frappuccino tainted with blood’
 Family sues after mother and two-year-old girl ‘drank
Starbucks frappuccino tainted with barista’s blood’
and had to take HIV tests to check they were not
infected.A California family is suing Starbucks after they say their
two-year-old daughter drank a frappuccino tainted with a barista’s
blood. The Vice family stopped for drinks at the Starbucks at 601 W 2nd
Street in San Bernardino on February 6, 2016. The drinks had a ‘strong
metallic smell’ but they didn’t think anything about it until they got
home, and noticed blood stains in and outside the cups.
 

ITALY: ARCHBISHOP BREAKS RANKS, CONDEMNS FELLOW PRELATES WHO ADVOCATE BREAKING IMMIGRATION LAWS~AN ABUSE WHICH THE POPE HAS ENTHUSIASTICALLY COMMITTED

 http://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Luigi-Negri-benedicente.jpg
ITALY: ARCHBISHOP BREAKS RANKS, CONDEMNS FELLOW PRELATES WHO ADVOCATE BREAKING IMMIGRATION LAWS
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

“An archbishop has broken ranks from fellow Italian prelates, saying
that mayors have no right to appeal to conscientious objection to
disobey the nation’s immigration laws.” Luigi Negri didn’t just oppose
fellow Italian prelates with his comments. He also has indirectly
opposed the Pope, who recently hijacked the religious feast day
Epiphany, celebrated by millions of Christians around the world on
January 6. Pope Francis gave a mass to around 60,000 people in St
Peter’s Basilica, but he decided to deliver his shameless sales pitch to
advance open-door immigration before the worshipers.

Negri further stated:

The right to object is to be defended when fundamental
principles are undermined….Those mayors who use conscientious objection
deliberately as a political tool against legitimate actions of superior
or equal authorities, abuse the concept.

An abuse that the Pope has committed in his role repeatedly. Also
important was Negri’s recognition of the importance of Judeo-Christian
culture and the threats posed to its institutions:


The archbishop said moreover that not everyone is in a
position to integrate into Italian society, which is based on a
Judeo-Christian understanding of the person, family, and society


He was clearly referring to Islamic supremacists, who have wreaked havoc throughout Europe and elsewhere.

“Italian Archbishop Says No ‘Conscientious Objection’ on Immigration Law,” by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, January 8, 2019:

An archbishop has broken ranks from fellow Italian
prelates, saying that mayors have no right to appeal to conscientious
objection to disobey the nation’s immigration laws — an Italian parallel
to American sanctuary cities.


Luigi Negri, the former archbishop of Ferrara, suggested Sunday that
bishops who have supported or called for recourse to conscientious
objection have overstepped their competence, failing to respect the
legitimate autonomy of the political sphere in questions that require
prudential judgment. Similarly, mayors who appeal to the principle to
disobey immigration laws misuse it.


“The right to object is to be defended when fundamental principles
are undermined,” Negri said. “Those mayors who use conscientious
objection deliberately as a political tool against legitimate actions of
superior or equal authorities, abuse the concept.”

According to Catholic theology, one must refrain from obeying laws
that mandate immoral behavior, such as a law requiring people to
participate in abortions.

The “security decree” of interior minister Matteo Salvini, which
among other things facilitates the deportation of illegal immigrants,
has raised the ire of certain members of the Italian Catholic hierarchy.

On the same day, the archbishop of Chieti, Bruno Forte, protested the
Salvini decree in an interview with the press, claiming that rescuing
migrants is not something optional but a “moral imperative.”

Ethically speaking, Forte said, “if something contrary to my
conscience is imposed on me, such as refusing help to whole families at
the mercy of the sea for days, conscientious objection is justified.”

“Alarmism and talk of an invasion are propagandistic lies that are
harmful to everyone, except to those who use them for electoral
advantages,” the archbishop said in reference to the interior minister’s
allusions to Italy’s migrant crisis.

Archbishop Negri took issue with this line of reasoning, saying that
prelates have no right to meddle in secular affairs where moral
absolutes do not come into play.

“The issue of security is a matter for dialogue among the secular forces participating in social life,” he said.

“In general, those who exploit the gospel are mistaken,” Negri said,
while also defending the Salvini decree, arguing that “a recovery of
cultural, human and religious identity is absolutely positive: the
famous Christian roots of Europe.”

The archbishop said moreover that not everyone is in a position to
integrate into Italian society, which is based on a Judeo-Christian
understanding of the person, family, and society…..

WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING YOU ABOUT THE YELLOW VESTS~THE TRUTH ABOUT THE EUROPEAN SPRING

WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING YOU ABOUT THE YELLOW VESTS~THE TRUTH ABOUT THE EUROPEAN SPRING
REPORT BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON OF INFOWARS

 It’s quite simple; the left hates the yellow vests movement because they hate the working class.
Please share this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDAjEaFPnwY

 Italy declares support for Yellow Vests, sparking row between Salvini and Macron

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/italy-declares-support-for-yellow-vests-sparking-row-between-salvini-and-macron
EXCERPTS:
 Matteo Salvini has now stoked the Yellow Vest movement in his
declaration: “I support honest citizens who protest against a president
who governs against his own people.” Salvini is describing not just
Macron, but globalist leaders everywhere. The Yellow Vests are a
movement of defense.


Macron’s rebuttal was to reference the “populist movement” as the rise of “leprosy.”