FEDS & U.N. DUMPING “UNVETTED, DISEASED REFUGEE MEN” ON TAXPAYER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
A Missouri woman who has attended official meetings on resettling migrants is blowing the whistle on United Nations and federal schemes that she says
are quietly flying in huge numbers of unvetted, diseased “refugees”
from across Africa and the Middle East — many of whom do not even have a
known name — and immediately handing them passports, Social Security
numbers, and a vast array of tax-funded benefits. Noting that the
overwhelming majority of the migrants she observed were men, she
suggested the schemes were an “intentional device” to “invade the United
States of America.”
Adding insult to injury, said the woman with knowledge of the
program, is the fact that state officials and those involved with
processing the new arrivals are being encouraged at official meetings to
classify as many of the newcomers as possible as being permanently
disabled — especially as having chronic headaches and lower back pain.
The purpose of this, she was told, was so the “refugees” could qualify
for Social Security long-term disability, allowing them to collect
taxpayer money for the rest of their lives despite never having
contributed to the already-strained system on its way to bankruptcy.
“Much to my shock, they wanted us to try to identify them in such a
way that they would qualify for long-term Social Security disability,”
she explained, adding that the designation was for life and would cost
taxpayers a fortune. “So if they get identified as qualifying for
long-term Social Security disability, they are as good as set up for
life…. It is insanity.” Indeed, one of the first things workers are
supposed to do is sign up the new migrants for Social Security, she
said. They also receive cash upon arrival.
Also sparking concerns is the fact that the migrants are being
shipped in on airplanes under cover of darkness, with the flights
arriving late at night after the airports are cleared out of the general
public. There is apparently no real vetting going on at all, she said,
citing the information she obtained at the official meetings. Senior government officials have also confirmed a lack of serious vetting. In a brief phone interview, the woman explained that the secrecy being pushed by state officials was deliberate and strategic.
“The meetings are technically not secret, but they make it very hard
to find them,” said the activist, who has testified on these issues in
front of Missouri lawmakers. “They said they wanted to, in their words,
´keep all this information on the down low,´ because there would be
people in opposition to the work that they’re doing. So they asked that
we not discuss the information we received outside of the meetings.” But
the activist could not keep silent.
The explosive revelations she offered first received widespread
attention across America during an interview with nationally syndicated
talk-show host Josh Tolley. The Missouri woman, Jill Noble, who last
year began attending UN refugee resettlement program meetings sponsored
by Missouri social services, said she very quickly began realizing that
something was very wrong. And so, she wanted to share some of the
details with the American people. So far, nobody has publicly challenged
her allegations, despite widespread publicity surrounding them, she
told The New American.
In the video-taped interview with Tolley, entitled “Diseased Refugees Obtaining SSN and Passport Upon Arrival,”
the activist blows the whistle on a wide range of troubling elements
surrounding the program. While President Trump has reduced the flow of
refugees, she said, the situation is hardly under control, and the
program may be placing all Americans in danger — both from a national
security standpoint, and from a public-health perspective.
“It just struck me as curious how casual they were about the number
of people that they were bringing into the state of Missouri and how
they were being brought in and where they were going and the conditions
under which they were being brought in,” she explains to Tolley in the
video, which has been seen by over 125,000 viewers. Indeed, the
description she provides of what is happening in Missouri — and
presumably across America — would shock the overwhelming majority of
Americans, regardless of political persuasion.
Among other concerns, Noble highlighted the complete lack of vetting.
“Actually they are not vetted and they are not the safest people,” she
says, contradicting statements by some politicians and establishment
media organs. “We’re being told through mainstream media that they are
going from 12 to 18 months worth of vetting, but in the meetings that I
have attended I learned that there was no vetting done at all. They were
literally given plane tickets and put on a plane right away within 24
hours. And, they were put on the plane with the clothes on their back.”
Many of them are being listed on their paperwork as “FUNU,” she said,
which stands for “Full Name Unknown.”
Others have confirmed the lack of vetting. “As a recently retired
25-year veteran of the U.S. Department of State who served almost eight
years as a refugee coordinator throughout the Middle East, Africa,
Russia and Cuba, I have seen first-hand the abuses and fraud that
permeate the refugee program and know about the entrenched interests
that fight every effort to implement much-needed reform,” wrote former
State Department official Mary Doetsch in a February letter published by the Chicago Tribune in support of Trump’s efforts.
“Despite claims of enhanced vetting, the reality is that it is
virtually impossible to vet an individual who has no type of an official
record, particularly in countries compromised by terrorism,” she added.
“U.S. immigration officials simply rely on the person’s often rehearsed
and fabricated testimony. I have personally seen this on hundreds of
occasions.”
Another major concern is the diseases being brought in, many of which
had been rare or virtually non-existent in the United States. “Many of
them come into country diseased,” explained Noble. “They come in with
tuberculosis, leprosy, HIV, giardia, smallpox, polio – communicable
diseases, apart from giardia, which is a parasite. They’re coming in
with communicable diseases — highly contagious diseases.” Tolley echoed
those concerns, citing information received from a doctor in New York
who was similarly alarmed at the importation of pathogens and the
emergence of a “health hazard to the entire country.”
Noble also said the media was lying about the demographics of those
being brought in. “They’re pulling on the heart strings of the American
people, we’re very compassionate people, and so, knowing that, they pull
on the heart strings of the public,” she explained. While the American
public is being led to believe the “refugees” are primarily women and
children fleeing wars, “the vast majority of the refugees that we’ve
received here in Missouri have been males between the ages of 15 and
upwards to 45-years old.”
Tolley pointed out that a similar phenomenon is being observed in
Europe, with the UN admitting that over two thirds of the “refugees” are
military-aged males — and overwhelmingly Muslim. Noble points out that
there have actually been some women and children, including a recent
flight carrying refugees from the Congo. Noble said that unlike many of
those being brought in, the group of Congolese were clean and
well-clothed. And that group was sponsored by a local church, which
picked them up and provided clothing, transportation, and more. But they
were not the norm, Noble explained.
Noble and Tolley both make clear that they have no animosity against
genuine refugees who truly need protection from persecution —
particularly if they plan to return home, as most legitimate refugees
fleeing war or natural disaster presumably would once the crisis or
danger has passed in their homeland. But they suggested something very
different seems to be at work with the UN and federal programs shipping
as many migrants as possible into the West, as quickly as possible,
primarily men, with no serious vetting, all at taxpayer expense, under
cover of darkness, and without even minimal public-health precautions.
The response to Tolley’s explosive video has been overwhelmingly
positive, with more than 2,250 up-votes compared with less than 100
down-votes on Youtube. Numerous prominent blogs and websites picked
up the story, too. And so far, despite the interview having gone viral
across the Internet, no official has publicly disputed her allegations.
In addition to her interview with Tolley, Noble has also been giving
public speeches and educating Missouri policymakers and elected
officials on the dangers of the program. Along with her work on the
migration issue, Noble is also an activist who focuses on education. She
has testified on these issues and her observations of the UN and
federal refugee programs at a committee hearing at the state capitol.
Even states that cancel their participation in the federal-UN refugee
schemes are not immune to the massive influx, though. In fact,
according to a lawsuit filed by the Thomas More Law Center on behalf of
the Tennessee General Assembly, the federal government is violating the
Constitution’s spending clause and the Tenth Amendment by force feeding
“refugees” into the state, using taxpayer-funded “ministries” and
“non-profit” organizations to funnel ever-more refugees in, at public
expense, despite the state dropping out of the program in 2008.
President Trump tried to slow down the massive refugee influx by
lowering the cap on refugee numbers down to 50,000 refugees for the
fiscal year — less than half of what Obama decreed. However, in
overturning Trump’s executive order on the subject, U.S. judge Derrick
Watson in Hawaii and the federal courts re-opened the flood gates. And
so, the State Department is once again shipping in UN-designated
“refugees” at breakneck speed.
“In accordance with the Court Order, and consistent with both our
operational capacity and our capacity under available funding, we have
increased the current pace of refugee arrivals to approximately 900
individuals per week,” a spokesperson for the U.S. State Department told
journalist Leo Hohmann at WND. Hohmann’s latest book, Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration And Resettlement Jihad, argues that Islamists are using the “refugee” schemes to invade the West for nefarious purposes.
As The New American has reported, the real agenda behind the UN’s “refugee” schemes, designed with help from the totalitarian Socialist International alliance, is hardly humanitarian. Instead, the agenda includes, according to critics and architects of the schemes alike, the breaking down of national sovereignty. Top government leaders including Hungarian
Prime Minister Viktor Orban has also blasted what he termed a
“treasonous conspiracy” of “internationalist fanatics” to undermine
Western civilization, Christianity, and the nation-state on the road toward “world order.” In fact, the
same establishment globalists flooding the West with migrants were
largely responsible for destroying the Middle Eastern countries many of the refugees are fleeing. Globalism and Big Government are key to understanding the phenomenon.
If the real goal were truly humanitarian, shipping millions of
African and Middle Eastern refugees to Europe and America at taxpayer
expense would be among the most absurd strategies imaginable. Estimates
suggest the cost of importing a single refugee is 50 times higher than
helping the refugees closer to their own countries, meaning for every
one imported to re-settle in the West, 50 more must suffer closer to
their home countries. Plus, if they remain near their homelands, they
can return home to rebuild once the danger has passed.
America’s national security and public health are being recklessly
put at risk by the UN and the federal government, all to advance a
totalitarian agenda. If even some of what Noble has described is true —
and so far there is no reason to doubt the accuracy of her testimony —
something is clearly very wrong. Congress, Trump, and the states must
investigate what is happening. Any programs involving the
dictator-dominated UN should be canceled immediately, along with any
schemes to flood the West with foreigners for subversive purposes.
Americans are perhaps the most charitable people on the planet. So if
they want to help people dealing with war, poverty, and persecution —
and no doubt many millions do — there are thousands of fantastic
charities and ministries to help with that. But the fact remains that
nothing in the U.S. Constitution authorizes any of the schemes described
by Noble or the importation of people from around the world at taxpayer
expense. And so, the schemes must be shut down.
Related articles:
Refugee Crisis: Using Chaos to Build Power
Hungarian PM: Mass Migration a Plot to Destroy Christian West
No Vetting of Syrian “Refugees” in Obama’s “Resettlement” Invasion
UN, Socialist International, Obama Design U.S. Refugee Resettlement
Obama Administration Increases Refugee Resettlement During Final Months
UN “Together” Propaganda Bid Seeks to Flood West With Migrants
U.S. Not Screening Refugees for Extremist Views
Swedes and Germans Told to Integrate Into Their “New Country”
Obama Administration Expands Refugee Program for Central Americans
Social Security Inching Its Way Toward Bankruptcy, Says CBO
Insider: EU-U.S. Must Take More Refugees, Get Rid of Sovereignty
Refugee Crisis Has Europe on the Brink
Obama-UN Refugee Plan: More Chaos, Conflict, Terror
UN Refugee Summit Supports U.S. Plan to Admit More Refugees
Obama-UN Refugee Summit: Huge Push for More Refugees
Americans, Europeans Agree: Trump Is Right on Immigration
Globalists Who Created Refugee Crisis Now Exploiting It
