Day: January 14, 2017

 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Here are a few snippets from Obama’s goodbye speech to the American people:
“Going
forward, we must uphold laws against discrimination…But laws alone
won’t be enough. Hearts must change…For blacks and other minorities, it
means tying our own struggles for justice to the challenges that a lot
of people in this country face – the refugee, the immigrant, the rural
poor, the transgender American, and also the middle-aged white man…For
white Americans, it means acknowledging that the effects of slavery and
Jim Crow didn’t suddenly vanish in the ‘60s; that when minority groups
voice discontent, they’re not just engaging in reverse racism or
practicing political correctness…”
The question is: do people want empty sentimental sop from Obama or do they want action?

Well, it’s too late for action, because Obama’s presidency is done.
And it makes no difference whether, as a result of his final speech,
people view him as a great and honorable man who did his best, or as a
con artist, because again, he’s on his way out the door.
Needless
to say, his supporters were deeply moved by his words. They want to be
moved. They don’t want to look at uncomfortable facts.
For
example, let’s go to CNN, which is going to offer the best possible
interpretation of economic indicators for black people in America:
“Blacks
have seen their median income stagnate, along with the rest of the
population…Median income [for blacks] stood at $35,398 in 2014, just a
touch below where it was in 2009, when Obama took office. But it has
climbed back from [a low of] $33,926 in 2011…The Great Recession sent
many Americans into poverty, but blacks were hit particularly hard. The
[poverty] rate for blacks hit 27.6% in 2011, nearly 2 percentage points
higher than what it was when Obama was sworn in. It has since receded to
26.2%.”
If you call that a ringing endorsement of Obama’s performance as president, you’re in need of help.
Let
me put it this way. For all Obama’s talk about racism and prejudice and
justice, Americans of every description and color have been willing,
for a long time, to work alongside each other and get along — IF THERE
IS WORK TO BE HAD. DECENT PAYING WORK.
Obama is, in effect, trying to move back to another time, before that was the case.
When
he was elected, in 2008, during the recession, his closest advisors
thought he would come out swinging and do everything possible to create
jobs. That was the number-one concern of Americans.
They were
absolutely shocked when he opted for Obamacare out of the gate, as his
first priority. And look what it has led to: a massive mess.
Gazing
at his presidency head-on, without excuses, it’s clear that Obama chose
to IGNORE jobs. He didn’t want to make a move in that arena.
Why?
The answer is stark and simple: the globalist agenda forbids the creation of new jobs, and Obama is a globalist. He was plucked out of nowhere by Ted Kennedy and mentored by Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, along with David Rockefeller.

The Trilateral Commission is the single most important globalist
force in the world. And of the 87 members of the Commission who live in
the US, Obama appointed 11 of them to key posts in his administration.
This is no accident. This is intentional.
The
idea that Obama would launch a no-holds-barred effective crusade
against corporations leaving the US and throwing huge numbers of
Americans (of all colors) out of work, is laughable. Look at the record,
if you need verification. It never happened. It was never going to
happen.
The man can talk forever about discrimination and
prejudice and social justice, but those words fall flat, because he has
never taken action to correct the true crime—which is there for all to
see: Globalists are committed to torpedoing economies.
Obama can be a master of overly sentimental rhetoric—but this is merely a diversion.
And
aside from the massive loss of jobs, if he has been talking about the
inner cities of America, he should have focused on the enduring
disasters that destroy life in those places and hold law-abiding
citizens hostage: gangs, the murders they commit, their other crimes,
drugs, and the absence of fathers in homes. That’s where he would have
started. And he would have launched solutions.
But he didn’t.
In various ways, over and over, he simply said: “We’re all in this together.” That and $2 will get you a bus ticket in Chicago.
‘We’re
all in this together’ doesn’t destroy pernicious globalist trade
treaties or create jobs for people who are willing and ready to go to
work and support their families.
‘We’re all in this together’ doesn’t eliminate gangs, killings, drugs, and highly dangerous neighborhoods.
‘We’re
all in this together’ doesn’t start a national program of urban farms
in inner cities, and suddenly give people the opportunity to grow their
own fresh clean food, eat it, and make money by selling the excess.
‘We’re all in this together’ doesn’t help create a culture in which fathers deserting their families is a cardinal offense.
‘We’re
all in this together’ does pour a pleasant syrup of “deep concern” on
the heads of people who, above all, want to appear virtuous. These are
the people who can be led to believe in an imitation of actual solutions
and action.
They are content to think that a leader who espouses a lofty ideal has done enough.
Everyone
else should put the ideal into action. If they don’t, it’s not the
leader’s fault. He flew the banner. He recited poetics. He wanted a
better world. He was operating at a higher level—and unfortunately, the
bulk of humanity couldn’t grasp its profundity.
That notion and $2.75 will get you a ride on a New York subway.
This article originally appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com. Want to free your mind from the Matrix? Check out The Matrix Revealed.