Barbara Bush with Hillary Clinton’s Aide Huma Abedin(L) and with Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards Over “Lunch” 

 Discussing Body Parts Sales?




 Alexander Skarsgard, wearing a plaid shirt, sits in the grandstands at the US Open, America's most prestigious tennis match

Bush Daughter to Headline Texas Planned Parenthood Fundraiser 



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 FORT WORTH, Texas — Barbara Pierce Bush, 
the daughter of former President George W. Bush, is scheduled to be the 
keynote speaker at the annual luncheon for Planned Parenthood of Greater
 Texas on Wednesday.

Last June, in an interview with the New York Times, Bush
called Planned Parenthood an “exceptional organization,” as she partners
with the abortion and contraceptive giant through her non-profit
organization Global Health Corps, which “mobilizes a global community of
young leaders to build the movement for health equity.”

“Every day I’m privileged to be part of a community bound by
the belief that health is a human right. Our ability to dream big, to
ignore the status quo, and to achieve results will ensure that by
working together every woman, man, and child has the opportunity to live
a healthy life,” Bush states of her mission on her Corps website.
The site lists
Planned Parenthood as being a partner in Uganda, as well as in Zambia.
Global Health Corps additionally partners with the Planned Parenthood
Federation of America for its work in the states.

Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards told BuzzFeed on Saturday that it is “really exciting” that Bush will be headlining the Fort Worth fundraiser.

“It’s huge, and such a diverse crowd, a lot of elected
officials, a lot of Republican sort of first families,” she stated. “I
don’t know if she’s ever spoke at any [Planned Parenthood] event

While Bush’s father has been known to identify as pro-life
with exceptions, her mother has stated on several occasions that she
believes abortion should remain legal—although she supports the idea of
reducing the number of terminations.

“[We should do] what we can to limit the number of
abortions, to try to reduce the number of abortions in a lot of ways,
and that is by talking about responsibility with girls and boys, by
teaching abstinence—having abstinence classes everywhere in schools and
in churches and in Sunday school,” Laura Bush told NBC’s “Today Show” in
“We are a nation of different generations and beliefs,
seeing issues through different eras and different eyes. While
cherishing life, I have always believed that abortion is a private
decision, and there, no one can walk in anyone else’s shoes,” she
also outlined in her 2010 memoir “Spoken From the Heart.”
Barbara Bush told the New York Times last June in an
interview alongside Planned Parenthood’s president that her family
agrees on the issue of same-sex “marriage,” however. The outlet noted
that Bush had participated in a public service announcement for
“marriage equality.”

“[T]he narrative was that I was breaking with my father. But
I had talked to my dad about doing it, and he was very supportive,”
Bush said. “But my parents raised us to use our voices for issues we
care about, and I feel strongly about marriage equality.”
Bush attended an event last year supporting Hillary Clinton’s run for the presidency.
Tickets for the Planned Parenthood fundraiser start at $150.

 Uploaded on Feb 27, 2012
Barbara Pierce Bush talks about what she does as the Co-Founder and President of Global Health Corps.

Published on Feb 25, 2017
Pierce Bush, the daughter of former President George W. Bush, will
headline a Planned Parenthood fundraiser next week in Texas, according
to a report from the Texas Tribune.
Bush is expected to be the keynote speaker at the Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas’s annual Fort Worth fundraising luncheon.
Bush pushed for anti-abortion policies during his time in the White
House, but his wife Laura Bush has supported legal abortion in the past.

announcement comes amid the continuing debate over federal funding for
Planned Parenthood, which provides a variety of reproductive health
services to women, including abortions.
Barbara Bush is the CEO and
co-founder of Global Health Corps and called Planned Parenthood an
“exceptional organization” last year in an interview with the New York
Times. Bush also attended an event for Democratic presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton in Paris.

Better By Half: A Conversation with Melinda Gates, Barbara Bush, and Katie Couric 
 Published on Dec 17, 2014
November, Melinda Gates joined Global Health Corp’s Barbara Bush and
Katie Couric for a conversation about making the world better by half by
empowering women and girls. 
  Top Globalists Foreshadow An Apocalyptic 
Biological Attack
 Published on Feb 28, 2017
January 18th, in an article titled “Bill Gates is teaming up with world
leaders to stop the next deadly pandemic”, Business Insider reported
that “Governments from Germany, Japan, and Norway have pooled funds
along with the Gates Foundation to raise a total of $490 million so far.
The target is $1 billion, which Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness
Innovations (CEPI) says will help finance the first five years of
research and development.” Gates appeared at January 2017’s Davos World
Economic Forum, flaunting his CEPI program. CBS news. “Bill Gates on how
to outsmart global epidemics”.

“Words MATTER” George W. Bush SLAMS 

Donald Trump
 Published on Feb 27, 2017

made some not-so-veiled criticisms of Trump Monday on NBC. When asked
about Trump’s travel ban, he pivoted to “freedom of worship”, implying
that (a) the restrictions were religious persecution and (b) foreign
citizens have a right to immigrate. On freedom of the press, Bush43
made it about the right of mainstream media to maintain their monopoly
of press coverage at the White House, without anyone questioning what
they report.

Bush43 Flies His Globalist Flag 

 Published on Feb 18, 2017
dad questions his 11-year-old daughter’s homework assignment when
politics is injected. Is this a case of school indoctrination or
parental overreaction? #Tucker
 Staten Island teacher in Trump assignment is disciplined
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Diane C. Lore | [email protected]

Follow on Twitter

on February 17, 2017 at 1:50 PM, updated February 17, 2017 at 4:58 PM

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — A veteran Staten Island teacher who
slipped an anti-President Trump question into her homework assignment
to her sixth-grade class has been disciplined by school authorities for
using “poor judgment” in the matter.

Adria Zawatsky, a sixth-grade English teacher at Paulo
intermediate School (I.S. 75) in Huguenot since 2005, had a letter of
reprimand placed in her personnel file, according to officials. The
letter followed a sit-down with Paulo Principal Kenneth Zapata.

“We have clear standards and regulations in place to ensure
school staff maintain neutrality with respect to their political beliefs
while in school,” said Department of Education spokesman Michael

Vincent Ungro, an Annadale father of four, and an unabashed
Trump supporter, had complained to the Advance when his 11-year-old
daughter, a sixth-grader at Paulo, came home with a vocabulary
assignment containing sentences he believed were disparaging to the
president and inappropriate for the classroom.

The vocabulary sheet drawn up by Zawatsky, gave students
sentences and had them fill in the blanks, choosing from a list of words
that would complete the sentence and make sense.

“President Trump speaks in a very superior and _________
manner insulting many people. He needs to be more __________ so that the
American people respect and admire him,” Zawatsky wrote.

The sentence was supposed to be completed using the words “haughty” and “humble”.

A second question, that read “Barack Obama set a _________
when he became the first African American president,” was supposed to be
completed with the word “precedent”.

Ungro had his daughter turn in the assignment, minus the
three answers for the Trump and Obama sentences. Instead, Ungro circled
the sentences and penciled a hand-written note to the teacher on the
bottom of the sheet. “Please keep your political views to yourself and
do not try to influence my daughter,” he wrote.

Zawatsky — who took 15 points off the assignment for the three missing Trump and Obama words — wrote back.

“Firstly, I do not believe I was expressing a political view
at all on my vocabulary sheet. My reference to President Trump was
about his personality traits rather than his ability as a president,”
Zawatsky responded.

Still, Ungro said the reference to Trump, followed by Obama,
was inappropriate, and he believed the teacher should have avoided the
political reference altogether, or at the least, offered an apology when
it was called to her attention.

“First, I don’t think that putting your personal feelings
about politics into a sixth-grader’s homework is proper. There were at
least a thousand sentences that she could have used besides disparaging
our president,” Ungro told the Advance.

While Ungro, said he didn’t want to see Zawatsky fired or suspended, “she should have known better,” he said.

Zawatsky, who earns a six-figure salary, has been teaching since 1996.

Ungro said he’s glad he called the assignment to the
attention of school officials, and believes he taught his daughter a
valuable life-lesson through the experience.

“I taught my daughter a valuable lesson,” he said. “That she
should stay strong with her beliefs even if it’s not the beliefs of her
peers. That you don’t have to block traffic, wear silly costumes or
destroy other people’s property to be heard.
Through patience, persistence and the power of the pen, you can accomplish many things.”


 She’s Back! Hillary Urges Dems to ‘Keep Fighting’ and Resist Trump
 ‘United, energized and ready to wage and win the battles ahead,’ former secretary of state says
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Two-time presidential loser Hillary Clinton is urging members of
 the Democrat party to “keep fighting” against Donald Trump’s Republican

In a video uploaded Friday to The Democrats YouTube channel, a
revitalized-looking Clinton communicated the urgency of keeping the
liberal-progressive agenda moving forward, describing it as a “battle”
that must be won.

“Hello Democrats, thank you all for coming
together to represent our party at its best. United, energized and ready
to wage and win the battles ahead,” the former secretary of state said.

Clinton said her failed 2016 campaign was “the most progressive
platform in history,” and took credit for her ideas “inspiring leaders
and activists across this country.”
She claimed votes for her were
“fueling grassroots energy and activism,” and took joy that “everywhere
people are marching, protesting, tweeting, speaking out and working for
an America that is hopeful, inclusive and big-hearted.”
“From the
Women’s March, to airports where communities are welcoming immigrants,
refugees and people of every faith, to town hall meetings where people
are speaking up for healthcare, the environment, good jobs and all the
other issues that deserve our passionate support,” Clinton said.
commanded her distraught supporters to “stay engaged in the field and
online,” and encouraged fellow party members to fight back against
“Let resistance, plus persistence equal progress for our
party and our country,” she concludes, clearly suggesting dems should
continue obstructing the president’s every move.
It’s not yet clear whether Hillary will make her third run for president in 2020.

 Hypocrite Hillary Joins “The Resistance”


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In July 2012, Perez — then the assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, was asked by Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ):

Will you tell us here today that this administration’s
Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that
criminalizes speech against any religion?

Perez could have simply answered yes, and maybe even cited the First
Amendment. Instead, Perez refused to answer the question directly.
Franks persisted, ultimately asking it four times.
Perez at one point responded that it was a “hard question.” He simply
refused to affirm that the Obama Justice Department would not attempt
to criminalize criticism of Islam.
So this was the choice for Democrats: a Congressman with many
connections to an organization dedicated in its own words to
“eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within” or a foe
of the First Amendment right to the freedom of speech. The foe of the
freedom of speech won.

That’s today’s Democratic Party.

“Former Labor Secretary Tom Perez elected DNC chair,” by Ryan Struyk and MaryAlice Parks, ABC News, February 25, 2017:

Former Secretary of Labor Tom Perez has been elected the
next chair of the Democratic National Committee, grabbing the reins of
the political wing of the party and emerging as a key figure in the
party’s opposition to President Donald Trump’s agenda.

More than 400 party insiders gathered in Atlanta this weekend to cast
their ballots. The former Obama appointee will try to rally the party
of Democrats still reeling from its presidential election defeat and
crippled by down-ballot losses across the country over the last decade.
Many in the party’s progressive wing had rallied around Minnesota
Rep. Keith Ellison, expressing their frustration with the status quo of
the party. They felt strongly that Ellison better identified with the
grassroots movement growing across the country in opposition to Trump.
Perez had fallen one short shy of victory in the first round of voting.
“We need a chair who can not only take the fight to Donald Trump,
make sure we talk about our positive message,” Perez told the crowd
before the vote. “We also need a chair who can lead turnaround and
change the culture of the Democratic Party and DNC.”
The next chair will be key in trying to unify and rally a party still
reeling from its presidential election defeat and crippled by
down-ballot losses across the country over the last decade.
“We’re in this mess because we lost not one election but a thousand
elections,” Ellison said before the vote. “We gotta go to the
grassroots, ya’ll. Unity is essential. We gotta walk out of here with

 As soon as Tom Perez was chosen as head of the DNC, he chose Keith
Ellison as Deputy Chair, signaling that he would do the bidding of the
Islamic supremacist groups with whom Ellison is affiliated. Of President
Trump, he says: “He hasn’t proposed anything but chaos and carnage from
day one. We’ve seen no evidence of anything constructive from this
president.” For Perez and the Democrats, protecting the American people is “chaos and carnage” and nothing “constructive.”


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Matt Chandler’s Village Church and the American Left: Giving Leftist-Islamic Groups a Foothold in the Church

The conservative movement, and more importantly the conservative
evangelical church, is being undermined and compromised by well-known
evangelical leaders. Men, such as Matt Chandler, are accommodating and
participating in interfaith dialogues with groups who share ties to
radical Islam. It is no longer leftists in this country finding friends
only within organizations of the religious left. Today the agenda of the
American left has also found a home within the mainstream leadership of
the conservative, evangelical church.

Pastoring one of the largest churches in Dallas, The Village Church, Matt Chandler currently serves as president of the ACTS 29 network, and he is also on the leadership council
of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), the
public-policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention. (The current
president of Ethics & Religious Liberty is Russell Moore, who has
recently been embroiled in a battle over his organization’s decision to
file an amicus brief on behalf of a Muslim group attempting to build a
mosque in New Jersey.)

In addition, Chandler is a popular speaker at Christian conferences
across the country. Therefore, his far-reaching influence among
conservative Christians cannot be underestimated.

In response to the growing interfaith movement between Muslims and
Christians, Shahram Hadian, an Iranian Muslim convert to Christianity says
Christians are being played like a fiddle.
They are either naïve or
deceived. He is now a Christian pastor who recognizes the dangers of
blending Islam and Christianity.

Taking a close look at the activities and the alliances being formed,
it is clear that this is not about Christian evangelism. To the
contrary, it is about the conservative Christian church being seduced by
those who practice Islam, a false religion. While the followers of
Allah join with Christians in interfaith campaigns, Christian
participants continue to ignore Scriptural warning against it.
Consequently, those who in the past may have been considered
conservative Christian leaders are being robbed of spiritual alertness
and discernment.

Furthermore, it is too serious to ignore the dangerous mixed messages
Chandler’s church is currently sending, and, as we have learned from
Mark Driscoll, former president of ACTS 29, there can be two sides to a ministry: one side that speaks the truth while the other side undermines and perverts it.

Therefore, as we will see in the case of Matt Chandler and the
ministries he supports, two radical Islamic groups have been involved
with ACTS 29 leaders, and even most recently within Chandler’s own
church. Collaborating behind the scene are CAIR, the Council on American
Islamic Relations and ISNA, the Islamic Society of North America–two
groups very involved in Christian/Muslim bridge-building projects.

It is well documented that both CAIR and ISNA were founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. Their objectives in America have been declared; destroy our society from within.

Per Jamie Glazov, the managing editor of FrontPage magazine, they
“manipulate and exploit dialogue with us as a weapon to weaken and
destroy us…a tactic found in Muslim Brotherhood documents.” Furthermore,
Glazov warns, “ISNA,…was an unindicted co-conspirator in the federal
prosecution of the Hamas-funding Holy Land Foundation. It was listed in a
Muslim Brotherhood memorandum as one of ‘our organizations and the
organizations of our friends.’ Based on its long record of advancing the
Islamist worldviews, ISNA has been described as ‘one of the chief
conduits through which the radical Saudi form of Islam passes into the
United States.”

Therefore, it is alarming that on November 2, 2016, two pastors on
staff at The Village Church, including the director of The Village
Church’s SEEK THE PEACE spoke and showed their support at an event
co-sponsored by ISNA, the Shoulder to Shoulder Campaign and FFEU, the
Foundation for Ethnic Understanding. (Russel Simmons is the chairman of
) The meeting was held at the Islamic Center of Frisco and as stated by
FFEU, participants publicly signed the Religious Freedom Pledge, which
was launched in 2016 at the National Cathedral in Washington D.C.

The pledge commits leaders to “uphold and defend the freedom of
conscience of all individuals by rejecting and speaking out, without
reservation, against bigotry discrimination, harassment, and violence
based on religion or belief.”

Furthermore, per FFEU, the endorsers of the pledge will “call on
public officials to uphold these same values, particularly in this
season of heightened anti-Muslim rhetoric and hate crimes.”
Additionally, an Imam said that by coming together at the Fresco mosque
just days before the election, the participants were making the case
that we “will not allow the poisonous political discourse penetrate our

Village staff pastors participating were Pastor Richard Brindley and Pastor Kyle Worley, and a Village Church layman, Jason Clarke, who is the director of SEEK THE PEACE, a group financially, supported by The Village Church. (source) Clarke shows his partnership with The Village Church.

Seek the Peace is also actively involved in the liberal politics of
the resettling of Syrian refugees into the country.
On January 20, 2016,
a posting from “We Welcome Refugees” was on Seek the Peace’s Facebook page
calling on followers to stop a bill in the Senate, which they said
would “grind to a halt the resettlement of Syrian and Iraqi refugees.”
Their stated position was to increase in the coming year the number of
refugees to 200,000 (including 100,000 to be Syrians refugees) to be
admitted to the U.S.

Then to fit the liberal narrative, The Village Church has also bought
into the social justice language of the old social gospel describing
Jesus as a Refugee. (source)
In addition, they further this agenda by linking from their church site to the International Rescue Committee. The President and Chief Executive Officer is David Miliband. Miliband is currently running for a top United Nation’s development job and he has also been an outspoken critic of the Brexit movement,
and conservative/Trump efforts to protect American borders. The
following article reflects his political support of global and
“international order.” It has been reported he had been tipped for a senior job in a Hillary Clinton administration if she had won the US presidential election.

The politics of International Rescue Committee is clearly
fighting against conservative Republicans and the Trump administration’s
temporary ban of immigrants entering the country. Consequently, one
would be negligent in not asking why Matt Chandler and his church
ministries are validating and accommodating groups working against the
efforts of conservative Christians? (Listed overseers of the
International Rescue Committee include: Madeleine Albright, Henry
Kissinger, Colin Powell, Rhonda Weingarten, President of American
Federation of Teachers.) (source, source)

Another internally very connected group to The Village Church is Peace Catalyst International.
This group has is not only linked to online from Village Church
sites but also the profile of Peace Catalyst staff member, Sarah Long,
shows she is also on staff
at Chandler’s Village Church.  Long’s active involvement in setting the
tone of a liberal, politically correct agenda within the church is
evident in her article titled Engaging Muslims.

Per her article following her mosque-speaking experience where she
presented her stand against so-called discrimination, hate crimes, and
oppression, Ms. Long provided clear instructions on how Christians must
stand against the rise of “Islamophobia.”
Usage of this liberal term by
Sarah Long is telling because it is a term created by the left to
silence and intimidate anyone that disagrees or interferes with their
political position.

Ms. Long’s rules of engagement included “visit your local mosque,…Be
sensitive to where the Christian West has failed to look like Jesus,
…Talk about Jesus but carry no agenda, … Don’t criticize Muhammad, the
Qur’an, or anything about the Islamic faith, …We must be more committed
to our relationships than to be right. We must push back against the
hateful rhetoric being spoken about all Muslims.” Then, listed under her
“Recommended resources” are “Seek the Peace,” and “Peace Catalyst International.”

Matt Chandler’s alliance with Peace Catalyst presents another
question regarding with whom he is willing to accommodate and associate.
As we will see further on in this paper, from all outward appearances,
Peace Catalyst has a track record of partnering with left leaning or any
Muslim group regardless of their track record. Furthermore, the
sentiment and heart of this group can be seen in the words of their organization’s president Rick Love.

Responding to concerns raised due to Love’s support of A Common Word Between Us and You, a letter from Islamic leaders to Christian leaders, he defended his position and said, I do not hesitate to refer to the God of the Bible as Allah, since Arab Christians before and after the birth of Islam use the term Allah
to describe the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Moreover, he
also said, “I believe that Muslims worship the true God.”

Rick Love’s faulty doctrine
sums up why Muslim leaders and “Christians” were quick to join arms in
fellowship. The “Christians” were not discerning and too eager to find
common ground. They didn’t even get to first base before they had
already weakened the Christian faith. Consequently, we now have CAIR and
ISNA within the church.

This careless willingness to ignore the truth and overlook the
background and character of those in our fellowship is putting us also
in the path of others who are even more reckless. For example, while
Rick Love sports his Christian credentials, he is also courting and
validating those who do not share what he says he claims to believe.

As the president of Peace Catalyst, Rick Love is also on the advisory board of the organization Charity and Security Network,
a group funding by groups such as George Soros’ Open Society, the
United Muslim Relief and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Others
on this advisory board include the Alliance for Peacebuilding and the
ACLU. The Charity and Security Network states that since U.S. law makes
it a crime to conduct almost any transaction with a terrorist group, it
is restricting “peace building groups to train terrorist groups on how to
use nonviolent means to address their grievances.” What are they
saying? Are we to trust them to bring peace to the Middle East?

(Note: Rick Love is also a member of the Peacebuilding Global Advisory Council: )

The groundwork for much of this had been laid many years before. For
example, Matt Chandler announced in an interview with John Piper on the
topic of “Social Justice” that a layman in his church had started an
organization called Free City International. Chandler stated the goal of
this group was to serve as a HUB for the Middle Eastern culture in
Dallas. (As stated on its current website, the group was founded in 2008 but the name was changed to SEEK THE PEACE.)

(In above video, hear Chandler’s remarks around minute 5:06-5:28.)

In addition to the forming of Free City International, ACTS 29 leaders already had their fingers involved in the interfaith movement. In 2010, ACTS 29 showed their willingness to dialogue with CAIR when an ACTS 29
church invited members of CAIR to a church in Renton, Washington.
Reports included the participating Muslims were even allowed the call to
prayer within the walls of this “Christian” church. WorldnetDaily was on top of this story with one of their headlines stating:
“Christian question: ‘Interfaith dialogue’ or ‘useful idiots’? Growing
trend to meet with Muslims rings bells of alarm for some.”

(Hear the audio from the Muslim/Christian dialog here)

The response from CAIR to this March 27, 2010, event can be summed up
by Imam Mohamad Joban. Commenting on their success, he stated, “What
happened this past Saturday night at Harambee Church was a bounty of our
Lord. …It was a combination of thoughtful preparation, generous efforts
by the organizers, and our trust in Allah.” (source)

The Pastor of Harambee Church at the time was Mike Gunn, co-founder of Mark Driscoll’s Seattle Mars Hill Church. Gunn has also served as the acting director of ACTS 29
International. In his lengthy rebuttal to the concerns raised regarding
his accommodation of CAIR, he stated whether or not CAIR has ties to
Hamas “is irrelevant.” Gunn also accused those who disagreed as showing a “…kind of legalistic nonsense.”

However, it appears the major organizer of the Harambee interfaith
event was Michael Ly, co-pastor of Harambee Church. A CAIR news release
also described him as “Vice president of Peace Catalyst International.”
Ly’s name is also given by CAIR as a contact person for other interfaith

Accord to a Seattle Times article 9/7/2010,
Ly’s next big project was to work with CAIR to organize a dinner
inviting 20 imams and other Muslim leaders, and 20 pastors and other
Christian leaders “mainly from conservative evangelical churches.”

Ly may have left the Seattle area but his activities and influence
have indeed expanded as he is now listed as not only the co-founder of
Peace Catalyst International, but he also serves on staff.

Matt Chandler and other Evangelical leaders going down this road are
not protecting the Church or the country. Their hospitality is being
taken advantage of to advance a liberal, leftist cause. In the process,
they are neutralizing and watering down the clarity of the gospel
message and undermining efforts to keep our nation safe.

This is not the time for a lack of courage or compromising men. Yet,
now, they appear to be the ones given the strongest voice and platform.
We are fighting against an evangelical establishment that in many ways
may be just as strong as the entrenched Republican Party establishment.
Both battles will not be for the weak at heart.

As believers, it is one thing to show the love of God and share the
gospel with Muslim neighbors. But, it is an entirely different business
to work with and corroborate with false teachers or with those who are
hell bent on the destruction of Western civilization.

Contrary to comments made by the leader of Peace Catalyst suggesting
Christians and Muslims pray to the same God, he is wrong. Scripture
states, “Whoever…does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have
God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the
Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into your house…” 2 John 9-11.
In other words, hospitality and love must be discerning. Otherwise,
Christians may aid those who are attempting to destroy basic truths of
the faith.

I am reminded of the wisdom of a godly man who warned the church:
“Follow discerning leaders.” However, it is obvious that today far too
many of our “Christian leaders” are ignoring the warning.

Regardless of the motives of Matt Chandler and other like-minded men,
the consequences of their leadership are the same. They have been
careless in not protecting the Church and thus, the conservative
evangelical church is being attacked from within.

George Soros understands the importance of using the church to
implement his aggressive refugee resettlement program throughout Europe
and the west. He wrote in the World Economic Forum September 28, 2015,
where I found linked to from SEEK THE PEACE blog:

“Finally, to absorb and integrate more than a million asylum seekers
and migrants a year, the EU needs to mobilize the private sector – NGOs,
church groups, and businesses – to act as sponsors.”





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Kelleigh Nelson
February 27, 2017
is no longer Europe, it is Eurabia, a colony of Islam, where the Islamic
invasion does not proceed only in a physical sense, but also in a mental
and cultural sense. There are moments in Life when keeping silent becomes
a fault, and speaking an obligation. A civic duty, a moral challenge,
a categorical imperative from which we cannot escape.
Oriana Fallaci
wave of the Islamic revolution will soon reach the entire world.

—Mahmoud Ahmadinejah, President of Iran
very title of this article should worry all of us. The newly appointed
National Security Adviser thinks the term, “radical Islamic terrorism”
is not beneficial because terrorists are “un-Islamic.”
R. Mansoor, a retired Army colonel who served with McMaster in Iraq during
the 2007 surge of U.S. troops, said earlier that McMaster “absolutely
does not view Islam as the enemy. So, I think he will present a degree
of pushback against the theories being propounded in the White House that
this is a clash of civilizations and needs to be treated as such.”
like (President) Obama, is someone who was in positions of leadership
and thought the United states should not play into the jihadist propaganda
that this is a religious war,” William McCants, a senior fellow
at the Brookings Institution, told The Times. [Link],
Trump repeatedly slammed President Obama and Democratic rival Hillary
Clinton for avoiding explicitly saying “radical Islamic terrorism.”
Trump argued that not identifying enemies hinders the fight against terror,
while Democrats argue that such words unfairly link Islam with terrorism.
was right, and so was General Flynn. So, who vetted McMaster, and who
is advising our President, and it’s even more worrisome that Senator
McCain is thrilled with Trump’s latest choice.
Lauds McMaster for NSA
Trump selected General H.R. McMaster to be his National Security Advisor,
most folks breathed a sigh of relief that CFR member, John Bolton wasn’t
chosen, but that relief may have been premature.
McMaster, like his supporters, Senator McCain, and Moscow born, Max
, the Jeanne J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow in National Security
Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, are all members
of the CFR
McCain, who in Munich, stated his not-so-subtle attacks on Trump for not
being harder on Russia, said that, “McMaster knows how to succeed.
I give President Trump great credit for this decision, as well as his
national security cabinet choices. I could not imagine a better, more
capable national security team than the one we have right now.”
Boot stated much the same thing, “H.R. McMaster is one of the most
impressive army officers of his generation—a rare combination of
soldier and scholar,” said Max Boot, in an email to The Daily Beast.
“But not even the most talented individual will succeed in that
job as long as Bannon and Kushner continue to run their own foreign policies.”
McMaster is not the man to guide President Trump toward better relations
with Russia and less US interference in the internal affairs of other
nations, as was former NSA Chief, General Michael Flynn.
In a
speech delivered
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies just last May, Gen.
McMaster blamed the lack of sufficient US military presence overseas for
what he calls a more aggressive Russian geo-strategic posturing. Take note
of what the General said:
though it may have been apparent, at least since 2008, that Russia was
changing its geo-strategic behavior and engaging in…probing, probing
at the far reaches of American power, our strategic response was to
accelerate our withdrawal of…army forces from Europe. And what
we’re seeing now is we’ve awakened to obviously this threat
from Russia who is waging limited war for limited objectives. Annexing
Crimea. Invading Ukraine. At zero cost. And consolidating gains over
that territory, and portraying the reaction by us and partners as escalatory.
… What is required is forward deterrence. To be able to ratchet
up the cost at the frontier.
General also made the completely fallacious assertion that Russia invaded
Georgia in 2008. Even the overtly anti-Russia European Union concluded
that Georgia was to blame for launching an ill-advised attack on Russian
peacekeeping forces that were part of an international mission in South
certainly doesn’t sound like someone who is going to work to help
our President improve relations with Russia. In fact, McMaster is a hawk
and is all
about conflict with Russia
. Is it any wonder that the likes of Max
Boot and John McCain are thrilled with Trump’s new NSA Chief?
Long Feud with Trump
Bezos owned Washington Post reported that Trump had stated, “McCain
is no war hero,” but they misled the people by misstating what Trump
had actually said, as clarified
by Sharyl Attkisson
. Nothing new here, misquotes and lies are a common
thread of media since the 1964
NYTs v. Sullivan Supreme Court decision
allowing media to lie with
impunity. And this is the reality of what Trump calls, “fake news.”
too that in September of 2016, Trump endorsed John McCain for re-election
and said nice things about him.
what’s with the Senator from Arizona?
Real John McCain
He served
our country, and we do not know what he went through as a POW, so we honor
him for his service.
the truth of the matter is that despite McCain’s military service,
he has never been a man of or for the American people, and the “R”
he wears behind his name more often than not comes across as a “D.”
In fact,
last October, this alleged Republican stated that he would not be voting
for Donald Trump, the nominee from his own party! So, who did he vote
did state that McCain graduated at the bottom of his class, and he was
right. Even McCain alluded
to his academic record
during a commencement speech in 1997 when he
stated, “This is quite an unexpected honor for a Naval Academy midshipman
who graduated fifth from the bottom in the Class of ’58.”
He actually graduated 790th out of 795 students.
are countless stories on the web of McCain’s actual service and
his actual imprisonment by the Vietcong, but there is one
by Philip Giraldi
that elucidates truth. He tells of Pulitzer Prize
winning journalist Sydney Schanberg, who was intrigued by the Vietnam
POW issue, and began pursuing the McCain story in the late 1980s.
makes two key points: first that a number of American prisoners of war
were left behind in Indochina in 1973 with the connivance of top levels
in the U.S. government (See
Henry Kissinger, Soviet Agent
), and second that John McCain has worked
assiduously to obstruct any efforts to open Pentagon files and follow
up on leads to determine the status of the POWs and the “missing
in action.”
McCain is still a powerful voice in the Senate consistently advocating
policies calling for the United States to use military force around the
world. More troubling perhaps, McCain has consistently and irrationally
advocated an undeviating hard line against Russia, the only country with
the military capability to confront and destroy much of the United States
through its nuclear armed ballistic missile forces. Perhaps this is why
he is so enamored with General McMaster, and why he so hated General Flynn.
Voting Record
Review grants McCain an “F” with a 48
percent rating
, calling out McCain for an extensive 32-year entrenchment
in Washington. CR Editor, Gaston Mooney, said, “McCain’s consistent
support for gun control, cap and trade, amnesty, and tax increases have
put him at odds with just about every coalition inside the Republican
Party. McCain pandered to the right in 2008, and he
did it again
to be re-elected in 2016.
are few Republicans who have betrayed our conservative principles more
than John McCain,” read the Senate Conservatives Fund letter. “McCain
lost his way a long time ago.”
Senator has also been criticized for his part in the “Gang of Eight”
immigration reform and his support for amnesty, his vote for the taxpayer
funded “Wall Street” bailout, his vote to fund implementation
of Obamacare
and criticism of efforts to halt that funding, opposition
to a $1.3 trillion tax cut, support for a $600 billion tax hike, repeated
votes to raise the debt limit and voting against term limits.
no words, the Senate Conservatives’ letter refers to McCain as “one
of the most anti-conservative RINOs in the Senate.”
Munich Conference Comments
kind of American is John McCain? He’s certainly not one who represents
the Constitution he took an oath to uphold.
apparently had no problem bashing our President in foreign countries recently.
Why didn’t McCain honor the tradition of standing for America in
foreign countries? He has embarrassed our nation, and himself, just as
Obama did over and over again.
is the transcript
of McCain’s speech in Munich. Without mentioning
President Trump even once, he ridiculed and slammed his policies, his
presidency, and his abilities. In doing so, McCain also slammed every
American who voted for Trump and wants his policies to succeed.
what I found the most telling was his comment, “I refuse to accept
the demise of our world order.” He actually mentioned “world
order” five times in his short Munich speech. What world order John?
The New World Order you’ve been pushing since you took office in
Senator even stated that VP Pence, and Generals Kelly and Mattis, all
disagree with Trump’s stances and policies and have also voiced
those opinions at the Munich Conference.
Senator’s latest attacks on our President are unconscionable and
absolutely bordering on sedition.
on Meet the Press
On Sunday,
during an interview with Chuck Todd, the senator again talked about the
“new world order” established after World War II, and how
he is fearful it is under assault from a variety of forces. (Does this
remind you of George
H.W. Bush’s 1991 NWO speech
He also
claimed to be worried about presidential advisor Steve Bannon’s
role on the National Security Council. Then he attacked Trump by saying,
“A free press is vital and suppressing a free press is “how
dictators get started.”
comments were ridiculous. My friend Vin Sabella said this:
he claimed that the president was destroying freedom of the press. Then
he said that’s what all dictators do to gain power. Then he said
he didn’t mean that Trump was trying to be a dictator.
if that’s true, Senator, why did you bring up the fact that you
thought Trump was muzzling the press and say that that is what dictators
do in the same breath? I think the answer is obvious. You wanted to
call Trump a potential dictator and be able to weasel your way out of
having done so if you were called on it.
Rand Paul said, McCain is deliberately blowing Trump’s criticism
of the press out of proportion. Every president has criticized the press
throughout history. But, as Paul says, there is a big difference between
criticizing the press and passing a law or issuing an executive order
to suppress the press. Trump has obviously done neither.
Mika Brzezinski, (daughter of Zbignew Brzezinski) recently made it clear
that she
believes it is the media’s job to control what people think
Really Mika? One need only watch Chris Cuomo or Van Jones to understand
their propaganda and socialist/communist allegiances.
NSC Status
question arises, could we lose another valuable man in the National Security
Council? Fox
News reported the following
House press secretary Sean Spicer said Tuesday that if President Donald
Trump’s newly appointed national security adviser wanted to remove
chief strategist Steve Bannon from the National Security Council’s
principals committee, the president would “take that under serious

president has made clear to him he’s got full authority to structure
the national security team the way he wants,” Spicer said of Lt.
Gen. H.R. McMaster, whom Trump appointed last Monday as his new NSA
chief. Spicer made the remarks in the daily White House press briefing.
this worry me? You bet it does. Bannon is one of the most trusted insiders
and as such, he should remain exactly where he is for our President.
J. Trump is in new waters, and he is learning as he goes. He wants to
keep his promises to the American people. He’s the boss, and his
employees should follow his lead.
President has a huge job, and he is wrestling against the rulers of the
darkness of this world, and against spiritual wickedness in high
. Pray for him, and pray for our country.

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 ou can see McMaster say this beginning at the four-minute mark: 

“We are engaged today, as General George C. Marshall’s generation was
 engaged, against enemies who pose a great threat to all civilized 
peoples. As our World War II generation defeated Nazi Fascism and 
Japanese imperialism, and as later generations defeated Communist 
totalitarianism, we will defeat today’s enemies, including terrorist 
organizations like Daesh, who cynically use a perverted interpretation 
of religion to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against 
innocents.” — Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, speech to Virginia Military 
Institute, Center for Leadership and Excellence, November 21, 2016

In this video
 also, from May 2016, McMaster says this same thing. At 14:43, McMaster 
refers to “groups like ISIL, who use this irreligious ideology, this 
perverted interpretation of religion to justify violence. They depend on
 ignorance, and the ability to recruit vulnerable segments of 
populations  to foment hatred, and then use that hatred to justify 
violence against innocents.” 

This could be Barack Obama or John Kerry speaking.

As I explained here,
 this was during the Obama regime, when that was the official policy of 
the U.S. government, but President Trump has repeatedly criticized his 
predecessor (and his 2016 election opponent) for not being willing to 
call the problem of jihad terror by its right name. Since he has become 
President, he has repeatedly reiterated his determination to eradicate 
“radical Islamic terrorism.” If McMaster genuinely holds the view that 
the Islamic State is not Islamic, then he is a disastrous pick as 
National Security Adviser, and will continue the willful ignorance of 
the Obama administration, hamstringing efforts to understand, and 
counter effectively, the motives and goals of the enemy. 




 Published on Feb 24, 2017

News released a “Dear Mr. President” video consisting of a bunch of
clips of kids saying they’re scared of Trump and don’t like his plan to
build the wall or fix our illegal immigration problem, in what they’re
calling “Letters from the American Children Donald Trump.” Media
analyst Mark Dice has the story.

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 School Kids Brainwashed 
to Worship Obama 




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Muslim Brotherhood-linked Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to be elected to Congress, also has past ties
to the Nation of Islam — a black Islamic supremacist, anti-white,
anti-gay, anti-Catholic and virulently anti-Semitic group.
conveniently denounced his involvement with the group when it suited him in 2006, after it became an issue during his first run for Congress.
It would seem that no matter how much hatred Ellison has spewed
against the U.S. and Israel, his documented Islamic supremacist ties,
and his facilitating of the crudest divisions in racial politics, he is
still a trusted and influential Democratic leader, and likely soon to be
the Chair of the DNC.

“Keith Ellison Once Said Black People Don’t Have ‘Obligation’ To Obey Government”, by Peter Hassan, The Daily Caller, February 23, 2017:

Democratic congressman and DNC chair front-runner Keith
Ellison once said that “black people don’t live in a democracy” and
“don’t have an obligation” to obey the government.

Ellison made the comments at a 1992 protest after white police
officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. At least 63
people died in the racially charged riots following the verdict.
Minnesota newspaper the Star Tribune quotes Ellison as telling a
group of protesters in Minneapolis that “Black people do not live under a

“You don’t have an obligation to obey a government that considers you to be less than human,” Ellison said.
Ellison, the nation’s first Muslim congressman, has come under fire
for his history of making racially inflammatory comments, as well as his
past association with notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, whom
Ellison has since renounced. (RELATED: Democratic Donor: Keith Ellison
‘Clearly An Anti-Semite’)
Ellison once called for American blacks to have their own nation and
called the U.S. Constitution “best evidence of a white racist conspiracy
to subjugate other peoples.”

While speaking to an atheist group in 2007, Ellison compared the
Sept. 11 attacks to the Reichstag fire, stopping just short of accusing
then-President George W. Bush of having a hand in the attacks.
“It’s almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that,”
Ellison said of 9/11, according to reports at the time. “After the
Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the
leader [Hitler] of that country in a position where he could basically
have authority to do whatever he wanted.”
Ellison went on to say he wouldn’t suggest the U.S. had a hand in the
attacks because “you know, that’s how they put you in the nut-ball box —
dismiss you,” before later walking back his comments…


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

President Trump has chosen Lt. General William McMaster as his new
National Security Adviser. As a three-star general, McMaster’s
appointment will require Senate confirmation,
and one hopes that the Senators before they vote will take the
opportunity to examine his understanding of Islamic terrorism. For
surely this is the greatest threat not only to American security, but to
that of the entire West.

General McMaster has pronounced on the subject of Islamic terrorism
twice in the last year, in almost identical language, and what he said
suggests that he has missed something important about the ideology of

In May 2016, in a speech
he delivered on “Harbingers of Future War: Implications for the Army”
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, General McMaster
referred to “groups like ISIL, who use this irreligious
ideology, this perverted interpretation of religion to justify violence.
They depend on ignorance, and the ability to recruit vulnerable
segments of populations to foment hatred, and then use that hatred to
justify violence against innocents.

Apparently well-satisfied with his original formulation, General
McMaster repeated it, almost verbatim, in a speech to the Center for
Leadership and Excellence at the Virginia Military Institute on November
21, 2016, ringingly declaring that “we will defeat today’s enemies,
including terrorist organizations like Daesh, who cynically use a perverted interpretation of religion to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against innocents.”
This description of Daesh – the Islamic State – as “cynically using
a perverted interpretation of religion to incite hatred and justify
horrific cruelty against innocents” is most peculiar. For whatever else
you can say about Daesh or other Muslim terrorists, the adverb
“cynically” is the least applicable to their actions. Al-Baghdadi,
Al-Awlaki, Bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri, Nidal Hasan. Omar Mateen, Adam
Gadahn, Aafia Siddiqui, Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, and all the other stars
in the terrorist firmament have not been cynics, but rather, the
reverse — the truest of true believers. And what they truly believe(d)
in is what Islam’s texts inculcate, including the view of non-Muslims as
cosmically ungrateful (in not accepting the message of Muhammad), their
“vileness” Qur’anically established (8:55; 98:6), their continued
insubmissive existence as kuffar seen as a colossal affront to Islam.
Muslims have a duty to spread Islam by means of Jihad, which
overwhelmingly means the use of violence, though it can be conducted
through other means – as, for example, Jihad of the Pen/Tongue, to
spread Islam’s message. Today, along with violence, a new instrument –
demographic conquest – is being used to overwhelm the Infidels and
spread Islam. “New” because never before in history have millions of
people dedicated to the longterm destruction of others been allowed by
those others to settle deep behind what ought be regarded as enemy
lines, as Muslims have now been allowed to settle throughout Western
Europe. If Muslim numbers do surpass those of the indigenous
non-Muslims, Muslims will be in a position to offer non-Muslims a
choice: either to convert to Islam, or be killed, or to accept the
permanent status of dhimmi, with all of its attendant disabilities. And
there is no end to Jihad; it should continue until the whole world is
ultimately subjected to Islam. There is nothing – pace General McMaster — “cynical” about any of this.

As for those phrases repeated by General McMaster about this
“perverse interpretation of religion [used] to justify violence” which
becomes, in his longer variant, a “perverted interpretation of religion
to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against innocents,” the
only “perverted interpretation” of Islam is, I’m afraid, that of General
McMaster himself, who appears certain that Islam properly understood
cannot possibly inculcate anything that might “incite hatred and justify
violence” against non-Muslims. I’m not sure which would be worse: that
he may think he must pretend to believe this nonsense in order to avoid
being accused of Islamophobia and to safely rise high in the Washington
ranks, or that he really believes it.
Perhaps before they vote, some Senators will press him on this,
trying to find out what McMaster thinks Islam, mainstream Islam, teaches
and how it differs from that “perverse interpretation” to which he
keeps referring. The exchange ought to be instructive. For example, the
Senators might ask him, while reporters are present and cameras
whirring, what he remembers from the Qur’an on the subject of Infidels.
What, a probing Senator might ask him, under the guise of refreshing his
memory, does he make of Qur’an 98:6, describing Infidels as “the vilest
of creatures”? Would he regard it as a “perverse interpretation” of
that verse to think it inculcates hatred toward non-Muslims, or isn’t it
in fact clear in its declaration of such hatred, and should he not be
willing to recognize that this is a perfectly straightforward, if
disturbing statement, with no “perverse interpretation” necessary?
Or take the famous Verse of the Sword, Qur’an 9:5: “When the sacred
months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them,
besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and
take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God
is forgiving and merciful.” What “perverse interpretation” of this
pellucid call to violent Jihad is needed to make this verse “incite
hatred”? It’s dripping with murderous hatred already. The Senators could
continue to quote from the more than one hundred Jihad verses in the
Qur’an or stories from the Hadith, that is, verses that exhort the
killing of Infidels. Or they might read out, and ask for General
McMaster to comment on, the description of the mass killings of the
600-900 bound prisoners of the Banu Qurayza, by Muhammad and his
followers, or the accounts of the pleasure Muhammad (“al-insan al-kamil,”
the Perfect Man, and “uswa hasana,” the Model of Conduct) took in
learning of the murders of those who mocked him (Asma bint Marwan, Abu
Afak), or the descriptions of the many military campaigns he took part
in not only against his sworn enemies, but simply against those who,
like the inoffensive Jewish farmers of the Khaybar Oasis, were known to
be prosperous. For the Khaybar farmers had not been fighting against
Muhammad; they were a target for this covetous warlord simply because
they were both well-off and ill-defended. The Khaybar attack gives the
lie to the Muslim claim that Muhammad only fought defensive wars.
Muhammad and his men despoiled the Khaybar farmers, who had done nothing
against them, of both their property and their women; the loot was
enough of a lure. Or was this aggressiveness all a matter of Muhammad’s
“perverse interpretation” of Islam?
It would be perfectly appropriate for the Senators to ask General
McMaster what “perverse interpretation” of Islam he thinks the Islamic
State or Al-Qaeda labor under, to explain exactly where the terrorists’
interpretation of Islam distorts or veers away from the basic tenets of
Islam, as conveyed by any mainstream madrasa’s lessons, or any orthodox
imam’s sermons?

General McMaster refers to “groups like ISIL, who use this irreligious ideology” and whose members “depend on ignorance,
and the ability to recruit vulnerable segments of populations to foment
hatred.” Again he should be asked, what is the “ignorance” that members
of the Islamic State depend on to obtain recruits? Is General McMaster
suggesting that these potential recruits are “ignorant” of the real
meaning of Islam – the peace and tolerance and convivencia
about which the small army of apologists (John Esposito, Pope Francis,
Karen Armstrong, Barack Obama, Reza Aslan, Omid Safi, and so many
others) constantly prate? Is General McMaster quite convinced that it is
“ignorance” of Islam that helps “groups like ISIL [ISIS]”? How is it
that so many “ignorant” Muslims could manage to remain unaware of
Islam’s pacific essence, and thus be easily inveigled into believing the
“perverse interpretation” of the faith, as something violent,
hate-filled, cruel, that is the very opposite of what, in the General’s
view, is the essence of Islam? Is this what General McMaster purports to
believe? Isn’t it, rather, that those who join ISIS or Al-Qaeda are not
ignorant at all, but know perfectly well what the texts of Islam
inculcate, and rightly understand the meaning of Islam as a warlike
doctrine of conquest and subjugation? And aren’t they quick to offer
textual support from the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira, for their every act
of terror? And hasn’t Islam meant conquest through violence, and
subjugation, of many different kinds of Infidels, over many different
lands, for the past 1400 years?
Many of the Senators voting on General McMaster’s appointment will
prefer not to press these points. Most Democrats will agree with his
pollyannish remarks on Islam.
Most Republicans may simply wish to defer
to the general as a Trump appointee, wrongly assuming that he must,
therefore, be “tough” on Islam. Few senators will have the stomach to
discuss Islam truthfully in public, knowing they will then have to
endure the usual idiotic charges of bigotry and “Islamophobia” from
those whose minds are made up, and who do not want to be confused with
facts. But it would take only a handful of senators, possibly from both
parties, offering piercing questions, to strike a blow for common sense
and our common security. Ideally, a few of them will choose to read
aloud Qur’anic verses or stories from the Hadith that inculcate hatred
of, and violence toward, Infidels. The General should be asked what
exactly those recruited by terrorists are ignorant of, and why he
considers them, as a result, more “vulnerable” to the siren song of the
Al-Baghdadis and Bin Ladens. Does he think these recruits are less
educated, or more impoverished, and because of that easier to inveigle
into terrorism? The data suggests otherwise. Many studies have concluded that Islamic terrorists are both better off economically and better educated than the average Muslim.
If they are particularly “vulnerable” to those texts that preach
violent Jihad, this means not that they are “ignorant” and susceptible
to accept a “perverse interpretation” of the faith, but that they are
prepared to take Islam to heart, not shirking their duty to engage in
violent Jihad (or to “strike terror”), but acting upon what Islam
demands of its followers; they are having their Islam straight up, as
determined Jihadists, and not on the rocks of self-interested
calculation that might make some hesitate to sacrifice themselves for
Islam. It’s hard to understand what General McMaster means by his use of
the word “ignorance” in reference to these recruits. Is he suggesting
that their knowledge of Islam is incomplete, and that if they were to
learn more, they would of course come to realize that only a “perverse interpretation
of Islam would lead to violence? Does he believe that his understanding
of Islam is superior to that of Al-Baghdadi or Bin Laden? After being
confronted in those hearings with those 100-plus Jihad verses, and many
other verses, too, that teach contempt for the Infidels, those that
characterize them as the “vilest of creatures” and instruct Muslims not
to take Christians and Jews as friends, “for they are friends only with
each other,” would General McMaster still maintain his rosy view of
Islam? It is not those more ignorant of Islam who are inveigled by
terrorist masters but, rather, those who, becoming ever more devout,
study the texts closely, take to heart the endless litany of hatred
toward Infidels, feel keenly the duty of Jihad, and become terrorists
fully conscious of what they are doing. We would all prefer to believe –
it would be such a great relief – that General McMaster is right, and
that Islamic terrorism is a result of a “perverse interpretation” of
Islam, one having no relation to the “real” Islam. How comforting it
would be to believe that Muslim terrorist masters “depend on ignorance”
(of the real, peaceful Islam) – how comforting, and how false.
Perhaps, made aware of comments critical of his knowledge of Islam, such as these you are reading, or here,
General McMaster might give himself, by way of preparation for his role
as national security adviser, a short course in Islam that would
disabuse him of his hitherto complacent understanding. He could then
simply tell the sympathetic senators that he has had occasion to study
both Islamic texts and Islamic terrorism more fully, and based on that
study, wishes to revise his previous statements, made last year, so that
they would read something like this: “The many Islamic terrorist
groups, such as the Islamic State, Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah, and
many other groups and groupuscules, are able to recruit Muslims using an
interpretation of Islam that is not necessarily accepted by all but is
certainly accepted by a great many – far too many – Muslims, and candor
compels me to admit, following a re-examination of the Qur’an and other
Islamic texts, that this version of Islam should be considered not
aberrant but mainstream.”

And then he might add: “It is up to us to figure out how best we can
help those born into Islam, without any choice in the matter, who
recognize those troublesome aspects of their faith that are inimical to
real peace and real tolerance, and for which they would like to find a
solution, if such is possible.” An unflinching statement like that, from
General McMaster, despite the subsequent howls of protest by CAIR and
the Southern Poverty Law Center, would be enough – would be more than
enough – to clear a good many minds of cant.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 While the UN rains down condemnations upon Israel and the international 
establishment propaganda media treats the “Palestinians” as if they were
 an oppressed victim class, this is the reality. And the EU cash will 
keep coming.

“Palestinian Kids at EU-Funded Festival: ‘Jihad is Needed, Pull the Trigger,’”, February 23, 2017:

The winning performance at a recent Palestinian youth
dancing competition in Nablus called for violence against Israel and
featured the lyrics “jihad is needed, pull the trigger,” the watchdog
organization Palestinian Media Watch reported Monday.

The event took place at the Yafa Cultural Center, which is funded by
Germany, Norway, and the European Union itself. The winning dance was
performed by 14-year-old Ru’a Ahmed Sa’id Hamdan to the song “Pull the
Trigger,” which was previously broadcast on a Palestinian Authority
television channel in 2010.

The song includes the lyrics:

We replaced bracelets with weapons
We attacked the despicable [Zionists]
We do not want [internal] strife or disputes
While this invading enemy is on the battlefield
This is the day that Jihad is needed
Pull the trigger.
We shall redeem Jerusalem, Nablus and the country.

Hamdan and the competition’s top two runners-up received trophies
bearing a map of “Palestine” that encompassed the entirety of Israel and
the Palestinian territories….



 Obama is building a 30,000 person army of 
“lynch mob” agitators to start riots, civil war 
across America
Published on Feb 22, 2017
is building a 30,000 person army of “lynch mob” agitators to start
riots, civil war across America Barak Hussein Obama is not sitting idly
by watching the dismantling of his disastrous and destructive legacy
after eight years in the White House. Quite the contrary. He and
Michelle are setting up a “shadow white house within two miles of
[President] Trump,” reports the New York Post. It is from this vantage
point that the former President and First Lady will be leading “a group
of leftist non-profits led by Organizing for Action” (OFA). Author Ed
Klein pointed this out on Fox News before President Trump’s

The OFA currently has over 250 offices in America
and more than 32,000 fired up participants, along with another 25,000
who are actively being trained for six weeks in the same “Alinsky
agitation tactics Obama received in Chicago when he was a community
organizer.” Saul Alinsky (1909 – 1972) was a highly motivated and fiery
Chicago socialist whose ideology has been a strategic model for both
Obamas. Alinsky’s well known book “Rules for Radicals” was dedicated to

The OFA has raised over $40 million in donations and
grants since 2013 when it morphed out of another Obama organization
called Organizing for America. Because the OFA is organized as a 501 (c)
(4), it doesn’t have to disclose who provides the funding, but you can
be sure that Obama’s pal, the notorious, evil billionaire pal George
Soros certainly has skin in the game. points out that
in 2014, according to IRS tax filings, the donors giving OFA the most
were members of the “Soros- founded Democracy Alliance,” a group formed
for “left-wing billionaires devoted to radical political change.”

extend it’s reach, the OFA has teamed up with another anti-Trump
progressive group called Indivisible, which boasts “4,500 local groups
signed up to resist Trump in nearly every Congressional district in the
country.” One of their first joint OFA/Indivisible projects was an
online training Recess Tool Kit, which instructs the newly trained
agitators how to “bully GOP lawmakers into backing off support for
repealing ObamaCare, curbing immigration from high-risk Islamic nations,
and building a border wall.” As Breitbart has exposed, “Indivisible
leaders are openly associated with groups financed by billionaire George

In addition to the OFA goal of keeping ObamaCare and
resisting President Trump’s conservative agenda on immigration issues,
there are other platforms Obama and his band of OFA minions are
desperate to salvage. These include a platform to fight against “climate
deniers,” promote gun control, and ensure that women still have the
right to kill their young inside the womb, among others. Reading through
the issues pushed by OFA, is a stark reminder of what the past eight
years have been – and what could have been had Hillary Clinton been
elected. As you may recall, Soros donated $25 million dollars to get her
in the White House. It’s clear he’s still trying to make good on his

That a former president is actively engaged, merely
weeks after stepping down, in preserving a lying and destructive agenda
is something new in America, but these days, how can we be surprised at
any attempts by those intent on a globalist agenda to thwart President
Trump? The disconnect between reality and lies is growing bigger for
those who have signed up for another ride on the Obama train. Time will
tell if these organized agitators will employ violence or mayhem. The
former White House occupier may possess the biggest disconnect of all,
with an ego that prevents him from knowing it.


 Intelligence Advisor Discusses Coup Against 
President Trump 
 Published on Feb 23, 2017
reporter Millie Weaver discusses developments regarding an ongoing coup
against President Donald Trump with renounced code breaker and former
intelligence advisor Louis Buff Parry. Weaver and Parry discuss a recent
Tucker Carlson interview with former CIA officer Bryan Dean Wright who
reveals insider information which confirms that a rouge group within the
US intelligence community is withholding sensitive information from
President Trump in what appears to be part of a coup against Trump to
remove him from office. Parry goes over possible ways the Trump
administration could stop the coup within the powers allotted to him by
way of the Constitution and Executive Orders.
 Trump 2017Fox News panel: “Obama is trying to IMPEACH Donald Trump in secret”
 Published on Feb 23, 2017
Fox News panel discusses how Obama is secretly scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency and impeach him.

former President Barack Obama said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump
protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops?
Yes, Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who
will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic
presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two
miles from the White House.

In what’s shaping up to be a highly
unusual post-presidency, Obama isn’t just staying behind in Washington.
He’s working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a
shadow government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to
sabotage the incoming administration and its popular “America First”

He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led
by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up
to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that
candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up
for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across
the country.

Since Donald Trump’s election, this little-known but
well-funded protesting arm has beefed up staff and ramped up
recruitment of young liberal activists, declaring on its website, “We’re
not backing down.” Determined to salvage Obama’s legacy, it’s drawing
battle lines on immigration, ObamaCare, race relations and climate

Obama is intimately involved in OFA operations and even
tweets from the group’s account. In fact, he gave marching orders to OFA
foot soldiers following Trump’s upset victory.

“It is fine for
everybody to feel stressed, sad, discouraged,” he said in a conference
call from the White House. “But get over it.” He demanded they “move
forward to protect what we’ve accomplished.”

“Now is the time for some organizing,” he said. “So don’t mope.”

from sulking, OFA activists helped organize anti-Trump marches across
US cities, some of which turned into riots. After Trump issued a
temporary ban on immigration from seven terror-prone Muslim nations, the
demonstrators jammed airports, chanting: “No ban, no wall, sanctuary
for all!”

Run by old Obama aides and campaign workers, federal
tax records show “nonpartisan” OFA marshals 32,525 volunteers
nationwide. Registered as a 501(c)(4), it doesn’t have to disclose its
donors, but they’ve been generous. OFA has raised more than $40 million
in contributions and grants since evolving from Obama’s campaign
organization Obama for America in 2013.

OFA, in IRS filings, says
it trains young activists to develop “organizing skills.” Armed with
Obama’s 2012 campaign database, OFA plans to get out the vote for
Democratic candidates it’s grooming to win back Congress and erect a
wall of resistance to Trump at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

will be aided in that effort by the Obama Foundation, run by Obama’s
former political director, and the National Democratic Redistricting
Committee, launched last month by Obama pal Eric Holder to end what he
and Obama call GOP “gerrymandering” of congressional districts.

will be overseeing it all from a shadow White House located within two
miles of Trump. It features a mansion, which he’s fortifying with
construction of a tall brick perimeter, and a nearby taxpayer-funded
office with his own chief of staff and press secretary. Michelle Obama
will also open an office there, along with the Obama Foundation.

to the fight is rebuilding the ravaged Democratic Party. Obama hopes to
install his former civil rights chief Tom Perez at the helm of the
Democratic National Committee.

Perez is running for the vacant
DNC chairmanship, vowing, “It’s time to organize and fight . . . We must
stand up to protect President Obama’s accomplishments,” while also
promising, “We’re going to build the strongest grassroots organizing
force this country has ever seen.”

The 55-year-old Obama is not content to go quietly into the night like other ex-presidents.

going to see me early next year,” he told his OFA troops after the
election, “and we’re going to be in a position where we can start
cooking up all kinds of great stuff.”

Added the ex-president: “Point is, I’m still fired up and ready to go.”

Obama Moves to Bunker & Prepares To ‘Fight Trump’—30,000 Man Activist Army READY At His COMMAND

 Published on Feb 13, 2017

Here’s the link that goes with the video:…

 For More Information See:………………


Check Out Obama’s Guide to Resist Trumps Agenda (OFA) 

 Published on Feb 20, 2017

Obama-linked activists have a ‘training manual’ for protesting Trump…

The First Lady on the Launch of Organizing for Action…
Organizing for America Facilitates Minnesota Voter Fraud…

Take a deep breath. Then take action…

Indivisible Guide…

Town Hall Project…

A practical guide For resisting the Trump agenda


Obama’s Backers Seek Big Donors to Press Agenda…

Obama Group Trains Activists to Sabotage Trump Presidency…

Michele Obama on the Launch of Organizing for Action 

Obama’s OFA releases brainwashing tactics
 Published on Feb 20, 2017

anti Trump protest group OFA has released a manifesto on how to
brainwash Americans into believing their propoganda through very
sophisticated tactics.

I know he is in jail still, but Pete
Santilli still has videos up on his channel warning America about this
very thing and I highly recommend them.


Sabotage: Obama Is Commanding An Army Of 30,000 Anti-Trump Activists From His Home 2 Miles From The White House



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The American Dream

February 13, 2017 

Throughout American history, most ex-presidents have chosen
to move away from Washington D.C. once their terms have ended, and the
vast majority of them have tried very hard not to interfere with their

Unfortunately, Barack Obama has opted for the exact opposite
approach. His new home is less than two miles from the White House, and
from this “command center” he will be directing the activities of an
army of more than 30,000 anti-Trump activists. In fact, as you will see
below, this army has already been heavily involved in many of the
protests and riots that have been popping up around the nation in recent
days. “Sabotage” is a very strong word, but it is becoming apparent
that Obama intends to do all that he can to sabotage the Trump
administration, and that is very bad news for the American people.

On Saturday, the New York Post ran an excellent article by author Paul Sperry that was entitled “How Obama is scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency”. In that piece, Sperry actually accuses Obama of setting up “a shadow government” to oppose Trump…

When former President Barack Obama said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes,
Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will
fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency.
And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.

In what’s shaping up to be a highly unusual post-presidency, Obama isn’t just staying behind in Washington. He’s
working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a shadow
government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to sabotage
the incoming administration and its popular “America First” agenda.

The “army of agitators” that Sperry is talking about is actually a
nationwide network of “community organizers” known as “Organizing for

If you go to the official website
of Organizing for Action, you will see that there is a big picture of
Obama right in the background of the homepage. Organizing for Action “grew out of Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign”, and it claims to have 250 local chapters around the nation.

If Hillary Clinton had won the election, Organizing for Action would
almost certainly have faded from the spotlight, but now that Trump is in
the White House they are rapidly raising money and gearing up for war.

And one of the first things the organization is trying to do is to save Obamacare. The following comes from NBC News

To defend Obamacare, the group says it has planned 400
health care-focused events in 42 states this year with partners that
include mainline liberal groups, like the Center for American Progress
and Planned Parenthood, as well those from the progressive wing, like

OFA says 20,000 people have used their tool to call senators’ offices
to urge them not to repeal Obamacare and says one million supporters
have already taken action with OFA.

The goal is to further hinder the already stalling momentum around repeal the Affordable Care Act.

But Organizing for Action is not just about peaceful political action. In fact, according to Sperry some of the anti-Trump marches that Organizing for Action helped put together actually “turned into riots”…

Far from sulking, OFA activists helped organize anti-Trump marches across US cities, some of which turned into riots. After Trump issued a temporary ban on immigration from seven terror-prone Muslim nations, the demonstrators jammed airports, chanting: “No ban, no wall, sanctuary for all!”

Run by old Obama aides and campaign workers, federal tax records show
“nonpartisan” OFA marshals 32,525 volunteers nationwide. Registered as a
501(c)(4), it doesn’t have to disclose its donors, but they’ve been
generous. OFA has raised more than $40 million in contributions
and grants since evolving from Obama’s campaign organization Obama for
America in 2013

So many people have been pointing the finger at George Soros for
funding and organizing anti-Trump activists, but the truth is that
Organizing for Action is perhaps even more involved than Soros is.

And Barack Obama is guiding and directing Organizing for Action from
his brand new compound less than two miles from the White House.

The ironic thing about all of this is that Obama is currently
building a very tall brick wall around his compound while at the same
time his army of activists is highly criticizing Trump for wanting to
build a border wall to protect the United States from unwanted

If Obama doesn’t like walls, he should tear down his own wall first.

Another form of sabotage against the Trump administration is coming
from Obama loyalists that are still embedded within various government

According to Trump, those loyalists are responsible for the very disturbing leaks that have been happening

President Donald Trump pointed the finger at Obama
administration holdovers at the White House and National Security
Council for leaking information about private phone conversations he had
with leaders of Australia and Mexico.

“It’s a disgrace that they leaked because it’s very much against our country,” Trump told Fox News
Sunday, accusing “Obama people” in civil service positions for the
leaks. “It’s a very dangerous thing for this country,” he added noting
that these individuals were still being sought out and replaced.

Needless to say, after eight years under Obama many government
agencies are absolutely crawling with people that are still very loyal
to him. Trump needs to do a major housecleaning, and that is going to
take some time.

What is going on between Obama and Trump is a microcosm of what is happening to society as a whole.

Obama and his loyalists have totally bought into the radical
progressive agenda of the global elite, and Donald Trump and his
followers are very much against it.

I don’t know that it is possible for there to be much compromise
between the two sides, and so that means that more conflict is ahead.

The election of Donald Trump has fired up the radical left like never
before, and I believe that the protests and riots that we have seen so
far are only just the beginning.

And if things go really bad under Trump, it is very easy to imagine widespread civil unrest erupting all over the nation.

Unfortunately, throughout all of this we are going to be having an
ex-president sitting less than two miles from the White House guiding
and directing the anti-Trump forces every step of the way.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
        NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
        Information gleaned from Julian Assange's WikiLeaks release of Hillary Clinton's
        campaign manager John Podesta's emails and DCLeaks documents from George 
        Soros’ own Open Society Foundation corroborate that Soros' private intelligence 
        agents/detectives secretly meeting with top Vatican cardinals, according to the 
example, while preparing for a Papal visit to North and South Americas,
the Pope’s minions working in the Vatican went out of their way to get
cozy with what’s commonly called the
radical fringe of the U.S. Democratic Party
from what we’ve gleaned from the Wikileaks
and DCLeaks material, the Pope is actually colluding with one of the world’s
wealthiest — some say wickedest — neo-Socialist who is hell bent in
creating a single ruling entity for the entire planet. His vision dwarfs
even the world described by George Orwell in his cautionary tale 1984,”
claims political consultant and attorney Michael Baker.
believes that of all the pontiffs sitting on the Vatican throne Pope Francis
is the closest to an irreligious Marxist by far. “The fact is our
Pope is from South America, which is arguably a hotbed of Marxism,
neo-Socialism and totalitarian communism
. It gave this Pope a different
perspective from those coming from European nations,” Baker noted.
At the
height of the presidential race between Clinton and Trump, DCLeaks documents
lifted from Soros’ Open Society exposed the more than half-million
dollars Soros forked over to PACO,
a radical organization of community organizers
, for travel and lodging
for Vatican strategy meetings in anticipation of the 2016 election. Despite
the fact that Trump holds tightly to the pro-life philosophy — and in
fact, he was endorsed by many Protestant clergy men and women including
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s niece Alveda King — the Catholic Church
and its U.S. members appear enthralled by the likes of Clinton, Sen. Bernie
Sanders, and Sen. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren, all of whom
support partial-birth abortions.
weeks of the new Francis papacy, Jeffrey
— a longtime George Soros associate and adviser — who is on
record taking $50 million of Soros $40 billion treasure-trove, was invited
to and featured as the Pope’s leading expert on the far-left’s climate
change agenda.
A detailed
report on the critical PICO/Vatican trip would certainly be of critical
interest to the Chairman of the Clinton Presidential Campaign, underscoring
the Soros/Clinton/Vatican partnership. Soros gave at least $25 million
to the Clinton presidential campaign and Podesta previously chaired the
Soros’ Center for American Progress. And, indeed, the meeting notes
disclose valuable insight and intelligence about the leftist cabal at
work in the Vatican.
pulls back the curtain on the radicals entrenched in the Francis papacy.
The PICO Vatican meeting was not simply a brisk cursory papal meet and
greet. Rather, documents reveal that Alinsky activists were invited, welcomed,
and dined in intense strategy sessions with high level Vatican cardinals.
The leaked emails expose the leftist political machinations behind the
Francis papacy, where the Soros-funded community organizers coordinated
radical messaging with high level papal cardinal confidantes.
there is no evidence of the multi-billionaire or the Pope ever meeting
face-to-face, the Bishop of Rome did acknowledge Soros, who helped with
a Catholic event in the U.S.
In a
letter, which is dated February 10, Pope Francis publicly praises the
organization PICO — People Improving Communities through Organizing
— which was one of the promoters of this Vatican event.
Pope Francis does not mention is that PICO is heavily funded by George
Soros. A leftist watchdog website describes PICO as a group that “uses
[Saul] Alinsky-style organizing tactics to advance the doctrines of the
religious left.” As John-Henry Westen, editor-in-chief of LifeSiteNews
in August, leaks from the Soros Foundation have shown how
Soros funded PICO and other organizations in order to influence the Vatican
in favor of certain policies and agendas. Westen reports.
emails through WikiLeaks reveal that billionaire globalist George Soros
— one of Hilary Clinton’s top donors — paid $650,000
to influence Pope Francis’ September 2015 visit to the USA with
a view to “shift[ing] national paradigms and priorities in the run-up
to the 2016 presidential campaign.” The funds were allocated in
April 2015 and the report on their effectiveness suggests that successful
achievements included, “Buy-in of individual bishops to more publicly
voice support of economic and racial justice messages in order to begin
to create a critical mass of bishops who are aligned with the Pope.”
[…] Grantees were PICO, a faith-based community organizing group,
and Faith in Public Life (FPL), a progressive group working in media to
promote left-leaning ‘social justice’ causes. Soros has funded
left-wing causes the world over and was just found to have been funding
an effort to eliminate pro-life laws around the globe.”
Soros Dynasty
to Oath Keepers,
a conservative non-partisan association of current and formerly serving
military, police, and first responders, who pledge to fulfill “defend
the U.S. Constitution, the tentacles of George Soros can be traced directly
or indirectly to his Open Society Foundations (OSF). A partial
list of verified beneficiaries of Soros’s generosity includes the
for Choice: This nominally Catholic organization supports women’s
right to abortion-on-demand; as well as Catholics in Alliance for the
Common Good, a political nonprofit group is dedicated to generating support
from the Catholic community for leftist candidates, causes, and legislation.
is also either a primary controller or a large contributor for scores
of leftist and socialist groups including:

Advancement Project:
This organization works to organize “communities
of color” into politically cohesive units while disseminating its
leftist worldviews and values as broadly as possible by way of a sophisticated
communications department.

Air America Radio:
Now defunct, this was a self-identified “liberal”
radio network, with hosts such as Al Franken, Rachel Maddow, Rev. Al Sharpton
and others, was a total failure despite getting almost constant coverage
by the mainstream news media.

This NGO (non-governmental agency) produces highly politicized
reports, papers, books, and legal analyses regarding alleged Israeli human-rights
abuses committed against Palestinians.

All of Us or None:
This organization seeks to change voting laws
— which vary from state to state — so as to allow ex-inmates,
parolees, and even current inmates to cast their ballots in political

Alliance for Justice:
Best known for its activism vis a vis the
appointment of federal judges, this group consistently depicts Republican
judicial nominees as “extremists.”

America Coming Together:
Soros played a major role in creating
this group, whose purpose was to coordinate and organize pro-Democrat
voter-mobilization programs.

America Votes:
Soros also played a major role in creating this
group, whose get-out-the-vote campaigns targeted likely Democratic voters.

America’s Voice:
This open-borders group seeks to promote
“comprehensive” immigration reform that includes a robust
agenda in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens.

American Bar Association Commission on Immigration Policy:
organization “opposes laws that require employers and persons providing
education, health care, or other social services to verify citizenship
or immigration status.”

American Civil Liberties Union:
This group opposes virtually
all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by the U.S. government.
It supports open borders, has rushed to the defense of suspected terrorists
and their abettors, and appointed former New Left terrorist Bernardine
Dohrn — wife of Bill Ayers — to its Advisory Board.

American Constitution Society for Law and Policy:
This Washington,
DC-based think tank seeks to move American jurisprudence to the left by
recruiting, indoctrinating, and mobilizing young law students, helping
them acquire positions of power. It also provides leftist Democrats with
a bully pulpit from which to denounce their political adversaries.

American Friends Service Committee:
This group views the United
States as the principal cause of human suffering around the world. As
such, it favors America’s unilateral disarmament, the dissolution
of American borders, amnesty for illegal aliens, the abolition of the
death penalty, and the repeal of

American Immigration Council:
This non-profit organization is
a prominent member of the open-borders lobby. It advocates expanded rights
and amnesty for illegal aliens residing in the U.S.

American Immigration Law Foundation:
This group supports amnesty
for illegal aliens, on whose behalf it litigates against the U.S. government.

American Independent News Network:
This organization promotes
“impact journalism” that advocates progressive change. The
editor of Media Matters, David Brock, is the top honcho.

The American Prospect, Inc.:
This corporation trains and mentors
young left-wing journalists, and organizes strategy meetings for leftist

Amnesty International:
This organization directs a grossly disproportionate
share of its criticism for human rights violations at the United States
and Israel.

Applied Research Center:
Viewing the United States as a nation
where “structural racism” is deeply “embedded in the
fabric of society,” ARC seeks to “build a fair and equal society”
by demanding “concrete change from our most powerful institutions.”

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now:
This group
conducted voter mobilization drives on behalf of leftist Democrats. These
initiatives have been notoriously marred by fraud and corruption. The
group helped start a Chicago community organizer named Barack Obama on
the road to the Oval Office and was exposed by two young journalists —
James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles — and was disbanded but still functions

Black Alliance for Just Immigration:
This organization seeks
to create a unified movement for “social and economic justice”
centered on black racial identity.

Blueprint North Carolina:
This group seeks to “influence
state policy in North Carolina so that residents of the state benefit
from more progressive policies such as better access to health care, higher
wages, more affordable housing, a safer, cleaner environment, and access
to reproductive health services.”

Brennan Center for Justice:
This think tank/legal activist group
generates scholarly studies, mounts media campaigns, files amicus briefs,
gives pro bono support to activists, and litigates test cases in pursuit
of radical “change.”

Brookings Institution:
This organization has been involved with
a variety of internationalist and state-sponsored programs, including
one that aspires to facilitate the establishment of a U.N.-dominated world
government. Brookings Fellows have also called for additional global collaboration
on trade and banking; the expansion of the Kyoto Protocol; and nationalized
health insurance for children. Nine Brookings economists signed a petition
opposing President Bush’s tax cuts in 2003. While the news media
call them a non-partisan group, the moment one of their spokespeople starts
“lecturing” audiences, it become apparent it is a left-wing
think tank.

Campaign for America’s Future:
This group supports tax
hikes, socialized medicine, and a dramatic expansion of social welfare

Campus Progress:
A project of the Soros-bankrolled Center for
American Progress, this group seeks to “strengthen progressive voices
on college and university campuses, counter the growing influence of right-wing
groups on campus, and empower new generations of progressive leaders.”

Center for American Progress:
This leftist think tank is headed
by former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta, works closely with Hillary
Clinton, and employs numerous former Clinton administration staffers.
It is committed to “developing a long-term vision of a progressive
America” and “providing a forum to generate new progressive
ideas and policy proposals.”

Center for Community Change:
This group recruits and trains activists
to spearhead leftist “political issue campaigns.” Promoting
increased funding for social welfare programs by bringing “attention
to major national issues related to poverty,” the Center bases its
training programs on the techniques taught by the famed radical organizer
Saul Alinsky.

Center for Economic and Policy Research:
This group opposed welfare
reform, supports “living wage” laws, rejects tax cuts, and
consistently lauds the professed achievements of socialist regimes, most
notably Venezuela.

Center for International Policy:
This organization uses advocacy,
policy research, media outreach, and educational initiatives to promote
“transparency and accountability” in U.S. foreign policy and
global relations. It generally views America as a disruptive, negative
force in the world especially in their goal of a New World Order.

Center for Reproductive Rights:
CRR’s mission is to guarantee
safe, affordable contraception and abortion-on-demand for all women, including
adolescents. The organization has filed state and federal lawsuits demanding
access to taxpayer-funded abortions (through Medicaid) for low-income

Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS):
Aiming to redistribute wealth
by way of higher taxes imposed on those whose incomes are above average,
COWS contends that “it is important that state government be able
to harness fair contribution from all parts of society – including
corporations and the wealthy.”

Change America Now:
Formed in December 2006, Change America Now
describes itself as “an independent political organization created
to educate citizens on the failed policies of the Republican Congress
and to contrast that record of failure with the promise offered by a Democratic

Coalition for an International Criminal Court:
This group seeks
to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures to those of an international

Color Of Change:
This organization was founded to combat what
it viewed as the systemic racism pervading America generally and conservatism
in particular.

Common Cause:
This organization aims to bring about campaign-finance
reform, pursue media reform resembling the Fairness Doctrine, and cut
military budgets in favor of increased social-welfare and environmental

Constitution Project:
This organization seeks to challenge the
legality of military commissions; end the detainment of “enemy combatants”;
condemn government surveillance of terrorists; and limit the President’s
executive privileges.

Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund:
Defenders of Wildlife opposes
oil exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It
condemns logging, ranching, mining, and even the use of recreational motorized
vehicles as activities that are destructive to the environment.

Democracy Alliance:
This self-described “liberal organization”
aims to raise $200 million to develop a funding clearinghouse for leftist
groups. Soros is a major donor to this group.

Democracy 21:
This group is a staunch supporter of the Bipartisan
Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act.

Democracy Now!:
Democracy Now! was created in 1996 by WBAI radio
news director Amy Goodman and four partners to provide “perspectives
rarely heard in the U.S. corporate-sponsored media,” i.e., the views
of radical and foreign journalists, left and labor activists, and ideological
foes of capitalism.

Democratic Justice Fund:
DJF opposes the Patriot Act and most
efforts to restrict or regulate immigration into the United States —
particularly from countries designated by the State Department as “terrorist

Drum Major Institute:
This group describes itself as “a
non-partisan, non-profit think tank generating the ideas that fuel the
progressive movement,” with the ultimate aim of persuading “policymakers
and opinion-leaders” to take steps that advance its vision of “social
and economic justice.”

Earth justice:
This group seeks to place severe restrictions
on how U.S. land and waterways may be used. It opposes most mining and
logging initiatives, commercial fishing businesses, and the use of motorized
vehicles in undeveloped areas.

Economic Policy Institute:
This organization believes that “government
must play an active role in protecting the economically vulnerable, ensuring
equal opportunity, and improving the well-being of all Americans.”

Ella Baker Center for Human Rights:
Co-founded by the revolutionary
communist and Barack Obama friend Van Jones, this anti-poverty organization
claims that “decades of disinvestment in our cities” —
compounded by “excessive, racist policing and over-incarceration”
— have “led to despair and homelessness.”

EMILY’s List:
This political network raises money for Democratic
female political candidates who support unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded

Energy Action Coalition:
Founded in 2004, this group describes
itself as “a coalition of 50 youth-led environmental and social
justice groups working together to build the youth clean energy and climate
movement.” For EAC, this means “dismantling oppression”
according to its principles of environmental justice.

Fair Immigration Reform Movement:
This is the open-borders arm
of the Center for Community Change.

Faithful America:
This organization promotes the redistribution
of wealth, an end to enhanced interrogation procedures vis a vis prisoners-of-war,
the enactment of policies to combat global warming, and the creation of
a government-run heath care system.

Families USA:
This Washington-based health-care advocacy group
favors ever-increasing government control of the American healthcare system.

Feminist Majority:
Characterizing the United States as an inherently
sexist nation, this group focuses on “advancing the legal, social
and political equality of women with men, countering the backlash to women’s
advancement, and recruiting and training young feminists to encourage
future leadership for the feminist movement in the United States.”

Four Freedoms Fund:
This organization was designed to serve as
a conduit through which large foundations could fund state-based open-borders
organizations more flexibly and quickly.

Free Press:
This “media reform” organization has
worked closely with many notable leftists and such organizations as Media
Matters for America, Air America Radio, Global Exchange, Code Pink, Fairness
and Accuracy in Reporting, the Revolutionary Communist Party, and Pacifica

Funding Exchange:
Dedicated to the concept of philanthropy as
a vehicle for social change, this organization pairs leftist donors and
foundations with likeminded groups and activists who are dedicated to
bringing about their own version of “progressive” change and
social justice. Many of these grantees assume that American society is
rife with racism, discrimination, exploitation, and inequity and needs
to be overhauled via sustained education, activism, and social agitation.

Gamaliel Foundation:
Modeling its tactics on those of the radical
Sixties activist Saul Alinsky, this group takes a strong stand against
current homeland security measures and immigration restrictions.

Gisha: Center for the Legal Protection of Freedom of Movement:

This anti-Israel organization seeks to help Palestinians “exercise
their right to freedom of movement.”

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect:
This group contends
that when a state proves either unable or unwilling to protect civilians
from mass atrocities occurring within its borders, it is the responsibility
of the international community to intervene — peacefully if possible,
but with military force if necessary.

Global Exchange:
Established in 1988 by pro-Castro radical Medea
Benjamin, this group consistently condemns America’s foreign policy,
business practices, and domestic life. Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks,
Global Exchange advised Americans to examine “the root causes of
resentment against the United States in the Arab world — from our
dependence on Middle Eastern oil to our biased policy towards Israel.”

Grantmakers Without Borders:
GWB tends to be very supportive
of leftist environmental, anti-war, and civil rights groups. It is also
generally hostile to capitalism, which it deems one of the chief “political,
economic, and social systems” that give rise to a host of “social

Green For All:
This group was created by Obama pal Van Jones
to lobby for federal climate, energy, and economic policy initiatives.

Health Care for America Now:
This group supports a “single
payer” model where the federal government would be in charge of
financing and administering the entire U.S. healthcare system.

Human Rights Campaign:
The largest “lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender”
lobbying group in the United States, HRC supports political candidates
and legislation that will advance the LGBT agenda. Historically, HRC has
most vigorously championed HIV/AIDS-related legislation, “hate crime”
laws, the abrogation of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t
Tell” policy, and the legalization of gay marriage.

Human Rights First:
This group supports open borders and the
rights of illegal aliens; has filed amicus curiae briefs
on behalf of terror suspect Jose Padilla; and deplores the Guantanamo
Bay detention facilities.

Human Rights Watch:
This group directs a disproportionate share
of its criticism at the United States and Israel. It opposes the death
penalty in all cases, and supports open borders and amnesty for illegal


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Kelleigh Nelson
February 24, 2017
people of the United Kingdom have exercised the sacred right of all free
peoples. They have declared their independence from the European Union,
and have voted to reassert control over their own politics, borders and
economy. A Trump Administration pledges to strengthen our ties with a
free and independent Britain, deepening our bonds in commerce, culture
and mutual defense. The whole world is more peaceful and stable when our
two countries – and our two peoples – are united together,
as they will be under a Trump Administration.
—Donald J. Trump
June, 2016
our Allies
VP Pence
was in Brussels at the end of a European trip where he was comforting
and reassuring allies that Trump will never abandon them. In meetings
in Brussels, Pence said he was acting on behalf of President Donald Trump
“to express the strong commitment of the United States to continued
cooperation and partnership with the European Union.” He pledged
America’s “steadfast and enduring” commitment to the EU. [Link]
Brussels is the de facto capitol of the European Union.
me, VP Pence, but wasn’t our President thrilled when the UK dropped
out of the EU? He even said that Great Britain had exercised the right
of all free peoples, so why did you say, “Today, it is my privilege
on behalf of President Trump to express the strong commitment of the United
States to continued cooperation and partnership with the European Union.”
I recall, Donald Trump and Nigel Farage actually celebrated when Britain
declared their independence from the EU.
Backed Brexit
Trump apparently caused “alarm” with some by endorsing Britain’s
decision to leave the bloc and suggesting that other states might follow.
He was supportive of Britain’s vote last year to leave the 28-nation
EU, and he has suggested that the EU itself could soon fall apart.
VP Pence’s
recent statements in Europe seem far different than Donald Trump’s
and Steve Bannon’s.
wrote in January, 2016, “The European Parliament’s chief Brexit
negotiator, Guy Verhofstadt, lists President Donald Trump, and his chief
strategist Steve
, as “one of the main three existential threats facing
the European Union.” Verhofstadt views Trump and his populist policy
advisers as an even greater threat to the EU than Brexit itself.
well he should. Trump knows that freedom doesn’t come from unelected
faceless bureaucrats telling countries what to do.
in 2014, Steve Bannon spoke favorably about European populist movements
and described a yearning for nationalism by people who “don’t believe
in this kind of pan-European Union.”
Europe,” he said at the time, “was built on a foundation of
strong nationalist movements,” adding, “I think it’s what
can see us forward.”
voiced the administration’s strong support for NATO last weekend.
His meetings were aimed at assuring European leaders that his words reflected
the views of President Trump.
defense requires Europe’s commitment as much as ours,” Pence said.
He reminded the group that in 2014 all 28 members of NATO promised to
try to spend two percent of their GDP on defense by 2024. Only the United
States, Britain, Poland, Greece and Estonia have met the two percent target.
As a candidate, Trump repeatedly called for NATO to pay more, Pence noted.
now Trump is president. “So, let me say again what I said this last
weekend in Munich,” Pence said “The president of the United
States and the American people expect our allies to keep their word and
to do more in our common defense, and the president expects real progress
by the end of 2017. … It is time for actions, not words.”
United States’ commitment to the European Union is steadfast and
enduring,” he said.
in a January, 2017 interview with the Times
of London
, Trump questioned the value of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization alliance when he was asked whether he understood why many
in Eastern Europe feared Russian aggression.
said a long time ago — that NATO had problems. Number one it was
obsolete, because it was, you know, designed many, many years ago. Number
two — the countries aren’t paying what they’re supposed to pay.”
He also
appeared indifferent toward the EU. “People want their own identity,
so if you ask me, others, I believe others will leave,” Trump said
of the political and economic union. He also said that the EU’s future
didn’t matter much for the US.
VP Pence
is a long-time politician and establishment globalist, and this is obvious
from his stances during his 12 years in Congress, mentioned in
my last article
. However, his library from his 12 years in Congress
until 2022 or his death.
Trump however, believes strongly in freedom and sovereignty and is working
toward this goal for America. Britain broke free and America must take
heed to understand the same establishment who controls the EU are the
same ones who are building NAFTA and the North American Union. 
 Is our
Vice President simply assuaging Europe’s worries, or are some of
his beliefs and stances in direct opposition to our President’s?
Time will tell.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

When President Donald Trump signed an executive order reinstating
Mexico City Policy — defunding international abortion efforts, like
those of Planned Parenthood — it garnered quite a lot of approval and
many Americans were excited by the turning of the tide. When former
president Barack Obama took office, he swiftly took action to overturn
the policy, ensuring that international abortion businesses could
receive federal funding.

Obama’s choice to repeal Mexico City Policy was not favorable among most Americans: a mere 35 percent approved of the action.
That means a sound majority did not approve of it being revoked. And
yet, our new president has been awash with criticism from the Left for
his choice to support what most Americans believe in.

One of these critics is none other than Bill Gates, famous for Microsoft, infamous for his advocacy of global depopulation.
According to Gates, reinstating Mexico City Policy will have
catastrophic effects that will endanger the lives of millions of women
and unborn children. Of course, given his penchant for reducing the
world’s population, one must wonder if his intent is truly as altruistic
as he tries to make it seem.

Life News suggests that millions more women and children are
harmed or killed during abortion procedures, and notes that Gates’
concerns for these people are nothing short of ironic.

The executive order to revive Mexico City Policy merely prevents taxpayer dollars from being used to fund abortion procedures
and promotion overseas. The order does not, however, stop international
aid for other health care and humanitarian causes. It simply stops the
money from subsidizing abortions in other countries.

Gates and his wife Melinda have openly complained that the policy
puts a stop to money flowing to the international division of Planned
Parenthood and Marie Stopes International. He has even told The Guardian that the cessation of funds to these organizations could “create a void that even a foundation like ours can’t fill.”

“We’re concerned that this shift could impact millions of women and
girls around the world. It’s likely to have a negative effect on a broad
range of health programs that provide lifesaving treatment and
prevention options to those most in need,” Melinda Gates commented.
Melinda Gates went on to describe a host of health conditions not
related to abortion that she believes will somehow be impacted by the
cessation of government funds being given to abortion businesses.
However, this assumption seems to neglect the fact that Planned
Parenthood rarely provides anything other than abortions.

In a fine case of fear-mongering, Melinda Gates alleges that
defunding international abortion will also put a stop to treatment and
prevention of HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis — which is simply untrue.
Planned Parenthood does not offer standard medical care: they deal only
with abortion-related care and provide contraceptives, according to the Planned Parenthood Global website. Marie Stopes International
also strictly provides abortions, post-abortion care and contraception.
These are not healthcare organizations — they are abortion outlets.

Melinda Gates does not outright say that these organizations provide
actual health care, but she certainly alluded to it. And perpetuating a
myth, such as the idea that abortion facilities will provide medical
care for infectious diseases like malaria, shows how far they will go to
push their agenda.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

While deporting the criminals known as illegal aliens now inspires
protests, deporting from class teachers who express support for
immigration law is often considered just — even when they express their
opinions on their own time.

First there’s Collier County, Florida, elementary school teacher
Veronica Fleming, who was reassigned to administrative duties after
posting a Facebook message opposing last Thursday’s “Day Without
Immigrants.” Then there’s an unnamed Prosser, Washington, elementary
school teacher placed on leave after using Facebook to encourage people
to boycott the event and report illegal aliens to authorities.

There are also teachers on leave in Jurupa Valley, California, for creating what have been described as “controversial social media posts.” tells us that Fleming “linked to a Chicago Tribune story about the nationwide protest and offered her take on the situation,” opining:

The funny part about immigrants staying
home is the rest of us who pay for them are here at work like we’ve
always been. Looks like less mouths to feed today. Have fun while you
still can. So glad to hear about massive deportation. Let’s make America
great again. Thanks Donald Trump!

This inspired complaints from some parents, according to Collier County Public Schools spokesman Greg Turchetta. In the school, writes the Naples Daily News,
“96 percent of the students are minorities” — which, of course, means
they’re the majority. Does this make Fleming a persecuted minority?

Moreover, in taking pains to point out the school’s demographics, are
the mainstream media implying that illegal migration should be viewed
as a minority issue? Or, are they saying minorities have a problem
obeying the law?

And illegal migration is what’s addressed in the teacher’s
comments and the protest to which she objected; after all, legal
immigrants don’t have to worry about deportation.

This illegality was explicitly referenced in the case of the Prosser
teacher, who taught at Keene-Riverview Elementary School. The Yakima Herald reports
that she “provided information on how to contact the U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement Agency to ‘report illegal aliens.’”

The Herald continued, “They will need to know names,
locations (either work place or residence) and any other specific
information you can provide,’ the post said.”

“‘If this offended you in anyway [sic] do me a favor and unfriend my American a[**]!!!’ the post said.”

In a touch of unsurprising politically correct irony in the Florida
case, spokesman Turchetta distanced the school district from Fleming’s
opinion by issuing a statement which included, “This is a very
tight-knit neighborhood school that stands for inclusion.”

Apparently, though, this inclusion excludes people who believe in robustly enforcing immigration law.

In both cases, critics played the bigotry card. The Prosser School
District said that the Keene-Riverview teacher’s post “could be
considered hostile or offensive on the basis of national origin,” as the Herald relates it.

As for Fleming’s alleged trespass, some parents labeled her post “racist.” EAGNews
tells us, for instance, “‘I was mad. Really, really mad,’ said
Gabriella Marquez, whose two children are in Fleming’s class. ‘I would
consider it really to be racist.’”

It was not explained what “national origin” is indicated by the term
“illegal alien” or “immigrants”; in reality, each group comprises many
dozens of nationalities. And what “race” does “alien” denote? The human
race? Perhaps Fleming is biased in favor of Martians.

(Strike that — that’s a planetary designation. “Little green men” perhaps? Strike that, too — that’s referencing color.)

Moreover, while illegal migration is largely a Hispanic phenomenon,
“Hispanic” not only refers to people from numerous countries; it’s also
not a racial designation. It’s an ethnic one.

In the case of the teachers placed on leave in Jurupa Valley,
California, the issue is that they noted that having certain students
“play hooky” to attend the Day Without Immigrants protest had positive
effects. As the Washington Times reported,
in “now-deleted Facebook comments, at least five teachers and one
counselor from Rubidoux High School reveled in the fact that their
classes were smaller and more productive without the striking students.”

This makes sense, since youths who forgo school to attend protests
often are ne’er-do-wells who’ll seize upon any opportunity to skip

The Press Enterprise tells us,
“Social science teacher Geoffrey Greer started the [social media]
thread Thursday afternoon by writing that having 50 percent fewer
students proved ‘how much better things might be without all this

The Enterprise further informed that the “comments included
statements that students were ‘lazy’ and ‘drunk’ and that the cafeteria
was cleaner without them. Jurupa Unified School District Superintendent
Elliott Duchon said the posts don’t represent the views of
administrators and employees.” (Telling the truth is not district

And the truth is that being a patriot today can be hazardous to
career health. In contrast, though, educators who supported the Day
Without Immigrants apparently suffered no persecution. An example is
teacher Erika Montes, 30, who participated in last Thursday’s protest, marching on the White House. She’s portrayed as just a good citizen, but one could wonder: Did she take the day off from work?

Presumably certain teachers did. In fact, Red Alert Politics tells us
that some college students “expressed delight at classes being canceled
for the day,” a whole “Spanish department shut down,” and that some
“immigrant professors canceled classes.” (Were the conscientious
students reimbursed a day’s tuition money?)

This presents a striking reality. While teacher Erika Montes said she
was at her protest “to be the voice of those who can’t speak,” it’s the
teachers opposing her position who can’t speak — at least not without
suffering persecution. In fact, teachers who skipped class to express a
pro-criminality position during school time are applauded, while those
who showed up for work and, at least in most cases, merely expressed a
pro-immigration-law position on their own time are punished.

So today, everything has been turned on its head. It wasn’t considered controversial when President Dwight Eisenhower instituted mass deportations
in the 1950s via his “Operation Wetback.” Now, a notable percentage of
our population is so radically un-American that they consider it radical
to enforce immigration law at all.

The one bit of good news is that, to an extent, anyway, the “Day
Without Immigrants” backfired. Not only did it likely alienate many
patriotic Americans, but, reports Red Alert Politics, “Some
workers were fired for ditching work to participate in the strike, while
others were laid off because their employers discovered they had been
working for them for years without legal documentation. Twitter users
expressed backlash by calling for the boycott of those employers.”

So with the protest having been somewhat of a failure, perhaps we
should try a slightly different event: a Day without Citizens. How well
would the nation function then?


 Published on Feb 22, 2017
Veritas has announced a new investigation where they have gone
undercover inside the Mainstream Media and are about to release
‘hundreds of hours’ of footage exposing the MSM
Infowars reporter
Millie Weaver covers this latest announcement made on the Sean Hannity
Show where James O’Keefe reveals he has ‘moles’ inside the MSM and that
they are about to do a ‘Wikileaks style’ data dump. When Hannity asks
which media outlet Project Veritas infiltrated, O’Keefe implies CNN. In
other news, Millie Weaver discusses how the TV series Homeland has a new
character mirrored after Alex Jones.
This fictional radio host, whose
last name is O’Keefe, is a lunatic fringe radio host who, on the show,
fuels the fire of conservative extremists. This wannabe ‘Alex Jones’
character appears to be yet another attempt my the MSM to demonize
Infowars and their listeners.
 #CNNLeaks: Project Veritas Releases Over 100 Hours of Audio From Inside CNN


 Published on Feb 22, 2017

reporter Joe Biggs breaks down a new clip from MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski
who admits that it’s the mainstream media’s job to tell the American
people what to think
and claims that President Trump needs to basically
stop bypassing them so they can tell you what’s fake and what isn’t.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Self-centeredness? Let’s see.
Somali Muslim migrant Mohammad Barry in February 2016 stabbed multiple patrons at a restaurant owned by an Israeli Arab Christian; Ahmad Khan Rahami, an Afghan Muslim migrant, in September 2016 set off bombs in New York City and New Jersey; Arcan Cetin, a Turkish Muslim migrant, in September 2016 murdered five people in a mall in Burlington, Washington; Dahir Adan, another Somali Muslim migrant, in October 2016 stabbed mall shoppers in St. Cloud while screaming “Allahu akbar”; and Abdul Razak Artan, yet another Somali Muslim migrant, in November 2016 injured nine people with car and knife attacks at Ohio State University. 72 jihad terrorists have come to the U.S. from the countries listed in Trump’s immigration ban.
What’s more, all of the jihadis
who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered
Europe as refugees. In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would
soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. The Lebanese Education Minister said
in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in
camps in his country. On May 10, 2016, Patrick Calvar, the head of
France’s DGSI internal intelligence agency, said that the Islamic State was using migrant routes through the Balkans to get jihadis into Europe.
But concern about all that is rooted in self-centeredness. In
spreading this nonsense, the Pope is endangering his own people,
particularly in light of the papal idolatry that is rampant in the
Catholic Church today.

“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

“Pope Francis: ‘the protection of migrants is a moral duty,’” Vatican Radio, February 21, 2017:

To welcome.  “Rejection is an attitude we all
share; it makes us see our neighbour not as a brother or sister to be
accepted, but as unworthy of our attention, a rival, or someone to be
bent to our will” (Address to the Diplomatic Corps, 12 January 2015).
 Faced with this kind of rejection, rooted ultimately in
self-centredness and amplified by populist rhetoric, what is needed is a
change of attitude, to overcome indifference and to counter fears with a
generous approach of welcoming those who knock at our doors.  For those
who flee conflicts and terrible persecutions, often trapped within the
grip of criminal organisations who have no scruples, we need to open
accessible and secure humanitarian channels.  A responsible and
dignified welcome of our brothers and sisters begins by offering them
decent and appropriate shelter.  The enormous gathering together of
persons seeking asylum and of refugees has not produced positive
results.  Instead these gatherings have created new situations of
vulnerability and hardship.  More widespread programmes of welcome,
already initiated in different places, seem to favour a personal
encounter and allow for greater quality of service and increased
guarantees of success….


  Pope Claims Muslim Terrorism Is A Myth
 Published on Feb 22, 2017

Alex Jones breaks down how the current Pope is a son of Satan.…
I first started seeing headlines that claimed that Pope Francis said
that “Muslim terrorism does not exist”, I thought that it couldn’t
possibly be true. After all, who could possibly deny that Islamic
radicals are engaged in terrorism?

Pope Francis Declares ‘Muslim Terrorism Does Not Exist’ As He Continues To Set The Stage For A One World Religion 

What in the world is he thinking?



 republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 When I first started seeing headlines that claimed that Pope
Francis said that “Muslim terrorism does not exist”, I thought that it
couldn’t possibly be true. After all, who could possibly deny that
Islamic radicals are engaged in terrorism?


Within the last 30 days, there have been 127 Islamic terror attacks in a total of 25 different countries. And in 2016 global terror attacks set an all-time record high and were up 25 percent
from the year before. Unfortunately, there are many world leaders that
are so politically correct and that are so married to the idea that
Islam is good that they cannot admit to themselves that radical Islamic
terror is being fueled by radical Islamic beliefs. And in the case of
Pope Francis, he is exceedingly careful never to say anything negative
about Islam because it would greatly hinder his efforts to bring all of
the major religions of the planet closer together.

To say that
“Muslim terrorism does not exist” is such an outrageous statement that I
needed to get solid confirmation that Pope Francis actually said these
exact words. And I got that confirmation from the official Vatican website

other is a reflection that I shared at our most recent World Meeting of
Popular Movements, and I feel is important to say it again: no people
is criminal and no religion is terrorist. Christian terrorism does not
exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist.
They do not exist. No people is criminal or drug-trafficking or
violent. “The poor and the poorer peoples are accused of violence yet,
without equal opportunities, the different forms of aggression and
conflict will find a fertile terrain for growth and will eventually
There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and
religions—and with intolerant generalizations they become stronger
because they feed on hate and xenophobia. By confronting terror with
love, we work for peace.

According to Pope Francis,
if Islamic terrorists were simply given “equal opportunities” we could
solve the problem of global terror once and for all.
What in the world is he thinking?
truth is that some of the wealthiest nations on the entire planet such
as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are funding and
arming radical Islamic groups all over the globe.
And often the
primary targets for radical Islamic terrorists are Christians and
Christian churches. For example, just consider what just happened in Uganda

Several weeks ago, we reported how Muslims attacked a Christian church during services in Uganda. They locked the Christians in the church and then attacked them, raping 15 women, kidnapping several and beating the rest. The story made international headlines.
in a recent story, the local news media in Uganda has tried to
whitewash what happened, saying that it was a ‘mania’ that broke out
after Christians praying for the return of an ‘unnamed prophet’ got mad
when the supposed ‘prophet’ did not appear.
In the meantime,
Christians in the area have continued to receive threats from the
Muslims, and the local pastors are reporting seeing Muslims at night
walking close to the church where the attack happened while brandishing

According to Pope Francis, if each of those
Muslims was given a good job, a nice house, a Honda and a 401K plan they
wouldn’t want to commit those types of attacks any longer.
And I bet that we are supposed to believe that Islam had nothing to do with the following attack in an undisclosed location in north Africa

told WND the background: The girl was attacked by “fanatic Muslim men
and woman” while walking home from school, dragged to a nearby home and
subjected to “brutal female genital mutilation.”
She was left in a coma.
After local physicians had given up and declared her dead, she suddenly sat up.
The girl described how her soul “left my body and I was dead.”
came to receive me to heaven. But Jesus appeared before me and said, ‘I
cannot turn back from the prayers of my children. My eyes are upon my
children and ears are open to their prayer. So I give you your life
back, for the issues of death belong to me. You go, and be my witness.’
Then he put his face right against and right into mine. He breathed into
my nostrils, and my soul went in. Then he moved his nail-scarred hands
over my body and healed me completely!”

What an incredible story!
such as this one need much more publicity, but the mainstream media and
politically correct leaders such as Pope Francis avoid them like the
plague because they don’t fit the narrative.

To the global elite,
Islam must always be portrayed as good, because it is going to be a key
player in the coming one world religion.
Another essential element
of globalism is an unshakeable belief in man-made climate change. In
the same speech that I referenced above, Pope Francis once again
affirmed his stance that global warming is an extreme danger to
humanity. Here is more from the official Vatican website

the ecological crisis is real. “A very solid scientific consensus
indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the
climatic system.”[6]
Science is not the only form of knowledge, it is true. It is also true
that science is not necessarily “neutral”—many times it conceals
ideological views or economic interests. However, we also know what
happens when we deny science and disregard the voice of Nature. I make
my own everything that concerns us as Catholics. Let us not fall into
denial. Time is running out. Let us act. I ask you again—all of you,
people of all backgrounds including native people, pastors, political
leaders—to defend Creation.

Ever since the very
beginning of his papacy, Pope Francis has been pushing for global unity
in religious matters, global unity in economic matters and global unity
in political matters.
The following timeline of events comes from one of my previous articles
May 2016: Pope Francis welcomed one of the top Sunni clerics in the world to the Vatican, and he reportedly told the cleric that “our meeting is the message“.
And mainstream news outlets all over the planet clearly understood what
was being communicated. For example, the Daily Mail article about this
meeting was entitled “Pope embraces grand imam at historic Vatican meeting in a bid to bring the Catholic and Muslim churches together“.
January 2016:
The Vatican releases an extremely disturbing video in which Pope
Francis declared that all of the major world religions are “seeking God
or meeting God in different ways” and that ultimately “we are all
children of God”. The video also featured leaders from various major
religions, and they are shown declaring fidelity to their particular
gods. First, we see a female Buddhist cleric tell us “I have confidence in the Buddha“, and that is followed by a Jewish rabbi declaring “I believe in God“. As the video goes on, a Catholic priest announces “I believe in Jesus Christ“, and last of all an Islamic leader boldly declares “I believe in God, Allah“. If you have not seen the video yet, you can watch the entire thing right here. After watching that video, nobody can deny that the Vatican is openly promoting a one world religion.
November 2015: Pope Francis declared that fundamentalism, even Christian fundamentalism, is a “sickness” during remarks in which he stressed the similarity of the major religions.
September 2015:
Pope Francis traveled to New York City to deliver a speech that kicked
off a conference during which the United Nations unveiled a “new universal agenda” for humanity.
September 2015: During a stop at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, Pope Francis stressed the unity between Christianity and Islam. These words were directly spoken by him…

would like to express two sentiments for my Muslim brothers and
sisters: Firstly, my greetings as they celebrate the feast of sacrifice.
I would have wished my greeting to be warmer. My sentiments of
closeness, my sentiments of closeness in the face of tragedy. The
tragedy that they suffered in Mecca.
In this moment, I give assurances of my prayers. I unite myself with you all. A prayer to almighty god, all merciful.

July 2015: During a trip to Ecuador, Pope Francis spoke of the need for “a new economic and ecological world order” in which the wealth of the planet is “shared by everyone”.
July 2015: Pope Francis denounced global capitalism and refers to its excesses as the “dung of the devil“.
June 2015: Pope Francis called for “a new global political authority” that would have the resources necessary “to deal with the world’s economic problems and injustices”.
October 2014: Pope Francis publicly embraced the theory of evolution by making statements such as these
we read about Creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was
a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything. But that is not
-“The Big Bang, which today we hold to be the origin of the
world, does not contradict the intervention of the divine creator but,
rather, requires it.”
-“Evolution in nature is not inconsistent
with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of
beings that evolve.”
By fully embracing the theory of evolution,
Pope Francis has aligned himself with the leftist social engineers that
are seeking to merge humanity into a socialist new world order, and he
has aligned himself against “fundamentalists” that believe that there is
one true God that created the heavens and the earth.
June 2014: For the first time in the history of Catholicism, Pope Francis authorized “Islamic prayers and readings from the Quran”
at the Vatican. In ancient times, this would have been considered
blasphemy, but today nobody really even notices when something like this
March 2013:
During his very first ecumenical meeting as Pope, Francis made it very clear that he believes that Christians and Muslims both “worship the one God”

I then greet and cordially thank you all, dear friends belonging to other religious traditions; first of all the Muslims, who worship the one God, living and merciful, and call upon Him in prayer,
and all of you. I really appreciate your presence: in it I see a
tangible sign of the will to grow in mutual esteem and cooperation for
the common good of humanity.
The Catholic Church is aware of the
importance of promoting friendship and respect between men and women of
different religious traditions – I wish to repeat this: promoting
friendship and respect between men and women of different religious
traditions – it also attests the valuable work that the Pontifical
Council for interreligious dialogue performs.

evidence very clearly shows that Pope Francis is a globalist, and the
globalists are absolutely convinced that this planet could be
transformed into some sort of great progressive utopia if they could
just get humanity to unite.

But when they are finally able to
achieve their goal, it won’t be a utopia at all. Instead, it will bring
about the greatest tyranny that humanity has ever experienced, and this
is something that I talk about in my latest book.

Whenever you deny the truth, you open yourself up for deception.
everyone out there that chooses to believe that Islam has nothing to do
with terrorism and that all religions are equally valid paths to the
same God is opening the door wide to great deception.

In this day
and age, it is imperative that we all learn how to think for ourselves
and to boldly speak the truth – even if that means disagreeing with the
Pope himself.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Muslim students mocking the Holocaust, inciting violence against
Jews, delegitimizing the existence of Israel, and pushing a false
Palestinian and “Islamophobia” victimhood narrative has become
commonplace. The media is trying desperately to portray President Trump
as responsible for antisemitism in the U.S.; in reality, they should be
looking at Students for Justice in Palestine and its allied groups.

And now this hatred has even entered schools for the youngest children. Nancy Salem, who is quoted in the article below, taught
at The Children’s Courtyard in South Arlington, Texas. Salem was also
“a member of the UTA chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine and a
supporter of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
movement,” and “used her now-disabled Twitter account to post such
remarks as: ‘How many Jews died in the Holocaust? Not enough…HAHAHAHA.’”

Salem was suspended from her teaching job; but she should be fired
and charged with a hate crime, as should have been the case with a
Toronto-area school teacher, as reported by Jihad Watch….

A Toronto-area schoolteacher who called
a jihadist who crushed the skull of a four-year-old Israeli girl a hero
and martyr is back in the classroom, after receiving a mere rap on the
knuckles for her abhorrently violent Facebook postings. A spokesperson
for the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School said
that Nadia Shoufani returned to work at St. Catherine of Siena Separate
School before Christmas. She was not charged with a hate crime,
according to the announcement, and she is being entrusted with the
well-being of children. Why should any Canadian child have to sit in a
classroom led by a murder-minded, hate-filled teacher? The school
administration should be prioritizing the well-being of the children.

“‘Stuff Jews in the Oven’ Among Antisemitic Social Media Posts
Flooding Pages of University of Texas-Arlington Students, Covert Campus
Watchdog Finds”, by Lea Spyer, Algemeiner, February 15, 2017:

“Jews only live once” and “stuff Jews in the oven” are
among the offensive comments flooding the social media pages of current
and former students at the University of Texas, Arlington (UTA), a
dossier recently released by a covert campus watchdog group revealed.

According to the document, compiled by Canary Mission – which
anonymously monitors anti-American, anti-Israel and antisemitic activity
on US college campuses — 24 UTA students and graduates have likened
Israel to Nazi Germany, called for violence against Jews and both denied
and championed the Holocaust in Facebook and Twitter posts.

Majority of the posts come from former and current students
affiliated with the school’s chapters of Students for Justice in
Palestine (SJP) and Muslim Student Association (MSA).

In 2014, UTA student Mariam Ghanem — an SJP activist and member of
MSA — compared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Hitler, and
tweeted a cartoon equating Nazi soldiers and IDF officers.

In 2013, Ismail Said Aboukar — a member of UTA’s SJP and MSA and a
proponent of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)
movement — referred to the Nazi genocide of the Jews as

Aboukar also said the “world would be sooo much better without jews man [sic].”

Nancy Salem — a student activist with UTA’s SJP and a supporter of
BDS — retweeted a riddle asking: “How many Jews died in the Holocaust?”
The answer: “Not enough, HAHAHAHA.”
And another: “How was the copper
wire invented?” Answer: “They threw a penny between two Jews.”

The postings uncovered by Canary Mission represent just a “fraction
of the hatred and intolerance that SJP and its members harbor on
campuses across North America,” the group said, and pointed out that of
the 24 students whose online rhetoric is blatantly antisemitic, 19 are
affiliated with SJP and 12 with MSA.

As The Algemeiner reported in October, a study released at Brandeis —
called “Hotspots of Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Sentiment on US
Campuses” — showed that “one of the strongest predictors of perceiving a
hostile climate towards Israel and Jews is the presence of an active
Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) group on campus.”

Following the publication of this article, a UTA spokesman told The
Algemeiner, “As one of the most diverse campuses in the nation,
inclusion and respect are at the very core of the values of UTA. UTA
condemns statements of hate while acknowledging the principles of free
speech and open expression. We welcome and encourage the sharing of
ideas, thoughts and opinions, but we also expect respect and civility
from students, faculty and staff.”…….

 BY Maria Danilova and Sadie Gurman
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Wednesday ended federal 
protection for transgender students that required schools to allow them 
to use bathrooms and locker rooms matching their gender identities, 
stepping into an emotional national issue.

The administration came down on the side of states’ rights, lifting 
federal guidelines that had been issued by the Obama administration. 
Without the Obama directive, it will be up to states and school 
districts to interpret federal anti-discrimination law and determine 
whether students should have access to restrooms in accordance with 
their expressed gender identity and not just their biological sex.

“This is an issue best solved at the state and local level,” Education 
Secretary Betsy DeVos said. “Schools, communities, and families can find
 — and in many cases have found — solutions that protect all students.”

The Obama guidance did not sufficiently explain how federal sex 
discrimination law known as Title IX also applies to gender identity, 
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement.

“Congress, state legislatures and local governments are in a position to
 adopt appropriate policies or laws addressing this issue,” Sessions 

In a letter to the nation’s schools, the Justice and Education 
departments said the earlier guidance “has given rise to significant 
litigation regarding school restrooms and locker rooms.”

The agencies withdrew the guidance to “in order to further and more completely 
consider the legal issues involved.”

Anti-bullying safeguards would not be affected by the change, according 
to the letter. “All schools must ensure that all students, including 
LGBT students, are able to learn and thrive in a safe environment,” it 

It was not clear what immediate impact the change would have on schools,
 as a federal judge in Texas put a temporary hold on the Obama guidance 
soon after it was issued — after 13 states sued.

Even without that hold, the guidance carried no force of law. But 
transgender rights advocates say it was useful and necessary to protect 
students from discrimination. Opponents argued it was federal overreach 
and violated the safety and privacy of other students.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer said President Donald Trump “has made 
it clear throughout the campaign that he is a firm believer in states’ 
rights and that certain issues like this are not best dealt with at the 
federal level.”

Conservative activists hailed the change, saying the Obama directives 
were illegal and violated the rights of fixed-gender students, 
especially girls who did not feel safe changing clothes or using 
restrooms next to anatomical males.

“Our daughters should never be forced to share private, intimate spaces 
with male classmates, even if those young men are struggling with these 
issues,” said Vicki Wilson, a member of Students and Parents for 
Privacy. “It violates their right to privacy and harms their dignity.”

However, the reversal is a setback for transgender rights groups, which 
had been urging Trump to keep the guidelines in place. Advocates say 
federal law will still prohibit discrimination against students based on
 their gender or sexual orientation.

Still, they say lifting the Obama directive puts children in harm’s way.

“Reversing this guidance tells trans kids that it’s OK with the Trump 
administration and the Department of Education for them to be abused and
 harassed at school for being trans,” said American Federation of 
Teachers President Randi Weingarten.

Activists protested the move Wednesday outside the White House. “Respect 
existence or expect resistance,” read one placard.

Spicer denied media reports that DeVos, who has been criticized for her 
stance on LGBT issues, had opposed the change but was overruled by 
Sessions. Spicer said any disagreement was merely over wording and 

“There is no daylight between anybody,” Spicer said, adding that DeVos was 
“100 percent” on board with the decision.

The Obama administration’s guidance was based on its determination that 
Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, 
also applies to gender identity.

While not legally binding, the guidance sent a warning that schools could lose 
funding if they did not comply.

Republicans pushed back, arguing that the federal effort was an example 
of Obama administration meddling in state and local matters. Texas Lt. 
Gov. Dan Patrick equated it to blackmail and said his state was ready to
 forfeit federal education money rather than comply.

Legal experts said the change in position could impact pending court 
cases involving the federal sex discrimination law, including a case to 
be heard by the Supreme Court in March involving Gavin Grimm, a 
transgender teen who was denied bathroom access in Virginia.

The justices could decide not to hear the case and direct lower courts to decide 
that issue.

In a phone interview with the AP, Grimm said of the Trump action: “It’s 
not positive. It has the possibility of hurting transgender students and
 transgender people. We’re going to keep fighting like we have been and 
keep fighting for the right thing.”

A patchwork of state laws could continue to emerge as a result of the 
change. Fifteen states have explicit protections for transgender 
students in their state laws, and many individual school districts in 
other states have adopted policies that cover such students on the basis
 of their gender identity, said Sarah Warbelow, legal director of the 
Human Rights Campaign. Just one state, North Carolina, has enacted a law
 restricting access to bathrooms in government-owned buildings to the 
sex that appears on a person’s birth certificate. Lawmakers in more than
 10 states are considering similar legislation, according to the 
National Conference of State Legislatures.

 President Trump breathed new life into an old controversy when he
recently suggested he might form an independent scientific commission to
investigate vaccine safety. He discussed that possibility with Robert
F. Kennedy, Jr. Kennedy was in Washington, DC this week pressing forward
with his own vaccine safety effort, and was joined by other advocates,
including Academy Award winner Robert De Niro. Environmental lawyer
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. briefed members of Congress on Capitol Hill,
pushing them to investigate an untouchable subject—the safety of
 Study Links Vaccines to Neuropsychiatric Disorders 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A recent study by researchers from Pennsylvania State University and
the Yale University’s Child Study Center found that patients diagnosed
as having neuropsychiatric disorders such as “obsessive–compulsive
disorder (OCD), anorexia nervosa (AN), anxiety disorder, chronic tic
disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), major
depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder” were more likely to have been
vaccinated three months before they were diagnosed.1

The study, which analyzed private health insurance data on more than
95,000 children ages 6-15 years collected from January 2002 to December
2007, was published in the peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Psychiatry on Jan. 19, 2017.1

According to the authors of the study, “This pilot epidemiologic
analysis implies that the onset of some neuropsychiatric disorders may
be temporally related to prior vaccinations in a subset of individuals.
These findings warrant further investigation, but do not prove a causal
role of antecedent infections or vaccinations in the pathoetiology of
these conditions. “1

Among the specific findings of the study were that vaccinated
children were 80 percent more likely to be diagnosed as having anorexia
and 25 percent more likely to be diagnosed with OCD than unvaccinated
children. Children who had been vaccinated were also more likely to be
diagnosed as having an anxiety disorder than unvaccinated children.2

The influenza vaccine, in particular, correlated with higher rates of OCD, anorexia, anxiety disorder, and tic disorder.3

According to professor of pediatrics at the Yale School of Medicine James F. Leckman, MD, who was a co-author of the study, “There’s
a fair amount of interest in the vaccine safety question, so let’s try
to be critical and do further studies that will help examine this issue
in a more thorough way.”3



1 2 3 7