RED ALERT! TOTAL MARTIAL LAW TAKEOVER IN AMERICA~LONG TERM PLANNING COMING TO FRUITION

RED ALERT! TOTAL MARTIAL LAW TAKEOVER IN AMERICA~LONG TERM PLANNING 
COMING TO FRUITION 
 Published on Feb 18, 2017

The
intelligence community, the mainstream media and the corrupt DC
establishment are waging a coup against President Donald Trump
attempting to sabotage the first days of his presidency.
Alex Jones
explains the engineered takedown of society and ties it in with previous
military training targeting the American people.

 

NEW TECH ALLOWS PARENTS TO SEE THEIR UNBORN BABIES IN CRYSTAL CLEAR VIDEO

 
 The new scanning technique shows the baby at 20 weeks in incredible detail.
NEW TECH ALLOWS PARENTS TO SEE THEIR 
UNBORN BABIES IN CRYSTAL CLEAR VIDEO
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Expectant parents can now see their child in the womb in incredible detail thanks to a technological breakthrough.

While ultrasound has been commonplace in maternity clinics since the
1980s, a new MRI scan captures footage of the unborn child in clear,
high-quality imaging.

The technique has come to the public’s attention after a 24 second
video of a 20 week old unborn baby seen kicking, swallowing and pulling
on the umbilical cord, went viral.

Early treatment

According to The Telegraph, the new £10 million technique could lead
to complications being spotted earlier, and potentially treated before
the baby is born.

Previously, if a baby was highly active during a scan, the images
would be unusable. The new imaging uses computer algorithms to
compensate for small foetal movements.

This means that clear imaging can be created, without the mother returning for another scan.

The team behind the new technology, iFIND, hope that it will soon be rolled out to maternity clinics across the world.

Sanctity of life

The video, which shows the fully-formed the baby in such detail, is
likely to reignite debate about lowering the current abortion limit of
24 weeks.

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has previously supported cutting the limit to 12 weeks.

In 2012, he said that everyone has their view on when human life
begins and that in his own opinion, “12 weeks is the right point for
it”.

He added that in 2008 he voted for the abortion limit to be halved from 24 to 12 weeks.
 When does human life begin?

When does human life begin?

When
does human life begin? It is a fundamental and decisive question
because your answer reveals your understanding of the nature and status
of the human embryo. It also shapes your stance on the big bioethical
issues of the day such as abortion, cloning and embryonic stem cell
research. There are many voices sowing confusion, but the Bible is
unmistakably clear that human life begins at conception. In this
booklet, John Ling provides a wide-ranging explanation of biblical
truth, the historical Christian perspective and evidence from modern
science to support this position.

 
 

SHIRLEY EDWARDS: ANGER AND KINDNESS CAN KILL

SHIRLEY EDWARDS: ANGER AND KINDNESS
CAN KILL
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Shirley Edwards


February 18, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
[These
are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and
spirit of my country has changed over 50 years. Why the country does
not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing
it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.]
“Those
who cry the loudest are not always the ones who are hurt the most”
– Aesop
Just
for once, I didn’t have to be personally present to witness
or understand the anger at the Women’s anti-Trump march recently
held in London. I have suffered with frustration and anger, I have
seen the damage it can cause, and I also recognise it in others. It
is an ugly spirit. It is usually loud, indignant and demanding; sometimes
it hides behind a quiet demeanour, victim hood, tears, or a painted
smile. There is a lot of it about.
However,
with barely one foot through the front door of The White House, it
still came as a bit of a surprise that an exaggerated 100,000 angry
women’s voices would be on him like a ton of bricks from this
side of the Atlantic, and that the event would be heavily covered
through all of our mainstream media. The new president of the United
States, is suddenly not only responsible for offending the minority
of voters in the USA, and creating world division; but he is now apparently
responsible for every woman’s anguish here in the UK and across
the world as well.
I hope he has broad shoulders.
Jumping
on the bandwagon of what some call group solidarity for all those
people who think they are marginalized or feel deeply offended by
laws being implemented on the other side of the Atlantic; there were
plenty of others across the nation, from the comfort of their own
home, who were being empowered by joining in with the criticism, the
hatred, and the disbelief directed towards the new president of the
United States who they consider to be against women and also very
racist towards immigrants. I heard it in the workplace, in shops,
at friend’s homes, and witnessed the sudden outage of indignation
verbalizing itself at every conceivable moment. It was quite astonishing
to hear that once more, especially after the Brexit result, and to
see it displayed amidst the quiet acceptance and respect that many
others felt towards the majority of voters in the USA.
Yet
my observations came not only from watching the display of female
anguish marching through the streets of London, believing they spoke
for the nation, but from asking why this very large group of protestors,
if they were concerned about women, were not directing their energy
against the real perpetrators of abuse in our society today? There
are plenty of them about. What has Donald Trump had to do with it?
Sometimes,
it’s not those women who cry loudest who are the ones who are
most hurt…….They are usually the ones who are most wrong.
Was
Donald Trump acting as a catalyst for something else; an unhealed
anguish deeply forgotten and buried? Why haven’t we witnessed
such hatred for male leaders; home and abroad before?
Why
did this anger turn itself against one man, without looking at its
own guilt, and the wrong compromises it has already made with evil
within its own home?
Silent
Witness – The Missing Women
If
demonstrators were upset about the unfair way that women are treated,
I wondered why they were not around when just one British woman bought
out a private prosecution against 2 male doctors who were discovered
carrying out abortions on unborn baby girls in the UK, based purely
on their gender. With an estimated 100,000,000 missing women based
solely on the practice of gendercide across the world, it should surely
be something worth speaking out against.
What
a wonderful platform some of those speakers in that demonstration
could have had to highlight that abuse in our own country. [Link]
Silent
Witness – The Invisible Mother
I
wondered if 100,000 demonstrators will march or speak out on the removal
of the name ‘mothers’ which is now being called for by
the BMA, (The British Medical Association), who have issued official
internal guidelines to all of its members to implement and refer to
a new mother as a ‘pregnant person’, thus removing the
unique gift, joy and privilege of being called a mother; in order
to not offend others.
The
guidelines also promote the new title of Mx which can be used instead
of Miss, Ms, Mrs or Mr. It will not be a Happy Mx Day when that suggestion
finally takes a hold.
The
road to genderless, non descript, non identifiable ‘nobodies’
is upon us. Will we question or blindly comply with these instructions?
You
can read A
Guide to Effective Communication, Inclusive Language in the Workplace

issued by The British Medical Association.
Silent
Witness – The Invisible Child
I
wondered why 100,000 demonstrators have not vocally objected in the
streets to the sexualizing of children through the promotion of soft
porn through music videos, where a little girls ambition in life has
now become demoted to using the power of her assets to become a sex
symbol like Rhianna, Beyonce or Britney and little boy’s are
trained early to see girls as pure objects for their desire?
Passing
their antics off as powerful and liberating is an insult to women,
but more alarmingly it is feeding a more sinister and abusive agenda
to make sex and provocative behaviour in children, especially little
girls, much more acceptable.
It
was interesting to see some of the more provocative female celebrities
being the ones to shout the loudest in some of the organized marches
across the world.
Silent
Witness – Human Chattel
However,
most of all I have wondered why those 100,000 demonstrators have not
focused their energy into something which would be helpful and expose
the evil of human trafficking in the UK, the rising number of rapes
across Europe, child slavery, child brides, forced marriage, honour
based violence, and FGM, (female genital mutilation) which is highlighted
as a cultural problem and where it is estimated that the number of
girls and women who have undergone FGM in the UK is estimated to vary
from anything from 66,000 to 280,000 with between 7,000 to 24,000
girls under 17 years of age at risk?
The
slogan currently being used to highlight FGM is No Voice – No
Choice.
As
the Women’s anti-Trump movement in the UK now takes a stance
against his restrictions on immigration and travel to the USA, with
demonstrations up and down the country in many of the major cities,
I refer to two of the many signs that I have witnessed in these rallies
which reads:
‘Kindness
is Everything’
‘Your cannot unify with Hate’
Promoting
humanism in a country which is already divided, not through the efforts
of Donald Trump, but by another system which has purposefully overcrowded
one culture with another culture, people are already aware that their
kindness has been mis-used.
Apart
from genuine immigrants and refugees who have integrated over many
years into the UK, who are friends to the UK, and consider themselves
British; unfortunately there are many legal and illegal immigrants
who are not so friendly now living within our society.
Many
places in Europe have fallen backwards and become unrecognisable;
there are many places where people, especially women, are very afraid
to visit. There is no kindness or unity there.
An
area known as Tower Hamlets is known to be one of the most dangerous
places for women and girls in the east end of London.
Tower
Hamlets is also known as one of the ‘no-go’ areas which
are reportedly existing throughout the United Kingdom where people
do not feel safe or protected anymore.
In
an article by Soeren Khan from the Gatestone Institute in relation
to European ‘no-go’ zones, fact or fiction; here are some
of the comments from people who speak out against some of the areas
which now populate the British Isles.
The
article also speaks about how many people are desperately leaving
some areas in which they feel that the British law, culture and values
are being dominantly displaced by cultures which want to police themselves
and others, rather than follow the law of the land. [Link]

“There are some communities born under other skies who will
not involve the police at all… there are communities from other
cultures who would prefer to police themselves.” — Sir
Tom Winsor, chief inspector of the police forces in England and Wales.
“We are sleepwalking our way to segregation.
We are becoming strangers to each other and leaving communities to
be marooned outside the mainstream.” — Trevor Phillips,
former chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality.
“One of the results of [multiculturalism]
has been to further alienate the young from the nation in which they
were growing up and also to turn already separate communities into
‘no-go’ areas where adherence to this ideology [of Islamic extremism]
has become a mark of acceptability.” Michael Nazir-Ali, former
Bishop of Rochester.
“There are things that I see when I’m
driving around Birmingham that shouldn’t be happening. I only drive
into these areas, never actually walk into these areas, I just wouldn’t.
Just in case I did do something that…because of their culture or
their religion it was a threat or it was an insult or something.”

— Resident of Birmingham.
Who
will fill the Void?
The
protestors in the Women’s anti-Trump march I fear are being
used in varying ways. An out-of-control reaction, an anger, by the
protesters is creating an irrational and biased attack upon a president
who may be initially daring to prioritize the safety of his own fellow
citizens first, and it is also acting as a distraction against some
of the real issues that we should all be talking about and not be
shouted down upon in our own country. It is not racist to highlight
such problems.
The
real anguish which some women feel is that they do not feel safe,
or protected in society. They feel badly let down by men, even the
good ones. It was all very well to march in large numbers through
a relatively safe street in London. It is not so nice to walk alone
in places of society where no one cares for you.
 When
we no longer identify or respect the specific and special roles that
each of the sexes possess, society becomes demoralized so low that
it loses all respect for itself and each other, and becomes very weak.
It does not recognise genuine strength, love or grace.
You
can sense and see the growing weakness and lack of character and identity
all around. Who is it that is orchestrating the demise of mankind
and why do we have to be considered unkind to object to it?
Will
men and women unite together and value their role in society, protect
their children and stand up to evil in a rational way without falling
prey to the political correctness and humanism which is destroying
people?
Out
of control anger, like over the top kindness, can kill people. The
women’s anti-trump demonstration was a weak attempt at the countries
collective failure to show true strength and kindness in the correct
proportion when it should have done a long long time ago. Leaders
have let us down.
Is
it to late to turn back to a dignity now lost….?
Sources
and Links

CHUCK BALDWIN, NETANYAHU, JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS

CHUCK
BALDWIN, NETANYAHU, JEWS
 AND THE CHRISTIANS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By
Rabbi Nachum Shifren


February 18, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
[NOTE:
The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is
not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives,
or other contributing writers.]
My
Response to Pastor Chuck Baldwin [Link]
I have
had the good fortune to see my articles in NewsWithViews.com over the
years. I say this because being one of the “deplorables” in
America today limits our access to many journalistic opportunities, and
yet like many of the faithful of publisher Paul Walter, we wouldn’t have
it any other way.
As such,
many of you who’ve been following Pastor Chuck Baldwin’s philosophical
meanderings through the years might have caught a slight dissonance in
his recent column, “Is Netanyahu Finished”, as if something
was out of sync.


I am
using this opportunity to rebut his points, one by one. I look forward
to your heartfelt responses to my article. Let me say from the outset:
this is a no-holds-barred rebuttal to his opining of Netanyahu, Israel,
Jews, and Christians.
We all know that if you want to get people riled
up, just talk about Israel, Jews, and Christian attitudes to the above
and you’ll open the Pandora’s Box.
PB (Pastor
Baldwin): “Bibi is one of the most corrupt political leaders on the
planet”
RS (Rabbi
Shifren): Perhaps it is so, but being in the middle east, surrounded by
those who want your demise, is not an easy situation for any leader. Here
is a country where literally nothing is normal (I may seem to be leaning
here toward Pastor Baldwin, but for different reasons). Fully 50% doesn’t
want to, or rebels at, anything resembling traditional Judaism. You have
an active, aggressive Gay/Lesbian population eating away at the thousands
of years of Biblical prophecy and Divine intervention. And you also have
open communists with an axe to grind in the spirit of Marx, Trotsky, and
Alinsky.
Then
there are Hellenists, who if they had no Israeli passport, would resemble
anybody windsurfing at Waikiki or eating sushi in Beverly Hills, and Yeshiva
students who never see the light of the sun, squinting at obtuse tractates
of Talmudic law under the cover of dimly lit florescent bulbs. Last but
not least, there is an active, healthy underground fueled by pimps, prostitutes,
and a mafia which would make Meir Lansky blush. So yes, Pastor Baldwin
is right about the insanity of Israel….but to be its LEADER, well now,
that takes an acute level of ability that the Democratic Party of Waters,
Ellison, and Pelosi could hardly dream of.
And
he’s right: Bibi is the darling of many Christian groups who want their
own fantasy relationship with the people of the Book, the progeny of the
Holocaust. What many don’t realize is that Bibi was for many years ensconced
in Manhattan during his position in the UN, gleaning from the rich and
powerful, all eager to get in his good graces, being close to a real Israeli
war hero, regardless of issues of character or philosophy.
Bibi
cleverly marshalled his well-honed English fluency, good looks and Machiavellian
political moxie to ingratiate himself into the “salon” milieu,
managing to be everything to everybody seeking to find an excuse for being
pro-Jew/Israeli. Bibi is so well spoken that when you hear him, you believe
every word he says.
Pastor
Baldwin doesn’t illuminate why Bibi is going down, and I tend to think
that even hardened Israelis have occasionally had it with his hegemony.
But the good pastor doesn’t get: many Israeli politicos are corrupt. It
is endemic, just as the 25% of the underground economy who is fleeing
the tax man.
How
legitimate could one be to sit in a coalition with Palestinian Arabs enumerating
their hatred for the Jewish state from the dais of the Knesset (parliament),
encouraging and abetting intifadas and blood-letting. Really, this is
one aspect that the media has left unturned: the special ability to reconcile
with a perpetual terrorist sword drawn against its very survival, giving
the pretense that this is true “democracy.” So yes, nobody
normal, least of all the coalition factions of orthodox rabbis whiling
away the tedious speeches of the Arabs, the Israeli Left, and otherwise
crass corrupt philistines, could imagine the horror of governing such
a witch’s brew. Truly, Bibi has his hands full just keeping Israel alive
and safe.
PB:
“He is pressuring Donald Trump to ratchet up a war against Iran”
to give cover and deflect from his misdeeds…
RS:
Here the good pastor shows a complete lack of understanding of the Israeli
mind-set. Note well: Israel doesn’t need America, and is fully capable
of neutralizing the Iranian threat. Nonetheless, a joint coalition would
certainly be favorable and elevate the raison de guerre of Israel in her
continuous war to find favor in the eyes of the Gentiles. Yet when the
boom is ultimately lowered, Israel will stand alone, just as it did at
Entebbe and the Iraqi nuclear facility. They know it, American insiders
know it–everyone but Pastor Baldwin knows it.
PB:
“There is one common denominator that links the mainstream media
with the so-called conservative media: infatuation with the modern state
of Israel” (wonder what he means here by “modern”…would
these pundits have preferred the Israel of King David? I rather doubt
it…)
RS:
I detest knee-jerk thinkers and groups, Jewish or Gentile. I abhor “Black
Lives Matter” because I know who these punks are. In the same way,
I detest playing the Holocaust card. It’s so easy to do, and who wants
to be labeled in the same Jew-baiting ranks with Goebbels, Streicher,
Eichmann….the entire Jewish leadership plays this card to a tee. Pathetic
and stifling of any discussion. Pat Buchanan and Mel Gibson will tell
you volumes about going against the Israeli/Jewish bulwark.
PB:
“He is mobilizing accelerated (illegal) settlements on private land
owned by Palestinians”
RS:
Is this man a pastor, a man of god? What religion is he representing?
This is perhaps his most puzzling statement to date. Does Pastor Baldwin
believe in God? Which God? Because if it’s the God of the Old Testament,
and the God of Heaven and Earth, then there is only ONE God…and that
same God stated: “The Land of Israel will be an eternal inheritance
to your seed”. “Those that bless you will be blessed, those
that curse you will be cursed.” Genesis 12:1-3.
The
problem the pastor has is that his rhetoric and ideology have trumped
his divine calling. I know of not ONE Christian (who truly is a Christian,
devoid of anti-Semitic leanings), who does not stand behind this doctrine
and other pronouncements in Exodus, giving the Land of Kanaan (Israel)
exclusively to the seed of Abraham (see appropriate passages regarding
the banishing of Ishmael and his claims).
Therefore,
his mention of Palestinian “rights” is curious, suspiciously
incongruent with the foundation of Christian theology. Yet, it is difficult
to stand up to the nay-sayers in today’s Christian church. Many a man
of integrity and knowledge of scripture has given in to the leftists and
Palestinian inciters’ relentless assault against traditional belief (It
was none other than Arafat that confided that the “Palestinian”
cause was bogus, used only as a means to weaken and destroy Israel).
Of course,
there have always been malevolent purveyors of Jew-baiting in the history
of Christianity. Yet, when candid, these erudite haters will quote you
chapter and verse about the exclusivity of the Abrahamic covenant with
God, having zero mention of “Palestinian rights.” So, what
then must we conclude from Pastor Baldwin’s strange rhetoric? It doesn’t
have to be complicated: somewhere, somehow, a Jew stood before him and
obstructed his pathway. This is not unique.
PB:
“Neither does it hurt that Trump’s son-in-law is a MAJOR financial
backer of the (illegal) settlements”
RS:
As Reagan would say, “There you go again!” But hey, somebody
needs to come up with the green to finance that which the Israeli government
has been doing: putting facts on the ground that will never be erased.
If God is real (is he, really good Pastor?), and the scriptures are not
fake, then this land is part of the biblical Land of Israel, whether we
(our congregations/clerics) approve of it, or not. God gave it to Israel,
and a lot more than they have today belonged only to them.
PB:
“Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is starting to back away from Bibi”
RS:
Here’s a man who understands when he’s throwing good money after bad….
PB:
“Many Christians have accused me of heresy” for what I said
about Bibi
RS:
I won’t. You have accurately described Bibi…it’s just that you haven’t
seen the big picture. Or that you just have lost your ability to withstand
pressure from apostates within your church, or otherwise leftist/anti-Semitic
agitators who you might have been courting or perhaps you are the leader
in this courting since in one article you stated that the Jews of Israel
are not the Jews of the Bible. Well then, PB, who are they? Because many
can trace their ancestry back to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
PB:
“For many professing Christians, the modern state of Israel is every
bit as important as Jesus Christ himself and their own personal salvation.
RS:
This is probably your only righteous statement. The State of Israel is
every bit as important as Jesus Christ because Israel is the Wife of God,
and the Church states they are the Bride of Christ. The Abrahamic Covenant
is unconditional and includes the land, and God does not lie, and neither
does he go back on his promises.
[Editor’s
Note: See Bibi Netanyahu and President Trump at a press meeting in DC
on 2-15-17]
PB:
“Netanyahu is not only a crook, a globalist, and murderer, he is
also a Talmudist”
RS:
A murderer, really? I wasn’t aware, whom did he murder? Your argument
has no feet. Not once in your invective have you called to task the unrelenting
war of Arab terror against Jews. You’ve saved your arrows for those evil
“Talmudists” like Bibi, who actually teaches a Bible class every
week.
But
how hysterical are you? Bibi a Talmudist? Even Woody Allen would laugh
you off your lectern… Bibi is a politician and puts on a yarmulke when
he goes to a Concentration Camp, or a funeral. Do you know his heart?
You cannot claim you do.
PB:
“If you think the Koran is bad, try reading the Talmud.”
RS:
Yes, you’ve finally come to your senses: the Koran is definitely bad!
Regarding the Talmud, what about that ever-problematic passage about “an
eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth?” Do you know what that means?
Of course not, you know nothing of the Talmud except to cherry-pick problematic
statements of which you have no clue. Actually, the passage in question
refers to monetary damages due to the aggrieved, and not in removing the
plaintiff’s eye. So, there you have it, now you can certainly rest.
The remainder is a life’s work and toil about what was given over on Sinai,
and what was transmitted orally, known as the Oral Law (as opposed to
the Bible, or Written Law). Few have the time, patience, and determination
to dive into the minutia and profound manner of the arguments given forth…you
least of all.
 PB:
“Iran is being painted as the next big, bad wolf”
RS:
For such a smart guy, how could you be so wrong?! The problem you’re facing?
You’ve never lived in Iran as a Christian, or anywhere else as a Christian
in the Middle East….good luck. Yes, not one American boy should be sacrificed
to shut these maniacs down. So, when Israeli jets take off one night during
Ramadan, remember I told you so….
PB:
“Sanctions against Iran are a violation of the 2015 treaty”
RS:
Are you kidding me?! A treaty with Iran, you say? Pastor, this is delusional.
Find someone in your congregation that can teach you about Iran….let
me elucidate for you a cardinal principle: the Saudis hate Iran, so they’re
going to be good news for us. Period. The way of the world.

OBAMACARE REPLACEMENT PLAN INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS

 http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170214184200-rand-paul-mark-sanford-split-super-169.jpg
OBAMACARE REPLACEMENT PLAN INTRODUCED 
IN CONGRESS
BY BOB ADELMANN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Representative Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) introduced
their ObamaCare Replacement Act (ORA) on Wednesday. It would
simultaneously repeal nearly all of ObamaCare’s most onerous demands and
mandates while opening up the health-insurance market to individuals to
purchase, or not to purchase, coverage.
The bill, S.222, might more
appropriately be named the “Health Insurance Freedom to Purchase Act,”
putting the decision to buy, or not to buy, coverage back in the hands
of individual citizens and taking it out of the hands of the federal
government.

Senator Paul said, “This is a big, big day for conservative
Republicans. We owe this to the conservatives around the country who
elected us to repeal, to completely repeal, ObamaCare. But I think if
you’re going to repeal something, you should replace it.”

Whether that is so is open to debate. Some would say it would be
better just to repeal ObamaCare and let the free market sort things out
afterwards. Nevertheless, the ORA puts the decision to purchase health
insurance coverage back in the hands of the people paying for it,
allowing them the freedom not to purchase coverage if they don’t want
to. The ObamaCare mandate requiring people to either purchase health
insurance or pay a penalty would disappear. It would allow those
citizens choosing to buy health coverage to choose whatever plan they
want. Insurance companies will be allowed to offer coverages across
state lines, and expand their offerings without federal interference or
demands that certain expenses be covered even when unwarranted or
unnecessary.

Rather than punishing those who decided under ObamaCare not to buy
coverage with IRS penalties, ORA offers incentives instead. Individuals
may set up their own Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) to pay for future
medical and health expenses. Any amounts may be added to those accounts,
and those funds may be invested without incurring taxes on any
earnings. And a tax credit of up to $5,000 per person putting away funds
into an HSA is allowed. Those without insurance through their employer
but wanting to buy coverage will be able to join voluntary associations
for the sole purpose of buying insurance, taking advantage of better
coverage at lower rates.

Funds invested in HSAs may be used to buy health insurance, pay for
prescriptions and over-the-counter drugs along with dietary supplements,
and pay for physical exercise regimens offered by personal trainers and
workout centers and facilities. And, of course, those funds may be used
to cover any deductibles in the coverages they decide to purchase. HSA
funds may also be used by those already covered under the VA, Medicare,
Tricare, IHS (Indian Health Service), or healthcare sharing ministries.

In other words, HSAs under the new law will be tax-deferred savings
accounts, with tax credits added in as a bonus to encourage people to
set them up.

Included in the ORA are provisions allowing states more freedom to
modify Medicaid coverages without federal government interference. And
it provides a two-year “window” open-enrollment period under which
individuals with pre-existing conditions can purchase coverage.

The ORA is a “consensus” bill combining the elements of at least four
plans being offered to replace ObamaCare. While there are still some
issues to be ironed out, especially regarding Medicaid and the size of
the tax credit, the bill in final form could arrive on President Trump’s
desk by the end of March.

The ORA is also a political move by the House Freedom Caucus, which
supports it unanimously. The 40-member caucus is using this as a lever
to move ObamaCare’s repeal along more rapidly. That caucus voted on
Monday night to repeal the bill passed by both houses in 2015 undoing
ObamaCare, putting in its place the ORA.

If it becomes law, the ORA will put responsibility for one’s health
care back where it belongs: the taxpayers who are making the decisions
on how they want to spend the money they earn. That freedom, under the
ORA, would include the freedom not to buy health insurance if one
decides not to. That is the paradigm shift toward freedom and away from
government mandates contained in the bill offered by Senator Paul and
Representative Sanford.

HUMANA EXITS OBAMACARE: DEATH SPIRAL ACCELERATES

HUMANA EXITS OBAMACARE: 
DEATH SPIRAL ACCELERATES 
 Published on Feb 17, 2017

Reality
will repeal Obamacare even if the GOP won’t. Humana becomes the first
major insurer to exit Obamacare as insurance company mergers fail.
Trump & his new Health Secretary Tom Price have issued orders to try
and ease some of the pain for people and companies but Obamacare will
never be affordable for insurers or patients. “Too Big TO Fail”
insurance companies plus Obamacare will be just as disastrous for health
care (currently 1/5 of the economy) as “Too Big To Fail” banks plus
Glass-Steagall repeal was disastrous for homeownership. David Knight
looks at the tweaks that were just done to Obamacare as well as the big
picture of what needs to happen.

Follow David on Twitter – https://twitter.com/libertytarian

 Federal Judge Blocks Aetna-Humana 
Health Insurance Megamerger 
Argued it would reduce competition in the Medicare Advantage market
  Humana Exits Obamacare: Death Spiral Accelerates 
Obamacare is slowly but surely being dismantled

TRUMP TOYS WITH REPORTERS AT PRESS CONFERENCE

TRUMP TOYS WITH REPORTERS AT PRESS CONFERENCE 
 Published on Feb 16, 2017

Donald
Trump toys with a CNN reporter again, calling his network “very fake
news” at today’s epic press conference where he pulled no punches and
repeatedly called out the mainstream media for their bias and anti-Trump
coverage. CNN’s Jake Tapper, NBC’s Chuck Todd, and Fox News’ Shepard
Smith all threw a hissy fit about the way Trump treated the media.
Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
 

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

FIVE WAYS CHINA IS IGNITING A COUP AGAINST TRUMP

 5 Ways China Is Igniting a Coup Against Trump
FIVE WAYS CHINA IS IGNITING A COUP 
AGAINST TRUMP
 Here’s how the Chicoms are instigating a takeover 
on US soil
BY JAMIE WHITE & KIT DANIELS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Communist Chinese often accuse the U.S. of hacking,
censorship, meddling with other countries, propaganda and “not doing its
part” with immigration, while China routinely and openly does it all.

Here’s a list of China’s hypocrisies laid bare as it fuels a coup on US soil against President Trump:
1. Attacks sovereignty of U.S. and other nations
China
often accuses the U.S. of meddling in other countries’ affairs, while
failing to mention that it’s busy buying up Hollywood studios and waging a “holistic” cyber-economic campaign to infiltrate American politics, finance, information technology and energy.

State-run newspaper China Daily quickly flexed the national
sovereignty muscle after Trump spoke with Taiwan’s president last
December, warning that China would “have no choice but to take off the gloves” if Trump didn’t respect the “One China” policy.
China
loves its sovereignty, but has little regard for the sovereignty of
neighboring countries like Vietnam or the Philippines, since China’s
been seizing
major shipping lanes and claiming a stake in the disputed South China
Sea by creating artificial islands laden with anti-aircraft and other
weapons systems.

Additionally, the communists have
controlled Tibet since 1949 by claiming the region has been a Chinese
vassal for the past several centuries despite evidence
suggesting otherwise.
2. Encourages Silicon Valley to adopt Chinese-style censorship
Chinese
state media pressured anti-Trump Silicon Valley to adopt domestic
internet censorship similar to China’s “Great Firewall” to try and
prevent Trump from winning the election.

“So long as the
mainstream media is free and open, online rumors would do no harm in the
big picture – isn’t that the consistent argument in the West?” writes the Global Times, a Communist Party publication.

While
the efforts to stop Trump failed, the tech elite are still proceeding
with internet censorship to prevent future Trump-style populists from
blocking their globalist agenda, such as French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen.

“On
Feb. 6, 2017, Google News Lab announced CrossCheck, a new ‘Fake News’
project billed as a collaborative effort between journalists, newsrooms
and social media companies that appears aimed at censorship so as to
impede the chances of Le Pen of to win the French presidential
election,” reported
Jerome R. Corsi. “In a press release dated Feb. 6, 2017 Google
announced from Paris a partnership between Google News Lab and First
Draft to help ‘the French electorate make sense of what and who to trust
in their social media feeds, web searches and general news consumption
in the coming months.’”
In addition, Twitter is now reportedly censoring positive responses to tweets sent out by President Trump.
Considering that a recent Stanford and New York University study concluded
that “fake news” had no impact on the 2016 U.S. election, it seems that
China is simply promoting another technique for the power elite to
maintain dominance over society.
3. Propaganda
China
has been busy investing heavily into America’s film industry by buying
major stakes in all six major Hollywood studios with the aim of
transforming Hollywood into a propaganda tool to promote Chinese
interests while also diminishing American values.

The latest example
of this is the upcoming Chinese-backed dystopian film ‘Little America’
which seeks to mock Trump’s presidency and America’s place in the world.
In
the film, a former American Force Recon member who is hired by a
Chinese billionaire to infiltrate an American ghetto and rescue his
daughter.
These efforts to portray Trump as a weak leader
responsible for America’s downfall is no coincidence, and neither is the
portrayal of China as the real controller of America.
“The
government and some leading companies claim they want to promote China’s
image around the world – both by squashing negative portrayals and
promoting positive ones,” said author Mercy Kuo. “That goal seems short-sighted at best.”
“Attempts to censor negative China content look pathetic, even when done voluntarily by Hollywood studios.”
4. Immigration Hypocrisy
In 2015, Chinese media lectured
the U.S. to take in as many Muslims migrants as possible while
abdicating any responsibility themselves, saying that “many Chinese
people are still living in poverty and that the refugees won’t want to
come to China anyway.”

That same year, China began to crack down on Islam
following the Charlie Hebdo massacre by banning the hijab, banning men
with long beards from riding public transportation, and mandating that
Islamic restaurants sell alcohol and cigarettes – which has resulted in
some non-Muslims being assaulted for even asking for these items.

Ironically, record numbers of Chinese nationals were also caught trying to cross the U.S. southern border in 2016.
5. Cyberwarfare
China often accuses the U.S. of hacking, but just last year China has been caught hacking the Pentagon, other national security agencies and email accounts of US officials.
Just
last December, the FBI investigated a breach into the FDIC (Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation) and found that China’s military had been hacking the agency since 2010.
“If
you have no definitive proof, then it is very hard for you to judge
where the attacks really come from,” Chinese Foreign Ministry
spokeswoman Hua Chunying said when asked about the ongoing
investigation.
Chinese cyberattackers also reportedly launched an unprecedented and sophisticated DDoS attack against Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com last December which lasted for days.
China: Defender of the Globalist Faith
At the Davos meeting last month, China’s President Xi Jingping presented
his country as the emergent leader of the globalist model in which a
tiny, unelected elite controls the world’s population, national
resources and wealth.

Communist China is already a microcosm of that model.
“Clearly
it signals that Chinese leader Xi Jinping is now interested in writing
both China and himself in a grander way on the global diplomatic
horizon,” said Orville
Schell, director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations at the Asia
Society. “He feels it’s time to really come out. Behind that probably is
an assumption and wishful thinking that the U.S. is in disarray, Europe
is feckless, and so on.”

“He’ll be received almost as the number one citizen at Davos.”

It’s
ironic – yet fitting – how the “Defender of the Faith” title was once
given to European monarchs by the Pope, and now China is the “Defender
of the Faith” for globalism which is also heralded by the socialist Pope
Francis.

__________________________________________________
SEE ALSO: 

 China Positions to Start WW3

Communists want NWO forged by them

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/china-positions-to-start-ww3/

 

OBAMA’S STASI BEGINS SOFT COUP WITH FLYNN’S POLITICAL ASSASSINATION

OBAMA’S STASI BEGINS SOFT COUP WITH 
FLYNN’S POLITICAL ASSASSINATION 
 Published on Feb 16, 2017

With
leaks designed to destroy the credibility of key members of the Trump
administration, and the ultimate goal that Trump “ ill die in jail”, the
“Deep State”, the rogue intelligence community, has seceded from the
republic, declared civil war and asserted its sovereignty. The CIA used
to hide its assassinations and deny it overthrew foreign governments.
The NSA used to hide that it spied on Americans and the FBI denied it
did searches without warrants. Now they not openly admit they do these
things, they use the laws designed to constrain them, like FISA, as
tools of the police state. As James Madison pointed out, “the means of
defense against foreign danger historically have become instruments of
tyranny at home”

Even people on the left who intensely dislike
Trump & Flynn have said Flynn’s political assassination sets a very
dangerous precedent. But some, like Glenn Greenwald, say very serious
crimes were committed by the leakers, but he thinks the end justifies
the means. David Knight explains why this is fundamentally different
and far, far more dangerous than whistleblowers exposing criminal
actions.

Follow David on Twitter – https://twitter.com/libertytarian

 

ROBERT KENNEDY JR. & ROBERT DE NIRO HOLD MAJOR VACCINE PRESS CONFERENCE~OFFER $100,000 FOR EVIDENCE~NEW CDC VACCINE SCHEDULES & QUARANTINE EXPANSION

ROBERT KENNEDY JR. & ROBERT DE NIRO 
HOLD MAJOR VACCINE PRESS CONFERENCE~
OFFER $100,000 FOR EVIDENCE
 San Antonio DA Speaks Out Against Toxic Vaccines
 “Vaxxed” Producer: We Are Killing Our Children
 This is Insane! (Rant from the Heart) Paul Thomas, MD, Pediatrician
 I have a huge concern, in The New York Times today… it is
February 8th, 2017… there’s a huge article urging our President, Donald
Trump, not to have a commission on vaccine safety. Wait a minute! They
don’t want to find out if there’s a problem with our vaccines? That’s
insane, folks! Absolutely insane. I’m a board certified pediatrician. I
am not anti-vaccine. I’m not pro-vaccine. This idea of pushing people
into anti or pro is ridiculous. We all want healthy kids. If we’re going
to use vaccines, we want safe vaccines. There is absolutely no reason
we shouldn’t look into this.

 New Federal 2017 Vaccine Schedules Approved 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention (CDC) and its Advisory Committee on Immunization 
Practices (ACIP) have approved new adult and childhood vaccine 
schedules, effective Feb. 1, 2017.
  The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American Academy
 of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of Obstetricians and 
Gynecologists (ACOG) have all endorsed the new schedules.1

The CDC’s release of the vaccine
schedules has coincided with news reports that the Trump administration
may appoint a special commission to investigate the safety of vaccines.
In response to these reports, AAFP’s president, John Meigs, expressed his opposition to the proposal:

A new federal commission
on immunizations is not necessary and would divert much-needed dollars
from other, more pressing health care issues. To suggest the need for
such an organization promotes unnecessary, ongoing and disproven
skepticism about vaccines and public safety.”2

He added:
The science
is clear, and family physicians stand ready to help everyone―from the
incoming administration to the general public―understand how safe and
important vaccines are.
2

Updates to the Childhood Vaccine Schedule

The updated childhood vaccine schedule recommends that children between
ages 11-12 years old receive two doses of Human Papillomavirus (HPV9)
vaccine instead of the previously licensed three-dose schedule.
2
The HPV9 vaccine can be given as early as nine years old and as late as
13-14 years old. For patients 15 years old and over, it is recommended
that they receive three doses of HPV9.2
The second update pertains to the
timing at which two doses of the meningococcal vaccine MenB-FHbp should
be administered rather than the three doses originally recommended.2

The third update relates to the HepB
vaccine. The ACIP recommends the hepatitis B shot should be administered
to newborn infants 
“within 24 hours of birth” instead of the previous “at hospital discharge.”3

Updates to the Adult Vaccine Schedule

The ACIP recommends that adult
patients with a history of egg allergy that manifests with symptoms
other than hives may receive age-appropriate inactivated (IIV) or
recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) but should be supervised by a
medical professional, who is able to quickly recognize and manage severe
allergic reactions.
2
The ACIP additionally recommends HepB
vaccine for adults suffering from chronic liver disease, cirrhosis,
alcoholic liver disease, fatty liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis.2

 References:

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunizations: For Healthcare Professionals. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Feb. 6, 2017.
2 American Academy of Family Physicians. CDC, AAFP Release 2017 Immunization Schedules. AAFP.org Feb. 6, 2017.
3 
CDC. Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger, UNITED STATES, 2017. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Feb. 6, 2017.
_______________________________________________________

 CDC Publishes Final Rule on Quarantine Powers 
BY JOSEPH MERCOLA, DO
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The federal government’s legal authority to detain and quarantine
persons infected with certain highly communicable and deadly infectious
diseases historically primarily has involved detaining people entering
the U.S. by boats and airplanes or traveling across state lines.
Federal government officials have long had the authority to
apprehend, isolate and quarantine people for a limited number of
infectious diseases on the U.S. quarantine list.
However, the legal authority for surveillance, detention and
quarantining of citizens residing in the U.S. suspected of being
infected with certain non-quarantinable communicable diseases
historically has resided with state government health officials.1
On Jan. 17, 2017, the last day of the Obama administration, a new
final rule on the Control of Communicable Diseases was issued by the
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that is schedule
to take effect in March.


The new rule gives the CDC expanded authority to apprehend, isolate
and quarantine for at least 72 hours a person entering the U.S. or
traveling between states, who is suspected of being infected, or at risk
of being infected, with one of the nine diseases on the U.S. quarantine
list (cholera, plague, diphtheria, smallpox, yellow fever, infectious
tuberculosis, viral hemorrhagic fevers [like Ebola], severe acute
respiratory syndrome [SARS] and influenza) that can cause a pandemic.2


The rule also strengthens federal surveillance of travelers for
symptoms of non-quarantinable diseases like measles, pertussis and
meningococcal disease.3

While proponents are touting the changes as necessary to protect the
public health, critics have been arguing since the CDC first published
the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) in August 2016, that it is an
example of government overreach, which poses a risk to  health and civil
liberties.4
Because the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) and other
organizations advocating for protection of civil liberties urged
Americans to contact the CDC and oppose the NPRM last summer, the CDC
received more than 15,000 comments from the public, many of them
expressing concern that the rule violated the U.S. Constitution, and
human and civil rights.

Although the CDC rejected this characterization, the agency did make
changes to the final rule, including eliminating a provision that would
have allowed the CDC to require individuals to agree to submit to public
health measures such as hospitalization, vaccination and medical
treatment.
In addition, the final rule states that medical examinations can only be conducted with prior informed consent.5

Who Could Be Quarantined Under the New Rule?

The new rule gives the CDC the power to detain for further health
assessment a person who is crossing the U.S. or state borders if he or
she is exhibiting certain infection symptoms associated with
quarantinable diseases, such as fever, headache and acute
gastroenteritis (abdominal cramps, loose stools or vomiting).
The new rule also makes it clear that rash and cough symptoms of
non-quarantinable infectious diseases, such as measles and pertussis,
among travelers are going to be more closely monitored by federal
government officials as well.
For non-quarantinable diseases, CDC will be working with state health
departments, who have the legal authority to detain and quarantine
citizens suspected of being infected with, or at risk for, being
infected with a communicable disease.
James Hodge Jr., a professor of public health law and ethics at the
Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, told
NPR, “Because of the breadth and scope of the definition of ill persons,
CDC can target a much wider swath of persons to assess and screen.”6

Airline Pilots and Ship Operators to Become Surveillance Crews?

The new rule also includes new reporting requirements for airplanes
and ships. If the rules take effect, airline pilots and ship operators
would be required to report not only deaths on board but also “certain
overt and common signs and symptoms of sick travelers” to the CDC prior
to arriving into the U.S. Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC co-founder and
president noted:7

It is not a good idea to make the public’s airport
experience even more difficult by enlisting flight crews to report
passengers with symptoms that could be nothing more than eczema, acne,
norovirus or the common cold.
… What started out as a vacation could be turned into a nightmare spent in an airport quarantine center.

The required signs and symptoms include the following, and must be
reported not only during international travel, but also on airline
flights flying domestically, between states:8
Airlines
(1) Fever (defined as measured temperature of 100.4 degrees F [38
degrees C] or greater, feels warm to the touch or gives a history of
feeling feverish)
AND one of the following:

  • Skin rash
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Persistent cough
  • Decreased consciousness or recent onset of confusion
  • New unexplained bleeding or bruising
  • Persistent diarrhea
  • Persistent vomiting (other than airsickness)
  • Headache with stiff neck
  • Appearing obviously unwell; OR

(2) Fever that has persisted for more than 48 hours; OR
(3) Other signs or symptoms of communicable disease CDC is concerned about and has announced in the Federal Register.
Ships
(1) Fever (defined as measured temperature of 100.4 degrees F [38
degrees C] or greater, feels warm to the touch or gives a history of
feeling feverish)
AND one of the following:

  • Skin rash
  • Difficulty breathing or suspected or confirmed pneumonia
  • Persistent cough or cough with bloody sputum
  • Decreased consciousness or recent onset of confusion
  • New unexplained bruising or bleeding
  • Persistent vomiting (other than seasickness)
  • Headache with stiff neck
  • Appearing obviously unwell; OR

(2) Fever that has persisted for more than 48 hours; OR
(3) Acute gastroenteritis (inflammation of stomach or intestines or both), defined as:

  • Diarrhea, defined as within a 24-hour period, three or more episodes
    of loose stools or an occurrence of loose stools that is above normal
    for the person, or
  • Vomiting and one or more of the following additional symptoms: one
    or more episodes of loose stools in a 24-hour period, abdominal cramps,
    headache, muscle aches or fever (temperature of 100.4 degrees F [38
    degrees C] or greater); OR

(4) Other signs or symptoms of communicable disease CDC is concerned about and has announced in the Federal Register.

Is This Part of Global Efforts to Eradicate Measles?

In August 2016, NPRM, the CDC pointed to “the ongoing persistence of measles
in the United States” as an example of why the updated rules are
necessary. They even said, “Every case of measles in the United States
is considered a public health emergency because of its extremely high
transmissibility.”9
The World Health Organization (WHO) and U.S. health officials have
targeted mass MMR vaccination campaigns as the solution to eradicating
measles, even though serious questions remain about the vaccine’s efficacy and safety.
In the final rule, measles outbreaks in the U.S. were again
highlighted. It illustrates why travelers with a rash or cough could
become the subject of scrutiny and reporting to the CDC by airline and
other public transportation personnel as the federal government more
closely monitors almost all signs of illness in all travelers.

Will the New Rules Backfire?

Once it becomes widespread knowledge that an airline pilot or ship’s
captain must report symptoms of common illness directly to the federal
government, and that information could be used to immediately detain or
quarantine you, there’s a good chance people may try to evade the
system. Jennifer Nuzzo, a research epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins
Center for Health Security, told NPR:10

The worst-case scenario is that people may try to
evade these procedures by, say, taking medicines to reduce their fever,
or be afraid to report it if they are feeling ill on a plane … We don’t
want to drive cases underground by putting measures in place that seem
as though they carry some penalties associated with them.

Emergency Health Measures Should Be Grounded in Science, Not Fear

While one concern is that increased surveillance of travelers by
health officials could drive diseases underground, another is that
overreaching power could allow people to be wrongly detained. An op-ed
piece in The New York Times described the case of Kaci Hickox, who had volunteered as a nurse treating Ebola patients in Sierra Leone, West Africa.
She had no known exposure to the disease, as she had worn heavy
protective gear, but upon her return to the U.S., New Jersey Gov. Chris
Christie ordered her quarantined to an area hospital. This was against
the current CDC guidelines, which stated she should monitor herself for
symptoms at home.
“It’s imperative that whenever the next outbreak hits, emergency
health measures are grounded in scientific evidence and guided by clear,
fair rules to protect people from wrongful deprivation of their
liberties,” the Times piece states, continuing:11

That incident wasn’t an anomaly. During a bubonic
plague outbreak in 1900, for example, government officials quarantined
the entire Chinatown neighborhood of San Francisco.
The quarantine applied only to Chinese residents, and lacked
any scientific basis. It was fueled by little more than naked fear and
racism. Given this history, we want to ensure that federal officials
applying the new regulations will act on the basis of science and
evidence and not on politics and public fear.

What Diseases are Covered in the Quarantine Rules?

According to the new rules, “CDC may apprehend, detain, examine or
conditionally release an individual if it reasonably believes that
he/she may be infected with or exposed to a quarantinable communicable
disease.”12 Those diseases currently include the following:

  • Cholera
  • Diphtheria
  • Infectious tuberculosis
  • Plague
  • Smallpox
  • Yellow fever
  • Viral hemorrhagic fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American and others not yet isolated or named)
  • Severe acute respiratory syndromes (e.g., SARS, MERS)
  • Influenza caused by novel or re-emergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic

However, as mentioned, the new rule also allows the CDC to step up
federal surveillance of travelers displaying a number of common illness
symptoms associated with non-quarantinable diseases like measles and pertussis.
Although travelers found to be infected with or at risk for being
infected with a non-quarantinable disease like measles cannot be
quarantined by federal health officials, state health officials do have
the legal authority to detain and quarantine residents infected with
certain communicable diseases, depending upon the state’s public health
laws.
The final rule was originally scheduled to go into effect Feb. 21,
2017. However, with the change in administration, the new regulations
are being reviewed and will not take effect until the end of March 2017,
at the earliest.13

 References: 
______________________________________________________ 

 Actor Bravely Exposing Vaccine Coverup
 Published on Feb 20, 2017

Robert
De Niro still can’t fully support vaccination. In an interview on “Full
Measure with Sharyl Attkisson,” the 73-year-old actor asked, “Where is
the science?” This is surprising since he was forced to remove the
documentary Vaxxed from the Tribeca Film Festival last year, in a move
that seemed to indicate the actor was backing down from his efforts to
push the issue into the mainstream.

Robert De Niro still can’t
fully support vaccination. In an interview on “Full Measure with Sharyl
Attkisson,” the 73-year-old actor asked, “Where is the science?” This is
surprising since he was forced to remove the documentary Vaxxed from
the Tribeca Film Festival last year, in a move that seemed to indicate
the actor was backing down from his efforts to push the issue into the
mainstream.

 

Published on Feb 21, 2017

The
Center for Disease Control and Prevention declared that there is no
connection between and vaccines and autism, however actor Robert De Niro
— who is the father of an autistic child — asks, “Where is the
science?”.

Now that De Niro has joined forces with Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. in questioning the safety of vaccinating children and
pregnant women, will we finally get more information that’s been long
hidden by the CDC?VACCINES: Healthcare Crisis, Reaction, Solution

VATICAN “CONCERNED” OVER “SPREAD OF NATIONALISM, POPULISM” IN U.S. & EUROPE~LIBERALS POLITICIZE LOVE TO PUSH OPEN BORDERS

VATICAN “CONCERNED” OVER “SPREAD OF NATIONALISM, POPULISM” IN U.S. & EUROPE
BY CHRISTINE WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Vatican’s Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin
said Monday that the Holy See is concerned over growing populist and
nationalist movements, both in Europe and in the United States.


The Holy See has not demonstrated any such concern about jihad
attacks and the Islamic supremacist incursion into the West through
Hijra and the violent crimes associated with it. Where is Pope Francis’
compassion for the millions of victims of Islamic supremacists and
jihadists globally?

“Vatican Expresses Concerns Over ‘Spread of Nationalism, Populism,’” by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, February 14, 2017:

The Vatican’s Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin
said Monday that the Holy See is concerned over growing populist and
nationalist movements, both in Europe and in the United States.
In an interview for the Italian evening news on the state-owned RAI
network, Cardinal Parolin was asked whether the Vatican is worried about
what the interviewer called “the spread of nationalism and populism not
only in Europe but also in the United States with Donald Trump.”
“I think so, I think so,” Parolin said. “Certainly these closings are
not a good sign,” since many of them “are born of fear, which is not a
good counsellor.”
The Cardinal also recalled recent comments by Pope Francis, saying that “there is a risk of history repeating itself.”
In a lengthy interview with the Spanish daily El País in late
January, Pope Francis was asked whether he was concerned about the
spread of a populism that capitalizes on “people’s fears,” preaching “a
message of hate.”
In his reply, Francis distinguished between a good, grassroots
populism, where it is the people who are “the protagonists,” and a cult
of personality where a charismatic figure like Hitler rises to power and
is welcomed as a savior figure.
“For me the most typical example of populism in the European sense is
the Germany of 1933,” Francis said. After Hindenburg, “Germany tries to
get back up, searches for its identity, looks for a leader, someone to
give it back its identity and a youngster named Adolf Hitler says, ‘I
can do it; I can do it.’”
Whereas the first sort of populism is a good thing, the latter can be very dangerous, he said.
The risk, Francis said, is that in times of crisis we lack judgment
and people can begin to think, “Let’s look for a savior who gives us
back our identity and let’s defend ourselves with walls, barbed-wire,
whatever, from other people that may rob us of our identity.”
“And that is a very serious thing,” he said. “That is why I always try to say: talk among yourselves, talk to one another.”
In the same interview, the Pope was asked specifically whether he was
worried about Donald Trump, whom the interviewer described as a
xenophobe filled with “hatred for foreigners.”
Francis said that the new U.S. President deserved to be judged by his actions, not by “prophecies” of what he may or may not do.
“I think that we must wait and see,” Francis said. “I don’t like to
get ahead of myself nor judge people prematurely. We will see how he
acts, what he does, and then I will have an opinion.”
The Pope said it is “most unwise” to be afraid of something that might or might not happen.

_____________________________________________________

 Liberals Politicize Love To Push Open Borders
 Published on Feb 15, 2017

The
left has politicized everything, including love. In an all out assault
this week by the globalists, we saw them pushing open borders hard,
along with other globalist initiatives once said to be conspiracy
theories.

_______________________________________________________

 

U.S. Bishops Welcome Blocking of Trump Travel Ban

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/robert-spencer-in-pj-media-u-s-bishops-welcome-blocking-of-trump-travel-ban; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Perhaps they have a financial reason for ignoring jihad attacks on churches. 
My latest in PJ Media:
 

The temporary ban on immigration from seven Muslim
countries is dead, at least for the time being, and the U.S. Conference
of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) couldn’t be happier.


Bishop Joe Vasquez of Austin, Texas, who is the USCCB’s chair of the Committee on Migration, issued a statement saying:


We welcome the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals. We respect the rule of law and the American judicial process.
We remain steadfast in our commitment to resettling refugees and all
those fleeing persecution. At this time, we remain particularly
dedicated to ensuring that affected refugee and immigrant families are
not separated and that they continue to be welcomed to our country. We
will continue to welcome the newcomer as it is a vital part of our
Catholic faith and an enduring element of our American values and
tradition.

By ignoring the national
security issues that this “refugee” influx poses, Vazquez’s statement
was sadly typical of USCCB communiqués on immigration issues. He spoke
about the Church’s “commitment to resettling refugees and all those
fleeing persecution,” but about those refugees who are coming in order
to persecute non-Muslims, Vazquez was silent.


Is such a concern preposterous?
Not at all.
In 2016 alone, there were numerous incidents of Muslim
migrants staging jihad attacks in the United States. In February 2016,
Somali Muslim migrant Mohammad Barry stabbed multiple patrons at a
restaurant owned by an Israeli Arab Christian. In September 2016, Ahmad
Khan Rahami, an Afghan Muslim migrant, set off bombs in New York City
and New Jersey. Arcan Cetin, a Turkish Muslim migrant, murdered five
people in a mall in Burlington, Washington in September 2016. In October
2016, Dahir Adan, another Somali Muslim migrant, stabbed mall shoppers
in St. Cloud while screaming “Allahu akbar.” In November 2016, Abdul
Razak Artan, yet another Somali Muslim migrant, injured nine people with
a car and knife attack at Ohio State University.
In all, no fewer than 72 jihad terrorists have come to the U.S. from the countries listed in Trump’s immigration ban.
What’s more, all of the jihadis
who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered
Europe as refugees. In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would
soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. The Lebanese education minister said
in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in
camps in his country. On May 10, 2016, Patrick Calvar, the head of
France’s DGSI internal intelligence agency, said that the Islamic State was using migrant routes through the Balkans to get jihadis into Europe.
The USCCB should also take careful note of the fact that Muslim migrants in Europe are targeting Christians and churches.
In France, anti-Christian attacks have risen by 245 percent. In Germany, Muslims reportedly “devastated” a Christian parish center and wrote “Islamist slogans” on the walls. In Italy, a Muslim set fire to a church Nativity scene. Most notoriously, in France Muslims entered a Catholic church during mass and murdered the elderly priest at the altar. Shortly thereafter, Muslims entered another church in France and left a photograph of the perpetrator of the jihad massacre in Nice on the altar.
Do the U.S. Catholic bishops
really think that such incidents will not or cannot happen here? They
have never answered that question or even been asked it, because all
discussion of this issue is immediately buried under charges of
“Islamophobia.”


The USCCB’s steadfast refusal
to address these issues, and strong opposition to Trump’s ban, may stem
from motives somewhat less high-minded than those that Bishop Vazquez
articulated….

Find out what they are and read the rest here.

 

FORMER OBAMA OFFICIALS, LOYALISTS WAGED SECRET CAMPAIGN TO OUST FLYNN TO PRESERVE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL~MUSLIM LOVING BILDERBERG GLOBALIST PETRAEUS BEING CONSIDERED

 
FORMER OBAMA OFFICIALS, LOYALISTS WAGED SECRET CAMPAIGN TO OUST FLYNN 
TO PRESERVE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The swamp, in so dire need of draining, has struck back and scored a victory. 
 

“Former Obama Officials, Loyalists Waged Secret Campaign to Oust Flynn,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, February 14, 2017:

The abrupt resignation Monday evening of White House
national security adviser Michael Flynn is the culmination of a secret,
months-long campaign by former Obama administration confidantes to
handicap President Donald Trump’s national security apparatus and
preserve the nuclear deal with Iran, according to multiple sources in
and out of the White House who described to the Washington Free Beacon a behind-the-scenes effort by these officials to plant a series of damaging stories about Flynn in the national media.
The effort, said to include former Obama administration
adviser Ben Rhodes—the architect of a separate White House effort to
create what he described as a pro-Iran echo chamber—included a small
task force of Obama loyalists who deluged media outlets with stories
aimed at eroding Flynn’s credibility, multiple sources revealed.

The operation primarily focused on discrediting Flynn, an opponent of
the Iran nuclear deal, in order to handicap the Trump administration’s
efforts to disclose secret details of the nuclear deal with Iran that
had been long hidden by the Obama administration.
Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told the Free Beacon
that these Obama loyalists plotted in the months before Trump’s
inauguration to establish a set of roadblocks before Trump’s national
security team, which includes several prominent opponents of diplomacy
with Iran. The Free Beacon first reported on this effort in January.

Sources who spoke to the Free Beacon requested anonymity in
order to speak freely about the situation and avoid interfering with the
White House’s official narrative about Flynn, which centers on his
failure to adequately inform the president about a series of phone calls
with Russian officials.
Flynn took credit for his missteps regarding these phone calls in a
brief statement released late Monday evening. Trump administration
officials subsequently stated that Flynn’s efforts to mislead the
president and vice president about his contacts with Russia could not be
tolerated.
However, multiple sources closely involved in the situation pointed
to a larger, more secretive campaign aimed at discrediting Flynn and
undermining the Trump White House.
“It’s undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well
underway before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and
politicized series of leaks designed to undermine him,” said one veteran
national security adviser with close ties to the White House team.
“This pattern reminds me of the lead up to the Iran deal, and probably
features the same cast of characters.”
The Free Beacon first reported in January that, until its final days in office, the Obama administration hosted
several pro-Iran voices who were critical in helping to mislead the
American public about the terms of the nuclear agreement. This included a
former Iranian government official and the head of the National Iranian
American Council, or NIAC, which has been accused of serving as Iran’s
mouthpiece in Washington, D.C.
Since then, top members of the Obama administration’s national
security team have launched a communications infrastructure after they
left the White House, and have told reporters they are using that infrastructure to undermine Trump’s foreign policy.
“It’s actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are
celebrating today,” said one veteran foreign policy insider who is close
to Flynn and the White House. “They know that the number one target is
Iran … [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was
going to go off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the
[secret] agreements even surfaced.”
Flynn had been preparing to publicize many of the details about the
nuclear deal that had been intentionally hidden by the Obama
administration as part of its effort to garner support for the deal,
these sources said.
Flynn is now “gone before anybody can see what happened” with these
secret agreements, said the second insider close to Flynn and the White
House….

_______________________________________________________

 Flynn out at NSA, Petraeus could be all in
EXCERPT:  Petraeus would be a disaster — a stalwart of the old establishment in an administration that said it would “drain the swamp.” 

“In May 2016, he published
what was essentially an anti Trump screed, saying that proposals to
restrict immigration from Muslim countries that are hotspots of jihad
terror shouldn’t even be made, so as to avoid offending Muslims.

He was in favor of using al Qaeda jihadis to defeat the Islamic State,
which would give us a region full of al-Qaeda jihadis with American
weapons and materiel who hate the United States and want to destroy it.
(This is essentially what we have now in Syria, where Obama armed
“moderates” who were really al-Qaeda jihadis.)

When he headed up the international coalition in Afghanistan, he said that
Florida pastor Terry Jones’ plan to burn the Qur’an was “hateful, it
was intolerant and it was extremely disrespectful and again, we condemn
it in the strongest manner possible.” He warned that the Qur’an-burning would endanger American troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere. He issued a statement saying
that he hoped “the Afghan people understand that the actions of a small
number of individuals, who have been extremely disrespectful to the
holy Quran, are not representative of any of the countries of the
international community who are in Afghanistan to help the Afghan
people.””

 

AMERICA’S ‘POOR ME’ GENERATION, AWASH IN SELF-PITY

AMERICA’S
‘POOR ME’ GENERATION, 
AWASH IN SELF-PITY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By
Ron Ewart

February 8, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
“Life
is a fight, a fight to stay alive and a fight to keep others and government
from taking your life or your liberty from you. Acknowledge that fact
and you might just survive as a free man. Those awash in self-pity and
think of themselves as victims will never be free and they will be a
heavy burden on the rest of society.”
—Ron Ewart
In
the year 1620 and beyond, they crossed the Atlantic in sailing ships
to get to America and freedom. The journey could take anywhere from
six to 12 weeks to make the crossing, depending on the winds. Life aboard
ship was primitive at best. Firsthand accounts speak of illness, cramped
quarters, food and water rations. They had to endure scurvy, diphtheria,
dysentery and seasickness. They were at the mercy of the captain, ship
owners ….. and the sea. Many of them died during the passage. Because
the journey was so long, when passengers died, their bodies were thrown
overboard because there was no way to store them on the ship. The bones
of thousands of Pilgrims are held forever in the bosom of the Atlantic
Ocean, on their failed journey to freedom.
There
was no government to protect the Pilgrims, pay their fare to the new
land, or provide a handout if they got sick or destitute. Those who
could not pay were required to remain on board the ship until they were
sold into indentured servitude and forced to work to pay for their voyage.
When
the surviving Pilgrims landed on the shores of America, they were faced
with life in the wilderness and attacks by local Indian tribes. Health
care and doctors were almost non-existent. You either survived because
of your wits and plain dumb luck, or died from the elements, starvation,
disease, or an Indian arrow.
They
crossed the plains in covered wagons to reach some dream they had of
owning land in the territories, or striking it rich in the gold fields.
They built up little towns and roads, bridges, businesses and schools.
Then the trains came and they could expand their travel and markets
exponentially. The only thing the government did was to provide the
land for the railroad companies and land grants to eager settlers, under
the Homestead Act of 1862. If the settler worked and improved his land
for five years, it was his land to keep for free and he will have earned
it many times over.
But
other than that, there was no government farming subsidies. There were
no food stamps, rent assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security,
welfare, much less free college tuition. These hardy people built a
nation and they did it with little help from government and even less
government interference. They persevered by main strength and awkwardness.
Many times they lost, but got up again and pressed forward. Their strength
was built on adversity. They didn’t “cry”, “moan”,
“groan”, or “complain” to government when the going
got tough. They just worked harder or found a way to “fix”
whatever they faced at the time. They didn’t win all the time but nevertheless,
most never gave up. That beginning environment of adversity forged the
strength of a nation and was the foundation of a strong, prosperous
and exceptional America.
When
the wave of European immigrants passed through Ellis Island (1892 to
1954) eager to come to the land of the free and the home of the brave,
government provided little to no assistance. In fact, the government
went to great lengths to see that the arriving immigrants could support
themselves and had enough money to get started in their new land. The
government even initiated a “head tax” for arriving immigrants.
They were screened for disease and other maladies. Up to 20% of the
arriving immigrants were returned to their native country for one reason
or another.
Not
so today. Illegal immigrants that evade the Border Patrol receive no
screening for disease or the ability to sustain themselves. There is
little effort to round them up and deport them for breaking our immigration
laws, once “lost” in the general population. Instead, they
are molly coddled, pampered, paid and protected by sanctuary jurisdictions
and immigration advocates.
Legal
and illegal immigrants and refugees arriving in America receive all
kinds of government assistance, a monumental burden on the American
taxpayer, a huge drag on the economy and a giant magnet to attract more
of them. It is no wonder that America is broke and deep in debt.
But
let’s get back to the “Poor Me” whiners, crybabies, protestors
and self-ascribed victims in America that inhabit our colleges, ghettos
and immigrant enclaves. Millions of Americans and legal and illegal
immigrants have become the “poor me” generation, most of them
subscribing to the left side of politics. Their forbearers of colonial
and pioneer days are rolling in their graves to see how their descendants
turned out. More than half of them wouldn’t survive under the conditions
our forefathers and mothers had to endure. If they suddenly found themselves
in the wilderness, most of them wouldn’t have the slightest idea on
how to survive, because they haven’t been taught.
They
haven’t been taught about self-reliance, personal responsibility and
individual freedom. They haven’t been trained to survive when the going
gets tough. Adversity builds strength and character. The easy life,
where there is no discipline and where everything is provided for them,
leads to personal weakness, low self-esteem and the desire to indulge
in pleasures of the flesh. Instead of looking to them selves to solve
their own problems, they have been taught to look to government and
government is only too eager to “help” them, but with a string
attached. The string comes at the voting booth where those receiving
the government “help” are obliged to vote for those providing
the “help.”
We
all know which Party is offering the “help”, with money from
the Public Treasury to which none in the Party own any piece thereof.
Under law, they call this robbing-the-till for personal gain what it
is, grand theft, punishable by fines and imprisonment. Unfortunately,
the “help” this Party offered to its “Poor Me” groupies
turned out to be a very expensive, slowly evaporating mirage on a distant
horizon. That “help” just converted otherwise potentially
strong individuals, into crybabies and bowls of quivering yellow jelly
and made them helpless cripples.
What
we do know is that those reading this column are probably not members
of the “Poor Me” generation.
Ever
since the government-triggered Great Depression and the rapid rise of
socialism under FDR, America has been headed downhill, away from individual
freedom, self-reliance and personal responsibility and towards collectivism,
dependency and government control of everything. The passage of the
16th Amendment in 1913, which created the Federal Reserve and the IRS,
was no coincidence. It was no coincidence that the government, in the
late 1920’s, retained the University of Illinois and Harvard University
to study how to control people through their subconscious minds. It
was no coincidence that the U. S. economy suddenly collapsed in 1929.
It was no coincidence that socialism rose rapidly under FDR during the
1930’s and beyond. It was no coincidence that the gold standard was
abolished in 1933. America was bankrupt, threatened by Communism and
headed for Hell. Socialism and top-down control of the masses was government’s
and the central bankers’ answer.
We
just received a response to one of our recent articles where the person
described, in one paragraph, what happened to America since the 1930’s.
He wrote:
“The
‘Master Plan’ for the USA has always been to reduce the USA to a third
world feudal state by diluting the gene and intelligence pool, degrading
education, attacking tradition and culture, abolishing the nuclear family,
promoting sexual perversion and abnormality and hybrid relationships,
debasing the currency, eliminating the middle class, dissolving Christianity,
ignoring the Constitution, weakening and removing personal liberty and
base freedoms, and importing as many impoverished and uneducated persons
from around the globe to economically and socially drain as much life
from the US as possible ….. Marxism masquerading as immigration. The
US has been in the crosshairs for decades because to take down the ‘Crown
Jewel’ of the Western world is to send a message to all other countries
that they can also be co-opted. ‘Front end’ rationale for any action
taken by this government is not ever the reason for the action. Ponder
no longer on the matter. The destruction of western civilization is
the goal.”
When
you throw back the curtain and expose the politicians, central bankers
and industrialist “Wizards” calling the shots, this gentleman
cannot be too far off the mark. The whiners, crybabies, protestors and
self-ascribed victims in America are the result of actions of the “Wizards”
pulling the strings of international money, commerce, trade, wars and
politics. The “Wizards” have bought off the people with a
few pieces of silver and filled their Little
Black Boxes
with hogwash, mush and propaganda.
These
same “Wizards” (mostly Progressives) have convinced
the “Poor Me” generation that because they are poor, sick,
out of work, an illegal immigrant, refugee, Black, Latino, gay, transgender,
or just plain lazy, they have an irrevocable claim to everyone else’s
money and sweat labor, or special treatment from government. To pay
for their alleged irrevocable claim, or special treatment, the government
collects that money in an act of forced charity ….. at the point of
a gun. Charity should have never become the purview of government and
was never authorized by the Constitution. Charity, to be true charity,
must be voluntary, not mandatory. Mandatory charity is slavery by any
other name.
Sadly,
the weakest among us have sold their souls and given away their freedom
for so little because their parents did not teach them critical thinking,
personal responsibility, to question everything, how to recognize a
fraud and to never trust government.
Everything
you think you know is probably a government, media, or academia created
illusion with the sole intent of controlling the masses. The international
environmental movement and social justice were designed to that end
and to re-distribute the wealth of western nations. Economy destroying,
expensive legislative actions to limit alleged man-caused global warming,
are just one of the elements of the international environmental plan
of control.
 Americans
have been hoodwinked by 100+
Years of Progressive Rule
that champion a collectivist
culture, social justice, radical environmentalism, appeasement of our
enemies, a massive welfare state, illegal immigrants, sanctuary cities,
open borders and mindless compliant citizens. Progressives have created
multiples of a “Poor Me” generation, awash in self-pity, low
self-esteem and rabid self-indulgence, requiring that their only salvation
is being dependent on Mother government when things go wrong in their
lives and things are always going wrong in their lives.
With
over half of the American people steeped in this “dependent”
culture, planted there by decades of constant Progressive indoctrination
and brainwashing, the fate of America is pre-ordained unless President
Trump and those that support him can trigger a massive flashback to
the time of self-reliance, independence, personal responsibility and
individual freedom. As we stated in our last article: “A
successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that
was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.”
But
like the fighter pilot says after consuming over half of his fuel, “we
have passed the point of no return ….. without midair refueling.”

We had better hope that midair refueling happens soon ….. very soon,
or Progressivism, collectivism and socialism will have won and individual
freedom will have been thrown on the trash heap of forgotten Republics.
If
you LIKED
this article, let us know. Constructive comments welcome.

GLOBAL EFFORT LAUNCHED TO “REPEAL & REPLACE” UNITED NATIONS

GLOBAL EFFORT LAUNCHED TO “REPEAL & REPLACE” UNITED NATIONS
BY ALEX NEWMAN
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A global effort dubbed “Covenant of Democratic Nations
is working to abolish the United Nations, widely ridiculed as the
“dictators club,” and replace it with an international forum open
exclusively to free and democratic nations. Basically, it is a “repeal
and replace” campaign to protect the world from the UN and its
increasingly vicious attacks on freedom and self-government.

A number of lawmakers around the world have expressed interest in the
campaign as the movement travels from city to city hosting events to
expose the UN and promote an alternative.

The figurative straw that broke the camel’s back for organizers
appears to have been UN Security Council resolution 2334 declaring the
presence of Jews in parts of Jerusalem to be a violation of supposed
“international law.” The move sparked outrage across the political spectrum. Even stalwart neo-conservatives and globalists jumped on the bandwagon
to defund the UN. On Capitol Hill, interest in protecting America and
liberty from the UN has surged since that vote. The “Covenant of
Democratic Nations” agenda also has strong support among certain Jewish
and Zionist groups seeking to defend Israel against the constant UN demonization.

But with the dictator-dominated UN becoming increasingly and openly hostile to freedom, borders, and self-government — not to mention the perpetual UN scandals, the regular rape of children by UN “peace” troops, the retaliation against whistleblowers, and other horrors — the broader movement to protect humanity and liberty from the UN has been growing for decades
as well. And in the years ahead, it is almost certain to keep getting
stronger. On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump was a fierce
critic of the UN, too, pointing out that the outfit was “not a friend”
to freedom, Israel, or the United States.  

The Covenant of Democratic Nations held its “Global Launch”
event last month on Capitol Hill. “The League of Nations outlived its
usefulness during the Hitler regime,” read the invitation for the
January 23 confab, held at the Rayburn House Office Building. “After the
War, the League was replaced by the United Nations. Now the United
Nations has outlived its usefulness and must be replaced with a new
international body, one comprised solely of those nations governed by
democratic principles, devoted to genuine democracy, equality, and
peaceful relations throughout the world.”

“The United States should defund and withdraw from the United Nations
and reconstitute the movement to achieve world peace for all in a new
world body: The Covenant of Democratic Nations,” the campaign continued
on its website and in various documents and invitations. “The Covenant
of Democratic Nations will review, re-ratify, amend, or nullify all acts
and resolutions of the United Nations and its agencies creating a new
body of long-overdue, reformed, and updated international law.” The
Trump administration is already working on executive orders and actions
that would fit nicely with that agenda.

Among those in attendance at the “Global Launch” in Washington, D.C.,
was Representative Trent Franks (R-Ariz.). “This is a critically
important issue,” he explained. “The United Nations started out with a
noble charter … but the United Nations has not only failed their
charter, they have distinctly moved in the opposite direction and done
actual harm. They have become an anti-American, anti-Semitic,
anti-democratic, anti-freedom mob. We need some type of alternative — a
Covenant of Democratic Nations. We need to repeal and replace.”

On the campaign’s website, Franks is also quoted blasting the UN.
“The United Nations is a proven failure and must be replaced,” said the
congressman, who has a cumulative 73 percent on the Freedom Index,
which ranks lawmakers based on their fidelity to the U.S. Constitution.
“An international body with the goal of promulgating global stability
and protecting and promoting inalienable human rights and freedom in the
world requires an entirely new institution. Founded by genuine
democracies, limited to democracies, and devoted to democracy as the
foundation for world peace, the Covenant of Democratic Nations would be
able to succeed where the U.N. has failed.”

A number of other prominent voices also spoke at the event. Among them was Edwin Black, author of the book IBM and the Holocaust,
and one of the lead figures behind the new campaign. “The world body
began as a sick organ, and deteriorated from there,” Black explained in
recent commentaries about the proposed new body, highlighting the fact
that the UN’s member regimes include the most blood-thirsty and brutal
dictatorships on the planet.

Another leading activist pushing the plan who attended the Global
Launch was Sarah Stern, founder of the pro-Israel Endowment for Middle
East Truth (EMET). Panelist Kenneth Marcus, former director of the U.S.
Civil Rights Commission, pushed an “Amexit” from the UN. Finally,
constitutional attorney Nathan Lewin, who has reportedly worked on
dozens of Supreme Court cases, said the UN “deserves an obituary” after
“signing its own death warrant” by passing the Security Council
resolution claiming the Jewish presence in East Jerusalem and Judea and
Samaria was illegal.

Ben Cohen of the Israel Project also spoke at the event. “You now
have states that are basically glorified concentration camps … like
North Korea, who get to have an equal voice with Australia, Canada and
the United States,” he said, highlighting the constant demonization of
Israel at the UN.

Follow-up events have been or will be held in New York, Palm Beach,
San Francisco, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Los Angeles, Detroit, and
other major cities. A number of additional speakers and panelists have
made appearances at the subsequent events.

Lawmakers in other liberty-minded Western nations have also joined
the bandwagon. Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts with the
anti-globalist One Nation party, for example, said the UN was also a threat to his country.
“This much is quite clear,” he said. “Australia’s values and way of
life are also at risk from insidious institutions such as the unelected
swill that is the United Nations. Action needs to be taken.” He is
facilitating an event by the anti-UN group at the Australian Parliament.

The campaign to repeal and replace the UN has been almost entirely
ignored by the establishment press so far. Indeed, outside of a few
articles and columns in Jewish media outlets, there has been virtually
no U.S. media coverage of the effort. One article on a fringe far-left
website called “BuzzFeed” attacked Senator Roberts as a “far-right wing”
lawmaker for opposing the UN, socialism, and the killing of unborn
children.

Much of the rhetoric of the Covenant of Democratic Nations campaign
has touted “democracy” as the ideal to be pursued and the requirement
for admission. The founders of the United States, though, explicitly
rejected pure democracy as an unstable and dangerous system of
government in which individual rights would not be adequately protected.
Instead, they decided to establish a constitutional republic, governed
by the rule of law and democratically elected representatives, in which
the God-given rights of individuals would be protected.

In The Federalist, No. 10,
James Madison, known as the “father” of the U.S. Constitution, made the
point clearly, saying that democracies “have ever been spectacles of
turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with
personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as
short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.” To
guard against such a system and its risks to life, liberty, and
property, Madison advocated a republican form of government. “A
republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of
representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the
cure for which we are seeking,” he continued.

And of course, the Constitution he wrote made that explicit as well.
In Article IV, Section 4, the U.S. Constitution mandates that the United
States “guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of
Government.” Madison was not referring to the GOP, obviously, but to the
system of government based on the rule of law to protect individual
rights.

It appears, though, that rather than “democracy,” per se, the
individuals behind the Covenant of Democratic Nations hope to impose
admissibility requirements such as self-government and elected
leadership. On the other hand, membership would be closed to
dictatorships and unfree regimes, which are welcome in the UN and even dominate its discredited UN “Human Rights Council.”

Of course, the Covenant of Democratic Nations is hardly the only
effort to replace the scandal-plagued UN with something else.
Billionaire Swedish-Hungarian investor Laszlo Szombatfalvy, for example,
is offering $5 million in prizes to whoever can invent a new UN-style
organization to allegedly solve global problems better than the current
scheme.

“The biggest threats to humanity stem from the global community’s
inability to deal with them effectively,” the Hungarian-born billionaire
said in an interview with Swedish media. However, unlike many UN
critics, Szombatfalvy appears to be a fervent globalist, hoping the “UN
2.0” will impose a global “climate” regime and other radical schemes as
part of a new system of “global governance for the 21st century.”

In the United States, various efforts to quash or rein in the UN are
currently under development or being explored. Following the Security
Council vote on Israel, a large group of lawmakers vowed to stop U.S. tax funding of the so-called “dictators club” unless and until it was reversed. President Trump, meanwhile, is working on a plan to strip “at least 40 percent” of the UN’s American funding.
American taxpayers pay over $10 billion per year to the UN and its
tentacles, more than 185 other UN member states combined, and in
exchange receive constant attacks on freedom, the Constitution, Judeo-Christian civilization, and other American values.

Separately, a group of liberty-minded U.S. lawmakers is working to have the U.S. government completely withdraw from the UN. The legislation, known as the American Sovereignty Restoration Act
(H.R 193), would also evict the UN from U.S. soil while ending American
support for the global outfit and all of its agencies. Representative
Franks of Arizona, who joined the Covenant of Democratic Nations
campaign, is not yet a co-sponsor of H.R. 193. His office did not have a
formal response by press time.

As it becomes clear to more and more people around the world that the
UN is not compatible with freedom or self-government, many more ideas
for “replacing” the UN will undoubtedly emerge. Whether the Covenant of
Democratic Nations is the right solution to protecting humanity from the
out-of-control UN remains to be seen. It may not even need to be
replaced. And considering the fact that globalists on both sides of the political spectrum have proposed similar schemes for “entangling alliances,”
a skeptical eye is certainly justified. However, simply by advancing
the global conversation on the threat posed by the UN dictators club,
the latest campaign to abolish it is performing a valuable service for
humanity and liberty. 

Related articles:

Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN Introduced in New Congress

#Brexit to #Amexit: Keep the Momentum Going!

Next on Trump’s List: Rein in the UN Dictators Club

Australian Efforts to Dump the United Nations Gain Momentum

Congress Planning to Defund UN as Critics Seek Full Withdrawal

UN Whistleblower: UN Gave Names of Dissidents to Communist China

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

After Brexit, U.S. Should Dump UN, Says Sarah Palin

Sen. Rand Paul Would be “Happy to Dissolve” the UN

After Equating Trump With ISIS, UN Freaks Out Over His Victory

U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

UN Child-abuse Whistleblower Skeptical That Ethics Can Return to UN

UN Panics Amid Growing Scandal on Child Rape by “Peace” Troops

UN “Human Rights” Council Now Officially Controlled by Dictators

Concert of Democracies: Same Old Globalism

REP. JUSTIN AMASH CO-SPONSORS BILL TO ELIMINATE U.S. EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

 http://media.mlive.com/grpress/news_impact/photo/Justin%20Amash.jpg
REP. JUSTIN AMASH CO-SPONSORS BILL TO ELIMINATE U.S. EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
BY DR. SUSAN BERRY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) is a co-sponsor of a recently introduced bill that would eliminate the federal education department.

Amash’s office said in a statement reported by Fox17:

Our Constitution reserves the power over education to the
states, and Rep. Amash has consistently supported putting parents and
teachers back in control. While relatively little federal money for
public education comes from Washington, federal bureaucracy and mandates
reduce the total amount of resources available to public schools and
cannot properly account for the individualized needs of students.

The measure, H.R. 899, introduced
by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), is only one sentence long and states,
“The Department of Education Shall Terminate on December 31, 2018.”

“Unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. should not be in charge of
our children’s intellectual and moral development,” Massie said.
“States and local
communities are best positioned to shape curricula that meet the needs of their students.”
Massie launched the bill on the same day Betsy DeVos – also from
Michigan – was confirmed as U.S. Education Secretary. According to
mlive.com, the timing of the bill was not intended as a response to DeVos’s confirmation, but to the greater issue of federal control of education.
In a Facebook
post in November, Amash – a longtime defender of parental and local
control of education – congratulated DeVos on her nomination, yet still
expressed his hope for a return to local control of education.

“I look forward to working with her to empower parents and local
communities, advance school choice and competition, protect the right of
homeschooling, and stop federal mandates and harmful initiatives like
Race to the Top and Common Core,” he said.
Amash voted against the massive new federal education law known as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), confirming what many education scholars have said about the law – that it “further entrenches the federal government in education.”

In 2014, Amash and a coalition of 42 conservative members of Congress introduced a measure that condemned the federal government’s overreach in local school districts through Common Core.
“I’m proud of the many parents, local school districts, and states that have resisted Common Core,” Amash said in a statement. “I want them to know that they have partners in Congress working to roll back this harmful policy.”
“The federal government should not impose Common Core standards and
curriculum on our kids,” he added. “We have a strong tradition in this
country of parental control of education, which fosters competition and
diverse approaches to learning. That tradition is embodied in the Tenth
Amendment, which is supposed to bar this kind of federal interference.”
Other co-sponsors of the measure to eliminate the federal education
department are: Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), Rep.
Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA), and Rep. Raul Labrador
(R-ID).

EVANGELICAL UNIVERSITIES & SEMINARIES OFFERING MASTER OF ARTS IN SPIRITUAL FORMATION~GOING INTO THE DEEPER WATERS OF CONTEMPLATIVE SPIRITUALITY

 
 ADOPTING & ADAPTING CATHOLIC MYSTICISM INTO THE CHRISTIAN FAITH
Evangelical Universities & Seminaries
Offering Master of Arts in Spiritual Formation – Going into the Deeper
Waters of Contemplative Spirituality 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Photo: Carey University in British Columbia

Over the past decade, while most evangelical colleges, seminaries, and universities
have allowed the influence of the Spiritual Formation movement into
their schools to one degree or another, not all of them had gone so
far as to create a Master’s Degree program in Spiritual Formation. In
fact, ten years ago, there weren’t that many schools that had
Spiritual Formation degree programs. But things are changing rapidly.
Today, a large number of the evangelical seminaries and universities
have such degree programs.

These schools that offer such a degree have
taken the plunge into the deeper waters of contemplative spirituality.
And while there is currently an effort by some of these schools to
convince the church that there is a “good” Spiritual Formation, the
fact is, where there is Spiritual Formation, there is always a trail
that leads to the mystics as Lighthouse Trails has pointed out for many
years.

Below is a partial list of
Christian colleges, universities, and seminaries that offer Masters
Degrees in Spiritual Formation. Some of these are Spiritual Formation
specializations or concentrations tacked onto Master of Divinity or
Master of Arts degrees.
In other cases,  Spiritual Formation programs
are tucked inside Christian Leadership degrees and Christian Formation
and/or Soul Care degrees.

These seminaries and universities are where the
church’s next generation of pastors and leaders are coming from. The
church has been hijacked and is being held hostage to spiritual
deception, but few seem to care. The only thing we are learning from
Christian leaders today is “Simon Says” and “Follow the Leader”
because most will not speak up on this vital issue. On the contrary,
they promote it.

Baylor UniversitySpiritual Formation and Discipleship

Barclay CollegeMaster of Arts: Spiritual Formation

Biola University Master of Arts in Spiritual Formation and Soul Care

Carey Theological College (BC) – Master of Arts in Spiritual Formation

Corban UniversityMaster of Arts in Christian Leadership

Dallas Theological SeminarySpiritual Formation Cohort (under the DMin degree)

Denver SeminaryMA in Christian Formation & Soul Care

George Fox UniversitySpiritual Formation and Discipleship Specialization

Garrett Evangelical Theological SeminaryMaster of Arts in Spiritual Formation and Evangelism

Grand Rapids Theological Seminary (ie., Cornerstone University)The Master of Arts in Christian Formation

Johnson UniversityGraduate Certificate in Spiritual Formation & Leadership

Lincoln Christian University (IL) – MA in Spiritual Formation

Logsdon Seminary (TX) Master of Arts (Religion) Spiritual Formation

MidAmerica Nazarene Unversity The Master of Arts in Spiritual Formation and Christian Counseling

Moody Bible CollegeMaster of Arts in Spiritual Formation and Discipleship

Multnomah University

The Master of Arts in Christian Leadership with a Spiritual Formation Emphasis

Nazarene Theological SeminaryMaster of Arts in Christian Formation and Discipleship Degree

North Greenville University (NC) – Master of Arts in Spiritual Formation and Discipleship 

Northwest Nazarene UniversityMaster of Arts: Spiritual Formation

Pepperdine University

Spiritual Formation and the Christian Mission

Phoenix Seminary

MDiv in Spiritual Formation

Richmont Graduate SchoolMaster of Arts in Spiritual Formation and Direction

Seattle Pacific University Master of Arts in Christian Leadership

Southeastern University

Master of Arts in Ministerial Leaders

Spring Arbor UniversityMaster of Arts in Spiritual Formation & Leadership

Western SeminaryM.A. in Ministry and Leadership (Concentration in Spiritual Formation)

RELATED MATERIAL:

An Epidemic of Apostasy – How Christian Seminaries Must Incorporate “Spiritual Formation” to Become Accredited

 

ANTIFA BULLIES SHUT DOWN FREE SPEECH ON UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CAMPUS

 ANTIFA BULLIES SHUT DOWN FREE SPEECH ON UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CAMPUS
Published on Feb 13, 2017
Infowars
reporter Millie Weaver
encounters a group of commies on the University
of Texas Austin campus while trying to interview college students. Not
surprisingly the commies were triggered upon seeing the Infowars
moniker and slurs of vulgarities followed. The commies also went so far
as to intimidate fellow UT students into silence.
1 2 3 4 5 7