Day: January 28, 2017

NEXT ON TRUMP’S LIST: REIN IN THE U.N. DICTATORS CLUB

NEXT ON TRUMP’S LIST: 
REIN IN THE U.N. DICTATORS CLUB
BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Establishment globalists were right to be concerned about the fate of their schemes.
After a fast-paced first week of putting “America First” by targeting
pseudo-“free trade” regimes and rogue regulatory agencies, President
Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to take on the United Nations. Its
swarms of agencies, programs, bureaucracies, conventions, and associated
schemes are also in the crosshairs. According to a January 25 report in the anti-Trump New York Times,
which claimed to have seen a set of draft orders being prepared by the
administration, Trump plans to drastically reduce the U.S. government’s
role at the UN and other international organizations. He is also
planning a review of sovereignty-stealing UN treaties, with a view
toward restoring self-government in various policy areas and saving U.S.
taxpayers billions of dollars. Globalists everywhere are in a panic.

Under one of the two draft orders, headlined “Auditing and Reducing
U.S. Funding of International Organization,” the U.S. government would
cut funding to any UN agency or international organization that meets
any specific criteria. One of those criteria, the Times
reported, was granting full membership to the Palestinian Authority (PA)
or the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Deceitfully, the Times did not mention until close to the bottom of its report is the
fact that two 1990s-era federal laws already require the U.S.
government to halt all funding to any UN entity that admits the PA or
PLO as a member state. That is why the UN’s extremist “education” agency UNESCO has been defunded,
despite Obama’s best efforts. Then-President Bill Clinton signed one of
those measures into law, with the other being signed by George H.W.
Bush.

Also subject to being defunded under Trump’s draft executive order, according to the Times,
is any UN or international outfit that “is controlled or substantially
influenced by any state that sponsors terrorism.” That would likely
include the UN’s widely ridiculed “Human Rights Council.” The extremist
body, run by an Islamic dictatorship’s prince who equated Trump with ISIS and claims “international law” requires “robust gun control” in America, is literally dominated by a majority of un-free regimes — including some of the most savage and murderous dictatorships
on the planet that have sponsored terrorism for decades. UN entities
controlled or substantially influenced by regimes that persecute
marginalized groups or systematically violate human rights would also be
defunded.

While specific states were not mentioned in the Times report
about Trump’s orders, the brutal Communist Chinese dictatorship would
appear to be a prime target. Among other crimes, it ruthlessly
persecutes Christians, Muslims, Falun Gong practitioners, and other
religious minorities — with
some even having their body organs harvested and offered to Communist
Party bigwigs or wealthy foreigners. In Tibet, Beijing is perpetrating
what is widely referred to around the world as the “cultural genocide”
of the ancient nation, essentially seeking to wipe it off the face of
the Earth forever. And yet, despite its well-documented barbarism, which
includes killing more people than any government in human history, the regime’s agents currently lead at least a half-dozen UN agencies.

Other requirements under the draft order include instituting cuts of
“at least 40 percent” in all remaining U.S. taxpayer funding to
international organizations. The Times claimed it was not clear
whether the order was intended to cut 40 percent or more of the
American funding for each UN agency, or whether the cuts were aimed at
the entire federal funding budget feeding the array of largely hostile
international bureaucracies. Also set to be reviewed, according to the
orders, is any funding that could be diverted to the International
Criminal Court (ICC), a kangaroo court that claims to have jurisdiction
over every person on Earth, including Americans and journalists, despite the fact that the U.S. Senate never ratified the agreement creating it.  

The first order would also establish a committee to recommend where
to make cuts to U.S. funding for UN agencies and other globalist
outfits. That body would be tasked with, among other specific
responsibilities, investigating U.S. funding for a number of UN agencies
and bureaucracies. Among them is the International Criminal Court,
which in recent months threatened that it was considering hauling U.S. troops in. The ICC tried to jail a journalist, too. Also set to be scrutinized are the
UN’s scandal-plagued “peacekeeping” missions, which have been notable
primarily for the wide-scale rape of children, the slaughter of
civilians, the persecution of those who blow the whistle, and other
crimes. Finally, the UN Population Fund, which
has been implicated in aiding the Communist Chinese regime in its
forced abortions and its savage population-control regime, is also set to be examined.

The second draft executive action purportedly seen by the Times
is the “Moratorium on New Multilateral Treaties.” According to the
report, the order would demand a review of all current and pending
multilateral treaties involving more than one foreign government. The
review would be followed by recommendations on which negotiations,
conventions, or treaties the U.S. government should ditch. That order
specifically mentions the “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women,” which has been weaponized by governments
worldwide to assault freedom and family. It also mentions the UN
“Convention on the Rights of the Child,” a totalitarian scheme that Scottish lawmakers cited to justify the assignment of a named bureaucrat to oversee the upbringing and indoctrination of each and every child. The U.S. Senate has refused to ratify either scheme.

The second order on multilateral treaties exempts any treaty
“directly related to national security, extradition or international
trade.” The Times absurdly — pathetically, almost — tried to claim that might exempt the UN’s pseudo-treaty on alleged man-made global warming known as the “Paris Agreement” because it touches on “trade.” In the real world, Trump has already promised to “cancel” that illegal UN scheme, which was never ratified by the Senate anyway. And immediately upon taking office, the White House website vowed to dismantle Obama’s illegal “Climate Action Plan,” which was the centerpiece of Obama’s illegal “commitments”
under the UN climate regime. Plus, without the trillions in loot from
U.S. and Western taxpayers promised to the UN “Green Climate Fund,” virtually every Third World regime on Earth has already promised to walk away. 

It is unclear whether the latest report is accurate or even substantially accurate. The Times,
which has lost much of its credibility in recent months with its
anti-Trump hysteria masquerading as journalism, has been widely
criticized across the political spectrum for its extreme bias in favor
of Hillary Clinton, the man-made global-warming theory, globalism, and
Big Government. It played a key role in covering up the Soviet genocide
of Ukrainians, in bringing Castro the “freedom fighter” to power in
Cuba, and in advancing the globalist agenda of swamp central aka the Council on Foreign Relations. In fact, after resigning, a reporter for the self-styled “newspaper of record” ridiculed the Times as a “propaganda megaphone” for the establishment, war, and more.

Liberty-minded insiders at the UN who have spoken to this reporter
have long warned that it would be preferable to shut down and abolish
the UN agencies — particularly to avoid the ongoing abuse of the global
bureaucracies by the Communist Chinese regime and other autocracies to
spy on the West, undermine Western economies, restrict liberty,
legitimize tyranny, and more. A 1995 non-paper by the U.S. State
Department entitled “Readying the United Nations for the 21st Century”
recommended shutting down and consolidating a wide array of UN programs,
agencies, and schemes. Today, more than a few prominent voices have
continued to call for shutting down UNESCO, UNIDO, the UN HRC, and
numerous other out-of-control bureaucracies.

But that is not enough. American taxpayers pay between $8 billion and
$10 billion each year to the UN, more than 185 other member states
combined. And in return, the American people, their liberties, their Constitution, and their national independence are subject to constant and vicious attack from the dictators club and its leading officials. Activists are hopeful that, under President Trump, that will begin to wind down. Congress is also working to defund the UN.
But as long as the “dictators club” is left alive to limp along with
U.S. membership, it will inevitably come back to wage war on freedom and
self-government eventually.

Of course, Trump’s expected actions represent an excellent place to
start — especially after eight years of Obama, who in his last speech to
the dictator-dominated UN General Assembly openly called for America to
“accept constraints,” “giving up some freedom of action” (also known as
self-government), and “binding ourselves to international rules.”
However, a much better and more permanent solution would be to get the U.S. out of the UN completely. Legislation to do that, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 193),
is currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. And with
enough public pressure, 2017 can be the year that America finally breaks
free of the dictators club.

Related articles:

Top CFR Globalist Warns UN Will Get “Hammered” by Trump

Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN Introduced in New Congress

President Trump Unveils Plans to Undo Much of Obama’s Damage

Congressman Mike Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN

Congress Planning to Defund UN as Critics Seek Full Withdrawal

#Brexit to #Amexit: Keep the Momentum Going!

After Equating Trump With ISIS, UN Freaks Out Over His Victory

U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

New UN Chief: Globalist, Socialist, Extremist

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

Philippines President Threatens to Withdraw From UN  

Trump: “Americanism, Not Globalism, Will Be Our Credo”

The United Nations: On the Brink of Becoming a World Government

Sen. Rand Paul Would be “Happy to Dissolve” the UN

WHY THE LEFT HAS NO CREDIBILITY

WHY
THE LEFT HAS NO CREDIBILITY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Professor
Steven Yates


January 28, 2017
NewsWithViews.com

The
other day, information
came my way about the fate of Yazidi girls and women at the hands
of ISIS. The Yazidi are a Kurdish people indigenous to what was Mesopotamia.
They live primarily in what is now the Nineveh Province in what is now
northwestern Iraq, although there are Yazidi communities in both Syria
and Turkey. Their religion is a blend of Zoroastrianism, Islam, Judaism
and Christianity, with links to Sufiism.
They had already been caught between U.S. troops and Iraqi insurgents.
Not being Muslims and being a peaceful people, they were sitting targets
for the Islamic State.
ISIS
militants came to the Yazidi region of Shingal on August 3, 2014. Thousands
of Yazidis were killed, kidnapped, or sexually enslaved. The article
I received spoke of Yazidi girls being “sold” for a few
packs of cigarettes.
Mirza
Ismael, who chairs the Yazidi Human Rights Organization-International,
said, “Some of these women and girls have had to watch 7-, 8-, and
9-year-old children bleed to death before their eyes, after being raped
by ISIS militia multiple times a day. ISIS militias have burned Yazidi
girls alive for refusing to convert and marry ISIS men. Why? Because we
are not Muslims and because our path is the path of peace. For this we
are being burned alive: for living as men and women of peace.”
There
is, of course, a massive international slave and “sex worker”
trade in that part of the world. Girls who have not yet entered puberty,
some of them kidnapped, are repeatedly gang raped by ISIS militiamen many
of whom are pedophiles. If the girls cry out in protest, they are beaten
bloody, often to death. Those who try to escape and are caught can have
their noses or ears or hands or feet cut off.
Radical
Islam, of course, sees women as less than property. It is illegal in countries
controlled by Radical Islam for women to receive an education. Most can’t
read or write their native language. They are forbidden to leave their
houses without male approval.
I present
this live horror show as the perfect backdrop for these highly-touted
(by Western corporate media, anyway) women’s marches in Washington
and other major Western cities following the Trump inauguration, protesting
actions they seem to believe the Trump administration is about to undertake.
There
were many speakers at these events. One of them, actress Ashley Judd,
read a poem in which she asked why “tampons are taxed when Viagra
and Rogaine are not.”
In this
one query, given all we reviewed above, you should see the reasons why
the American Left has no credibility — none whatsoever. It had none
before the Donald Trump era began on January 20. But now the fact (and
it isn’t an “alternative fact”) is out in the open,
or should be.
People
like Ashley Judd, other celebrities including far wealthier and more famous
ones like Madonna, live in a bubble of privilege — and I don’t
mean that leftist invention, “white privilege.” I mean the
privilege of being able to open their mouths and be heard by millions
despite their utter cluelessness.
One
of the criticisms I sometimes hear of U.S. citizens is that when all is
said and done, we know little of what goes on outside our borders. I doubt
most Americans have heard of the Yazidi, or know that ISIS overwhelmed
them on August 3, 2014. After all, I’m sure Kim Kardashian did something
that week!
It is
unclear how many women participated in these grandiose marches. What is
clear is that they have no idea how well off they are compared to their
counterparts elsewhere in the world. As children they were taught to read
and write. They went to school alongside boys. As adults they can come
and go as they please, without asking permission. They can go to college
and pursue careers. They can gain visibility (with or without actual talent).
Some of the world’s wealthiest celebrities are American women.
Yes,
yes, yes, I know there were women who struggled and fought for those rights.
I saw a list on the Left-leaning Medium site just the other day. I also
know that today’s whiners aren’t qualified to polish those
women’s shoes.
One
of their biggest fears seems to be that under the Trump administration
and the new GOP-controlled Congress they might lose the “right”
to kill their unborn children and have the U.S. federal government pay
for it if they can’t pay for it themselves, which means taxpayers,
some of whom are pro-life, will continue being coerced into helping fund
the killing of unborn babies.
They
are afraid Planned Parenthood might be defunded and shut down. I have
the feeling, though, that the Madonnas and Ashley Judds of the world have
enough money between them — that there is enough money in the community
of celebrity women generally — that they could keep Planned Parenthood
open, privately funded, and serving women’s legitimate health needs.
I wonder if this has occurred to any of them. Probably not. They would
have to stop whining, get up off their celebrated duffs, and start doing
something useful.
Why
do I keep mentioning Madonna?


Because
the other day she was quoted as having thought about “blowing up
the White House.” When I read that, what raced through my mind was,
“Why isn’t that a terroristic threat?”


Then
Secret Service started looking into the matter. She did some of her fanciest
backpedaling, saying her remark was taken out of context. I don’t
believe she meant it literally, of course. She was just doing what Left-leaning
celebrities do best, which is shoot off their mouths. But with the thought
now out on the table, who knows what one of her fanatic followers might
do?
The
American Left has lost control of the public narrative. Other voices,
including from alternative media with alternative narratives, are now
being listened to. Leftists can’t stand it, and are reacting as
they typically do when they can’t have their way: getting verbally
abusive and violent.
Outside
the now-infamous Deploraball [sic.] in Washington the night before the
Inauguration, writer
James Allsup, a Trump supporter from Seattle, was targeted outside
the event by leftist protesters along with some of his fellow attendees.
Pushing and shoving ensued. After hearing someone yell, “Die, Nazi!”
Allsup was punched while others filmed it, then struck in the head with
a metal flagpole. He had to go to the ER for stitches.
This
was only one example, and it is hardly an outlier. We reported on the
harassment of Trump supporters and attendees of his rallies as far back
as last spring, when thousands of University of Illinois at Chicago students
took to the streets, compelling Trump to cancel a scheduled appearance
out of public safety concerns.
It was
not Trump supporters, moreover, who began to shut down major thoroughfares
and interstate highways trying to block attendees from reaching Hillary
Clinton rallies.
Now
there is abundant evidence that the Left is in total meltdown mode. A
friend of mine who lives in Texas sent
me this the other day.
I know
that was painful. She either didn’t know she was being filmed or
didn’t care.
Do these
people have any idea how silly they look and
sound?
Author
and blogger Charles Hugh Smith has a brilliant
essay about what happened to the Left. He goes further into the history
of Marxism then we need to worry about here, but what it boils down to:
their obsessions with political correctness and identity politics cost
the Left the support of the American working class.
For
all practical purposes, they threw this support away, because so many
American workers are straight white Christian males, and straight white
Christian males are history’s biggest villains, didn’t you
know?
A lot
of Democrats have yet to figure out that had they not throw this obviously
important segment of the electorate under the bus, their candidate might
have won!
That
wouldn’t have given the Left credibility. The Clintons sold out
to the postmodern religions of money and power years ago; neither would
know any other reality if it walked up and bit them. Hillary’s arrogant
refusal to campaign in certain states was a dead giveaway: she didn’t
think she’d need the white working class vote to defeat Donald Trump.
She
lost each of those states to Trump. Reality always gets the last laugh.
Now,
Bernie Sanders has
offered to work with Trump on trade issues. Sanders just might be
getting it (maybe, I hope).
The
American Left’s ignorance may be exceeded only by its volume and
its capacity for violence, but leftists are not Donald Trump’s most
formidable enemies.


The
globalists — or the super-elite, the global elite, or the
international financial cartel, call them what you will — are Trump’s
most formidable enemies. Those paying attention know they just held their
annual World Economic Forum confab in Davos, Switzerland. The number one
topic: “populist” insurgencies in Europe (think: Brexit, Geert
Wilder in the Netherlands, Marine Le Pen in France) as well as in the
U.S., i.e., the growing resistance to their economic domination of the
planet, with all its externalities which include the wanton destruction
of advanced nations’ middle classes and mass migrations caused by
their incessant wars. Globalists, incidentally, like wars! Wars are very
profitable! Ask those in the upper echelons of Halliburton!
The
proximate cause of the European “populist” insurgency is Muslim
mass migration which is tearing their countries apart. France, reeling
from multiple terror attacks over the past couple of years, has a problem
dwarfing anything the U.S. has to worry about.
I’ve
long thought Trump misplayed his hand with Mexicans. He could have pointed
out that Mexico’s agricultural workers were hurt as badly by NAFTA
as the U.S. manufacturing base. He would have had Hispanic communities
on his side, as he moves to renegotiate or scrap super-elite-driven “free
trade” deals and enforce U.S. immigration laws just as Mexico enforces
its immigration laws.
Muslims
from places where ISIS is now established are far more dangerous. When
a leftist whines about Islamophobia — among all the fake
phobias the Left has invented over the years, that one has to be the stupidest!
— I want to ask her how many more San Bernardino type workplace
shootings or Orlando type nightclub massacres she would countenance, and
what she would say to families of innocent people killed by newly transplanted
Muslim immigrants who turned out to be ISIS sympathizers?
I’m
sure the pseudo-intellectuals who championed Europe’s open borders
policies didn’t think they’d be dealing with violent, unassimilable
populations destroying neighborhoods in France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden,
and elsewhere. So please don’t somebody write me and tell me nothing
like that could happen in the U.S.
Well,
under Donald Trump’s watch it won’t happen. I think —
I hope! — we can be assured of that!
The
problem, though, remains the globalists, the super-elite. They haven’t
gone away, and I don’t believe for five seconds they are willing
to allow one rogue “blue collar billionaire” to upend plans
they’ve been working on longer than most of us have been alive without
trying to do something about it — something possibly worse than
anything Madonna might have thought up. Just keep in mind: Trump has inherited
a mammoth stock market bubble; global debt has never been higher; the
only thing standing between the present world and a massive depression
is continued money printing by central banks. Were there a planned economic
downturn — the Meltdown of 2008 on steroids! — given their
control over corporate media, and given the gullibility the Left regularly
displays, for globalists to get away with blaming Trump and other “populists”
would be child’s play! 
 These
are the things that worry me the most right now! Plus the fact that everything
the Left is saying and doing to try and weaken and de–legitimize Donald
Trump plays right into the hands of the globalists. 

If the
Left wanted to make itself useful, its members would forget their marches
and start monitoring pro-globalist sites on the Internet. There are quite
a few, actually, like The
Economist, Foreign
Affairs, Foreign
Policy Magazine, Bloomberg,
and Project
Syndicate. Globalists, in their hubris, cannot keep their mouths
shut, either. Across the aisle, survivalist author Brandon Smith has useful
advice on how globalists think. My book Four
Cardinal Errors: Reasons for the Decline of the American Republic
(2011) is still in print, as is my “The
Real Matrix” series. The latter is incomplete, but not terribly
dated.
In other
words, now that Donald Trump is President there is work to be done informing
those who care about where the real danger lies. And frankly — I
hate to be blunt about it, but — leftists, you are in the way!

D.C. RIOTERS FACE STIFF PENALTIES – IT’S ABOUT TIME

D.C. RIOTERS
FACE STIFF PENALTIES~
IT’S ABOUT TIME
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Rev. Austin
Miles 


January 28, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
WASHINGTON,
D.C. –The days of a gentle slap on the wrist accompanied by whispering,
“Naughty Naughty,” are over. There’s a new sheriff in town who
takes a different approach to thuggery. Two hundred and thirty of the
masked rioters who tried to invade the Inauguration of the new President
were arrested, charged with Felony Rioting by the U.S. Attorney and face
10 years in prison along with a $25,000 fine. At last, justice
will be served for political criminal activity.
All
welfare benefits should be cancelled for those involved in the riots with
the intention of interfering with the constitutional process of electing
a president and causing destruction. Every penny of the fine should be
paid in full before release, and that sentence should be 10 years of hard
labor which is not unreasonable. Justice Department, please take
note.
The
protesters seem to have plenty of stamina and physical strength to throw
things around, swing sledge hammers into store windows to smash them,
set cars on fire along with trash bins that they threw into the streets
and set ablaze. They also publicly burned the American Flag.
So they are not lacking physical strength to work. These hoodlums should
not be collecting welfare or other benefits. They owe US. We owe them
nothing. They are perfectly able to work and earn their keep.
It is
a new day in America. There is no more coddling criminals, no more ‘political
correctness’ but instead, stern punishment for lawlessness and creating
havoc.
A Presidential
inauguration Ceremony is supposed to be a distinguished event. That is
how it was designed. Communist Leader George Soros paid
protesters to disrupt this transfer of power in D.C. in an attempt to
spoil the most important event in the country. He did not succeed.
These
paid imbeciles attacked people trying to get to the inauguration, harassed
attendees (actually striking some), set cars on fire, tried to block entrances
to the ceremony, and broke store windows. They set a stretch limo on fire
and spray painted, “We the People” on the side of the burning
limousine. They smashed TV trucks which is strange since the main payoff
for these nitwits is television attention. That shows how bright they
are.
TV personality
Larry King was in his studio doing a program. When he came out he found
that all the windows of his SUV had been smashed.
The
anarchists were dressed head to toe in black with faces covered so as
not to be identifiable, which is illegal. One of the rioters draped himself
or herself in a rainbow flag.
Soros
not only set up various organizations to carry out these ‘protests,’ but
also worked with 50 organizations, mostly sponsoring Muslim organizations,
to put together the national women’s march throughout the U.S. the day
after the inauguration to make it appear that nobody liked Trump.
Not so. Millions upon millions of people love President Trump and are
happily relieved that he is now our Commander-in-Chief.
And
by the way, the trash these women left strewn in the streets was the worst
to ever be seen. They did not have the decency to clean up their mess
since they have no decency.
What
has NOT been adequately reported is the LOOTING that has become a mainstay
of such anti-American events. They kept that quiet so as not to make the
looters look bad and cause stereotyping. Store windows were broken as
Black Lives Matter participants, as usual, grabbed what they could. They
should have their welfare benefits cancelled as well.
This
rampage by anti-Americans took place only two blocks from the White House.
Six police officers were injured by being hit with rocks thrown at them.
It is of interest to know that “Bikers for Trump,”
a sturdy looking group was on hand to deal with some of the protesters.
The anarchists held back in the presence of the bikers knowing full well
that the bikers were ready and more than willing to do serious battle.
A
note to President Donald Trump. BRAVO! Yes withdraw all welfare
and other government benefits from everyone who took place in those third
world style riots. And this should include everyone who is a part of Black
Lives Matter, another creation of Soros. Begin proceedings to charge George
Soros with Treason and Sedition. There is more than enough evidence to
show that he is a traitor and it is time to deal with him as such.
His
home country Hungary is preparing to take actions against him. Russia
would love to get their hands on him and Israel wants him in their hands.
He needs to be dealt with and removed from the scene. His enormous wealth
can be confiscated to repair the damage he and those he hired have caused
not only to America, but countries throughout the world whose economies
have been wrecked by Soros as well as currencies around the world being
devalued due to his manipulation.
When
you think of the recent events, one must ask, where’s the beef? The new
President wants America to again be prosperous, our military strengthened
in order to protect us from enemies, and better relations with the world
and for Christians to not have to hide their faith or Who they worship
.He wants better job opportunities for America and for families to live
in peace.
 He wants
to turn Obama’s misrepresented health care plan around and replace that
with affordable health care for everyone. He wants to do more for our
veterans and military (he just gave military personnel their first raise),
actual education for our children, and to carefully vet anyone who wants
to come here from other countries. And he will block all efforts to prevent
citizens from saying, Merry Christmas during the Holiday season.
So
what can be objectionable to this agenda? Absolutely nothing. It
is something to be desired for all with the exception of these ignorant
misinformed bums who think they will be better under Communism, better
known as The New World Order. I have seen what life under Communism is
like. Believe me, you do NOT want that. And President Trump believes in
the celebration of life for all.
Yes,
we have a new sheriff in town and millions of people are backing him and
praying for him. We have been ushered, by God, into a new era…a new
day. With God’s help, we have taken back our country. Let us never forget
What God has done for us. Christians, be visible.

TRUMP’S STEADY STREAM OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND ACTIONS OFFENDS LIBERALS~THEY THINK TRUMP IS MOVING TOO FAST!

 
TRUMP’S STEADY STREAM OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND ACTIONS OFFENDS LIBERALS
 Trump signs executive order for “extreme vetting” to “keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the USA”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

It is not yet clear whether the signed text is the same, or how it differs, but a published draft of the executive order “Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals” stated:

In order to protect Americans, we must ensure that those
admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward our
country and its founding principles. We cannot, and should not, admit
into our country those who do not support the U.S. Constitution, or
those who would place violent religious edicts over American law. In
addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of
bigotry and hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence
against women, or the persecution of those who practice other
religions) or those who would oppress members of one race, one gender,
or sexual orientation.

Will officials try to vet for Sharia supremacism and support for
honor killings, dhimmitude, and Sharia oppression of women? It will be
interesting to see how that will be done.
“Trump Signs Two Executive Orders; Expands Power of Military, ‘Extreme Vetting,’” by Phil McCausland and Courtney Kube, NBC News, January 27, 2017:

President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on
Friday that dramatically expand the nation’s military and so-called
“extreme vetting” of visa seekers from terror-plagued countries — moves
aimed at strengthening the U.S. response to terrorism both home and
abroad.

In signing the order, Trump pledged to “keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America.”

Extreme vetting is an idea that evolved from Trump’s controversial
Muslim ban that he called for in Dec. 2015, which would address the
refugees entering the country.

“We’ve taken in tens of thousands of people. We know nothing about
them,” Trump said in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on
Thursday. “They can say they vet them. They didn’t vet them. They have
no papers. How can you vet somebody when you don’t know anything about
them and you have no papers?”

Though the United States government already utilizes a thorough
nine-step vetting system for refugees, the president’s executive order
is said to go further. It is unclear what these steps would mean and if
it would target any particular religious group as the president stated
on the campaign trail….

 ________________________________________________________
 Feds Reinvestigating Syrian Refugees 
Not Thoroughly Vetted
BY WARREN MASS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Federal agents are re-investigating dozens of Syrian refuges who were
admitted into the United States without being thoroughly vetted. Some of
these refugees had potentially negative information in their files that
was not discovered prior to their admission, two unnamed U.S.
law-enforcement officials told the Los Angeles Times.

Immigration authorities are reviewing the cases of some refugees,
including one who failed a polygraph test when he applied for employment
at an overseas U.S. military installation. Another refugee being
re-investigated may have been in communication with an Islamic State
(ISIS) leader, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of
anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

The Times reported that immigration agents have not
concluded that any of the refugees being re-investigated should have been
rejected for entry, but the flaw in the vetting process — which was
discovered in late 2015 and corrected last year — prevented
U.S. officials who conducted background checks on the refugees from
learning possible “derogatory” information about them.

The officials said that at the very least, the intelligence lapse
would have triggered further investigation that might have resulted in
some asylum applications being rejected.

A report about this security lapse in American Thinker was critical of how the anonymous agents’ exchange with the Times was phrased. American Thinker’s Ed Straker noted:

Do you appreciate the minimalist way this
was written?  There’s nothing to worry about — merely “potentially
negative information in their files.” Doesn’t sound very serious, does
it? The refugees whose cases are under review include one who failed a
polygraph test when he applied to work at a U.S. military installation
overseas and another who may have been in communication with an Islamic
State leader, according to the officials. I would say communicating with
an Islamic State leader would be very “potentially negative
information” in a refugee’s file. Wouldn’t you?

Another report in the Daily Caller noted that former President
Obama’s administration repeatedly stressed that the refugee-vetting
process was very rigorous. The Caller quoted former White House Press
Secretary Josh Earnest’s statement last August asserting that the
administration was able to increase the number of Syrian refugees
admitted in 2015 “without cutting any corners when it comes to
security.” Earnest claimed that “significant screening was put in place
to ensure that these individuals don’t pose an undue threat to our
national security.”

In contrast, noted the Caller, Donald Trump repeatedly criticized the
resettling of Syrian refugees in the United States throughout the 2016
campaign, saying they posed an unnecessary national security risk.

As we reported on January 26, President Trump is expected to sign an
executive order soon that will suspend the issuance of visas and other
immigration benefits to “nationals of countries of particular concern,”
including Syria.

A draft of Trump’s executive order obtained by several news outlets
(and posted online by the LexisNexis legal research website) directs the
secretary of state to suspend the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program
(USRAP) for 120 days and specifies that during that 120-day period, the
secretary of state and the secretary of homeland security shall review
the USRAP application and adjudication process to determine what
additional procedures can be taken to ensure that those approved for
refugee admission do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of
the United States.

The order will also direct the secretary of homeland security, in
consultation with the secretary of state, to submit to the president a
list of countries recommended for inclusion on a presidential
proclamation that would prohibit the entry of foreign nationals from
each country on the list.

The only country that is specifically named in the order is Syria. According to the order,

The Secretaries of State and Homeland
Security, as appropriate, shall cease refugee processing of and the
admittance of nationals of Syria as refugees until such time as I have
determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure
its alignment with the national interest.

The order also provides for “safe zones” in Syria:

Pursuant to the cessation of refugee
processing for Syrian nationals, the Secretary of State, in conjunction
with the Secretary of Defense, is directed within 90 days of the date of
this order to produce a plan to provide safe areas in Syria and in the
surrounding region in which Syrian nationals displaced from their
homeland can await firm settlement, such as repatriation or potential
third-country resettlement.

After the 120-day suspension, the United States will then cap the
number of refugees admitted to our country at approximately 50,000. This
number would include refugees from around the world, not just Syria or
other areas of conflict in the Middle East.

Related articles:

Trump Executive Order to Ban Nationals of “Countries of Particular Concern”

Regarding Fake Passports for Syrians

Obama Scrapping Registration of Aliens From Mostly Muslim Nations

Sons of Middle Eastern Immigrants Recruited by Terrorist Groups

Border Patrol: Arrests of Pakistanis, Afghans Up This Year

Military Concerned About Large Numbers of Individuals From Terrorist Regions Crossing Border

Smuggling Network Brings Aliens With Terrorist Ties Across U.S. Border

Mexican Cartels Moving Terrorists Across Southern U.S. Border

Terrorist Smuggling Into U.S. a Real Concern

Pakistanis With Terrorism Ties Caught After Crossing U.S.-Mexican Border
_________________________________________________________

 Trump says Syrian Christian refugees 
will be given priority
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“Pew Research Center said last October 38,901 Muslim refugees entered
the United States in fiscal year 2016 from all countries – almost the
same number of Christian refugees, 37,521.”

Reuters is being deliberately misleading. From Syria in 2016, the Obama administration admitted 12,587 refugees:
12,486 Muslims, 68 Christians, and 24 Yazidis. Trump is ending this
obvious social engineering and saying that Syrian Christians, who have
borne the brunt of persecution from jihad groups there, will be given
priority.

This also shows the falsity of establishment propaganda media claims
that Trump’s immigration ban would keep out non-Muslim victims of
persecution by jihadis.

“Trump says Syrian Christian refugees will be given priority,” Reuters, January 27, 2017:

WASHINGTON, Jan 27 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump
said on Friday that Syrian Christians will be given priority when it
comes to applying for refugee status in the United States.

“If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian,
it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair, everybody
was persecuted in all fairness, but they were chopping off the heads of
everybody but more so the Christians,” Trump said in an excerpt of an
interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network.

Pew Research Center said last October 38,901 Muslim refugees entered
the United States in fiscal year 2016 from all countries – almost the
same number of Christian refugees, 37,521….

_________________________________________________________

 Trump Train Traveling At Mach Speed
 In Blitzkrieg Action Trump Delivers On Promises
 
Drain The Swamp, Drain The Sanctuary Cities
 
Trump Will Prosecute Clinton Crime Family
 
President Donald Trump With Sean Hannity 
FULL Interview
 
Robert F. Kennedy, Junior And The War Against 
Fake Vaccines

Vaccines: Trump Crosses Party Lines to Expose 

Big Pharma

 
 

TRUMP JOINS ANTI-BREXIT THERESA MAY, UK PRIME MINISTER, FOR PRESS CONFERENCE~SWEARING IN OF JAMES MATTIS AS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

TRUMP JOINS ANTI-BREXIT THERESA MAY, UK PRIME MINISTER, FOR PRESS CONFERENCE~SWEARING IN OF JAMES MATTIS AS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
IS MAY A STAB IN THE BACK “FRIEND” 
OF TRUMP & THE USA?
 UK’s Theresa May, speaking in Philadelphia, lauds 
“the peaceful religion of Islam” and “internationalism”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

This will make for an interesting conversation between this self-righteous destroyer of her own nation and President Trump.

Theresa May recently boasted about having banned me from the country, and likened me to violent jihad terrorists. I was actually banned
for noting, quite correctly, that “[Islam] is a religion and is a
belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers…” That is what
May thinks is the flip side of jihad terrorism. Meanwhile, May’s Britain
has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a
moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred
and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in
Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain. The UK Home Office recently admitted
Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has
said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things.
One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest.
Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth –
tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination
of the above.” May’s government also recently admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, it banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
What does Theresa May think is going to be the outcome of all this?
Does she think that by admitting jihad preachers such as Syed Muzaffar
Shah Qadri and jihad terrorists such as Jamshid Piruz
into the U.K., while banning foes of jihad terror, she will pacify her
restive and growing Muslim population, and obviate the jihad imperative?
Does she really believe that if “Islamophobia” is stamped out, Muslims
will see no need to respond with jihad?
Imagine how surprised she will be when she has managed to silence
every last critic of Islam and jihad, and jihad will still rear its
bloody head in her green and pleasant land. But it boggles the mind to
think she could be this stupid in the first place. Is there no one in
the British government with sufficient knowledge and courage to take the
Prime Minister aside and explain to her that jihad violence arises from
imperatives within Islam itself, which will not be blunted, calmed, or
discarded in the face of kindness from infidels?

“Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority,” by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, January 26, 2017:

British Prime Minister Theresa May used her speech in
Philadelphia to needle the new Trump administration on a number of
issues ranging from globalism to climate change, Islam, and even to
defending the European Union.
Mrs. May began her speech at the Republican Retreat in Philadelphia
with a brief history of Anglo-American relations, invoking the spirit of
the Founding Fathers of the U.S. as well as expressing gratitude
towards America’s involvement in the World Wars of the 20th century.
But her speech was also littered with politically correct terms, as
well as left and center-left talking points regarding international
institutions, Islam, and radical Islamic terrorism, the latter of which
she called “Islamist extremism”.
The British premier compared “open, liberal and democratic” societies
in the West versus “closed, coercive” ones. She hailed the United
Nations, praised the World Bank, and called NATO “the cornerstone” of
Western defense.
And Mrs. May also spoke of the necessity for multilateralism in stark
contrast with the line pushed by the White House — which prefers
bilateralism — over recent days. She cited the need to tackle “climate
change” as one of the reasons to back globalist institutions.
She called for the two nations to be “internationalist” and “global”,
though noted “Some of these organisations are in need of reform and
renewal”.
And while committing to the destruction of the Islamic State, she
failed to mention the name of the group, choosing instead the term
“Daesh” — a word preferred by politically correct types and most notably popularized by former Secretary of State John Kerry and President Barack Obama.
She went on to describe “radical Islamists”, stopping short of
echoing the phrases used by the new U.S. administration including
“radical Islamic terrorism”.
The British PM stated: “Of course we should always be careful to
distinguish between this extreme and hateful ideology and the peaceful
religion of Islam, and the hundreds of millions of its adherents,
including millions of our own citizens, and those further afield who are
so often the first victims of this ideology’s terror”….
Curiously, despite Britain’s Brexit vote, Mrs. May said of the
European Union: “We will build a new partnership with our friends in
Europe. We are not turning our back on them, or on the interests and the
values that we share. It remains overwhelmingly in our interests – and
in those of the wider world – that the EU should succeed”.

Clearly, she is abandoning Brexit, which is no surprise at all. It
remains to be seen whether there are enough free Britons to cast her out
of office and install a Prime Minister who will make Brexit a reality.
__________________________________________________

  https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/trump-mattis-pence.jpg?w=640&h=480
Donald Trump Swearing-In James Mattis 
as Secretary of Defense

 Message to the Department of Defense 
from Secretary of Defense James Mattis
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- It’s good to be back and I’m grateful to serve alongside you as Secretary of Defense.
Together with the Intelligence Community we are the sentinels and guardians of our nation.
We
need only look to you, the uniformed and civilian members of the
Department and your families, to see the fundamental unity of our
country.

You represent an America committed to the common good;
an America that is never complacent about defending its freedoms; and an
America that remains a steady beacon of hope for all mankind.

Every
action we take will be designed to ensure our military is ready to
fight today and in the future. Recognizing that no nation is secure
without friends, we will work with the State Department to strengthen
our alliances.
Further, we are devoted to gaining full value from
every taxpayer dollar spent on defense, thereby earning the trust of
Congress and the American people.

I am confident you will do your part. I pledge to you I’ll do my best as your Secretary.

________________________________________________________