republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Betty Freauf
December 31, 2016
an earlier article entitled
Parents Gave Up Rights to Educate, I noted all the chaos we are experiencing
is the result of the Harvard/Unitarian/Progressive enlightened snobs
way back at the turn of the 19th Century attempting to bring communism
to the U.S. which would require getting control of education away from
the Calvinists Christian parents. Well, the Trump presidential candidacy
did to one thing – educated
people on the Electoral College
. I know 80 year olds who didn’t
know what it was.
is not only written by the victors but by the ignorant, the biased and
the devious. If, in addition to distortions of the history record, one
adds another factor – the intentional “dumbing down”
of a people, then the disintegration of a country can be accomplished
even more quickly. As those who were listening and watching soon saw
our Constitutional Republic being dismantled ever so quietly by these
enlightened snobs. I cringe every time I hear another elected leader
call our country a democracy. The
lack of Civics
in our public school system has been the biggest
problem. Suddenly we found ourselves confronted by an incredible societal
transformation – a tectonic
of enormous magnitude – had taken place before our eyes.
However, it has been the last generation of what are now called millennials
is the most frightening and they seem to be the ones billionaire George
Soros paid to protest Trump’s election.
great journalist Alan
passed away in 2009. He warned when the Communists impose
their version of Socialism on a country, they always destroy its history.
They stop teaching it in the schools. They don’t talk about it
in the media. They delete and pervert it in the movies and we know who
owns Hollywood. Nationally, if you don’t know history, you are
no longer a nation. You are people without cohesion, disunited and easily
Now if all this rings a bell, please study what he’s written
about Islam
. No. 30 of the 45
declared goals
for the communist takeover of America is to discredit
the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who
had no concern for the “common man.” No. 21 says to belittle
all forms of America culture and discourage the teaching of American
history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big
picture” and No. 32, support any socialist movement to give centralized-
control over any part of the culture
– education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health
clinics, etc.
train their children at an early age how to handle guns and explosives.
They are taught to hate and while Americans were brainwashed to believe
two children was enough, the Muslims are having lots of babies.
Recently there is much talk in our news about the 18-wheeler truck driven
into the Berlin Christmas party and we are being warned by the intelligence
community America is going to be next; however, google HOAX Global war
on Terrorism. According to news reports, some communities such as Dearborn,
Michigan have already taken over large portions of the town and the
insistence that the women must wear burkas that cover their whole body
plus their faces, automatically becomes a source of contention and anxiety
in these communities.
for immigrants to bond together in certain areas is not unusual. This
has happened since they got off the boat at Ellis Island in search of
a better life and couldn’t wait to become citizens but the Muslims
refuse to assimilate
as described in their dress above and one can find no U.S. flags in
the areas. Some men have up to four wives and receive welfare assistance.
Eventually they will run for some public office in a district where
they can guarantee election and one by one they will bring in others.
this is what happens when God turns a nation over to Satan. (Romans
1:18-32) The goal of the Muslims is to take over the world and install
. They come to our country and support themselves with our “politically
correct” welfare system. Recently psychologist Dr. James Mitchell
an expert on the Muslims say it only takes one or two people to cause
great carnage like allegedly recently happened in Berlin and this terror
threat is worldwide.
first female chancellor, Angela Merkel, is the daughter of a Lutheran
minister and is compassionate to a fault with the refugees. Like white
caused America to vote into the White House not once but twice
two total communist groomed frauds, Merkel’s type of WWII-Hitler
“guilt” stops Germany’s ability to defend themselves.
we also see President Barack Obama doing likewise. In addition, before
he leaves office, he’s granting clemency to hundreds (maybe thousands)
of those in prison primarily on drug charges – he calls them low
level offenders. And guess where the Muslims recruit – at our
with strong families are survivors. So the first attack was to destroy
a mother’s
self worth
with the women’s movement which encouraged women
to go to work outside the home. Spankings
were called “child abuse so in order to protect the children from
abusive parents, the Child Protective Services (CPS) was created to
intervene into what used to be God’s command – spare the
rod, spoil the child. (Prov. 29:15) And yes, abuse did occur but the
authority that should have been called and asked to investigate would
be the duly elected county sheriff and not a bunch of unqualified and
unelected pecksniffians in CPS. (Hypocritically affecting benevolence
or high moral principles – character in Charles Dickens Novel
Martin Chuzzlewit – 1843)
1994 it was noted a growing number of sex researchers were supporting
the idea that pedophilia
could be healthy and should be legalized and promoted. Way back in 1984
one homosexual spokesperson said “We will Sodomize your sons.”
Alan Stang in his 2007 book NOT HOLIER THAN THOU wrote about the sodomizing
of children and by whom- A pervert by the name of Craig Smith “maintained
a call boy ring that catered to the political elite and, unlike most
D.C. call boy rings, offered children to its clients.” Stang told
how the Republican Party had homosexuals worm their way into important
jobs. One example was sodomite lawyer Roy Cohn, who, dying of disease
in a hospital bed, was still trying to arrange homosexual liaisons.
Psychiatry profession once labeled homosexuality as a mental disorder
but applied pressure on the profession got that classification removed.
The 6/30/03 New American magazine gave names of homosexual serial killers
and the numbers they killed.
the young, get them away from religion and get them interested in sex
is the communist rule for a revolution. No. 27 of communist goals: Discredit
the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does
not need a “religious crutch.” To further this experiment,
SIECUS (Sexuality Information
and Education Council of the U.S.) entered the picture. It’s January
1993 report called for “respect for the diversity
of values
and beliefs about sexuality” and asserted that “sexuality
is a natural healthy part of living” and each individual must
have the right to make “responsible sexual choices. These generalizations
belie the fact that SIECUS lacked respect for religious, traditional
sexual beliefs and has resulted in bitter fruit but the experiment went
on. And in 1994, sex clinics became known and condom clinics cashed
in under President Clinton’s “Health Security Act. (S1757)
The bill scheduled $50 million a year for “School Health Education”
which, of course, is popularly known as sex education. This is where
counselors would smuggle PG girls out the back door for an abortion
without parental knowledge. Since Clinton’s sex life with Monica
Lewinsky was exposed, 12 and 13 year olds in middle school began having
oral sex. Kids are dirty dancing at high school events. A December 2002
NEWSWEEK magazine said 46% are having sex. The number of kids having
sex before 14 is increasing. They have sex in the bathrooms, science
class, and the parking lot.
President Jimmy Carter created the unconstitutional Department of Education.
So basic
and writing, arithmetic skills, Civics and the Constitution
were ignored and replaced with sex education under the premise parents
were incapable. The overall goal of sex education program was stated
to enhance self esteem , increase decision making capacity, enable adolescents
to make responsible decisions about sex. Embarrassed students were asked
to tell what they like and did not like about the instruction, the group,
the size and appearance of their own sex organs. Education aides included
rubber like models of sex organs, Play Doh for students to shape into
sex organs, fruits and vegetables to represent parts of male and female
anatomy – all this without the knowledge of the parents.
Reisman writes about “Kinsey’s Kooky Shrinks” and
says anyone who believes that sex professors are just objective, high-minded
intellectuals has never attended a sex conference. Communist collective-bargaining
unionized teachers also lacking in history allowed themselves to become
instead of whistle blowers. And now President elect Donald
Trump has selected Betsy DeVos to head the Department of Education which
should have been repealed years ago! Americas used to be #1 in education
worldwide, now we are 36th.
sex education has morphed into mass confusion in the minds of our young
people and we now have 300 million grandparents who are now either having
their children and grandchildren living in their homes or are helping
them out financially. The advent of political correctness and social
networks has broken down traditional barriers and expanded boundaries
to unacceptable dangerous lifestyles to where it is difficult to protect
our children
from sexual deviants.
identity is the theme of today’s sexual indoctrination and Planned
Parenthood and our school system wants to make your child so confused
in hopes they will begin to question who they really are – enhancing
therefore, the homosexual
. In 2016 California began to indoctrinate seven year olds
with the new LGB T curriculum. So we now have young folks wanting the
government to pay for their sex reassignment surgery and transgenders
want access to all public restrooms.
for the New World Order, death education will play as important a part
in changing attitudes toward death as sex education played in changing
attitudes toward sex information and wide acceptance of various lifestyles.

They offered death education
. Such classes promoted conditioning of these young minds
and desensitizing of the masses to the mass genocide to come, with abortion,
euthanasia, necrophilia, cannibalism, group death and cruelty. The Illuminati
listed 25 ways to smash America’s resistance to the global Agenda
and #19 was the death culture to promote the conditioning of young minds
so now we know why young people
. And then an increase in suicides by young people….
we’ve seen videos how Islam parents are conditioning their children
early to kill the infidels. That which was once Normal, has suddenly
become Political Incorrect as Saul Alinsky came on the scene to socialize
or nationalize everything (one step below communism and a dictator)
and he was Hillary Clinton’s as well as many others mentors. And
what Bill and Hillary Clinton have done is not well known by today’s
young snowflakes
who began to melt down when their leader, Hillary Clinton, lost the
after more than a hundred years of universal public education indoctrination,
we can say that it nowhere resembles the Utopia vision that drove its
proponents to create it and public schools have become a shelter for
incompetent communistic collective bargaining teachers who were trained
by the majority of communist professors in these worthless colleges.
I can use Bill Ayers as
an example. Because of prosecutorial errors, Ayers went free boasting,
“guilty as hell, free as a bird,” for killing a policeman.
It was no accident that Barack Obama chose Ayers as mentor in his run
for the Illinois Senate. This felon Ayers went on to become a college
professor spewing out his dangerous doctrine to heads full of mush.
now newcomers who have suddenly awakening to the deception carried on
by the education elites should be able to better understand why it has
all happened. Look at how their futures are desolate because of what
they’ve been taught. These young folks protesting now and bemoaning
the fact that their evil leader, Hillary, lost are products of an education
presented to them by a bunch of miserable, unhappy, constantly angry
intellectuals and elitists who have created an army of mind-numbed ill
educated robots who will spend the rest of their lives miserable and
unhappy, unsatisfied and it has been done on purpose. Yes, politics
and the social media can become
a mental disorder
and few exit the system untarnished.


Muslim migrants were employed as security guards in Cologne on New Year’s Eve
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

That was the night that their co-religionists went on a rampage of sex assault
against non-Muslim women. Now it comes out that the foxes were placed
in charge of the hen house — so sure are European officials that Islam is
a religion of peace that is perfectly compatible with Western values
and norms.

“Untrained refugees employed as security guards in Cologne on New Year’s Eve,” by Allan Hall, Express, December 29, 2016:

IT has just been revealed that UNTRAINED refugees were deployed as security personnel on New Year’s Eve in Cologne last year.
But many abandoned their posts and at least one was so drunk he couldn’t work.
A total of 59 asylum seekers were stationed on bridges across the
Rhine to assist in a mammoth security operation aimed at stopping any

Last year mobs of mostly North African men sexually assaulted and
robbed hundreds of women in and around the city’s main railway station
as police totally lost control of the situation.

On September 7, 2015 authorities made the decision to give some
refugees a role in the policing of celebrations – a little known fact
which has only just emerged.

The security firm Westturm was in charge of hiring the migrants who
were told to have a “basic mastery of the German language and to bring
along warm clothing”.

Bild published a list of those who were hired on Thursday.
Most came from North Africa, Syria and Afghanistan….


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Attorney Constance Cumbey
December 31, 2016
my life and its memories, I have seen Presidents come and go. My personal
recall goes back to the last days of the first Truman administration.
He had entered office as a Vice President and became President when Franklin
Delano Roosevelt died in 1945. My personal memories of hearing the radio
discussions about the upcoming election stem from 1948. Truman was expected
to become a “lame duck” in 1948, but it did not happen.
went to bed with news that Dewey had won. He awoke to learn that he, instead
had prevailed. Truman was succeeded in 1952 by Republican Dwight David
Eisenhower. My parents paid attention to that election where they had
voted for Eisenhower in the first election and the Democratic candidate
in the 1956 election.
Eisenhower was succeeded by the candidate of the opposite party by Democrat
John Fitzgerald Kennedy. That was 1960. I was a Junior in high school.
I do not remember public rancor and anger during that transition, even
though Richard Nixon, Eisenhower’s Vice President had a surprise loss.
The Kennedy years were brief with his tragic assassination in Dallas on
November 22, 1963. He was succeeded by Lyndon Baines Johnson, his Vice
President. Johnson was re-elected over Barry Goldwater in 1964. The years
to follow were tumultuous and very reminiscent of what is happening now.
Lyndon Johnson was exceedingly unpopular among many Democrats and did
not seek re-election for what would have in effect been a third term in
1968. Richard Nixon instead was elected. Although the times were turbulent
and the Cold War was on, I do not recall an ugly transition period —
at least in my then perception.
Nixon was re-elected in 1972. There was turbulence, but that turbulence
seemed to stem more from Nixon’s insecurities, the ongoing Vietnam War,
and what was shaping up that we came to know as “Watergate.”
Gerald Ford succeeded fallen and disgraced former Vice President Spiro
Agnew in that office and then became President of the United States upon
President Nixon’s resignation in disgrace. Although times were turbulent
indeed, I do not recall an ugly transition period when Jimmy Carter took
office as President of the United States (POTUS). I do not recall, however,
the December 1976 through January 1977 being an ugly or tumultuous period
in terms of the Presidential succession.
was a one-termer, having been defeated in 1980 by Ronald Reagan. Although
Democrats were saddened at the loss, I do not recall the transition period
being an ugly one. Ronald Reagan after serving two terms was succeeded
by his Vice President George H. W. Bush who served only one term as President
after having served two full terms as Vice President. William Jefferson
Clinton was elected President. Although the Republicans were disappointed,
I recall the inauguration and transition period proceeding smoothly and
was real turbulence in 2000 when Vice Presidential Albert Gore and George
W. Bush’s races collided. There were angry and politicized Supreme Court
challenges that fell in favor of George W. Bush. Nevertheless, the transition
proceeded smoothly despite the rancor. 
we came to 2008 when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had a tumultuous
primary race where Obama prevailed. Obama was elected President over John
McCain his first term and over Mitt Romney his second term. The Bush-Obama
transition went smoothly.
we come to the very last days of the Obama Administration. Suddenly, globally
precipitous moves are made by the outgoing administration, obviously designed
to make the transition anything but smooth. President Obama, in his declining
days, it appears, has made war on both Israel and Russia. I don’t get
classified briefings, nor do I know what the full facts are, but it is
a safe bet that both countries have been actively spying on the other
— but the accusation that Hillary’s defeat blamed first on FBI director
James Comey and now on “the Russians” is unique in our history,
at least as my personal recall goes.
It is
my impression for better or for worse that what Barack Obama is doing
is working actively to prevent a smooth transition of power and to create
a far more dangerous world for Israel and for the United States than existed
before. The actions against Russia are provocative to say the least.
My prayer
is that Russia does not take the bait! May the Lord help us all!
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Diane Kepus
December 31, 2016
Underhanded and Nefarious
a Christian, I try very hard to understand the reasons that people do
some of the things they do. I have found it impossible to reason out
any of the actions of Barack Obama or whatever his name is.
I am NOT a PARTY person, but rather choose to pick the candidates I
support because of who they are and not what party they belong too,
the fact Obama is a Democrat has nothing to do with this except it just
re-enforces some of his actions against Americans and others.
wrote about him about 2 years after he took office having noted he is
a Colonialist, disliking America and his objective to destroy as much
of America and her people as he could all in the name of the under-privileged
when what he did for them was bury them deeper into nothingness and
latest actions since his meeting with President-elect Trump have been
nasty, vile and intentionally disruptive and damaging to not only the
future of America but other parts of the world, namely Israel.
in 2011, Obama began showing his distaste for Israel when he urged Israel
to hand over half of Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, Temple Mount, Old
Jerusalem, Via Dolorosa and the tomb of Jesus Christ to various radical
Islamic organizations.
in 2013, Obama tried to talk Israel into just handing over the holist
Christian and Jewish sites to those very same Islamic groups.
man Obama cannot possibly be a Christian even though he supposedly sat
in Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years. We learned long ago of the
antics being carried out by Wright and the black, male members of his
as the Muslim I believe he is, must be questioned as to his concern
that Palestine be recognized as a country entitled to the land owned
by Israel. It is currently being rumored that John Kerry at the direction
of Obama is currently finalizing a document that Obama hopes will form
the basis for a UN Security Council resolution that will officially
recognize a Palestinian state before the end of Obama’s term on
January 20th.
Obama is not a Muslim, than from my way of thinking, he just hates Americans.
he were a Christian, he would have never considered doing what he did
thru the U.N. in telling the U.S. not to veto against Resolution 2334.
the man has proven over and over that he is a liar and he has never
shown that to be more true than with his actions since his meeting with
Trump. He sat there in an interview with Trump and reporters, telling
the world what a great meeting they had and how he intended to help
with the transition into the change-over and he lied.
wasting all our tax-payer money flying around the country supporting
Hillary and now since she has lost and his meeting with Trump is over,
he talks about how he should have pushed to re-run for a third term
arguing that a majority of Americans continue to support his progressive
vision for the country not caring the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution
says he could not – but then when has Obama ever cared about anything
in the Constitution?
told Marines at the base in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii during his Christmas
vacation, “I am confident in this vision, because I’m confident
that if I had run again and articulated it, I think I could have mobilized
a majority of the American people to rally behind it. I know that in
conversations that I’ve had with people around the country,” he
continued, even some people who disagreed with me, they would say, the
vision, the direction that you point towards is the right one.”
ego ridden individual also decided to turn his back on Clinton and criticized
her for how she ran her campaign refusing to see that the American people
are just plain tired of being lied too and “ruled” by a
“self-serving president/government and illegal Executive Orders.
personally have no doubt it will be proven that Obama was behind this
recent attack against Israel. Both Hillary and Obama have brought Muslims
of very questionable character and relationships into the White House.
Muslims have become good American citizens assimilating to our country
and its government. Some have even fought in the US Armed Forces and
against radical Islamic terrorism. But our elected president has deliberately
brought within the folds of our government members of the Muslim Brotherhood
(the progenitor of Jihadism), and its front groups, the Council of American
Islamic Relations (CAIR), and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).
and methodically over the past 8 years, Obama has been filling the Washington
bureaucracy to include DHS, National Security Council, CIA, White House,
State Department, DOD, US Armed Forces and every US Intelligence Agency
with members of the above-mentioned groups. Obama has acted as a “tool”
for the Jihadi movement in the U.S.
CIA director John Brennan has converted to the Muslim faith; Huma Abedin,
former aide to Hillary; Department of Homeland Security Deputy Mayor,
Arif Alikhan; Mohammed Elibiary, Advisor to DHS Security; Obama Administration
Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel;
and Malick Obama, the Head of the Muslim Brotherhood Finance and Arms
Procurement, Obama’s half-brother.
make matters worse, Obama senior appointee Lois Lerner, IRS Director
at the time, is now implicated in providing material support to Malik
Obama. Malik Obama is a known Muslim Brotherhood terrorist and has been
granted undeniable special privilege under U.S. law and in granting
that privilege, Lerner even used an alias and a private email server
initially to complete the act. In other words, she knew what she was
doing was treason and she was attempting to cover it up.
Higgins (former DOD Manager of the Combating Terrorism & Technical
Support Office & Irregular Warfare Section) made explosive charges
on national radio stating, “What leaders in the Obama administration
are actually scrubbing is any references to the Islamic doctrine that
would allow us to define who is or who is not actually one of our enemies.
When you look at the deliberate decision-making process of the Obama
administration, as it relates to “Radical Islam”, that deliberate
decision-making process is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.
And the way they control it is by prohibiting US National Security Agency
personnel from ever developing an understanding to the level
where Phil Haney had it
have heard for themselves Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice LIE about something
as serious as Benghazi and Extortion 17. Americans need to understand
the Muslim Brotherhood has been banned from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Russia,
Jordan, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirate because the Muslim Brotherhood
& CAIR have been identified as International Terrorist organizations
that have tried to undermine and overthrow friendly Muslim Middle East
the Obama administration has brought numerous members of the Muslim
Brotherhood into the White House and given them positions near and dear
to classified information.
Haney, DHS whistle blower and former Dept. of Homeland Security official
this year released his book See
Something, Say Nothing
explaining the backroom maneuvers
going on to deceive America’s citizens.
2007 a subtle play has been happening at the UN between the Organization
of the Islamic Congress (OIC) countries led by Pakistan and the West
(mainly EU, US and their allies).
is also becoming apparent is that Western values no longer have the
power they once had in the United Nations (UN) and our platform of democracy
and equality is also being eroded. The growing Muslim voting block of
nations is slowly but surely introducing Sharia Law into the UN and
apparently without anyone really noticing.
18 December 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted the resolution “Combating
Defamation of Religions” by 108 votes to 51 with 25 abstentions.
The resolution expresses “deep concern about the negative stereotyping
of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in
matters of religion or belief”. But the only religion mentioned
by name was Islam.
this resolution did was in effect give Islam Human Rights status—something
that should be only accorded to human beings not to an ideology or religion.
day after a prominent U.S. Muslim leader reacted to the November 2015
Paris attacks with a declaration that the Islamic State, also known
as ISIS, has nothing to do with Islam, President Obama made the same
assertion. Watching these
two video’s
will give you all the information you need along
with showing you the deliberate direction the Obama administration has
taken against this country.
listening to the two video’s I wonder if you will also believe
as I do is that a great deal of Obama’s actions has been in motion
to destroy all Western civilization from within. The gravitational force
of the Global Islamic Movement is not radicalization – the gravitational
force of the Global Islamic Movement is the implementation of Sharia
government has been supporting and approving the operation of over 165
Muslim Gulen Charter schools in this country since 2000 on YOUR tax
dollars hidden under various names. American parents are actually sending
their non-Muslim children to these schools. Have American parents totally
lost their minds?
video by
Bill Whittle exposes how Obama has been impeding Federal Law Enforcement
from identifying and effectively fighting “Radical Islamic Terrorists”
within the US.
who is the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations – certainly not
a person favorable to the United States:

Samantha Powers is the wife of Cass Sunstein Obama’s former
regulatory czar who has been labeled the most dangerous liberal in
Powers passionately hates Israel and her
remarks here
and here
and here
prove it.
Powers once worked for the George Soros’
‘think tank’ ICG
(International Crisis Group)

In a 2002 interview she stated the U.S. should
pour billions of dollars of taxpayer money into a new state of Palestine.
She was re-hired in 2009 as Obama’s
Special Assistant to President Barack Obama and Senior Director of
Multilateral Affairs on the Staff of the National Security Council.
this recent slap in the face of Israel is enough to make the United
States decide to leave the United Nations I say hurrah! As of 2007,
we were pouring $7.7 BILLION dollars into the UN a YEAR with no change
and no results. After a nine-month examination in 2015 of the U.N. organization’s
anti-fraud policies, what examiners found was something akin to anarchy:
a “state of near denial” among some U.N. organizations about
the theft of their goods, money and services; and inertia, incoherence
and a “perceived sense of impunity for fraud perpetrators”
in many others.
other results the report showed “more than half” of some
16,000 U.N. staffers and 164 executive managers consulted by the examiners
who had completed a “fraud perception survey” indicated
that they believe that fraudulent behavior goes unpunished in their
United Nations has continually been linked to fraud and corruption.
The pay their staff receives is approximately 38% higher than the average
comparable employee in the U.S. government. U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon’s New York Secretariat stated, “Fraud is not considered
a corporate risk within the Secretariat, and no specific fraud risk
assessments are conducted.”
2012, the Heritage Foundation and others called for the US to rein in
the UN’s lavish salaries after having discovered that U.N. employees
in the professional and higher grades in New York earn a net remuneration
(take-home salary) that averages 29.5 percent higher than that of equivalent
U.S. civil servant grades in Washington, D.C. Moreover, U.N. employees
enjoy benefits that in many cases exceed those of U.S. civil servants.
it not enough the UN has consistently over the years paid money intended
for those in need to their country’s dictators? The world should
be enraged at the billions upon billions of $$ that have continually
been funneled through the United Nations and the countries they were
supposed to help are still in poverty, sick and starving.
Ki-moon once again calling for emergency funds earlier this month for
Global Humanity which he claims has quadrupled over the years, leaving
more than 128 million people in need of assistance. Did these people
just crop up or have they been ignored for years and the money sent
to their dictators? I say “get your house in order and in fact
we just need to close you down”.
if for one minute you think this world is not being pushed to Globalization
and total acceptance of Islam/Sharia check these out:

George Washington University has eliminated its United States history
requirement for history majors in order to attract more students in
our “globalizing” world. [Link]

The Alwaleed Islamic Studies Program at Harvard University is dedicated
to furthering the scholarly study of Islam and the Muslim world. [Link]

will receive a stipend of up to $5,000 per month and are expected
to promote the development of policy papers “at the intersection
of Islamic law and relevant issues of U.S. policy.”
These policy
papers will include short commentary on recent cases or other Islamic
law sources, longer policy briefs, or op-eds, according to the law
school website. Here comes Sharia Law in America!
I need to remind you once again that if our children are not taught
about what our founders gave us and personally gave up so that we had
this wonderful country, they will have no allegiance to it?


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Secretary of State John Kerry astounded, alarmed, and angered people
around the world with his marathon speech dealing with the UN Security
Council’s condemnation of Israel and Obama’s refusal to veto their
nonbinding resolution. That was a total contradiction of a decades-old
American policy. The resolution demands that Israel stop building
settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank where about 600,000 Jews

Israel took East Jerusalem and the West Bank during the 1967 Six-Day
War that was started by Egypt, Jordan, and Syria when they massed troops
on Israel’s border. Iraq joined the battle later. In six days, little
Israel whopped the Arab world, doubling their size and the area they
took is called occupied territory under control of the
Palestinian Authority. However, it has been traditionally true that the
winner in a war gets to keep what he has won. Israel won; the attacking
Arab nations lost. That should settle it.

But it gets worse. The resolution calls for the Western Wall (Wailing
Wall) and the Jewish Quarter in the Old City to be occupied territory!
If I know anything about Israel and Netanyahu, that is not going to
happen. Well, maybe it will when shrimp learn to sing in harmony
Israel’s National Anthem, “The Hope.” “As long as the Jewish spirit is
yearning deep in the heart, With eyes turned toward the East, looking
toward Zion, Then our hope – the two-thousand-year-old hope – will not
be lost: To be a free people in our land, The land of Zion and

No, not even if the shrimp learn to sing in Hebrew! Would just be another miracle, something with which the Jews are familiar.

Israeli authorities may give up Judea and Samaria for a perverted
peace but never Jerusalem which is considered their eternal city made
famous when King David conquered it in 1010 B.C.

However, Israel’s boundaries, biblically and historically, are from
the eastern border of Egypt (the Sichor River, an eastern branch of the
Nile) to the Euphrates River. Moreover, Israel has foolishly agreed to
trade land for peace but there can be no peace since the PLO and Hamas
refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist! In fact, their maps do not
show the reality that the world knows to be true: Israel is a nation.
So, Israel is willing to give up their claim to the West Bank in
exchange for recognition as a legitimate nation with secure borders. The
“Palestinians” would, in turn, be recognized as a nation of Arabs and
would live in peace with Israel. When pigs learn to fly.

Israel should keep all land from the Mediterranean to the Jordan
River as a united nation; and if the “Palestinians” want a nation then
one can be carved out of Jordan and Saudi Arabia. There is plenty of
desert land. However, Muslim nations don’t give a flip about the
“Palestinians” other than to use them as a political tool to further
their own cause.

The “Palestinian people” don’t exist as an historical group but they
do exist as a political ploy used by the PLO and other Muslim extremists
for their own selfish purposes. These “Palestinian” people are refugees
from the Middle East whom the Muslim nations will not accept as
citizens but will use as grunt workers in their fields and orchards.
The refugees are welcome as workers but not as citizens. By leaving the
refugee camps, they better themselves as migrate workers but without any
hope of citizenship from their “brother” Muslims. However, they have
been and are being used as pawns to further the political agenda of
their fellow Muslims. The workers are too dumb or fanatical to realize
that fact.

Any honest person will recognize that there is no mention of
“Palestina” in history before the Romans gave that new hated name to the
province of Judea. This fact was admitted by Professor Philip Hitti, an
Arab historian who declared, “There is no such thing
as Palestine in history, absolutely not.” This fact is further confirmed
by the Saudi Arabia Representative at the United Nations. “It is common
knowledge that Palestine is nothing but Southern Syria,” also denying
Israel as a nation.

Fathi Hammad, minister of the interior and national security for
Hamas–a recognized terror group whose charter calls for the destruction
of Israel, confirmed, “half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the
other half are Saudis.”
King Hussein of Jordan was the only Arab leader that showed any sympathy
toward what is called the Palestinian Arabs. In 1960 he stated: “Since
1948 Arab leaders have approached the Palestine problem in an
irresponsible manner….They have used the Palestine people for selfish
political purposes. This is ridiculous and, I could say, even criminal.”
The King was correct.

I started going to the Middle East just after the 1967 Six-Day War
(in which Israel sent the nine Muslim nations arrayed against them
running for cover) and have been there 14 times. That doesn’t make me a
Middle East expert but I became convinced that King Hussein, who died in
1999, was the most reasonable and kind Muslim leader in the Muslim
world. He shocked the world when he recognized Israel as a nation in
1994 much to the chagrin of other Muslim leaders.

Unknown to the world, King Hussein wanted peace with Israel and
secretly negotiated with Israel’s leaders and U.S. officials. The
private talks took place in London at the home of Hussein’s Jewish
physician. In 1970, Hussein kicked the PLO (Arafat) out of Jordan! It
must be remembered that Arafat, while leader of the PLO, was an
Egyptian, not a “Palestinian”; but then, no one is a “Palestinian.”

I corresponded with King Hussein in the late 70’s while I was a
member of the Indiana House of Representatives. I also was a newscaster
and commentator at a fledgling Indianapolis television station. Since I
went to the Middle East about every year I contacted the king about
doing a television interview, and much to my surprise, he readily
agreed. We set the date to coincide with my itinerary and I prepared to
become an “international correspondent.” But alas, it was not to be. My
trip was rescheduled because of terrorist activities and the king was
out of the country when I was finally there.

Syrian dictator Hafez Assad (father of the present dictator) told PLO
leader Yasser Arafat, “You do not represent Palestine as much as we do.
Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people,
there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria.” Don’t you think
the media should finally get the point: Palestinian people do not exist
except as a political pawn? The claim that Palestinians are “fighting to
regain their ancient homeland” is a bogus claim that no honest
historian will support. By the way, we have plenty of Muslim states in
the area and don’t need another one, especially at the expense of the
one true democratic state–Israel.

Zuhair Muhsin, military commander of the PLO and member of the PLO
Executive Council, clearly said “There are no differences between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one
nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our
Palestinian identity… yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian
identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian
state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel.” I wonder
if the media are listening. Maybe they can’t understand plain English.

Even Chris Matthews of MSNBC can understand that statement from a
Muslim terrorist–well, maybe not, since Chris’ main activity is in his
leg, not his brain. But we know John Kerry doesn’t understand.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“I have ordered a number of actions in response to the Russian
government’s aggressive harassment of U.S. officials and
cyber-operations aimed at the U.S. election,” President Obama announced
this week. He added, “These actions follow repeated private and public
warnings that we have issued to the Russian government and are a
necessary and appropriate response to efforts to harm U.S. interests in
violation of established international norms of behavior.”

Obama’s statement was an explanation for his expulsion of 35 Russian
intelligence operatives, and the sanctioning of five Russian entities
and four individuals as a reaction to Obama’s charge that the Russian
government interfered in the 2016 presidential campaign. Democrats
contend that Russian hacking probably altered the outcome of the
election in which former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lost to
Donald Trump.

The president is giving the Russians 72 hours to get out of the country.
Obama stated that all Americans “should be alarmed by Russia’s
actions,” however, because it interfered with U.S. election process.”
While Obama and other leading Democrats are not explicitly saying so,
the impression has been left with many Americans that the Russians
somehow hacked voting machines, switching votes from Clinton to Trump.
This is reminiscent of the widespread but inaccurate belief that Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein attacked the United States on September 11,
2001. While the Bush administration never said directly that Iraq was
behind 9/11, they certainly led millions of Americans to think so.

A similar ploy appears to be in the making with this “Russian
hacking” story. Many Americans mistakenly believe that if the Russians
“hacked” the election, this means they changed the results recorded on
voting machines. The clever use of the word “election,” instead of
“campaign,” for example, would understandably lead the casual observer
to conclude that a foreign power, Russia, “stole” the election for
Donald Trump.
What Obama, Clinton, and the DNC are complaining about is that the
released e-mails demonstrated that Clinton and her allies at the DNC
were involved in many questionable activities. The e-mails were
published by WikiLeaks (which has flatly denied obtaining them from the
Russians). In a clever political move, however, the Democrats have
diverted attention away from the content of the leaks to the source of the leaks.
Obama recently said that he directly told Russian President Vladimir
Putin in September to “knock it off” in his alleged hacking activities,
supposedly directed toward altering the outcome of the U.S. election.
Obama added that this alleged hacking was greatly reduced after this
“stern” warning, which leads one to wonder why the Russian agents were
not expelled then, instead of now.
One could conclude that Obama’s actions,only three weeks from the end
of his term, were taken more for domestic political advantage than a
true retaliatory action against the Russians.
Obama also claimed that American diplomats had “experienced an
unacceptable level of harassment in Moscow by Russian security services
and police over the last year,” adding, “Such activities have
In addition to the expulsions, Obama also announced that the State
Department will shut down two Russian compounds, one in Maryland and the
other in New York, that are used by Russian personnel for
intelligence-related purposes.
State Department spokesman Mark Toner issued a statement charging the
Russians with other actions that had led to Obama’s reaction. “The
Russian government has impeded our diplomatic operations by, among other
actions: forcing the closure of 28 American corners which hosted
cultural programs and English-language teaching; blocking our efforts to
begin the construction of a new, safer facility for our consulate
general in St. Petersburg; and rejecting to improve perimeter security
at the current, outdated facility in St. Petersburg.”
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) added their own complaints
about the Russians. While supporting the president’s actions, they
contended that the measures were inadequate, stating, “These intrusions
are not just hacks. They were attacks on the United States by a foreign
power and should be treated as such. Therefore, today’s action alone by
the White House is insufficient.”
Then, the DNC statement revealed that its members intend to use these allegations of Russian
hacking as a political weapon against the Republican Congress and the
soon-to-be Republican president Donald Trump: “Now it’s time for
resident-elect Trump and the Republican leadership in Congress to put
our national security before politics and show the American people that
they are serious about protecting our democracy [sic].”
Obama promised to hold the Russians accountable, and said the U.S.
would “work together” with American allies to “oppose Russia’s efforts
to undermine established international norms of behavior and interfere with democratic governance.”
(Emphasis added.) Again, it is clear that with less than a month left
in his term, Obama and the Democrats intend to use this issue to
question the legitimacy of the election of Trump.
Trump appears to understand this, arguing that is “time for our
country to move on to bigger and better things. Nevertheless, in the
interest of our country and its great people, I will meet with leaders
of the intelligence community next week in order to be updated on the
facts of this situation.” (But if Trump really thinks the Democrats and
the media will “move on” from this story, we can predict he would be
mistaken. They will “move on” only if something more useful to attack
Trump comes along).
Of course, the intelligence “community” is a part of the Obama
administration, and they paint a dark picture of the Russians. The
Department of Homeland Security reported that “These cyber-operations
have included spear phishing campaigns targeting government
organizations, critical infrastructure entities, think tanks,
universities, political organizations and corporations leading to the
theft of information.”
Dimitry Peskov, a Russian government spokesman, charged that the
Obama administration’s sanctions are intended to “spoil” U.S. relations
with Russia and “undermine” the presidency of Donald Trump. Still,
Russian President Putin has so far declined to retaliate by expelling a
like number of U.S. diplomats, despite the urging of his foreign
minister, Sergey Lavrov. Lavrov argued that Putin should expel 31 U.S.
diplomats from the U.S. Embassy in Moscow and four more from the U.S.
Consulate in St. Petersburg. He insisted that Russia “cannot leave these
sanctions unanswered.”
Peskov concluded that Obama’s sanctions are “groundless,” and are
“aimed directly at undermining” U.S. and Russian relations. And, of
course, since Obama will be out of the White House after January 20,
that means relations between the Russians and the incoming Trump
In short, the Obama/Clinton/DNC narrative appears to be that Trump
was Putin’s preferred winner in the presidential race, and that Russian
hacking was responsible for the release of multiple e-mails damaging to
the Clinton campaign.
But one could just as easily make the case that Clinton should have
been Putin’s preferred choice, not Trump. After all, shortly after Obama
took over the White House in 2009, Secretary of State Clinton implied
that the new U.S. administration wanted better relations with the
Russians, even going so far as to give Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov a “reset button.”
Meeting with Lavrov in Geneva, Switzerland, she handed him a small
green box with a ribbon. Inside there was a red button, with the Russian
word “peregruzka” printed on it. “I would like to present you with a
little gift that President Obama and Vice President Biden and I have
been saying and that is: ‘We want to reset our relationship, and so we
will do it together.”
Unfortunately, the word was not the Russian word for “reset,” but
rather their word for ‘overcharged.’ This led to some scrambling within
the State Department to find the right Russian word for “reset.”
Regardless, it was clear that Clinton intended to “reset” at least her personal relations with the Russians.
An examination of some of the leaked Hillary Clinton e-mails reveals
that perhaps the candidate who had a closer relationship with the
Russian oligarchs was Clinton, not Trump. For example, while Clinton was
secretary of state, the better relations with Putin’s Russia enabled
the Clinton Foundation and its donors to make millions of dollars off a
deal that sold Uranium One (and 25 percent of America’s strategic
uranium production) to Russia.
In a recent article for The New American, C. Mitchell Shaw
cited the involvement of Clinton campaign manager John Podesta in a
“huge financial/national security scandal involving his position as an
executive board member of Joule Global Sticthing, a company owned by
Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg and Putin’s state-owned RUSNANO
corporation.” Even more directly, Clinton, while she was secretary of
state (and supposedly working for American national interests),
“set up multi-billion dollar deals and transfers of U.S. technology to
help Vladimir Putin build Skolkovo, Russia’s high-tech Silicone Valley,
concerning which the FBI has issued ‘an extraordinary warning’ noting
that Russia may use this cooperation to obtain America’s ‘sensitive or
classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies.’”
But, when Trump is sworn in as president next month, we can expect
that the mantra of the Democrats, backed by their progressive allies in
the media, will be that he owes his election to the machinations of
Vladimir Putin and the Russian government. This story would seem to be
more about delegitimizing the incoming administration and influencing
the outcome of future elections in the United States than about the
just-concluded presidential election.

Obama Retaliates Against Russians Over Purported Cyber Attack, But Is There a Double Standard?

Why prosecute the Russians if the DHS is involved in the same illicit activity?



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

While President Obama is eagerly awaiting National Security
Director James Clapper’s full investigative report on the ‘Russian
hacking’ fiasco to hit his desk in the Oval Office, the administration
retaliated against Russia Thursday by imposing new sanctions and
expelling 35 intelligence operative from US soil.

as it stands now, the White House is in somewhat of a catch-22 and is
finding it difficult to legally retaliate against the purported Russian
hacks in the digital realm over specifics listed in a 2015 executive order
which indirectly excludes counteroffensive measures to be taken against
foreign cyber-actions aimed at influencing the U.S. electoral system.
But despite formalities, after making adjustments, the White House plans
to make it burdensome not only for the Russians but also plans to make
it challenging for a newly-elect President Trump to reverse any actions
taken by the current Administration once in office.
According to the Washington Post:

Obama issued the executive order
in April 2015, creating the sanctions tool as a way to hold accountable
people who harm computer systems related to critical functions such as
electricity generation or transportation, or who gain a competitive
advantage through the cyber­­theft of commercial secrets.
of people overseas who have engaged in cyber-acts that have threatened
U.S. national security or financial stability. The sanctions would also
block commercial transactions with the designated individuals and bar
their entry into the country.
is all quite unusual for the times and sets a dangerous precedent
considering the fact that warmongers and Senators John McCain and
Lindsay Graham just announced a plan, a push, that would likely cause
yet even more friction between the U.S. and Russia.
inciting the push, Sen. Graham told CNN, “There are a hundred U.S.
senators [and] ninety-nine of us believe the Russians did this and we’re
going to do something about it, along with Senator McCain.”
going to put sanctions together and hit Putin as an individual and his
inner circle for interfering in our election,” said Sen. Graham before
carrying on to insinuate that the Russians are “doing it all over the
Sen. Graham told CNN that has
intel that the Russians are conducting a “massive military buildup […]
in the western district of Russia along the Balkans border and Poland”
and that the Russians “are absolutely increasing their military
capability in this region.”
Graham also
said that he and Sen. McCain will “advise the President-elect, when he
becomes president, to continually keep U.S. troops in the region —
partnering with, training, advising, assisting, exercising, with our
Balkan partners to reassure them of our commitment.”
can see how the not so dynamic duo, McCain and Graham, along with the
White House, are firmly pressing for conflict with Russia, which
president-elect Donald Trump has been thoroughly trying to avoid at all
According to the Washington Post
piece, the quagmire faced by the White House does not fit into terms
written into the executive order “which require harm to critical
infrastructure or the theft of commercial secrets” for action to be
According to the order, the Washington Posts concludes:
would (a) have to be able to say that the actual electoral
infrastructure, such as state databases, was critical infrastructure,
and (b) that what the Russians did actually harmed it,” said the
administration official. “Those are two high bars.”
Russian government hackers are believed to have penetrated at least one
state voter-registration database, they did not tamper with the data,
officials said.
But wait a
minute, if this rings true, why wouldn’t the Department of Homeland
Security face the same anticipated wrath that the Russians face, based
on the department’s attempted hacking breach of the U.S.-based State of Georgia voter system database leading up to the general election as pointed out by Georgia’s Secretary of State Brian Kemp?
stated in a letter addressed to President-elect Donald Trump, “There
are still many questions regarding the origin and intent of this attack
that remain unanswered.”
And after all,
to quote the Washington Post, “Some analysts believe that state election
systems would fit under “government facilities,” which is one of the 16
critical infrastructure sectors designated by the Department of
Homeland Security.”
Is there a double
standard here? Why prosecute the Russians if the DHS is involved in the
same illicit activity? But even worse yet, the DHS engaged its own
Just some food for thought.


Soros: Trump is a "Would Be Dictator" Who Threatens the New World Order
 Billionaire globalist pens panicked rant
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Billionaire globalist George
Soros has penned a panicked rant in which he decries President-elect
Donald Trump as a “would be dictator” who threatens the future of the
new world order.
In an article for Project Syndicate,
Soros begins by mentioning how he lived under both Nazi and then Soviet
rule in Hungary before asserting that “various forms of closed
societies – from fascist dictatorships to mafia states – are on the
This claim is confounded by the facts, which show that, “The share of the world population living in democracies (has) increased continuously.”
writes that in voting for Trump, Americans “elected a con artist and
would-be dictator as its president,” and that his defeat of Hillary
Clinton means America will be “unable to protect and promote democracy
in the rest of the world” (because that policy worked so well in Iraq,
Afghanistan, Syria and Libya).
Soros also slams Trump’s new cabinet as containing nothing other than “incompetent extremists” and “retired generals.”
how he supports the European Union because it is a successful attempt
at “social engineering,” Soros laments the fact that the body has become
“increasingly dysfunctional” and its disintegration has been
accelerated, “first from Brexit, then from the election of Trump in the
US, and on December 4 from Italian voters’ rejection, by a wide margin,
of constitutional reforms.”
Soros also bemoans Russian President Vladimir Putin’s alleged undue influence during the presidential election.
first, he tried to control social media. Then, in a brilliant move, he
exploited social media companies’ business model to spread
misinformation and fake news, disorienting electorates and destabilizing
democracies. That is how he helped Trump get elected,” writes Soros.
says Putin “felt threatened by “color revolutions” in Georgia, Ukraine,
and elsewhere,” without mentioning that Soros himself played a key role
in bankrolling these contrived uprisings, as well as the color
revolution being fomented against Trump.
irony of an ultra-rich elitist who has bankrolled the overthrow of
innumerable governments insisting he cares about “democracy” and the
will of the people is particularly rich.
whole tone of the piece is clearly fraught with concern that the
populist movement sweeping the west poses a direct threat to the
plutocratic new world order that Soros has spent his entire life helping
to build.
He concludes by warning
that “the EU is on the verge of breakdown” due to stagnant economic
growth and the out of control refugee crisis (that Soros himself again
helped create in the first place as a way to obtain political power).

Soros Calls For Armageddon To Stop Trump

Obama/Soros Launch Plan To Destroy Israel

Soros Is A Giant Pentagram

Soros Panics


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The new masters of Germany are impatient with those who do not recognize
 their preeminence. But a few more lessons about how it’s “racist” to 
resist, and all will no doubt be well.

“Rampaging Syrian migrants KICK BABY on bus, then attack paramedics trying to treat child,” by Rehema Figueiredo, Express, December 28, 2016 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):

MIGRANTS kicked a one-year-old baby on a bus then attacked paramedics with BELTS as they tried to treat the infant.
The shocking attack happened at approximately 9pm on Sunday night in Augsburg, one of Germany’s oldest cities.
Residents were being evacuated following the discovery of a bomb from
the Second World War and some had boarded a replacement night bus when a
fight broke out.
Several Syrian migrants erupted with anger because of a pram taking up space on the bus.
Migrants hurled abuse at other passengers before a fight broke out,
with four of the Syrian men using the handles on the bus to hoist
themselves up and attack women and old people to try and drag them into
the fighting, according to an eyewitness.
The migrants paid no attention to anyone in their way, at one point kicking a one-year-old in the face.
Paramedics were called and arrived on the scene to help the injured
but the men began attacking them with belts – not letting up until the
police were called….



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

An eight-year-old girl in Secaucus, N.J., says Boy Scout officials
should treat her as a transgender boy, and let her join a boys’ Cub
Scout pack.

The child, who is a biological girl but has been living as a
“transgender boy” for more than a year, was asked to leave the pack
following reported protests from parents.

Kristie Maldonado said her child, Joe, had been a member of Cub Scout
Pack 87 for about a month, when a Boy Scout official notified her that
the girl could not remain in the boys’ Cub Scout group. “Not one of the
kids said, ‘You don’t belong here,’” the mother said of the boys in the pack, according to

“I’m a girl. I just don’t want to be a girl,” the girl told “My identity is a boy.”

Gay political groups say the federal government should force Americans and their many civic society groups — including kids in K-12 schools’ biology classrooms and bathrooms — to accept the groups’ ideological claim
that each person’s changeable “gender identity” should determine that
person’s legal sex. In contrast, Americans prefer to rely on science and
biology when gauging the sex of people who are seeking entry into
single-sex sports leagues, bathrooms, showers, social groups and other
civic institutions.

Transgender behavior is rare. A recent study of the 2010 census
showed that only one-in-2,400 Americans adults had changed their name
from one sex to the other.

According to the news report:

The Scouts declined to say whether they have a written
transgender policy. Effie Delimarkos, the communications director for
the Boy Scouts of America, said in a statement that the organization’s
Cub Scouts programs are for boys age 7 to 10 and that “the
classification on the participant’s birth certificate” would be used to
“confirm legal status.”
She did not provide additional details and did
not specify whether the Boy Scouts have ever examined gender statuses on
birth certificates.

“No youth may be removed from any of our programs on the basis of
his or her sexual orientation. Gender identity isn’t related to sexual

Effie Delimarkos, communications director, Boy Scouts of America

The controversy over a transgender child comes following the recent uproar over the Boy Scouts’ decision to end its bans against gay Scouts and Scout leaders.

In May of 2015, the Boy Scouts caved to pressure from corporate
donors, the media, and government officials to accept gay Scouts, even
though the organization is private and voluntary.

Former U.S. Secretary of Defense and then-Boy Scouts of America president Robert Gates warned a
national annual gathering of Boy Scout attendees that failing to accept
gay Scout leaders would open the organization up to legal challenges
and a decline in membership.

“We must deal with the world as it is, not as we might wish it would be,” said Gates, reported the Washington Post. “The status quo in our movement’s membership standards cannot be sustained.”

The Boy Scouts, however, had only addressed gay Scouts, and not children confused about their gender.

In July, Delimarkos told
the Associated Press that transgender children would be permitted to
participate in co-ed Boy Scouts programs, but not in Cub Scouts and Boy
Scouts programs for boys only.

But the pro-gay pressure groups are beginning to pressure the scouting movement.

“The Boy Scouts as a national organization have a decision to make,”
said Justin Wilson, executive director of Scouts for Equality. “Are they
going to exclude a transgender boy for the first time, or welcome
transgender boys?”

Wilson added that the use of birth certificates to determine gender
would be “a new, unfair arbitrary standard” for membership in the Boy

The mother said she thought her daughter was a tomboy because she
enjoyed tree-climbing and other typically male activities. She said that
when the girl was five years old, the child began to read about
transgenderism. Last year, the mother allowed the girl to live as a boy,
and now says the girl is “much happier.”

The American College of Pediatricians states
that gender ideology is harmful to children and that transgendered
children are psychologically confused and at risk for mental health
disorders. The College says:

No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a
biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or
female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective
biological one…

A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at
best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological
boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl
believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that
lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These
children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly
listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental
disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V)…

“According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and
88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex
after naturally passing through puberty,” the College asserts.
“Conditioning children into believing that a lifetime of chemical and
surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is
child abuse.”

Similarly, Youth Trans Critical Professionals, a group of self-described “left-leaning, open-minded, and pro-gay rights” professionals, say
it is risky to affirm young people who claim to be transgender and
provide them with hormonal and surgical treatments to change their

“Our concern is with medical transition for children and youth,”
states the group. “We feel that unnecessary surgeries and/or hormonal
treatments which have not been proven safe in the long-term represent
significant risks for young people.”

“Policies that encourage — either directly or indirectly — such
medical treatment for young people who may not be able to evaluate the
risks and benefits are highly suspect, in our opinion,” says the
organization, which is composed of psychologists, social workers,
doctors, and other professionals.

The professionals express “alarm” that, because of the current
trendiness of being transgendered, many young people have decided they
are a member of the opposite sex simply as a result of “binges” on
social media sites. They describe a process of transgender activists
recruiting these young people for their “cult.”

“There is evidence that vulnerable young people are being actively
recruited and coached on such sites to believe that they are trans,” the
professionals say.

Despite such potential mental health problems associated with gender
confusion, children who claim to be the opposite sex are no longer
legally permitted to see a therapist to get stabilizing “conversion
therapy” in some states. Youth Trans Critical Professionals sees such
state prohibitions as dangerous since they may block the process of
critical thinking and evaluation of the young person regarding the
reasons why he or she desires to become a transgender member of the
opposite sex.

“While the sentiment behind this legislation is laudable, in some
cases, it is being interpreted to mean that therapists cannot explore
gender identity with a youth who is professing to be trans,” argue the
professionals. “This would mean we can’t ask why; we can’t explore
underlying mental health issues; we can’t consider the symbolic nature
of the gender dysphoria; and we can’t look at possible confounding
issues such as social media use or social contagion.”


 Facebook’s Snopes Fact-checkers: A Prostitute, a Dominatrix, an Accused Embezzler
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

CLAIM: “Facebook ‘fact checker’ who will arbitrate
on ‘fake news’ is accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes
— and its staff includes an escort-porn star and ‘Vice Vixen dome.’”


Although the above is the form used to introduce topics at
“fact-checking” website, don’t hold your breath waiting for
this particular claim to appear there anytime soon. This isn’t because
the quoted sentence, a Daily Mail headline, is true or untrue.
It’s because it’s all too revealing about Snopes’ CEO — in a “the
emperor has no clothes” kind of way.

The claim of embezzlement was made by Snopes founder Barbara
Mikkelson against co-founder and ex-husband David Mikkelson; the pair
are locked in a bitter legal dispute in which they accuse each other of
financial impropriety.

This he-said/she-said story takes on importance because of what
Facebook recently said: that Snopes will be one of the fact-checking
outlets it will use to determine if news is “fake” and should,
therefore, be discredited and sent to Internet Siberia. Other Facebook
fact-checkers are media organs such as ABC, the Associated Press, and
Politifact — left-leaning entities all.

Not surprisingly, the Snopes fact-checking couple can’t agree on the facts surrounding their own decoupling. As the Daily Mail reports:

Legal filings seen by
detail a lengthy financial and corporate dispute which stretches long
after their divorce, and which one lawyer describes as ‘contentious’ in
court documents.
In the filings, Barbara, 57, has accused
her former husband, 56, of ‘raiding the corporate business Bardav bank
account for his personal use and attorney fees’ without consulting her.
She also claimed he embezzled $98,000
from the company over the course of four years ‘which he expended upon
himself and the prostitutes he hired’.
… In court records, Barbara alleged
that her ex-husband removed thousands from their business accounts
between April and June of 2016 to pay for trips for him and his
She claimed he spent nearly $10,000 on a
24-day ‘personal vacation’ in India this year and expensed his
girlfriend’s plane ticket to Buenos Aires.
‘He’s been depleting the corporate
account by spending monies from it on his personal expenses,’ said
Barbara in a filing last June.

Of course, David disputes the above. He says the India trip was
business-related — he was getting a sense of the culture because he’s
considering establishing a fact-checking website on the subcontinent —
and that he went to Buenos Aires for a fact-checking conference. The Mail doesn’t indicate that he disputed the allegations about company funds used for prostitutes.

What is not in dispute is that Snopes smacks of a den of iniquity.
Having divorced Barbara last year, David married 47-year-old Elyssa
Young, a longtime escort and porn actress whose working name is “Erin
O’Bryn.” Note, David had previously hired Young to be an “administrative
assistant” at Snopes.

Young has an “escort”-oriented Twitter page and website, which the Mail
states appear to still be active, and has described herself as “a
mature and experienced courtesan [what the less sophisticated call a
‘hooker’], idealist, activist & dreamer.”

The fees she dreams of, and presumably received, are $1,200 for four
hours and $5,000 for a full 24. For that you can have “‘an elite and
discreet companion’ who ‘understands that while pleasure and passion may
be explored in the bedroom, it is hardly the only place,’” wrote Young.

It’s not known if David Mikkelson advertises for hires in a red-light
district, but Young is perhaps not the strangest Snopes fact maven. As Breitbart informs,
“Writing under the pseudonym Vice Vixen, Snopes fact-checker Kim
LaCapria regularly wrote about sex and fetish gear on her own blog,
which was described as a lifestyle blog ‘with a specific focus on
naughtiness, sin, carnal pursuits, and general hedonism and bonne
vivante-ery.’ LaCapria’s blog often featured reviews of sex toys…. On
another blog, LaCapria once described what she did on her day
off, writing that she ‘played scrabble, smoked pot, and posted to
Snopes.’ She then added, ‘That’s what I did on my day ‘on,’ too.’”

In other words, she admitted she has done her Snopes work while stoned.

LaCapria also revealed that she has strong dominatrix instincts and,
more bizarrely still, said she was “addicted to smutty HP [Harry Potter]
fanfic,” according to the Mail.

Why does this Enquirer-worthy story matter? Well, would you
buy a used “fact” from these people? “The eye altering alters all,”
observed poet William Blake. People enthusiastically indulging vice and
unapologetically proclaiming it are called vice-ridden, and it’s risky
to assume that amidst a pattern of vice a person would exhibit the
virtue of honesty. Moreover, this quality and another virtue, diligence,
are prerequisites for competence. Just ask yourself if you would retain
the services of an auto mechanic, a baby-sitter, or a brain surgeon you
knew had a LaCapria-like altered eye. Would you want to elect a
politician who did?

Losing sight of the virtue/vice character yardstick creates an
altered eye resulting in altered judgment. Just consider the Duke
University rape frame-up case
in 2006. Media and social activists formed a life-rending lynch mob
against three white Duke lacrosse players who were falsely accused of
rape by black stripper Crystal Mangum (now incarcerated for murder in an
unrelated incident). As New York Times public editor Dan Okrent
put it, alluding to the prejudices coloring judgment, “It was white over
black, it was male over female, it was rich over poor, educated over

In fact, Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong was so corrupt
in his prosecutorial efforts of the Duke trio that he was forced to
resign and was disbarred. Yet common sense should have informed that
strippers aren’t exactly reliable sources. Mind you, I’m not saying a
rush to judgment should blithely dismiss such a person’s claims — only
that a bigotry-born rush to misjudgment caused them to be blithely
labeled gospel.

As for Young and LaCapria, a discerning eye can easily judge their
politics. Young ran for “U.S. congress in Hawaii as a Libertarian in
2004, during which she handed out ‘Re-Defeat Bush’ cards and condoms
stamped with the slogan ‘Don’t get sc[****]d again’,” reports the Mail. And the Daily Caller informs
that LaCapria “describes herself as a liberal and has called
Republicans ‘regressive’ and afraid of ‘female agency’”; she also
labeled the Tea Party “teahadists.”

Unsurprisingly, this is a bias that fancies fallacies and falsehoods fact. Here are a few examples, according to the Caller:

• “TheDC exposed a Snopes lie about the lack of American flags at the
Democratic convention, trying to pass off a picture from day two of the
convention as though it were from day one.”

• “[A] Snopes attempt at discrediting a news story from The Daily
Caller News Foundation earlier this month was riddled with factual
errors and omissions.”

• “Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as ‘rumors.’”

Of course, LaCapria did state that a “special focus” of her blog was
“sin.” So maybe it’s no surprise that this would include the sin of
lying — and that it wouldn’t be confined to only her more perverted



 Calif. Governor Jerry Brown Vows to Resist Trump Climate Policies
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

California Democratic Governor Jerry Brown, who has a record as a
strong environmentalist and who has attended the United Nations Climate
Change Conference in Paris and the Climate Summit of the Americas in
Toronto, has said that he will take California in a different direction
if the incoming Trump administration relaxes environmental regulations
or measures to fight against so-called “climate change.”

Brown gave an interview to the New York Times, which
reported that he pledged to bypass Washington and work directly with
other nations and states to defend and strengthen California’s
environmental policies, which are already the most aggressive in the
nation. Following the line prevailing among those who insist that carbon
emissions contribute to climate change and global warming, Brown
maintains that strict regulations are necessary to prevent such
environmental calamities — a theory that has been disputed by many

“California can make a significant contribution to advancing the
cause of dealing with climate change, irrespective of what goes on in
Washington,” said Brown in the Times interview. “I wouldn’t
underestimate California’s resolve if everything moves in this extreme
climate denial direction. Yes, we will take action.”

“Climate denial” is a term coined by supporters of the theory that
climate change and so-called global warming are anthropogenic (caused by
human activity) to dismiss those — including many respected
environmental scientists — who have offered evidence to the contrary.

During the interview, Brown described Trump’s election as a setback
for the climate movement, but predicted that it would be a temporary

“In a paradoxical way, it could speed up the efforts of leaders in
the world to take climate change seriously,” he said. “The shock of
official congressional and presidential denial will reverberate through
the world.”

Brown is not the first governor of California to buy into the global
warming theory and to impose strict regulations on the state’s
industrial segment. His predecessor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, signed
Executive Order S-3-05 in June 2005 that set so-called greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions reduction targets for California as follows: by 2010,
reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to
1990 levels; and by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990

Brown followed up by signing Executive Order B-30-15 in April 2015,
adding the intermediate target of reducing GHG emissions to 40 percent
below 1990 levels by 2030.

Even the Times, which might be expected to be supportive of
Brown’s liberal agenda, pointed out the pitfalls of the path the Golden
State has taken, observing:

The environmental effort poses decided
risks for this state. For one thing, Mr. Trump and Republicans have the
power to undercut California’s climate policies. The Trump
administration could reduce funds for the state’s vast research
community — including two national laboratories — which has contributed a
great deal to climate science and energy innovation, or effectively
nullify state regulations on clean air emissions and automobile fuel
“They could basically stop enforcement of
the Clean Air Act and CO2 emissions,” said Hal Harvey, president of
Energy Innovation, a policy research group in San Francisco. “That would
affect California because it would constrain markets. It would make
them fight political and legal battles rather than scientific and
technological ones.”

The Times also quoted a statement from Rob Lapsley, the
president of the California Business Roundtable, who warned that
California’s aggressive regulatory agenda would make it difficult for
the state to attract companies that might prefer to locate to states
that are more business friendly. Said Lapsley:

If the other states pursue
no-climate-change policies, and we continue to go it on our own with our
climate change policies, then we would be at a competitive disadvantage
for either relocating companies or growing companies here, particularly
manufacturing factories.

Considering the dire economic consequences of imposing strict carbon
emissions regulations on industry, it would seem prudent before putting
them into effect to first weigh both their environmental and economic
consequences to determine if they are necessary, or even desirable. As The New American’s
writers have pointed out in numerous articles over the past several
years, there is no unanimous consensus on climate change and global
warming among the scientific community. Those articles have quoted many
respected scientists offering evidence that not only are periods of
global warming more likely to be the result of natural cyclical changes
than human (anthropogenic) activity, but that the warming process has
reversed itself and our Earth may actually have entered a cooling

As we noted in a recent article, climate blogger Tony Heller reported
on November 13 that over the last eight months, global temperatures
over land have cooled a record 1.2°C. Heller’s findings were charted on a graph posted on the website Heller was one of the speakers at the ninth International Conference on Climate Change held on July 9, 2014 in Las Vegas, delivering a talk titled “The Emperor’s New Climate.”

While this latest report may come as a surprise to many people, longtime readers of The New American will not be among them. In an article published by this magazine in 2013, foreign correspondent Alex Newman observed:

So-called global-warming alarmists are in
a frenzy after the latest climate data confirmed the Earth actually
appears to be entering a potential cooling trend, sea-ice cover in
Antarctica is growing to record levels, tornadoes and hurricanes are at
record lows, and more.

While we could cite dozens of articles debunking both the theory that
carbon emissions generated by humans are causing global warming, and
the propaganda asserting that there is a consensus among scientists
supporting that theory, space allows only one more reference. That is an
article posted today titled: “Biggest Fake News Story: Global Warming and Phony Consensus.” The report cites a recent article in The Atlantic
asking: “Are Climate Scientists Ready for Trump?” The article’s writer,
Robinson Meyer, posed several questions, including, “How should climate
scientists react to a president-elect who calls global warming a
‘hoax’? How much should they prepare for his administration? And should
they prepare for the worst?”

In The Atlantic article, Meyer notes that on the first day
of the recent American Geophysical Union (AGU) conference in San
Francisco, the thousands of assembled scientists heard from Harvard
historian Naomi Oreskes, the politically motivated ideologue who is most
responsible for perpetrating the “scientific consensus” fraud regarding
anthropogenic (human caused) global warming, or AGW.

The New American’s Alex Newman pointed out that this
magazine has repeatedly reported on the fraudulent methodology used by
Oreskes and Australian global warming activist John Cook to arrive at
their unsubstantiated claims of near-unanimous consensus for their
global warming theory. The article notes that  Prof. Richard S. J. Tol and Dr. Benny Peiser are
but two of the experts who have exposed Oreskes and Cook, showing that
only one percent of climate research papers — not 97 percent — support
the “consensus” view claimed by the AGW alarmists. (See herehere, and here.)

The article continues:

However, no amount of debunking, and no
amount of evidence, will change the “crisis” mindset that grips many of
the media commentators. CNN’s Chris Cuomo is a prime example of the
arrogance of ignorance among the committed AGW media meisters. In a combative “interview”
on December 12, CNN’s Chris Cuomo went after Trump adviser Anthony
Scaramucci, repeatedly citing the false claim that the science is
settled and that “science” has declared we must accept vast new global
governance and controls to avert planetary catastrophe.

Since the AGW is a major source of global warming disinformation,
Newman offers this advice to the incoming Trump administration: “The new
administration must move quickly and decisively to dismantle and defund
the huge federally-funded AGW lobby and withdraw all U.S. support for
the UN’s destructive Paris Agreement, which President Obama has illegally tried to bind the United States to through executive agreement.”

Related articles:

Biggest Fake News Story: Global Warming and Phony Consensus

Former Climate Chairman Calls Out Inaccuracies of Data and Models

Education Author Exposes Environmentalist Movement’s Agenda

Princeton Physics Professor Discredits Anthropogenic Climate Change Theory

Climate Scare Over: Top Experts Expose Scam at Freedom Confab

Media Blasted for “Fake News” on Trump’s Climate Stance

With Obama Out, Communist China Takes Lead on UN “Climate” Scam

Skeptic to UN Climate Conference: Global Warming Is Bunk

Greenies, Lefties Protest Dakota Access Pipeline With Violence

Climate-change Report: Record Global COOLING Over Last Eight Months

Earth Is Cooling, Sea Levels Not Rising, Scientists Say

Establishment Boasts Its Paris Climate Agreement Now a Done Deal

Multiple Studies Refute Claims of Rising Seas Due to Global Warming

Documentary “Climate Hustle” Exposes Global-warming Con Job

Climate-change Computer Models Fail Again — and Again, and Again



 Congress Planning to Defund UN as Critics Seek Full Withdrawal
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

U.S. lawmakers and pro-Israel activists are calling for an end to American taxpayer funding of the United Nations after a controversial UN Security Council vote declared some Israeli settlements to be illegal.
Congress is already planning to cut the UN’s funding in response to the
UN scheme. The growing outrage also came from President-elect Donald
Trump, who vowed that the UN situation would change once he is in the
Oval Office. But other critics of the UN said defunding the “dictators
club” would not be enough, and that it was past time for the U.S.
government and other civilized member states to ditch the scandal-plagued global body altogether.

The most recent wave of outrage surrounding the UN came in response to UN Security Council Resolution 2334, a deeply controversial measure
adopted on December 23 with 14 votes in favor and the Obama
administration abstaining. Among other controversies, the measure
purports to declare the Jewish presence in parts of Jerusalem and an
area known to Jews as Judea and Samaria (“West Bank” to Arabs) to be a
“flagrant violation” of what the UN likes to call “international law.”
Basically, the UN and more than a few of its autocratic member regimes
do not think Jews should be allowed to live in East Jerusalem and other

Unsurprisingly, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blasted the
UN and its “shameful” resolution, vowing to ignore it and curtail
relations with the governments and regimes responsible for the scheme.
“Israel rejects the anti-Israel resolution at the United Nations,”
Netanyahu’s office said in a statement ridiculing the UN. “Israel looks
forward to working with President-elect Trump and with all our friends
in Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, to negate the harmful
effects of this absurd resolution.” 
Trump, a longtime critic of the UN and globalism in general, was
among those to speak out, albeit more mildly than on the campaign trail.
“The United Nations has such great potential but right now it is just a
club for people to get together, talk and have a good time. So sad!,”
said Trump on social media after having previously noted that the UN was
not a friend of Israel, freedom, or the United States. Unfortunately,
as explained by its own founders, the UN was always designed to be
progressively strengthened. And it already does much more damage than it
would if it were merely a place for people to talk and have a good time
at taxpayer expense. Trump sent out another statement blasting Obama
and the UN, urging Israel to “stay strong” because “January 20th is fast

But the world may not have to wait until Trump is sworn in for
concrete action. Leading Democrats and Republicans alike have fervently
denounced the UN and slammed the Obama administration for failing to
exercise the U.S. government’s veto to stop the scheme. Even
ultra-far-left U.S. lawmakers slammed the UN scheme, with Congressman
Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) blasting it as “a one-sided, biased resolution.”
Incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), another pro-UN
globalist who also happens to be pro-Israel, blasted the UN as a
“fervently anti-Israel body” that has been that way since it declared
Zionism to be racism. Other Democrats also rushed to put out statements
condemning the UN resolution.

Republicans — even of the globalist and neocon variety — were also
furious at the UN vote. Perhaps most vocal was conservative Senator Ted
Cruz (R-Texas), who is leading the charge to cut all U.S. funding to the
UN. “The disgraceful anti-Israel resolution passed by the UNSC was
apparently only the opening salvo in the Obama administration’s final
assault on Israel,” he was quoted as saying, reminding Obama that
Congress reconvenes soon and that under the U.S. Constitution, Congress
controls the money. On social media, he said: “No US $ for UN until
reversed.” Other GOP lawmakers agreed.

Even neocon globalist and reliable establishment figure Senator
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who chairs the Senate appropriations
subcommittee for the State Department and foreign operations, vowed to
push for Congress to stop funding the UN. “The UN has made it impossible
for us to continue with business as usual,” Graham said. “Almost every
Republican will feel like this is a betrayal of Israel and the only
response that we have is the power of purse.”

“This is a road we haven’t gone down before,” Graham was quoted as
saying in media reports, adding that the UN was increasingly being
viewed as anti-Semitic. “If you can’t show the American people that
international organizations can be more responsible, there is going to
be a break. And I am going to lead that break.” A number of other GOP
senators have already pledged their support, and media reports suggested
that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would also be on

Senate aides quoted in a number of media reports said a variety of
options were under consideration. Among them: defunding the UN,
defunding certain UN programs and policies, withdrawing from UN agencies
such as the communist-controlled UNESCO,
and even passing legislation to protect any Jews targeted by the UN who
may also be American citizens. Also being considered is cutting off
funds for the U.S. taxpayer-funded Palestinian Authority, and even the
possibility of expelling its diplomats in the United States.

While the situation is likely to get more dramatic after Trump is
sworn in, congressional officials speaking to reporters off the record
said action could begin as soon as next week when lawmakers reconvene.
“We will make a very strong attempt to do something immediately,” one
senior GOP senate aide told the pro-Obama, pro-Clinton, pro-UN Washington Post. “It is a real moment to re-examine the relationship with the United Nations and what it really does.”

Even Israel’s most vehement American critics have realized that the
UN’s behavior is bizarre — the UN and its various agencies have
condemned Israel more often than all other governments on earth,
combined. The U.S. government, of course, pays more for the UN than 185
other member governments and dictators — combined. And yet the UN, when
it is not demonizing Israel, spends much of its time haranguing
Americans and others to surrender their God-given rights under various

From free speech and religious freedom to gun rights and due process, the UN has become increasingly bold and vicious when it comes to attacking the unalienable rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights. It is also increasingly threatening U.S. independence and self-government as it seeks to empower itself as what UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon called the “Parliament of Humanity.”

For those reasons and others, The John Birch Society, a
constitutionalist group with chapters in all 50 states, has long worked
to not just defund the UN, but to get the U.S. government out of the UN
and the UN off U.S. soil. “For over 56 years, The John Birch Society has
been warning and educating the American people of the danger called the
United Nations,” JBS CEO Art Thompson said, a reference to the
56-year-old “Get US Out of the United Nations
campaign. “The recent brouhaha is only the tip of the iceberg relative
to the harm that the UN has done since its very founding by those who
wish to destroy the independence of the United States — indeed all
nations — on the road to a one world government led by megalomaniacs.”

Other prominent commentators also referenced the JBS campaign amid
the recent furor over the Israeli settlements resolution. Conservative
commentator and former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan picked up on
comments by senators Schumer and Graham blasting and threatening the UN
to illustrate the escalating fury over the global outfit. “If the folks
over at the John Birch Society still have some of those bumper stickers —
Get the U.S. out of the U.N., and the U.N. out of the U.S.! — they
might FedEx a batch over to Schumer and Graham,” Buchanan quipped in his latest column. “May have some converts here.”

More than a few other prominent conservative commentators said plans
to defund the UN did not go far enough. David Greenfield at FrontPage
Magazine went through a litany of UN crimes, abuses, and horrors before
saying that “we and every sane country” should have defunded the UN
decades ago. “If you give money to the U.N., it will end up anywhere and
everywhere except where it’s supposed to go,” he continued. “But
defunding the U.N. isn’t enough. There is no reason for us to remain
there at all.”

He said the U.S. government should “defund and withdraw” from the
scandal-plagued outfit. “The billions we waste on the U.N. will go
toward taking care of our people,” he added. “And once we are free of
the U.N., we will actually be able to promote real human rights instead
of pandering to the dictators and Islamists of the United Nations.”

Former Senator and GOP presidential contender Rick Santorum,
meanwhile, said the growing crisis in relations between the UN and the
U.S. government was the perfect opportunity for those seeking to abolish
the UN altogether. “This has opened up the opportunity for those of us
who are very anti-U.N., who think that it has passed its prime, it’s not
serving any really good purpose, it’s not helping legitimate
governments around the world and it’s outlived its usefulness,” he was
quoted as saying. “To the extent we can deconstruct it, the better.”

Santorum also suggested Trump’s focus could now move from NATO, a UN
subsidiary, to the UN itself. “The focus will come off NATO and will
move squarely onto the U.N.,” Santorum explained to a pro-UN
propagandist at the anti-Trump Washington Post, which claimed the U.S. was better off with a functioning UN in a propaganda piece about the upcoming “war” between Trump and the UN.
“It’s going to be a very raucous time. Barack Obama, with this move,
did more damage to the United Nations than he did to Israel.”

Conservative media outlet WND is circulating a petition slamming the UN and calling for a U.S. withdrawal.
“It is outrageous an organization hosted on American soil, protected by
American arms, funded by American tax dollars and built upon a global
order sustained by the United States seemingly spends all its time
attacking America and its ally Israel,” reads the petition, signed by
thousands of people so far since it was published on December 27. “The
United States should stand with its allies and in defense of its own
principles rather than continuing to pay the bills of an organization
which has all but openly declared itself an enemy both of our Republic
and the besieged Jewish State.”

Writing in PJ Media, Roger Simon, co-founder of the conservative
outlet, also said it was time to take on the UN. Ridiculing the UN as a
“moribund center of international corruption and megaphone for tin-pot
dictators,” Simon suggested that Trump could find savings to rebuild the
military and U.S. infrastructure by ending funding of the “clowns” at
the UN. “Although, in this case, it would be useful to negotiate the
entire institution out of existence, or at least impoverish it to the
degree it will have to decamp from Manhattan and leave that pricey
Turtle Bay real estate for better purposes,” he said, adding that there
is apparently lots of empty space in Yemen.

“I wouldn’t doubt you would have all your deplorables solidly behind
you in this negotiation/defunding and a lot more of the country as well,
once they get full knowledge of exactly how much we’re actually paying
for this insanity,” Simon continued. “As with most things, they haven’t
been told by our media, who have no interest in informing the public on
anything that might disrupt their narrative.” But the truth is getting
out anyway, and the American people overwhelmingly think the UN is doing
a bad job.

Even some neocons and establishment loyalists called for taking
serious action against the rogue international body. Columnist and
establishment talking head Charles Krauthammer, for example, a member of
the globalist Council on Foreign Relations that has been instrumental
in surrendering U.S. sovereignty for generations, suggested on Fox News’
“Special Report” that Trump should turn UN headquarters in New York
City into condos.

“We’re paying an organization that spends half its time — more than
half its time and energy and resources and bureaucracy trying to attack
the only Jewish state on the planet, a tiny little spec, while genocide,
mayhem, murder, terrorism is going on all over the world,” declared
Krauthammer, a neocon. “It’s an obsession that to an outside a observer
appears to be insane. And the rest of the time is spent undermining the
United States and democracy [sic] and our allies around the world. It is
an organization that exacerbates tensions, it does not assuage them….
It turned out to be a disaster.”

While stopping short of calling for an American exit (Amexit) from
the UN, Krauthammer did suggest getting the UN out of the United States.
“Any move to minimize our support for it, any move to get it out of the
U.S. — imagine if [UN] headquarters were in Zimbabwe. The amount of
weight and coverage it would get would be zero. I think that’s good real
estate in downtown New York City, and Trump ought to find a way to put
his name on it and turn it into condos.” Considering the UN’s three
tributes to mass-murdering Cuban dictator Fidel Castro so far in the
weeks after his death, Havana might make a good spot for UN headquarters
as well.

With the UN, there is much more at stake than Israeli settlements. And there are plenty of reasons to support a U.S. government withdrawal, or an “Amexit,” from the UN beyond the recent resolution. Legislation to secure an Amexit, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act,
has been introduced in practically every Congress for decades. With
lawmakers on both sides of the aisle and large swaths of the American
public in outrage mode over the latest anti-Israel vote, the time has
never been better to Get US Out of the United Nations. Concerned
Americans should contact their elected representatives to make their
feelings known.

Related articles:

UN Resolution on Israeli Settlements Prompts Mixed Reactions

Barack Backhands Bibi

UN Seeks to Prosecute Israelis for “War Crimes” in Global Court

Congressman Mike Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN

#Brexit to #Amexit: Keep the Momentum Going!

U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

New UN Chief: Globalist, Socialist, Extremist

UN “Human Rights” Body, Run by Dictators, Ridiculed in Congress

UN “Human Rights” Boss Equates Trump, Farage With ISIS

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

UN Schools Caught Teaching Arab Children to Wage Jihad on Jews

Deputy Knesset Speaker Feiglin on Iran, Arab Spring, U.S. Aid, and More



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“This arrogant act by a lame duck president will not stand,” tweeted
Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) in reaction to President Barack Obama
designating two national monuments Wednesday at sites in Nevada and in
Lee’s home state of Utah.

Christy Goldfuss, managing director of the White House Council on
Environmental Quality, stated that the action will not allow any new
mining or oil and gas development within the monument boundaries.

The Bears Ears National Monument in Utah designation adds even more
land to the control of the federal government, covering 1.35 million
acres in the Four Corners region. While Lee and many other residents of
the states affected by Obama’s latest executive order reacted angrily,
conservationists were ecstatic.

The proposed monument is located in between existing national parks
and the Navajo Indian Reservation. Navajo Nation President Russell
Begaye called it an exciting day for members of his tribe. “We have
always looked to Bears Ears as a place of refuge, as a place where we
can gather herbs and medicinal plants, and a place of prayer and
sacredness,” he said. “The rocks, the winds, the land — they are living,
breathing things that deserve timely and lasting protection.”

Today, the federal government owns two-third of the land in Utah. In
the case of Bears Ears, the federal government will “co-manage” the land
not with the state of Utah, but rather with five tribes: the Hopi, the
Navajo Nation, the Uintah-Ouray Utes, the Ute Mountain Ute, and the
Pueblo of Zuni.

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) called the action by Obama “an
astonishing and egregious abuse of executive power,” which indicated to
him that “far-left special interest groups matter more to him than the
people who have lived on and cared for Utah’s lands for generations.”
Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) also expressed his disapproval of
Obama’s actions: “The midnight move is a slap in the face to the people
of Utah, attempting to silence the voices of those who will bear the
heavy burden it imposes. It does not have the support of the governor, a
single member of the state’s congressional delegation, nor any local
elected officials or state legislators who represent the area.”

Such disrespect for the wishes of the population and its elected
officials of the area affected is yet another indication of the low
regard in which the Obama administration holds the principle of
federalism. Utah’s Attorney General Sean Reyes has promised to sue over
the action.

In Nevada, the Gold Butte National Monument has been a site of
controversy for more than 15 years. Environmentalists have worked
feverishly to stop the expansion of Las Vegas in order to protect
various indigenous species such as the desert tortoise. Local cattle
rancher Cliven Bundy made national news when he refused to recognize the
authority of the federal government over the land, eventually engaging
in an armed standoff with officials of the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) in 2014.

Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval and U.S. Senator Dean Heller, both
Republicans, contend that it is Congress that should make land
designations, not the president.
But Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the
retiring Democrat leader in the U.S. Senate, actually pushed for the
designation for the remote area northeast of Lake Mead, claiming it’s “a
wonderful capstone to [my] career of fighting to protect Nevada’s
pristine landscapes.”

Obama said his action will “protect some of our country’s most
important cultural treasures, including abundant rock art,
archaeological sites, and lands considered sacred by Native American
tribes. Today’s actions will help protect this cultural legacy and will
ensure that future generations are able to enjoy and appreciate these
scenic and historic landscapes.”

He defended the legality of his designation of 1.35 million acres as
now off-limits to new energy development and recreation by citing the
1906 Antiquities Act, a law passed during the Progressive Era in which
Congress gave up power to the president to designate national monuments
on his own, without approval from Congress. The Antiquities Act was
passed at the urging of progressive Republican President Theodore
Roosevelt, a strong believer not only in government taking over private
land “to conserve it,” but also in increasing the power of the
president. He argued that a president should be able to do anything that
he is not forbidden to do under the Constitution, and is therefore
generally regarded as the one most responsible for changing the office
of president into what is now called “the Imperial Presidency.”

Interestingly, Homer Cummings, the U.S. attorney general for
President Franklin Roosevelt, issued an opinion in 1938 that while
presidents could remove land from private use under the 1906 law, they
could not reverse such executive actions. Republicans in Congress,
incensed at Obama’s repeated use of executive orders to circumvent the
will of Congress, are threatening to change the law in January.

While Franklin Roosevelt used the law to limit use of land in the
West the most during his 12 years in office, Obama has taken the most
land: 554,590,000 acres. this latest action is the 29th time Obama has
used the power to create national monuments.

Only William Howard Taft has reduced the amount of land taken by the
federal government (only 500 acres). Only four presidents did not use
the power at all — Warren Harding, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and
George H.W. Bush. Gerald Ford added a mere 90 acres.

It appears that Obama is doing his best to take as many actions as he
can to advance his progressive viewpoint in the little time he has left
in office. For example, he has blocked additional mining outside of
Yellowstone National Park, and has stopped new oil drilling in the
Arctic Ocean. Donald Trump is slated to take the oath of office as the
45th president on January 20, 2017, and environmentalists have expressed
deep concern that he will attempt to alter Obama’s land “protections.”

This is an opportunity for the Republicans, who now control both
houses of Congress, and the White House to rein in both the excessive
power of the Imperial Presidency, and the policy of the federal
government controlling more and more land in the western states. Whether
they will actually do so remains to be seen.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Ron Edwards

December 30, 2016
Declaration of Independence was written to proclaim to the world the many
reasons for seeking freedom from tyranny from England. The Declaration
enumerates a detailed list of legal offenses that Great Britain had left
unresolved, the awakening Founders saw them as more than isolated wrongs.
Rather they saw them as a part of a predetermined plan to take away their
religious liberties and reestablish the Church of England to rule over
their hearts and souls, thus enslaving the colonies.
In that
light one understands the amazing power of Patrick Henry’s volcanic
words. Faced with such prospects, the Declaration stated that the American
colonists were set to defend: the laws of nature and nature’s God”
words that define the principles upon which the Founders stood. The laws
of nature were understood to mean the will of God for man as revealed
to man’s reason. However, because man is fallen and his reason does
not always comprehend this law, God gave his law in the Bible to make
it totally clear.
it was the CHURCHES that became the primary vehicle to stir the embers
of Liberty, telling colonists that the English government was usurping
their God given rights, and the King and Parliament were abusing the laws
of God. Thus, the Founding Fathers were convinced that it was their sacred
duty to start a revolution to uphold the laws of God. The Founding Fathers
were convinced that it was their sacred duty to begin a revolution to
uphold the law of God against the unjust and aggressive laws of men. The
battle for political liberty was an unalienable right, according to God’s
natural law.
As it
is noted in the American Patriot’s Bible New England ministers,
in particular were decisive in rallying the popular moral support for
war against England. They pressed their congregations to overthrow King
George because they believed that rebellion to tyrants was obedience to
God. From numerous pulpits ministers recruited troops and strengthened
them in battle with patriotic sermons. While the church leaders were well
schooled in the fact that the Bible placed great emphasis on due submission
to civil authorities (Romans 13), they noted there are also many passages
that approve resistance to ungodly authority.
example, when the apostles were commanded by the Sanhedrin to cease preaching
that Jesus Christ had risen from the dead, Peter boldly asserted, “We
ought to obey God rather than men” (acts 5:29). To further explain,
the early apostles were not about to allow the right to freely spread
the gospel to be taken away. Therefor it is no coincidence that one of
the watchwords of the American Revolution was “No King but King
most of the patriots, their faith gave them the courage to stand on God’s
word and risk their lives and properties to break the tyranny of an unjust
human authority. It was many northern ministers and their engaged congregations
that would later fight and pray against the scourge of slavery. When one
researches the history of Christian involvement in our republic from it’s
infancy it is easy to comprehend that Christians were aware of the issues
of the day and cared about where and how they lived.
In more
recent years, beginning after World War Two ministers began to preach
against being involved in the issues of the day regarding our republic.
The one major exception was during the civil rights era during the 1960s.
But unfortunately, for the most part the church proudly gave up her seat
of moral authority in society. One can blame the many years of indoctrination
against the necessity of Christian involvement and providential guidance. 
many mainline denominations are run by individuals who don’t even
believe in the deity of Christ and have been watering down the teachings
of God’s instructions. As a result of tossing God’s principles
out of society and lessening the standard of education overall, our republic’s
quality of life and stature in the world has been in steep decline.
good news is as I have predicted for years on my syndicated radio commentary
“The Edwards Notebook” that a large remnant of Christians
would awaken from their moral and spiritual stupor and pray to God and
seek His forgiveness for negligence and not caring about the condition
of our nation. That movement of prayer grew to many hundreds of thousands,
maybe millions. But now Christians are starting to take their rightful
place in society as participants, rather than just wimpy onlookers from
the sidelines.

of pointing fingers and proclaiming how dirty politics is we should be
the best we can be, get involved and help drain the swamp. But without
Providential guidance and actions in society, the progressives will reach
their goal of seeing America become one nation gone under.


Don’t believe in Jesus’ virgin birth? 
Not a problem, says Andy Stanley
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Andy Stanley
Political Insider
AJC blog about Atlanta politics, Georgia politics, Georgia and metro Atlanta election campaigns. Because all politics is local.
December 27, 2016
| Filed in: Southern Baptists

December has apparently proven to be an interesting
month for the Rev. Andy Stanley, son of a former president of the
Southern Baptist Convention and lead pastor of North Point Community
Church in Alpharetta — one of the largest congregations in the country.
Though it is only now breaking in to the open, the Baptist world has been rocked by a Dec. 4 sermon in
which the son of famed TV evangelist Charles Stanley discounted the
importance of believing in the virgin birth of Jesus. His entry point:
“A lot of people just don’t believe it. And I understand that.
Maybe the thought is, ‘Hey, maybe they had to come up with some myth
about Jesus to give him street cred, you know, later on.’ Maybe that’s
where that came from.

“It’s interesting, because Matthew gives us a version of the
birth of Christ, Luke does, but Mark and John – they don’t even mention
it. A lot has been made of that….

“You’ve heard me say some version of this a million times, so
this will be old if you’ve been around for a while. But see, if somebody
can predict their own death and then their own resurrection, I’m not
all that concerned about how they got into the world.”

Many Baptists were aghast at what they saw as an unexpected new front opening up in the war on Christmas. From Baptist Global News:
Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
in Louisville, Ky., took exception to Stanley’s view in a Dec. 16
podcast describing the Bible stories about Christ’s incarnation as “the
central truth claim of Christmas.”

“Just in recent days, one Christian leader was quoted as saying
that if Jesus predicted his death and then was raised from the dead, it
doesn’t matter how he came into the world,” Mohler said. “But the Bible
insists it really does matter and the answer given from Scripture very
clear in the gospel of Matthew and in the gospel of Luke is that Jesus
was born to a virgin.”

We’ll let the religion desk of the Washington Post weigh in as well:
This is not the first time Stanley…has had to defend remarks from
his sermons. Earlier this year, after critics accused him of
downplaying the authority of scripture, the nondenominational pastor
attributed the issue to his nontraditional preaching style.

“The real story is the handful of Southern Baptist professors and
writers (not so much preachers) who seem to have nothing else to do but
listen to bits and pieces of my messages,” he said in his statement to
The Post. “Anyone who listens to all three [sermons in the series] will
know that I stand firmly within the orthodox Christian tradition
regarding the incarnation of Jesus — including the birth narratives as
presented [in] Matthew and Luke.”

Stanley also said he believes people can become Christians without knowing the narratives around Jesus’ birth.

 (Friday Church News Notes, December 30, 2016,, 
[email protected], 866-295-4143) - 
The following is from Matt Costella,
 Fundamental Evangelistic Association, Dec. 23, 2016: 
Andy Stanley, pastor of North Pointe Ministries in the Atlanta area, is no 
stranger to controversy. Stanley has made numerous statements just this 
past year that have generated controversy and resulted in backlash from 
conservative evangelicals. But Stanley’s December 3, 2016, sermon may be
 the most controversial yet. In his sermon, Stanley minimized the 
importance—if not the reality—of the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. ‘A 
lot of people don’t believe it, and I understand that,’ Stanley said. He
 added, ‘Maybe the thought is they had to come up with some kind of myth
 about the birth of Jesus to give him street cred later on. Maybe that’s
 where that came from’ (Baptist News Global,
 ‘Virgin Birth Debate Interrupts Regular ‘War on Christmas’ Program,’ 
12-21-16). Stanley then noted that it is interesting that only 2 of the 4
 gospels mention the virgin birth, and said ‘Christianity doesn’t hinge 
on the truth or even the stories around the birth of Jesus … It really 
hinges on the resurrection of Jesus.’ Earlier this year, Stanley 
minimized the importance of the role Scripture plays in the life of the 
believer, and minimizing the importance of the virgin birth of Christ is
 simply the next step in this downward trajectory. The virgin birth of 
Christ is vitally important, for without the virgin birth, mankind would
 not have a Savior (the God-man) and no resurrection could have 
occurred! Despite what Stanley says, Christianity does
 hinge on the truth surrounding the birth of Jesus Christ. Stanley’s 
statements are dangerous and his conclusions are completely 
unbiblical. Discerning believers must beware of those who minimize vital
 doctrinal truths in an attempt to relate to those who reject such 
truths in the first place.”

Andy Stanley: Virgin Birth and Bible are Not Important


 “So this tells me that the US president
brought suffering on 800,000 Jews because he has a personal vendetta against
a Prime Minister. Wow.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Cathy Sherman

December 30, 2016
A day
before Chanukah, a Friday right before Shabbat started, the UN Security
Council voted unanimously to pass Resolution 2334, which forbids Israel
from “settlement activity” in Judea and Samaria (the West
Bank to those who reject history). They not only included new settlements
on land no one has used in centuries, but places in which Jews have had
a presence for thousands of years – East Jerusalem and the Western
Wall of the Temple Mount. Basically they called “outlaws”
all the 800,000 or so Jewish inhabitants of this disputed territory.
US was complicit as the White House said “Netanyahu brought the
US abstention on himself”. So this tells me that the US president
brought suffering on 800,000 Jews because he has a personal vendetta against
a Prime Minister. Wow.
What a foreign policy that is. Your legacy, Obama,
is a judgment that will bring dishonor on your head. What leader of the
free world espouses a foreign policy of personal vendetta except for the
Islamic terror state leaders?
essay isn’t about the history of the disputed land, as volumes have
already been written on this. Some history does, however, need to be summarized
to provide context for the conflict. But basically, the land was part
of Israel historically and Biblically. It includes the part of Jerusalem
in which the Temple sat for centuries. Though the Jewish nation was scattered
for 2000 years, there were always some Jews remaining in the areas of
Judea and Samaria and the Old City of Jerusalem’s Jewish Quarter.
It was controlled mainly by the Ottomans and the British for centuries,
though neither did much with this land overlooking the Jordan Valley.
When Israel was made a state in 1948, Judea and Samaria became part of
the state of Jordan, the part of Palestine which was supposed to be for
the Arab refugees of Israel.
It didn’t
work that way, of course. Muslims and Arabs are not known for keeping
their word. They value taquiyya – lying – as a way to obtain their
wants, in addition to terror and murder. For nineteen years, though Jordan
“occupied” Judea and Samaria, they did little with the land.
Then in 1967, when they held the “West Bank” in their control,
several Arab nations attacked Israel. Miraculously, Israel won and not
only protected small Israel, but advanced to the Jordan River and took
possession of Judea and Samaria.
when one state wins territory in a war, to end the fighting, a peace treaty
is signed, awarding the land won to the winner. For some reason, Israel
agreed to stop fighting even without such a treaty. Jordan and Israel
did later sign a peace agreement, but the land Israel now occupied was
left for some later negotiation.
the Arab refugees, who were given Jordan for their state, when Palestine
was split in 1948. Rather than do so, as the Jordanian king, being an
Alawhite, didn’t want more of the refugees, the Arabs created the
“Palestinians”. Even though Jews were also Palestinians, that
inconvenient fact is not relevant to the Arab narrative, which suddenly
became the need for the Arab Palestinians to have their own state. These
were Arabs who moved to the area largely to work for the new state of
Israel, since so many jobs were opened as the Jews needed help building
infrastructure. Many of them were not the refugees who had lived in Israel
and fled during the War of Independence in 1948. Despite the fact that
there is no historical basis for a “Palestinian” state in
Israel, many of the Arabs living in the area were incited to terrorize
Israelis until land could be taken from Israel for their state.
it soon became clear – from their own words – that the Arab nations were
supporting these “Palestinians” because the Arabs had failed
in every war they waged against Israel. Their new weapon was the terrorism
of the incited Arabs who were brainwashed to believe that Judea and Samaria
were their lands. The goal has always been – as was the goal pre-1967
– to wipe out all of the Jews in the Middle East. Muslims can’t
have a total caliphate in the Middle East with a nation of upstart Jews
thriving in it. And this is the cogent, all-important basis behind all
of the Arab-Israel conflict.
So that
brings us to December 23, 2016, when the UN Security Council finally voted
to outlaw the settlements which were built on land Israel had been controlling
for 50 years. This ruling made outlaws of the hundreds of thousands of
Jews living in this land. These Jews came to this area because they wanted
to live on the land where King David walked, where their ancestors had
lived, where the Tabernacle – and later the Temple – had been located.
This was the land in which the sons of Jacob, David and others pastured
their flocks. It is the land of Jewish heritage.
So I
ask the UN and US – why do you wish to destroy Israel? Anyone who has
lived in Israel knows we cannot survive living among warring Arabs without
the protection provided by the highlands of Judea and Samaria. We cannot
long survive without our control of the Temple Mount, the holiest site
of our history and faith – our very heart and soul.
years the UN policy and rulings stated that no one could dictate to the
Jews and Arabs how the solution would be worked out to the conflict, but
that Jews and Arabs would have to work out a “final status agreement”.
Now the UN, for the umpteenth time, has violated its own previous rulings
and policy. It has imposed Muslim desires upon Israel for no good reason,
other than to rid Judea and Samaria of Jews and hand over the Judenrein-to-be
area to the favored Muslims.
UN Security
Council members and the UN-supporting world which remains silent: for
what sins do you persecute us Jews?

Is it for the sin of the provision of the Bible and the world’s
first monotheistic faith?
Is it for the provision of the foundation for
the Christian faith?
Is it for the provision of thousands of medical
cures and treatments
Is it for Israel’s
aid to countless nations
such as Haiti following the cataclysmic
events which brought suffering to each one’s citizens?
Is it for our countless scientific
and technological
developments which have brought better living
to many areas of the world?
Is it jealousy that we continue to prosper
throughout centuries
of attempted annihilation
Is it our huge impact on the entertainment
Is it our long list of Nobel
in Literature, Chemistry, Medicine, Physics and Economics?
Is it that we have the highest percent per
capita of University Degrees?
Is it because we have the highest percent per
capita of museums, zoos, orchestras, and home computers?
Is it because we’re the only country
in the world with more trees at the beginning of the 21st century than
at the start of the 20th?
Is it for Israel’s high number of contributions
to the advancement of agriculture?
Is it for Israel’s high number of incredible environmental
in the world?

Or perhaps, do you persecute us because we represent God’s will
on earth when living in the land where He chose to put His Name? Are
you really trying to stamp out God and His revelations to humans? After
all, if you can eliminate the people whom God promised to save, you
could make Him out to be a liar.
Is that
your ultimate desire and goal? Because you might as well give up now,
as you will only bring down trouble on your heads, and always fail.
for which of these things, or other more heinous crimes, do you persecute
the Jews of Israel?


 News Image

January 15th: 70 Nations Will Gather In Paris To Discuss The Future Of Israel 


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
On January 15th, representatives from 70 different countries will
gather in Paris, France for an unprecedented global conference.  The
stated goal of this conference is to promote a “two-state solution” as
the way that lasting peace will be brought to the Middle East.  
Israel, there is a tremendous amount of concern that whatever is agreed
upon at this conference will immediately be used as the basis for a UN
Security Council resolution that would permanently divide the land of
Israel and create a Palestinian state.  
things would have to move very rapidly in order for that to happen,
because Barack Obama’s time in the White House comes to an end on
January 20th, and Donald Trump has already made it exceedingly clear
that he would never support such a resolution.
UN Security Council resolution that was passed on Friday was one of the
most significant events that we have witnessed in decades.  Resolution
2334 made all Israeli settlements in the West Bank and in East Jerusalem
illegal, it set the 1967 ceasefire lines as the border between the
Israelis and the Palestinians, and it granted every single inch of East
Jerusalem to the Palestinians.  
But it stopped short of giving official UN Security Council
recognition to a Palestinian state, and that is why this conference on
January 15th is so important.
The Israeli
government is reportedly fearful that any guidelines agreed in Paris
would be turned into another UN resolution before Trump’s inauguration.
spokesman for Netanyahu claimed to have “ironclad evidence” that the
Obama administration had plotted behind the scenes to promote the UN
resolution. Israel has said it will present evidence against the Obama
administration to the incoming Trump team.
what an Egyptian newspaper is claiming is true, then there may very well
be an international conspiracy at work against Israel.  According to a
transcript published by the Al-Youm Al-Sabea newspaper, John Kerry and
U.S. National Security Adviser Susan Rice met with Palestinian officials
in early December and presented Kerry’s plan to them at that time…
a meeting in early December with top Palestinian negotiator Saeb
Erekat, US Secretary of State John Kerry told the Palestinians that the
US was prepared to cooperate with the Palestinians at the Security
council, Israel’s Channel 1 TV said, quoting the Egyptian Al-Youm
Al-Sabea newspaper.

Also present
at the meeting were US National Security Adviser Susan Rice, and Majed
Faraj, director of the Palestinian Authority’s General Intelligence

Kerry is quoted as
saying that he could present his ideas for a final status solution if
the Palestinians pledge they will support the proposed framework. The US
officials advised the Palestinians to travel to Riyadh to present the
plan to Saudi leaders.
The Obama
administration is denying all of this of course.  But if it is true,
then the betrayal of Israel by Obama is much deeper than any of us
With less than a month to go in his
presidency, Barack Obama has decided to launch an all-out attack on
Israel.  Once Resolution 2334 passed and the uproar against it was
limited, that emboldened the Obama administration to go for broke.
it looks like they actually could try to get a Palestinian state
created before he leaves office on January 20th, and if that happens it
will be absolutely catastrophic for America.  
see, the truth is that we have been warned for many years that our land
will be divided after the land of Israel is officially divided into two
states.  Many of us have been watching for the creation of a
Palestinian state for a very long time, and now we may be right on the
verge of it happening.

When Donald Trump takes office he would not be able to reverse the
creation of a Palestinian state, but one thing that he could do would be
to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
If that happens, the Palestinians are promising to throw a massive temper tantrum…
asked how the Palestinians would react if Trump carried out his promise
to move the US embassy to Jerusalem, Erekat reportedly said the
Palestine Liberation Organization would rescind its recognition of
Israel and ask Arab states to expel their US envoys.

made precisely that threat in a December 19 conference call organized
by the Wilson Center policy forum. He said he would immediately resign
as the chief Palestinian negotiator, and that “the PLO will revoke its
recognition of Israel” as well as all previously signed agreements with
Furthermore, said Erekat, all
American embassies in the Arab world would be forced to close — not
necessarily because Arab leaderships would want to close them, but
because the infuriated public in the Arab world would not “allow” for
the embassies to continue to operate.
Ultimately, everything that is happening now is setting the stage for the biggest war in the Middle East that we have ever seen.
So instead of this “peace process” being the solution, it is actually going to cause the Middle East to explode in violence.

Obama administration lied, exposed as architect of anti-Israel UN action


EXCERPT:  “On the heels of the hotly contested resolution, which condemned Israel
for building homes in its capital, Jerusalem, senior Obama
administration officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry and
Vice President Joe Biden, have been identified as leading the charge to
ensure the anti-Israel measure won approval by the U.N. Security


(Friday Church News Notes, December 30, 2016,,
[email protected], 866-295-4143) – 

In what has been called Obama’s
parting shot at Israel, the White House allowed a UN Security Council
resolution to pass last Friday that refers to the West Bank and eastern
Jerusalem as “Palestinian territory occupied since 1967” and demands a
halt to Israel’s construction in those places. The Temple Mount,
including the Western Wall and the Temple Mount plaza, are located in
eastern Jerusalem. “In actuality, the Palestinians never had a state in
either the West Bank or eastern Jerusalem and they are not legally
recognized as the undisputed authority in those areas. Jordan occupied
and annexed the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem from 1948 until Israel
captured the lands in a defensive war in 1967 after Arab countries used
the territories to launch attacks against the Jewish state. In 1988
Jordan officially renounced its claims to the West Bank and eastern
Jerusalem. … The Committee for Accuracy for Middle East Reporting in
America (CAMERA) pointed out [that] international law does not make
Israeli settlements illegal: ‘Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva
Conventions, which is relied upon by those who claim the settlements are
illegal, does not apply in the case of the West Bank. This is because
the West Bank was never under self-rule by a nation that was a party to
the Convention, and therefore there is no “partial or total occupation
of the territory of a High Contracting Party,” as Article 2 of the
Convention specifies. Moreover, even if it did apply, by its plain
terms, it applies only to forcible transfers and not to voluntary
movement. Therefore, it can’t prohibit Jews from choosing to move to
areas of great historical and religious significance to them’” (
Dec. 23, 2016). “And the LORD said unto Abram, after that Lot was
separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place
where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward: For
all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed
for ever” (Genesis 13:14-15). “Neither, because they are the seed of
are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called” (Romans 9:7).

Published on Dec 30, 2016

establishment continues to push the false narrative that Russia is
running our elections and the hearts and minds of Americans despite no
proof and being completely repudiated by the entire planet.

Obama Tosses Out 35 Russian Diplomats as PNG, Closes Two Compounds | Sheeple Media Read the Script 

 Published on Dec 29, 2016

United States expelled 35 Russian diplomats and closed two Russian
compounds in New York and Maryland in response to a campaign of
harassment against American diplomats in Moscow, a senior U.S. official
said on Thursday. The move against the diplomats from the Russian
embassy in Washington and consulate in San Francisco is part of a series
of actions announced on Thursday to punish Russia for a campaign of
intimidation of American diplomats in Moscow and interference in the
U.S. election. The Obama administration was also announcing on Thursday a
series of retaliatory measures against Russia for hacking into U.S.
political institutions and individuals and leaking information to help
President-elect Donald Trump and other Republican candidates, two U.S.
officials said. Trump, who takes office on Jan. 20, has called for
better relations with Russia. It was not clear if he will be able to
immediately overturn the measures announced on Thursday.
The Russian
diplomats would have 72 hours to leave the United States, the official
said. Access to the two compounds, which are used by Russian officials
for intelligence gathering, will be denied to all Russian officials as
of noon on Friday, the senior U.S. official added.…


Gohmert Weighs in on Obama Admin Evicting 35 Russian Diplomats; Calls it a “Middle School Slap Back”

Liberals Panic, Call For Nuclear War With Russia 

 Published on Dec 29, 2016

The left is losing their minds as Donald Trump gets closer and closer to being sworn in as President of the United States.



Kerry: ‘Israel Can Either Be Jewish Or Democratic,  

Not Both’

Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer fires back 

at Sec John Kerry.


Israeli ambassador to US sounds alarm on UN resolution


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“Oh disbelievers, As you are preparing for Christmas celebrations, we advise you to prepare your coffins as well.”

Disbelievers: the Islamic State (ISIS) is fighting against us, as it
has told us, only on the basis of Islam. If the U.S. were an Islamic
state, ISIS would not be fighting us.

“Your celebrations have become a battlefield and a fighting area. So, wait for us.”

Why are our celebrations a battlefield? Whose fault is that? The
fault lies with Western politicians who have enabled this by means of
their immigration policies, coupled with their determination to ignore
and deny, and hence not fight in any way, the ideological roots of the
jihad threat.

“ISIS-linked group calls for New Year’s Eve attacks using horrific images,” by Lisa Daftari, The Foreign Desk, December 28, 2016:

Islamic State supporters are calling upon jihadis in the
West to launch more holiday attacks in an effort to seize momentum after
last week’s truck attack in Berlin.

In a series of graphical images posted to an encrypted Telegram
channel seen by The Foreign Desk, the Nashir Media Foundation, a
pro-ISIS media group, urges potential ‘lone wolf’ attacks in public
venues including cinemas, malls and even hospitals.

The posts, however, make a point to warn Muslims to stay safe, away from New Years’ celebrations.

One brutal image showing a knife-wielding jihadi chasing a ‘Santa on
the run’ is captioned, “You disbelieving dogs which prepared for
Christmas celebrations, be ready for shedding the blood scattering the
shreds and funerals, for the eyes of caliphate lions are looking
straight towards you and promise you with bitter deaths.”

In another image a jihadi stands next to a burning image of a
numerical 2017 with an inscription that reads, “We will make your New
Year mayhem with bombings and trampling attacks.”

Another poster reads “Oh disbelievers, As you are preparing for
Christmas celebrations, we advise you to prepare your coffins as well.
Your celebrations have become a battlefield and a fighting area. So,
wait for us.”…


Published on Dec 28, 2016

The Russians are covering Alex Jones’ ongoing battle with globalism and how he is winning.

Traitors To Truth Push Russian False Narrative

 Published on Dec 30, 2016

establishment continues to push the false narrative that Russia is
running our elections and the hearts and minds of Americans despite no
proof and being completely repudiated by the entire planet.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — Prominent Catholic Cardinal Timothy 
Dolan, Franklin Graham, and prosperity preacher Paula White will be 
among the ecumenical selection of faith leaders who will present prayers
 and readings at Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony next month, the 
inaugural committee announced on Wednesday.

“Since the first inaugural ceremony, our leaders have paid tribute to
the blessings of liberty that have been bestowed upon our country and
its people,” Committee Chairman Tom Barrack said in a statement. “I am
pleased to announce that a diverse set of faith leaders will offer
readings and prayers at the swearing-in of President-elect Trump and
honor the vital role religious faith plays in our multicultural, vibrant
In addition to Dolan, Graham and White, Jewish rabbi Marvin Hier of
the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Samuel Rodriguez of the National Hispanic
Christian Leadership Conference and Wayne Jackson of Great Faith
Ministries International will also participate.
“I am honored to have been asked to offer a reading from Scripture at
the upcoming presidential inauguration, and look forward to asking
Almighty God to inspire and guide our new president and to continue to
bless our great nation,” Dolan said in a statement.

“In American history Inauguration Day is one of the most sacred and
important celebrations we have as a people, not only because it
signifies the peaceful transition of power but also because on this day
‘We The People’ appeal to the favor, blessing and guidance of God on our
country, on our people and on our new leadership,” White also remarked.
As previously reported,
in September 2015, White was among a number of spiritual leaders,
including televangelists Kenneth Copeland and Jan Crouch, who laid hands
on and prayed for Trump at Trump Tower in New York. She specifically
made a “faith declaration” that she was securing Trump’s “calling and
his mantle.”
“Father, we just secure him right now by the blood of Jesus. We thank
you that no weapon formed against him will be able to prosper and any
tongue that rises against him will be condemned according to the word of
God,” White, who leads New Destiny Christian Center in Florida, prayed
as she touched his arm.

“All the days of his life, let him live well,” she continued. “I
secure him. I secure his children. I secure his calling and his mantle.”
James Dobson of Focus on the Family also told reporters in June that “Paula White has known Trump for years and that she personally led him to Christ.”
In addition to prayers and readings from Catholic, Jewish and
evangelical leaders, music will also be provided by the Mormon
Tabernacle Choir.
“The Mormon Tabernacle Choir has a great tradition of performing at
the inaugurals of U. S. presidents,” Ron Jarrett, president of the
Mormon Tabernacle Choir, said in a statement. “Singing the music of
America is one of the things we do best. We are honored to be able to
serve our country by providing music for the inauguration of our next
As previously reported,
the Mormon Tabernacle Choir has performed at inaugural events for
Presidents Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W.
Bush and George W. Bush.


 Prosperity Pimptress Paula White and Franklin Graham Partner to Lead Trump’s Inauguration;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Paula White, the B-girl of prosperity-hustling Christian
skullduggery, is slated to lead the nation in prayer at the inauguration
of Donald Trump. White, who has been widely extolled by evangelicals as
“the one” who “led Donald Trump to Christ,” should have no problem
fitting in. After all, they both go through spouses like dirty diapers.

CNN reports Donald Trump’s Committee Chairman Tom Barrack as saying,

I am pleased to announce that a diverse set of faith
leaders will offer readings and prayers at the swearing-in of
President-elect Trump and honor the vital role religious faith plays in
our multicultural, vibrant nation.

Diverse, indeed it will be. While Paula White denies the Trinity and denies that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God while prominent patriotic-gospel evangelicals like James Dobson are spewing the inanity
that this charlatan actually had something to do with Trump’s
fruitless, repentance-less conversion to Christianity. “I don’t know
when it was, but it has not been long, and I believe [Donald Trump]
really made a commitment, but he’s a baby Christian,” Dobson says, “I
also hear that Paula White has known Trump for years and that she
personally led him to Christ.”
You might be asking, “why does this really matter?” The problem isn’t
that any earnest Christian might actually believe that Donald Trump
takes his new-found “faith” seriously. But some might actually believe
Paula White is a Christian. Why? Because she will be sharing the stage with the well-known evangelical hero, Franklin Graham. This partnership, strictly forbidden in the Scriptures (2 Corinthians 6:14),
lends credibility to those who preach a false Gospel, proclaim a false
Jesus and make false disciples. It obscures the clear lines between
biblical truth and damning spiritual error.
Other questionable spiritual figures participating in the burlesque
will be the Catholic archbishop of New York Cardinal Timothy Michael
Dolan and Reverend Dr. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National
Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference. Rodriguez is a regular
appearance at the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious
Liberties Commission (ERLC) conferences and is associated with the New
Apostolic Reformation.
What’s the point? These religious “leaders” aren’t genuinely
coalescing for the bona fide purpose of coming together before our
Creator to petition His blessing upon our nation. That isn’t even
possible–they all worship a different God. It’s merely an amalgamation
of multiple versions of American-made religiosity to appease those who
propelled him into office. Of course, in today’s American version of
watered-down gospel-less Christianity, patriotic fidelity rises far
above doctrinal integrity. As long as you stand for “conservative
values” and throw your support behind the candidate that promises to
protect them, you can be a Christian.
Beware of who you bow your head and pray with.

FEMALE PREACHER AT TRUMP’S INAUGURATION RECOMMENDS PORNOGRAPHY (Friday Church News Notes, January 6, 2017,, [email protected], 866-295-4143)
– The
following is from “Female Preacher,”, Dec. 30, 2016).
“Paula White, who has been selected as the presiding pastrix to deliver
the prayer at Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration, is an advocate
of pornography. In August of 2015, her husband, Jonathan Cain [the third
marriage for both parties], took the stage next to her while the two
insisted that a wife should engage in watching porn with a husband who
likes it in order to strengthen their marriage. The Bible is very
clear that pornography is sinful and is equated to adultery. Matthew 5:28
says, ‘But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust
after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.’ This
would most certainly include pornography. Donald Trump is also a staunch
advocate of sexual immorality. This is the same Paula White that
evangelical pro-family leader, James Dobson, insisted led Donald Trump
to Christ. The well-known reverend Franklin Graham is also scheduled to
standing in unity with Paula White during the inauguration.”


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — Well-known attorney Jay Sekulow, who 
serves as chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, 
which takes up cases for conservative, pro-life and pro-family causes, 
expressed his support on national television this week for two of the 
picks on President-elect Donald Trump’s Supreme Court shortlist—Judges 
Diane Sykes and Bill Pryor—stating that they have a “proven track 

However, others have voiced concern about the judges precisely
because of their track record, which includes Sykes’ favorable Planned
Parenthood ruling calling abortion “a right” and Pryor’s prosecution of
“Ten Commandments Judge” Roy Moore. Reports state that both Sykes and
Pryor are “top contenders” on Trump’s Supreme Court list.

Sekulow had been interviewed on Tuesday’s Fox & Friends regarding
the more than 100 court vacancies Trump currently will have to fill as
president, as well as whether he agrees that Trump should not compromise
in his Supreme Court pick, but choose someone who is “hard right.”

“I look at some of the potential nominees like Bill Pryor from the
11th Circuit, Diane Sykes and others—these are judges that have a proven
track record, they have a proven judicial philosophy, and there’s no
reason not to select a nominee,” Sekulow, who works out of Pat
Robertson’s Regent University and in Washington, said on Tuesday’s “Fox
& Friends.”

“First of all, we’re replacing the late great Justice Antonin Scalia,
so this is Scalia’s seat; it needs to be someone in that judicial
mold,” he continued. “There’s no need to compromise. I think this is you
got to go full bore. The list is very strong that President-elect Trump
put forward, and we should not hesitate in working these nominations
through, period. I don’t there should be any discussion about that … It
should be non-negotiable.”

View Sekulow’s comments in full here.

But conversely, Andrew Schlafly, the son of the late Phyllis Schlafly
of Eagle Forum and likewise an attorney, has been working to create a
coalition of 70+ groups to urge Trump to take Sykes off his list of
Supreme Court picks.

“Diane Sykes has a pro-choice record,” Schlafly contended during a
strategy call earlier this month. “I don’t know why she’s even on the

He recently sent a letter to Trump over the matter, which included
dozens of co-signers, including Ambassador Faith Whittlesey of the Trump
Advisory Committee, Michelle Cretella of the American College of
Pediatricians, Michael Robb of the Association of American Physicians
& Surgeons, Bobby Schindler of the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope
Network, Janet Porter of Faith2Action, Mark Harrington of Created Equal
and many others.

“Several of these judges on [your] list have even written or spoken
in ways that are at odds with the pro-life position,” it read in part.
“Candidates who lack a pro-life record include, for example, Judges
Diane Sykes, Steven Colloton, Raymond Kethledge, and Neil Gorsuch, and
Justices Allison Eid and Joan Larsen. In addition, each of these judges
has either ruled against the pro-life position or has otherwise shown an
unwillingness to be publicly pro-life.”

Read the letter in full here.

As previously reported, Trump had mentioned both Sykes and Pryor in February as potential nominees following the sudden death of Antonin Scalia.

“We could have a Diane Sykes or a Bill Pryor,” he said. “We have some fantastic people.”


SykesSykes was nominated to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals by then-President George W. Bush. In 2013, she wrote the majority opinion in a case that barred the state of Indiana from defunding Planned Parenthood.

“[The Supreme] Court has explained that the constitutional right to
obtain an abortion is a right against coercive governmental burdens; the
government may not ‘prohibit any woman from making the ultimate
decision to terminate her pregnancy’ before fetal viability or impose an
‘undue burden on a woman’s ability to make this decision,’” she noted
in her writings.

“As long as the difference in treatment does not unduly burden a
woman’s right to obtain an abortion, the government is free to treat
abortion providers differently,” she said.

While Sykes and her colleagues did not find the Indiana law to be a
“burden” on the “right” to abortion, she still concluded that Indiana
should not be permitted to defund Planned Parenthood because it would
interfere with a woman’s choice to select the organization as her

“The defunding law excludes Planned Parenthood from Medicaid for a
reason unrelated to its fitness to provide medical services, violating
its patients’ statutory right to obtain medical care from the qualified
provider of their choice,” she wrote.

In 1993, while serving as a trial judge, Sykes also sentenced two
abortion protestors to 60 days in jail for seeking to shut down an
abortion facility, while also reportedly telling them, “I do respect you
a great deal for having the courage of your convictions and for the
ultimate goals that you sought to achieve by this conduct.”


Pryor and MooreBill
Pryor, the former attorney general of Alabama, is most known for his
prosecution of Roy Moore in 2003 over his refusal to remove a Ten
Commandments monument from the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court.
Pryor’s comments to Moore during his trial focused more on Moore’s
refusal to stop acknowledging God as chief justice.

“[Y]our understanding is that the federal court ordered that you
could not acknowledge God; isn’t that right?” Pryor asked. “And if you
resume your duties as chief justice after this proceeding, you will
continue to acknowledge God as you have testified that you would today?”

“That’s right,” Moore replied.

“No matter what any other official says?” Pryor asked.

“Absolutely,” Moore stated. “Let me clarify that. Without an
acknowledgment of God, I cannot do my duties. I must acknowledge God. It
says so in the Constitution of Alabama. It says so in the First
Amendment to the United States Constitution. It says so in everything I
have read.”

As Moore continued to stand his ground, he was ordered by Pryor to be
“removed from his position of Supreme Court justice of Alabama.”

The same year, Pryor was nominated by then-President George W. Bush
to serve on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. During his confirmation
hearing, he advised that although he personally believes that abortion
is “morally wrong,” he would not seek to overturn Roe v. Wade as a
federal judge.

“[M]y record as attorney general shows that I am able to put aside my
personal beliefs and follow the law, even when I strongly disagree with
it, to look carefully at precedents and to do my duty,” he advised.

“So even though you disagree with Roe v. Wade, you would act in
accordance with Roe v. Wade on the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals?”
asked Sen. Orrin Hatch.

“Even though I strongly disagree with Roe v. Wade, I have acted in
accordance with it as attorney general and would continue to do so as a
court of appeals judge,” he said.

When questioned further by a skeptical Sen. Chuck Schumer about the
matter, Pryor outlined that he had urged a colleague to refrain from
seeking to overturn Roe, advising him not to “present that question to
the [Supreme] Court.”

Pryor was also a part of an appeals court opinion in 2011 that refused relief to a Christian woman who had been forced out of her counseling studies at
Augusta State University after she declined to go through a
“remediation program” that included sensitivity training and attending
homosexual pride events.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — The Museum of the Bible, a project of 
Hobby Lobby President Steve Green, has officially announced that its 
doors are scheduled to open in the nation’s capital in November 2017.

“The grand opening of Museum of the Bible is sure to be one of the
most memorable events held in our nation’s capital in 2017,” said museum
President Cary Summers in a statement on Friday.

The 430,000-square-foot museum is being constructed just three blocks
from the U.S. Capitol, and plans to house one of the world’s largest
collections of ancient biblical scrolls, codices, papyrus fragments and
other historical artifacts.

The eight-floor facility with 40-foot bronze doors will feature over
40,000 biblical manuscripts owned by the Green family. It will also
house a 500-seat theater, a 100-seat lecture hall, a restaurant,
gardens, and a Nazareth village. Floors will serve various themes, such
as “The Impact of the Bible,” “The Narratives of the Bible,” and “The
History of the Bible.”

“The History Floor will feature more than 500 world-class artifacts
that document the Bible’s preservation, translation, and transmission
across centuries and cultures,” the website for the project outlines.
“This floor features many of the greatest biblical discoveries,
including writings dating to the time of Abraham, fragments of the Dead
Sea Scrolls, early New Testament writings, and more.”

“The Impact Floor will explore the Bible’s impact over time on
cultures, civilization, and daily life, including its profound influence
on fine arts, science, government, and more,” it explains, noting that
the experience will be visually stimulating and interactive.

Summers says that the museum will be on the cutting-edge of modern technology.

“Museum of the Bible’s team of innovators, in concert with some of
the world’s leading creative and technical minds, has dedicated itself
to building the most technologically advanced museum in the world,” he
said in a press release. “This team brought together the most impressive
electronic systems in the world, dreamed up how to create the best
museum experience and then invented the rest of the tools they needed to
bring our guests the most interactive, memorable experience possible.”

The performance hall will feature 7 state-of-the-art 4K projectors,
which can project a 30,000-lumen image. Commentary at various exhibits
will be available in 10 different languages, and some presentations will
have 3D interactive virtual and augmented reality capability.

But most of all, the museum is meant to be a teaching tool in a world that doesn’t really understand the Scriptures.

“We have probably the most ignorant population we’ve ever had in our
society [about the Bible] because it’s been taken out of our schools,”
Green told Baptist Press in 2014 prior to the construction of the site.
“We want to be able to, in a simple way, explain to them, ‘Here’s what
the Bible is.’ Ultimately, it’s about the fact that we are sinners, we
need a Savior and Christ was that. And He came to die for us that we
might have life.”

1 2 3 8