UN MIGRATION PACT TAKES AIM AT “HATE SPEECH”; SLOVAKIA BECOMES THE TENTH COUNTRY TO REJECT IT
As part of the UN Migration Pact, signatories
are required to “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with
measures including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate
speech” and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was
written in such a way that it would create a legal framework.”
Sensible nations are rejecting the disastrous UN Migration Pact — the full name of which is the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration —
a UN scheme to make the hijrah seem to be controlled and orderly, all
the while stripping away the border controls of sovereign countries and
putting them in the hands of the United Nations, which will also
influence “diversity” measures and work to curtail free speech within
Western nations under the pact.
Slovakia is now “the latest nation to follow U.S. President Donald
Trump’s lead in withdrawing from the United Nations.” The Prime Minister
of Slovakia, Peter Pellegrini, has called the Pact harmful and a
dangerous security risk, warning that the document describes mass
migration as “inevitable, necessary, and desirable” while failing to
distinguish between legal and illegal migration.
Although there are arguments that the migration pact would not be
legally binding, it is politically binding. It is presented in much the
same deceptive manner that the Liberal Government of Canada presented
the anti-blasphemy Motion M103,
which was passed in Parliament. Its proponents argued that a motion is
not a law, but motions provide the framework for possible future laws,
as well as influence the interpretation of existing laws. Of course,
M-103 further armed
the already weaponized Canadian human rights commissions and tribunals,
enabling them to terrorize and ruin the lives of citizens, as was
recently shown in a Jihad Watch article: “Landlord loses appeal to overturn order to pay Muslims $12,000 for wearing shoes in their prayer room.” M-103 also resulted in followup action
to systematically “monitor citizens for compliance” in a
23-million-dollar program — money stolen from Canadian taxpayers — that
will supposedly help fight discrimination, including “Islamophobia.”
So while many continue to insist that the UN Pact on Migration is not legally binding, it is deemed to be politically binding, and sets up a “legal framework” that can be used to interpret the law. It is no irony that Canada plans to “lead the charge” on the UN Migration Pact.
The world is being divided into two camps: globalists and populists.
Despite the name-calling by globalists against so-called “populists” —
names including “racist,” “far right,” “xenophobic,” and “Islamophobic” —
reasonable people of all races and creeds are starting to wake up to
the Leftist-Islamic supremacist alliance, and to globalist leaders’ aim
to fling open the doors of Western nations to the hijrah, with no
concern for the safety of Western citizens or for their economic
futures, even as many of them are nearing pension age. The plan is
socialism, which will heap the burden of rising taxation upon the backs
of the hardest-working taxpayers. The riots that are now exploding in
France over fuel prices are just the tip of the iceberg as more and more
people begin to feel the economic pinch. Where do citizens who support
globalism think the money is going to come from to support a multitude
of migrants from mostly anti-Western countries, all too many of whom
have no interest in working? Globalist Sweden is already preparing to
raise its retirement age to accommodate “migrant-driven population growth.”.
It has just been revealed
that globalist Angela Merkel’s government “deceived the public… as
internal documents from the Federal Foreign Office reveal that Angela
Merkel’s government has been the main architect of the controversial UN
migrant pact.” The co-leader of Germany’s “populist” AfD party, Alexander Gauland, has
vowed: “We will do everything we can to avert this disaster in the
making.” Merkel is stepping down soon, as her party is deeply divided
over Germany’s handling of migration. It has also come to light in
France that the “globalist poster boy” Emmanuel Macron‘s polls have just plunged to “historic lows,” while populist Marine Le Pen has climbed in the polls above Macron.
So far, the US, Slovakia Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic,
Austria, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Australia and Israel have all rejected
the UN Pact on migration.
“Slovakia Is Latest EU Nation to Follow Trump’s U.S. Out Of ‘Harmful, Dangerous’ UN Migration Pact,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, November 26, 2018:
Slovakia is to be the latest nation to follow U.S.
President Donald Trump’s lead in withdrawing from the United Nations
(UN) migration compact, its prime minister has announced.
Speaking after a European summit on Brexit Sunday, Peter Pellegrini
said: “Slovakia will not support this United Nations pact under any
circumstances and will not agree with it.”
“As the prime minister, I reject the wording of the compact … and I
refuse to enter it into effect in Slovakia,” he said of the document,
which describes mass migration as “inevitable, necessary, and
desirable”.
“Slovakia does not believe that there is no difference between legal
and illegal migration,” Pellegrini told reporters in Brussels,
stressing: “We consider economic migration illegal, harmful, and a
security risk.”
Foreign affairs minister Miroslav Lajčák had threatened to resign
last week unless Slovakia signs up to the so-called Global Compact for
Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, telling reporters that his priority
in post was “to pursue the vision of a democratic, European Slovakia
that is part of solutions”….
President Trump pulled America out of the agreement in December last
year, commenting that the compact appeared to demand a “no borders,
everyone can come in!” approach to managing migration flows.
Advocates argue the document is not legally binding and so would have
no impact on national sovereignty, while the governments
of Sweden and Germany claim signing up will benefit their countries and
even reduce illegal immigration flows.
Experts have warned that the agreement, which requires signatories
“commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with measures
including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate speech”
and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was written in
such a way that it would create a legal framework…..