Day: November 29, 2018

POLICE STATE-LAWRENCEVILLE, NEW JERSEY: CHICK-FIL-A NOT WELCOME AT RIDER UNIVERSITY

 
AUTHORITARIAN, DRACONIAN POLICE STATE IS THE MODEL TO BE 
EMULATED BY STUDENTS
INCLUSIVE, BUT CHRISTIANS ARE OFFENSIVE BY NATURE OF THEIR BELIEFS & MUST BE BANNED
 https://www.advocate.com/sites/advocate.com/files/styles/teaser_custom_user_mobile_1x/public/2018/11/26/rideruniversit-chick-fil-a-750x422.jpg?timestamp=1543267089
 https://www.rider.edu/sites/default/files/styles/hero_image_-_no_play_icon/public/featuredimages/1516WelcomeDellOmo_final_0.jpg?itok=J20GyiOm
 Jan Friedman-Krupnick





Assistant Vice President-Student Affairs
““[Chick-fil-A] have come out publicly, and they have contributed to
organizations that have been anti-LGBTQ, so that doesn’t align with our
wanting to have a place where people feel comfortable and that Rider is a
place that’s inclusive and welcoming,” Friedman-Krupnick said in an
interview with The Rider News on Nov. 12.”
“The email stated that “as an institution of higher learning, we
believe strongly in the open exchange of ideas and positions —
especially around a complex issue such as this one.””

“Although this was what was written to Rider’s community, Aminov said
that the administration’s actual stance on free speech is hypocritical
and limiting.”   

“In my opinion, the university only encourages free thinking as long as students think the way they want them to,” Aminov said.”
 Jan Friedman-Krupnick
POLICE STATE-LAWRENCEVILLE, NEW JERSEY: 
CHICK-FIL-A NOT WELCOME AT RIDER UNIVERSITY
 Or is it its Christianity that isn’t welcome?
BY JACK KERWICK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Chick-Fil-A is not welcome at Rider University.
Rider
is a modestly-sized liberal arts university in Lawrenceville, New
Jersey.  During the spring semester of 2018, administrators distributed a
survey in which students were asked about which restaurant franchises
they’d prefer to see locate to their campus. 
Most students chose Chick-Fil-A above and beyond any other option.
And yet Rider—again, after inquiring into their preferences—refuses
to honor students’ wishes on the grounds that Chick-Fil-A’s “corporate
values have not sufficiently progressed enough to align with those of
Rider.” 
According to Campus Reform, a
subsequent email explaining the administration’s decision was sent to
the student body.  Evidently, Chick-Fil-A fails to “promote…inclusion
for all people.”
Julia Pickett, a political science major and
junior at Rider, objected to Rider’s decision, telling Campus Reform
that since Chick-Fil-A “sell[s] chicken,” its corporate values shouldn’t
be “the focus.” She added: “If people didn’t want to buy their food
then they don’t have to.”
Pickett also shared what she takes to be the real reason that accounts for Rider’s decision:
“I think that the administration of Rider felt that having Chick-Fil-A
on campus would cause unwanted controversy and felt that the easiest
fix was to find another restaurant.”  This being said, the
administration should “be honest about it though instead of trying to
cover it as a deep offense to the school.”
The Rider Assistant
Vice President of Student Affairs, Jan Friedman-Krupnick, informed
Campus Reform that both he and the University find it “important…that
all voices are heard.” However, while it’s correct that Chick-Fil-A is
(most) popular amongst students, “there are members of the community
(faculty, staff, and students) who strongly opposed the option as well.”
Of course, as anyone who has been paying any attention to the cultural
landscape for the last so many years knows all too well, Chick-Fil-A is
anathema to the political and ideological left for no other reason than
that it’s a traditionally Christian corporation.  As such, it creates
employment opportunities for people young and not-so-young, male and
female, and the members of every conceivable racial, ethnic, and
religious background while insisting upon the highest quality of
customer service. Moreover, Chick-Fil-A has managed to become a
remarkably successful company, in many instances blowing away the
competition, even as it closes every Sunday to observe the Christian day
of rest.
Also in keeping with its Christian vision,
Chick-Fil-A continues to affirm what all peoples in all places and at
all times have always affirmed until pretty recently, namely, that
marriage is an inherently heterosexual union.
Chick-Fil-A, in other words, refuses to celebrate “same-sex marriage.”
But even this way of putting the matter is misleading.  As such, it
reinforces precisely the narrative that the left has shaped in its
campaign to demonize one of the finest businesses in the country.
Chick-Fil-A is a family-operated business that was founded by S.
Truett Cathy.  Back in 2012, its president and chief operating officer,
Dan Cathy, made an appearance on a radio program during which he made
the following comments:
“I think we are inviting God’s
judgement on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, ‘We know
better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.’”
Cathy
went on to confess that he prays that God extends His “mercy on our
generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we
have the audacity to define what marriage is about.”
A month
later, when asked about Chick-Fil-A’s “support of the traditional
family” and the opposition against it, Cathy replied:
“We are very much supportive of the family—the Biblical definition of the family unit.”
Cathy elaborated:
“We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are
married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that…We want to do
anything we possibly can to strengthen families.  We are very much
committed to that.”
Cathy insisted that, despite the pressures
that leftist activist groups were bringing to bear upon his family’s
business, Chick-Fil-A had every intention of “stay[ing] the course.”  He
concluded: “We know that it might not be popular with everyone, but
thank the Lord, we live in a country where we can share our values and
operate on biblical principles.”
Chick-Fil-A has donated money
to organizations known for their opposition to “same-sex marriage,”
organizations like the Pennsylvania Family Institute, the Family
Research Center, and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes.   But notice:
the business whose “exclusive” or “anti-gay” “corporate values” are
allegedly incompatible with those of Rider University hasn’t a single
policy that so much as remotely speaks to the question of homosexuality,
to say nothing of “same-sex marriage.” Cathy was speaking to the
Christian vision of his family, a vision that is not only compatible
with, but which actually demands that gays, along with every other human being, be treated with the God-given dignity that inheres in all persons.
In other words, a person’s homosexual orientation is utterly
irrelevant to obtaining either a job or characteristically superb
customer service at Chick-Fil-A.
Yet perhaps it is ultimately this Christian vision that Rider University finds incompatible with its values. 
_____________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.advocate.com/business/2018/11/26/anti-lgbtq-chick-fil-not-welcome-new-jerseys-rider-university 
EXCERPTS:
“”Chick-fil-A was removed as one of the options based on the company’s
record widely perceived to be in opposition to the LGBTQ+ community,”
Rider president Gregory G. Dell’Omo and vice president for student
affairs Leanna Fenneberg wrote in a letter to students posted Friday.”
______________________________________________________


University Refuses Students Non-Progressive Chick-fil-A On Campus | Katie Petrick

SILICON VALLEY SHARIA

 https://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Screen-Shot-2018-11-23-at-8.08.24-AM.png
ABOVE: LAURA LOOMER
 https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/11/23/11/6552234-6421185-Ilhan_Omar_newly_elected_to_the_U_S_House_of_Representatives_on_-a-28_1542971954451.jpg
ABOVE: ILHAN OMAR
 https://www.prisonplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/160818jeong1.jpg
ABOVE: SARAH JEONG, NEW YORK TIMES
SILICON VALLEY SHARIA
BY MICHELLE MALKIN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- This is a tale of two young, outspoken women in media.
One
is a liberal tech writer. The other is an enterprising conservative new
media reporter. One has achieved meteoric success and now works at a
top American newspaper. The other has been de-platformed and
marginalized. Their wildly different fates tell you everything you need
to know about Silicon Valley’s free speech double standards.
Some
smug elites will downplay Twitter’s disparate treatment of these users
by arguing that private tech corporations can do whatever they want and
that no First Amendment issues have been raised. But this battle is
about much more than free speech rights. It’s about whether the
high-and-mighty progressives who monopolize global social media
platforms truly believe in nurturing a free speech culture.
By
punishing politically incorrect speech and making punitive examples of
free thinkers, tech titans are enforcing their own authoritarian version
of Silicon Valley sharia — a set of both written and unwritten codes
constricting expressions of acceptable thought in the name of “safety”
and “civility.”
Laura Loomer was suspended permanently from Twitter over the Thanksgiving holiday for this tweet — and I quote in full:

“Isn’t
it ironic how the twitter moment used to celebrate ‘women, LGBTQ, and
minorities’ is a picture of Ilhan Omar? Ilhan is pro Sharia(.) Ilhan is
pro-FGM(.) Under Sharia, homosexuals are oppressed & killed. Women
are abused & forced to wear the hijab. Ilhan is anti Jewish.”

Ilhan
Omar is the newly elected Democratic Muslim congresswoman from
Minnesota who is indeed pro Sharia. Omar equivocated on a state bill to
increase penalties against female genital mutilation. It is a fact that
gay people are oppressed and killed under Sharia. It an undeniable truth
that women are abused and forced to wear the hijab. Omar has accused
Israel of hypnotizing the world, attacked its “evil doings,” and has
said she supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against
the Jewish state.
Twitter booted Loomer, who is Jewish, off its
site for expressing her well-supported opinions, which the social media
giant called “hateful conduct.” She has been labeled a “far-right
activist” for her mainstream views. As she noted in a new statement
posted to her website Tuesday:

“I am just one example
of someone who has been banned for discussing issues on social media
that big tech companies have deemed as untouchable. All across the
world, people are being silenced, censored, and even jailed for having
online discussions about Islam, immigration, jihad, and Sharia. I was
banned for posting facts about Islam. In other words, non-Muslims are
being subjected to Islamic blasphemy laws on social media,
progressively.”

If Loomer were a left-wing
“Islamophobia”-invoking feminist who practiced undercover or gonzo
journalism to go after Republicans, she’d be hailed as an innovative
disruptor instead of dismissed by establishment elites on both sides of
the political aisle.
Now contrast the fate of 30-year-old Sarah
Jeong, who was named an editorial writer at The New York Times in August
2018. Her left-wing colleagues and admirers applauded her “verve and
erudition.” And they made much of her diversity status as a “young Asian
woman.” This person-of-color shield gave Jeong immunity to post several
years’ worth of hateful tweets attacking white people.

“White men are bull——”;
“#CancelWhitePeople”;
“oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men” and “f—- white women lol.”

She
has tweeted “f—- the police” and “cops are a—holes,” derided fraternity
members and athletes wrongfully accused of rape and fumed about “dumb—-
f—-ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like
dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”
Let’s review: Loomer was kicked
off Twitter for calling out Sharia and a culture that promotes hatred of
gays, boycotts of Jews and subjugation of women. Before the permanent
suspension, Loomer — who had built up a following of more than 250,000 —
had her blue check removed and was silenced during the midterm
elections when her investigative work was making a difference. She
called out Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey for anti-conservative bias at a
congressional hearing and was mocked by establishment detractors in
both parties.
Meanwhile, Jeong sits on her perch on The New York
Times editorial board after using Twitter to spew hatred against all
men, all cops, the entire white race — and Twitter. Jeong denies Silicon
Valley’s political bias and selective speech suppression, which she has
dismissed as a “paranoid fantasy.”
Every day that blue check
marked hate-monger Sarah Jeong gets to tweet while Laura Loomer remains
silenced reminds us of how powerful social media conglomerates have
rigged the free speech playing field.

It’s no fantasy. It’s a nightmare.

About Michelle MalkinMichelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin is host of “Michelle Malkin Investigates” on CRTV.com. As well as the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” & “Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild“. Her email address is writemalkin@gmail.com.

JEW HATING “PALESTINIAN” WASHINGTON, D.C. CONFERENCE DECLARES ETERNAL WAR ON ISRAEL

  http://www.julg7.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/miko-peled-sur-la-creation-de-le.jpg

  Miko discusses the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement with
Pulitzer prize winning journalist Chris Hedges. They discuss the global
campaign to economically and politically pressure Israel to end its
occupation of Palestinian land, grant equality to Arab-Palestinian
citizens and allow Palestinian refuges the right of return to their
homes.

To learn more about the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement (BDS) visit: https://bdsmovement.net/

SEE ALSO: THE JERUSALEM FUND & PALESTINE CENTER YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
JEW HATING
“PALESTINIAN” WASHINGTON, D.C. CONFERENCE DECLARES ETERNAL WAR ON ISRAEL 
BY ANDREW HARROD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

“What is legal about Tel Aviv?” asked the Israeli anti-Zionist radical Miko Peled on November 16 at the annual conference
of Washington, DC’s Israel-hating Palestine Center before a room filled
with over 40 equally implacable listeners. Such extreme presentations
demonstrated the hollowness of any peace process with a Palestinian
movement that unrelentingly rejects a Jewish state of Israel.

Peled pleased a radical audience that included the anti-Zionist Neturei Karta rabbi Yisrael Dovid Weiss, Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) activist Shelley Cohen-Fudge, and Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) editor Delinda Henley.
Israel’s native son Peled stated that he actually “was born and raised
in Palestine” and abandoned his Israeli allegiance in a “journey from
the sphere of the oppressor to the sphere of the oppressed.” Meanwhile,
he declared that “most Israelis have no connection with the Holocaust,”
an amazingly cavalier treatment of a genocide that haunts all Jewish
memories globally, regardless of their personal proximity to this
horror.

Peled’s slander of the Jewish national homeland as an imperial
implant led to his scathing conclusion that “Zionism is incompatible
with peace” and the “rights of the indigenous people of Palestine.” His
fellow conference speaker Zena Agha
similarly damned Zionism as an “ethno-religious ideology which holds a
supremacist structural organization of society, which all people are
incumbent to oppose,” like “fighting white supremacy.” With breathtaking
intellectual cultural appropriation, the Electric Intifada’s Palestinian-American editor Ali Abunimah also completely rejected the idea that “Zionism has to do with Judaism.”

Abunimah derided Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Miami
native Ron Dermer, as “Ambassador for Miami,” while a slide presentation
via Skype by Salman Abu Sitta
likewise maligned Israeli Jews as foreign “immigrants/settlers.” “Like
the whites of South Africa, we don’t belong there; we are not native to
the place,” but rather are a “result of settler-colonialism and racism
and the ethnic cleansing and genocide,” Peled said of Israeli Jews like
himself. “We cannot in good conscience call that place Israel,” he
astonishingly declared, for this term is “legitimizing this brutal,
racist apartheid ideology and regime, because there is no part of
Palestine that is not occupied.”

Accordingly, the conference speakers expressed almost unanimous
disdain for the most commonly accepted Israeli-Palestinian conflict
settlement proposal. Peled rejected the “ridiculous notion of a
two-state solution” that would create a Palestinian state alongside
Israel, and instead fantasized about Jews living harmoniously amidst
Muslim-majority populations. Islamic supremacism, including antisemitism,
under which non-Muslim minorities have historically suffered, make
ludicrous his envisioned “single democracy over all of Palestine . . .
where people just live in peace and there is tolerance.”

Agha concurred that the “two-state solution is all but null,” while
Abunimah was even more strident. “Stop this sterile discourse of a
Palestinian state and two-state solution, and peace process and all of
this kind of nonsense,” he stated. “Our peace plan” means the “end of
Zionist colonialism.”

The address by Josh Ruebner from the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR)
showed how extreme Palestinian visions of an independent state could
be, with his rejection of Israeli security concerns restricting
Palestinian sovereignty. He denounced a past “charade of negotiations”
and “fig leaf of a dialogue” between Israelis and Palestinians, in which
a Palestinian “state-minus” defined all American peace plans under
numerous presidents. “The plan was always for the Palestinian entity not
to be a sovereign state, not to have an army, not to have an
independent foreign policy; not to have any control over its borders,
its airspace, its sea-lanes.”

Rather than appreciate the necessity of such concessions, Lamis Deek from the Islamist Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
celebrated Palestinian terrorism in her address via Skype. Befitting
CAIR’s Hamas origins, she began her remarks by “honoring our fallen
heroes” among Gaza’s Hamas jihadists. These terrorists, in the “purest
form of love, a not-self-interested love, gave their lives to protect
the two million people in Gaza” against the “Israeli colonizing project
for ethnic cleansing.” Noting that “our struggle is discursive as much
as it is military or solidarity,” she wanted to “normalize and elevate
the Palestinian resistance.”

By contrast, Abunimah condemned Israeli self-defense against Palestinians terrorists in the Gaza Strip who attempted to breach Israel’s security barrier during the recent March of Return. Israel is “using snipers to murder children in cold blood,” according to his propaganda. The Israel-hating former CNN journalist Jim Clancy
concurred that Israel is committing “in broad daylight right in front
of our eyes in Gaza . . . blatant war crimes.” He additionally ranted
that American recognition of Israel’s capital Jerusalem showed that
“U.S. foreign policy is up for sale.”

Abunimah praised March of Return participants for “giving their lives for our rights,” namely a Palestinian “right of return” for millions of descendants of at most
750,000 Arab refugees from Israel’s 1948 independence war. The entry of
these Arabs into Israel would demographically destroy the Jewish state
and accomplish what past Arab armies and terrorists have failed to
achieve. Nonetheless, the uncompromising Abunimah denounced the leftist
American Jewish organization J Street as a “racist, Zionist organization that exists to oppose the Palestinian right of return.”

Agha called the Palestinian “inalienable right to return to their
historic homeland” the “central pillar of Palestinian liberation,” while
Palestine Center Executive Committee Chair Subhi Ali described this as “sacred” and “not negotiable.” Referring to some 850,000 Jews
who fled the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in the decades
following Israel’s 1948 creation, Agha also bizarrely endorsed the
“ability for Arab Jews to return to the land from which they came.” Jews
“historically have lived very peacefully and under very prosperous
conditions in their home countries” such as Iraq, she said in an
exaggerated statement that ludicrously suggested Jews would endure the
MENA region’s antisemitism again.

The Palestinian United Nations Permanent Observer, Riyad H. Mansour, also showed in his keynote address no inclination to abandon the Palestinian refugee “farce.” He praised the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Near East Refugees (UNRWA)
as a “fantastic agency” and “model of success,” opposing American
efforts to close this organization irredeemably dedicated to the “right
of return.” In contrast, he smeared Israel’s recent nation-state law officially dedicated to preserving a Jewish national home as an “awful law, apartheid law.”

Mansour noted to applause that the Palestine Liberation Organization’s (PLO) Central Council had recently endorsed the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS)
movement against Israel. Along with his other statements, this BDS
support rendered null his pro forma embrace of a “two-state solution.”
Meanwhile Syracuse University Professor Osamah Khalil’s conspiracy-mongering
suggestion that the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat had been
“assassinated” did little to inspire confidence in negotiations with
Palestinians.

Mansour and the other prominent Palestinian spokespersons at the
Palestine Center conference clearly demonstrate the enduring Palestinian
rejection of Israel’s Jewish state. Beyond the foreign policy realm,
American domestic political leaders who praise CAIR or, like a possible presidential candidate Senator Cory Booker, claim ignorance
when associating with the USCPR, must answer for abetting
Israel-haters. Americans must clearly recognize their ally Israel’s
enemies and seek their defeat.

UN MIGRATION PACT TAKES AIM AT “HATE SPEECH”; SLOVAKIA BECOMES THE TENTH COUNTRY TO REJECT IT

UN MIGRATION PACT TAKES AIM AT “HATE SPEECH”; SLOVAKIA BECOMES THE TENTH COUNTRY 
TO REJECT IT 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

 As part of the UN Migration Pact,  signatories
are required to “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with
measures including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate
speech” and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was
written in such a way that it would create a legal framework.”

Sensible nations are rejecting the disastrous UN Migration Pact — the full name of which is the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration —
a UN scheme to make the hijrah seem to be controlled and orderly, all
the while stripping away the border controls of sovereign countries and
putting them in the hands of the United Nations, which will also
influence “diversity” measures and work to curtail free speech within
Western nations under the pact.

Slovakia is now “the latest nation to follow U.S. President Donald
Trump’s lead in withdrawing from the United Nations.” The Prime Minister
of Slovakia, Peter Pellegrini, has called the Pact harmful and a
dangerous security risk, warning that the document describes mass
migration as “inevitable, necessary, and desirable” while failing to
distinguish between legal and illegal migration.

Although there are arguments that the migration pact would not be
legally binding, it is politically binding. It is presented in much the
same deceptive manner that the Liberal Government of Canada presented
the anti-blasphemy Motion M103,
which was passed in Parliament. Its proponents argued that a motion is
not a law, but motions provide the framework for possible future laws,
as well as influence the interpretation of existing laws. Of course,
M-103 further armed
the already weaponized Canadian human rights commissions and tribunals,
enabling them to terrorize and ruin the lives of citizens, as was
recently shown in a Jihad Watch article: “Landlord loses appeal to overturn order to pay Muslims $12,000 for wearing shoes in their prayer room.” M-103 also resulted in followup action
to systematically “monitor citizens for compliance” in a
23-million-dollar program — money stolen from Canadian taxpayers — that
will supposedly help fight discrimination, including “Islamophobia.”

So while many continue to insist that the UN Pact on Migration is not legally binding, it is deemed to be politically binding, and sets up a “legal framework” that can be used to interpret the law. It is no irony that Canada plans to “lead the charge” on the UN Migration Pact.

The world is being divided into two camps: globalists and populists.
Despite the name-calling by globalists against so-called “populists” —
names including “racist,” “far right,” “xenophobic,” and “Islamophobic” —
reasonable people of all races and creeds are starting to wake up to
the Leftist-Islamic supremacist alliance, and to globalist leaders’ aim
to fling open the doors of Western nations to the hijrah, with no
concern for the safety of Western citizens or for their economic
futures, even as many of them are nearing pension age. The plan is
socialism, which will heap the burden of rising taxation upon the backs
of the hardest-working taxpayers. The riots that are now exploding in
France over fuel prices are just the tip of the iceberg as more and more
people begin to feel the economic pinch. Where do citizens who support
globalism think the money is going to come from to support a multitude
of migrants from mostly anti-Western countries, all too many of whom
have no interest in working? Globalist Sweden is already preparing to
raise its retirement age to accommodate “migrant-driven population growth.”.

It has just been revealed
that globalist Angela Merkel’s government “deceived the public… as
internal documents from the Federal Foreign Office reveal that Angela
Merkel’s government has been the main architect of the controversial UN
migrant pact.” The co-leader of Germany’s “populist” AfD party, Alexander Gauland, has
vowed: “We will do everything we can to avert this disaster in the
making.” Merkel is stepping down soon, as her party is deeply divided
over Germany’s handling of migration. It has also come to light in
France that the “globalist poster boy” Emmanuel Macron‘s polls have just plunged to “historic lows,” while populist Marine Le Pen has climbed in the polls above Macron.

So far, the US, Slovakia Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic,
Austria, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Australia and Israel have all rejected
the UN Pact on migration.

“Slovakia Is Latest EU Nation to Follow Trump’s U.S. Out Of ‘Harmful, Dangerous’ UN Migration Pact,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, November 26, 2018:

Slovakia is to be the latest nation to follow U.S.
President Donald Trump’s lead in withdrawing from the United Nations
(UN) migration compact, its prime minister has announced.

Speaking after a European summit on Brexit Sunday, Peter Pellegrini
said: “Slovakia will not support this United Nations pact under any
circumstances and will not agree with it.”

“As the prime minister, I reject the wording of the compact … and I
refuse to enter it into effect in Slovakia,” he said of the document,
which describes mass migration as “inevitable, necessary, and
desirable”.

“Slovakia does not believe that there is no difference between legal
and illegal migration,” Pellegrini told reporters in Brussels,
stressing: “We consider economic migration illegal, harmful, and a
security risk.”

Foreign affairs minister Miroslav Lajčák had threatened to resign
last week unless Slovakia signs up to the so-called Global Compact for
Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, telling reporters that his priority
in post was “to pursue the vision of a democratic, European Slovakia
that is part of solutions”….

President Trump pulled America out of the agreement in December last
year, commenting that the compact appeared to demand a “no borders,
everyone can come in!” approach to managing migration flows.

Advocates argue the document is not legally binding and so would have
no impact on national sovereignty, while the governments
of Sweden and Germany claim signing up will benefit their countries and
even reduce illegal immigration flows.

Experts have warned that the agreement, which requires signatories
“commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with measures
including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate speech”
and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was written in
such a way that it would create a legal framework…..

SAUDI ARABIA PLEDGES $50 MILLION TO UN’S “PALESTINIAN REFUGEE” AGENCY CUT OFF BY TRUMP

SAUDI ARABIA PLEDGES $50 MILLION TO UN’S “PALESTINIAN REFUGEE” AGENCY CUT OFF BY TRUMP 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

This shows yet again that Saudi Arabia is no true friend or ally of
the United States. It is wise not to break the alliance now, given
Iran’s aspirations in the region and worldwide, but it should not be
regarded with naivete. The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS details how Saudi Arabia came to be in the context of an Islamic reformation which bodes no good for the non-Muslim West.

At the same time, if anyone is going to fund this sinister
jihad-enabling agency, it shouldn’t be non-Muslim states, so in that
sense, this is a positive development.

For the truth about the deep dishonesty of the UNRWA, see the new website UNRWA Dynasty,
a project of the former Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor. It
tells the real stories of “Palestinian” “refugees” -– people who are
living quiet lives in countries such as Norway and elsewhere, and yet
who still claim to be “refugees.” A fascinating site.

“Saudi Arabia pledges $50 mln to UN Palestinian refugee agency,” Al Arabiya, November 28, 2018:

Saudi Arabia pledged $50 million in aid on Wednesday to
the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), which has been hit by
the withdrawal of all US funding.

The announcement was made at a news conference in the Saudi capital
by the director of the King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Centre,
Abdullah al-Rabeea.

UNRWA commissioner general Pierre Krahenbuhl told the news conference
that the agency had succeeded in containing spending following the
decision by the administration of President Donald Trump in August to
end all funding.

The United States had been by far the biggest contributor to the UN
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees and the move dealt a
massive blow to its already stretched finances.

Krahenbuhl said in Jordan last week that new funding pledges from
Europe and other Gulf Arab states had allowed the agency to dramatically
reduce the resulting budget shortfall, to just $21 million from $446
million at the start of the year….

YOUTUBE CLAMPS AGE RESTRICTION ON VIDEO REVIEW OF “THE HISTORY OF JIHAD” BY ROBERT SPENCER

YOUTUBE CLAMPS AGE RESTRICTION ON VIDEO REVIEW OF “THE HISTORY OF JIHAD” 
BY ROBERT SPENCER 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 Some time ago the YouTube channel apologiamixer published this video review of 
The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS:
 

This video has been up for over a month, but yesterday YouTube sent apologiamixer this notice:

Hi apologiamixer,

As you may know, our Community Guidelines describe which content we allow – and don’t allow – on YouTube. Your video The History of Jihad review by Dale Brown
was flagged to us for review. Upon review, we’ve determined that it may
not be suitable for all viewers and it has been placed behind an age restriction.

Video content restrictions

If a video contains violent or graphic content that appears to be
posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner, it’s less
likely to be allowed on YouTube. We also don’t allow content that’s
intended to incite violence or encourage dangerous activities. We review
content on a case by case basis and will only make limited exceptions
for appropriate educational, documentary, artistic, and scientific
contexts, where the purpose of posting is clear.

In light of this, we ask that uploaders post as much information as
possible in the title and description of their video to help us and
viewers understand the primary purpose of the video. Please note, even
with this additional context, it’s still not acceptable to post violent
or gory content that’s primarily intended to be shocking, sensational,
or disrespectful and this type of content is prohibited on YouTube.
Learn more here.

How you can respond

If you believe this was a mistake, we’d like to hear from you. To appeal this age restriction, please submit this form.
Our team will thoroughly review your appeal and will contact you again
very soon.For more information on YouTube’s Community Guidelines, please
visit our Help Center.

Sincerely,
– The YouTube Team

This is absurd, of course. As you can see in the video, it contains
no “violent or graphic content that appears to be posted in a shocking,
sensational, or disrespectful manner.” Nor does it incite violence or
encourage dangerous activities. But it does contain truths about the
jihad threat that powerful people today don’t want you to know.

What is YouTube so afraid of? What are they so desperate to prevent people from finding out? Discover for yourself in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS.

“BETWEEN 6-10,000 CHURCHES IN THE U.S. ARE DYING EACH YEAR”-AND THAT MEANS THAT OVER 100 WILL DIE THIS WEEK

“BETWEEN 6-10,000 CHURCHES IN THE U.S. ARE DYING EACH YEAR”-AND THAT MEANS THAT OVER 
100 WILL DIE THIS WEEK
 Any institution needs resources in order to survive, and churches are not any different
BY MICHAEL SNYDER-END OF THE AMERICAN DREAM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

America is littered with thousands upon thousands of church buildings that aren’t being used anymore. 
As
you will see below, between 6,000 and 10,000 churches are dying in the
United States every single year, and that means that more than 100 will
die this week alone.  And of course thousands of others are on life
support.  All over the country this weekend, small handfuls of people
will gather in huge buildings which once boasted very large
congregations.  At one time, America was widely considered to be “a
Christian nation”, but that really isn’t true anymore.  As an excellent article in The Atlantic has noted, even though most Americans still consider themselves to be “Christian”, the numbers are telling us a very different story…

Many of our nation’s churches can no longer afford to maintain their structures—6,000 to 10,000 churches die each year in
America—and that number will likely grow. Though more than 70 percent
of our citizens still claim to be Christian, congregational
participation is less central to many Americans’ faith than it once was.
Most denominations are declining as a share of the overall population, and donations to congregations have been falling for decades. Meanwhile, religiously unaffiliated Americans, nicknamed the “nones,” are growing as a share of the U.S. population.

In fact, the “nones” have risen from just 6 percent of the population in 1991 to 25 percent today.  That makes them the single largest “religious group” in the United States.

Today, less than 20 percent
of all Americans attend church on a regular basis.  As a result,
churches are dying in very large numbers, and this is a trend that
appears to be accelerating.  According to Thom S. Rainer of Lifeway, when you break the numbers down it means that “around 100-200 churches will close this week”…

Between 6,000 and 10,000 churches in the U.S. are dying each year. That means around 100-200 churches will close this week. The pace will accelerate unless our congregations make some dramatic changes.

Any institution needs resources in order to survive, and churches are not any different.

As attendance has declined, so has giving, and at this point the
percentage of charity donations going to religious institutions is at an all-time low…

Religious institutions are still the
single biggest recipients of overall charity donations, according to the
2015 survey by the Giving USA Foundation.
About 32 percent — $119.3 billion — of a total of $373.25 billion
Americans gave to charities went to churches, synagogues, mosques and
temples.
But that is down from about 50 percent since 1990, according to Rick Dunham, vice chairman of Giving USA, and the percentage has been “in steady decline for some time.”

So when churches die, what happens to their buildings?

Well, some are torn down, some are renovated for residential or business purposes, and some are being put to other uses…

A large number of abandoned churches have become wineries or breweries or bars. Others have been converted into hotels, bed-and-breakfasts, and Airbnbs. A few have been transformed into entertainment venues, such as an indoor playground for children, a laser-tag arena, or a skate park.

A similar thing is happening in Europe, only on a much greater scale.  Over there, hundreds of churches have been transformed into Islamic mosques, and this has generated quite a bit of controversy.

As I discussed in my article about demographic trends, we are witnessing societal change happen at a pace that would have been absolutely unthinkable a couple of generations ago.

This is especially true for our young people.  If you go back to
1986, just 10 percent of all young adults were “religiously
unaffiliated”, but now that number has jumped all the way to 39 percent…

Today, nearly four in ten (39%) young adults (ages 18-29) are religiously unaffiliated—three
times the unaffiliated rate (13%) among seniors (ages 65 and older).
While previous generations were also more likely to be religiously
unaffiliated in their twenties, young adults today are nearly four times
as likely as young adults a generation ago to identify as religiously
unaffiliated. In 1986, for example, only 10% of young adults claimed no religious affiliation.

That
makes young adults the single largest group of “nones” in the entire
country.  We are living at a time when there is a mass exodus from the
Christian faith in America, and it is likely going to take something quite dramatic to reverse that trend.

According to the Pew Research Center, Millennials are about half as likely to attend religious services on a weekly basis as the oldest Americans are.

Church attendance is simply not as important to Americans as it
once was.  In the old days, churches were central hubs where you got to
know your neighbors and important events were commemorated.  But now
churches sit idle and empty most of the time, and attendance on Sunday
mornings is depressingly low in most cases.

When I was growing up, my parents made sure that we were in
church on Sunday morning, Sunday evening and sometimes even on Wednesday
evening.  But today, most churches don’t even have Sunday evening or
midweek services because nobody would show up.

Our entire society, including our system of government, was
birthed out of a culture of Bible-believing Christians.  The following
comes from an excellent piece by Dr. Mark David Hall…

In 1776, every European American, with the exception
of about 2,500 Jews, identified himself or herself as a Christian.
Moreover, approximately 98 percent of the colonists were Protestants, with the remaining 1.9 percent being Roman Catholics.

Not only did early Americans identify themselves as Christians, but nearly all of them regularly attended church.

Now our society is moving very rapidly in the exact opposite
direction, and many believe that this has tremendous implications for
the future of our nation.

VIDEO: TRUTH ABOUT THE MIGRANT INVASION BY MILLIE WEAVER OF INFOWARS

VIDEO: TRUTH ABOUT THE MIGRANT INVASION
 Find out what MSM is hiding from the public
BY MILLIE WEAVER-INFOWARS.COM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Millie Weaver breaks down the
truths fake news media has been withholding from the public regarding
these so-called migrant caravans.

MUST WATCH: The Truth of How Mexican Citizens Feel About The Migrant Caravan

  

THE LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE BASTION OF PORTLAND, OREGON: CAPITOL OF ANTIFA, SEXUAL DEVIANCY & SELF-LOATHING

THE LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE BASTION OF PORTLAND, OREGON: CAPITOL OF ANTIFA, SEXUAL DEVIANCY & SELF-LOATHING 
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON-INFOWARS.COM

Portland: Capital of Antifa, degeneracy and depression.
Gosh darn it…. I think we have ourselves a sh*thole.
Portland is the most self-loathing city in America and also where the highest concentration of Antifa members live.
This is not a coincidence.
Please share this video: https://youtu.be/aSw79yRnDVs

STREETS STREWN WITH HUMAN WASTE, GARBAGE; JUST LIKE SOCIALIST PARIS, SAN FRANCISCO & VENEZUELA 
POLYAMORY, SODOMY LIKE SODOM & GOMORRAH