PATRIOT LAURA LOOMER BANNED FROM TWITTER FOR REVEALING TRUTH
PATRIOT LAURA LOOMER BANNED FROM TWITTER
SUPPORT LAURA AT:
www.lauraloomer.us
Banned for exposing Muslim Jew Hater
Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog
A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
US BORDER CHIEF: CARAVAN USED WOMEN, CHILDREN AS HUMAN SHIELDS BEFORE
A San Diego Customs and Border Protection agent gave CNN a
firsthand account of events at the US border in Tijuana over the
weekend, describing migrants who attacked agents as “adult males” who
used women and children as shields before assaulting agents with rocks.
Chief
Patrol Agent Rodney Scott on Monday described migrants who stormed the
border Sunday were mostly adult males who weren’t interested in seeking
asylum.
“I kind of challenge that this was a peaceful protest, or that the
majority of these people were claiming asylum. We ended up making about
42 arrests – only 8 of those were females and there were only a few
children involved. The vast majority were adult males.”
During Scott’s testimony, CNN aired images of women and children at the confrontation.
Scott said caravan members who participated in the Sunday siege at
the US border in Tijuana flung rocks at agents outfitted in tactical
gear and damaged CBP windows and vehicles.
“The group immediately started throwing rocks and debris at our
agents, taunting the agents. Once our agents were assaulted and the
numbers started growing we had two or three agents at a time initially
facing hundreds of people at a time. They deployed tear gas to protect
themselves and protect the border.”
Scott said migrants were able to breach a portion of a
dilapidated border wall made of sheet metal which has yet to be
reinforced with new wall infrastructure.
“What I saw on the border yesterday was not people walking up to
Border Patrol agents and asking to claim asylum. Matter of fact, one of
the groups I watched… they passed 10 or 15 marked Border Patrol agents
walking West to East, numerous uniformed personnel, as they were
chanting, waving the Honduran flag and throwing rocks at the agents.”
Here’s moment right before shot bang. You can see some rocks being thrown.
“If they were truly asylum seekers, they would have just walked
up with their hands up and surrendered, but that did not take place,” he
added.
Agent Scott further stated he found it “unconscionable” that the
group exploited children in their mission to harm Border Patrol agents.
“What we saw over and over yesterday was that the group – the
‘caravan’ as we call them – would push women and children towards the
front and then begin basically rocking our agents.”
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
Put this tiny minority of extremists together in a city and you would
have Boise, Idaho, or Richmond, Virginia, or Des Moines, Iowa. But
that’s not a roster of Muslim civilians who support Islamic terrorism,
just active members of terrorist groups. And so a better point of
comparison is to national armies.
At 230,000, Sunni Islamic
Jihadists outnumber the British Armed Forces (149,000), the French Armed
Forces (117,000), and Germany’s Bundeswehr (179,753). That should be
troubling since those are some of the militaries and countries on the
front lines of Europe’s reluctant fight against Islamic incursions.
The list of Sunni fighters has a lot of questions marks and is
incomplete. Sunnis outnumber Shiites, but under the Iranian umbrella,
Shiites have fielded sizable terror forces in Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen.
Hezbollah in Lebanon boasts between 25,000 to 65,000 Jihadists. The
Houthis in Yemen, currently the beneficiaries of a massive propaganda
campaign in the media, have around 25,000 to 30,000 Jihadists. Iraqi
PMU’s add another 90,000 to 150,000 Jihadists to these numbers. And
finally there’s Iran’s own Revolutionary Guard, a regional terror hub
with another 120,000 members.
These numbers add between
260,000 and 365,000 Jihadists on the Shiite side for a total of over
half a million Sunni and Shiite Jihadists making Islamic terrorists the
world’s eighth largest military.
That’s not a tiny minority of extremists and it’s not a few guys in a chat room or a cave.
This dark army of terror grew by leaps and bounds under the Obama
administration which fractured Sunni countries by overthrowing their
governments in and bringing Islamists to power in the Arab Spring, while
the Iran nuke deal fed and freed up billions for Iran to invest in
Shiite expansionism.
The CSIS report notes that
the number of Salafi Jihadists and allied terror groups more than
doubled between 2008 and 2016. Despite the Iraq War, during Bush’s
second term, the increase was fairly light. The stratospheric increase,
from the thirties to the sixties, took place during the Obama years.
The estimated number of Jihadist fighters rose from a high of 100,000 in 2008 to 250,000 in 2016.
The mass deaths in Syria, Libya and Yemen (to name some of the worst
Arab Spring trouble spots) are a direct result of the policies and, in
Libya of the military intervention, of the Obama administration.
Lefty twitter brims with propagandas photos of supposed Yemeni
children starving to death. The media has tried to blame the religious
war between Sunnis and Shiites (and their Saudi and Iranian backers) on
President Trump. But dead children in Yemen are the wages of the foreign
policy of Hope and Change.
As the Democrats and the
Republican foreign policy establishment advocate for Jamal Khashoggi,
intervention in Syria and support for the Palestinian Authority, it is
urgent to remember that these are the same old failed policies that led
to a 150% increase in Jihadists and killed over 500,000 people in Syria,
and cost the lives of tens of thousands more in Yemen and Libya. And
elsewhere in the region.
“Democratization” is a poisoned Islamist chalice. At its cloudy bottom lie terror and death.
The media has accused President Trump of a callous indifference to
human life for putting American national interests ahead of Khashoggi,
an Islamist pal of Osama bin Laden. But it’s the media radicals whose
horrid idealism put half a million people into the ground in the service
of the region’s Islamists.
Khashoggi’s Islamist political agenda killed enough people to qualify as its own genocide.
Half a million dead and half a million Jihadists rampaging around the
world are the outcome of an idealistic foreign policy in which
chattering class lefties allowed Islamists like Khashoggi to call the
shots. The tiny minority of extremists was never that tiny, but it grew
to a monstrous size with massive infusions of cash and military
interventions plotted by Islamists and implemented by Washington D.C.
Many of the 70,000 Jihadists in Syria were directly or indirectly
funded by the Obama administration. As were many of the 5,000 Jihadists
in Libya, where Obama’s illegal military intervention led to everything
from a near Al Qaeda takeover of Mali to the flow of surface-to-air
missiles to Hamas terrorists.
Major terror groups and state
sponsors of terror from Pakistan to Iran to the Palestinian Authority
also saw huge cash transfers from American taxpayers to Islamic
terrorists.
In his first year in office, Obama signed off on a
$7.5 billion aid package for Pakistan. The Islamic terror state repaid
us by harboring Osama bin Laden and aiding Islamic terrorists killing
American soldiers.
This year, President Trump made drastic
cuts to foreign aid to Pakistan after tweeting, “The United States has
foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the
last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit,
thinking of our leaders as fools.”
We’re still foolishly
funding Jihadists, including the tens of thousands of members of the
Palestinian Authority’s security forces, even after their leader, Abbas,
called for the destruction of the White House.
CSIS doesn’t
list the Islamic terror militias in the Terrorist Occupied Territories
in Israel. That leaves the tens of thousands of Jihadists in Hamas,
Fatah and other Palestinian Authority TOT terror groups out of the
calculations. These groups are not just a threat to Israel. Hamas is an
arm of the Muslim Brotherhood and is backed by Iran. Its skills and
resources are at the disposal of allied terror groups.
That’s
how Iran’s Hezbollah assisted Al Qaeda in its preparations for 9/11.
It’s why Iran is aiding the Taliban today. An Islamic terror group or
terrorist anywhere is a link in a global terror network.
That is the understanding that made ISIS so deadly, striking from Iraq to Paris to New York.
Islamic terrorists are not a tiny minority of half a million. They are
not an aberration. They are everywhere. And the failed foreign
establishment funded and aided many of them.
Military
interventions spread them, democratization brought them to power and
immigration transplanted them from war zones into our countries. Their
numbers have more than doubled in a decade. If the Left gets to set
foreign policy again, in another generation there will be millions.
If we want to avert that outcome, our interventions, regime change and
immigration policies must all objectively meet the test of making
societies, including our own, less Islamist, not more so. Foreign aid
should be barred by law from going to any country or militia whose goal
is to establish Islamic theocracy by force. Any intervention must be
objectively shown to make a society less bound to Islamic law. And
immigration policy must be aimed at reducing the percentage of Islamists
in the United States.
Otherwise the next Islamic civil war won’t be fought in Syria, but in the United States of America.
Utilizing CRISPR, they intend on eliminating a gene known as CCR5 and
creating genetically modified babies resistant to HIV, smallpox, and
cholera.
But does the bad outweigh the good?
Scientists worry that once a species is modified, it is changed forever.
According to recently disclosed patents, Google is preparing to take
“surveillance as a feature” to a whole new level, with devices in every
room of users’ homes to watch, listen, and analyze users’ every word and
action.
Promoting the new devices as a matter of convenience, as it has done
with the Google Home speaker, the tech giant seems to expect that users
will readily accept even more (and more detailed) surveillance for the
promise of greater ease and convenience. The unevenness of that
trade-off (something as precious as privacy for something as unimportant
as convenience) is why this writer refers to such technology as
“surveillance as a feature.”
While Google may have started out as a search engine and is still
largely associated with that aspect of its business model, the reality
is that Google’s main business (to which the search engine aspect is
completely subservient) is data-mining and data analysis. Consider that
the tech titan has amassed a net value of roughly $200 billion by
offering “free” services, such as search, e-mail, calendar, and address
book, along with YouTube and other services. That $200 billion has
largely been made by gathering troves of personal data on its more than
one billion users and leveraging that data into advertising revenues.
The company also routinely filters and manipulates search results for
the benefit of political candidates and policies favored by the
company’s leaders.
The recently publicized patents reveal that the surveillance hawks at
Google apparently don’t think enough is enough. In fact, those patents
show that the new technology in Google’s offing blows past anything the
company has done up to this point. The new technology includes the
integration of cameras, microphones, and other sensors that would allow
those devices to work together to monitor the comings and goings (using
sensors on doors as well as cameras and microphones) of people in homes
equipped (read: bugged) with the devices. The cameras and microphones
would allow the devices and Google’s servers to recognize people and
objects and analyze the significance of the presence of those people and
objects. As PJ Media is reporting:
That degree of surveillance is far beyond anything found in the current state of “surveillance as a feature.”
As an indication of the thinking of the folks over at Google, the description for one of the patents
begins by lamenting the lack of ability to use current “smart-devices”
to accomplish the level of surveillance the company desires. The patent
is explained in 258 paragraphs. Paragraph [0003] and [0004] state:
And paragraph [0006] says:
So, the current state of “so-called smart devices” isn’t up to
Google’s standard? Apparently, the only devices that qualify as “smart”
to Google are those that allow the company to analyze your every
conversation and movement throughout your home. To drive that home,
paragraph [0072] spells out just how two of the processors in the device
described by this patent would work together to accomplish the type of
surveillance that meets Google’s standard for “smart devices.” It
states:
Paragraph [0125] explains how the devices would distinguish between
voices to determine, for instance, that a room is occupied by an adult
male, an adult female, or a female child based on the audio signatures
of the voices. It goes on to state, “Video data may optionally be used
to confirm or to help arrive at such conclusions.” And paragraph [0131]
explains how the devices can use “facial recognition or other
image-based recognition” along with “digital device presence (e.g.,
presence of electronic devices associated with a particular person), or
other inputs … associated with a particular household occupant or
particular type of household occupant” to identify people.
Perhaps one of the most disturbing elements is found is paragraph
[0185]. It describes the presence of sensors, cameras, and microphones
in bathrooms to determine whether a person is brushing his teeth— based
on “an audio signature and/or video signature” to measure such things as
“the sounds and/or images of teeth brushing” and the sound of the sink
being left on for the time it takes a person to brush their teeth.
Let that sink in for just a moment: sensors, cameras, and microphones
in your bathroom? Remember that paragraph [0125] already discussed the
fact that the devices can detect the presence of children. This means
that the folks over at Google are already aware that there are children
in the world. Those children take baths and showers. Google wants you to
point a camera and a microphone at your children while they bathe?
And that is far from the only access to your children sought by
Google. Another patent filed by Google discusses the tech company’s
plans to monitor children as a type of digital nanny. As The Atlantic reported:
As bad as all of this is, Google makes sure to leave the door open
for more. Early on, paragraph [0005] of the first patent states:
So, Google — already pushing surveillance into new areas — reserves
the “right” under this patent to push even further as new surveillance
ideas enter the darkened minds of the leaders of the company whose motto
was once, “Don’t be evil!”
Lecrae, Carl Lentz, and Planned Parenthood all have one thing in
common. They all endorse Stacey Abrams as a role model for young girls.
Abrams lost her race for Governor of George to pro-life Republican,
Brian Kemp, no thanks to celebrities who came out to support her in
droves. When Planned Parenthood endorsed the Democratic candidate, they
pointed out her service on the NARAL Pro-Choice Georgia board and her
pro bono legal work for young women who want abortions. Abrams also
opposed a 20-week abortion ban during the 2012 legislative session, in
which she voted to allow the murder of infants, while she was yet 9
months pregnant (she videotaped her speech for abortion so that it could be played when she went into labor).
This is a photo of Abrams being endorsed by Planned Parenthood below.
Abrams is not a role model for little girls. She’s responsible for the
deaths of little girls. She’s Margaret Sanger in black-face. There is
nothing commendable about Stacey Abrams that can outweigh her wicked and
evil support of abortion.
Nonetheless, Oprah isn’t the only celebrity that has fawned over the
now-defeated gubernatorial contender. Christian recording artist Lecrae
also took time to pose for a photograph with the woman who wants to keep
the wombs of American mothers a more dangerous environment than any
slave ship to cross the Atlantic.
Posting to his Instagram account, Lecrae said:
Dear @staceyabrams, My daughter looks up to you and she’s 9. Not
because she’s familiar with your stances and policies, but because
you’re a highly educated woman of color who fights for what she believes
in despite opposition. She sees that she can be more than what society
says. Thank you.
Well, for starters, society said Stacey Abrams couldn’t be the governor of Georgia. So there’s that.
Secondly, Lecrae commends Abrams for fighting “for what she believes
in” and apparently teaches his daughter that this is a commendable
trait. This, of course, is sub-intellectual.
Jefferson Davis, the first (and only) president of the Confederate
States of America, literally fought for what he believed in. Was it
honorable?
Adolf Hitler, who gassed 6 million Jews and countless others, literally fought for what he believed in. Was it honorable?
Orval Faubus, as governor of Arkansas, challenged desegregation and the Little Rock Nine, and fought for what he believed in. Was it honorable?
Nathan Bedford Forrest was an early member of the Ku Klux Klan and
was a general in the Confederacy, having fought for what he believed in.
Was it honorable?
Of course, people of reasonable intellect know that “fighting for what you believe in” is not a good thing if what you believe in is a bad thing.
In the case of Stacey Abrams, this includes the mass-infanticide of
unborn black Americans in disproportionate numbers. That’s hardly a good
thing. Honestly, it seems as wicked as any Civil War general ever was.
In fact, considering that there is no record of any Confederate Civil
War general having advocated for the death of infants or for the eugenic
extermination of the ethnic Africans, it’s safe to say that Stacey
Abrams ‘fighting for what she believes in’ is significantly worse.
For Lecrae, it seems that the primary reason his daughter
(supposedly) looks up to Abrams as a role model is because of the color
of her skin and her education. There are, of course, countless highly
educated black women who don’t promote political policies that accord with the devil.
Lecrae was joined by Hillsong pastor, Carl Lentz, who similarly stated admiration for the pro-choice politico.
Lentz said, “Amazing! Women like this, I point my daughters to as well! God bless her.”
Carl Lentz has previously defended abortion on The View. After an uproar caused by polemics ministries reporting his words to the Christian public, Lentz back peddled. And yet, here Lentz says “God bless her” to refer to an exceedingly evil woman who is the opposite of the midwives God blessed in Egypt.
Some of Lecrae’s followers, however, took exception.
Lecrae employs here the tactics of Critical Race Theory and Marxist
victimology, claiming that he’s “sad” someone has seen through the
blackness of Abram’s skin into the blackness of her heart. Apparently,
the lens through which Lecrae sees the pro-choice politician doesn’t
have a moral filter, but one that stops at the surface-level. Lecrae’s
lens is essentially amoral. He is judging someone by the color of their skin, and not the content of their character.
[Contributed by JD Hall]
[Chiapas, Mexico] Roman Catholics are persecuting evangelical
Protestant Christians in Mexico. Among other things, like cutting off
the water supply to their homes, the local government has now refused to
let one family bury the body of their mother.
Authorities in the village of Ranchera Yocnajab (in the state of
Chiapas) are refusing to let the woman be buried because her family has
not participated in local Roman Catholic festivities. The family was
told she would have to be buried outside the city limits, but other
plots for burial aren’t readily available. Ultimately, she had to be
buried in an altogether different town in Comitan.
The woman was a member of one of seventeen Protestant families who
refuse to contribute to religious festivals of the Papists. In return,
the town cut off their utilities and basic services.
Reportedly, it is the local Roman Catholic church in Ranchera
Yocnajab that has convinced civil servants to persecute these believers.
An organization that is designed to help protect persecuted Christians
in Mexico Called Mission Agency 21 Gramos claims that city officials
have signed illegal agreements to keep the Protestant believers from
receiving these utilities and burial rights.
The Protestant believers have made complaints through all proper
governmental channels, but they are repeatedly told to submit themselves
to the local authorities and that it’s “what the majority has decided.”
Without having the Mexican equivalent of a First Amendment right, the
Protestant families have to suffer through a tyranny by the majority.
This is why nationalism designed to protect individual liberties in
juxtaposition to Communitarianism, is so important for religious
freedom.
The Human Rights Office of Mexico has acknowledged that the water to
the family’s homes has been cut off, but has thus far not taken action.
[HT Evangelical Focus and Christian News Network]
[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Garry McNab and first published at 9 News, title changed by P&P]
______________________________________________________
[Canberra, Australia] The Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
in Australia is looking into Brian Houston’s cover-up of the sexual
abuses of his father against church children. This has been widely
reported, as covered by Pulpit & Pen and many other news sites. What’s not been widely reported yet
is a startling accusation toward a sexual abuse victim by Hillsong
founder, Brian Houston. The Royal Commission already censured Brian
Houston for the sex-abuse cover-up back in 2015, but the latest
revelations are truly tragic.
Brian Houston told a child sex abuse victim, “It’s your fault all this happened, you tempted my father.”
The commission received an account of Houston’s words under oath, and
reportedly occurred as Houston was talking to his father’s victim,
after his father had agreed to pay him 10 thousand dollars.
According to The Australian:
After the allegations became public within the church
during 1999, Frank Houston met his victim offering him $10,000 and
saying: “I want your forgiveness for this. I don’t want to die and have
to face God with this on my head,” the commission heard.Months later, when the money had not
arrived, his victim called Frank Houston’s son Brian, who was then the
national president of the Assemblies of God in Australia Pentecostal
movement.The victim said Brian told him: “You know, it’s your fault all this happened. You tempted my father.”“Brian got very angry after that. He
slammed the phone down after saying words to the effect of ‘You’ll be
getting your money’,” the victim told the commission. He received a
cheque for $10,000 about two weeks later.
Brian Houston has made a statement acknowledging the phone call with
his father’s victim, but denies he said those words precisely.
_____________________________________________________________
[Independent Australia] The PM remains
mute as his mentor, Pentecostal Pastor Brian Houston, is investigated
for covering up child sexual abuse but demands Muslim leaders take
responsibility for their communities’ criminal behaviour, writes Dr Jennifer Wilson.
IN HIS MAIDEN SPEECH, current Prime Minister Scott Morrison referred to evangelical Christian and Hillsong Church leader, Brian Houston, as his “mentor.”
The Prime Minister thanked Houston for his support and encouragement.
While Morrison no longer attends Hillsong he does attend Horizon, another Pentecostal church that along with Hillsong is affiliated with Australian Christian Churches — the Australian branch of the Assemblies of God.
In 2015, Brian Houston was censured by the Child Abuse Royal Commission for failing to report his father, Frank Houston, to police for the alleged sexual abuse of children in his church.
On Monday, three years after this censure, NSW Police confirmed that Brian Houston is being investigated by them after
complaints that he failed to report his father’s crimes, instead,
concealing them and urging church officials to refrain from publicly
revealing the allegations in the interests of the institution’s
reputation.
“I think this will now open the doors for other
jurisdictions to start looking at trying to prosecute people who
deliberately looked after their institution and, literally, threw
children to the wolves.”
It appears that Prime Ministerial mentor Brian Houston and the Hillsong Church may have “deliberately looked after their institution” and “thrown children to the wolves”. The current police inquiry will pursue this possibility.
Continue Reading >>
https://ratherexposethem.org/2018/11/lecrae-carl-lentz-fawn-over-pro.html