ASSEMBLY OF GOD MEGA-CHURCH SAYS YOGA IS DEMONIC; BIBLE BELT TOWN FREAKS OUT

 ASSEMBLY OF GOD MEGA-CHURCH SAYS YOGA 
IS DEMONIC; BIBLE BELT TOWN FREAKS OUT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
[USA TODAY] SPRINGFIELD, Mo. — A pastor
of an Assemblies of God megachurch recently took aim at yoga, saying it
has “demonic roots” and warning Christians to avoid the popular activity.


Pastor John Lindell told the attendees
of James River Church in Ozark, Missouri — which has a congregation of
about 10,500, according to a 2016 report — that the positions in yoga were “created with demonic intent to open you up to demonic power because Hinduism is demonic.”
Members of nearby Springfield’s yoga community are now speaking out.
A Christian yogi says his practice has brought him
closer to God and wants others to know that it’s possible to do sun
salutations while following Christ. One owner of a yoga studio said
she’s worried that small local businesses are being hurt. An instructor,
feeling on edge after a shooting at a Florida yoga studio Nov. 2, can’t shake a fear that someone might take the church’s anti-yoga message too far.
They are taking a stand against the sermon’s message, which they say is “ignorant” and divisive, in a time when unity is needed.
“Yoga transcends religion,” said Reggie Harris, who
also said five years of yoga has transformed his life. “Yoga brings
people together in a heart of unity and love. You’re teaching people to
hate something that may help them physically, emotionally, spiritually.”

Sermon: Yoga as ‘paranormal’

Lindell delivered a paranormal-themed sermon the
Sunday  before Halloween. Among other things, he warned congregants
about the spiritual dangers of fortune-telling, Wicca, a form of
paganism, and finally, yoga.
Pastor John Lindell leads a prayer service at James River Assembly in Ozark, MIssouri, in this file photo from 2013. Pastor John Lindell leads a prayer service at James River Assembly in Ozark, MIssouri, in this file photo from 2013. (Photo: File photo)

People might be shocked that the church was comparing yoga to the paranormal, Lindell acknowledged.
“That, to me, is an indication of how far our society
has drifted into a post-Christian culture. Earlier, it would have been a
given that yoga was inherently a form of eastern mysticism that
Christians should absolutely avoid, but that is no longer the case,” he
said during the sermon.
Yoga is everywhere now, he said, pointing to the local YMCA’s class schedule as an example.
First, he addressed yoga poses.
“They were designed, they were created with demonic
intent, to open you up to demonic power because Hinduism is demonic,”
Lindell said.
According to the government of India’s Ministry of External Affairs, yoga does not adhere to any particular religion or belief system.
Lindell said the sun salutation, a common sequence of positions in yoga, is meant to worship Surya, the Hindu sun god.
“To say the positions of yoga are no more than
exercise are tantamount to saying water baptism is just aqua aerobics,”
Lindell said.
Then, he talked about meditation.
During meditation, he said, people clear their minds.
Sometimes they chant a mantra, which can incorporate the names of Hindu
gods, Lindell said.
He said it’s “spiritually dangerous” for people to empty their minds.
“Yoga is diametrically opposed to Christianity,” he
said. “….Christians should stay away from yoga because of its demonic
roots.”
Lindell said he was coming from a place of concern for people’s spiritual well-being.
Stop doing yoga, he told his congregants, and they don’t have to be afraid.
“I can’t say the same if you keep doing it,” Lindell said.

Yogis respond

Attendance was low at Heather Worthy’s yoga class at a Republic, Missouri, gym a week after the sermon.
Worthy said many people at the gym are active members
of James River Church, and she speculated that Lindell’s sermon had an
impact on them.
“It hurt,” she said. “It could have been a coincidence, but it’s interesting.”
She called the sermon “quite ludicrous.”
Stephanie Wubbena owns Live Pure Yoga in Springfield, Missouri, and runs Goats and Yoga out of her Rogersville farm made a rebuttal video to the James River Sermon about yoga and posted it to YouTube on Nov. 1. It’s received more than 530 views as of Monday.
Stephanie Wubbena leads the class during Goats and Yoga on Herding Dogs Farm in Rogersville, Missouir, on May 19, 2018. Stephanie Wubbena leads the class during Goats and Yoga on Herding Dogs Farm in Rogersville, Missouir, on May 19, 2018. (Photo: Andrew Jansen/News-Leader)

In an interview, Wubbena said  her main concern is that the sermon is “going after small businesses.”
“This is our sole source of livelihood,” Wubbena said. “One yoga studio lost over 10 members the Monday after the sermon.”
Wubbena agreed with Lindell on one aspect: that yoga has “pagan origins,” she said.
But so do Christmas and Easter traditions, Wubbena said.
“The blatant hypocrisy was just so overwhelming,” she said.
Harris, who has been practicing yoga for five
years, said yoga has helped with more than just physical ailments.
Emotionally, he said he’s less angry and less insecure.
For the 36-year-old, who grew up “old school Baptist,” yoga has a deep spiritual side as well.
“I know my relationship with the Lord and my relationship with him has gotten deeper through yoga,” Harris said.
Harris said he felt “disappointed, hurt and angry” when he listened to Lindell’s sermon online.
Doing yoga with goats is way more about the goats
than the yoga, and it’s so joyful, you’ll feel the therapeutic benefits
immediately. 10Best Editors, USA TODAY 10Best
Amanda Davis said the pastor’s message is “hate speech,” and it’s frightening after the shooting at a Florida yoga studio.
“It’s really… scary,” said Davis, who is a yoga
instructor. “I don’t really know if somebody is going to walk into the
Y, and shoot us up, or one of the other studios we teach.”
Toward the end of his sermon, Lindell said he hopes people consider his words.
“I don’t do it to make anybody mad. If I made you mad,
that’s unfortunate,” he said. “But I have a responsibility before God
as the shepherd of souls to say I told you the truth.”

To continue reading, click here.

[Editor’s Note: James River Assembly is a
Pentecostal Assembly of God Church that regularly teaches meditative or
contemplative prayer, which is little different than Eastern Mysticism.
We’re glad that, oddly enough, Yoga seems to be a stand that Pastor
Lindell saw to be worth making. It is worth noting that not all agree
with Lindell on Christian Yoga. Andrew Rappaport surprised the
discerning audience at the 2017 Judge Not Conference that his own pastor was on the board for a “Christian Yoga” organization]

______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT YOGA & THE YMCA:
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/search?q=YOGA&max-results=20&by-date=true
https://ratherexposethem.org/2013/02/can-yoga-ever-be-christian-or-if-not.html 
 

SODOMITES MAD BECAUSE PASTOR REBUKES CROSS-DRESSING CHURCH MEMBER IN FRONT OF CONGREGATION

 SEE VIDEO ABOVE
SODOMITES MAD BECAUSE PASTOR REBUKES 
CROSS-DRESSING CHURCH MEMBER 
IN FRONT OF CONGREGATION
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

“When you come in this house, if you a man, dress like a
man … When you come in here, you will not be a drag queen … I’m not
going to allow you to disrespect the house of God” 

[Christian Post] Pastor Antonio Rocquemore of
Power House International Ministries in Chicago, Illinois, is coming
under fire from advocates of the LGBTQ community for publicly rebuking a
male member who came to his church dressed as a woman Sunday night.

In response, Rocquemore said the male member had been repeatedly
warned that he would not be allowed to dress like a female during
worship service.

clip of
Rocquemore’s open rebuke of the church member, who was not identified
in the video, was first highlighted by Christian James Lhuillier, who
insisted that the member should not have been rebuked.

“Some of y’all are going to have to excuse my language but I am tired
of this sh*t. In a place that is supposed to be a place of change, a
place of deliverance, whatever you want to call it why would you destroy
someone in front of a room full of people?” Lhuillier asked.

“This is the kind of bullsh*t that causes people to go home and
commit suicide. Sh*t like this is the reason that the church has no
power in 2018 because they are so worried about the wrong things. I know
drag queens and transsexuals that can pray you out of sickness faster
and some of these preachers that collect your love offerings every
Sunday,” he continued.

“I would have turned that church clean out do you hear me!!!!!!!!!
It’s time for us to stand up for what we believe and stand in our truth
and walk away from these ministries that bash who we are. Too many
illegitimate relationships have been created trying to conform to a mold
you were never meant to fit. I have a great deal of respect for the
house of God. But I wish upon wishes upon wishes that had been me. The
city of Chicago would never forget my name!” Lhuillier ended.
 Continue Reading >>

“GAY CHRISTIAN” SAYS JESUS IS PROMISCUOUS & POLYAMOROUS

 https://www.queertheology.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/sodomy-featured.jpg
 “GAY CHRISTIAN” SAYS JESUS IS PROMISCUOUS 
& POLYAMOROUS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

Warning: The following article contains a description of
extreme blasphemy. It also has offensive language. We only write about
this with fear and trembling, so as to lift it to scorn and contend
against it.

In a video entitled, “Jesus is Polyamorous,” amateur theologian,
Brian G. Murphy – a co-founder of “Queer Theology” who identifies as
polyamorous, gay and Christian – claims that Jesus was polyamorous.

“Jesus is polyamorous. We know this already if we don’t
think about it or put it in those terms. If you’re one of those
Christians who believe in having a personal relationship with Jesus,
well Jesus is having personal relationships with billions of other
people. He’s kind of a relationship slut.”

Let me start my take-down of this rainbow-dyed dung of blasphemy.

First, Murphy conflates “having a personal relationship” with
polyamory. If his definition of polyamory -which consists apparently of
anyone with multiple personal relationships – were true, everyone on the
planet would be polyamorous because we all have relationships with
multiple people. This means I’m in a three-way love triangle with my
wife and post-woman. Worse yet, this means that parents are in a
polyamorous relationship with their children. This is what one will, by
necessity, deduce when conflating romantic or erotic relationships with any and all types
of relationships. And it’s gross. It’s almost as gross as this
boy-band-looking fellow with the homosexual lisp trying to do theology
via Facebook.

No, wait. It’s even grosser.

Jesus’s polyamory…is Biblical, even. In Ephesians 5, Paul
specifically uses the word ‘marriage’ to refer to Jesus’ relationship
with us. Repeatedly, Paul reminds us that Jesus gave himself for us. Us.
The church, which Paul describes as the whole body of believers. In
this marriage, Jesus isn’t married to one person. He’s married to the
entire body of believers. Jesus is in a pan-sexual, polyamorous
relationship with us.

Second, Jesus has one Bride. As Murphy correctly points out (but glosses over), Jesus’ relationship with the whole church is likened to a marriage. The church is one body. The church isn’t a bunch of bodies. Jesus isn’t a polygamist and he’s not a bigamist. The Bible doesn’t speak of Jesus having multiple brides.

Third, while this Olympian-level jump in logic leads Murphy to argue
that Jesus is in a “pan-sexual” relationship, we might stop to ask where
on Earth does the “sexual” part come from in Scripture? Jesus loves
you. But Jesus does not love you like that.

This is the heresy of theoerosism,
which essentially amounts to romantic vibes for Jesus. That’s not the
type of love with which he loves us. He’s not your boyfriend. His love
is not reckless or romantic. In fact, Jesus doesn’t love us “amorously”
and so to argue Jesus is polyamorous, is logic that does not follow.

That’s gay. Jesus isn’t gay.

Then the polyamorous, gay fellow argues an “ergo” that because Jesus is polyamorous, it’s okay for you to be polyamorous.

And so, of course, Christians can be in a polyamorous
relationship; that’s a Biblical model of relationship…are relationship
with God can be a model for our romantic and sexual relationships as
well…

Do you remember how those perverts in Sodom wanted to rape the angels
that came to visit Lot? That’s this guy. Had he been in Sodom, he would
have been beating on the door to rape the sons of God. This guy
basically wants to engage in a “gay sexual” relationship with God
Almighty.


I submit to you that hell was not made for demons any more than for Brian G. Murphy.

You can watch the video below [adults with strong stomachs only, please].
 VIDEO:
 https://www.facebook.com/qtheology/videos/2234834956762783/

LYSA TERKEURST PROMOTES PROSPERITY GOSPEL IN LATEST BOOK

https://www.wordandway.org/images/stories/2018_pix/webRNS-TerKeurst-Book3-110819.jpg
 WITHOUT THE MAKE UP:
 https://i2.wp.com/pulpitandpen.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/lysa-terkeurst.jpg?fit=720%2C719&ssl=1
LYSA TERKEURST PROMOTES PROSPERITY GOSPEL 
IN LATEST BOOK 
BY JODIE JENSEN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

A new book was released this week by Lysa TerKeurst , and I want to
earnestly caution believing friends against running out to get it or
hopping on Amazon to order it. She is an exuberant writer and speaker
and has experienced great triumph over intense difficulties in her life,
but these things alone do not make her a sound Biblical teacher, and
that should be our top priority when we are studying the Word of God.

In her latest book, “It’s Not Supposed to Be This Way”, she states,

“We will be victorious because Jesus is victorious. Victorious people were never meant to settle for normal.”


Referencing 1 Cor 15:57 she says,

“But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.”


Sounds awesome, right? What if your life IS normal? What if God’s
plan for you is to be a postman, accountant, Kindergarten teacher,
orphan, widow, childless spouse, or an amputee?

VV. 54-58 give us a broader, more accurate picture. Paul is speaking
about our *eternal* life. We are not promised victory in our earthly
life. We may have triumphs – for which we should praise and glorify the
Almighty God – but this is not primarily a promise for our mortal lives.
This is called eisegesis – inserting your own personal thoughts, hopes,
and self into Biblical text, rather than proper EXegesis: that is, the drawing out of the truth that God has already established for us.

Countless Christians live with overwhelming discouragement in their
spiritual walk because they are told they should be victorious *now*,
that things would go better for them if they had more faith, that even
if trials come, they will have peace if they simply TRUST GOD. When
leaders put this burden on a believer without proper Biblical teaching,
the weight is often too great and people give up. We don’t have peace
because we muster the strength to trust God. We have peace when we
realize we are lost, wrought with sin, desperately in need of a Savior,
and governed by a sovereign God who works all things for His glory –
which is to be our purpose also.

1 Cor 10:31, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.”
Rom 11:36 says, “For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to Him be glory forever.”
Psalm 73:24-26:
You guide me with your counsel,
and afterward, you will receive me to glory.
Whom have I in heaven but you?
And there is nothing on earth that I desire besides you.
My flesh and my heart may fail,
but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever.

In a PDF entitled “How to Hear God’s Voice”, Lysa declares:

”Every day, God speaks to us. Sometimes He invites us to
draw close and listen as He reveals Himself, His character, and His
direction. Other times He calls us to participate in His purposes. Still
other times He simply whispers to remind us of His amazing love for
us.”

Where, when taken in context, does Scripture say this? Where does
Scripture say we need to be hearing from God as the PDF asserts? (It
doesn’t.)

She goes on to say:

“God will never speak to us or tell us to do something
that is contrary to His Word. But unless we know Scripture, we will not
be able to discern whether what we are hearing is consistent or not with
the Word.”

If this is the case, all we need is the Word. We do not need to be
seeking extra-Biblical revelation because we are then, in fact, ADDING
to scripture, which God says is complete.

Proverbs 30:5–6 cautions us not to add to God’s words:

“Every word of God is flawless; he is a
shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, or he
will rebuke you and prove you a liar.”

Deuteronomy 4:2 (and Deut 12:32) warns us not to add or take away from God’s commands:

“Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you”

We have all of the instruction we need, and do not require more.

2 Pet 1:3,
“His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and
godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory
and excellence”

When we seek personal revelation, we are seeking instruction outside
of God’s Word, and these notions are subjective within our emotions and
circumstances, and therefore not to be trusted. Our words and thoughts
cannot be equated with scripture, and we must, therefore, do away with
this practice of contemplative listening. Just read your Bible, unless
it’s an audio version of the Bible. Listen to that, and you will never
mishear God!

Eph 5:11, “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”
Col 2:8,
“See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty
deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits
of the world, and not according to Christ.”

http://lysaterkeurst.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/How_to_Hear_Gods_Voice.pdf
[Contributed by Jodie Jensen]

THE DANGEROUS DELUSION OF THE NEW DOCTRINE OF DIVERSITY

THE DANGEROUS DELUSION OF THE NEW DOCTRINE OF DIVERSITY 
BY ED DINGESS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 As the world turns, so turns the churches. As the culture trends, so 
trends the churches. And the world is turning, and the culture is 
trending in the direction of diversity. Diversity has been all the rage 
for quite some time in corporate America. It has now weaved its way into
 the churches so that now it has become part of the criteria for some 
churches to fill vacancies in the pastoral staff. This post seeks to 
turn the spotlight on the uncritically accepted premise that “diversity 
is inherently good.” Is diversity a goal or objective to be pursued by 
the churches? Should we purposely aim for ethnic diversity inside the 
walls of our churches? Should the pastoral staff be intentionally 
diverse? These are all good questions even though it seems to me that 
very few people are asking them.

We are living in increasingly dangerous times. While the church has
deliberately downplayed the significance of the Reformation in its
history, American culture has done its best to turn back the clock on
the enlightenment. Contributing to the dismal conditions in the world
more than any other single factor is the academy.
Heather MacDonald wrote on the condition of the academy regarding the
loss of rational justification for our source of authority:

We are cultivating students who lack all
understanding of the principles of the American Founding. The mark of
any civilization is its commitment to reason and discourse. The great
accomplishment of the European Enlightenment was to require all forms of
authority to justify themselves through rational argument, rather than
through coercion or an unadorned appeal to tradition.”[1]

In 2018, human beings who are biological males or females are now
protected in their psychological delusions of self-identifying as the
opposite of their undeniable scientific class. And Heaven help you if
you refuse to go along with this delusion. This is just one example of
the radical and massive shift we are witnessing in American society. I
could go on and on about racism, microaggressions, feminism, etc. You
get the idea. The point here is that science and all reason be can be
ignored, dismissed, or tossed into the incinerator if at any time they
contradict my narcissistic tendencies regardless of how radical they
might be.
As the world turns, so turns the churches. As the culture trends, so
trends the churches. Contributing to the same dismal conditions in the
churches that we see in society is the seminaries and the men they are
producing of late. One example of the church’s mimicking the world is
how she thinks about diversity. Society is all about diversity.
Diversity, in and of itself, is a virtue to be prized. And seemingly, it
is to be prized above all else. But should it be? Should diversity be
an intentional pursuit of the churches? Should diversity play a role in
pastoral searches for example? If we do as the culture has done and
remove any rational justification for an appeal to epistemic authority,
then to what shall we appeal to answer these questions? It seems to me
that the mob now has the authority and the mob isn’t about to give it
back come hell or high water. And that mob, believe it or not, is having
a dramatic impact on the churches both by way of influencing the
seminaries, the pastors, and uncritical Christians which sadly, happens
to be the overwhelming majority these days. Returning to the mob
mentality, my point is that the mob demands that its morality be the
standard and it does so without the slightest compulsion whatever to
provide a rational justification for its demands. The mob snaps its
fingers and a man can become a woman, a woman can become a man, and
murder can become a woman’s right to healthcare. That is how the mob
thinks and it is how the mob behaves. The mob is never to be challenged
for any reason whatsoever. And if you challenge the mob, it stands ready
to club you to death, without mercy, metaphorically speaking at least.
The minority in society isn’t the only group that is intimidated by the
mob mentality. The church is too. Her seminaries are intimidated. Her
pastors are intimidated. Indeed, mob rule has reached a crisis point in
society and unless a strong, opposing voice can rally the rational, I am
afraid that civil society can see the end of its existence from where
we stand today.
The doctrine of diversity is one that ought to be challenged. It
ought to be challenged by any critically thinking godly men. But the
price for such a challenge is high and there are few who are willing to
write that check. In fact, the churches have been caving to the
diversity pressure rapidly over just this past year. Beginning with the
celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr., sponsored by the SBC, to the
#MeToo intimidation that led to the firing of Page Patterson, to the
outright promotion of the idea of the homosexual Christian under
the ruse of Same-Sex Attraction, the churches have wilted under the
pressure of this godless society with its god-hating, man-centered,
narcissistic movements. All that has to happen for the churches to
succumb to the wickedness around us is for the hirelings to possess the
megaphones and for good men to stand by and do nothing. And that is
precisely where we are today. The hireling kingdom builders and
celebrity pastors are in possession of the megaphones, they have the
platform, and the good men, many of them, are too weak-in-the-knees to
write that check in opposition to the strong current of paganism we see
sweeping society. Many good pastors are quiet on these issues and that
is both unfortunate and regrettable. The pastorate is no place for men
who are lacking in courage.
Many of these good men have been deluded into thinking that diversity
in and of itself is a good thing. This idea, they have inherited from
society. If it is the case that we are all sinners, totally depraved,
God-hating at our core, then how could diversity in and of itself be a
good thing? The only good thing in me is not my German or Irish
heritage. Not even for a second. The only good in me is Christ. Now, I
know what you’re thinking. You are thinking that it takes an Irishman to
win an Irishman and an African to win an African and a Chinaman to win a
Chinaman. And it takes an Irish pastor to attract Irish unbelievers or
even Irish Christians, etc. But is hiring an Irish pastor to attract
Irish people to the church a principle or practice that can garner
biblical support? The easy and obvious answer to that question is NO.
Otherwise, Christianity would have forever remained a Jewish religion.
So then, this kind of diversity thinking on the part of the church,
seminaries, and pastors is a departure from, and in fact a contradiction
to biblical principles. For starters, it fosters division in the body
by unwittingly reinforcing an “us vs them” mentality based on things
like ethnicity and even melanin. This thinking is foreign to anything
taught in Scripture. What should we be doing instead? We should be
teaching believers NOT to judge others based on their ethnicity and not
to be loyal to one’s earthly heritage to the point that it affects major
decisions like where we will worship. Think about that. It’s fine to be
proud of one’s heritage, such as being Irish or African as far as it
goes, but it isn’t fine to break off into groups and it certainly isn’t
fine to pick a church or a pastor, based on ethnicity, melanin, or any
other trivial accident in man. The entire idea is absurd and fleshly.
Yet, we have thousands of pastors who inadvertently (in many cases)
encourage just this kind of behavior. And make no mistake about it: this
behavior, this thinking, this way of looking at others is sinful.
A perfect example of this kind of thinking is found in 1 Corinthians 3,
And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but
as to men of flesh, as to infants in Christ. I gave you milk to drink,
not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even
now you are not yet able for you are still fleshly. For since there is
jealousy and strife among you, are you not fleshly, and are you not
walking like mere men? For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another,
“I am of Apollos,” are you not mere men?

To think that things like the unscientific concept of race or the
ethnicity of other people matters in churches is indeed to think like
the world. It is fleshly. It is worldly thinking at its core.
Let’s return to the mob for a moment. Back in 2015, A University of
Missouri student reported having the N-word painted on his door. He
claimed that the administration had allowed these attacks. The board of
overseers convened in emergency session because the black athletes on
the Missouri football team threatened a boycott. The president of the
university, Timothy Wolfe resigned before the meeting with the typical
mea culpa: “I take full responsibility for this frustration.” The
university could have lost as much as a million dollars if it had
forfeited the game which was with BYU. There is no evidence that the
University of Missouri denies equal opportunity for its black students.
Those black students, like every other student on campus, are surrounded
by lavish educational resources, which are available to them for the
asking on a color-blind basis. Nor was there any evidence of the attacks
alleged by the graduate student; he reported none of them to the
university or to the city law enforcement. Yet, despite all this lack of
evidence, Timothy Wolfe had to forego his career and place his family
in a very bad situation just to satisfy the mob.
Today, this same situation has obtained in many of the churches,
mostly SBC churches. Unless you support the racial reconciliation
movement, the #MeToo movement, the SSA movement, then you must be one of
those racist, sexist, homophobes. Or, as some from that mob are saying,
you must be an old white male. The rhetoric of the mob is indeed
outrageous and fantastic, both outside and inside the churches. The
tactics are the same. And those tactics are ungodly and must be called
out for what they are: fleshly, worldly, departing from the principles
taught by Christ himself.
To highlight how the mob tactic is working, I will provide one more
illustration. Recently, I listened to a Christian woman describe an
interaction she had with an Indian man. The man told her that he was
definitely not a Christian in a way that made her wonder what he had
against Christianity. She inquired into why he felt this way about
Christianity. He told her that Christians hate everyone who is not a
Christian. And he tossed out a few groups, homosexuals being at the top
of his list. The lady used this as an example of what is wrong with
Christianity. We are unloving in how we present ourselves and the
gospel. What is wrong with this scenario?
For starters, she thought it was odd that people should hate
Christianity or Christians. The reason that they do so must be because
we are doing something wrong. But she couldn’t have been more mistaken.
Jesus said,
Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and
falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. “Rejoice and be
glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you. —
Matt. 5:11-12
It should come as no surprise to us that the world hates us. To quote Jesus again,
If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but
because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world,
because of this the world hates you. —
John 15:19
The world is going to hate Christians because the world hates Christ
because the world hates God. Why would we think that the world would
love us if in fact we are being transformed into the image of the one
the world hates?
The doctrine of diversity, so embraced by many well-meaning leaders
and by plenty of not-so-well-meaning leaders, is dangerous because it is
a threat to core Christian principles. The most basic of those
principles is that it is the nature of truth to offend the ungodly.
Diversity, at its core, will always seek to mitigate the offense caused
by truth and it usually does so by either ignoring truth or by taking
the stinger out of it altogether. For example, I hear men say that God
doesn’t condemn the homosexual because he is a homosexual but because he
is a sinner like everyone else. Now, on the face it, that is true but
only to a degree. The real question is what are we doing when we engage
in that sort of rhetoric? We are taking the stinger out of that person’s
personal pet rebellious sin against God. Homosexuality to the
homosexual is their idol. Above all else, it is their god. And when you
attack their god directly, you attack their most prized idol above all
their idols. And when you do that, they respond with the mob tactic: you
are hateful, mean, homophobic. And of course, we don’t want to be any
of those things and so, in order to not be attacked by the mob tactic
due to our own lack of courage and willingness to suffer for Christ, we
change the language. This proves we have bought into the world’s idea
and the world’s tactics as legitimate and we have adjusted our thinking
and even our presentation of the gospel accordingly.
Diversity is an idol of our culture. God is truly saving from all
nations and tribes. The kingdom of heaven will be a diverse kingdom. But
that work belongs to God alone. Only God fills his kingdom with those
whom he predestined before the foundation of the world. And if you think
that God’s criteria for election involve diversity, then you have truly
failed to understand grace. There is nothing in man that God
would choose him. So consider this: when you are deliberately targeting
people in your community based on any criteria other than they are a
sinner in need of a Savior, you are operating contrary to the core
principles bound up in the gospel of grace. And that is no small error.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free
man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ
Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants,
heirs according to promise. —
Gal. 3:28-29
[1]MacDonald, Heather. The Diversity Delusion, 17.
[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Ed Dingess, and first published at Reformed Reasons]

BAPTIST CHURCH HOSTS THANKSGIVING MEAL FOR HOMOSEXUALS WHOSE FAMILIES DON’T ACCEPT THEIR SIN

BAPTIST CHURCH HOSTS THANKSGIVING MEAL 
FOR HOMOSEXUALS WHOSE FAMILIES 
DON’T ACCEPT THEIR SIN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
“Pastor” Maurice Blanchard and his “husband”

But now I am writing to you not to associate with
anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual
immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or
swindler—not even to eat with such a one.
1 Corinthians 5:11

The Highland Baptist Church will host a “Soul Supper” on Nov. 15 at 6
p.m. for members of those identifying by the sin of sodomy.

The church claims to hold to “progressive theology” on its website.

“You will find folks from all walks
of life contributing to this church family: retired grandparents,
hard-working twenty-year-olds, parents, tons of kids, LGBTQ friends of
every age, and people with a variety of gifts, abilities, insights, and
opinions. Our progressive theology is hard to miss, but hopefully, you
will also notice how we value the healthy tension that comes from
recognizing our differences.”

The pastor, Maurice Blanchard (who is a homosexual and goes by the
nickname “Bojangles”), claimed that the meal was for those practicing
sodomy who can’t return home because they’re unrepentant. He told the
press, “We provide a safe space for them to come be loved, affirmed, feel safe.

The pastor said, “Some people might be shocked that a Baptist church
would be a welcoming place for the LGBTQ community, but I can tell you
that Highland Baptist and this community have really embraced the LGBTQ
folk.”


Pastor Bojangles was arrested in 2013 for demanding a gay marriage license from his local courthouse, and when denied, hosting a “pray-in” demonstration.

EPISCOPAL CHURCH TO HOST “REQUIEM MASS: A QUEER DIVINE RIGHT”

EPISCOPAL CHURCH TO HOST 
“REQUIEM MASS: A QUEER DIVINE RIGHT” 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
Practicing the “Queer Mass” musical at the Episcopal Cathedral


An Episcopal cathedral is hosting a gay musical composition that
borrows from the Latin Mass. The composer says the work is “a radical
appropriation of a European, patriarchal tradition, the formal Latin
Mass, which we reinterpret through the lens of the marginalized LGBTQ
experience.”


Apparently, appropriation is okay so long as its religious and not cultural.

Holcombe Waller

“Requiem Mass: A Queer Divine Rite” will premiere on Nov. 16 & 17
at Grace Cathedral. The piece is a choral work by composer Holcombe
Waller, and was created to honor those who have suffered persecution due
to their homosexual sin. “Requiem Mass” is presented by Yerba Buena
Center for the Arts in collaboration with Grace Cathedral’s Ghiberti
Foundation.

‘Requiem Mass: A Queer Divine Rite’ is a radical appropriation of a
European, patriarchal tradition, the formal Latin Mass, which we
reinterpret through the lens of the marginalized LGBTQ experience,”
Holcombe Waller told one San Francisco press outlet, the Bay Area Reporter.

He continued, “In many ways, the result is like an alternate universe
in which the millennia of queer leadership in communities of faith have
been out all along, shining their example of loving equity across all
people. This is what the piece seeks to dream into being.”

According to reports, the idea for the Mass-inspired musical
production was due to the Mormon and Catholic support for Proposition 8
in California, which sought to define marriage as between one man and
woman.

Waller said, “At that time, I realized that the queer arts owed it to
organized religion to intervene. It’s so misguided to apply Christian
tenants against equitable social justice. It’s sort of a no-brainer to
offer some ceremonial counterpoint. Music brings people together. It
creates fellowship and shared experience. It disarms, it softens, it
connects with heart. A Requiem calls on our common mortality. These were
all points of inspiration.”

Waller added, “For many who grew up in religious contexts who felt
alienated for their gender expression or sexuality, the piece may feel
cathartic and surprisingly uncanny in how it intersects the familiarity
of High Church with the incredibly queer-affirming love, despite the
fact that it’s right there in all of the most basic Christian ideals.”

Waller himself is not a Christian or religious, but he claims to have
an adequate enough understanding of the Christian Scriptures to pull
out a pro-LGBTQ message from the Sacred Writ.

HILLSONG CHRISTMAS MUSICAL TRAILER DEPICTS JESUS BORN IN A BAR

HILLSONG CHRISTMAS MUSICAL TRAILER 
DEPICTS JESUS BORN IN A BAR 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

Increasingly, Hillsong Church’s Christmas musical productions seem to
break the blasphemy barrier of the year before. In 2015, Hillsong made
international news for a “Sleazy Night” Christmas special,
which was a cabaret and burlesque-type show that incorporated Christmas
hymns. At the time, charismatic apologist, Michael Brown, defended Hillsong from critics, claiming that they meant well  (Brown also defended Hillsong’s Carl Lentz when he made pro-abortion comments and defended Hillsong when they had gay choir directors). Two years later, Hillsong one-upped the Sleazy Night presentation with yet another Christmas sensuality show. Blaspheming God by masquerading flesh-peddling as “worship” is nothing new, with Hillsong famously having a “naked cowboy” appear at a women’s conference in 2016 and then a “naked Santa” later that year.
While there’s still time to see how flesh will be on display at
Hillsong Australia’s Christmas program this year (mark it down; it will
be), Hillsong London’s Christmas program seems to be attempting to break
the barrier of the worst re-telling of the Christmas narrative ever.
The trailer for the Hillsong London’s Christmas program depicts the
“Three Wisemen” hunting down the newborn Christ at the Inn. The Inn, in
the Hillsong depiction, was a place where patrons were swilling mugs of
beer at a bar, while serving wenches danced on tables. As the scene
progresses, Jesus is depicted with Mary and Joseph in the midst of the
bar scene, among much mirth and merriment.
In reality, Jesus was born in the stable – not in the Inn, which had
no vacancy for his expectant mother – and laid in a manger, or feeding
trough (Luke 2:12). The Wisemen, or Magi (a sect of astronomers and seers going back to the prophet, Daniel –Daniel 2:48 ), whose number is unknown, found Jesus at his home sometime during the first year after his birth (Matthew 2:11),
just prior to their midnight flight to Egypt. Inns of the first century
in Jerusalem, by the way, were not bars or brothels resembling Old West
taverns, but informal guest rooms in larger residential houses.

For why Hillsong music is dangerous for your church, click here.

To understand how Hillsong uses music to attract people to the aberrant teachings, read about the Arian Snare, or Snarianism, click here.
_______________________________________________________

 Hillsong Church Exposed
 Hillsong Church is a denomination which has chapters throughout the
world. Hillsong Church, United, Young and Free and Worship contain false
theology, teachings and doctrines. All of these topics are analyzed in
this video
 

COUNTY SHERIFF TAKES OATH SERIOUSLY, VOWS ZERO ENFORCEMENT OF NEWLY PASSED GUN CONTROLS

 Image result for oathkeeper orders we will not obey

 COUNTY SHERIFF TAKES OATH SERIOUSLY, VOWS ZERO ENFORCEMENT OF NEWLY PASSED 

GUN CONTROLS 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 Police Chief Loren Culp of Republic, Washington, says 
the gun controls in the newly passed Initiative 1639 
will not be enforced in his county.

On September 25, 2018, Breitbart News reported that
I-1639 would put in place enhanced background checks for the purchase
of semiautomatic rifles, would place a ten-day wait on completion of a
semiautomatic rifle sale, and would require purchasers to pass a gun
safety course. The initiative also contained new gun storage laws for
every type of firearm, including penalties for gun owners whose guns
were stolen and used in crimes, among other things.
Chief Culp reacted to the passage of I-1639 by reminding Republic
residents that the Second Amendment will reign supreme under his
leadership:

Republic Police WA
I’ve talked with quite a few concerned citizens today so let me clear something up.
I’ve taken 3 public oaths, one in the US
Army and Two as a police officer. All of them included upholding and
defending the Constitution of the United States of America.
The second amendment says the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
As long as I am Chief of Police, no
Republic Police Officer will infringe on a citizens right to keep and
Bear Arms, PERIOD! – Chief Culp
 In an interview with KXLY, Culp added,
“We took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the United
States and the constitution of the State of Washington, and [I-1639]
completely flies in the face of both the U.S. and state constitution.”

Culp said he believes I-1639 will “eventually … be overturned in the
courts.” Until then, he made clear, the controls of the initiative will
not be enforced in Republic, Washington.

U.S. CLOSES PORTS OF ENTRY AMID REPORTS CARAVAN PREPARING TO RUSH BORDER

 U.S. Closes Ports of Entry Amid Reports Caravan Preparing To Rush Border
U.S. CLOSES PORTS OF ENTRY AMID REPORTS CARAVAN PREPARING TO RUSH BORDER 
 Migrants determined to flout American sovereignty
BY JAMIE WHITE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

The U.S. has temporarily closed several ports of entry with
Mexico after officials received reports that the migrant caravan of
3,000 is preparing to bum-rush the border, DHS Secretary Kirstjen
Nielsen announced Monday.

“This AM, all of #SanYsidro
Port of Entry’s northbound lanes were temporarily closed to initiate
additional port hardening efforts after @CBP officials were notified
that a large # of caravan migrants were planning to rush the border in
an attempt to gain illegal access to the US,” Nielsen tweeted.

This AM, all of Port of Entry’s northbound lanes were temporarily closed to initiate additional port hardening efforts after @CBP officials were notified that a large # of caravan migrants were planning to rush the border in an attempt to gain illegal access to the US.

In response, Customs and Border Protection issued a statement,
saying they blocked several port-of-entry lanes and reinforced their
numbers to head off the invasion, in conjunction with the Department of
Defense.

“In the early morning hours, CBP officials received reports of
groups of persons from the caravan gathering in the city of Tijuana for a
possible attempt or attempts to rush illegally through the port of
entry instead of presenting themselves as required to a CBP officer.”

“CBP officials suspended operations to safely place impediments
at the port of entry that would restrict access to a large group
attempting to run through the border crossing. After the CBP response at
San Ysidro, no activity materialized at the border crossing,” the
statement read.
 

.@CBP and @DeptofDefense appropriately responded by blocking the lanes, deploying additional personnel and seeking assistance from other law enforcement and federal assets. has reopened lanes for legitimate trade and travel. I want to thank them for their swift actions.

San Ysidro is known as the border’s busiest crossing, with over 100,000 people entering the U.S. daily.

About 10 lanes were reopened several hours after the closure.

Nielsen reminded the caravan that entering the U.S. by force is illegal and won’t be tolerated.

“Unfortunately, some members of the caravan are purposely causing
disruptions at our border ports of entry. There is a legal and illegal
way to enter the US. We have deployed additional forces to protect our
border. We will enforce all our laws.”

Unfortunately, some members of the caravan are purposely causing disruptions at our border ports of entry. There is a legal and illegal way to enter the US. We have deployed additional forces to protect our border. We will enforce all our laws.

Video has emerged of residents of Tijuana, Mexico, clashing with members of the caravan over the weekend, saying President Trump was right to call it an “invasion.”

Trump tweeted an updated picture of the reinforced border, saying that the Fake News has been “showing old footage.”

“The Fake News is showing old footage of people climbing over our
Ocean Area Fence. This is what it really looks like – no climbers
anymore under our Administration!”

 

The Fake News is showing old footage of people climbing over our Ocean Area Fence. This is what it really looks like – no climbers anymore under our Administration!

US HOUSE DROPS 181 YEAR OLD RULE AGAINST HEADCOVERINGS TO APPEASE NEWLY ELECTED HIJABBED MUSLIM

US HOUSE DROPS 181 YEAR OLD RULE 
AGAINST HEADCOVERINGS TO APPEASE 
NEWLY ELECTED HIJABBED MUSLIM 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
There have been Orthodox
Jewish men who have served in the House, and this rule was never changed
for them. But the principle must always be maintained: wherever Islamic
law and custom and American law and custom conflict, American law and
custom must give way.

“US House Reverses 181-Year-Old-Rule To Appease Newly Elected Muslim,” by Cillian Zeal, Western Journal, November 17, 2018:

For 181 years, you haven’t been able to wear head
coverings on the floor of the House of Representatives. Now, however,
after the election of the first hijab-wearing Muslim representative,
that’s about to be changed.

According to the New York Post,
the election of Minnesota’s Ilhan Omar will put an end to a rule that
was originally meant to differentiate Congress from British Parliament.

Parlimentarians had a tradition of wearing hats on the floor of
Westminster. Given that we took up coffee as our national beverage (and
even threw that dastardly tea over the sides of some ships in Boston
Harbor) to let the British know how we felt about their institutions,
banning hats only seemed to come naturally.

However, in the age of Ilhan Omar, that’s changing.

“There are those kinds of policies that oftentimes get created
because people who have blind spots are in positions of influence and
positions of power,” Omar said Thursday.

“I think it will be really exciting to see the stuff that we notice within the rules that don’t work for a modern-day America.”…

There have been numerous changes to dress code in Congress over the
years; women were forbidden to wear pants on the floor until 1993, and bare arms were first allowed under Paul Ryan’s speakership.

So, the times they do a-change when it comes to congressional styles.
However, the aforementioned rules were based around gender biases and
the norms of the era; there wasn’t any real or symbolic reasoning behind
them. In this case, it isn’t quite that simple.

As the House’s website
notes, proposals to ban head coverings dated back to 1822. In 1833,
future president James K. Polk proposed that the House “provide that the
members should sit in the House uncovered, unless under special leave
of the Speaker.”

Others pointed out “the symbolic value of the tradition, noting that
members of the British House of Commons wore hats during debate to
symbolize that body’s independence from the King of England.”

Of course, the case could be made that a religious argument against it could have existed since 1845, when Lewis Charles Levin became the first Jewish man elected to Congress.

Granted, Levin is probably best remembered as a vicious
anti-Catholic, anti-foreigner zealot, but the point still holds that for
173 of the 181 years that the head-covering ban has existed, there’s
likely been a compelling reason to abandon it for Jewish men who wish to
wear the kippah. Yet, we’ve seen no movement on the matter until now.

Should the tradition be amended? It’s interesting that the only representative who plans to take advantage of this new rule is Representative-elect Omar; even Watson Coleman says she’s not going to be taking advantage of it.

While we appreciate the fact that the hijab is part of Omar’s
religious dress, we also appreciate that head coverings have likely been
the part of other representatives’ religious dress, and they also
haven’t been able to wear them on the floor, either. This wasn’t just
some “blind spot” but part of congressional heritage….

SARAH SILVERMAN’S TV SHOW MOCKS JESUS CHRIST AS “PANSEXUAL”

 Sarah Silverman blasphemy mockery of Christianity | End time Christian persecution
 WARNING OFFENSIVE & INAPPROPRIATE FOR CHILDREN & THE IMMATURE
 SARAH SILVERMAN’S TV SHOW MOCKS 
JESUS CHRIST AS “PANSEXUAL” 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
Sarah Silverman has repeatedly mocked the name of God – now depicting Jesus as “pansexual.”

In
just the latest of attacks on The Lord Jesus Christ and the Christian
faith, comedian Sarah Silverman used a skit from her newest TV show to
portray Jesus Christ as a profanity spewing pansexual seeking to ban
crucifixions. Silverman who has spent much of her career mocking,
attacking and ridiculing Christianity not only demonstrated the current
state of TV when it comes to its treatment of the Christian faith but
also how far society is falling from any fear of God at all.

According to reports:

“Comedian
Sarah Silverman, who has made a career out of mocking religion, took
her crass humor to another level last week with an Election Day skit
involving a cursing “Jesus” who is promiscuous.

The skit, which
appeared on Hulu’s I Love You America, shows Silverman in a line on
Election Day when she spots “Jesus” (played by Fred Armisen) at the
front and calls out his name. Newsbusters first reported about the
controversy.
“Sarah, my child, how are you?” she asks.
“I’m great, how are you?” he responds.
The
discussion quickly devolves into a discussion of his genitalia – which
he happily talks about – before the conversion turns to politics.
“I don’t want to say who I’m voting for,” he says.
Silverman asks him which issues are most important to him.
“I just want a law that says you can’t force your kid to die publicly by bleeding to death on a cross,” he says.
The discussion then turns back to sex, with Silverman saying she wished he wasn’t celibate.
“I’m essentially pansexual,” he says, before adding that he had “sex” with an oak tree recently.
When Silverman lets an f-bomb slip, he curses, too, saying, “I curse all the time. F— f— f—. D–. P–. H–, B—-. S—.” (source).

Sarah Silverman’s History of Blasphemy

Sarah Silverman I love America Blasphemy | Antichristian TV shows and movies

Silverman makes many comments with the intent to anger and “trigger” Christians.

Silverman has devoted much of her comedic efforts ridiculing Christianity. Here is just a portion:

Webster’s 1828 dictionary (based on the English of the King James Bible) defines blasphemy as:

“An
indignity offered to God by words or writing; reproachful, contemptuous
or irreverent words uttered impiously against Jehovah.
Blasphemy
is an injury offered to God, by denying that which is due and belonging
to him, or attributing to him that which is not agreeable to his
nature.” (source).

The
Bible warns: “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain;
for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.”
(Exodus 20:7). Denigrating the Name of God is a serious offense in the Bible:

“Be
not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that
shall he also reap.  For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh
reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit
reap life everlasting.” – Galatians 6:7-8

And
yet, Silverman has relentlessly attacked God in her comedy skits and
shows. Why? The Bible is clear that the farther someone moves from God,
the more their anger and animosity towards The Lord grows:

“For
they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they
that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.  For to be carnally
minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to
the law of God, neither indeed can be.” – Romans 8:5-7.

All
people are born with a corrupted, sinful nature as a result of the
first sin in the Garden of Eden. And thus, we are “carnally minded”
focused on satisfying the sinful desires of our hearts that we all have.
But in addition to wanting to sin – the carnal mind is at “enmity” or
at war, with God. So, the problem for an unbeliever like Silverman is
not that she does not believe in God – but that she hates God. Hence her
spending so much time attacking, mocking and challenging a God she
claims does not exist and a faith she says is “magic.”

An Outspoken Support of Murder In The Womb

Bible verses on blasphemy | Is Sarah Silverman Jewish?

A “joke” made by Silverman during her “Jesus Is Magic” comedy show.

To
no surprise, much of Silverman’s public anger towards Christianity
centers around abortion.
She is an ardent supporter of Planned
Parenthood – the abortion corporation Beginning And End has repeatedly detailed for its racist history, encouraging minors to have abortions and having workers on video encouraging the cover up of statutory rape.
At a pro-abortion telethon Silverman berated laws that seek to prevent
corporations from using the body parts of aborted children for
commercial use. In response the comedian said: “If anything has ever
made me want to eat an aborted fetus, it’s this law.” (source).
In
response to laws that seek to provide funerals for babies killed in the
womb she stated: “F— funerals for f—aborted fetuses? I would like to
speak at those funerals. He lived the way he died. He died the way he
lived. The size of a sesame seed with no discerning brain function.” (source).
She’s also tweeted her support of abortions on a regular basis:

Sarah Silver man Illuminati Satanic Entertainment | Hollywood blasphemy of Jesus Christ and the Bible

Silverman
pretending to be pregnant with “before and after” photos of an abortion
with her then boyfriend, Alec Sulkin, a writer for the Family Guy cartoon which also has mocked The Lord Jesus Christ.

God says of those who come to belief and faith in Him and the mindset of those who willfully reject and deny Him:

“For
whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the Lord.
 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that
hate me love death.” – Proverbs 8:35-36

Notice
the verse above does not say “all they that do not believe in me…” but
rather rightly identifies the many people who hate God. And along with
that becomes a love of death. The pro-abortion movement has continually
linked attacking Christianity with their political movement – one stark
example being when a group of pro-abortion activists shouted, “Hail
Satan!” during a rally at the Texas Capitol building.

Pray For Sarah Silverman

Without
a doubt, some reading this article will be incredibly angered at the
brazen disrespect and blasphemy carried out by Sarah Silverman for over a
decade. And that anger stems from a love for God and the defense of the
Christian faith. But remember that the Bible says: “Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: Neither give place to the devil.” (Ephesians 4:26-27).
The Lord Jesus Christ commands believers to pray for those who
persecute Christians. Pray for Sarah Silverman and the many entertainers
who use their platform to blaspheme the name of God. And pray for
society to move away from viewing blasphemy as entertainment.
Silverman
is a lost soul whose heart has been seared from years of rebellion and
enmity at God. But that does not change the fact that the same Jesus
Christ she disrespected gave His life for her, just as He did for the
soldiers who mocked and attacked Him as He walked to the cross. God
loves her just as He does all the lost souls in the world today. Pray
she repents and receives the free forgiveness that can be found through faith in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross, taking her punishment so she could be forgiven.
If you are a Christian tune out blasphemous entertainment. And if you
are not a Christian, understand that Jesus Christ predicted this would
take place as the end times approached. And He gave a stern warning
about how we speak to Him:

“A good man out of the good
treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out
of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.  But I say unto you,
That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account
thereof in the day of judgment.  For by thy words thou shalt be
justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.” – Matthew 12:35-37

Lord willing Sarah Silverman will repent of her words before the day she stands face to face with the real Jesus Christ.

TRUMP VOWS TO KICK CNN’S ACOSTA OUT AGAIN

TRUMP VOWS TO KICK CNN’S ACOSTA OUT AGAIN  
The president responds to activist judge’s ruling to restore Acosta’s “hard pass” 
BY MATTHEW VADUM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
 
President Trump took CNN’s improbable court victory temporarily
restoring CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta’s “hard pass” media
credential for the executive mansion in stride, vowing to kick Acosta
out again in the future if he breaches White House protocol again.
The yanking of the physical credential, by the way, isn’t exactly a
grave hardship. It just means Acosta would need to make an appointment
through the White House press office every time he wanted to visit the
White House grounds, just as the rest of the non-hard pass-holding
journalists who don’t work for big media outlets like CNN have to do.
Lacking a hard pass does not prevent anyone from reporting on the White
House.
Speaking to Chris Wallace of Fox News Channel in an interview that aired Sunday, Trump had some new ideas on how to deal with Acosta, who picks fights with him during pressers.
“I think one of the things we’ll do is maybe turn the camera off that
faces them, because then they don’t have any air time, although I’ll
probably be sued for that and maybe, you know, win or lose it, who
knows,” Trump said. “I mean, with this stuff you never know what’s going
to happen.”
The president described Acosta as “unbelievably
rude to [White House Press Secretary] Sarah Huckabee, who’s a wonderful
woman,” and said his administration is drawing up “rules and
regulations” for White House reporters. “And if he misbehaves, we’ll
throw him out or we’ll stop the news conference,” Trump said.
Acosta’s hard pass was pulled
after a contentious Nov. 7 press conference at the White House. After
interacting with President Trump – Acosta said he wanted to “challenge”
him on calling the Central American caravans an “invasion” – the
president called upon another reporter to speak. After lecturing Trump,
Acosta belligerently refused to yield the microphone to a White House
staffer and pushed her arm away as she reached for the device, all of
which was captured on video.
On Nov. 16, U.S. District Judge
Timothy J. Kelly of Washington, D.C., who was appointed by Trump, ruled
against the administration and ordered Acosta’s hard pass restored for
14 days, pending further hearings in the lawsuit. But it was not a
vindication of Acosta’s free speech rights under the First Amendment.
The judge specifically said that the First Amendment claim made by
Acosta and CNN had not yet been adjudicated and added that the president
was free not to call on Acosta at future press conferences.
The temporary restraining order was nowhere to be found online at press
time, but according to media reports, Kelly found that the
administration violated Acosta’s due process rights under the Fifth
Amendment to the Constitution. The White House vowed to remedy the
situation by drawing up rules governing press conferences.
The
U.S. Department of Justice said the court ruling was disappointing.
“The President has broad authority to regulate access to the White
House, including to ensure fair and orderly White House events and press
conferences. We look forward to continuing to defend the White House’s
lawful actions.”
Acosta ignorantly blathered on to reporters when he returned to the White House Friday after the court ruling, incorrectly claiming he won a great First Amendment victory.
“I’m very grateful for what happened today,” Acosta said. “I’m
grateful for my colleagues in the press who stood by us through all of
this.”
“This was a test and I think we passed the test,” he said.
“Journalists need to know that in this country their First Amendment
rights of freedom of the press are sacred, they’re protected in our
Constitution,” Acosta said. “Throughout all of this I was confident and I
thought that this would be the result at the end of the day that our
rights would be protected as we continue to cover our government and
hold our leaders accountable.”
The court case isn’t over yet. The legal antagonists have to report to the court Monday afternoon.
The court ordered the parties to “file a joint status report proposing
how they would like to proceed in this case by 3:00 p.m. on November
19, 2018[,]” according to its online docket.
According to CNN,
“White House officials sent Acosta a letter stating that his pass is
set to be suspended again once the restraining order expires.”

From the looks of the letter, the W.H. is trying to establish a paper
trail that will empower the administration to boot Acosta again at the
end of the month.
CNN responded with this statement on
Sunday: “The White House is continuing to violate the First and 5th
Amendments of the Constitution. These actions threaten all journalists
and news organizations. Jim Acosta and CNN will continue to report the
news about the White House and the President.”

The Acosta-CNN lawsuit was filed by Ted Boutrous and Trump-hating
Republican lawyer Ted Olson, of the law firm Gibson, Dunn, and Crutcher.
Olson was solicitor general in President George W. Bush’s
administration. (The legal complaint may be viewed here.)
Boutrous said CNN is prepared to dig in for a protracted legal fight if it needs to.
“We’re ready to litigate as long as we have to, to protect these First
Amendment rights, to ask the court to declare rules of the road going
forward,” he said.
____________________________________________________________

 Petition to Give Alex Jones WH Press Credentials; 
Seat Him Next to Jim Acosta!!!
 Here’s why the petition to give Alex Jones full White House press
credentials and seat him next to CNN’s Jim Acosta is both realistic and
brilliant!
 

MIKE HUCKABEE AT HOROWITZ’S RESTORATION WEEKEND: THE CASE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP

MIKE HUCKABEE AT HOROWITZ’S RESTORATION WEEKEND: THE CASE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 Editor's note: Below are the video and transcript of remarks
 given by Mike Huckabee at the David Horowitz Freedom Center's 
2018 Restoration Weekend. The event was held Nov. 15th-18th at the 
Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach, Florida.
 

Mike Huckabee from DHFC on Vimeo.

Transcript:

Thank you.  Well, thank
you very much.  It is a delight to be with you.  You don’t have to worry
about me going over the time today, because I’ve got to catch a flight
out of here, get to D.C. to guest host the Sean Hannity show, because
the FBI’s looking for him and I need to go in and fill in.  Of course,
the bad news is, they’re looking for me too.  So, please don’t tell them
I’m going in to D.C.  There’s a lot of those guys up there.  Andrew,
don’t tell them.  I know you’ve got a lot of contacts in there.  It is a
delight to be with you, and I want to say thanks also for the
introduction, because he actually mentioned some biographical things
about me, which are unimportant, but these days I don’t get that
anymore.  I used to.  You know, he was governor this time.  He did
this.  He did that.  Now, most of the introductions I get are, “Ladies
and gentlemen, Sarah’s dad”, and that’s it.  That’s the whole thing.

And, as you can see, the mere mention of her name gets four times the
applause I got for showing up.  But people ask me all the time, where
does she get that toughness, and sometimes I’ll say, “Have you ever met
her mother?”  Never say that when Janet is around.  But there is an
honest explanation for it, and it’s pretty simple.  She had two older
brothers who were unbelievably mean to her.  Really.  They once
super-glued her fingers together.  That was a trip to the emergency room
late one night.  They once gave her a big glass of mud and told her it
was a chocolate milkshake, and so, when you see what the press is doing
to her, she’s used to it, and, in fact, if anything, it made her tough,
and she, even to this day, she will say, “I’m so glad my brothers were
as mean to me as they were, because it made me learn how to fight”, and
she does, and I love how she does it.
By the way, I may have
said this when I was here 2 years ago, but I want to just make it real
clear.  Donald Trump was not my first choice for president.  I was my
first choice for president, just to get that out of the way.  But the
good news is we did get a Huckabee in the White House.  It just wasn’t
the one that I thought it was going to be, but I think she’s doing a
great job for the President.  She takes nothing off those guys.  Now, I
know many of you have been in the meeting.  You may not have heard it,
and this is not a punchline.  This actually happened, but the federal
judge ruled just about an hour and a half or 2 hours ago that Jim Acosta
from CNN is going to get his hard pass back to the White House.  Yeah. 
I was just as excited as you are.  The good news is, the judge did not
rule it on First Amendment grounds, because that would’ve been
ludicrous.  There is no First Amendment case.  Jim Acosta and CNN, his
failing network, is free to say anything they want, and he is not
inhibited by the government to report.  If he were, he would’ve shut up a
long time ago.  But it was on Fifth Amendment grounds saying that there
was not a process in place to deny his hard pass.
What I
hope happens is an energy saving measure by the White House will be
announced soon.  They will permanently turn off the lights in the press
briefing room, and it will stay dark until they decide they’re going to
behave like adults and not go in there like a bunch of wild people.  And
I did wonder to myself, I wonder what would happen if Jim Acosta went
into the federal courtroom and pulled a stunt to the federal judge like
he did to the elected President of the United States.  If had gone into
the federal courthouse and said, “I challenge you, judge,” and then when
the judge said, “You’re going to need to sit down, sir,” he wouldn’t do
it, and twice more he was asked to sit down and he didn’t do it, and
finally the bailiff comes over to get the microphone and Acosta pushes
his arm away, and basically all but eats the microphone so nobody else
can have it, I wonder if that had happened in a federal courtroom if the
judge who was so understanding of Acosta’s being the southbound end of a
north mule, I wonder if the federal judge would have been as
understanding and as accommodating as he was when Acosta acted that way
toward the President of the United States in the White House.  My guess
is no, and thus sort of forms the frame of what I would share with you
today.
I don’t have to tell you we’re living in divisive and
combative times, but I also would be the first to say that one of the
reasons that I think that many people, even some never Trumpers, and
there were a lot of them out there, have come around to the President is
because despite whatever you think about him on a personal level, he
does fight back, and we are in a time where we have to.  As I said,
Donald Trump was not my first choice, but to the surprise of a lot of
people, he was my second choice for President.  He really was, and when I
left the race, which I had to do because of illness, people were sick
of me and I had to get out, but when I left the race, I endorsed Donald
Trump, and again there were a lot of people who were shocked by that,
and they said, “Why?”  You know?  You would think that I would have
endorsed one of the other evangelicals or someone else, maybe with a
kinder manner about them, and I said, “Look, here’s part of it.  He’s
the only person that I feel like on that stage that is not already
obligated to the donor class, because he’s financed his on primary. 
When he becomes President, there aren’t a thousand donors, all of whom
have their hooks in him and will begin to really direct him more than he
will be able to direct the policies of the country.”  And I said,
“That’s part of it.”  The second is because I felt like that of all the
people on the stage, including President Trump, no one knew Hillary
better than me, but because I did know her as well as I did and do, I
was convinced that there was no other person other than Donald Trump who
would be able to take her on in the matter in which was going to be
necessary to win.
Now, little did I know that she would not
show up for many of the states in the election and decide that she
didn’t really need to campaign that hard, because she had it in the bag,
and she was busy signing checks to get her fireworks show all set for
election night, but that being said, I think what we saw in this
President was that unlike so many of us kind and gentle Republicans, who
in our own congenial way end up getting our heads handed to us because
we think we’re all playing to the same rules and we find out the other
side is not, President Trump, if hit, will hit back ten times harder,
and sometimes people don’t like that, but here’s what I’ve discovered
standing up on the debate stage with him.  People would say, “How come
you never challenged him?”  I said, “Well, there’s two reasons.  First
of all, I didn’t get up there and argue with any of the other
Republicans for a simple reason.  One of us was going to win, and
whoever won needed the support of the others, and I did not want to have
to claim that these guys that I had said horrible things about now were
great guys.”  I said, “Then that’s disingenuous, so you have to battle
that.”  And I said, “The other reason was these guys aren’t my enemies. 
They’re my political opponents for the primary, but any one of us on
that stage would have been infinitely better every day of the week and
twice on Sunday than having Hillary in the White House would have
been.”  And that’s why.
When I look at the judicial
appointments alone that the President has made, two on the Supreme Court
and dozens in the federal judicial system, if for no other reason, and
add to that the relocation of the embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv,
which I thought was a gutsy and wonderful move, and throw in the tax
cuts and throw in the deregulation that has resulted in the doubling of
the GDP growth and a significant increase of people having a better
paycheck than they’ve had in many years, and the fact that we have more
African-American and Hispanics employed and in better jobs than have
been for African-Americans ever in history, for Hispanics the best
probably ever, and for women in 30 years and the list could go on, throw
those things in there and I can tolerate come 5:00 a.m. tweets that
sometimes are cringe-worthy, okay?  And if that’s the worst thing I can
say about him, I’d rather have a President who occasionally will either
say or tweet something that is not the way I would say it, but he’s
getting the job done that we sent him there to do.  And this is why I
think many of us continue to support this President.
I’ve had
friends of mine who will try to argue with me about support for the
President.  Here’s how I respond.  Suppose you have been diagnosed with a
very serious disease that is going to require surgery that could, in
fact, take your life, and there’s two doctors that you must choose from
to do the surgery, and one of the doctors comes in and he’s the kindest
guy in the world.  He comes and sits on the edge of the bed.  He hugs
your wife.  He sheds a tear as he describes how serious this is.  He
answers all the questions that every family member has, and he’s
gentle.  He’s kind and he’s just the most thoughtful guy, and before he
leaves he hugs you and hugs everybody else.  The other guy comes in.  He
throws everybody out of the room.  He says, “I ain’t got time to answer
a lot of questions.  Look, I’m just here to tell you how this goes
down,” and he’s gruff.  He’s rude.  He’s caustic.  He insults your wife,
and he has the bedside manner of a porcupine, but he’s done that
surgery 1,200 times, and 1,100 of his patients have survived.  The other
guy has done it 9 times, and 8 of them died.  You tell me who you’d
pick to be your surgeon, and that’s how I look at President Trump in the
White House.  His bedside manner may leave something to be desired from
time to time, but I sure do like the results, because folks, I want to
keep our country.  It’s as simple as that.  I want to keep the United
States of America as the great republic that we have inherited.

A week ago, I had on my television show that I host every weekend on
the Trinity Broadcasting Network a 95-year-old World War II
Congressional Medal of Honor recipient.  I still, I just am in awe of
some of these guys that handed me my freedom.  I’m overwhelmed by what
they did.  When I read the stories of the Medal of Honor recipients, but
for that matter, even if a guy served back in the States or anywhere, I
realize I am the beneficiary of the most amazing sacrifices in the
history of humankind, people who did it not because there was a gun to
the back of their head if they didn’t move forward, not because they
were slave labor, but because they chose to serve this country and to
keep the battle for our freedom somewhere else other than in the streets
where we live, and thank God for them.
But I fear if we don’t
see the willingness to fight back against the so-called resistance, and
I wonder what is it they’re resisting?  Are they resisting liberty? 
Are they resisting freedom of speech?  Are they resisting property
ownership?  And the answer is, yes.  They’re resisting all of those
things.  The whole notion of changing our great Constitutional Republic,
a nation of law where we elect our public officials, and if the person
we voted for didn’t succeed, we suck it up and say we’ll do better next
time.  We don’t try to delegitimize every election we lose, whether by
arguing that it really shouldn’t have happened or we didn’t get the
popular vote or just being, I guess, here in Palm Beach County, or next
door in Broward County, and just keep counting votes until we come up
with enough, even if we have to dig them out of a trunk of a car or a
warehouse somewhere.
Folks, this is a dangerous place for
America to be.  The single greatest threat to us in my view is that we
don’t respect the results of our elections.  That, singularly, threatens
our republic, and for 2 years we’ve heard about Russian interference. 
We’ve got to stop these Russians from interfering, and I don’t want the
Russians interfering any more than I want us interfering, as we did
under Barack Obama with the election of Bebe Netanyahu in Israel, when
we spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars trying to defeat him
under the Obama administration.  I don’t remember the same level of
anger and angst over the U.S. Government involving themselves in that
election, but the Russians have not proven not to have turned one vote
in the 2016 elections.
But what I do worry about is that U.S.
election officials and U.S. political figures trying to change the
results of an election, either by ignoring the fundamental law of which
our elections are held by going through some of their process by which
they can overturn the election by finding new balance, claiming that the
whole point is to know the intent of the voter.  Look, if a voter is
not competent enough to mark the ballot correctly, the intent of the
voter is to be stupid, and I think at that point you throw the ballot
out, and you say when you learn how to vote like a big boy, or a big
girl, then you bring your ballot in, but if you mark it so that you mark
everybody on it, you don’t get to after the election come in and say,
“You know, I think I intended to vote for this guy.”  It shouldn’t be
that hard.
I want to preserve this country, because like so
many of you in this room, this country has been good to me, better to me
than I ever could have imagined, and I owe it more than just being a
participant occasionally and a deserver for the most part.  I know where
I come from.  I grew up dirt poor in a little insignificant town in
south Arkansas that you would never heard of had Bill Clinton not run
for President.  Yes, I to believe in a place called Hope.  So, but I
actually grew up there.  Clinton was born there.  He moved when he was
5, but you have to understand, he moved to another town in Arkansas
where he really grew up, but it would not have sounded as good in the
’92 campaign, particularly given his reputation, if he had made his
speech and said, “I believe in a place called Hot Springs, huh.”  So, as
a result, people knew where Hope was suddenly, but nobody did when I
was growing up.
But, I come from a family that were not
significant, major people in the community that everyone wanted to talk
to.  My mother and dad both grew up in the depression.  I feel like I
did, because I heard those stories so many times, I thought, my gosh. 
Some of you heard them too, walking to school uphill both ways, carrying
their homemade lunch in a bucket, walking through snow, even though it
never snowed in south Arkansas.  I mean, I heard all these stories and I
though, oh, my gosh, but then I got older and found out they were
really, a lot of them, true.  My mother grew up in a house that didn’t
have a floor.  It was just dirt.  Dirt.  It had a roof, no floor. 
Dirt.  No electricity, no running water, just a shelter.  She was the
oldest of seven and had to work from the time she was a young teenager
just to help keep food on the table for her six brothers and sisters.

My dad grew up in a time when he also had to work to help the
family have food.  These weren’t people who were working to get a
Ferrari.  These were folks who were working just to survive.  My dad
never finished high school, and his father had never finished high
school, and his father before him hadn’t, and on and on it goes.  In
fact, I am the first male in my entire family lineage to have ever
graduated high school, much less gone to college.  So, when people want
to talk about the America dream, I’ve lived it.  At the age of 8, I
remember my dad said to me, “Son, I’m gonna take you down to this new
lake that the State’s built, and the governor’s gonna come down here and
make a dedication, and he’ll make a talk, and I’m gonna take you down
there to hear the governor make his talk, ’cause son, you may live your
whole life and you may never see a governor in person.
I still
vividly remember going down at 8 years old and seeing the then Governor
of Arkansas come and make that talk, and I got to shake his hand and my
dad said, “Now, son, you cherish this, because that’s probably the only
time you’re ever gonna see a governor.”  You would never have been able
to convince my father that one day his son would spend more time living
in the Governor’s mansion than any house that I’ve lived in so far in
my life.  I don’t think he would have believed that.  But, like so many
people who built this country, he didn’t ask the country to do a lot for
him.  He never accepted a penny of relief or welfare.  He worked two
jobs.  He was a fireman, and he worked 24 hours on 24 off, and on the
24 hours that he was not at the fire station, he was a mechanic and
working on cars in a shop standing on his feet on a concrete floor and
lifting heavy things and getting his hands dirty.  And I’ve told people,
“Look, my father, that’s all he knew.  Hard, hard work.”
And
I’ll bet some of you had fathers like mine who worked with his hands and
got his hands dirty and never could scrub them completely clean, and
I’ve watched him scrub them, so I knew he tried, but there was always
the residue of his work that never could get out of his hands, and I’m
going to tell you something.  I grew up, and the only soap we had in my
house when I was a kid was Lava soap.  Many of you in this room do not
understand what that means, but let me try to describe it.  Here’s the
deal.  I was in college before I learned it isn’t supposed to hurt when
you take a shower.  What a revelation that was.  And we’re at this
marvelous hotel at The Breakers in Palm Beach, and my guess is that some
of the ladies who are here will spend some time at the spa, and they
may even spend a couple of hundred bucks and have an exfoliation.  A bar
of Lava will do the exact same thing.  But to the husbands here, let me
recommend, do not next Valentine’s present your wife with a bar of Lava
soap and say, “Here, honey.  Go exfoliate yourself,” ’cause skin’s
comin’ off of you and Lava won’t even be involved with it.

That was my life.  And, as a kid, I used to have to do the things that a
kid had to do.  If I wanted BBs for my BB gun, or if I wanted a
baseball or a baseball glove, there was no parent writing a check or
saying, “Here, here’s my credit card.  Go down and get one.”  It was,
“Well, kid, good luck.  Go find a way to make the money.”  So, whether
it was collecting pop bottles or doing some other things, and when I was
too young to get a real job that puts you on the clock, 7, 8, 9 years
old, the only job you could get was catching chickens.  Now, some of you
have not lived in an area that is prevalent with poultry.  Can I just
tell you something?  There aren’t many things in this world worse than
going out at 10:00 at night and working all night long in a chicken
house chasing chickens, catching them, and putting them in those old
wooden crates so they could be hauled off so that you could have one at
the Colonel’s house.  I’m telling you, it’s the most God-awful thing,
and every time I’d do that, I’d always say, “What do I have to do so I
don’t have to do this for the rest of my life, and the answer was always
the same.  Get a good education, work hard, treat people right.  So, I
can tell you at an early age, I said, “I don’t know how I’m going to do
it, but I’m going to get an education, I’m going to work hard, and I’m
going to do my best to treat people right.”  That’s the old-fashioned,
American formula, to do better than the generation before you, and to
pass something on to the next one.
And folks, I said all of
those things for the simple reason that the battle that we are in now is
not a battle so that Republicans can win over Democrats.  I could care
less what the labels are.  I really could.  I care a lot about what kind
of country my kids, and now my six grandchildren are going to have, and
if we don’t fight back, and if we don’t stand tall, and if we don’t do
something significant to protect our Constitutional form of government,
and I believe that next to the Holy Bible, the Constitution is the most
inspired document on planet Earth that gives us the framework for house
civilized people can and should live under a system of law.  And it’s
existed, and it has thrived, and as a country we have thrived because of
it, and before we let people shred it before our very eyes, and I hope
you believe that we’ve got to stand up and fight for our system of
government and for the processes that gave every one of us in the room
the extraordinary privilege and blessing to be citizens of the greatest
nation on God’s green Earth, the United States of America.  That’s
what’s at stake, folks.
I don’t want a single young American
growing up in poverty.  My hope and dream would be that no kid would
ever sleep in a car under a bridge at night.  My hope and prayer is that
no wife or child would ever be on the receiving end of a beating from
some abusive husband and father.  My hope and dream is that no father
would ever have to go home empty handed and not have a paycheck with
which he could pay the rent and put food on the table and be able to say
we’re going to have a decent life.  I don’t want there to be ever a
family who has a child with a developmental disability that can’t get
the access to being able to take care of that child without losing every
last dime they have, because I’m not a heartless person.  I’ve often
said I did not grow up sitting at a head table.  I grew up more
comfortable with the people working in the kitchen, not the folks at the
head table.  I had to learn how to sit at the head table.  I knew
explicitly well how to work the floor.  I want every America to grow up
with the belief and understanding that there are no limits, except the
ones that we impose upon ourselves.  And I want no one, ever, to be
limited because of their color, their gender, their geographical
backgrounds and where they’ve come from, who their father was how much
land their family owned.  It means sometimes we have to work a little
harder.  Maybe there aren’t the advantages, but folks, the United States
of America is not about guaranteeing us an outcome.  It’s guaranteeing
us the right to fight for one.  That’s all I’ve ever asked, and it’s all
I would ask for the rest of my fellow Americans.  But when we have
people who are now talking about giving everybody a guaranteed income,
regardless of whether or not they work for it, we lose this country.

When we talk about that we change the whole idea of what it means to
be even male or female, then we start losing our minds.  When we live in
a culture that thinks that somehow the greatest way to protect a woman
is to take life of the child within her, and end its life, arbitrarily,
which is not only an affront to the baby, it’s an incredible affront to
the birth mother as well, and as a pro-life person, I want to make sure
that we are very clear that there are two victims in every time Planned
Parenthood is successful in taking taxpayer money and using it, because
it’s an injury to the baby, but it’s also an injury to that woman who
probably was talked into it, and we need to love both.
So, I
say to you today, it’s time for us to be polite, to be good people, to
be gracious.  I never, ever, ever would encourage people who believe
like we believe to go into someone’s neighborhood and go bang on their
door and scream.  I would never, ever suggest that we go to a restaurant
and yell at people while they’re trying to have dinner with their
families; that we would go to them, as Maxine Waters suggested, at the
restaurants, the service stations, the malls, wherever and get in their
faces and scream at them.  That’s not the conduct of civilized people.  I
never suggest we do that.  But here’s what I do suggest.  I suggest we
work really hard to make sure that the elections are fair and they’re
just.  And I strongly urge that we get on the front lines of battle and
we don’t give up and we don’t surrender and the values and the things
that we know make America a truly great place to live and the place that
people from around the world want to come to that we yield not 1 inch
of the territory, and that we take a lesson from our current President,
and we recognize that this is no time for subtle surrender.  This is a
time for principled fighting for the things that we value and that we
hold dear.
Several years ago, Mike Levitt was Governor of Utah
and invited me and a couple of other governors to go out the Salt Lake
City.  It was February 2001, exactly 1 year before the Olympics would be
held in February of 2002.  And he invited us to come out for a
conference and so we all came out that evening and we spoke, and the
next day we were supposed to have a special activity, and he got up at
the end of it and he just said, “Now, folks, tomorrow, we’re going to go
out to Olympic Village just outside of Salt Lake.  You will be some of
the first people to see it.”  It’s not officially open, but the athletes
are there and they’re training, and we’re going to go out and
experience Olympic Village 1 year before the Olympics come to our
state.  And he said, “And we have a special treat for you.  The special
treat is we’re going to have the Governor’s bobsled competition.”  And
that caught my ear and I thought, “What?”  And, I thought, well, I guess
what they’re going to do is name bobsleds after each of the governors
and we will cheer them on, and the more he talked, the more I realized,
he was talking as if we were going to be in a bobsled.
Now, as
I told you, I grew up south Arkansas.  We didn’t have snow almost ever
there, so I’d never seen a bobsled in person, ever.  The only bobsled I
had any vision of was on ABC’s Wild World of Sports that ran on
Saturdays, and they had this ski jumper that would gracefully jump and
make this wonderful landing, and they’d say, “The thrill of victory,”
and then you’d see this bobsled go careening off the side of a mountain,
and the announcer would say, “And the agony of defeat.”  And I’m
thinking that guy probably got capitated in that bobsled for God’s
sake.  And so I go up to Levitt afterwards and I said, “Now, you’re not
serious.  We’re not going to actually be a in a bobsled, are we?”  He
said, “Yeah, yeah, but don’t worry about it.  We’re going to get you
some training before you do it.”  I didn’t sleep that night.  And the
only thing I could find out a bobsled was that a bobsled can go up to
95 miles an hour.  I asked Levitt about that.  He said, “Well, you guys
aren’t professionals.  You probably won’t get yours over 75.”  That was a
real comfort to know that.
And we get up there the next day
to Olympic Village and here’s my training.  They pair me with a
16-year-old junior Olympic athlete, who’s going to teach me how to drive
the bobsled.  Look, no offense, but I don’t want to learn how to drive
anything from a 16-year-old boy.  Nothing.  And the training was putting
spikes on my boots, and we started at the bottom of the 1‑mile track of
the bobsled, which is nothing but a sheet of ice, and the kid walks me
from the bottom to the top with those spiked boots, and at each of the
12 curves in the bobsled track, he tells me where I need to put the
skids.  Like, I’m gonna remember this.  And we get to No. 12 and he
says, “This is, like, No. 12.  And, like, when we get to this curve, you
need to, like, put the skids, like, right here, ’cause, if we, like,
put the skids up here, then we could go off, and if you put the skids
way down here, then we’ll, like, bounce back and forth against the wall,
and that’ll hurt.”  And then we get to No. 11.  He goes through the
same thing on No. 10 and all the way up to the top.  By the time we get
to the top, I’m hyperventilating.
First of all, I’m
exhausted.  I’ve just climbed a mile up a sheet of ice, and secondly,
now I’m terrified.  I’m pretty sure that that night on the news, here is
the headline.  “And in Utah, Governor of Arkansas tragically killed
trying to drive a bobsled.”  So, I get to the top, and there are a
couple of guys, and they’re the attendants that are going to squeeze me
down into the bobsled and the kid’s job, he’s the brakeman, which makes
no sense, because there is no brake on a bobsled.  And he said, “Now,
here’s what we’re gonna do.  I’m gonna push off.  I’ll jump in, and then
I realize there is no brake, so all he does is hold on for dear lie. 
I’ve got to drive it.  And the guy’s up at the top says, “Well,
Governor, are you ready?”  Oh, they were so chipper.  And I said, “Ready
for what?  To meet Jesus.  I mean, come on, guys.  This is not a good
thing here.”  And they get me down, but just before we go down, the kid
says something I’ll never forget.
He said, “Now, when we come
off the top, you’re gonna see the first curve.  And as soon as you see
it, steer for it, because we’re gonna be picking up speed pretty
quickly.”  Of that, I was certain.  And he said, “As soon as you see the
curve, steer for it,” and by the time you’ve reacted to it, you’ll be
in the curve.”  And he said, “If, if you think you’ve made a mistake,
never think behind you.  Never look behind you, because the ice behind
you can’t hurt you.”  The implication is, the ice in front of you still
can.  He said, “And if you are in the curve, don’t try to correct
everything, because centrifugal force is going to be controlling the
bobsled in the curve.  Ride it out, but don’t try to over correct,
because you can’t.  But as soon as you come out of the curve, you’ll see
the next curve, and when you do, steer for it, and you’ll be fine.”

And his basic advice was simple.  Steer for the curve ahead.  That was
it.  And by the way, I came in second only to Levitt, which I think he
cheated, because he was the host governor.  I’m pretty sure he did, but I
lived, because I listed to this piece of advice.  Steer for the curve
ahead.  And I got to thinking about it, the kid had no idea of the
profundity of that statement, but I say to you, it was extraordinarily
wise advise, not only for driving a bobsled, but being a governor, being
a husband, being a father, owning a business.  Quit worrying about the
things behind us.  Can’t fix it.  Can’t change it.  Not a thing I can do
to make it different.  Don’t try to fix everything at one time.  Can’t
do it.  The centrifugal force of nature itself is such that if you think
you can just make everything happen in an event, you cannot, but
there’s one thing that we can and one thing that we must do, and that
would be my advice for America today.
Steer for the curve ahead, and let’s win.  God bless you.  Thank you very, very much.

LIBERAL DELAWARE: BRUTAL MIDTERM ELECTION NIGHT SHOWS A REPUBLICAN CAN’T WIN DELAWARE

LIBERAL DELAWARE: BRUTAL MIDTERM ELECTION NIGHT SHOWS A REPUBLICAN CAN’T WIN DELAWARE 
NOTICE: WRITTEN BY LIBERALS FOR A LIBERAL NEWS COMPANY
BY Matthew Albright,


Delaware News Journal 
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
News Journal Engagement Editor Matthew Albright.



Jennifer Corbett, The News Journal

Tuesday was a brutal night for the Republican Party in Delaware.

All five of its statewide candidates lost their elections. Their margins of defeat ranged from “decisive” to “humiliating.”

The one that hurts the most is the one that was closest —
Treasurer Ken Simpler, the party’s clear rising star, lost his
re-election bid to first-time candidate Colleen Davis, 46-52.

Simpler was almost universally seen as the Republicans’
next — maybe only — potential candidate to make a serious run for
governor in the next few years. Not only does Simpler’s loss mean there
won’t be any statewide Republicans next year, it strongly suggests that
the party won’t be able to compete in such races for the foreseeable
future.

The numbers: See the results of Tuesday’s statewide elections

If any Republican could win a statewide, it would be
Simpler. He had plenty of campaign funds, he earned widespread praise
for his work in office and he cultivated a reputation as a moderate
consensus builder, which could have theoretically helped him win
independent and even Democratic voters.

But it wasn’t enough. Maybe it was rage at President
Donald Trump, maybe his message got lost in the noise, but Simpler just
couldn’t overcome the huge registration advantage Democrats enjoy in
Delaware.

Republicans are used to being outnumbered in Delaware,
but their plight is getting worse. Not only are there 135,000 more
Democrats than Republicans, the majority party is adding voters at a
significantly faster rate than the GOP.

So the gap is wide, and getting wider.

The GOP used to overcome its registration disadvantage by
running candidates like Mike Castle, who was fiscally conservative but
socially moderate or even liberal. That made him capable of winning
independents and Democrats.

These days, Republicans seem to be relaying more heavily
on candidates like Rob Arlett — Trump-supporting, family-values
conservatives. These candidates might excite Sussex County
conservatives, but they don’t have much out-of-party appeal. And simple
math says Republicans can’t win a base election.

Even Republicans with crossover appeal — like Simpler,
who Castle enthusiastically endorsed — are struggling these days. Not
only are Republican voters drifting further to the right, but Democrats
are less and less likely to cross party lines, particularly while Trump
is in office.

There was more bad news for Republicans in the races for
the General Assembly. Republicans lost a seat in the House and a seat in
the Senate, which doesn’t sound bad — until you hear who was defeated.

Rep. Deborah Hudson and Sen. Greg Lavelle were both
longtime lawmakers and top leaders in their caucuses. Lavelle in
particular was probably the single most effective legislator in opposing
Democrats’ agenda.

There is a reason why Democrats threw the kitchen sink at him — Republicans are going to sorely miss Lavelle in Dover.

There are some points of consolation for the GOP.  While
elected New Castle County Republicans are an increasingly endangered
species, they aren’t totally extinct — the GOP successfully defended two
Pike Creek-area House seats despite steep registration disadvantages
and energetic Democratic challengers.

Republicans can also take comfort in the knowledge that
their grip on the southern end of the state is now near-absolute.
Democrats were excited about many of the candidates they ran in Sussex
County, particularly Don Allan, but they all got crushed — outside of
liberal enclaves at the beaches, no Democratic candidate broke 40
percent.

It’s clear that Delaware’s two political parties are
increasingly entrenching themselves in their geographic strongholds —
Democrats are locking down New Castle County while Republicans tighten
their grip on Sussex.

Unfortunately for Republicans, there are far more people
upstate than there are downstate. And until they find some way to break
out of this mold, they will be firmly limited to minority status.

I’m convinced this is a bad thing for Delaware.

As a moderate, I worry that Democrats will be inevitably
be pushed to the left once their main concern is winning a primary
election. But regardless of your ideology, there’s reason to want
competitive general elections.

When the primary election is the vote that matters, and
when only Democrats get to vote in that election, then only Democrats
really get a say in who leads our state. Less than half the state gets
to pick who governs all of us.

Related: Delaware’s closed primary elections disenfranchise independent voters like me

That’s just undemocratic. It’s a potential recipe for
complacency and corruption. And the only way it’s going to change is if
Republicans stop playing base-obsessed hard-right-wing politics and claw
their way back into relevance on the statewide scene.

Unfortunately, I don’t see that happening anytime soon.