Month: November 2016

ARMED TEXAS STATE TROOPER GUARDS ELECTIONS DIRECTOR FRAUD MASTERMIND IN CAPITOL BUILDING FROM REPORTER~HIS CONNECTIONS TO HILLARY

ARMED TEXAS STATE TROOPER GUARDS ELECTION FRAUD MASTERMIND COMMISSIONER 
IN CAPITOL BUILDING FROM REPORTER
Published on Nov 2, 2016
Infowars reporter Owen Shroyer attempts to question Texas Director of Elections Keith Ingram after he ran away from David Knight last week. Keith Ingram, after being asked a simple question about election fraud, now has a full time armed state trooper guarding his office. It’s glaringly obvious these election officials have something to hide. 
Keith Ingram, Director of Elections
*
      
Elections Division
*
      
Office of the Secretary of State
*
      
1019 Brazos Street
*
Austin, Texas 78701
*
URL http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/index.shtml
*
E-Mail: elections@sos.texas.gov
*
512/463-5650   FAX 512/475-2811
*
1-800/252-8683 (Toll Free)

SEE ALSO: 
https://asweetdoseofreality.com/2016/10/27/levers-of-power-texas-eliminates-audit-trail-making-it-easier-to-steal-election/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

LEVERS OF POWER: TEXAS ELIMINATES AUDIT TRAIL MAKING IT EASIER TO STEAL ELECTION

October 27, 2016 · by  · in Corruption, Politics · Leave a comment

Electronic voting machines flushing vote down the memory hole

By David Knight | Infowars.com

Establishment politicians and press are outraged that Trump would question the integrity of their system.They say it undermines public trust in political institutions.Yet to see who is truly undermining public trust we need look no further than the people running the elections, who are shutting down election audit procedures, who stonewall and eject certified election monitors and who make any recording of malfunctioning voting machines a felony.One such person is Texas Director of Elections, Keith Ingram.

This story is specific to Texas, but the same tactics are used nationwide by both parties to exploit vulnerabilities inherent in electronic voting.
I went to the Texas Secretary of State offices to ask Mr. Ingram about specific procedural changes he has made in his four-year tenure and the changes he attempted to make in August that would have gone into effect this November.
With camera & mic in hand, we told the reception desk we were with the press and would like to talk to the Director about the election.
We were told to wait in the lobby and Mr. Ingram would be down.
You can see for yourself what happened when he saw the mic flag showing we were with Infowars.
The man running the election bureaucracy runs from questions.
So much for transparency and candor.
This unelected bureaucrat is tasked with ensuring that counties adhere to election law.
What follows are the specific actions taken by his office that waive requirements and undermine election integrity in Texas.
But before we get to specifics about his actions & his connection to the Rose Law firm in Arkansas, there are some general questions that should concern voters nationwide:
• Why would standards required by our elected lawmakers for election integrity be bent to the capabilities of vendors rather than require vendors to perform to the standard?
• Why would election procedures be waived and honesty and transparency sacrificed for the convenience of election workers & officials?
Burning The Paper Trail
In August 2016, Ingram, Texas Director of Elections, attempted to make last minute rule changes for the upcoming November 8 election that would eliminate crucial paper backup records for electronic voting.
His office issued new rules that would:
• Eliminate printing of paper audit logs that poll watchers are entitled to monitor at main tabulation computers.
• Eliminate printing of Early Voting Results tapes.
• Eliminate printing of ballot images for recounts.
Fortunately activists and some elected representatives got the proposed rule changes postponed, with a formal public hearing scheduled after the November election.
State Senator Don Huffines said “The state’s chief election officers must reconsider and redraft their proposed election rules to pursue more real-time paper records and backups, not fewer…The comfort & convenience of election administrators should not take priority over voters’ confidence and election integrity.”
But even though these procedures have been postponed, Ingram’s previous rule changes are still a cause for concern in the November election and have caused repercussions in two election cases currently being litigated. Here are some of the problems…
1) Waiver of laws requiring a Partial Manual Recount audit
Ingram waived the requirement to conduct a manual count in 1% of the election precincts or 3 election precincts, whichever is greater. This was waived in all 254 counties the day after the March 2016 Primary.
The timing is significant because during the primary there were 1,743 move votes than voters in Hill County in the Republican Primary. The margin of victory was 225 in Texas House District 8 that contains Hill County.
In calling for a criminal investigation, Ingram noted that it appears “6 or 7 voters voted more than once in the election and one voter voted as many as four times.” Yet he waived the partial manual recount audit requirement statewide and he has waived other audit and monitoring procedures.
2) Waiver of laws requiring printing of paper backup results tapes
Ingram’s waivers issued in 2014, 2015, and 2016, appear to be in direct contradiction of state election laws 65.004, 65.014, 66.022, 66.023, 66.024 and the Judges Handbook. These rules require –
• “Three original tally lists shall be maintained at the polling place to record the number of votes received for the candidates”
• “On completion of the vote count, the presiding judge shall prepare the returns of the election for the precinct” with “total number of voters”, “total number of votes” with the presiding judge signing each of the 3 copies to certify.
zero-tape-tally1Ingram also issued waivers for requirements that a “zero tape” be printed from the machines at the beginning of election day and a “tally tape” printed at the close of election. His letter states that “the process of printing of the zero tape and tally tape at each countywide precinct location could take hours in both the morning and the evening of election day.”
So expediency for election workers takes precedent over requirements enacted by the legislature for integrity of elections. And if a favored vendor can’t perform to the law, the law is waived.
If proper procedures had been followed to ensure that the machine was at a zero state, instead of waived by Ingram, the Hill County issue of 1,743 more voters than votes would not have happened. The vendor in Hill County, ES&S eventually identified the source of the extra votes saying “An audit of the log report from the central paper ballot scanner showed that the hard drive had not been properly cleared of all ballots cast before scanning Early Voting or Election Day ballots…There are established election protocols which should be followed to prevent this type of reporting error.”
But the Director of Elections is waiving those “established election protocols”. Ingram’s waver of legal requirements & his improvised solution of “printing a zero tape at the county warehouse prior to election day” opens the door for error and fraud.
3) Ignoring laws requiring printing of legally sufficient ballot images for recounts
The Secretary of State Election Division claims that “cast vote records” are equivalent to “ballot images”. As you can see, the cast vote records are very different from ballots and are not uniquely numbered.
The Texas Constitution, Article 6 – Suffrage, Section 4 says “In all elections by the people, the vote shall be by ballot, and the Legislature shall provide for the numbering of tickets and make such other regulations as may be necessary to detect and punish fraud and preserve the purity of the ballot box.”
Yet the machines by vendors Hart InterCivic and ES&S, certified by Ingram, do not provide uniquely numbered ballots per state recount laws and don’t provide other components of a legal Texas ballot.
4) Ignoring laws that allow poll watchers to monitor all election activities such as the printing of paper audit logs for computerized result tabulation
Texas Election Code, Sec 33.056 says a “watcher is entitled to observe any activity conducted at the location at which the watcher is serving.”
Affidavits from two official poll watchers for a candidate in Dallas County (with official Poll Watcher signed forms) detail how they were “repeatedly obstructed from monitoring multiple election activities at the Dallas County Central Counting Station such as ballot scanning, vote transfer, ballot transfer, computer activities, ballot tabulation, and viewing the elections computer line printer.” They state that they were “repeatedly treated disrespectfully, obstructed and blatantly ignored” by the election officials, and voting machine vendor before being thrown out after the officials spoke with the Texas Secretary of State Elections office.
Hostility to election monitors, like Ingram’s refusal to answer our questions, destroy the public’s confidence in the honesty of the process — and rightfully so.
Ingram’s Connections To Arkansas, Kutak Rock, Rose Law Firm & Hillary Clinton
According to a public information request of Ingram’s Secretary of State personnel file, Ingram left private practice and moved to Little Rock Arkansas, taking a job with the law firm, Kutak Rock, LL. At Kutak Rock, he worked under the managing partner, Gordon Miller Wilbourn who had been a partner with Hillary Clinton, Vince Foster and Webster Hubbell at the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas in the 1990’s. The Wilbourn family is a large donor to the Clinton Foundation and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
rose-law-firm-letterhead
Ingram left Kutak Rock to return to Texas when he was hired by Gov. Rick Perry’s appointment office in 2008 to oversee statewide political appointments for various courts, boards & commissions.
Ingrams’s career moves are interesting. In just 10 months, his journey from private practice in Texas through Arkansas Clinton-cronies and back to Texas government resulted in pay cuts with each move and his salary being cut in half. In 2012, Ingram, was promoted to Director of the Election Division in the Texas Secretary of State’s Office where his salary was still 40% less than private practice.
Ingram’s determination to remove paper trails and auditing procedures for electronic voting is even more troubling when we look at his connections to big Clinton donors.
Establishment Of Both Parties Don’t Appear To Want Election Integrity
In one lawsuit contesting election results for Austin City Council, the County could not produce ANY ballot images as required by law to conduct a recount. Computer logs had multiple “corruption/invalid” errors. During discovery it was learned that the computer counted more votes than registered voters in 10 of the 12 precincts forming the district. One precinct had 100% voter turnout, another was just 2 registered voters shy of 100% in spite of only 32% and 17% county-wide turnout in the general and runoff elections.
The County Democrat Party has financed legal opposition to the lawsuit and a Republican judge claimed there was no evidence for election irregularities.
There are some positive developments, however. The Republican judge has now been voted off the bench of the solidly Republican County and state legislators have taken up the question of election integrity that has so far been ignored by Governor Abbott’s office.
State Senator Bob Hall said, “Due to an increasing number of complaints, it is time for the Texas Elections Division Office to take immediate and decisive action to rescind all waivers issued by that office…and instruct all Texas counties using electronic voting systems to consistently adhere to all election laws…”
Voters, regardless of political affiliation, should reject policies and personnel that compromise honest, transparent elections. For example, Chambers County in Texas recently announced electronic voting would be suspended until the glitches affecting voting machines could be corrected. It’s time to remove Keith Ingram as Texas Director of Elections and replace easily hacked electronic voting machines with paper ballots.
13--Legal Texas Ballot Example 2014
14 Cast_Vote_Record_Travis_County_NP

MASSIVE EVIDENCE OF ELECTION FRAUD BY HILLARY CLINTON

MASSIVE EVIDENCE OF ELECTION FRAUD 
BY HILLARY CLINTON
Published on Nov 1, 2016
The facts continue to mount which prove more and more that not only is election fraud possible, but it’s happening at the will of Hillary Clinton.
Texas Election Officials Harass Reporters 
for Exposing Election Fraud!
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/biggest-election-fraud-in-history-discovered-in-the-united-states-breaking-now/

VETERAN NAVY SEAL DOM RASO SUPPORTS SECOND AMENDMENT FOR SELF DEFENSE

“TRUTH ISN’T FEAR MONGERING”
ISIS IS A REAL THREAT TO AMERICANS
When Dom Raso talks about a very real threat facing Americans today — that of radical Islamic terror — he’s accused of fear-mongering. But the threat is real, of course, and Dom says we can either prepare for it by arming and training ourselves, or we can ignore it and pretend that restricting the Second Amendment rights of the law-abiding citizen will eliminate the threat.
“How A Pro-American President Fights ISIS”
If we had a president who believed in the Second Amendment, here’s what Dom Raso says that president would say to our fellow Americans about the threat of radical Islamic terror. Unfortunately, we’ll never hear that speech from Obama. So it’s up to us to arm and train ourselves and take the responsibility of protecting ourselves and our loved ones into our own hands.

Watch more episodes of Commentators on NRATV: https://www.nratv.com/series/commenta…

HARRISBURG, PA CHRISTIAN CHARITY FORFEITS FEDERAL FOOD IN FAVOR OF KEEPING PRAYER BEFORE & WITH MEALS

Christian Charity Forfeits Federal Food in Favor of Faith
Christian Charity Forfeits Federal Food 
in Favor of Faith
BY MICHAEL TENNANT
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/24526-christian-charity-forfeits-federal-food-in-favor-of-faith; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“We don’t force our faith on anybody else,” Chuck Wingate, executive director of Bethesda Mission, told PennLive.com. “But we find the whole idea that the government’s going to come in and tell us what we can and cannot do in our own facility to be out of bounds, especially in matters of faith.”
Wingate, who says his Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, ministry serves 100,000 people a month, was referring to a new U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulation forbidding recipients of USDA food from requiring “a beneficiary to attend or participate in any explicitly religious activities that are offered by the organization.” A USDA press release stated that the rule was established pursuant to an executive order issued by President Barack Obama and would “provide new religious liberty protections for beneficiaries of federally funded social service programs.”
Bethesda, which has been helping the poor and homeless in the Keystone State capital for nearly 102 years, formerly received about 1,000 pounds of USDA food per month via the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank. But given the choice between taking Uncle Sam’s freebies and continuing to offer thanks to God before serving meals, the mission’s leaders decided on the latter.
“We can no longer take the food on principal [sic] because prayer is an integral part of everything we do at Bethesda Mission,” Scott Dunwoody, the shelter’s vice president of business development, told Harrisburg’s WHTM-TV.
“The USDA revised regulations regarding this food distribution to say that no religious services or religious activities could occur during the distribution of the food,” Wingate told CNSNews.com. “Well, we pray before meals, so if there’s a meal being served — and we serve 3,000 meals a week — if there’s a meal being served with USDA food somewhere in it, then we would be prohibited from praying. We just said ‘nope’ that’s too onerous for us and we’re not going to continue to accept the food if that’s a condition of receiving it.”
Many religious charities are now faced with the same dilemma as Bethesda. So far, few seem willing to cut the umbilical cord to Washington — or perhaps they long ago made the necessary compromises to get USDA comestibles. Jennifer Powell of the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank told PennLive that “only a handful” of the bank’s 900 program partners have chosen either to stop taking the USDA food or to change their practices — by, say, conducting prayers outside the room in which the food is served — to fall in line with the new rule.
Eric Saunders, executive director of Harrisburg-area New Hope Ministries, told PennLive his ministry didn’t need to change its practices because they have never required people to participate in prayer or a religious service in order to obtain food. “When the new rule came out,” reported the website, “Saunders said he simply reminded staff to make sure any religious activities were done at a different time or place from when people were being served.”
Bethesda doesn’t require participation in religious activities, either, but anyone there for a meal is going to be in the presence of an audible prayer. This, apparently, does not comport with the Obama administration’s definition of religious freedom, whereby passively causing someone to hear a prayer before giving him free food is unacceptable but forcing a Christian charity or business to pay for contraceptive coverage for its employees is worth defending all the way to the Supreme Court.
Saunders said of Bethesda, “I have a lot of respect for them and the principled stand they took.”
Bethesda will probably not be hurt much by declining the USDA’s food. Although 1,000 pounds a month sounds like quite a bit of food, it really only amounted to about 0.5 percent of the food distributed by the shelter, according to Wingate. He claimed the announcement has already led to an increase in donations to the ministry. In addition, Powell said the food bank has plenty of other food the mission could use.
All of these problems could have been avoided, of course, if the federal government had not strayed from its enumerated powers under the Constitution. Nowhere in that document is the government delegated the authority to distribute food, no matter how noble its intentions may be in doing so. As James Madison, the father of the Constitution, so eloquently put it, “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”
Charities, especially Christian ones, ought also to be mindful of the fact that the “free” food they get from Washington and other levels of government is paid for by the expropriation of the citizenry; “Thou shalt not steal” contains no exceptions for either government or charities. Furthermore, they should recognize that by accepting the government’s largess, they are also accepting its control, even to the point of denying their faith. It may be more cumbersome and less reliable to subsist on voluntary contributions, but it is the only sure way to maintain a charity’s religious character over the long run.
_____________________________________________________
Bethesda Mission http://www.bethesdamission.org/contact-us/
PO Box 3041
Harrisburg, PA 17105
Phone: 717-257-4442
Fax: 717-257-5486
Email: info@bethesdamission.org
Executive Director – Chuck Wingate
Phone: 717-257-4442 ext. 226
Email: cwingate@bethesdamission.org
V.P., Business Development – Scott Dunwoody
Phone: 717-257-4442 ext. 229
Email: sdunwoody@bethesdamission.org
(For help with charitable bequests, planning your giving or charitable gift annuities)
Director of Community Relations – Ken Ross
Phone: 717-257-4442 ext. 223
Email: kross@bethesdamission.org
(Media inquiries, Newsletter requests, request a Tour of our facilities, or to schedule a speaker)
Volunteer Coordinator – Deb King
Email: dking@bethesdamission.org
Phone: 717-257-4442 ext. 222
(volunteer opportunities)
Director of Human Resources – Kathy Geyer
Phone: 717-257-4442 ext. 225
Email: kgeyer@bethesdamission.org
(employment opportunities)
Donor Services Dept.
Phone: 717-257-4442 ext. 240
(Questions about your donation or mailings)
 Men’s Shelter, Medical/Dental Clinics & Donation Center
611 Reily Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102
717-257-4440
Directions
Women’s Shelter
717-257-4447
Youth Center
1438 Herr Street, Harrisburg, PA 17103
717-257-5483
Directions
Rural Outreach
5 Pleasant View Drive, Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
717-691-0410
Directions
Administration Offices
2101 N. Front Street, Building 1, Suite 300
Harrisburg, PA 17110
717-257-4442
Directions

CALIFORNIA’S ANTI-GUN, ANTI-AMMO PROPOSITION 63 LIKELY TO PASS

“SAFETY FOR ALL” EXCEPT IF YOU’RE A CALIFORNIA RESIDENT
“That it’s a phony political ploy is evident from the fact that the bill would only apply to California residents. Nonresidents would be exempt. Nonresidents such as criminals, illegal immigrants, out-of-state terrorists, gang members and convicted felons “can bring ammunition into California all they want,””
California’s Anti-gun Prop 63 Likely to Pass
CALIFORNIA’S ANTI-GUN, ANTI-AMMO PROPOSITION 63 LIKELY TO PASS 
BY BOB ADELMANN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24517-california-s-anti-gun-prop-63-likely-to-pass; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
California Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom’s (shown) campaign to run for something (either governor of the state or for Dianne Feinstein’s Senate seat when she retires) in 2018 is likely to get a significant boost when Proposition 63 passes next month. Prop 63 won’t do anything to restrict criminal gun violence, but it will raise him from obscurity, provide his campaign (which he announced in February last year) with mailing lists and funding sources, and propel him into national prominence.
In other words, Prop 63 is all about Newsom. As sponsor of the anti-gun, anti-Second Amendment bill, Newsom has taken plays from the Brady anti-gun playbook and sold them to the California low-information voters, who are being influenced by the bill’s support from Senators Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, various mayors, and three of the state’s largest newspapers. At last count, more than 90 percent of Democrats and a hefty majority of Republicans support the bill.
The bill, which Newsom calls his “Safety for All” measure, would, he says, “help save countless lives.” Its primary focus, according to Newsom, is on ammunition: It would, effective January 1, 2018, require purchasers of ammunition to undergo background checks and have the sale recorded permanently onto a new database maintained by the California Department of Justice. If a seller sells more than 500 rounds in any 30-day period, he would have to become a licensed ammunition vendor and would be forced to sell ammunition only face-to-face, not by mail.
In addition the proposition would create a “new court process … for the removal of firearms from individuals upon conviction of certain crimes” according to the state’s voter information guide. In addition, it would ban the possession of magazines holding more than 10 rounds. That guide goes on to parrot the traditional anti-gun promises of similar bills:
Proposition 63 will improve public safety by keeping guns and ammunition out of the wrong hands. Law enforcement and public safety leaders support Prop. 63 because it will reduce gun violence by preventing violent felons, domestic abusers, and the dangerously mentally ill from obtaining and using deadly weapons and ammo.
That it’s a phony political ploy is evident from the fact that the bill would only apply to California residents. Nonresidents would be exempt. Nonresidents such as criminals, illegal immigrants, out-of-state terrorists, gang members and convicted felons “can bring ammunition into California all they want,” according to Kim Rhode. Rhode, a six-time Olympic medal winner in the shooting sports and an honorary life member of the National Rifle Association, added: “This tells you how fundamentally twisted this proposition really is. It will cause the police and the state to divert resources to monitor law-abiding citizens [who] are not causing any problems, but will do nothing to stop criminals.”
Rhode is joined by numerous individuals and groups who see the bill for what it really is, including 10 professional law-enforcement associations and John Malcolm, director of the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation:
This law would make criminals out of people who are morally blameless. These are special taxes and background checks on ammunition, just to make it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. It’s an assault on the Second Amendment.
Agreeing with Malcolm’s assessment of the bill’s malevolent results is Michele Hanisee, president of California’s Association of Deputy District Attorneys for Los Angeles County:
For one thing, this initiative would do nothing to stop criminals from acquiring ammunition, guns, or large-capacity magazines. But it would make it prohibitively difficult for responsible gun owners to obtain ammunition for sport and home defense.
As prosecutors, we would enthusiastically support any proposed law that promised to be a realistic tool against gun violence. But Prop. 63 is simply bad public policy. Its passage would have zero effect on criminals — other than to encourage them to commit more crimes. At the same time, it would criminalize the conduct of ordinary citizens.
Passage of Proposition 63, which now appears to be certain, will turn out to be a two-fer: 1) a further infringement of precious rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the citizens of California, and 2) a boost from obscurity to national prominence the highly popular former mayor of San Francisco and current radio host who has his eyes set on 2018 political opportunities.

DEFENSE SECRETARY HALTS FORCED REPAYMENT OF ENLISTMENT BONUSES~BUT SERIOUS ISSUES REMAIN

DEFENSE SECRETARY HALTS FORCED REPAYMENT OF ENLISTMENT BONUSES 
BY STEVE BYAS
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/24522-defense-secretary-halts-forced-repayment-of-enlistment-bonuses; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Responding to a chorus of protests and complaints, Defense Secretary Ash Carter has suspended collection of repayments of enlistment bonuses made to members of the California National Guard. Carter has also directed that a review be made of the process that led to members of the California Guard being given bonuses to reenlist, only to have the Department of Defense demand repayment of the bonuses.
Carter called the process “unfair to service members and to taxpayers,” and said he has ordered the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to “suspend all efforts to collect reimbursement from affected California National Guard members, effective as soon as is practical.”
“This suspension,” Carter added, “will continue until I am satisfied that our process is working effectively.”
“I’m glad the Pentagon came to its senses,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said, in response to Carter’s statement. “Congress will continue to work on any reforms necessary to ensure this doesn’t happen again.”
Jeff Miller, a Florida Republican, and chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, was not as charitable as Ryan, however. He denounced Carter’s response as “weak and ham-handed,” pointing out that the moratorium will not cover potential problems outside California.
Miller added, “Carter seems to have no plan to make those who’ve already been forced to pay back their bonuses whole, and by focusing only on the California Guard, he is ignoring what media reports indicate could be a national problem. Once again, it seems Congress will be forced to fix a problem that the Obama administration created but refuses to fully address on its own.”
During the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the California National Guard offered soldiers thousands of dollars in bonuses to entice them to re-enlist. It was at a time when the military was having difficulty meeting its recruiting goals. It is estimated that the bonuses were given to almost 10,000 soldiers, in amounts of $15,000, or even more.
David Cloud of the Los Angeles Times explained the problem to National Public Radio (NPR). The bonuses were paid to encourage soldiers to sign up for another tour in the Army, generally for an additional six years. “They were being paid at a time when the California Guard desperately needed soldiers to fill the ranks of units going to Iraq. So they were more generous than usual.”
Unfortunately, many soldiers given bonuses did not qualify under the rules used at the time. Then, many years later, the Pentagon conducted audits and demanded the soldiers who received the payments pay them back — with interest.
“This story has made my blood boil,” said Bill Hahn, vice president for communications with The John Birch Society (parent organization of The New American magazine), making specific reference to a woman — a master sergeant — who went to Afghanistan after getting a $15,000 bonus. Susan Haley’s entire family served in the Army, and she had served 26 years in the military herself. After all of that, she received notice — while caring for her son, another soldier who had lost his leg in Afghanistan — that she owed thousands of dollars to the Pentagon.
“I feel totally betrayed,” said Sergeant Haley, a native of Los Angeles. Haley is presently sending the Pentagon $650 each month — a quarter of her family’s income. Haley is worried that she will have to sell their home to repay the bonuses. “They’ll get their money, but I want those years back,” Haley said, referring to the additional six years she spent in the military as a consequence of the bonus she is now forced to repay.
A former Army captain, Christopher Van Meter, expressed similar sentiments: “People like me just got screwed. These bonuses were used to keep people in.” Van Meter has been forced to refinance his home mortgage to pay the $25,000 in re-enlistment bonuses the Army insists he should not have received. During the extra time he spent in the service, he was thrown from an armored vehicle turret, after the vehicle detonated a buried roadside bomb. He received a Purple Heart for his injuries.
Robert Richmond, an Army sergeant, re-enlisted for $15,000 as a special forces soldier. In 2007, his company was deployed to Hillah, an Iraqi town 60 miles south of Baghdad. In this area — known as the “Triangle of Death” — a roadside bomb exploded, leaving him with permanent injuries to his back and his brain.
With the $15,000 unpaid “debt” on his credit report, he was turned down for a home loan in Texas.
The Army began to experience recruiting shortfalls during the second Bush administration and the two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, forcing the Pentagon to resort to the most generous re-enlistment incentives in history. The recruiting and re-enlistment difficulties have continued into the Obama administration, causing some to address causes for the problem, and others to offer solutions.
National Guard units, such as those in California, have been activated more and more frequently in recent years, as the Pentagon has faced difficulty raising enough troops in the regular Army to handle the frequent overseas deployments in the administrations of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. This in turn has led to more difficulty in filling the ranks of the various state units of the National Guard across the country.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are obvious reasons for the reluctance of many to join the national armed forces or the National Guard units. But with the increasing political correctness of the armed forces (with training in such morale-damaging classes as “White Privilege,” the inclusion of women in combat roles and the lowering of physical standards to accommodate them, the push to allow for homosexual, bisexual, and transgendered soldiers, and the like) thousands more soldiers have opted for a different career.
With difficulties in raising enough soldiers through recruitment, some have advocated a return to the military draft. The draft ended in 1973, but at the urging of President Jimmy Carter, draft registration was reinstated in 1980. This became a minor issue in the presidential campaign of 1980, with Governor Ronald Reagan speaking out in opposition to draft registration. Since that time, there has been insufficient national support for reinstating the draft. But with the decline in recruitment, supporters of the draft have blamed the all-volunteer force.
If the country were to return to the draft, the question of whether women should be included in any conscription law would be raised. Recently, the U.S. Senate voted to include women in draft registration, but the Republican-led House of Representatives balked, narrowly defeating the effort by 217-203.
Presently, men must sign up for the draft within 30 days of turning 18. But with falling numbers of young men willing to join today’s military forces, for whatever reason, expect increasing pressure to add women to the draft registration rolls.   
In 1940, on the eve of a presidential election, President Franklin D. Roosevelt famously said, “I say to you again, and again, and again — your sons will never be sent to fight in a foreign war.” With the inclusion of young women in both the draft and combat, perhaps this should be updated to “Your sons and your daughters will never be sent to fight in a foreign war — but if they are, expect us to ask for their bonuses back.”

DANNEY WILLIAMS, ALLEGED SON OF BILL CLINTON, TO ASK FOR MONICA LEWINSKY’S “STAINED” BLUE DRESS FOR DNA TESTING TO PROVE PATERNITY

DANNEY WILLIAMS, ALLEGED SON OF BILL CLINTON, TO ASK FOR MONICA LEWINSKY’S “STAINED” BLUE DRESS FOR DNA TESTING 
TO PROVE PATERNITY
Published on Nov 1, 2016
At a recent press conference in Washington, DC Danney Williams asks Monica Lewinsky if he can borrow her infamous blue dress in order to get a DNA sample from former President Bill Clinton to conduct a paternity test verifying Bill Clinton is his father. David Knight interviews Danney Williams about his paternal quest to legitimize Bill Clinton is his father.
Published on Nov 1, 2016
Infowars reporter Millie Weaver interviews Danney Williams about his lifelong quest to legitimize his claim that former President Bill Clinton is his paternal father. At a recent press conference, Danney Williams asks Monica Lewinsky if he can borrow her infamous blue dress in order to get a DNA sample from Bill Clinton to conduct a paternity test to verify Bill Clinton is his father. 
Bill Clinton’s Son Holds Explosive 
DC Press Conference
Published on Nov 2, 2016
Danney Williams, son of Bill Clinton gives a press conference at the prestigious National Press Club where he asks that Monica Lewinsky help him obtain a DNA sample to help prove paternity.

DONNA BRAZILE OF THE DNC RESIGNS (OR FIRED) FROM CNN AFTER BEING CAUGHT FEEDING HILLARY QUESTIONS A SECOND TIME PRIOR TO DEBATES

DONNA BRAZILE OF THE DNC 
RESIGNS (OR FIRED) FROM CNN 
AFTER BEING CAUGHT FEEDING HILLARY DEBATE QUESTIONS A SECOND TIME 

About Time! CNN Fires Donna Brazile for Rigging Debates, Giving Hillary Questions in Advance

BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24525-about-time-cnn-fires-donna-brazile-for-rigging-debates-giving-hillary-questions-in-advance; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
CNN made it official Monday, firing commentator Donna Brazile (shown) for giving Hillary Clinton questions in advance of debates with Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primaries. The avidly pro-Clinton network was virtually forced to sever ties with Brazile by the new revelations from the latest WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta’s hacked e-mails. Podesta, the longtime adviser/crony/fixer for Bill and Hillary Clinton, and currently chairman of Hillary’s election campaign, has now seen over 39,000 of his e-mails released by the WikiLeaks hacktivists, and they have been very revealing indeed, exposing the corruption, dirty tricks, and criminality of the Clinton political machine .
Brazile, a veteran Democratic Party hack, has been serving as interim chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) since July, when then-DNC chair Rep. Deborah Wasserman Schultz, was forced to resign in an e-mail scandal that exposed Wasserman Schultz and other DNC officials blatantly taking sides with Clinton and sabotaging Sanders, in violation of DNC rules to maintain neutrality in primary campaigns.
As the Podesta e-mails reveal, Brazile was involved in those same ethics violations, extending to violating the rules for the televised debates. The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), which sponsored the debates, states on its website: “All debates will be moderated by a single individual and will run from 9:00-10:30 p.m. Eastern Time without commercial breaks. As always, the moderators alone will select the questions to be asked, which are not known to the CPD or to the candidates.”
However, that obviously was not the case, as Brazile was providing Team Clinton with a heads-up ofdebate questions in advance. The first Brazile e-mail to leak out concerned the televised CNN-TV One Town Hall event on March 13 of this year. The day before, Brazile sent an e-mail to Clinton’s director of communications, Jennifer Palmieri, saying she’s worried about “HRC” (Hillary Rodham Clinton) facing a question on the death penalty. The subject heading of her e-mail was: “Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance.”
Here is the e-mail, as provided by WikiLeaks:
On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Donna Brazile <donna@brazileassociates.com>; wrote:
Here’s one that worries me about HRC.
DEATH PENALTY
19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty?
Sent from Donna’s I Pad. Follow me on twitter @donnabrazile
The following day, on the CNN-TV One Town Hall, co-moderated by CNN’s Jake Tapper and TV One’s Roland Martin, Hillary Rodham Clinton was indeed asked a question about the death penalty, by audience member Ricky Jackson — and HRC had a scripted answer ready and waiting. We, the public, did not find out that the game had been rigged until months later, when WikiLeaks released the incriminating e-mail on October 11. Nevertheless, even after the WikiLeaks release, most of the establishment media ignored the Brazile-Podesta-Palmieri skullduggery in favor of bashing Donald Trump over unsubstantiated, sensationalist charges of sexual harassment. For nearly two weeks, Donna Brazile was allowed to wave off the e-mail evidence with diversionary tactics and charges that the e-mails are fabrications by WikiLeaks and Russian intelligence.
However, on October 20 Brazile was skewered on Fox News by a relentless Megyn Kelly, who refused to let her weasel her way through another interview. Not that the DNC chair didn’t try; Brazile kept going to script, using every diversion she could muster to avoid answering the direct, careful questions put to her by the Fox anchor.
She tried the Christian/persecution diversion: “As a Christian woman I understand persecution, but I will not sit here and be persecuted,” Brazile told Megyn Kelly.
She tried the “poisoned fruit” diversion: “Podesta’s emails were stolen. You’re so interested in talking about stolen material, you’re like a thief that wanna bring into the night the things that are in the gutter.”
She tried the motor-mouth/repetition diversion, the total innocence diversion, and much more.
It was still more of the same patently absurd denial and rehearsed propaganda by Brazile when Kelly confronted her with the undercover video stings of top Democratic dirty tricks operatives Scott Foval and Bob Creamer, who were caught red-handed boasting of rigging elections and admitting to inciting violence at Trump rallies.
Incredibly, Brazile insisted to Megyn Kelly that “I always play ‘straight up’ and I’m going to be ‘straight up’ with you.” However, it was painfully clear by the end of the Fox “interview” that “straight up” Donna Brazile is as weasely and deceitful as “Crooked Hillary.”
It is noteworthy that during her Fox News interview, when Megyn Kelly repeatedly asked her where she got the advance debate questions, Brazile fatuously insisted that she had “never” received any questions from CNN. She continued repeating the same lines even when Kelly asked her directly if the questions had come not from CNN itself but from Roland Martin, the former CNN commentator who now works for TV One and co-moderated the Town Hall event.
In the same e-mail thread of March 12 cited above, Brazile responded to a reply from Jennifer Palmieri. Brazile told Palmieri: “I’ll send a few more [debate questions]. Though some questions Roland submitted.” That would seem to be a very solid “clue” that Roland Martin was the source and Brazile was the conduit to Podesta and the Clinton Campaign.
Politico reporter Hadas Gold reported on October 12 that Politico had obtained an e-mail of March 12 from Roland Martin to CNN debate producers with the identical death penalty question that appeared in Brazile’s March 12 e-mail to Palmieri. What’s more, it was Roland Martin who introduced Ricky Jackson, the pre-selected, pre-scripted “audience” member who asked the rigged question about the death penalty.
As Gold reports, Martin initially denied that he had shared his questions “with anybody.” However, after being confronted with the fact that Politico possessed e-mail evidence to the contrary, he began walking the denial back to more ambiguous ground.
Media “Uncomfortable” but not Outraged — Deceit, Propaganda Continue
In an October 13 interview, Jake Tapper said he has “tremendous regard” for Brazile, but said the WikiLeaks revelation was “very, very troubling.” “It’s horrifying,” the CNN anchor said. “Journalistically it’s horrifying, and I’m sure it will have an impact on [CNN] partnering with this organization [TV One] in the future.”
The following day, on October 14, CNN spokeswoman Lauren Pratapas stated that CNN hadn’t given Brazile the debate questions in advance and announced Brazile had resigned from the network. “CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate,” Pratapas said in a written statement. “We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor.”
The October 30 WikiLeaks release contains another Brazile-DNC-Podesta debate revelation, concerning the March 6 debate in Flint, Michigan, where Democrat Party operatives and their media allies have transformed lead poisoning into a false national issue with which to clobber Republicans. The Clinton-Sanders Democratic primary debate was hosted by CNN and moderated by Anderson Cooper. (See the full debate here.)
The event was held in Flint at Clinton’s request, as she herself pointed out during the course of the debate. A Brazile e-mail from March 5 of this year to Podesta and Palmieri, is entitled: “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash.”
“Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint” Brazile’s e-mail goes on to alert Hillary’s debate coaches. Sure enough, the lead poisoning question came up on cue, and HRC slammed in another easy homerun answer.
lead poison question
Yes, many in the pro-Clinton media industry are “uncomfortable” with the WikiLeaks revelations, but, judging from their continued overwhelmingly slanted coverage, the discomfort comes from being exposed, not from being disgusted with the serial cheating and lying of the Clinton camp and their media allies. There has been precious little outrage expressed by the pro-Clinton mainstream media elites of the kind and volume that would have gushed forth if the same rigging had been perpetrated by the Trump Campaign. There have been no media-orchestrated calls for TV One to fire Roland Martin, nor for the DNC to fire Donna Brazile, nor for Hillary Clinton to fire John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri.
The Brazile-Podesta-Palmieri debate e-mails are damning, but, arguably, not as serious as the many other revelations concerning the Clinton family’s rampant criminality on national security matters such as Uranium One, and the “pay-to-play” wheeling-dealing at the HRC State Department and the Clinton Foundation. However, the WikiLeaks e-mails released thus far have shown an alarming willingness and ability of Hillary Rodham Clinton and her DNC-Big Media allies to rig the election debates. And the ones we’ve seen may be only the tip of the iceberg. If this is the case in the primaries, are Donald Trump’s charges about rigging the November 8 election really all that outlandish, as the pro-Clinton media choir would have us believe?
Related articles:

TURKEY: EMERGENCY ORDER BROADENING POWERS TO DEPORT FOREIGNERS CONCERNS CHRISTIANS

Emergency Order Broadening Turkey’s Powers to Deport Foreigners Concerns Christians
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



TURKEY (Morning Star News) – An emergency order issued over the weekend makes it significantly easier for Turkey to deport expatriates, further unsettling  foreign Christians after the government this month ordered the deportation two U.S. Christians.



The directive eliminates the need for a court decision before a foreigner can be deported, amending sections of the 2013 Law on Foreigners and International Protection, as reported in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey on Saturday (Oct. 29). Now the government, in particular the Ministry of the Interior, can independently deport anyone it deems a threat to “public security” without a judicial order or review.



The Christians ordered deported earlier this month were accused of being such security risks.







The change in the law is one of many made by the government in the wake of the unsuccessful coup attempt on July 15. Since then, the government enacted a “state of emergency” that allows it to suspend the law and imprison anyone it deems a threat to the country. Officials assert the emergency laws are necessary to fight terrorists and those responsible for the attempted coup, but critics say the moves amount to a purge of anyone critical of the government.



Many foreign Christians in Turkey were already concerned about being deported or banned from returning to the country, in light of the two U.S. Christians the government ordered deported, and have considered canceling Christmas travel plans. The new order compounds the government’s already expanded powers.



“It’s just like they can come to your door and drag you out of your home, and there is nothing you can do about it,” one expatriate Christian who asked not to be identified said. “It really makes no sense. They’re going after people who love the country, pray for it, help improve it and invest their money here, and not those who are really hurting the country.”



According to the Association of Protestant Churches (TEK), expatriate Christians in Turkey have increasingly been affected by residency issues, deportation or entry bans. U.S. Christians, specifically those seen as “active” Christians, are being targeted by officials who see anyone who isn’t Sunni Muslim as a threat to national unity, public order and “Turkishness,” according to TEK spokesman Soner Tufan.



“American Christians are being targeted as a symptom of larger problems with the U.S.,” Tufan said, adding that rocky relations between the Turkish government and Washington  have to do with Turkish dissatisfaction with extradition process of Fethullah Gülen, whom the Turkish government claims was the architect of the coup attempt.



“Turkey wants that man from America, but they won’t give him to them,” Tufan said.



The Turkish government is holding one U.S. Christian in a deportation center without charge. Andrew Brunson, the U.S. pastor of Izmir Dirilis Church, is caught in legal limbo. The government has issued a deportation order and lifetime ban against him for being “a national security risk” but refuses to deport him. They also refuse to release him on appeal of his charges.



On Oct. 7, Izmir police arrested Brunson and his wife Norine, telling them they would be deported in 15 days and banned from Turkey for life.



The couple was taken to the Izmir Immigration Centre and was refused access to a U.S. consular official or a lawyer, according to religious freedom advocacy group Middle East Concern (MEC). They were confined together but denied clean clothes, medicine and other basic provisions until Oct. 13.



On Oct. 19, officials took Norine Brunson to receive a brief physical, told her that charges against her had been dismissed and released her.



Andrew Brunson remains alone in a detention center. The usual deadline for him to be deported has passed, and in spite of his signing government papers agreeing to be deported and the lack of any charges against him, the government refuses to release him.



Brunson was the second U.S. citizen the government ordered deported in October. On Saturday (Oct. 29), Ryan D. Keating, 39, a U.S. Christian and long-time time resident of Turkey, was reunited with his wife and four children in England after more than 20 days of separation when he was banned from reentering Turkey.



Keating, a doctoral student in Philosophy at Ankara University, was detained when he arrived at Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport on Oct. 16. Immigration officials told him that on Aug. 19, his residency permit had been revoked for “national security” reasons and the Ministry of the Interior had issued a lifetime ban on him entering Turkey. After a brief stay in the detention holding area of the airport, Keating was then placed on the first flight back to London.



Keating said he moved to Turkey in 2006, but his interest and sense of connection to the country started during a high school student exchange program. On his return in 2006 to start his doctoral studies, he became very active in his church and started a discipleship program and a ministry to aid refugees.



Keating told Morning Star News he thinks the reason he was expelled was because his ministries were “high profile.”



“Several of the church ministries I have developed or have been in charge of have been high profile, and in that sense I am an easy target for people who want to rid the country of Christians,” he said. “The work that we do with refugees is especially politically sensitive.”



Keating emphasized that neither he nor his wife have any affiliation with a political or ideological group in Turkey, “directly or indirectly.”



“We want to emphasize, we love Turkey and the people of Turkey,” he said. “We’ve not done anything illegal, and I’ve been careful throughout my time in Turkey to honor all of the rules and regulations about visas, about residency, about things related to our ministry that we do. So it’s especially disappointing when the government labels me as it has to kick me out unjustly.”



Keating is fighting the decision against him in court.

______________________________________________________





Jews die, Turks celebrate



BY ROBERT SPENCER





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



“Idiots, since when have non-Muslims been wished to rest in peace?”



Words to ponder. Turkey’s rapidly escalating re-Islamization threatens Jews, Christians, and all non-Muslims.



“Jews Die, Turks Celebrate,” by Robert Jones, Gatestone Institute, November 1, 2016:





Two important Jew [sic] have lost their lives lately: Shimon Peres, the ninth President of Israel, and Ishak Alaton, a Jewish businessman from Turkey.



Upon receiving the news of the deaths of these two men, many Turks rushed to Twitter proudly and openly to show off their hatred of Jews, according to the Turkish news site, Avlaremoz, which covers Jewish affairs.



Some of the Tweets posted after Peres’s death on September 28 included:


    

  • “Shimon Peres died, there is now one fewer Jew. I wish the same for other Jews and their sperm…”
    • 

  • “Shimon Peres died. One fewer Jew. The world has got rid of one more piece of dirt.”
    • 

  • “Shimon Peres, you’ll get a nice tan there. May your hellfire be fierce. Jewish dog.”
    • 

  • “It would be great if we do salah [Islamic prayer] of thankfulness every time a Jew drops dead.”
    • 

  • “Hellfire is calling you, Jewish dog Shimon Peres.”
    • 




Some people might attempt to normalize these Turks’ hatred of Peres by pointing out that Peres was an Israeli state leader. However, the reactions many Turks gave on social media after a Turkish businessman of Jewish origin died shows that these reactions are instead simply raw Jew-hate, which has little to do with the policies of the state of Israel.



Ishak Alaton, a Turkish businessman and investor of Jewish descent, born in Istanbul in 1927, died of heart failure on September 11, at the age of 89. This is how some Turks on Twitter paid farewell to him:


    

  • “Ishak Alaton, the darling of Soros and the Jewish usurer, has croaked. Master Baphomet was not able to protect him. I wish the same for other Jewish vampires.”
    • 

  • “Even those whose top expertise is making money eventually bid farewell to life. Ishak Alaton lost his life.”
    • 

  • [Responding to a tweet that wished Alaton to rest in peace:] “Idiots, since when have non-Muslims been wished to rest in peace? You do not even know about that. You have nothing to do with religion.”
    • 

  • “Even his air conditioners will not be enough to cool him down in the afterlife.”
    • 

  • “It is cause for rejoicing that one more Jew falls before the Bayram [Eid al-Adha, the Islamic ‘Sacrifice Feast’].”
    • 




Alaton had contributed immensely to the Turkish economy, and culture, as well as to the efforts of democratization of the country.



Between 1947 and 1948, he performed his military service in the Turkish army, compulsory for all male Turks. After studying and working in Sweden from 1951 to 1954, he returned to Turkey, co-founded the Alarko group of companies, and employed thousands of people.



A prominent businessman and philanthropist, Alaton was granted the Swedish Order of the North Star and the Spanish Order of Civil Merit. Yet he preferred to live in Turkey. There he became the chairman of one of the most prominent businesses in the country and established the Turkey Foundation of Economic and Social Studies.



The Turks that spewed Jew-hatred after his death are evidently sure that no prosecutor in Turkey will hold them accountable account for their remarks calling for hatred and even violence against Jews. They seem to think that no matter what you say or write about Jews, you can get away with it.



In fact, celebrating Jewish deaths on social media seems to be a tradition for some Turks. Following an attempted stabbing at the Israeli Embassy in Ankara on September 21, and the bombing attack in Istanbul’s Taksim district which resulted in three Israeli deaths, many Turkish Twitter-users had filled Twitter with hate-filled messages again.



This should come as no surprise: 71% of the Turkish adult population harbors anti-Semitic attitudes, according to the 2015 Anti-Defamation League Global 100 Poll.



“I do not think that there has ever been a period in this country in which anti-Semitism and hatred against Jews has decreased,” said Isil Demirel, an anthropologist from Turkey and an author for Avlaremoz. “And during the current political atmosphere, hate speech against Jews in Turkey is even more commonplace.”



The Jewish community in Turkey has also been exposed to deadly terror attacks at the hands of Muslim groups. On September 6, 1986, Palestinian Arab terrorists affiliated with the Abu Nidal Organization bombed and opened fire at Neve Shalom Synagogue in Istanbul during a Sabbath service; 22 people were killed.



On November 15, 2003, Islamist Turks and Al-Qaeda sympathizers exploded near-simultaneous car bombs outside two Istanbul synagogues — Neve Shalom and Beth Israel — both filled with worshippers. At least 23 people were murdered, and more than 300 wounded. According to Demirel:





“The attacks against synagogues in particular have made security an even more alarming issue for the Jewish community. That is why, for many years, synagogues and other Jewish institutions have been protected by safety measures…. The government should immediately recognize anti-Semitism as a hate crime and impose penal sanctions on the perpetrators. I think this is the most important step to be taken to help the Jewish community live in peace here.”





But given the anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli statements of state authorities in Turkey, it does not seem realistic to expect them to make laws that would recognize anti-Semitism as an offense in Turkey.



For example, on July 18, 2014, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said:





“The state that knows best how to kill children is Israel. The obvious reality is that Israel is the country that threatens peace in the world and in the Middle East. Israel has never been pro-peace. It has persecuted and continues the persecution.



“Israel might seem to be the winner now. But it will eventually be defeated. This will also bother the Jews living in certain parts of the world. We as Turkey and myself — as long as I am in charge — can never have a positive view of Israel.”





According to a 2014 Pew Poll, Israel is the most hated country in Turkey, with 86% of respondents holding an unfavorable view of the Jewish state, and only 2% viewing it positively.



Although the Jewish people have not been allowed to live free and safe lives in Turkey, they have resided there for millennia — as have the Armenians and the Greeks, who were also persecuted, and the Alevis and the Kurds who are persecuted now.



“The Jewish presence in Asia Minor dates back to Biblical times,” writes Professor Franklin Hugh Adler. “This is mentioned by Aristotle and several Roman sources, including Josephus.





“Jews, in fact, had inhabited this land long before the birth of Mohammed and the Islamic conquests of the seventh and eighth centuries, or for that matter, the arrival and conquests of the Turks, beginning in the eleventh century.



“At the beginning of the Turkish Republic, in 1923, the Jewish population was 81,454. Nevertheless, Turkey’s current Jewish population has diminished to 15,000.”





Many verbal and physical attacks on Jews have played a significant role in Jewish emigration from Turkey. These included the “Citizen Speak Turkish” Campaign of 1930s, the 1934 anti-Jewish pogrom in eastern Thrace, the 1941-1942 conscription of the “twenty classes” (an attempt to conscript all male non-Muslim populations, including the elderly and mentally ill during World War II), and the 1942-1944 Wealth Tax. Today, under the current Islamist government, life for Jews in Turkey is no easier than before.



Meanwhile, militants linked to the Islamic State in the Sinai Peninsula recently released a new video that contains more threats against the Jews and Israel. “Oh Jews, wait for us,” the narrator in the video threatens. “The punishment is severe and soon you will pay a high price.”



This history and narrative leads one to ask: What is a radical Muslim and what is a moderate Muslim? Is “being radical” only about being an armed militant? Can Muslims who do not engage in violent action but who have extremely hate-filled and murderous speech be considered “moderate”? Or should their supremacist or even genocidal speech be reason enough to think of them as “radical?”



What then is the difference between armed Islamic State terrorists who threaten Jews with massacre and unarmed Turkish Twitter users who celebrate Jewish deaths and call for massacring more Jews?









			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
HILLARY CLINTON’S “WATERGATE”?
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

Hillary’s Watergate?



“CARLOS DANGER” 



(WEINER’S SEXTING USER NAME)



Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top aide, sent thousands of emails to the private laptop she shared with husband Anthony Weiner, a.k.a. Carlos Danger, who is under FBI investigation for allegedly sexting with a 15-year-old girl.
BY PAT BUCHANAN



Pat Buchanan



SEE: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/11/hillarys-watergate/#axzz4Olw0h0eP; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







Carlos Danger





USA –  -(Ammoland.com)- After posting Friday’s column, “A Presidency from Hell,” about the investigations a President Hillary Clinton would face, by afternoon it was clear I had understated the gravity of the situation.



Networks exploded with news that FBI Director James Comey had informed Congress he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email scandal, which he had said in July had been concluded.



“Bombshell” declared Carl Bernstein. The stock market tumbled. “October surprise!” came the cry.



The only explanation, it seemed, was that the FBI had uncovered new information that could lead to a possible indictment of the former secretary of state, who by then could be the president of the United States.



By Sunday, we knew the source of the eruption.



Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top aide, sent thousands of emails to the private laptop she shared with husband Anthony Weiner, a.k.a. Carlos Danger, who is under FBI investigation for allegedly sexting with a 15-year-old girl.





The Weiner-Abedin laptop contains 650,000 emails.





The FBI has not yet reviewed Abedin’s emails, and they could turn out to be duplicates of those the FBI has already seen, benign, or not relevant to the investigation of Clinton.


Andrew McCabeAndrew McCabe’s wife, in a 2015 state senate race in Virginia, received $475,000 in PAC contributions from a longtime friend and major fundraiser for Hillary Clinton.



But it does appear that Abedin misled the FBI when she told them all communications devices containing State Department work product were turned over to State when she departed in 2013.



Clinton, understandably, was stunned and outraged by Comey’s letter.



For it casts a cloud of suspicion over her candidacy by raising the possibility that the FBI director could reverse his decision of July, and recommend her prosecution.



By Monday, Oct. 31 2016, new problems had arisen, some potentially crippling or possibly lethal to a Clinton presidency.



Reporters have unearthed a near-mutiny inside the FBI over the decision to shut down the investigation of the Clinton email scandal and Comey’s recommendation of no prosecution.



Andrew McCabe, No. 2 at the FBI, has come under anonymous fire from inside the bureau as one of those most reluctant to pursue aggressively any investigations of the Clintons.





McCabe’s wife, in a 2015 state senate race in Virginia, received $475,000 in PAC contributions from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime friend and major fundraiser for Bill and Hillary Clinton.





After the Senate race that McCabe’s wife lost, he was promoted from No. 3 at the FBI to No. 2, where he has far more influence over decisions to investigate and recommend prosecution.



Justice Department higher-ups under Attorney General Loretta Lynch apparently disagreed with Comey notifying Congress, and the nation, to new developments in the email scandal. Yet Comey had given his word to Congress that he would do so.



In the Southern District of New York, which has jurisdiction over the Weiner sexting investigation, FBI agents have reportedly been blocked from opening an investigation into charges of corruption in the Clinton Foundation.



This follows revelations that corporate chiefs and foreign rulers and regimes, hit up for contributions to the Clinton Foundation, were then urged by an ex-Clinton aide to provide six-figure speaking fees for Bill Clinton.



This follows reports the Clinton Foundation took contributions for victims of natural disasters, and awarded multimillion-dollar contracts to contributors to do the work.


Attorney General Loretta LynchStill unanswered is what Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch discussed during that 30-minute meeting on the Phoenix tarmac.



Still unanswered is what Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch discussed during that 30-minute meeting on the Phoenix tarmac, prior to the FBI and Justice Department decision not to indict Hillary Clinton.



The stench of corruption is reaching Bhopal dimensions.



What appears about to happen seems inevitable and predictable.



If Hillary Clinton is elected, the email scandal, the pay-for-play scandal involving the Clinton Foundation, “Bill Clinton, Inc.,” the truthfulness of her testimony, and reports of Clinton-paid dirty tricksters engaging in brown shirt tactics at Trump rallies, are all going to be investigated more thoroughly by the FBI.


Tim KaineShould Hillary be be forced from office, Tim Kaine would be our President…



And if Clinton is president, there is no way her Justice Department can investigate the Clinton scandals, any more than this city in the early 1970s would entrust an investigation into Watergate to the Nixon Justice Department.



If Clinton wins this election, and Republicans hold onto one or both houses of Congress, investigations of the Clinton scandals will start soon after her inaugural and will go on for years. And the clamor for a special prosecutor, who will, as Archibald Cox did with Nixon, build a huge staff and spend years investigating, will become irresistible.



Realizing that this is the near-certain fate and future of any Hillary Clinton presidency, and would be disastrous for the country, Sunday night, Doug Schoen, who worked for President Clinton for six years, said he has changed his mind and will not be voting for Hillary.



Donald Trump says this is worse than Watergate. As of now, it is only potentially so.



But if Hillary Clinton, this distrusted and disbelieved woman, does take the oath of office on Jan. 20 2017, there is a real possibility that, like Nixon, down the road a year or two, she could be forced from office.





Do we really want to go through this again?



















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
WIKILEAKS EMAIL: HILLARY CAMPAIGN STRUGGLES TO REACH “F***ING DUMB” YOUNG PEOPLE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

Wikileaks Email: Hillary Campaign Struggles to Reach "F**king Dumb" Young People



WIKILEAKS EMAIL: HILLARY CAMPAIGN STRUGGLES TO REACH “F***ING DUMB” YOUNG PEOPLE



“That’s the crap that young people pay attention to”



BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON



SEE: http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-email-hillary-campaign-struggles-to-reach-fking-dumb-young-people/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







A new email released by Wikileaks as part of the Podesta dump features Hillary ally Wendy Bronfein advising Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta on how to reach “f***ing dumb” young people.



Marketing executive Bronfein tells Podesta that Clinton “may not be the best face” to attract younger voters and that she needs to utilize “trending figures” as par of an “infusion to pull younger voters” because “that’s the crap that young people pay attention to”.



Bronfein goes on to state, “It’s f**king dumb but being “cool” counts for more than it maybe should.”



She references Bill Clinton’s saxophone playing as an example of this before asserting, “I hate to generalize a generation but by social media nature, they “follow”. So if someone they identify as cool endorses – they will likely fall in line with that candidate.”



Bronfein is introduced to John Podesta in another email as someone who “could be immensely helpful in improving HRC’s connection to millennials.”







The email is yet another example of the disdain that Hillary insiders have for Clinton’s own voters.



Yesterday, we highlighted how Clinton ally Brent Budowsky accused Hillary operative David Brock of having a plan that relied upon black voters being “stupid”.



In an audio recording leaked earlier this month, Hillary Clinton was caught on tape saying Bernie Sanders supporters are “living in their parents’ basement” and had bought into a “false promise”.



In another email, Clinton operative Bill Ivey spoke of the need to maintain political power by producing “an unaware and compliant citizenry”.



_____________________________________________________



Wikileaks Bombshell: Hillary Camp Calls 



Young People “F***ING Dumb”

















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
CLINTON CAMPAIGN IMPLODING, ABEDIN IN HOT WATER
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

CLINTON CAMPAIGN IMPLODING, ABEDIN IN HOT WATER



SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh364.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







By Kelleigh Nelson




October 31, 2016
NewsWithViews.com



“Wickedness was like food: once you got started it was hard to stop; the gut expanded to take in more and more.” —John Updike, The Witches of Eastwick



“Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!”—Ronald Kessler, Inside the White House



Hillary is Once Again Under Investigation



Images of Abedin crying on the Clinton plane have surfaced after the FBI announcement that they’ve reopened the Clinton email investigation. It was later revealed that Huma Abedin’s ex-husband, Anthony Weiner, shared the same laptop that contained damning evidence against Clinton.



Abedin has worked for Hillary Clinton for 21 years as her number one aide, and her presence has been fodder for any number of conservative articles, including my own, because of her ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which makes this entire FBI investigation even more interesting.



Back in July, everyone assumed that when FBI Director James Comey said, “I’m not moving forward with charges; I’m not going to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton,” that the investigation was closed. But apparently, they never closed it. It was still technically open. Other investigations within the FBI were going on, and in this case, one of them was Anthony Weiner, former husband of Huma Abedin, whose proclivities to send pornographic photos of himself were allegedly under investigation. Of course, that investigation by the FBI led them to the emails from Anthony Weiner’s and Huma Abedin’s devices, and thus finding classified government information on them. Now there are warrants for even more.



She previously was granted an immunity deal by the FBI, as were other Clinton staff.



By withholding evidence during her FBI interview, that she had a home computer and then lying that she only printed emails at the State Dept., not home, Huma Abedin just wrote a big fat VOID over her immunity deal. So, is she going to talk or face jail? My guess is she’ll plead the 5th. She is not on the plane with Hillary to Florida, although she was on the plane yesterday to Iowa. Hillary doesn’t want her around apparently. When you play with fire, you often get burned.



This could not have happened at a worse time for Hillary Clinton. I wonder what kind of deal Obama is making to be kept out of this mess. She is now a cornered animal, and one I would consider even more dangerous than she is normally.



Huma Testified to Hillary’s Burned Schedules



Yes, Huma Abedin testified in a deposition last July where she indicated that Hillary Clinton destroyed a ton of her schedules when she was Secretary of State. Why would she put hundreds of her own travel logs in a burn bag to have destroyed? Aren’t all of her travels as Secretary documented by the government?



In that deposition, it was obvious that Huma was also “extremely careless” with some sensitive documents, and even emailed another aide to tell her that Hillary’s schedule was left sitting on a bed in an unlocked hotel room.



There’s more…WikiLeaks revealed that Abedin had access to Hillary’s Secretary of State email address that wasn’t secured! Hillary apparently naps quite frequently because of a mental health issue, or maybe because of one too many cocktails, but nevertheless, she allowed Huma to use her email server to send replies and read what was coming in. Abedin did NOT have the clearance to operate under this capacity, but Hillary allowed her to do so.



Assange and Judicial Watch Release New Emails



In Julian Assange’s latest release of 296 emails, it is believed that Huma Abedin has committed a number of felonies. Judicial Watch, in working with WikiLeaks, says these emails show that Hillary has committed more crimes, but also that Abedin is complicit.












The new documents reveal that in April 2009, controversial Clinton Foundation official, Doug Band, pushed for a job for an associate. In the email, Band tells Hillary Clinton’s former aides at the State Department, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, that it is “important to take care of [Redacted]. Band is reassured by Abedin that, “Personnel has been sending him options.” Band is co-founder of Teneo Strategy with Bill Clinton, and a top official of the Clinton Foundation, including its Clinton Global Initiative.



Remember that Doug Band was originally Bill Clinton’s close aide, and John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager, whose WikiLeaks emails are of great interest, was Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff.



Doug Band actually directed Abedin and Cheryl Mills to put Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire and Clinton Foundation donor, Gilbert Chagoury, in touch with the person at the State Dept. on Lebanon. He insisted to Huma and Cheryl that Chagoury is a key guy. Of course he is, because he’s a close friend of Bill Clinton’s and a top donor to his Foundation. According to foundation documents, he’s a top donor of between $1 and $5 million. And…get this, he pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative. But there’s even more…Chagoury was convicted in Switzerland in 2000 for laundering money from Nigeria and had to repay $66 million to the Nigerian government. The corruption runs deep.



What they were doing was a clear violation of the ethics agreements Hillary had to sign before becoming Secretary of State. She promised she would not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which The William J. Clinton Foundation (or the Clinton Global Initiative) were involved.



“No wonder Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin hid emails from the American people, the courts and Congress,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “They show the Clinton Foundation, Clinton donors, and operatives worked with Hillary Clinton in potential violation of the law.”



In June, Judicial Watch uncovered two batches (here and here) of new Clinton email records through court-ordered discovery.



Twice in May, Judicial Watch uncovered new Clinton emails, including emails that show Clinton knew about the security risk of her BlackBerry (see here and here).



This is another email find also at odds with her official campaign statement suggesting all “work or potentially work-related emails” were provided to the State Department.



Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch discusses his team’s findings in this video.



Social Media Black Out



FBI emails are not trending on Twitter, on Facebook, on Buzz feed, or Snap Chat. What is trending on Twitter now is the top story that Hillary Clinton is winning! Control, control, control. The 5th story on Twitter is, “Was James Comey Wrong to Write to Congress!”



The FBI has opened a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT! And you can’t find squat about it on social media!



What kind of genius loses $6 billion dollars, four American lives, a laptop, four cell phones, three tablets, and 33,000 emails all while Secretary of State? A criminal, that’s what kind!



Hillary has learned from countless previous scandals that lying and obfuscating allows you to get away with criminal conduct.



Trump is right, it’s way past time to Drain the Swamp!



[P.S. In order to wake up the population, we need to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]



_______________________________________________________



CLINTON SUPPORT DWINDLES AFTER FBI ANNOUNCEMENT



Published on Oct 31, 2016





Infowars reporter Millie Weaver attends a Bill Clinton “Get the Vote Out” event in Cleveland, OH the day after FBI announces reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton. Stuffed into an indoor alleyway, the handful of attending Hillary supporters look uncomfortable with the small setting and how few people showed up. 



















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
BREAKING: FEDS LEAK DETAILS OF NEW CLINTON INVESTIGATION/WEINERGATE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

HUMA ABEDIN & PERVERT 



ANTHONY WEINER







BREAKING: FEDS LEAK DETAILS OF NEW CLINTON INVESTIGATION/WEINERGATE





Could this be the end of Hillary’s campaign?





SEE: http://www.infowars.com/breaking-feds-leak-details-of-new-clinton-investigationweinergate/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







The FBI has reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton after discovering new information on the electronic devices of Anthony Weiner.



Could this be the end of Hillary’s campaign or is it a distraction to draw attention away from more serious crimes and corruption within our government?



On Monday thousands of new emails from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta were published by WikiLeaks.



Within that new data dump was smoking gun proof that the White House was colluding with Hillary to cover up the fact that Obama had lied to Congress and the American people when he said he learned about the email scandal from the news.



Those new emails stirred outrage within the FBI and took the ongoing mutiny to a whole new level.



The new investigation into Weiner could be a way for the FBI to compartmentalize the larger issue of Hillary and Obama’s collusion.



EXCLUSIVE: FBI Mutiny Reopened Clinton Investigation





















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
FBI REOPENS INVESTIGATIONS: CLINTON, COMEY & THE E-MAIL SCANDAL~IS THERE A REBELLION AT THE FBI?~FORMER FBI AGENT CALLS CLINTONS A “CRIME FAMILY”~WEINER “SEXTED” 15 YEAR OLD GIRL
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

Clinton, Comey and the E-mail Scandal: Is There a Rebellion at the FBI?



CLINTON, COMEY & THE E-MAIL SCANDAL: IS THERE A REBELLION AT THE FBI? 



BY SELWYN DUKE



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





The Clintons are a “crime family” and Hillary a “pathological liar,” said former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom during an interview Sunday. And it appears his belief is shared by current rank-and-file FBI agents, as a rebellion has apparently been brewing within the bureau.



The latest shocking news on this front is that despite a plea deal to destroy laptops (evidence) belonging to Clinton associates, those devices were not destroyed and are still in the possession of the FBI. As the Daily Caller reports:



Washington D.C. attorney Joe DiGenova said on The David Webb Show on SiriusXM Friday night that despite the FBI agreeing to destroy the laptops of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson as part of immunity deals made during the initial investigation of Clinton’s email server, agents involved in the case refused to destroy the laptops.



“According to the agreement reached with the attorneys who handed over their laptops, the laptops were to be destroyed per the agreement after the testimony was given — the interviews were given — by the attorneys. The bureau and the department agreed to that,” DiGenova said. “However the laptops contrary to published reports were not destroyed and the reason is the agents who are tasked with destroying them refused to do so. And by the way the laptops are at the FBI for inspection by Congress or federal courts.”



DiGenova said the laptops have already been subpoenaed and the FBI is waiting for Congress to ask for them.



As to this report’s credibility, American Thinker’s Thomas Lifson notes that “DiGenova, a former US Attorney and Washington, DC super lawyer is no flake. He has plenty of contacts within the FBI and a reputation to protect. So I take his words on Sirius/XM’s David Webb show quite seriously.”



Ever since FBI director James Comey (shown above) shook the political world Friday by announcing that the bureau was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s illegal use of a private e-mail server, theories as to why he’s acting now have proliferated. After all, since consensus was that Comey was covering for the Democrats at the Obama administration’s behest, no one expected a revisiting of Clinton’s criminality just over a week before the election.



Of course, given that tens of thousands of e-mails — some apparently Clinton related — were recovered from ex-congressman Anthony Wiener’s laptop during an investigation into his having sent illicit text messages to a 15-year-old girl, the most obvious explanation is that of Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein, that whatever was found is “a real bombshell.” As Thomas Lifson wrote in “3 competing theories on why the FBI re-opened the Hillary email server investigation,” “It is possible that something so dramatic came up in the pertinent emails that postponing a public reaction by not announcing the reopening of the investigation would, [sic] be regarded as political interference by covering up a smoking gun until after the election. In this scenario, Comey is assuming the evidence cannot be suppressed, and that he would be held accountable after it comes out. This scenario also indicates that we could be headed for a constitutional crisis, involving the possible indictment of a president-elect before an election. Or the evidence being turned over to the House of Representatives for impeachment hearings.”



The second theory Lifson outlined was one put forth by radio host Rush Limbaugh. As Lifson wrote, “By announcing an FBI Investigation resuming, Comey is putting a lid on further attention to Wikileaks. I guess this means that Clinton forces will argue we must wait for the investigation to be complete (after the election) before speaking about what the evil Russians are planting into our politics.”



Lastly, Lifson wrote that Comey “might be seeking to restore his badly damaged reputation, recognizing that the damage he has inflicted on the FBI is substantial. Three days ago, American Thinker published an open letter from a retired FBI agent, Hugh Galyean, that laid out some of the damage Comey has inflicted on the institution he leads. There is little doubt that this reached many in the FBI family, putting in print what people have only whispered about. If those silenced voices start speaking out, Comey could face a serious loss of face. In this scenario, he is heading off a staff rebellion, possibly including mass resignations.”



This last theory is lent great credence by the news that the plea-deal laptops were never destroyed. If that story is true, it reflects a rebellion more serious than most anyone had imagined — with agents defying a direct order. This also adds weight to a related theory: that agents are so disgruntled that not only could some “resign and reveal,” but that active personnel could actually leak the truth to the media. If this is the case, Comey might be trying to get out ahead of such a development.



None of this is hard to imagine. While the FBI director is a political appointee perhaps chosen based on party or ideological loyalty, rank-and-file agents didn’t join the bureau for political power or money. They often are people who chose their career because they wanted to serve their country, and many (if not most) take their oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” very seriously. And word has it that they have no respect for Comey, viewing him as a “dirty cop.”



The aforementioned James Kallstrom vindicated this assessment, saying “that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau,” reports the Hill. “‘The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,’ he said.”



This is, apparently, because the agents know what Kallstrom does. As the Hill further writes:



“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”



... He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.



“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”



“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.



This appears standard FBI sentiment. I personally know of an ex-agent — someone with knowledge of Clinton “crime family” dealings — who I’m told is having trouble sleeping at night due to the prospect of a Clinton presidency.



Two other people who may now have trouble finding the arms of Morpheus are Clinton and her longtime aide and confidante (and rumored lesbian lover) Huma Abedin. Abedin, who has questionable Islamic connections, is Anthony Wiener’s estranged wife and is apparently responsible for the Clinton-related e-mails found on his laptop. Note that Abedin may have legal problems herself, having sworn under oath that she relinquished “all devices” and having signed, under penalty of perjury, a document stating she wasn’t retaining any copies of the relevant materials.



Whether or not the new Clinton e-mails contain devastating information, they certainly provide an excuse for Director Comey to reopen the investigation, thus controlling a bureau rebellion that could lead to his own scandalization and career destruction. He may now realize that it’s a matter of Clinton — or him.



Whatever the case, this unprecedentedly scandal-ridden campaign — with Project Veritas, WikiLeaks, and now FBI revelations and a story that, as radio host Michael Savage put it, only a Shakespeare could write — should have a wild closing week. Logic dictates that Halloween will be followed by the scariest revelations yet, likely the result of another WikiLeaks dump. Hold on to your seats; the ride has just begun.



______________________________________________________



The Clintons Are "Crime Family";



Admits Former FBI Assistant Director



Published on Oct 31, 2016





The former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom, says that the Clintons are a "Crime Family" and endorses Donald Trump to clean up the corruption in Washington. He made the stunning statements on AM 970 in New York on John Catsimatidis' show 'The Cats Round Table' Sunday morning. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.









Hillary Still Crooked: FBI Reopens 



Clinton Email Investigation



Published on Oct 29, 2016







The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, another shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.

In a letter to committees and lawmakers relevant to the matter, FBI Director James Comey cited “recent developments” for the bureau’s decision to look into new emails which may contain classified information and how they may relate to its previous investigation.











Round Two Hillary Investigation Fallout



Published on Oct 28, 2016







FBI Director James Comey in a surprising letter to Congress laid out the vague details of the possibility of a reopening of an FBI Investigation into newly discovered Clinton emails from her National Security threatening personal email server. The letter addressed to a swathe of Congressional Chairmen read:

“In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony,” Comey wrote in the letter obtained by CNBC.

“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.”

“Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony,” Comey stated.Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz, who led an Oversight Committee effort to pursue perjury charges against Hillary, tweeted about the FBI’s announcement. It read FBI Dir just informed me, "The FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation." Case reopened.

The campaign trail was thrown into chaos by the news. Hillary, as expected, went on... business as usual.

Hillary's campaign has been nothing short of a parade of corruption and bottomless scandals. A platform running for the highest office in the land. At what point do the American people become an accessory to Hillary's crimes by simply voting for her?











Trump Responds To FBI 



Reopening Clinton Email Probe



Published on Oct 29, 2016





During a campaign rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa on Friday night, Donald Trump criticized his opponent Hillary Clinton for attempting to politicize the recent news that the FBI reopened its investigationinto her email scandal, which was revealed earlier on Friday. http://www.infowars.com/donald-trump-...
http://www.infowars.com/in-leaked-mem...









Hillary To Be Indicted After Election: Trump Responds To FBI Investigation



Published on Oct 28, 2016







http://www.infowars.com/breaking-fbi-...
The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, another shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.








HUMA ABEDIN'S HUSBAND ANTHONY WEINER 








"SEXTED" A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL











CLINTON SUPPORT DWINDLES AFTER FBI ANNOUNCEMENT



Published on Oct 31, 2016







Infowars reporter Millie Weaver attends a Bill Clinton "Get the Vote Out" event in Cleveland, OH the day after FBI announces reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton. Stuffed into an indoor alleyway, the handful of attending Hillary supporters look uncomfortable with the small setting and how few people showed up. 






















































			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
SHOCK VIDEO: HILLARY VOTERS ATTACK HOMELESS BLACK WOMAN FOR SUPPORTING TRUMP
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

SHOCK VIDEO: HILLARY VOTERS ATTACK HOMELESS BLACK WOMAN 



FOR SUPPORTING TRUMP





Violent social justice warriors taunt, laugh at victim





BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON



SEE: http://www.infowars.com/shock-video-hillary-voters-attack-homeless-black-woman-for-supporting-trump/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:









A homeless black woman was viciously abused and then physically attacked by crazed social justice warriors because she supported Trump.



This is how so-called “progressives” behave. They will violently abuse and attack you while claiming you’re the one who’s being hateful.



Share this video to expose these bastards!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJV41gS2c8M











			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH PLEADS FIFTH AMENDMENT ON SECRET IRAN RANSOM CASH PAYMENTS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

loretta_lynch



ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH 



PLEADS FIFTH AMENDMENT ON 



SECRET IRAN RANSOM CASH PAYMENTS 



BY ROBERT SPENCER



SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/attorney-general-lynch-take-the-fifth-on-secret-iran-ransom-payments; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”



If we had any kind of actual opposition party, it would be investigating whether Obama’s actions regarding Iran constituted treason. But we don’t.



“Congress: Attorney General Lynch ‘Pleads Fifth’ on Secret Iran ‘Ransom’ Payments,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, October 28, 2016:



Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments, according to lawmakers and communications exclusively obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.



Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered.



In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf, refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment, which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American hostages from Iran.



The response from the attorney general’s office is “unacceptable” and provides evidence that Lynch has chosen to “essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries regarding [her] role in providing cash to the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio and Pompeo wrote on Friday in a follow-up letter to Lynch, according to a copy obtained by the Free Beacon.



The inquiry launched by the lawmakers is just one of several concurrent ongoing congressional probes aimed at unearthing a full accounting of the administration’s secret negotiations with Iran.



“It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people’s elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue,” the lawmakers wrote. “Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue.”



“As the United States’ chief law enforcement officer, it is outrageous that you would essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries,” they stated. “The actions of your department come at time when Iran continues to hold Americans hostage and unjustly sentence them to prison.”



The lawmakers included a copy of their previous 13 questions and are requesting that Lynch provide answers by Nov. 4.



When asked about Lynch’s efforts to avoid answering questions about the cash payment, Pompeo told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration has blocked Congress at every turn as lawmakers attempt to investigate the payments to Iran.



“Who knew that simple questions regarding Attorney General Lynch’s approval of billions of dollars in payments to Iran could be so controversial that she would refuse to answer them?” Pompeo said. “This has become the Obama administration’s coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran—hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people.”



“They know this isn’t a sustainable strategy, however, and I trust they will start to take their professional, and moral, obligations seriously,” the lawmaker added….

_______________________________________________________



AG Lynch Takes The Fifth As Crisis Intensifies



Published on Oct 29, 2016





Attorney General Loretta Lynch has plead the fifth to avoid incrimination in the illegal transfer of billions of dollars in cash to Iran.





























			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
DONALD J. TRUMP: FEARLESS COURAGE, FOR GOD, FOR FAMILY AND FOR COUNTRY
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

DONALD J. TRUMP: FEARLESS COURAGE, FOR GOD, FOR FAMILY AND FOR COUNTRY



SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh363.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







By Kelleigh Nelson




October 29, 2016
NewsWithViews.com



Bias has always been a factor in journalism. It’s nearly impossible to remove. Humans have their thoughts, and keeping them out of your work is difficult. But 2016 saw the remaining veneer of credibility, thin as it was, stripped away and set on fire. —Derek Hunter, Former Never Trumper Talk Show Host



The Spine of Steel



In the face of the most horrific attacks on his person, his family, and his policies, Trump has withstood the avalanche of media bias and hatred and never wavered. He has shown he definitely has what it takes to be the 45th President of the United States of America.



Remember the one man in China’s Tiananmen Square who stood defiantly against the tanks? He was mowed down for wanting freedom. The Clinton Machine including main stream media, the Justice Department, the republican 5th column, and every globalist in America, has excoriated Trump with lies, hatred, and half-truths. They too wanted Trump mowed down. But he stood defiantly in the face of all the hatred. And he stood because he knows that America is on the precipice of destruction and only he can save her. He has shown a spine of steel, true chutzpah!


He gave up a life of leisure, a life filled with wonderful accomplishments, with family, with business, with his children, and he did it for America, and for all of us, and he continually tells us that he loves us.



I’m so proud to have been a supporter of this amazing man from the very beginning of his campaign.



FBI Reopens Investigation into Hillary Email Use



Trump, speaking to cheering supporters Friday afternoon in Manchester, N.H., praised the FBI for having the “courage” to “right the horrible mistake that they made” – saying he hopes that is “corrected.”



“Hillary Clinton’s corruption is on a scale we have never seen before,” Trump said. “We must not let her take her criminal scheme into the Oval Office.”
In a nod to the significance of the FBI’s announcement, Trump quipped: “The rest of my speech is going to be so boring.”



WikiLeaks Has Finally Burst the Hillary Clinton Bubble



If Bill Clinton can pardon the Riches, then Donald Trump can pardon and bring home, Julian Assange.



When the mainstream media, including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, MSNBC, Bloomberg, and Washington Post, have lifted their coordinated blackout on all things negative about Hillary Clinton, you know it’s bad. Next week, Julian Assange is set to release Hillary’s actual emails which could be the smoking gun that finally brings her down.”



Be sure to watch the Fox segment below:







Indictment Coming for Hillary?



Of course, the question remains, will the powers-that-be protect Hillary Rodham Clinton. Julian Assange assures us that the next batch of emails he releases will be enough to indict Hillary. Assange also made it clear that there is no evidence of Russian involvement, despite the Clinton campaign’s claims.



Julian Assange is still holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, but he’s sure been busy! Not only has he released 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee, now he says he’ll be releasing more, enough to see Hillary Clinton indicted and arrested. All I can say is, “It’s about danged time.”



Assange has given a number of interviews where he states there is no evidence that any of these emails came from Russian sources. He has said that the DNC servers were ripe for hacking and were riddled with holes. He says that when the Clinton Campaign talks about having proof the emails were hacked by Russians, he says he doesn’t know what they’re talking about, but they’re not talking about my leak. He said that maybe someday his sources will step forward and some will have egg on their faces.



Of course, it’s not important where the emails come from, but what is in them! What they have now is the Clinton Campaign using diversion to escape the truth of these emails…what she does is blame the Russians, blame the Russians, over and over again, and say that these were private emails that were hacked. Well, Hill, your private emails have exposed you and your entire rotten corrupt campaign.



No kidding Hillary, they were emails that were not on a secured server. You got people killed because of your ineptness and laziness as the Secretary of State under the Obama administration, who absolutely detests you and your husband. I wouldn’t be surprised if Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama are gleeful about this.



We know that Obama supports you only because he wants you to continue his policies. We know and Obama knows that Donald J. Trump will dismantle everything that this Marxist Muslim loving president has done to our beloved country.



Anthony Weiner, Huma Abedin and Chelsea Clinton



The possibility of Hillary occupying the White House again is frightening…we know too much about this woman. She has consistently covered up the controversy regarding her unauthorized emails, she was on trial for how she responded to the Benghazi attack which left four Americans dead because of her failure to react in time to save them. Bill really hasn’t helped her out as he has grabbed headlines for his sex scandals, and his ill-gotten statements while campaigning. Hillary continually blames innocent Trump for the things that she herself has done. She’s guilty…we all know it.



Clinton emails that prompted a review were actually found on Anthony Weiner’s device…so just how much did Huma Abedin tell her husband, Anthony Weiner? The guy is a total pervert. So, where does this leave us? Trump’s statements about Weiner were spot on when he called him a security risk reflective of Hillary’s bad judgment.


The “pay to play” Clinton Foundation has been exposed with emails from the former president’s daughter, whose name is on the foundation, accusing his aides of “hustling” business to win clients at foundation events. We have Chelsea insisting that these aides were taking “significant sums of money from my parents personally.”



And we have longtime Hillary loyalist Huma Abedin concerned about the former secretary of State promising to attend a foundation event in Morocco at the request of its king, who had just promised a $12-million donation to the foundation. “She created this mess and she knows it,” Abedin wrote.



Conclusion



Just remember, a lot can happen in 10 days, and I really don’t trust the entire Justice Department or anyone in this present administration. So, we have to keep working and praying. Hillary will not go down without a fight, and God only knows what she’ll do next.



This is not a right wing conspiracy Hillary, you did this to yourself, and blessed be, Julian Assange is exposing all of it.



It’s time to elect a man who is not a politician. It’s time to elect an outsider. It’s time to elect a businessman. It’s time to elect someone who wants to make America great again. It’s time to elect a man who will DRAIN THE SWAMP! Vote to save America! Vote for Donald J. Trump.



[P.S. In order to wake up the population, we need to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]

			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
HOW AMERICA’S ELECTIONS ARE HACKED~PETITION TO REMOVE SOROS OWNED MACHINES SWITCHING VOTES SURPASSES 100,000
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

HOW AMERICA’S ELECTIONS ARE HACKED, MISSING LINK DISCOVERED



Vote fraud expert Bev Harris exposes 



electronic voting machines





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:




How America's Elections Are Hacked, Missing Link Discovered



Watch elections expert Bev Harris discuss the smoking gun behind voting fraud LIVE: Infowars.com/show







Black Box Voting, founded in 2003, performs nonpartisan investigative reporting on elections in an attempt to stop vote rigging.



You may be wondering what the term “black box” means. A “black box” system is non-transparent; its functions are hidden from the public. Elections, of course, should not be black box systems.



Here is a link to a free copy of the book, Black Box Voting HERE.



Author Bev Harris became known for groundbreaking work on electronic voting machines, which can remove transparency of the vote count.



With voting machines, all political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors:







Extensive analysis on the topic by Alex Jones can be viewed below:



Watch the full interview with Bev Harris streaming now from the Alex Jones Show:







How Elections Are Stolen In America Exposed



Published on Oct 31, 2016





This incredible video by blackboxvoting.org gives you all the details about how elections are manipulated and stolen in America without leaving a trace.









PETITION TO STOP GEORGE SOROS VOTING MACHINES HITS 100K



Will America finally stand up to global elite rigging our elections?




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:









A White House petition to remove Soros-owned electronic voting machines has passed the 100k votes necessary for a response. Will America finally stand up to global elite rigging our elections?



The U.K.-based company Smartmatic has sent voting machines to important battleground states across the US including Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia.



“Other jurisdictions affected are California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin,” noted the Daily Caller.



“Smartmatic Chairman Mark Malloch-Brown is a former U.N. official and sits on the board of Soros’ Open Society Foundations.”



The discovery has caused concern among the US voting populace given Soros’ deep ties with Clinton.







Soros Linked Voting Machines To Be Used In Key Battleground States



























			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
AMERICANS URGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED VOTER FRAUD AND INTIMIDATION~STATE NUMBERS TO CALL
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

AMERICANS URGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED VOTER FRAUD AND INTIMIDATION



SEE: http://newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news543.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
October 29, 2016© 2016 NewsWithViews.com



Donald J. Trump is arguably the only presidential candidate ever to be openly targeted by his own party’s (GOP’s) establishment, the entire Democratic Party, super-rich leftist organizations complete with their underground cash-dispersal system, and the mainstream media all at the same time.



Yet Trump isn’t backing down and in fact he’s telling his supporters — and undecided voters — that the current election process is a “rigged” system. He has focused his argument that voters have their only chance to defeat the “rigged” system by electing him.



“Remember folks, it’s a rigged system,” Trump said at a rally. “That’s why you’ve got to get out and vote, you’ve got to watch. Because this system is totally rigged.”



“I believe we’re actually winning,” Trump said Tuesday in Florida. “It’s a rigged system.”



“The media isn’t just against me. They’re against all of you,” he later said in St Augustine. “They’re against what we represent.”



Wikileaks documents lifted from the Internet servers of the Democratic National Committee and from individuals, such as Hillary for President Campaign director John Podesta, when released by Julian Assange gave an unvarnished look at the DNC and Clinton machines. Wikileaks document dumps also suggest that the Democratic Party ranks are rife with voter fraud and those eager to protect the status quo.







Add the recent videos released by ‘take-no-prisoners” investigative journalist James O’Keefe — videos that have Democratic operatives bragging about their unethical at best, criminal at worst, activities — and it’s no wonder conservatives are suspicious.



It wasn’t that long ago when conservatives watched in shock as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and certain Democratic Party officeholders targeted Tea Party groups and other right-of-center organizations that were seeking only their rightful tax-exempt status. Not one person at the IRS has been arrested let alone prosecuted for unlawful acts committed by a government agency against its own people.



While conservatives are accused of being infatuated with the Second Amendment (guns) liberals owe their allegiance to the Fifth Amendment (remaining silent to avoid incrimination in an illegal act).



Now with millions of Americans repeating Trump’s words — “The system is rigged” — the left is seeing that denying it is useless after all of the evidence was made public. Now they are saying this type of talk is “dangerous” to the integrity of our electoral system. They are even ridiculing Trump and asking him to prove his voter fraud allegations.



The argument isn’t whether voter fraud is real, but how widespread it is and will Americans follow the Department of Homeland Security’s advise: If you see something, say something. Below are the phone numbers for the authorities in each of the 50 states that citizens can contact to complain about irregularities seen or heard while visiting the polling stations during the elections.



Provide all the information possible and don’t worry about “profiling” or any other restrictions placed on cops and prosecutors. Also keep a record of whom you reported an incident, his or her title, the time and date you made the report and voilà you’ve done your civic duty.



Above are the telephone numbers to call about suspicious activity you’ve observed while voting.

			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	
		
	

		
		
FEDS USURP HOUSING AUTHORITY TO FIGHT “RACISM”~SUSTAINABLE FREEDOM LAB FIGHTS BACK
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

FEDS USURP HOUSING AUTHORITY 



TO FIGHT “RACISM” 




SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/24511-feds-usurp-housing-authority-to-fight-racism; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







The federal government is using the concept of “sustainable development” to usurp complete and unchallengeable control over housing in the United States. There is one group of patriots, however, that refuses to stand idly by while the fundamental right to property is abolished by the bureaucracy.



Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is the federal agency leading the attack against property rights and against local, accountable self-government after the fashion favored and established by our ancestors.



John Anthony of Sustainable Freedom Lab recognizes the threat and is warning his countrymen about the scope and severity of the federal assault. “HUD uses our own money to bring communities to heel,” Anthony said in a statement released on the group’s website October 28. “By saying “no,” we can bring the agency to its knees. We do not need Congress, we do not have the time to wait for deceptive legislation and we cannot depend on political leaders drunk with inside the beltway power. We need our neighbors, political and non-political, building the same coalitions our forefathers built to survive in this new rugged land,” he added.



Anthony’s assessment of HUD’s ultimate aim is spot on. This federal agency and the programs it administers are nothing more than regulations conceived and written by desk-bound dictators who are given unjust authority by the president and whose diktats are beyond the reach of the people who are forced to obey these directives or face being subjected to the full panoply of punishments.



HUD’s particular area of unaccountable absolutism is the environment and housing. In this latest effort, the agency’s underlying policy is the promotion of “sustainability,” which is globalist newspeak for totalitarianism under one world government.



Here’s the connection, as uncovered in an article published by Property Values Defense, a grassroots organization that “unites attorneys, public officials and activists nationwide to stop federal agency overreach”:



HUD, DOT and the EPA have been instrumental in fostering regionalism since 1993. In 2009, the three agencies formed a “Partnership for Sustainable Development” for the express purpose of merging their unique authorities toward the common goal of advancing sustainable regions. In June 2016, the agency also teamed with the Department of Education to promote regional Equity Assistance Centers to advance income integration in elementary and secondary classrooms.



These agencies are working feverishly to infill suburbs by transplanting urban families into the outlying communities, which then merge with nearby counties and towns into larger regions managed by unelected councils.



Even HUD’s new Assessment of Fair Housing, the document applicants must complete to receive AFFH related grants, requires grant recipients to align their local plan with a regional plan.



Collectivism is being forced on Americans under the guise of protecting the environment and providing “affordable housing” to the less advantaged.



The true purpose, of course, is to collect all mankind into urban mega-centers in order to facilitate the imposition of top-down, strong central government rule, otherwise known as global fascism.



John Anthony rightly perceives that the problem is not one of development, but one of despotism.



“HUD [and other federal agencies] have converged into a massive administration-led autocracy, pre-planning neighborhoods, living patterns, school attendance and even the social makeup of your community,” he said.



“Communities that resist face compliance reviews, withdrawal of millions in HUD funding or even civil rights lawsuits that will break the financial backs of most towns and counties. And, of course the counterfeit charges of not caring for America’s poor and needy.”



That last charge will be the wedge the federal government will use to divide Americans and to convince the purportedly neglected to accept federal tyranny in exchange for “equal housing opportunities.”



Of course, it is one thing for a city or county to want to resist the federal regulatory restrictions, but it is not as easy to maintain this staunch sovereignty in the face of a bag of federal cash and other incentives for playing ball with the bureaucrats.



States, counties, and cities must continue, however, refusing to dance to the tune played by the federal bandleader. They must reinforce American federalism and civil liberties by emphasizing in city and county codes and state laws the sovereignty that exists in states and that exists only on loan to the federal government, no matter how much money the latter can use to bribe the former.



When it comes to caving to the central government’s offers: caveat emptor.



The familiar “carrot and stick” gambit is the coin of the realm in D.C. From police to highways, from environmental standards to labor policies, the federal government has stomped its heavy jackboot into all aspects of life — areas that were once the bailiwick of states, cities, or the people themselves.



Anthony and the Sustainable Freedom Lab offer seminars to show municipalities methods for charting a course around HUD’s haranguing and around the centrifugal spin of “sustainable development.”



The course, entitled “Ending HUD’s Tyranny,” teaches local governments to “turn the tables on the government’s argument that because you reject HUD overreach, you are a ‘racist that does not care about African Americans, women or the protected classes.'”



While such lessons are useful and urgently needed if American cities and counties are to remain independent, free to forge their own infrastructure plans and housing ordinances, there is a more permanent, constitutionally sound system for forcing the federal beast back inside its constitutional cage: the law of agency.



As I wrote in an article reporting on a Georgia county’s effort to nullify HUD’s regulatory remaking of the right to property:



Upon its ratification, the states, as principals, gave limited power to the central government to act as their agent in certain matters of common concern: defense, taxation, interstate commerce, etc.



The authority of the agent — in this case the federal government — is derived from the agreement that created the principal/agent relationship. Whether the agent is lawfully acting on behalf of the principal is a question of fact. The agent may legally bind the principal only insofar as its actions lie within the contractual boundaries of its power.



Should the agent exceed the scope of its authority, not only is the principal not held accountable for those acts, but the breaching agent is legally liable to the principal (and any affected third parties who acted in reliance on the agent’s authority) for that breach.



Under the law of agency, the principal may revoke the agent’s authority at will. It would be unreasonable to oblige the principals to honor promises of an agent acting outside the boundaries of its authority as set out in the document that created the agency in the first place.



Imagine the chaos that would be created if principals were legally bound by the acts of an agent that “went rogue” and acted prejudicially to the interests of the principals from whom he derived any power in the first place. It is a fundamental tenet of the law of agency that the agent may lawfully act only for the benefit of the principal.



Finally, despite seeming like we are constantly “fighting an uphill battle against a government that is corrupt, dishonest packed with legions of uniformed bureaucrats,” there are many avenues now open to cities and counties that lead to liberty and the protection of the right to own property and to the permanent ostracism of the globalists and their sustainability scam.



_________________________________________________________



JOHN ANTHONY OF SUSTAINABLE FREEDOM LAB




John Anthony is the founder of Sustainable Freedom Lab. He is a nationally acclaimed speaker, researcher and writer. Mr. Anthony’s Property Value Defense Network informs public officials and attorneys nationwide of the impacts of regulatory laws on property rights. His online workshop, Shattering America’s Trance, teaches effective techniques for cross-political communications.







SEE ALSO: TOM DE WEESE AT:




Sustainable Freedom Lab Seminar



Published on Sep 25, 2012





While Americans focus on sustainable development, they often lose sight of the importance of property rights. In many cases people are losing their property, their ability to travel as they choose and even the right to develop their own land. All in the quest to achieve sustainable development.


What they forget is that, the best way to protect land is to own and care for your own.


This series teaches all citizens how to protect their property rights in a changing world while respecting the environment.















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
JIMMY CARTER APPOINTED JUDGE BLOCKS ALABAMA LAW BANNING ABORTION FACILITIES FROM OPERATING NEAR SCHOOLS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

JUDGE BLOCKS ALABAMA LAW 



BANNING ABORTION FACILITIES 



FROM OPERATING NEAR SCHOOLS 



BY HEATHER CLARK



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





MONTGOMERY, Ala. — A federal judge in Alabama who once ordered the removal of Roy Moore’s Ten Commandments monument has now also blocked a state law banning abortion facilities from operating near k-8 schools. Judge Myron Thompson, appointed to the bench by then-President Jimmy Carter, opined that the law would close two abortion facilities that perform an estimated 70 percent of abortions in the state, and would therefore place an undue “burden” on mothers seeking to obtain an abortion since they would have to drive further.



“This burden would become particularly devastating for low-income women who represent half of all abortion recipients and a significant majority of women seeking abortions in Alabama,” he wrote.







Thompson said that it if women can’t have an abortionist end the lives of their children, they will resort to doing it themselves.



“Recently, Tuscaloosa’s medical director has treated multiple women who attempted to self-abort, such as a woman who consumed turpentine after consulting the Internet and learning about its use as a folk remedy,” he wrote. “So too can Alabama expect an increased level of self-abortions if the school-proximity law were to take effect.”



Thompson also contended that there was no evidence that the law, which was passed in part to keep children from being exposed to the issue of abortion, was necessary.



“The record contains absolutely no evidence of concerns expressed by the school’s students or their parents about the Huntsville clinic or the demonstrations near it,” he stated. “As to Highlands, the State’s two interests (minimizing disruption and supporting a parent’s right to control their children’s exposure to the subject of abortion) would not in any way be furthered by the closing or relocation of the Huntsville clinic.”



As previously reported, the law had been challenged earlier this year by abortionists Willie Parker (a professing Christian) and Yashica Robinson White, with the assistance of the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama (ACLU).



“The Alabama Department of Public Health may not issue or renew a health center license to an abortion clinic or reproductive health center that performs abortions and is located within 2,000 feet of a K-8 public school,” the legislation, S.B. 205, simply reads.



There are two abortion facilities near schools in Alabama: Alabama Women’s Center for Reproductive Alternatives in Huntsville and West Alabama Women’s Center Inc. AL.com reports that the facilities performed 72 percent of the state’s 8,080 abortions in 2014.



Thompson also blocked a law on Thursday that would ban dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortions, also known as dismemberment abortions. It made it illegal for abortionists to “purposely to dismember a living unborn child and extract him or her one piece at a time from the uterus through use of clamps, grasping forceps, tongs, scissors, or similar instruments that, through the convergence of two rigid levers, slice, crush, or grasp, or any combination of the foregoing, a portion of the unborn child’s body to cut or rip it off.”



D&E procedures are common nationwide in second trimester abortions.



Abortions 15 weeks (nearly four months gestation) and later would be “almost wholly unavailable,” Thompson asserted.



“Alabama women would likely lose their right to pre-viability abortion access at or after 15 weeks,” he said, stating that mothers have a “constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy before viability.”



The ACLU of Alabama cheered Thompson’s issuance of the preliminary injunctions. He had granted temporary emergency injunctions in July to stop the laws from going into effect on their scheduled date of Aug. 1.



“It’s long past time for our elected officials to stop wasting time and taxpayer money passing laws that violate women’s constitutional rights and start focusing on the needs of women and families in this state,” said executive director Susan Watson in a statement. “Alabama women deserve to access their rights protected by the Constitution. And our doctors deserve to be able to provide care in clinics, not fight medically unnecessary laws in courthouses.”



As previously reported, Thompson is known for ordering the removal of a Ten Commandments monument placed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore in 2003. He also made headlines last October when he ruled that officials must restore the state’s contract with Planned Parenthood because canceling it denied women their choice in reproductive services.









			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	


			  

					
1
…
6
7
8
9