Day: November 1, 2016

DONNA BRAZILE OF THE DNC RESIGNS (OR FIRED) FROM CNN AFTER BEING CAUGHT FEEDING HILLARY QUESTIONS A SECOND TIME PRIOR TO DEBATES

DONNA BRAZILE OF THE DNC 
RESIGNS (OR FIRED) FROM CNN 
AFTER BEING CAUGHT FEEDING HILLARY DEBATE QUESTIONS A SECOND TIME 

About Time! CNN Fires Donna Brazile for Rigging Debates, Giving Hillary Questions in Advance

BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24525-about-time-cnn-fires-donna-brazile-for-rigging-debates-giving-hillary-questions-in-advance; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
CNN made it official Monday, firing commentator Donna Brazile (shown) for giving Hillary Clinton questions in advance of debates with Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primaries. The avidly pro-Clinton network was virtually forced to sever ties with Brazile by the new revelations from the latest WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta’s hacked e-mails. Podesta, the longtime adviser/crony/fixer for Bill and Hillary Clinton, and currently chairman of Hillary’s election campaign, has now seen over 39,000 of his e-mails released by the WikiLeaks hacktivists, and they have been very revealing indeed, exposing the corruption, dirty tricks, and criminality of the Clinton political machine .
Brazile, a veteran Democratic Party hack, has been serving as interim chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) since July, when then-DNC chair Rep. Deborah Wasserman Schultz, was forced to resign in an e-mail scandal that exposed Wasserman Schultz and other DNC officials blatantly taking sides with Clinton and sabotaging Sanders, in violation of DNC rules to maintain neutrality in primary campaigns.
As the Podesta e-mails reveal, Brazile was involved in those same ethics violations, extending to violating the rules for the televised debates. The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), which sponsored the debates, states on its website: “All debates will be moderated by a single individual and will run from 9:00-10:30 p.m. Eastern Time without commercial breaks. As always, the moderators alone will select the questions to be asked, which are not known to the CPD or to the candidates.”
However, that obviously was not the case, as Brazile was providing Team Clinton with a heads-up ofdebate questions in advance. The first Brazile e-mail to leak out concerned the televised CNN-TV One Town Hall event on March 13 of this year. The day before, Brazile sent an e-mail to Clinton’s director of communications, Jennifer Palmieri, saying she’s worried about “HRC” (Hillary Rodham Clinton) facing a question on the death penalty. The subject heading of her e-mail was: “Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance.”
Here is the e-mail, as provided by WikiLeaks:
On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Donna Brazile <donna@brazileassociates.com>; wrote:
Here’s one that worries me about HRC.
DEATH PENALTY
19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty?
Sent from Donna’s I Pad. Follow me on twitter @donnabrazile
The following day, on the CNN-TV One Town Hall, co-moderated by CNN’s Jake Tapper and TV One’s Roland Martin, Hillary Rodham Clinton was indeed asked a question about the death penalty, by audience member Ricky Jackson — and HRC had a scripted answer ready and waiting. We, the public, did not find out that the game had been rigged until months later, when WikiLeaks released the incriminating e-mail on October 11. Nevertheless, even after the WikiLeaks release, most of the establishment media ignored the Brazile-Podesta-Palmieri skullduggery in favor of bashing Donald Trump over unsubstantiated, sensationalist charges of sexual harassment. For nearly two weeks, Donna Brazile was allowed to wave off the e-mail evidence with diversionary tactics and charges that the e-mails are fabrications by WikiLeaks and Russian intelligence.
However, on October 20 Brazile was skewered on Fox News by a relentless Megyn Kelly, who refused to let her weasel her way through another interview. Not that the DNC chair didn’t try; Brazile kept going to script, using every diversion she could muster to avoid answering the direct, careful questions put to her by the Fox anchor.
She tried the Christian/persecution diversion: “As a Christian woman I understand persecution, but I will not sit here and be persecuted,” Brazile told Megyn Kelly.
She tried the “poisoned fruit” diversion: “Podesta’s emails were stolen. You’re so interested in talking about stolen material, you’re like a thief that wanna bring into the night the things that are in the gutter.”
She tried the motor-mouth/repetition diversion, the total innocence diversion, and much more.
It was still more of the same patently absurd denial and rehearsed propaganda by Brazile when Kelly confronted her with the undercover video stings of top Democratic dirty tricks operatives Scott Foval and Bob Creamer, who were caught red-handed boasting of rigging elections and admitting to inciting violence at Trump rallies.
Incredibly, Brazile insisted to Megyn Kelly that “I always play ‘straight up’ and I’m going to be ‘straight up’ with you.” However, it was painfully clear by the end of the Fox “interview” that “straight up” Donna Brazile is as weasely and deceitful as “Crooked Hillary.”
It is noteworthy that during her Fox News interview, when Megyn Kelly repeatedly asked her where she got the advance debate questions, Brazile fatuously insisted that she had “never” received any questions from CNN. She continued repeating the same lines even when Kelly asked her directly if the questions had come not from CNN itself but from Roland Martin, the former CNN commentator who now works for TV One and co-moderated the Town Hall event.
In the same e-mail thread of March 12 cited above, Brazile responded to a reply from Jennifer Palmieri. Brazile told Palmieri: “I’ll send a few more [debate questions]. Though some questions Roland submitted.” That would seem to be a very solid “clue” that Roland Martin was the source and Brazile was the conduit to Podesta and the Clinton Campaign.
Politico reporter Hadas Gold reported on October 12 that Politico had obtained an e-mail of March 12 from Roland Martin to CNN debate producers with the identical death penalty question that appeared in Brazile’s March 12 e-mail to Palmieri. What’s more, it was Roland Martin who introduced Ricky Jackson, the pre-selected, pre-scripted “audience” member who asked the rigged question about the death penalty.
As Gold reports, Martin initially denied that he had shared his questions “with anybody.” However, after being confronted with the fact that Politico possessed e-mail evidence to the contrary, he began walking the denial back to more ambiguous ground.
Media “Uncomfortable” but not Outraged — Deceit, Propaganda Continue
In an October 13 interview, Jake Tapper said he has “tremendous regard” for Brazile, but said the WikiLeaks revelation was “very, very troubling.” “It’s horrifying,” the CNN anchor said. “Journalistically it’s horrifying, and I’m sure it will have an impact on [CNN] partnering with this organization [TV One] in the future.”
The following day, on October 14, CNN spokeswoman Lauren Pratapas stated that CNN hadn’t given Brazile the debate questions in advance and announced Brazile had resigned from the network. “CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate,” Pratapas said in a written statement. “We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor.”
The October 30 WikiLeaks release contains another Brazile-DNC-Podesta debate revelation, concerning the March 6 debate in Flint, Michigan, where Democrat Party operatives and their media allies have transformed lead poisoning into a false national issue with which to clobber Republicans. The Clinton-Sanders Democratic primary debate was hosted by CNN and moderated by Anderson Cooper. (See the full debate here.)
The event was held in Flint at Clinton’s request, as she herself pointed out during the course of the debate. A Brazile e-mail from March 5 of this year to Podesta and Palmieri, is entitled: “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash.”
“Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint” Brazile’s e-mail goes on to alert Hillary’s debate coaches. Sure enough, the lead poisoning question came up on cue, and HRC slammed in another easy homerun answer.
lead poison question
Yes, many in the pro-Clinton media industry are “uncomfortable” with the WikiLeaks revelations, but, judging from their continued overwhelmingly slanted coverage, the discomfort comes from being exposed, not from being disgusted with the serial cheating and lying of the Clinton camp and their media allies. There has been precious little outrage expressed by the pro-Clinton mainstream media elites of the kind and volume that would have gushed forth if the same rigging had been perpetrated by the Trump Campaign. There have been no media-orchestrated calls for TV One to fire Roland Martin, nor for the DNC to fire Donna Brazile, nor for Hillary Clinton to fire John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri.
The Brazile-Podesta-Palmieri debate e-mails are damning, but, arguably, not as serious as the many other revelations concerning the Clinton family’s rampant criminality on national security matters such as Uranium One, and the “pay-to-play” wheeling-dealing at the HRC State Department and the Clinton Foundation. However, the WikiLeaks e-mails released thus far have shown an alarming willingness and ability of Hillary Rodham Clinton and her DNC-Big Media allies to rig the election debates. And the ones we’ve seen may be only the tip of the iceberg. If this is the case in the primaries, are Donald Trump’s charges about rigging the November 8 election really all that outlandish, as the pro-Clinton media choir would have us believe?
Related articles:

TURKEY: EMERGENCY ORDER BROADENING POWERS TO DEPORT FOREIGNERS CONCERNS CHRISTIANS

Emergency Order Broadening Turkey’s Powers to Deport Foreigners Concerns Christians
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



TURKEY (Morning Star News) – An emergency order issued over the weekend makes it significantly easier for Turkey to deport expatriates, further unsettling  foreign Christians after the government this month ordered the deportation two U.S. Christians.



The directive eliminates the need for a court decision before a foreigner can be deported, amending sections of the 2013 Law on Foreigners and International Protection, as reported in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey on Saturday (Oct. 29). Now the government, in particular the Ministry of the Interior, can independently deport anyone it deems a threat to “public security” without a judicial order or review.



The Christians ordered deported earlier this month were accused of being such security risks.







The change in the law is one of many made by the government in the wake of the unsuccessful coup attempt on July 15. Since then, the government enacted a “state of emergency” that allows it to suspend the law and imprison anyone it deems a threat to the country. Officials assert the emergency laws are necessary to fight terrorists and those responsible for the attempted coup, but critics say the moves amount to a purge of anyone critical of the government.



Many foreign Christians in Turkey were already concerned about being deported or banned from returning to the country, in light of the two U.S. Christians the government ordered deported, and have considered canceling Christmas travel plans. The new order compounds the government’s already expanded powers.



“It’s just like they can come to your door and drag you out of your home, and there is nothing you can do about it,” one expatriate Christian who asked not to be identified said. “It really makes no sense. They’re going after people who love the country, pray for it, help improve it and invest their money here, and not those who are really hurting the country.”



According to the Association of Protestant Churches (TEK), expatriate Christians in Turkey have increasingly been affected by residency issues, deportation or entry bans. U.S. Christians, specifically those seen as “active” Christians, are being targeted by officials who see anyone who isn’t Sunni Muslim as a threat to national unity, public order and “Turkishness,” according to TEK spokesman Soner Tufan.



“American Christians are being targeted as a symptom of larger problems with the U.S.,” Tufan said, adding that rocky relations between the Turkish government and Washington  have to do with Turkish dissatisfaction with extradition process of Fethullah Gülen, whom the Turkish government claims was the architect of the coup attempt.



“Turkey wants that man from America, but they won’t give him to them,” Tufan said.



The Turkish government is holding one U.S. Christian in a deportation center without charge. Andrew Brunson, the U.S. pastor of Izmir Dirilis Church, is caught in legal limbo. The government has issued a deportation order and lifetime ban against him for being “a national security risk” but refuses to deport him. They also refuse to release him on appeal of his charges.



On Oct. 7, Izmir police arrested Brunson and his wife Norine, telling them they would be deported in 15 days and banned from Turkey for life.



The couple was taken to the Izmir Immigration Centre and was refused access to a U.S. consular official or a lawyer, according to religious freedom advocacy group Middle East Concern (MEC). They were confined together but denied clean clothes, medicine and other basic provisions until Oct. 13.



On Oct. 19, officials took Norine Brunson to receive a brief physical, told her that charges against her had been dismissed and released her.



Andrew Brunson remains alone in a detention center. The usual deadline for him to be deported has passed, and in spite of his signing government papers agreeing to be deported and the lack of any charges against him, the government refuses to release him.



Brunson was the second U.S. citizen the government ordered deported in October. On Saturday (Oct. 29), Ryan D. Keating, 39, a U.S. Christian and long-time time resident of Turkey, was reunited with his wife and four children in England after more than 20 days of separation when he was banned from reentering Turkey.



Keating, a doctoral student in Philosophy at Ankara University, was detained when he arrived at Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport on Oct. 16. Immigration officials told him that on Aug. 19, his residency permit had been revoked for “national security” reasons and the Ministry of the Interior had issued a lifetime ban on him entering Turkey. After a brief stay in the detention holding area of the airport, Keating was then placed on the first flight back to London.



Keating said he moved to Turkey in 2006, but his interest and sense of connection to the country started during a high school student exchange program. On his return in 2006 to start his doctoral studies, he became very active in his church and started a discipleship program and a ministry to aid refugees.



Keating told Morning Star News he thinks the reason he was expelled was because his ministries were “high profile.”



“Several of the church ministries I have developed or have been in charge of have been high profile, and in that sense I am an easy target for people who want to rid the country of Christians,” he said. “The work that we do with refugees is especially politically sensitive.”



Keating emphasized that neither he nor his wife have any affiliation with a political or ideological group in Turkey, “directly or indirectly.”



“We want to emphasize, we love Turkey and the people of Turkey,” he said. “We’ve not done anything illegal, and I’ve been careful throughout my time in Turkey to honor all of the rules and regulations about visas, about residency, about things related to our ministry that we do. So it’s especially disappointing when the government labels me as it has to kick me out unjustly.”



Keating is fighting the decision against him in court.

______________________________________________________





Jews die, Turks celebrate



BY ROBERT SPENCER





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



“Idiots, since when have non-Muslims been wished to rest in peace?”



Words to ponder. Turkey’s rapidly escalating re-Islamization threatens Jews, Christians, and all non-Muslims.



“Jews Die, Turks Celebrate,” by Robert Jones, Gatestone Institute, November 1, 2016:





Two important Jew [sic] have lost their lives lately: Shimon Peres, the ninth President of Israel, and Ishak Alaton, a Jewish businessman from Turkey.



Upon receiving the news of the deaths of these two men, many Turks rushed to Twitter proudly and openly to show off their hatred of Jews, according to the Turkish news site, Avlaremoz, which covers Jewish affairs.



Some of the Tweets posted after Peres’s death on September 28 included:


    

  • “Shimon Peres died, there is now one fewer Jew. I wish the same for other Jews and their sperm…”
    • 

  • “Shimon Peres died. One fewer Jew. The world has got rid of one more piece of dirt.”
    • 

  • “Shimon Peres, you’ll get a nice tan there. May your hellfire be fierce. Jewish dog.”
    • 

  • “It would be great if we do salah [Islamic prayer] of thankfulness every time a Jew drops dead.”
    • 

  • “Hellfire is calling you, Jewish dog Shimon Peres.”
    • 




Some people might attempt to normalize these Turks’ hatred of Peres by pointing out that Peres was an Israeli state leader. However, the reactions many Turks gave on social media after a Turkish businessman of Jewish origin died shows that these reactions are instead simply raw Jew-hate, which has little to do with the policies of the state of Israel.



Ishak Alaton, a Turkish businessman and investor of Jewish descent, born in Istanbul in 1927, died of heart failure on September 11, at the age of 89. This is how some Turks on Twitter paid farewell to him:


    

  • “Ishak Alaton, the darling of Soros and the Jewish usurer, has croaked. Master Baphomet was not able to protect him. I wish the same for other Jewish vampires.”
    • 

  • “Even those whose top expertise is making money eventually bid farewell to life. Ishak Alaton lost his life.”
    • 

  • [Responding to a tweet that wished Alaton to rest in peace:] “Idiots, since when have non-Muslims been wished to rest in peace? You do not even know about that. You have nothing to do with religion.”
    • 

  • “Even his air conditioners will not be enough to cool him down in the afterlife.”
    • 

  • “It is cause for rejoicing that one more Jew falls before the Bayram [Eid al-Adha, the Islamic ‘Sacrifice Feast’].”
    • 




Alaton had contributed immensely to the Turkish economy, and culture, as well as to the efforts of democratization of the country.



Between 1947 and 1948, he performed his military service in the Turkish army, compulsory for all male Turks. After studying and working in Sweden from 1951 to 1954, he returned to Turkey, co-founded the Alarko group of companies, and employed thousands of people.



A prominent businessman and philanthropist, Alaton was granted the Swedish Order of the North Star and the Spanish Order of Civil Merit. Yet he preferred to live in Turkey. There he became the chairman of one of the most prominent businesses in the country and established the Turkey Foundation of Economic and Social Studies.



The Turks that spewed Jew-hatred after his death are evidently sure that no prosecutor in Turkey will hold them accountable account for their remarks calling for hatred and even violence against Jews. They seem to think that no matter what you say or write about Jews, you can get away with it.



In fact, celebrating Jewish deaths on social media seems to be a tradition for some Turks. Following an attempted stabbing at the Israeli Embassy in Ankara on September 21, and the bombing attack in Istanbul’s Taksim district which resulted in three Israeli deaths, many Turkish Twitter-users had filled Twitter with hate-filled messages again.



This should come as no surprise: 71% of the Turkish adult population harbors anti-Semitic attitudes, according to the 2015 Anti-Defamation League Global 100 Poll.



“I do not think that there has ever been a period in this country in which anti-Semitism and hatred against Jews has decreased,” said Isil Demirel, an anthropologist from Turkey and an author for Avlaremoz. “And during the current political atmosphere, hate speech against Jews in Turkey is even more commonplace.”



The Jewish community in Turkey has also been exposed to deadly terror attacks at the hands of Muslim groups. On September 6, 1986, Palestinian Arab terrorists affiliated with the Abu Nidal Organization bombed and opened fire at Neve Shalom Synagogue in Istanbul during a Sabbath service; 22 people were killed.



On November 15, 2003, Islamist Turks and Al-Qaeda sympathizers exploded near-simultaneous car bombs outside two Istanbul synagogues — Neve Shalom and Beth Israel — both filled with worshippers. At least 23 people were murdered, and more than 300 wounded. According to Demirel:





“The attacks against synagogues in particular have made security an even more alarming issue for the Jewish community. That is why, for many years, synagogues and other Jewish institutions have been protected by safety measures…. The government should immediately recognize anti-Semitism as a hate crime and impose penal sanctions on the perpetrators. I think this is the most important step to be taken to help the Jewish community live in peace here.”





But given the anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli statements of state authorities in Turkey, it does not seem realistic to expect them to make laws that would recognize anti-Semitism as an offense in Turkey.



For example, on July 18, 2014, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said:





“The state that knows best how to kill children is Israel. The obvious reality is that Israel is the country that threatens peace in the world and in the Middle East. Israel has never been pro-peace. It has persecuted and continues the persecution.



“Israel might seem to be the winner now. But it will eventually be defeated. This will also bother the Jews living in certain parts of the world. We as Turkey and myself — as long as I am in charge — can never have a positive view of Israel.”





According to a 2014 Pew Poll, Israel is the most hated country in Turkey, with 86% of respondents holding an unfavorable view of the Jewish state, and only 2% viewing it positively.



Although the Jewish people have not been allowed to live free and safe lives in Turkey, they have resided there for millennia — as have the Armenians and the Greeks, who were also persecuted, and the Alevis and the Kurds who are persecuted now.



“The Jewish presence in Asia Minor dates back to Biblical times,” writes Professor Franklin Hugh Adler. “This is mentioned by Aristotle and several Roman sources, including Josephus.





“Jews, in fact, had inhabited this land long before the birth of Mohammed and the Islamic conquests of the seventh and eighth centuries, or for that matter, the arrival and conquests of the Turks, beginning in the eleventh century.



“At the beginning of the Turkish Republic, in 1923, the Jewish population was 81,454. Nevertheless, Turkey’s current Jewish population has diminished to 15,000.”





Many verbal and physical attacks on Jews have played a significant role in Jewish emigration from Turkey. These included the “Citizen Speak Turkish” Campaign of 1930s, the 1934 anti-Jewish pogrom in eastern Thrace, the 1941-1942 conscription of the “twenty classes” (an attempt to conscript all male non-Muslim populations, including the elderly and mentally ill during World War II), and the 1942-1944 Wealth Tax. Today, under the current Islamist government, life for Jews in Turkey is no easier than before.



Meanwhile, militants linked to the Islamic State in the Sinai Peninsula recently released a new video that contains more threats against the Jews and Israel. “Oh Jews, wait for us,” the narrator in the video threatens. “The punishment is severe and soon you will pay a high price.”



This history and narrative leads one to ask: What is a radical Muslim and what is a moderate Muslim? Is “being radical” only about being an armed militant? Can Muslims who do not engage in violent action but who have extremely hate-filled and murderous speech be considered “moderate”? Or should their supremacist or even genocidal speech be reason enough to think of them as “radical?”



What then is the difference between armed Islamic State terrorists who threaten Jews with massacre and unarmed Turkish Twitter users who celebrate Jewish deaths and call for massacring more Jews?









			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
HILLARY CLINTON’S “WATERGATE”?
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

Hillary’s Watergate?



“CARLOS DANGER” 



(WEINER’S SEXTING USER NAME)



Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top aide, sent thousands of emails to the private laptop she shared with husband Anthony Weiner, a.k.a. Carlos Danger, who is under FBI investigation for allegedly sexting with a 15-year-old girl.
BY PAT BUCHANAN



Pat Buchanan



SEE: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/11/hillarys-watergate/#axzz4Olw0h0eP; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







Carlos Danger





USA –  -(Ammoland.com)- After posting Friday’s column, “A Presidency from Hell,” about the investigations a President Hillary Clinton would face, by afternoon it was clear I had understated the gravity of the situation.



Networks exploded with news that FBI Director James Comey had informed Congress he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email scandal, which he had said in July had been concluded.



“Bombshell” declared Carl Bernstein. The stock market tumbled. “October surprise!” came the cry.



The only explanation, it seemed, was that the FBI had uncovered new information that could lead to a possible indictment of the former secretary of state, who by then could be the president of the United States.



By Sunday, we knew the source of the eruption.



Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top aide, sent thousands of emails to the private laptop she shared with husband Anthony Weiner, a.k.a. Carlos Danger, who is under FBI investigation for allegedly sexting with a 15-year-old girl.





The Weiner-Abedin laptop contains 650,000 emails.





The FBI has not yet reviewed Abedin’s emails, and they could turn out to be duplicates of those the FBI has already seen, benign, or not relevant to the investigation of Clinton.


Andrew McCabeAndrew McCabe’s wife, in a 2015 state senate race in Virginia, received $475,000 in PAC contributions from a longtime friend and major fundraiser for Hillary Clinton.



But it does appear that Abedin misled the FBI when she told them all communications devices containing State Department work product were turned over to State when she departed in 2013.



Clinton, understandably, was stunned and outraged by Comey’s letter.



For it casts a cloud of suspicion over her candidacy by raising the possibility that the FBI director could reverse his decision of July, and recommend her prosecution.



By Monday, Oct. 31 2016, new problems had arisen, some potentially crippling or possibly lethal to a Clinton presidency.



Reporters have unearthed a near-mutiny inside the FBI over the decision to shut down the investigation of the Clinton email scandal and Comey’s recommendation of no prosecution.



Andrew McCabe, No. 2 at the FBI, has come under anonymous fire from inside the bureau as one of those most reluctant to pursue aggressively any investigations of the Clintons.





McCabe’s wife, in a 2015 state senate race in Virginia, received $475,000 in PAC contributions from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime friend and major fundraiser for Bill and Hillary Clinton.





After the Senate race that McCabe’s wife lost, he was promoted from No. 3 at the FBI to No. 2, where he has far more influence over decisions to investigate and recommend prosecution.



Justice Department higher-ups under Attorney General Loretta Lynch apparently disagreed with Comey notifying Congress, and the nation, to new developments in the email scandal. Yet Comey had given his word to Congress that he would do so.



In the Southern District of New York, which has jurisdiction over the Weiner sexting investigation, FBI agents have reportedly been blocked from opening an investigation into charges of corruption in the Clinton Foundation.



This follows revelations that corporate chiefs and foreign rulers and regimes, hit up for contributions to the Clinton Foundation, were then urged by an ex-Clinton aide to provide six-figure speaking fees for Bill Clinton.



This follows reports the Clinton Foundation took contributions for victims of natural disasters, and awarded multimillion-dollar contracts to contributors to do the work.


Attorney General Loretta LynchStill unanswered is what Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch discussed during that 30-minute meeting on the Phoenix tarmac.



Still unanswered is what Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch discussed during that 30-minute meeting on the Phoenix tarmac, prior to the FBI and Justice Department decision not to indict Hillary Clinton.



The stench of corruption is reaching Bhopal dimensions.



What appears about to happen seems inevitable and predictable.



If Hillary Clinton is elected, the email scandal, the pay-for-play scandal involving the Clinton Foundation, “Bill Clinton, Inc.,” the truthfulness of her testimony, and reports of Clinton-paid dirty tricksters engaging in brown shirt tactics at Trump rallies, are all going to be investigated more thoroughly by the FBI.


Tim KaineShould Hillary be be forced from office, Tim Kaine would be our President…



And if Clinton is president, there is no way her Justice Department can investigate the Clinton scandals, any more than this city in the early 1970s would entrust an investigation into Watergate to the Nixon Justice Department.



If Clinton wins this election, and Republicans hold onto one or both houses of Congress, investigations of the Clinton scandals will start soon after her inaugural and will go on for years. And the clamor for a special prosecutor, who will, as Archibald Cox did with Nixon, build a huge staff and spend years investigating, will become irresistible.



Realizing that this is the near-certain fate and future of any Hillary Clinton presidency, and would be disastrous for the country, Sunday night, Doug Schoen, who worked for President Clinton for six years, said he has changed his mind and will not be voting for Hillary.



Donald Trump says this is worse than Watergate. As of now, it is only potentially so.



But if Hillary Clinton, this distrusted and disbelieved woman, does take the oath of office on Jan. 20 2017, there is a real possibility that, like Nixon, down the road a year or two, she could be forced from office.





Do we really want to go through this again?



















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
WIKILEAKS EMAIL: HILLARY CAMPAIGN STRUGGLES TO REACH “F***ING DUMB” YOUNG PEOPLE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

Wikileaks Email: Hillary Campaign Struggles to Reach "F**king Dumb" Young People



WIKILEAKS EMAIL: HILLARY CAMPAIGN STRUGGLES TO REACH “F***ING DUMB” YOUNG PEOPLE



“That’s the crap that young people pay attention to”



BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON



SEE: http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-email-hillary-campaign-struggles-to-reach-fking-dumb-young-people/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







A new email released by Wikileaks as part of the Podesta dump features Hillary ally Wendy Bronfein advising Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta on how to reach “f***ing dumb” young people.



Marketing executive Bronfein tells Podesta that Clinton “may not be the best face” to attract younger voters and that she needs to utilize “trending figures” as par of an “infusion to pull younger voters” because “that’s the crap that young people pay attention to”.



Bronfein goes on to state, “It’s f**king dumb but being “cool” counts for more than it maybe should.”



She references Bill Clinton’s saxophone playing as an example of this before asserting, “I hate to generalize a generation but by social media nature, they “follow”. So if someone they identify as cool endorses – they will likely fall in line with that candidate.”



Bronfein is introduced to John Podesta in another email as someone who “could be immensely helpful in improving HRC’s connection to millennials.”







The email is yet another example of the disdain that Hillary insiders have for Clinton’s own voters.



Yesterday, we highlighted how Clinton ally Brent Budowsky accused Hillary operative David Brock of having a plan that relied upon black voters being “stupid”.



In an audio recording leaked earlier this month, Hillary Clinton was caught on tape saying Bernie Sanders supporters are “living in their parents’ basement” and had bought into a “false promise”.



In another email, Clinton operative Bill Ivey spoke of the need to maintain political power by producing “an unaware and compliant citizenry”.



_____________________________________________________



Wikileaks Bombshell: Hillary Camp Calls 



Young People “F***ING Dumb”

















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
CLINTON CAMPAIGN IMPLODING, ABEDIN IN HOT WATER
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

CLINTON CAMPAIGN IMPLODING, ABEDIN IN HOT WATER



SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh364.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







By Kelleigh Nelson




October 31, 2016
NewsWithViews.com



“Wickedness was like food: once you got started it was hard to stop; the gut expanded to take in more and more.” —John Updike, The Witches of Eastwick



“Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!”—Ronald Kessler, Inside the White House



Hillary is Once Again Under Investigation



Images of Abedin crying on the Clinton plane have surfaced after the FBI announcement that they’ve reopened the Clinton email investigation. It was later revealed that Huma Abedin’s ex-husband, Anthony Weiner, shared the same laptop that contained damning evidence against Clinton.



Abedin has worked for Hillary Clinton for 21 years as her number one aide, and her presence has been fodder for any number of conservative articles, including my own, because of her ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which makes this entire FBI investigation even more interesting.



Back in July, everyone assumed that when FBI Director James Comey said, “I’m not moving forward with charges; I’m not going to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton,” that the investigation was closed. But apparently, they never closed it. It was still technically open. Other investigations within the FBI were going on, and in this case, one of them was Anthony Weiner, former husband of Huma Abedin, whose proclivities to send pornographic photos of himself were allegedly under investigation. Of course, that investigation by the FBI led them to the emails from Anthony Weiner’s and Huma Abedin’s devices, and thus finding classified government information on them. Now there are warrants for even more.



She previously was granted an immunity deal by the FBI, as were other Clinton staff.



By withholding evidence during her FBI interview, that she had a home computer and then lying that she only printed emails at the State Dept., not home, Huma Abedin just wrote a big fat VOID over her immunity deal. So, is she going to talk or face jail? My guess is she’ll plead the 5th. She is not on the plane with Hillary to Florida, although she was on the plane yesterday to Iowa. Hillary doesn’t want her around apparently. When you play with fire, you often get burned.



This could not have happened at a worse time for Hillary Clinton. I wonder what kind of deal Obama is making to be kept out of this mess. She is now a cornered animal, and one I would consider even more dangerous than she is normally.



Huma Testified to Hillary’s Burned Schedules



Yes, Huma Abedin testified in a deposition last July where she indicated that Hillary Clinton destroyed a ton of her schedules when she was Secretary of State. Why would she put hundreds of her own travel logs in a burn bag to have destroyed? Aren’t all of her travels as Secretary documented by the government?



In that deposition, it was obvious that Huma was also “extremely careless” with some sensitive documents, and even emailed another aide to tell her that Hillary’s schedule was left sitting on a bed in an unlocked hotel room.



There’s more…WikiLeaks revealed that Abedin had access to Hillary’s Secretary of State email address that wasn’t secured! Hillary apparently naps quite frequently because of a mental health issue, or maybe because of one too many cocktails, but nevertheless, she allowed Huma to use her email server to send replies and read what was coming in. Abedin did NOT have the clearance to operate under this capacity, but Hillary allowed her to do so.



Assange and Judicial Watch Release New Emails



In Julian Assange’s latest release of 296 emails, it is believed that Huma Abedin has committed a number of felonies. Judicial Watch, in working with WikiLeaks, says these emails show that Hillary has committed more crimes, but also that Abedin is complicit.












The new documents reveal that in April 2009, controversial Clinton Foundation official, Doug Band, pushed for a job for an associate. In the email, Band tells Hillary Clinton’s former aides at the State Department, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, that it is “important to take care of [Redacted]. Band is reassured by Abedin that, “Personnel has been sending him options.” Band is co-founder of Teneo Strategy with Bill Clinton, and a top official of the Clinton Foundation, including its Clinton Global Initiative.



Remember that Doug Band was originally Bill Clinton’s close aide, and John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager, whose WikiLeaks emails are of great interest, was Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff.



Doug Band actually directed Abedin and Cheryl Mills to put Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire and Clinton Foundation donor, Gilbert Chagoury, in touch with the person at the State Dept. on Lebanon. He insisted to Huma and Cheryl that Chagoury is a key guy. Of course he is, because he’s a close friend of Bill Clinton’s and a top donor to his Foundation. According to foundation documents, he’s a top donor of between $1 and $5 million. And…get this, he pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative. But there’s even more…Chagoury was convicted in Switzerland in 2000 for laundering money from Nigeria and had to repay $66 million to the Nigerian government. The corruption runs deep.



What they were doing was a clear violation of the ethics agreements Hillary had to sign before becoming Secretary of State. She promised she would not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which The William J. Clinton Foundation (or the Clinton Global Initiative) were involved.



“No wonder Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin hid emails from the American people, the courts and Congress,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “They show the Clinton Foundation, Clinton donors, and operatives worked with Hillary Clinton in potential violation of the law.”



In June, Judicial Watch uncovered two batches (here and here) of new Clinton email records through court-ordered discovery.



Twice in May, Judicial Watch uncovered new Clinton emails, including emails that show Clinton knew about the security risk of her BlackBerry (see here and here).



This is another email find also at odds with her official campaign statement suggesting all “work or potentially work-related emails” were provided to the State Department.



Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch discusses his team’s findings in this video.



Social Media Black Out



FBI emails are not trending on Twitter, on Facebook, on Buzz feed, or Snap Chat. What is trending on Twitter now is the top story that Hillary Clinton is winning! Control, control, control. The 5th story on Twitter is, “Was James Comey Wrong to Write to Congress!”



The FBI has opened a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT! And you can’t find squat about it on social media!



What kind of genius loses $6 billion dollars, four American lives, a laptop, four cell phones, three tablets, and 33,000 emails all while Secretary of State? A criminal, that’s what kind!



Hillary has learned from countless previous scandals that lying and obfuscating allows you to get away with criminal conduct.



Trump is right, it’s way past time to Drain the Swamp!



[P.S. In order to wake up the population, we need to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]



_______________________________________________________



CLINTON SUPPORT DWINDLES AFTER FBI ANNOUNCEMENT



Published on Oct 31, 2016





Infowars reporter Millie Weaver attends a Bill Clinton “Get the Vote Out” event in Cleveland, OH the day after FBI announces reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton. Stuffed into an indoor alleyway, the handful of attending Hillary supporters look uncomfortable with the small setting and how few people showed up. 



















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
FBI REOPENS INVESTIGATIONS: CLINTON, COMEY & THE E-MAIL SCANDAL~IS THERE A REBELLION AT THE FBI?~FORMER FBI AGENT CALLS CLINTONS A “CRIME FAMILY”~WEINER “SEXTED” 15 YEAR OLD GIRL
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

Clinton, Comey and the E-mail Scandal: Is There a Rebellion at the FBI?



CLINTON, COMEY & THE E-MAIL SCANDAL: IS THERE A REBELLION AT THE FBI? 



BY SELWYN DUKE



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





The Clintons are a “crime family” and Hillary a “pathological liar,” said former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom during an interview Sunday. And it appears his belief is shared by current rank-and-file FBI agents, as a rebellion has apparently been brewing within the bureau.



The latest shocking news on this front is that despite a plea deal to destroy laptops (evidence) belonging to Clinton associates, those devices were not destroyed and are still in the possession of the FBI. As the Daily Caller reports:



Washington D.C. attorney Joe DiGenova said on The David Webb Show on SiriusXM Friday night that despite the FBI agreeing to destroy the laptops of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson as part of immunity deals made during the initial investigation of Clinton’s email server, agents involved in the case refused to destroy the laptops.



“According to the agreement reached with the attorneys who handed over their laptops, the laptops were to be destroyed per the agreement after the testimony was given — the interviews were given — by the attorneys. The bureau and the department agreed to that,” DiGenova said. “However the laptops contrary to published reports were not destroyed and the reason is the agents who are tasked with destroying them refused to do so. And by the way the laptops are at the FBI for inspection by Congress or federal courts.”



DiGenova said the laptops have already been subpoenaed and the FBI is waiting for Congress to ask for them.



As to this report’s credibility, American Thinker’s Thomas Lifson notes that “DiGenova, a former US Attorney and Washington, DC super lawyer is no flake. He has plenty of contacts within the FBI and a reputation to protect. So I take his words on Sirius/XM’s David Webb show quite seriously.”



Ever since FBI director James Comey (shown above) shook the political world Friday by announcing that the bureau was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s illegal use of a private e-mail server, theories as to why he’s acting now have proliferated. After all, since consensus was that Comey was covering for the Democrats at the Obama administration’s behest, no one expected a revisiting of Clinton’s criminality just over a week before the election.



Of course, given that tens of thousands of e-mails — some apparently Clinton related — were recovered from ex-congressman Anthony Wiener’s laptop during an investigation into his having sent illicit text messages to a 15-year-old girl, the most obvious explanation is that of Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein, that whatever was found is “a real bombshell.” As Thomas Lifson wrote in “3 competing theories on why the FBI re-opened the Hillary email server investigation,” “It is possible that something so dramatic came up in the pertinent emails that postponing a public reaction by not announcing the reopening of the investigation would, [sic] be regarded as political interference by covering up a smoking gun until after the election. In this scenario, Comey is assuming the evidence cannot be suppressed, and that he would be held accountable after it comes out. This scenario also indicates that we could be headed for a constitutional crisis, involving the possible indictment of a president-elect before an election. Or the evidence being turned over to the House of Representatives for impeachment hearings.”



The second theory Lifson outlined was one put forth by radio host Rush Limbaugh. As Lifson wrote, “By announcing an FBI Investigation resuming, Comey is putting a lid on further attention to Wikileaks. I guess this means that Clinton forces will argue we must wait for the investigation to be complete (after the election) before speaking about what the evil Russians are planting into our politics.”



Lastly, Lifson wrote that Comey “might be seeking to restore his badly damaged reputation, recognizing that the damage he has inflicted on the FBI is substantial. Three days ago, American Thinker published an open letter from a retired FBI agent, Hugh Galyean, that laid out some of the damage Comey has inflicted on the institution he leads. There is little doubt that this reached many in the FBI family, putting in print what people have only whispered about. If those silenced voices start speaking out, Comey could face a serious loss of face. In this scenario, he is heading off a staff rebellion, possibly including mass resignations.”



This last theory is lent great credence by the news that the plea-deal laptops were never destroyed. If that story is true, it reflects a rebellion more serious than most anyone had imagined — with agents defying a direct order. This also adds weight to a related theory: that agents are so disgruntled that not only could some “resign and reveal,” but that active personnel could actually leak the truth to the media. If this is the case, Comey might be trying to get out ahead of such a development.



None of this is hard to imagine. While the FBI director is a political appointee perhaps chosen based on party or ideological loyalty, rank-and-file agents didn’t join the bureau for political power or money. They often are people who chose their career because they wanted to serve their country, and many (if not most) take their oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” very seriously. And word has it that they have no respect for Comey, viewing him as a “dirty cop.”



The aforementioned James Kallstrom vindicated this assessment, saying “that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau,” reports the Hill. “‘The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,’ he said.”



This is, apparently, because the agents know what Kallstrom does. As the Hill further writes:



“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”



... He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.



“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”



“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.



This appears standard FBI sentiment. I personally know of an ex-agent — someone with knowledge of Clinton “crime family” dealings — who I’m told is having trouble sleeping at night due to the prospect of a Clinton presidency.



Two other people who may now have trouble finding the arms of Morpheus are Clinton and her longtime aide and confidante (and rumored lesbian lover) Huma Abedin. Abedin, who has questionable Islamic connections, is Anthony Wiener’s estranged wife and is apparently responsible for the Clinton-related e-mails found on his laptop. Note that Abedin may have legal problems herself, having sworn under oath that she relinquished “all devices” and having signed, under penalty of perjury, a document stating she wasn’t retaining any copies of the relevant materials.



Whether or not the new Clinton e-mails contain devastating information, they certainly provide an excuse for Director Comey to reopen the investigation, thus controlling a bureau rebellion that could lead to his own scandalization and career destruction. He may now realize that it’s a matter of Clinton — or him.



Whatever the case, this unprecedentedly scandal-ridden campaign — with Project Veritas, WikiLeaks, and now FBI revelations and a story that, as radio host Michael Savage put it, only a Shakespeare could write — should have a wild closing week. Logic dictates that Halloween will be followed by the scariest revelations yet, likely the result of another WikiLeaks dump. Hold on to your seats; the ride has just begun.



______________________________________________________



The Clintons Are "Crime Family";



Admits Former FBI Assistant Director



Published on Oct 31, 2016





The former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom, says that the Clintons are a "Crime Family" and endorses Donald Trump to clean up the corruption in Washington. He made the stunning statements on AM 970 in New York on John Catsimatidis' show 'The Cats Round Table' Sunday morning. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.









Hillary Still Crooked: FBI Reopens 



Clinton Email Investigation



Published on Oct 29, 2016







The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, another shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.

In a letter to committees and lawmakers relevant to the matter, FBI Director James Comey cited “recent developments” for the bureau’s decision to look into new emails which may contain classified information and how they may relate to its previous investigation.











Round Two Hillary Investigation Fallout



Published on Oct 28, 2016







FBI Director James Comey in a surprising letter to Congress laid out the vague details of the possibility of a reopening of an FBI Investigation into newly discovered Clinton emails from her National Security threatening personal email server. The letter addressed to a swathe of Congressional Chairmen read:

“In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony,” Comey wrote in the letter obtained by CNBC.

“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.”

“Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony,” Comey stated.Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz, who led an Oversight Committee effort to pursue perjury charges against Hillary, tweeted about the FBI’s announcement. It read FBI Dir just informed me, "The FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation." Case reopened.

The campaign trail was thrown into chaos by the news. Hillary, as expected, went on... business as usual.

Hillary's campaign has been nothing short of a parade of corruption and bottomless scandals. A platform running for the highest office in the land. At what point do the American people become an accessory to Hillary's crimes by simply voting for her?











Trump Responds To FBI 



Reopening Clinton Email Probe



Published on Oct 29, 2016





During a campaign rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa on Friday night, Donald Trump criticized his opponent Hillary Clinton for attempting to politicize the recent news that the FBI reopened its investigationinto her email scandal, which was revealed earlier on Friday. http://www.infowars.com/donald-trump-...
http://www.infowars.com/in-leaked-mem...









Hillary To Be Indicted After Election: Trump Responds To FBI Investigation



Published on Oct 28, 2016







http://www.infowars.com/breaking-fbi-...
The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, another shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.








HUMA ABEDIN'S HUSBAND ANTHONY WEINER 








"SEXTED" A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL











CLINTON SUPPORT DWINDLES AFTER FBI ANNOUNCEMENT



Published on Oct 31, 2016







Infowars reporter Millie Weaver attends a Bill Clinton "Get the Vote Out" event in Cleveland, OH the day after FBI announces reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton. Stuffed into an indoor alleyway, the handful of attending Hillary supporters look uncomfortable with the small setting and how few people showed up. 






















































			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
BREAKING: FEDS LEAK DETAILS OF NEW CLINTON INVESTIGATION/WEINERGATE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

HUMA ABEDIN & PERVERT 



ANTHONY WEINER







BREAKING: FEDS LEAK DETAILS OF NEW CLINTON INVESTIGATION/WEINERGATE





Could this be the end of Hillary’s campaign?





SEE: http://www.infowars.com/breaking-feds-leak-details-of-new-clinton-investigationweinergate/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







The FBI has reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton after discovering new information on the electronic devices of Anthony Weiner.



Could this be the end of Hillary’s campaign or is it a distraction to draw attention away from more serious crimes and corruption within our government?



On Monday thousands of new emails from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta were published by WikiLeaks.



Within that new data dump was smoking gun proof that the White House was colluding with Hillary to cover up the fact that Obama had lied to Congress and the American people when he said he learned about the email scandal from the news.



Those new emails stirred outrage within the FBI and took the ongoing mutiny to a whole new level.



The new investigation into Weiner could be a way for the FBI to compartmentalize the larger issue of Hillary and Obama’s collusion.



EXCLUSIVE: FBI Mutiny Reopened Clinton Investigation





















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH PLEADS FIFTH AMENDMENT ON SECRET IRAN RANSOM CASH PAYMENTS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

loretta_lynch



ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH 



PLEADS FIFTH AMENDMENT ON 



SECRET IRAN RANSOM CASH PAYMENTS 



BY ROBERT SPENCER



SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/attorney-general-lynch-take-the-fifth-on-secret-iran-ransom-payments; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”



If we had any kind of actual opposition party, it would be investigating whether Obama’s actions regarding Iran constituted treason. But we don’t.



“Congress: Attorney General Lynch ‘Pleads Fifth’ on Secret Iran ‘Ransom’ Payments,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, October 28, 2016:



Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments, according to lawmakers and communications exclusively obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.



Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered.



In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf, refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment, which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American hostages from Iran.



The response from the attorney general’s office is “unacceptable” and provides evidence that Lynch has chosen to “essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries regarding [her] role in providing cash to the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio and Pompeo wrote on Friday in a follow-up letter to Lynch, according to a copy obtained by the Free Beacon.



The inquiry launched by the lawmakers is just one of several concurrent ongoing congressional probes aimed at unearthing a full accounting of the administration’s secret negotiations with Iran.



“It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people’s elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue,” the lawmakers wrote. “Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue.”



“As the United States’ chief law enforcement officer, it is outrageous that you would essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries,” they stated. “The actions of your department come at time when Iran continues to hold Americans hostage and unjustly sentence them to prison.”



The lawmakers included a copy of their previous 13 questions and are requesting that Lynch provide answers by Nov. 4.



When asked about Lynch’s efforts to avoid answering questions about the cash payment, Pompeo told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration has blocked Congress at every turn as lawmakers attempt to investigate the payments to Iran.



“Who knew that simple questions regarding Attorney General Lynch’s approval of billions of dollars in payments to Iran could be so controversial that she would refuse to answer them?” Pompeo said. “This has become the Obama administration’s coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran—hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people.”



“They know this isn’t a sustainable strategy, however, and I trust they will start to take their professional, and moral, obligations seriously,” the lawmaker added….

_______________________________________________________



AG Lynch Takes The Fifth As Crisis Intensifies



Published on Oct 29, 2016





Attorney General Loretta Lynch has plead the fifth to avoid incrimination in the illegal transfer of billions of dollars in cash to Iran.





























			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
SHOCK VIDEO: HILLARY VOTERS ATTACK HOMELESS BLACK WOMAN FOR SUPPORTING TRUMP
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

SHOCK VIDEO: HILLARY VOTERS ATTACK HOMELESS BLACK WOMAN 



FOR SUPPORTING TRUMP





Violent social justice warriors taunt, laugh at victim





BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON



SEE: http://www.infowars.com/shock-video-hillary-voters-attack-homeless-black-woman-for-supporting-trump/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:









A homeless black woman was viciously abused and then physically attacked by crazed social justice warriors because she supported Trump.



This is how so-called “progressives” behave. They will violently abuse and attack you while claiming you’re the one who’s being hateful.



Share this video to expose these bastards!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJV41gS2c8M











			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
DONALD J. TRUMP: FEARLESS COURAGE, FOR GOD, FOR FAMILY AND FOR COUNTRY
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

DONALD J. TRUMP: FEARLESS COURAGE, FOR GOD, FOR FAMILY AND FOR COUNTRY



SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh363.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







By Kelleigh Nelson




October 29, 2016
NewsWithViews.com



Bias has always been a factor in journalism. It’s nearly impossible to remove. Humans have their thoughts, and keeping them out of your work is difficult. But 2016 saw the remaining veneer of credibility, thin as it was, stripped away and set on fire. —Derek Hunter, Former Never Trumper Talk Show Host



The Spine of Steel



In the face of the most horrific attacks on his person, his family, and his policies, Trump has withstood the avalanche of media bias and hatred and never wavered. He has shown he definitely has what it takes to be the 45th President of the United States of America.



Remember the one man in China’s Tiananmen Square who stood defiantly against the tanks? He was mowed down for wanting freedom. The Clinton Machine including main stream media, the Justice Department, the republican 5th column, and every globalist in America, has excoriated Trump with lies, hatred, and half-truths. They too wanted Trump mowed down. But he stood defiantly in the face of all the hatred. And he stood because he knows that America is on the precipice of destruction and only he can save her. He has shown a spine of steel, true chutzpah!


He gave up a life of leisure, a life filled with wonderful accomplishments, with family, with business, with his children, and he did it for America, and for all of us, and he continually tells us that he loves us.



I’m so proud to have been a supporter of this amazing man from the very beginning of his campaign.



FBI Reopens Investigation into Hillary Email Use



Trump, speaking to cheering supporters Friday afternoon in Manchester, N.H., praised the FBI for having the “courage” to “right the horrible mistake that they made” – saying he hopes that is “corrected.”



“Hillary Clinton’s corruption is on a scale we have never seen before,” Trump said. “We must not let her take her criminal scheme into the Oval Office.”
In a nod to the significance of the FBI’s announcement, Trump quipped: “The rest of my speech is going to be so boring.”



WikiLeaks Has Finally Burst the Hillary Clinton Bubble



If Bill Clinton can pardon the Riches, then Donald Trump can pardon and bring home, Julian Assange.



When the mainstream media, including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, MSNBC, Bloomberg, and Washington Post, have lifted their coordinated blackout on all things negative about Hillary Clinton, you know it’s bad. Next week, Julian Assange is set to release Hillary’s actual emails which could be the smoking gun that finally brings her down.”



Be sure to watch the Fox segment below:







Indictment Coming for Hillary?



Of course, the question remains, will the powers-that-be protect Hillary Rodham Clinton. Julian Assange assures us that the next batch of emails he releases will be enough to indict Hillary. Assange also made it clear that there is no evidence of Russian involvement, despite the Clinton campaign’s claims.



Julian Assange is still holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, but he’s sure been busy! Not only has he released 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee, now he says he’ll be releasing more, enough to see Hillary Clinton indicted and arrested. All I can say is, “It’s about danged time.”



Assange has given a number of interviews where he states there is no evidence that any of these emails came from Russian sources. He has said that the DNC servers were ripe for hacking and were riddled with holes. He says that when the Clinton Campaign talks about having proof the emails were hacked by Russians, he says he doesn’t know what they’re talking about, but they’re not talking about my leak. He said that maybe someday his sources will step forward and some will have egg on their faces.



Of course, it’s not important where the emails come from, but what is in them! What they have now is the Clinton Campaign using diversion to escape the truth of these emails…what she does is blame the Russians, blame the Russians, over and over again, and say that these were private emails that were hacked. Well, Hill, your private emails have exposed you and your entire rotten corrupt campaign.



No kidding Hillary, they were emails that were not on a secured server. You got people killed because of your ineptness and laziness as the Secretary of State under the Obama administration, who absolutely detests you and your husband. I wouldn’t be surprised if Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama are gleeful about this.



We know that Obama supports you only because he wants you to continue his policies. We know and Obama knows that Donald J. Trump will dismantle everything that this Marxist Muslim loving president has done to our beloved country.



Anthony Weiner, Huma Abedin and Chelsea Clinton



The possibility of Hillary occupying the White House again is frightening…we know too much about this woman. She has consistently covered up the controversy regarding her unauthorized emails, she was on trial for how she responded to the Benghazi attack which left four Americans dead because of her failure to react in time to save them. Bill really hasn’t helped her out as he has grabbed headlines for his sex scandals, and his ill-gotten statements while campaigning. Hillary continually blames innocent Trump for the things that she herself has done. She’s guilty…we all know it.



Clinton emails that prompted a review were actually found on Anthony Weiner’s device…so just how much did Huma Abedin tell her husband, Anthony Weiner? The guy is a total pervert. So, where does this leave us? Trump’s statements about Weiner were spot on when he called him a security risk reflective of Hillary’s bad judgment.


The “pay to play” Clinton Foundation has been exposed with emails from the former president’s daughter, whose name is on the foundation, accusing his aides of “hustling” business to win clients at foundation events. We have Chelsea insisting that these aides were taking “significant sums of money from my parents personally.”



And we have longtime Hillary loyalist Huma Abedin concerned about the former secretary of State promising to attend a foundation event in Morocco at the request of its king, who had just promised a $12-million donation to the foundation. “She created this mess and she knows it,” Abedin wrote.



Conclusion



Just remember, a lot can happen in 10 days, and I really don’t trust the entire Justice Department or anyone in this present administration. So, we have to keep working and praying. Hillary will not go down without a fight, and God only knows what she’ll do next.



This is not a right wing conspiracy Hillary, you did this to yourself, and blessed be, Julian Assange is exposing all of it.



It’s time to elect a man who is not a politician. It’s time to elect an outsider. It’s time to elect a businessman. It’s time to elect someone who wants to make America great again. It’s time to elect a man who will DRAIN THE SWAMP! Vote to save America! Vote for Donald J. Trump.



[P.S. In order to wake up the population, we need to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]

			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
AMERICANS URGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED VOTER FRAUD AND INTIMIDATION~STATE NUMBERS TO CALL
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

AMERICANS URGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED VOTER FRAUD AND INTIMIDATION



SEE: http://newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news543.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
October 29, 2016© 2016 NewsWithViews.com



Donald J. Trump is arguably the only presidential candidate ever to be openly targeted by his own party’s (GOP’s) establishment, the entire Democratic Party, super-rich leftist organizations complete with their underground cash-dispersal system, and the mainstream media all at the same time.



Yet Trump isn’t backing down and in fact he’s telling his supporters — and undecided voters — that the current election process is a “rigged” system. He has focused his argument that voters have their only chance to defeat the “rigged” system by electing him.



“Remember folks, it’s a rigged system,” Trump said at a rally. “That’s why you’ve got to get out and vote, you’ve got to watch. Because this system is totally rigged.”



“I believe we’re actually winning,” Trump said Tuesday in Florida. “It’s a rigged system.”



“The media isn’t just against me. They’re against all of you,” he later said in St Augustine. “They’re against what we represent.”



Wikileaks documents lifted from the Internet servers of the Democratic National Committee and from individuals, such as Hillary for President Campaign director John Podesta, when released by Julian Assange gave an unvarnished look at the DNC and Clinton machines. Wikileaks document dumps also suggest that the Democratic Party ranks are rife with voter fraud and those eager to protect the status quo.







Add the recent videos released by ‘take-no-prisoners” investigative journalist James O’Keefe — videos that have Democratic operatives bragging about their unethical at best, criminal at worst, activities — and it’s no wonder conservatives are suspicious.



It wasn’t that long ago when conservatives watched in shock as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and certain Democratic Party officeholders targeted Tea Party groups and other right-of-center organizations that were seeking only their rightful tax-exempt status. Not one person at the IRS has been arrested let alone prosecuted for unlawful acts committed by a government agency against its own people.



While conservatives are accused of being infatuated with the Second Amendment (guns) liberals owe their allegiance to the Fifth Amendment (remaining silent to avoid incrimination in an illegal act).



Now with millions of Americans repeating Trump’s words — “The system is rigged” — the left is seeing that denying it is useless after all of the evidence was made public. Now they are saying this type of talk is “dangerous” to the integrity of our electoral system. They are even ridiculing Trump and asking him to prove his voter fraud allegations.



The argument isn’t whether voter fraud is real, but how widespread it is and will Americans follow the Department of Homeland Security’s advise: If you see something, say something. Below are the phone numbers for the authorities in each of the 50 states that citizens can contact to complain about irregularities seen or heard while visiting the polling stations during the elections.



Provide all the information possible and don’t worry about “profiling” or any other restrictions placed on cops and prosecutors. Also keep a record of whom you reported an incident, his or her title, the time and date you made the report and voilà you’ve done your civic duty.



Above are the telephone numbers to call about suspicious activity you’ve observed while voting.

			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
HOW AMERICA’S ELECTIONS ARE HACKED~PETITION TO REMOVE SOROS OWNED MACHINES SWITCHING VOTES SURPASSES 100,000
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

HOW AMERICA’S ELECTIONS ARE HACKED, MISSING LINK DISCOVERED



Vote fraud expert Bev Harris exposes 



electronic voting machines





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:




How America's Elections Are Hacked, Missing Link Discovered



Watch elections expert Bev Harris discuss the smoking gun behind voting fraud LIVE: Infowars.com/show







Black Box Voting, founded in 2003, performs nonpartisan investigative reporting on elections in an attempt to stop vote rigging.



You may be wondering what the term “black box” means. A “black box” system is non-transparent; its functions are hidden from the public. Elections, of course, should not be black box systems.



Here is a link to a free copy of the book, Black Box Voting HERE.



Author Bev Harris became known for groundbreaking work on electronic voting machines, which can remove transparency of the vote count.



With voting machines, all political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors:







Extensive analysis on the topic by Alex Jones can be viewed below:



Watch the full interview with Bev Harris streaming now from the Alex Jones Show:







How Elections Are Stolen In America Exposed



Published on Oct 31, 2016





This incredible video by blackboxvoting.org gives you all the details about how elections are manipulated and stolen in America without leaving a trace.









PETITION TO STOP GEORGE SOROS VOTING MACHINES HITS 100K



Will America finally stand up to global elite rigging our elections?




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:









A White House petition to remove Soros-owned electronic voting machines has passed the 100k votes necessary for a response. Will America finally stand up to global elite rigging our elections?



The U.K.-based company Smartmatic has sent voting machines to important battleground states across the US including Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia.



“Other jurisdictions affected are California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin,” noted the Daily Caller.



“Smartmatic Chairman Mark Malloch-Brown is a former U.N. official and sits on the board of Soros’ Open Society Foundations.”



The discovery has caused concern among the US voting populace given Soros’ deep ties with Clinton.







Soros Linked Voting Machines To Be Used In Key Battleground States



























			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	
		
	

		
		
FEDS USURP HOUSING AUTHORITY TO FIGHT “RACISM”~SUSTAINABLE FREEDOM LAB FIGHTS BACK
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

FEDS USURP HOUSING AUTHORITY 



TO FIGHT “RACISM” 




SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/24511-feds-usurp-housing-authority-to-fight-racism; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







The federal government is using the concept of “sustainable development” to usurp complete and unchallengeable control over housing in the United States. There is one group of patriots, however, that refuses to stand idly by while the fundamental right to property is abolished by the bureaucracy.



Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is the federal agency leading the attack against property rights and against local, accountable self-government after the fashion favored and established by our ancestors.



John Anthony of Sustainable Freedom Lab recognizes the threat and is warning his countrymen about the scope and severity of the federal assault. “HUD uses our own money to bring communities to heel,” Anthony said in a statement released on the group’s website October 28. “By saying “no,” we can bring the agency to its knees. We do not need Congress, we do not have the time to wait for deceptive legislation and we cannot depend on political leaders drunk with inside the beltway power. We need our neighbors, political and non-political, building the same coalitions our forefathers built to survive in this new rugged land,” he added.



Anthony’s assessment of HUD’s ultimate aim is spot on. This federal agency and the programs it administers are nothing more than regulations conceived and written by desk-bound dictators who are given unjust authority by the president and whose diktats are beyond the reach of the people who are forced to obey these directives or face being subjected to the full panoply of punishments.



HUD’s particular area of unaccountable absolutism is the environment and housing. In this latest effort, the agency’s underlying policy is the promotion of “sustainability,” which is globalist newspeak for totalitarianism under one world government.



Here’s the connection, as uncovered in an article published by Property Values Defense, a grassroots organization that “unites attorneys, public officials and activists nationwide to stop federal agency overreach”:



HUD, DOT and the EPA have been instrumental in fostering regionalism since 1993. In 2009, the three agencies formed a “Partnership for Sustainable Development” for the express purpose of merging their unique authorities toward the common goal of advancing sustainable regions. In June 2016, the agency also teamed with the Department of Education to promote regional Equity Assistance Centers to advance income integration in elementary and secondary classrooms.



These agencies are working feverishly to infill suburbs by transplanting urban families into the outlying communities, which then merge with nearby counties and towns into larger regions managed by unelected councils.



Even HUD’s new Assessment of Fair Housing, the document applicants must complete to receive AFFH related grants, requires grant recipients to align their local plan with a regional plan.



Collectivism is being forced on Americans under the guise of protecting the environment and providing “affordable housing” to the less advantaged.



The true purpose, of course, is to collect all mankind into urban mega-centers in order to facilitate the imposition of top-down, strong central government rule, otherwise known as global fascism.



John Anthony rightly perceives that the problem is not one of development, but one of despotism.



“HUD [and other federal agencies] have converged into a massive administration-led autocracy, pre-planning neighborhoods, living patterns, school attendance and even the social makeup of your community,” he said.



“Communities that resist face compliance reviews, withdrawal of millions in HUD funding or even civil rights lawsuits that will break the financial backs of most towns and counties. And, of course the counterfeit charges of not caring for America’s poor and needy.”



That last charge will be the wedge the federal government will use to divide Americans and to convince the purportedly neglected to accept federal tyranny in exchange for “equal housing opportunities.”



Of course, it is one thing for a city or county to want to resist the federal regulatory restrictions, but it is not as easy to maintain this staunch sovereignty in the face of a bag of federal cash and other incentives for playing ball with the bureaucrats.



States, counties, and cities must continue, however, refusing to dance to the tune played by the federal bandleader. They must reinforce American federalism and civil liberties by emphasizing in city and county codes and state laws the sovereignty that exists in states and that exists only on loan to the federal government, no matter how much money the latter can use to bribe the former.



When it comes to caving to the central government’s offers: caveat emptor.



The familiar “carrot and stick” gambit is the coin of the realm in D.C. From police to highways, from environmental standards to labor policies, the federal government has stomped its heavy jackboot into all aspects of life — areas that were once the bailiwick of states, cities, or the people themselves.



Anthony and the Sustainable Freedom Lab offer seminars to show municipalities methods for charting a course around HUD’s haranguing and around the centrifugal spin of “sustainable development.”



The course, entitled “Ending HUD’s Tyranny,” teaches local governments to “turn the tables on the government’s argument that because you reject HUD overreach, you are a ‘racist that does not care about African Americans, women or the protected classes.'”



While such lessons are useful and urgently needed if American cities and counties are to remain independent, free to forge their own infrastructure plans and housing ordinances, there is a more permanent, constitutionally sound system for forcing the federal beast back inside its constitutional cage: the law of agency.



As I wrote in an article reporting on a Georgia county’s effort to nullify HUD’s regulatory remaking of the right to property:



Upon its ratification, the states, as principals, gave limited power to the central government to act as their agent in certain matters of common concern: defense, taxation, interstate commerce, etc.



The authority of the agent — in this case the federal government — is derived from the agreement that created the principal/agent relationship. Whether the agent is lawfully acting on behalf of the principal is a question of fact. The agent may legally bind the principal only insofar as its actions lie within the contractual boundaries of its power.



Should the agent exceed the scope of its authority, not only is the principal not held accountable for those acts, but the breaching agent is legally liable to the principal (and any affected third parties who acted in reliance on the agent’s authority) for that breach.



Under the law of agency, the principal may revoke the agent’s authority at will. It would be unreasonable to oblige the principals to honor promises of an agent acting outside the boundaries of its authority as set out in the document that created the agency in the first place.



Imagine the chaos that would be created if principals were legally bound by the acts of an agent that “went rogue” and acted prejudicially to the interests of the principals from whom he derived any power in the first place. It is a fundamental tenet of the law of agency that the agent may lawfully act only for the benefit of the principal.



Finally, despite seeming like we are constantly “fighting an uphill battle against a government that is corrupt, dishonest packed with legions of uniformed bureaucrats,” there are many avenues now open to cities and counties that lead to liberty and the protection of the right to own property and to the permanent ostracism of the globalists and their sustainability scam.



_________________________________________________________



JOHN ANTHONY OF SUSTAINABLE FREEDOM LAB




John Anthony is the founder of Sustainable Freedom Lab. He is a nationally acclaimed speaker, researcher and writer. Mr. Anthony’s Property Value Defense Network informs public officials and attorneys nationwide of the impacts of regulatory laws on property rights. His online workshop, Shattering America’s Trance, teaches effective techniques for cross-political communications.







SEE ALSO: TOM DE WEESE AT:




Sustainable Freedom Lab Seminar



Published on Sep 25, 2012





While Americans focus on sustainable development, they often lose sight of the importance of property rights. In many cases people are losing their property, their ability to travel as they choose and even the right to develop their own land. All in the quest to achieve sustainable development.


What they forget is that, the best way to protect land is to own and care for your own.


This series teaches all citizens how to protect their property rights in a changing world while respecting the environment.















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
JIMMY CARTER APPOINTED JUDGE BLOCKS ALABAMA LAW BANNING ABORTION FACILITIES FROM OPERATING NEAR SCHOOLS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

JUDGE BLOCKS ALABAMA LAW 



BANNING ABORTION FACILITIES 



FROM OPERATING NEAR SCHOOLS 



BY HEATHER CLARK



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





MONTGOMERY, Ala. — A federal judge in Alabama who once ordered the removal of Roy Moore’s Ten Commandments monument has now also blocked a state law banning abortion facilities from operating near k-8 schools. Judge Myron Thompson, appointed to the bench by then-President Jimmy Carter, opined that the law would close two abortion facilities that perform an estimated 70 percent of abortions in the state, and would therefore place an undue “burden” on mothers seeking to obtain an abortion since they would have to drive further.



“This burden would become particularly devastating for low-income women who represent half of all abortion recipients and a significant majority of women seeking abortions in Alabama,” he wrote.







Thompson said that it if women can’t have an abortionist end the lives of their children, they will resort to doing it themselves.



“Recently, Tuscaloosa’s medical director has treated multiple women who attempted to self-abort, such as a woman who consumed turpentine after consulting the Internet and learning about its use as a folk remedy,” he wrote. “So too can Alabama expect an increased level of self-abortions if the school-proximity law were to take effect.”



Thompson also contended that there was no evidence that the law, which was passed in part to keep children from being exposed to the issue of abortion, was necessary.



“The record contains absolutely no evidence of concerns expressed by the school’s students or their parents about the Huntsville clinic or the demonstrations near it,” he stated. “As to Highlands, the State’s two interests (minimizing disruption and supporting a parent’s right to control their children’s exposure to the subject of abortion) would not in any way be furthered by the closing or relocation of the Huntsville clinic.”



As previously reported, the law had been challenged earlier this year by abortionists Willie Parker (a professing Christian) and Yashica Robinson White, with the assistance of the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama (ACLU).



“The Alabama Department of Public Health may not issue or renew a health center license to an abortion clinic or reproductive health center that performs abortions and is located within 2,000 feet of a K-8 public school,” the legislation, S.B. 205, simply reads.



There are two abortion facilities near schools in Alabama: Alabama Women’s Center for Reproductive Alternatives in Huntsville and West Alabama Women’s Center Inc. AL.com reports that the facilities performed 72 percent of the state’s 8,080 abortions in 2014.



Thompson also blocked a law on Thursday that would ban dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortions, also known as dismemberment abortions. It made it illegal for abortionists to “purposely to dismember a living unborn child and extract him or her one piece at a time from the uterus through use of clamps, grasping forceps, tongs, scissors, or similar instruments that, through the convergence of two rigid levers, slice, crush, or grasp, or any combination of the foregoing, a portion of the unborn child’s body to cut or rip it off.”



D&E procedures are common nationwide in second trimester abortions.



Abortions 15 weeks (nearly four months gestation) and later would be “almost wholly unavailable,” Thompson asserted.



“Alabama women would likely lose their right to pre-viability abortion access at or after 15 weeks,” he said, stating that mothers have a “constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy before viability.”



The ACLU of Alabama cheered Thompson’s issuance of the preliminary injunctions. He had granted temporary emergency injunctions in July to stop the laws from going into effect on their scheduled date of Aug. 1.



“It’s long past time for our elected officials to stop wasting time and taxpayer money passing laws that violate women’s constitutional rights and start focusing on the needs of women and families in this state,” said executive director Susan Watson in a statement. “Alabama women deserve to access their rights protected by the Constitution. And our doctors deserve to be able to provide care in clinics, not fight medically unnecessary laws in courthouses.”



As previously reported, Thompson is known for ordering the removal of a Ten Commandments monument placed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore in 2003. He also made headlines last October when he ruled that officials must restore the state’s contract with Planned Parenthood because canceling it denied women their choice in reproductive services.









			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
NEXTGEN CLIMATE, “NON-PROFIT”, CAUGHT IN ILLEGAL ACITIVITY!: CLINTON VOTERS BEING BUSED TO POLLS IN LIMOUSINE VANS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

NEXTGEN CLIMATE







CAUGHT!: CLINTON VOTERS BEING BUSED 



TO POLLS IN LIMOUSINE VANS



Published on Oct 30, 2016





Infowars reporter Millie Weaver catches limousine buses transporting Hillary Clinton voters to polls in swing-state Ohio. Nextgen Climate owned by Tom Steyer, Hillary Clinton’s largest single donor, is paying for the limousine services. Millie Weaver confronts them only to find out it’s a non-profit organization caught engaging in partisan activities violating IRS rules for non-profit political organizations. 













Tom Steyer NARAL Donation: Isn’t NextGen focused on Climate, not Abortion?







Democratic Billionaire Tom Steyer: 



“I’m Not the Koch Brothers” 



“We Don’t Try to Hide What We Do”











Steyer’s NextGen To Target 1 Million Swing Voters Ahead Of U.S. Election



Published on Sep 4, 2014







Billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer’s political group on Wednesday said it plans to focus on winning over a narrow band of voters persuadable on climate change issues in key states ahead of U.S. elections in November.
NextGen Climate, Steyer’s group, said it has made a targeted push to gain the support of more than one million voters in competitive races in seven states, hiring more than 700 staff and volunteers and opening more than 20 offices across the country.
The group, with $50 million in backing from Steyer, says it hopes to counter the financial influence of the fossil fuel industry by supporting lawmakers who would work to combat climate change.













			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
TOO MANY MILLENIALS ARE COOL WITH COMMUNISM
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

The Waning West: Too Many Millennials Are Cool With Communism



BY SELWYN DUKE





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





“We learn from history that we do not learn from history,” observed German philosopher Georg Hegel. Perhaps nothing illustrates this better than a new survey showing that far too many “millennials” are not just cool to “capitalism,” but are actually cool with communism. As Market Watch reports:



Of the 2,300 Americans polled by YouGov, 80% of baby boomers and 91% of the elderly agree with the statement that “communism was and still is a problem” in the world today. Millennials? Only 55%.



Furthermore, almost half of Americans between the ages of 16 and 20 said they would vote for a socialist, while 21% would go so far as to back a communist.



Capitalism, on the other hand, is viewed favorably by 64% of those over the age of 65, compared with only 42% of millennials.



Citing these results, the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation’s Marion Smith stated, as quoted by MarketWatch, “One of the concerns [the foundation] has had since its establishment is that an emerging generation of Americans has little understanding of the collectivist system and its dark history.” For sure. This was evidenced when a teenager once naively asked me, “What’s so bad about communism?” Another registered a look of shock when I gave him part of the answer: During the 20th century, Marxist governments exterminated approximately 100 million people, making them history’s most murderous ideologues.



Related to this, MarketWatch also tells us that “a third of millennials say they believe more people were killed under George W. Bush than Joseph Stalin,” clearly oblivious to Stalin’s psychopathic actions having accounted for upwards of 20 million of the above number. Of course, 82 percent of millennials at least knew who Stalin was. This cannot be said regarding Chinese leader Mao Tse-tung; 42 percent of millennials were unfamiliar with this mass murderer of approximately 60 million. Forty percent didn’t know who Argentine Marxist and major Cuban Revolution figure Che Guevara was. With respect to Vladimir Lenin and Karl Marx, the “unacquainted with” figures were, respectively, 33 and 32 percent.



Not surprisingly, this ignorance goes beyond history. While it’s troubling that almost half of those aged 16 to 20 would support a socialist, there’s good and bad news here. And they’re the same thing:



These young people generally don’t know what socialism is.



As I wrote in February, “People 18 to 29 just helped vault Senator Bernie Sanders to a resounding New Hampshire primary victory, not at all deterred by his socialist label. But while they view that positively, they don’t believe in socialist (in Sanders’) wealth redistribution. In fact, this research shows that they cotton to it little more than do average Americans and no more than their age group did 20 years ago. In other words, millennials may like the word socialism, but, as with so many others, they don’t understand well what it signifies or the nature of those for whom they vote.”



In reality, the label “socialism” is applied loosely today, yet it has a firm definition. Note that socialism was popularized via Karl Marx’s and Friedrich Engels’ Communist Manifesto. And under Marxist doctrine, “socialism” — or the socialist revolution — is the transitional phase that extinguishes economic freedom and ushers in communism. Moreover, there are no communist governments because “communism” is the culmination of socialism, the stage where, the fanciful theory goes, the government has melted away and everyone lives happily and harmoniously in a state of economic equality-induced bliss.



This is why the Iron Curtain-disgorging evil empire could, with a straight collective face, call itself the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. And it’s why we should see a red flag (pun intended) when a politician such as Bernie Sanders calls himself a socialist. Maybe he’s more wizened than wise and doesn’t really know what the word means — or, perhaps, he knows full well — and is capitalizing on the fact that others don’t.



Whatever the case, it would be a mistake to view socialist seduction as solely a “millennial” problem, as this only sparks intergenerational squabbling. For there are old fools and young fools and much foolishness in-between. Yet while we recognize that people are largely products of their upbringing, we nonetheless will analyze a given generation as if it’s a breed apart as opposed to what it almost always is: the next iteration in a pattern. 



Consider how 80 percent of Boomers consider communism a problem. While a high number, it’s still a statistically significant drop from their elders’ 91 percent figure. And this is just part of a pattern, with the percentage of each age group that views “socialism” positively being as follows: age 65+, 13 percent; 50-64, 25 percent; 30-49, 34 percent; 18-29, 49 percent (Pew Research Center, Dec. 28, 2011). Evident here isn’t an overnight sea-change, but steadily increasing ignorance.



Tragically, this is a worldwide phenomenon. Marxism has to an extent taken hold in Japan, Spain, and elsewhere, and Karl Marx is more popular than he has been in decades. As I wrote in 2013, “Sales of The Communist Manifesto (the best-selling book in history next to the Bible) and Das Kapital have soared since the 2008 financial crisis. Karl Marx was voted ‘favorite philosopher’ by BBC radio listeners, beating out contenders such as Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, and Thomas Aquinas. And in an irony akin to having Marx’s picture on a Bible tract, his image is the one most often chosen by customers of Germany’s Sparkasse Chemnitz Bank — for their credit cards.”    



Given the above, it’s not surprising that what inspired mockery of late Senator Joe McCarthy has become reality: Marxist types abound in our government. New York City elected “Bolshevik” Bill de Blasio, who raised money for the Sandinistas, subscribed to their newsletter, and honeymooned in Cuba. John Drew, a former Barack Obama acquaintance and reformed Marxist with whom I’ve spoken personally, revealed that when he knew Obama, Obama was an “ardent Marxist-Leninist” who “was in 100 percent, total agreement with [his] Marxist professors”; this is no surprise because Obama’s mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA.



Then there are Obama’s appointees, such as former “Green Jobs Czar” and self-proclaimed communist Van Jones; former communications director Anita Dunn, who said that Mao Tse-tung was one of her “two favorite philosophers”; “Manufacturing Czar” Ron Bloom, who said in a speech, “We agree with Mao”; and “Global Warming Czar” Carol Browner, who was until recently listed as a leader of the socialist organization “Commission for a Sustainable World Society.”



And, finally, there’s the woman who wants to succeed Obama, Hillary Clinton. Former Clinton operative Larry Nichols tells us that when he first met her, in the 1970s, she was wearing a medal around her neck stating, “Proud member of the American Communist Party” (video here; forward to 6:07). No wonder the Communist Party USA is “all in” for Hillary.



It’s also no wonder that Clinton is beating Donald Trump by 28 points among under-30 voters. But tolerance for socialism/communism is intolerable. If we learned that almost half of young Americans would vote for a fascist and 21 percent would go so far as to back a Nazi, we’d rightly be aghast. Instead, they’re warming to the ideological descendants of even more prolific killers. Hey, what’s 100 million victims between comrades?





			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
WENDY LONG, PRO SECOND AMENDMENT STALWART CHALLENGES ANTI GUN SENATOR CHARLES SCHUMER OF N.Y.
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						





Pro-2nd Amendment Stalwart Wendy Long Challenges Anti-Gun Senator



BY Raquel Okyay



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





USA -(Ammoland.com)- Senate candidate from the Empire State earns accolades for openly opposing the gun-hating, 17-year- incumbent liberal Democrat, Sen. Charles “Chuckie” E. Schumer.



“Schumer is basically a premier enemy of the people and probably the whole congress,” said Wendy Long, who is the U.S. Senate nominee for the Republican, Conservative and Reform Parties. “He has consistently been rated ‘F’ by the NRA, his answer to everything is gun control, and he never wastes the chance to undermine Americans’ rights under the Second Amendment.”



Thomas H. King, President of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc., the oldest gun club in the nation, said that Schumer has a terrible record of being anti-gun.



“Schumer has either sponsored or has been a co-sponsor on every single anti-gun bill that has come through the Senate. He is the type of politician that will say he is a supporter of your Second Amendment rights because he supports your hunting rights, and that’s all he’ll ever say, and as you and I both know, hunting rights have nothing to do with the Second Amendment.”



Based on the statements Long has made and the people she is associated with, King said Long in comparison to Schumer, is pro Second Amendment to the core.



“Long spoke at our annual meeting and unequivocally stated that she believes in the Second Amendment as the founders wrote it, with no reservations. You have never heard Schumer say that, you have never heard him even come close to saying anything other than he supports hunting rights.”



Long, a wife, mother and New York attorney, said if re-elected Schumer would continue to implement every possible gun control legislation that he can.



“I am consistently opposed to those efforts, and on the contrary, believe that lawful citizens exercising our right to keep and bear arms protect families, protects public safety, and the last line to ensure we do not have a tyrannical government.”



On the campaign trail, Long said everywhere she goes she finds New Yorkers frustrated with the 2013 NY SAFE Act. Passed by the legislature and signed by the governor in the middle of the night, without debate or discussion, the SAFE Act, commonly known as the “un-SAFE Act”, turned law abiding citizens into criminals with the strike of a pen.



“People are enraged over the SAFE Act because it does precisely the opposite of what it purports to do; it makes law abiding citizens less safe,” said Long. Frustration over the SAFE Act extends to the frustration with what upstate voters contend with on a regular basis, she said. “The power New York City sometimes has over the entire state.”



In this critical election year, the former Clerk at the U.S. Supreme Court, said if upstate voters turnout on Election Day, their vote will make the difference in who is victorious.



“In terms of raw numbers, voters are roughly equally balanced between the city and upstate, but if we don’t turn out the vote then that’s when the city voters are able to win on anything that is a statewide issue or a statewide candidate. So, it is very important for voter’s upstate to turn out because their numbers are great enough.”



In order to preserve our Second Amendment rights, gun owners and those who care about the Second Amendment and the Constitution, no matter what party affiliation or non-affiliation, ought to get out the vote for the pro Second Amendment candidates on the ballot, said Long.



“Schumer has declared that his number one goal if re-elected is to enshrine what he calls a progressive majority in the U.S. Supreme Court. And that means that the pro Second Amendment decisions from the last 6 years that have clarified the right to keep and bear arms as stated in the Second Amendment, like any other constitutional right, is an individual right that we each have.”



Long said she grew up in a rural environment in New Hampshire. “My whole life, growing up, we had every possible firearm imaginable in our arsenal. We had lots of handguns, shot guns, long guns, and we shot recreationally.”



She said it has been her life experiences, education and norm to defend the Second Amendment.



“I understand that the Second Amendment even precedes our Constitution; that it’s a God-given right; that it’s enshrined in the Constitution; that it cannot be legitimately taken away by any governmental body and it cannot be infringed upon.”



Carl R. Gottstein, Jr., Associate Editor and Staff Writer at Bullet Magazine, said that NY gun advocates are supporting Wendy Long for U.S. Senate in droves because she personifies constitutionalism.



“When America elects our first woman president, let her be a woman like Wendy Long. A great woman exuding excellence and integrity that leaves behind a trail of accomplishment, blazing a positive and healthy path for others to follow.”




			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
JUDGE ROY MOORE & ATTORNEY WALK OUT OVER OBJECTIONS TO USING RETIRED RATHER THAN SITTING JUDGES FOR APPEAL
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

moore-attorney-compressed



JUDGE ROY MOORE & ATTORNEY WALK OUT OVER OBJECTIONS TO USING RETIRED RATHER THAN SITTING JUDGES FOR APPEAL



BY HEATHER CLARK



SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/10/28/roy-moore-attorney-walk-out-over-objections-to-using-retired-rather-than-sitting-judges-for-appeal/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:







MONTGOMERY, Ala. — Suspended Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore and his attorney walked out of the state Supreme Court on Thursday in objection to officials ignoring their motion to recuse Acting Chief Justice Lynn Stuart and others from participating in the selection of judges for Moore’s appeal, and that the judges be active and not retired.



“We have a motion pending to continue this procedure because of the methodology that was set by justices that should have recused in this sealed case,” attorney Philip Jauregui declared. “This court has refused to address that motion.”



“We can’t address it. You may be seated,” replied Stuart, who took over Moore’s job after his suspension and asked that he remove his belongings from the court.







“Well, I’m leaving, your honor, and Chief Justice Moore will address the media outside,” Jaurequi announced as the two, as well as Moore’s family, stood and walked out of the courtroom.



Moore told reporters outside the courthouse that the Court of the Judiciary (COJ) acted wrongfully in craftily suspending him for the remainder of his term since there was not a unanimous vote to remove him from office. Under Alabama law, removal must be by a unanimous decision. There was only a unanimous vote to suspend Moore but not to remove him.



“It’s a de facto removal,” Moore said. “To have the Court of the Judiciary say that we can’t remove you because we didn’t have the votes, but we can suspend you for two-and-a-half years nearly (the rest of Moore’s term), that’s completely improper.”



“It has to be reversed for the sake of the judges and justices in our state or we’re going to warp the law and just let them skip over a unanimous vote for removal and say they they can remove you for the rest of your term,” he opined.



The COJ advised in its order last month that since it did not have the unanimous votes needed to remove Moore from office, it therefore voted unanimously to suspend him—for the remainder of his term. Moore believes the move was an underhanded means to still remove him by making the suspension term-long instead of temporary.



“A majority of this court also agrees with the JIC that the only appropriate sanction for Chief Justice Moore is removal from office. Removal of a judge from office, however, requires ‘the concurrence of all members sitting,” the COJ had written in its decision. “It is clear there was not a unanimous concurrence to remove the Chief from office, so the COJ suspends him for the remainder of his term.”



As previously reported, the controversy surrounding Moore began in 2013 when two lesbians in the state sued Gov. Robert Bentley, Attorney General Luther Strange and Mobile County Probate Judge Don Davis—among others—in an attempt to overturn Alabama’s marriage amendment after one of the women was denied from adopting the other woman’s child.



In January 2015, U.S. District Judge Ginny Granade ruled in favor of the women, prompting Moore to send a memo to probate judges throughout the state, advising that they are not required to issue “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples as he believed that Grenade’s ruling only applied to the two women.



Moore also wrote a letter to Gov. Robert Bentley, urging him to “uphold and support the Alabama Constitution with respect to marriage, both for the welfare of this state and for our posterity.”



“Be advised that I will stand with you to stop judicial tyranny and any unlawful opinions issued without constitutional authority,” he stated.



The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) then filed a judicial ethics complaint against Moore over his letter to Gov. Bentley, and the homosexual activist group Human Rights Campaign (HRC) submitted 28,000 petition signatures to the JIC calling for Moore’s removal.



As confusion ensued over Moore’s letter to probate judges, one judge, John Enslen of Elmore County, asked the full Alabama Supreme Court for further guidance. In March 2015, six of the nine judges of the Alabama Supreme Court released a historic order halting the issuance of same-sex “marriage” licenses in the state. Moore recused himself from the matter and was not included in the order.



“As it has done for approximately two centuries, Alabama law allows for ‘marriage’ between only one man and one woman,” the 148-page order read. “Alabama probate judges have a ministerial duty not to issue any marriage license contrary to this law. Nothing in the United States Constitution alters or overrides this duty.”



Three months after the Alabama Supreme Court issued its order, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges. The Alabama court did not immediately lift its order following the ruling as it took time sorting through the matter.



Therefore, in January, Moore sent another letter advising that the full court’s previous instructions remained in effect until it issued directives in light of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell.



“Until further decision by the Alabama Supreme Court, the existing orders of the Alabama Supreme Court that Alabama probate judges have a ministerial duty not to issue any marriage license contrary to the Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment or the Alabama Marriage Protection Act remain in full force and effect,” he wrote on Jan. 6.



But he also noted that his memo did not weigh in on how June’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling has impact on the Alabama Supreme Court’s directive, and said that it was not his place to make that determination.



“I am not at liberty to provide any guidance to Alabama probate judges on the effect of Obergefell on the existing orders of the Alabama Supreme Court. That issue remains before the entire court, which continues to deliberate on the matter,” Moore wrote.



In March, the court finally issued its opinions on the matter, dismissing all outstanding cases before the bench.



In May, the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission (JIC) announced that it had filed ethics charges against Moore, and suspended the chief justice while he faced a trial before the COJ.



Moore argued during his trial that he had not issued any orders, but only a status update as the Alabama Supreme Court had not rescinded its previous order following Obergefell. The COJ did not believe Moore and found him guilty of all ethics charges, asserting that he had told judges to act contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling.



“I would never tell anybody to disobey and order of a federal court; that’s not my job,” Moore said on Thursday. “What I told [probate judges] was the injunction in effect remained valid until it was reversed by the Alabama Supreme Court, when in fact is has not been reversed to this day and that injunction is still in effect.”



“[The COJ] can argue with me or they can argue with the law …. That’s the law of the United States Supreme Court,” he continued. “An injunction once placed by a court is in effect until reversed by that court, the court of first instance, or a higher court, which would be the United States Supreme Court. It still remains in effect.”



Those randomly selected on Thursday for the appeal were retired Judges Frank McGuire III, Ed McFerrin, Susan Moquin, Charles Price, Daniel Reynolds, Michael Nix and Robert Wilters.








________________________________________________________________


stuart-compressed


SEE ALSO:


http://christiannews.net/2016/10/31/ethics-complaint-filed-against-alabama-acting-chief-justice-lyn-stuart-over-handling-of-roy-moore-case/;


EXCERPTS:



MONTGOMERY, Ala. — An ethics complaint has been filed against Acting Alabama Chief Justice Lyn Stuart over her handling of suspended Chief Justice Roy Moore and his upcoming appeal.



The organization Sanctity of Marriage Alabama filed the complaint with the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission (JIC) on Oct. 24, asserting that she has violated multiple Canons of Judicial Ethics in her alleged mishandling of the matter.



“Justice Stuart played a part in a sealed case regarding Chief Justice Moore, has repeatedly, prematurely, and boldly inserted her judgment for that of courts over which she should have no sway, and even now, refuses to disqualify herself from the process of Chief Justice Moore’s appeal,” President Tom Ford said in a statement.