Like this video? Support my independent journalism here:

Follow me on Instagram:


On February 23, 2019, Ilhan Omar was the keynote speaker at the CAIR banquet in Woodland Hills, California. Hassan Shibly, CAIR Florida’s Executive Director also spoke at the fundraiser. He is currently suing the Trump administration for the ISIS bride, and often represents family members of terrorists who have murdered innocent Americans.

CAIR, known as the Council on American Relations, has been designated as a terrorist organization in United Arab Emirates.

CAIR claims to be “America’s largest Islamic civil liberties group,” but in 2007, the U.S. government labeled CAIR a co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial for financing HAMAS.

Along with being classified as a terrorist organization in the United Arab Emirates in 2014, CAIR has been labeled as a Muslim Brotherhood entity by the United States Justice Department and was found by a federal judge, the U.S. Attorney Generals office, and the Fifth Circuit Court of appeals as having direct ties to Hamas.

On July 1, 2009, U.S. District Court Judge Jorge Solis upheld CAIR’s designation as a co-conspirator, saying there was “ample evidence” linking CAIR to Hamas.

Hamas has also been classified as a designated terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department and is listed as a co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial in 2008, which is the largest terrorism financing case in U.S. history. In the Covenant of Hamas, which outlines the goals and motive of Hamas and its members, it states that one of its main goals in the destruction of Israel.

After the Department of Justice found CAIR conspired with terrorist organizations like HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood, the FBI severed ties with CAIR, saying it “does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner.”

The long term plan of the Muslim Brotherhood and their allies is outlined in the Explanatory Memorandum, a document discovered by the FBI in a 2004 raid in Annandale, Virginia in the home of a senior Muslim Brotherhood official. The Explanatory Memorandum explains step by step how Muslims will implement their take over of America.

CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood operation, and they endorsed Ilhan Omar and gave her campaign money when she was running for office.

Why is the Hilton Hotel hosting a terrorist fundraiser? And why is a US Congresswoman who is on the House Foreign Affairs Committee speaking at a terrorist fundraiser? Who is Ilhan sharing our classified information with?

Want to see more videos like this?

Please Support my Independent Journalism


Follow me on social media…


Video Produced by Illoominate Media and folkLoreAmericana


Luke 13:9“and if it bears fruit next year, fine; but if not, cut it down.”Matthew 7:15-20“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.

John 15:5“I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.2 Corinthians 6:14-18 – Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness? 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
When? Where? When has it ever borne fruit? Where and when, in the 1,400-year history of jihad, have Christian lands near Muslim lands ever been left alone by the Muslims? When, in that 1,400-year history, have Christians living in Muslim lands ever been granted equality of rights and been treated as full citizens? The Pope is guilt-tripping Christians into accepting mass Muslim migration into Europe while ignoring the history of Islam and denying the doctrines of Islam, and demanding that everyone believe that the situation will be different this time, despite the absolute lack of any reason to believe that it will be. 
Is he bent on destroying Europe as a home for free societies and obliterating the remnants of Christendom? That certainly will be the result if his exhortations are heeded.
“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)
“Pope: coexistence with Muslims ‘is a beautiful flower that promises to bear fruit,’” Asia News, April 1, 2019 (thanks to Lookmann):
Vatican City (AsiaNews) – Coexistence between Christians and Muslims “is a beautiful flower that promises to bear fruit. We must not give up!” knowing that“ there will still be difficulties, many difficulties because unfortunately, there are intransigent groups ”.
Pope Francis confirmed his belief in dialogue on his return from Morocco, a country where “there is freedom of worship, there is religious freedom”, in speaking with journalists during the flight back to Rome. He also said that “now we see the flowers, the fruits will come later. But the flowers are promising ”.
Always, “when there is a fraternal dialogue, there is a relationship at various levels”. “For example: the joint appeal for Jerusalem was a step forward made not by an authority of Morocco and an authority of the Vatican, but by believing brothers who suffer seeing this” City of hope “that is not yet as universal as we all desire it to be: Jews, Muslims and Christians. We all want this. And this is why we have signed this desire: it is a desire, a call to religious fraternity that is symbolized in this city that is all ours. We are all citizens of Jerusalem, all believers ”.
“With Muslim brothers and sisters, we sealed this fraternity in the Abu Dhabi document, and here in Morocco, with this we have all seen a freedom, a welcome, all brothers with such great respect.” “We have seen that it is better to sow hope, to go hand in hand, always ahead”. In Morocco, he said, we have seen, “even in the dialogue we need bridges and we feel pain when we see people who prefer to build walls. Why do we feel pain? Because those who build walls will end up being prisoners of the walls they have built ”.
He later went on to say “but something else is concerning to me: the regression of us Christians when we take away freedom of conscience. Think of the Christian doctors and hospital institutions that do not have the right of conscientious objection, for example, for euthanasia. How? The Church has moved on and you Christian countries go backwards? Think of this because it is a truth. Today, we Christians have the danger that some governments will take away our freedom of conscience, which is the first step toward freedom of worship. The response isn’t easy. But, let’s not accuse Muslims. Let’s accuse ourselves also in these countries where this happens. It is a shame.”…




SEE:;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Nessreen Zayed describes herself on Linkedin as a dentist in the “Cincinnati, Ohio Area.” Is she employed? Is her employer aware of her intentions to harm her Zionist patients? Are her gleefully evil statements tolerated because any other course of action would be “Islamophobic”?
Zayed says she is “temporarily in the exile” in the United States. When she was admitted, doubtless her standing as a medical professional impressed those who were examining her case. They never would have dreamed of asking her what she thought about treating Jewish or pro-Israel patients. That would certainly have been an “Islamophobic” question.
But she has abundantly documented her sentiments herself, freely and voluntarily. Will any authorities take action? She should not be allowed to practice dentistry on anyone, Jewish or non-Jewish. Doctors and dentists should be immediately barred from practicing if they declare support for principles that violate the Hippocratic Oath.
“Nessreen Zayed,” Canary Mission, n.d.:
Nessreen Zayed is a dentist who has joked about torturing “Zionists patients.” She has also expressed support for Hamas and anti-Israel terrorism.
Zayed endorsed United States Senate candidate Patrick Little, who ran as a Republican in 2018, promoting an anti-Jewish neo-Nazi platform.
Zayed has spread anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and is a prolific disseminator of Israel hatred on Twitter.
She has also promoted a 2018 petition started by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) at the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley) demonizing pro-Israel students and calling to support SJP founder Hatem Bazian.
Zayed is a supporter of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement and has also promoted anti-Israel events and activities on Twitter, organized by Al-Awda — the Palestinian Right to Return Coalition.
As of May 2018, Zayed’s Twitter bio said she was a “#Palestinian Dentist proud Muslim temporarily in the exile” and located in the “United States.”
Joking About Torturing Zionist Patients
On September 24, 2015, in response to a tweet that read:”@nzayed07 @onetripp This is for you Nessreen …” Zayed tweeted: “@AnarchoZionist @onetripp I loved the video I will enjoy doing this to Zionists patients with my pleasure 😂😂😂
Zayed was responding to a tweet that linked to a scene from the movie “A Little Shop of Horrors” where a dentist played by Steve Martin joyfully inflicted pain on his patients.
Support For Hamas
On December 15, 2016, Zayed tweeted: “In solidarity with the people of #Aleppo during the 29th anniversary of the #Hamas movement in #Gaza. #aleppohasfallen.”
The tweet featured photos of demonstrators holding Hamas flags at the 29th anniversary of the movement’s founding.
On January 2, 2016, Zayed tweeted: “Heartbreaking, watch the funeral of the 17 martyrs killed by Israel last month.. God give their families strength 💔😭
The tweet featured photos of the funerals of Hamas terrorists, killed while committing terror attacks.
On October 30, 2015, Zayed tweeted: “@danny_chirps89 @HamdoDelic @TiberTaig sorry we still love Hamas 💜💙💛✌️
On the same day, Zayed tweeted: “@TiberTaig I love Hamas u can #askhamas.”
On May 31, 2015, Zayed tweeted: “@solioslo I know resistance has started before Hamas but right now Hamas is the only one defense the #Palestinian that’s a fact we can’t.”
Support for Terrorism
On July 12, 2015, Zayed tweeted: “Khader Adanan is finally free after 51days of hunger strike him and his mom after he got released from Israel prison.”
Khader Adnan is a senior member of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) terrorist organization. A 2007 YouTube video showed Adnan praising and encouraging suicide bombings: “Who among you will carry the next explosive belt? Who among you will fire the next bullets? Who among you will have his body parts blown all over?”
On October 5, 2015, Zayed tweeted: “@FlipFluytketel @rosewestchester @IAMMaJDee @exogeen thats why resistance is the solution no Zionist allowed to stay in our lands shut the F.”
On October 9, 2015, Zayed tweeted: “@robbyhuda18 @Omar_Gaza hey why u follow me I’m Palestinian by the way I’m against Israel I can care less if they stab all Zionists my dream.”
On August 16, 2016, Zayed tweeted: “Bilal Kayed .. 63 days in hunger strike ..#FreeBilalKayed #freepalestine #BDS.”
PFLP terrorist Bilal Kayed was incarcerated for 14 years for terror attacks and attempted terror attacks committed during the second intifada, in 2002.
On July 7, 2017, Zayed tweeted: “Palestinian prisoner in Israeli occupation jails Mohammad Allan is on the 24 day of hunger strike against his administrative detention.”
Allan is a member of Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a terror group “whose objective is the destruction of the State of Israel and the establishment of a sovereign, Islamic Palestinian state.” PIJ is backed by Iran and has killed dozens of Israelis in suicide bombings and other attacks.
Allan was first jailed by Israel in 2006 for trying to recruit a suicide bomber to carry out an attack in Israel. He was detained in 2015 for similar reasons.
Zayed retweeted tweet from April 15, 2018, that read: “Today marks 16 years since Israel’s arrest of Palestinian leader #MarwanBarghouthi . As we mark Mandela’s centenary this year, we reiterate the call for the freedom of Barghouthi, the ‘Palestinian Mandela’, and all other Palestinian political prisoners. #FreeMarwanBarghouthi.”
Marwan Barghouti is currently serving five consecutive life sentences for his role in suicide bombings and shooting attacks that killed five Israelis during the second intifada.
Barghouti led the the Palestinian Authority (PA) terrorist Tanzim force and founded the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. He also financed the guitar-case bomb used in the Sbarro Cafe massacre, where 15 civilians were killed and 130 injured.
Zayed retweeted tweet from May 27, 2018, that read: “#صور الشهيدين حسين سمير العمور وعبد الحليم عبد الكريم الناقة من سرايا القدس، اللذين ارتقيا خلال قصف مدفعي للاحتلال شرق رفح، صباح اليوم.
الله يرححمهم ويجعل مثواهم الجنة# قروب_احرار_فلسطين [# Pictures of the martyrs Hussein Samir Al-Amour and Abdel Halim Abdel-Karim Al-Naqa of the Al-Quds Brigades, who rose during the artillery shelling of the occupation east of Rafah, this morning. God bless them and make them their paradise] # قروب_حرار_فلسطين”
The tweet featured a photo of two Palestinian Islamic Jihad members.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) is a terror group “whose objective is the destruction of the State of Israel and the establishment of a sovereign, Islamic Palestinian state.” PIJ is backed by Iran and has killed dozens of Israelis in suicide bombings and other attacks….


Little Shop of Horrors-Dentist Song that Zayed Refers To:


With Colorado, now firmly in the grasp of progressive Democrats from the Governor’s Mansion to the State House and Senate, about to pass and sign into law its own odious “red flag” law, a reporter from CNN couldn’t wait to interview Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams about his threat to go to jail before he enforces it on any of his county’s citizens:
“Are you willing to sit in your own jail to avoid enforcing this law?” CNN asked Reams. His reply:
Well, obviously, no sheriff wants to be confined in [his] own jail, but if that’s what it takes to get this bill ironed out, then I guess that’s a sacrifice I’ll be forced to make. The worst way to bring attention to it is for me to be put in that position, but I’ll do that before I’ll violate somebody’s constitutional rights.
We’re working hard to try to figure out a mechanism to get this into the courts before somebody is harmed by it. Unfortunately, someone has to be damaged by it first. It comes down to whether I want to take this to court for violating somebody’s rights, or for me [for] refusing to enforce a court order.
It comes down to Reams taking his oath of office seriously, or not. His oath is to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Colorado.
Reams has a lot of support. Thirty-two of Colorado’s 64 counties already officially oppose the bill, which hasn’t even been signed into law yet. Many of those counties have declared themselves “sanctuary” counties, and some have declared that the sheriff may not expend county funds in enforcing the red flag law. In El Paso County, the locus of Colorado Springs, the state’s second largest city, Sheriff Bill Elder has declared that he will enforce the red flag law, but has joined with others in a lawsuit in opposition to it, which will be filed once the bill is signed into law.
The problem with red flag laws in general, and Colorado’s pending law in particular, is their blatant disregard for precious rights held sacred by citizens. The problem is compounded by the fact that most sheriffs are elected by the citizens living in each county. In Colorado, every sheriff but one is elected by his citizens (Denver’s sheriff is appointed by the mayor, and is therefore beholden to him) to be the chief law-enforcement in each county. As a result, the sheriff is perceived to be the last line of defense against overreaching government officials, be they state or federal.
Republican Lori Saine, representing Colorado’s House District 63, voted against the bill to no avail. Democrats hold a majority there, as they do in the State Senate. With a Democrat governor already anxious to sign the bill into law, it’s just a matter of time before it becomes effective. In an e-mail to her constituents, Saine complemented Sheriff Reams for taking this stand: “[He] said he will sleep better in his own jail knowing that he didn’t violate a citizen’s constitutional rights should a judge hold him in contempt. That is a real sheriff, folks, one who will stand with us when things aren’t easy and the political winds threaten to blow the house down.”
She then outlined some of the problems with the bill about to become law:
HB1177 is an assault on the Bill of Rights, violating the Fourth Amendment right of privacy, the Fifth Amendment right against uncompensated takings of property, the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial and to confront opposing witnesses, and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of due process of law….
RED FLAG: something liberals haven’t apparently thought about: with an ERPO, the police can search your home with a no-knock warrant even if you don’t have any firearms — it’s just up to your ex-boyfriend and girlfriend to claim you have one. The bill fails to provide a civil remedy for persons who are victimized by false accusations. There should be a stronger deterrent to prevent people from using this law to harass gun owners.
RED FLAG: you are guilty until proven innocent based a standard of a preponderance of the evidence. Then the burden of proof is on YOU to prove the negative, that you are a risk, with clear and convincing evidence — which is a higher threshold of proof than a preponderance….
RED FLAG: HB1177 lays a federal trap for gun owners: A strict reading of the federal law suggests that a person under any ERPO has been “adjudicated as a mental defective” by a judge and is barred from all gun ownership from the federal perspective.
Leave it to Pastor Chuck Baldwin to lay out the threats to precious freedoms by red flag laws popping up all over the country. In his “Open Letter to Senators Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, Et. Al” on March 21, Baldwin minced no words:
“Red flag” gun confiscation laws violate every principle of liberty upon which our country was founded. There is no due process associated with “red flag” laws. A judge’s order to seize the firearms from an American citizen who has not been accused of a crime, charged with a crime, convicted of a crime — or who never even threatened to commit a crime — based on the accusation of a single individual is anything but due process.
Our accuser could be a disgruntled employee, a bitter ex-spouse or relative, a vengeful neighbor, an anti-gun liberal or even an anti-gun policeman. By definition, “red flag” laws use mere suspicion of what one “might” do as justification to seize a person’s firearms. Tactics such as these have been used in virtually every despotic regime of history. In the name of protecting society, the rights and liberties of individuals were denied. Eventually, these repressive governments included political or religious persuasion as triggering “red flags,” which led to their disarmament — all in the name of public safety, of course….
Does the judge who issues a warrant to seize a person’s firearms under a “red flag” law provide the accused with an opportunity to defend himself BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No. Does the judge provide an opportunity for a close examination of the accusations against the accused (including investigating the accuser) BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No. Does the judge allow the accused to face his accuser BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No.
“Red flag” laws turn the Bill of Rights and the fundamental legal doctrine that a man is innocent until proven guilty completely upside down. “Red flag” laws are a mockery to every constitutional principle of liberty since the Magna Carta. Seizing a citizen’s firearms by force (and thereby rendering him defenseless) without a crime being committed — or even the accusation of a crime being made — is old-fashioned TYRANNY. Such an act presumes a person is guilty until proven innocent….
The implementation of “red flag” laws (at any level) is unconscionable and totally unacceptable. And I am here to warn you that there are millions of Americans who will never submit to such oppression. None of us wants to see acts of violence committed against law enforcement personnel in America, but when law enforcers begin carrying out these draconian “red flag” laws, they will begin lighting the matches of resistance in the hearts of freedom-loving people in this country like hasn’t been seen in over 150 years.
We have already heard about Gary Willis, the Maryland man who was killed by police officers in his own home as they attempted to carry out a “red flag” order to seize his guns. This man had committed no crime; he had not been accused of committing a crime; he was given no hearing and no due process. Mr. Willis did not attempt to harm the officers; he merely resisted their efforts to disarm him, and he was killed on the spot — in his own home — by police officers who had taken an oath to protect the liberties of this poor innocent man.
I assure you, Mr. Willis will not be the last American to resist the attempted confiscation of his firearms.
How many illegal and unconstitutional red flag laws must be enacted, and innocents die as a result, before a court dumps them all into the trash can of history where they belong?