POLICE STATE: NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO COPS-IGNORE “ICE”, HELP ILLEGAL ALIENS FLEE

 
IF NOT MUSLIMS, THEN SIKHS TO DESTROY 
JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CULTURE, BELIEFS, VALUES, 
STANDARDS, LAWS
 https://cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/democrat-ag-directive-ICE-696x413.jpg
 
POLICE STATE: 
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO COPS:
IGNORE “ICE”, 
HELP ILLEGAL ALIENS FLEE
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The attorney general of New Jersey has made it official: The state will be a virtual sanctuary for illegal aliens.

Gurbir S. Grewal, shown, the state’s top law-enforcement officer and the son of Indian immigrants, published a directive last week,
effective March 15, that forbids state and local police from helping
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Moreover, state and local
authorities will not honor ICE detainers. That means localities can
simply release illegal aliens back into the community.


Middlesex County adopted such a policy and released an illegal alien
whom police had collared for domestic violence. The illegal alien went
to Springfield, Missouri, police and ICE allege, and murdered three people.


Grewal is apparently unconcerned that it will happen again.

The Order
Grewal’s subversive “Directive
Strengthening Trust Between Law Enforcement and Immigrant Communities”
avers that “individuals are less likely to report a crime if they fear
that the responding officer will turn them over to immigration
authorities.”
So cops can ignore ICE when it needs help, wrote the Sikh attorney general:
[Police] are not responsible for enforcing civil immigration
violations except in narrowly defined circumstances. Such
responsibilities instead fall to the federal government. …
Although state, county, and local law enforcement officers should
assist federal immigration authorities when required to do so by law …
providing assistance above and beyond those requirements threatens to
blur the distinctions between state and federal actors and between
federal immigration law and state criminal law. It also risks
undermining the trust we have built with the public.
In keeping with that leftist talking point, the attorney general
stated that state and local police need not honor detainers from ICE
because they are not warrants signed by federal or state judges.

The order does not forbid state and local authorities from “imposing
their own additional restrictions on providing assistance to federal
immigration authorities, so long as those restrictions do not violate
federal or state law or impede the enforcement of state criminal law.”
Indeed, Grewal “does not mandate that law enforcement officials provide
assistance in any particular circumstance, even when, by the terms of
the Directive, they are permitted to do so.”


That, of course, was Middlesex’s policy when it released the illegal alien suspected of murdering three people.
No Cooperation
The order forbids local police
from helping immigration enforcement with a long list of no-nos.
 

State
and local cops cannot “stop, question, arrest, search, or detain any
individual” because he is a suspected illegal alien. Nor can they
inquire about an individual’s immigration status unless an investigation
warrants it.


Nor can state or local officials provide ICE with “non-public
personally identifying information regarding any individual,” or office
space or equipment or data, or permit interviews with illegal aliens
unless they consent.


Even worse, state and local officials cannot tell ICE
about an illegal alien’s release from custody unless he has been
charged with or convicted of a “violent or serious offense,” or has been
“convicted of an indictable crime other than a violent or serious
offense” within the past five years, or “is subject to a Final Order of
Removal that has been signed by a federal judge and lodged with the
county jail or state prison where the detainee is being held.”


State and local authorities cannot honor a detainer and keep an
illegal alien in jail past the time he would normally be released unless
the illegal fits those same categories. And “such detention may last
only until 11:59 pm on the calendar day on which the person would
otherwise have been eligible for release.”

Whether the illegal-alien murder suspect Middlesex loosed
upon the good people of Springfield, Missouri, would now be released
given the details in this directive is open to question. Grewal’s
directive lists domestic violence. But ICE had a detainer, not a
judicial warrant.
One practical result of the subversive order is this: A two-time
drunk-driving illegal alien cannot be held for deportation in New Jersey
because drunk driving is traffic violation.


So a good liberal county such as Middlesex could, pursuant to its own
policy and the attorney general’s order, ignore an ICE detainer and
release the drunk. Then he’d be free to kill a little girl or NFL star when he tunes up and gets behind the wheel again.

FATHER FIGHTING TO SAVE SIX YEAR OLD SON FROM “GENDER REASSIGNMENT”

 
 JAMES (CALLED “LUNA”) ON THE RIGHT ABOVE
DR. ANNE GEORGULAS, MOTHER, BELOW 
SHE WANTS SON CHEMICALLY CASTRATED & 
TURNED INTO A GIRL
 https://doximity-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/t_public_profile_photo_320x320/v1458598956/b5iglc17whodt3pritd1.jpg
FATHER FIGHTING TO SAVE SIX YEAR OLD SON 
FROM “GENDER REASSIGNMENT” 
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

A Texas father is in danger of losing parental rights to his
six-year-old son because of his refusal to agree with his ex-wife that
the boy is transgender. Anne Georgulas, the mother of six-year-old
James, is a Dallas-area pediatrician, and claims in a petition seeking
to terminate the parental rights of her estranged husband Jeffrey
Younger that their son is a “transgender child and, by choice, now goes
by the name Luna and is only known by her classmates as a girl.”

The petition seeks to terminate Younger’s parental rights because
James reportedly behaves in line with his male gender when he is with
Younger. Additionally, Georgulas is asking the court to compel Younger
to pay for counseling during which a therapist affirms that James is a
girl, and to foot the bill for hormone treatments as part of James’
biological “transition” to the female gender.

On the website SaveJames.com,
launched to help stop the “transition” and to assist Younger in
protecting his son, James is described as “a normal, happy, healthy
little boy — who deserves a chance to be just that.”

The site relates that James has a twin brother, Jude, and that Jeff
Younger “is currently in a very tenuous custody battle as he and his
ex-wife each fight for full custody. When the boys were 3 years old,
Jeff’s ex-wife decided that James should not be a boy. She began
dressing him as a girl, calling him by the name ‘Luna’ and enrolled him
in ‘social transitioning’ therapy to prepare him for chemical
castration.
This process can begin at age 8. She has enrolled him in
Coppell Schools as a girl. He is currently in 1st grade. The teachers
and administrators know that he is a boy, but the other parents and
students are unaware.”

According to the site, “Courts have enjoined Jeff from dressing James
as a boy at school, from teaching him that he is a boy, and from
sharing religious teachings on sexuality and gender. He has been accused
of abuse for saying that his son is a boy.”

In his own court filings Younger stated: “Few things are more
important to people than the care and rearing of their young. The courts
are entertaining government suppression of some of the most fundamental
practices and traditions of American families.”

Writing at TheFederalist.com, former transgender individual Walter Heyer,
who ultimately rejected his female alter-persona, noted that, contrary
to Georgulas’ insistence, the father of James “isn’t seeing signs of
gender dysphoria. In the father’s home James appears to be a normal boy
and doesn’t identify as a girl. He has a choice of boy’s or girl’s
clothes there, and he chooses to dress as a boy. The fact that James
changes gender identity depending on which parent is present makes the
diagnosis of gender dysphoria both dubious and harmful.”

Heyer, who has worked with Younger in his efforts to defend his
child, added that when James is away from his mother, “he consistently
rejects the idea that he is ‘Luna girl’ or that he wants to be a girl.
Because the court prohibits dad from dressing James as a boy or from
teaching him that he is a boy by sharing religious or science-based
teachings on sexuality, dad presents James with male and female clothing
options and James always chooses, even insists on, his boy clothes.”

Heyer warned that time is of the essence to save James from being
forced into a false gender role. “The diagnosis is critical because
labeling a child with gender dysphoria can trigger a series of physical
and mental consequences for the child and has legal ramifications in the
ongoing custody case,” Heyer wrote. “Get it wrong and young James’ life
is irrevocably harmed.”
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://christiannews.net/2018/12/03/husband-in-custody-battle-for-son-accused-by-wife-of-being-emotionally-abusive-for-not-affirming-child-as-girl/ 
EXCERPTS:
 “However, Georgulas has claimed in court documents that James’ father is
being “emotionally abusive” toward the child in treating him as a boy,
which includes taking him to get his hair cut.”
 “The Scotts, who are Christians and have been blogging about the
matter in hopes that others will support Younger in his fight, said that
Younger lost his job over the matter due to an “anonymous” report that
he is “abusing” his son.”

““It sickens me that his right to free speech and ability to protect
and father his sons has been restricted. I have seen first hand what an
excellent father he is and how well he interacts with his boys. He is
encouraging and supportive and gentle. I trust him with my children and
am outraged that anyone would call his behavior towards his sons
anything but exemplary,” wrote Sarah Scott.”

“A petition
to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and others has been launched to request that
those in authority in Texas protect James and all Texas children from
those who would seek to have youth undergo “sex change” surgery. A fundraiser for Younger has also been created at GoGetFunding.”

 

“MINISTERS” CLAIM SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE, HOOKUPS “NOT SINFUL”~SAY CHASTITY IS “OUTDATED & SILLY” EXPECTATION

 http://images.christianpost.com/full/76277/brandan-robertson.jpg?w=262
 “MINISTERS” CLAIM SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE, HOOKUPS “NOT SINFUL”~SAY CHASTITY IS “OUTDATED & SILLY” EXPECTATION 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Three false ministers, including one who identifies as homosexual and
another as polyamorous, recently told the Huffington Post that they
believe that sex before marriage is “not sinful,” and that it is rather
“unreasonable,” “outdated and silly” to expect people to stay chaste
until marriage. One said that he doesn’t “judge” those who choose to
engage in random hookups, even if he doesn’t do so himself.

The outlet interviewed Brandan Robertson, an open homosexual who
leads Missiongathering Christian Church in San Diego; Chalice Overy, who
is an associate pastor at Pullen Memorial Baptist Church in Raleigh,
North Carolina; and a man that was only identified as Michael, who says
he is currently dating three women and a man, and serves as a clergyman
in San Antonio, Texas.

The article, written by Brittany Wong, was entitled “We Asked Ministers What It’s Like To Date Today. Here’s What They Said.”

“I think the evangelical church world that I come from has taught
some really unhealthy ideas about sex and sexuality, and I spend a lot
of my time trying to deconstruct ‘purity culture’ in favor of a
healthier, more holistic view of sexuality,” opined Robinson, who caused
controversy in 2011 for his pro-homosexual views as a student at Moody
Bible Institute, but went on to graduate with a Bachelor of Arts degree
in pastoral ministry and theology.

“I believe for some people, waiting for marriage before having sex
can be a very healthy path. I also believe that for most people, sex
before marriage is a healthy expression of the gift of sexuality and is
not ‘sinful’ or morally wrong,” he said.

Overy made similar remarks.

“I honestly think it’s unreasonable to expect people to wait until
they are married to have sex if we expect people to make thoughtful
decisions about who they marry,” she said, although noting that she
personally prefers a man who “wants to get to know me, not just my
body.”

“But if we are willing to do the spiritual and emotional work of
intimacy, should we deny ourselves the joy of physical intimacy? I don’t
think so,” Overy added.

Michael, who is divorced, outlined that his church is aware of his
multiple relationships, and says that he has been engaged in polyamory
since his youth.

“One of the worst things the Church has done is take God and the
Divine out of the bedroom and shame people for their desires and
practices,” he claimed. “I have always believed that contractual
arrangements (including marriage) are not the boundary on sex—our own
personal ethics are.”

“Most of the single clergy I know have sex, even when the rules of
their denomination prohibit it,” Michael continued. “It simply is an
outdated and silly expectation, in my opinion. Like anything else, sex
can be manipulative, unhealthy or used as a power differential. Sex, or
even dating without sex with a congregant is never okay because of the
power differential. Within relationships of equals or with agreed-upon
boundaries, though, it is healthy and beautiful.”

The three also stated that they have no issues with dating someone
who is not a Christian, and would actually prefer so. Robertson said
that he emphasizes the “normal-ness” of his life on dating apps, noting
that he enjoys “craft beer, going clubbing [and] traveling.” Michael
outlined that he mostly dates atheists and agnostics, stating that he
desires those who “at the very minimum, question the historic faith.”

As
previously reported, the Bible teaches against—apart from prohibitions
on homosexuality, such as in Romans 1:26-27—premarital sex in numerous
Scriptures, and strongly warns that those who engage in unrepentant
fornication will not inherit the kingdom of God.

Ephesians 5:3-6 admonishes, “But fornication, and all uncleanness, or
covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints,
neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not
convenient, but rather giving of thanks. For this ye know, that no
whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater,
hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man
deceive you with vain words, for because of these things cometh the
wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.”

1 Thessalonians 4:1-8 likewise instructs, “Furthermore then, we
beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord Jesus, that as ye have
received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God, so ye would
abound more and more. For ye know what commandments we gave you by the
Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that
ye should abstain from fornication, that every one of you should know
how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honor—not in the lust of
concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God.”

“For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness. He
therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also
given unto us His Holy Spirit.”

Scripture also warns in 2 Timothy 4:3-4, “For the time will come when
they will not endure sound doctrine, but after their own lusts shall
they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears. And they shall
turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.”

SAUDI TEXTBOOKS TEACH JIHAD VIOLENCE, HATRED OF JEWS & CHRISTIANS, DEATH FOR APOSTASY

SAUDI TEXTBOOKS TEACH JIHAD VIOLENCE, HATRED OF JEWS & CHRISTIANS, DEATH FOR APOSTASY 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

David Andrew Weinberg of the Anti-Defamation League presents the
Saudi textbook material as if it were some aberration, a manifestation
of Saudi “extremism.” In reality, however, it’s standard Islam.

“This academic year, once again Saudi Arabia’s high school
monotheism textbooks teach that infidels such as Jews and Christians are
‘the enemies of Islam and its people’ and that proper observance of
Islam requires ‘abhorring the infidels’ and ‘enmity’ toward them.”


“You will surely find the most intense of the people in enmity toward
the believers to be the Jews and those who associate others with
Allah…” (Qur’an 5:82)

“There has already been for you an excellent pattern in Abraham and
those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Indeed, we are
disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than Allah.
We have denied you, and there has appeared between us and you animosity
and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone.’” (Qur’an 60:4)

“These textbooks characterize Shiite Muslims — like those who
make up the majority in Iran — as polytheists and declare that Jews,
Christians, and polytheists are “the most evil of creatures.”

“Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Book and the
polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein.
Those are the most vile of creatures.” (Qur’an 98:6)

“Saudi Arabia’s current high school religion textbooks also call
for violence against such people. One textbook urges ‘fighting the
infidels and polytheists’ except under limited extenuating
circumstances. Another, this one on the subject of sayings attributed to
the Prophet Muhammad, calls for jihad through ‘battling with the
infidels by proselytizing them and fighting them.’”

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “Fight against those who disbelieve
in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are
polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to
any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing
them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you,
accept it from them and desist from fighting against them…. If they
refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to
pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay
the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them. (Sahih Muslim 4294.)

“Another teaches the importance of ‘exposing the People of the Book,’ meaning Jews and Christians, and ‘urging to fight them.’”

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah nor the Last Day, and do not
forbid what has been forbidden by Allah and his messenger, and do not
acknowledge the religion of Truth, even if they are of the People of the
Book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel
themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

“But Jews — who are described in the textbooks as devious, deceptive schemers…”

“And indeed, there is among them a party who alter the Scripture with
their tongues so you may think it is from the Scripture, but it is not
from the Scripture. And they say, ‘This is from Allah,’ but it is not
from Allah. And they speak untruth about Allah while they know.” (Qur’an
3:78)

“One Saudi textbook advocates the beating of women, teaching that it is ‘a means of discipline’ and ‘permitted when necessary.’”

“Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one
superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain
them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because
Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience,
admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” (Qur’an 4:34)

“The kingdom’s introductory high school textbook on Islamic
jurisprudence teaches that the penalty for adultery is death by stoning
and that people who engage in anal sex or who mock or convert away from
Islam should also be killed.”

Stoning for adultery: “Umar said, ‘I am afraid that after a long time
has passed, people may say, “We do not find the Verses of the Rajam
(stoning to death) in the Holy Book,” and consequently they may go
astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm
that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual
intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by
witnesses or pregnancy or confession.”’ Sufyan added, ‘I have memorized
this narration in this way.’ Umar added, ‘Surely Allah’s Apostle carried
out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him.’” (Bukhari 8.82.816)

Anal sex: “The Prophet said: If anyone resorts to a diviner and
believes in what he says (according) to the version of Musa), or has
intercourse with his wife (according to the agreed version) when she is
menstruating, or has intercourse with his wife through her anus, he has
nothing to do with what has been sent down to Muhammad – according to
the version of Musaddad.” (Sunan Abu Dawud 3904)

Converting away from Islam: a hadith depicts Muhammad saying:
“Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” (Bukhari 9.84.57)

Mocking Islam: “Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: A Jewess used to abuse the
Prophet and disparage him. A man strangled her till she died. The
Apostle of Allah declared that no recompense was payable for her blood.”
(Sunan Abu Dawud 4349)

“Saudi textbooks still foment hate: The kingdom’s education materials
are rife with anti-Semitism and calls to hurt Shiites, gays, women and
more,” by David Andrew Weinberg, New York Daily News, November 30, 2018:

…How bad is it? The kingdom’s new books for the 2018-2019
school year continue to teach hatred or even violence against Jews,
Christians, Shiites, women, gay men and anybody who mocks or converts
away from Islam.


This academic year, once again Saudi Arabia’s high school monotheism
textbooks teach that infidels such as Jews and Christians are “the
enemies of Islam and its people” and that proper observance of Islam
requires “abhorring the infidels” and “enmity” toward them. These
textbooks characterize Shiite Muslims — like those who make up the
majority in Iran — as polytheists and declare that Jews, Christians, and
polytheists are “the most evil of creatures.”


Saudi Arabia’s current high school religion textbooks also call for violence against such people.

One textbook urges “fighting the infidels and polytheists” except
under limited extenuating circumstances. Another, this one on the
subject of sayings attributed to the Prophet Muhammad, calls for jihad
through “battling with the infidels by proselytizing them and fighting
them.”

Another teaches the importance of “exposing the People of the Book,” meaning Jews and Christians, and “urging to fight them.”

In addition to calling Christianity “an invalid and perverted
religion,” the books teach incorrectly that the American Universities in
Beirut and Cairo are among the top sources of Christian missionary work
at the expense of Islam in the world today.

But Jews — who are described in the textbooks as devious, deceptive
schemers — are an even greater target than Christians for false
conspiracy theories in the current Saudi curriculum. For example, these
books teach that “a main goal” for the vast majority of Jewish
organizations today is to destroy the al-Aqsa Mosque and that the
ultimate objective of Zionism is a “global Jewish government to control
the entire world.”

One Saudi textbook advocates the beating of women, teaching that it is “a means of discipline” and “permitted when necessary.”

The kingdom’s introductory high school textbook on Islamic
jurisprudence teaches that the penalty for adultery is death by stoning
and that people who engage in anal sex or who mock or convert away from
Islam should also be killed….

TEXAS INVASION: AGENTS ARREST 1,900 AT SOUTHERN BORDER~GANG MEMBERS, CHILD PREDATORS, AMONG ILLEGALS ARRESTED IN BORDER CRACKDOWN

TEXAS INVASION: AGENTS ARREST 1,900 AT SOUTHERN BORDER~GANG MEMBERS, CHILD PREDATORS, AMONG ILLEGALS ARRESTED 
IN BORDER CRACKDOWN
2,500 POUNDS OF MARIJUANA SEIZED
BY ADAN SALAZAR
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Border Patrol agents arrested a staggering 1,900 illegal immigrants in South Texas over the weekend.
The extremely high number of arrests took place in the Rio Grande Valley, the busiest US sector for illegal crossings.

 Among the illegals arrested throughout the valley, most of whom were
from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, at least one was confirmed to
be an MS-13 gang member. 

A Customs and Border Protection agent who spoke to local news blamed the spike on human smugglers.

“The smugglers don’t care for the individuals they’re crossing,
all they care about is the money. They see these as a commodity, not as
people,” CBP Agent Marcelino Medina told ValleyCentral.com.
 RGV Sector Chief Manuel Padilla, Jr. confirmed that on Saturday alone
agents foiled 27 human smuggling attempts, in addition to busting
shipments of 2,500 pounds of marijuana.

The journey took a deadly turn for some immigrants, whose bodies and
skeletal remains have been located on the banks of the Rio Grande River.

“Just this weekend, Border Patrol Agents discovered two skeletal
remains and then recovered one body in the Rio Grande,” Medina told
Valley Central. “Plus, this (Monday) morning, Border Patrol Agents found
the body of a deceased person in a canal in Mission. The cost of them
coming to the United States should never be their life.”

For the ones who successfully made the journey, it’s possible they’ll be released into the US and never heard from again.

In a 2014 Infowars exclusive, a Rio Grande Valley city attorney
told our cameras Border Patrol agents were dropping illegals off at the
McAllen bus terminal after processing, and providing them vouchers and bus tickets allowing them to travel further into the US.

In exchange for the vouchers, illegals are given a date to appear
at immigration court, but the court dates are set months, sometimes
several years in advance and 90% of illegals never show up to court.

News of the arrests in Texas comes a week after members of the migrant caravan engaged in violent clashes with Border Patrol agents in San Diego.

SCHOLAR: U.S. COLLEGES ARE “BREEDING GROUNDS FOR CIVIL WAR”~STUDENTS TAUGHT TO HATE WESTERN CIVILIZATION & EACH OTHER

 SCHOLAR: U.S. COLLEGES ARE “BREEDING GROUNDS FOR CIVIL WAR”~STUDENTS TAUGHT TO HATE WESTERN CIVILIZATION & EACH OTHER 
BY DAN LYMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
American colleges have become ‘breeding grounds for civil war,’ warns author and political commentator Heather Mac Donald.

Mac Donald, regarded by many as a leading conservative intellectual
and researcher, asserts that students are being trained to “hate” and
obsess upon identity politics by predatory cultural Marxists in faculty
and administration.


“Come the 80s, students were given a license for ignorance,” Mac
Donald told Fox News host Mark Levin. “They were taught the only thing
they needed to know about a book were the race and gender of the author
to know whether it was thoroughly dismissable, without being read, and
they could go on to instead wallow in their own delusional oppression.”

“It has only gotten worse since then, and what we are doing is
breeding the grounds for, I fear, civil war,” she warned. “Because
students are being taught to hate — to hate the greatest works of
Western civilization, and frankly, to hate each other.”

“From the moment a student steps on college campus today as a
freshman — or as a ‘freshperson’ I should probably say — the bureaucracy
is determined to drum into that student’s head, identity politics,
which says he’s either a victim or an oppressor,” she continued.

Mac Donald contends that this extreme manipulation of young minds
is creating hordes of damaged collectivists who carry a “chip on their
shoulders,” preventing them from “seizing the magnificent opportunities”
and vast knowledge made available to them by modern society and
technology.

“They carry this chip, this delusional victimology, into the
world at large, and they are going around blaming American institutions
of endemic racism and sexism when that no longer is true,” Mac Donald
said.

Mac Donald’s comments echo sentiments she expressed in a recent article in the American Mind.

“The core sickness of the academy is not relativism but hatred,”
Mac Donald wrote. “Students are taught to hate the greatest works of
Western civilization, and to hate each other, based on the tribal
trivialities of gonads and melanin.”

Mac Donald, a Fellow of the Manhattan Institute, made waves in 2016 with her bombshell PragerU presentation “Are the Police Racist?” analyzing police shootings and challenging the Black Lives Matter narrative.

ADL GIVES APPLE’S TIM COOK AWARD FOR CENSORING ONLINE SPEECH

 https://www.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/11-16-18-censorship-610x320.jpg
 http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/tim-cook-ceo-apple1.jpg
 https://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/apple-tim-cook-globalization-004-01-e1490023880290.jpg
ADL GIVES APPLE’S TIM COOK AWARD FOR CENSORING ONLINE SPEECH 
 Apple CEO says it’s “a sin” to not ban certain people
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Apple CEO Tim Cook received a “Courage Against Hate” award
from the Anti-Defamation League yesterday for censoring online speech,
including Infowars’ Alex Jones, whom Cook referred to as a “violent
conspiracy theorist”.

“At Apple, we believe
technology needs to have a clear point of view,” said Cook during his
acceptance speech. “This is no time to get tied up in knots. We only
have one message for those who seek to push hate, division, or violence:
You have no place on our platforms. You have no home here.
From the
earliest days of iTunes to Apple Music today we have always prohibited
music with a history of white supremacy. Why? Because it’s the right
thing to do. And as we showed this year, we won’t give a platform to
violent conspiracy theorists. Why? Because it’s the right things to do.”

As the Verge noted,
Cook’s “violent conspiracy theorists” line “refers to Alex Jones’
Infowars,” which is a defamatory statement because neither Alex Jones or
Infowars have ever advocated violence of any kind.

Apple CEO Tim Cook suggests it’s “a sin” to not ban certain people from social media and technology platforms: “We only have one message for those who seek to push hate, division, and violence: You have no place on our platforms. You have no home here.”
 See the censored video where Alex Jones breaks down why Tim Cook and the ChiComs see him as Public Enemy #1.
 ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt subsequently linked “hate speech” with
criticism of immigration before praising Cook as “courageous” for
banning Alex Jones.

“Apple was the first company to remove Alex
Jones’s hateful anti-government conspiratorial rants from their
platform, and other tech companies, as we know, followed their lead,” he
said.

Cook also suggested it was “a sin” not to ban certain individuals from social media platforms.
However,
as the past few months have vehemently proven, the banning of prominent
conservatives by Big Tech giants has nothing to do with preventing
“hate speech” and everything to do with silencing political opposition.

Journalist Laura Loomer was banned for criticizing the brutal practice of female genital mutilation, while conservative pundit and combat veteran Jesse Kelly was banned for no identifiable reason whatsoever.
Reaction to the award from free speech advocates was not so glowing.
“Republican
politicians are too stupid to address the issue of censorship,” tweeted
journalist Tim Pool. “Activists accuse everyone of being a white
supremacist, even people who aren’t white. They have already banned
people for criticizing politicians under the guise of “hate speech”.

Republican politicians are too stupid to address the issue of censorship.

Activists accuse everyone of being a white supremacist, even people who aren’t white.

They have already banned people for criticizing politicians under the guise of “hate speech”

 “Apple fired me for not being as woke as the rest of my team,” remarked
Alejandrina Gonzalez. “My SJW manager would stalk my social media
everyday and then email me commenting about what I said.”
 “The question is who defines the ground rules- what constitutes
“division?” Would the “resistance” & “persistence” count as
division? Actually, isn’t the current state of @twitter conversation
divisive?” remarked the Free Our Internet campaign.
 “That means it’s not a “platform” but a “publisher” & thus should be
able to be sued for what it publishes,” said Mark Krikorian.
 “They understand how much power they have now and know the media won’t
challenge them as long as they continue deplatforming their enemy,”
observed Patrick Courrielche. 
 “If you don’t understand why this is scary you need to research history more,” warned Ben Askren.
 ______________________________________________________________

 Apple CEO plans to ban “divisive” ideas – Ezra Levant
______________________________________
 SEE: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2674634/Apple-CEO-Tim-Cook-poses-smiling-pictures-San-Francisco-Gay-Pride-just-days-accidentally-outed-homosexual-presenter-live-TV.html
EXCERPTS:

Apple CEO Tim Cook poses smiling arm-in-arm with revelers for
pictures at San Fran Gay Pride just days after he was accidentally outed
as homosexual by a presenter on live TV

  • Cook showed up to greet the 5,000 Apple employees who showed up for the event Sunday
  • The
    CEO, who has never directly addressed his sexual orientation publicly,
    posed for pictures in an Apple Pride t-shirt with employees
  • The move came two days after CNBC’s Squawk on the Street co-host Simon Hobbs outed Cook live on the air
  • During a segment about the dearth of openly gay CEOs, he said, ‘Tim Cook is fairly open about the fact he’s gay’
“Nod and a wink? Apple CEO Tim Cook surprised many when he showed up to
San Francisco’s gay pride parade to cheer on his 5,000 employees who
participated on Sunday”
 WEARING SHIRTS WITH THE APPLE PRIDE LOGO:
 Nod and a wink? Apple CEO Tim Cook surprised many when he showed up to San Francisco's gay pride parade to cheer on his 5,000 employees who participated on Sunday
 Pride: Like the employees and their family members who attended, Cook
donned a special Apple Pride t-shirt that featured a rainbow-hued
rendering of their logo:
Cook wore the Apple Pride shirt Sunday along with other Apple employees at the parade.
Outed? Apple recently came out against an Arizona bill that would permit
businesses to refuse service on religious grounds, a measure that
critics said could allow discrimination against gay people and Cook
himself has been outspoken about gay rights but he’s never publicly
addressed his own sexual preference


Outed? Apple recently came out against an Arizona bill that would permit businesses to refuse service on religious grounds, a measure that critics said could allow discrimination against gay people and Cook himself has been outspoken about gay rights but he's never publicly addressed his own sexual preference