Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog
A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
Read more here:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/jud…Jeff Younger Speaks To Infowars About Son James’ Court Forced Sexual Transition
Share: US Court Pushes Chemical Castration of 8 yr Old
Texas Family Court Demands 8-Year-Old Boy Be Chemically Castrated Against Father’s Wishes
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
DALLAS, Texas, October 24, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – The judge presiding over the case of Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition,” ruled today that the parents will have joint conservatorship over James, which includes making joint medical decisions for the child.Judge Kim Cooks of the 255th district also put a gag order on both parents so that they cannot speak to the press about the case and decided that the father is not required to pay attorney fees. The judge’s decision means that the Save James website will have to be shut down.Mr. Younger and his ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, were in court last week fighting over custody and decision-making abilities for James and his twin, Jude. Dr. Georgulas wants to continue to “transition” James “into” a girl called “Luna.” Mr. Younger wanted to take a “wait and see” approach rather than start the child on puberty blockers.Eleven out of 12 jurors decided Monday that Mr. Younger should not be granted Sole Managing Conservatorship over his twin boys. Dr. Georgulas admitted in court she is not actually the twins’ biological mother and used in-vitro fertilization via an egg donor to gestate them.On Monday, a jury ruled 11-1 that the current Joint Managing Conservatorship should be replaced by a Sole Managing Conservatorship – and that Mr. Younger should not be that person.Judge Cooks’ ruling was originally scheduled for Wednesday afternoon but was delayed. When a seasoned civil court journalist from the Dallas Morning News asked the court clerk for the ruling schedule and provided her with the specific case number, she confirmed the day but refused to share the time of the ruling.Since kindergarten, Dr. Georgulas has enrolled James in school as a girl under the name “Luna.” She began telling him he’s a girl when he was just three, and testified in court that she began to believe that when he liked a McDonald’s toy meant for girls. James’ pediatrician records also indicate Dr. Georgulas has met with GENECIS, a medical “transition” clinic in Dallas and is considering “hormone suppression” when James is closer to eight or nine years old.Watch this exclusive video with Jeffrey Younger given right before the judge issued the gag order: (SEE AT TOP OF THIS POST)Prior to this case, Dr. Georgulas had exclusive rights to make decisions regarding psychological and psychiatric care for James and Jude. She needed to inform Mr. Younger of her decisions, but he couldn’t weigh in on or change the decisions. GENECIS wouldn’t begin James on puberty blockers without Mr. Younger’s consent.Dr. Georgulas and Mr. Younger’s messy custody dispute entailed, in part, the latter filing a counter-petition to the court requesting sole managing conservatorship in order to obtain the ability to make decisions on psychological and psychiatric care. This would have given him the ability to prevent James’ from starting puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones.Mr. Odeneal told supporters that an appeal “takes about a year” and it would be very difficult to overturn a jury ruling.There were only three news agencies present throughout the trial: LifeSiteNews, The Texan, and Channel One (a Russian News Agency). After the jury ruling, the public outcry has been immense. Blogger Matt Walsh started the hashtag #protectjamesyounger on twitter. It has been used in tweets over 41,000 times. Additionally, other conservative news agencies are beginning to pick up the story.A petition created by LifeSiteNews in support of Jeffrey Younger’s efforts to protect his son from being transitioned into a girl has been signed by over 65,000 people.Follow all LifeSiteNews coverage of the James Younger case here.________________________________________________LifeSite reporter locked out of courtroom of 7-yr-old ‘gender transitioning’ case
BY Stephen Kokxrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:DALLAS, Texas, October 24, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — LifeSite reporter Madeleine Jacob and close to 50 other people, including The Texan News, were refused entrance into the Dallas courtroom where the trial concerning 7-year-old James Younger came to a close today. Three bailiffs were ordered to stand guard in front of the locked door as Judge Kim Cooks announced her final ruling granting joint custody of James.In the #ProtectJamesYounger case, Judge Cooks CLOSED the court room and three bailiffs prevented anyone without a hard card press pass from entering the court room.— LifeSiteNews.com (@LifeSite) October 24, 2019At the #ProtectJamesYounger case and close to 50 people were denied entry to the court room. Some came from across the state and without warning Judge Cooks closed the court room.— LifeSiteNews.com (@LifeSite) October 24, 2019Despite not needing to show a press pass to enter the court at any time during the past two weeks, Jacob found herself standing outside in the hallway this afternoon because she didn't have a hard copy of her credentials. A local CBS-affiliate was invited in with their camera.Jacob, who has been in the courtroom every time the trial has been in session, presented not only her license but also a digital press pass in an effort to get in. She was told she needed a hard copy press pass to enter. Industry practice is generally that a digital press pass is enough to gain admission to an event.“I think it’s unfair that the media outlets who have been covering it from the beginning were thrown out while the local mainstream media outlets were invited in,” Kim Roberts, a reporter for The Texan, told LifeSite.Judge Kim Cooks just closed the #ProtectJamesYounger courtroom. LifeSiteNews, @TheTexanNews, and many other reporters were preventing from entering the closed court because we didn’t have ‘hard cards press passes. Digital passes didn’t count. No family either.— LifeSiteNews.com (@LifeSite) October 24, 2019On Monday, the jury ruled 11-1 against Jame’s father, Jeffrey Younger, in his fight against his ex-wife, Dr. Anna Georgulas, who wants to raise James as “Luna” and force Jeffrey to affirm that identity.The case has garnered national headlines in the last 48 hours, with Texas Senator Ted Cruz calling it “horrific and tragic” while Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott announced he is launching an investigation.The jury’s decision was that Mr. Younger should not be given sole managing conservatorship over James and his twin brother Jude. Rather, the current joint managing conservatorship should be replaced by a sole managing conservatorship. However, Judge Cooks ruled today that there will be a joint managing conservatorship over James.______________________________________________________‘Child abuse’: Rand Paul slams Texas mom’s plan to ‘transition’ 7-year-old against dad’s will
BY Calvin Freiburgerrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:Update: Judge Kim Cooks has ruled that James' parents will have joint conservatorship over him. Read more by clicking here.October 24, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is the latest national lawmaker to speak against forcing 7-year-old James Younger to undergo a gender “transition” demanded by his mother but opposed by his father.Jeffrey Younger and his son JamesSaveJames.com
On Monday, a Dallas jury ruled 11-1 against father Jeffrey Younger in his fight against his ex-wife, Dr. Anna Georgulas, who wants to raise James as “Luna” and force his father to affirm that identity, and has discussed subjecting him to "hormone suppression" between ages eight and nine – all against the boy’s will, his father says. Judge Kim Cooks is slated to issue a final ruling later today.The case has sparked intense national outrage even as the mainstream press largely ignores it, with experts warning that not only is affirming a child’s gender confusion psychologically unhealthy in the long run, but exposure to sex-change hormones carries serious physical risks including infertility, impairment of adult sex function, and reduced life expectancy.Numerous public figures have weighed in on the case, the latest being Sen. Paul with a tweet Thursday, declaring that what Georgulas wanted constitutes child abuse:We don’t let kids drink alcohol til 21. People want to move smoking age to 21. But we will allow a 7 year old to have his life and body altered like this? This is child abuse and the state should side with the father who is trying to protect the child.” https://t.co/fNXF50qQEY— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 24, 2019Other lawmakers to comment include Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Dan Crenshaw, both of Texas:A 7-year-old child doesn't have the maturity to make profound decisions like this. The state of Texas should protect this child's right to choose—as an informed, mature person—and not be used as a pawn in a left-wing political agenda. #ProtectJamesYounger— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) October 24, 2019This is heartbreaking and sets a horrible precedent. A 7-year-old can’t possibly make this decision or understand it. Parents should know better. I hope this father receives the public support he needs. #ProtectJamesYoungerhttps://t.co/4hszPgqGWe— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) October 22, 2019Regarding what lawmakers could do, the Washington Examiner notes that Texas does not currently prohibit legal guardians from giving puberty blockers or hormones to minors; Conservative Review senior editor Daniel Horowitz suggeststhe state convene a special legislative session to ban the practice, and that Congress limit federal courts’ ability to interfere with states that do the same.Gov. Abbott announced Wednesday evening that state officials are investigating the situation:FYI the matter of 7 year old James Younger is being looked into by the Texas Attorney General’s Office and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. #JamesYounger— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) October 23, 2019As of the time of this writing, a Change.org petition calling on Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and state lawmakers to intervene has received more than 223,000 signatures. LifeSiteNews has also launched its own petition, which has collected more than 59,000 signatures so far.Follow all LifeSiteNews coverage of the James Younger case here.______________________________________________________________Transgendering Children is the New'Munchhausen by Proxy' Child AbuseBY DANIEL GREENFIELDSEE: https://cms.frontpagemag.com/point/2019/10/transgendering-children-new-munchhausen-proxy-daniel-greenfield; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:Munchhausen by Proxy is a familiar and ugly behavior in which parents, often mothers, seek attention by attributing illnesses to their children. They successfully convince children, bystanders, sometimes even medical professionals, that their children are sick.And they do this, often, by poisoning their children or otherwise interfering with their health.The James Younger case seems to be showing some of the familiar symptoms of Munchhausen by Proxy.A video has now come into public light where you can see the father asking James questions about whether or not he’s a girl or a boy. The child answers that he is a girl because his mother told him so.“You’re a boy, right?” asks Younger.“No, I’m a girl,” replies James.“Who told you you’re a girl?” asks Younger.“Mommy,” said James.The father continued to ask questions of his young son about his preferences, including how “mommy puts you in a dress and puts nail polish on you?” The son answers in the affirmative, noting that his mother buys him dresses, hairbands, and hairclips, and that he likes nail polish.“And what does mommy tell you?” asks the father.“She tells me I’m a girl,” replies James.It's bad enough that lefties insist that 8-year-olds are capable of deciding to take medications that will scar their bodies and prevent them from functioning as adult men or women, but even they aren't claiming that 3-year-olds can do this. Yet.And this is a fairly clear sign that the 'gender syndrome' here is manufactured.If the Left hadn't embraced transgenderism lately, this would be treated as Munchhausen by Proxy.Younger believed that his ex-wife, Anne Georgulas, was “only giving [James] love and affection if he acted like a girl,” and “was putting my son into time-outs and she would lock him in his room and say that monsters only eat boys.”The transition therapist, for instance, observed that James is oddly inconsistent when it comes to wanting to be “Luna.” At one point, James was presented with two pieces of paper, one with the word “James” and one with the word “Luna,” and asked to pick the name he preferred. When in the presence of his mother, he chose “Luna.” When in the presence of his father, he chose “James.”This isn't really about politics. It's about the reality that child abuse will be defended if it serves the ideological cause of the Left.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A captured internal Muslim Brotherhood document states: “The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”Now if you were dedicated to that goal of “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” how would you act any differently from how these people are acting?“US ‘Border Church’ and ‘Border Mosque’ team up for prayer service,” by Alejandra Molina, RNS, October 25, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):For more than a decade, the Rev. John Fanestil, a United Methodist minister, has held a Sunday service at Friendship Park, a historic meeting place on the US-Mexico border overlooking the Pacific Ocean between San Diego and Tijuana.While Communion is celebrated each week, Fanestil began the non-sectarian Christian ministry to help preserve the park as a public space where family members separated by their immigration status can interact, even if their interaction takes place through border fencing.But in recent months, Border Church, or La Iglesia Fronteriza, has blossomed into a multifaith movement that includes a group of Muslims, who call themselves the Border Mosque, that has been joining Fanestil in prayer since April.On Sunday. the two groups will co-host “Pray Beyond Borders”, a binational day of prayer that will include Indigenous, Muslim, Christian and Jewish leaders, as well as civil rights activist Linda Sarsour.The event comes a year after new US Government restrictions took effect at the site, limiting the number of people allowed in the park to 10, down from 25, with federal immigration officials rotating people in and out every 30 minutes, Fanestil said.Dustin Craun, executive director of the San Diego branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said the interfaith work at Friendship Park “is primarily about the families and keeping that space open”….Craun has also been inspired by the border.He has worked in El Paso, Texas, and Juarez, across the border, volunteering for a time at Annunciation House, a Catholic non-profit in El Paso that helps refugees. About five years ago, he co-founded MPower Change, a Muslim-led social and racial justice organisation, where he worked with Sarsour and other activists. Among MPower’s achievements is successfully advocating for the Louisville International Airport in Kentucky to be renamed after Muhammad Ali, a Louisville native.Craun moved to San Diego earlier this year, he said, with the idea of beginning “some type of binational prayer”. When he learned of Border Church, he contacted Fanestil and Border Mosque was born soon afterward. Craun has produced a short film about the work Border Church has done to protect the part of Friendship Park where families meet. The film also documents how Border Church inspired the Muslim community “to stand for justice in the borderlands,” he said….Sonia Garcia, founder of the Latina Muslim Foundation, said that the Border Mosque is a way for Muslims, who have faced immigration difficulties since 9/11, to expand their activism. Muslim voices, she said, need to “be heard in all borders,” and to stand for deported people and separated families no matter their national origin….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Its “All Together” cereal effort combines six varieties of cereal in one box, and features the mascots of each on the packaging.The company said the cereal is “a symbol of acceptance no matter how you look, where you’re from or who you love.”“We all belong together. So for the first time in history, our famous mascots and cereals are offered exclusively together in the same box for All Together cereal. It’s a symbol of acceptance no matter how you look, where you’re from or who you love. We believe that all people deserve an environment where they can be their best selves,” a webpage for the initiative reads.As previously reported, the Bible teaches that all men are in the exact same predicament: All are born with the Adamic sin nature and are therefore “by nature the children of wrath” (Ephesians 2:3), having various inherent inclinations that are contrary to the law and will of God and being utterly incapable of changing by themselves (Job 14:4).It is why Jesus came: to “save His people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21) and that they might be “saved from wrath through Him” (Romans 5:9) — taking out of the way for those who are saved both the penalty for, and the power of, sin.Jesus outlined in John 3:5-7 that men must be regenerated by the second birth, and be transformed from being in Adam to being in Christ, or they cannot see the kingdom of Heaven. This work of the Holy Spirit is known in Christianity as the doctrine of regeneration.“But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life,” Romans 6:22-23 explains. “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This article was first published by Gatestone Institute. Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.The Trump administration recently called out and threatened to cut federal funding for the Consortium for Middle East Studies (CMES), a program run by Duke University and the University of North Carolina (pictured above). It was accused by the U.S. Education Department of misusing a federal grant to advance “ideological priorities” and unfairly promote “the positive aspects of Islam,” particularly in comparison to Judaism and Christianity.The Education Department summarized its position in an August 29 letter that opens with a reminder: institutions of higher education may receive federal funding via Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965—though “only for the purposes of establishing, strengthening, and operating comprehensive foreign language and area or international studies centers and programs.” The logic is simple: “cultural studies providing historical information about customs and practices in the Middle East and assisting students to understand and navigate the culture of another country, in concert with rigorous foreign language training, could help develop a pool of experts needed to protect U.S. national security and economic stability.”After reviewing the Consortium for Middle East Studies’ curricula, the Department letter warned that it had “little or no relevance” to federal funding:For example, although Iranian art and film may be of subjects of deep intellectual interest … the sheer volume of such offerings highlights a fundamental misalignment between your choices and Title VI's mandates. Although a conference focused on “Love and Desire in Modem [sic] Iran” and one focused on Middle East film criticism may be relevant in academia, we do not see how these activities support the development of foreign language and international expertise for the benefit of U.S. national security and economic stability. Similarly, the link between the statutory goals and the academic papers referenced in your grant proposal, Amihri Hatun: Performance, Gender-Bending and Subversion in the Early Modern Ottoman Intellectual History, or Radical Love: Teachings from Islamic Mystical Tradition, is patently unclear.The Department letter further accused the program of projecting and “advance[ing] narrow, particularized views of American social issues” onto the Middle East. It cites a CMES teacher training seminar that described itself as focusing on “issues of multicultural education and equity to build a culture and climate of respect,” and “serving LGBTIQ youth in schools, culture and the media, diverse books for the classroom and more.”Just as the CMES proliferates in topics popular on U.S. campuses—but that have no bearing on the realities of the Middle East—so too is there “a startling lack of focus on geography, geopolitical issues, history, and language of the area, as Congress required in Title VI,” the Department letter continues. As for those two fields that the grant was primarily designed for, “foreign language instruction and area studies advancing the security and economic stability of the United States have taken ‘a back seat’ to other priorities at the Duke-UNC CMES.”In short, “the Duke-UNC CMES offers very little serious instruction preparing individuals to understand the geopolitical challenges to U.S. national security and economic needs but quite a considerable emphasis on advancing ideological priorities.”Significantly but not surprising, the letter further accused CMES of “lack[ing] balance as it offers very few, if any, programs focused on the historic discrimination faced by, and current circumstances of, religious minorities in the Middle East, including Christians, Jews, Baha'is, Yadizis, Kurds, Druze, and others.” Instead,there is a considerable emphasis placed on understanding the positive aspects of Islam, while there is an absolute absence of any similar focus on the positive aspects of Christianity, Judaism, or any other religion or belief system in the Middle East. This lack of balance of perspectives is troubling and strongly suggests that Duke-UNC CMES is not meeting legal requirement that National Resource Centers “provide a full understanding of the areas, regions, or countries’ in which the modern foreign language taught is commonly used.”The letter concluded by warning CMES to respond by September 22 or risk losing funding. CMES did; it send a 16-page letter of explanation, adding that it “will re-examine its procedures to ensure that its Title VI-funded activities continue to match the purposes and requirements of the Title VI program,” and was granted another year of funding.Whatever lasting impact the Education Department letter has on CMES, it is a welcome development for several reasons. First, it suggests that the government is paying attention. This is important considering that over a dozen other Middle East Studies departments—including at Columbia, Georgetown, Harvard, Princeton, and Yale universities—are also Title VI recipients. Moreover, all of them can be accused of most if not all of the failures cited in the Education Department letter to Duke and North Carolina (perhaps suggesting that the latter two, in the guise of CMES, were meant to be an example and warning to the rest).Another benefit of the Department letter is that, although it only concerns Title VI recipients, it made national headlines—it made waves—that may lead to more questions and/or create more public awareness on the greater issue: that most Middle East Studies departments on campuses across America can to varying degrees be accused of focusing on irrelevant topics, sidelining language skills, whitewashing Islam—in short, indoctrinating students in the Left’s views.As the letter is about funding, it may also prompt questions about its flipside—foreign funding. For example, a 2018 report found that “elite U.S. universities took more than half a billion dollars” from Saudi Arabia in gifts and donations “between 2011 and 2017”; as far back as 2005, Georgetown and Harvard each received $20 million “to support Islamic studies on their respective campuses.”Why would a nation that treats women like chattel, teaches Muslims to hate all non-Muslims, arrests and tortures Christians “plotting to celebrate Christmas”—a nation that has crack unitsdedicated to apprehending witches and warlocks—become a leading financial supporter of America’s liberal arts? The answer would seem to be obvious: so that recipients can show their gratitude by indoctrinating students in a fictitious Middle East and Islam—both of which are supposed victims of America.In all spheres of life, education is intimately connected with success—as its opposite, ignorance, is connected with failure. The reason U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East has tended towards disaster is because policymakers depend on advisors and analysts who are products of the aforementioned Middle East and Islamic studies programs. Until such time that Middle East Studies teach their topics with objectivity, balance, and above all, honestly—all criteria indispensable to success—failure will continue to dominate American policy.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Teachers are being encouraged to use a ‘gender snowperson’ drawing in sex education classes.Yes, really.Teacher2Teacher, a resource community which provides lesson plans and other tools for educators, tweeted the image with the words “Using this “gender snowperson,” learn about identity and language!”They tagged Johnny Cole as the source of the image, a “diversity” officer for Lexington Public Schools.The image shows a gender ambiguous ‘snowperson’ and is accompanied by post-it notes, including one that reads, “Gender Identity – Girl, Boy, Both or Neither – who you are and how you feel as a person.”Using this "gender snowperson," Ss learn about identity and language! ( via educator @LexingtonDEI) #EdEquity #ChampForKids#SchoolCulture pic.twitter.com/VEmaO2cFVt— Teacher2Teacher (@teacher2teacher) October 22, 2019Responses to the tweet weren’t exactly enthusiastic.“Can we stop pushing the idea of sexuality at all until kids are older?” asked Brett Fenderson. “Or are teachers just a bunch of sex-craved pervs these days? I’m a preschool teacher and I am blessed to never have to come across this issue with 3-5 year olds. I would protect them from people like you.”“Whatever teacher decided this was a good idea for what I would assume would be elementary school kids needs to be fired immediately,” commented another user. “And any parent who wants their child to be normal and healthy mentally should pull their child out of this school ASAP.”Perhaps the next step is to have drag queens dress up as ‘gender snowpersons’ and teach the kids that way.At this point, anything is possible._____________________________________________________________Teachers Encouraged to Use ‘Gender Snowperson’ in Classrooms to Teach Children About Gender Identity
BY SANDRA ROSESEE: http://sandrarose.com/2019/10/teachers-encouraged-to-use-gender-snowperson-to-teach-children-about-gender-identity/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:Teachers are being encouraged to use a "Gender Snowperson" graphic to teach students about gender identity in sex education classes.The gender snowperson image was tweeted by Teacher2Teacher, a left leaning nonprofit organization that provides lesson plans and other resources to teachers.Teacher2Teacher is sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.The organization identified Johnny Cole, a "diversity officer" for the Lexington School District, as the source of the image.The image shows a genderless snowman on a board accompanied by stickers that explains the gender identity ideology. One sticker says:"Gender Identity Girl, Boy, Neither Who you are and how you feel as a person."Another sticker reads:"Sexual orientation Who you love or are attracted to".A third sticker says:Sex Assigned at Birth Girl, Boy, Intersex Pronoun assigned at birth".Twitter users were confused and baffled by the agenda behind the lesson."What is the target age for this lesson?" asked one Twitter user."This is just awful. This is not something prepubescent children should have to deal with," wrote another user.A third user tweeted: "Why is the snowman white?".?? Using this "gender snowperson," Ss learn about identity and language! (? via educator @LexingtonDEI) #EdEquity #ChampForKids #SchoolCulturepic.twitter.com/VEmaO2cFVt— Teacher2Teacher (@teacher2teacher) October 22, 2019This is just awful. This is not something prepubescent children should have to deal with.— Travis Wester (@westerspace) October 22, 2019Critical Theory is not #Science...It is nothing more than advocacy masquerading as scienceTeaching this to children is malpractice in #education in addition to being factually at odds with scientific data— Kevin Krahenbuhl (@DrKrahenbuhl) October 23, 2019By gender identity you just mean personality, don't you? Except you're encouraging children to categorise their feelings and interests in line with stereotypes, then to check whether their bodies "match". It's hyper-conservative.— Victoria Smith (@glosswitch) October 23, 2019I have no problem with transgender people, even if my own child was transgender. But I would not want to put the idea in my child's head. If they are truly transgender they will find a way to express it to me and I will support them in anyway I can...— FiestyDreams (@FiestyDreams) October 23, 2019What reference point does a young snowman have to know how they feel as a person means they identify as a boy or a girl in this midel l?— Leoniebc (@leoniebc) October 23, 2019Everyday the alphabet people gives me more reasons to consider homeschooling for my future children. Thank you for making my choice easier by the day.— Amalia (@Flowerondacreek) October 23, 2019
Using this "gender snowperson," Ss learn about identity and language! (
via educator
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In an open letter to a newspaper editor, Pope Francis says that sincere atheists will be accepted by God. Writing to Eugenio Scalfari, founder of La Repubblica, the pope said: “You ask me if the God of the Christians forgives those who don’t believe and who don’t seek the faith. I start by saying–and this is the fundamental thing–that God’s mercy has no limits if you go to him with a sincere and contrite heart. The issue for those who do not believe in God is to obey their conscience” (“Pope Francis Assures Atheists,” The Independent, UK, Sept. 11, 2013).
This statement made big news, but there is nothing here that evangelicals have not been saying for decades. In fact, this is yet another way in which Roman Catholics and evangelicals are “coming together.” It is another aspect of the building of the end-time, one-world “church.”
A 1996 book by Zondervan Publishing House featured the writings of various theologians on the subject of whether or not there is salvation in pagan religions. The book,More Than One Way? is subtitled “four views on salvation in a pluralistic world.”
At least three of these views promote some form of inclusivism or universalism. The authors of the four views are John Hick, Clark Pinnock, Alister McGrath, R. Douglas Geivett, and W. Gary Phillips. The book is edited by Dennis Okholm and Timothy Phillips, associate professors of theology at Wheaton College. The various views are divided into four groups: 1) Normative Pluralism, 2) Inclusivism, 3) Agnosticism regarding those who have not heard the Gospel, and 4) Exclusivism – salvation only through personal faith in Christ.
Scholarly evangelicalism has long refused to see doctrine in terms of black and white, right and wrong, truth and heresy. The emerging church is just the most recent twist in evangelicalism’s apostasy.
Scholarly evangelicals typically see things in terms of various shades of gray. Theology is more an intellectual pastime than a matter of life and death, heaven and hell. The evangelical claims that the Bible is his sole authority, but in practice he has no absolute authority, because he is willing to accept heretical interpretations of Scripture as acceptable “models.”
The editors of More Than One Way noted that a large percentage of students in evangelical colleges no longer believe that those outside of Jesus Christ are lost.
“The new willingness to subject revelation to contemporary sensibilities has eroded the theological underpinnings for a missionary faith. Hunter’s questionnaire found that only two-thirds of the students in evangelical colleges believe that the sole hope for heaven is through a personal faith in Jesus Christ. Increasingly students in Christian colleges are affronted when hearing the traditional claim that salvation is found in Jesus Christ alone” (Editors, More Than One Way, p. 11).
CLARK PINNOCK
Consider some excerpts from Clark Pinnock’s statements:
“When I was a young believer in the 1950s, C.S. Lewis helped me understand the relationship between Christianity and other religions in an inclusivist way. Because I trusted him as an orthodox thinker, I was open to hear him say that he could detect God’s presence among other faiths and that he believed people could be saved in other religions because God was at work among them. His view was wonderfully summed up for me in that incident in The Last Battle, the last volume of the Narnia cycle, where the pagan soldier Emeth learns to his surprise that Aslan [the lion which represents Jesus Christ] regards his worship of Tash as directed to himself. Anyone who appreciates that incident is on his or her way to inclusivist thinking.
“The other influence was Sir Norman Anderson, a scholar of Islamic law and a longtime leader in the InterVarsity Fellowship in Great Britain. In 1970, he wrote a book called Christianity and Comparative Religion, which in 1984 was revised and retitled Christianity and World Religions. Anderson taught that people could be saved while being members of other faiths, much the way people were saved in Old Testament times apart from any Christian confession. Both these scholars helped me as a young student avoid the narrow outlook toward other faiths that was otherwise characteristic of evangelicalism” (More Than One Way, p. 107).
“Moving from the parochial and personal to the world stage, the key historical influence for inclusivism is undoubtedly the work of the Second Vatican Council in its articulation of this teaching. The spirit of the whole Council was one of openness to the world and a seeking after the unity of humanity. … Its standpoint was to view religions as arising from the spiritual dimension of created life and to seek the hidden presence of God in that sphere. … As an inclusivist, I acknowledge my debt to the Catholic Church for its leadership in this regard, and, as an evangelical, I am concerned that the model be shown to be congruent with the Scriptures. In agreement with the Council, I want the model to be not only theologically coherent, but also exegetically well founded” (More Than One Way, pp. 108,109).
“God has been at work saving human beings before Jesus was born and does so where Jesus has not been named. … Faith in Jesus as the Savior of the world leaves room for us to be open and generous to other religious traditions. Scripture encourages us to see the church not so much as the ark, outside of which there is no hope of salvation, but as the vanguard of those who have experienced the fullness of God’s grace made available to all people in Jesus Christ. … I welcome the Saiva Siddhanta literature of Hinduism, which celebrates a personal God of love, and the emphasis on grace that I see in the Japanese Shin-Shu Amida sect. I also respect the Buddha as a righteous man (Matt. 10:41) and Mohammed as a prophet figure in the style of the Old Testament” (More Than One Way, pp. 110-111).
This is heresy. Pinnock admits that he has been influenced by C.S. Lewis and Roman Catholic Vatican II Council. It is interesting to see how deeply this “evangelical” has drunk from the fountain of Catholicism.
ROB BELL
Rob Bell is another example of “evangelicals” who are teaching a form of universalism. In a 2005 interview with Beliefnet, Bell said “the church must stop thinking about everybody primarily in categories of in or out, saved or not, believer or nonbeliever.” In his influential book Velvet Elvis, which is popular with many Southern Baptists, Bell described a wedding that he conducted for two pagan unbelievers who told him that “they didn’t want any Jesus or God or Bible or religion to be talked about,” but they did want him to “make it really spiritual” (p. 76). Bell agreed with this ridiculous request and said that his pagan friends “are resonating with Jesus, whether they acknowledge it or not” (p. 92).
In his 2011 book Love Wins, Bell makes a case for universalism, though he might have left room for some folk to wind up for a while in some type of hell. Consider two of many quotes we could offer as evidence:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The ID2020 Alliance is a digital identity program that uses vaccination to insert tiny microchips into people’s bodies as part of a “digital identity program,” which has already been rolled out for use on the homeless:
Below is the report from Natural News:
Vaccines now being used to harvest biometric identities of everyone; Big Brother merges with Big Pharma
by Ethan Huff
It’s all happening, just as we predicted. Big Pharma is officially partnering with the tech industry to pair “immunization” with digital biometrics, meaning humans will soon be microchipped, tracked, and ultimately controlled through a global identification matrix.
The ID2020 Alliance, as it’s being called, is a digital identity program that aims to “leverage immunization” as a means of inserting tiny microchips into people’s bodies. In collaboration with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations, also known as GAVI, the government of Bangladesh and various other “partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief,” the ID2020 Alliance hopes to usher in this mark of the beast as a way to keep tabs on every human being living on Earth.
Similar to how cattle are marked with ear tags, this globalist alliance wants all humans to be “vaccinated” with digital tracking chips that will create a seamless monitoring system for the New World Order to manage the populations of the world with ease.
“We are implementing a forward-looking approach to digital identity that gives individuals control over their own personal information, while still building off existing systems and programs,” says Anir Chowdhury, a policy advisor at a2i, the Bangladesh government’s “Access to Information Program.”
“The government of Bangladesh recognizes that the design of digital identity systems carries far-reaching implications for individuals’ access to services and livelihoods, and we are eager to pioneer this approach,” he adds.
For more related news about the coming one world government and its biometrics component, be sure to check out PopulationControl.news.
ID2020 MICROCHIPS ARE ALSO BEING “VACCINATED” INTO THE BODIES OF HOMELESS PEOPLE IN AUSTIN, TEXAS
While the ID2020 program’s testing grounds are primarily in the Third World, the group says it’s also now working with governments here in the United States to start microchipping people through vaccination.
In Austin, Texas, for example, the homeless population is now being exploited as a collective guinea pig for ID2020’s microchip vaccination program, which the group claims will help to “empower” homeless people by supposedly giving them “control” over their personal identity data.
“The City of Austin, ID2020, and several other partners are working together with homeless people and the service providers who engage with them to develop a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform called MyPass to empower homeless people with their own identity data,” writes Chris Burt for BiometricUpdate.com.
ID2020 is also jabbing refugees with its microchip vaccinations through two inaugural pilot programs known as iRespond and Everest. According to reports, iRespond has “improved continuity of care” for more than 3,000 refugees receiving drug treatments for chronic illness. Everest, on the other hand, has “assisted with the provision of access to critical energy subsidies and a range of additional services with secure and user-centric digital identities without relying on a smartphone,” Burt writes.
All of this is priming the public for an eventual mandate of microchip vaccinations, which will be required for every individual in order to buy and sell goods. Chowdhury openly admitted this in stating that digital identity systems will be necessary for “individuals’ access to services and livelihoods.”
In other words, the Bible is right: A global identification system is in the works that will eventually be required for people to function in society, and ultimately survive. Without these microchips in their bodies, people won’t be able to work, let alone eat, and it’s all happening right before our very eyes.
Keep in mind that ID2020 is a part of the so-called “REAL ID,” which will soon be required for those who wish to travel. REAL ID will also be used as a backdoor method of implementing mandatory vaccination policies for adults.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
House Republicans stormed the Democrats’ closed-door impeachment deposition within the Capitol, forcing a delay into the secret unconstitutional proceedings.The charge into the Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) on Wednesday included nearly 50 other lawmakers determined to bring daylight to the secret proceedings helmed by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).Rep. Matt Gaetz: “We’re going to go and see if we can get inside.”WATCH: Republicans storm closed-door SCIF hearing to protest impeachment inquiry https://t.co/HzYe5CmIuxpic.twitter.com/EJBRr3WsnX— The Hill (@thehill) October 23, 2019Developing: House GOP members storm a secure hearing room to interrupt witness testimony in the impeachment inquiry into @realDonaldTrump @RepMattGaetz led the charge. https://t.co/mWBdJSGZdh pic.twitter.com/Lj1P7mSnVb— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) October 23, 2019ALL Americans should be outraged at the secrecy by which Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi are conducting their unauthorized impeachment inquisition of @POTUS @realDonaldTrump. Everyone should stand for truth, transparency, and due process. That’s why I’m storming Schiff’s SCIF. pic.twitter.com/YQJY9E1e0F— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) October 23, 2019Rep. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) told reporters that Schiff said “nothing” and shut down the deposition as soon as Republicans entered the chamber for their sit-in.“He doesn’t have the guts to come talk to us,” Marshall said. “He left, he just got up and left. He doesn’t have the guts to tell us why we can’t come in the room, why he doesn’t want this to be transparent. It’s the biggest facade, biggest farce of my life.”Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) compared the secret proceedings to that of the Soviet Union.Democrats are trying to deny Republican Members of Congress access to Schiff’s secret impeachment proceedings. What are they hiding??Enough is enough! The American people deserve transparency! This Democrat scheme to impeach @realDonaldTrump behind closed doors cannot continue. pic.twitter.com/ernM1x73m9— Steve Scalise (@SteveScalise) October 23, 2019Schiff was also “threatening” GOP members with ethics violations after postponing his secret hearing, said Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Fla.).I’m a Green Beret and a proud veteran. This impeachment process does not make me proud.As a sitting member of Congress, I still can’t read the transcripts on impeaching our President.I’ve fought in third-world countries that have fairer processes than what we’re seeing today. pic.twitter.com/6QSf8V1qA4— Rep. Michael Waltz (@RepMichaelWaltz) October 23, 2019Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Alabama), who sits on the Armed Services Committee, said he wasn’t even allowed to observe the hearing despite the fact one of the “witnesses” the Democrats were questioning is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense.“Adam Schiff just SHUT DOWN his secret underground impeachment hearing after I led a group of Republicans into the room,” Byrne tweeeted. “Now he’s threatening me with an Ethics complaint! I’m on the Armed Services Cmte but being blocked from the Dept. Asst. SecDef’s testimony. This is a SHAM!”Adam Schiff just SHUT DOWN his secret underground impeachment hearing after I led a group of Republicans into the room. Now he’s threatening me with an Ethics complaint! I’m on the Armed Services Cmte but being blocked from the Dept. Asst. SecDef’s testimony. This is a SHAM! pic.twitter.com/6qUMerxENC— Rep. Bradley Byrne (@RepByrne) October 23, 2019Democrats are sweeping the area after some of the Republicans brought their cell phones into the SCIF.• Why don't we know who the whistleblower is? • Why is this so-called #impeachment "inquiry" being ran secretly in the basement of the U.S. Capitol? • Why are the American people being left in the dark?@RepAdamSchiff owes us all answers. pic.twitter.com/1NZUqq9Fwz— Oversight Committee Republicans (@GOPoversight) October 23, 2019America, whatever you believe about our President, you must realize that senior Democrat leadership in the House is ignoring the founding principles of our democracy. We need the House to vote on this and it must be done in transparency. pic.twitter.com/vcIjiaycDQ— Rep. Mark Green (@RepMarkGreen) October 23, 2019Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Fla.) told the Democrats not to “hide” their impeachment “travesty” “from the American people.”Rep. Mo Brooks: “By golly, if they’re going to do it, do it in public. Don’t hide it from the American people. Show your face where we can all see the travesty that you are trying to foist on America & the degradation of our Republic that you are engaged in.” pic.twitter.com/LrGJ4mCF7w— The Hill (@thehill) October 23, 2019Several other Republican lawmakers expressed their frustration that House Democrats continue to hold their secret impeachment inquiry without due process or transparency..@RepLeeZeldin: LEAKED testimony “is not firsthand from Ambassador Taylor, it’s not secondhand from Ambassador, it’s not THIRD-hand from Ambassador Taylor…”“On the process and the substance, this whole thing has been a JOKE.” pic.twitter.com/EHJX5qYym6— Mark Bednar (@MarkBednar) October 23, 2019We are sick and tired of this secretive, backroom impeachment sham. My Republican colleagues and I just stormed the impeachment hearing room and finally got in. However, Chairman Schiff got up and walked away. That’s what cowards do, they get up and walk away. #StoptheSchiffShow pic.twitter.com/trDb8P3pG6— Buddy Carter (@RepBuddyCarter) October 23, 2019From this morning’s press conference outside the basement room of the Capitol where Adam Schiff is conducting his closed-door hearings.Watch here— Congresswoman Debbie Lesko (@RepDLesko) October 23, 2019#NEW: .@RepMarkWalker speaks out against the impeachment inquiry into Pres. Trump:“The American people are being shut out. House Democrats are bypassing Constitutional norms and basic standards of due process with their impeachment obsession.”pic.twitter.com/D9hGQrr9Gq— Jennifer Franco (@jennfranconews) October 23, 2019I joined @RepMattGaetz and dozens of other @HouseGOP colleagues for a press conference to demand @RepAdamSchiff open the “impeachment inquiry” hearings and be transparent. We then went to the SCIF and the @HouseDemocrats ended the hearing and left the room. My reactionpic.twitter.com/1WpF6CzF24
— Congressman Fred Keller (@RepFredKeller) October 23, 2019Stepping out of Schiff’s dungeon for a quick update.Members and the thousands of constituents they represent have a right to know what’s going on in this “impeachment inquiry.”Schiff’s efforts to hide this process from the American people will not stand. #StopTheSchiffShow pic.twitter.com/asEJV7Yvm9— Rep. Jody Hice (@CongressmanHice) October 23, 2019BREAKING–> My report from inside the SCIF hearing room where we are exposing Adam Schiff's secret so-called impeachment inquiry. pic.twitter.com/fPcPJ94R9y— Rep. Alex Mooney (@RepAlexMooney) October 23, 2019Adam Schiff isn't allowing Reps. to see the transcripts from this impeachment inquiry, but selectively leaks small portions to the press. This process should be transparent to the American people. It should be a fair process w/ clear rules, just like past impeachment inquiries. pic.twitter.com/Rg2AKtRHIM— Rep. Dan Crenshaw (@RepDanCrenshaw) October 23, 2019Democrats have not released any of the transcripts from the witnesses who appeared in the secret hearings, but selectively leaked their opening statements to shape their narrative that Trump’s impeachment is justified.Watch the full Republican press conference leading up to their disruption of Democrats’ secret hearing below:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
When a synagogue is attacked in Germany, it is doubly disturbing. It has more gravity attached to it than if it occurs elsewhere. Similarly, when the genocidal Iranian regime official, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Hossein Salami, threatens to “wipe the sinister Zionist regime off the map,” and German Chancellor Angela Merkel seems to see it as merely “anti-Israel,” but not anti-Semitic, it is particularly worrisome. It was Merkel who said early in her chancellorship that, “Israel’s security is to be a German staatsräson, or “reason of state.”Last Wednesday, on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, a German native, identified as a 27-year old Stephan Balliot, clad in military fatigues, tried to shoot his way into a synagogue in Halle (Eastern Germany) and massacre its Jewish worshippers. In the process, he killed two innocent people. His intention however was clear, kill as many Jews as possible.The shocking aspect of this event is that it occurred in Germany, formerly Nazi Germany. A people, and a land that created the Holocaust in which Six Million innocent and pious Jews were gassed, burned, forced to dig their own graves, were shot in the head by special killing squads of ordinary Germans, and led by educated Ph.D. holding commanders. The same groups smashed Jewish babies against walls, tearing them away from their mothers. They humiliated women and old men by marching them naked just before murdering them, to the jeers of anti-Semitic crowds. They also bayoneted pregnant women. It was Germany that murdered one and a half million Jewish children with the hope of “wiping out the Jewish race.”Now, Germany led by Chancellor Merkel is doing business with a similar regime that seeks, in the words of its Ayatollahs and IRGC commander Hossein Salami, “to wipe the Jews off the map.”To Merkel, that is “only” a case of “anti-Israelism,” just as it was to her parents' generation, a matter of killing Jews as “Communists” and interchangeably as “Capitalists.” Hitler was clear when he spoke to the entire German nation about his intention to “wipe out the Jewish race.”Anti-Semitism in Germany has had deep historical roots, culminating in racial hatred rather than the former form of religious prejudice. Today however, within western culture’s “political correctness,” anti-Semitism and racism are proscribed. Thus, Europeans in general, and Germans in particular invented subterfuges. One such subterfuge is the canard of anti-Israelism as a way to hide the anti-Semitism behind it. In other words, it is OK to murder Israelis without having to consider them as Jews. Add to that the shameless falsehood that many German anti-Semites hold, that “Israel treats Palestinians like the Nazis treated Jews,” and there is a clear path for neo-anti-Semitism from both the political right and political left, which are aligned with the anti-Semitic Islamic jihadists.Remko Leemhuis, the acting director of the American Jewish Committee pointed out that, “We have seen a rise in anti-Semitism (in Germany) for years now, we see it across society. And, right now it feels like it’s coming from everywhere.” A survey conducted by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in 2015 revealed that 16% or over 11 million German adults harbor anti-Semitic attitudes. In terms of age group, 19% of Germans aged 35-49 harbor anti-Semitic attitudes, 17% of those age 50+ share the same attitudes. Christians with anti-Semitic attitudes account for 14% of the adult population, 56% of Muslims harbor anti-Semitic feelings.The survey also found that 51% of Germans hold the view that “Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust.” 52% of Germans age 50+ believe the previous statement, (including the people who were of age during the Nazi era and the Holocaust), 49% of young people aged 18-34 believe it too, as well as 51% of the intermediate age group 35-49, shared the same view. In terms of religion, 59% of Muslims believe that and 51% of Christians. The same survey showed that 49% of Germans hold the view that “Jews are more loyal to Israel than to any country they live in.”Anti-Semitism in Germany is pervasive and is found along all ideological, ethnic, and religious groups. The neo-Nazis hate Jews for the same reasons their parents or their civic and church leaders did. Although the Nazis had been defeated, the anti-Semitism that was intrinsic to their ideology has not. Radical leftists on the other side of the spectrum like to excuse their anti-Semitism in terms of hating Israel as the so-called “oppressor of Palestinians.” The Muslim community, and in particular the new migrants from Syria and Iraq, were long indoctrinated by their home media, mosques, and school system, that Jews were evil and must be eradicated. This, coupled with hatred for Israel as their enemy, makes them the most potent group to commit violence against Jews. Germans, as a whole, do not want to be reminded of the burden of being the “murderers of Jews during the Holocaust.” Thus, many young Germans find comfort in comparing Nazi Germany’s treatment of Jews to the alleged treatment of Palestinian-Arabs by Israel. Simply put, Germans “care for Palestinians” only to assuage their guilt.The public schools in Germany are experiencing a great deal of anti-Semitism, particularly with the influx of immigrants from the Middle East. Native Germans however, were not taught about the horrors of the Holocaust, nor its Nazi German perpetrators. This reporter was reminded by a German friend of that fact decades ago. While Germany had restored synagogues and built memorials to the victims of the Holocaust, for many of mainstream, middle-class Germans, it meant that: “We’ve done it. We dealt with anti-Semitism.” But nobody really dealt with it within the families. The painful questions were never asked. Today, Muslim students who torment their Jewish classmates are acting in an environment that was already suffused with native anti-Semitism.In a 2018 European Union survey of Jews, 85% of respondents in Germany characterized anti-Semitism as a “very big” or “fairly big” problem; 89% said the problem has become worse in the last five years. Overall, reported anti-Semitic crimes in Germany increased by nearly 20% last year to 1,799, while violent anti-Semitic crimes rose by about 86%, to 69.Ironically, while Chancellor Merkel minimizes Iran’s genocidal threat to the Jewish state, in order to curry favor with the murderous Ayatollahs regime, the rightist Alternative for Germany (AfG) parliamentarian, Beatrix von Storch, accused Germany’s United Nations ambassador of “relativizing” and “trivializing” the threat Israel faces from Hamas.Josef Schuster, head of the Central Council of the Jewish communities in Germany, cautioned in an interview with the mass circulation German daily Die Welt, that, “Many of the refugees are fleeing the terror of the Islamic State and want to live in peace and freedom, but at the same time, they come from countries in which hatred of Jews and intolerance are an integral part.”Merkel has failed in her declaration that “Israel’s security is Germany’s state reason for being." Nonsense, for Merkel and other German and European politicians, greed trumps morality. Dealing with Iran and defending the Islamic Republic’s interests overrides concern for the lives of Israeli Jews. Similarly, the appointing of an anti-Semitism Commissioner did little to counter the damage done by the importation of Jew-hating Muslim migrants from the Middle East. In the final analysis, it has made Merkel’s concerns about anti-Semitism in Germany a merely rhetorical gesture.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Arizona state Sen. David Farnsworth (R-Mesa) accused a fellow colleague of threatening his life for refusing to stop investigating a possible link between missing children in the state’s foster care system and organized sex trafficking.Farnsworth told the Arizona Department of Public Safety that state Sen. Kate Brophy McGee (R-Phoenix) made a veiled threat to him during a meeting the two had earlier this month, reportedthe Arizona Capitol Times.“I’m not asking you to stop. I’m telling you to stop. Stop or my husband will stop you,” Farnsworth recalled Brophy McGee telling him in the meeting.“The police officer asked me if I felt threatened, and I thought, ‘Well, that’s pretty much all I’ve thought about for the last 24 hours. So, I guess I did feel threatened,’” he said after meeting with police.“Is the threat real? I don’t know. That’s what I tried to determine by asking her. She certainly didn’t make me feel any better. She didn’t back away,” Farnsworth added.From the Arizona Capitol Times:The two Republican senators often don’t see eye-to-eye politically, but both described having a good working relationship that become strained over the past several months as Farnsworth met with a group of critics of the Arizona Department of Child Safety.Farnsworth’s meetings, held every other week in the Senate’s minority caucus room, included parents with children in state custody and guests from the AZ DCS Oversight Group, which has accused DCS of direct involvement in child trafficking.Brophy McGee pushed back on Farnsworth’s characterization of her remarks, saying she was trying to tell him that the “crazy parents” critical of the DCS were “unbalanced.”“These people are unbalanced, and I kept telling Senator Farnsworth that and he went to them and told them I said they’re unbalanced,” she said. “It’s like ‘thank you, the target on my back just got bigger,’ and then he feels threatened? Welcome to my world.”Farnsworth stressed that he doesn’t personally believe anyone at DCS is selling children or facilitating trafficking, but he does believe some of the roughly 550 children who DCS lists as “missing,” “runaways” or “no ID placement” have been kidnapped, the Arizona Capitol Times reported.“When I first heard about this, I believed that children from Arizona (custody) were ending up in sex trafficking,” he said. “Now, after the research I’ve done, I’m confident of it. But I can’t prove it.”“Corruption is what got me involved,” he said. “I wanted to root it out. Here I am, termed out, I have one session left and I finally find something that wow, this is worth fighting for.”“The safeguards in place to protect our children are not enough,” he added. “That’s the bottom line.”Farnsworth also alleged that two former Republican state senators from Arkansas and Oklahoma who were shot dead within days of each other over the summer were “executed” because they were investigating links between their own states’ child protective agencies and global sex trafficking rings.Infowars has previously reported on instances of children under Child Protective Services care who ended up in the sex trafficking trade.Since President Trump was sworn into office in 2017, Department of Justice efforts to stop child sex trafficking have skyrocketed.For example, the DoJ in June arrested 1,700 child sex predators in a nationwide sting called Operation Broken Heart.And just recently, the DoJ announced its largest ever worldwide bust of child pornography in history.Today’s news 10 years agohttps://t.co/0xp7PbWkFDhttps://t.co/hdQCnxJQwmhttps://t.co/jOqJGwKtRehttps://t.co/uMqpqyScmqhttps://t.co/o3aoakDZBw— Rob Dew (@DewsNewz) October 22, 2019Watch YouTuber Amazing Polly deliver a thorough breakdown of the ongoing situation with Farnsworth below:Also check out this bombshell 2009 Alex Jones interview with Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer, who was murdered in her home amid her investigation into CPS and child trafficking.Twitter: Follow @WhiteIsTheFuryPresident Trump’s DOJ has successfully targeted several sex trafficking rings operating in the U.S. John Michael Chambers joins Will to take on this tough but very important topic.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF PAUL DAVID GAUBATZWEST CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA2 Nov 2013I, Paul David Gaubatz, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statements are true and correct and based on my own personal knowledge:This sworn affidavit pertains to Islamic Society of Chester County, operating within West Chester, Pennsylvania (1001 Pottstown Pike, West Chester, PA)
- Background pertaining to credentials to research and analyze Islamic based issues: I was a U.S. Federal Agent with a Top Secret/SCI clearance for approximately 15.5 years. This was during the time period 1988 – 2003.
- In addition to my Top secret/SCI clearance, I was also briefed into many programs known to the public as “Black Projects”. These projects pertained essentially to Counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism issues.
- On 11 Sept. 2001, I was assigned as an (1811) civilian Federal Agent in Albuquerque, NM. I had primarily been assigned the duties of ‘Technology Protection’ in regards to our countries highest classification of technologies used to defend our country.
- After the attack on our country (11 Sept. 2001), I was assigned counter-terrorism duties on a full time basis and in late 2002, assigned to the Foreign Service Institute (U.S. State Department/Arlington, VA). My duties were to train full time in Arabic and counter-terrorism issues. The Arabic language was almost one complete year. During this time period I was sent to Jordan for a three week ‘immersion’ program to better understand the Arabic language, the culture, and Islam.
- In Jan 2003, before Operation Iraqi Freedom, I was requested to deploy as a U.S. civilian Federal Agent to ArAr Air Base, Saudi Arabia (within a few miles of Iraqi border). My full time duties were to collect intelligence involving potential attacks against U.S. Armed Forces personnel and to conduct counter-espionage against Saudi Arabian government/military, Iraqi, and other people in the ArAr area. I led several counter-terrorism/counter-espionage expeditions.
- From Apr – Jul 2003, I was assigned inside (Nasiriyah, Baghdad, Basrah, and other cities) Iraq and my primary duties were counter-terrorism and counter-intelligence.
- While in Iraq I interviewed numerous Iraqis in regards to terrorism against the U.S., the Islamic ideology pertaining to violent Jihadists activity, and the methodology of Islamic terrorists.
- While in Iraq I had the opportunity to discuss the training and tactics used by Islamic terrorist leaders and their supporters.
- I have received training on the Islamic terrorist ideology/tactics from people who were former members of Islamic terrorist groups and from Muslims who were investigating these groups themselves. These people included military and police officers who served under Saddam Hussein (former Iraq President).
- Since returning from Iraq in 2003, I have trained over 2500 U.S. law enforcement officers in counter-terrorism involving Islamic terrorist groups and their supporters.
- I have discussed Islam and Sharia law with over 100 Imams and Islamic leaders in the U.S.
- I have listened to over one thousand plus hours of lectures by Islamic scholars/leaders that have been trained in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, and Iran.
- I have read over 5000 different publications, books, and brochures by Islamic scholars.
- In 2005, I hired a senior Council on American-Islamic Relations leader to provide me training on the operation of this Islamic organization.
- I have personally conducted first-hand research at over 250 plus Islamic Centers in the U.S. The research involved speaking with the leaders, worshippers, and reviewing the materials they use to educate their worshippers (men, women, and children).
- I have monitored several ‘overseas’ based Islamic terrorist group internet sites.
- I have received numerous U.S. Government awards pertaining to my work in protecting our country, our technology, and U.S. Armed Forces personnel.
- I have worked jointly in counter-terrorism research and investigations with Muslims and non Muslims. (government awards attached)
- My research is not biased. I credit the saving of my life and the saving of many U.S military personnel lives with several Muslims who risked their lives to protect ours. These Muslims and I both realize there are Islamic groups, their supporters, and Islamic scholars based in the U.S. that do advocate violence against innocent men, women, children, and pose a ‘grave’ security risk to our country.
Research Findings related to the Islamic Society of Chester County:During the period 25 and 26 Oct 2013, I conducted research at the Islamic Society of Chester County (ISCC) and at Islamic bookstores in Philadelphia, PA, that Muslim worshippers at the Islamic Society referred me to. The research involved speaking with leaders, worshippers, and reviewing the materials this Center uses to educate their worshippers.I have a PowerPoint Presentation with the materials obtained from the ISCC and the Islamic bookstores they suggested to visit. Quotes /Statements were taken from the Islamic materials. The materials are available for complete review.Based on my qualifications listed in numbers 1 through 19, it is my professional opinion the leadership of the ISCC):A: Does advocate violence against innocent Muslims and non–Muslims that do not adhere to and desire an Islamic Ummah (Nation) under Sharia Law in America.B: Does advocate treason and sedition against the U.S. using violent and non violent tactics/methods as do such Islamic terrorist groups as Al Qaeda have and currently utilize.C: Does pose a serious risk of educating innocent Muslim children into the violent aspects of Islamic terrorist groups and their violent activities directed against America.D: This Islamic Center uses materials from convicted terrorists and supporters of Islamic based terrorism to educate their worshippers.E: Is not a religious institution, but more in line with a political/government system.F: The leadership is openly involved and advocates polygamous marriages.Recommendation to law enforcement: Conduct a thorough investigation of the ISCC and its leadership (using federal or state authorities):
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A Texas father lost a court case this week, forcing him to accept his 7-year-old son as a girl and allow the child’s mother to start giving him puberty blockers.Eventually, the mother wants the boy to fully “transition” from male to female.Jeffrey Younger, the father, has been fighting to protect his son from what equates to chemical castration for nearly a year.The boy’s mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, has been dressing the child in girl’s clothes and telling him he’s a girl, according to the child.The ruling by the jury will likely require Younger to call his son by she/her pronouns and to attend a class on transgenderism.11 of 12 jurors decided to grant Sole Managing Conservatorship of the couple’s twin boys to Georgulas, and on Monday, Judge Kim Cooks will deliver rulings on possession, child support, and more.Dr. Georgulas is requesting Mr. Younger’s visits be supervised and that the number of overnight stays the boys get with him be reduced.The mother also asked that Younger be prohibited from calling his son “James” and instead, forced to address him as “Luna.”In fact, Georgulas has specifically asked the father not bring “James” around people who do not “affirm” him as a girl.Younger argues his ex-wife is transitioning the child against his will and voices concerns about his mental and physical health.In a Twitter thread about the case, journalist Matt Walsh claims “James” is not Georgulas’ biological child because he was conceived with donor eggs.Oh and icing on the cake: the demented lunatic of a "mother" isn't actually the mother. The child was conceived with donor eggs. She's not even biologically related to the kid.— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) October 22, 2019Life Site News cites the Mayo Clinic’s list of possible side effects of cross-sex hormone therapy treatments as the following:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A jury has ruled against a father in Texas who has been battling over the past year to stop his ex-wife from “transitioning” their young son into a female via chemical castration.Jeffrey Younger had filed a lawsuit against his former wife, Dallas-area pediatrician Anne Georgulas, seeking sole custody of his twin sons, James and Jude. Georgulas has insisted in court documents that James, now seven years old, is a “transgender child and, by choice, now goes by the name Luna and is only known by her classmates as a girl.”On October 21 the 12-person jury decided 11-1 in favor of Georgulas, giving her sole custody of the two young boys and clearing the way for her to begin “gender transition” procedures on James.On the website SaveJames.com, launched to help stop the “transition” and to assist Younger in protecting his son, James is described as “a normal, happy, healthy little boy — who deserves a chance to be just that.”The site relates that when the twin boys were three years old, Younger’s ex-wife Georgulas “decided that James should not be a boy. She began dressing him as a girl, calling him by the name ‘Luna’ and enrolled him in ‘social transitioning’ therapy to prepare him for chemical castration. This process can begin at age 8. She has enrolled him in Coppell Schools as a girl.... The teachers and administrators know that he is a boy, but the other parents and students are unaware.”In court filings Younger has stated that James only acts in a feminine manner when he is with his Georgulas. “James presents as a boy with me and he presents as a girl with his mom,” Younger related. “He gets dressed as a boy at his mother’s home and he comes out to me as a boy. That means that he’s comfortable as a boy at his mother's home.”Court documents relate that Georgulas previously received a diagnosis of gender dysphoria for James, but Younger testified that “when I took James to see his gay counselor who affirms him as a girl, he went as a boy. She put two sticky notes down onto her desk. One had James on it. One had his fake girl name. She said, ‘which name do you want to be called, pick up the sticky note.’ He picked up James.”Writing in November 2018 on TheFederalist.com, former transgender individual Walter Heyer, who has worked with Younger to defend and protect his son, noted that, contrary to Georgulas’ insistence, James showed no signs of gender dysphoria. “In the father’s home James appears to be a normal boy and doesn’t identify as a girl,” wrote Heyer. “He has a choice of boy’s or girl’s clothes there, and he chooses to dress as a boy. The fact that James changes gender identity depending on which parent is present makes the diagnosis of gender dysphoria both dubious and harmful.”Heyer added that when James is away from his mother, “he consistently rejects the idea that he is ‘Luna girl’ or that he wants to be a girl. Because the court prohibits dad from dressing James as a boy or from teaching him that he is a boy by sharing religious or science-based teachings on sexuality, dad presents James with male and female clothing options and James always chooses, even insists on, his boy clothes.”Younger has steadfastly contended that the evidence does not support a diagnosis of pediatric gender dysphoria, and moving ahead with “transitioning” him to female will have catastrophic consequences for his son. As reported by LifeSiteNews.com, “Younger is worried about Dr. Georgulas forcing a lifetime of misery on their son. Transgender-identifying individuals, even when encouraged in their confusion, suffer from more psychological issues than the general population, have shorter lifespans, and are more likely to commit suicide.”Heyer warned that time is of the essence to save James from being forced into a false gender role. “The diagnosis is critical because labeling a child with gender dysphoria can trigger a series of physical and mental consequences for the child and has legal ramifications in the ongoing custody case,” Heyer wrote. “Get it wrong and young James’ life is irrevocably harmed.”Meanwhile, speaking of his ongoing battle to protect James, Younger related that “every single day you have to see your son sexually abused, and you have to maintain your calm, because the courts are not going to be fair to you. And the only way you can survive this and get your son through this alive is to calmly allow your son to be tortured right before your eyes and outlast the opposition. That’s what it’s like. They’re asking me to affirm a delusion.”
_____________________________________________________________
Court Rules Father Unable to Stop 7 Year Old Son from Being Chemically Castrated
There’s just one problem – “transwomen” will never be women, no matter how many trophies they steal.
Where a tree falls, there it lies (Ecclesiastes 11:3)
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
John MacArthur was doing “word association,” a tradition for conferences held at Grace Community Church. The moderator, as usual, was Todd Friel of Wretched Radio. Several years ago when Friel said “Steven Furtick,” MacArthur responded “unqualified.” Furtick later sent John MacArthur an expensive package as a gift, which included a copy of his new book, Unqualified, a “dig” on the older pastor.This time, Friel gave MacArthur the name, Beth Moore. MacArthur asked how many words he available to use for the sake of clarification. After a moment of consideration, MacArthur responded, Go home.The crowd, consisting of both men and women, laughed and applauded in agreement.MacArthur wasn’t saying anything that virtually all theologically sound people agree with. But, MacArthur went on to add…“There is no case that can be made Biblically for a woman preacher. Period. Paragraph ended. End of discussion.”Phil Johnson followed up by saying that Beth Moore is a narcissist who preaches herself rather than Christ and quoted Moore as saying she tries to find herself in the [Biblical narrative].Mike Riccardi, also on stage, deferred back to the opinion of MacArthur.MacArthur went onto add, in paraphrase, that the ability to hock jewelry on television or to sell things doesn’t preach the Gospel. He went on to say that it bothered him greatly. In the same breath, MacArthur also impugned Paula White, who has been written about in Christian news after several conservatives endorsed her book to the chagrin of many.MacArthur said, “This is feminism gone to church. This is why we can’t let the culture exegete the Bible.”MacArthur continued on to dispute Resolution 9 of the SBC, which promoted Critical Race Theory, and the pastor said it was a “watershed moment in the SBC.”He also went on to describe recent events in the SBC “not a direction of the SBC, it was a plunge.”MacArthur was cool, calm, and collected. H did not raise his voice or call names. And yet, people instantly began to attack him for how he said it.We’ll just provide on example for now, although there are thousands to choose from, and that’s from Brandon A. Cox. Cox is a BMA pastor from Bentonville, Arkansas, and is associated with Chrislam pastor, Rick Warren. Cox’s church website calls itself a “Purpose Driven Church” (which basically means it has a coffee shop and tickles itching ears) and Cox’s personal website calls himself a “leadership coach” (gag me), “entrepreneur” (apparently fleecing God’s people is a business venture) and an “influencer.”Although Cox is at the center of the Bible-belt, his Orange County, left-coast influence is evident in his outrage at Dr. MacArthur for holding to what is pretty standard fare for Baptist preachers since time immemorial.The room was full of women, also. Maybe they know their Bible and stuff.Cox made no attempt to say what was unbiblical and MacArthur’s words or defend a woman usurping leadership over men (1 Timothy 2:12). He simply made an assertion without any attempt to support it by the Bible. In other words, it was probably a lot like his preaching.Here’s a tip: When someone accuses a truth-teller of arrogance, it’s because they can find no fault in the truth itself.Yet, what many of us have been saying over the weekend is that it has nothing to do with how MacArthur said it. It’s what he said. These gutless wonder coward-pastors are just afraid to say they’ve gone the way of the United Methodists and other estrogen-fueled quilting circles.Consider a tweet from Cox later in the day.You see, it wasn’t really about how MacArthur said it. It’s that he said it. The reason why so many complain about how he said it (which was super polite) is that they are afraid to just come out of the egalitarian closet and say, “I’m for women preachers, oppose the Word of God, and deny Biblical inerrancy.”Trying to get them to just come out and admit they deny the inerrancy of Scripture is like pulling teeth, but they will always first complain about tone. It’s easier than just straight-forwardly stating their position.Just prior to tweeting his support for Beth Moore’s ministry, Cox tweeted out a loving memorial for Elijah Cummings, the brutal pro-abortionist legislator who opposed God and who split hell open on October 17.In retrospect, it makes total sense that Pastor Cox would oppose John MacArthur and support Beth Moore.It is easier for emotionally lactating males to lament “tone” than to stand up like men and simply state their real positions. When it comes to defending their position, they are just far more comfortable squatting than standing.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
An abortion doctor was arrested a week after pointing a handgun at a group of pro-life advocates outside his clinic.Dr. Ronald Yunis of Phoenix, Arizona, was captured on video pointing a handgun from his Tesla vehicle at local pro-life activist Elvis Kesto, who was demonstrating outside the Acacia Women’s Center last week.Kesto presented the video evidence to the Phoenix Police Department, but they claimed they didn’t have enough evidence to arrest Yunis despite the footage clearly showing a brandished gun, which was later confirmed by several other law enforcement officials.Pastor Jeff Durbin of Apologia Church, which organized the pro-life demonstration, expressed his disappointment in the police for failing to initially arrest Yunis.“No basis under law to pull out a weapon and point it at somebody,” Durbin said.“To be fair, if one of our people out here had brandished and pulled a weapon on the abortionist, I would expect the person to be arrested and I want the same for him,” he added.However, the police eventually arrested Yunis on Friday following public outcry and attempted to justify their delay on Facebook.“The suspect’s identity had not been confirmed at that point and officers determined that any immediate threat no longer existed as the suspect had left the location,” the Phoenix Police Department said in a Facebook post.“At this point, the investigative process began, focused on gathering interviews and evidence while protecting the rights of all the individuals. The goal of this process is to determine if there is enough probable cause to make an arrest.”Yunis was booked into the Maricopa County jail and is facing charges of aggravated assault.Twitter: Follow @WhiteIsTheFuryHarrison reacts to a video that was released showing a DC abortion doctor explaining how he lets babies die after they are born alive in botched abortions._______________________________________________________SEE ALSO:EXCERPTS: "After the incident, the police claimed they did not have enough evidence to arrest Dr. Yunis, as they could not tell if the item in question was a gun. The police later questioned the abortionist, who claims he does not bring weapons into work. A week later, Kesto demanded Yunis’ arrest."AND:EXCERPTS:"However, after entering the facility and speaking with the abortionist, police claim they can’t tell if it’s a gun in the video footage, and claims the witnesses that Kesto has — meaning others protesting on the sidewalk that day — “aren’t independent witnesses.” Furthermore, the officer states that Dr. Yunis claims he doesn’t bring weapons to work, and responds that they don’t intend to search his vehicle to confirm this. A police supervisor is called, and still, nothing is done in response."
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
BERLIN (Fox News) – A 93-year-old former SS private, who as a teenager stood guard in a watchtower in a Nazi Germany concentration camp, began trial Thursday in Hamburg state court where he’s accused of being an accessory to 5,230 murders in the finals months of World War II.Bruno Dey was in his late teens when he worked at the Stutthof concentration camp more than seven decades ago outside of Danzig, which is now the city of Gdansk in Poland.Prosecutors argue that while Dey was not directly involved in a killing in Stutthof, he was a “small wheel in the machinery of murder” committed during his time as a guard from August 1944 to April 1945 given he actively stopped inmates from escaping the camp, which was one of the last to be liberated.