THE WAR TO DESTROY CHRISTIAN AMERICA

THE WAR TO DESTROY CHRISTIAN AMERICA

David Horowitz’s new book examines the secular left’s dark agenda.

BY MARK TAPSON
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273060/war-destroy-christian-america-mark-tapsonrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Order David Horowitz’s new book, Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian AmericaCLICK HERE.
Today, the free exercise of religion has ceased to be a guaranteed right in America. Instead, it has become a battlefield. – David Horowitz
For years, Morris County in New Jersey had been giving historic churches money to make repairs under an historic preservation program. In 2015, the State Supreme Court ruled that taxpayer funds should not be used to repair places of worship. A challenge to this ruling recently went before the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case, but Justice Brett Kavanaugh pointed out that “[b]arring religious organizations because they are religious from a general historic-preservation grants program is pure discrimination against religion.” This “would raise serious questions under this Court’s precedents and the Constitution’s fundamental guarantee of equality.”
This seems like a relatively minor, local issue but it is yet another instance of the fierce conflict referred to in Horowitz’s quote above. As the Freedom Center’s founder notes in his brand new book Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America, we are engaged in “a war against this nation and its founding principles: the equality of individuals and individual freedom. For these principles are indisputably Christian in origin. They are under siege because they are insurmountable obstacles to radicals’ totalitarian ambition to create a new world in their image.”
Those totalitarian radicals are today’s progressives. “Since its birth in the fires of the French Revolution,” Horowitz writes, “the political left has been at war with religion, and with the Christian religion in particular.” He knows this from personal experience. As a “red-diaper baby,” he learned early on that his parents and their leftist friends were true believers in a faith, but not one concerned with the fate of souls. The label “progressivism” masked their true religion, which was Communism, and their “cause was the salvation of mankind” – but “they thought of themselves as the redeemers, not God.”
As Horowitz demonstrates in his slim but compelling and disturbing new volume, the left’s ruthless antagonism toward Christianity stems from its own arrogant determination to shape the world according to atheist Karl Marx’s utopian vision of perfect equality and social justice (with Edenic environmental harmony thrown in for good measure). “Those who believe they are changing the world, or saving the planet, or transforming the human race,” Horowitz writes, “are intoxicated with self-aggrandizing pride.” Those afflicted with this arrogance, such as the so-called New Atheists like political comedian Bill Maher, condemn the violence and bigotry spread in the name of religion (especially Christianity; Islam is usually off-limits to condemnation partly because it shares an anti-Western animosity with the left, and partly because open criticism of Islam tends to get the critic targeted for death). But they “are blind to all the positive influences religion has had on human behavior, and they ignore all the atheist-inspired genocides of the last 250 years,” Horowitz writes. He rightly points out that the danger lies not in religion but in human nature; it is our flawed humanity that sometimes poisons religion, not the other way around.
The left, however, is loath to acknowledge this because human nature is messy and incompatible with their utopianism; thus it must be either ignored, denied, or forcefully molded to fit the glorious collectivist dream. Similarly, our nation’s Christian roots must be denied or cut off to pave the way for the realization of that dream. Horowitz explains, for example, that “America is the logical, if not inevitable, development of the Protestant Reformation,” which “led directly to the principle at the heart of the Declaration of Independence, that ‘all men are created equal’ and endowed with rights by their Creator – rights no government has the authority to deny.”
But the statist left demands this authority for itself, so it seized upon the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to undermine American religious traditions, and found a willing instrument in an activist Supreme Court: “In one despotic decision after another, the Supreme Court inflated the Establishment Clause while letting all the air out of the Free Exercise protection. Again and again, the High Court jammed its radical redefinition of the First Amendment down the throat of an unwilling, unready society.”
“Once the left had built a wall of separation between church and state,” Horowitz continues, “it had to change history and make the past conform to the present.” Thus, for example, schools and textbooks began to reflect a de-emphasis on our Christian roots, such as referring to the early Pilgrims as merely “settlers” or “European colonizers.”
Horowitz identifies the weaponized Supreme Court as the principal villain in this drama:
In case after case – religious expression in schools, contraception, abortion – the Supreme Court handed down a string of earthshaking decisions founded on the flimsiest and even bogus constitutional reasoning. The unintended consequence of these decisions was to place the Supreme Court on the front lines of an epic culture war. It was not merely a war between left and right, but between secularism and religion, especially the Christian religion. The secular left had discovered an all-powerful instrument – the Supreme Court – with which it could impose its radical, anti-Christian agenda on an unwilling nation.
The cast of characters in Dark Agenda includes the rabidly anti-Christian activist Madelyn Murry (later O’Hair), who filed a lawsuit against school prayer which Horowitz calls “the Fort Sumter of the war over religious liberty.” Murray shrewdly found an ally in the Supreme Court, and the rest is history: “A circus put on by a calculating, truth-challenged anti-American crackpot, egged on by ACLU radicals, provided an opportunity for eight lifetime political appointees, elected by no one and accountable to no one, to reinterpret the Constitution, overturn nearly two centuries of precedent and tradition, and change the life of a nation.”
Horowitz also tells the tale of eugenicist Margaret Sanger, a feminist icon who declared in her manifesto Woman and the New Race that women could be liberated from what feminists perceived to be the bonds of motherhood by means of “reproductive freedom,” and may, “by controlling birth, lift motherhood to the plane of a voluntary, intelligent function, and remake the world.” [Emphasis added] Sanger strove to implement her aims by promoting the previously socially unacceptable tools of contraception and abortion.
Horowitz describes how, in order to get the Supreme Court to legalize abortion, feminists sought a sacrificial lamb, a woman whose case would be compelling enough to assure legal victory. That lamb was Norma McCorvey, manipulated into serving as the “Jane Roe” of the immeasurably damaging Roe v. Wade decision (McCorvey never actually had an abortion and became an anti-abortion advocate).
The cast also includes Horowitz’s friend Christopher Hitchens, the New Atheist author of God is Not Great; constitutionalist Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork, infamously demonized by Ted Kennedy and the anti-Christian left; Jack Phillips, the Colorado baker the left tried to destroy because he refused to compromise his Christian beliefs by baking a wedding cake for a gay couple; and of course, former president Barack Obama, whom one faith-based website declared “America’s Most Biblically Hostile U.S. President.”
Today, after eight years of Obama’s relentless castigation of Christian institutions and individuals as bigoted (Horowitz even provides a timeline of hostile acts toward people of Biblical faith during Obama’s tenure), President Donald Trump has been embraced by the religious right despite Trump’s problematic personal character because, as Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council put it, “My support for Trump has never been based upon shared values; it is based on shared concerns.” Predictably, in its obsessive hatred for Christianity and for the upstart political outsider who “stole” the White House from progressive icon (and Saul Alinsky protégé) Hillary Clinton, the left set out to delegitimize Trump by claiming the religious right’s backing is grounded in racism.
This critical front of the culture war that has riven our country still rages. David Horowitz’s Dark Agenda is a must-read for every citizen who wants to understand, and to fight back against, the radically secular drift of our country and the assault on America’s core values, traditions, and freedoms.
_______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273120/david-horowitz-exposes-lefts-dark-agenda-richard-kirk

OCASIO-CORTEZ: U.S. SHOULD NOT HAVE AUTHORIZED USE OF FORCE AGAINST 9/11 JIHADIS

OCASIO-CORTEZ: U.S. SHOULD NOT HAVE AUTHORIZED USE OF FORCE AGAINST 9/11 JIHADIS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/ocasio-cortez-us-should-not-have-authorized-use-of-force-against-9-11-jihadisrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The force was largely used in a wrongheaded and counterproductive manner. However, the idea that we should have done nothing to counter al-Qaeda after 9/11 is simply a counsel of surrender. Traitors and saboteurs have become mainstream on the Left today.
“Ocasio-Cortez: U.S. Should Not Have Authorized Use Of Force Against 9/11 Perpetrators,” by Ryan Saavedra, Daily Wire, March 5, 2019:
Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) made radical statements Monday night on Twitter, suggesting that the United States should not have authorized the use of force against those who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks — the deadliest terrorist attack in world history.
“It is disturbing that Rep. Omar continues to perpetuate hurtful anti-Semitic stereotypes that misrepresent our Jewish community. Additionally, questioning support for the U.S.-Israel relationship is unacceptable,” Democrat Rep. Juan Vargas (CA) tweeted. “Israel has and remains a stalwart ally of the United States because of our countries’ shared interests and values. I condemn her remarks and believe she should apologize for her offensive comments.”
Ocasio-Cortez responded in a dishonest manner, suggesting that Vargas was calling out Omar’s foreign policy stances, not her anti-Semitism.
“I‘m curious if Rep. Vargas will further explain his stance here that it’s unacceptable to even *question* US foreign policy,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “Plenty of Dem members have asserted that discussion + debate on this issue is fair and merited. Is this stance a departure from that?”
Ocasio-Cortez continued with another tweet that contained some false information: “I remember a time when it was ‘unacceptable’ to question the Iraq War. All of Congress was wrong, including both GOP & Dem Party, and led my generation into a disastrous + wrong war that virtually all would come to regret, except for the one member who stood up: Barbara Lee.”
After being called out for the tweet’s inaccuracies, Ocasio-Cortez clarified that she meant the Afghanistan war, and added: “(But honestly we shouldn’t have been in either, and we should end the AUMF now while we’re at it)”
“The AUMF was passed with Lee’s lone dissenting vote on Sept. 14, 2001, three days after terrorists from Osama Bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization crashed commercial airliners into the World Trade Center, Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania killing more than 3,000 people,” The Huffington Post reported.
The Hill noted that the AUMF “authorizes the president ‘to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons’— in other words, al Qaeda and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.”….

PARENTAL RIGHTS BEING STAMPED OUT IN CANADA AS LGBT MAFIA GIVEN FREE REIGN TO SEIZE, STERILIZE CHILDREN UNDER EVIL “TRANS” AGENDA

Image: Parental rights being stamped out in Canada as LGBT mafia given free reign to seize, sterilize children under evil “trans” agenda
PARENTAL RIGHTS BEING STAMPED OUT IN CANADA AS LGBT MAFIA GIVEN FREE REIGN TO SEIZE, STERILIZE CHILDREN UNDER EVIL “TRANS” AGENDA
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/parental-rights-stamped-canada-lgbt-mafia-given-free-reign-seize-sterilize-children-evil-trans-agenda/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
(Natural News) In a shocking affront to parental rights in Canada, the Supreme Court of British Columbia has ruled that an underage, mentally-ill girl who decided that she wants to turn into a “boy” can legally receive testosterone injections as part of her “trans” conversion – even though her parents are vehemently opposed to this decision.
A major victory for the LGBT mafia, the court ultimately decided that the girl’s parents should not be allowed to influence or guide their child in any way concerning her desire to attempt a sex change, despite the fact that her misguided decision to do so will have life-altering and potentially irreversible consequences.
Referred to in the media as “Maxine” due to court-imposed restrictions barring the public release of her real name, the young girl was reportedly first encouraged by her school counselor, who works for B.C.’s Delta School District, to identify as a “boy” while she was still in the seventh grade. Later on when Maxine turned 13, Dr. Brenden Hursh and his colleagues at B.C. Children’s Hospital decided that Maxine should start taking testosterone injections in order for her to begin developing a more “masculine” appearance.
It was around this time that “Clark,” which is the public alias given by the court to Maxine’s father to protect his privacy as well, was notified by Hursh that Maxine was going to be given testosterone injections based on his daughter’s consent alone. Clark immediately filed an injunction, but a judge decided that Maxine is “exclusively entitled to consent to medical treatment for gender dysphoria,” meaning neither one of her parents has any say in the matter.
“Attempting to persuade [Maxine] to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria; addressing [Maxine] by his birth name; referring to [Maxine] as a girl or with female pronouns whether to him directly or to third parties; shall be considered to be family violence under s. 38 of the Family Law Act,” the court further ruled.
For more related news about the endless LGBT assault on normal human biology, be sure to visit Gender.news.

Corrupt governments are using children as “guinea pigs” to mainstream transgenderism

Like Hursh, the judge cited the infamous B.C. Infants Act, which allows for underage children in the Canadian province to decide for themselves to become “transgenders” without the need for parental consent. This is how B.C. Children’s Hospital was able to sidestep the will of Maxine’s parents, and lead this little one down the road of transgenderism – which as we’ve reported in the past is a form of child abuse.
“The government has taken over my parental rights,” Clark is quoted as saying in response to the ruling.
“They’re using [Maxine] like she’s a guinea pig in an experiment … Is BC Children’s Hospital going to be there in 5 years when she rejects [her male identity]? No they’re not. They don’t care. They want numbers.”
You can view this heinous court ruling in its entirety at this link.

Most children diagnosed by the system as having “gender dysphoria” grow up to embrace their true biological sex

Clark also commented on the fact that the vast majority of children like his own who are pushed to become transgenders by both “educators” and the state are not only “special needs” children, but also end up regretting their decision as adults.
“These activists are taking over,” Clark told the media, pointing to data showing that trans activists are working overtime to “fast-track” children into hormone treatments.
“These activists are taking over, and it’s not in the interests of our kids. It’s in the interests of self-promotion and the things that they want to do and accomplish.”
Alex Jones of Infowars also commented on the ruling, explaining how the transgender agenda is being used to chemically and surgically mutilate innocent children to the point that they become sterilized.
“When you pull back and actually look at the global program being carried out by the multinational corporations for their new world order, it is the end of the human family, and the traditional roles of men and women and children,” Jones stated during a recent segment of his program.
“But beyond the end of traditional roles, it is a total takeover of the human condition.”
Jones also warns that the children being targeted most are those with mental conditions, making them easy prey for the trans cult.
“The vast majority of young ‘trans’ children are special needs and are ‘autistic,’” Jones says.
“And in the schools they’re told, ‘you could be a boy, you could be a girl,’ and the schools, and teachers that have gone public, then trick them into saying, ‘I want that,’ the parents are then told, ‘you’re not allowed to have input, your child is emancipated from you, and we’re going to either cut their genitals off or start hormone-blockers, or giving them hormones to change ‘what their sex is,’ even though they’re only mimicking that with the hormones.”

PRESIDENT TRUMP TO ISSUE EXECUTIVE ORDER TYING FEDERAL FUNDS TO FREE SPEECH

THE “ALLEGED” ATTACKER:
PRESIDENT TRUMP TO ISSUE EXECUTIVE ORDER 
TYING FEDERAL FUNDS TO FREE SPEECH 
BY JOE WOLVERTON II, J.D.
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31657-pres-trump-to-issue-exec-order-tying-federal-funds-to-free-speech?vsmaid=3690&vcid=3987republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
During a speech he delivered March 2 at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), President Trump announced that he would soon issue an executive order “requiring colleges and universities to support free speech if they want federal research dollars.” 
“If they want our dollars, and we give it to them by the billions, they’ve got to allow people like Hayden and many other great young people and old people to speak,” Trump told the crowd gathered in National Harbor, Maryland.
The “Hayden” Trump referred to in his speech is Hayden Williams (shown), a young man attacked at the University of California Berkeley where he was appearing in an effort to recruit students for a chapter of the conservative student organization Turning Point USA. In the assault caught on video, a man identified as Zachary Greenberg punched Williams in the face.
“Ladies and gentlemen, he took a hard punch in the face for all of us,” Trump said, after bringing Williams on stage with him.
While many commentators have chimed in, attacking the language they anticipate will be used in the president’s promised executive order, others have focused on the need to prevent political correctness to stifle speech on campuses, particularly in light of the billions of federal aid dollars these universities receive.
The National Review, for example, wrote, speaking of the executive order, “The most morally defensible executive order would apply to recipients of all federal research dollars and would demand protection of core academic freedom for the researcher while respecting institutional mission.”
Adam Kissel, author of the National Review article, muses on the potential scope of the educational edict:
Should the order apply to all institutions, including private religious colleges? What conditions should the order include? How could it be enforced, and how can alleged violations trigger enforcement? Having served in the U.S. Department of Education in 2017 and 2018, and having worked at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) for five years, I can provide a basic guide to the legal boundaries and tradeoffs involved.
Kissel goes on to advocate for a robust role for the federal government.
“Therefore, pretty much every unacceptable part of a speech code, wherever and to whomever it applies, should be subject to a federal policy protecting academic freedom for students and faculty members,” he writes.
Later, Kissel indicates that he favors abolition of federal agencies, claiming the courts are a more constitutionally sound approach to protecting speech on campus.
All of this acceptance — albeit reluctant — of a president taking out his pen or getting on his phone to issue fiats dictating federal policies should be remarkable, but Republican reaction to President Trump’s open and avowed disregard for the Constitution generally and his oath of office specifically seems almost always supportive.
President Trump, to the dismay of many members of his party, continues to pursue his agenda with an untrammeled tack toward its accomplishment. This is certainly not consistent with the Constitution, the enumerated powers contained therein, and the principle of the separation of powers.
Contrast Trump’s CPAC pronouncement with an executive order he issued on May 4, 2017. Entitled “Presidential Executive Order Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty,” the decree revealed the president’s aim of making sure executive branch departments and agencies respect “religious and political speech.” In that prior executive order, the president, claiming he was acting under “the authority vested in [him] as President by the Constitution,” declared:
All executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall, to the greatest extent practicable and to the extent permitted by law, respect and protect the freedom of persons and organizations to engage in religious and political speech. In particular, the Secretary of the Treasury shall ensure, to the extent permitted by law, that the Department of the Treasury does not take any adverse action against any individual, house of worship, or other religious organization on the basis that such individual or organization speaks or has spoken about moral or political issues from a religious perspective, where speech of similar character has, consistent with law, not ordinarily been treated as participation or intervention in a political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) a candidate for public office by the Department of the Treasury. As used in this section, the term “adverse action” means the imposition of any tax or tax penalty; the delay or denial of tax-exempt status; the disallowance of tax deductions for contributions made to entities exempted from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of title 26, United States Code; or any other action that makes unavailable or denies any tax deduction, exemption, credit, or benefit.
While the chief executive signing an executive order directing executive branch agencies to respect religious liberty is certainly constitutional, the new executive order aimed at colleges and universities is not. The president does not have the authority to dictate policies at colleges and universities. Of course, if such educational institutions were not receiving federal funds in the first place (which is unconstitutional), all of this would be a moot point.
Despite speaking for nearly two hours, President Trump offered no clarification about when he would hand down the new federal free-speech fiat. 
What is clear, however, is that if the president usurps this authority, it will be used by a future president to force universities to conform to his conception of what speech should and should not be protected and promoted. How the president and his supporters don’t appreciate that the very (unconstitutional) power he would wield to force acceptance of their idea of “free speech” would be undoubtedly exercised by the next executive is baffling.
As Robby Soave explained in Reason, “It’s not obvious that a presidential order would really address the cultural dimensions of the campus free speech issue. It might, however, worsen a very different problem: executive overreach. Congress, after all, is tasked with funding higher education, not the president.”
According to Soave’s sources, the president has prepared a draft of the executive order and that “the plan is to penalize universities that do not protect free speech by taking away their federal grants.”
I’ll close with words written by the incomparable Thomas Gordon in 1722, describing the despotism that comes when the cure is worse than the disease: “It is certain, that Liberty is never so much in danger, as upon a Deliverance from Slavery. The remaining Dread of the Mischiefs escaped, generally drives, or decoys Men into the same or greater; for then the Passions and Expectations of some, run high; and the Fears of others make them submit to any Misfortunes to avoid an Evil that is over; and both Sorts concur in giving to a Deliverer all that they are delivered from.”

GLAZOV MOMENT: YOUTUBE CRACKDOWN ON “BORDERLINE CONTENT”

GLAZOV MOMENT: YOUTUBE CRACKDOWN 
ON “BORDERLINE CONTENT” 
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/glazov-moment-youtube-crackdown-on-borderline-contentrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I discuss YouTube Crackdown on “Borderline Content”and I shed light on when you are not violating YouTube “community standards” – but you get shut down anyway.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.

QATAR, WHICH FUNDS HAMAS & AL-QAEDA, HAS BEGUN A MASSIVE MILITARY AIRCRAFT PROJECT IN SOUTH CAROLINA

SURVEILLANCE AIRCRAFT IN THE PALMETTO STATE
QATAR, WHICH FUNDS HAMAS & AL-QAEDA, HAS BEGUN A MASSIVE MILITARY AIRCRAFT PROJECT 
IN SOUTH CAROLINA 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The politicians in South Carolina are lining their pockets, but are we enabling those who will one day be fighting against us?
“South Carolina is becoming home to a quiet Qatari military aircraft project,” by Jordan Schachtel, Conservative Review, March 5, 2019:
The nation of Qatar, a tiny Gulf state known for its vast energy riches, tiny indigenous population, slave labor economy, and, of course, its troublesome connections to international terrorist organizations, has commenced a massive but under-the-radar spending spree in South Carolina. Through Barzan Aeronautical, a subsidiary of the Qatar defense ministry-controlled Barzan Holdings, Doha has targeted South Carolina as the location for a major military aircraft initiative. The state is home to several Qatar-friendly politicians and defense industry heavyweights.
Senator Lindsey Graham has held several face-to-face meetings with high-ranking delegations from the $320 billion Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), which has pledged to invest billions into the state. Over the past couple of years, Graham has emerged as one of the major pro-Qatar voices in the Senate. He routinely takes to television and other media platforms to repudiate Qatar’s regional adversaries, while bolstering its allies.
The top donor to South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster’s recent successful gubernatorial campaign is a major Qatari lobbyist. Between 2017 and 2018, Imaad Zuberi, a lobbyist who represents the ultra-wealthy QIA, shelled out over $50,000 for McMaster’s campaign, according to campaign finance reports. Zuberi told associatesthat his donations to Republicans were a way to pay for further access to politicians, according to The New York Times.
On the local level, the mayor of Charleston, which is home to a major Boeing plant, is also a friend to the Gulf state. He has “signed a declaration of understanding to encourage economic development, cultural and environmental cooperation between Charleston and Doha, Qatar’s capital city,” after meeting with Qatari investment officials, The Post and Courier reported.
Charleston is home to Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner assembly plant. Qatar recently spent over $11 billion to order 30 787s and 10 777s from Boeing. Moreover, the Qatari air force has a $6.2 billion contract with Boeing….
In interviews, Qatari officials have stressed that the one-year-old Barzan Holdings project is a top-priority project for advancing Qatar’s defense goals. In November, the ruler of Qatar himself paid a visit to the Barzan research and development center….
Using its huge energy resources turned to wealth to promise statewide development, Qatar has racked up tremendous diplomatic and financial capital with the influential politicians and defense companies of South Carolina, enough that the al Qaeda and Hamas-funding state is apparently set to build military surveillance aircraft inside the continental United States.

______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/44282/bombshell-terror-supporting-qatar-working-josh-hammer 
EXCERPTS:
“Jordan Schachtel of Conservative Review has a detailed report out today on a clandestine project that has been launched in South Carolina by the tiny, disproportionately influential, infamously pro-Islamism nation of Qatar. Along with increasingly Islamist Turkey, Qatar is one of the two chief contemporary bankrollers of extremist Sunni madrasas and insidious pro-Muslim Brotherhood academic sinecures alike. Qatar is infamous for its cozy ties with Hamas — and even with al-Qaeda.”
“A high-powered K Street law firm, Ott, Bielitzki & O’Neill PLLC, defined the Barzan Aeronautical mission as a project dedicated to “development and production of surveillance aircraft” for Qatar.”

LEFTIST INDOCTRINATION IN MAINE CLASSROOMS GETS GREEN LIGHT FROM GOP LEGISLATORS

LEFTIST INDOCTRINATION IN MAINE CLASSROOMS 
GETS GREEN LIGHT FROM GOP LEGISLATORS

What could happen if our side played offense for a change?

BY LAWRENCE LOCKMAN
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273053/leftist-indoctrination-maine-classrooms-gets-green-lawrence-lockmanrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Editors’ note: The following op-ed is by Lawrence Lockman, a Republican currently serving his 4th term in the Maine House of Representatives. He is co-founder and president of the conservative non-profit Maine First Project – which trains activists and candidates to fight fire with fire. He can be reached at larrylockman22@gmail.com.
Should teachers in Maine’s public schools be allowed to push partisan politics and ideology in the classroom?
I don’t think so, and neither do many parents who have contacted me. That’s why I sponsored LD 589, proposed legislation directing the state board of education to draft a Code of Ethics for K-12 teachers.
Simply put, the Code of Ethics would forbid teachers from endorsing candidates as part of their classroom instruction, from introducing controversial material not germane to the subject being taught, and generally from using their classrooms as bully pulpits for political, social or religious advocacy. The bill I sponsored is based on model legislation drafted by the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
There’s abundant evidence that students in Maine’s K-12 government schools are being subjected to Leftist indoctrination in the classroom. “Progressive” teachers, administrators, and textbook publishers have been working overtime to ensure that students practice “correct thinking” on subjects such as racial guilt, gender identity, illegal immigration, and other controversial issues.
As soon as the Code of Ethics bill was referred to the Education committee for a public hearing in late February, all the usual suspects announced their opposition. The head of the statewide teachers’ union insisted that teachers never engage in political advocacy in the classroom, while the far-Left ACLU defended the right of teachers to do exactly that.
Mallory Haar, a teacher at Casco Bay High School in Portland, is one of the bill’s most outspoken critics. She took to Twitter to express her opposition to a provision in LD 589 that would prohibit teachers from “singling out one racial group of students as responsible for the suffering or inequities faced by another racial group of students.” Haar claims this proposed rule would institutionalize “white fragility,” the most recent addition to the Leftist lexicon of identity politics, and a close relative of “white privilege.” .
One can only imagine the level of racial scapegoating and educational malpractice that goes on in Haar’s classroom.
Based on what I’ve heard from parents since I introduced the bill, and from what I’ve seen on social media directly from teachers, Haar is hardly exceptional. Too many teachers and administrators view the classroom as a taxpayer-funded soapbox to promote their personal opinions on politics. Members of the Education committee heard testimony from dozens of parents about the rampant Left-wing indoctrination of their children in public schools.
Such as the elementary school teacher in southern Maine who used her classroom whiteboard to bash Gov. Paul LePage for “his ridiculous denial of the science of climate change.”
Or the high school in eastern Maine where a teacher agreed (out loud) with a student who labeled Trump voters “white trash.”
Last year, teachers at Cape Elizabeth High School facilitated a student walkout specifically aimed at passage of more restrictive firearms legislation. School officials helped plan the rally and even modified the school schedule to accommodate the gun-control lobbyist who spoke at the event.
Here’s how a student described what happened in her class on the day of the national walkout: “At the appointed time, no students walked out so the teacher stopped talking, looked at the clock, and said, “Aren’t you supposed to be walking out?” That induced about half the class to depart. Then the teacher said, “I’m surprised more of you aren’t going.” That induced another quarter [of the class] to depart. To the remaining students she said, “There’s no point continuing with the lesson because so many aren’t here.”
Testimony submitted to the Education committee established that students across the state were used as pawns: “Most didn’t know why they were walking out or that they were part of the Woman’s March agenda.”
“This was a taxpayer-funded protest rally, pure and simple,” said one parent.
The Education committee also heard from a parent concerned with his 7th grader’s social studies homework: “The assignment was to research the website We the Future, which describes only leftist causes including Black Lives Matter, gun control, open borders, the Women’s March. Each student was to pick a cause and answer, ‘How can you get involved?’ I was shocked to see the teacher attempt to openly recruit students to support these causes.”
All of this compelling testimony fell on deaf ears at the public hearing. I was hardly surprised that all the Democrats on the Education committee were strongly opposed to the Code of Ethics bill. The Dems tend to do whatever the teachers’ union bosses tell them to do. But why did all the Republicans on the committee choose to ignore the overwhelming evidence of deeply embedded Leftist identity politics in Maine classrooms?
GOP legislators cited concerns about “local control,” and their aversion to state mandates on local school districts. Yet state government pays more than half the cost of K-12 public education, and that amount goes up year after year despite a declining school population, and below-grade level student achievement across the board.
In practice, the “local control” argument advanced by GOP lawmakers means they’re really not interested in protecting the civil rights of students and their parents. It means these Republicans are OK with ethics being optional for Maine teachers. These legislators are well aware that local school boards controlled by self-styled “progressives” in Maine’s major population centers (Portland, Lewiston, Bangor) will never rein in teachers who are spewing partisan propaganda in the classroom.
In exchange for their “ought not to pass” votes in committee, GOP legislators secured the flimsiest of fig leaves. That came in the form of a promised letter to local school districts from the Maine School Management Association, a private nonprofit that’s been around since 1971 lobbying for superintendents and school boards.
Sounds to me like Republican lawmakers expect the swamp critters to drain the swamp.
Off camera and away from the microphones, these legislators confessed that their biggest concerns about the bill were strictly political. They know ethics shouldn’t be optional for teachers, but were afraid that a recorded vote by the full Legislature would hurt Republican legislators running for re-election next year. So they agreed with Democrats to kill the bill in committee.
Seriously.
I suppose that when you’re always tucked into a defensive crouch, and want to be well thought of by the Democrats and the Fake News media, you would have good reason to be scared of losing your next election campaign if you voted against the wishes of the ACLU and the union bosses.
But what if our side played offense for a change?
What if we hammered the union bosses for all they have done to wreck public education and indoctrinate our kids? What if we went to bat on behalf of parents and students who are being cheated by the rigged system?  
What would happen if we decided to fight fire with fire?
We’ll never know until we try.

REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO CORTEZ’S DIRTY MONEY MACHINE

REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO CORTEZ’S 
DIRTY MONEY MACHINE
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/273051/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-dirty-money-machine-daniel-greenfieldrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The Cortez-Chakrabarti story is starting to get more interesting. First there were a few puffs of smoke, then more puffs and now a whole lot of smoke.
Two political action committees founded by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s top aide funneled over $1 million in political donations into two of his own private companies, according to a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission on Monday.
Campaign finance attorneys described the arrangement as “really weird” and an indication “there’s something amiss.” They said there was no way of telling where the political donations went — meaning they could have been pocketed or used by the company to pay for off-the-books campaign operations.
Doppelganger LLC versions of the PACs soaked up a lot of the money from the PACs. And that’s where the trial ends.
In 2017, Brand New Congress PAC transferred another $240,000 to Brand New Congress LLC, also for “strategic consulting.” Another PAC co-founded by Chakrabarti that year called “Justice Democrats” transferred an additional $605,000 to Brand New Congress LLC in 2017.
Chakrabarti was a Bernie Sanders person and the Sanders campaign was notorious for all sorts of shady money issues. As is Bernie Sanders, whose Sanders Institute employs his own family, and it could have been a clumsy effort by a political novice to siphon funds.
Or, it could be something more sophisticated. And there might be a whole network moving lefty money around.
That said, I wouldn’t count on consequences. Obama, Bernie and Hillary all got away with shady campaign finance stuff. Worst comes to worst, the Dems will sacrifice Chakrabarti and bring in one of their own vets to be Cortez’s new political puppeteer. 
______________________________________________________________

Ocasio-Cortez Faces Five Years in Prison for FEC Crimes



HEARING LOSS? BUYER BEWARE!: DISCREDITED LIBERAL SOCIALIST-GLOBALIST “POCAHONTAS” ELIZABETH WARREN’S “HEARING AID” BILL PROVES SHE’S A CRONY CAPITALIST

Elizabeth Warren’s bipartisan hearing aids bill is a deceptive ruse, using FDA to fool the gullible and line the pockets of big companies
HEARING LOSS? BUYER BEWARE!: 
DISCREDITED LIBERAL SOCIALIST-GLOBALIST “POCAHONTAS” 
ELIZABETH WARREN’S “HEARING AID” BILL PROVES SHE’S A CRONY CAPITALIST 

Proposed legislation rewards campaign contributors like Bose by labeling their amplifiers as medical devices

BY  | July 31, 2017
SEE: https://www.lifezette.com/2017/07/elizabeth-warrens-hearing-aid-bill-proves-shes-a-crony-capitalist/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Elizabeth Warren: progressive stalwart or crony capitalist?
Warren’s latest bill to increase the FDA’s regulatory power over hearing aids for millions of Americans is the latest indicator of her true crony capitalist intentions.
Warren introduced the Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act of 2017 in March, which, on the surface, sounds great. I mean, who wouldn’t want to increase access to medical devices for seniors?
The problem is that these aren’t even medical devices; they’re sound amplifiers that are already available over the counter for anyone to buy. Under the guise of increasing access to over-the-counter hearing aids for seniors, Warren cleverly paved the way for her big donors to sell personal sound amplification products (PSAPs) as hearing aids.
These devices are commonly used to amplify sounds for outdoor and indoor activities, and are more closely related to headphones than to hearing aids. Big donors such as Bose, which is headquartered in her home state of Massachusetts, spent no less than $50,000 this year lobbying Warren and other legislators to have the FDA reclassify these devices as ‘hearing aids,’ when they are anything but.
Warren’s bill opens a whole new market for these speaker companies, allowing them to re-brand their products as medical devices subject to FDA regulation. In doing so, they trick the consumer into thinking they’re getting a solution to a problem that affects nearly half of seniors, when it can often have the exact opposite effect.
True hearing aids are medical devices and should be treated as such. Most people wouldn’t just pop a random pair of prescription lenses on and walk out of the store. An individual with common sense would go to a physician for an eye exam, and then get fitted for lenses there. Why should we treat hearing devices any differently?
The bill’s first sentence leaves no ambiguity as to its intended effect, which is “to provide for the regulation of over-the-counter hearing aids.” Make no mistake, this is a ploy by industry giants to unfairly increase their profits at the expense of seniors.
The House version of the bill recently passed, and was conveniently packaged into an FDA user fee bill. Hopes of stopping this bill now lie with the Senate, where Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), and Susan Collins (R-Maine) have vowed to reform it.
With its history of decreased safety, higher prices, and lack of innovation, the FDA is the last agency that should be given more power over the American consumer. We should be decreasing the power the FDA has to regulate hearing devices, not increasing it. The worst part is that some Republican senators, as well as a bipartisan group of House members, have signed on to this crony capitalist bill.
Warren’s bill is typical of big government bureaucrats, who sell the idea of increased consumer access to consolidate their own power. This bill is not simply against free-market principles: It will hurt the very people it is designed to help.
Peter Van Voorhis is a conservative activist, commentator, and journalist. He is a weekly contributor to iHeartRadio’s PowerTalk 96.7FM.
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

WHAT APOLOGY?: REP. ILHAN OMAR ACCUSES JEWISH CONGRESS WOMAN OF WANTING HER TO HAVE DUAL LOYALTY TO ISRAEL~TLAIB’S JEW HATE PROBLEM GROWS TOO

REP. ILHAN OMAR ACCUSES JEWISH CONGRESS WOMAN OF WANTING HER TO HAVE DUAL LOYALTY TO ISRAEL 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/rep-ilhan-omar-accuses-jewish-congresswoman-of-wanting-her-to-have-dual-loyalty-to-israelrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar just can’t seem to stop making antisemitic statements. She is a devout believer in Islam, and the Qur’an demonizes the Jews in numerous ways. It depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
The chances that Ilhan Omar will continue to make antisemitic statements are 100%. So will she be removed from the Foreign Affairs Committee and repudiated in other ways? Or will Democrats circle the wagons, defend her, and thereby continue to normalize antisemitism? The latter is more likely.
“Omar Doubles Down On Anti-Semitism, Accuses Jewish Congresswoman Of Wanting Her To Have Dual Loyalty To Israel,” by Ryan Saavedra, Daily Wire, March 3, 2019:
Embattled Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) ignited another firestorm on Sunday when she made anti-Semitic comments to a Jewish member of Congress, accusing the congresswoman of wanting her to have dual loyalties to Israel.
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), who is Jewish and the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, condemned Omar on Friday for anti-Semitic remarks she made last week, calling her comments “vile,” “anti-Semitic,” “outrageous,” and “deeply hurtful.”
On Sunday, Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), who is also Jewish, also called out Omar for her anti-Semitic remarks from last week, tweeting: “Lawmakers must be able to debate w/o prejudice or bigotry. I am saddened that Rep. Omar continues to mischaracterize support for Israel. I urge her to retract this statement and engage in further dialogue with the Jewish community on why these comments are so hurtful.”
Omar responded: “Our democracy is built on debate, Congresswoman! I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee. The people of the 5th elected me to serve their interest. I am sure we agree on that!”
In essence, what Omar is saying is that she believes Jewish people expect her to have dual loyalties to Israel.
“I have not mischaracterized our relationship with Israel, I have questioned it and that has been clear from my end,” Omar falsely claimed.
Omar later falsely claimed: “I have not said anything about the loyalty of others, but spoke about the loyalty expected of me. There is the difference.”…
Omar’s latest round of anti-Semitic remarks drew a lot of criticism from notable figures in the media and in politics:
“Someone please write ‘Antisemitism for Dummies,”’ Bret Stephens tweeted. “Nobody expects @IlhanMN to pledge ‘allegiance’ to Israel. But her attacks on pro-Israel Americans of doing so is a charge of dual loyalty. That is classic anti-Semitism.”…

______________________________________________________________

Rep. Ilhan Omar under fire again for 

anti-Semitic comments

Rep. Omar ignites a Twitter feud with fellow Democrat Rep. Lowey over support for Israel. Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz reacts.
 House Foreign Affair chair demands Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar apologize for “vile anti-Semitic slur”
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/house-foreign-affair-chair-demands-muslim-rep-ilhan-omar-apologize-for-vile-anti-semitic-slur

TLAIB’S JEW HATE  PROBLEM GROWS TOO
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/glazov-moment-tlaibs-jew-hate-problem-growsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I discuss Tlaib’s Jew-Hate Problem Grows and unveil what the establishment media doesn’t want you to know about its new anti-Trump Muslim hero.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.

House Democrats draft anti-Semitism resolution

BRIGITTE GABRIEL ON OMAR & TLAIB:

Ilhan Omar has no business on the House Foreign Affairs Committee!



PATRIOT NURSE: THE FIGHT IS COMING: CIVIL WAR, CORRUPT CHURCHES & ANTIPATHY

PATRIOT NURSE: THE FIGHT IS COMING: 
CIVIL WAR, CORRUPT CHURCHES & ANTIPATHY 
In this informative video, Patriot Nurse discusses the coming civil war and the influence of communist infiltration into the American church, as well as the obvious signs of impending conflict in the United States. The Left has steadily shown that they intend to continue taking away the rights of citizens, all the while attempting to soothe and placate them with the siren song of antipathy fomented even now in the Church.

Support my work via donation:

Patreon: https://bit.ly/2D9IIfJ
Subscribestar:
https://bit.ly/2RESD4S
Bitcoin: 3FxJWbSL9nFSMRgymSsicniPxTPd26Kuvj
Ethereum: 0x5134d6f2700Fa21cEcE6ED1ABDE240b3B320bDDd
Litecoin: MC1qkabuDXGCrjNcXwxvz5qgtsFGVpXYKF
Take my CLASS:
https://bit.ly/2U36EpA

Episcopal church on deity gender: https://wapo.st/2GXwTeH

Deuteronomy 32:4 The Rock! His work is perfect, for all His ways are just. A trustworthy God who does no wrong, righteous and just is He.
_______________________________________________________

WATCHMEN & WATCHWOMEN NEEDED:

WILLOW’S VERDICTS IN: BILL HYBELS GUILTY OF SEXUAL ABUSE & VERBAL ABUSE OF MEN & WOMEN

WILLOW’S VERDICTS IN: BILL HYBELS GUILTY OF SEXUAL ABUSE & VERBAL ABUSE OF MEN & WOMEN 
BY CHERIE VANDERMILLEN
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/03/01/willows-verdicts-in-bill-hybels-guilty-of-sexual-abuse-and-verbal-abuse-of-men-and-women/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
[Emily McFarlan Miller | Religious News Service] The allegations of “sexually inappropriate words and actions” by Bill Hybels, the founder of Willow Creek Community Church, are credible, according to an independent group of Christian leaders advising the church.
That alleged behavior, directed mostly at women connected to the Chicago-area megachurch, took place at various points during Hybels’ more than four decades of leadership.
“The credibility of the allegations would have been sufficient for Willow Creek Community Church to initiate disciplinary action if Bill Hybels had continued as pastor of the church,” according to the report by the Willow Creek Independent Advisory Group.
The group’s report was posted online Thursday (Feb. 28) by Willow Creek Community Church and the Willow Creek Association.
Hybels stepped down from his roles with both the church and association early last year after allegations of misconduct surfaced against him. He has publicly denied allegations of misconduct.
Members of the advisory group — which looked into Hybels’ role as pastor of Willow Creek and as leader of the association — included Jo Anne Lyon, general superintendent emerita of The Wesleyan Church; Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals; Margaret Diddams, provost of Wheaton College in Wheaton, Ill.; and Gary Walter, past president of the Evangelical Covenant Church.
Their investigation included interviews with Hybels and members of his family, the women who came forward with allegations against Hybels, staff who worked directly with Hybels at both the church and association and others.
Hybels was accused last year of sexual harassment and misconduct spanning decades by a number of women connected to the church in a series of news reports. He and Willow Creek initially dismissed the allegations as “lies.” They also accused former church staff and pastors of conspiring against Hybels.
After Hybels stepped down, the church’s elders admitted that he had sinned. All the church’s elders and Hybels’ successors — Heather Larson and Steve Carter — eventually resigned.
“While we cannot change the events of the past, we grieve what has happened, ask for forgiveness, and commit ourselves to pursuing healing and reconciliation,” Willow Creek’s newly installed elder board wrote in a statement on the church website.
The report concluded that Hybels also verbally and emotionally intimidated both male and female employees.
And neither the church nor the association did enough to stop him.
[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Emily McFarlan Miller and originally published at Religious News Service. Title changed by P&P.]
________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

ABORTIONIST: IF ABORTION PROCEDURE FAILS & BABY IS BORN ALIVE, “MOST LIKELY WE’D BREAK ITS NECK”

ABORTIONIST: IF ABORTION PROCEDURE FAILS & BABY IS BORN ALIVE, “MOST LIKELY WE’D BREAK ITS NECK”
BY CHERIE VANDERMILLEN
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/03/01/abortionist-if-abortion-procedure-fails-and-baby-is-born-alive-most-likely-wed-break-its-neck/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
[Michael Snyder | End Of The American Dream] What I am about to share with you is absolutely sickening.  But if we do not shine a light on these practices, they will never stop.  And once you learn what is really going on behind the scenes, you have a responsibility to help do something about it.  Since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, more than 60 million children have been murdered by abortionists in America.  Future generations will not look back on this time in history with fond memories.  Instead, they will look back with horror at a generation that committed evil on an unprecedented scale.
Abortion is murder, but sometimes babies survive the abortion attempt.
So what happens to those babies that are born alive?
Well, one Planned Parenthood “doctor” in Minnesota recently admitted that if a baby is born alive, “most likely we would break the baby’s neck”
The unnamed patient shared her horrifying experience with Pro-Life Action Ministries. She was 22 weeks pregnant when she went to a Planned Parenthood in St. Paul, Minnesota for an abortion in 2017, but she said she chose life after hearing what the abortionists would do to her son.
The woman said she asked the two abortionists, “If you guys were to take him out right now while he’s still, his heart rate is still, you know, going, what would you guys do?”
She said one of the abortionists looked at the other one, then looked back at her, “and she told me that we don’t tell women this, and a lot of women don’t even ask this question, but if we was to proceed with the abortion and the baby was to come out still alive and active, most likely we would break the baby’s neck.”
I don’t even have the words to describe how sickening this is.
You can learn much more about the investigation that uncovered this right here.  We must shine a light on these absolutely wicked people, otherwise, they will just keep on killing.
Earlier this week, the U.S. Senate considered a bill that would have ended this practice, but Democrats were able to successfully block it
Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have threatened prison time for doctors who don’t try saving the life of infants born alive during failed abortions, leading conservatives to wonder openly whether Democrats were embracing “infanticide” to appeal to left-wing voters.
All prominent Democratic 2020 presidential hopefuls in the Senate voted down the measure, including Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Kamala Harris of California, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. The final vote was 53-44 to end Democratic delaying tactics — seven votes short of the 60 needed.
One of the Senate Democrats that voted to block this bill could potentially become our next president.
Thankfully, we currently have a president that was supportive of the bill, and he is greatly disturbed that Democrats apparently “don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth”
In response, President Trump tweeted late Monday that “This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress.”
“Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children,” Trump wrote. “The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth.”
Following the abortion procedure, organs are usually harvested from the children and are sold off to the highest bidder.
A lot of these harvested organs end up being sold to researchers who use them in some of the strangest “scientific experiments” imaginable.  For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled “Aborted Baby Parts Are Being Grafted On To Mice In Bizarre Scientific Experiments – And The U.S. Government Is Paying For It”.
To continue reading click here
_______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

POWERFUL: FOX HOST CRIES AS ABORTION DOCTOR DESCRIBES 
LATE TERM ABORTION- Feb 28, 2019

TRUMP PROMISES EXECUTIVE ORDER DENYING FUNDS TO ANTI-FREE SPEECH UNIVERSITIES

TRUMP PROMISES EXECUTIVE ORDER DENYING FUNDS TO ANTI-FREE SPEECH UNIVERSITIES

Students must be free to challenge “ridiculous and dangerous ideas,” Trump tells CPAC.

BY MATTHEW VADUM
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273041/trump-promises-executive-order-denying-funds-anti-matthew-vadumrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Trump vowed to issue an executive order protecting free speech at America’s universities Saturday as he invited Hayden Williams, a conservative victim of leftist violence on campus, to share the stage with him at this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference.
“We reject oppressive speech codes, censorship, political correctness and every other attempt by the hard left to stop people from challenging ridiculous and dangerous ideas. These ideas are dangerous,” Trump said March 2 in a speech that was interrupted by chants of “USA! USA! USA!” “Instead we believe in free speech, including online and including on campus.”
“Today I’m proud to announce that I will be very soon signing an executive order requiring colleges and universities to support free speech if they want federal research grants.”
“If they want our dollars, and we give it to them by the billions, they’ve got to allow people like Hayden and many other great young people and old people to speak. Free speech. If they don’t, it will be very costly,” he said. “Every day we’re restoring common sense and the timeless values that unite us all. We believe in the Constitution and the rule of law.”
The president did not provide details about the upcoming executive order. Robby Soave of Reason reports that “an official with knowledge of the executive order confirmed … that a draft exists. Indeed, the plan is to penalize universities that do not protect free speech by taking away their federal grants.”
The announcement came after student leaders from a group of taxpayer-funded universities in Kentucky urged state lawmakers to approve legislation to protect free speech on campus. A letter to lawmakers was signed by 18 student leaders, including representatives of College Republicans, Young Americans for Liberty, and the Council on Post-Secondary Education. “Across the country, speech codes have been used against students of all parts of the political spectrum,” the letter states.
Williams, a field representative for the grassroots conservative training academy, the Arlington, Va.-based Leadership Institute, briefly joined Trump on the dais at CPAC in a National Harbor, Maryland hotel a few miles from the nation’s capital.
“It’s great that I’m being recognized … but there’s so many conservative students across the country who are facing discrimination, harassment, and worse if they dare to speak up on campus,” said Williams, a black eye visible on his face.
“So I’m glad that we could we could bring this to the forefront and I’d just like to say if these socialist progressives had their way they would put our Constitution through the paper shredder in a heartbeat. So it’s as important now [as] ever, the work at Leadership Institute and Campus Reform, exposing these liberal abuses to the public.”
Williams, 26, was coldcocked Feb. 19 when he was allegedly assaulted by Zachary Greenberg, 28, at the University of California, Berkeley.
At the time Williams was assisting the campus chapter of Turning Point USA at that group’s recruiting table. Turning Point strongly backs Trump. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., headlined the group’s event, “AmericaFest,” on the first night of CPAC, Feb. 28.
Although the attack was captured on video, Berkeley officials abruptly dropped an investigation into the assault and then re-opened it under pressure from conservatives who claimed officials weren’t taking the matter seriously because the victim was a conservative activist. Greenberg was arrested March 1 and charged with assault with a deadly weapon and attempting to cause great bodily injury. His bail was set at $30,000. He is scheduled to appear in court March 4, Fox News reports.
In his animated, well-received address to CPAC that lasted more than two hours –reportedly the longest of his presidency— Trump urged Williams to file suit against his attacker and the authorities.
“Sue him. But he’s probably got nothing but sue him forever. But sue the college, the university, and maybe sue the state. Ladies and gentlemen, he took a hard punch in the face for all of us. Remember that. He took a punch for all of us.”
That may be good advice.
In December, UC Berkeley agreed to compensate Young America’s Foundation (YAF) and Berkeley College Republicans for trampling the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of conservative speakers and students on its campus. The Trump administration sided with campus conservatives against the school. The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest on behalf of the two groups. The department “will not stand by idly while public universities violate students’ constitutional rights,” Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand said at the time.
When conservatives had been scheduled to speak on campus, the campus administration typically didn’t forbid their appearances. Instead, it made the speeches inconvenient to the point of impossibility, for example, forcing students to use venues a mile off campus or at times when students couldn’t attend. Berkeley also often required non-leftist groups to hand over thousands of dollars to defray security costs, a requirement not rigorously or consistently imposed on left-wing speakers or groups.
An aggressive crackdown on non-leftist speech came after Berkeley officials—emboldened by a violent Antifa mob blocking a Feb. 1, 2017 campus appearance by firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos—decided to formalize viewpoint discrimination in the school’s policy on speakers.
Around that time, Trump threatened to withhold federal funds from Berkeley.
“If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view – NO FEDERAL FUNDS?” Trump tweeted Feb. 2, 2017.
The speech, which was sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center (publisher of FrontPage), never happened. Police stood down and allowed left-wing students and activists to “no-platform” Yiannopoulos because they didn’t like his views. Demonstrators caused $100,000 in damage to the campus and several times as much damage to the surrounding town.
The continuing threat of violence by Antifa at Berkeley also led to the cancelation of a planned on-campus premiere of a documentary film this writer executive-produced, America Under Siege: Antifa, during Yiannopoulos’s planned Free Speech Week at the school.
Under the terms of the out-of-court settlement attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon reached with Berkeley, the university was to pay YAF $70,000, rescind its unconstitutional “high-profile speaker policy,” rescind its viewpoint-discriminatory security fee policy, and abolish its heckler’s veto—protesters are no longer allowed to shut down conservative expression.
Berkeley is no longer able to impose a 3:00 p.m. curfew on conservative speech. Nor is it allowed to ban advertisements for YAF-sponsored campus lectures or relegate conservative speakers to remote or inconvenient lecture halls on campus while giving leftist speakers access to preferred locations.
At CPAC, Trump praised the conservative activists in the audience.
“Young Americans like you are leading the revival of American liberty sovereignty and self-determination in the face of left-wing intolerance. The anger, the unbelievable anger. I see it every day. Fortunately for you it’s mostly pointed at me. You have the courage to speak the truth. To do what is right. And to fight for what you believe and keep doing it.”
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

WALMART’S GAY “LOVE IS IN THE AISLE” HOOKUP VIDEO ADVERTISES THEIR PRODUCTS, BUT THE LGBTQ LIFESTYLE MORE SO

SAME SEX BLIND DATE
WALMART’S GAY “LOVE IS IN THE AISLE” VIDEO
“STARRING” PATRICK & ANDY HOOKING UP
A BETTER TITLE: “PERVERSION IS IN THE AISLE”
WILL THE BATHROOMS BE NEXT?

Walmart Releases ‘Love Is in the Aisle’ Video Depicting Two Men Meeting Up for ‘Blind Date’ at Store

BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“He’s Pat. He’s Andy. They’re going on a blind date at their local Walmart to see if love is in the aisle,” states a controversial video recently posted to social media by mega-retailer Walmart.
The Facebook post is one of three “Love Is in the Aisle” videos released by Walmart in February, which depict single shoppers meeting up to go on a blind date at the store.
“Oh my [Lord’s name in vain], you’re handsome!” Pat exclaims to Andy upon meeting him at the entrance.
The men walk through the store jokingly discussing various items, such as coconuts, cast iron pans and 3-in-1 body wash. Andy also opens a box of oatmeal cookies in the store and has Pat try one.
“You’re gonna have one of these right now,” he says. “You’re gonna eat it right up. It’s gonna be awesome.”
“This is amazing,” Pat replies after taking a bite.
At the end of the video, the two men express a mutual interest in each other.
“I don’t know why, but I like Andy,” Pat states.
“Grocery shopping is usually a chore, but Pat made it fun,” Andy remarks. “And I would very much like to go grocery shopping again with him sometime.”
The marketing effort has generated both praise and concern, with some opining that the video is “pretty cute” and others stating that the social media post is “disappointing.”
“Walmart, you may want to reconsider pushing the envelope on morals. Target has tried it with gender neutral restrooms and that hasn’t worked out well,” one commenter wrote.
Walmart commented under a number of supportive remarks, but did not reply to the complaints.
“I think it would be so awesome if during pride month all the associates wore rainbow vest or pins!” one commenter wrote. “That sure is a great idea,” Walmart responded, giving a thumbs up.
The American Family Association has now launched a petition drive, calling upon Walmart President Doug McMillon to keep the company neutral on the issue.
“Walmart’s shift away from neutrality on this controversial issue to full support for same sex relationships is something Sam Walton would never have approved of,” it reads in part. “I urge you, Mr. McMillon, to return Walmart back to its founding principles by removing the pro-homosexual video and agreeing to remain neutral on the controversial issue of homosexuality.”
As previously reported, the Bible teaches that all men are in the same predicament: All are born with the Adamic sin nature, having various inherent inclinations that are contrary to the law of God and being utterly incapable of changing themselves. It is why Jesus outlined in John 3:5-7 that men must be regenerated by the second birth, and be transformed from being in Adam to being in Christ, or they cannot see the kingdom of Heaven.
“Jesus answered and said unto him, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.’ Nicodemus saith unto him, ‘How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?’
Jesus answered, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, ‘Ye must be born again.’”
John 8:34-36 also reads, “Jesus answered them, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto you: Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house forever, but the Son abideth ever. If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.’”

SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH CRISIS: EXPLOSIVE HOUSTON NEWS REPORT FINDS OVER 700 VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE

Church policies to prevent child abuse | Bible verses on protecting children

CHURCH CRISIS: EXPLOSIVE HOUSTON NEWS REPORT FINDS OVER 700 VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE IN SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCHES

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The Houston Chronicle news series shed light on the dark crisis of abuse in the church today.

In one of the most shocking and disturbing Christian news stories in years, the Houston Chronicle And San Antonio express released a 3-part series in which their research into Southern Baptist Churches revealed over 700 cases of sexual abuse and over 250 convicted sexual predators working in prominent positions of church leadership – many of whom were permitted to work after being caught and convicted. This horrific study showed decades of neglect and outright opposition to the claims of abuse by many churches and the battle against sin right within the walls of God’s house.

20 YEARS: 700 VICTIMS AS SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCHES REFUSE REFORMS TO PREVENT SEXUAL ABUSE

Mary DeMuth, a survivor of rape and abuse at church, speaks at a protest outside of a Southern Baptist Convention meeting in 2018.

According to reports:
“Thirty-five years later, Debbie Vasquez’s voice trembled as she described her trauma to a group of Southern Baptist leaders.
She was 14, she said, when she was first molested by her pastor in Sanger, a tiny prairie town an hour north of Dallas. It was the first of many assaults that Vasquez said destroyed her teenage years and, at 18, left her pregnant by the Southern Baptist pastor, a married man more than a dozen years older.
In June 2008, she paid her way to Indianapolis, where she and others asked leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention and its 47,000 churches to track sexual predators and take action against congregations that harbored or concealed abusers. Vasquez, by then in her 40s, implored them to consider prevention policies like those adopted by faiths that include the Catholic Church.
“Listen to what God has to say,” she said, according to audio of the meeting, which she recorded. “… All that evil needs is for good to do nothing. … Please help me and others that will be hurt.”
Days later, Southern Baptist leaders rejected nearly every proposed reform.
The abusers haven’t stopped. They’ve hurt hundreds more.
In the decade since Vasquez’s appeal for help, more than 250 people who worked or volunteered in Southern Baptist churches have been charged with sex crimes, an investigation by the Houston Chronicle and the San Antonio Express-News reveals.

It’s not just a recent problem: In all, since 1998, roughly 380 Southern Baptist church leaders and volunteers have faced allegations of sexual misconduct, the newspapers found. That includes those who were convicted, credibly accused and successfully sued, and those who confessed or resigned. More of them worked in Texas than in any other state.
They left behind more than 700 victims, many of them shunned by their churches, left to themselves to rebuild their lives. Some were urged to forgive their abusers or to get abortions.” (source).

A STUNNING ABUSE OF TRUST AND THE FAITH

Bible verses on protecting children | how can churches stop child predatorsGwen Casados, mother of Heather Schneider, who was sexually abused in church. Heather later died of a drug overdose.

“Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” – Matthew 18:4-6
The report found that over 250 who worked or volunteered in Southern Baptist Churches have been charged with sex crimes. Since 1998, 380 workers and volunteers have faced allegations. Of these nearly 100 are incarcerated, registered sex offenders. The report even created its own database of all of these church sexual predators.

For some of the victims like David Pittman, who stated that he was 12 when he first molested by a youth pastor, the assailant (who 2 other men told the Houston Chronicle molested them as well) still works at a Southern Baptist Church.
“That is the greatest tragedy of all,” he said. “So many people’s faith is murdered. I mean, their faith is slaughtered by these predators.”
The calls for reform in the SBC often fell on deaf ears. As the infographic below shows: in many instances, even confessed molesters were permitted to remain working in leadership positions in their respective churches.
In one particular outrageous case, Leslie Mason, an Illinois pastor who confessed to sexual abuse of four young girls was not only rehired after serving prison time for his crimes, but defended by Glenn Akins, then-interim Director of the Illinois Baptist State Convention. Michael Leathers, a writer for the State Baptist newspaper who outed Mason in an article, was forced to resign for writing factually about the criminal past of Mason – a convicted sex offender, who again hired after seven years in prison:
“That just appalled me,” Leathers said. “They had to have known they put a convicted sex offender behind the pulpit. … If a church calls a woman to pastor their church, there are a lot of Southern Baptist organizations that, sadly, would disassociate with them immediately. Why wouldn’t they do the same for convicted sex offenders?” (source).

NOT JUST A “CATHOLIC PROBLEM”

Many Church leaders covered up abuse claims and supported child predators.

 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God?  For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.” – Romans 2:23-24
Although the Roman Catholic Church has been repeatedly reported in the media for massive ongoing scandals of abuse, there should be no confusion that this is just a “Catholic issue.” In the most Bible-based, fundamental churches, abuse of children should be a glaring, red-flag issue for church leadership.
Make no mistake: churches are targets for child abusers. With the chance for direct access to children, freedom to build relationships and the “spiritual endorsement” of church leadership, child and youth ministry positions are a priority for those wicked predators engulfed in the sin of child abuse. Note in the video below, the church “leader” shows absolutely no remorse for his abuse even once convicted.

100 YOUTH PASTORS CONVICTED OF SEX CRIMES – THE BIBLICAL ERROR IN CHOOSING “LEADERS”

Youth Ministries love fun, cool events. But are the leaders properly vetted?

“ Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre; Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience. And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless.” – 1 Timothy 3:8-10
The report also stated that over 100 youth pastors were convicted of sexual abuse – many again who were permitted to work in other churches after being outed. In today’s modern church – hyper-focused on building large congregations, sprawling campuses and dozens of ministries many new attendees are encouraged immediately to “join a ministry.” In many cases, the Youth Pastor or Youth Leader is an inexperienced, spiritually immature and unscreened “leader” for those most vulnerable in the church.
Again, Christians have to face the facts: churches attract pedophiles and child abusers. Being a Youth Pastor provides direct access and influence over children who are putting full trust in the men or women their pastor has appointed over them. What is your church’s process for selecting a Youth Pastor or any ministry worker? The book of Acts provides a clear model:
“And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business.
But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word. And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch:
 Whom they set before the apostles: and when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them. And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith. And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people.” – Acts 6:1-8
Notice the standards the Apostles used in selecting men to serve in ministry:
1) Honest report: these were men who other members of the church could testify to their living righteous lives for Christ. This means the witness actually personally knew these men and they were not new people who just showed up for one or two services. In other words, they were vetted.
2) Full of the Holy Ghost And Wisdom: These were men who knew the Bible and demonstrated their Biblical wisdom. Spending time in the Word is one of the most powerful ways to combat sinful temptation in your life. Does your church test the knowledge of Scripture of their leaders? Are Youth Pastors required to demonstrate their understanding, knowledge and Biblical wisdom? 
And these requirements were for a position in bread distribution. Not as a pastor or leader but as a bread distributor. If the Apostles took that role so seriously that they went through the above process – how seriously should Christians treat the role of leaders who are actually responsible for teaching and preaching and serving the spiritual needs of the congregation?  The modern model of throwing inexperienced, unknown attendees into ministry is wildly unbiblical and a formula for the disastrous criminal activity that is rampant in the church today.

HOW A CHURCH CAN COMBAT AND PREVENT SEXUAL ABUSE

Sunday schools Children’s church classes should be safe havens for children – not places of danger.

“And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.” – John 3:19-20
Child predators do not want the light of Christ to shine on their wicked deeds. A church that is outspoken and public in their opposition and condemnation of child abuse will scare many potential abusers away. All churches need to take a long look at their policies on preventing and reporting abuse and ask some simple questions:
  1. Formal Policy on Sexual Abuse – Pastors and Church leaders should openly preach and discuss the heinous sin of sexual abuse and make it a part of their church’s culture. Bathrooms should have posted signs with confidential emails and phone lines that congregants can call if they are in or being pressured into inappropriate relationships. Church nurseries should have very clear signage outlining the church’s policy on sex abuse and screening protocol for all teachers and volunteers – including making sure no volunteer is ever alone with a child. 
  2. Biblical Vetting of Teachers, Leaders – as stated above all ministry workers, without exception should be subject to criminal background checks before ever working for a church. If the church cannot afford the cost of a background speaking then that ministry worker should pay for it. If no one has the funds, then the church should remain with the small leadership they have until they have appropriate funding to grow. Additionally, all ministry workers should be required to demonstrate their Biblical knowledge either in an interview or written form and provide at least 2 or 3 witnesses of their moral character and Christian life. All ministry workers should sign a letter of commitment that clearly outlines the church’s position on moral issues with specific statements about abuse. 
  3. Child Abuse Training – All ministry workers should be required to go through child abuse and domestic abuse training. All ministry workers should be trained in identifying red flags in the behavior of their colleagues to report any suspicious behavior. http://www.netgrace.org/how-we-help
  4. Take All Allegations Seriously – When a victim finds the courage to step forward with an accusation against a church leader – reassure them that they are believed and they will be supported. It is incredibly intimidating to accuse and tarnish the reputation of a “leader.” In this age, when pastors, ministry workers and leaders have large social media followings, plaster their faces all over every piece of marketing material and embrace celebrity status, it is even more daunting to reveal their criminal behavior. Victims should be comforted, believed and their charges taken seriously. And the church leadership should regularly encourage victims to come forward. 
  5. Involve the Police Immediately – It is incredibly foolish and potentially criminal for churches to conduct their own “investigations” into matters as serious as abuse of children. This is an issue for the police to get involved immediately and resolve. 
  6. Remove Accused Abusers Immediately – There is nothing wrong with stating someone is “innocent until proven guilty.” However in the case of child abuse, the accused should be removed from their role on a temporary basis pending the outcome of the investigation. And the church should be informed publicly of this. While this may seem unfair to the accused leader – they should be encouraged to know that the church leadership takes these issues seriously.
As displayed in the video above many child abusers, even after they are convicted, do not believe they have done anything wrong. Many even blame the young children for “seducing them.” Do not let the proclamations of innocence by a ministry worker prevent the church leadership from immediately removing that person and publicly sharing the situation with the church. 

7. Prepare The Ministries To Support The Abused –
“The Lord also will be a refuge for the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble. And they that know thy name will put their trust in thee: for thou, Lord, hast not forsaken them that seek thee.” – Psalm 9:9-10.
God’s house should be a refuge and safe haven for those who have been victimized by abuse. Ministry workers need to be trained in dealing with victims after abuse takes place and understanding the massive damage done to their psyche and spiritual walk. The church should readily use funds to pay for Christ-centered counseling for the victims as well whatever arrangements need to be made for their families. 

8. Repent – Where there is abuse there must be repentance. The Pastors and Church leadership need to openly repent to the church for any abuse that took place on their watch. And again, should encourage any victims to come forward.

THIS BATTLE AGAINST ABUSE IN CHURCH IS SPIRITUAL WARFARE

“…I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” – Jesus Christ, Matthew 17:18
The Devil and his minions want to do anything to destroy the church. And the rise of sexual predators infiltrating congregations is a major tool in the Adversary’s arsenal. While this is a sad situation, it should not be a surprise to a Bible believing Christian that Satan wants to ruin your church. If you go to a church that has not outlined their policies on sexual abuse, challenge your Pastor and leadership to do so and take the steps outline above or implement similar protocols. Pray for churches throughout the United States and worldwide to use Godly wisdom and proactively confront child abuse before it even takes place.

D.C. COMICS CANCELS BLASPHEMOUS SECOND COMING COMIC BOOK

Vertigo Comics Second Coming Mocking Jesus Christ | Pop Culture War against Christianity

D.C. COMICS CANCELS BLASPHEMOUS SECOND COMING COMIC BOOK

SEE: https://beginningandend.com/d-c-comics-cancels-blasphemous-second-coming-comic-book/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” – Galatians 6:7

A blasphemous comic book that mocked the Christian faith by portraying Jesus Christ as a failure has been cancelled. Over the past month, much news was made about DC Comics’ plan to release ‘Second Coming’ – a comic about Jesus returning to Earth to learn from His “mistakes” by shadowing a superhero. After a petition by Christians went viral, DC reversed course and cancelled the comic series before it ever hit shelves. 

CHRISTIANS STAND UP FOR THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST

According to reports:
“A new comics series in which Jesus Christ is sent on “a most holy mission by God” to learn “what it takes to be the true messiah of mankind” from a superhero called Sun-Man, has been cancelled by DC Comics. The move follows a petition that called it “outrageous and blasphemous”.
The Second Coming series, from DC imprint Vertigo, was due to launch on 6 March. Written by Mark Russell and illustrated by Richard Pace, its story followed Jesus’s return to Earth. “Shocked to discover what has become of his gospel,” he teams up with a superhero, Sun-Man, who is more widely worshipped than him.
But the comics publisher has now told retailers that the series has been cancelled. The decision follows a 200,000-signature petition from anti-abortion, anti-LGBT conservative campaign site CitizenGo calling on DC to pull the comic. “Would DC Comics publish similar content about other religious leaders, such as Muhammad or Buddha?” said the petition. “This content is inappropriate and blasphemous.”” (source).
Beginning And End detailed the disrespectful aspects of this comic series in our article: DC Comics ‘Second Coming’ Mocks Jesus Christ And The Crucifixion. Among some of the more blasphemous aspects of the story:
  • Jesus is viewed as a failure by God The Father for dying on the cross during His first incarnation on Earth.
  • He is sent back to Earth to learn what being a Messiah means from a superhero named Sun Man whom God The Father truly loves.
  • When Jesus returned to Earth He was “appalled” at modern Christians.
Mark Russell, the writer of the comic made it clear that his intention with the comic was to mock Christians today because he does not feel the Church follows “true Christianity.”  After the cancellation, he could not hold back his disdain for believers in Christ:
“I first heard of CitizenGo … when they ran this silly campaign to get the buses in Portland to drop ads featuring lesbians. They would be completely ridiculous if not for the fact that social media’s anger-made-easy platforms give them access to cranks from all over the world. But it’s OK. Some enemies are worth having,” he told Syfy Wire. “I think the religious fundamentalists and critics who are trying to stop Second Coming aren’t interested in protecting Christ so much as their ability to control his narrative … They probably (correctly) suspect that it’s not Christ who’s being parodied, but themselves and how they’ve twisted his teachings of mercy for the powerless into a self-serving tool of the powerful.” (source).

PRAISE GOD FOR THE VICTORY

If you are a Christian, give God thanks and praise for DC Comics changing their mind about publishing something so offensive to the Christian faith. And for the hundreds of thousands of Christians who made their feelings known. And pray for Mark Russell and the others involved with his comic as they will no doubt seek another publisher to print their comic. Pray they will repent and believe the Gospel for the free forgiveness of sin. Pray they will lose their desire to attack Christians and show some of the mercy and love they profess the religion to truly be based on. 

YOUTUBE ALTERNATIVES FOR GUN VIDEOS & CONTENT CREATORS

YouTube Alternatives for Gun Videos & Content Creators
YOUTUBE ALTERNATIVES FOR GUN VIDEOS & 
CONTENT CREATORS 
BY JOHN CRUMP
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/03/youtube-alternatives-for-gun-videos-content-creators/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- When FPSRussia debuted on YouTube, no one could have imagined that the channel’s creator Kyle Myers would be able to make a living on the video sharing platform, but he became wealthy by playing the character of Dmitri Potapoff for adoring fans.
The YouTube creator’s success led to others being able to follow their dream and share their passion for guns and the Second Amendment on the Google video sharing platform.   This success was until what became known as the YouTube “Ad-pocalypse” happened on the website.
In March of 2017 advertisements played on certain racist and extremist content.  Watchdog groups notified the mainstream media and newspapers such as the Wallstreet Journal jumped on the story and started contacting advertisers to get comments.  In this age of PC, brands didn’t want the public to think they were endorsing these views, so they started pulling their ad money from the Google-owned subsidiary.
Seeing their value plummet, YouTube decided they needed to act to head off the mass exoduses of advertisers.  They rewrote their policy, and most advertisements were only running on what they considered family friendly content.

Google, being a far-left company,  does not believe gun channels were family friendly.

Firearms channels saw a massive decrease in ad revenue.  Not only did they see their ad revenue decreased, the chances of YouTube recommending their content plummeted.  Without being recommended by the algorithm, it is hard to be discovered by new viewers and sponsors.   This change was the original shadowban.
Jason Abston of Boomstick Tactical ran into problems with YouTube and had strikes placed on his channel and had his other videos demonetized for arbitrary reasons.
“I’m a state certified firearms instructor and make videos on gun safety as well as training videos,” Abston told me. “YouTube has deleted one of my videos, demonized them and block my channel from search results. One video I made was me standing in front of the camera talking about the history behind the Second Amendment. YouTube said it violated their community standards.”
YouTube removed some channels without warning for violating rules that the website didn’t even list at the time they banned the channels.  These bans left channels with little recourse to get there channels back.  These bans are not just limited to gun channels.  The popular comedy channel Mumkey Jones was removed for making fun of a mass shooter.  He came to fame by making a video that made fun on Hillary Clinton.
In that situation, Mumkey Jones received all three strikes at the same time.  YouTube considered making fun of a mass shooter as “extremist content.”  This was the full-time job for Mumkey Jones, so he lost his whole income.  YouTube even terminated his girlfriend’s channel to make sure.
Gun channels were hit hard with these mass channel banning.  This situation is what happened to Brian Purkiss of LockedBack.com.  He was banned for violating a secret rule and Google left him with no recourse.
“I abided by all of the rules YouTube publicly posted and they even agreed I did so,” Purkiss told me. “But since my site sold AR parts kits, they banned me. They admitted they had AR parts kits as a forbidden item. They admitted they didn’t list it publicly on their rules, and they admitted it was on a list they refused to make public.”
When you depend on a single site for your income, then you put your lively hood in the hands of people that can decide to kick you off the platform at a whim without even receiving any notice.  There was a need for people to diversify their revenue streams.
Bill Frady of “Lock n Load Radio” understands the need to have multiple streams.  He diversifies where his content is hosted.  This multiple host system not only gives him the peace of mind of knowing his content cannot be deleted at a whim of an anti-gun employee but also give his advertisers more visibility.
“Content creators have to have multiple streams,” Frady told me. “You shouldn’t just have one stream because anything can happen. You don’t want your content gone overnight.”
There were other websites like Daily Motion and Vimeo where these creators could go to, but there is no guarantee that they will not get kicked off those sites.   It is like playing Russian Roulette with your income if you are a full-time content creator.  A couple of gun creators even moved their content to porn sites.  Obviously, most gun creators didn’t want to be associated with porn especially if they want to be family friendly, and they were still looking for a safety net.
Out of despair comes a great opportunity, and a few people decided to turn the great YouTube purge of 2017 into an opportunity.  They tackled this problem by creating video hosting sites that are firearms based.  The two most prominent firearms video sharing sites is Full30 and Gunstreamer.

Full30

Full30 Video WebsiteFull30 Video Website

Full30 was created by Mark Hammonds when YouTube started demonetizing videos.  Some of the biggest gun channels mirrored their content to Full30.   Full30 call these content creators “Producers.”
The current crop of content creators on Full30 is exclusive.  Regular users can sign up and reserve their channel but can’t upload any videos yet.   There is no word when the site will open video hosting to the general public.
Full30, like YouTube, makes its money by selling AD space next to videos.   There are two methods of selling AD space that YouTube uses for its customers.
The first method YouTube uses is Cost-per-click (CPC) where advertisers will pay every time a viewer clicks on an ad.  If an ad is viewed, but not clicked, the advertiser pays nothing.  Full30 decided not to offer this model.
The second method is the model is the one that Full30 has decided to embrace.  This method is Cost per impressions (CPM).  In this setup, Advertisers pays after a number of times that viewers watch their AD.  The standard is per 1000 views, but I have seen it as high as 5000.
Full30 shares the revenue they make from their advertisers with their monetized producers.  Not all producers choose to monetize their channels.  Certain producers use Full30 just as a place to put videos where they are safe from the whims of the giants of Silicon Valley.
Full30 isn’t just a video hosting site.  One of the best-kept secrets about the site is their forums.  The forum on Full30 is a place where people from all over the gun world can come together.  The forums are full of creators, writers, manufacturers, and just average gun guys.
These forums are a little different than other gun forums sites on the Net that concentrates on a single specific topic. The Full30 forums are trying to be like a United Nations of the gun world where members of all these groups can come together and share ideas.
Unlike the videos hosting portion site, anyone can sign up and post on the forums.  I found myself using the forums more than the video portion of Full30.  I was able to connect with people from all over the gun world which helps me with my work as a firearms journalist.

GunStreamer

GunStreamer Video WebsiteGunStreamer Video Website

GunStreamer is the second site dedicated to filling the gap for high-quality gun videos now that YouTube has even started to ban DIY gun videos such as AR-15 Builds and video about things such as bump stocks.  My small YouTube page had about 20 out of the 60 videos removed because they were how-to videos.
Because of the direction, YouTube was going Austin Roberts decided to start GunStreamer.  His idea was simple.  Make a platform that gives the creators control without having them worry about violating the terms of services.  The site is not into censorship.  The only things explicitly banned is nudity and illegal activity.
“We like to transparent as a company in general,” Roberts told me. “We are drawing lines on just a couple particular things that we think is absolutely necessary, but we want it to be clear that our policy will not be used to encroach of free speech.    Our platform is open for all.  We, as owners, will be not be discriminating against our content creators or our user base on their personal views, and we will not be using our terms of service as a weapon against free speech.”
Unlike Full30, anyone can sign up for GunStreamer.  If a user already has a YouTube channel, GunStreamer has a built-in import feature that can import a single video or an entire channel.  I was able to import my channel by just copy and pasting the URL and clicking a button.
The system works well.  Every time I post a video on YouTube, it is automatically posted to GunStreamer as well.   This video import system makes using GunStreamer a little easier than other video sites.
GunStreamer also uses primarily a CPM design for revenue sharing but can also a comandante advertiser request for a CPC model. In addition to the revenue sharing model, the company also launched ContributUS which is a Patreon alternative for the gun world.

Patreon & ContributUS

ContributUS WebsiteContributUS Website

Patreon is a platform where users can “subscribe” to their favorite creators.  The issue with Patreon is that they have banned people for arbitrary reasons without warning.  This random banning can take away a creator living in a blink of an eye.
Patreon has recently been in the news due to the banning of Sargon of Akkad.  The famous YouTuber was kicked off Patreon for a comment made on a Podcast that wasn’t even his own.  The controversial comment was him using the “N”-word when talking about Neo-Nazis.  He said that Neo-Nazis like using that word, but they are the real ones.
Patreon has long stated that it would not take any action against users for things that take place off the crowdfunding platform itself.   The Sargon incident didn’t take place on Patreon or even on any of his own media streams.   It also happened six months before Patreon banned him for the comment.
According to Patreon, the context of the clip didn’t matter.  Sargon used one of their secret banned words.  Also, Patreon doesn’t have clear guidelines on what is allowed and what is banned.  They have a small team to decide on what is banned and for who.  They also decide the punishment.  Patreon claims this lets them judge everything incident and creator on a case by case basis.
The issue with this is that a line in the sand for one person is not the same line for another person.  Also, without a warning system, a person doesn’t know when they crossed that line which leaves people guessing at what is allowed or prohibited.
Much like GunStreamer, ContributUS has a clear policy of what is and isn’t allowed.  Another cool thing is that ContributUS is built directly into the video-sharing site.  This something, not even Patreon offers their customers.
The Video creator can make subscription levels and lock down videos to those levels.   This ability gives the content creator a greater range of monetization options compared to even YouTube.
Will either of these sites be able to siphon off users from YouTube?  The answer is most likely not, but they might not have to.  With YouTube moving more and more to the anti-gun left, people seeking content from their favorite gun video creator might not be able to find it on Google’s video platform.  When that eventually happens, these sites will be there.
About John CrumpJohn Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. He is the former CEO of Veritas Firearms, LLC and is the co-host of The Patriot News Podcast which can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotnews. John has written extensively on the patriot movement including 3%’ers, Oath Keepers, and Militias. In addition to the Patriot movement, John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and is currently working on a book on leftist deplatforming methods and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, on Facebook at realjohncrump, or at www.crumpy.com.

GLAZOV MOMENT: “JIHADI BRIDES” BEAT CHILDREN WITH CABLES

GLAZOV MOMENT: “JIHADI BRIDES” BEAT CHILDREN WITH CABLES
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/glazov-moment-jihadi-brides-beat-children-with-cablesrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I discuss “Jihadi Brides” Beat Children With Cables, and I ask: Where are the Nuremberg-style trials?
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.

PAKISTAN: GOVERNMENT MINISTER SAYS “JIHAD IS A DUTY IN ISLAM; THOSE WHO AVOID JIHAD ARE NOT MUSLIMS”

PAKISTAN: GOVERNMENT MINISTER SAYS 
“JIHAD IS A DUTY IN ISLAM; THOSE WHO AVOID JIHAD ARE NOT MUSLIMS”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/pakistan-government-minister-says-jihad-is-a-duty-in-islam-those-who-avoid-jihad-are-not-muslimsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Rasheed Ahmad is Pakistan’s Federal Minister for Railways. He wasn’t talking about an interior spiritual struggle, as he refers here to Farooq and Geelani, who are leaders of violent jihad groups. But surely that most learned of imams, Pope Francis, is on his way to Pakistan now in order to explain to Ahmad how “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Qur’an reject every form of violence.”
In any case, this open support for jihadis from a Pakistani government minister ought to be a wake-up call for those who still think the U.S. alliance with Pakistan is viable and worth preserving. But it won’t be.
“Shocking: Pak minister talks of jihad and Kashmir,” TNN, March 1, 2019 (thanks to K.):
In yet another shocker for a Pakistani minister, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmad praised terrorism, saying “jihad is a duy [sic] in Islam”. While speaking in Pakistan’s Parliament, Ahmad said, “Those who avoid jihad are not Muslims.” “I have good relations with Mirwaiz Mohammad Umar Farooq and Syed Ali Shah Geelani. I am known to the young boys too and Burhan Muzaffar Wani is their leader,” he said in a video footage. A few days back, he dared India after India decimated JeM terror camps in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir.

OCASIO-CORTEZ & YOUNG RADICALS FIRMLY CONTROL DEMOCRATIC PARTY~”PALESTINIAN” MUSLIM VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE’S ANTI-SEMITIC DIATRIBE

OCASIO-CORTEZ & YOUNG RADICALS FIRMLY CONTROL DEMOCRATIC PARTY
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
 republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
It appears that what remains of the moderate wing of the Democratic Party is dead. Or at least has no voice.
The party of abortion, sodomy, and socialism is now under the firm control, apparently, of a 29-year-old former bartender who proclaims herself a democratic socialist and already shows signs of the totalitarian impulses so common to her ilk.
Such is the iron control the party’s radicals have achieved that an old party hand cannot even say something nice about a Republican, as Joe Biden learned the other day. He said Vice President Pence was a “decent guy.” It was a big mistake.
Upshot? The GOP better stiffen its spine to fight these totalitarian central planners.
No Voting With the GOP. Period.
According to the Washington Post, moderates in the Democratic Party received marching orders yesterday: Shut up and do what you’re told, or face the equivalent of a firing squad.
“House Democrats exploded in recriminations Thursday over moderates bucking the party, with liberal Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez threatening to put those voting with Republicans ‘on a list’ for a primary challenge,” the Post reported.
And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the elderly leftist from California, agrees. “We are either a team or we’re not,” she warned, the Post reported.
Ocasio-Cortez, the face that launched a thousand Facebook memes, threatened party moderates with exile. “Corbin Trent, a spokesman for Ocasio-Cortez,” the Post reported, “said she told her colleagues that Democrats who side with Republicans ‘are putting themselves on a list.’”
Ocasio-Cortez issued a not-so-subtle Stalinist threat, the Post reported, after the GOP outfoxed Democrats on an amendment to a bill that would expand federal background checks before one can purchase a firearm.
That amendment, defeated in committee, required Immigrations and Customs Enforcement to be notified if an illegal alien tried to purchase a firearm. Using a motion to recommit, which gives the minority party a last shot at amending a bill, Republicans reintroduced it on the floor, where 26 Democrats helped pass it.
“That infuriated liberals who have railed against ICE’s role in conducting mass deportations and embarrassed Democratic leaders who couldn’t keep their members in line on a high-profile bill,” the Post reported.
Thus, Ocasio-Cortez’s spokesman told the Post, “she said that when activists ask her why she had to vote for a gun safety bill that also further empowers an agency that forcibly injects kids with psychotropic drugs, they’re going to want a list of names and she’s going to give it to them.”
The problem for Pelosi and her colleague from New York 14? Democratic Congressmen from pro-Trump districts. Those moderates “insist they are not going to be dissuaded from voting with their districts, and many are warning that majority control is at stake.”
Inside the Democratic meeting, one of those freshmen — Rep. Xochitl Torres Small (N.M.) — reacted sharply to Ocasio-Cortez’s comments and rose to urge her colleagues to respect the political reality of representing a swing district, according to multiple people present….
Publicly and privately, Pelosi has urged members to treat the Republican motions as procedural feints that should be routinely ignored. “Vote no — just vote no,” she told reporters Thursday, “because the fact is, a vote yes is to give leverage to the other side.” But [Representative Steny] Hoyer and [Representative James] Clyburn believe that is untenable when Republicans stand ready to use those votes as political cudgels against vulnerable Democrats.
Say Nothing Nice
How much control do party radicals have over the party’s elderly leaders?
The Hill reported yesterday that former Vice President Joe Biden, still contemplating a run for president, permitted a left-wing lesbian to upbraid him for calling Vice President Mike Pence a “decent guy.” Biden was speaking at a foreign policy forum in Nebraska.
The reprimand came from failed gubernatorial candidate Cynthia Nixon, one of the stars of Sex in the City, a pornographic television program about the sexual adventures of four women in New York City.
“@JoeBiden you’ve just called America’s most anti-LGBT elected leader ‘a decent guy,’” she tweeted. “Please consider how this falls on the ears of our community.”
Like an old man afraid his kids would put him in a nursing home if he didn’t mind them, Biden quickly gave in.
You’re right, Cynthia. I was making a point in a foreign policy context, that under normal circumstances a Vice President wouldn’t be given a silent reaction on the world stage.
But there is nothing decent about being anti-LGBTQ rights, and that includes the Vice President.
__________________________________________________________

Virginia Democratic Candidate’s Anti-Semitic Diatribe Has a Radical Past

BY Abha Shankar
SEE: https://www.investigativeproject.org/7825/ipt-exclusive-virginia-democratic-candidate-antirepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Update: Samirah was elected with 60 percent of the vote.
A Virginia General Assembly candidate has apologized for past social media posts excoriating Jews and Israel. But Ibraheem Samirah continues to shade his involvement with groups which would like to see Israel eliminated, a sentiment that was prominent in his life.
In a Feb. 8 apology, Samirah, the Democratic nominee for Virginia’s 86th House of Delegates district, expressed remorse for his “ill-chosen words” that “added pain to the Jewish community.” A special election in Samirah’s race will be held Tuesday.
Samirah dismissed the widespread condemnation of his posts as a “slander campaign” that “is using 5-year-old Facebook posts from my impassioned college days, posts that upon reflection and with the of [sic] blessing of time, I sincerely regret and apologize for.”
He is 27 years old.
The posts, first published Feb. 7 by Big League Politics, claimed that sending money to Israel was “worse” than sending money to the Ku Klux Klan and wishing that former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon would burn in hell.
“Ariel Sharon, burn. Burn a million times for every innocent soul you killed. Hell is excited to have you,” Samirah wrote after Sharon died in 2014.
To show he’s not an anti-Semite, Samirah’s apology mentioned that he is a co-founder of American University’s Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) chapter. But JVP is a rabidly anti-Israel group that championed the case of a convicted Palestinian terrorist.
Samirah’s campus activism also includes work with the virulently anti-Israel Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). The SJP is a radical student organization active on approximately 200 U.S. college campuses. Since its establishment in 2010, SJP chapters have campaigned for divestment from Israel, which it smears as an apartheid state, and accuses of ethnic cleansing.
Samirah participated in a 2016 SJP protest at Boston University against an Israel Peace Week festival sponsored by Boston University Hillel and BU Students for Israel.
He accused festival organizers of using “fun things to cover up very horrible, terrible crimes against humanity.”
“They are blindly supporting Israel, so we came to expose that reality,” Samirah said. “On top of that, we came to expose the reality internationally for the Palestinian people living under occupation, as related to us here in BU.”
Samirah has supported the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) campaign targeting Israel and was the listed contact person in a 2016 JVP campaign “calling for local and state governments to end contracts with Hewlett-Packard (HP)” because of the company’s work in Israel.
The BDS movement describes itself as “a Palestinian-led movement for freedom, justice, and equality” that uses a strategy of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions to challenge “international support for Israeli apartheid and settler-colonialism.” But it is considered inherently anti-Semitic because many of its advocates have called for Israel’s destruction and because it singles out the world’s only Jewish state while ignoring human rights abuses of far greater magnitude in other countries, especially in Muslim-majority states.
Samirah, who was born in Chicago and calls himself a “second generation Palestinian refugee,” has described the significant role his father has played in shaping his views. The family had to leave the United States when he was a child after his father was “was seen as a security threat for being Muslim and an activist,” Samirah said in an April 2017 interview with a Boston University publication
His father was merely “registering Muslim Americans to vote and lobbying politicians for Muslim needs” but because of rising Islamophobia after 9/11, he “was informed he was a threat to national security,” Samirah said.
In fact, Sabri Ibrahim Samirah (also known as Sabri Ibrahim) was a senior leader of a now-defunct Hamas network in the U.S. called the “Palestine Committee.”
The “Palestine Committee” was created by the Muslim Brotherhood to support Hamas politically and financially in the United States. Sabri Ibrahim, was chairman of the Palestine Committee’s main propaganda arm, the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP). He served on the board of the American Muslim Society (AMS), which was another name for the IAP, from at least 1993-2002.
The IAP issued Hamas press releases and communiques and published the Hamas charter, which called for Israel’s destruction and the murder of Jews. It also sponsored annual conventions and other events that included senior Hamas leaders as speakers.
In 1996 testimony before the United States Senate Foreign Relations’ Subcommittee on the Near East and South Asia, Investigative Project on Terrorism Executive Director Steven Emerson noted that Sabri Ibrahim hosted the IAP-sponsored “Jerusalem Festival” two years earlier in Chicago. The event celebrated the “eighth year of the [Palestinian] Intifada.” A bazaar featured radical pro-Hamas publications and the main auditorium played songs of revolution and speeches by the Hamas leadership in the United States and overseas.
“In Chicago … which we will permit ourselves to call the Muslim capital of America,” Ibrahim said in a speech, “… and in the shadows of the memory of the martyrs who gave their blood for Palestine … and in the passage of six years’ imprisonment of the Sheikh of the intifadah, Ahmed Yassin [the founder of Hamas who had been imprisoned for directing the kidnapping and killing of Israeli soldiers] in almost the second year following the arrest of a member of our own community, Muhammad Salah … we the Islamic Association for Palestine send them a deeply felt greeting, and to … the mujahideen … all of you have gathered here today.”
Sabri Ibrahim also led several summer retreats for local Muslim children. In one such retreat – captured on videotape – the children, several wearing T-shirts with American basketball team insignias, sat around a campfire singing Arabic chants praising Hamas leader Ahmed Yasin, jihad and armed struggle against the Jews. “With daggers in our hands we burst forth to strike … (against) our enemies,” one chant said. Another stanza listed the names of Hamas heroes Ahmed Yasin, Abdullah Azzam, and Iz ad-Din al-Qassam. The Hamas military wing is named after al-Qassam.
Sabri Ibrahim’s pro-Hamas, anti-Israel stance hasn’t changed with time.
“We are ready to sacrifice all we have for Palestine. Long Live Palestine,” he said at an April 2014 American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) conference. The IPT first identified at least five AMP officials and speakers who worked in the Hamas-supporting Palestine Committee. “We have a mission here [in the U.S.] also to support the struggle of our people back there in order to achieve a free land in the Muslim world, without dictators and without corruption.”
Ibraheem Samirah’s apology was vague and stands amid a lifetime immersed in intense anti-Israel sentiment. If he hopes to ever be a genuine representative of the people, he needs to explain exactly how his thinking has changed.
____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
Samirah’s Tweets & Actions
Palestinian Children Taught to Hate Jews

POPE AND GRAND IMAM JOIN HANDS FOR WORLD PEACE; CONTINUE ON THE PATH TO A ONE WORLD APOSTATE RELIGION

Stacks Image 336990
POPE AND GRAND IMAM JOIN HANDS 
FOR WORLD PEACE 
SEE: https://www.wayoflife.org/friday_church_news/20-09.phprepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

(Friday Church News Notes, March 1, 2019,www.wayoflife.orgfbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) – 
On February 4, Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of al-Azhar, Ahmed el-Tayeb signed the DOCUMENT ON HUMAN FRATERNITY FOR WORLD PEACE in Abu Dhabi. It is based on the doctrine of the universal Fatherhood of God. The pope said the document “is born of faith in God who is the Father of all and the Father of peace” (“Pope: Peace document born of God,” Vatican News, Feb. 5, 2019). The document “invites all persons who have faith in God and faith in human fraternity to unite and work together so that it may serve as a guide for future generations to advance a culture of mutual respect in the awareness of the great divine grace that makes all human beings brothers and sisters.” The Grand Imam of al-Azhar, who is based in Egypt, holds a prominent position in the Sunni branch of Islam. This is the latest step toward a one-world religion and is further preparation for the coming Antichrist’s peace pact. The first major move toward this was the FIRST PARLIAMENT OF WORLD RELIGIONS in Chicago in 1893. This was the first formal gathering of representatives of Christianity and eastern religions. Hindu swami Vivekananda was given a three-minute standing ovation when he got up to speak. He urged the crowd to reject the “demons” of “sectarianism, bigotry, and fanaticism,” so that human society could advance and the world could be filled with peace and blessing. A WORLD CONGRESS OF FAITHS, held in London in 1936, was organized by the famous British explorer-soldier Francis Younghusband who believed that there is a “divine spark” within man and called God “the Central Spirit of Things” (Marcus Braybrooke, A Wider Vision: A History of the World Congress of Faiths, 1936-96). THE TEMPLE OF UNDERSTANDING was established in 1960 by Juliet Hollister to “create a more just and peaceful world.” Eleanor Roosevelt, wife of the U.S. president, was an active supporter and called it a “Spiritual United Nations.” The Temple of Understanding is closely affiliated with the United Nations and hosted the UN’s 50th anniversary celebration in 1995. Its offices are located in the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, a radically liberal Episcopal church. THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, which was held 1962-65, opened the doors for Roman Catholic involvement in interfaith dialogue. Vatican II announced that “whatever is true or good or noble among other peoples or religions owes its origin finally to God.” Vatican II stated that people in other religions can be saved by their “faith,” but it also reaffirmed its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the true church. In 1964 the Vatican established thePONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE. Roman Catholic interfaith dialogue was shaped by Cardinal Francis Arinze during his presidency from 1984 to 2002. Over the years he sent “fraternal” greetings to and facilitated dialogue with every sort of religionist, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Janist, Animist, whatever. In 1988 Arinze said, “Every human being is looking for God,” and, “The Christian should take notice of the beautiful elements in the religion of the other person” (Arinze interview with Ralph Rath, “Mutual Respect,” A.D. 2000 Together, Fall 1988, p. 7). In 1965, the leaders of seven world religions came together in San Francisco for aCONVOCATION OF RELIGION FOR WORLD PEACE. Pope Paul VI sent his blessing and the UN Secretary-General U Thant participated in person. On October 1986, Pope John Paul II held the first DAY OF PRAYER FOR WORLD PEACE in Assisi, Italy. Its objective is to find world peace through interfaith unity: “peace within the church and peace with all mankind.” The 160 participants included leaders from 32 Christian denominations and organizations and 11 non-Christian religions. The prayers included petitions to “the Great Thumb” by an African tribal animist and to “mother earth” by a Crow medicine man (“A Summit for Peace in Assisi,” Time magazine, Nov. 10, 1986). In 1988, the COUNCIL FOR A PARLIAMENT OF THE WORLD’S RELIGIONS (CPWR) was formed to “cultivate harmony between the world’s religious and spiritual communities and foster their engagement with the world and its other guiding institutions in order to achieve a peaceful, just, and sustainable world.” It is intended to be a continuation of the first Parliament of World Religions of 1893. The CPWR has sponsored interfaith Parliaments in 1993 in Chicago; in 1999 in Cape Town, South Africa; in 2004 in Barcelona, Spain; in 2009 in Melbourne, Australia; in 2015 in Salt Lake City, Utah; and in 2018 in Toronto. In November 1994, Pope John Paul II hosted the WORLD CONFERENCE ON RELIGION AND PEACE. It was the first official interfaith conference at the Vatican and the theme was “Healing the World: Religions for Peace.” In 1995, the UNITED RELIGIONS ORGANIZATION was founded by Episcopalian priest William Swing, Communist Mikhail Gorbachev, and others. The announcement for the new organization was made at a syncretistic service held at the Grace Episcopal Cathedral in San Francisco. Alan Jones, dean of the cathedral, said the service was “a summons to the great religious traditions of the world to be in deeper conversation with each other … as workers for peace, as guarantors of the sacredness of the earth” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 26, 1995). In his book Reimagining Christianity, Jones calls the doctrine of the cross a “vile doctrine.” Prayers and chants were offered to a dozen deities. During the service, children mingled water from over 30 “sacred waters” from around the world, including the Ganges, Amazon, Jordan, and Lourdes, to signify world unity. As the waters were poured into one bowl a children’s choir sang a dirge from the Missa Gaia, an earth-worshipping concert originally commissioned by the St. John the Divine Episcopal Cathedral in New York City. Swing said, “We are on the threshold of the first global civilization.” The WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, which was formed in 1948 and represents roughly 340 denominations, is deeply involved in interfaith activities. In 1978 its Ecumenical Prayer Cycle included this syncretistic prayer: “O God, the Parent of our Lord Jesus Christ, and our Parent: thou who art to us both Father and Mother: We who are thy children draw around thy lotus feet to worship thee. Thy compassion is as the fragrance of the lotus. … We see thy compassion in Jesus. He gives content to the Hindu name for thee — Siva, the Kindly One. He gives significance to the Muslim address of thee — Allah, the Merciful. He embodies in the Godhead what the Buddhist worship in the Buddha — compassion itself. Thou God of all the world, let our history teach us that we belong to thee alone and that thou alone dost belong to us” (Ecumenical Prayer Cycle, 1978, p. 157). The World Council’s Sixth Assembly, July 1983 in Vancouver, British Columbia, opened with Native American Indians tossing offerings of fish and tobacco into a “sacred fire” and dancing around the pagan altar. It also featured a Hindu dance to the “earth mother goddess.” “But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober” (1 Thessalonians 5:1-6).
_____________________________________________________________

The Exclusive Gospel in a Pluralistic Culture
BY MIKE GENDRON OF PROCLAIMING THE GOSPEL.ORG

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:


Claims of exclusivity are often met with great resistance in societies where different religious paths are accepted as equally valid. Christians who communicate the exclusivity of their faith will experience this in a variety of ways. They are either dismissed, ridiculed, mocked, or considered intolerant. These responses to the Gospel have been occurring for 2000 years. Paul wrote: “we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness” (1 Cor. 1:23).
Why is there so much antagonism toward the Gospel of Jesus Christ? It is because people do not want to be told there is only one way to heaven in a society deeply influenced by pluralism and postmodernism. Yet when it comes to the Gospel, Christians must contend for its purity and exclusivity (Gal. 1:6-9). The call for ecumenical unity among all “professing Christians” must be met with determined opposition. We know that “truth” is exclusive and cannot be compromised because “No lie is of the truth” (1 John 2:21). Truth is as incompatible with error as light is with darkness. Any teaching which contradicts or opposes biblical truth is false, and it must be exposed for what it is. As Christians, we cannot be passive or indifferent towards any distortion of the Gospel. We must contend earnestly for the faith (Jude 3).

The Gospel is exclusive because it is about only one Person and two historical events (1 Cor. 15:1-4). It reveals the good news of man’s redemption, which was accomplished by the eternal Son of God incarnate, through His atoning sacrificial death and glorious resurrection from the dead. The Gospel is a unique and eternal message (Rev. 14:6). It is the same message for every generation and must be proclaimed, protected and defended. 

Only One Savior
The apostle Peter proclaimed this exclusive statement to an already hostile audience: “There is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

Only One Mediator
The apostle Paul made this exclusive declaration: “For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Tim. 2:5).

Only One Way
The Lord Jesus declared, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me” (John 14:6). He said, “the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it” (Mat. 7:14).

Only One Source of Eternal Life
The apostle John declared: “God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life” (1 John 5:11-12). John also said, “He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him” (John 3:36).

Only One Exemption from Judgment
Jesus satisfied divine justice as the sinless substitute for all believers. “He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God” (John 3:18).

The Gospel is also exclusive because it is the only message with the divine power and promises to reverse the curse of sin (Rom. 1:16; 8:21). God’s Word makes these exclusive promises to anyone who repents and believes the Gospel. 

Sins are forgiven (Col. 2:13-14)
Divine justice is satisfied (Rom. 5:1; 8:1)
Christ’s Righteousness is imputed (2 Cor. 5:21)
Redemption is paid (Heb. 9:12)
Reconciliation with God is accomplished (2 Cor. 5:18)
Death is conquered (John 11:25)
Resurrection is promised (John 5:29)
Salvation is secured (1 John 5:13)

How can Christians communicate the exclusivity of the Gospel effectively in our religiously pluralistic society? We need to understand that the Gospel is offensive to those who are offensive to God. It humbles people under the sovereign hand of God and strips them of their own righteousness. We must tell them they have broken God’s law, they are condemned by God’s justice, they deserve God’s wrath, they need God’s mercy, and their only hope is God’s Son.

DR. FAUCI, IT’S NOT NICE TO FOOL CONGRESS ABOUT VACCINE REACTIONS

Anthony Fauci Says Under Oath MMR Does Not Cause Encephalitis

FULL PUBLIC HEARING: 1 HOUR, 45 MINUTES:

DR. FAUCI, IT’S NOT NICE TO FOOL CONGRESS 

ABOUT VACCINE REACTIONS 
BY BARBARA LOE FISHER
SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/02/dr-fauci-its-not-nice-to-fool-congress-about-vaccine-reactions/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
On Feb. 27, 2019, the U.S. House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a public hearing on “Confronting a Growing Public Health Threat: Measles Outbreaks in the U.S” that was also broadcast live on C-span. Parents across the nation watched and heard the renowned Anthony Fauci, MD, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),1 either tell a bald-faced lie or show his ignorance when he testified, under oath, that MMR vaccine does not cause encephalitis. This large dose of disinformation drew gasps of protest from parents attending the Capitol Hill hearing and prompted Committee Chair Diana DeGette (D-CO) to bang the gavel and warn that “manifestations of approval or disapproval of the proceedings is in violation of the rules of the House and this Committee.”
It is really hard to watch a distinguished physician like Dr. Fauci mislead legislators by blatantly denying the damage that serious vaccine reactions like brain inflammation can do to children’s brains. It is also hard to watch legislators believe everything they are told by government employees just because they have MD or PhD written after their names.  
At 53:05 in the 95 minute House public hearing (42:05 on C-Span), Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) asked this question: “I want to look at some of the concerns. I’ve heard some parents claim that measles vaccine can cause brain inflammation, known as encephalitis. Is that true? Is that true?”
Looking like he was buying time, Dr. Fauci answered, “Brain inflammation…encephalitis…”
Rep. Guthrie persisted, “Can measles vaccine cause encephalitis? The vaccine…”
Dr. Fauci without blinking took a Pinocchio turn and answered, “The vaccine? No.”
When the audience broke out in audible disbelief and as the Chair brought the gavel down, Fauci knew he was busted and quickly murmured, “…rare.”
Then Nancy Messonnier, MD, Director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases,2 jumped in to help Fauci out. She stated authoritatively, “In healthy children MMR vaccine does not cause brain swelling and encephalitis.”
Rep. Guthrie appeared concerned and continued to pursue the line of questioning, “So if a child was unhealthy when they got the vaccine, would it…?”
Messonnier replied, “There are rare instances in children with certain very specific underlying problems with their immune system in whom the vaccine is contraindicated. One of the reasons it’s contraindicated is, in that very specific group of children, there is a rare risk of brain swelling.”
Rep. Guthrie followed up with a logical and very important question, “But would a parent know their child was in that category before…”
And then Dr. Messonnier proceeded to tell a whopper of her own, quickly reassuring the congressman that parents would know if their child’s brain was going to swell before getting MMR vaccine because doctors would tell them so. She answered without hesitation, “Certainly. And that’s why parents should talk to their doctor.”
Let’s more closely examine the disinformation (false information intended to deceive or mislead3) dished out to legislators on Capitol Hill by two of the highest-ranking public health officials in the U.S.
DISINFORMATION: MMR vaccine does not cause encephalitis (brain inflammation).
THE TRUTH: MMR vaccine can cause encephalitis and acute and chronic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction).
Here is THE EVIDENCE:

MMR Vaccine Manufacturer Package Insert

The MMR product manufacturer package insert published by Merck & Co., the manufacturer of MMR vaccine, states: “Encephalitis and encephalopathy have been reported approximately once for every 3 million doses of M-M-R II or measles-, mumps-, and rubella-containing vaccine administered since licensure of these vaccines. The risk of serious neurological disorders following live measles virus vaccine administration remains less than the risk of encephalitis and encephalopathy following infection with wild-type measles (1 per 1000 reported cases).” Warnings include: “Due caution should be employed in administration of M-M-R II to persons with a history of cerebral injury, individual or family histories of convulsions, or any other condition in which stress due to fever should be avoided.” The same warnings are included for Merck’s MMRV vaccine.

CDC’s Vaccine Information Statement (VIS)

Under the informing, recording and reporting safety provisions of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986,4 doctors are required by law to give the VIS to parents before children receive a CDC recommended vaccine. The VIS handouts for MMR and MMRV vaccine state that “severe” adverse events may include “deafness; long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness; and brain damage.”  The VIS for MMRV vaccine states that one of the “moderate” adverse events that can occur is “Infection of the lungs (pneumonia) or the brain and spinal cord coverings (encephalitis, meningitis).”

Medical Literature Reports

There is additional evidence in the medical literature that MMR vaccine can cause encephalitis and encephalopathy, including the following references.
The large prospective case controlled National Childhood Encephalopathy Study (NCES) conducted in Britain, which investigated all causes of encephalitis, encephalopathy and chronic neurological dysfunction in children, was published in 1981. Researchers concluded that, “The risk of a serious neurological disorder within 14 days after measles vaccine in previously normal children irrespective of eventual clinical outcome is 1 in 87,000 immunizations.”5
In 1998, federal public health officials published a report in Pediatrics reviewing the medical records of children who had filed claims in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) and had suffered “acute encephalopathy followed by permanent brain injury or death” following receipt of live attenuated measles vaccine alone or in combination with rubella and mumps vaccines (MR, MMR). They stated, “Eight children died, and the remainder had mental regression and retardation, chronic seizures, motor and sensory deficits, and movement disorders. The onset of neurologic signs or symptoms occurred with a nonrandom, statistically significant distribution of cases on days 8 and 9. No cases were identified after the administration of monovalent mumps or rubella vaccine. This clustering suggests that a causal relationship between measles vaccine and encephalopathy may exist as a rare complication of measles immunization.”6
A report, “Inflammatory/Post-Infectious Encephalomyelitis,” was published in 2004. The authors stated, “The non-neural measles, mumps, and rubella vaccinations are most commonly associated with post–vaccination encephalomyelitis. The incidence is 1-2 per million for live measles vaccinations.”7
In 2007, another prospective study conducted in Britain investigating the risk of serious neurologic disease after vaccination in early childhood (2-36 months old) was published in Pediatrics. The researchers concluded, “There was no evidence of a raised relative incidence of serious neurologic disease in any of the specified risk periods with the exception of a raised relative incidence of 5.68 in the 6–11 days after measles, mumps, rubella vaccine.”8
In 2013, a study was published in 2013 in PLOS One that evaluated cases of post vaccine acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) reported to the U.S. vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) and the EudraVigilance post-authorisation module (EVPM) of the European Union.9 Researchers described ADEM as “an immune mediated inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) that commonly occurs within one month from antigenic challenge.”
When looking at ADEM reports in the VAERS database related to a specific age group, they stated, “We observed that vaccines against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) and FLU were those most commonly involved in the 0-5 years age group (13%), followed by pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) (11%) and DTaP (9%).”

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Vaccine Injury Table

According to the March 21, 2017 Vaccine Injury Table in the VICP, “encephalopathy or encephalitis” occurring within 5 to 15 days of receipt of vaccines containing measles, mumps, and rubella virus or any of its components (e.g. MMR, MM, MMRV) is a compensable illness, disability or injury.10
DISINFORMATION: Parents know whether their child will suffer encephalitis or encephalopathy after MMR or MMRV vaccination because doctors identify those children and do not vaccinate them.
THE TRUTH: There are very few CDC approved contraindications to vaccination, and doctors cannot reliably predict which children will be harmed by MMR vaccine or any other vaccine before they are vaccinated.  
Here is THE EVIDENCE:

Few Vaccine Contraindications or Medical Exemptions

According to CDC guidelines, almost no health condition qualifies for a contraindication and a medical exemption to vaccination, including for measles containing vaccines.11 Children with HIV and cancer and those who have suffered convulsions after vaccination and other serious vaccine reactions are routinely vaccinated.12

Doctors Cannot Reliably Predict Who Will Be Harmed by Vaccines

The Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, published a report Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality in 2012 and noted that, although there is individual susceptibility to vaccine reactions, doctors are unable to reliably identify those who are genetically and otherwise more susceptible:
“Both epidemiologic and mechanistic research suggest that most individuals who experience an adverse reaction to vaccines have a pre-existing susceptibility. These predispositions can exist for a number of reasons – genetic variants (in human or microbiome DNA), environmental exposures, behaviors, illness or developmental stage, to name just a few, all of which can interact. Some of these adverse reactions are specific to particular vaccines, while others may not be. Some of these predispositions may be detectable prior to the administration of vaccine; others, at least with current technology and practice, are not.”13

Limited Scientific Evidence About Children Susceptible to Vaccine Harm

In 2013, the Institute of Medicine published a report examining the safety of the CDC’s recommended early childhood vaccine schedule (0 to 6 years old), The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety, and reiterated that there is limited scientific knowledge about how to identify children at higher risk for suffering vaccine reactions:
“The committee found that evidence assessing outcomes in subpopulations of children, who may be potentially susceptible to adverse reactions to vaccines (such as children with a family history of autoimmune disease or allergies or children born prematurely) is limited and is characterized by uncertainty about the definition of populations of interest and definition of exposures or outcomes.”14

$4 Billion Government Payout to Vaccine Victims

If individuals more susceptible to being harmed by vaccines are being identified by doctors before vaccination takes place, if children are not suffering encephalitis, encephalopathy and other crippling vaccine reactions that end with a lifetime of chronic illness and disability or even death, then why has the government paid out $4 billion in compensation to vaccine victims, including to those who have been harmed by measles containing vaccines like MMR?
If FDA licensed, CDC recommended and state mandated vaccines like MMR vaccine do not cause brain inflammation and permanent brain damage, why did Congress give the vaccine industry a partial liability shield in 1986 and the U.S. Supreme Court declare vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and hand the vaccine industry complete immunity from vaccine injury lawsuits in 2011?15

Disinformation About Vaccine Reactions Betrays the Public Trust

Parents, who trusted and did what they were told to do when they took their healthy children into a doctor’s office to be vaccinated and then watched their children suffer brain inflammation and regress into chronic poor health, learn that it is not a good idea to believe everything that doctors say about vaccines. People who were healthy, got vaccinated and were never healthy again, quickly learn how to tell the difference between a doctor telling the truth about vaccine safety and one who is not, because their lives depend upon it.
If public health officials can go before Congress and provide demonstrably false statements about MMR vaccine reactions, what else are they fooling the public about?

Federal Health Officials Influence State Vaccine Laws

On Jan. 30, 2019, Dr. Fauci gave an interview to CBS and said, “These [measles] outbreaks are due to the anti-vaccine movement.” He also said that scientific studies show claims about vaccine risks are “based purely on fabrication” and that, “There’s a category called philosophical reasons not to get vaccinated and that particular category has been abused. So I’m in favor of states or cities making regulations that require a more strict interpretation of the exemptions that one has to not get vaccinated.”16
As noted in a press release issued by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) on Feb. 25, 2019, state legislatures have the constitutional authority to make vaccine laws and the federal government should not be interfering in state rights. Although federal health officials make vaccine use recommendations and state health officials use that information to encourage state legislators to turn those recommendations into state vaccine mandates, state legislatures have the power to decide which vaccines to mandate and what kind of exemptions to allow.
Right now, the NVIC Advocacy Portal reports that 140 vaccine-related bills are pending in 31 states, some of which propose to restrict, eliminate or expand medical, religious and conscientious belief vaccine exemptions. Thousands of parents have already lined up to attend public hearings in state legislatures to defend the legal right to exercise parental and informed consent rights and make voluntary decisions about vaccination for their children without being punished for the decision made.

Federal Officials Should Be Held Accountable

There are more than a dozen new vaccines being developed that likely will be federally recommended and states will be encouraged to mandate in the future.17 Decisions are being made in state legislatures and in Congress right now that will affect the health and lives of this generation and generations of Americans to come. For the health of our nation, Congress should take the blinders off and hold federal officials accountable for the false statements they make about vaccine safety.
References:
1 Anthony S. Fauci, MD. Biography. Oct. 9, 2018.2 Nancy Messonnier, MD. Biography. Mar. 28, 2016.3 The Free Dictionary. Definition of Disinformation.4 National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
5 Alderslade R, Bellman MH, Rawson NSB, Ross EM, Miller DL. The National Childhood Encephalopathy Study: A Report on 1000 Cases of Serious Neurological Disorders in Infants and Young Children from the NCES Research Team. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 1981.6 Weibel RE, Casserta V, Benor DE et al. Acute Encephalopathy Followed by Permanent Brain Injury or Death Associated with Further Attenuated Measles Vaccine: A Review of Claims Submitted to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Pediatrics 1998; 101(3): 383-387.7 Bennetto L, Scolding N. Inflammation/Post Infectious EncephalomyelitisJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75 (Suppl 1): 122-128.8 Ward KN, Bryan NJ, Andrew NJ et al. Risk of Serious Neurologic Disease After Immunization of Young Children in Britain and Ireland. Pediatrics 2007; 120(2): 314-321.9 Pellegrino P, Carnovale C, Perrone V et al. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Onset: Evaluation Based on Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting SystemPLOS One Oct. 18, 2013.10 HRSA. Encephalopathy, Encephalitis, Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis. Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Vaccine Injury Table. Mar. 21, 2017.11 CDC. Recommendations and Guidelines of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): Contraindications and Precautions. Table 4-2. Conditions incorrectly perceived as contraindications or precautions to vaccination (i.e., vaccines may be given under these conditions). Jan. 10, 2019.12 Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Lyungman P et al. 2013 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guideline for Vaccination of the Immunocompromised HostClin Infect DisDec. 4, 2013; 58(3).13 Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines. Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality.(Evaluating Biological Mechanisms for Adverse Events: Increased Susceptibility). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2012. Chap. 4 (103-238).
14 Institute of Medicine Committee on the Assessment of Studies of Health Outcomes Related to the Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule. Summary: Health Outcomes (p. 5-6) and Conclusions About Scientific Findings (p. 11) and Review of Scientific Findings (p. 75-98). The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence and Future Studies; Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2013.15 NVIC. National Vaccine Information Center Cites “Betrayal” of Consumers by U.S. Supreme Court Giving Total Liability Shield to Big PharmaNVIC Press Release Feb. 23, 2011.16 CBS News. Measles Outbreak Fueled by Anti-Vaccination Movement, Infectious Disease Expert Says. Jan. 30, 2019.17 World Health Organization. WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC) meeting. June 26-27, 2018.
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.infowars.com/plague-inc-video-game-to-cast-anti-vaxxers-as-disease-spreaders/


CONGRESS ORDERS “SHIELDS DOWN” BY BLOCKING EMERGENCY DECLARATION

CONGRESS ORDERS “SHIELDS DOWN” 

BY BLOCKING EMERGENCY DECLARATION

Willfully ignoring threats to national security

BY MICHAEL CUTLER
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273000/congress-orders-shields-down-blocking-emergency-michael-cutlerrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
It has been said that “Timing is everything.”
On February 26, 2019 the House of Representatives voted to block President Trump’s declaration of an emergency on the southern border.  Nancy Pelosi and others claimed that the declaration was a violation of the Separation of Powers provisions of the Constitution.
It would appear that failures to secure our nation’s borders against the entry of massive numbers of illegal aliens is a clear violation of our Constitution.
Article IV, Section 4 states:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
Invasion is defined, part as:
An incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity:  an unwelcome intrusion into another’s domain.
Furthermore, there would have been no need for any additional action by the administration if Congress had simply voted to fund the construction of a barrier to protect our nation from the illegal and un-inspected entry of people and contraband including narcotics and weapons, into the United States.
Congress failed to act responsibly and in accordance with the oaths of office that each member took to support and defend the Constitution of the United States by preventing invasion and domestic violence.
The media was quick to pick up on the Congressional response to the President’s action to fund the construction of a barrier to protect the vulnerable and highly porous U.S./Mexican border.
On February 26, 2019 Mass Live reported, “Mass. Democrats vote to block President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration.”  Of course, it was not just Massachusetts Democrats who voted against the declaration, but the comments in the article are worth considering.
Also on February 26th, the New York Times reported, “House Votes to Block Trump’s National Emergency Declaration About the Border.”
The action by Congress was not the only story making headlines, on February 26, 2019, however.
On that same day, that the Democrats and some Republicans in the House of Representatives voted against the Presidential declaration of emergency, ABC News reported, “26 years ago: 6 die in 1993 World Trade Center bombing.”
Finally, on February 26, 2019 the Washington Post reported, “Again, 9/11 first responders are pleading with Congress to fund their health care. Again, Jon Stewart is joining them.”
If we were to play the game of “connect the dots,” there is a common thread that connects these news reports: the issue of national security and the threats posed to America and Americans by terrorism and the consequences of failures of the immigration system that enabled foreign terrorists to enter the United States and carry out deadly terror attacks in 1993 and again in September 11, 2001.
While a barrier on the U.S./Mexican border wouldn’t, by itself solve the immigration crisis, it is a vital element of what must be a multi-pronged approach to secure our nation and protect our citizens.
After the attacks of 9/11, politicians from both parties demanded to know, “Why weren’t the dots connected?”
Since the attacks of September 11, 2001 the dots have been repeatedly connected, all too often in the wake of additional deadly terror attacks conducted by alien terrorists who easily gained entry into the United States by a variety of means.
Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, the leader of the extremely violent Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel was just convicted of smuggling huge quantities of narcotics into the United States across the U.S./Mexican border.  His organization is responsible for numerous murders and crimes of violence and corruption.
There have been a long list of Congressional hearings and official government reports that warn that among the numerous threats that the U.S. faces around the world, many of those threats emanate from Latin America.
On January 29, 2019 the Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a hearing on Worldwide Threats that was predicated on a just-released paper, “World-Wide Threat Assessment,” that was issued by Daniel Coats, the Director of the Office of National Intelligence, which oversees the U.S. intelligence community.
Here is an excerpt from that report:
Transnational Organized Crime
Global transnational criminal organizations and networks will threaten US interests and allies by trafficking drugs, exerting malign influence in weak states, threatening critical infrastructure, orchestrating human trafficking, and undermining legitimate economic activity.
Drug Trafficking
The foreign drug threat will pose continued risks to US public health and safety and will present a range of threats to US national security interests in the coming year. Violent Mexican traffickers, such as members of the Sinaloa Cartel and New Generation Jalisco Cartel, remain key to the movement of illicit drugs to the United States, including heroin, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and cannabis from Mexico, as well as cocaine from Colombia. Chinese synthetic drug suppliers dominate US-bound movements of so- called designer drugs, including synthetic marijuana, and probably ship the majority of US fentanyl, when adjusted for purity.
Approximately 70,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2017, a record high and a 10-percent increase from 2016, although the rate of growth probably slowed in early 2018, based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data.
Increased drug fatalities are largely a consequence of surging production of the synthetic opioid fentanyl; in 2017, more than 28,000 Americans died from synthetic opioids other than methadone, including illicitly manufactured fentanyl. The CDC reports synthetic opioid- related deaths rose 846 percent between 2010 and 2017, while DHS reports that US seizures of the drug increased 313 percent from 2016 to 2017.
Other Organized Crime Activities
Transnational criminal organizations and their affiliates are likely to expand their influence over some weak states, collaborate with US adversaries, and possibly threaten critical infrastructure.
Mexican criminals use bribery, intimidation, and violence to protect their drug trafficking, kidnapping-for-ransom, fuel-theft, gunrunning, extortion, and alien-smuggling enterprises.
Gangs based in Central America, such as MS-13, continue to direct some criminal activities beyond the region, including in the United States.
Transnational organized crime almost certainly will continue to inflict human suffering, deplete natural resources, degrade fragile ecosystems, drive migration, and drain income from the productive—and taxable—economy.
Human trafficking generates an estimated $150 billion annually for illicit actors and governments that engage in forced labor, according to the UN’s International Labor Organization.
The first paragraph of the preface of the official report,  9/11 and Terrorist Travel, will provide my “closing argument” against the Congressional betrayal that America is now witnessing:
It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.
1 3 4 5 6