Credit:
Getty
Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog
A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
ISIS has issued a chilling threat against the Vatican just
weeks before Christmas, where tens of thousands of people from around
the world gather to celebrate the Christian holiday.
A pro-ISIS propaganda channel called Wafa Media made the threat through a poster depicting a vehicle attack, according to the Site Intelligence Group, who monitor terrorist activity.
The poster reads “Christmas Blood,” showing a masked jihadist driving
a BMW towards St. Peter’s Basilica, where Pope Francis holds mass.
A rifle and backpack can be seen next to the jihadist, who’s using GPS navigation and driving fast.
ISIS has made threats to the Vatican and Europe in the past, especially around the Christmas holiday.
Days before Christmas last year, an Islamic terrorist plowed a semi truck into a crowded Christmas market in Berlin, Germany, killing 12 people and injuring 56.
Several countries have already indicated their capitulation to Islam to avoid offending potential jihadists.
France has decided to shutter their Paris Christmas Market, which sees around 15 million attendees every year, and instead will keep the Ramadan festival this year.
And UK-based supermarket chain Tesco launched a politically
correct “Christmas” ad featuring Muslims, Sikhs and a gay couple, but no
Christians – in an ad meant to celebrate the Christian holiday.
Too early to start talking about Christmas? Surely not!
However you do Christmas, we’ve got a turkey for you. #EveryonesWelcome pic.twitter.com/Iun5467JJi— Tesco (@Tesco) November 6, 2017
Notably, Pope Francis also has a conciliatory view of ISIS,
likening Islam’s spirit of conquest to Jesus’ sending out his disciples
to spread the Word of God.
“It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of
Islam, however, it is also possible to interpret the objective in
Matthew’s Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in
terms of the same idea of conquest,” the Pope told French media last year.
It’s not unreasonable to assume that if ISIS did manage to carry
out an attack in the Vatican that the mainstream media would immediately
downplay the carnage and demonize anybody as “racist” or “Islamophobic”
who points out the radical Islamic fundamentalism that inspired the
attack in the first place, the same way they did after the horrific
Berlin Christmas market attack.
“Beyond the immediate panic and horror, there also appears to be a
potentially more pernicious reward to the forces of the political far
right best positioned to capitalize on such a tragedy,” wrote CNN’s David Andelman the day after the attack.
It’s just a “truck crash,” says CNN. Not an attack and definitely nothing to do with Islam. pic.twitter.com/ed8Z7bTmqG— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) December 19, 2016
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Nigel Farage says while Russia is accused of funding
Britain’s ‘Leave’ campaign, financier George Soros’ recent $18 billion
donation to pro-EU charity Open Society has escaped scrutiny. “This is
where the real international political collusion is,” Farage says.
Speaking to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Farage
told fellow MEPs he believes that when it comes to international
collusion, “we are looking in the wrong place.” He says Soros’ influence
in Brussels is “truly extraordinary,” adding: “I fear we could be
looking at the biggest level of international, political collusion in
history.”
Farage, the leader of the Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy
Group, believes Soros has spent billions in the EU to undermine the
nation state. “When we are talking about offshore money, when we are
talking about political subversion, when we are talking about collusion,
I wonder if we are looking in the wrong place.
“And I say that because George Soros recently gave Open Society,
which of course campaigns for freedom of movement of people and
supranational structures like the European Union, $18 billion. And his
influence here and in Brussels is truly extraordinary.”
Farage said Open Society boasts it held 42 meetings in 2016 with
the European Commission, and has published a book of reliable “friends”
in the European Parliament. There are 226 names on the list, he says. He
told those MEPs he would be writing to them to establish whether they
had accepted money or help from billionaire investor and liberal
campaigner Soros.
If we’re going to have a debate, and talk about full, political
and financial transparency, well let’s do it. So I shall be writing
today to all 226 of you, asking some pretty fair questions: Have you
ever received funds directly or indirectly from Open Society? How many
of their events have you attended? Could you please give us a list of
all the representatives including George Soros?”
He is also calling on the European Parliament to set up a special
committee to look into the issue. “I say this at a time when the use of
money and the implications it may have had on the Brexit result or the
Trump election has reached virtual hysteria.
“Just last week, the Electoral Commission launched an
investigation to find out whether the Leave campaign took offshore money
or Russian money. This came about as a result of questions asked in the
House of Commons by one Ben Bradshaw, someone linked to an organization
called ‘Open Society.’”
In October, Soros transferred the “bulk of his wealth” to Open
Society, it confirmed. Writing on his website, the financier said: “My
success in the financial markets has given me a greater degree of
independence than most other people. This allows me to stand on
controversial issues: in fact, it obliges me to do so because others
cannot.”
______________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
A reported shooting in northern California has left at least three people dead in Tehema County, California.
The Tehama County Sheriff’s Office says the shooting happened at an
elementary school in Rancho Tehama around 8:00 am. local time. Rancho
Tehama is about 115 miles north of the state capital of Sacramento.
A Corning Unified School district employee confirmed there were injuries at the school.
Police are investigating at least five crime scenes. At least 100 law enforcement officers have responded to the crime scenes.
Children have been moved from the school to a safe location.
BREAKING: At least 3 dead in shooting in Tehama
Co. it started at a home and moved to the school. Shooter shot and
killed by police. pic.twitter.com/xIKvyIxq4y— Sara Stinson (@SaraStinsonNews) November 14, 2017
A man spoke with KCRA’s affiliate Action News Now and said that
his truck was stolen and his roommate was shot and killed by the gunman.
“He’s dead. He didn’t make it,” the witness said. “For his family and everything, I feel bad, and we’ll be there for them.”
“The crazy thing is that the neighbor has been shooting a lot of
bullets lately, hundreds of rounds, large magazines,” he added.
“This guy has been crazy, and he’s been threatening us and
everything. I just feel like there maybe should have been more effort
put into stopping things like this.”
Parents are in distress stuck behind road block
not knowing the status of their kids at school in Rancho Tehama where
the shooter ended up. pic.twitter.com/kf7afIPr7z— Sara Stinson (@SaraStinsonNews) November 14, 2017
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“The Bible: So Misunderstood, It’s a Sin.” As Ronald Reagan said, “There you go again,” an apt comment on Newsweek’s recent hit piece on the Bible as they continue the war on God. Of course, Newsweek,
struggling to pay its bills, will use anything to denigrate, denounce,
and deny the Bible especially if it pulls in a few bucks of advertising.
The writer of this hit piece was
whose claim to fame as a respected journalist was in the area of
business but is now totally discredited as to his motive and his
character. Poor Eichenwald comes across in this infamous piece as a
totally incompetent writer without even a modicum of journalistic skills
for research, balance, fairness but as a rabid, foam-at-the-mouth
zealot for the left.
Wiping the foam from his lips he wrote his first paragraph depicting
evangelical Christians as nuts, jerks, and flakes comparing us to the
Westboro Baptists in Kansas. From this inauspicious beginning it is
obvious that he is dishonest or totally uninformed; either reason would be justification for yanking his journalist credentials.
Eichenwald’s untrue, unfair, unkind characterization of Christians
would be like my suggesting that all journalists are wild, woozy, and
wicked people who get to work at 10:00, have a three hour lunch break
consisting of three shots of cheap gin, stagger back to the office to
work a couple hours then buy a quart of wine from the local grocery and
go home where they cause havoc in the neighborhood, beat their wives and
knock their children around until bed time. Now, I’m sure that is true
of a few journalists but it is irresponsible to suggest that is true of
most of them. Kurt was irresponsible.
He spends much ink dealing with snake handling as if that is normal
in real Christianity! Some leftists are dumb as a box of rocks or are so
short of arguments that they depict Christians as carrying a sack of
rattlesnakes to church each Sunday.
Eichenwald makes a very silly statement when he declares that
“evangelicals are always talking about family values. But to Jesus,
family was an “impediment to reaching God.” He took that position
because of a naïve misinterpretation of Matthew 19:29 where Christ spoke
about forsaking father, mother, brother, and sister for His sake and
their inheritance of eternal life. Of course even Christian neophytes
are aware that the Bible clearly commands us to love and support family
and to honor father and mother.
Kurt further shows his immaturity or dishonesty when he charges that
all female Christians in political life should quit (or remain
hypocrites!) because of 1 Timothy 2:12 that commands a woman not to
teach and have authority over a man. This is a much discussed verse and
theologians in various denominational groups take various
interpretations but everyone knows it specifically deals with women in
the local church. Kurt doesn’t know that.
There is no way Eichenwald could have done any research without
knowing about I Timothy 2:12 yet he was way out in left field and gave
no indication of objectivity. Of course, true objectivity is as hard to
find in Newsweek and all liberal media as white dinosaurs in Kentucky.
Eichenwald is out of his league in this article. In paragraph after paragraph I cringed in embarrassment for him and Newsweek.
He was like a 12-year old kid making an appearance at the Major League
Training Camp in Florida with a desire to play in the big leagues. The
kid would be told to come back in a few years. I’m afraid it would be
many years before Eichenwald could qualify for the Theological Big
League. Mainly because Kurt seems to be blind (or keeps his eyes shut)
therefore can’t read the Bible he accuses us of not reading!
He continues to prove his lack of knowledge (or honesty) when he
charges that fundamentalists “twist phrases and modify translations” to
prove some of our “biases and beliefs.” The fact is most fundamentalists
may be guilty of a little twisting (always wrong) now and then but we
never “modify translations.” We would rather be caught naked in subzero
weather on Fifth Avenue during rush hour than mess with the King James
Bible. We take it as it is–inspired, inerrant, and infallible.
Kurt then charges that Christians believe “Mosaic law from the Old
Testament directs American government.” Gasp, does he mean that we
believe that our basic judicial system is based on the original Ten
Commandants? If so, then everyone knows that is true: From Israel, to
Rome, to England to America. You know, don’t bare false witness, don’t
kill, don’t steal, don’t commit adultery.
He further charges us with Bible illiteracy but with his litany of
mistakes, mishmash, and misrepresentation, that is like a skunk accusing
a rabbit of having bad breath. Our “illiteracy” allegedly causes
parents to “banish children from their homes.” No doubt this refers to
parents who require children to live decently, get a job, not fornicate,
not use vile language and no pornography if they want to live at home.
How dare they!
Because of our alleged “Biblical illiteracy” he charges that we
believe that climate change (remember when it used to be global
warming?) is impossible because of God’s promise to Noah! Hey, only an
uninformed fool would use such an argument when there is no evidence of
man-made climate change. Of course, the climate changes every day!
His also charges us with “imped[ing] science” and undermining
“intellectual advancement” which, of course, refers to the
creation/evolution controversy. He and others will discuss how evolution
happened but not if it happened. Such people talk about being open minded but their minds are as closed as a miser’s wallet.
His diatribe is based on “scores of theologians and scholars” but he did not interview or quote one evangelical,
let alone a fundamentalist, but three–count them, one, two, three
leftists. And he only names one–Bart Ehrman, an apostate New Testament
professor at the University of North Carolina. Bart grew up a
fundamentalist, went to Moody (after me), then to Princeton where he
lost whatever faith he had. Kurt calls him a “groundbreaking Biblical
scholar” when he is really an apostate. I could have chosen a kinder
term but I’m committed to honesty and accuracy.
Dr. Michael Kruger, an expert in early Christianity wrote of
Eichenwald’s “jaw-dropping ignorance of the facts about the Bible.”
Kruger declared that Eichenwald’s article “is short on the facts, it has
little understanding of interpretive principles, it assumes that it
knows more about theology than it really does, and it pours out scorn
and contempt on the average believer.” Right!
Dr. Daniel Wallace, commented on Eichenwald’s “numerous factual
errors and misleading statements, his lack of concern for any semblance
of objectivity, his apparent disdain for and lack of interaction with
genuine evangelical scholarship, and his uber-confidence about more than
a few suspect viewpoints.” Wallace is Professor of New Testament
Studies at Dallas Seminary.
Eichenwald charges that none of us have ever read a reliable
Bible–that we have translations of translations of translations of bad
translations that have been altered hundreds of times. The fact is that
we have over 6,000 good Greek manuscripts going back as far as the
second century! When Kurt writes about corrupt manuscripts he gives the
impression that he knows what is corrupt and what is not corrupt.
Neither he nor anyone else has read the original autographs. Kurt is a
charlatan.
Kurt shows his shallowness with his antiquated charges: there are two
(or even four) creation stories; Christ’s geologies are contradictory;
the events around His birth are in conflict; the resurrection stories
are in conflict; Moses did not write Deuteronomy; Noah taking two or
seven kinds of animals on the ark and the number of days the water was
upon the earth; the question of David killing Goliath and many others.
Kurt tells us that unicorns did not exist even though the Bible
mentions them ten times. It is really humorous to hear liberals deal
with this subject. They seem to be clueless about the extinction of
species since the beginning of time and all evolutionists agree with
that. Unicorns could have existed and like the dodo bird disappeared
long ago. Furthermore, a whole herd of unicorns could be found tomorrow
grazing on a Peruvian mountainside!
Eichenwald may not believe much of the Bible but like all
humanists, hedonists, and homosexuals he believes Jesus when He said,
“Don’t judge” in Matt. 7:1. However, we are not to judge unfairly or
without judging ourselves first. In fact, we are commanded to judge
righteous judgment in John 7:24. Kurt is very careless with the context
of his criticism.
Wonder if Eichenwald, in all fairness, will do a hatchet job on the Koran
as he has the Bible. No, because he is a coward. He knows Christians
are taught to turn the other cheek while Koranic Muslims are taught to
behead critics.
(Next column: “Newsweek’s Hatchet Job on the Bible!”)
http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY Watch
these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota:
“A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”
(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of
Representatives, author of 15 books, frequent guest on television and
radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. His shocking books, ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse!; Christian Resistance: An Idea Whose Time Has Come–Again!; and The God Haters
are all available at Amazon.com. These columns go to newspapers,
magazines, television, and radio stations and may be used without change
from title through the end tag. His web sites are www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com and www.thegodhaters.com. Contact Don for an interview or talk show.)
“Like” Dr. Boys on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/CSTNews?ref=hl
and http://www.facebook.com/TheGodHaters?ref=hl
Follow him on Twitter at https://twitter.com/CSTNews
Visit his blog at http://donboys.cstnews.com/
Websites Links
http://unregisteredbaptistfellowship.org/
http://the-trumpet-online.com/
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The following photos are an assortment taken from stories we have written or posted over the last three years.
July 2017
2014 at the Vatican, Italy
2014
2014 – Beth Moore’s Legitimizing of the Catholic Church
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
We received the top two photos last week from a reader. Below that
are photos of various labyrinths in churches across North America. We
have posted these, not to single out these particular churches, but
rather to show examples of how many denominations have now incorporated
the contemplative mystical practice of walking the labyrinth. And this
is only showing some of the churches that have labyrinths on site. There
are countless churches, ministries, and denominations that may not
necessarily have labyrinths on site, but pastors and leaders encourage
their congregations or followers to use them (e.g., the Reformed Church of America), or they encourage their congregations to visit retreat centers that have them. Carl Teichrib has written an excellent article/booklet on labyrinths that is worth the read.
(The photos used below are low resolution
photos used in accordance with the U.S. Fair Use Act for the critique,
review, and dissemination of information.)
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The appalling New York Times pseudo-journalist Scott Shane has likened me to
Anwar al-Awlaki, even though I have never aided any terrorists in plotting their attacks, and have never perpetrated, approved of, or called for any acts of terrorist violence. Will Shane pressure the New York Times to take down my videos next? He probably wouldn’t have to lean on them very hard to get them to do so: YouTube has already removed a “Robert Spencer” playlist that
someone had on YouTube solely for his own reference, has several times removed
Palestinian Media Watch’s YouTube page, and generally harasses foes of jihad terror.
It’s just one aspect of how the social media giants appear determined to deny a platform
to those who dare speak out against and oppose jihad violence and Sharia oppression.
It’s good that they’ve finally taken down al-Awlaki’s videos, but why did it take them so
long?
“In ‘Watershed Moment,’ YouTube Blocks Extremist Cleric’s Message,” by Scott Shane, New York Times, November 12, 2017:
WASHINGTON — For eight years, the jihadist propaganda of
Anwar al-Awlaki has helped shape a generation of American terrorists,
including the Fort Hood gunman, the Boston Marathon bombers and the
perpetrators of massacres in San Bernardino, Calif., and Orlando, Fla.
And YouTube, the world’s most popular video site, has allowed
hundreds of hours of Mr. Awlaki’s talks to be within easy reach of
anyone with a phone or computer.
Now, under growing pressure from governments and counterterrorism
advocates, YouTube has drastically reduced its video archive of Mr.
Awlaki, an American cleric who remains the leading English-language
jihadist recruiter on the internet six years after he was killed by a
United States drone strike. Using video fingerprinting technology,
YouTube now flags his videos automatically and human reviewers block
most of them before anyone sees them, company officials say.A search for “Anwar al-Awlaki” on YouTube this fall found more than
70,000 videos, including his life’s work, from his early years as a
mainstream American imam to his later years with Al Qaeda in Yemen.Today the same search turns up just 18,600 videos, and the vast
majority are news reports about his life and death, debates over the
legality of his killing, refutations of his work by scholars or other
material about him. A small number of clips of Mr. Awlaki speaking
disappeared after The New York Times sent an inquiry about the change of
policy last week.“It’s a watershed moment on the question of whether we’re going to
allow the unchecked proliferation of cyberjihad,” said Mark D. Wallace,
the chief executive of the Counter Extremism Project, a research
organization that has long called for Mr. Awlaki’s recordings to be
removed from the web. “You just don’t want to make it easy for people to
listen to a guy who wants to harm us.”Mr. Wallace, a former diplomat, said the fact that much of Mr.
Awlaki’s YouTube presence was mainstream lectures on Islamic history did
not justify keeping it on the site. “It’s an insult to Islam to say the
teaching of the religion can’t stand the loss of a preacher who was
also the leading propagandist of jihad in English,” he said.The policy shift at YouTube comes in the face of a growing chorus of
criticism for internet companies, including Facebook, Twitter and
Google, which owns YouTube. They had long argued that they were merely
neutral platforms with no responsibility for what users posted.But they were quick to remove copyrighted material, child pornography
and beheading videos, for example, which posed an obvious threat to
their business. They have slowly stepped up the removal of extremist
content, spurred on after 2014 by the Islamic State’s use of Twitter to
recruit fighters….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The shrieking mob running through village streets carrying pitchforks
and flaming torches is looking for someone, anyone to hunt, harry, and
harass. Probably most of the sexual predators ending up being tarred and
feathered deserve it from Spacey to Weinstein to Segal. But, the mob is
intoxicated and will only be satisfied with a higher level victim–a
right wing, Christian, senatorial candidate–Roy Moore of Alabama! To
make it worse, Moore is a potential senator who will not go along with
the establishment. The establishment requires his defeat at any cost in
the special election Dec. 12, of this year.
It is charged that Moore was indiscreet with some teenagers when he
was in his 30s and unmarried, or so the story goes. I’m not sure if the
script was written in Hollywood or in the inner sanctum of Washington,
D.C. It is unlikely the authors are Democrats although they are very
experienced with fake news. However, this script probably came out of
the National Republican Senatorial Committee (or similar people) that
have cut off funds for Moore’s campaign.
Moore is known mostly for being removed twice as chief justice of the
Alabama State Supreme Court in 2003 for refusing to take down a Ten
Commandments monument from the Alabama judicial building, Then in 2016
he was removed for telling state judges not to issue marriage licenses
to same-sex couples after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized “gay”
marriage. Most of his controversial decisions were highly principled
ones that cost him dearly; so with a record like that, I’m giving him
the benefit of the doubt.
Jerry Falwell, President of Liberty University, declared–”It comes
down to a question who is more credible in the eyes of the voters — the
candidate or the accuser….And I believe the judge is telling the truth.”
I agree with Falwell.
The charges against Moore are about 40 years old. Every day a woman
hesitates in making charges lessens their influence and importance. It
is also very telling as to the timing: only a few weeks away from one of
the most important senatorial elections in our history!
We are expected to believe that a Washington Post reporter stumbled
over information that Moore “sought relationships with teenage girls”
when he was in his 30s and single. Over the next three weeks, two
reporters chased down four women who were “initially reluctant to speak
publicly.” Well, yes, I would think decades of silence qualifies as
being reluctant but after “multiple interviews” the women were convinced
to report their “interactions with Moore.”
Of the four accusers, it is noteworthy that only one makes any real
charges. The other three women admit that Moore kissed them and “they
did not have intercourse.” One accuser, Gloria Thacker Deason, said her
mother thought Moore “was good husband material.”
Debbie Wesson Gibson said when she told her mother that she was
dating Moore, she replied, “I’d say you were the luckiest girl in the
world.”
Doesn’t sound very ominous to me. At least the mothers didn’t think so.
Leigh Corfman was a 14-year-old girl who said Moore took her to his
home and he allegedly gave her alcohol. They kissed then she got nervous
and asked him to take her home–which he did. They dated again, so
evidently she was not too nervous and scared. She was lying on a blanket
on the floor and Moore came into the room wearing “tight white”
underwear. She charges that Moore kissed her and touched her through her
bra and underpants then guided her hand toward his underwear and she
pulled back.
At that point, she asked to be taken home–which he did! Isn’t it
great to have a child molester with manners! Moore, the molester with
manners! She never filed a complaint but now wants the world to know how
much she suffered. She did not tell her story–until now–because she had
three divorces and three bankruptcies and people might not believe. You
think?
It must be emphasized that none of the women say that Moore forced
them into any kind of relationship or sexual contact. So, whatever
happened, if anything, was consensual. While that doesn’t justify any
criminal or immoral behavior, it was not forced.
“These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political
attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this
campaign,” Moore, now 70, said. Well, I’m convinced that it is the
Republicans behind this. But who knows? It will have the same affect.
Whoever is directing this witch hunt is determined to bring down a
good man. Leftists don’t usually hunt witches but with Moore and Trump
they would make exceptions. It has been historic that bad men delight in
destroying good men. Makes them feel better and less low-life.
I am willing to concede that the charges may be true; after all, it
is possible, however improbable they may be. I am thoroughly convinced
that if all members of congress were held to the strict standard they
are demanding of Moore–putting them under the spotlight when they were
single and young–there would be two very empty chambers on the Hill. It
seems hypocrisy is a necessary ingredient to be a politician these days.
Let me pursue the hypocrisy thread. No one likes a hypocrite in any
area of life and sanctimonious hypocrites are the worst kind. Note that
members of the GOP reacted quickly to the Moore allegations–allegations
that have not been proved. And while every female should be heard, they
should not be believed if they can’t be supported with facts.
But one of the Senate’s leading hypocrites John McCain, true to form
said, “The allegations against Roy Moore are deeply disturbing and
disqualifying. He should immediately step aside and allow the people of
Alabama to elect a candidate they can be proud of.” Others followed
McCain with basically the same response. Jeff Flake, David Perdue, John
Thune, Lisa Murkowski, Cory Gardner, Richard C. Shelby (senator from
Alabama!), and Patrick J. Toomey called on Moore to step aside as well
without couching their statement with “if true” language.
President Trump said he was convinced Moore would do the right thing.
Vice President Pence also “found the allegations in the story disturbing
and believes, if true, this would disqualify anyone from serving in
office.”
McConnell confidant Josh Holmes said, “If it’s true, the Republican
Party doesn’t have any place for pedophiles, and he should step down
immediately.” However, McConnell doesn’t have a record of being queasy
about working with adulterers, fornicators, homosexuals, pedophiles, and
drunks in the Congress. When did McConnell become so fastidious about
his associates?
Judge Moore is a man of character, courage, and commitment and should
be sent to the U.S. Senate where he will be as out of place as a
diabetic football player at a Sugar Bowl game.
(Next column: “Has Congress Tolerated Sexual Predators in their Membership?”)
Boys’ new book The World’s Best Jokes! was published last week as an eBook. T o get your copy, click here .
(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of
Representatives; ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis, wrote
columns for USA Today for eight years; authored 17 books and hundreds of
columns and articles for Internet and print media publications;
defended his beliefs on hundreds of talk shows. These columns go to
newspapers, magazines, television, and radio stations and may be used
without change from title through the end tag. His web sites are
www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com and www.thegodhaters.com .
Contact Don for an interview or talk show.)
Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at CSTNews and TheGodHaters , Twitter , and visit his blog .
Websites Links
http://the-trumpet-online.com/
http://biblicallawcenter.com/
______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/11/photos-roy-moore-accuser-democrat.html
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Jeffrey Sachs was invited to speak at a conference at the Vatican,
organized by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Sachs is a senior
United Nations advisor, is among Time Magazine’s 100 most influential
leaders, and is a renowned economist. Sachs is also the world’s foremost
proponent of “population control,” advocating abortion and eugenics as a
solution to a supposed ecological crisis. His 2008 book, “Commonwealth:
Economics for a Crowded Planet,” and advocates for abortion as a
low-cost way to lower nations’ fertility levels and has gone out of his
way to criticize Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush for keeping U.S. tax
dollars from paying for abortions overseas.
This is not the first time Sachs has been honored by the Vatican. He
previously spoke there in 2015 and 2013, and the connection between
Sachs and the Vatican seems to be Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, who
is the chancelor of the aforementioned Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Sorondo sits on the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, founded
by Sachs. Returning the favor, Sorondo has been repeatedly inviting
Sachs to discuss sustainable development (which in his view, includes
abortion as a solution to global problems).
Sachs took a break from advocating for abortion at the Vatican to
take a cheap shot at U.S. President Donald J. Trump, saying, “Believe
me, Donald Trump didn’t think of pulling out of the Paris agreement. He
doesn’t think of much.” The crowd – which contained many pro-abortion
advocates, laughed wildly.
Sachs repeated a leftist talking point, “He was told to pull out of
the Paris agreement by 22 Republican senators who are funded by Koch
industries.” In reality, Trump promised demise of the Climate Accords
while he was running for office. Sachs continued to urge the Papists to
follow the lead of the Pope of Rome, saying, “The Agreement itself came
about in part through not only spiritual intervention by Pope Francis,
but direct intervention in many ways.”
Along with the Paris Climate Accords, a document was passed called Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, which was spearheaded by Sachs. Sachs credits the Pope’s Laudato Si
was essential to the Sustainable Development Goals. The problem is that
those Sustainable Development Goals make abortion a “global right” used
to allow population control and assist in the Third World’s poverty
levels, and calls for, “universal access to sexual and reproductive
health care services.”
HT Lifesite News
______________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Perry Noble is the (formerly?) drunken pastor who played Highway to Hell on Easter Sunday, cussed at his church members for wanting discipleship, was rebuked by his denomination for butchering the Ten Commandments, and who was released from his megachurch ministry position for
unrepentance regarding alcohol and what appears to be marital
indiscretions. Recently, we brought to you news of his divorce. Prior to
that, we brought to you news that he was launching a ministry to help
pastors grow their churches through what is essentially a business
model.
Perry Noble, whose church had to reiterate that he was not qualified
for ministry when he refused to leave the pulpit (preaching at other
churches) in June, has hired a “Christian” public relations professional
who helps disgraced mega-ministers rebuild their reputations after
moral failure.
Yes, you may not have known it, but helping morally disqualified
ministers remain in the pulpit is an actual profession. Noble’s PR guy
is named Hunter Frederick and advertises himself as a “public relations
and crisis manager.” He bills himself as a well-meaning “servant” of
Jesus. In fact, he’s a sleazy opportunist who seeks to help fallen
ministers be restored – not by churches who have gauged their repentance
– but in the public eye, so they can continue to make money and stay on
the job even though they’ve been biblically disciplined.
Frederick contacted Pulpit & Pen today, identified himself as
Noble’s “publicist,” and told us to change our critical articles about
the charlatan. Because Frederick has provided his PR services to fallen
ministers like Tullian Tchividjian (who had multiple extramarital
affairs) and Michael Gungor (who angered his followers by denying the
inerrancy of Scripture), his reputation preceded him.
He said, “Not quite.” But, pretty close, apparently…
He then got to his point…
The article he refers to is this one.
He claims Perry Noble doesn’t recall certain quotations ascribed to him
(which makes sense, because he was likely drunk when he said them).
Before we give the rest of our interaction, a few things about Hunter
Frederick.
Amy Spreeman, a polemicist in her own right, has done research into
this spiritual crisis profiteer already. She explains in her post, “Crisis Managed?,”
that Frederick needs “to know they are repentant before [he] will work
with them.” Spreeman writes, “I called Frederick yesterday to ask him
about his newest client, Tullian Tchividjian. After losing his ministry
job last week, the former pastor contacted the agency, and on Monday,
Frederick took him under counsel.”
According to Spreeman, Frederick is the one who calls discernment
folks and polemicists on behalf of the ministry and asks them to retract
or go soft (our paraphrase) on criticizing them. After all, he says
they’re repentant. Spreeman linked a post at the Christian Newswire, which further explains Frederick’s job…
The article then explains what Frederick really thinks the problem is…those pesky discernment bloggers.
Frederick also believes that the ongoing scrutiny from
“ultra-conservative” christian media outlets contribute to the celebrity
status of those christian leaders that they believe are preaching a
false gospel.
“While we need to communicate certain concern over false teachings,
we need to be careful of the means in which we communicate these
concerns. A lot of these ‘watchman ministries’ believe it’s their goal
to ‘call out’ these leaders while at the same time evaluating their
celebrity status and enable them to use said media attention to their
advantage.”
How dare we. Of course, if people were listening to us, they wouldn’t
have been listening to hucksters like Perry Noble and the rest of
Frederick’s clientele, to begin with. We responded with the following…
If you recall, Tony Nolan – the popular evangelist – had entered into a partnership with Clayton Jennings
to help rebuild his ministry and restore him after multiple women came
out to testify that he preyed upon them spiritually and sexually, and
some had even been pressured with alcohol and to take the abortion pill.
Nolan later explained that Jennings ended the restoration process because
he had a team of “PR people” who would restore his ministry without
making him take a time-out. Whether or not that was Hunter Frederick, we
do not know, but we do know that there will be a hot place of
judgment for those with the vocational profession of circumventing
Biblical church discipline for the sake of financial gain.
There are so many celebrity preachers falling into unrepentant sin
that an entire industry of fake restoration has developed to help them
rebuild their reputations. If you have any information about Hunter
Frederick and know any of his other clients, please contact us at
info@pulpitandpen.org.
[Update: Frederick also or represented Lindsay Lohan]
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Barnabas Aid finally obtained figures proving that the UN
has only recommended tiny token numbers of Syrian Christians, Yazidis
and other minorities for resettlement in the UK. The overwhelming
majority of refugees recommended by the UN have been Sunni Muslims
This gross neglect of peaceful Christians and other minorities has
been long discussed, but without any steps being taken to remedy the
injustice. Instead, the UK and other Western nations have turned their
backs on the most needy groups, who are not only victims of war, but
have been persecuted at the hands of jihadists.
The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, declared that “politically correct officials were institutionally biased against Christian refugees” in the UK; in the U.S., of the 10,801 Syrian refugees who came to the US under Obama in 2016, only 56 were Christian.
Trump once promised that the US would prioritize Christian refugees, but to date, there has been no follow-up.
Most disturbing about the UK was that “ UK officials tried to prevent
the release of this information” about its discrimination against
Christian refugees, but “Barnabas Aid submitted a freedom of Information
request to the UK Home Office” and discovered the ugly truth.
Christians have been abandoned, not only by Western governments but
also by the largest Christian organizations globally, which have
remained strangely silent. Even the Pope promised to take in Christian
refugees in Italy, but then took only Muslims instead; he even called Muslim migrants “warriors of hope”.
Vice President Pence recently offered some hope in a speech
when he announced that President Trump had ordered the State Department
to stop funding UN relief efforts and “support directly persecuted
communities through USAID.” Results are now awaited.
“UK government discriminates against Christian refugees from Syria”, Barnabas Aid, November 2, 2017:
THE UK government and the UN are discriminating against
Christians and other minorities in their refugee programmes according to
new Home Office statistics, seen by Barnabas Aid an aid agency which
works for persecuted Christians.Last week Barnabas Aid finally obtained figures proving that the UN
has only recommended tiny token numbers of Syrian Christians, Yazidis
and other minorities for resettlement in the UK. The overwhelming
majority of refugees recommended by the UN have been Sunni Muslims who
form the majority in Syria. But Christians, and other minorities have
been repeatedly targeted for attack by Islamist groups such as IS.The new statistics, obtained in a Freedom of Information Request to
the Home Office by Barnabas Aid, of the religious background of Syrian
asylum seekers recommended by the UNHCR for resettlement in the UK
revealed:o In 2015 out of 2,637 refugees there were only 43 Christians, just
13 Yazidis and only one Shia Muslim. In 2016 the statistics were even
worse. Out of 7,499 refugees there were only 27 Christians, five Yazidis
and 13, Shia Muslims.o It is widely accepted that Christians made up 10 per cent of
Syria’s pre-war population and Shia’s around 1.5 per cent while there
are estimated to have been 70,000 Yazidis in Syria.Disturbingly, UK officials tried to prevent the release of this
information. Barnabas Aid submitted a freedom of Information request to
the UK Home Office in February. And in spite of being legally required
to release it within 28 days, officials failed to do so and repeatedly
stalled or simply did not answer correspondence.Eventually, Barnabas Aid lodged a formal complaint with the
Information Commissioner’s office. On 19 September the Information
Commissioner issued a formal notice requiring the Home Office to release
this information within 35 calendar days or face contempt of court
proceedings.Even then, the information was only released at the very last minute
after Barnabas Aid had contacted the immigration minister’s office,
alerting him to the situation and asking him personally to ensure civil
servants complied with the order.“This is shocking behaviour by both UN and UK officials. In 2005 the
UN formally adopted the responsibility of states to protect citizens
from genocide and crimes against humanity. These statistics show that
the UN has itself failed miserably and inexcusably in this respect,”
said Martin Parsons, Head of Research at Barnabas Aid.“Christians and other minorities in the Middle East have been treated
shamefully by the UN. And the UK government has abjectly outsourced its
own responsibilities to the victims of genocide in spite of repeated
representations,” he added.Barnabas Aid obtained these figures just as US Vice President Mike
Pence announced that the US government would now directly help
persecuted Christians ……
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“The term ‘moderate Islam’ is being lathered up again. The patent of
moderate Islam belongs to the West. There is no moderate or immoderate
Islam; Islam is one. The aim of using such terms is to weaken Islam.”
“Lathered up”: good phrase, Tayyip!
Doesn’t Erdogan know that “Islam is not a monolith”? He must be a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe”!
“The term ‘moderate Islam’ aims to weaken the religion, Erdoğan says,” Daily Sabah, November 10, 2017 (thanks to Lookmann):
President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan lashed out at the term
“moderate Islam” on Friday, saying the term’s only aim is to weaken the
religion itself rather than distance it from extremists.In a clear reference to Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman’s remarks, Erdoğan said that the origin of the term lies in the
Western world.“The term ‘moderate Islam’ is being lathered up again. The patent of
moderate Islam belongs to the West. There is no moderate or immoderate
Islam; Islam is one. The aim of using such terms is to weaken Islam,”
Erdoğan said.“They say we will return to moderate Islam, but they still don’t give
women the right to drive. Is there such a thing in Islam? I guess they
will give this right when they turn to the moderate one,” he added.Erdoğan’s words came at a women’s entrepreneurship event held for the
Organization Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) Women’s Advisory Council at
the Presidential Palace complex in Ankara.In his speech, Erdoğan also criticized discrimination against Muslim
women. “Headscarves are gradually being banned in EU states with the
public – personal space trick, attempting to bar Muslim women from
entering social life. Attempts to incarcerate Muslim women in their
homes is spreading like a virus,” Erdoğan said.“Today, most EU countries actively restrict Muslim women from working
and getting access to education. Those who are teaching us lessons on
human rights are unfortunately applauding as the most basic human rights
are being trampled in their countries.”…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
One of senatorial candidate Roy Moore’s accusers is
apparently a fervent Democrat who has worked for the DNC as a sign
language interpreter for Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, a revelation
which the Washington Post never included in its original report.
The accuser, Debbie Gibson, had also publically supported Moore’s opponent Doug Jones before the accusations came to light.
Interestingly, when attacking Moore ally Steve Bannon for suggesting
the Washington Post was politically motivated in its reporting, the
newspaper implied that Gibson wasn’t “down with Democratic propaganda,” a
statement which seemingly conflicts with Gibson’s political activism:
Now go back and look at the photos again.
The Post also reported:
“According to campaign reports, none of the women has donated to or
worked for Moore’s Democratic opponent, Doug Jones, or his rivals in the
Republican primary…”
But notice the precise wording; it’s lawyer-speak. It might very
well be true that Gibson didn’t donate or work for Doug Jones, but
according to her Facebook profile, she did actively campaign for him,
which doesn’t help her credibility and it should have been reported –
yet the Washington Post conveniently left it out.
And remember, the Post did endorse Jones on Oct. 23.
If the Washington Post was as objective as it claims to be, you’d
wouldn’t have to come to Infowars.com to find the rest of the story to
make up your own mind as to whether the accusations carry weight.
And as Infowars reported earlier, there’s a claim spreading on social media that a reporter was taped while reportedly offering a woman $1000 to accuse Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexual improprieties.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealKitDaniels
Twitter: Follow @KitDaniels1776
MORE Videos: Resistance News
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
After last week’s vicious assault upon U.S. Senator Rand Paul of
Kentucky by his next-door neighbor Rene Boucher (initially dismissed in
the media as a “trivial” dispute over landscaping issues, non-political,
and involving only “minor injuries”), several of Rand Paul’s neighbors
and Paul’s attorney have challenged those assertions.
Doug Stafford, Paul’s lawyer, told CNN on Thursday that the assault
was a “serious criminal matter involving serious injury. This was not a
fight. It was a blindside, violent attack by a disturbed person. Anyone
claiming otherwise is either uninformed or seeking media attention.”
Boucher, an anesthesiologist and Paul’s next-door neighbor of 17
years, has been charged with a misdemeanor, fourth-degree assault in the
attack, which reportedly occurred while Paul was mowing his yard in
Bowling Green, Kentucky. Paul was using earplugs, and was completely
unaware of Boucher until he tackled him behind, breaking six of Paul’s
ribs.
Paul is also suffering from excess fluid around his lungs, and there
are reports that his recovery may take months. With the Democrats and
Republicans so closely divided in the Senate, this could have serious
political implications for tax reform and other parts of the Republican
agenda. Paul is rated the most conservative member of the Senate by the “Freedom Index” of The New American (which
grades members of Congress on their fidelity to the Constitution);
Boucher, Paul’s alleged assailant, has a well-established reputation as
strongly anti-Republican and anti-conservative.
Earlier reports indicated that the two were almost friendly, even walking their dogs together, despite holding sharply different political views. However, Stafford
disputed the assertion that they were on friendly terms. Although the
two men are next-door neighbors, Stafford said they had not spoken to
each other for years.
Several of Paul’s neighbors have now weighed in, challenging the
narrative that the attack was the result of a landscaping dispute, which
left the implication that Paul did not properly maintain his property.
“The Pauls are and always have been great neighbors and friends. They
take pride in their property and maintain it accordingly,” neighbor
Travis Creed told Breitbart.
Creed added, “Rand has enjoyed working on and maintaining his lawn
for as long as I have known him. He was attacked on his property for no
apparent reason and suffered serious injury.”
A registered nurse who works with Boucher told the Washington Post
that Boucher’s politics are “liberal,” and that he was “active” on
social media expounding on those views. For example, Boucher posted on
Facebook, “May Robert Mueller fry Trump’s gonads,” and “Impeach Trump,
Impeach Pence, and Keep Impeaching.”
Another neighbor, Alicia Stivers, defended Paul’s character. “I have
never heard Sen. Paul speak an unkind word about anyone, let alone
become physically violent. Which makes it all the more shocking that a
next-door neighbor of many years who has not so much as exchanged an
email or spoken word with Rand in several years, would race downhill and
pummel Rand from behind.”
Stivers, who has been part of the neighborhood association for four
years, added that Paul was “attacked from behind with no warning.”
While a political motivation for the attack may not be proven, it
would appear that the initial reports that it was all about some leaves
is highly unlikely.
This attack, combined with the shooting of House Republican Whip
Steve Scalise in June, raises some serious questions. Scalise was shot
in Alexandria, Virginia, by James Hodgkinson, a strong supporter of
Senator Bernie Sanders, while practicing for the congressional baseball
game. Before opening fire, Hodgkinson asked another congressman present
what political party they were all in. When told “Republican,”
Hodgkinson began shooting, almost killing Scalise.
Now, a conservative Republican U.S. senator, simply mowing his lawn,
has been attacked by yet another known left-winger. Can one imagine the
response of the media if a Democratic Party member of Congress was targeted in a shooting by a known backer of, say, Senator Ted Cruz? If a Democratic Party
senator was struck so hard that it broke six ribs, and the assailant
was revealed to be a well-known conservative activist, would the media
have dismissed it all as a dispute over tree leaves?
Yet, Boucher’s lawyer argued on Monday that the dispute was “trivial.”
When Paul’s attorney, Doug Stafford, mentioned that the charges
against Boucher involved “state and federal authorities,” CNN’s report
said that Stafford “did not clarify why federal law enforcement would be
involved in the matter.” Perhaps it is because an assault on a U.S.
congressman is considered a federal offense.
It is to be hoped that Senator Paul will make a quick and full
recovery, and that attacks upon Republican members of Congress by
violent left-wing supporters of the Democratic Party and its progressive
agenda will not become common events.
______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/11/socialist-neighbor-assaults-senator.html
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The California Hawaii NAACP last week began visiting state
legislators’ offices in the California state capitol to distribute
copies of two resolutions that the organization passed at its state
conference in October. One urges Congress to rescind “one of the most
racist, pro-slavery, anti-black songs in the American lexicon”: the
national anthem. The other expresses support for former San Francisco
49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who was the first major professional
athlete to kneel when “The Star-Spangled Banner” was played before
games last season. His form of protest was copied by other NFL players
during this year’s NFL season and has become a highly publicized source
of controversy that even attracted the attention of President Trump.
“We owe a lot of it to Kaepernick,” said California Hawaii NAACP President Alice Huffman, as quoted by the Sacramento Bee. “I think all this controversy about the knee will go away once the song is removed.”
It was Huffman who proposed the idea of the resolutions at a recent
NAACP state convention. “We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,”
Huffman said. “We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much
controversy in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So,
whatever comes out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand
proudly and sing it.”
“This song is wrong; it shouldn’t have been there, we didn’t have it
’til 1931, so it won’t kill us if it goes away,” Huffman insisted, as
quoted by TV station CBS 13 in Sacramento.
The CBS report noted that Colin Kaepernick started the NFL protests
to bring attention to what he regarded as “systemic racial injustice in
the country.” But Huffman alleges that Kaepernick’s message was lost
when it turned into a debate about the flag. “The message got distorted,
the real intentions got overlooked, it became something that’s dividing
us, and I’m looking for something to bring us back together,” she said.
Huffman told CBS that the NFL protests led her to look at the lyrics
of the “Star Spangled Banner,” especially the parts of the anthem we
don’t typically sing, such as beyond the first stanza. “It’s racist; it
doesn’t represent our community, it’s anti-black,” she alleged.
Interestingly, Kaepernick never cited the words that Huffman says are
offensive to black Americans as a reason for kneeling during the
playing of the “Star Spangled Banner.”
During a 2016 interview with NFL Media, Kaepernick made this
statement explaining his reason fro refusing to stand for our national
anthem:
In an op-ed piece in the New York Times on September 25,
Kaepernick’s former teammate, San Francisco 49ers safety Eric Reid,
wrote: “Why Colin Kaepernick and I Decided to Take a Knee.” He wrote:
Reid approached Kaepernick and the two of them discussed “how we
could make a more powerful and positive impact on the social justice
movement.” He continued:
Kaepernick’s and Reid’s allegations that our nation’s police officers
regularly engage in shooting unarmed black people are contrary to the
facts. As just one example disputing Reid’s allegations, an article in
the Washington Times on April 21, 2015 stated: “An analysis
released last week shows that more white people died at the hands of law
enforcement than those of any other race in the last two years, even as
the Justice Department, social-justice groups and media coverage focus
on black victims of police force.” Another report from the Federalist
Papers Project the following day cited Peter Moskos, an assistant
professor at New York City University’s John Jay College of Criminal
Justice, who concluded that during the period ranging from May 2013 to
April of 2015 that roughly 49 percent of those killed by law-enforcement
officers were white, while only 30 percent were black.
While the numbers still seem to substantiate Kaepernick’s claims of
unethical targeting of blacks by police (since blacks only make up 13
percent of the U.S. populace), it must be remembered that, as Wall Street Journal
editor Jason Riley, who happens to be black, noted: “Blacks commit
seven to 10 times more violent crimes in this country than whites do.”
So if anyone were to complain about police targeting, it should be
whites.
These figures do not address another significant point, however: Even
if Kaepernick’s and Reid’s allegations about disproportionate police
violence against black citizens had some basis in fact, does publicly
showing disrespect for our national anthem do anything to solve the
problem?
Returning to the statements made by Huffman, pointing to Kaepernick’s
kneeling during the national anthem as evidence that the long-revered
song is racist and the cause of controversy, there simply is no
connection. Kaepernick never said he was objecting to the anthem and did
not mention any words in the song to which he was taking issue. His
protest was strictly against what he perceived to be law enforcement’s
treatment of black citizens. He never objected to the anthem itself.
Yet, the NAACP proposal is not intended to disrespect the flag,
Huffman said. “We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,” she said.
“We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much controversy
in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So, whatever comes
out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand proudly and
sing it.”
Even that statement belies reality. The lyrics to which Huffman
objects are found in the rarely sung third stanza of the anthem.
Furthermore, if we are to infer that Francis Scott Key was being
derogatory to blacks, we would also have to assume that he also hated
“hirelings,” who are mentioned in the same stanza — not likely. In
truth, the objectionable lyrics in question are impossible to interpret
and are left to conjecture, unless we can bring Francis Scott Key back
from the dead so he can explain their meaning to us. We offer the words
below, and challenge anyone to tell us exactly what Key’s intentions
were:
As an interesting aside, there were reputedly black British troops at the fort, called the Corps of Colonial Marines, who could have been the objects of the song.
Deciphering the meaning of these words would make an interesting
exercise in an English literature class, but no person without an agenda
would say they warrant the wholesale scrapping of our national anthem.
But then again, the NAACP always has an agenda.
Related articles:
NAACP Releases Report on Tea Party Racism
NAACP Set to Release Report on Tea Party Racism