SWEDEN UNDER PRESSURE TO ADOPT ISLAMIC NATIONAL FLAG

 Sweden Under Pressure to Adopt Islamic National Flag
SWEDEN UNDER PRESSURE TO ADOPT 
ISLAMIC NATIONAL FLAG
 Country known for appeasing Muslims 
in every possible way
BY KIT DANIELS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A social media campaign is pressuring Sweden to adopt a Turkish-style flag due to Islam’s rapid growth in the country.

A petition asking Sweden’s prime minister to do away
with the current, “offensive” flag is nearing its signature goal as the
campaign’s hashtag #ForBetterSweden continues to trend on Twitter.

“The Swedish flag is a constant reminder of our dark and oppressive
past,” the petition reads. “Refugees and migrants are forced to live
under its Christian Cross; a symbol of the Crusades and the slaughter of
millions of innocent Islamic lives in Sweden’s past that makes them
feel unwelcome and unsafe.”

“Sweden should be a safe space for everyone.”

Some have alleged the campaign is a troll job by 4Chan, but Sweden is
so cucked that the country might actually go along with it anyway.

For one thing, a Swedish bishop has already proposed removing Christian crosses from churches to appease Muslims and had even offered to transform church space into Muslim prayer rooms.

Ironically, the bishop, Eva Brunne, is a lesbian, meaning she’d be executed if she visited a more radical Muslim country.

A Turkish-style flag would be a fitting tribute to Sweden’s takeover
by Muslim migrants; the star and crescent of the flag is a symbol of the
Ottoman Empire, which conquered vast swaths of Christian Europe during
the 15th and 16th centuries.

Sweden’s former culture is disappearing fast; for one thing, Swedish
social services are allowing former ISIS fighter to return to the
country and raise families – all while Swedish officials harass parents
who homeschool their children.

And perhaps more shocking, a Swedish government report has declared milk to be a “racist hate symbol.”

The “milk is racist” report claims its goal is to “provide an insight
into some digital environments whose common denominator is that they
are all xenophobic.”

There might be hope for Sweden, however; Swedish residents are
growing more hostile over the country’s flee-flow immigration policies, according to a recent study.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealKitDaniels

Twitter: 

MORE Videos: Resistance News

 

BRITTNEY KARA: OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING DESTROYED BY VACCINES & MORE

BRITTNEY KARA: OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING DESTROYED BY VACCINES & MORE
 Brittney Kara, health freedom author and activist, calls on parents to take a stand against the poisoning of their children by the pharmaceutical and agriculture industries in this June 17, 20017 speech at the Children’s March For Humanity event in Santa Monica, CA. http://www.childrensmarchforhumanity.org | Watch the entire rally here: http://bit.ly/2rSCI0Z Questions about vaccine safety and efficacy? Watch Vaccines Revealed, a 9-part docu-series: http://bit.ly/2o0b5Cp Find Brittney at www.bmentored.com. 
 What’s Really Behind Mandatory Vaccines?
 Council for Vaccine Safety founder, Brandy Vaughn, joins the show to discuss what’s really behind the push for mandatory vaccinations. The pharmaceutical industry is set to make billions off of mandatory childhood vaccinations, and now both boys and girls will be pressured to take the highly controversial gardasil shot.

 Merck Scientists Expose Massive Vaccine Fraud

JIHAD CHRISTMAS: ISIS THREATENS TERROR ATTACK ON POPE & VATICAN

 Jihad Christmas: ISIS Threatens Terror Attack On Pope & Vatican
JIHAD CHRISTMAS: ISIS THREATENS 
TERROR ATTACK ON POPE & VATICAN 
 Terrorists looking to spread holiday fear
BY JAMIE WHITE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

ISIS has issued a chilling threat against the Vatican just
weeks before Christmas, where tens of thousands of people from around
the world gather to celebrate the Christian holiday.

A pro-ISIS propaganda channel called Wafa Media made the threat through a poster depicting a vehicle attack, according to the Site Intelligence Group, who monitor terrorist activity.

The poster reads “Christmas Blood,” showing a masked jihadist driving
a BMW towards St. Peter’s Basilica, where Pope Francis holds mass.

A rifle and backpack can be seen next to the jihadist, who’s using GPS navigation and driving fast.

ISIS has made threats to the Vatican and Europe in the past, especially around the Christmas holiday.

Days before Christmas last year, an Islamic terrorist plowed a semi truck into a crowded Christmas market in Berlin, Germany, killing 12 people and injuring 56.

Several countries have already indicated their capitulation to Islam to avoid offending potential jihadists.

France has decided to shutter their Paris Christmas Market, which sees around 15 million attendees every year, and instead will keep the Ramadan festival this year.

And UK-based supermarket chain Tesco launched a politically
correct “Christmas” ad featuring Muslims, Sikhs and a gay couple, but no
Christians – in an ad meant to celebrate the Christian holiday.

Notably, Pope Francis also has a conciliatory view of ISIS,
likening Islam’s spirit of conquest to Jesus’ sending out his disciples
to spread the Word of God.

“It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of
Islam, however, it is also possible to interpret the objective in
Matthew’s Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in
terms of the same idea of conquest,” the Pope told French media last year.

It’s not unreasonable to assume that if ISIS did manage to carry
out an attack in the Vatican that the mainstream media would immediately
downplay the carnage and demonize anybody as “racist” or “Islamophobic”
who points out the radical Islamic fundamentalism that inspired the
attack in the first place, the same way they did after the horrific
Berlin Christmas market attack.

“Beyond the immediate panic and horror, there also appears to be a
potentially more pernicious reward to the forces of the political far
right best positioned to capitalize on such a tragedy,” wrote CNN’s David Andelman the day after the attack.

 This ad from Tesco shows every sort of family around Christmas, except a Christian family.
 
 

NIGEL FARAGE CALLS ON E.U. TO INVESTIGATE GEORGE SOROS FUNDING, COLLUSION

 Farage calls on EU to investigate George Soros funding, collusion
 https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/george-soros-cia-war-against-usa-trump.jpg
 http://csglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Open-Society-Foundations-Defy-Hungary-Plans-To-Eliminate-Soros-Funded-NGOs.jpg
NIGEL FARAGE CALLS ON E.U. TO INVESTIGATE GEORGE SOROS FUNDING, COLLUSION 
 Soros group held numerous meetings with European Commission
BY RT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Nigel Farage says while Russia is accused of funding
Britain’s ‘Leave’ campaign, financier George Soros’ recent $18 billion
donation to pro-EU charity Open Society has escaped scrutiny. “This is
where the real international political collusion is,” Farage says.

Speaking to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Farage
told fellow MEPs he believes that when it comes to international
collusion, “we are looking in the wrong place.” He says Soros’ influence
in Brussels is “truly extraordinary,” adding: “I fear we could be
looking at the biggest level of international, political collusion in
history.”

Farage, the leader of the Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy
Group, believes Soros has spent billions in the EU to undermine the
nation state. “When we are talking about offshore money, when we are
talking about political subversion, when we are talking about collusion,
I wonder if we are looking in the wrong place.

“And I say that because George Soros recently gave Open Society,
which of course campaigns for freedom of movement of people and
supranational structures like the European Union, $18 billion. And his
influence here and in Brussels is truly extraordinary.”

Farage said Open Society boasts it held 42 meetings in 2016 with
the European Commission, and has published a book of reliable “friends”
in the European Parliament. There are 226 names on the list, he says. He
told those MEPs he would be writing to them to establish whether they
had accepted money or help from billionaire investor and liberal
campaigner Soros.

If we’re going to have a debate, and talk about full, political
and financial transparency, well let’s do it. So I shall be writing
today to all 226 of you, asking some pretty fair questions: Have you
ever received funds directly or indirectly from Open Society? How many
of their events have you attended? Could you please give us a list of
all the representatives including George Soros?”

He is also calling on the European Parliament to set up a special
committee to look into the issue. “I say this at a time when the use of
money and the implications it may have had on the Brexit result or the
Trump election has reached virtual hysteria.

“Just last week, the Electoral Commission launched an
investigation to find out whether the Leave campaign took offshore money
or Russian money. This came about as a result of questions asked in the
House of Commons by one Ben Bradshaw, someone linked to an organization
called ‘Open Society.’”

In October, Soros transferred the “bulk of his wealth” to Open
Society, it confirmed. Writing on his website, the financier said: “My
success in the financial markets has given me a greater degree of
independence than most other people. This allows me to stand on
controversial issues: in fact, it obliges me to do so because others
cannot.”
______________________________________________________

 Powerful: Nigel Farage Exposes George Soros’ Manipulation Of Western Governments 
As The Real Threat
 

BREAKING: MULTIPLE DEAD, CHILDREN SHOT IN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL SHOOTING

BREAKING: MULTIPLE DEAD, CHILDREN SHOT IN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL SHOOTING 
 Shooter killed after exchanging gunfire 
with authorities
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A reported shooting in northern California has left at least three people dead in Tehema County, California.

The Tehama County Sheriff’s Office says the shooting happened at an
elementary school in Rancho Tehama around 8:00 am. local time. Rancho
Tehama is about 115 miles north of the state capital of Sacramento.

A Corning Unified School district employee confirmed there were injuries at the school.

Police are investigating at least five crime scenes. At least 100 law enforcement officers have responded to the crime scenes.

Children have been moved from the school to a safe location.

A man spoke with KCRA’s affiliate Action News Now and said that
his truck was stolen and his roommate was shot and killed by the gunman.

“He’s dead. He didn’t make it,” the witness said. “For his family and everything, I feel bad, and we’ll be there for them.”

“The crazy thing is that the neighbor has been shooting a lot of
bullets lately, hundreds of rounds, large magazines,” he added.

“This guy has been crazy, and he’s been threatening us and
everything. I just feel like there maybe should have been more effort
put into stopping things like this.”

NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE JOINS IN THE WAR AGAINST GOD

 
 ABOVE: KURT EICHENWALD
NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE JOINS IN THE WAR AGAINST GOD 
BY DON BOYS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“The Bible:  So Misunderstood, It’s a Sin.” As Ronald Reagan said, “There you go again,” an apt comment on Newsweek’s recent hit piece on the Bible as they continue the war on God. Of course, Newsweek,
struggling to pay its bills, will use anything to denigrate, denounce,
and deny the Bible especially if it pulls in a few bucks of advertising.
The writer of this hit piece was

whose claim to fame as a respected journalist was in the area of
business but is now totally discredited as to his motive and his
character. Poor Eichenwald comes across in this infamous piece as a
totally incompetent writer without even a modicum of journalistic skills
for research, balance, fairness but as a rabid, foam-at-the-mouth
zealot for the left.

Wiping the foam from his lips he wrote his first paragraph depicting
evangelical Christians as nuts, jerks, and flakes comparing us to the
Westboro Baptists in Kansas. From this inauspicious beginning it is
obvious that he is dishonest or totally uninformed; either reason would be justification for yanking his journalist credentials.

Eichenwald’s untrue, unfair, unkind characterization of Christians
would be like my suggesting that all journalists are wild, woozy, and
wicked people who get to work at 10:00, have a three hour lunch break
consisting of three shots of cheap gin, stagger back to the office to
work a couple hours then buy a quart of wine from the local grocery and
go home where they cause havoc in the neighborhood, beat their wives and
knock their children around until bed time. Now, I’m sure that is true
of a few journalists but it is irresponsible to suggest that is true of
most of them. Kurt was irresponsible.

He spends much ink dealing with snake handling as if that is normal
in real Christianity! Some leftists are dumb as a box of rocks or are so
short of arguments that they depict Christians as carrying a sack of
rattlesnakes to church each Sunday.

Eichenwald makes a very silly statement when he declares that
“evangelicals are always talking about family values. But to Jesus,
family was an “impediment to reaching God.” He took that position
because of a naïve misinterpretation of Matthew 19:29 where Christ spoke
about forsaking father, mother, brother, and sister for His sake and
their inheritance of eternal life.  Of course even Christian neophytes
are aware that the Bible clearly commands us to love and support family
and to honor father and mother.

Kurt further shows his immaturity or dishonesty when he charges that
all female Christians in political life should quit (or remain
hypocrites!) because of 1 Timothy 2:12 that commands a woman not to
teach and have authority over a man. This is a much discussed verse and
theologians in various denominational groups take various
interpretations but everyone knows it specifically deals with women in
the local church. Kurt doesn’t know that.

There is no way Eichenwald could have done any research without
knowing about I Timothy 2:12 yet he was way out in left field and gave
no indication of objectivity. Of course, true objectivity is as hard to
find in Newsweek and all liberal media as white dinosaurs in Kentucky.  

Eichenwald is out of his league in this article. In paragraph after paragraph I cringed in embarrassment for him and Newsweek
He was like a 12-year old kid making an appearance at the Major League
Training Camp in Florida with a desire to play in the big leagues. The
kid would be told to come back in a few years. I’m afraid it would be
many years before Eichenwald could qualify for the Theological Big
League. Mainly because Kurt seems to be blind (or keeps his eyes shut)
therefore can’t read the Bible he accuses us of not reading!

He continues to prove his lack of knowledge (or honesty) when he
charges that fundamentalists “twist phrases and modify translations” to
prove some of our “biases and beliefs.” The fact is most fundamentalists
may be guilty of a little twisting (always wrong) now and then but we
never “modify translations.” We would rather be caught naked in subzero
weather on Fifth Avenue during rush hour than mess with the King James
Bible. We take it as it is–inspired, inerrant, and infallible.

Kurt then charges that Christians believe “Mosaic law from the Old
Testament directs American government.” Gasp, does he mean that we
believe that our basic judicial system is based on the original Ten
Commandants?  If so, then everyone knows that is true: From Israel, to
Rome, to England to America. You know, don’t bare false witness, don’t
kill, don’t steal, don’t commit adultery.

He further charges us with Bible illiteracy but with his litany of
mistakes, mishmash, and misrepresentation, that is like a skunk accusing
a rabbit of having bad breath. Our “illiteracy” allegedly causes
parents to “banish children from their homes.” No doubt this refers to
parents who require children to live decently, get a job, not fornicate,
not use vile language and no pornography if they want to live at home.
How dare they!

Because of our alleged “Biblical illiteracy” he charges that we
believe that climate change (remember when it used to be global
warming?) is impossible because of God’s promise to Noah! Hey, only an
uninformed fool would use such an argument when there is no evidence of
man-made climate change. Of course, the climate changes every day!

His also charges us with “imped[ing] science” and undermining
“intellectual advancement” which, of course, refers to the
creation/evolution controversy. He and others will discuss how evolution
happened but not if it happened. Such people talk about being open minded but their minds are as closed as a miser’s wallet.

His diatribe is based on “scores of theologians and scholars” but he did not interview or quote one evangelical,
let alone a fundamentalist, but three–count them, one, two, three
leftists. And he only names one–Bart Ehrman, an apostate New Testament
professor at the University of North Carolina. Bart grew up a
fundamentalist, went to Moody (after me), then to Princeton where he
lost whatever faith he had. Kurt calls him a “groundbreaking Biblical
scholar” when he is really an apostate. I could have chosen a kinder
term but I’m committed to honesty and accuracy.

Dr. Michael Kruger, an expert in early Christianity wrote of
Eichenwald’s “jaw-dropping ignorance of the facts about the Bible.”
Kruger declared that Eichenwald’s article “is short on the facts, it has
little understanding of interpretive principles, it assumes that it
knows more about theology than it really does, and it pours out scorn
and contempt on the average believer.” Right!

Dr. Daniel Wallace, commented on Eichenwald’s “numerous factual
errors and misleading statements, his lack of concern for any semblance
of objectivity, his apparent disdain for and lack of interaction with
genuine evangelical scholarship, and his uber-confidence about more than
a few suspect viewpoints.” Wallace is Professor of New Testament
Studies at Dallas Seminary.

Eichenwald charges that none of us have ever read a reliable
Bible–that we have translations of translations of translations of bad
translations that have been altered hundreds of times. The fact is that
we have over 6,000 good Greek manuscripts going back as far as the
second century!  When Kurt writes about corrupt manuscripts he gives the
impression that he knows what is corrupt and what is not corrupt.
Neither he nor anyone else has read the original autographs. Kurt is a
charlatan.

Kurt shows his shallowness with his antiquated charges: there are two
(or even four) creation stories; Christ’s geologies are contradictory;
the events around His birth are in conflict; the resurrection stories
are in conflict; Moses did not write Deuteronomy; Noah taking two or
seven kinds of animals on the ark and the number of days the water was
upon the earth; the question of David killing Goliath and many others.

Kurt tells us that unicorns did not exist even though the Bible
mentions them ten times. It is really humorous to hear liberals deal
with this subject. They seem to be clueless about the extinction of
species since the beginning of time and all evolutionists agree with
that. Unicorns could have existed and like the dodo bird disappeared
long ago. Furthermore, a whole herd of unicorns could be found tomorrow
grazing on a Peruvian mountainside!

Eichenwald may not believe much of the Bible but like all
humanists, hedonists, and homosexuals he believes Jesus when He said,
“Don’t judge” in Matt. 7:1. However, we are not to judge unfairly or
without judging ourselves first. In fact, we are commanded to judge
righteous judgment in John 7:24. Kurt is very careless with the context
of his criticism.

Wonder if Eichenwald, in all fairness, will do a hatchet job on the Koran
as he has the Bible. No, because he is a coward. He knows Christians
are taught to turn the other cheek while Koranic Muslims are taught to
behead critics.

(Next column: “Newsweek’s Hatchet Job on the Bible!”)

http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY  Watch
these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota:
“A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of
Representatives, author of 15 books, frequent guest on television and
radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. His shocking books, ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse!; Christian Resistance: An Idea Whose Time Has Come–Again!; and The God Haters
are all available at Amazon.com. These columns go to newspapers,
magazines, television, and radio stations and may be used without change
from title through the end tag. His web sites are www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com and www.thegodhaters.com. Contact Don for an interview or talk show.)

“Like” Dr. Boys on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/CSTNews?ref=hl

and http://www.facebook.com/TheGodHaters?ref=hl

Follow him on Twitter at https://twitter.com/CSTNews

Visit his blog at http://donboys.cstnews.com/

Websites Links

http://unregisteredbaptistfellowship.org/

http://the-trumpet-online.com/

http://biblicallawcenter.com/

PICTURES THAT SAY A THOUSAND WORDS~WHAT WOULD THE REFORMERS THINK OF THEM?

PICTURES THAT SAY A THOUSAND WORDS~
WHAT WOULD THE REFORMERS THINK OF THEM?
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The following photos are an assortment taken from stories we have written or posted over the last three years.
July 2017

reformation
Leaders of the World Communion of Reformed
Churches sign copies of the declaration in the Saint Mary’s City Church
in Wittenberg, Germany, expressing support from Reformed churches for
the Catholic-Lutheran Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of
Justification. (Credit: Photo courtesy of WCRC/Anna Siggelkow.)

2014 at the Vatican, Italy

reformation
Pope Francis speaks at an inter-religious
conference on family values at the Vatican on Monday. Saddleback Pastor
Rick Warren, bottom right, sits in the audience.

reformation
2014

reformation
Pope Francis with several evangelical leaders including James Robison, Tony Palmer, and Kenneth Copeland

2014 – Beth Moore’s Legitimizing of the Catholic Church

LABYRINTHS HAVE FOUND THEIR PLACE IN THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH

LABYRINTHS HAVE FOUND THEIR PLACE 
IN THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

We received the top two photos last week from a reader. Below that
are photos of various labyrinths in churches across North America. We
have posted these, not to single out these particular churches, but
rather to show examples of how many denominations have now incorporated
the contemplative mystical practice of walking the labyrinth. And this
is only showing some of the churches that have labyrinths on site. There
are countless churches, ministries, and denominations that may not
necessarily have labyrinths on site, but pastors and leaders encourage
their congregations or followers to use them (e.g., the Reformed Church of America), or they encourage their congregations to visit retreat centers that have them.  Carl Teichrib has written an excellent article/booklet on labyrinths that is worth the read.

(The photos used below are low resolution
photos used in accordance with the U.S. Fair Use Act for the critique,
review, and dissemination of information.)

labyrinth

labyrinth
Emmanuel Episcopal Church, Orcas Island, Washington

labyrinth
St. Mark Lutheran, Salem, Oregon

labyrinth
Millbrook Baptist, Raleigh, NC

labyrinth
Mennonite Church Eastern Canada

labyrinth
Wesleyan University

labyrinth
Calvin Presbyterian Church, Zelienople PA

labyrinth
First United Methodist Church, Boulder, CO

labyrinth
Fuller Theological Seminary

TWO STABBED AS WOMEN IN BURQAS TAKE OVER MALL OF AMERICA~GLOBALISTS BOMB AMERICAN MIDWEST WITH ISLAMIC INVASION

TWO STABBED AS WOMEN IN BURQAS TAKE OVER MALL OF AMERICA 
 Ironic scene shows Mall of America looking more 
like Mall of Somalia
 A 20-year-old suspect is in custody after two men were stabbed
at the Mall of America in Minnesota during what police called an
‘interrupted theft.’
 Globalists Bomb American Midwest 
with Islamic Invasion
 The globalist plan to overrun the United States with Islamic invaders 
is exposed.

THE CORPORATE CONTROLLED MEDIA HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED AGAINST AMERICA

THE CORPORATE CONTROLLED MEDIA HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED AGAINST AMERICA 
 Roy Moore accusations are just the latest example
BY NATURAL NEWS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 America is under siege. As much as I write about the scourge of 
chemical pesticides, hormone disruptors, GMO genetic pollution and 
mercury in vaccines, the far more insidious poison that has infected the
 minds of half the country is the corporate-controlled media running a “disinfo 
dictatorship.”

Sometimes called the “mainstream media” or “left-wing media,” the corporate-controlled media (CCM) in America has been weaponized against
this nation and its citizens for the purpose of overthrowing America,
eliminating its borders, destroying liberty and installing a totalitarian, globalist government regime that rules over an enslaved nation.

This is accomplished by the CCM completely ignoring all news and events that contradict their false narratives (such as the federal corruption trial of N.J. Sen. Bob Menendez) while exaggerating or fabricating whatever news events promote their narratives (like the recent Roy Moore accusations).

When a real event occurs that the media doesn’t want people to recognize as having actually taken place — such as Hillary Clinton’s physical sickness and near loss of consciousness at
the 9/11 memorial in 2016 — the media’s “fact checker” organizations
simply declare any reports on that event to be false. This wholesale
deception and dishonesty is exactly why Project Veritas has named the corporate-controlled media“American Pravda.”

The Bob Menendez criminal trial — involving child sex trafficking — is utterly ignored by the left-wing media for the simple reason that Menendez is a Democrat.

By selectively deciding what “facts” the public sees, the CCM creates an artificial “bubble” reality in
the minds of its viewers, painting a completely false worldview that
happens to be anti-Trump, anti-American, pro-communism, pro-vaccine,
pro-GMO, etc.

If Roy Moore were a Democrat, the media would be attacking his accusers

To fully understand the insidiousness of the corporate-controlled
media, consider the current media onslaught against Alabama candidate
Roy Moore. Barely one month before the election, the wholly discredited
political rag known as The Washington Post drums
up an accusation from a woman who claims to remember unwelcomed
touching nearly 40 years ago. Regardless of whether the accusation is
true or not, if Roy Moore were a Democrat, the Washington Post would be smearing the accusers.

When a Republican gets accused of something, you see, the Republican
is automatically guilty. When a Democrat gets accused of something, the
accusers are always liars, according to the CCM. That’s how they gave
Bill Clinton a pass on the rapes and sexual assaults leveled against him
by a multitude of credible women over the years. Yet even to this day, there has been zero acknowledgement of Bill Clinton’s sexual advances by the corporate-controlled media.

To rags like the Washington Post, Democrats are allowed to rape women… and it’s always the woman’s fault, too!

If Donald Trump were a Democrat, his actions would be hailed as “brilliant”

President Trump, meanwhile, is
mocked, ridiculed and lied about at every opportunity by this weaponized
left-wing media. Their goal, of course, is to convince all of America to vote against Trump in 2020,
replacing him with their selected Democrat (who might be a rapist or a
pedophile, but that would be completely covered up by the media anyway).

If Trump were a Democrat, everything he does would be hailed as
“brilliant” or even god-like. Right now, the left-wing media goes out of
its way to try to make Trump look as stupid as possible, even if it
means lying about his “fish feeding” in Japan.
But if Barack Obama fed the fish in the exact same way, it would have
been heralded as “honoring the Japanese culture” and celebrated as yet
another example of Obama’s international brilliance.

Consider the media’s portrayal of Hillary Clinton,
one of the most truly evil, murderous political mafia bosses of all
time. According to the left-wing media, Hillary is a goddess of truth,
wisdom and women’s rights. Yet in truth, she collected hundreds of
millions of dollars from foreign nationals while selling out 20% of the U.S. strategic uranium supply to Russia-linked companies.
Hillary Clinton was also the “bimbo eruption” mastermind who led the
attacks to smear and defame all the women who accused her husband of
sexual assaults, rape and inappropriate sexual behavior.

On top of all that, it is widely known throughout the halls of Washington D.C. that
the Clintons ordered the executions of dozens of individuals who had
dirt on them, going all the way back to Bill Clinton’s Arkansas
governorship. This is just as widely known as Harvey Weinstein’s sexual
assaults on women, yet the entire corporate-controlled media pretends
the Clintons are saviors of America. To this day, there are Clinton
cultists — mostly women — who literally worship Hillary Clinton, totally
oblivious to the truth about what an evil monster she truly is. And
this is all due to the corporate-controlled media’s twisted narratives
that routinely depict Democrats as saviors and Republicans as horrible
people.

Welcome to the “fact-free universe” depicted by the left-wing media

In essence, the left-wing media has woven a dark tapestry of lies,
deceptions and half-truths that are all intended to destroy American
patriotism, obliterate independent thinking, crush the Trump presidency
and make sure a left-wing globalist tyrant takes over the White House in 2020. To do this, the dishonest fake news media has created a “fact-free universe” where almost everything believed by leftists is a fabrication.

Consider just a few of the things Leftists now commonly believe to be absolutely true:

  • That all white people are inherently evil and being white is bad.
    Yes, the very same political movement that once claimed people should
    never judge others by the color of their skin now routinely judges others by the color of their skin.
  • That men can have menstrual periods or even give birth, because
    being a man or a woman is a “choice” that has nothing to do with
    biological reality. (The transgenderism delusion.)
  • That masculinity is automatically “toxic” by definition, and that
    men are born with a chemical imbalance that makes them insane and
    dangerous to society. This is all part of the ongoing campaign to
    marginalize men and have society ruled by women like Hillary Clinton.
  • That the oceans are going to inundate New York City and Miami under
    hundreds of feet of water that will arrive as a giant wave due to sudden
    global warming.
  • That communism is vastly superior to our Democratic Republic because
    centrally planned economies are somehow more efficient and fair.
  • That “diversity” means a room full of people with different skin
    color who all obediently parrot the exact same thoughts, words and
    beliefs.
  • That “equality” should be the ultimate goal in every society, even if it means crushing freedom and punishing innovation.
  • That anyone who disagrees with a Democrat is automatically a racist, sexist, Islamaphobe or other form of “deplorable.”
  • That free speech should no longer be tolerated for those who do not go along with the narratives of the Left.
  • That it’s okay to violently harm or even murder people who are Trump supporters because, well, they’re labeled “facists.”

Under the influence of the corporate-controlled media, in essence, the political Left in America has become a dangerous CULT. This cult is reinforced by the CCM, late-night comedy (Jimmy Kimmel) and even educational institutions which are now heavily infiltrated by left-wing cult members posing as educators.

How the political Left became an insane cult

This cult demands absolute obedience and tolerates no dissent
whatsoever. Nearly all left-wing journalists are members of this cult,
and because they are fully indoctrinated into the cult, they cannot see
the world with anything resembling clarity. All events and “facts” are filtered through their left-wing cult beliefs which
are rooted in “consensus facts” such as all men are “toxic”; all white
people are “racist”; all Republicans are evil; all gun owners are
murderers, etc.

Remember, too, that the left-wing cult operating in America today believes all sorts of bizarre fictions such as:

  • Parents are bad (only the State should control children)
  • God is dead (left-wing cultism is rooted in atheism and the believe that the State is your god)
  • Families are sexist (because motherhood is an assault against women)
  • Men are dangerous (merely for being men)
  • Individualism is also dangerous (collectivism is the real answer)
  • Rationality is evil (all political decisions must be rooted in emotional appeal, bypassing reason)

As any thinking person can see, the left-wing cult is truly
dangerous. Note that the left-wing cult believes that actual facts,
logic and reason are all dangerous ideas because they are mostly rooted
in white male philosophy which has also been labeled dangerous by numerous academic institutions. (Yes, the entire field of philosophy is now condemned because of its roots in Roman “white male” philosophical teachers.)

One left-leaning university professor has even denounced mathematics as being “racist”because
its history is rooted in the genius of historical mathematicians who
didn’t have brown skin. Her name is Rochelle Gutierrez, and she is a
professor at the University of Illinois. Her gold is, “to completely abolish mathematics because she believes that subjects like algebra and geometry are inherently racist.” (No, I’m not making this up…)

This is just a small taste of how insane, delusional and dangerous
the media-inspired left-wing cult has become in America today. Yet these
people depict whites, males and conservatives as being the dangerous
members of society who must be eliminated in the interests of “justice”
and “equality.” (The Left’s definitions of such concepts are, of course,
rooted entirely in emotional delusions rather than reasoned
understanding.)

You may have already figured out that societies which operate on the principles of this left-wing cult always end in totalitarianism followed by collapse (think Venezuela or North Korea).

Yet nearly half the country has voluntarily signed up for this
disastrous outcome. And how have they been convinced? By the
“weaponized” corporate-controlled media, of course. The media has
convinced them that falsehoods are true… and deceived them into
abandoning cause and effect in favor of dangerous notions like
“equality” that can only exist in a totalitarian regime.

The left-wing media is now the single most dangerous entity in America for the simple reason that it infects the minds of the masses with dangerous false beliefs that can only end in monumental human suffering.

Now is the time to support the independent media

This is why the corporate-controlled media must be strenuously
opposed, exposed and made obsolete. That can be accelerated by
supporting the independent media in two simple ways:

1) Make Censored.news your
daily news source. This mobile-friendly website now features The
Gateway Pundit, Blacklisted News, USA Watchdog and many other leading
indy news sources. Stories are updated automatically, in near-real time.

2) Use GoodGopher.com as
your news search engine. This news search site spiders thousands of
indy news sources each day, giving you the ability to search the
independent media for breaking news that you simply won’t find covered
in left-wing media outlets.

Vote against every political candidate endorsed by the media

Finally, vote against the media in all future
elections. Any candidate promoted by the corporate-controlled media is a
dangerous person, period. It’s a simple but powerful rule of thumb:
Vote in favor of whichever candidate the media is systematically
attacking and smearing. Remember: The media is anti-America,
anti-reason, anti-freedom and anti-reality. Any candidate promoted by
the media should be vehemently opposed, since they would not be promoted
by the media unless they sought to undermine America and destroy all
those who are attempting to protect American culture and liberties.

That’s the takeaway point in all this: In every election, a vote against the media is a vote for America.
Hilariously, the media openly tells you which candidate to oppose by
insisting that’s the person you should vote for. Every candidate
endorsed by the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, HuffPost or MSNBC
is, by definition, a clear and present danger to this nation.

Oppose them at every opportunity. Stop paying any attention to the
left-wing media, and get your information about the world from
independent, thinking sources like Natural News. Remember, too, that the more an independent media news source is attacked and smeared by the corporate-controlled media, the more they’re on target and a threat to the “disinfo dictatorship” of the media machine.

PUBLIC PERVERSION, ALL IN THE FAMILY: AUSTIN TEXAS DRAG QUEEN FESTIVAL GROOMS & PROMOTES GENDER CONFUSION & SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IN CHILDREN

 WARNING: MATURE CONTENT; 
NOT FOR MINORS
 https://www.fagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/austin-international-drag-festival-austin-tx.jpg
PUBLIC PERVERSION: 
AUSTIN INTERNATIONAL DRAG FESTIVAL
 https://www.austinchronicle.com/binary/dd58/Drag_fest.png
 DRAG QUEEN FESTIVAL PROMOTES GENDER CONFUSION & SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IN CHILDREN
 Infowars reporter Millie Weaver goes undercover as ‘Rainbow Snatch’ to
the Austin International Drag Festival to investigate how children are
being over-sexualized and indoctrinated into fetish lifestyles. The drag
festival was sated with raunchy language and provocative dancing with
very young children participating. Astonishingly, the afternoon event
climaxed with a burlesque dance from an 11-year-old transgender boy.
 
 International Drag Queen Festival Promotes Early Sexualization Of Children / Gender Confusion
 Millie Weaver joins Alex Jones live in studio to present footage she
shot at an Austin hotel where an international drag queen festival met
to sabotage the innocence of children and sexualize them.
 
 Children Give Cash To Pole-Dancing Men
 Alex Jones teases an upcoming story on today’s program that tells of an
International Drag Queen convention held in an Austin hotel conference
room with half naked men and little boys mingling.
 
Men In Dresses Manipulating Americans
 How has the drag queen culture crept into the mainstream of American life and begun influencing our children?
 
Transsexual Strippers Dance For Kids In Austin
 Sick, sick people dress up in sexually provocative drag outfits and dance in front of children.
 
Sexualizing Children Dehumanizes Them
 Alex Jones breaks down EXACTLY why he believes these attempts to
normalize transgender and homosexual individuals for children at too
early of an age will lead to damaging societal consequences.
SEE ALSO:

YOUTUBE FINALLY REMOVES JIHAD TERROR MASTERMIND ANWAR AL-AWLAKI’S VIDEOS

 http://yalibnan.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Anwar-al-Awlaki--e1445187732562.jpg
YOUTUBE FINALLY REMOVES JIHAD TERROR MASTERMIND ANWAR AL-AWLAKI’S VIDEOS
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The appalling New York Times pseudo-journalist Scott Shane has likened me to 
Anwar al-Awlaki, even though I have never aided any terrorists in plotting their 
attacks, and have never perpetrated, approved of, or called for any acts
 of terrorist violence. Will Shane pressure the New York Times to take 
down my videos next? He probably wouldn’t have to lean on them very hard
 to get them to do so: YouTube has already removed a “Robert Spencer” playlist that 
someone had on YouTube solely for his own reference, has several times removed 
Palestinian Media Watch’s YouTube page, and generally harasses foes of jihad terror. 
It’s just one aspect of how the social media giants appear determined to deny a platform 
to those who dare speak out against and oppose jihad violence and Sharia oppression. 
It’s good that they’ve finally taken down al-Awlaki’s videos, but why did it take them so 
long?
 

“In ‘Watershed Moment,’ YouTube Blocks Extremist Cleric’s Message,” by Scott Shane, New York Times, November 12, 2017:

WASHINGTON — For eight years, the jihadist propaganda of
Anwar al-Awlaki has helped shape a generation of American terrorists,
including the Fort Hood gunman, the Boston Marathon bombers and the
perpetrators of massacres in San Bernardino, Calif., and Orlando, Fla.


And YouTube, the world’s most popular video site, has allowed
hundreds of hours of Mr. Awlaki’s talks to be within easy reach of
anyone with a phone or computer.


Now, under growing pressure from governments and counterterrorism
advocates, YouTube has drastically reduced its video archive of Mr.
Awlaki, an American cleric who remains the leading English-language
jihadist recruiter on the internet six years after he was killed by a
United States drone strike.
Using video fingerprinting technology,
YouTube now flags his videos automatically and human reviewers block
most of them before anyone sees them, company officials say.

A search for “Anwar al-Awlaki” on YouTube this fall found more than
70,000 videos, including his life’s work, from his early years as a
mainstream American imam to his later years with Al Qaeda in Yemen.

Today the same search turns up just 18,600 videos, and the vast
majority are news reports about his life and death, debates over the
legality of his killing, refutations of his work by scholars or other
material about him. A small number of clips of Mr. Awlaki speaking
disappeared after The New York Times sent an inquiry about the change of
policy last week.

“It’s a watershed moment on the question of whether we’re going to
allow the unchecked proliferation of cyberjihad,” said Mark D. Wallace,
the chief executive of the Counter Extremism Project, a research
organization that has long called for Mr. Awlaki’s recordings to be
removed from the web. “You just don’t want to make it easy for people to
listen to a guy who wants to harm us.”

Mr. Wallace, a former diplomat, said the fact that much of Mr.
Awlaki’s YouTube presence was mainstream lectures on Islamic history did
not justify keeping it on the site. “It’s an insult to Islam to say the
teaching of the religion can’t stand the loss of a preacher who was
also the leading propagandist of jihad in English,” he said.

The policy shift at YouTube comes in the face of a growing chorus of
criticism for internet companies, including Facebook, Twitter and
Google, which owns YouTube. They had long argued that they were merely
neutral platforms with no responsibility for what users posted.

But they were quick to remove copyrighted material, child pornography
and beheading videos, for example, which posed an obvious threat to
their business. They have slowly stepped up the removal of extremist
content, spurred on after 2014 by the Islamic State’s use of Twitter to
recruit fighters….

 
 


JUDGE ROY MOORE & SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITES IN CONGRESS

JUDGE ROY MOORE & SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITES IN CONGRESS 
BY DON BOYS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The shrieking mob running through village streets carrying pitchforks
and flaming torches is looking for someone, anyone to hunt, harry, and
harass. Probably most of the sexual predators ending up being tarred and
feathered deserve it from Spacey to Weinstein to Segal. But, the mob is
intoxicated and will only be satisfied with a higher level victim–a
right wing, Christian, senatorial candidate–Roy Moore of Alabama! To
make it worse, Moore is a potential senator who will not go along with
the establishment. The establishment requires his defeat at any cost in
the special election Dec. 12, of this year.

It is charged that Moore was indiscreet with some teenagers when he
was in his 30s and unmarried, or so the story goes. I’m not sure if the
script was written in Hollywood or in the inner sanctum of Washington,
D.C. It is unlikely the authors are Democrats although they are very
experienced with fake news. However, this script probably came out of
the National Republican Senatorial Committee (or similar people) that
have cut off funds for Moore’s campaign.

Moore is known mostly for being removed twice as chief justice of the
Alabama State Supreme Court in 2003 for refusing to take down a Ten
Commandments monument from the Alabama judicial building, Then in 2016
he was removed for telling state judges not to issue marriage licenses
to same-sex couples after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized “gay”
marriage. Most of his controversial decisions were highly principled
ones that cost him dearly; so with a record like that, I’m giving him
the benefit of the doubt.

Jerry Falwell, President of Liberty University, declared–”It comes
down to a question who is more credible in the eyes of the voters — the
candidate or the accuser….And I believe the judge is telling the truth.”
I agree with Falwell.

The charges against Moore are about 40 years old. Every day a woman
hesitates in making charges lessens their influence and importance. It
is also very telling as to the timing: only a few weeks away from one of
the most important senatorial elections in our history!

We are expected to believe that a Washington Post reporter stumbled
over information that Moore “sought relationships with teenage girls”
when he was in his 30s and single. Over the next three weeks, two
reporters chased down four women who were “initially reluctant to speak
publicly.” Well, yes, I would think decades of silence qualifies as
being reluctant but after “multiple interviews” the women were convinced
to report their “interactions with Moore.”

Of the four accusers, it is noteworthy that only one makes any real
charges. The other three women admit that Moore kissed them and “they
did not have intercourse.” One accuser, Gloria Thacker Deason, said her
mother thought Moore “was good husband material.”

Debbie Wesson Gibson said when she told her mother that she was
dating Moore, she replied, “I’d say you were the luckiest girl in the
world.”

Doesn’t sound very ominous to me. At least the mothers didn’t think so.

Leigh Corfman was a 14-year-old girl who said Moore took her to his
home and he allegedly gave her alcohol. They kissed then she got nervous
and asked him to take her home–which he did. They dated again, so
evidently she was not too nervous and scared. She was lying on a blanket
on the floor and Moore came into the room wearing “tight white”
underwear. She charges that Moore kissed her and touched her through her
bra and underpants then guided her hand toward his underwear and she
pulled back.

At that point, she asked to be taken home–which he did! Isn’t it
great to have a child molester with manners! Moore, the molester with
manners! She never filed a complaint but now wants the world to know how
much she suffered. She did not tell her story–until now–because she had
three divorces and three bankruptcies and people might not believe. You
think?

It must be emphasized that none of the women say that Moore forced
them into any kind of relationship or sexual contact. So, whatever
happened, if anything, was consensual. While that doesn’t justify any
criminal or immoral behavior, it was not forced.

“These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political
attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this
campaign,” Moore, now 70, said. Well, I’m convinced that it is the
Republicans behind this. But who knows? It will have the same affect.

Whoever is directing this witch hunt is determined to bring down a
good man. Leftists don’t usually hunt witches but with Moore and Trump
they would make exceptions. It has been historic that bad men delight in
destroying good men. Makes them feel better and less low-life.

I am willing to concede that the charges may be true; after all, it
is possible, however improbable they may be. I am thoroughly convinced
that if all members of congress were held to the strict standard they
are demanding of Moore–putting them under the spotlight when they were
single and young–there would be two very empty chambers on the Hill. It
seems hypocrisy is a necessary ingredient to be a politician these days.

Let me pursue the hypocrisy thread. No one likes a hypocrite in any
area of life and sanctimonious hypocrites are the worst kind. Note that
members of the GOP reacted quickly to the Moore allegations–allegations
that have not been proved. And while every female should be heard, they
should not be believed if they can’t be supported with facts.

But one of the Senate’s leading hypocrites John McCain, true to form
said, “The allegations against Roy Moore are deeply disturbing and
disqualifying. He should immediately step aside and allow the people of
Alabama to elect a candidate they can be proud of.” Others followed
McCain with basically the same response. Jeff Flake, David Perdue, John
Thune, Lisa Murkowski, Cory Gardner, Richard C. Shelby (senator from
Alabama!), and Patrick J. Toomey called on Moore to step aside as well
without couching their statement with “if true” language.

President Trump said he was convinced Moore would do the right thing.
Vice President Pence also “found the allegations in the story disturbing
and believes, if true, this would disqualify anyone from serving in
office.”

McConnell confidant Josh Holmes said, “If it’s true, the Republican
Party doesn’t have any place for pedophiles, and he should step down
immediately.” However, McConnell doesn’t have a record of being queasy
about working with adulterers, fornicators, homosexuals, pedophiles, and
drunks in the Congress. When did McConnell become so fastidious about
his associates?

Judge Moore is a man of character, courage, and commitment and should
be sent to the U.S. Senate where he will be as out of place as a
diabetic football player at a Sugar Bowl game.

(Next column: “Has Congress Tolerated Sexual Predators in their Membership?”)

Boys’ new book The World’s Best Jokes! was published last week as an eBook. T o get your copy, click here .

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of
Representatives; ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis, wrote
columns for USA Today for eight years; authored 17 books and hundreds of
columns and articles for Internet and print media publications;
defended his beliefs on hundreds of talk shows. These columns go to
newspapers, magazines, television, and radio stations and may be used
without change from title through the end tag. His web sites are
www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com and www.thegodhaters.com .
Contact Don for an interview or talk show.)

Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at CSTNews and TheGodHaters , Twitter , and visit his blog .

Websites Links
http://the-trumpet-online.com/

http://biblicallawcenter.com/
______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/11/photos-roy-moore-accuser-democrat.html 
 

 

VATICAN INVITES “PRO ABORTION GLOBALIST” TO SPEAK, DERIDE TRUMP AT CONFERENCE

 Jeffrey Sachs, a pro-abortion advocate and eugenicist, spoke at the Vatican on November 2:
 https://s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/P1020035.JPG.jpeg
 http://3m7ajlsrzj92lfd1hu16hu7vc.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Ban-Ki-moon-George-Soros-and-Jeffrey-Sachs.-660x350-1433835654.jpg
 https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-04KjTFAbAYQ/WIABEOW4I4I/AAAAAAAAVro/bPSPO1le_bE3sBWTsZhmbfhWnNbyM3poACLcB/s1600/271-pope-obama-soros-moon-sachs-940.png
 http://www.earth.columbia.edu/sitefiles/image/press_room/press_releases/Gore_Sachs_2007_2.jpg
 http://image.slidesharecdn.com/laudatosirevisedanuad20151027dryobdoronila-151127062611-lva1-app6891/95/laudato-si-an-interdisciplinary-forum-dr-yob-doronila-6-638.jpg?cb=1448605675
VATICAN INVITES “PRO ABORTION GLOBALIST” 
TO SPEAK, DERIDE TRUMP AT CONFERENCE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Jeffrey Sachs was invited to speak at a conference at the Vatican,
organized by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Sachs is a senior
United Nations advisor, is among Time Magazine’s 100 most influential
leaders, and is a renowned economist. Sachs is also the world’s foremost
proponent of “population control,” advocating abortion and eugenics as a
solution to a supposed ecological crisis. His 2008 book, “Commonwealth:
Economics for a Crowded Planet,” and advocates for abortion as a
low-cost way to lower nations’ fertility levels and has gone out of his
way to criticize Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush for keeping U.S. tax
dollars from paying for abortions overseas.

This is not the first time Sachs has been honored by the Vatican. He
previously spoke there in 2015 and 2013, and the connection between
Sachs and the Vatican seems to be Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, who
is the chancelor of the aforementioned Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Sorondo sits on the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, founded
by Sachs. Returning the favor, Sorondo has been repeatedly inviting
Sachs to discuss sustainable development (which in his view, includes
abortion as a solution to global problems).

Sachs took a break from advocating for abortion at the Vatican to
take a cheap shot at U.S. President Donald J. Trump, saying, “Believe
me, Donald Trump didn’t think of pulling out of the Paris agreement. He
doesn’t think of much.” The crowd – which contained many pro-abortion
advocates, laughed wildly.

Sachs repeated a leftist talking point, “He was told to pull out of
the Paris agreement by 22 Republican senators who are funded by Koch
industries.” In reality, Trump promised demise of the Climate Accords
while he was running for office. Sachs continued to urge the Papists to
follow the lead of the Pope of Rome, saying, “The Agreement itself came
about in part through not only spiritual intervention by Pope Francis,
but direct intervention in many ways.”

Along with the Paris Climate Accords, a document was passed called Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, which was spearheaded by Sachs. Sachs credits the Pope’s Laudato Si
was essential to the Sustainable Development Goals. The problem is that
those Sustainable Development Goals make abortion a “global right” used
to allow population control and assist in the Third World’s poverty
levels, and calls for, “universal access to sexual and reproductive
health care services.”

HT Lifesite News 
______________________________________________________

 Jeffrey Sachs: ‘Trump’s rhetoric is provocative, 
ugly and frightening’
 Jeffrey Sachs says Donald Trump’s speech to the United Nations general
assembly will not help to “find a way out” of the North Korean nuclear
missile crisis. The American economist believes that Congress is too
“pathetic” to stop any “crazy orders” the president might issue.
 Jeffrey Sachs about Donald Trump 
and what really matters
 
Koch Brothers’ Behind Trump’s Climate Exit;
Sachs Says Trump is an “Idiot’:
 Jun.02, 2017-Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs talks about the
political influences behind President Donald Trump’s decision to leave
the Paris climate accord. He speaks on “Bloomberg Surveillance.”

PERRY NOBLE THREATENS “PULPIT & PEN” WITH LEGAL ACTION

  HUNTER FREDERICK
Publicist, Marketer, Crisis Manager, Planner, Servant
 
 Hunter Frederick, the guy who helps fallen ministers ignore church
discipline, remain unqualified, but continue to make money on the
evangelical celebrity circuit.
 http://images.christianpost.com/full/97153/perry-noble.jpg
PERRY NOBLE THREATENS “PULPIT & PEN” 
WITH LEGAL ACTION 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Perry Noble is the (formerly?) drunken pastor who played Highway to Hell on Easter Sunday, cussed at his church members for wanting discipleship, was rebuked by his denomination for butchering the Ten Commandments, and who was released from his megachurch ministry position for
unrepentance regarding alcohol and what appears to be marital
indiscretions. Recently, we brought to you news of his divorce. Prior to
that, we brought to you news that he was launching a ministry to help
pastors grow their churches through what is essentially a business
model.
Perry Noble, whose church had to reiterate that he was not qualified
for ministry when he refused to leave the pulpit (preaching at other
churches) in June, has hired a “Christian” public relations professional
who helps disgraced mega-ministers rebuild their reputations after
moral failure.
Yes, you may not have known it, but helping morally disqualified
ministers remain in the pulpit is an actual profession. Noble’s PR guy
is named Hunter Frederick and advertises himself as a “public relations
and crisis manager.” He bills himself as a well-meaning “servant” of
Jesus. In fact, he’s a sleazy opportunist who seeks to help fallen
ministers be restored – not by churches who have gauged their repentance
– but in the public eye, so they can continue to make money and stay on
the job even though they’ve been biblically disciplined.
Frederick contacted Pulpit & Pen today, identified himself as
Noble’s “publicist,” and told us to change our critical articles about
the charlatan. Because Frederick has provided his PR services to fallen
ministers like Tullian Tchividjian (who had multiple extramarital
affairs) and Michael Gungor (who angered his followers by denying the
inerrancy of Scripture), his reputation preceded him. 
He said, “Not quite.” But, pretty close, apparently…

He then got to his point…

The article he refers to is this one.
He claims Perry Noble doesn’t recall certain quotations ascribed to him
(which makes sense, because he was likely drunk when he said them).
Before we give the rest of our interaction, a few things about Hunter
Frederick.
Amy Spreeman, a polemicist in her own right, has done research into
this spiritual crisis profiteer already. She explains in her post, “Crisis Managed?,
that Frederick needs “to know they are repentant before [he] will work
with them.” Spreeman writes, “I called Frederick yesterday to ask him
about his newest client, Tullian Tchividjian. After losing his ministry
job last week, the former pastor contacted the agency, and on Monday,
Frederick took him under counsel.”
According to Spreeman, Frederick is the one who calls discernment
folks and polemicists on behalf of the ministry and asks them to retract
or go soft (our paraphrase) on criticizing them. After all, he says
they’re repentant. Spreeman linked a post at the Christian Newswire, which further explains Frederick’s job…

With the constant news headlines of
pastors and other Christian leaders falling away due to sexual
immorality, misuse of church funds, denying certain Christian orthodoxy
as well as others, the man that these Christian leaders turn to during a
time of crisis believes he knows why our Christian leaders are
failing…Hunter Frederick, the owner of the entertainment and faith-based
crisis management and public relations firm Frederick & Associates
believes that a reason why we are seeing more and more Christian leaders
fall is because of the celebrity status we give our christian leaders.

The article then explains what Frederick really thinks the problem is…those pesky discernment bloggers. 
Frederick also believes that the ongoing scrutiny from
“ultra-conservative” christian media outlets contribute to the celebrity
status of those christian leaders that they believe are preaching a
false gospel.
“While we need to communicate certain concern over false teachings,
we need to be careful of the means in which we communicate these
concerns. A lot of these ‘watchman ministries’ believe it’s their goal
to ‘call out’ these leaders while at the same time evaluating their
celebrity status and enable them to use said media attention to their
advantage.”
How dare we. Of course, if people were listening to us, they wouldn’t
have been listening to hucksters like Perry Noble and the rest of
Frederick’s clientele, to begin with. We responded with the following…

If you recall, Tony Nolan – the popular evangelist – had entered into a partnership with Clayton Jennings
to help rebuild his ministry and restore him after multiple women came
out to testify that he preyed upon them spiritually and sexually, and
some had even been pressured with alcohol and to take the abortion pill.
Nolan later explained that Jennings ended the restoration process because
he had a team of “PR people” who would restore his ministry without
making him take a time-out. Whether or not that was Hunter Frederick, we
do not know, but we do know that there will be a hot place of
judgment for those with the vocational profession of circumventing
Biblical church discipline for the sake of financial gain.
There are so many celebrity preachers falling into unrepentant sin
that an entire industry of fake restoration has developed to help them
rebuild their reputations. If you have any information about Hunter
Frederick and know any of his other clients, please contact us at
info@pulpitandpen.org.
[Update: Frederick also or represented Lindsay Lohan]

FORMER FACEBOOK PRESIDENT SEAN PARKER: “GOD ONLY KNOWS WHAT IT’S DOING TO OUR CHILDREN’S BRAINS”

 
FORMER FACEBOOK PRESIDENT SEAN PARKER: 
“GOD ONLY KNOWS WHAT IT’S DOING TO OUR CHILDREN’S BRAINS” 
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

(The Telegraph) Facebook has been
criticized by one of its founding members for “exploiting a
vulnerability in human psychology” and putting children’s mental health
at risk.
Sean Parker, the former president of Facebook who joined Mark
Zuckerberg’s company in its first months, said the company’s founders
intentionally built the site to consume as much human attention as
possible.
Parker, who has made billions as an early shareholder in the social
network, also criticized Facebook’s effect on children. “It literally
changes your relationship with society, with each other,” he told
newsite Axios. “It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways.
God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains.”

“The inventors, creators… understood this consciously. And we did it anyway,” Parker said.
Parker, a former hacker who founded file-sharing website
Napster, said he had become a “conscientious objector” to the social
networking site. His stint at Facebook was shortlived, resigning from
the site in 2005 after a cocaine scandal.

Facebook

Facebook has been competing for human attention

Credit:
Getty

Facebook and internet addiction have been found to show up in brain scans in a similar way to drug addiction. Instagram, which is also owned by Facebook, was found to have to have the worst impact on young people’s self esteem, negatively impacting people’s body image, sleep and fear of missing out.
Facebook
came under fire earlier this week for asking users to send in nude
pictures they feared would be leaked on the social network so it could automatically block the images if they were uploaded as revenge porn.
Several
Silicon Valley entrepreneurs have expressed concerns about the so-called
“war for your attention” as Google, Facebook and other internet
giants compete for user interaction.
Tristan Harris, a former Google engineer, said on Twitter:
“The race to bottom of the brain stem is not my opinion, it’s the truth
– I’m describing how the system works… This isn’t about criticising
the tech industry, it’s about urgent need to reform the way the
attention economy works.”
Parker, 37, was portrayed by Justin Timberlake in The Social Network.
Arrested by the FBI for hacking at 16, he went on to found
controversial file-sharing website Napster in 1999, which was later shut
down under legal challenges from the music industry.
He has invested in a series of other companies, including Spotify,
serving on the music streaming service’s board for a period, although he
now devotes most of his time to philanthropy. In 2013 he was fined $2.5m for building a film-style wedding venue in a conservation area in California without permits.
_____________________________________________________

 All Facebook Users Must Know THIS Secret
 Alex Jones breaks down how the Facebook social networking website is
designed to prey on a psychological “vulnerability,” the company’s
former president recently warned.

Speaking at an Axios event Wednesday, Facebook’s first president, Sean
Parker, said the app used by over two billion people around the world
takes advantage of human psychology and the need for social-validation,
and is possibly re-wiring human brains. 

CLICK BELOW FOR THE FULL STORY…..
 

 Former President Of Facebook Exposes Their Evil Plan

 Former Facebook President Sean Parker Says Facebook Is Designed To Prey On Users
 The Facebook social networking website is designed to prey on a
psychological “vulnerability,” the company’s former president recently
warned.
 
Give Your Soul To Mark Zuckerberg, Or You’re A Racist
 It’s time to SUBMIT your children to Master Zuckerberger.

Ex-Facebook President Warns App Exploits Psychological ‘Vulnerability’


Suggests social media platform re-wiring minds, putting children’s brains at risk

BY ADAN SALAZAR

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/ex-facebook-president-warns-app-exploits-psychological-vulnerability/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Facebook social networking website is designed to prey on
a psychological “vulnerability,” the company’s former president
recently warned.

Speaking at an Axios
event Wednesday, Facebook’s first president, Sean Parker, said the app
used by over two billion people around the world takes advantage of
human psychology and the need for social-validation, and is possibly
re-wiring human brains.

“The thought process that went into building these applications,
Facebook being the first of them, … was all about: ‘How do we consume as
much of your time and conscious attention as possible?’” Parker said.


The billionaire also revealed the company proceeded with their
exploitation of the human mind despite signs the website altered one’s
“relationship with society,” and could be negatively affecting children.

“I don’t know if I really understood the consequences of what I was
saying, because [of] the unintended consequences of a network when it
grows to a billion or 2 billion people and … it literally changes your
relationship with society, with each other … It probably interferes with
productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it’s doing to our
children’s brains.”

The app, Parker explained, plays off human psychological needs,
effectively exploiting a feedback loop every time a person’s content
receives likes, shares or comments, encouraging them to use the app more
frequently.

“And that means that we need to sort of give you a little
dopamine hit every once in a while, because someone liked or commented
on a photo or a post or whatever. And that’s going to get you to
contribute more content, and that’s going to get you … more likes and
comments.”

“It’s a social-validation feedback loop … exactly the kind of
thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re
exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology.”

While Facebook developers and creators, including company CEO
Mark Zuckerberg, were aware of the website’s potential to essentially
control one’s mind, Parker says they did nothing to change it.

“The inventors, creators — it’s me, it’s Mark [Zuckerberg], it’s
Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it’s all of these people — understood this
consciously. And we did it anyway.”

Parker now heads up a cancer research institute and claims he’s become a social media “conscientious objector.”



Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735

 

UK GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST CHRISTIAN REFUGEES FROM SYRIA

 http://www.virtueonline.org/sites/default/files/styles/news-large/public/BARNABAS.png?itok=lwldo-WBUK GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST CHRISTIAN REFUGEES FROM SYRIA 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Barnabas Aid finally obtained figures proving that the UN
has only recommended tiny token numbers of Syrian Christians, Yazidis
and other minorities for resettlement in the UK. The overwhelming
majority of refugees recommended by the UN have been Sunni Muslims

This gross neglect of peaceful Christians and other minorities has
been long discussed, but without any steps being taken to remedy the
injustice. Instead, the UK and other Western nations have turned their
backs on the most needy groups, who are not only victims of war, but
have been persecuted at the hands of jihadists.


The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, declared that “politically correct officials were institutionally biased against Christian refugees” in the UK; in the U.S., of the 10,801 Syrian refugees who came to the US under Obama in 2016, only 56 were Christian.

Trump once promised that the US would prioritize Christian refugees, but to date, there has been no follow-up.

Most disturbing about the UK was that “ UK officials tried to prevent
the release of this information” about its discrimination against
Christian refugees, but “Barnabas Aid submitted a freedom of Information
request to the UK Home Office” and discovered the ugly truth.

Christians have been abandoned, not only by Western governments but
also by the largest Christian organizations globally, which have
remained strangely silent. Even the Pope promised to take in Christian
refugees in Italy, but then took only Muslims instead; he even called Muslim migrants “warriors of hope”.

Vice President Pence recently offered some hope in a speech
when he announced that President Trump had ordered the State Department
to stop funding UN relief efforts and “support directly persecuted
communities through USAID.” Results are now awaited.

“UK government discriminates against Christian refugees from Syria”, Barnabas Aid, November 2, 2017:

THE UK government and the UN are discriminating against
Christians and other minorities in their refugee programmes according to
new Home Office statistics, seen by Barnabas Aid an aid agency which
works for persecuted Christians.

Last week Barnabas Aid finally obtained figures proving that the UN
has only recommended tiny token numbers of Syrian Christians, Yazidis
and other minorities for resettlement in the UK. The overwhelming
majority of refugees recommended by the UN have been Sunni Muslims who
form the majority in Syria. But Christians, and other minorities have
been repeatedly targeted for attack by Islamist groups such as IS.

The new statistics, obtained in a Freedom of Information Request to
the Home Office by Barnabas Aid, of the religious background of Syrian
asylum seekers recommended by the UNHCR for resettlement in the UK
revealed:

o In 2015 out of 2,637 refugees there were only 43 Christians, just
13 Yazidis and only one Shia Muslim. In 2016 the statistics were even
worse. Out of 7,499 refugees there were only 27 Christians, five Yazidis
and 13, Shia Muslims.

o It is widely accepted that Christians made up 10 per cent of
Syria’s pre-war population and Shia’s around 1.5 per cent while there
are estimated to have been 70,000 Yazidis in Syria.

Disturbingly, UK officials tried to prevent the release of this
information. Barnabas Aid submitted a freedom of Information request to
the UK Home Office in February. And in spite of being legally required
to release it within 28 days, officials failed to do so and repeatedly
stalled or simply did not answer correspondence.

Eventually, Barnabas Aid lodged a formal complaint with the
Information Commissioner’s office. On 19 September the Information
Commissioner issued a formal notice requiring the Home Office to release
this information within 35 calendar days or face contempt of court
proceedings.

Even then, the information was only released at the very last minute
after Barnabas Aid had contacted the immigration minister’s office,
alerting him to the situation and asking him personally to ensure civil
servants complied with the order.

“This is shocking behaviour by both UN and UK officials. In 2005 the
UN formally adopted the responsibility of states to protect citizens
from genocide and crimes against humanity. These statistics show that
the UN has itself failed miserably and inexcusably in this respect,”
said Martin Parsons, Head of Research at Barnabas Aid.

“Christians and other minorities in the Middle East have been treated
shamefully by the UN. And the UK government has abjectly outsourced its
own responsibilities to the victims of genocide in spite of repeated
representations,” he added.

Barnabas Aid obtained these figures just as US Vice President Mike
Pence announced that the US government would now directly help
persecuted Christians ……

STANFORD UNIVERSITY FASCISTS SCHEDULE “STANFORD AGAINST SPENCER: A RALLY AGAINST ISLAMOPHOBIA”

 
 https://www.conservativebookclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/robert-spencer-e1502473692590.jpg
STANFORD UNIVERSITY FASCISTS SCHEDULE “STANFORD AGAINST SPENCER: A RALLY AGAINST ISLAMOPHOBIA”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Once again we see it. In The Coming of the Third Reich,
historian Richard J. Evans explains how, in the early days of National
Socialist Germany, Stormtroopers (Brownshirts) “organized campaigns
against unwanted professors in the local newspapers [and] staged mass
disruptions of their lectures.” To express dissent from Nazi positions
became a matter of taking one’s life into one’s hands. The idea of
people of opposing viewpoints airing their disagreements in a civil and
mutually respectful manner was gone. One was a Nazi, or one was silent
(and fearful).

Today’s fascists call themselves “anti-fascists.” Just like the
Nazis, they are totalitarian: they are determined not to allow their
opponents to murmur the slightest whisper of dissent. Forcibly
suppressing the speech of someone with whom one disagrees is a
quintessentially fascist act.

You may object that these students are not forcibly suppressing my
speech, they’re just protesting it elsewhere. That is true, but whether I
am allowed to speak, or shouted down by fascist students as happened
last spring at the University at Buffalo, remains to be seen. Meanwhile,
note Evans’ statement about how the Brownshirts “organized campaigns
against unwanted professors in the local newspapers”: the ongoing
campaign of defamation and ad hominem attacks on me in the Stanford
Daily and Stanford Review, as well as this protest, are the modern-day
embodiment of such campaigns. The intent is the same as that of the Nazi
Brownshirts: to make sure I am heard by as few people as possible, and
that most people go away with the idea that I am a terrible person, and
the ideas I represent are to be shunned by all decent people.
All this without any genuine examination, discussion, or debate of
those ideas. These “Stanford Against Islamophobia” students don’t want a
free and open discussion. They want to shut down free and open
discussion. You can see how their propaganda works in the message below:

“Spencer is a self-proclaimed Islamophobe”

Indeed: my new book is called Confessions of an Islamophobe,
and it discusses the very phenomenon we see in this protest, of
demonizing and stigmatizing foes of jihad terror. Have you preordered
your copy yet, Stanford students? Get it here.
In it, as well as in Jihad Watch posts advertising the book (not that
Stanford fascist students can be expected to have done any actual
research), I’ve explained that “Islamophobia” is an intentional
conflation of two distinct phenomena: vigilante attacks upon innocent
Muslims, which are never justified, and honest analysis of the
motivating ideology of jihad terrorism, which is lumped together with
those vigilante attacks in order to discredit such analysis and
intimidate people away from attempting it. I am an “Islamophobe” in the
sense of opposing jihad terror, discrimination against women, gays, and
non-Muslims, and the denial of the freedom of speech. In that sense,
everyone should be an “Islamophobe.” But in this propaganda piece, the
Stanford fascists are attempting to give you the impression that I
approve of vigilante attacks upon innocent Muslims. Note that they never
define “Islamophobia,” because doing so would give away their game.

“and co-founder of two known hate groups.”

Hate groups according to whom? According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is a hard-Left propaganda and smear group, not a reliable arbiter of what constitutes a “hate group.”

On his own blog, just within the past week, he has targeted Stanford students and our community centers.

Hey, Stanford Leftists, thanks for reading! This one is really rich. I
responded point-by-point to the vicious smear campaign being conducted
against me in the Stanford student press, and now they say I’m
“targeting” Stanford students and community centers. Well, my dear
snowflakes, welcome to the real world, where there are no safe spaces.
When you attack someone, he may fight back. Crying victimhood when you
started the conflict is silly and bad form, and apes Hitler in claiming
that when he invaded Poland he was just responding to Polish
provocations. But of course, we have already established that y’all are
fascists.

When Spencer attacks
members of our community, we cannot be idle. Let’s show Spencer that
Stanford students refuse his violent rhetoric and presence on our
campus.

Good. Don’t be idle. Don’t expect me to be, either. One thing you can
do, when you crawl out of your safe spaces after hugging your teddy
bears and enjoying some milk and cookies, is substantiate your false
claim that I indulge in “violent rhetoric.” Produce one quote from me
that advocates for violence. Happy hunting!

“Stanford Against Spencer: A Rally Against Islamophobia,” Stanford Against Islamophobia:

Tuesday, November 14 at 8:00 PM – 10:00 PM PST
Next Week
9–17°Partly Cloudy

Mitchell Earth Sciences Building., Stanford University

397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305

135 Going · 100 Interested

Share this event with your friends

Invite
Dear Stanford Students, Faculty, and Staff,
Join us in uplifting communities attacked by Robert Spencer’s
Islamophobia. On Tuesday, November 14th at 8pm, come to a rally on the
grass in front of Mitchell Earth Sciences to show solidarity with those
affected by Islamophobia. There will be speakers, music, food, and time
to share your thoughts and hear from others. Email
stanfordagainstislamophobia@gmail.com if you would like to be added to a speakers list.
We are a coalition of concerned students and organizations that
formed in response to the Stanford College Republican’s event with
Robert Spencer. Spencer is a self-proclaimed Islamophobe and co-founder
of two known hate groups. On his own blog, just within the
past week, he has targeted Stanford students and our community centers.
When Spencer attacks members of our community, we cannot be idle. Let’s
show Spencer that Stanford students refuse his violent rhetoric and
presence on our campus.

In our open letter (https://www.stanforddaily.com/2017/11/08/an-open-letter-to-the-college-republicans-regarding-robert-spencer/),
we asked the College Republicans to cancel the event because we, as as a
campus, don’t want to take part in endorsing his platform with our name
and money. We also reiterate our ask of campus to boycott the event,
because attending will only legitimize his platform.
Islamophobia is not just a Muslim issue. It’s a campus issue.
In solidarity,
Concerned students of Stanford
For accessibility concerns, please email stanfordagainstislamophobia@gmail.com. There are accessibility ramps to the rally between Durand and Mitchell Earth Sciences.
Time: 8PM-10PM
Location: Mitchell Earth Sciences
Hosted by: Stanford Against Islamophobia

______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/stanford-hosted-son-and-supporter-of-palestinian-jihad-murderer-and-supporter-of-911-jihad-attacks-with-no-uproar 

ERDOGAN: THE AIM OF THE TERM “MODERATE ISLAM” IS TO “WEAKEN ISLAM”

 
ERDOGAN: THE AIM OF THE TERM “MODERATE ISLAM” IS TO “WEAKEN ISLAM” 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“The term ‘moderate Islam’ is being lathered up again. The patent of
moderate Islam belongs to the West. There is no moderate or immoderate
Islam; Islam is one. The aim of using such terms is to weaken Islam.”

“Lathered up”: good phrase, Tayyip!

Doesn’t Erdogan know that “Islam is not a monolith”? He must be a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe”!

“The term ‘moderate Islam’ aims to weaken the religion, Erdoğan says,” Daily Sabah, November 10, 2017 (thanks to Lookmann):

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan lashed out at the term
“moderate Islam” on Friday, saying the term’s only aim is to weaken the
religion itself rather than distance it from extremists.

In a clear reference to Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman’s remarks, Erdoğan said that the origin of the term lies in the
Western world.

“The term ‘moderate Islam’ is being lathered up again. The patent of
moderate Islam belongs to the West. There is no moderate or immoderate
Islam; Islam is one. The aim of using such terms is to weaken Islam,”
Erdoğan said.

“They say we will return to moderate Islam, but they still don’t give
women the right to drive. Is there such a thing in Islam? I guess they
will give this right when they turn to the moderate one,” he added.

Erdoğan’s words came at a women’s entrepreneurship event held for the
Organization Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) Women’s Advisory Council at
the Presidential Palace complex in Ankara.

In his speech, Erdoğan also criticized discrimination against Muslim
women. “Headscarves are gradually being banned in EU states with the
public – personal space trick, attempting to bar Muslim women from
entering social life. Attempts to incarcerate Muslim women in their
homes is spreading like a virus,” Erdoğan said.

“Today, most EU countries actively restrict Muslim women from working
and getting access to education. Those who are teaching us lessons on
human rights are unfortunately applauding as the most basic human rights
are being trampled in their countries.”…

PHOTOS: ROY MOORE ACCUSER A DEMOCRAT ACTIVIST

 http://cowgernation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Roy-Moore-Accuser2.jpeg
PHOTOS: ROY MOORE ACCUSER 
A DEMOCRAT ACTIVIST 
 Accuser had closely worked with Hillary Clinton’s campaign
BY KIT DANIELS
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 


One of senatorial candidate Roy Moore’s accusers is
apparently a fervent Democrat who has worked for the DNC as a sign
language interpreter for Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, a revelation
which the Washington Post never included in its original report.

The accuser, Debbie Gibson, had also publically supported Moore’s opponent Doug Jones before the accusations came to light.

Interestingly, when attacking Moore ally Steve Bannon for suggesting
the Washington Post was politically motivated in its reporting, the
newspaper implied that Gibson wasn’t “down with Democratic propaganda,” a
statement which seemingly conflicts with Gibson’s political activism:






Now go back and look at the photos again.

The Post also reported:

“According to campaign reports, none of the women has donated to or
worked for Moore’s Democratic opponent, Doug Jones, or his rivals in the
Republican primary…”

But notice the precise wording; it’s lawyer-speak. It might very
well be true that Gibson didn’t donate or work for Doug Jones, but
according to her Facebook profile, she did actively campaign for him,
which doesn’t help her credibility and it should have been reported –
yet the Washington Post conveniently left it out.

And remember, the Post did endorse Jones on Oct. 23.

If the Washington Post was as objective as it claims to be, you’d
wouldn’t have to come to Infowars.com to find the rest of the story to
make up your own mind as to whether the accusations carry weight.

And as Infowars reported earlier, there’s a claim spreading on social media that a reporter was taped while reportedly offering a woman $1000 to accuse Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexual improprieties.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealKitDaniels

Twitter: 

MORE Videos: Resistance News

 

ATTACK ON SENATOR RAND PAUL CALLED “SERIOUS CRIMINAL MATTER”

ATTACK ON SENATOR RAND PAUL CALLED 
“SERIOUS CRIMINAL MATTER” 
BY STEVE BYAS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

After last week’s vicious assault upon U.S. Senator Rand Paul of
Kentucky by his next-door neighbor Rene Boucher (initially dismissed in
the media as a “trivial” dispute over landscaping issues, non-political,
and involving only “minor injuries”), several of Rand Paul’s neighbors
and Paul’s attorney have challenged those assertions.


Doug Stafford, Paul’s lawyer, told CNN on Thursday that the assault
was a “serious criminal matter involving serious injury. This was not a
fight. It was a blindside, violent attack by a disturbed person. Anyone
claiming otherwise is either uninformed or seeking media attention.”


Boucher, an anesthesiologist and Paul’s next-door neighbor of 17
years, has been charged with a misdemeanor, fourth-degree assault in the
attack, which reportedly occurred while Paul was mowing his yard in
Bowling Green, Kentucky. Paul was using earplugs, and was completely
unaware of Boucher until he tackled him behind, breaking six of Paul’s
ribs.

Paul is also suffering from excess fluid around his lungs, and there
are reports that his recovery may take months.
With the Democrats and
Republicans so closely divided in the Senate, this could have serious
political implications for tax reform and other parts of the Republican
agenda. Paul is rated the most conservative member of the Senate by the “Freedom Index” of The New American (which
grades members of Congress on their fidelity to the Constitution);
Boucher, Paul’s alleged assailant, has a well-established reputation as
strongly anti-Republican and anti-conservative.

Earlier reports indicated that the two were almost friendly, even walking their dogs together, despite holding sharply different political views. However, Stafford
disputed the assertion that they were on friendly terms.
Although the
two men are next-door neighbors, Stafford said they had not spoken to
each other for years.

Several of Paul’s neighbors have now weighed in, challenging the
narrative that the attack was the result of a landscaping dispute, which
left the implication that Paul did not properly maintain his property.
“The Pauls are and always have been great neighbors and friends. They
take pride in their property and maintain it accordingly,” neighbor
Travis Creed told Breitbart.

Creed added, “Rand has enjoyed working on and maintaining his lawn
for as long as I have known him. He was attacked on his property for no
apparent reason and suffered serious injury.”

A registered nurse who works with Boucher told the Washington Post
that Boucher’s politics are “liberal,” and that he was “active” on
social media expounding on those views. For example, Boucher posted on
Facebook, “May Robert Mueller fry Trump’s gonads,” and “Impeach Trump,
Impeach Pence, and Keep Impeaching.”

Another neighbor, Alicia Stivers, defended Paul’s character. “I have
never heard Sen. Paul speak an unkind word about anyone, let alone
become physically violent. Which makes it all the more shocking that a
next-door neighbor of many years who has not so much as exchanged an
email or spoken word with Rand in several years, would race downhill and
pummel Rand from behind.”

Stivers, who has been part of the neighborhood association for four
years, added that Paul was “attacked from behind with no warning.”

While a political motivation for the attack may not be proven, it
would appear that the initial reports that it was all about some leaves
is highly unlikely.

This attack, combined with the shooting of House Republican Whip
Steve Scalise in June, raises some serious questions. Scalise was shot
in Alexandria, Virginia, by James Hodgkinson, a strong supporter of
Senator Bernie Sanders, while practicing for the congressional baseball
game. Before opening fire, Hodgkinson asked another congressman present
what political party they were all in. When told “Republican,”
Hodgkinson began shooting, almost killing Scalise.

Now, a conservative Republican U.S. senator, simply mowing his lawn,
has been attacked by yet another known left-winger. Can one imagine the
response of the media if a Democratic Party member of Congress was targeted in a shooting by a known backer of, say, Senator Ted Cruz? If a Democratic Party
senator was struck so hard that it broke six ribs, and the assailant
was revealed to be a well-known conservative activist, would the media
have dismissed it all as a dispute over tree leaves?

Yet, Boucher’s lawyer argued on Monday that the dispute was “trivial.”

When Paul’s attorney, Doug Stafford, mentioned that the charges
against Boucher involved “state and federal authorities,” CNN’s report
said that Stafford “did not clarify why federal law enforcement would be
involved in the matter.” Perhaps it is because an assault on a U.S.
congressman is considered a federal offense.

It is to be hoped that Senator Paul will make a quick and full
recovery, and that attacks upon Republican members of Congress by
violent left-wing supporters of the Democratic Party and its progressive
agenda will not become common events.
______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/11/socialist-neighbor-assaults-senator.html 

NAACP URGES CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ASK CONGRESS TO RESCIND “RACIST” NATIONAL ANTHEM

 http://www.bethsnotesplus.com.php56-15.dfw3-2.websitetestlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Star-Spangled-Banner.png
NAACP URGES CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ASK CONGRESS TO RESCIND “RACIST” NATIONAL ANTHEM 
BY WARREN MASS
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The California Hawaii NAACP last week began visiting state
legislators’ offices in the California state capitol to distribute
copies of two resolutions that the organization passed at its state
conference in October. One urges Congress to rescind “one of the most
racist, pro-slavery, anti-black songs in the American lexicon”: the
national anthem. The other expresses support for former San Francisco
49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who was the first major professional
athlete to kneel when “The Star-Spangled Banner” was played before
games last season.
His form of protest was copied by other NFL players
during this year’s NFL season and has become a highly publicized source
of controversy that even attracted the attention of President Trump.

“We owe a lot of it to Kaepernick,” said California Hawaii NAACP President Alice Huffman, as quoted by the Sacramento Bee. “I think all this controversy about the knee will go away once the song is removed.”

It was Huffman who proposed the idea of the resolutions at a recent
NAACP state convention. “We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,”
Huffman said. “We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much
controversy in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So,
whatever comes out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand
proudly and sing it.”

“This song is wrong; it shouldn’t have been there, we didn’t have it
’til 1931, so it won’t kill us if it goes away,” Huffman insisted, as
quoted by TV station CBS 13 in Sacramento.

The CBS report noted that Colin Kaepernick started the NFL protests
to bring attention to what he regarded as “systemic racial injustice in
the country.” But Huffman alleges that Kaepernick’s message was lost
when it turned into a debate about the flag. “The message got distorted,
the real intentions got overlooked, it became something that’s dividing
us, and I’m looking for something to bring us back together,” she said.

Huffman told CBS that the NFL protests led her to look at the lyrics
of the “Star Spangled Banner,” especially the parts of the anthem we
don’t typically sing, such as beyond the first stanza. “It’s racist; it
doesn’t represent our community, it’s anti-black,” she alleged.

Interestingly, Kaepernick never cited the words that Huffman says are
offensive to black Americans as a reason for kneeling during the
playing of the “Star Spangled Banner.”

During a 2016 interview with NFL Media, Kaepernick made this
statement explaining his reason fro refusing to stand for our national
anthem:

I am not going to stand up to show pride
in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.
To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part
to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people are
getting paid leave and getting away with murder.

In an op-ed piece in the New York Times on September 25,
Kaepernick’s former teammate, San Francisco 49ers safety Eric Reid,
wrote: “Why Colin Kaepernick and I Decided to Take a Knee.” He wrote:

In early 2016, I began paying attention
to reports about the incredible number of unarmed black people being
killed by the police. The posts on social media deeply disturbed me, but
one in particular brought me to tears: the killing of Alton Sterling in
my hometown Baton Rouge, La. This could have happened to any of my
family members who still live in the area. I felt furious, hurt and
hopeless. I wanted to do something, but didn’t know what or how to do
it. All I knew for sure is that I wanted it to be as respectful as
possible.
A few weeks later, during preseason, my
teammate Colin Kaepernick chose to sit on the bench during the national
anthem to protest police brutality. To be honest, I didn’t notice at the
time, and neither did the news media. It wasn’t until after our third
preseason game on Aug. 26, 2016, that his protest gained national
attention, and the backlash against him began.

Reid approached Kaepernick and the two of them discussed “how we
could make a more powerful and positive impact on the social justice
movement.” He continued:

After hours of careful consideration, and
even a visit from Nate Boyer, a retired Green Beret and former N.F.L.
player, we came to the conclusion that we should kneel, rather than sit,
the next day during the anthem as a peaceful protest.

Kaepernick’s and Reid’s allegations that our nation’s police officers
regularly engage in shooting unarmed black people are contrary to the
facts. As just one example disputing Reid’s allegations, an article in
the Washington Times on April 21, 2015 stated: “An analysis
released last week shows that more white people died at the hands of law
enforcement than those of any other race in the last two years, even as
the Justice Department, social-justice groups and media coverage focus
on black victims of police force.” Another report from the Federalist
Papers Project the following day cited Peter Moskos, an assistant
professor at New York City University’s John Jay College of Criminal
Justice, who concluded that during the period ranging from May 2013 to
April of 2015 that roughly 49 percent of those killed by law-enforcement
officers were white, while only 30 percent were black.

While the numbers still seem to substantiate Kaepernick’s claims of
unethical targeting of blacks by police (since blacks only make up 13
percent of the U.S. populace), it must be remembered that, as Wall Street Journal
editor Jason Riley, who happens to be black, noted: “Blacks commit
seven to 10 times more violent crimes in this country than whites do.”
So if anyone were to complain about police targeting, it should be
whites.

These figures do not address another significant point, however: Even
if Kaepernick’s and Reid’s allegations about disproportionate police
violence against black citizens had some basis in fact, does publicly
showing disrespect for our national anthem do anything to solve the
problem?

Returning to the statements made by Huffman, pointing to Kaepernick’s
kneeling during the national anthem as evidence that the long-revered
song is racist and the cause of controversy, there simply is no
connection. Kaepernick never said he was objecting to the anthem and did
not mention any words in the song to which he was taking issue. His
protest was strictly against what he perceived to be law enforcement’s
treatment of black citizens. He never objected to the anthem itself.

Yet, the NAACP proposal is not intended to disrespect the flag,
Huffman said. “We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,” she said.
“We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much controversy
in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So, whatever comes
out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand proudly and
sing it.”

Even that statement belies reality. The lyrics to which Huffman
objects are found in the rarely sung third stanza of the anthem.
Furthermore, if we are to infer that Francis Scott Key was being
derogatory to blacks, we would also have to assume that he also hated
“hirelings,” who are mentioned in the same stanza — not likely. In
truth, the objectionable lyrics in question are impossible to interpret
and are left to conjecture, unless we can bring Francis Scott Key back
from the dead so he can explain their meaning to us. We offer the words
below, and challenge anyone to tell us exactly what Key’s intentions
were:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion,
A home and a country, should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps’ pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave,
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.”

As an interesting aside, there were reputedly black British troops at the fort, called the Corps of Colonial Marines, who could have been the objects of the song.
Deciphering the meaning of these words would make an interesting
exercise in an English literature class, but no person without an agenda
would say they warrant the wholesale scrapping of our national anthem.

But then again, the NAACP always has an agenda.

Related articles:

NAACP Releases Report on Tea Party Racism

NAACP Set to Release Report on Tea Party Racism

National Anthem Protests

The Star-spangled Banner

CANADA: CATHOLIC SCHOOLS THREATENED TO PUSH LGBT AGENDA

CANADA: CATHOLIC SCHOOLS THREATENED 
TO PUSH LGBT AGENDA 
 Recent developments in Canada highlight the extreme danger of allowing
government to get involved in the funding of private schools. In short,
taxpayer-funded Catholic schools in the Canadian province of Alberta are
being threatened with closure. The reason: refusing to promote
homosexuality, gender confusion, masturbation, anal sex, and other
elements of the mandated “sex education” curriculum. Americans should
take note.
 

VIETNAM: PRESIDENT TRUMP’S POWERFUL SPEECH TO WORLD LEADERS AT “APEC 2017”: “I’M PUTTING AMERICA FIRST”~VETERANS HONORED

VIETNAM: PRESIDENT TRUMP’S POWERFUL SPEECH 
TO WORLD LEADERS AT “APEC 2017”: 
“I’M PUTTING AMERICA FIRST” 
 “I am going to put America First” President Donald Trump gives a defiant
speech at APEC 2017 Summit slamming U.S. trade partners for unfair
trade and taking advantage of the United States. 
November 10, 2017
 President Trump Signs a Presidential Proclamation 
for the 50th Anniversary of the Vietnam War
 President Donald Trump participates in a meet and greet with Veterans of
the Vietnam War, commemorating the 50th anniversary with a presidential
proclamation. 

November 10, 2017

1 2 3 4 5 6