Day: November 2, 2017

HALLOWEEN TERROR IN NEW YORK CITY: 8 DEAD, 15 INJURED AFTER TRUCK RAMPAGE IN MANHATTAN~ANGRY TRUMP RESPONDS~OFFICIALS DENY CONNECTION TO ISIS OR ISLAMIC JIHADIST SUPREMACISM

HALLOWEEN TERROR IN NEW YORK CITY: 8 DEAD, 15 INJURED AFTER TRUCK RAMPAGE IN MANHATTAN
 Suspect was heard yelling ‘Allahu akbar’
BY INFOWARS.COM
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A suspected terror attack Tuesday left eight people dead, and
at least 15 people injured in lower Manhattan, according to reports.
Police arrested 29-year-old Tampa, Florida resident Sayfullo Saipov –
an Uzbek national – who they believe drove a Home Depot rental truck
onto a hike and bike path in the neighborhood of Tribeca and rammed into
a school bus.
Several witnesses reported the man, who reports initially claimed fired shots, yelled, “Allahu akbar!” during the attack.

Watch eyewitness video below (Warning: Graphic Content):

NYPD officers shot and apprehended the suspect, who was carrying a B.B. gun or a pellet gun, in addition to a paintball gun.
The FBI announced they’ll investigate the event as a terror attack,
after first characterizing the incident as potential “road rage.”

Tribeca is one of the most expensive neighborhoods in Manhattan, and is home to unique architecture associated with the city.

This mass killing event comes just a month after the Mandalay Bay
massacre, the deadliest mass shooting in the U.S. that left 59 dead and
hundreds injured.

President Trump issued the following statements on Twitter:

The president also commented on the possibility the attack may have been inspired by the radical Islamic terror group ISIS, who recently called for October 31 Halloween attacks.

_______________________________________________________
 Horror: Raw Footage of NYC Terror Attack Shows School Bus Wreckage
Horror: Raw Footage of NYC Terror Attack Shows School Bus Wreckage


Islamic terror attack resulted in 8 deaths

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/horror-raw-footage-of-nyc-terror-attack-shows-school-bus-wreckage/;  

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Footage from the scene of the New York City terror attack Monday
 that resulted in 8 deaths and 15 injuries shows the damage inflicted on
 a school bus that was hit by the attacker’s vehicle.
_________________________________________________
 SEE ALSO:
NYC “Allahu akbar” truck jihad mass murderer 
identified as Sayfullo Saipov from Uzbekistan
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/nyc-allahu-akbar-truck-jihad-
mass-murderer-identified-as-sayfullo-saipov-from-uzbekistan 
 
 NYC truck jihad death toll now eight, 
“Middle Eastern man” arrested
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/nyc-truck-jihad-death-
toll-now-eight-middle-eastern-man-arrested 
 
 CNN: NYC truck driver/gunman screamed 
“Allahu akbar,” now attack IS being investigated 
as terrorism
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/cnn-nyc-truck-drivergunman-
screamed-allahu-akbar-now-attack-is-being-investigated-as-terrorism 
 
 Bloodbath in NYC: Van driver runs down several 
people, shoots pedestrians, cops say 
not terror-related
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/bloodbath-in-nyc-van-driver-runs
-down-several-people-shoots-pedestrians-cops-say-not-terror-related 
 
 NY Governor Cuomo on NYC jihad massacre: 
No evidence to suggest wider plot, 
“no ongoing threat”
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/ny-governor-cuomo-on-nyc-jihad-
massacre-no-evidence-to-suggest-wider-plot-no-ongoing-threat 
 
 Terror Attack Kills 8 and Injures 11 in Manhattan
SEE: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/31/nyregion/police-shooting-lower-
manhattan.html 
 
 NYPD monitored jihad murderer Saipov’s mosque 
until Linda Sarsour convinced them to stop
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/nypd-monitored-jihad-murderer-
saipovs-mosque-until-linda-sarsour-convinced-them-to-stop 
 
 De Blasio: “Last thing we should do is start 
casting dispersions [sic] on whole races of people 
or whole religions”
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/de-blasio-last-thing-we-should-
do-is-start-casting-dispersions-sic-on-whole-races-of-people-or-whole-religions 
___________________________________________________
 President Trump's EXPLOSIVE Response to NY 
Truck Attack: "Send Him to Gitmo!" 11/1/17
 "Allahu Akbar!" Terror Strikes New York City
Breaking: Islamic Terror Attack In Manhattan
Truck Terror: Jihadist Mows Down Innocents 
In NYC 
Manhattan Attack Is A Product Of 
Uncontrolled Immigration
NYC Terror Reveals Omni-Surveillance 
& Govt’s Insatiable Demand For More
NYPD Press Conference On Bloody ISIS Attack
Infowars Reporter On Scene Of Deadly 
NYC Terror Attack






 
 
 

MUSLIMS CAN DISTORT, DISTRACT, & DECEIVE TO ADVANCE A WORLD CALIPHATE!

MUSLIMS CAN DISTORT, DISTRACT, & DECEIVE 
TO ADVANCE A WORLD CALIPHATE!
BY DON BOYS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

It seems America and the free world have been universally bullied,
badgered, blackmailed into believing that Islam is a peaceful religion
but the event this week in New York City proved otherwise. Every true
Muslim is obligated to do his or her part in destroying free people as
they build a world caliphate. Consequently, committed Muslims who
worship and follow the Koran cannot be mainstreamed. Freedom and
democracy are foreign concepts to them.

Islam is on a world crusade to subvert every nation and bring everyone under sharia.
Anyone who challenges that fact is disingenuous, delusional, or dumb as
a box of rocks. It is folly to challenge truth since it always
prevails–sooner or later. Progressives and even Evangelical Christians
haven’t learned that truth.

I have interviewed numerous Muslims all over the world and have
written two books on the subject to document Islam’s world crusade.

Committed Muslims cannot be trusted. They are permitted to lie to
further the cause of Islam. Being doubted and questioned makes it very
difficult for non-fanatical Muslims to function in a free society since
they are lumped along with the fanatics.

My emails and phone calls from hate-filled Muslims supports my
contention and proves their mindset. From the beginning of one of my
critic’s missives, I assumed we were not going to be friends. He wrote,
“You are a hater and a bigot not because you ‘revealed the facts about
Islam’ but because you are a complete dishonest, lying corrupt scum!” He
was responding to my article dealing with Muslims having permission to
lie if it furthers the cause of Islam. Being very perceptive, I assumed I
was not one of his favorite persons.

A number of Koran and Hadith passages establish the religious
authority of breaking oaths, lying, unilaterally violating treaties, and
generally scheming against non-Muslims. It is not unfair or untruthful
or unchristian to say that no Muslim can be trusted because of this
doctrine of permissive lying known as Taqiyya!

A good example of Islamic lying is seen in the life of Mohammed who
gave permission to one of his disciples to lie to facilitate the murder
of a poet who had angered him: a follower asked Mohammed, “Would you
like that I kill him?” Mohammed told him he would.

The follower said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing i.e. to deceive Kab.”

Mohammed replied, “You may say it.” There, Mohammed approved lying and murder. (Sahih al-Bukhari 5.369.)

Mohammed authorized lying according to Bukhari, vol. 4, book 52,
numbers 268–271 because “war is deceit” as a justification for him
murdering unarmed prisoners after promising them safe passage. True
Islam is evil with skin.

Bukhari (3:49:857) reveals, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” Muslims can “invent” information to advance Islam.

Bukhari also reveals that Muhammad said if he took an oath and later
found something else better, he would do “what is better” and expiate
his oath. Now you know how Muslim leaders say one thing in America or
Europe and go back to their Muslim nations and say the opposite while
speaking in Arabic.

There are three circumstances where lying is permitted by Muslims:
“in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the
narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of
the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring
reconciliation between them)” (Book 32, Number 6303).

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it “has not
now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported any
covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization.” The truth is
that ISNA was, in fact, created by the Muslim
Brotherhood. Moreover, they have financially supported Hamas terrorists.
At least nine of their leaders have been accused by prosecutors of
supporting terrorism.

I am accused of not providing verses from the Koran that support
Muslims’ lying, but the following prove my contention of Islam’s
deception, duplicity, and dishonesty.

Allah tells his followers that they are released from liability to
unbelievers. Sura 9:3 reveals, “And an announcement from Allah and His
Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah
and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters.” In other words, unbelievers don’t deserve fair and honest responses that Muslims deserve.

“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your
oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving,
Most Forbearing” (surah 2:225). Therefore, Muslims don’t have to be
faithful to their oaths and Mohammed was an excellent example who broke
his word and treaties whenever it benefited him.

Verse 226 deals with a man who takes an oath about not having sex
with his wife (Al-‘lia) for a certain time but if he changes his mind,
the oath is forgiven and he is released from his word.

“Allah hath made lawful for you (Muslims) absolution from your oaths (of such a kind), and Allah is your Protector. He is the Knower, the Wise” (surah 66:2).

Mohammed’s lying is the best example Muslims have to validate lying under certain circumstances. A quote from my book, ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse!
proves that Mohammed was a liar (who was also a thief, killer, slaver,
and child molester): “With every month, Mohammed grew stronger as more
converts showed up at his tent. (Ladies, loot, and land will do that.)
Now was the time to take Mecca for good. A treaty was made between the
leaders of Mecca and Mohammed whereby he and his followers could make
the pilgrimage to the Kaaba; Mohammed could ‘preach some revivals’ but
could not engage in any forced conversions. However, true to his lack of
character, Mohammed broke the treaty within a year since he believed it
was legitimate to fake a peace when you are weak so that you can smash
your enemy when you are eventually strong.”

Mohammed was a liar and gave permission for his followers to lie to advance Islam. That lying is going on today to advance sharia in America.

Furthermore, surah 3:54, 8:30, and 10:21, reveal that Allah is “the best deceiver”!

If your god cannot be trusted, then you are in big trouble! Can you be sure you will have 72 virgins after all!

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

NURSE ARRESTED FOR NOT ALLOWING BLOOD DRAWN ON CRASH VICTIM WITHOUT WARRANT RECEIVES $500 THOUSAND SETTLEMENT

 
NURSE ARRESTED FOR NOT ALLOWING BLOOD DRAWN ON CRASH VICTIM WITHOUT WARRANT 
RECEIVES $500 THOUSAND SETTLEMENT
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

SALT LAKE CITY — The University of Utah Hospital
nurse who was dragged out screaming and placed in handcuffs for
explaining to a police detective that he needed a warrant to withdraw
blood from an unconscious crash victim has agreed to a $500,000 payment
from Salt Lake City and the University of Utah to settle the matter.

“There will be no lawsuit,” Karra Porter, attorney for nurse Alex Wubbels told reporters on Tuesday.
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Wubbels will use part of the
money to provide legal help to others seeking to obtain body camera
footage of incidents such as hers, and will also donate some of the
settlement payment to the Utah Nurses Association. She will additionally
help to lead a campaign to stop nurse abuse in America.
“We all deserve to know the truth and the truth comes when you see
the actual raw footage and that’s what happened in my case,” she said
during the news conference. “No matter how truthful I was in telling my
story, it was nothing compared to what people saw and the visceral
reaction people experienced when watching the footage of the experience
that I went through.”

As previously reported,
the matter began on on July 26, as Utah Highway Patrol was involved in a
chase with driver Marcos Torres, 26, in Cache County after he was
reported for driving recklessly. Torres soon crossed into oncoming
traffic and smashed into a semi head-on, which was driven by 43-year-old
William Gray. The truck burst into flames.
While Torres died from his injuries on the scene, Gray, who works as a
reserve police officer when not driving semis, was transported to
University of Utah Hospital, where he was treated for severe burns.
Salt Lake Police Detective Jeff Payne later arrived at the hospital’s
burn unit to request samples of Gray’s blood to determine if he had
drugs in his system, as directed by another agency. However, on-duty
nurse Alex Wubbels explained to Payne that he needed to meet one of
three conditions as per the police department’s agreement with the
hospital: 1) obtain consent from the patient 2) obtain a warrant or 3)
the patient must be under arrest.

As Gray was not under arrest since he was the victim in the incident,
and as he was in a comatose state and was therefore not able to give
consent, Wubbels outlined to Payne that he would need to obtain an
electronic warrant. She proceeded to contact numerous supervisors to ask
what to do about the situation.
Becoming unhappy with her answers, Detective Payne repeatedly
threatened that he was going to arrest Wubbels and take her to jail.
“I either go away with blood in vials or body in tow,” he warned.
With another staff member at her side to provide assistance, Wubbels
soon printed out the hospital policy for blood draws and read it to
Payne, advising him that he needs to meet one of the three conditions.
“This is something that you guys agreed to with this hospital,” she explained calmly.
Wubbels also placed one of the supervisors on speaker phone to talk to Payne about the matter himself.
“The patient can’t consent, he’s told me repeatedly that he doesn’t
have a warrant, and the patient is not under arrest,” she explained to
the supervisor. “I’m just trying to do what I’m supposed to do, that’s
all.”
“So, I take it [that] without those in place, I’m not going to get blood. Am I fair to surmise that?” Payne asked.
The supervisor, who advised Wubbels that she was simply relaying the
information, then asked Payne why he was “blaming the messenger,” and he
replied that it was because she was the one who was denying his
request.
The supervisor then warned Payne sternly, “Sir, you’re making a huge mistake because you’re threatening a nurse.”

Payne snapped.
“We’re done!” he declared, grabbing for Wubbels phone. “You’re under arrest!”
She backed away from the officer, but Payne continued to move toward
Wubbels and within seconds, he physically grabbed the nurse and forced
her out the door.
“Somebody help me! Stop! Stop! I did nothing wrong!” she exclaimed, screaming. “You’re assaulting me! Stop!”
Other hospital employees tried to reason with Payne, who handcuffed Wubbles, but to no avail.
“She’s under arrest,” Payne said.
“For doing her job?” the employee asked.
“I’ve done my job; she’s done hers,” Payne replied.
View a video of the incident released by the Salt Lake Tribune here.
Wubbles was released 20 minutes later, and was not charged with any crime.
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Payne outlined in a report on the
incident that he had been advised by Lt. James Tracy, the commander on
duty that evening, to arrest Wubbles for interfering with a police
investigation if she declined to allow him to take the blood sample. He
said that he had been told that “implied consent” was sufficient.
However, on Oct. 10, Salt Lake City Police Chief Michael Brown fired
Payne, and Tracy was also demoted from lieutenant to officer. Both have
filed an appeal, contending that the punishment is excessive.
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Payne’s attorney, Greg Skordas,
says that federal DOT law mandates a blood sample whenever a driver with
a CDL license is involved in a fatal crash. Therefore, in obtaining the
CDL, one is giving their implied consent.
However, Porter, Wubbels’ attorney, argues that the blood draw is
actually the employer’s responsibility and not that of police, and that
Utah law specifically requires that the person be suspected of being
intoxicated, which Gray was not.
Following the incident, Payne was initially suspended from the police
department’s draw program, which trains officers in phlebotomy so that
they can draw the blood themselves for investigations.
“To date, we have suspended the officer from the blood draw program.
We have already replaced our blood draw policy with a new policy,” Brown
outlined on Sept. 1. “All remaining officers on the blood draw program
have reviewed, and are operating under the new policy and protocol.”
Payne was later fired altogether, and also lost his part-time job
with a paramedics company for being caught on camera stating that he
would bring the hospital “all the transients and take the good patients
elsewhere.”
Tracy says that he was not aware that the police department had an agreement with the hospital.
“Lt. Tracy was operating under an outmoded policy and one that was
clearly inconsistent with state law when it came to drawing blood from
unconscious or deceased accident victims,” his appeal reads. “He had
been given no training in the new policy and had no reason to believe he
could deviate from the policy he believed to be in effect at the time.”
William Gray, the man from whom Payne sought to obtain blood, died on Sept. 25.

______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/27283-utah-nurse-waives-lawsuit-settles-for-500-000-in-patient-privacy-case
_________________________________________________

 Violent Cop – Canned for Evil Act – 
Cries About Being Treated Unfairly!
 

ANTIFA BUYS FULL PAGE AD IN NEW YORK TIMES CALLING FOR OVERTHROW OF TRUMP NOVEMBER 4TH

 http://usdefensewatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/110117nytimesad-768x1252-628x1024.jpg
ANTIFA BUYS FULL PAGE AD IN NEW YORK TIMES CALLING FOR OVERTHROW OF TRUMP NOVEMBER 4TH
 Full-Page NY Times Ad Demands Antifa Revolution 
to Overthrow Trump
 Coup against Trump ad appears in NY Times’ national edition
BY KIT DANIELS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The New York Times published a full-page ad calling for a “revolution” to overthrow President Trump on Nov. 4.
The ad, which appears near the front of
the newspaper’s national edition, demands nationwide protests that won’t
stop until the Trump administration is “driven from power.”
“Join with the thousands who will gather
in cities and towns across the country,” reads the ad. “A movement of
protests that continue every day and night, growing until we become
millions… determined now to stop until this regime is driven from
power.”
The ad was written by Refuse Fascism, a communist group funded by George Soros which took responsibility for shutting down a conservative event hosting journalist Milo Yiannopoulos at UC Berkeley in Feb.
It’s ironic how the Times, which operates
under the press protections guaranteed by the First Amendment, sold ad
space to a group which bragged about denying First Amendment rights to a
journalist.
The Times was already under fire for its
bias against the Trump administration as revealed by a series of sting
videos produced by Project Veritas, which caught the newspaper’s editors
discussing how they help set up the media’s anti-Trump narrative.
“I think that one of the things that
maybe journalists were thinking about is, like, ‘Oh, if we write about
[Trump], about how, like, insanely crazy he is and how ludicrous his
policies are, then maybe people will read about it and be, like, ‘Oh,
wow, like, we shouldn’t vote for him,’’” the Times’ homepage editor
Desiree Shoe said on hidden camera.
The attitudes of the Times’ staff,
combined with the Refuse Fascism ad, underscore how the establishment
newspaper is not as “professionally neutral” as it claims to be.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealKitDaniels
Twitter: 
MORE Videos: Resistance News

 
Soros: Puppet Master Of Antifa
 George Soros has unleashed his army of communist lackeys 
to try and destroy America.

NY Times Promotes Antifa-Communist Coup Effort Against Trump for Nov. 4 

BY WILLIAM F. JASPER

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/27285-ny-times-promotes-antifa-communist-coup-effort-against-trump-for-nov-4;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“This Nightmare Must End: THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO!”

So declare the opening lines of a full-page advertisement in the New York Times promoting mayhem and insurrection for this Saturday, November 4.
“Nov. 4 It Begins,” the ad continues. “Join with the thousands who
will gather in cities and towns across the country. A movement of
protests that continue every day and night, growing until we become
millions… determined now to stop until this regime is driven from
power.” (See the full ad below.)
The advertisement directs readers to go to RefuseFascism.org, “To
Find a Protest Near You.” At the website, information on planned Nov. 4
“protests” can be found for Boston, Chicago, Atlanta, Cincinnati,
Austin, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles, New York City, Omaha, and other
cities.
The New York Times, of course, knows — even if many of its
readers do not — that Refuse Fascism is a front group founded and run by
the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), a violent Marxist-Leninist
group that idolizes China’s Communist mass-murderer Mao Zedong. Which
makes the Refuse Fascism appeal to “humanity” doubly ludicrous and
doubly offensive. “NO! IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT A
FASCIST AMERICA!”, the ad declares.
“In the name of humanity”? The Revolutionary Communist Party/Refuse
Fascism fanatics still believe that Mao was fully justified in murdering
tens of millions of Chinese and torturing, imprisoning, and enslaving
hundreds of millions more. The RCP/Refuse Fascism cadres form a major component of the masked, black-clad Antifa thugs who have been rioting and causing mayhem throughout America for the past year.
The New American’s Mitchell Shaw reported on
September 30 about the upcoming November 4 “protests” planned by the
Antifa/RCP communists. We have already seen these “protests” and the
death, destruction, and turmoil they have left in their wakes. Why is
the New York Times helping a known communist group — one with
both a long history of violence as well as recent involvement in riots,
sedition, and other criminal acts — promote havoc and the overthrow of a
validly elected president of the United States?
It’s no secret that the New York Times has been pro-communist for over a century. From covering up Stalin’s genocide of millions of Ukrainians
to helping make Fidel Castro the dictator of Cuba, to glorifying Mao
Zedong, to romanticizing communist Weather Underground terrorist Bill
Ayers — and much, much more, the Times has been foremost among
media organizations promoting communism worldwide. In fact, this year,
in celebration of the hundredth anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution,
the Times has run an appalling series of articles under the heading “Red Century” that wistfully pine for the romantic era of the gulag and the Lubyanka.
This is not the first time that the Times has aided the RCP/Refuse Fascism communists by running an ad for their subversive operations. As we reported in January, the Times
ran a similar full-page ad for RCP/Refuse Fascism to gin up support for
the mayhem that was unleashed on President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Related articles:

DR. MERCOLA & BARBARA LOE FISHER DISCUSS VACCINE AWARENESS~MEDICAL DESTRUCTION BY THE NUMBERS; MEDICAL INDUSTRY SLOWLY KILLING AMERICA

DR. MERCOLA & BARBARA LOE FISHER DISCUSS VACCINE AWARENESS
  Medical Destruction By The Numbers 
 Jon Rappoport hosts the fourth hour of the Alex Jones show and reveals
how the medical industry is being used to slow kill America.

 Pro-Vaxers Debunk THIS! – Vaccination Truth 
w/ Dr. Suzanne Humphries

 One day, should the Lord tarry and man does not fully revert to the Dark
Ages, mankind will one day look back at the vaccination agenda of our
age as we look back at blood-letting. A day when doctors will understand
that vaccination is based on agenda-driven speculation, opinion, grand
assumptions, and lies repeated and repeated until they become truth in
the ears of those conditioned not to question the voices of authority of
our “civilized” control system, NOT real science.
Dr. Humphries gives a pretty good overview of several of the real, and
scientifically-demonstrable problems with vaccinations. Judge for
yourself. But you owe it to you and your kids to make an INFORMED
choice. There is one side that tries to shame and coerce your choice in
this very important matter. That vaccines are being MANDATED should tell
any thoughtful soul how (un)effective they are.

 Bigger Than JFK Files: HHS Vaccine Harm Covered-Up

 Del Bigtree, producer of VAXXED, joins David Knight blow the whistle on
misconduct by HHS (Health & Human Services). When the federal govt
took away our right to sue vaccine companies, giving them liability
immunity, HHS was tasked as the sole means of protecting the public. But
they don’t test vaccines like drugs are tested, they don’t allow
discovery in their “court”, they don’t even keep records of those
injured. The cover-up is bigger than JFK and may cost you and your
children your health, even your life. 
SEE: INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK-

JUDGE RULES CALIFORNIA CAN’T REQUIRE PREGNANCY CENTERS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON GOVERNMENT ABORTION PROGRAMS

 
JUDGE RULES CALIFORNIA CAN’T REQUIRE PREGNANCY CENTERS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION 
ON GOVERNMENT ABORTION PROGRAMS 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A superior court judge in California has ruled that a state 
law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide information about 
government abortion programs runs afoul of the California Constitution.

“Here, the State commands clinics to post specific directions for
whom to contact to obtain an abortion. It forces the clinic to point the
way to the abortion clinic and can leave patients with the belief they
were referred to an abortion provider by that clinic. … In Scharpen’s
case that would be inaccurate, profoundly inaccurate,” wrote Judge
Gloria Trask.

She said that there are other ways for the government to get its
message out besides forcing those who are opposed to abortion to provide
the information.

“Compelled speech must be subject to reasonable limitation,” Trask
said. “The statute compels the clinic to speak words with which it
profoundly disagrees when the state has numerous alternative methods of
publishing its message. … In this case, however virtuous the State’s
ends, they do not justify its means.”

As previously reported,
in 2014, Gov. Jerry Brown signed the Reproductive FACT Act into law, a
measure that has been dubbed the “bully bill” by pro-life groups in the
state. The bill had been authored by Democratic Assemblyman David Chiu,
who outlined in the law that he takes issue with pregnancy centers that
don’t provide abortion referrals to women.

“The author contends that, unfortunately, there are nearly
200 licensed and unlicensed clinics known as crisis pregnancy centers
(CPCs) in California whose goal is to interfere with women’s ability to
be fully informed and exercise their reproductive rights, and that CPCs
pose as full-service women’s health clinics, but aim to discourage and
prevent women from seeking abortions,” it reads.

The legislation therefore requires that licensed pregnancy care
centers provide the following message to clients in print: “California
has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to
comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved
methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible
women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social
services office at (telephone number).”

But Scott Scharpen, pastor at Rock Valley Christian Church in
Murietta and founder of Go Mobile for Life, said that he could not
comply with the requirement and therefore went to court to challenge the law. Go Mobile for Life operates a mobile pregnancy center that provides free ultrasounds to women.

“I will not post that notice in our clinic. I would rather close the
clinic than post that notice,” he said in a statement released by his
attorneys with Advocates for Faith and Freedom. “Now, by law, we are
required to provide referral information to a woman for services that we
find morally and ethically objectionable, namely abortion.”

“If the California state government gets away with telling pregnancy
clinics what to say and even how to say it, then ALL faith-based
businesses are at risk of being bullied into delivering the government’s
mandated speech,” Scharpen stated. “We must stand up and fight this
unconstitutional law for the benefit of all people!”

On Monday, Judge Trask ruled in favor of Scharpen, declaring that
“[t]he legislature may not use the wall of the physician’s office as a
billboard to advertise the availability of low cost abortions.” She
declared the Reproductive FACT Act to be in violation of Article 1,
Section 2 of the California Constitution, which reads, “Every person may
freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects,
being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or
abridge liberty of speech or press.”

Scharpen applauded the ruling, which he characterized as a “huge victory for free speech.”

“The whole notion of being compelled to share information with our
patients about abortion availability, which is contrary to our mission
and purpose, is fundamentally wrong. Lives will be saved because of this
ruling,” he said.

 

ROGUE JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP’S REINSTITUTION OF MILITARY “TRANSGENDER” BAN

 https://www.charterflightgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Colleen-Kollar-Kotell.jpg
ROGUE JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP’S REINSTITUTION OF MILITARY “TRANSGENDER” BAN 
BY SELWYN DUKE
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

In another example of how we’ve become a government of, by, and for
judges, a federal judge has blocked President Trump’s reinstitution of
the ban on Made-up Sexual Status (so-called transgender) individuals
serving in the military. Strangely, the ban had been in place for more
than 50 years when Barack Obama overturned it last year, yet it wasn’t
found “unconstitutional” until Trump decided to return to the long-held
status quo.

The opinion was handed down by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, who stated in a 76-page decision
that as “far as the court is aware at this preliminary stage, all of
the reasons proffered by the president for excluding transgender
individuals from the military in this case were not merely unsupported,
but were actually contradicted by the studies, conclusions and judgment
of the military itself.” 

This outrageous example of judicial activism reflects the earlier
blocks of Trump’s travel bans, in which a judge — ignoring a 1952 law
stating that the president may “suspend the entry of … any class of
aliens” — claimed that the government hadn’t shown good reason for such a
ban. The court’s rationale, in part, was that there hadn’t been any
terrorist attacks perpetrated by individuals from the ban-affected
nations.

Not only did this claim overlook overseas attacks by such people, as well as other factors (as I explained here), but since when does the president need to prove a policy’s validity to a black-robed lawyer?

A judge’s place is only to determine if a law or action is
constitutional, not whether it’s a “good idea.” Yet because power
corrupts, judges’ judicial supremacy and Congress’ failure to use its
constitutionally granted power to check the courts have begotten an
ever-more-brazen judiciary.
The 2015 Obergefell decision is another good example of
judicial usurpation, with Justice Anthony Kennedy justifying an opinion
mandating nationwide same-sex “marriage” recognition with the notion
that the children of same-sex couples cannot wait for the social change
that would allow their guardians to “marry”; it must happen now.
(Of course, not long ago many leftists, fashionably cynical about
tradition, claimed they didn’t need a “piece of paper” to validate their
relationship; now they absolutely cannot do without it.)
So many judges today are just making it up as they go along, and this
is no laughing matter. For they’re literally endangering our Republic —
by undermining our system of checks and balances.
In fact, their judicial supremacy — the notion that the courts are
the ultimate arbiters of law’s meaning and that their judgments must
constrain all three governmental branches — has made them supremely
dangerous.
Consider: As Dr. Alan Keyes explained in
2005, they have their judicial power. Yet if they can strike down laws,
contrary to the legislature’s will, they’ve also arrogated to
themselves the legislative power. And if they can tell the chief
executive that an action must or mustn’t be executed, then they’ve
arrogated to themselves the executive power as well. Now note what James
Madison, the “Father of the Constitution,” said about having the
executive, legislative, and judicial powers all in one entity’s hands:
It is the very definition of tyranny.
Note, too, that we elect legislators and a president to,
respectively, create and execute our laws. Having this outsourced to
unelected lawyers makes a sham of our representative Republic, reducing
us to a government of, by, and for judges. It’s the tyranny of an
oligarchy.
Yet there are solutions. As referenced earlier, Congress could bring
the courts to heel. Under the Constitution’s Article III, Congress can
eliminate any and every federal court, except for the Supreme Court; and
can limit the appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, meaning, SCOTUS’
ability to hear cases brought up through lower courts. It thus could
mostly eliminate judicial review.
Why doesn’t Congress do this? Because it means taking a stand on
contentious issues and possibly suffering electoral consequences. It’s
far easier for legislators to just posture, puff up their chests, and
then throw up their hands saying, “Hey, we tried. But the courts have
ruled!” This brings no electoral consequences because most Americans
don’t know civics and are never aware that Congress is shirking its
power-balancing duty.
Yet there is one more remedy. The president and governors could
simply ignore unconstitutional (unlawful) court rulings. After all,
“judicial supremacy” is not in the Constitution. Rather, it’s an extra-constitutional power declared by the courts themselves, notably in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision.
In other words, the courts gave the courts their trump-card power.
It’s a great con if you can pull it off.
Thomas Jefferson noted judicial supremacy’s danger early on, warning in 1819 that its acceptance would make the Constitution an “act of suicide.”
So contrary to the common misconception, a president who ignores
usurpative courts isn’t violating the law, but defending it; he’s not
sparking a “constitutional crisis” but  responding to one — one already
sparked by rogue judges.
It would be nice if President Trump could thus assert his executive
authority, but there’s a catch: It likely would serve as a pretext for
impeaching him. After all, rampant ignorance ensures everyone would
think that instead of ignoring the rule of lawyers, he was actually
violating the rule of law. It’s a testimonial to the thoroughness of the
judicial con and a great example of truth turned on its head. 
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
http://christiannews.net/2017/10/30/federal-judge-blocks-trump-ban-on-transgenders-in-military/ 

UK: ISLAMIC STATE THREATENS TO KILL FOUR YEAR OLD PRINCE GEORGE

 https://dailypost.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/1-298.jpg
UK: ISLAMIC STATE THREATENS TO KILL 
FOUR YEAR OLD PRINCE GEORGE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

ISIS has threatened to kill Prince George on a social
media platform labelled by cyber-security experts as a “breeding ground”
for terrorists.

So Britain is now furious, as it should be, but the key point is that
citizens of the UK appear to be surprised, when they should not be.

There was a national outcry on social media as the news
broke of the sick plot. Britons took to twitter to declare their
outrage. One wrote: “There are threats to kill Prince George?! Wtf he’s
just a child!!! What is wrong with some people?!”

Jihadists are killing machines. Men, women, children and the elderly
are all fair game for slaughter when it comes to the infidels and
apostates. The Islamic State blew up a baby in a training exercise and
fed a Yazidi young woman her own baby, cooked.

Yet this same Britain that is mortified about the threat to the life
of toddler Prince George has allowed the Islamic State to infiltrate its
own country.

M15 recently announced the highest ever threat alert; up to 23,000
jihadists are on UK soil, as opposed to 3,000, as had been recently
revealed.

Wake up, Britain! Unfortunately the shock expressed about Prince
George will likely not change a thing in the UK with regards to their
appeasement of Islamic supremacists.

“He’s a CHILD!’ Britain FURIOUS as ISIS ‘threatens to KILL Prince George at school’”, by Thomas Mickie, Express, October 27, 2017:

Using the encrypted instant messaging app Telegram the terrorists said: “Even the royal family will not be left alone.”

The brain-washed ISIS followers chilling added a picture of Prince
George next to his school, Thomas’s Battersea, in south London,
according to the Daily Star Sunday.

There was a national outcry on social media as the news broke of the
sick plot. Britons took to twitter to declare their outrage.

One wrote: “There are threats to kill Prince George?! Wtf he’s just a child!!! What is wrong with some people?!”

Another wrote: “Where is the National outrage at the discovery of a
plot by ISIS to assassinate Prince George? What the f*** is wrong with
this country?”

Milica Delrey said: “I hope Prince George is safe and sound, he is just a little child, damn.”

Stephen Curl said: “A plot to kill any child is evil”.

Alex Bus wrote on Twitter: “Some twisted people about. Wanting to murder a child.

“I pray and hope nothing that sickening ever happens to our Prince George.”

The four-year-old’s photo was posted on the messaging app with the caption “school starts early”.

The vile post also included Arabic words taken from a jihadi song
which translates as “when war comes with the melody of bullets, we
descend on disbelief, desiring retaliation”

British intelligence have been heavily monitoring the anonymous
messaging service in an effort to stop potential terror attacks in the
UK.

Cyber-security experts said it it was critical to keep monitoring the
service and warned the Telegram app was a “breeding ground” for
terrorists.

Barry Spielman, whose internet surveillance company, Sixgill, has
been tracking Telegram channels since the start of the year, said: “Our
intelligence suggests that these threats are to be taken seriously.

“Over the last 12 months, we have seen both official and non-official Isis channels move over to Telegram.

“It’s an encrypted platform, making it a lot safer to communicate without being traced.

“We used to just track the Dark Web and Deep Web but now we are tracking Telegram.”

It comes as people living and working near the future king’s school
have also raised concerns about security at Thomas’s Battersea after a
woman filmed herself walking through the corridors unchallenged.

Sarah Burnett-Moore walked into the £17,600-a-year private school,
days before the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s four-year-old son
started on September 7th.

“It seems that as ISIS continues to lose ground in Syria and Iraq, it has stepped up its threats to hit the West.

“This threat to Prince George is chilling.

“We have also seen evidence terrorists are planning a strike at the World Cup in Russia.

“These are very worrying times and it is critical we try to uncover these plots.

“Telegram is where many of them are being hatched as we speak.”

Meanwhile, a British Muslim convert, Jack Letts has been charged with being a member of ISIS after being captured in Syria……..