A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
At its General Synod in July, the Church of England will consider a
proposal for a new baptism service “to celebrate transgender individuals
who have transitioned genders” (“Church of England Considers Baptizing
People into New Gender,” ChristianHeadlines.com, Jun. 2, 2017). This
church, so-called, already has transgender priests. One
of these, Rachel Mann, said, “Trans people feel powerfully called to be
recognized in their ‘chosen’ name. An opportunity to be publicly
introduced to God is therefore significant.” We are not sure what “God”
Mann is talking about, but it is not the Creator God who made man male
and female. Scripture teaches that the Creator forms each individual in
the womb according to a preexisting plan, and being male or female is no
accident of nature. True churches don’t celebrate moral perversion;
they
preach the life-changing gospel of Jesus Christ whereby sinners are
converted from wickedness and given a new mind to love truth and
righteousness. The transgender movement of the 21st century is the
logical consequence of the feminist unisex movement of the 20th. “Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there
was none of them” (Psalm 139:16).
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
WASHINGTON — U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson
released a statement on Wednesday recognizing “LGBT Pride Month,” an act
that some have noted President Donald Trump has not done, unlike
predecessor Barack Obama, who released such a statement each year.
“In recognition of LGBTI Month, the Department of State affirms its
solidarity with the human rights defenders and civil society
organizations working around the world to uphold the fundamental
freedoms of LGBTI persons to live with dignity and freedom,” Tillerson
said in a national press release.
He decried discrimination against homosexual and transgendered
persons and vowed as diplomat to continue to support their rights around
the world.
“We also recognize that LGBTI persons continue to face the threat of
violence and discrimination. Violence and discrimination targeting any
vulnerable group undermines our collective security as well as American
values,” Tillerson stated.
“When all persons are protected on the basis of equality and with
dignity, global stability is strengthened,” he said. “We will continue
to support the human rights of LGBTI persons together with like-minded
governments, businesses, and civil society organizations globally.” As previously reported,
Tillerson, a former president of the Boy Scouts of America, was stated
to be instrumental in the organization’s decision to allow openly
homosexual scouts and leaders.
“I can’t get into the intimacy of these conversations, but he
agonized over this. He prayed on it, and ultimately he came to the
conclusion the only thing that can guide him here is what’s best for the
young boys,” John Hammer of the Center for Strategic and International
Studies told the Dallas News in 2014. “I think he became a key leader in
helping the group come to a consensus.”
The Baptist Press also reported in 2013 that Tillerson, a
Congregationalist, met with the Southern Baptist Convention’s Frank
Page, and explained why he believed the Boy Scout’s policy on open
homosexuals should be overturned.
“There are changing cultural winds on the issue of homosexuality,
Tillerson said,” the outlet reported. “Local scouting organizations
would retain control over their local leadership, he said, and national
gatherings of scouts would accommodate troops who don’t have gay
leaders.”
Some had consequently expressed concern about Trump’s selection of
Tillerson as secretary of state, while others contended that
homosexuality wouldn’t have anything to do with his job as diplomat.
“Trump calls Rex a ‘world class player and dealmaker,’ but if these
are the kinds of deals Tillerson makes … risking the well-being of young
boys under his charge in an attempt to placate radical homosexual
activists—then who knows what sort of ‘diplomacy’ he would champion at
DOS?” asked Tony Perkins of Family Research Council in December.
Trump’s daughter Ivanka likewise issued a statement recognizing Pride Month, posting two remarks to Twitter on June 1.
“[W]ishing everyone a joyful #Pride2017. This month we celebrate and honor the #LGBTQ community,” she wrote,
as well as, “I am proud to support my LGBTQ friends and the LGBTQ
Americans who have made immense contributions to our society and
economy.” As previously reported, Ivanka Trump also met with Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards in January as part of her listening tour.
While President Trump did not issue any statements in recognition of
Pride Month, he has made several remarks over the past year about
homosexuals, and sold “LGBT for Trump” t-shirts and pins during his presidential campaign.
Proverbs 14:34 reads, “Righteousness exalteth a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.”
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT PROMOTES HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS WORLDWIDE
(Friday Church News Notes, June 16, 2017, 2017, www.wayoflife.orgfbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) – U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson issued a statement on June 7 promoting homosexual rights
worldwide. “In
recognition of LGBTI Month, the Department of State affirms its
solidarity with the human rights defenders and civil society
organizations working around the world to uphold the fundamental
freedoms of LGBTI persons to live with dignity and freedom.”
LGBTI stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex. The
very concept of LGBTI is brazen
rebellion against the holy Creator, who made man male and female and
forbade man to have sexual relationships outside of holy matrimony,
which the Bible defines as a marriage of one man and one woman. The
pushing of homosexual rights by the United States government has already
resulted in oppression of Bible-believing Christians, and it will
escalate as the power of government is brought to bear against those who
refuse to bow to its immoral stance. President Donald Trump has done
nothing to
stop this trend. The only thing that will hinder this apostasy is
effectual intercession by individuals and churches that are on “praying
ground.” (For more on this see “What Rights Others Lose When Homosexuals
Gain Their Rights,” www.wayoflife.org.) “Why
do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of
the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against
the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their
cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord
shall have them in derision” (Psalm 2:1-4).
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
DOVER, Del. — Lawmakers in Delaware have passed a
bill that would ensure that abortion remains legal in the state should
the U.S. Supreme Court ever overturn Roe v. Wade.
The House passed Senate Bill 5
on Tuesday, which amended current law that made it illegal for
abortions to be performed except in the cases of rape, incest and the
life of the mother. The law had been considered unenforceable following
the 1973 ruling of Roe v. Wade.
“This Act modernizes Delaware’s laws on abortion to be consistent
with the scope of the right protected by the United States Constitution
and the practice in Delaware for the past 43 years,” a synopsis of the
bill explains. “In doing so, this Act permits the termination of a
pregnancy prior to viability, to protect the life or health of the
mother, or in the event of serious fetal anomaly.”
The measure had been hotly debated in the legislature, with some
lawmakers asserting that they support a mother’s “right to choose”
despite their feelings on the issue, and others stating that abortion is
murder and therefore is not a lawful choice.
“This legislation ensures that physicians have the ability to provide
the care that’s compassionate [and] medically appropriate under the
circumstance,” remarked Rep. Deb Heffernan, D-Bellefonte. “The fact of the matter is that this bill represents a license to
murder. Period. No questions about it,” said Rep. Joe Miro, R-Pike Creek
Valley. Pro-life groups also rallied against the legislation, including the
Delaware Family Policy Council, which had invited abortion survivor
Melissa Ohden to speak.
Ohden’s teenage mother had obtained a saline abortion as a way to
undo her unplanned pregnancy. An assistant to the abortionist heard
Ohden crying in the medical waste container where she had been discarded
following the procedure.
“What I know is that when I was born alive—certainly it was very
shocking, right? This is not supposed to happen. Demands were made to
leave me to die in that hospital room,” Ohden shared at the rally. “No
one’s life should hang in that balance.”
“You would never know by looking at me that I should’ve been poisoned
to death in the womb, but when I first survived, the doctors didn’t
think I would live for very long—yet I’m standing here today perfectly
healthy,” she declared.
Senate Bill 5 now heads to the desk of Gov. John Carney, who is expected to sign the legislation.
“We will exert the same pressure upon Governor Carney, a Catholic, to
uphold the sanctity of life for those innocent unborn children whose
lives depend upon his vetoing this radical bill,” Delaware Right to Life
spokeswoman Moira Sheridan told Reuters.
As previously reported, the 1973 ruling of Roe v. Wade centered on a
Texas woman named Norma McCorvey who sought an abortion over an alleged
rape. McCorvey later admitted that she had lied, writing in her book “I
Am Roe” that she made up the rape story at the advice of her feminist
attorneys to make her case more convincing.
She also never obtained an abortion, but placed her child up for
adoption and went on to become a vocal pro-life advocate, even going to
court in an effort to overturn the ruling.
“My decisions were wrong and I am fighting with every breath to change what has occurred,” McCorvey said in 2008.
She died in February at an assisted living facility.
GETS STANDING OVATION IN “ROMAN COLISEUM” STYLE OUTDOOR THEATER BY BLOODTHIRSTY CROWD
“BLOOD BATH” IN CENTRAL PARK, NEW YORK:
STAGING OF SHAKESPEARE’S “JULIUS CAESAR” FEATURES TRUMP GETTING ASSASSINATED
Published on Jun 7, 2017
The
audience reaction has been mixed for New York City’s latest
‘Shakespeare in the Park’ production, which shows a character that
resembles President Trump being brutally stabbed to death. William
Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar,’ which opened May 23 and will be performed
throughout this month in Central Park, is causing a stir among
audiences due to its apparent inspiration from the Trump administration.
The play’s climax comes with Caesar’s stabbing death at the hands of
his best friend, Brutus.
Trump Assassination Porn: NYC Shakespeare in the Park – Julius Casesar Stars Trump Stand-In
Published on Jun 6, 2017
Talk
about the Shakespeare in the Park production of Julius Ceasar at the
Delacourt outdoor Theater in New York City’s Central Park. Liberal
theater people portraying the bloody and brutal assassination of an
admitted Donald Trump stand-in.
Play In New York Features Donald Trump Being Stabbed To Death
“I mean, it was the on-stage murder of the President of the United States.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
New York’s Public Theater is running a modernized version of
Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, which features POTUS Donald Trump as the
protagonist.
In the play’s most iconic scene, the character, clearly intended to be the President is gruesomely stabbed to death.
The Caesar character has light hair and wears a suit with a long coat and a long royal blue tie, just like Trump. Caesar’s
wife, Calpurnia, has been made to look exactly like the first lady
Melania Trump, and even speaks with an eastern European accent.
On the play’s website, Caesar, aka Trump, is described as “Magnetic, populist, irreverent, he seems bent on absolute power.”
“A
small band of patriots, devoted to the country’s democratic traditions,
must decide how to oppose him.” the preview reads, adding
“Shakespeare’s political masterpiece has never felt more contemporary.”
One person who attended the production told reporters that it was “blatantly obvious” that Trump was the protagonist. The theater-goer, Laura Sheaffer, described the murder scene as “shocking” with blood “spewing everywhere.”
“They had the full murder scene onstage, and blood was spewing
everywhere out of his body,” she said. “To be honest I thought it was
shocking and distasteful. If this had happened to any other president —
even as recently as Barack Obama or George W. Bush — it would not have
flown. People would have been horrified.”
“I always go to
Shakespeare in the Park, but I wasn’t expecting to see this… I mean, it
was the on-stage murder of the President of the United States.” she
stated.
“Why is no one horrified by this?” the woman asked, describing the staging as “just too far.”
The
production comes on the heels of Kathy Griffin’s ‘Trump beheading’
stunt, which even the mainstream media reacted to with disgust.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Canada’s Ontario
province has passed a law empowering government to take children from
parents who oppose the “gender identity” or “gender expression” of their
child. The Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017 (Bill
89), which passed June 1 by a vote of 63 to 23 in Ontario’s legislature,
requires courts, social workers, and adoption services to consider
“race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship,
family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, and gender expression” when making decisions concerning a
child’s welfare. That would include removing children from homes where
parents oppose a child’s embrace of homosexuality or “gender” choice.
Michael Coteau, Ontario’s Minister of Child and Family
Services, who introduced the bill, said that he considered it “a form of
abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no,
you need to do this differently. If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the
definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into
protection where the abuse stops.”
Irwin Elman, Ontario’s provincial advocate for children
and youth, added approvingly that the new law “represents a paradigm
shift for the province with its commitment to the participation of
children and youth in every decision that affects them, the creation of a
child-centered system of service, and commitment to anti-racism and
children’s rights.”
Bill 89 replaces the previous Child and Family Services
Act, or Bill 28, which stipulated that a parent has the right to direct a
child’s “education and religious upbringing.” The new law deletes faith
considerations, requiring that parents direct a child “in accordance
with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity, and
cultural identity.” The change means that a parent may not step in to
challenge a child’s same-sex attraction, or his notion that he
identifies with the opposite sex rather than the one with which he was
born.
Opponents called the measure oppressive and a violation of
religious liberties. “With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era
of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in
Canada’s history,” said Jack Fonseca of Canada’s Campaign Life
Coalition. “Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and
all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family
through adoption.”
Fonseca warned that the new law gives government
bureaucrats “a type of police power to bust down your door, and seize
your biological children if you are known to oppose LGBT ideology and
the fraudulent theory of ‘gender identity’, if for instance, some claim
is made that your child may be same-sex attracted or confused about
their ‘gender.’”
Tanya Granic Allen of Canada’s Parents As First Educators
said that “disappointed as I am with this result, I am not surprised,”
adding that Ontario’s social liberals “have for years been pursuing
their anti-parent and anti-family agenda and Bill 89 is the latest
installment.”
Fonseca also targeted Christian leaders, particularly
Canada’s Catholic bishops, for not stepping up to challenge the measure.
“Why has the most powerful spiritual body in this province, the
Catholic hierarchy, not lifted a finger nor raised a voice to oppose
this tyranny against Christian families, and those from other faiths?”
he challenged. “The lack of spiritual leadership is killing us. Every
single time that Liberals, either federally or provincially, roll out
the LGBT juggernaut to take away our rights, or to demonize us as
bigots, we hear nothing but silence from the Church. This has to stop.”
Following
the video of his visit to Didsbury Mosque to talk to the Imam, Tommy
Robinson details every Hate preacher that has spoken at the mosque,
explaining exactly why it is such a dangerous institution. From the man
Theresa May fought for years to deport to, the Manchester bomber, Tommy
Robinson dissects the mosque’s history, its leadership and its dangerous
links to Islamic extremism. MORE: https://www.therebel.media/tommy_robi…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The travesty of justice in Idaho is now complete. In the summer of
2016, a 5-year-old girl was orally and anally raped and urinated upon by
three Muslim migrant boys in Twin Falls, Idaho. Since then, instead of
getting justice, the victim’s family has been abused by law enforcement
and governing authorities as if they were the criminals – because what
happened to their little girl contradicts the politically correct
narrative about Muslim migrants. On Tuesday, the perpetrators were
sentenced, and the final injustice was done to this poor girl.
The injustice began in the proceedings at the Snake River Juvenile
Detention Center in Twin Falls when Judge Thomas Borreson of Idaho’s 5th
Judicial District ordered the little victim’s parents to say nothing to
anyone – ever – about what was said in the courtroom Tuesday, or to
disclose the sentence that he gave to the savage attackers. He did allow
them to say that they were unhappy with the sentencing, but threatened
to jail them for contempt of court if they disclosed why they were
unhappy with it.
But even though the victim’s parents were not allowed to talk to me,
there were twelve to fifteen people in the courtroom who saw and heard
the whole sorry business. I was nevertheless informed of what happened
by an anonymous source inside the courtroom – and the more I heard, the
more I understood why this judge wanted to keep all the proceedings
secret.
Janice Kroeger, the Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, who was
supposed to be trying these boys for their crimes, defended the boys and
repeatedly attacked Lacy, the victim’s mother. A therapist for the boys
was present, as well as a parole officer and a detective. Everything
that was said was designed to portray the perpetrators as victims.
Throughout the proceedings, they were repeatedly called victims, and the
youngest one was called “the biggest victim of them all.”
The court heard all about how the attackers are doing well in school,
and about how smart they are. They were praised for the supposed ordeal
they had to go through. It was claimed that all three are suffering
from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from having to go through
courtroom proceedings.
After this love fest, which lasted for five hours in the courtroom,
all three boys were sentenced, one after the other. All three were given
probation. They were not found guilty of rape, but of sexually lewd
conduct.
In the midst of this judicial mugging, every time Lacy’s lawyer tried
to speak up, he was silenced. The little victim, Jayla, was never even
mentioned once by Kroeger or the judge – or by the police or anyone
else. Only Lacy mentioned her, when she made her statement. Lacy
detailed how the poor girl is still suffering the effects of this
attack: she is wetting the bed and having bad dreams, and more.
Yet when Lacy completed her statement, Kroeger lashed out not at the
perpetrators or their parents, but at Lacy. She viciously tongue-lashed
Lacy for a full fifteen minutes, until finally Judge Borreson had to
stop her.
Understandably, the parents of the victim were and are devastated.
Back in April, when the attackers initially pleaded guilty, Twin Falls
County Prosecutor Grant Loebs said:
“I am pleased that we were able to resolve this case in a way that was
approved and agreed to by the victim’s family. This continues to be a
serious and sad case, but it was resolved properly.”
Nothing could be farther from the truth. The resolution of the case
was not accepted by the victim’s family, and it was not resolved
properly.
From the beginning to the end, for Idaho officials this case was
about one thing, and one thing: not justice for this poor little girl
who was brutalized and abused, but about making sure that Americans
don’t start to realize what is happening and oppose the Muslim migrant
influx. Idaho officials were willing to sacrifice this girl’s wellbeing
for that goal – to their everlasting shame.
If there were any justice, Judge Borreson would be impeached and
removed now. Meanwhile, please help the victim and her family meet their
considerable expenses: contribute here.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
This is an intelligence briefing. Here I present the bare bones of what has been happening before our eyes…if we would see it. Once
upon a time, there was an industrial combine in Nazi Germany called IG
Farben. It was the largest chemical/pharmaceutical octopus in the world.
It owned companies, and it had favorable business agreements with
companies from England to Central America to Japan.
The author of The Devil’s Chemists,
Josiah DuBois, traveled to Guatemala, on a fact-finding mission, in the
early days of World War 2, and returned with the comment that, as far
as he could tell, Guatemala was “a wholly owned subsidiary of Farben.”
The pharmaceutical empire was and is one of the major forces behind
the European Union (EU). It is no accident that these drug corporations
wield such power. They aren’t only involved in controlling the medical
cartel; they are political planners.
This is how and why Big
Pharma fits so closely with what is loosely referred to as the New World
Order. The aim of enrolling every human in a cradle-to-grave system of
disease diagnosis and toxic drug treatment has a larger purpose: to
debilitate, to weaken populations.
This is a political goal. It facilitates control.
IG
Farben’s main component companies, at the outbreak of World War 2, were
Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst. They were chemical and drug companies. Farben
put Hitler over the top in Germany as head of State, and the war was
designed to lead to a united Europe that would be dominated by the
Farben nexus.
The loss of the war didn’t derail that plan. It was
shifted into an economic blueprint, which became, eventually, the
European Union.
The European Commission’s first president was
Walter Hallstein, the Nazi lawyer who, during the war, had been in
charge of post-war legal planning for the new Europe.
As the Rath
Foundation reports: In 1939, on the brink of the war, Hallstein had
stated, “The creation of the New Law [of the Nazis] is ONLY the task of
the law-makers!”
In 1957, with his reputation sanitized, Hallstein
spoke the words in this manner: “The European Commission has full and
unlimited power for all decisions related to the architecture of this
European community.”
Post-war, IG Farben was broken up into
separate companies, but those companies (Bayer, Hoechst, and BASF) came
roaring back, attaining new profit highs.
I refer you to the
explosive book, The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU, by Paul Anthony
Taylor, Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, Dr. Matthias Rath, and August Kowalczyk.
You can read it at relay-of-life.com. It is a dagger in the heart of
the EU.
At the Rath Foundation, you can also read Joseph Borkin’s classic, “The Crime and Punishment of IG Farben.”
In
1992, I was deeply engaged in researching the specific devastating
effects of medical drugs. Eventually, I concluded that, at the highest
levels of power, these drugs weren’t destructive by accident. They were
intended to cause harm. This was covert chemical warfare against the
population of the planet. The Rockefeller-Standard Oil-Farben connection
was a primary piece of the puzzle.
It was, of course, Rockefeller
(and Carnegie) power that had forced the birth of pharmaceutical
medicine in America, with the publication of the 1910 Flexner Report.
The Report was used to excoriate and marginalize Chiropractic,
Homeopathy, Naturopathy, and other forms of traditional natural
practice, in favor of what would become the modern juggernaut of
drug-based treatment.
In an article about the FDA, “Medical Murder
in the Matrix,” I point out the fact that this federal agency has
permitted at least 100,000 deaths of Americans, per year, from the
direct effects of drugs it, the FDA, has certified as safe. (See, for
example, JAMA, July 26, 2000, ‘Is US Health Really the Best in the
World,’ Dr. Barbara Starfield.)
The FDA knows these death figures. “Unintended” and “accidental” can no longer be applied to this ongoing holocaust.
The pharmaceutical industry itself also knows those death figures.
To
understand the dimensions and history of the ongoing chemical warfare
against the population, in the form of medical drugs (and of course
pesticides), one must factor in the original octopus, IG Farben.
World War 2 never ended. It simply shifted its strategies.
In
any fascist system, the bulk of the people working inside the system,
including scientists, refuse to believe the evidence of what is
happening before their own eyes. They insist they are doing good. They
believe they are on the right side. They see greater top-down control as
necessary and correct. They adduce “reasonable” explanations for
inflicted harm and death.
World War 2 is still underway. The battleground has been changed, and the means are far cleverer.
Sun
Tzu wrote: “Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not
supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s
resistance without fighting…The best victory is when the opponent
surrenders of its own accord before there are any actual hostilities…It
is best to win without fighting.”
This is what has been happening: invisible warfare.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The Swedish government has
announced that a clinic in Stockholm will no longer treat female rape
victims and the money will be spent on treating ‘traumatized’ Muslim
migrants instead.
After 10
years of helping rape victims, the Stockholm Crisis and Trauma Center
“will now only devote itself to patients with war and torture trauma,” reports SVT.
Authorities
in Stockholm claim their agreement with the clinic does not cover rape
victims and the focus will now be moved to treating migrants with
“psychological problems are associated with torture or severe trauma
from war,” despite the fact that the majority of migrants pouring into
Sweden are not arriving from war-torn countries.
According to Maria Hägerstrand, Unit
Manager for Psychiatry in Stockholm County Council, “This is a group
that is now expanding with the major migration flows that exist and we
want them to be able to help even more in that group in the future.”
The
clinic helps around 200 rape victims annually, with around 140 of these
being women. All of them will now have to find somewhere else to
receive support.
The clinic said it was “very surprised” that authorities announced their intention to cancel the agreement.
“Unfortunately, I do not think everyone will get the care they need,” said Fredrik Garpe.
Birgitta
Sevefjord, a member of the Stockholm City Council, said the decision
was “completely insane” and that “nobody else in the county council can
meet these women’s needs.”
“There is no one who will take care of them, it’s actually a scandal,” she added.
The
horrible irony here of course is that a significant percentage of
current and future rape victims to use the clinic would have been
victims of migrant rapists given that Sweden is now the rape capital of
Europe thanks to its open border policy.
Rapes
have skyrocketed in Sweden over recent years. Authorities have claimed
that this is due to the definition of rape being changed, but the spike
occurred long after the change was made.
Sex crimes in the country have doubled since 2012. The most recently available statistics showed that immigrants were 5.5 times more likely to carry out sexual assaults.
In February we reported
on how a Swedish woman was brutally gang raped and racially abused by a
group of men in Gothenburg who also live streamed the assault to
Facebook, but police were disinterested when the case was brought to
their attention.
When I started practice, everybody only got
two [vaccines] at a time. And I actually began to see problems with it
even early on because when I started practice we used the original DPT.
So, kids on monitors, I noticed that they had increased alarms after
vaccines. So I made sure that they were aggressive with fever control
and things afterward. And then, as time went on in the late 80s they
started to increase the number of vaccines, and I had a problem with
that because giving just two at a time was hard enough but now they
wanted to give four or five, six at a time. So I made the decision at
that time that our practice would only give two at a time. It was never
more than two at a time. And then, as more time went on, I started
seeing truly vaccine injured kids. I started seeing a lot of autistic
children and their parents all said the same thing. They said my child
was fine till they got this shot and then within a week we lost him.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
If you thought Hillary Clinton would stop talking any time soon then think again. The
defeated presidential candidate told a fundraiser for a youth program
that the best way to stop terrorism was to “understand” other cultures
and their food. Yes, really. Hillary defended London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the man who once represented
9/11 Al-Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui, called moderate Muslims “Uncle
Toms” and said terrorism was “part and parcel” of living in a major
city.
Clinton said that Khan, who has called for Donald Trump to be banned
from entering the UK for a state visit (while actual terrorists from
Syria are free to return), had shown “steady, determined leadership”. Hillary
said the best way of combating terror was to “reach out to the world”
in order to “understand” people living in foreign countries. “Getting to know one another. Learning about the experiences, the lives, the cultures, the religions, the food,” she added.
One wonders what kind of “cultures” Clinton is referring to? Maybe the ‘culture’ of Bacha bāzī,
where elderly Muslim men dress up young boys as girls and then rape
them? Or could she be referring to female genital mutilation? Another
expression of Islamic ‘culture’ now endorsed by imams living in America.
“This
is not a time to lash out, to incite fear or to use tragedy and terror
for political gain,” said Clinton, a comment obviously aimed at Donald
Trump and anyone else who has correctly identified political correctness
and tolerance of Islamism as creating a fertile ground for terrorist
attacks in the west.
Maybe Hillary is right. Maybe we don’t need
to arrest the thousands of jihadists who walk our streets. Maybe we
don’t need to stop terrorists who have fought alongside ISIS in Syria
and Iraq from returning to the west. Maybe we just need to get a better grip on the dietary habits of Muslims. Who
knew it would be this easy to stop suicide bombers, rampaging knifemen
and jihadists who plough vehicles into crowds of people?
Hillary
Clinton has once more come to the rescue of America. Completely ending
terrorism over night by understand the Islamic culture and their food.
Thank you, Hillary Clinton.
EXCERPTS: “Based on evidence seized from her home, federal prosecutors detailed
Winner’s alleged plans to burn down the White House and travel to
Afghanistan, pledging her allegiance to the Taliban.”
“Prosecutors said she also instructed family members to transfer $30,000
into her mother’s account so she’d appear poor enough for a
court-appointed attorney.”
Paul
Joseph Watson breaks down Reality Winner, the NSA leaker, her beliefs,
as advertised on her own social media sites, and what led her to release
the classified documents from the NSA.
Potential Deep State Leaker Reality Leigh Winner Gets Discovered by FBI and Arrested
Published on Jun 6, 2017
Reality
Leigh Winner has been named as the source of a leaked report on
Russia’s involvement with the United States’ election. She is a 25 year
old Air Force veteran who originally comes from Texas where she worked
as a linguist and yoga instructor. Currently, she lives in Augusta,
Georgia where she is an employee of Pluribus International Corporation.
Her employer is a sub-contractor of the NSA. Winner apparently has
many accomplishments in her life including having a top-secret security
clearance. The security clearance she has may have enabled her to gain
direct access to an NSA site in Georgia to download and print the
documents in question, which she leaked to “The Intercept.”
The
federal government was tipped off about this leak from The Intercept
itself because of their attempt to get the document verified after the
source (Reality Winner) dropped it off to them. At this point, the FBI
gets involved and Winner is nearly immediately identified as the leaker.
Within the first few days of the article featuring the leaked Russia
report going up on The Intercept’s website, she was arrested.
This
could very well be a deep state operation in which the young lady in
question was used as a patsy or the proverbial “fall guy.” One thing to
note here is that she would have had no business dealing with that
information at all. So the question must be … how did she know where to
look for it? The NSA must have all types of security layers that
prevent information from being easily found and stolen even for those
who have top level security clearances. Reality Winner’s social media
was full of anti-Trump rhetoric, so it would have been easy for
high-level shadowy figures to single her out as a weak link to use in
their ploy to undermine the President.
Who Is Reality Winner? The 25-year-old Air Force Veteran has been charged with mailing classified material to a news outlet. https://www.theatlantic.com/news/arch…
If The UK Continues To Fail Its Citizens English Men Will Take The Law Into Their Own Hands
Tommy Robinson Confronts Didsbury Mosque
Hosting Hate Preachers
The Manchester attacker’s mosque completely exposed
Tommy Robinson paid a visit to the mosque attended by
Manchester attacker Salman Abedi. It has recently been proven that the
mosque has distributed anti-western propaganda and hosted a number of
radical preachers. This video first appeared at therebel.media
ISIS Fighters Should Be Tried And Executed,
Not Imported By Libtard Gov’ts
Published on Jun 6, 2017
Islam
has been at war with the West for hundreds of years, no other religion
or ideology is as incompatible and destructive as Islam.
Trump berates London’s Muslim mayor over response to jihad attacks in London
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
President Trump has taken London Mayor Sadiq Khan to task for his
grossly insensitive statement about the London jihadist attack:
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack,” the
president wrote on his personal Twitter account, “and Mayor of London
says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
Only a “leader” with either an unsound mind or an unsavory agenda
could utter such bizarre words following a gruesome jihad rampage
(within two weeks of the one Manchester) that began with the mowing down
of innocent civilians and continued with a 12-inch blade “knife
frenzy.” All the while, the jihadis shouted “this is for Allah.”
Khan’s words start to look more sinister than obtuse when one considers his own jihadist connections. He was reported by the UK’s Spectator to have known links to “extremists”:
Some of these associations date back to his time as a
director of Liberty and a human rights lawyer – trying to get the UK to
lift its ban on the American Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who
has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great
man, and speaking at the same conference as Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, a member
of the now proscribed Islamist organisation that trained the 7/7 bomber
Mohammad Sidique Khan.
in 2004 he appeared on a platform with five Islamic
extremists at a conference in London organised by Al-Aqsa, a group that
has published works by the notorious Holocaust denier Paul Eisen….In the
same year, Khan was the chair of the Muslim Council of Britain’s legal
affairs committee and was involved in defending the Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent
Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are
unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to
determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The
majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence
(Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools
of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah,
Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that
apostates must be executed.”
In September, Khan stated that
it was necessary for Westerners to be careful not to insult Muslims and
to affirm that Muslims can hold Western values, otherwise they would
join jihad groups. In other words, Khan was warning non-Muslims to
beware of insulting Muslims, otherwise they would kill you.
Also, it did not matter that jihad attacks in Britain tripled in five years: Khan boasted in March that he planned on bringing in 1,500,000 more migrants.
Khan should have never become Mayor of London in the first place,
given his unsavory background. His plan to bring 1,500,000 more migrants
to London will further expose London to jihad attacks and
infiltration.
The West is in a self-induced crisis and needs to end the practice of
putting political correctness before the wellbeing of its own citizens.
“Donald Trump berates London mayor over response to terror attacks”, by Martin Pengelley, Guardian, June 4, 2017:
Donald Trump has criticised the mayor of London, hours
after seven people were killed and 48 injured in a terror attack in the
centre of the city.
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack,” the president
wrote on his personal Twitter account, “and Mayor of London says there
is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
In response, a spokesman for Sadiq Khan said the mayor had “more
important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet
that deliberately takes out of context his remarks”.
Khan commented on the attacks in a statement overnight and in a
television interview earlier on Sunday. In the interview, he said there
was “no reason to be alarmed” by an increased and armed police presence
in the city that day.
In his statement on Saturday night, issued as the London Bridge
attack unfolded, Khan said: “Metropolitan police are responding to the
horrific terrorist attack at London Bridge and Borough Market.” He
added: “My thoughts are with everyone affected, and I’d like to thank
the brave men and women of our emergency services who were first on the
scene and will be working throughout the night.
“This was a deliberate and cowardly attack on innocent Londoners and
visitors to our city enjoying their Saturday night,” he said. “I condemn
it in the strongest possible terms. There is no justification
whatsoever for such barbaric acts.”
In the television interview on Sunday morning, Khan said the UK
general election, scheduled for Thursday, should go ahead as planned. He
added: “There aren’t words to describe the grief and anger that our
city will be facing today. I’m appalled and furious that these cowardly
terrorists would deliberately target innocent Londoners.
“There can be no justification for the acts of these terrorists and I am quite clear that we will never let them win.
“My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm
and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today,
including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to
be alarmed by this. We are the safest global city in the world. You saw
last night as a consequence of our planning, our preparation, the
rehearsals that take place, the swift response from the emergency
services tackling the terrorists and also helping the injured.”
After Trump’s tweet, a spokesperson for Khan said: “The mayor is busy
working with the police, emergency services and the government to
coordinate the response to this horrific and cowardly terrorist attack
and provide leadership and reassurance to Londoners and visitors to our
city.
“He has more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s
ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks
urging Londoners not to be alarmed when they saw more police – including
armed officers – on the streets.”…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
You can set your watch to it. In the wake of very jihad terror
attack, no matter how heinous and horrifying, in come the washerwomen
with buckets of dirty water working double time to scrub and censor the
motive from the attack. Once the stage is sufficiently washed and
prepped, in march the jihadis in the information battle-space,
silver-tongued snakes selling Islam-is-peace snake oil to an over-eager media audience braying for more.
CNN had to stage it. Because there are never any Muslim protests
against jihad or female genital mutilation or gender apartheid or creed
apartheid or Islamic antisemitism. I have yet to see CNN, BBC or any of
the enemedia news outlets go to the hospitals and interview the victims
or speak to the mutilated, maimed, deformed little girls with holes in
their faces who attended the Manchester pop concert.
No matter the monstrosity, nothing changes. If the torn, dismembered
bodies of little girls at an Ariana Grande concert were not a
game-changer, then nothing will move the conquered and the unmovable.
Not only do we, the victims, have to clean up the flesh and bone and
blood running down the pavement, we must subject ourselves to endless
dawah (proselytizing) for Islam on mind-numbing news shows on the BBC,
CNN, MSNBC, and the like. FOX is lost. Sunday morning, Fox and Friends
had on liar and deceiver Mubin Shaikh (Robert Spencer debated him here), Shaikh said “we must never equate Islam and terrorism.” The hosts nodded gravely. There is nowhere on TV you can get reality.
Teddy bears, candlelight vigils and hashtags will not defeat jihad.
Islamic terror-tied groups like CAIR rub their hooves in glee in the
wake of every Islamic attack. After the body count, it’s their turn to
wage jihad in the information battle-space.
One of the jihadis said, “I’m ready to do whatever I need to
do in the name of Allah. I am ready in the name of Allah to do what
needs to be done, including killing my own mother.”
What further proof does anyone need? Why the madness and irrational
denial? Sixteen years after 9/11 and over thirty thousand deadly Islamic
attacks, this is where we are? Yes, deliberate delusion and collusion
continues. As I have so often lamented, in the wake of horrific jihad
terror comes the post-jihad dawah (proselytizing for Islam).
While jihadis scream “Allahu akbar” and “takbir,” elites in the media
and academia assure us it is not about Allah or Islam.
Nor will you hear much about these scenes from the London jihad slaughter (as reported in the Guardian):
–“He just stepped outside the bar for a second and a
man ran up to him and said: ‘This is for my family, this is for Islam’,
and stuck a knife straight in him. He’s got a seven-inch scar going from
his belly round to his back,” Elizabeth O’Neill told reporters outside
King’s College hospital.
–The van was “probably travelling at about 50 miles an hour” and hit “five or six people.”
–According to another witness, Eric, the men inside jumped out once
the van crashed and “ran towards the people that they nearly ran over”. “[Then] they literally just started kicking them, punching them, they took out knives… it was a rampage really,” he said.
One man, Gerard, told the BBC he saw a woman being stabbed “10 or 15 times” by men shouting “This is for Allah.”
Nor will you hear much about the words spoken to a mother in London before a jihadi plunged a knife into her son’s stomach: “This is for Islam.”
Will we ever learn their motive?
One of the other jihadis who attacked London with two co-religionists
before being shot dead by police deceived his neighbors into thinking
he was a great guy, a good neighbor. He played football with their
children on the nearby field. Secretly, he had a devout, destructive
hatred, and he frequently changed his appearance in preparation of
unleashing a deadly Islamic attack on the capital city, during which
seven people died and up to 50 were injured last night. How many other
“moderates” are in our midst? More than you can imagine.
Prime Minister Theresa May and every major media news outlet insists
jihadis have “perverted” and/or “hijacked” Islam? How have they
perverted it? They cite Quranic texts and teachings chapter and verse. They follow the hadith, Muhammad’s example.
Harun Khan, who leads the Muslim Council of Britain, said, “I am
appalled and angered by the terrorist attacks at London Bridge and
borough market, in my home city. These acts of violence were truly
shocking and I condemn them in the strongest terms.” Is that so. What
have Khan and his coreligionists who allege that this is a
misunderstanding of Islam done to combat it? There is, for example, not a
single program in any mosque or Islamic school in the UK (or the UK) to
teach young Muslims to reject the Islamic State’s understanding of
Islam. With the Islamic State energetically recruiting young Muslims in
the US, that is a significant omission.
The Sun says that Ramadan is meant for devotion and peace. Since when? As Robert Spencer has noted: “A jihad group explained it
back in 2012: ‘The month of Ramadan is a month of holy war and death
for Allah. It is a month for fighting the enemies of Allah and God’s
messenger, the Jews and their American facilitators.’ Referring to a
jihad attack that happened at that time, the message continued: ‘One of
our groups aided by Allah managed to bomb a bus full of Jewish tourists,
plunderers of holy lands, after careful tracking. The holy war is not
confined to a particular arena and we shall fight the Jews and the
Americans until they leave the land of Islam.’”
All this dawah and whitewashing makes one thing clear.Terrorism works.
In the wake of every jihad attack come sharia-backed policies,
legislation, and submission. Freedom of speech is not the problem. Free
exchange of ideas is not the problem. Islamic texts and teachings that
exhort to jihad is the problem.
Yet Theresa May says the internet must now be regulated following the
London Bridge terror attack. Of course, good folks will say, well, that
makes sense, because they don’t know better. But let me assure you,
these measures will be used to silence my colleagues and me. The left
has already proved to be too fearful of Islam to take real action
against jihadis. And if my colleagues and I were not blacklisted and
invited to debate these ideas in the national conversation, good people
would see this for exactly what it is.
The West means to roll back technology, silence the mechanism, in
which those religious teachings are shared? That is a primitive as jihad
savagery.
As long as Quranic texts and teachings are seen as legitimate and
holy, Muslims will share them, preach them, and act on them with or
without the internet. What is May going to do, ban WhatsApp and
Telegram, the dark web? She banned my colleagues and me, not jihad
preachers or these Muslim terrorists who slaughtered Brits in the
homeland. She equates those of us who oppose jihad (extremists) to the
jihadis (extremists). If Theresa May were serious, she would lift the
ban on Robert Spencer and me.
Like every bad left-wing idea, this steaming pile of dung is packaged
in a blue Tiffany box. Remember how they sold “hate crime”
“legislation” using the brutal beating of a gay man, Matthew Shepard
(when actually it was just a drug deal gone bad). Hate crime legislation was officially criminalizing thought. Thought crime.
The internet is the last place for informed citizens to get news and
information the sharia-compliant elite media won’t cover. Online is the
last frontier for truth and free speech, and the left is going after
that as well, enforcing the blasphemy laws under the sharia. Facebook
has blocked my content from close one million followers.
If Theresa May wants to turn things around, the first thing she can
do is lift the ban on Spencer and me — if for no other reason than to
show that she finally understands that the problem is not those who
oppose jihad, but jihad.
Instead, the dawah and whitewashing will continue.
________________________________________________________
Italy: Fear of jihad terror attack sets off stampede, 1500 injured
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who
disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every
fingertip of them.” — Quran 8:12
With the ever-increasing number of jihad attacks in the Western
countries, terror is being struck into the hearts of their citizens. The
days of expecting peace and protection in a democratic society are
over. The Western world is in turmoil, thanks to jihadists and leaders
who strangely keep getting voted in while sacrificing the safety of
their own jurisdictions and countries for political expediency.
The Telegraph was a little more descriptive about what happened:
The Turin prefect said in a statement that the crowd “was
taken by panic and by the psychosis of a terror attack,” fearing that a
loud noise was caused by attackers. The source of the loud noise that
triggered the stampede remained unclear, officials said. Italian media
has speculated it may have been a firecracker.
“Turin stampede: ‘1,500 injured’ at Juventus screening”, BBC News, June 4, 2017:
About 1,500 people were injured in the Italian city of
Turin after a firecracker provoked a stampede on Saturday night, police
say.
Thousands of football fans were watching a live relay of Juventus’
Champions League final against Real Madrid in Cardiff when a bang was
heard and rumours of an explosion spread.
At least seven people, including a seven-year-old child, were seriously hurt, local media say.
It is the 12th Champions League title for Real Madrid.
With 10 minutes of the second half remaining, crowds rushed away from
the centre of Piazza San Carlo, crushing people against barriers.
Bags and shoes were left scattered on the ground as people ran screaming out of the square.
Some of the injuries occurred when a barrier around the entrance to an underground car park gave way.
While most of the wounded had cuts on their legs and arms, seven were still in hospital, local media reported.
Three of them were reportedly in a critical condition, including a
seven-year-old boy who had head and chest injuries after he was trampled
by people rushing to escape.
There was anger locally that the authorities did not do more to put
in place proper crowd control measures, the BBC’s James Reynolds in Rome
reports….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Theresa May says she wants governments to unite to combat online
“extremism.” But since she clearly regards critics of Sharia as
extremists (as she showed by banning Pamela Geller and me from the
country), it’s obvious that critics of Sharia will be censored as well.
The superb David Wood discusses this in this new video.
"RAMADAN'S PEACE, LOVE & TEDDY BEARS":
Not Internet Control, But Border Control &
Armed Citizens to Fight Jihad
Published on Jun 6, 2017
London
Mayor Khan thinks the greatest problem before us is “Climate Change”.
UK Prime Minister Theresa May sees a jihadi problem, but her solution is
internet control. We look at the real solutions — border control &
an armed citizenry — and how technology will defeat political attacks
on free speech.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The number of parents questioning the wisdom of the currently recommended schedule is up and corroboration is easy to find.1 An article in the journal Pediatrics in August 2016 reported that the number of pediatricians encountering parents who either question vaccine safety or refuse one or more vaccines or want to use an alternative vaccination schedule for their children increased from just under 75 percent in 2006 to 87 percent by 2013.2
A study from the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics3 reported that the primary reasons given for vaccine hesitancy or refusal of one or more recommended vaccinations include
concern over pain associated with multiple injections (44 percent); too
many vaccines given at one time (34 percent); the possibility of
vaccines causing autism or other learning disabilities (26 percent, down
from the 2006 survey); concern that there is an association between
vaccines and chronic illnesses (13.5 percent); and lack of adequate
safety studies (13.2 percent). Some parents also are questioning whether so many childhood vaccines
are necessary (up from the 2006 survey), and whether experience with
natural disease is better for children than repeated artificial
manipulation of the immune system by vaccinations.
Overall, fewer parents are focused specifically on fears of autism
compared with a few years ago. Instead, parents are expressing broader
concerns such as the potential effects on immune system function,
worries over how the injection of so many toxins may affect their
child’s well-being long term, lack of adequate vaccine safety studies,
and protection of parental rights to make informed medical decisions for
their children.4
The general consensus that vaccine hesitancy is on the rise has spawned a host articles in the medical literature and in the media about how
to “fix the problem.” Many doctors and and health care professionals
have serious questions themselves and agree that vaccine decisions
should be left to parents, but a far more common position holds that
parents should not have the final say on vaccine decisions and that it
is a societal obligation for doctors to change the mind of anyone who
disagrees with current vaccine recommendations. A quick Google search of
“vaccine hesitancy” turns up mountains of advice on how to persuade
so-called “misinformed” or “confused” parents to change their minds and
get with the program.
From tired old references to the “debunked” notion that vaccines
cause autism to condescending suggestions for educating, incentivizing
or coercing reluctant patients or parents to accept all recommended
vaccines, it can be intimidating to even admit to having questions about
vaccination. It may help to know what to expect and to recognize
pressure strategies that may be used.
Categorizing the Vaccine Hesitant
One of the first things recommended for doctors faced with vaccine
hesitant parents (a term reportedly coined to “depolarize the ‘pro’
versus ‘anti’ vaccination alignment and to express the spectrum of
parental attitudes toward vaccines5)
is to categorize the parents by degree of and reasons for reluctance,
in order to determine the best strategy for changing hesitancy to
compliance.
Scott Halperin, MD, is credited with identifying the “five types of
vaccine-hesitant parents,” classified as follows in a blog post for
“National Immunization Awareness Month”6:
“Uninformed But Want To Become Informed” parents
are defined as those who turn to their trusted physician because of his
or her expertise and want to be reassured and educated about the safety
and effectiveness of vaccines. It is suggested that these parents can be
educated about the science in simple terms without using too much
jargon, and that sharing personal experiences—such as the fact that the
physician’s own children are fully vaccinated—may help.
“Misinformed But Correctable” describes parents
considered to have been fooled by exploitative, anonymous online
reporting that plays into their worst fears, despite the “strength of
the evidence that vaccines are safe and effective.” For these parents,
it is suggested that sound data de-bunking the myths they’ve bought into
should do the trick. It is also said to be important to both
acknowledge the risks and limitations of vaccines and to respect their
parental authority… but to very clearly stress the “strong benefits of
vaccines.”
“Well-Read and Open-Minded” parents are described
as having absorbed so much information on both sides of the issue that
they come to their physician with many questions and concerns. These
parents require help in evaluating the information they have heard. It
is recommended that the doctor have sound data and appropriate websites
to refer them to, in order to refute any “misinformation” they have
received. A reassuring follow-up phone call is also said to be helpful.
“Convinced and Content” parents are categorized as
those who are “convinced vaccines are bad, but come to [their physician]
to prove they are open-minded.” The strategy to deal with such parents
is described as “acknowledging their concerns but strongly refuting them
with scientific data.”
“Committed and Missionary” is the final category
identified for vaccine questioners. These people are said to be
“card-carrying anti-vaccine activists who try and convert you to their
position.” Some of the suggestions for dealing with such parents include
stressing the positive effects of vaccines, and making sure they
understand the responsibilities and risks they are accepting if they
choose not to vaccinate. Physicians are encouraged to “Be patient, as
correcting anti-vaccine myths and changing parent attitudes does not
happen overnight.”
Going Beyond Official Policy Education
If gentle persuasion and carefully scripted education are not enough
to convince parents to fully vaccinate their children, other means of
doing so have been identified by some doctors.
One ploy is referred to as “presumptive delivery,” in which the
physician begins by presenting vaccination as a requirement to prevent
disease rather than as an optional course of action.7
Similarly, a “strategy of inconvenience” is alleged to be pretty
effective. For example, when a step was added requiring Michigan parents
seeking a vaccine exemption to meet in person with a “county health
educator” before being granted the exemption, the number of requests
dropped by 35 percent in one year, and vaccination rates rose. Health
policy specialist Mark Largent said the idea was to make the “process
more burdensome,” adding that, “Moral claims and ideology don’t matter
as much when it’s inconvenient.”8
Appealing to a parent’s sense of societal obligation is another
tactic used frequently. Pediatrician Richard Lander, MD expressed a
common opinion when he said that it is important to help “people view
vaccines as protecting overall community health, similar to the way
other laws are designed to protect community health.”9
Dr. Lander further suggested that “If a parent decides not to give
vaccines, perhaps the insurance companies should charge them higher
premiums since their risk of preventable infections is higher; and maybe
if someone contracts a preventable illness from their child, the
parents should be financially responsible for the health care costs
involved. This would place more responsibility upon those parents and
really alert them to how their decision doesn’t only affect their
child.”9
Guilt and fear tactics are also said to be effective, as when a
physician asks, “Do you really want your child to have to suffer through
a disease you either had as a child or never had to have yourself?” or
plays up the risks of “vaccine preventable diseases” with photographs
and horror stories of children who became very ill or died from one of
those diseases. Some physicians resort to denying
medical care to children if parents refuse to give their children all
federally recommended vaccines according to the CDC’s recommended
schedule.
If all else fails, offering candy is a suggested bribe for convincing
the truly intractable. No joke. Health officials in Ireland suggest
that uptake of the flu vaccine can be increased substantially among
nurses by offering chocolate or drawings for iPads to nurses who agree
to be vaccinated.10
Although the comments were roundly criticized for being patronizing and
condescending, they offer a telling glimpse into the way people who question the safety of vaccines are viewed by public health officials and the mainstream medical community.
Be
prepared. The radical, fear-mongering pro-vaxers who want to give big
daddy government the right to your health care choices and freedom use
some common debate tactics. Be aware. Be prepared.
One
day, should the Lord tarry and man does not fully revert to the Dark
Ages, mankind will one day look back at the vaccination agenda of our
age as we look back at blood-letting. A day when doctors will understand
that vaccination is based on agenda-driven speculation, opinion, grand
assumptions, and lies repeated and repeated until they become truth in
the ears of those conditioned not to question the voices of authority of
our “civilized” control system, NOT real science.
Dr. Humphries
gives a pretty good overview of several of the real, and
scientifically-demonstrable problems with vaccinations. Judge for
yourself. But you owe it to you and your kids to make an INFORMED
choice. There is one side that tries to shame and coerce your choice in
this very important matter. That vaccines are being MANDATED should tell
any thoughtful soul how (un)effective they are.
Nurse Fired For Sharing Truth About Vaccines Tells All
Mainstream Media Funded By Drug Companies
Pushing Poison On America
Published on Jun 5, 2017
Alex Jones breaks down how the mainstream media funds itself by pushing dangerous pharmaceuticals on the American public.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Faced with an orchestrated influx of millions of migrants from Africa and the Middle East,
German officials have started commandeering private property to house
the tsunami of new arrivals. Italian property owners have also been
forced, literally kicking and screaming, to house migrants against their will. Plans to put resistors in jail are reportedly being considered.
And in Sweden, where an extreme housing shortage in Stockholm has been
made even more acute by the arrival of hundreds of thousands of migrants
in recent years, authorities are using tax money to outbid Swedes in the intensifying competition for living space. Other fundamental freedoms are also being attacked under the guise of dealing with the self-inflicted “refugee crisis.” And it is going to get worse. Perhaps the most extreme attacks on private property have come from
Germany. In the city of Hamburg (shown), the ruling coalition of extreme
left-wing authorities first began seizing private property to house
migrants with a controversial law passed in October of 2015. With some
400 migrants arriving in the city each day and migrant shelters already
packed to capacity with new arrivals, officials claimed it was needed.
At first, it was just commercial property that was supposed to be
confiscated and turned into migrant housing, and only if the property in
question was vacant. The confiscation was also only supposed to take
place if the owner refused to hand over their properties voluntarily in
exchange for compensation funds extracted from taxpayers.
But as always occurs with government attacks on fundamental rights,
it was a slippery slope — and it did not take long for phase two to
begin. Now, authorities in Hamburg, Germany’s second-largest city, are even
targeting and commandeering residential properties as well. According to
local and international news reports this
month, authorities have now seized six apartments in the central Hamm
district, against the owner’s will. After the properties were
confiscated, officials began “renovating” them so they would be suitable
for tenants of the government’s choosing. The property owner will be
billed for all the “renovation” expenses incurred by the government, a
spokesman for the governing council behind the seizures was quoted as
saying in the press. The costs are estimated to run into five figures. A
“city-appointed trustee” will oversee the process and the housing units
commandeered by authorities.
But this is just the start, according to various news agencies. The
local government, dominated by the far-left Socialist and Green parties,
even established a “hotline” for residents of Hamburg to report any
properties they may know of which may have been vacant for more than
four months. After those four months are up, the residential properties
will be subject to being commandeered by local government and being put
under the supervision of the government’s “trustee,” who can then pack
the apartments with migrants or other tenants at taxpayer expense.
Activists reportedly also set up a website dubbed “Vacancy Reporter” to
help authorities locate vacant real estate for authorities to commandeer
in Hamburg and beyond.
Of course, multiple government policies have fueled the housing
crisis. From failing to approve building permits to imposing draconian
restrictions on rent, local authorities have helped ensure an acute
shortage in supply. Combined with the surge in demand brought about by
the national government’s deeply unpopular policy of inviting millions of Third World migrants into the country at
taxpayer expense, the housing and rental-property markets have been
radically distorted. And so, city officials have resorted to further
attacks on private property rights to deal with the problems government
helped create to begin with.
Outside of Hamburg, municipalities have also been evicting tenants
from their apartments to house migrants. The first reported case in
Germany happened in September of 2015 in the town of Nieheim. It
involved Bettina Halbey, a 51-year-old nurse. “I was completely taken
aback,” she told Die Welt after receiving the eviction letter.
“I find it impossible to describe how the city has treated me.” On
social media, she described the move as “a kick in the teeth.” Later
that month, Gabrielle Keller, in the German town of Eschbach, was
ordered by authorities to vacate her government-owned apartment, again
to make room for migrants. “The alternative would have been to set up
beds in the gym,” argued the mayor.
An even more draconian scheme to trample private property rights to
house migrants was also floated in the German capital of Berlin. Under
that proposal, police would have been authorized to invade private
property without a warrant to determine whether the residence would be
suitable for migrant housing, according to media reports. However, even
amid the escalating “refugee” crisis brought on by “former” East German Communist Party propagandist Angela Merkel
and her “open door” policy, that was considered an unconstitutional
bridge too far. More than a few critics suggested Hamburg’s attacks on
property rights may also be unconstitutional, but no official
determination has yet been made.
Still, critics expressed outrage. “Hamburg’s situation clearly
illustrates the downside to uncontrolled mass migration,” argued Matt
O’Brien with the Washington, D.C.-based Federation for American
Immigration Reform, which opposes mass migration. “Western civilization
operates on the notion that the first duty of a government is to protect
the life, liberty and property of its own citizens. All other
obligations are subsidiary. Hamburg decided to protect foreigners at the
expense of German citizens and, in so doing, failed to fulfill the
first duty of government. Let’s hope that if the U.S. government ever
begins expropriating private land in response to a migrant crisis, it’s
to build a border wall, not to house massive numbers of immigrants that
the people of the United States never wanted here.”
Local political figures in Hamburg have also spoken out, comparing
the attacks on private property to tyranny and shameful communist
horrors in Germany’s past. “The proposed confiscation of private land
and buildings is a massive attack on the property rights of the citizens
of Hamburg,” André Trepoll with the Christian Democratic Union (CDU)
party was quoted as saying in media reports, saying the “law of
intimidation” was a “political dam-break with far-reaching
implications.” “It amounts to an expropriation by the state…. The ends
do not justify any and all means.” The leader of the Free Democrats
Party in Hamburg, meanwhile, called it an “unacceptable crossing of red
lines” and noted that, ironically, such “coercive measures” would “only
fuel resentment against refugees.”
Germany is hardly the only formerly sovereign European nation in
which citizens and their fundamental rights — including their
private-property rights — are being trampled by authorities to
accommodate the avalanche of Third World migrants. In Italy, for
example, an elderly hotel operator was terrorized by armed agents of the
state for refusing to have his property packed full of migrants. A horrifying video of the episode went viral across the Internet.
When Luigi Fogli, 80 at the time, refused to house “refugees” for 7
euros in tax money for each — all of them apparently African men without
families present, video shows — authorities simply forced him to do it,
literally.
Late last year, the Italian Interior Ministry even floated a scheme,
dubbed the “Viminale Plan,” that would have put resistors behind bars
for refusing to allow their properties to be commandeered for housing
migrants. Under the plan, widely reported in Italian media,
thousands of armed enforcement agents from the police and the military
would be deployed to oversee enforcement. The Justice Ministry was
reportedly prepared to provide trials and detention to those who
resisted the plan. And almost incredibly, the commandeering of private
property was set to take place without compensation, as the government
does not have the funds to pay.
As The New American has documented extensively in a series
of articles, private property rights are not the only fundamental human
rights being targeted in Europe under the guise of dealing with the
so-called refugee crisis. Indeed, across Europe and the rest of the
Western world, the
globalist-engineered migrant crisis is leading to attacks on a wide
array of fundamental liberties including self-government, privacy, free
speech, freedom of the press, and more. In Germany, authorities have been raiding apartments and arresting those who criticize foreigners, Islam, or the mass-migration agenda too vociferously.
The Islamist terror attacks that have resulted from the crisis and
will continue to worsen, meanwhile, are being cited by regional
authorities at the European Union and national powers as a pretext to
justify the ongoing expansion of the police state at the national,
regional, and international level. More than a few political leaders
have suggested the establishment’s
agenda behind the migrant tsunami is the destruction of national
cohesion, Christianity, and the nation-state on the road to regional and
global governance. And senior establishment bigwigs such as former Goldman Sachs boss and UN migration czar Peter Sutherland have all but confirmed it. Indeed, the United Nations is funding TV ads urging German women to wear Muslim head scarves.
The attacks on private property rights must be resisted by all
clear-thinking people. America’s Founding Fathers warned about just how
serious infringements on private property were. John Adams, America’s
first vice president and second president, was perhaps the most firm and
eloquent. “The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property
is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of
law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence,”
Adams warned.
“If ‘Thou shalt not covet,’ and ‘Thou shalt not steal,’ were not
commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every
society, before it can be civilized or made free.”
Across the Western world, including in the United States, that idea
was admitted long ago. And under the guise of housing migrants, the idea
is rapidly being expanded all over the West.
Amid the globalist-orchestrated refugee crisis, in which globalist
Western governments destroyed Middle Eastern and African nations before
inviting the victims to Europe and the United States at taxpayer
expense, the very foundations of Western civilization and
Christendom are being eroded. And that was probably the agenda all
along. Instead of bombing foreign countries to rubble and then welcoming
the Third World into the West, real solutions to the problems must
begin by holding accountable the establishment figures behind the
tragedies.
Trampling the fundamental rights of Germans, Americans, and Italians
is probably the worst possible way of dealing with the crisis. Instead
of attacking innocent citizens, everyone in Brussels and Washington, D.C., who engineered the illegal wars on Libya and other nations based
on illegitimate United Nations resolutions should face legal
accountability — up to and including criminal prosecution if crimes were
committed, as it seems they were. Property owners in the West and
around the world should be left in peace.
Italy’s Minister of the Interior Angelino Alfano is planning to
throw citizens in prison if they don’t hand over their homes to
migrants, according to a report from Italian paper Ilgiornale.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
It looks as if the Justice Department swamp not only has not been
drained, but is full of more voracious crocodiles than ever before. This
case started during the Obama administration, but it is the Trump
administration’s Justice Department that is handing down this ruling.
President Trump needs to repudiate it, or else he owns it.
In battles over mosques all over the country, the elephant in the
room is not allowed to be discussed: the connections of the mosque
leaders to the Muslim Brotherhood and other jihad groups. People don’t
oppose these mosques because of “racism” or “bigotry,” but because
they’re concerned about jihad terror. With most of the mosques in the
U.S. getting funding from Saudi Arabia and surveys having shown
that most mosques in the U.S. preach hatred of Jews and Christians and
the necessity ultimately to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic
law, these are legitimate concerns, but discussion of them is foreclosed
as “Islamophobic.”
“Diversity and inclusion training,” meanwhile, means having to listen
to a lot of lies about how Islam is a religion of peace and Muslims are
victimized by “Islamophobia.” The object of the “training” is to
intimidate the “trainees” into fearing to oppose Islamic supremacism,
jihad terror, Sharia, and the mosques in which such things are preached. “’Municipalities around the country should pay close attention to
what happened in Bernards Township,’ Adeel A. Mangi, lead counsel for
the mosque, told My Central Jersey. ‘The American Muslim community has
the legal resources, the allies and the determination to stand up for
its constitutional rights in court and will do so.’”
Threat noted. It should also be noted that there is no constitutional
right to break American laws under the guise of freedom of religion.
This principle has been obscured, and needs to be reasserted, or we are
in for a world of hurt. The Trump administration Justice Department should be allowing for
such discussion, not strong-arming and extorting communities to support
what will likely be a Muslim Brotherhood installation in their midst. Is
Sessions even aware of this ruling? Is Trump? If they’re not, it’s
criminal negligence, and if they are, it’s something even worse.
“A New Jersey town denied Muslims a mosque. Now it must pay them $3.25 million,” by Katie Mettler, Washington Post, May 31, 2017:
The worshipers waited four years and 39 public hearings
for the official denial: Muslims in their small New Jersey town would
not be allowed to build a mosque.
The 2015 decision made by the planning board in Bernards Township,
N.J., a majority-white suburb of 26,000 people, came after significant
public opposition to the mosque that thrust the community into the
national spotlight and spurred religious discrimination lawsuits from
the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge and the Department of Justice.
On Tuesday, the township learned the cost of its six-year-old decision: $3.25 million.
As part of a settlement of the suits, the township must allow
construction of the mosque to begin at its original proposed location,
according to the Justice Department. Bernards Township will pay the
Islamic Society $1.5 million in damages and $1.75 million in attorney
fees and require town officials to submit to diversity and inclusion
training.
“Municipalities around the country should pay close attention to what
happened in Bernards Township,” Adeel A. Mangi, lead counsel for the
mosque, told My Central Jersey. “The American Muslim community has the
legal resources, the allies and the determination to stand up for its
constitutional rights in court and will do so.”…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Former Vice President Joe Biden officiated over his second
same-sex ceremony on Saturday, this time between the finance chair of
the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and his partner.
Biden presided over the ceremony for Henry Muñoz III and
Kyle Ferrari on Saturday, and a photograph of the occasion was posted
online by Melanie Griffith.
“My dearest friends Henry Munoz and Kyle Ferrari were
married today by VP Joe Biden. Wishing them everlasting love and a
joyous life journey!” the actress, whose daughter Dakota Johnson stars
in the controversial “50 Shades of Grey” film, wrote.
As previously reported,
last August, Biden officiated another ceremony between two White House
staffers at his Washington home. Brian Mosteller worked as director of
Oval Office operations for Barack Obama, and Joe Mahsie served as a
travel coordinator for Michelle Obama.
“Proud to marry Brian and Joe at my house. Couldn’t be happier, two longtime White House staffers, two great guys,” Biden wrote. His wife, Jill, also Tweeted the photo after the ceremony, writing, “Love is love.” Biden first publicly announced his support for same-sex “marriage” in 2012, just days before Barack Obama did likewise.
“I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying
men, women marrying women, and heterosexual men and women marrying one
another are entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all
the civil liberties,” he said.
But CNN reported at that time that “Biden has, in the past, counseled the president against coming out for same-sex marriage.”
Biden, a Roman Catholic, attended numerous homosexual pride
events at the White House throughout his tenure and once stated that he
believes transgenderism is “the civil rights issue of our time.”
The Huffington Post reports that in March, Biden made
statements critical of the Trump administration after the U.S.
Department of Justice dropped a lawsuit filed by the previous attorney
general that challenged North Carolina’s bathroom bill. The law at issue
required those visiting government facilities to use the restroom that
correlates with their birth sex.
“Instead of focusing on the fact that 40 percent of the
homeless youth on the street are identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender [and] rejected by their families out on the street, and
what do we do about that, we’re now focusing on whether or not a
transgender child, which bathroom they can use,” Biden is reported as
stating.
Jesus said in Mark 10:6-8, “But from the beginning of the
Creation, God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man
leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife, and they twain
shall be one flesh.” 1 Corinthians 11:9 also outlines that God made “woman for
man,” and Proverbs 18:22 declares, “He who finds a wife finds a good
thing and obtains favor from the Lord.”
MURDEROUS JIHADISTS RAMPAGE IN LONDON STABBING, KILLING, & INJURING
Trump’s Response Of The London Bridge Attack Twisted By The Left
Published on Jun 5, 2017
”
The latest issue of the Islamic State’s weekly newspaper al-Naba
released two days ago warned that another terrorist attack in Britain
was “definitely coming.”
Al-Naba, a 16-page color newsletter, is
distributed within ISIS territory but is also posted and distributed
online via the usual ISIS mediums such as Telegram and social media.”
according to PJ Media.
England’s Prime Minister Teresa May has responded to the online availability of ISIS threats.
While
the mayor of London called for people to not be alarmed that innocent
people were being mowed over and stabbed by Islamic terrorists in the
heart of London. Clearly there is reason to be alarmed. Apparently even
with a warning, there is just so much police can safeguard against while
the general public is defenseless.
Bilderberg Elite Hide Behind Walls While Pushing Open Borders
Elite enjoy perimeter security while advocating borderless world
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Despite heavy attendance by open borders advocates, the
Bilderberg conference is surrounded by thick walls, zealous police and
“no trespassing” signs.
Entrance to the conference in
Chantilly, Virginia, attended by over 130 of the world’s top
politicians, bankers, intelligence outfits and media owners, is tightly
controlled by police and private security who ensure that only vetted,
invited guests are allowed into the Westfields Marriott where Bilderberg
is taking place.
Overall, Bilderberg has perimeter security
similar to that of Eastern European countries which are currently
boosting their border security amid the migrant crisis.
But in a fit of hypocrisy, the EU leaders attending Bilderberg are
the same ones demanding countries like Hungary and Poland reopen their
borders to allow Middle Eastern migrants, many of whom are military-age
males who lack critical language and employment skills, to flow into
their countries without proper vetting.
“A host of EU countries
are set to demand Poland and Hungary accept their quota of migrants or
they will face being booted out of the crumbling bloc,” the Daily
Express reported.
“Both countries have ignored EU proposals to relocate 160,000 migrants
and the rest of the bloc is set to take action to ensure they share the
burden.”
But if someone uninvited dared to enter the Bilderberg grounds, he’d be quickly arrested and removed.
Interestingly,
the EU originated out of past Bilderberg meetings in which top
globalists designed the framework for an unelected European bureaucracy
that would slowly erode the national sovereignty of Old World nations.
The initial idea for the EU came as early as 1955 when the Bilderberg Group met in West Germany.
“…Pressing
need to bring the German people, together with the other peoples of
Europe, into a common market,” a leaked document from the 1955 meeting
stated. “…To arrive in the shortest possible time at the highest degree
of integration, beginning with a common European market.”
The “common European market” later developed into the Euro and the trade regulations of the EU.
The
elites attending Bilderberg see themselves as the “specialized class”
responsible for steering the world because they believe the public’s
“too stupid” to make their own decisions.
That’s why Bilderberg
members have no problem demanding tight perimeter security for their own
conferences but not for nation-states.
_________________________________________________________
Elites Push Russian Collusion;
Lie As They Collude At Bilderberg
Published on Jun 2, 2017
The
elite are once more gathered for Bilderberg, colluding on how best to
destroy freedom across the globe as they continue to push the
Trump-Russia collusion lie.
Bilderberg Breakdown 2017
Published on Jun 3, 2017
Rob
Dew and Michael Zimmerman of Infowars discuss the details of the infamous,
ultra-secret meeting of elites who call their club Bilderberg, in Chantilly, Virginia.
Witnesses To Bilderberg Meeting Speak Out
Published on Jun 5, 2017
Alex Jones talks with David Knight and Owen Shroyer about what they witnessed at Bilderberg 2017.
BREAKING: Van plows into 15-20 on London Bridge, people on scene call it “terrorist attack”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“We had to run. There was loads of shooting.”
There isn’t usually shooting after a drunk driver loses control of
his vehicle, but still, this could be nothing -— a drunk driver indeed,
or a Filipino robber. Or it could be jihad.
“BREAKING: Van ploughs into ’15-20′ people on London Bridge,” by Tom Evans, The Sun, June 3, 2017:
ARMED police have swooped on London Bridge after a car reportedly ploughed into dozens of people.
Police arrive at London Bridge after serious incident outside pub People at the scene have claimed the incident is a “terrorist attack”.
Reporters for Daily Star Online have seen people fleeing the area and running away from the bridge in tears.
Witnesses claim to have seen a speeding white van veering into pedestrians.
And Twitter users have suggested seeing “bodies” at the scene.
London’s transport authority said London Bridge station had been closed at the request of the police.
Emergency helicopters, ambulances and police cars have all been sighted in the area.
One terrified woman said she was at a restaurant and police swarmed on the area.
She said police were shooting. “We had to run. There was loads of shooting.”…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
London Mayor Sadiq Khan said that jihad attacks were “part and parcel” of life
in a big city. “It is a reality I’m afraid that London, New York, other major cities
around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things.” He also
criticized Donald Trump for saying it was time to “get tough” on terrorism.
“‘On the floor!’: Moment police barge into a pub near London Bridge
and shout at terrified customers to get on the ground as knifemen target
bar and restaurant goers,” by Ann Schmidt, Dailymail.com, June 4, 2017:
Video shows police officers barging into a pub near
London Bridge and shouting at customers to get down and hide under
tables, as reports of possible acts of terrorism are happening around
London. It has been reported that five men mowed down up to 20 people with a
white van on London Bridge before getting out of the vehicle near
Borough Market and stabbing several people in bars and restaurants,
including one man who was reportedly stabbed five times in the chest.
The video, posted to Twitter, shows a commotion as people walk back
and forth inside the bar, believed to be Katzenjammers on Southwark
Street, near where the attacks where happening.
Police can be heard shouting for people to get down, and customers begin to crowd underneath tables and benches.
Officers are then seen, motioning for people to stay down as they continue shouting and walk around the bar.
The five men who drove the van onto London Bridge and randomly
stabbed multiple people near Borough Market shouted ‘this is for
Allah’….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Theresa May says “far too much tolerance of extremism in our country,”
and that “when it comes to taking on extremism and terrorism things need
to change.” Then she repeats the same false and failed analysis, that
the jihad “is a perversion of Islam.” Her refusal to identify the
motivating ideology behind these jihad attacks means that she will never
confront this enemy properly, and never deal with the real source of
the incitement to violence. And so for all her tough talk, she is doomed
to failure.
“Theresa May says ‘enough is enough’ in wake of London Bridge terror
attack as she confirms General Election will go ahead,” by Jack
Maidment, Telegraph, June 4, 2017:
Theresa May has vowed that “enough is enough” as she
urged people to go about their lives as normal after seven people were
killed and almost 50 injured in the London Bridge terror attack.
The Prime Minister said that there is “far too much tolerance of
extremism in our country” as she set out plans to crackdown on terror.
She said that while the Manchester Arena attack which killed 22
people, the Westminster attack in March which left four people dead and
the London Bridge attack are not directly connected there is now a “new
trend” in the threat the UK faces as “terrorism breeds terrorism”.
The Prime Minister said that the UK must do more to tackle the threat posed by “Islamist extremism”.
Speaking in Downing Street after chairing a meeting of the Cobra
emergency committee, she said: “It will only be defeated when we turn
people’s minds away from this violence and make them understand that our
values, pluralistic, British values, are superior to anything offered
by the preachers and supporters of hate.”
Mrs May paid tribute to the emergency services who responded to the
latest attack with “great courage and great speed” as she confirmed that
many of the injured are in “life threatening conditions”.
She said: “Our country has made significant progress in disrupting plots and protecting the public.
“But it is time to say enough is enough. Everybody needs to go about their lives as they normally would.
“Our society should continue to function in accordance with our
values but when it comes to taking on extremism and terrorism things
need to change.”
All of the major political parties have suspended national
campaigning ahead of the General Election and Mrs May said campaigning
will resume tomorrow with polling day on June 8 to go ahead as planned.
She said: “As a mark of respect the two political parties have
suspended our national campaigns for today but violence can never be
allowed to disrupt the democratic process.
“So those campaigns will resume in full tomorrow and the General Election will go ahead as planned on Thursday.”
The Prime Minister struck a defiant tone as she said that “things
need to change” in the fight against terror and that the UK “cannot and
must not pretend that things can continue as they are” as she suggested
that longer sentences could be introduced for terror offences and
pledged to review the Government’s counter terrorism strategy.
She said the London and Manchester attacks are connected in “one important sense”.
“They are bound together by the single evil ideology of Islamist
extremism that preaches hatred, sows division and promotes
sectarianism,” she said.
“It is an ideology that claims our Western values of freedom,
democracy and human rights are incompatible with the religion of Islam.
“It is an ideology that is a perversion of Islam and a perversion of the truth.
“Defeating this ideology is one of the great challenges of our time
but it cannot be defeated through military intervention alone.”
Alex Jones plays a clip of PM Theresa May after the London Bridge Terror Attack that Occurred the previous evening. https://www.infowars.com/the-truth-ab…
Dan Bongino, Ex Secret Service Agent:
Don’t follow London mayor’s advice,
be alarmed
Tommy Robinson: “Get these murderous scumbags
off our streets”
British Govt Houses ISIS Next To
Children’s Primary School
Published on Jun 7, 2017
Tommy
Robinson reports, while terrorism hits the streets of the UK, the
government is housing known radical Islamists including Abu Haleema, who
has been placed 100 yards from a primary school.
Left Defends Londonistan Mass Murder
The Left Defends Islam Because They Hate The West
Published on Jun 4, 2017
Alex
Jones breaks down how Soros and The LEFT are bringing down america and
destroying christian values using their islamic terrorist puppets that
they fund because that is their true nature. They will do what ever it takes to End Western Culture. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/… https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3717339…
ENGLAND UNDER ISLAMIC SIEGE
None Dare Call It A Jihad
Published on Jun 5, 2017
Alex
Jones breaks down the facts surrounding the ongoing Jihad of western
civilization. Reminding all of the tolerant left that ISIS announced
that they would flood Europe and the U.S. with jihadists years ago.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
What a hypocrite. Freedom of religion? If Erdogan values the freedom
of religion so highly, why is he trying to choke off and destroy the
Greek Orthodox Church by requiring that the Ecumenical Patriarch be a
Turkish citizen, and yet closing and refusing to allow the reopening of
the only Greek Orthodox seminary in the country? Erdogan has never
visited the Christian institutions in Turkey, and has consistently
refused to recognize the Ecumenical Patriarch. The hypocrisy of his
self-righteous moralizing regarding the Ramadan iftar is compounded by
Turkey’s steadfast refusal to admit its complicity in the Armenian
Genocide and the Greek and Syro-Chaldean obliteration from Asia Minor.
If Erdogan really believes in religious freedom, he could show it by
visiting the Ecumenical Patriarchate and recognizing the right of
Christians to live in Turkey. He could allow the Orthodox seminary to
reopen. He could maintain the Hagia Sophia as a museum, without
continuing its reconversion into a mosque. Of course, if he really
wanted to show his respect for the freedom of religion in a big way, he
could give it back to the Christian community for use as a cathedral,
with an apology for 450 years of persecution of the Christians under
Ottoman and then secular Turkish rule.
It is, of course, virtually inconceivable that he would do that. I
only suggest it to cast his hypocrisy in sharp relief. This is a man who
has systematically pursued policies to reduce and ultimately destroy
the Christian presence in his country, depending on the ignorance and
indifference of the outside world regarding the persecution of
Christians in Turkey in order to lecture Trump about the freedom of
religion. Erdogan could himself benefit from a few honest lectures about
what the freedom of religion actually means.
“Turkey: Erdogan challenges US freedom of worship,” by Jaber Ali, Middle East Confidential, June 2, 2017:
President Erdogan has questioned Trump’s administration
claim of respecting the freedom of religion during an Iftar dinner in
Ankara. In a message directed at Washington during his address, the Turkish
president raised concerns about Trump administration’s decision to not
host an Iftar-dinner as part of events marking the Muslim Holy month of
Ramadan. Upholding such a decision will be discriminatory, Erdogan said as he
reminded the U.S. of their claimed promotion of freedom of worship. “Did
you not say you did not oppose freedom of religion?” he asked….
A concrete decision is yet to be made but President Erdogan has
signaled that failing to host a dinner could lead “views on the United
States to change.” He didn’t go into details on how the relationship
between them will be affected.
Turkey has often highlighted that its ties with the U.S. would be
affected due to its national security concerns that is, it claims, being
jeopardized by individuals and groups resident in the US or in the
Middle East. “We know what those who smile at our face do in our back”
Erdogan stated as he raised the cases of Reza Zarrab, a Turkish-Iranian
man who faces trial in the U.S. on allegations of busting sanctions
against Iran, and Fethullah Gulen, accused of pioneering the failed 2015
coup plot. The latest arming of the Kurdish fighters in Syria was also a
cause of alarm for the authorities in Anakra.
“From now on, everything will be reciprocal,” Erdogan warned. Washington has not yet reacted to his address.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Yesterday, I appeared on CBN to discuss why jihad attacks become more frequent during Ramadan.
I start at the eight-minute mark.
“Ramadan Martyrs Get Extra Reward: Experts Warn to Brace for ‘Holy Month of Jihad,’” by George Thomas, CBN News, June 1, 2017:
Watch CBN News’ George Thomas’ interview
with Middle East expert Robert Spencer & former Muslim Isik Abla on
why Islamic terrorists are commanded to kill during Ramadan
ISIS is calling on its followers to massacre civilians during Islam’s
holy month of Ramadan, saying violence is a ‘beloved” act to Allah. And it appears the bloodletting is underway.
Muslims in Afghanistan are mourning the loss of family members,
friends and colleagues, the day after a massive truck bomb in the
capital city killed at least 90 people and injured more than 450
people….
“The depth of, and the magnitude of the destruction, was so high that
even properties within a 3 mile radius of the incident were affected,
said Abdullah Habibzai, Kabul’s acting mayor.
A suicide bomber drove his truck into Kabul’s heavily guarded
diplomatic quarter during the morning rush hour, leaving behind chaos
and destruction….
“The total damage based on our recent data is at least 1.5 million
U.S. dollars but the estimation is going on and we expect up to 6
million U.S. dollars damage to the properties,” Habibzai told reporters
at a news conference.
The attack in Afghanistan came just days after ISIS massacred 29 Christians near Cairo, Egypt and carried out two massive car bombings in Baghdad, Iraq, killing at least 31 people….
The bloodshed comes as Muslims around the world started their annual 30-day Ramadan fast on May 26.
“Ramadan is a holy and glorious month so we welcome this Ramadan with
joy,” said Muhammad Fikri, a Muslim religious teacher. “In this month
we come to the mosque to worship, give charity and also try to clean our
hearts.”
In Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim nation, hundreds of thousands are flocking to mosques to also pray for peace.
“In welcoming this Ramadan, let us show that Islam is cool, peaceful
and safe and let us compete in making good things in our life,” said Sun
Keng Hok, an Indonesian Chinese Muslim….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) (by cutting
off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but
circumcision of the female is by cutting out the bazr ‘clitoris’ [this
is called khufaadh ‘female circumcision’]).” — ‘Umdat al-Salik e4.3, translated by Mark Durie, The Third Choice, p. 64
Why is it obligatory? Because Muhammad is held to have said so: “Abu
al- Malih ibn Usama’s father relates that the Prophet said:
‘Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women.’”
— Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 5:75
“Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah: A woman used to perform
circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said to her: ‘Do
not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a
husband.’” — Abu Dawud 41:5251
“Do not cut severely,” but not “Do not cut.”
That’s why it is so common around the world, and why it is certain to
become increasingly common in the United States, particularly with help
from the ACLU, which doubtless wants to avoid appearing to be
“Islamophobic.”
Note that Shaker Elsayed is quite clear in his remarks that FGM is to be practiced in order to control female sexuality.
Meanwhile , even lawmakers who fatuously praised
Dar Al-Hijrah noted that “the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center is
affiliated with the Muslim American Society.” The Muslim American
Society is the chief arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S.,
according to Ikhwanweb,
the Muslim Brotherhood’s English website. Shaker Elsayed, the mosque’s
imam from 2005 to the present, was Secretary General of the Muslim
American Society. According to a captured internal Brotherhood document,
the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. is engaged in a “grand Jihad in
eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and
‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the
believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made
victorious over all other religions.”
There is more. The late jihad leader Anwar al-Awlaki was the imam at Dar al-Hijrah.
He is said to have been a “spiritual adviser” to three of the hijackers
who attacked America on September 11, 2001. Al-Awlaki was also in
regular contact with Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalab, the Christmas underwear
bomber who tried to blow up a passenger jet over Detroit on Christmas
Day 2009.
Former Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who murdered thirteen Americans in a jihad massacre at Fort Hood in Texas, worshiped at Dar al-Hijrah when he lived in the area and was in touch with al-Awlaki shortly before he carried out his attack.
The Saudi-backed North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, bought the mosque’s grounds in 1983. Mohammed al-Hanooti, the mosque’s imam from 1995 to 1999, was named an unindicted co-conspirator
in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Ahmed Omar Abu Ali taught
Islamic studies and was a camp counselor at the mosque; he is now in
prison for plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush. Abdelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar, a member of the mosque’s Executive Committee, was convicted
in November 2007 of contempt and obstruction of justice for refusing to
testify regarding Hamas and received an eleven-year prison sentence.
“Dar al-Hijrah Imam Endorses (Partial) Female Genital Mutilation,” by John Rossomando, IPT News, June 2, 2017 (thanks to the Geller Report):
Female genital mutilation (FGM) can be an effective tool
to prevent promiscuity among girls, the imam at a prominent northern
Virginia mosque claimed in a recent lecture flagged by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). Without it, “hyper-sexuality takes over the entire society and a woman is not satisfied with one person or two or three,” said
Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center Imam Shaker Elsayed in a May 19 talk,
“Foundation of a Happy Family.” Only tip of a girl’s clitoris should be
cut, he said, otherwise it creates “serious harm in the sexual life of
the child when she grows up. And this is why the West thinks of alkhikah as sexual mutilation…”
Muslim societies which prohibit FGM are making a mistake “to prohibit
the tradition and they end up causing a lot of damage on the other
extreme side of the sexual life of a woman,” Elsayed said.
He isn’t the only prominent voice in the U.S. Muslim community
endorsing female genital mutilation. The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in
America (AMJA) endorses the practice
in two fatwas posted on its website, using justifications similar to
Elsayed’s. While not required, one fatwa says, “it is considered an
honorable thing for females.”
Islamist advocates argue that FGM has nothing to do with Islam.
After several Detroit area doctors were charged with violating Michigan’s ban on female genital mutilation in April, activist Linda Sarsour denounced denouncing the practice as contrary to Islam.
“FGM has no place in Detroit or anywhere else in the world. FGM is barbaric & not an Islamic practice,” Sarsour wrote.
She should target that message to its proponents. Sarsour spoke at a fundraiser
at Elsayed’s mosque six days before his talk on female anatomy and
promiscuity. FGM did not come up, but Sarsour described Islam’s prophet
Mohammed as “a feminist in his own right.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
One of the prevailing heresies growing in the modern visible church
is the Word of Faith movement. It is a movement that grew out of the
charismatic sect of Pentecostalism and teaches that Apostolic sign gifts
of the early church, such as tongues, prophecy, and healings, have not
ceased. One of the practices in this movement is the exorcism of demons.
At a Word of Faith church in Spindale, North Carolina, a homosexual
man had his demons expelled by 30 members of his congregation. He was
actually beaten and assaulted by these people. According to an article in the Daily Mail one
member of the church testified in court that the man was slapped,
beaten, and choked for nearly two hours by the members of this crazed
cult.
The article reports,
As part of an ongoing, two-year
investigation into abuse of Word of Faith Fellowship congregants by
church leaders, The Associated Press interviewed four former church
members who say they witnessed Fenner being attacked.
Based on interviews with 43 former
members, documents and secretly made recordings, it was reported in
February that Word of Faith Fellowship congregants were regularly
punched, smacked, choked, slammed to the floor or thrown through walls
in a violent form of deliverance meant to ‘purify’ sinners by beating
out devils.
The church’s website is here,
where the home page doesn’t feature information about the church’s
location, a statement of faith, or any of the expected information from a
church’s website, but features a series videos defending its
questionable actions over the years and calling out a former member of
the church who has broken away from the cult and has been dedicated to
exposing them for their actions.
This is the fruit of the false doctrine and false gospel of the Word of Faith church.
__________________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Uploaded on Apr 18, 2009
A
CALL FOR DISCERNMENT DVD: a Fair Biblical Critique of the Word of Faith
Prosperity gospel. SO4J-TV www.SO4J.com worked w/Justin Peters
Ministries www.JustinPeters.org to Produce an Updated 2010-2011 DVD of
Justin’s Excellent & Informative 6 Hour Seminar (3 Sessions) on 2
DVDs. JUSTIN PETERS teaches his eye opening Seminar around the World
that Exposes the Deceptions of the Health & Wealth Prosperity
gospel. Word of Faith Theology dominates Christian Satellite & Cable
TV.
INSIDE THESE 2 DVDs:
This 2010 6 Hour Seminar on 2
DVDs include a lot of Video & Audio Clips of various Word of Faith
Leaders such as: Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Kenneth & Gloria Copeland,
Jessie Duplantis, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Hagin, Creflo Dollar, Paula
White, Larry Huch, Myles Munroe, Jan & Paul Crouch, Fredrick Price,
Mike Murdock, John Crowder, John Hagee, Sid Roth, Rod Parsley, Paul
& Jan Crouch, etc.
This DVD allows people to See and Hear for
themselves what these individuals are actually Teaching, along with the
many False Prophecies that have been spoken and Not come True.
Everything is then balanced with Scripture as there is Biblical
Commentary, and Scriptures to help the viewer Examine Everything with
the Word of God (Acts 17:11, 1 John 4:1, 1 Thess 5:21).
• Justin’s Testimony: his Cerebral Palsy & Nora Lam
• The Duty of Discernment
• Definition of Discernment
• Bereans: Search the Scriptures – Acts 17:11
• Why do we need Discernment?
• Answering the Critics
SESSION 1: DANGEROUS DOCTRINES
• History: Word Faith / Metaphysical Cultic Origins
• Phineas P. Quimby
• Essek W. Kenyon
• William Branham
• Kenneth Hagin, Sr.
• Word of Faith Doctrines
• Positive Confession
• Little gods Doctrine
• The Fall
• Jesus Christ – Just a man?
• Spiritual Death of Jesus
• Jesus Made Sin?
SESSION 2: MANGLED MANIFESTATIONS
• Abuse of Tongues
• Spectacular Claims
• Heavenly Encounters
• Bizarre Behavior
• Slaying in the Spirit
• Divine Revelation Knowledge
• Occultic / Demonic
• False Prophets
SESSION 3: THE HURT OF HEALING
• Points to Ponder
• Healing – Is it Always God’s Will?
• Is Healing in the Atonement?
• The Biblical Record
• Requirement for Healing
• A Sense of Expectation
• Money
• Right Heart & Perseverance
• Hindrances to Healing
• Lack of Faith
• Not Saved?
• Gospel of Jesus Christ
This
6 Hour Seminar has all New Footage of Justin Peters. It includes the
same great Material in his previous DVD’s— but better Quality, more
Clips, and it fits now on 2 DVDs vs 3. It also has a large DVD Menu that
is easier to navigate around than the past DVD’s.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The establishment Swamp of globalists, tax-funded climate alarmists,
socialists, and others erupted into a frenzy of unhinged outrage and
apoplectic fury after President Donald Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the illegal and unratified United Nations Paris Agreement on “climate change.”
Some of the most unhinged voices claimed Trump’s move would destroy the
planet and was tantamount to a war on America or humanity. From Obama
and foreign rulers to crony capitalists and UN bureaucrats, the seething
anger is clearly intense. And a full day after the president announced
his historic decision to
reclaim U.S. sovereignty, protect the Constitution, unlock domestic
energy supplies, and reinvigorate America’s economy, the Swamp’s
hysterical panic is still growing more extreme.
It is easy to see why the Swamp is losing its collective marbles over
Trump’s decision. Even after the globalist establishment and its
institutions, including the pseudo-“mainstream” media, put all their
combined credibility on the line, most Americans still do not even believe in their discredited global-warming theory
— much less in the totalitarian, anti-American pseudo-solutions. And
that means the jig may well be up for their deception. Indeed, if the
climate “hoax,” as Trump has called it, finally collapses completely, it
may be close to impossible for the establishment and its propaganda
organs to be taken seriously by the public again for the foreseeable
future. And so, the Swamp is metaphorically doubling down on a
metaphorical busted flush.
Of course, among reputable scientists, Republicans, taxpayers,
workers, climate realists, patriots, constitutionalists, conservatives,
libertarians, and everyday Americans concerned with jobs and rising
prices, Trump’s historic decision was greeted with widespread
celebration. As the full impact of the move begins to sink in, that will
undoubtedly grow. Trump supporters have been busy ridiculing alarmists
and their attacks on the president. And fortunately for Americans and
humanity, some foreign governments wedded to the man-made global-warming
theory (or at least the totalitarian policies underpinned by it) vowed
not to renegotiate the UN “climate” regime in response to the U.S.
withdrawal. As Trump put it in his speech announcing the decision,
“that’s fine.”
But for the Swamp, it is now a no-holds barred fight. Consider Obama,
whose administration was largely responsible for the pseudo-treaty.
Sounding like a petulant child despite being warned repeatedly that his
illegal climate schemes would not stand, the former president lashed out
at Trump with blatant falsehoods. “The nations [governments and
tyrants] that remain in the Paris agreement will be the nations that
reap the benefits in jobs and industries created,” he claimed, as if
jobs and “industries” reliant on taxpayer support to exist were
desirable or productive. Of course, without the U.S. tax money for the
Green Climate (slush) Fund, the UN scheme is practically dead already
anyway, as multiple governments and regimes made clear at the UN summit.
Obama also tried to put a smiley face on it all, suggesting some
state and local governments would be willing to cripple their own
economies and impoverish their own constituents to prop up his UN
scheme. “Even in the absence of American leadership; even as this
administration joins a small handful of nations that reject the future;
I’m confident that our states, cities, and businesses will step up and
do even more to lead the way, and help protect for future generations
the one planet we’ve got,” Obama claimed, sounding delusional to more
sober-minded analysts. A handful of fringe left-wing politicians at the
state and local level did claim they would stand by the UN scheme, but
if they do, the jurisdictions they rule will suffer tremendously as
businesses and taxpayers flee to friendlier regions.
The Soros-funded AstroTurf movement created by Obama, Organizing for
Action (OFA), was even more unhinged. In a mass e-mail to the group
signed by former Obama White House Communications Director Jen Psaki,
the organization claimed Trump’s decision was “devastating.” She
pretended, first of all, that Obama’s unconstitutional promises to the
UN and its member regimes — promises that were never ratified by the
Senate, approved by Congress, or authorized by the Constitution — needed
to be kept. In reality, Obama never had any authority to make such
promises to begin with, and adhering to them would have only compounded
the error. Still, Psaki and OFA promised that the “fight isn’t over
yet.”
“Any way you slice it, pulling out of Paris is the wrong move,” Psaki
continued for OFA, claiming it was bad for jobs, the climate, health,
safety, air, national security, water, the U.S. “relationship” with the
world, children, and so on. “Thanks to Paris, united worldwide progress
on climate change isn’t theoretical anymore. Nearly every other country
in the world is formally on board, with plans to make serious cuts in
carbon pollution in the coming decades.” Even Big Business and Big Oil
supported the scheme, the OFA activist said after years of falsely
claiming opposition to their scheming was coming from oil companies.
But there were many lies and deceptions in the screed that were
largely representative of the broader Swamp’s reaction. Of course, as
all scientists know, CO2 is not “pollution,” it is the “gas of life,” and
no matter how many times Swamp creatures and the increasingly
irrelevant media repeat the lie, it will still be a lie. The fact that
Third World dictators signed up to a scheme under which they would do
nothing except keep their victims in poverty and collect welfare checks
from U.S. taxpayers, meanwhile, is hardly impressive — regardless of
whether Psaki and other alarmists dishonestly conflate those tyrants
with the countries they oppress.
Indeed, most of the establishment’s propaganda organs joined in the
dishonesty, labeling as “pollution” the essential-to-life gas CO2 —
literally exhaled by every person on earth in every breath. The press,
ranging from the New York Times and the Washington Post
to CNN and the networks, claimed other “countries” were upset about
Trump’s decision. In reality, the regimes ruling over those countries —
many of them brutal totalitarians and mass murderers — were simply upset
that the stream of U.S. tax funding to their corrupt governments was
set to dry up. To claim that “countries” signed up is absurd.
Unsurprisingly, Al Gore, the discredited climate profiteer whose prophecies of doom
have repeatedly proven to be completely wrong, was also apoplectic at
the news of Trump’s decision. “Removing the United States from the Paris
agreement is a reckless and indefensible action,” fumed the former vice
president, widely ridiculed as a key “cult” leader for his role pushing
the climate alarmism despite the growing amounts of evidence
discrediting it. “It undermines America’s standing in the world and
threatens to damage humanity’s ability to solve the climate crisis in
time.”
Former Secretary of State John Kerry was even more unhinged, claiming
Trump’s decision “may be the most self-defeating action in American
history” and “one of the most shameful any president has made.” “Those
of us who have spent a lifetime fighting on this issue know that America
pulling out of Paris will not only result in lost leadership, it will
also result in lost momentum,” he warned, perhaps forgetting that, until
the early 1980s, the supposed “issue” was alleged man-made global
cooling that was set to start a new ice age, even according to Obama
Science Czar John Holdren.
Kerry, sounding like a false prophet of doom standing on the corner
with a sign warning of that the “End is Near,” also warned that if
humanity does not do what he said, terrible apocalyptic scenarios await.
Among the disasters Kerry listed that will afflict humanity if it
refuses to repent of its carbon emission sins: “stronger storms, longer
and more intense droughts, more wildfires, more strains on agriculture
and fishing, a swell of climate refugees, and, as military brass has
been warning for years, intensified conflict around the world.” Similar
predictions have been made for generations, and they have consistently
been proven completely wrong.
Big Business, Big Oil, and crony capitalists feeding at the taxpayer
trough such as Elon Musk, a self-styled “entrepreneur” whose business
models always depend on tax money, also expressed fury. Musk even put
out a note on social media saying “climate change is real” and vowing to
withdraw from a few symbolic presidential councils he had been put on.
In response, he was widely ridiculed, including by U.S. Senators, for
his phony outrage and his use of a CO2-spewing private jet. Indeed, it
has been reported that he uses his luxurious private jet to fly to
Washington to lobby for even more of your tax money to support his crony
companies.
Perhaps the most unhinged reaction of all — and that is saying something —
came from billionaire crony capitalist Tom Steyer, who stood to make
big profits from his investments in tax-funded “green” schemes in
addition to his coal investments overseas. He was quoted in media
reports saying Trump was “committing a traitorous act of war against the
American people.” Of course, the majority of the American people do not
even believe in the discredited man-made warming theory, much less in
the draconian pseudo-solutions demanded by the UN and its largely
autocratic membership roster. So, in reality, Trump is simply obeying
the Constitution and doing what he promised voters by canceling the
illegal UN scheme.
In the days and weeks ahead, Americans and Trump will continue to be
subjected to a barrage of unhinged hate and dishonest propaganda from
the Swamp and its increasingly fringe media organs. However, many years
of that propaganda were unable to convince enough American voters to
fall for the scam, as evidenced by Trump’s election on a platform of
canceling the UN scheme. In response to the growing stream of fake news
and the constant attacks from the establishment, Americans should
redouble their efforts to expose the climate scam and oppose the UN’s
globalist agenda.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
IOWA CITY, Iowa — The Iowa Supreme Court
has ruled that a mother may sue her OB/GYN and radiologist for “wrongful
birth” after they failed to tell her that her child had birth defects
so that she might be able to obtain an abortion.
“The right to sue for wrongful birth belongs to parents who
were denied the opportunity to make an informed choice whether to
lawfully terminate a pregnancy in Iowa,” wrote
Justice Thomas Waterman in the 6-1 decision. “It is not this court’s
role to second-guess that intensely personal and difficult decision.”
“Parents of children with disabilities may find their lives
enriched by the challenges and joys they confront daily. But under our
tort law, financial compensation should be paid by the negligent
physician if liability is proven,” he added.
According to reports, Jeremy and Pamela Plowman—now
divorced—sued Fort Madison Community Hospital and several of its medical
providers after their son was born in 2011 with cerebral palsy,
microcephaly and a small corpus callosum, resulting in intellectual
disability, cortical visual impairment and seizure disorder.
The conditions were not diagnosed until the child was at
least four month old after the mother became concerned that her son
might have developmental disabilities and was directed to a specialist.
Doctors now say the boy might never walk or speak.
The parents asserted in their complaint that when Plowman
went for an ultrasound in her 22nd week (between five and six months),
she was told by her OB/GYN that “everything was fine,” as the
radiologist did not report that microcephaly—an abnormally small head
circumference—had actually been detected. The radiologist rather
reported the circumference as being “within two standard deviations of
normal.”
The Plowmans consequently sued over the alleged failure to
properly interpret, diagnose and communicate their child’s abnormalities
as shown by the ultrasound. While the mother testified that she “really
enjoy[s] spending time with [her son] and get[s] a lot of happiness
from him,” the couple’s lawsuit also noted that she “would
have terminated her pregnancy” had she known of her son’s conditions.
The suit seeks damages for mental anguish, cost of care
past, present and future, and the loss of income after the mother needed
to quit her job to take care of her son—now almost six years old.
The Iowa Supreme Court, in issuing its decision, noted that
23 other states allow for wrongful birth suits, and that Roe v. Wade
permits mothers to obtain an abortion before the point of viability
(when current technology has the capability to keep the child alive
separated from the mother’s womb).
“Defendants argue the disabled child may later be
emotionally traumatized upon learning his or her parents would have
chosen to abort. But given Z.P.’s severe cognitive disabilities,
there is nothing in the record to indicate he will someday understand
his parents sued over their lost opportunity to avoid his birth,” the
court also wrote.
The lone dissenting justice, Edward Mansfield, opined that
the Plowmans should not have been allowed to sue because wrongful birth
suits over abnormalities could lead to a “slippery slope” that could
include any medical condition.
“True, today’s decision is limited to a ‘severely disabled
child.’ But the court does not define the term,” he wrote. “What if
testing indicates the child will be born blind or without a hand? Is
that enough?”
“The court’s decision also opens up the possibility for
other claims. Can a mother sue a father for not telling her that he
carried a genetic disorder, on the theory that she would otherwise have
had an abortion?” Mansfield asked. “Can a father sue a mother for not
telling him she carried a genetic disorder, on the theory that he would
not have had unprotected sex? Can a couple that relies on an outside
sperm donor sue the source of that donation in tort?”
