ECUMENICAL “TOGETHER 2016” ORGANIZER MEETS WITH POPE FRANCIS TO UNITE CHRISTIANS, CATHOLICS ON NATIONAL MALL~ANN VOSKAMP’S MYSTICAL “ROMANTIC PANENTHEISM”

ONE IN SPIRIT, BUT NOT BASED ON THE WORD OF GOD; JUST WHAT THE POPE WAS HOPING FOR TO DECEIVE A MILLION OR MORE
Ephesians 5:11-“And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them”.
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? 2 Corinthians 6:14-15
Hall Bergoglio Together-compressed
ECUMENICAL “TOGETHER 2016” ORGANIZER MEETS WITH POPE FRANCIS TO UNITE CHRISTIANS, CATHOLICS ON NATIONAL MALL 
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/06/10/together-2016-organizer-meets-with-pope-francis-to-unite-christians-catholics-on-national-mall/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
WASHINGTON — An ecumenical event featuring Hillsong United, Lecrae, Michael W. Smith, Josh McDowell, Ravi Zacharias, Francis Chan and other renown evangelical and Catholic speakers and musicians that is set to take place in Washington, D.C. is raising concerns as it seeks to draw a million attendees to “link arms” in unity, including with the Vatican.
“Together 2016” is an event to be held on July 16 at the National Mall in Washington, and seeks to unite those of various backgrounds to “stand together for Jesus.” Both Christians and Catholics alike will be featured at the prayer and worship event.
“Together 2016 is about laying aside what divides us to lift up Jesus who unites us,” organizer Nick Hall of PULSE told Christian News Network. “We are coming together in historic unity to pray for a reset for our nation.”
“Jesus said that His followers are family. We believe that it is time for a family gathering,” he also said in an official statement. “It’s not about what divides us, but about the one who unites us—Jesus. The world sees division. We can change that.”
This week, Hall announced that Jorge Bergoglio, also known as Pope Francis, will be delivering a video message to those in attendance.
“We are humbled and honored by his involvement and are eager to share his message with the crowd that gathers at Together 2016,” he told the Christian Post. “That His Holiness would choose to speak into this historic day is a testament to the urgency and the need for followers of Jesus to unite in prayer for our nation and our world.”
Hall traveled to Rome on Thursday to meet with the Roman Catholic leader and other Vatican officials ahead of the event.
“We’ve been praying for this and God has been answering our prayers,” he said in an online video in speaking of Bergoglio’s support of the gathering, explaining that he and a representative from the Vatican discussed how to unite Christians and Catholics.
Hall also noted that he and Bergoglio would be praying together on Friday.
“This is just what God’s been doing,” he asserted.
Supporters of the event include The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, the Luis Palau Association, CRU (formerly Campus Crusade for Christ), Intervarsity Christian Fellowship, Premiere Productions, the National Day of Prayer, YWAM, the American Bible Society and other organizations.
Confirmed speakers include Francis Chan, Ravi Zacharias, Josh McDowell, Southern Baptist Convention President Ronnie Floyd and National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference President Samuel Rodriquez. Music will be provided by Michael W. Smith, Hillsong United, Lecrae, Kari Jobe, Jeremy Camp, Lauren Daigle, Casting Crowns, Kirk Franklin, Andy Mineo and Matt Maher, among others.
“I love the name Together,” Joel Houston of Hillsong United said in a statement. “There’s a power in unity and a blessing that comes when people put aside their differences and gather together for one purpose. Our prayer is for this to be a reset for us as a generation of the church—in America and beyond.”
Worship leader, Matt Maher, who identifies as a Roman Catholic, has outlined at other ecumenical events that he believes it is his calling to work toward to the unification of Christians and Catholics.
“We’ve never seen a unified church before in the history of the church since the Reformation. We don’t even know what it looks like,” he said at OneThing 2015. “I think what the work of unity starts with [is]: It starts with us praying together. It starts with us fellowshiping together. It starts with us having a common respect for each other, a love for each other.”
However, not everyone believes that Christians should link arms with Roman Catholics and set aside major differences that go to the heart of the gospel.

GendronGendron

“Nick Hall either does not know the exclusivity of the gospel of God or he does not know the Roman Catholic plan of salvation because they are diametrically opposed,” Mike Gendron of Proclaiming the Gospel Ministries told Christian News Network. Gendron is a former Roman Catholic who now teaches evangelicals how to share the gospel with Catholics.
“We’re divided on how one is born again: Rome says water baptism, the Bible says the work of the Spirit. We’re divided on how one is justified: Rome says faith plus works, the Bible says faith. We’re divided on how one is purified of sin: Rome says purgatory, the Bible says the blood of Jesus. We’re divided on the essentials of the gospel: Rome has other mediators, the Bible says it’s Christ alone,” he explained.
Gendron said that Jesus himself came to divide with truth, and prayed that His Church would be sanctified with that truth.
“It was the Lord Jesus Christ who came to divide: He divides with His word and His gospel. He divides mother against daughter, father against son—and we must remain sanctified and not united with any who are not born again,” he explained. “More than ever, we must maintain the exclusivity of the gospel of Christ. What hope does an unbelieving world have unless we maintain the purity of the gospel?”
Gendron also stated that he is concerned about the message that it will send when Christians see evangelical leaders involved with an event that validates Roman Catholicism, and therefore does not view those in the religion as a mission field.
“This is going to put the gospel off limits to many Roman Catholics who are there, so it will also confuse the evangelical Church,” he said.
In addition to concerns about unification with the Vatican, there are also questions about Hall’s inclusion of Andy Mineo at the event following his defense of profanity earlier this year on Twitter.
“Do you guys really think if a person uses ‘profanity’ (words we’ve given meaning) in their music they couldn’t possibly be Christian? Why?” Mineo asked, and later responded to a follower who said Christians shouldn’t be using profanity, “Your idea of Christianity is black and white. One day you’ll understand there is grey and it’s ok.”
As previously reported, some have likewise expressed concern over Kirk Franklin’s appearance on profane rapper Kanye West’s new album.
“When I was sitting in the studio with Kirk—Kirk Franklin—and we’re just going through it, I said, ‘This is a gospel album with a whole lot of cursing on it, but it’s still a gospel album,’” West stated in a recent interview on Big Boy Radio. “It’s the gospel according to Ye.”
Hall did not respond to Christian News Network’s question as to whether an artist’s behavior is a factor when being vetted, or if there is a vetting process at all for speakers and musicians.
_____________________________________________________
THE NON BIBLICAL, NON DOCTRINAL APPROACH TO CREATE THE ONE WORLD CHURCH OF HERESY AND APOSTASY
______________________________________________________________

Ronnie Floyd, Lecrae, and Hillsong Unite with the Pope at Monumental Together 2016 Gathering

BY BRANDON HINES
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/06/08/hillsong-ronnie-floyd-lecrae-join-pope-at-monumental-together-2016-gathering/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
As has been thoroughly covered elsewhere, the Together 2016 is hosting many theologically questionable people whom are widely popular with evangelicals.  This rogue’s gallery includes Hillsong UNITED, Christine Caine, Kari Jobe, Kirk Franklin, the rapper “who happens to be Christian,” Lecrae, SBC President, Ronnie Floyd, Josh McDowell, Tedashii, Trip Lee, “God’s lover” Ann Voskamp, Matthew West, and Roman Catholic musician Matt Maher. It has to the attention of the Pulpit & Pen that Matt Maher won’t be the only Roman Catholic featured at this event. Pope Francis has added himself to the lineup,  stating that he will speak to the audience via video. Founder of PULSE, Nick Hall, who helped organize the event, said,
We are humbled and honored by his involvement and eager to share his message with the crowd that gathers at Together 2016…That His Holiness would choose to speak into this historic day is a testament to the urgency and the need for followers of Jesus to unite in prayer for our nation and our world.
Many of the people in the lineup have already demonstrated a lack of Christian common sense.  For example Kirk Franklin helped write a profane gospel album with Kanye West and Ravi Zacharias gave a evangelically weak lecture at the Mormon Tabernacle and often speaks with Christian figures of ill-repute such as Christine Caine.  Now Zacharias, West, and their compatriots will engage in a partnership with the Pope of Rome himself.  This isn’t a mere demonstration of a lack of common sense.  This is a flouting of biblical admonition.
Sadly, inappropriate partnerships are nothing new for Southern Baptist President, Ronnie Floyd.  In 2015, Floyd spoke at the ecumenical IHOP OneThing Gathering, hosted by NAR luminary, Mike Bickle.  Floyd made it clear that he believed the doctrinal differences between he and Bickle were minimal. He has taken a similar and more concerning position with regard to the Together 2016 gathering.  In a letter he wrote to the events’ producers, he stated:
In 1997, Promise Keepers held their Stand in the Gap rally on the National Mall. I had the privilege to speak to over 1.3 million men who attended from all over America. It was one of the greatest moments of my life. Unquestionably, the scene of a sea of men gathered to experience the Lord together was epic. 
Now is the time for another million or more people from our generations to come together on the National Mall in Washington D.C. A gathering of people from all backgrounds of life and every ethnicity joining together in one place, at one time, for one day to unite around Christ and His hope for America and the World
Our greatest need in America is for the next Great Spiritual Awakening to occur. What if Saturday, July 16, 2016 was the day that God brought Spiritual Awakening to the National Mall in Washington D.C.? Do not miss Together 2016.
It’s incredible that the president of the Southern Baptist Convention, a denomination that has historically stood on conservative biblical truth, has not only displayed a lack of discernment by partnering with an IHOP dominionist but with the false-gospel-proclaiming pontiff of the apostate Roman Catholic Church.
It does’t take a great theologian to figure out that God is not going to bring a revival through false worship that He hates.
Roman Catholicism teaches many dangerous doctrines. Chief among these is the teaching that Christians are saved by a combination of faith and works (Council of Trent, Canon 9). Rome also teaches that the Bible is not sufficient, but that the Bible and Church Tradition are equal in authority.  In these Catholics traditions are seen things like praying to dead saints and the sanctification of Mary as a Co-mediator with Christ. The Catholic Church teaches many doctrines that should cause Bible-believing Christians to separate from them.  Yet Ronnie Floyd chooses to speak at a conference with the Pope.
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? 2 Corinthians 6:14-15
_____________________________________________________
ANN VOSKAMP’S “ROMANTIC PANENTHEISM” LEADS THOUSANDS ASTRAY WITH CATHOLIC MYSTICISM
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
QUOTE: “Lysa Terkeurst promoting “breath payers” in her book “Made to Crave”, and who endorsed Ann Voskamp’s book One Thousand GiftsAnn Voskamp has a blog where she shares how to do Lectio Divina. Both of these women are deceiving many women with their contemplative mysticism.”

See Lighthouse Trails Research about “breath prayers”: 
http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/breathprayer.htm, and “lectio divina”:
http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=10887.


Together2016, Ann Voskamp Declare Scripture Insufficient

BY JEFF MAPLES
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/06/10/together2016-ann-voskamp-declare-scripture-insufficient/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Pulpit & Pen recently confirmed and reported that the Pope of Rome will be joining Southern Baptist President, along with Hillsong United, Lecrae, and many other professing evangelical Christians in Washington D.C. for an ecumenical fornication-fest. The event, dubbed Together 2016, is estimated to host over 1 million attendees.
Recently, a tweet appeared from Together2016’s official Twitter account that stated the following:
This tweet is a reference to one of Ann Voskamp’s recent blog posts where she writes:
We believe. Because we know. He knows our grief. We know His goodness. And the truth is – we don’t need an explanation from God like we need an experience of God.
One person on Facebook commented,
I genuinely feel sorry for people like her who don’t know the awesome experience of hearing from God through His word. I used to be one of them and I can attest that it’s a frustrating, restless way to live when you chase “experiences” all over the place. Beginning to learn His Word and therefore His will is what has brought me peace and rest.
Voskamp is noted for her bad theology and romanticizing of her relationship to God. In her book, One Thousand Gifts, she wrote of an “experience” she claimed to have with God that shows, at best, a complete lack of understanding of God’s love for his people. Some of the excerpts depict a seemingly sexual relationship with God. She writes:
“I fly to Paris and discover how to make love to God.” (One Thousand Gifts, p 201)
“I run my hand along the beams over my loft bed, wood hewn by a hand several hundred years ago. I can hear Him. He’s calling for a response; He’s calling for oneness. Communion” (One Thousand Gifts, p 211)
“I remember this feeling. The way my apron billowed in the running, the light, the air. The harvest moon. I remember. The yearning. To merge with Beauty Himself. But here…….Now? Really?…….I am not at all certain that I want consummation…….And who wouldn’t cower at the invitation to communion with limitless Holiness Himself?” (One Thousand Gifts, p 211)
And in another blog post she wrote, she said,
And she laughs loud and we’re carried and hey, who needs Ryan Gosling and his “Hey Girl” meme when you’ve got God with His “Hey Beautiful” promise?
Voskamp’s prioritizing of an experiential relationship with God over God’s Word is representative of the over-arching theme of the entire Together 2016 event. Voskamp will be among many other popular Chrislebrities confirmed to be present at the event. Amy Spreeman of Berean Research reports,
This so-called revival is bringing Assemblies of God Supt. George O. Wood and Southern Baptist Convention president Ronnie Floyd together to link arms in spiritual unity with the Pentecostal Charismatic Churches of North America, Grace Communion International (formerly the Armstrongism Worldwide Church of God), and a host of familiar Chrislebrities including Hillsong United, Kari Jobe, Francis Chan, Lecrae, Nick Hall, Passion, Crowder, Kirk Franklin, Ravi Zacharias, Jeremy Camp, Bob Lenz, Andy Mineo, Michael W. Smith, Lauren Daigle, Christine Caine, Mark Batterson, Matthew West,Jo Saxton, Mike Kelsey, Casting Crowns, John K. Jenkins Sr., Josh McDowell, Laurel Bunker, Luis Palau, Tedashii, Tasha Cobbs, Lacey Sturm, York Moore, Trip Lee, Samuel Rodriguez, Ronnie Floyd, Reid Saunders, Jose Zayas, Jennie Allen, Nabeel Qureshi, Ann Voskamp, KB, Christine D’Clario, Matt Maher, Sammy Wanyonyi, Lindsey Nobles, Amena Brown, and Josh Brewer.
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols? – (2 Corinthians 14-16)
See also:

______________________________________________________
FROM LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS RESEARCH: 


Dear Lighthouse Trails:
A group of friends who are believers are doing a book study on “One Thousand Gifts” by Ann Voskamp. I thought I heard the word “Eucharist” mentioned.  Do you know anything about the book or author? Just curious,
Blessings to you, _______
Our Review from 2011:
“Ann Voskamp’s Best Selling Book One Thousand Gifts – A Collision of Inspiration and the New Spirituality”
One Thousand Gifts by Ann Voskamp is a 2010 Zondervan title that is a New York Times, USA Today, and Amazon Best-Seller. The author is a contributing writer for DaySpring, and she has a blog that receives 40-50 thousand visitors every week.1  Voskamp has risen quickly in popularity, with invitations to various conferences and other events. (In April, she spoke in Portland Oregon at the Q Conference sharing a platform with popular Christian figures like Luis Palau and Louie Giglio).
Ann Voskamp’s sincerity and her desire for a relationship with the Lord are unarguable. Her honesty in her own shortcomings and frailties is admirable. Her description of how she witnessed the death of her baby sister (run over by a farm truck) when she herself was very young is heart-wrenching. What’s more, few would disagree with the overall key theme of the book that we should give thanks to God in everything (1 Thessalonians 5:18). Voskamp shares how practicing thanksgiving and gratitude has changed her life. Thinking about 1 Timothy 6:6 (“godliness with contentment is great gain”), it is true that being thankful and content does have great gain in the believers life.
But One Thousand Gifts, as well-meaning as the author may be, is not a book we can recommend and in fact is one we must warn about. We do not want to cause distress to Ann Voskamp; but given the high popularity of her book, we are compelled to issue this warning.
It is clear by reading One Thousand Gifts that Ann Voskamp reads and admires several mystics, panentheists, and universalists. Her book is peppered with quotes by Sarah Ban Breathnach (a New Age author launched into stardom by Oprah), Teresa of Avila, Julian of Norwich, Evelyn Underhill, Brennan Manning,  Annie Dillard, Thomas Acquinas, Buddhist sympathizer and Catholic convert Peter Kreeft, Walter Brueggemann, Francis de Sales, Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Henri Nouwen, and Jean-Pierre de Caussade. Many of the statements Voskamp says in her book  would resonate with these authors showing that Voskamp has absorbed some of the beliefs of these people. In addition, Voskamp’s popular blog lists a number of contemplative/emerging authors on her book list page: Richard Foster (Celebration of Discipline),  Adele Ahlberg Calhoun (Spiritual Disciplines Handbook, a primer on Eastern style meditation), and emerging church author Phyllis Tickle are included.
In reading One Thousand Gifts, we are reminded of author Sue Monk Kidd (The Secret Life of Bees), who started off as a conservative Southern Baptist Sunday School teacher, but when she began reading Thomas Merton and other mystical writers, her spiritual outlook changed dramatically. The progress of Monk Kidd’s spiritual change can be seen from one book to the next. Today, she is a self-proclaimed worshipper of the goddess Sophia and states in her book The Dance of the Dissident Daughter that God is in all things (panentheism) even graffiti and excrement. Monk Kidd says:
Deity means that divinity will no longer be only heavenly … It will also be right here, right now, in me, in the earth, in this river, in excrement and roses alike. (p. 160)
Ann Voskamp echoes Monk Kidd when she states that God is “present in all things,” even “sewage flowing downriver” (p. 110-111)
The last chapter of One Thousand Gifts, “The Joy of Intimacy,” Voskamp devotes to what she calls “intimacy” with God. But brace yourself, you won’t find the way she talks about intimacy with God in the Bible. We share the following with you not to shock you for theatrical sake – its to show where the “new” Christianity is heading.  We think it important, in light of the many young women who are reading this book, to quote Voskamp’s view of “intimacy” with God which she also calls the “mystery of that romance.” Voskamp says:
Mystical union. This, the highest degree of importance. God as Husband in sacred wedlock, bound together, body and soul, fed by His body, quenched by His blood . . . God, He has blessed – caressed. I could bless God – caress with thanks. It’s our making love. God makes love with grace upon grace, every moment a making of His love for us. . . . couldn’t I make love to God, making every moment love for Him? To know Him the way Adam knew Eve. Spirit skin to spirit skin. . . The intercourse of soul with God is the very climax of joy . . . To enter into Christ and Christ enter into us – to cohabit.  (pp. 213, 216-217).
We find Voskamp’s mixture of sexual and spiritual language when referring to a relationship with God offensive. The most “intimate” relationship anyone ever had with God on this earth was the one Jesus Christ had with His Father; but nowhere in the Bible does Jesus (or the disciples) use sexual language and innuendos to describe the relationship between God and man. And in fact, the Bible tells us that sexual union was given to man, in the confines of marriage between a man and wife, for procreation; the Bible also tells us that in our eternal heavenly home, there will be no marriage (the need for procreation will not exist). If we, as Christians, were supposed to think about our relationship with God in sexual terms, wouldn’t God have made that clear in His word?  It’s like the contemplative prayer movement that emphasizes repeating a word or phrase over and over to be intimate with God. But nowhere are we instructed to do this in Scripture. It’s as if the Holy Spirit who inspired men to write the books of the Bible left out vital elements that now contemplatives and emergents are enlightening us to. God forbid that we should think so. Books like One Thousand Gifts have added to what God has said in His Word.
Voskamp isn’t the only emerging-type author to use sexual language when talking about intimacy with God. We see an increase in books and speakers talking about” intimacy with God” (most of these writers are proponents of contemplative – that’s no coincidence – but rather signs that tantra spirituality (sexual experiences combined with mystical experiences)) is entering the church now. One of the most popular books today on marriage, Sacred Marriage by Gary Thomas (promoted by Calvary ChapelFocus on the Family, and Rick Warren) is laced with quotes by or references to (about a dozen instances) Mary Anne McPherson Oliver’s book, Conjugal Spirituality, a primer on tantric sex; McPherson Oliver says that “mystical experiences can be associated with erotic love.” McPherson Oliver tells readers to use mantras and breath prayers during the sexual experience to help induce the tantric mystical experience. The fact that one of today’s most popular Christian books on marriage has so many references to this book is a telling sign of what has entered the evangelical/Protestant church. The popularity of One Thousand Gifts is another sure indication.
Today, the “new” progressive Christianity is more sensual than spiritual.  Appealing to the senses (making it sensual) and the carnal man rather than strengthening the spiritual man within. Scripture warns us though: “For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace” (Romans 8:6). One Thousand Gifts may be the poster book, so to speak, for the latest carnally-minded book, taking a place in line with The Shack.
______________________________________________________
ALSO FROM LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS RESEARCH:

Ann Voskamp’s Best Selling Book One Thousand Gifts – A Collision of Inspiration and the New Spirituality

SEE: http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=6604

______________________________________________________________
FROM KEN SILVA’S APPRISING.ORG:
SEE: 

CONCERNING ONE THOUSAND GIFTS BY ANN VOSKAMP

http://apprising.org/2012/05/28/concerning-one-thousand-gifts-by-ann-voskamp/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Apprising Ministries has been warning about, and documenting, the sad slide of largely pretending to be Protestant evangelicalism into becoming what I’ve referred to as The Ecumenical Church Of Deceit (ECoD); and much of the current sorry state of the church visible can be traced back through to the semi-pelagian (at best) man-centered Church Growth Movement birthed out of Fuller Theological Seminary.
Keep in mind this is coming from one who is not a strict cessationist; the root roughly begins with the charismatic revival as it spreads through the Jesus People/Movement circa early 1970′s out into various denominations and into what became the Fuller Theological Seminary School of World Mission.[1] This is the cesspool from which the new liberalism of the Seeker Driven methodology of letting culture define the church would spring.
As Dr. John MacArthur said:
And I’ll tell you, how do you know it’s the new liberalism?  Because you can’t stop a seeker-friendly movement, because it’s going to be redefined, it’s going to be redefined, it’s going to be redefined…  It’s relentlessly being redefined because the culture changes so fast in a media-driven society.  It changes so fast!…
So, there’s a flow going on here.  And where is it going?  It’s going toward the Emerging Church.  That’s why you can have all those people—Rick Warren and Brian McLaren—way out on the edge of the Emergent Church, you can have all those people at the same conference in San Diego all speaking, and, in between, sessions on Yoga.  If you just look at the roots of something—and look where it’s going: if you let the culture define the church, there’s no way to catch up. (source)
The fact is, within contemporary evangelicalism there’s been a re-education process spewed at us by these leaders of the man-loving ECoD as she does her best to please her harlot mother, the Church of Rome, with her own apostate Roman Catholicism; essentially undoing the the Lord’s Reformation. Look at these various factions, like the Purpose Driven/Seeker Driven sector and the neo-liberal cult of the Emerging Church 2.0 with its reimagined i.e. new form of Progessive Christianity they call Emergence Christianity, as having the same product. That being church; that they then are selling to different markets using different forms of advertising.
As these kinds of 1 Peter 4:17 judgments are sent upon the church visible by Jesus, the result is a growing apostasy and spiritual blindness. Evangelicals are now turning away from the proper Christian spirituality of sola Scriptura to corrupt Contemplative Spirituality/Mysticism (CSM)—and its crown jewel Contemplative/Centering Prayer, which is itself a form of meditation in an altered state of consciousness. The “key mentors” of CSM being  Living Spiritual Teacher and Quaker mystic Richard Foster, along with his spiritual twin Dallas Willard, who at last check is with the Southern Baptist Convention.
Sadly, this dumping of discernment has opened the door for highly subjective experiences—allegedly with God—to come right into the very mainstream Protestant sectors of the visible church. Take for example this literal vision wildly popular Southern Baptist Bible teacher tells us she had circa 2002: (Video no longer available).
And we’re supposed to believe Jesus sees the Roman Catholic Church as part of the Body of Christ: (Video no longer available).
Well, I have news for you; since this vision wasn’t from God, then at best Beth Moore encountered a demon. At worst, Satan himself. Shouldn’t we be concerned with this? It’s against this context I tell you that one of the more popular books of this kind of refried mystic mythology of Roman Catholicism making the rounds in evangelical women’s Bible studies over the past year or two is One Thousand Gifts by Ann Voskamp. We’re really not surprised to see that this book is published by Zondervan who tells us using classic mystic-speak:
Ann Voskamp invites you into her grace-bathed life of farming, parenting, and writing—and deeper still into your own life. Here you will discover a way of seeing that opens your eyes to ordinary amazing grace, a way of living that is fully alive, and a way of becoming present to God that brings you deep and lasting joy. (source)
Now I’m pleased to point you to Romantic Panentheism, a Review of One Thousand Gifts by Ann Voskamp by Christian apologist Bob DeWaay, where we find out just how far off-track this book actually is:
We live in a theological age (postmodern) where the rational and cognitive are questioned and replaced by the sensual and mysterious. Many churches promote the idea of worshipping God with all five senses. Feelings trump clear Biblical exegesis, systematic theology, statements of faith, and any other rational approach to Christian theology. Into this milieu comes a book that takes romanticism to a new level, using sensuality to invoke religious feelings and ostensibly true devotion…
[There is a] panentheistic worldview revealed in the book [as well as] the romanticism that accompanies it. Panentheism is the belief that God is in everything. It is to be distinguished from pantheism that teaches that God is everything. The very popular Emergent movement is panentheistic as is New Age theology. Since God is in everything, then God can be discovered and understood through encounters with nature. Voskamp shows that she knows what is wrong with pantheism, but unwittingly (or perhaps not so unwittingly) replaces it with panentheism:

Pantheism, seeing the natural world as divine, is a very different thing than seeing divine God present in all things. I know it here kneeling, the twilight so still: nature is not God but God revealing the weight of Himself, all His glory, through the looking glass of nature.[2]

Her statement is not a valid implication from passages such as Psalm 19 and Romans 1 that speak of general revelation. For one thing, nature is fallen and does not reveal “all His glory” (Christ does that) and what can be discerned about God through nature is not saving knowledge, but condemning knowledge… Pagan nature religions do not provide messianic salvation. Paul claims that salvation comes only through the gospel (which comes to us through special, not general revelation). The confusion between these two categories is shown throughout Voskamp’s book…
Voskamp would likely recoil from the notion that she is promoting pagan nature religion or mysticism. But she does put Christians on the same footing as the pagans by taking them on a journey with her to find God in nature and art. The concepts about God that are distinctively Christian in her book are borrowed from special revelation (the Bible) and brought with her on her journey of discovery. But she never makes a distinction between general revelation and special revelation and by integrating the two so seamlessly, elevates nature to the status of saving revelation.
Since God is supposedly in everything, then God can be found in everything… Her experience is described in salvific terms: “It’s dawning, my full moon rising. I was lost but know I am found again” (Voskamp: 118). She claims an “inner eye” that sees God in a panentheistic way: “If my inner eye has God seeping up through all things, then can’t I give thanks for anything? . . . The art of deep seeing makes gratitude possible” (Voskamp: 118). In Romans 1, “seeing” God through general revelation in a way that makes all humans culpable is true for all, not just special enlightened ones like Voskamp.
There are other troubling things about the claim that salvation can be found in seeing God in the harvest moon. One is that Voskamp implies that for her, “salvation” is being saved from an unhappy life filled with ingratitude. She never mentions God’s wrath against sin (she does mention sin but not in the context of substitutionary atonement)… Voskamp’s panentheism is not compatible with Christian theism. This worldview is very popular in today’s culture, inside and outside the church, but it is not from God. It is a departure from the faith once for all delivered to the saints…
Romanticism arose in the early 19th Century as a reaction against the Enlightenment and rationalism. The idea was that truth could be found in feelings, art, and the intuitive rather than through empirical investigation and the rational. At the conclusion of my book on the Emergent Church, I suggested that Emergent was a new Romanticism[3] I was able to express that idea to Doug Paggit personally, and he did not offer disagreement, but silence. I am quite sure that the assessment is accurate. Romanticism, old and new, has a common enemy which is the Enlightenment.
Voskamp is not so concerned about the Enlightenment or other philosophical considerations, but displays Romanticism throughout her book. In fact it could be mistaken for a romance novel with God the desired lover… Voskamp’s point in the soap bubble chapter is to teach the theological error that time is the essence and nature of God. She gains that idea through wrongly interpreting the self-designation of God as I AM to be proof that time is of the essence of God so therefore God is to be found in the present (Voskamp: 69, 70). Her ideas are remarkably similar to Echkart Tolle’s (New Age pantheist) ideas taught in his
books The Power of Now and The New Earth[4]…
Voskamp is not really interested in theology understood cognitively, but rather in romantic feelings about God… This [idea] is about seeing (an art for the spiritually enlightened) God in the moment and in all things (panentheism). It is not really about God’s relationship to time, but about our attentiveness and awareness that will cause use to see God (Voskamp: 77)… New Age ideas are found throughout One Thousand Gifts. For example she cites Pierre Teilhard de Chardin who is a darling with New Age writers: “Nothing here below is profane for those who know how to see” (Chardin as cited by Voskamp: 122).
It is possible that a false teacher like Chardin could have some true ideas; but Voskamp cites him (as part of the heading of a chapter) precisely at his point of error (and hers). The idea that everything is holy and nothing profane is popular but fully unbiblical. It comports with the idea of panentheism. If indeed God is in everything, then nothing is profane. Rob Bell makes the same error in Velvet Elvis when he claims everything is holy.[5]…
Emergent writers speak of the “rhythm of God in the world,” an idea promoted by Doug Pagitt. In their thinking this rhythm is to be found and tuned into through man-invented practices.[6] What is important to understand is that the idea that nothing is profane and that God’s rhythm can be found in all things is panentheistic and not Christian. The Christian view is that the created order, because of sin and rebellion, contains good and evil, the holy and the profane…
The real problem is not our failure to see God in everything, but our failure to believe what God has said, and by grace obey. The grand claim of the Bible is that “God has spoken” (Hebrews 1:12). The question is whether we will listen to what God has said or not… Voskamp’s romanticism reaches its pinnacle in chapter 11. There she describes a trip to Paris where she has an intimate encounter with God through art and architecture. God “woos” her through this encounter and she falls in love…
At Notre Dame Cathedral, carried away by the experience, she claims to have found the holy: “This air is old, the ground, holy” (Voskamp: 207). On the contrary, the New Testament does not describe holy places, especially not Roman Catholic cathedrals filled with pagan icons and grotesque gargoyles such as at Notre Dame (which means “our lady” referring to the virgin Mary)… There, in a Catholic cathedral which ought to invoke our objection, Voskamp, as do her role models, the mystics of the Middle Ages, finds “intimate union” with God…
Amazingly, Voskamp unabashedly teaches the path to mystical union that has its roots in ancient, pagan, Rome. This path is taught in the Catholic Encyclopedia.8[7] This threefold path is “common to all forms of mysticism, Christian or otherwise” writes Pastor Gary Gilley who rightly warns the church about it.[8] Voskamp extols the medieval mystics who were instrumental in the building of Notre Dame (Voskamp: 208)…
Mysticism and the practices Voskamp endorses that promote it, do lead to a Cosmic Christ, that is a creation centered one rather that the Christ who bodily ascended to heaven and is seated at the right hand of God. The mystical Christ is immanent only, not transcendent. He is contacted by unbiblical, mystical means rather than through the gospel that saves us from God’s wrath against sin…
As fraught with theological error that this book is, its basic premise is true: as Christians we ought to be thankful people who give thanks in all things. The Bible teaches us that. But do we need to jettison Christian theism in favor of panentheism and objective truth in favor of romantic feelings and higher order experiences to become thankful? No! … There is enough sensuality in the world without us having sensual desires stirred up under the guise of a higher order religious experience in the context of a panentheistic worldview.
Voskamp’s book feeds into the romantic sensibilities of its postmodern readers. But it does nothing to promote the faith once for all delivered to the saints. It pushes the church even further down the unbiblical road of mysticism that so many are already on. We need to reject this and instead return to objective, Biblical truth. (source)

 Endnotes:

[1] http://tinyurl.com/2do9obh, accessed 5/28/12.
[2] Ann Voskamp, One Thousand Gifts; (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010) 110. All further references from this book will be in brackets within this article.
[3] Bob DeWaay, The Emergent Church – Undefining Christianity; (Minneapolis: DeWaay, 2009), 204.
[5] See CIC Issue 4 for Bell’s misuse of “holy.”
[6] I discuss Doug Pagitt’s idea of God’s “rhythm” here: CIC Issue 99
See also:
THE ORIGIN OF CONTEMPLATIVE/CENTERING PRAYER
______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
http://www.solasisters.com/2014/05/ann-voskamps-one-thousand-gifts.html
AND: 
A Commentary on Ann Voskamp’s One Thousand Gifts 
by Christian researcher and apologist, Marcia Montenegro
Reprinted in full with permission, April 2012

http://www.solasisters.com/2012/04/commentary-on-ann-voskamps-one-thousand.html










EXPOSED: GOOGLE CAUGHT TRYING TO RIG PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FOR HILLARY CLINTON

Google Caught Censoring For Criminal Hillary



EXPOSED: GOOGLE CAUGHT TRYING TO RIG PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 

FOR HILLARY CLINTON 

SourceFed discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton

BY MICHAEL DEPINTO
SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/exposed-google-caught-trying-to-rig-presidential-election-for-hillary-video/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
For conservative writers like myself, who are constantly being censored, monitored, or banned for days, and even weeks at a time by companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google, we’ve known for years that social media was not just left-leaning, but absurdly left-leaning. In the story below, a bombshell report by SourceFed reveals what they’re calling “the biggest story they’ve ever reported.” SourceFed says that Google is manipulating search results to bury negative stories about Hillary Clinton. I remember not that long ago when I was posting stories about Facebook manipulating future elections, and I heard what I always do: “That’s never going to happen. That’s pure conspiracy crap. You people are dangerous.”
ONCE AGAIN… THE “CONSPIRACY THEORISTS” ARE SPOT ON…
Personally, I am terrified for the future that lies ahead. Over and over, history has taught us how this story ends. Either you see what’s happening, or you don’t. If you don’t, I fear there’s nothing I nor anyone else can say or do to show it to you at this point. With stories like the one below from SourceFed, it should be abundantly clear to ANYONE, that the forces that oppose liberty and embrace tyranny, will stop at nothing until we the people are under their thumb completely and absolutely.
Before the story from SourceFed is a powerful video that says more than I could ever hope to. The following are just some of the words conveyed by Sergeant Dire:
“Patriots, at this crucial point in our nations history, information and knowledge are key, they mean thedifference between retaining or losing this republic … Our Founders believed in the potential of this country so greatly, that they gave their lives, and some of them even watched as their children were slaughtered on the battlefield, and others lost everything, and died penniless. They endured greater pains than you or I could ever even fathom, simply so their children and grandchildren could prosper without the wolf of tyranny knocking at their door.
MY COUNTRYMEN… MY BROTHERS… THAT WOLF IS NOW AT OUR DOOR… 
That evil which they warned us about has come upon us like a thief in the night.it has crept slowly inito our lives, and is preparing for its final blow. We have NOT heeded the words of our Forefathers, and for that we may have to pay dearly to regain our republic… 
I’m am sorry, but there is a great chance that our republic can no longer be saved through political means… They have all but extinguished our chances of diplomatic resolve… 
James Madison, Father of the Constitution said, “The ultimate authority resides in the people, and that if the federal government go too powerful and overstepped its authority, then the people would develop plans of resistance and resort to arms.” (James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 46.) 
234 years ago our Forefathers KNEW this could happen, and they spoke openly about it so that it wouldn’t. NOW, the mainstream media portrays you as some crazy, redneck, racist if you echo the thoughts of the great men who created this nation…
These truly are frightening times we are living in, as both videos, the story, and the supporting links below will demonstrate to anyone willing to objectively look. I fear time may be running out if we don’t stop the madness soon… 
As you’ll learn in the video below, while researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, SourceFed discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton. If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren’t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google’s algorithm. According to a research paper cited in this video, that kind of search result manipulation has the potential to substantially influence the outcome of actual elections.

Liberals have long controlled the education system, media and various other aspects of our culture. It was recently uncovered that Facebook was censoring conservative stories from appearing on its list of trending stories.
Well, apparently Facebook’s not the only one accused of censoring the internet. A few weeks ago on HBO’s hit show “Silicon Valley,” Hooli’s (a company in the show parodying Google) CEO is discovered to have been scrubbing Web searches to hide negative stories about himself.
As it turns out, the satirical show wasn’t far off from reality.
A bombshell report by SourceFed that they’re calling “the biggest story we’ve ever reported” reveals Google is manipulating search results to bury negative stories about Hillary Clinton.
The Washington Times writes:
When typing “Hillary Clinton cri,” Google’s auto-complete function brings up as its top choice “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” even though competing search engines Bing and Yahoo show the most popular search topics are “Hillary Clinton criminal charges” and “Hillary Clintoncrime.”
While that could reflect legitimate differences in the engines’ algorithms, Mr. Lieberman said that a search of “Hillary Clinton crime reform” onGoogle trends showed that “there weren’t even enough searches of term to build a graph on the site.”
“Which begs the question, why on Earth is it the first potential result?” he said, adding, “Apparently far more people are searching for ‘Hillary Clinton crimes’ than ‘Hillary Clinton crime reform.’ Google just doesn’t want you to know or ask.”
SourceFed found a similar result when typing in, “Hillary Clinton ind,” which yielded “Hillary Clinton Indiana” and “Hillary Clinton India” onGoogle, but “Hillary Clintonindictment” on the other search engines.
“The intention is clear. Google is burying potential searches for terms that could have hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary elections over the past several months by manipulating recommendations on their site,” Mr. Lieberman said.
This report comes just days after Wikileaks founder Julian Assange publicly stated that Google is “directly engaged in Hillary’s campaign.”
More specifically, Breitbart reports that Assange claimed:
The chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt, set up a company to run the digital component of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.” Eric Schmidt did in fact create a company in the last quarter of 2015 called The Groundwork whose website is empty except for a single placeholder logo. Breitbart has previously reported on The Groundwork and how it was reportedly developed to install Clinton in the Oval Office. However, whether or not Google itself is a part of Schmidts’ involvement in The Groundwork remains unclear to the public.
Assange pointed out that many high up Google employee names appear within Clinton’s leaked email transcripts, a searchable list of which Assange hascompiled here. A name that appears with regularity is that of Jared Cohen, the founder of ‘Google Ideas’ – now rebranded as ‘Jigsaw’. Cohen’s team at Google was revealed to be working with Clinton alongside Al Jazeera in attempts to influence regime change in Syria following the publishing of Clinton’s emails by Wikileaks.

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT RULES UNCONSTITUTIONALLY: “NO RIGHT TO CARRY CONCEALED GUNS”

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT RULES UNCONSTITUTIONALLY: 
“NO RIGHT TO CARRY CONCEALED GUNS”

“The protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public,” the 9th Circuit Court ruled.

BY TIM BROWN
SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/9th-circuit-court-rules-unconstitutionally-no-right-to-carry-concealed-guns/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The same liberal court that upheld the right to sell and purchase guns just weeks ago, has now ruled in an unconstitutional manner regarding the Second Amendment. In a 7-4 decision, the court ruled that individual citizens do not have the right to carry their guns concealed and that states may regulate that.
“We hold that the Second Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public,” Judge William Fletcher wrote in the majority opinion. 
“The protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public,” the ruling reads.
Let’s see, what exactly does the Second Amendment say?
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” –Second Amendment to the US Constitution
Seems crystal clear to me, “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” I see no exceptions for whether a knife or gun is concealed or not. In fact, it was because of the stupid idea of British soldiers coming out in red on the battlefield while the colonists fought concealed that helped in winning the War for Independence. Just think about that for a moment.
Part of the court’s nonsensical statement above is that they fail to speak of the scope of the Second Amendment. By stating “whatever the scope of that protection may be,” they are ignoring the plain language of the text. The text states the right to keep and bear arms is not to be infringed, period. Keeping and bearing arms concealed falls into that category. There is no other way to understand what is being said there.
Additionally, when we think of rights, we should recognize that those come from God in order to perform our righteous duties before Him, as stated in the Declaration of Independence. In fact, when rights are recognized, not only are they not to be infringed by the central government, but those rights are not to be infringed on by the states either, and this case is with regard to California’s pretended law that gun owners had to provide “good cause” in order to obtain a concealed carry permit.
While I have a CCW permit, the fact is that it is asking the state to permit you to exercise a right that God gives. No permission is actually needed if the state simply recognized that they are not God.
NBC points out:
In 1897, well after the adoption of the Second Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “the right of the people to bear arms is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons.”
So, more than one hundred years from our founding, the Supreme Court overstepped its bounds and did actually infringe on the Second Amendment, despite their claims that they did not. This left the 9th Circuit to continue on in a lawless manner with their ruling.
“The historical materials bearing on the adoption of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments are remarkably consistent,” wrote Judge William Fletcher, going back to 16th century English law to find instances of restrictions on concealed weapons. “We therefore conclude that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms does not include, in any degree, the right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.”
The problem in the ruling is referring all the way back to English law in the 16th century. The framers rejected those kinds of infringements upon the rights of the people. They not only rejected it when it came to arms, but also quartering troops, unlawful searches and seizures, free speech, freedom of assembly and various other rights that were violated with pretended law by England.
“Because the Second Amendment does not protect in any degree the right to carry concealed firearms in public, any prohibition or restriction a state may choose to impose on concealed carry — including the requirement of ‘good cause,’ however defined — is necessary allowed by the Amendment,” the 9th Circuit said.
At least there were judges who rightly dissented.
“In the context of present-day California law, the Defendant counties’ limited licensing of the right to carry concealed firearms is tantamount to a total ban on the right of an ordinary citizen to carry a firearm in public for self-defense,” Judge Consuelo M. Callahan wrote.
“Because the majority eviscerates the Second Amendment right of individuals to keep and bear arms as defined by Heller and reaffirmed in McDonald, I respectfully dissent,” Callahan added.
I side with Judge Callahan. Any legislation passed by any government against the right of law-abiding citizens that restricts their ability to keep and bear arms in any fashion is a clear, willful and with knowledge violation of said right.
_____________________________________________________

California Strikes Down The Second Amendment

Published on Jun 10, 2016
The old adage “As California goes so goes the Country” should be the Red Alert harbinger of the U.S. Constitution destroying and criminal Presidential Campaign of Hillary Clinton. Because California has officially crossed the line. On Thursday a federal appeals court in California ruled the Second Amendment does not permit Americans to carry firearms in public. The ruling upholds a California law that imposes strict rules on individuals who wish to exercise concealed carry. The California law requires applicants to demonstrate “good cause” for carrying a weapon.

How’s this for good cause California? 14 dead and 22 wounded in a terrorist attack in San Bernardino on December 2nd, 2015 after every Homeland Security firewall was easily breached. Or the incident back in March of 2016 when as World Net Daily reports “Deputies from the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Office and other agencies responded to a report of “Allahu Akbar” chanting, turban-wearing men shooting assault rifles, handguns and shotguns in a remote desert area.”

Or the fact that Illegal Aliens commit 30% of murders in Many States. As Breitbart reports “….criminal aliens accounted for 38% of all murder convictions in the five states of California, Texas, Arizona, Florida and New York, while illegal aliens constitute only 5.6% of the total population in those states.” Meanwhile Mexico is crushing under the weight of the mass exodus United States bound and saying they have reached their limit.


UN CHIEF REMOVED SAUDI ARABIA FROM BLACKLIST OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS AFTER SAUDIS THREATENED TO CUT UN FUNDING

Ban-Ki-Moon
UN CHIEF REMOVED SAUDI ARABIA FROM BLACKLIST OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS AFTER SAUDIS THREATENED TO CUT UN FUNDING  
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/un-chief-removed-saudi-arabia-from-blacklist-of-human-rights-abusers-after-saudis-threatened-to-cut-un-fundingrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
A clear admission that the UN is thoroughly compromised and sold out to interests that are at clear variance with its (long forgotten) stated mission. If we had an administration in Washington that cared about American interests, the US, not the Saudis, would be cutting funding for the UN.
Also: what else have the Saudis bought? A full revelation of their paid-for lackeys among the American political media elites would be eye-opening, but is unlikely to be forthcoming.
“U.N. Chief Says He Went Soft on Saudi Arabia and Allies to Avoid Aid Cut,” by Colum Lynch, Foreign Policy, June 9, 2016 (thanks to John):
Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. secretary-general, confirmed Thursday he was essentially blackmailed into removing the Saudi-led military coalition in Yemen from a U.N. blacklist of countries, rebel movements, and terrorist groups that have killed, maimed, or otherwise abused children in conflict.
The move follows Foreign Policy’s exclusive report Tuesday that Saudi Arabia privately threatened to break relations with the United Nations and cut hundreds of millions of dollars in humanitarian and counterterrorism funds if it was not taken off the list. In response to the threat, Ban agreed Monday to remove Saudi Arabia and its allies from the blacklist, pending a joint review of the matter by the U.N. and representatives of the Saudi-led coalition.
The decision sparked sharp criticism from human rights advocates, who accused the U.N. chief of capitulating to pressure.
But Ban hit back publicly on Thursday, telling reporters he continues to stand by the report’s finding that the Saudi-led coalition is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Yemeni children. Though he didn’t single out Saudi Arabia by name, Ban told reporters in a prepared statement that unnamed countries threatened to cut off financial support for vital U.N. programs if Saudi Arabia and its allies were not removed from the list.
U.N. officials said Ban received calls of protest from senior officials from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, and other close Saudi allies who demanded the stigma be lifted.
Privately, U.N.-based officials said senior Saudi representatives, including Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir, threatened to cut funding to such vital programs as those for displaced Palestinians and destitute Yemenis. They also said Riyadh raised the specter that other Arab nations, principally the oil-rich Persian Gulf states, would also follow suit, risking billions of dollars in humanitarian aid commitments….

IRAN SPENDS $1.7 BILLION IN U.S. TAXPAYER FUNDS TO BOOST ITS MILITARY

Khamenei
IRAN SPENDS $1.7 BILLION IN U.S. TAXPAYER FUNDS TO BOOST ITS MILITARY
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/iran-spends-1-7-billion-in-u-s-taxpayer-funds-to-boost-its-militaryrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Your tax dollars at work, aiding the military of a state that routinely has its citizens chant “Death to America!” This money will also go to aid Hizballah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and that will result in more jihad murders, primarily of Israeli civilians. All of this is courtesy Barack Obama and John Kerry. How they must be laughing in Tehran.
“Iran Spends $1.7 Billion in U.S. Taxpayer Funds to Boost Its Military,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, June 9, 2016:
The State Department is staying silent after Iranian officials disclosed that the Islamic Republic spent a recent payment by the United States of $1.7 billion in taxpayer funds to expand and build-up its military, according to comments provided to the Washington Free Beacon.
The Obama administration earlier this year paid Iran $1.7 billion from a U.S. taxpayer-funded account in order to settle decades-old legal disputes with the Islamic Republic.
The payment has been caught up in controversy following claims by Iranian officials and some in the U.S. Congress it was part of a “ransom payment” to secure the release of American hostages and 10 U.S. sailors who were abducted at gunpoint by the Iranian military….
Iranian officials have now disclosed that officials have ordered that this $1.7 billion be allocated to the Islamic Republic’s military forces….
When asked by the Free Beacon on Thursday if it could comment on Iran’s use of these U.S. funds, the State Department declined to take a stance.
“We would refer you to the Iranian government to address questions about its budget,” a State Department official told the Free Beacon.

SBC’S MOSQUE BUILDING RUSSELL MOORE DEFENDS ALLIANCES WITH EVIL~MONIES GOING TO MOSQUES INSTEAD OF CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES

IMG-Badshahi-Mosque-97
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, I.E., MUSLIM INSTEAD OF CHRISTIAN
SBC’S MOSQUE BUILDING RUSSELL MOORE DEFENDS ALLIANCES WITH EVIL 
BY BUD AHLHEIM
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/06/09/sbcs-mosque-building-moore-defends-alliances-with-evil/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Not so many months ago, Americans watched the current Administration create an intentional alliance with Iran, perhaps the greatest threat in the Middle East, and certainly the most vocal enemy of America. Those on the right bellowed a righteous, slack-jawed “what are you possibly thinking?” while many on the left hemmed and hawed searching for a sliver of reason from which to jabber their toe-the-line support of the move.
That a godless Administration, overseeing an increasingly wicked government, would create such an alliance – not to mention patently paving a way to nuclear weaponization for them – should not be surprising, perhaps, to the astute student of Scripture.   In the total depravity of humankind, reason, logic, and truth do not improve. Per God’s design, the second law of thermodynamics isn’t merely a reality for the physics of the universe. Degradation is also the imminent process for a fallen humanity.   Not a surprise.
But when Russell Moore, President of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics And Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) chose to join hands with Muslims, the move was seen with similar “what are you thinking?” eyes. How can a man, single-handedly, in the name of the largest Protestant denomination in the nation, decide to align that denomination with what most of its members would easily identify as the very religion of evil itself?
The move to align the SBC with a lawsuit in support of Muslims who had been denied, in legal proceedings in a local New Jersey township, the right to build a mosque is defended by Moore on the grounds of religious liberty. His penned response, from his personal blog site on June 9, is entitled Is Religious Freedom For Non-Christians, Too?
Moore’s retort is in response to an opinion written by Gerald Harris, Editor of The Christian Index, entitled Do Muslims Really Qualify For Religious Freedom?  Moore frames his defense as follows:
Moreover, the idea that religious freedom should apply only to Christians, or only to religious groups that aren’t unpopular, is not only morally wrong but also self-defeating. A government that can tell you a mosque or synagogue cannot be built because it is a mosque or a synagogue is a government that, in the fullness of time, will tell an evangelical church it cannot be constructed because of our claims to the exclusivity of Christ.
Harris, though, cites several sources, including a sitting U.S. Representative, that Islam, while veiled in a religion-like veneer, is fundamentally a geo-political ideology.
Islam is driven by a desire for geographic conquest, through political and militaristic, even subversive, mechanisms in order to establish the rule of Sharia across the planet. This system of Islamic law is viewed by any reasonable person, believer or not, as thoroughly abhorrent, civilization-destroying, and medievally murderous.
As quoted in Baptist News Global, Harris queried the wisdom of Moore aligning the SBC with Islam.
“So, do Southern Baptists entities need to come to the defense of a geopolitical movement that has basically set itself against western civilization? Even if Islam is a religion must we commit ourselves to fight for the religious freedom of a movement that aggressively militates against other religions?”
This reflects the fundamental issue that seems to elude Moore.  The battle isn’t over whether religious liberty is a noble American cause to defend.  The question is whether Southern Baptists should defend it indiscriminately, particularly by aligning with the most vocal opponent of Christianity on the planet.
In a more immediate context, Harris posits another obvious question, especially for Georgia Baptists recently facing a battle over religious liberty legislation in their own state.
“And on a more personal note for Georgia Baptists, why would Dr. Moore spend his professional capital to defend the religious liberty of Muslims in New Jersey to build a mosque and fail to exert the same energy to get involved in Georgia’s quest to pass religious liberty legislation earlier this year?”
Indeed, the very Mission Statement of the Ethics And Religious Liberty Commission says nothing about commissioning its president as a no-holds-barred, and discernment-free, agent for religious liberty.   Nowhere does Moore’s own mission statement suggest, or require, that he make what amounts to nothing less than an unholy alliance with the very face of evil on the planet.
Surprising as it may be to some Southern Baptists, Russell Moore’s seemingly ubiquitous presence in the national media as a spokes face for religious liberty is not the primary task of the ERLC in its own mission statement. Below, in its entirety, is that mission statement. See if you can remotely align Moore’s behavior with the charged task of his agency.

MINISTRY STATEMENT

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission
of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC)

Ministry Statement Approved (by the SBC) June 1997

Mission

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission exists to assist the churches by helping them understand the moral demands of the gospel, apply Christian principles to moral and social problems and questions of public policy, and to promote religious liberty in cooperation with the churches and other Southern Baptist entities.

Ministries

1. Assist Churches in applying the moral and ethical teachings of the Bible to the Christian life.

Provide research, information resources, consultation, and counsel to denominational entities, churches and individuals with regard to the application of Christian principles in everyday living and the nation’s public ife.

2. Assist churches through the communication and advocacy of moral and ethical concerns in the public arena.

Represent Southern Baptists in communicating the ethical positions of the Southern Baptist Convention to the public and to public officials.

3. Assist churches in their moral witness in local communities.

Provide information resources that inform and equip churches for active moral witness in their communities.

4. Assist churches and other Southern Baptist entities by promoting religious liberty.

Provide information and counsel to denominational entities, churches, and individuals regarding appropriate responses to religious liberty concerns; represent Southern Baptists in communicating the positions of the Southern Baptist Convention on religious liberty issues to the public and to public officials.

Relationships

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission will work within the Southern Baptist Convention agency relationship guidelines approved by the Inter-Agency Council and the Executive Committee and printed in the Organization Manual of the Southern Baptist Convention.
____________________________________________________________
Specifically, the ERLC “exists to assist the churches” – not mosques, mind you – with a quad-pointed outline of ERLC ministries, each notably penned with the opening phrase, “Assist Churches.”  It seems rather hard, does it not, to reconcile mosque-building with helping churches.
Now, despite Moore’s response to Harris, if you’re a Southern Baptist, when is the last time Russell Moore, or a representative from his agency, showed up to help your church “understand the moral demands of the Gospel?” When is the last time they arrived in your association, or even your state, to train, teach, and provide support for applying “Christian principles to moral and social problems?”  (For about a hundred bucks, you can attend the ERLC’s upcoming National Conference.  Enjoy some crudite and support mosque-building, presumably.)
Indeed, in the case of Georgia Baptists, as Harris points out, Moore nor his agency engaged in helping “to promote religious liberty in cooperation with” Georgia Baptist Churches. But Moore certainly found time to jump to the aid of Muslims denied a building permit.
Moore’s defense of religious liberty in his blog isn’t the issue. The question is not whether Southern Baptists should defend this right. The question is should we not be extremely cautious, guided by well-discerned, Scripturally-guided discretion, as to how and with whom we align in pursuit of religious liberty?
We live in a world where the prevalent view is that there are many paths to God. Why add our name to a list of heretical foreign gods in defense of building a temple to evil, and thus forsake our Gospel witness? Is our trust in the liberty guaranteed by a government somehow more valuable than the promises we know to be real from the Author of Liberty?
From a purely legal, first amendment perspective, there seems little restriction in America that precludes Muslims, or Sikhs, or atheists, or whomever from seeking freedom in the name of religion or no religion. But from a Gospel perspective, is it necessary for Southern Baptists to align with evil so that God will protect our freedoms?
The Apostle John wrote something that Baptists used to actually believe. “We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.”   (1 John 5:19) The apostle then goes on to lovingly command the flock, “Little children, keep yourself from idols.” (1 John 5:20)
Methinks religious liberty is an idol for the ERLC, and Moore, in an evident self-aggrandizing effort, is willing to forego any discernment, any discretion in pursuing alliances necessary to perpetuate its worship. All the while, the mission of his very agency goes decidedly neglected.  Truly, in the SBC today, we need to be worrying less about the separation of church and state and much, much more about the separation of church and world.  “Come out from among them.” (2 Corinthians 6:17)
The upcoming annual meeting in St. Louis would be a great time for Southern Baptists to debate whether we could do much more with less Moore. If it’s deemed necessary to keep intact this lobbying arm of the Convention* then perhaps we should, at least, put a leader in place that will actually endeavor to fulfill its mission to the churches. It’s a worthy mission – if we had someone to do it.
* – The 2014/2015 Budget – funded by tithes and offerings – of the ERLC is $3,530,395. How many missionaries could be supported with these funds that, instead, went to support such things as mosque building?
_________________________________________________

SMOOTH TALKING HYPOCRITE, APOSTATE, BETRAYER OF CHRISTIANS
THE PURPOSE OF THE ERLC: RUSSELL MOORE

MINISTRY VISION: KINGDOM, CULTURE, MISSION