SOUTHERN BAPTIST DEACON UNDER FIRE FOR WORKING ON RENOVATIONS FOR OKLAHOMA ABORTION FACILITY~ONE OF SEVERAL “PRO LIFE” CONTRACTORS DOING WORK IN THIS ABORTUARY

“PRO LIFERS” GETTING AN ABORTUARY UP AND RUNNING, WHILE BEING HARASSED BY A GENUINE “PRO LIFE CULT”???
Yarbrough-compressed
SOUTHERN BAPTIST DEACON UNDER FIRE 
FOR WORKING ON RENOVATIONS FOR 
OKLAHOMA ABORTION FACILITY 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — A Southern Baptist deacon is under fire after it was discovered that his heating and air conditioning company decided to complete a renovations project for an Oklahoma abortion facility, stating that his company believes in “finishing what they have started.”
Yarbrough & Sons is a heating and cooling business owned and operated by First Baptist Church of Blanchard deacon Darren Yarbrough. Last month, a local Christian spotted the Yarbrough & Sons truck outside of the South Wind Women’s Center and called the business to advise that the facility was going to be opening as an abortion facility.
“I’m not saying you knew,” the man says in the phone call uploaded to YouTube. “However, I am saying now that you know [you should stop working on it].”
The receptionist who took the call said that she personally could not comment on the matter, but would have the owner contact the concerned citizen. However, she refuted the man when he stated that the company is essentially “aiding and abetting child sacrifice.”
In a Facebook post dated March 23, which has since been deleted, the Yarbroughs stated that they were not aware that the South Wind Women’s Center would be opening as an abortion facility, but felt it would be breach of contract to walk away from the job.
“If we had known the women’s clinic also provided services that go against the convictions of the owners and the many men & women within the company, then we simply would not have bid the job and moved on,” son Kolby Yarbrough wrote. “Unethically breaking contract is not in our belief system as a company; We believe in finishing what we have started. Having completed roughly 80% of the work, walking off the job would go against upholding the aforementioned characteristics.”
Kolby also posted a statement on March 25 where he called those who expressed concern a “cult,” but later removed the post as well.
“For the past week, our heat and air conditioning company has been under harassment and cyber bullying from a pro-life cult. … We were 80% done with the job and started to receive polemic protests, phone calls, voicemails, comments, and reviews. Their intent is to harm our reputation and get people to boycott our company,” he said.
“My dad has been in contact with our pastor and many mentors over the last couple of days. After much thought, prayer, and mentorship we have decided to complete the job because we are contractually bound and know that a breach of contract is illegal,” Yarbrough stated. “Such actions would also be dishonoring to our code of conduct and what we believe in.”
petition to Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission Director Russell Moore was soon launched, asking Moore to look into the matter and issue a statement “condemning Southern Baptist cooperation within the abortion industry.” The petition generated over 500 signatures.
First Baptist Church Blanchard, led by Andy Finch, soon issued a statement advising that it was working to bring resolution to the conflict.
“The First Baptist Church of Blanchard’s pro-life position is well known throughout our community. We believe strongly in the sanctity of life, and we oppose abortion and any effort to expand abortion,” Finch told the Christian Post.
“Accordingly, our church leadership always counsels our members to protect and defend the sanctity of human life,” he said. “The church is continuing to work through the current situation internally, with all seriousness and prayer.”
Alan Maricle, in writing for the blog site Pulpit & Pen, says that the Yarbrough’s reasoning is invalid and that they should not have continued the work after becoming aware that the building was being renovated to open as an abortion facility.
“First of all, breach of contract is not ‘illegal.’ That’s preposterous. It’s a violation of a civil contract, in which there are civil penalties. It is not criminal to violate a contract,” Maricle said.
“Chiefly, Yarbrough entered into a contract to provide services to a facility to murder children. Rather than being bound to a civil contract upon which there may be financial penalties, Yarbrough’s heart should be bound by conscience and the Word of God,” he stated, opining that it would be better to receive man’s consequences for breaching the contract than face God’s consequences for helping those that murder children.
“Yarbrough’s ‘code of conduct’ involves not engaging in what they call elsewhere ‘regressive business practices’ (IE losing money), but their code of conduct apparently does not include not helping infants have their brains sucked out of their mother’s womb,” Maricle wrote. “This is precisely why Yarbrough should be called to repentance by his church, and should he continue in his work, be forbidden from the Lord’s Table lest he drink damnation upon himself and be treated like a gentile and tax collector.”
________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
_______________________________________________________

20160321_081923

Pro-Lifers Cooperating With Abortion

BY ALAN MARICLE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Wichita, KS child sacrifice center whose halls George Tiller once stalked, weapons in hand, is once again open for its bloody and awful business. Not content with murdering children in Kansas, however, the South Wind Women’s Center is crossing state lines to open a branch in south Oklahoma City, right in the middle of a (surprise, surprise) majority-minority area. The better to cull the undesirables from the human race, my dear.
The pro-aborts clearly don’t fear pro-life legislation. Oklahoma is widely appreciated as the most pro-life state in the Union. There are many pro-life laws on the books, restricting abortion activity, setting requirements for abortion mills and their personnel to meet. And still they build. Senate Bill 1552 (the bill supported by the Republican Christian pro-lifers of Oklahoma over and against SB 1118, which would have labeled abortion as legal homicide) has good momentum and appears on the road to being signed into law. And still they build. Still they invest in child sacrifice in Oklahoma. They don’t fear because they are actually on the same team as the leaders of the pro-life movement.
And how’s this for a trick? They hire pro-life people to do their work for them! You see, the building chosen to house this new altar to Molech is the former home of an eye clinic. The place is shut down now, under renovation. The inside is gutted, steel joists exposed without any sheetrock, basic infrastructure construction underway. South Wind’s general contractor has done his job well, having hired pro-life Christians to build a modern death camp in the middle of a major American Midwestern city.
Rick, a worship leader from an evangelical church in Noble, OK, headed up Butler Plumbing, Inc’s effort to install the plumbing and pipes down which the blood of children will wash into city sewers.
Yarbrough & Sons Heat and Air of Blanchard, OK is headed up by good Christian men. They were informed of the nature of their project and chose not to lose $30,000 rather than walk off the job that would keep the abortionist in air-conditioned comfort as she rips babies’ faces off.
Crown Electric of Yukon, OK and Trek Electric of Edmond, OK just plain don’t care that their electrical wiring will power the weapons that will cut through flesh, bone, and cranial matter to reduce beautiful creations of God to gore and blood-red sludge in exchange for cash.
Matthew 16:24-27 – Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me. For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and WILL THEN REPAY EVERY MAN ACCORDING TO HIS DEEDS.”
2 Corinthians 6:14-16 – Do not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness? Or what harmony has Christ with Belial, or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever? Or what agreement has the temple of God with idols?
Proverbs 31:8-9 – Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all the unfortunate. Open your mouth, judge righteously, and defend the rights of the afflicted and needy.
If you are reading this, please contact these companies and call them to repentance. Please leave a review on Facebook, calling them to repentance. Please leave a review on other business and review websites like Yelp or Angie’s List, exposing their evil deeds for all to see.
Butler Plumbing, Inc – 405-635-8942 – Facebook pageYarbrough & Sons Heat and Air – 405-485-3470 – Facebook pageCrown Electric – 405-324-9555 – Facebook pageTrek Electric – 405-748-6330 – Facebook page
Ephesians 5:11 – Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them. [Contributed by: Alan Maricle]
________________________________________________

Yarbrough & Sons Supports Child Sacrifice
Published on Mar 22, 2016
Yarbrough & Sons Heat and Air of Blanchard, OK is helping to renovate a building that will become a child sacrifice center in Oklahoma City. Listen as an abolitionist informs the company of this fact and tries to stress the urgency of the matter, yet is constantly interrupted by their rude receptionist. Then listen as abolitionists visit with one of the owners (who was allegedly not available earlier in the day) and the owner claims to follow Christ and yet that he will not give up the prospect of earning money in order to do the right thing.

Worship Leader Rick Supports Child Sacrifice
Published on Mar 21, 2016
Rick is a worship leader at an evangelical church south of Oklahoma City. He works for Butler Plumbing, Inc. Watch as abolitionists inform him that he is installing plumbing at a new abortion facility, he appears to be unwilling to continue the job, he claims to have plenty of work, and he professes to love Jesus.  Then watch his big talk turn into excuses when confronted two weeks later.

Crown Electric and Trek Electric Support Child Sacrifice
Published on Mar 15, 2016
15 March 2016 A new abortion facility is being installed at a building located at 1240 SW 44, Oklahoma City, OK. It will be a branch of South Wind Women's Center of Wichita, KS, the child sacrifice center where the late George Tiller used to murder babies. Among the companies renovating it are Crown Electric and Trek Electric.  Let's see if they are willing to take the correct action once they are made aware for whom they are working.

SBC Deacon Doubles Down on Building Abortuary

BY ALAN MARICLE
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/05/02/sbc-deacon-doubles-down/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Darren Yarbrough & Sons
If helping to build an abortuary doesn’t qualify as a disciplinary offense in the Southern Baptist Convention, suffice it to say that nothing does. Pulpit & Pen brought you the news story of a new child sacrifice center being renovated in Oklahoma, and the various construction outfits providing the services necessary for it to become a baby-killing facility (source link). We then brought to you information regarding one of those service companies professing to be “Christians,” and in fact, its owner being a deacon of a Southern Baptist Church (source link). Then, I talked about this on the Pulpit & Pen Program and explained how when I called the church to discuss this with the pastor, the receptionist, Angela, rudely hung up on me – a fellow Southern Baptist pastor who was simply concerned that their deacon was facilitating the murder of children (source link).
A number of individuals have called the church and the deacon, pleading with them that they not continue works of evil that will support the facility where children’s faces will be ripped off and their brains and body fluids washed down the municipal drains. While some have castigated our efforts to reach out to the deacon and pastor as somehow wrong, like Lindale First Baptist Church pastor Tom Buck (who writes for Entreating Favor), most recognize that we’re legitimately trying to prevent professing Christians from partnering with cold, unabated murder. For full disclosure, Tom Buck has written several articles for this site, when we were under the assumption he was pro-life, and we apologize for that previous association.
Yarbrough Sr, the owner and operator of the heating and cooling unit providing service for the child sacrifice center, has responded in social media and his pastor-approved response needs vetting. He writes, as you can see above…
Update: For the past week, our heat and air conditioning company has been under harassment and cyber bullying from a pro-life cult.
The context of what Yarbrough calls “harassment” and “cyber bullying” is clear. Chiefly, concerned Christians have emailed and called his place of business, as well as the church from whom he received counsel to continue aiding the child murderers. Phone calls have gone out from sweet little old (no offense) “church ladies” in churches from similar denominations, Southern Baptist pastors like myself, fellow deacons in like-minded churches, a number of home school teenagers (and boy, do they have a reputation as being rowdy!) and at least one former director for the Montana Family Coalition and other pro-life organizations. These are the people who Yarbrough has characterized as a “cult.” The irony here cannot be overstated. Because of Yarbrough’s work, children will be ruthlessly slaughtered in the comfort of air conditioning while he is worried about “cyber bullying.” Empathy apparently is something in which Yarbrough is not trained, as the work of his hands is facilitating what in God’s eyes is clearly homicide. He’s facilitating murder, and he’s worried about “harassment,” ie, people calling him to plead he not continue to sully his hands with innocent blood.
So here is the Truth about why we are dealing with this group: Every month we bid 20-30 commercial jobs and out of that number we are usually hired for 3-4 of those bids each month. A couple months ago we were subcontracted to supply air conditioning services for a medical clinic. All we knew about the clinic was that it provided health services. We have done work on many hospitals and clinics before so this was not unusual. We were 80% done with the job and started to receive polemic protests, phone calls, voicemails, comments, and reviews. Their intent is to harm our reputation and get people to boycott our company.
While Yarbrough is defaming the name of Jesus, having the grave audacity to call himself a Christian after the name of our Savior, and by defaming his own church (First Baptist Church of Blanchard) by having it associated with such ungodly and overt godless paganism in its pews, he is concerned with those trying to “harm [their] reputation.” If harming their reputation means telling people that they’re facilitating the murder of children in air conditioned comfort, then so be it. Sadly, the one really defaming their character is Yarbrough and Sons, who are assisting murderers in their infanticide. That’s what’s truly defaming – Yarbrough’s behavior.
We are distraught by this the harassment and cyber bullying and have been seeking guidance. My dad has been in contact with our pastor and many mentors over the last couple of days. After much thought, prayer, and mentorship we have decided to complete the job because we are contractually bound and know that a breach of contract is illegal.
First of all, breach of contract is not “illegal.” That’s preposterous. It’s a violation of a civil contract, in which there are civil penalties. It is not criminal to violate a contract. Chiefly, Yarbrough entered into a contract to provide services to a facility to murder children. Rather than being bound to a civil contract upon which there may be financial penalties, Yarbrough’s heart should be bound by conscience and the Word of God. No doubt, Yarbrough would have civil consequences due to not completing his abetting of their murders, but the consequence for him completing that work will be worse than a millstone put around his neck.
Such actions would also be dishonoring to our code of conduct and what we believe in. If we had known the women’s clinic also provided services that go against the convictions of the owners and the many men & women within the company, then we simply would not have bid the job and moved on.
This is our chief complaint. Yarbrough’s “code of conduct” involves not engaging in what they call elsewhere “regressive business practices” (IE losing money), but their code of conduct apparently does not include not helping infants have their brains sucked out of their mother’s womb. This is precisely why Yarbrough should be called to repentance by his church, and should he continue in his work, be forbidden from the Lord’s Table lest he drink damnation upon himself and be treated like a gentile and tax collector.
Yarbrough & Sons does not investigate the actions of every individual within the residential and commercial building with which we do business. The prior stated would be an egregious practice for decent human interaction to require a completed form of all actions committed and all future actions intended in their home or business. That’s not a very good way to make friends or live the gospel. Discriminatory actions are not a part of our business policy. We gladly provide HVAC to all people unconditionally.
In case you’re wondering, in Yarbrough and Son’s providing non”discriminatory” services to people unconditionally, you can rest assured that Yarbrough and Son’s absolutely would have been building the gas chambers in 1939 Germany. After all, they don’t “discriminate.”
So here’s the Plan: The cult is under illusion and brainwashed to believe what they do is a veracious way to change the world; when in fact their harassment and gorilla tactic are destructive towards their own cause. We can not negotiate with them because they do not listen and are un-empathetic; so we have collected and reported all past and current interactions and will be deleting all posts and future posts involving the harassment and cyberbullying as best we can.
Yarbrough’s chief complaint is that we have exposed their wicked deeds. To Yarbrough, this is cult-like, guerrilla-tactics, and harassment. What we have done is exposed Yarbrough’s wickedness and his financial partnership with murderers, gladly and greedily accepting literal blood money as a part of his “business ethics.” If their reputation suffers as a part of our polemics work, it is only due to their unrepentant and willful role in infant homicide.
While Yarbrough seems to thinking that “reporting” all their “harassment” (to who, the First Amendment police?) and ignoring of future requests of inquiry regarding their abetting of murder (just as they’ve been ignoring the inquiries thus far) may ease their burden or make the issue go away, I assure you…it will not. We will continue to warn the Christian public not to do business with those who don’t discriminate against murderers. I have already contacted local radio stations to put Pulpit & Pen on the radio locally, and we will place ads in the newspaper warning Christians in their community of both their church and their services. Consumers might want to discriminate against those who blaspheme Jesus by calling their businesses “Christian” while helping abortion clinics get up and running. We’ll give them the option to find heating and air businesses with more integrity.
So family, friends, clients, and possible clients: If you desire to work with an air conditioning company that is faithful to uphold the ethical characteristics of Honest, Integrity, Compassion, and Empathy; give us a call and we would love to provide you with all of your air comfort needs.
Somehow, I don’t think “honesty, integrity, compassion and empathy” means what Yarbrough and Sons think it means.
May Yarbrough and Sons repent of taking part in such wickedness, and might they find full reprieve and forgiveness under the shed blood of Christ. May they display penitent faith in Jesus Christ and repent of their actions. If they do, the church should fully embrace and restore them. And if not, may the blood of murdered infants rest upon them for eternity, and might they abide under the wrath of God.
–Originally Contributed by JD Hall, 25 March 2016






			
		

WOMEN’S DRAFT BILL WORST LAW IN THE HISTORY OF NATIONS~DRAFTING WOMEN MEANS EQUALITY IN SLAVERY

WOMEN’S DRAFT BILL WORST LAW 
IN THE HISTORY OF NATIONS 
By Dr. Greg J. Dixon
In our opinion, the proposed Selective Service bill recently introduce in the House of Representatives would be the worst policy decision that any nation has ever adopted in the history of the world, if passed.  It is even worse than abortion on demand or the legalization of sodomy or the transgender laws.  It is the greatest assault on the model of society that God has ordained for the tranquility of mankind ever launched by any one, civilized or uncivilized. There is no mischief on earth that will not be spawned through this wicked law.  And to further this atrocity, the decision to put our young girls into combat further exacerbates the issue.  What kind of animals would do this?  And even so called “Christian” conservative women on TV are calling for this as good National policy.  I have heard some of the Fox News women, Greta, and others say, equality demands that they go.  How tragic that those who have been beating the drums for “Equal Rights”, couldn’t see what was coming.  Equal Rights also means, Equal Responsibilities.  We are now beginning to see the final fruit of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that the majority at the time called for, calling it the “mother vote”, and that the nation needed it, because it would raise the moral temperature of the country.  As Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. always said, “It never is right to do wrong in order to do right.”  The only defense against this will be a conscientious defense on the part of those who can prove that they cannot wear military attire because of their religious beliefs.   However their church will have to have a congregational resolution on record before this bill is passed, and a majority of the women will have to practice the resolution in their daily dress, including their children or when it goes to court, and it will, they will be laughed out of the court room.  But, if they can show consistency, it is our opinion that they can win their case on the First and Tenth Amendment.  In our opinion even the individual who can show that the family or one young lady, even if her family are not believers would be able to make the argument if she has been consistent in this matter of dress.  However there won’t be many that will qualify, but the Lord Jesus said, “Many are called but few are chosen.”
Satan hates women.  Ever since the promise of Gen 3:15 –  “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel,”he has hated the woman with all that is within him and has tried to do everything in his power to separate her from her God.  He is doing a pretty good job of it.  To drive her from the sanctity of her home into a foxhole with a strange man, possibly even of a different race, to face the horribleness of modern warfare, the reality of rape, by our own soldiers or the enemy, and the possibility of death or cruel torture and imprisonment is unthinkable beyond anything that the mind can imagine.  And then to see thousands of young women returning with one arm, or no legs, and then with PSTD trying to mother children, is to see a coming nightmare beyond description.
Mankind will go a long way in his rebellion against God and to prove that the Bible is untrue.  But it is a long, long way from claiming that man came from monkeys to saying that men and women are equal to the degree that women are capable to fight our wars.  This shows how far a perverted mind will carry you. 
_______________________________________________________
   DRAFTING WOMEN MEANS 
EQUALITY IN SLAVERY

Some proponents of a military draft justify it as “payback” for the freedom the government provides its citizens.

by ron paul
see: http://www.infowars.com/drafting-women-means-equality-in-slavery/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Last week the House Armed Services Committee approved an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act requiring women to register with Selective Service. This means that if Congress ever brings back the draft, women will be forcibly sent to war. 
The amendment is a response to the Pentagon’s decision to allow women to serve in combat. Supporters of drafting women point out that the ban on women in combat was the reason the Supreme Court upheld a male-only draft. Therefore, they argue, it is only logical to now force women to register for Selective Service. Besides, supporters of extending the draft point out, not all draftees are sent into combat.
Most of those who opposed drafting women did so because they disagreed with women being eligible for combat positions, not because they opposed the military draft. Few, if any, in Congress are questioning the morality, constitutionality, and necessity of Selective Service registration. Thus, this debate is just another example of how few of our so-called “representatives” actually care about our liberty.
Some proponents of a military draft justify it as “payback” for the freedom the government provides its citizens. Those who make this argument are embracing the collectivist premise that since our rights come from government, the government can take away those rights whether it suits their purposes. Thus supporters of the draft are turning their backs on the Declaration of Independence.
While opposition to the draft is seen as a progressive or libertarian position, many conservatives, including Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, and Robert Taft, where outspoken opponents of conscription. Unfortunately, the militarism that has led so many conservatives astray in foreign policy has also turned many of them into supporters of mandatory Selective Service registration. Yet many of these same conservatives strongly and correctly oppose mandatory gun registration. In a free society you should never have to register your child or your gun.
Sadly, some opponents of the warfare state, including some libertarians, support the draft on the grounds that a draft would cause a mass uprising against the warfare state. Proponents of this view point to the draft’s role in galvanizing opposition to the Vietnam War. This argument ignores that fact that it took several years and the deaths of thousands of American draftees for the anti-Vietnam War movement to succeed.
A variation on this argument is that drafting women will cause an antiwar backlash as Americans recoil form the idea of forcing mothers into combat. But does anyone think the government would draft mothers with young children?
Reinstating the draft will not diminish the war party’s influence as long as the people continue to believe the war propaganda fed to them by the military-industrial complex’s media echo chamber. Changing the people’s attitude toward the warfare state and its propaganda organs is the only way to return to a foreign policy of peace and commerce with all.
Even if the draft could serve as a check on the warfare state, those who support individual liberty should still oppose it. Libertarians who support violating individual rights to achieve a political goal, even a goal as noble as peace, undermine their arguments against non-aggression and thus discredit both our movement, and, more importantly, our philosophy.
A military draft is one of — if not the — worst violations of individual rights committed by modern governments. The draft can also facilitate the growth of the warfare state by lowing the cost of militarism. All those who value peace, prosperity, and liberty must place opposition to the draft at the top of their agenda.
______________________________________________________

Military Draft Opens Up to Women

Published on Apr 29, 2016
Women may soon be drafted into the military after the House passed a defense policy bill 60-2, which included a provision that women would be required to register for the draft. The provision comes months after the Defense Department lifted all gender-based restrictions on the front-line combat units. The US hasn’t had a military draft since the Vietnam War era in 1973. The full House will consider the provision next month. Joya Mia Italiano and Melvin Robert review the latest provision and the ongoing debate about women’s roles in the military on the Lip News.




COLORADO SENDS NON-VACCINATING PARENTS ILLEGAL ORDER TO “REGISTER THEIR CHILD WITH THE STATE”

COLORADO SENDS NON-VACCINATING PARENTS ILLEGAL ORDER TO 
“REGISTER THEIR CHILD WITH THE STATE” 
BY MAC SLAVO
SEE: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/colorado-sends-non-vaccinating-parents-illegal-order-to-register-their-child-with-the-state.htmlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Here’s the fraud of the State in action.
It seems that the Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment sent out a letter to parents demanding that those who have not vaccinated their children register them on a state website under requirement by law … the only problem is that there is no such law.
The agency has apologized, claiming the letter was sent out by mistake, but their intent was revealed anyway.
A law was proposed to require a “yellow star” registration process for families who don’t vaccinate … but the law did not make it out of committee. Of course, that doesn’t mean that the bill’s sponsors will give up.

A number of parents received a letter this month from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, which said in the document that parents of unvaccinated children in school would be required to register and exempt their child through a state website.
“My biggest issue is that you are trying to take my child’s information – that you have zero legislative authority to do – to track and to possibly come back to me,” parent Missy Frazier said, according to The Gazette newspaper. “Where does this end, and with whom are you going to share this information?”

It is hardly surprising that the school district is being accused of deliberately spreading the misconception that parents are legally required to comply.
But it certainly looked official when it went out: Here’s an image that was released of the letter:

vaccine-1024x443-768x332That is already that standard line with childhood vaccines – creating the impression that they are required, when freedom over medical injections should be  a personal decision protected by constitutional freedoms.

“I find it curious that the House has already killed 1164, whereas the health department has already implemented the provisions of 1164 in law on their website stating that by July 1, parents will be required to register online,” Lundberg said. “This online registration system is in complete violation of current statute. They don’t have the authority to require an online registration.”
“They want to populate the vaccine registry and they want to know exactly who’s exempting from which vaccines, where they live and I think it’s a harassment technique,” Theresa Wrangham of the National Vaccine Information Center told a Denver TV station.

 Demanding data from people who opt out of any program in this country is akin to discriminating against them and allowing them to be targeted and tracked – and it is dangerous civil liberties, particularly as threats against non-vaccinating families is nothing new.

In particular, government agencies in general seem very disconcerted by the level of independence and rebellion by anti-vaxxers – there is every reason to think that they fear the herd will be spooked, and they could lose control over the masses.
When you consider that non-vaccinating parents are frequently treated as second-class citizens and targeted with misplaced anger about the spread of disease, it is not surprising that this law is being required – as California and other states have stepped up their pro-vaccine rhetoric and used the power of state mandates to pimp for Big Pharma.
Read More:

NEW DIGITAL CASH SYSTEM WAS JUST UNVEILED AT A SECRET MEETING FOR BANKERS IN NEW YORK

NEW DIGITAL CASH SYSTEM WAS JUST UNVEILED AT A SECRET MEETING 
FOR BANKERS IN NEW YORK
BY MICHAEL SNYDER
SEE: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/a-new-digital-cash-system-was-just-unveiled-at-a-secret-meeting-for-bankers-in-new-york.htmlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Last month, a “secret meeting” that involved more than 100 executives from some of the biggest financial institutions in the United States was held in New York City.  During this “secret meeting,” a company known as “Chain” unveiled a technology that transforms U.S. dollars into “pure digital assets.”  Reportedly, there were representatives from Nasdaq, Citigroup, Visa, Fidelity, Fiserv and Pfizer in the room, and Chain also claims to be partnering with Capital One, State Street, and First Data.  This “revolutionary” technology is intended to completely change the way that we use money, and it would represent a major step toward a cashless society.  But if this new digital cash system is going to be so good for society, why was it unveiled during a secret meeting for Wall Street bankers?  Is there something more going on here than we are being told?
None of us probably would have ever heard about this secret meeting if it was not for a report inBloomberg.  The following comes from their article entitled “Inside the Secret Meeting Where Wall Street Tested Digital Cash”…

On a recent Monday in April, more than 100 executives from some of the world’s largest financial institutions gathered for a private meeting at the Times Square office of Nasdaq Inc. They weren’t there to just talk about blockchain, the new technology some predict will transform finance, but to build and experiment with the software.
By the end of the day, they had seen something revolutionary: U.S. dollars transformed into pure digital assets, able to be used to execute and settle a trade instantly. That’s the promise of a blockchain, where the cumbersome and error-prone system that takes days to move money across town or around the world is replaced with almost instant certainty.

So it is not just Michael Snyder from The Economic Collapse Blog that is referring to this gathering as a “secret meeting.”  This is actually how it was described by Bloomberg.  And I think that there is a very good reason why this meeting was held in secret, because many in the general public would definitely be alarmed by this giant step toward a cashless society.  Here is more on this new system from Bloomberg


While cash in a bank account moves electronically all the time today, there’s a distinction between that system and what it means to say money is digital. Electronic payments are really just messages that cash needs to move from one account to another, and this reconciliation is what adds time to the payments process. For customers, moving money between accounts can take days as banks wait for confirmations. Digital dollars, however, are pre-loaded into a system like a blockchain. From there, they can be swapped immediately for an asset.
“Instead of a record or message being moved, it’s the actual asset,” Ludwin said. “The payment and the settlement become the same thing.”

 Why this is so alarming is because we are seeing other major moves toward a cashless system all over the planet.  In Sweden, 95 percent of all retail transactions are already cashless, and ATM machines are being removed by the hundreds.  In Denmark, government officials actually have a stated goal of “eradicating cash” by the year 2030.  And in Norway, the biggest bank in the country has publicly called for the complete elimination of all cash.

Other nations in Europe have already banned cash transactions over a certain amount. Here are just a couple of examples

As I have written about previously, cash transactions of more than 2,500 euros have already been banned in Spain, and France and Italy have both banned all cash transactions of more than 1,000 euros.
Little by little, cash is being eradicated, and what we have seen so far is just the beginning. 417 billion cashless transactions were conducted in 2014, and the final number for 2015 is projected to be much higher.

The global push toward a cashless society is only going to intensify, because banks and governments both tend to really like the idea of such a system.
Banks really like the concept of a cashless society because it would force everyone to be their customers.  There would be no more hiding cash in a mattress at home or trying to pay all of your bills with paper money.  Under a cashless system, we would all be dependent on the banks, and they would make lots of money whenever we swiped our cards or our “chips” were scanned.
Governments see a lot of advantages in a cashless society as well.  They tell us that they would be able to crack down on drug dealers, tax evaders, terrorists and money launderers, but the truth is that it would enable them to watch, track, monitor and control virtually all of our financial transactions.  Our lives would become open books to the government, and financial privacy would be a thing of the past.
In addition, the potential for tyranny would be absolutely off the charts.
Just imagine a world where the government could serve as the gatekeeper for who is allowed to use the cashless system and who is not.  They could require that we all submit to some sort of government-issued form of identification before being permitted to operate within the system, or it is even conceivable that a loyalty oath would be required.
Of course if you did not submit to their demands, you could not buy, sell, open a bank account or get a job without access to the cashless system.
Hopefully people can understand where this is going.  Paper money is a very important component of our freedom, and if it is taken away from us that will open the door for all sorts of abuse.
Even now, cash is slowly being “criminalized” in America.  For example, if cash is used to pay for a hotel room that is considered by federal authorities to be “suspicious activity” that should be reported to the government.  Of course it isn’t against the law to pay your hotel bill in cash just yet, but according to the government it is something that “terrorists” do so it needs to be closely watched.
It doesn’t take a whole lot of imagination to see where all of this is going.  And for those of us that understand what time it is, this is a clear indication that it is getting late in the game.

OBAMA PROGRESSING IN PLAN TO MAKE “SMART GUNS” OPERABLE ONLY BY OWNERS

OBAMA PROGRESSING IN PLAN TO MAKE “SMART GUNS” OPERABLE ONLY BY OWNERS
BY BOB ADELMANN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/23094-obama-progessing-in-plan-to-make-smart-guns-operable-only-by-ownersrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
On Friday President Obama posted on his Facebook page the progress being made in his attempt to develop “smart gun” technology that would make guns inoperable unless fired only by their owners. He claimed it was all about preventing accidental shootings and tracking down stolen guns. He asserted:
These common-sense steps are not going to prevent every tragedy, but what if they prevent even one? We should be doing everything we can to save lives and spare families the pain and unimaginable loss too many Americans have endured.
In early January Obama issued several executive orders as he continued his attack on Americans’ right to keep and bear arms, including directing the Justice, Homeland Security, and Defense agencies to come up with plans on how to use the new technologies, and giving them 90 days to report back to him. He ordered them to work on a report “outlining research and development designed to expedite real-world deployment” of that technology in order, he said, “to reduce the frequency of accidental discharge or unauthorized use of firearms.”
Those departments said they are still working on it and will have a final report back to him in October, just in time to give Hillary Clinton’s presidential run a final boost going into the November elections.
Clinton declared last week on MSNBC that, once elected, she will pick up the baton from Obama on her first day in office and continue that attack: “I really support everything President Obama said he would do through regulations on guns, but we’re going to start the very first day and tackle the gun lobby to try to reduce the outrageous number of people who are dying from gun violence in our country.”
Efforts to develop that technology have been ongoing since at least 2001, when New Jersey passed its Childproof Handgun Law that would take effect “three years after it is determined that personalized handguns are available for retail purposes.” In 2006 Armatix, a Germany manufacturer, developed its Armatix iP1 (shown), a .22-caliber semi-automatic pistol containing 10 rounds with an effective firing range of 75 yards, and costing $1,800. The firearm was designed to team up with a smart watch its owner would wear containing an RFID (radio-frequency identification) chip. Only the owner could fire the weapon provided that the gun was less than 10 inches away from the watch.
It received poor reviews, and New Jersey’s attorney general finally ruled in 2014 that “after careful consideration of the iP1’s design, we have determined that it does not satisfy the statutory definition because … the pistol may be fired by a person who is not an authorized or recognized user.”
Jon Stokes, writing for TechCrunch.com, agreed, saying, “The smart gun, in all of its incarnations, is a fantasy. No electronic technology is 100% reliable, and very few people will trust a gun that can be turned into a brick by a failure of some on-board circuitry.” Besides, said Stokes, any new software will have a “whole host of brand new security and identity problems … that must be discovered and patched, and then the patches will have problems.”
Others are concerned about how the new technology, once it is sufficiently developed, can be manipulated by government agencies, using the chips to track the location of owners, and disabling firearms according to their own purposes.
If handing off the move to “smart guns” to Clinton is one of the reasons for the October release date, it has run into another stumbling block: Clinton is losing traction with the general public over the issue of guns. A survey of 1,000 American voters conducted by Harper Polling last month asking if Clinton’s demand that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) that protects the gun industry from being sued by crime victims be repealed, more than 70 percent said no. Those polled said the PLCAA “should be kept and we should punish the criminals who commit these acts, not the law-abiding manufacturers and retailers of lawful products which get misused.” Remarkably the majority of those polled agreed, including liberal Democrats residing in the northeast, along with those who voted for President Obama in the last election. 
Rasmussen Reports just conducted a telephone survey of likely U.S. voters asking whom they would vote for if the national election were held today: It was a virtual tie, at 38 percent each for Trump and Clinton. This is the first national poll of Americans who say they are likely to vote in November that shows Trump tied with Cinton.
That change in point of view is also likely helped along by Trump’s support for the Second Amendment. From his website one finds this:
The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.
The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right; it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.
If smart gun technology does eventually develop to the point where firearms can benefit from it, then Americans, under the Second Amendment, would be free to purchase such guns. Where the National Rifle Association disagrees with Obama and Clinton is government requirements “mandating” that such technology be incorporated in every firearm sold. Wrote Jennifer Baker, director of NRA-ILA Public Affairs: “President Obama’s obsession with gun control knows no boundaries. At a time when we are actively fighting terrorists at home and abroad, this administration would rather focus … on the president’s gun control agenda.”
If Rasmussen is right, that obsession, and Clinton’s determination to continue it, will be negated in November.
______________________________________________________

POLICE REJECT BEING ‘GUINEA PIGS’ 

IN OBAMA’S SMART GUN PUSH

“Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn’t be asked to be the guinea pigs…”

by AWR Hawkins | Breitbart
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/police-reject-being-guinea-pigs-in-obamas-smart-gun-push/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Rank-and-file police officers are already rallying against President Barack Obama’s scheduled push for government purchases of smart guns.
“Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn’t be asked to be the guinea pigs in evaluating a firearm that nobody’s even seen yet,” said James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police. “We have some very, very serious questions,” he said, according to Politico.
Obama’s push for smart guns is expected to come as soon as Friday, and it coincides with a Department of Justice National Institute of Justice announcement concerning the formulation of “test methods to provide a basis to determine whether the addition of a smart gun technology does or does not significantly reduce the reliability of the firearm system compared to existing firearms.”
Breitbart News reported that a new push for smart gun development was part of Obama’s executive gun controls in January.
______________________________________________________________

Obama Announces Plan To “Expedite” 

Smart Gun Technology

BY JOSHUA KRAUSE
SEE: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/obama-announces-plan-to-expedite-smart-gun-technology.htmlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
America is by far, the most difficult country to push any kind of gun control legislation. The gun grabbers really have their work cut out for them here. In just about any other nation, all it takes is one tragic mass shooting, and the sheep start bleating and begging for more restrictive laws. But for a variety of reasons, it just doesn’t work here. Guns have just become far too ingrained our culture for most people to give them up.
It’s actually quite impressive when you think about it. Every other line and amendment in the US Constitution has been violated into meaninglessness. Though the spirit of the Second Amendment has been violated as well, it hasn’t been done to the same extent. It’s the last domino that just won’t fall, no matter how hard the gun grabbers blow.
Since they can’t pull off an outright ban, they have to constantly find alternative routes of gun control. They try to place onerous regulations on buying and selling firearms, they push extra taxes on ammunition, or they try to force gun owners to buy insurance for each gun. The list goes on and on. One of their alternatives to gun confiscation, is the smart gun.
In case you don’t know, a smart gun is a weapon that uses biometrics, fingerprints, RFID chips, or a magnetic device to determine if the person holding the gun is the rightful owner. If someone else handles the gun, it won’t fire. This would presumably prevent the gun from being stolen by criminals or handled by children.
This makes it the perfect Trojan horse for gun control, since a roll-out of these weapons (if you can even call these neutered toys “weapons”) be implemented under the guise of safety. The gun grabbers can make an appeal to our conscience and desires. They’ll say that we can have whatever gun we want, so long as it has smart gun technology to prevent it from falling into the hands of bad guys or unknowing children (as you’ll see in a moment, it’s a Faustian bargain).
But first, they’ll try to roll out this technology in increments, starting with law enforcement. They’ll say that we need smart guns to prevent criminals from killing cops with their own weapons. President Obama recently proposed a plan to create better smart guns for that exact purpose.
First, we’ve jump started the development of smart gun technology. Today, many gun injuries and deaths are the result of legal guns that were stolen, misused, or discharged accidentally. As long as we’ve got the technology to prevent a criminal from stealing and using your smartphone, then we should be able to prevent the wrong person from pulling a trigger on a gun. So, my Administration released a plan today to expedite the development of smart gun technology, including by identifying the requirements that smart guns would have to meet in order for law enforcement to purchase and use them effectively – and keep themselves and the public safer in the process.
However, this has nothing to do with the safety of law enforcement. The threat of a cop having his gun stolen by a suspect is a non-issue. Of all the hundreds of thousands of police officers in America, only 51 were killed when a perp overpowered them and took their weapon, between 2000 and 2010.
So what is this really about?
The government wants to normalize smart guns, so that they have more control over us. How does that give them more control? Because, when you have a firearm that is dependent on electronics to function, that firearm becomes hackable. It will be programmed with back doors that the government can exploit, just like computers and smartphones.
In the future, smart guns will be designed so that government officials can shut them off remotely whenever they want. In fact, the first smart gun that can be remotely controlled by a bureaucrat was invented about two years ago.

A new technology that could allow authorities and others to literally “turn off” guns by remote control has been patented.
German arms maker Armatix GmbH has filed a patent for an improved smart pistol that can be shut down by a wireless signal.
“Preferably, the apparatus of the invention can be controlled remotely, for example via satellite and can send information to a satellite,” the European patent application for the gun says.

 That’s the real endgame. At first it will be voluntary, but eventually they’ll force you to buy smart guns. It’s the best way to implement gun control without alarming gun owners, because with this technology they can trust anyone to have any gun, knowing that they can turn it off at any moment. They’ll try to trick the pro-gun crowd with promises of reduced regulations. They’ll let you buy fully automatics and other “scary” weapons, just so long as it is a smart gun.

But if you take that deal, then one day you’ll wake up in a country filled with smart guns that you can’t really own or control. Unfortunately for the gun grabbers, gun owners aren’t stupid enough to take that deal, are they?


CRUZ GLOBALIST MACHINE BEHIND PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY’S EAGLE FORUM COUP

CRUZ GLOBALIST MACHINE BEHIND 
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY’S EAGLE FORUM COUP
BY KELLEIGH NELSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“Something called 'the Oklahoma Standard' became known throughout the world. It means resilience in the face of adversity. It means a strength and compassion that will not be defeated.” —Brad Henry
“When somebody challenges you, fight back. Be brutal, be tough.” —Donald Trump
Eagle Forum is a conservative organization founded by Phyllis Schlafly in 1972. They claim 80,000 members. In my previous articles, here and here, I explained how Eagle Forum was being torn apart by Cruz supporters within the organization.
Anne Cori and the Attempted Takeover
Phyllis Schlafly endorsed Trump, upon which her daughter, Anne Cori, launched a Board coup to take over Eagle Forum, and seize the bank accounts in the 501(c)4. This is where the money lies, and money that can be given to candidates. A 501(c)4 allows endorsements of candidates. The following court case was brought by Phyllis’s daughter, Anne Cori, against Phyllis and Eagle Forum.
On April 26th, Phyllis went to court in Madison County, IL. Here is the press release sent out by President Ed Martin:
Phyllis Schlafly To Defend Herself, Eagle Forum, from Takeover Attempt
Lawsuit by Six Individuals Seeks to Remove Schlafly from Bank Accounts and Operations
St. Louis - In response to a lawsuit filed by six individuals against Eagle Forum and its officers, Phyllis Schlafly will be in Madison County, Illinois court today to defend the organization that she founded.
The lawsuit is part of a continuing coordinated effort by the six individual plaintiffs to take control from Phyllis. Their lawsuit seeks emergency orders against Phyllis and Eagle Forum specifically to remove Phyllis from bank accounts and to manage other aspects of her organization.
In addition, Eagle Forum is in the midst of an election by its members of an at-large director of the Eagle Forum board according to its by-laws. The lawsuit by these individuals seeks judicial intervention to stop this election by the members of the private association.
The case is captioned Cori, et al. v. Eagle Forum, et al. and may be found at 16-MR-011.
This case will not succeed because the coup does not have the two-thirds majority needed to make structural changes to EF. There are six coup members on the11 member board. Since 54% is not two-thirds, the coup does not prevail. I’m not sure what all is being litigated beyond the by-law percentages.
Donna Hearne and the Constitutional Coalition
The Missouri Constitutional Coalition is backing Cruz and is involved in the coup. Donna Hearne is the executive director of the Constitutional Coalition, and is a top player at Bott Radio. According to sources, Hearne killed Phyllis’s national radio show and deleted all references to Phyllis and her archives from Bott Radio. The Constitutional Coalitions’ website is currently down, however, here is their FB page, as well as documentation on Donna Hearne’s control of the Constitutional Coalition. According to an inside source, Hearne has been paying herself an awfully big salary for a small non-profit organization, as reflected in the Form 990 for 2014 (the most recent one publicly available).
Donna Hearne brought an “Anti-Trump Cruz Slate” to Creve Coeur township, which had a Trump slate. Phyllis lives in this township and was on the Trump slate. She could not make it to the caucus because she was dealing with the coup. Hearne got a number of Cruz bots to show up at the township meeting, and the Cruz slate won by a few votes.
What many people are not aware of is that Donna Hearne has sponsored many of the Reconstructionist/Dominionist professors and pundits for years at her conferences. This likely plays into the reason she is a Cruz supporter. Cruz, his father, and many of his supporters, are Dominionists/Reconstructionists. These include David Barton, Flip Benham, Kevin Swanson, Tony Perkins, (president of the Family Research Council), would-be reality TV stars the Benham brothers, and anti-gay Houston activist and Dominionist, Dave Welch. Perkins is also a United Nations Non-Governmental Organization member. And, Senator Ted Cruz, isn’t backing away from the endorsement of Mike Bickle, a controversial Dominionist pastor who once characterized Hitler as “a hunter” sent by God to go after Jews who don’t to convert to Christianity. [Link]
Remember, Ted Cruz believes he is anointed to bring the spoils of war to the priests.
Schlafly a Stalwart Against Con-Con
The anachronism here is stunning: How can the Constitutional Coalition support Ted Cruz, who fully intends to make globalist changes to the Constitution via a Con-Con?
Phyllis had warned the Constitutional Coalition about the impact of Con-Con at a conference speech, but the coalition insists it is not a problem. So, we have another instance of the Christian Right serving the purposes of the globalist establishment.
The Cruz’s are economic globalists. Adding Fiorina totally seals the assessment. The majority of the politically-active Christian Right Elite have sold out to the economic globalists. However, the grassroots little guys are not buying it. So, this adds to the great dislike of both the Republican Party and the Christian Right – who appear to be committing mass suicide in this election. It is now obvious to those who have eyes to see, and ear to hear, that the GOP establishment is in on the same agenda as the left. Some, of course, still have scales on their eyes.
Cruz Wants a Constitutional Convention
In a conversation with Bob Menges, the South Carolina director for the Convention of States (COS) Project, Cruz reiterated his support for the movement. Ted Cruz is unequaled in his hypocrisy and treachery. He knows perfectly well that we will need a new Constitution to change our status from a sovereign nation to a member State in the North American Union. Remember, Ted's wife, Heidi, was on the CFR Task Force to write up the plan for the North American Community. He absolutely knows about the Parliament which the Plan sets up over Canada, the United States, and Mexico! The Parliament will consist of fifteen members (5 from each nation) to rule over the NAU. The North American Union would be yet another collective regional government, a new North American Soviet, that would clearly be the enemy of United States sovereignty.
Cruz’s close friends and supporters are also on the bandwagon for a Con-Con, Glenn Beck, David Barton, Mark Levin, and others.
Conclusion
Up to 20 women were involved in this EF coup, and several of them were for a Constitutional Convention. Phyllis Schlafly has always been an absolute warrior in battling against a Con-Con. This is another huge reason she endorsed Donald J. Trump, because Trump is adamantly against a Constitutional Convention.
The enemies of EF and Mrs. Schlafly are spreading the lies that she is senile, and this even appeared in an article in the leftist Daily Kos in 2015. However, Phyllis’s public endorsement of Donald Trump in March of 2016, in St. Louis, Missouri, made it clear she still has all her faculties and is sharp as a tack. Not only that, but she recently released a video regarding this attempted takeover which showed the strength and spine this woman still has at the age of 91. See videos here.
Cruz plays fast and dirty, he’ll do anything for an endorsement and money. He changes his tune depending upon to whom he’s reaching out for more campaign cash. These women, including Phyllis’s daughter, Anne Cori, who attained their positions in Eagle Forum because of their founder, Phyllis Schlafly, have turned their backs on her for the likes of a man with low ethical standards, a man who has no problem lying about his opponents and himself. Ted Cruz is the man who hired the dirtiest and lowest campaign manager available, Jeff Roe, and that’s why we have seen so many rotten campaign tricks.
As Phyllis has said, everyone has a right to vote for whomever they wish. But when a group of people within an organization pull a traitorous coup against the leader who put them in these powerful positions, just because they didn’t like Phyllis’s endorsement of Donald Trump, then it’s time for them to be purged.
[P.S. In order to help Mr. Trump we need to increase the hits to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage, etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]
_______________________________________________________

Pro-Cruz Plotters Against Phyllis Schlafly 

Drag Eagle Forum Founder into Court

EXCERPTS:
"The suit was filed by Schlafly’s own daughter, Anne Schlafly Cori, and four other Cruz supporters within Schlafly’s organization: Eunie Smith, Cathie Adams, Carolyn McLarty, and Rosina Kovar. Shirley Curry, the only other member of the so-called “Gang of Six” who is a plaintiff in this case, has not taken a public position on the presidential race.
The defendants in the case are Schlafly’s son, John Schlafly; Schlafly’s handpicked successor, Ed Martin; and Eagle Forum itself, the organization of which Mrs. Schlafly is the chairman."

WHO OWNS YOUR CHILDREN?~THE DANGERS OF GOVERNMENT AS A PARENT~DUKE PESTA: COMMON CORE, FROM FARCE TO FAILURE

WHO OWNS YOUR CHILDREN?~THE DANGERS OF GOVERNMENT AS A PARENT 
Published on Jun 30, 2014
FreedomProject Education’s Executive Director Alan Scholl discusses the change in direction, leadership, and intent of American Education. Mr. Scholl is currently accepting requests to deliver this speech live in your hometown. Email: information@fpeusa.org to inquire.

The collectivist-humanist philosophy has near-total control of federal, state, and local government schools, educators and agencies.

As a result, the traditional Judeo-Christian family-centered philosophy that built America is falling into disuse, faith and practice banned and attacked in schools, rewritten out of textbooks, and rejected and demonized by teachers, administrators, and teachers unions. How did the Bible, once the core of education in America, become “unsuitable?”

Have generations of students been “re-educated” rather than educated by the very institutions that parents have trusted to teach their children? What about massive changes like the so-called “Common Core State Standards?” Merely the latest fad, a cure, or dangerous indoctrination?

The rapid disintegration of American families and society is obvious. Many sense that we are speeding toward total government. Is this an “evolutionary trend” in education— or a sinister agenda? Watch and decide for yourself.

Learn more about FreedomProject Education by visiting www.FPEUSA.org.

Common Core: From Farce to Failure
with Dr. Duke Pesta

UPDATED MAY 2, 2016: FULLY EXPOSED-CRUZ AND FIORINA, A DREAM TICKET FOR GLOBALISTS~A DANGEROUS TEAM FOR AMERICA WITH NO MORALS DESPITE CLAIMS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

UPDATED MAY 2, 2016:
CRUZ GLOBALIST MACHINE BEHIND PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY’S 
EAGLE FORUM COUP

photo Ted-Cruz-Paisley-Robe-Teddy-Bare-Creep_zps8yawqm2n.jpg
ABOVE: CRUZ IN THE PRINCETON GIRLS’ DORMITORIES 
WEARING A PAISLEY PRINT BATHROBE
SEE: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/08/20/a_beastly_attack_on_ted_cruz_119647.html
BELOW: FIORINA QUOTE:  
“POLITICS IS OPERATING IN A ‘FACT FREE’ ZONE”
photo 13082704_10206024111632967_4678195423112743289_n_zpsmavtaa2w.jpg

One Woman Initiative (SEE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carly_Fiorina)

“Fiorina served as Fund Chair of One Woman Initiative (OWI), a partnership between the private sector and government agencies including the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United States Department of State(DoS). OWI describes itself as “An International Women’s Empowerment Fund” that seeks to “support existing initiatives in Muslim majority countries and countries with large Muslim populations” and “focus on key empowerment issues including entrepreneurship, political leadership, and the rule of law.” OWI said it would raise funds in order to give grants to achieve these objectives, with contributions managed through a separate section 501(c)(3) designated organization.
In June 2009, USAID announced that OWI grants totaling over US$500,000 had been made to grassroots organizations in Azerbaijan, Egypt, India, Pakistan, and the Philippines.
During the 2010 United States Senate election in CaliforniaFiorina was endorsed by GOProud, a gay conservative organization. In August 2010, Fiorina indicated on a Christian Coalition questionnaire that she opposed enforcing the 1993 law banning homosexuals in the militaryIn 2010, Fiorina stated that she supported the Defense of Marriage Act, but also supported civil unionsAccording to the financial disclosures filed by Fiorina’s campaign in June 2015, she and her husband have a combined net worth of $59 million. Fiorina has released the income tax returns that she and her husband jointly filed in 2013 and 2012; in those years, the Fiorinas reported income of almost $2 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Fiorina and her husband live in a home in the Washington, D.C. suburb of Mason Neck, Virginia, overlooking the Potomac River. The house and grounds were valued at $6.6 million in 2015. At the time of the 2010 Senate election, Fiorina and her husband lived in Los Altos Hills, California, a San Francisco Bay area suburb. Between 2005 and 2012, Fiorina and her husband also owned a condominium in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, where they lived for roughly half the year; they sold the condo for $5.3 million.”
Poster of Carly Fiorina praising Hillary Clinton - Clinton, The ...
TWO DEAD END LOSERS GOING HEAD TO HEAD? EITHER IS A BAD CHOICE
FULLY EXPOSED: CRUZ AND FIORINA, 
A DREAM TICKET FOR GLOBALISTS
BY KELLEIGH NELSON
SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh303.htmrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” —Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England in his political book, “Coningsby,” 1844
What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil. —Christian Science Monitor Editorial, June 19, 1920
Leftist Thought Process
We have neighbors with whom we are friendly, who happen to be die hard Democratic socialists and Hillary supporters, and I’m always astounded with their total stupidity.
Let me give you a few examples. Recently the husband said to me, “Do you really think people care about Hillary’s email problems?” Unfortunately, there are two answers to that question. The dumbed down Americans who listen only to the MSM probably don’t care. However, those of us who do any research absolutely believe she is not only corrupt to the core, but the murderess of Benghazi. I answered him with the scandal of General Petraeus who got the axe for far less than Hillary.
Another time I was walking with the wife and she said to me, “What would we do without China making all our goods?” I was floored. I said to her, “Well, we would have American people with jobs, we wouldn’t have an over trillion-dollar debt to China, and we wouldn’t have much of our tax dollars going to families who had lost everything and now were counting on government funds to support them.”
Truly, there is no end to the idiocy. Just yesterday this neighbor told me that Donald Trump hates women. I asked her how she knew that…she said she’d done her homework. I asked her if she knew how many women were employed and promoted at Trump companies. She said very few. Again, I had to argue with her on that one.
From the Daily Caller:
Appearing on “CNN’s New Day” with Chris Cuomo, Michael Cohen, Trump’s general counsel and an executive vice president at Trump Organization, said that while the billionaire’s companies employ 57 percent men and 43 percent women, “there are more female executives at the Trump Organization than there are male.”
“And women who are similarly situated in positions similar to that of their male counterparts, are actually paid more,” Cohen said.
Of course she told me that was all lies.
But let’s get back to Cruz and Carly, two peas in a pod, and both far more globalist leftists than people understand.
Cruz and Carly
How absolutely bizarre is it that Ted Cruz has named Carly Fiorina as his vice-president. After Trump’s Northeastern sweep on Tuesday night, it’s mathematically impossible for Cruz to net enough delegates to win on the first ballot if Trump doesn’t reach the requisite 1,237 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. I know, I know, Cruz and Kasich hope to keep Trump from gaining the delegates and resulting in a brokered convention where Cruz could win the nomination. 

Carly Fiorina, just months ago, called Ted Cruz a typical lying politician.
Now she’s joining with him and lauding his character and trustworthiness. In fact, she broke into song when it was announced that she would be his vice-president.

I really think these people have lost their minds, but then I knew what they were a long time ago, and have written about it over and over again. Crazy Glenn Beck who wants to knife Donald Trump, and Dominionist David Barton who believes Sharia Law and the Constitution are compatible, and all of them joining together to push a Constitutional Convention. These are Cruz’s closest friends and supporters.
And top it off with John Boehner calling Ted Cruz “Lucifer in the flesh,” and a “crazy SOB.” [Link] Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, they’re really two of a kind, albeit Cruz is far creepier.
Then there’s the lesser known tale of Ted Cruz actually trying to uphold a ban on dildos. Does it get even more weird than this? You bet it does. His former Princeton roommate says that the women would continually ask him to keep creepy Cruz out of their hallway. [Link]
The Daily Bail is reporting that Cruz has lost his mind. They stated, “Last night in Indiana, Ted Cruz lashed out at the national media for favoring Trump. Cruz fails to consider that the majority of sane Americans, including members of his own family, correctly believe that he’s an extremely creepy individual.”
And of course Ted has called the Council on Foreign Relations a “nest of vipers,” but his wife worked there for five years helping to write the North American Community. As well, his mentor at Princeton was none other than Robert George, CFR and UNESCO. Hmmm….if CFR is a “nest of vipers,” why has Cruz accepted George’s endorsement and his wife’s five year tenure at CFR?
Revisiting Carly Fiorina
Readers might want to revisit my two articles on Carly, her devastating destruction of Hewlett Packard, and how many in California still detest the woman. (Surely choosing Carly Fiorina for VP will help Donald Trump win big in California.) [Link], [Link]
Fiorina has openly admitted that she uses the Marxist Hegelian Dialectic every day, and lauds Islam as “the greatest civilization in the world.”
Cruz and Carly will get along famously. Both claim they will rid the country of Common Core, yet both are lying. Senator Cruz’s EDUCATION Bill S 306 expands Common Core to private, religious, and home schoolers. [Link], [Link]
Craig Barrett, AZ’s chief Common Core promoter and Chairman of the Board at Achieve Inc. (architects of the Common Core standards), hosted a private fundraiser for Carly Fiorina in AZ on 9/10/15, according to the Maricopa County Republican Committee (MCRC) Briefs.
Carly on Abortion
During the CNN debate, Fiorina blasted Planned Parenthood and the horror of selling baby body parts for profit. However, she certainly hasn’t put her money where her mouth is. The Daily Caller reported that Fiorina joined Revolution Health Group, (RHG) when it was founded in 2005, along with Colin Powell, as an investor and board member. RHG was a website which promoted abortion benefits and directed users to Planned Parenthood, National Abortion Federation, and NARAL for more information. Women were urged to “think through” their “choices,” but a pro-life perspective was not offered.
While campaigning for John McCain, Fiorina assured pro-choice folks thatMcCain “has never signed on to efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade.”Why would a pro-lifer regard this as a positive attribute to be touted? Why would a pro-lifer sign on as a surrogate for that sort of candidate?
And why…when Ted Cruz claims he’s a conservative would he join with someone like Carly Fiorina?
Destroying Hard Drives
Prior to Fiorina’s takeover of the board of Hewlett Packard, she had an employee take a hammer to five of her hard drives. One has to wonder what she wanted destroyed. Sure sounds a lot like Hillary Clinton antics. She and Cruz make a good pair.
Cruz and his infamous campaign manager, Jeff Roe, have run the dirtiest campaign I’ve seen in a long time. He lied about Carson in Iowa, Rubio in Hawaii, and now with Kasich, [Link], and add in all the lies he’s told about Trump. Even CNN corrected many of the lies Cruz spouted during the debates. Top all this off with the stealing of delegates, and the GOP helping Cruz to receive delegates in states where votes weren’t even cast.
Carly on Amnesty
Fiorina supports the DREAM Act. In her first debate with Sen. Boxer in 2010, she said: “I would support the DREAM Act because I do not believe that we can punish children who through no fault of their own are here trying to live the American dream.”
The DREAM Act (acronym for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) is an American legislative proposal for a multi-phase process for undocumented immigrants in the United States that would first grant conditional residency, and upon meeting further qualifications, permanent residency.
The bill was first introduced in the Senate on August 1, 2001, S. 1291 by Dick Durbin and Orrin Hatch, and has since been reintroduced several times (see legislative history) but has failed to pass.
Last June, Fiorina appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and said she is against a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens, but that a path to legal status is “a possibility.” [Link] So, what is the difference? She also added she is open to immigration reforms that would give citizenship to children of illegal aliens. If that’s the case, she might as well give every illegal alien citizenship. They are not “undocumented immigrants.” They have broken the law and invaded our country.
Ted’s wife believes in building a North American Community with Canada and Mexico, and eliminating our borders, thus making us one big North American Union, just like the European Union. Needless to say, he and Carly have much more in common than most people understand.
Guess who is running all the negative ads in Indiana against Trump? None other than Club for Growth, who originally spent $3.3 million on negative ads against Trump and is now funding even more. Wonder why? Because Club for Growth is pro-amnesty, and they know Cruz and Fiorina are too, whereas Donald Trump will close the borders and build that wall!
Conclusion
Cruz and Fiorina have much in common, both are consummate globalists, and both have flip-flopped on so many issues, all of course, to fool the American electorate.
Remember too, it was Fiorina at Cruz’s side when the National Enquirer story broke the story about his affairs with five women. It was Fiorina who answered the questions from the press, not Cruz, and certainly not Heidi Cruz, who disappeared for several weeks. Funny too that Ted never did sue the National Enquirer.
Both of these globalists need to be strongly rejected by the voters. I’ve often said that today’s Christians have very little discernment, but maybe they’re finally waking up to the real Ted Cruz. Let’s hope so!
_________________________________________________

DUPLICITOUS FIORINA IN VIDEOS PROVE SHE WILL TAKE THE EXPEDIENT WAY TO POWER:

Carly Fiorina slams Cruz: “Everybody could see this train wreck coming”

Fiorina slams Cruz as inconsistent

Carly Fiorina: Ted Cruz Will Say Anything To Get Elected

Carly Fiorina’s exact words on CNN were, “I would say that Ted Cruz is just like any other politician. He says one thing in Manhattan. He says another thing in Iowa. He says whatever he needs to say to get elected, and then he’s going to do as he pleases. I think the American people are tired of the political class that promises much and delivers much of the same.”

Carly Fiorina blasts sexist tweet
from Cruz spokesman

Carly Fiorina in 2008: “I Have Such Great Admiration and Empathy for Hillary Clinton”

Fiorina: Hillary Clinton Must Be PROSECUTED!

Carly Fiorina destroys Hillary Clinton

Fiorina: KY Clerk refusing marriage licenses
to same-sex couples is inappropriate

Virginia Delegate Describes Cruz Election Theft

KANSAS DEFIES OBAMA ON “SYRIAN” REFUGEES

Kansas Defies Obama on Syrian Refugees
KANSAS DEFIES OBAMA ON 
“SYRIAN” REFUGEES 
BY STEVE BYAS
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/23082-kansas-defies-obama-on-syrian-refugeesrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Led by Governor Sam Brownback (shown), the state of Kansas informed the Obama administration this week that it is defying its dictates for Kansas to cooperate in the resettlement of refugees from Syria. In a letter to Robert Carey, director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement, Brownback wrote, “The State of Kansas hereby withdraws its Refugee Resettlement Program State Plan and terminates its participation in all federal refugee resettlement grants and programs, effective at the earliest possible date.”
Brownback added that he was taking his action to “protect the safety and security interests of the State of Kansas.”
Beginning in November 2015, Brownback attempted to work with the federal government to address security concerns related to resettlement of some refugees in Kansas. “We made a reasonable request of the Obama Administration to provide us with information we need to help protect the safety and security of Kansas,” Brownback said. “Because the federal government has failed to provide adequate assurances regarding refugees it is settling in Kansas, we have no option but to end our cooperation with and participation in the federal resettlement program.”
Brownback and several other governors asked the White House in November of last year to share vetting information as President Obama pledged to take in 10,000 Syrian refugees. The administration refused to do so, citing the privacy rights of the refugees!
More than 30 states have expressed some resistance to the plan of importing Syrian refugees, mostly for security concerns. At least two of the Paris terrorists made their way into Europe, claiming to be “refugees” from Syria, which is in the midst of a civil war. The two terrorists entered Greece posing as Syrian refugees in September, made their way to France, where they joined in the preparation, arming, and execution of a massive terrorist attack three months later. A Syrian informant has revealed that over 4,000 ISIS fighters have already been smuggled into Western nations, hiding among “innocent refugees.”
Jeh Johnson, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has admitted, “We don’t know a whole lot” about Syrian refugees now entering America, and that DHS lacks an “active protocol” for properly screening them.
While the 1980 Refugee Act, passed at the urging of President Jimmy Carter, handed over to the federal government great powers in the importation of refugees, the states are considered an essential element in the settlement process. If the states simply refuse to cooperate, it is unlikely that many, if any refugees are likely to be moved to uncooperative states.
Obama is demanding that the states “step up” and do their part in the resettlement of the refugees from Syria.
Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, “seeks to halt” resettlement in his state. Democrat Governor Steve Bullock of Montana insists that refugees requesting settlement in Montana will be denied if there are safety concerns. Governor Matt Mead of Wyoming, a Republican, rejects a “lackluster system that allows terrorists to slip through the cracks.”
After Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, said his state will not accept any Syrian refugees, Robert Carey, director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) responded, “States may not deny ORR-funded benefits and services to refugees based on a refugee’s country of origin or religious affiliation. Accordingly, states may not categorically deny ORR-funded benefits and services to Syrian refugees.” He added that states that persist in their refusal are violating the law and “could be subject to enforcement action.”
Texas, like Kansas, was defiant. “The Health and Human Services Commission [of Texas] will continue to follow the directive of Gov. Abbott, which calls for the State of Texas to not participate in the resettlement of Syrian refugees,” responded a spokesman for the commission, Bryan Black.
It is not like Texas has not already admitted refugees in the past. More than 200 Syrian refugees had been resettled in Texas by the end of last August. Overall, 70,000 refugees from 78 countries are living in Houston alone!
Brownback initially attempted to cooperate with the Obama administration, asking more than once for Homeland Security to provide documentation and files on individual refugees, but the Obama administration flatly refused to comply. Brownback explained why he has decided to cease any cooperation with Obama’s plans. “As governor, my priority has been and will continue to be the safety and security of Kansans. Kansas remains a state that has always been welcoming to refugees, but we must take prudent and responsible actions to protect our communities.”
In February, Brownback issued an executive order, directing state agencies to use the official list of the U.S. Department of State of countries identified as state sponsors of terrorism in identifying whether a particular refugee should be deemed to present a safety and security risk. Those nations are Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
The executive order noted “federal charges” were filed in Texas and California against terrorist operatives that entered the United States as refugees, and that such admission of some refugees into Kansas “presents an unacceptable risk to the safety and security of the State of Kansas, and thus State government must take action to ensure that it does not assist in the relocation of such refugees to Kansas from anywhere in the world.”
Because of such concerns, Brownback’s order states, “No department, commission, board, or agency of the government of the State of Kansas shall aid, cooperate with, or assist in any way the relocation of refugees that present a safety and security risk to the State of Kansas, until such time as an adequate vetting process is in place with adequate assurances to the State.”
Brownback explained why he had to resort to defiance. “The State of Kansas has specifically requested, from multiple agencies and levels of the federal government, access to all documentation and files concerning any individual refugee relocated or proposed to be relocated from Syria to Kansas. There has been no response to these requests, which were made directly to the White House, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of Refugee Resettlement.”
Brownback made public a letter he had received from Secretary of State John F. Kerry, assuring the Kansas governor that refugees are undergoing a “rigorous security vetting process,” which is “extraordinarily thorough and comprehensive.” According to Kerry, the process is “the most robust screening process for any category of individuals seeking admission into the United States,” and is “multi-layered and intensive.”
In an attempt to persuade Brownback to accept refugees, he cited “the new government of our neighbor to the north, Canada,” which has pledged to accept 25,000 Syrian refugees in 2016. Of course, the new Trudeau government is known as a very liberal one, much like the one in that Kerry serves. Kerry told Brownback that the “at least 10,000″ the Obama administration intends to bring in “this fiscal year” is a “modest commitment.”
And according to Kerry, “The overwhelming majority of Syrian refugees we have accepted and will accept are families, victims of torture, and children.” Whenever they are challenged, liberals often pull out the “children” card, as in “it’s for the children.” Any adult males admitted, Kerry reassured Brownback, will be “especially vulnerable individuals,” such as lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgendered individuals. It is supposed to reassure Brownback — Syrian men who think they are women will now be making their way into women’s restrooms?
Kerry then explained the vetting process. First, the refugee candidates are “interviewed by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees; second, a refugee applicant is referred by the UN to the U.S. “along with a packet of information.” Then, the State Department takes over, and they interview the candidate again, providing the U.S. government a “very useful tool for gathering information.” Third, the refugee applicants are then referred to the United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS), where they are subjected to “rigorous status interviews.” The USCIS collects biometric information, including fingerprints for all refugees over the age of 14, or under 79 years of age.
“The burden of proof is on the applicant,” Kerry told Brownback.
Kerry concluded his letter by telling Brownback, “We have tremendous faith in this system’s ability to detect, investigate, and disrupt terrorist plotting in this country, as it has done repeatedly. With these measures in place, we believe that we are able to both protect the American people and maintain this Nation’s long standing position as the world’s beacon of hope and freedom.”
Once the refugees pass this supposedly “rigorous” series of fingerprinting and multiple interviews, Robert Carey of ORR has warned “states may not categorically deny ORR-funded benefits and services to Syrian refugees.” He cited the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the bases of race and national origin in all programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance. “Thus it is not permissible to deny federally funded benefits such as Medicaid or TANF to refugees who otherwise meet the eligibility requirements.” So, the refugees will quickly become recipients of the vast cornucopia of government benefits paid for by American taxpayers. According to Carey, this is “vital to achieving their potential in the United States and becoming self-sufficient, integrated members of our communities.” And, no doubt, eventually good voting Democrats?
Despite these soothing words that Brownback had nothing to worry about from these Syrian refugees, and if he did not submit there could be “enforcement action,” the Kansas governor persisted in his demand for information on individual refugees being placed in the Sunflower State.
Writing to Denis McDonough, Obama’s chief of staff, on December 31, 2015, Brownback said, “Accordingly, I hereby request on behalf of the State of Kansas a copy of all such documentation and files concerning any individual refugee relocated or proposed to be relocated from Syria to Kansas since November 16, 2015. The state is prepared to enter into an appropriate agreement to maintain the confidentiality and security of these documents.” He sent a nearly identical request to Secretary Kerry on the same day, but both letters were to no avail.
A letter from the State Department again told Brownback that “individual refugee records are considered confidential.”
Finally, on February 24 of this year, Sandra Kimmons of the Kansas Department for Children and Families informed one Syrian refugee that his application for refugee cash assistance had been denied, “as the [Brownback] Administration has requested from multiple agencies of the federal government, access to all documentation and files on any refugees relocated to Kansas from countries listed on the United States Department of State official list of countries determined to be state sponsors of terrorism.”
This precipitated a response from the Administration for Children and Families that Kansas had committed “two apparent violations of federal law.” The letter added that Kansas was not permitted to condition a refugee’s receipt of cash assistance simply because the U.S. government would not provide the information Brownback was demanding. The letter then concluded with the threat that Kansas may have “violated federal civil rights statutes.”
Brownback then made another attempt on March 22 to obtain the information he had previously requested, which he considered “necessary to assure the safety and security of Kansans in connection with refugee resettlement.”
When the federal government followed that up with more threats and denials of the information Brownback desired, the governor wrote to Carey (the director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement), “The State of Kansas hereby withdraws its Refugee Resettlement Program State Plan and terminates its participation in all federal refugee resettlement grants and programs…. As we have informed you previously, this action is being taken to protect the safety and security interests of the State of Kansas.”
Brownback expressed his exasperation at the federal government’s refusal to provide the requested information. “We have been reasonable and incredibly patient in attempting to work with the federal government on this issue. As governor, I must have confidence that the refugee relocation program, and particularly the vetting process, is sufficient to protect our citizens. If I have to choose between the safety and security of Kansans and the relocation of refugees, I will take action to protect Kansans.”
Hopefully, other governors will take the same position as taken by Governor Brownback of Kansas.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RELEASES LIST OF COLLEGES SEEKING EXEMPTION FROM “TRANSGENDER” LAW

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RELEASES LIST OF COLLEGES SEEKING EXEMPTION FROM “TRANSGENDER” LAW 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

WASHINGTON — While it is not known if the move was done due to the request of homosexual and transgender advocacy groups, the U.S. Department of Education has released a list of Christian identifying colleges and universities who have requested exemptions from a federal law that has recently been interpreted to pertain to homosexuality and transgenderism.
As previously reported, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) had released a statement earlier this year calling for the government to post the names of Christian colleges and universities nationwide that have requested an exemption from Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits educational institutions from discriminating against a person based on their gender.
“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance,” it reads.
Although the law has been most known as being applied to discrimination against women and in situations related to girls who desire to participate in sports programs, the Department of Education recently told various schools that it interprets Title IX to also apply to transgender students.
Schools who do not seek an exemption may be required to allow male students who identify as female to use the girls’ restroom and vice versa, or may be mandated to permit male students who identify as female to share dorm space with the girls and vice versa.
But Title IX also contains a provision allowing religious schools to request an exemption from the law if “application of the law would conflict with specific tenets of the religion.”
HRC noted in its report earlier this year that nearly 60 Christian schools nationwide have requested an exemption, especially in recent years, with 23 seeking an exemption surrounding their convictions about homosexuality and 33 seeking an exemption surrounding transgender issues.
Only 12 schools had applied for an exemption before the Obama presidency. The list has quickly grown in recent years considering the government’s broadened interpretation of the law.
HRC believes that it is discrimination for religious schools to refuse to allow transgender students to use the restroom or dorm of their choice, or to prohibit students from engaging in homosexual behavior.
“Prospective students and their parents deserve greater transparency, and we urge the Department of Education to take action by helping to increase accountability and to ensure that no student unknowingly enrolls in a school that intends to discriminate against them,” HRC President Chad Griffin in a statement. “We believe that religious liberty is a bedrock principle of our nation, however faith should never be used as a guise for discrimination.”
Those included on the list posted to the U.S. Department of Education website as of April 26 include Oklahoma Christian University, William Carey University in Mississippi (named after the renowned missionary), Lancaster Bible College in Pennsylvania, Maranatha Baptist Bible College in Wisconsin, Colorado Christian University, East Texas Baptist University, Indiana Wesleyan University and Northpoint Bible College in Massachusetts.
The full list may be viewed here.
______________________________________________________

CBN INVITES “SENSUAL” CANDACE CAMERON BURE TO WHITE HOUSE DINNER, SAYS CHRISTIANS SHOULDN’T “JUDGE”

Cameron Bure-compressed
CBN INVITES “SENSUAL” CANDACE CAMERON BURE TO WHITE HOUSE DINNER, SAYS CHRISTIANS SHOUDN’T “JUDGE” 
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/04/30/cbn-invites-sensual-candace-cameron-bure-to-white-house-dinner-says-christians-shouldnt-judge/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
WASHINGTON — Pat Robertson’s CBN News is defending its selection of talk show host and actress Candace Cameron Bure, who identifies herself as a “sexual woman,” as their guest at Saturday’s White House correspondents dinner, despite concerns over her involvement in sexually provocative broadcasts and postings of sensual photos to her social media pages. The outlet praised Cameron Bure as a role model in its press release about the invite, and its news director called Christians who express concern over her behavior “bullies” and stated that he doesn’t believe it’s anyone’s place to “judge.”
As previously reported, Cameron Bure has continued to raise concerns among Christians in recent weeks over her immodest attire and risque’ photographs, as well as her appearance on the sitcom “Fuller House,” which features immodesty, lesbian kissing, sexual and alcoholic references and other controversial content. Some mothers have expressed their disappointment to Cameron Bure that they cannot allow their daughters to view her appearances as they do not find the material to be appropriate.
First organized in 1921, the White House correspondents dinner is an annual event attended by journalists nationwide, and features an often humor-filled speech by the president, as well as other American celebrities. By the 1980’s, it became a custom for news outlets to invite celebrities to appear at the dinner as their guest.
CBN, which has no affiliation with Christian News Network, was founded by broadcaster Pat Robertson in 1960, who also hosts the internationally-viewed daily television broadcast “The 700 Club.” Robertson has been a controversial figure at times in the media, advising a man that it would be permissible to divorce his wife over Alzheimer’s since Robertson considers the disease “a kind of death,” and telling a woman who struggled with her husband’s infidelity, “Well, he’s a man.”
CBN says that it considers a list of professing Christians who they would consider to be role models in deciding who to invite as their guest. American Idol contestants Colton Dixon and Ruben Studdard, “Duck Dynasty’s” Willie and Korie Robertson, comedienne and former “The View” co-host Sherri Shepard, and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and his third wife Callista were all past guests of CBN.
This year, the outlet selected Cameron Bure and her husband Mark to be their guest at the White House dinner. Christian News Network asked Rob Allman, who has served as CBN’s news director for the past 12 years, about the vetting process for guests. Allman stated that he and others considered Cameron Bure’s work as a whole in making the selection, citing her role on “The View” and her 2014 appearance on “Dancing With the Stars.”
“We believe based on her body of work that Candace Cameron Bure has been an ambassador for the Christian community within the entertainment industry,” he said. “What I considered, and what we considered, as we discussed her work, her books, her stance, how she presents herself as she was asked to be on The View, how she presented herself all through her time on Dancing With the Stars—we felt it was a good idea.”
Cameron Bure’s 10-week appearance on “Dancing With the Stars” featured dances to songs such as Janet Jackson’s “Nasty,” Sam Smith’s “Stay With Me” and “I Love It” by Icona Pop.
The actress, who often wore dresses that cut high up her thigh, and in one dance wore a fabric clam shell top for a mermaid costume, acknowledged that some of her moves were sensual and sexual in nature. She told co-host Erin Andrews when asked how she balances her faith with performing a sensual dance, “I am a sexual woman. But, you know, I want to reserve certain things for my husband.”
“This rumba is not a sexual dance; it’s a sensual emotional dance,” Cameron Bure also contended of her dance to “Say Something” by Great Big World and Christina Aguilera. “Sensual is more sexy than raunchy sexy, so I think this is going to be a beautiful dance.”
Allman said that he found Cameron Bure’s appearance on “Dancing With the Stars” to be “quite inspirational” because she mentioned her Christian faith on the show and because he believed she “definitely took a more modest approach than anyone on the program.”
When asked if Allman was aware of the concerns surrounding “Fuller House,” he advised that he had heard some information about the matter but did not look into any of the show’s content. He also seemed not to be aware that Cameron Bure deleted from her social media pages a photograph of herself wearing a short, low-cut black lingerie-type dress on “Fuller House” after many Christians expressed concern over her immodesty and how it would reflect on being a role model to their daughters.
Allman, however, referred to Christians as “bullies” and pointed to another instance weeks later where some Christians expressed concern over a photo of a bikini that Bure had posted on her social media pages.
“Personally, I thought she was putting it out there to let Christians see how much of bullies they were,” he said. “But I don’t know.”
“Once these folks can somehow think that they are above others, in many cases they are really as good as the Pharisees and others who complained against Christ,” Allman stated.
He repeatedly asserted that Christians are not supposed to judge, stating that Jesus said not to do so and that Christians “sin every day in some shape, form or fashion.”
“It’s not our role to [judge],” Allman said. “We’re not judges of what others do.”
He would not comment when it was noted that Pat Robertson regularly makes judgments about right and wrong on “The 700 Club”—although at times controversial.
As previously reported, in the episode entitled “Funner House,” Cameron Bure, who plays D.J. Tanner, spends the evening drinking and dancing at a night club with her best friend Kimmy Gibbler and sister Stephanie Tanner.
As the women are preparing to leave the house, Tanner comments about her low-cut, short black dress, “I don’t know if I should be tugging this thing down or pulling it up.”
The women, who refer to themselves as the “She-Wolf Pack,” go to a night club called “Euphoria,” where they decide to order tequila shots. While at the club, Tanner tells Gibbler about her idea to do the “Dirty Dancing” routine together, and sister Stephanie Tanner speaks to M.C. Macy Gray about performing the song to get back at Gibbler’s “two-timing ex.”
During the dance-off, which also includes two men dancing suggestively, Tanner concocts a means to win by “bust[ing] out our big Dirty Dancing lift.”
“Sure that’s not the tequila talking?” Gibbler asks.
“Well, yeah, it totally is,” Tanner replies.
As the women win the dance-off, they are announced by Macy Gray as “luscious lesbians,” at which neither Tanner or her friend bat an eye.
“And the winners are these two luscious lesbians!” Gray declares. “Get up here you sexy people!”
“We’re the sexy people!” Tanner proclaims as she hurries to the stage and grabs the microphone. “I was just gonna stay in tonight, but my friends insisted that I go out and have some adult fun. They knew I needed to take care of me. Oh, I love you guys so d*rn much! Thank you, Euphoria! And the wait staff and the bartenders!”
“Shots for everybody! She-Wolf Pack is buying!” she announces.
The 12th episode of “Fuller House,” entitled “Save the Dates,” shows Kimmy Gibbler and Stephanie Tanner locking lips for several seconds until Gibbler’s ex-husband pulls them apart, and another contains a scene with heavy sexual references.
Fans of Cameron Bure posted remarks on Cameron Bure’s social media pages in expressing concern about her role in “Fuller House,” but she soon told them to take the debate elsewhere.
“I’m a little disappointed with the show,” one commenter wrote. “There are sexual references, immodest clothing, and you even said a curse word. It makes me sad.”
“I quit watching the show after the fourth one. There is too much crude humor and half nakedness and body flinging,” another stated. “For somebody who’s supposed to be a Christian is trying to please both worlds—it’s sad it had to come to this. It’s not something today’s kids should watch either.”
Allman stated that he would look into the Fuller House concerns, but defended CBN’s selection of Cameron Bure and asserted firmly, “I’m not going to put myself as some great judge over Candace or anyone else. … We are happy to be inviting Candace to be our guest at the White House correspondents dinner.”
Candace Cameron Bure’s church, Calvary Church of Pacific Palisades in California, did not return calls for comment on previous attempts. Ray Comfort of Living Waters Ministries, whom Cameron Bure cites as an influence in her personal testimony, also did not return calls for comment.

IN A “FARCE”, MISSOURI REPLACES COMMON CORE WITH ANOTHER COMMON CORE~SAXON MATH LOST TO COMMON CORE PUBLISHER

IN A “FARCE”, MISSOURI REPLACES 
COMMON CORE WITH COMMON CORE
by ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In a half-baked effort to placate an outraged citizenry, Missouri officials claimed to be “replacing” Common Core with supposedly “new” standards allegedly developed with local input. In the real world, however, the dumbed-down, Obama-backed national “education” standards were preserved largely intact, just under a new name, following a process that participants denounced as a “farce.” The federally decreed testing regime and data-gathering schemes will continue, too. Critics and those involved in the process were outraged by the “un-American” scheming. They vowed to keep fighting, saying it was time to “clip the wings” of the state education bureaucracy.
Of course, as this magazine has documented extensively, the people of Missouri are hardly the first in America to be victimized by such a brazen fraud. The same deceitful process used to keep Common Core in Missouri has been used in an effort to dupe parents and taxpayers in multiple other states where outrage over the controversial nationalization scheme boiled over. Indiana was perhaps the first, but essentially, every state that allegedly “repealed and replaced” Common Core has fallen victim to the scam. Even in states where Common Core was never formally approved, the standards are creeping in. But the deception, lies, and manipulation have not passed unnoticed.
In Missouri, one mother and activist leader who was appointed by lawmakers to serve on a working group for the “new” standards called the process a fraud, a farce, a hoax, and an outrage. “It was beautiful to see the people of Missouri rise up and scare lawmakers into action on this,” said Stacy Shore, one of the moms and leaders behind Missouri Moms Against Common Core, referring to the 2014 legislation demanding new standards to replace Common Core. “But then to see how the Goliath of the state education department put on a show and did everything possible to stop the will of the people and keep Common Core, it's disgusting, it's a farce.”
In a phone interview with The New American, Shore, who worked on the English Language Arts standards for grades 6 through 12, described her outrage and the sham process used to keep Common Core. “I can tell you from the very start, the process was completely corrupted by the state department of education,” she explained. “This was an absolute fraud. They just re-named Common Core. It's not gone, it's here more than ever, and they think it's here to stay. All these politicians who act like we got rid of it, and they voted against it, no, they didn't. The state board of ed just re-adopted common core. It was all a hoax.”
The entire thing was a “farce from the very beginning,” continued Shore, a concerned mother who expressed frustration over the amount of time and energy she dedicated to what proved to be such a fraud. “And I know I speak for almost every single mom on this — it's unbelievable how much time and energy we put, and for nothing,” she said. “The bureaucrats have taken over, and nobody holds them accountable. They just thumb their nose and do what they want, and nothing ever changes. It's a huge disappointment. It's a lie. It was a giant farce.”
Shore has been involved from the start, even before she worked with hundreds of other mothers to pressure the legislature into overwhelmingly passing a law getting rid of Common Core. The process she participated in, though, was shocking, she said. For example, Shore's working group tried to bring in Dr. Sandra Stotsky, a leading national expert on English standards who, as the only subject-matter expert on the Common Core Validation Committee, refused to sign off on the standards. Among other concerns, the leading standards expert said Common Core would reduce the critical thinking skills of children and strip much of the great literature from education.
“They wouldn't even let her speak, we have it on video,” Shore explained, adding that Stotsky had referred to the allegedly “new” standards as “warmed-over Common Core.” “One of the most renowned experts on this in the country, and they wouldn't even let her speak. She came to Missouri to try to be a voice and help weigh in with her expertise, and they wouldn't even let her speak.... She was treated like a dog. It was awful, and it was embarrassing.” Eventually Stotsky was given a few minutes, but it seems somebody did not want a real expert weighing in and pointing out what was going on for the record.
Despite the law mandating public participation, Shore said, “we had no voice in this process.” “It was all a dog and pony show,” she added. “It was set up from the get-go, a process to work against the will of the people of Missouri.” Indeed, even after the working group submitted its product, the state education bureaucracy brought in another work group not composed of parents that simply changed what the original group had produced before presenting it to the state board of education for final approval. It will go into effect in the next school year.
The process was “weird,” too, Shore said. “There were cameras on us at all times. [The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education] DESE was watching the entire time via camera. It was creepy,” she said. “If the camera went down, the meeting stopped. They were watching us from another room. It was the creepiest, weirdest thing — suddenly you understand why education is broken, no wonder education is broken, when the state department of ed has gotten away with treating superintendents, principals, parents, and teachers like this.”
When the parents and concerned citizens found out what had happened, they submitted a sunshine request for e-mails from the education department about her working group, Shore said. They received a response from the bureaucracy's general counsel saying there were some 6,000 e-mails relating to the working group. “And by law, DESE was not supposed to be part of the process,” Shore said. Adding insult to injury, the education bureaucracy then demanded $5,000 from the parents to be able to access those documents, forcing them to reach out to lawmakers for assistance. 
“I'm just a parent, and a businesswoman, and I'm married to a teacher,” Shore concluded. “What I saw happening is un-American. What was happening to my children in the schools, and the way I was treated as a parent, are un-American. There are men and women fighting wars overseas, who have paid the ultimate price to protect our country, so I'm one of those moms that took it upon myself to do something. I didn't know what the Goliath was prepared to do to stop us.”
The original goal, Shore said, was to give back “freedom to local districts,” get rid of the copyrighted national standards, and restore proper education across Missouri. “Unfortunately, that did not happen,” she explained. Real solutions are needed. “Until we completely clip the wings of the state department of education, this will continue,” Shore concluded.  
The supposedly new standards were approved by the state Board of Education last week following almost two years of work by various working groups and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. According to media reports, thousands of people gave comments on the final product, which, in many ways, was largely Common Core under a new name, with a few minor improvements.   
In a presentation dealing with the alleged changes to the English standards, for example, state education authorities offered just a few examples of updates: “more emphasis on research” and “language expectations in writing,” whatever those mean. The addition of cursive writing, which education experts say is important, was also touted, though Missouri school officials said that cursive had never gone away anyway.
The “new” math standards also appear to have undergone a few cosmetic non-changes, mostly involving “re-organization” of some sections, and apparently the “coding system that organizes expectations” was modified. A more advanced track to enable students to do serious math if they wanted was also created as an option, though what happened to that remains unclear. In “science,” the bogus “new” standards are essentially the same as the radical “Next Generation Science Standards,” which critics call indoctrination that strongly emphasizes the evolution theory and the man-made global-warming theory throughout, at the expense of real science, critical thinking, and the scientific method.    
However, anti-Common Core education activists in the state were pleased with at least one development — the state now has a role and process in place for standards that potentially allows changes to be made as needed at the state level. Anne Gassel, with the Missouri Coalition Against Common Core, served on a math work group. While she acknowledged that the supposedly “new” standards were broadly similar to Common Core in math and English, and to the national Common Core-linked “science” standards in science, she said the fact that there was now a state process in place was a relief.
But she did not sound pleased with developments, either. “Our state department of education changed what we produced and made it look more like Common Core, and then got approval from the state board,” she said in a phone interview. “They ignored the statute and did what they wanted.” The DESE bureaucracy did something “even more egregious,” too, she said. They put the standards out, received comments, and then changed the standards in an opaque process, without even keeping the original working groups in the loop. None of that was authorized by the statute.
“Part of this is that they want to populate all the longitudinal databases with student information. And so they wanted the standards to all look the same,” Gassel explained, touching on a subject that has outraged parents and educators across America. The tests, meanwhile, most likely have questions from the national testing regimes backed by the Obama administration, despite a court ruling finding Missouri's participation in the national testing consortium unconstitutional. “The [national] tests were removed in name only,” Gassel said, adding that part of the reason the standards were kept so similar was so the tests could remain aligned.  
She also blasted federal involvement in education. “There is tremendous pressure to stay within the system,” she said. “They are building a system, and they want to force us in, and once we're in, we won't be able to get out easily. This will make it very difficult to ever re-gain local control again.” And while there are some improvements in the revised standards, the primary positive development was the fact that they can be “tweaked” at the state level going forward, regardless of what Common Core's copyright owners do.
The original legislation touted as scrapping Common Core, HB 1490, was passed in 2014 by overwhelming margins. It was widely celebrated as a step forward in restoring local control, largely because it mandated that local school boards be “responsible for the approval and adoption of curriculum used by the school district.” However, the law also called for new standards and an associated testing regime for the entire state. Crucial to the agenda is the worse-than-meaningless term “college and career ready,” which besides being an oxymoron — college and career require vastly different preparation — is a term used by the federal government to keep everyone within the same straitjacket.   
And therein lies the poison pill — regardless of whether local districts and states are “allowed” to choose their own curriculum, if the state dictates Common Core or Common Core-style standards and associated national tests in exchange for federal bribe money, the curriculum will inevitably have to match. As chief Common Core financier and population-control zealot Bill Gates put it in a speech to the National Conference of State Legislatures in 2009: “When the tests are aligned to the common standards, the curriculum will line up as well.” The people of Missouri are learning that now.
For the sake of American children and the future of the nation, it is past time to step completely out of the dumbed-down “education” system being imposed from Washington, D.C., and instead pursue real educational reform. That begins with seeing through the massive educational fraud currently being perpetrated against an unwitting public in Missouri and beyond.  
Related articles:
___________________________________________________

Common Core Claims Saxon Math
Published on Apr 26, 2016
★ It's not enough to transform education: progressives must obliterate alternatives. FreedomProject Academy’s Academic Director, Dr. Duke Pesta, reveals Saxon Math officials admitting the once trusted homeschool textbook company has gone Common Core. (Correction: John Saxon died in 1996, not 2006.) ● Special thanks to Tina Hollenbeck and The Homeschool Resource Roadmap - http://hsroadmap.org/common-core-proj... ★ FreedomProject Academy is a Common Core Free, Live Online School, that is Faithfully Educating America. Learn more @https://fpeusa.org ★ LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/FreedomProje... ★ FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: https://twitter.com/FREEDOMPR0JECT

DUKE PESTA

FULLY EXPOSED: CRUZ AND FIORINA, A DREAM TICKET FOR GLOBALISTS~A DANGEROUS TEAM FOR AMERICA WITH NO MORALS DESPITE CLAIMS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

UPDATED MAY 2, 2016:
CRUZ GLOBALIST MACHINE BEHIND PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY’S 
EAGLE FORUM COUP

photo Ted-Cruz-Paisley-Robe-Teddy-Bare-Creep_zps8yawqm2n.jpg
ABOVE: CRUZ IN THE PRINCETON GIRLS’ DORMITORIES 
WEARING A PAISLEY PRINT BATHROBE
SEE: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/08/20/a_beastly_attack_on_ted_cruz_119647.html
BELOW: FIORINA QUOTE:  
“POLITICS IS OPERATING IN A ‘FACT FREE’ ZONE”
photo 13082704_10206024111632967_4678195423112743289_n_zpsmavtaa2w.jpg

One Woman Initiative (SEE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carly_Fiorina)

“Fiorina served as Fund Chair of One Woman Initiative (OWI), a partnership between the private sector and government agencies including the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United States Department of State(DoS). OWI describes itself as “An International Women’s Empowerment Fund” that seeks to “support existing initiatives in Muslim majority countries and countries with large Muslim populations” and “focus on key empowerment issues including entrepreneurship, political leadership, and the rule of law.” OWI said it would raise funds in order to give grants to achieve these objectives, with contributions managed through a separate section 501(c)(3) designated organization.
In June 2009, USAID announced that OWI grants totaling over US$500,000 had been made to grassroots organizations in Azerbaijan, Egypt, India, Pakistan, and the Philippines.
During the 2010 United States Senate election in California, Fiorina was endorsed by GOProud, a gay conservative organization. In August 2010, Fiorina indicated on a Christian Coalition questionnaire that she opposed enforcing the 1993 law banning homosexuals in the militaryIn 2010, Fiorina stated that she supported the Defense of Marriage Act, but also supported civil unionsAccording to the financial disclosures filed by Fiorina’s campaign in June 2015, she and her husband have a combined net worth of $59 million. Fiorina has released the income tax returns that she and her husband jointly filed in 2013 and 2012; in those years, the Fiorinas reported income of almost $2 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Fiorina and her husband live in a home in the Washington, D.C. suburb of Mason Neck, Virginia, overlooking the Potomac River. The house and grounds were valued at $6.6 million in 2015. At the time of the 2010 Senate election, Fiorina and her husband lived in Los Altos Hills, California, a San Francisco Bay area suburb. Between 2005 and 2012, Fiorina and her husband also owned a condominium in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, where they lived for roughly half the year; they sold the condo for $5.3 million.”
Poster of Carly Fiorina praising Hillary Clinton - Clinton, The ...
TWO DEAD END LOSERS GOING HEAD TO HEAD? EITHER IS A BAD CHOICE
FULLY EXPOSED: CRUZ AND FIORINA, 
A DREAM TICKET FOR GLOBALISTS
BY KELLEIGH NELSON
SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh303.htmrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” —Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England in his political book, “Coningsby,” 1844
What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil. —Christian Science Monitor Editorial, June 19, 1920
Leftist Thought Process
We have neighbors with whom we are friendly, who happen to be die hard Democratic socialists and Hillary supporters, and I’m always astounded with their total stupidity.
Let me give you a few examples. Recently the husband said to me, “Do you really think people care about Hillary’s email problems?” Unfortunately, there are two answers to that question. The dumbed down Americans who listen only to the MSM probably don’t care. However, those of us who do any research absolutely believe she is not only corrupt to the core, but the murderess of Benghazi. I answered him with the scandal of General Petraeus who got the axe for far less than Hillary.
Another time I was walking with the wife and she said to me, “What would we do without China making all our goods?” I was floored. I said to her, “Well, we would have American people with jobs, we wouldn’t have an over trillion-dollar debt to China, and we wouldn’t have much of our tax dollars going to families who had lost everything and now were counting on government funds to support them.”
Truly, there is no end to the idiocy. Just yesterday this neighbor told me that Donald Trump hates women. I asked her how she knew that…she said she’d done her homework. I asked her if she knew how many women were employed and promoted at Trump companies. She said very few. Again, I had to argue with her on that one.
From the Daily Caller:
Appearing on “CNN’s New Day” with Chris Cuomo, Michael Cohen, Trump’s general counsel and an executive vice president at Trump Organization, said that while the billionaire’s companies employ 57 percent men and 43 percent women, “there are more female executives at the Trump Organization than there are male.”
“And women who are similarly situated in positions similar to that of their male counterparts, are actually paid more,” Cohen said.
Of course she told me that was all lies.
But let’s get back to Cruz and Carly, two peas in a pod, and both far more globalist leftists than people understand.
Cruz and Carly
How absolutely bizarre is it that Ted Cruz has named Carly Fiorina as his vice-president. After Trump’s Northeastern sweep on Tuesday night, it’s mathematically impossible for Cruz to net enough delegates to win on the first ballot if Trump doesn’t reach the requisite 1,237 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. I know, I know, Cruz and Kasich hope to keep Trump from gaining the delegates and resulting in a brokered convention where Cruz could win the nomination. 

Carly Fiorina, just months ago, called Ted Cruz a typical lying politician.
Now she’s joining with him and lauding his character and trustworthiness. In fact, she broke into song when it was announced that she would be his vice-president.

I really think these people have lost their minds, but then I knew what they were a long time ago, and have written about it over and over again. Crazy Glenn Beck who wants to knife Donald Trump, and Dominionist David Barton who believes Sharia Law and the Constitution are compatible, and all of them joining together to push a Constitutional Convention. These are Cruz’s closest friends and supporters.
And top it off with John Boehner calling Ted Cruz “Lucifer in the flesh,” and a “crazy SOB.” [Link] Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, they’re really two of a kind, albeit Cruz is far creepier.
Then there’s the lesser known tale of Ted Cruz actually trying to uphold a ban on dildos. Does it get even more weird than this? You bet it does. His former Princeton roommate says that the women would continually ask him to keep creepy Cruz out of their hallway. [Link]
The Daily Bail is reporting that Cruz has lost his mind. They stated, “Last night in Indiana, Ted Cruz lashed out at the national media for favoring Trump. Cruz fails to consider that the majority of sane Americans, including members of his own family, correctly believe that he’s an extremely creepy individual.”
And of course Ted has called the Council on Foreign Relations a “nest of vipers,” but his wife worked there for five years helping to write the North American Community. As well, his mentor at Princeton was none other than Robert George, CFR and UNESCO. Hmmm….if CFR is a “nest of vipers,” why has Cruz accepted George’s endorsement and his wife’s five year tenure at CFR?
Revisiting Carly Fiorina
Readers might want to revisit my two articles on Carly, her devastating destruction of Hewlett Packard, and how many in California still detest the woman. (Surely choosing Carly Fiorina for VP will help Donald Trump win big in California.) [Link], [Link]
Fiorina has openly admitted that she uses the Marxist Hegelian Dialectic every day, and lauds Islam as “the greatest civilization in the world.”
Cruz and Carly will get along famously. Both claim they will rid the country of Common Core, yet both are lying. Senator Cruz’s EDUCATION Bill S 306 expands Common Core to private, religious, and home schoolers. [Link], [Link]
Craig Barrett, AZ’s chief Common Core promoter and Chairman of the Board at Achieve Inc. (architects of the Common Core standards), hosted a private fundraiser for Carly Fiorina in AZ on 9/10/15, according to the Maricopa County Republican Committee (MCRC) Briefs.
Carly on Abortion
During the CNN debate, Fiorina blasted Planned Parenthood and the horror of selling baby body parts for profit. However, she certainly hasn’t put her money where her mouth is. The Daily Caller reported that Fiorina joined Revolution Health Group, (RHG) when it was founded in 2005, along with Colin Powell, as an investor and board member. RHG was a website which promoted abortion benefits and directed users to Planned Parenthood, National Abortion Federation, and NARAL for more information. Women were urged to “think through” their “choices,” but a pro-life perspective was not offered.
While campaigning for John McCain, Fiorina assured pro-choice folks thatMcCain “has never signed on to efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade.”Why would a pro-lifer regard this as a positive attribute to be touted? Why would a pro-lifer sign on as a surrogate for that sort of candidate?
And why…when Ted Cruz claims he’s a conservative would he join with someone like Carly Fiorina?
Destroying Hard Drives
Prior to Fiorina’s takeover of the board of Hewlett Packard, she had an employee take a hammer to five of her hard drives. One has to wonder what she wanted destroyed. Sure sounds a lot like Hillary Clinton antics. She and Cruz make a good pair.
Cruz and his infamous campaign manager, Jeff Roe, have run the dirtiest campaign I’ve seen in a long time. He lied about Carson in Iowa, Rubio in Hawaii, and now with Kasich, [Link], and add in all the lies he’s told about Trump. Even CNN corrected many of the lies Cruz spouted during the debates. Top all this off with the stealing of delegates, and the GOP helping Cruz to receive delegates in states where votes weren’t even cast.
Carly on Amnesty
Fiorina supports the DREAM Act. In her first debate with Sen. Boxer in 2010, she said: “I would support the DREAM Act because I do not believe that we can punish children who through no fault of their own are here trying to live the American dream.”
The DREAM Act (acronym for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) is an American legislative proposal for a multi-phase process for undocumented immigrants in the United States that would first grant conditional residency, and upon meeting further qualifications, permanent residency.
The bill was first introduced in the Senate on August 1, 2001, S. 1291 by Dick Durbin and Orrin Hatch, and has since been reintroduced several times (see legislative history) but has failed to pass.
Last June, Fiorina appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and said she is against a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens, but that a path to legal status is “a possibility.” [Link] So, what is the difference? She also added she is open to immigration reforms that would give citizenship to children of illegal aliens. If that’s the case, she might as well give every illegal alien citizenship. They are not “undocumented immigrants.” They have broken the law and invaded our country.
Ted’s wife believes in building a North American Community with Canada and Mexico, and eliminating our borders, thus making us one big North American Union, just like the European Union. Needless to say, he and Carly have much more in common than most people understand.
Guess who is running all the negative ads in Indiana against Trump? None other than Club for Growth, who originally spent $3.3 million on negative ads against Trump and is now funding even more. Wonder why? Because Club for Growth is pro-amnesty, and they know Cruz and Fiorina are too, whereas Donald Trump will close the borders and build that wall!
Conclusion
Cruz and Fiorina have much in common, both are consummate globalists, and both have flip-flopped on so many issues, all of course, to fool the American electorate.
Remember too, it was Fiorina at Cruz’s side when the National Enquirer story broke the story about his affairs with five women. It was Fiorina who answered the questions from the press, not Cruz, and certainly not Heidi Cruz, who disappeared for several weeks. Funny too that Ted never did sue the National Enquirer.
Both of these globalists need to be strongly rejected by the voters. I’ve often said that today’s Christians have very little discernment, but maybe they’re finally waking up to the real Ted Cruz. Let’s hope so!
_________________________________________________

DUPLICITOUS FIORINA IN VIDEOS PROVE SHE WILL TAKE THE EXPEDIENT WAY TO POWER:

Carly Fiorina slams Cruz: “Everybody could see this train wreck coming”

Fiorina slams Cruz as inconsistent

Carly Fiorina: Ted Cruz Will Say Anything To Get Elected

Carly Fiorina’s exact words on CNN were, “I would say that Ted Cruz is just like any other politician. He says one thing in Manhattan. He says another thing in Iowa. He says whatever he needs to say to get elected, and then he’s going to do as he pleases. I think the American people are tired of the political class that promises much and delivers much of the same.”

Carly Fiorina blasts sexist tweet
from Cruz spokesman

Carly Fiorina in 2008: “I Have Such Great Admiration and Empathy for Hillary Clinton”

Fiorina: Hillary Clinton Must Be PROSECUTED!

Carly Fiorina destroys Hillary Clinton

Fiorina: KY Clerk refusing marriage licenses
to same-sex couples is inappropriate




1 4 5 6