Day: May 3, 2016

WOMEN’S DRAFT BILL WORST LAW IN THE HISTORY OF NATIONS~DRAFTING WOMEN MEANS EQUALITY IN SLAVERY

WOMEN’S DRAFT BILL WORST LAW 
IN THE HISTORY OF NATIONS 
By Dr. Greg J. Dixon
In our opinion, the proposed Selective Service bill recently introduce in the House of Representatives would be the worst policy decision that any nation has ever adopted in the history of the world, if passed.  It is even worse than abortion on demand or the legalization of sodomy or the transgender laws.  It is the greatest assault on the model of society that God has ordained for the tranquility of mankind ever launched by any one, civilized or uncivilized. There is no mischief on earth that will not be spawned through this wicked law.  And to further this atrocity, the decision to put our young girls into combat further exacerbates the issue.  What kind of animals would do this?  And even so called “Christian” conservative women on TV are calling for this as good National policy.  I have heard some of the Fox News women, Greta, and others say, equality demands that they go.  How tragic that those who have been beating the drums for “Equal Rights”, couldn’t see what was coming.  Equal Rights also means, Equal Responsibilities.  We are now beginning to see the final fruit of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that the majority at the time called for, calling it the “mother vote”, and that the nation needed it, because it would raise the moral temperature of the country.  As Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. always said, “It never is right to do wrong in order to do right.”  The only defense against this will be a conscientious defense on the part of those who can prove that they cannot wear military attire because of their religious beliefs.   However their church will have to have a congregational resolution on record before this bill is passed, and a majority of the women will have to practice the resolution in their daily dress, including their children or when it goes to court, and it will, they will be laughed out of the court room.  But, if they can show consistency, it is our opinion that they can win their case on the First and Tenth Amendment.  In our opinion even the individual who can show that the family or one young lady, even if her family are not believers would be able to make the argument if she has been consistent in this matter of dress.  However there won’t be many that will qualify, but the Lord Jesus said, “Many are called but few are chosen.”
Satan hates women.  Ever since the promise of Gen 3:15 –  “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel,”he has hated the woman with all that is within him and has tried to do everything in his power to separate her from her God.  He is doing a pretty good job of it.  To drive her from the sanctity of her home into a foxhole with a strange man, possibly even of a different race, to face the horribleness of modern warfare, the reality of rape, by our own soldiers or the enemy, and the possibility of death or cruel torture and imprisonment is unthinkable beyond anything that the mind can imagine.  And then to see thousands of young women returning with one arm, or no legs, and then with PSTD trying to mother children, is to see a coming nightmare beyond description.
Mankind will go a long way in his rebellion against God and to prove that the Bible is untrue.  But it is a long, long way from claiming that man came from monkeys to saying that men and women are equal to the degree that women are capable to fight our wars.  This shows how far a perverted mind will carry you. 
_______________________________________________________
   DRAFTING WOMEN MEANS 
EQUALITY IN SLAVERY

Some proponents of a military draft justify it as “payback” for the freedom the government provides its citizens.

by ron paul
see: http://www.infowars.com/drafting-women-means-equality-in-slavery/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Last week the House Armed Services Committee approved an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act requiring women to register with Selective Service. This means that if Congress ever brings back the draft, women will be forcibly sent to war. 
The amendment is a response to the Pentagon’s decision to allow women to serve in combat. Supporters of drafting women point out that the ban on women in combat was the reason the Supreme Court upheld a male-only draft. Therefore, they argue, it is only logical to now force women to register for Selective Service. Besides, supporters of extending the draft point out, not all draftees are sent into combat.
Most of those who opposed drafting women did so because they disagreed with women being eligible for combat positions, not because they opposed the military draft. Few, if any, in Congress are questioning the morality, constitutionality, and necessity of Selective Service registration. Thus, this debate is just another example of how few of our so-called “representatives” actually care about our liberty.
Some proponents of a military draft justify it as “payback” for the freedom the government provides its citizens. Those who make this argument are embracing the collectivist premise that since our rights come from government, the government can take away those rights whether it suits their purposes. Thus supporters of the draft are turning their backs on the Declaration of Independence.
While opposition to the draft is seen as a progressive or libertarian position, many conservatives, including Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, and Robert Taft, where outspoken opponents of conscription. Unfortunately, the militarism that has led so many conservatives astray in foreign policy has also turned many of them into supporters of mandatory Selective Service registration. Yet many of these same conservatives strongly and correctly oppose mandatory gun registration. In a free society you should never have to register your child or your gun.
Sadly, some opponents of the warfare state, including some libertarians, support the draft on the grounds that a draft would cause a mass uprising against the warfare state. Proponents of this view point to the draft’s role in galvanizing opposition to the Vietnam War. This argument ignores that fact that it took several years and the deaths of thousands of American draftees for the anti-Vietnam War movement to succeed.
A variation on this argument is that drafting women will cause an antiwar backlash as Americans recoil form the idea of forcing mothers into combat. But does anyone think the government would draft mothers with young children?
Reinstating the draft will not diminish the war party’s influence as long as the people continue to believe the war propaganda fed to them by the military-industrial complex’s media echo chamber. Changing the people’s attitude toward the warfare state and its propaganda organs is the only way to return to a foreign policy of peace and commerce with all.
Even if the draft could serve as a check on the warfare state, those who support individual liberty should still oppose it. Libertarians who support violating individual rights to achieve a political goal, even a goal as noble as peace, undermine their arguments against non-aggression and thus discredit both our movement, and, more importantly, our philosophy.
A military draft is one of — if not the — worst violations of individual rights committed by modern governments. The draft can also facilitate the growth of the warfare state by lowing the cost of militarism. All those who value peace, prosperity, and liberty must place opposition to the draft at the top of their agenda.
______________________________________________________

Military Draft Opens Up to Women

Published on Apr 29, 2016
Women may soon be drafted into the military after the House passed a defense policy bill 60-2, which included a provision that women would be required to register for the draft. The provision comes months after the Defense Department lifted all gender-based restrictions on the front-line combat units. The US hasn’t had a military draft since the Vietnam War era in 1973. The full House will consider the provision next month. Joya Mia Italiano and Melvin Robert review the latest provision and the ongoing debate about women’s roles in the military on the Lip News.




COLORADO SENDS NON-VACCINATING PARENTS ILLEGAL ORDER TO “REGISTER THEIR CHILD WITH THE STATE”

COLORADO SENDS NON-VACCINATING PARENTS ILLEGAL ORDER TO 
“REGISTER THEIR CHILD WITH THE STATE” 
BY MAC SLAVO
SEE: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/colorado-sends-non-vaccinating-parents-illegal-order-to-register-their-child-with-the-state.html; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Here’s the fraud of the State in action.
It seems that the Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment sent out a letter to parents demanding that those who have not vaccinated their children register them on a state website under requirement by law … the only problem is that there is no such law.
The agency has apologized, claiming the letter was sent out by mistake, but their intent was revealed anyway.
A law was proposed to require a “yellow star” registration process for families who don’t vaccinate … but the law did not make it out of committee. Of course, that doesn’t mean that the bill’s sponsors will give up.

A number of parents received a letter this month from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, which said in the document that parents of unvaccinated children in school would be required to register and exempt their child through a state website.
…“My biggest issue is that you are trying to take my child’s information – that you have zero legislative authority to do – to track and to possibly come back to me,” parent Missy Frazier said, according to The Gazette newspaper. “Where does this end, and with whom are you going to share this information?”

It is hardly surprising that the school district is being accused of deliberately spreading the misconception that parents are legally required to comply.
But it certainly looked official when it went out: Here’s an image that was released of the letter:

vaccine-1024x443-768x332That is already that standard line with childhood vaccines – creating the impression that they are required, when freedom over medical injections should be  a personal decision protected by constitutional freedoms.

“I find it curious that the House has already killed 1164, whereas the health department has already implemented the provisions of 1164 in law on their website stating that by July 1, parents will be required to register online,” Lundberg said. “This online registration system is in complete violation of current statute. They don’t have the authority to require an online registration.”
“They want to populate the vaccine registry and they want to know exactly who’s exempting from which vaccines, where they live and I think it’s a harassment technique,” Theresa Wrangham of the National Vaccine Information Center told a Denver TV station.

 Demanding data from people who opt out of any program in this country is akin to discriminating against them and allowing them to be targeted and tracked – and it is dangerous civil liberties, particularly as threats against non-vaccinating families is nothing new.

In particular, government agencies in general seem very disconcerted by the level of independence and rebellion by anti-vaxxers – there is every reason to think that they fear the herd will be spooked, and they could lose control over the masses.
When you consider that non-vaccinating parents are frequently treated as second-class citizens and targeted with misplaced anger about the spread of disease, it is not surprising that this law is being required – as California and other states have stepped up their pro-vaccine rhetoric and used the power of state mandates to pimp for Big Pharma.
Read More:

NEW DIGITAL CASH SYSTEM WAS JUST UNVEILED AT A SECRET MEETING FOR BANKERS IN NEW YORK

NEW DIGITAL CASH SYSTEM WAS JUST UNVEILED AT A SECRET MEETING 
FOR BANKERS IN NEW YORK
BY MICHAEL SNYDER
SEE: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/a-new-digital-cash-system-was-just-unveiled-at-a-secret-meeting-for-bankers-in-new-york.html; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Last month, a “secret meeting” that involved more than 100 executives from some of the biggest financial institutions in the United States was held in New York City.  During this “secret meeting,” a company known as “Chain” unveiled a technology that transforms U.S. dollars into “pure digital assets.”  Reportedly, there were representatives from Nasdaq, Citigroup, Visa, Fidelity, Fiserv and Pfizer in the room, and Chain also claims to be partnering with Capital One, State Street, and First Data.  This “revolutionary” technology is intended to completely change the way that we use money, and it would represent a major step toward a cashless society.  But if this new digital cash system is going to be so good for society, why was it unveiled during a secret meeting for Wall Street bankers?  Is there something more going on here than we are being told?
None of us probably would have ever heard about this secret meeting if it was not for a report inBloomberg.  The following comes from their article entitled “Inside the Secret Meeting Where Wall Street Tested Digital Cash”…

On a recent Monday in April, more than 100 executives from some of the world’s largest financial institutions gathered for a private meeting at the Times Square office of Nasdaq Inc. They weren’t there to just talk about blockchain, the new technology some predict will transform finance, but to build and experiment with the software.
By the end of the day, they had seen something revolutionary: U.S. dollars transformed into pure digital assets, able to be used to execute and settle a trade instantly. That’s the promise of a blockchain, where the cumbersome and error-prone system that takes days to move money across town or around the world is replaced with almost instant certainty.

So it is not just Michael Snyder from The Economic Collapse Blog that is referring to this gathering as a “secret meeting.”  This is actually how it was described by Bloomberg.  And I think that there is a very good reason why this meeting was held in secret, because many in the general public would definitely be alarmed by this giant step toward a cashless society.  Here is more on this new system from Bloomberg…


While cash in a bank account moves electronically all the time today, there’s a distinction between that system and what it means to say money is digital. Electronic payments are really just messages that cash needs to move from one account to another, and this reconciliation is what adds time to the payments process. For customers, moving money between accounts can take days as banks wait for confirmations. Digital dollars, however, are pre-loaded into a system like a blockchain. From there, they can be swapped immediately for an asset.
“Instead of a record or message being moved, it’s the actual asset,” Ludwin said. “The payment and the settlement become the same thing.”

 Why this is so alarming is because we are seeing other major moves toward a cashless system all over the planet.  In Sweden, 95 percent of all retail transactions are already cashless, and ATM machines are being removed by the hundreds.  In Denmark, government officials actually have a stated goal of “eradicating cash” by the year 2030.  And in Norway, the biggest bank in the country has publicly called for the complete elimination of all cash.

Other nations in Europe have already banned cash transactions over a certain amount. Here are just a couple of examples…

As I have written about previously, cash transactions of more than 2,500 euros have already been banned in Spain, and France and Italy have both banned all cash transactions of more than 1,000 euros.
Little by little, cash is being eradicated, and what we have seen so far is just the beginning. 417 billion cashless transactions were conducted in 2014, and the final number for 2015 is projected to be much higher.

The global push toward a cashless society is only going to intensify, because banks and governments both tend to really like the idea of such a system.
Banks really like the concept of a cashless society because it would force everyone to be their customers.  There would be no more hiding cash in a mattress at home or trying to pay all of your bills with paper money.  Under a cashless system, we would all be dependent on the banks, and they would make lots of money whenever we swiped our cards or our “chips” were scanned.
Governments see a lot of advantages in a cashless society as well.  They tell us that they would be able to crack down on drug dealers, tax evaders, terrorists and money launderers, but the truth is that it would enable them to watch, track, monitor and control virtually all of our financial transactions.  Our lives would become open books to the government, and financial privacy would be a thing of the past.
In addition, the potential for tyranny would be absolutely off the charts.
Just imagine a world where the government could serve as the gatekeeper for who is allowed to use the cashless system and who is not.  They could require that we all submit to some sort of government-issued form of identification before being permitted to operate within the system, or it is even conceivable that a loyalty oath would be required.
Of course if you did not submit to their demands, you could not buy, sell, open a bank account or get a job without access to the cashless system.
Hopefully people can understand where this is going.  Paper money is a very important component of our freedom, and if it is taken away from us that will open the door for all sorts of abuse.
Even now, cash is slowly being “criminalized” in America.  For example, if cash is used to pay for a hotel room that is considered by federal authorities to be “suspicious activity” that should be reported to the government.  Of course it isn’t against the law to pay your hotel bill in cash just yet, but according to the government it is something that “terrorists” do so it needs to be closely watched.
It doesn’t take a whole lot of imagination to see where all of this is going.  And for those of us that understand what time it is, this is a clear indication that it is getting late in the game.

OBAMA PROGRESSING IN PLAN TO MAKE “SMART GUNS” OPERABLE ONLY BY OWNERS

OBAMA PROGRESSING IN PLAN TO MAKE “SMART GUNS” OPERABLE ONLY BY OWNERS
BY BOB ADELMANN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/23094-obama-progessing-in-plan-to-make-smart-guns-operable-only-by-owners; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
On Friday President Obama posted on his Facebook page the progress being made in his attempt to develop “smart gun” technology that would make guns inoperable unless fired only by their owners. He claimed it was all about preventing accidental shootings and tracking down stolen guns. He asserted:
These common-sense steps are not going to prevent every tragedy, but what if they prevent even one? We should be doing everything we can to save lives and spare families the pain and unimaginable loss too many Americans have endured.
In early January Obama issued several executive orders as he continued his attack on Americans’ right to keep and bear arms, including directing the Justice, Homeland Security, and Defense agencies to come up with plans on how to use the new technologies, and giving them 90 days to report back to him. He ordered them to work on a report “outlining research and development designed to expedite real-world deployment” of that technology in order, he said, “to reduce the frequency of accidental discharge or unauthorized use of firearms.”
Those departments said they are still working on it and will have a final report back to him in October, just in time to give Hillary Clinton’s presidential run a final boost going into the November elections.
Clinton declared last week on MSNBC that, once elected, she will pick up the baton from Obama on her first day in office and continue that attack: “I really support everything President Obama said he would do through regulations on guns, but we’re going to start the very first day and tackle the gun lobby to try to reduce the outrageous number of people who are dying from gun violence in our country.”
Efforts to develop that technology have been ongoing since at least 2001, when New Jersey passed its Childproof Handgun Law that would take effect “three years after it is determined that personalized handguns are available for retail purposes.” In 2006 Armatix, a Germany manufacturer, developed its Armatix iP1 (shown), a .22-caliber semi-automatic pistol containing 10 rounds with an effective firing range of 75 yards, and costing $1,800. The firearm was designed to team up with a smart watch its owner would wear containing an RFID (radio-frequency identification) chip. Only the owner could fire the weapon provided that the gun was less than 10 inches away from the watch.
It received poor reviews, and New Jersey’s attorney general finally ruled in 2014 that “after careful consideration of the iP1’s design, we have determined that it does not satisfy the statutory definition because … the pistol may be fired by a person who is not an authorized or recognized user.”
Jon Stokes, writing for TechCrunch.com, agreed, saying, “The smart gun, in all of its incarnations, is a fantasy. No electronic technology is 100% reliable, and very few people will trust a gun that can be turned into a brick by a failure of some on-board circuitry.” Besides, said Stokes, any new software will have a “whole host of brand new security and identity problems … that must be discovered and patched, and then the patches will have problems.”
Others are concerned about how the new technology, once it is sufficiently developed, can be manipulated by government agencies, using the chips to track the location of owners, and disabling firearms according to their own purposes.
If handing off the move to “smart guns” to Clinton is one of the reasons for the October release date, it has run into another stumbling block: Clinton is losing traction with the general public over the issue of guns. A survey of 1,000 American voters conducted by Harper Polling last month asking if Clinton’s demand that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) that protects the gun industry from being sued by crime victims be repealed, more than 70 percent said no. Those polled said the PLCAA “should be kept and we should punish the criminals who commit these acts, not the law-abiding manufacturers and retailers of lawful products which get misused.” Remarkably the majority of those polled agreed, including liberal Democrats residing in the northeast, along with those who voted for President Obama in the last election. 
Rasmussen Reports just conducted a telephone survey of likely U.S. voters asking whom they would vote for if the national election were held today: It was a virtual tie, at 38 percent each for Trump and Clinton. This is the first national poll of Americans who say they are likely to vote in November that shows Trump tied with Cinton.
That change in point of view is also likely helped along by Trump’s support for the Second Amendment. From his website one finds this:
The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.
The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right; it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.
If smart gun technology does eventually develop to the point where firearms can benefit from it, then Americans, under the Second Amendment, would be free to purchase such guns. Where the National Rifle Association disagrees with Obama and Clinton is government requirements “mandating” that such technology be incorporated in every firearm sold. Wrote Jennifer Baker, director of NRA-ILA Public Affairs: “President Obama’s obsession with gun control knows no boundaries. At a time when we are actively fighting terrorists at home and abroad, this administration would rather focus … on the president’s gun control agenda.”
If Rasmussen is right, that obsession, and Clinton’s determination to continue it, will be negated in November.
______________________________________________________

POLICE REJECT BEING ‘GUINEA PIGS’ 

IN OBAMA’S SMART GUN PUSH

“Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn’t be asked to be the guinea pigs…”

by AWR Hawkins | Breitbart
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/police-reject-being-guinea-pigs-in-obamas-smart-gun-push/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Rank-and-file police officers are already rallying against President Barack Obama’s scheduled push for government purchases of smart guns.
“Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn’t be asked to be the guinea pigs in evaluating a firearm that nobody’s even seen yet,” said James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police. “We have some very, very serious questions,” he said, according to Politico.
Obama’s push for smart guns is expected to come as soon as Friday, and it coincides with a Department of Justice National Institute of Justice announcement concerning the formulation of “test methods to provide a basis to determine whether the addition of a smart gun technology does or does not significantly reduce the reliability of the firearm system compared to existing firearms.”
Breitbart News reported that a new push for smart gun development was part of Obama’s executive gun controls in January.
______________________________________________________________

Obama Announces Plan To “Expedite” 

Smart Gun Technology

BY JOSHUA KRAUSE
SEE: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/obama-announces-plan-to-expedite-smart-gun-technology.html; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
America is by far, the most difficult country to push any kind of gun control legislation. The gun grabbers really have their work cut out for them here. In just about any other nation, all it takes is one tragic mass shooting, and the sheep start bleating and begging for more restrictive laws. But for a variety of reasons, it just doesn’t work here. Guns have just become far too ingrained our culture for most people to give them up.
It’s actually quite impressive when you think about it. Every other line and amendment in the US Constitution has been violated into meaninglessness. Though the spirit of the Second Amendment has been violated as well, it hasn’t been done to the same extent. It’s the last domino that just won’t fall, no matter how hard the gun grabbers blow.
Since they can’t pull off an outright ban, they have to constantly find alternative routes of gun control. They try to place onerous regulations on buying and selling firearms, they push extra taxes on ammunition, or they try to force gun owners to buy insurance for each gun. The list goes on and on. One of their alternatives to gun confiscation, is the smart gun.
In case you don’t know, a smart gun is a weapon that uses biometrics, fingerprints, RFID chips, or a magnetic device to determine if the person holding the gun is the rightful owner. If someone else handles the gun, it won’t fire. This would presumably prevent the gun from being stolen by criminals or handled by children.
This makes it the perfect Trojan horse for gun control, since a roll-out of these weapons (if you can even call these neutered toys “weapons”) be implemented under the guise of safety. The gun grabbers can make an appeal to our conscience and desires. They’ll say that we can have whatever gun we want, so long as it has smart gun technology to prevent it from falling into the hands of bad guys or unknowing children (as you’ll see in a moment, it’s a Faustian bargain).
But first, they’ll try to roll out this technology in increments, starting with law enforcement. They’ll say that we need smart guns to prevent criminals from killing cops with their own weapons. President Obama recently proposed a plan to create better smart guns for that exact purpose.
First, we’ve jump started the development of smart gun technology. Today, many gun injuries and deaths are the result of legal guns that were stolen, misused, or discharged accidentally. As long as we’ve got the technology to prevent a criminal from stealing and using your smartphone, then we should be able to prevent the wrong person from pulling a trigger on a gun. So, my Administration released a plan today to expedite the development of smart gun technology, including by identifying the requirements that smart guns would have to meet in order for law enforcement to purchase and use them effectively – and keep themselves and the public safer in the process.
However, this has nothing to do with the safety of law enforcement. The threat of a cop having his gun stolen by a suspect is a non-issue. Of all the hundreds of thousands of police officers in America, only 51 were killed when a perp overpowered them and took their weapon, between 2000 and 2010.
So what is this really about?
The government wants to normalize smart guns, so that they have more control over us. How does that give them more control? Because, when you have a firearm that is dependent on electronics to function, that firearm becomes hackable. It will be programmed with back doors that the government can exploit, just like computers and smartphones.
In the future, smart guns will be designed so that government officials can shut them off remotely whenever they want. In fact, the first smart gun that can be remotely controlled by a bureaucrat was invented about two years ago.

A new technology that could allow authorities and others to literally “turn off” guns by remote control has been patented.
German arms maker Armatix GmbH has filed a patent for an improved smart pistol that can be shut down by a wireless signal.
“Preferably, the apparatus of the invention can be controlled remotely, for example via satellite and can send information to a satellite,” the European patent application for the gun says.

 That’s the real endgame. At first it will be voluntary, but eventually they’ll force you to buy smart guns. It’s the best way to implement gun control without alarming gun owners, because with this technology they can trust anyone to have any gun, knowing that they can turn it off at any moment. They’ll try to trick the pro-gun crowd with promises of reduced regulations. They’ll let you buy fully automatics and other “scary” weapons, just so long as it is a smart gun.

But if you take that deal, then one day you’ll wake up in a country filled with smart guns that you can’t really own or control. Unfortunately for the gun grabbers, gun owners aren’t stupid enough to take that deal, are they?


CRUZ GLOBALIST MACHINE BEHIND PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY’S EAGLE FORUM COUP

CRUZ GLOBALIST MACHINE BEHIND 
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY’S EAGLE FORUM COUP
BY KELLEIGH NELSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



“Something called 'the Oklahoma Standard' became known throughout the world. It means resilience in the face of adversity. It means a strength and compassion that will not be defeated.” —Brad Henry



“When somebody challenges you, fight back. Be brutal, be tough.” —Donald Trump



Eagle Forum is a conservative organization founded by Phyllis Schlafly in 1972. They claim 80,000 members. In my previous articles, here and here, I explained how Eagle Forum was being torn apart by Cruz supporters within the organization.



Anne Cori and the Attempted Takeover



Phyllis Schlafly endorsed Trump, upon which her daughter, Anne Cori, launched a Board coup to take over Eagle Forum, and seize the bank accounts in the 501(c)4. This is where the money lies, and money that can be given to candidates. A 501(c)4 allows endorsements of candidates. The following court case was brought by Phyllis’s daughter, Anne Cori, against Phyllis and Eagle Forum.



On April 26th, Phyllis went to court in Madison County, IL. Here is the press release sent out by President Ed Martin:





Phyllis Schlafly To Defend Herself, Eagle Forum, from Takeover Attempt



Lawsuit by Six Individuals Seeks to Remove Schlafly from Bank Accounts and Operations



St. Louis - In response to a lawsuit filed by six individuals against Eagle Forum and its officers, Phyllis Schlafly will be in Madison County, Illinois court today to defend the organization that she founded.



The lawsuit is part of a continuing coordinated effort by the six individual plaintiffs to take control from Phyllis. Their lawsuit seeks emergency orders against Phyllis and Eagle Forum specifically to remove Phyllis from bank accounts and to manage other aspects of her organization.



In addition, Eagle Forum is in the midst of an election by its members of an at-large director of the Eagle Forum board according to its by-laws. The lawsuit by these individuals seeks judicial intervention to stop this election by the members of the private association.



The case is captioned Cori, et al. v. Eagle Forum, et al. and may be found at 16-MR-011.





This case will not succeed because the coup does not have the two-thirds majority needed to make structural changes to EF. There are six coup members on the11 member board. Since 54% is not two-thirds, the coup does not prevail. I’m not sure what all is being litigated beyond the by-law percentages.












Donna Hearne and the Constitutional Coalition



The Missouri Constitutional Coalition is backing Cruz and is involved in the coup. Donna Hearne is the executive director of the Constitutional Coalition, and is a top player at Bott Radio. According to sources, Hearne killed Phyllis’s national radio show and deleted all references to Phyllis and her archives from Bott Radio. The Constitutional Coalitions’ website is currently down, however, here is their FB page, as well as documentation on Donna Hearne’s control of the Constitutional Coalition. According to an inside source, Hearne has been paying herself an awfully big salary for a small non-profit organization, as reflected in the Form 990 for 2014 (the most recent one publicly available).



Donna Hearne brought an “Anti-Trump Cruz Slate” to Creve Coeur township, which had a Trump slate. Phyllis lives in this township and was on the Trump slate. She could not make it to the caucus because she was dealing with the coup. Hearne got a number of Cruz bots to show up at the township meeting, and the Cruz slate won by a few votes.



What many people are not aware of is that Donna Hearne has sponsored many of the Reconstructionist/Dominionist professors and pundits for years at her conferences. This likely plays into the reason she is a Cruz supporter. Cruz, his father, and many of his supporters, are Dominionists/Reconstructionists. These include David Barton, Flip Benham, Kevin Swanson, Tony Perkins, (president of the Family Research Council), would-be reality TV stars the Benham brothers, and anti-gay Houston activist and Dominionist, Dave Welch. Perkins is also a United Nations Non-Governmental Organization member. And, Senator Ted Cruz, isn’t backing away from the endorsement of Mike Bickle, a controversial Dominionist pastor who once characterized Hitler as “a hunter” sent by God to go after Jews who don’t to convert to Christianity. [Link]



Remember, Ted Cruz believes he is anointed to bring the spoils of war to the priests.



Schlafly a Stalwart Against Con-Con



The anachronism here is stunning: How can the Constitutional Coalition support Ted Cruz, who fully intends to make globalist changes to the Constitution via a Con-Con?



Phyllis had warned the Constitutional Coalition about the impact of Con-Con at a conference speech, but the coalition insists it is not a problem. So, we have another instance of the Christian Right serving the purposes of the globalist establishment.



The Cruz’s are economic globalists. Adding Fiorina totally seals the assessment. The majority of the politically-active Christian Right Elite have sold out to the economic globalists. However, the grassroots little guys are not buying it. So, this adds to the great dislike of both the Republican Party and the Christian Right – who appear to be committing mass suicide in this election. It is now obvious to those who have eyes to see, and ear to hear, that the GOP establishment is in on the same agenda as the left. Some, of course, still have scales on their eyes.



Cruz Wants a Constitutional Convention




In a conversation with Bob Menges, the South Carolina director for the Convention of States (COS) Project, Cruz reiterated his support for the movement. Ted Cruz is unequaled in his hypocrisy and treachery. He knows perfectly well that we will need a new Constitution to change our status from a sovereign nation to a member State in the North American Union. Remember, Ted's wife, Heidi, was on the CFR Task Force to write up the plan for the North American Community. He absolutely knows about the Parliament which the Plan sets up over Canada, the United States, and Mexico! The Parliament will consist of fifteen members (5 from each nation) to rule over the NAU. The North American Union would be yet another collective regional government, a new North American Soviet, that would clearly be the enemy of United States sovereignty.



Cruz’s close friends and supporters are also on the bandwagon for a Con-Con, Glenn Beck, David Barton, Mark Levin, and others.



Conclusion



Up to 20 women were involved in this EF coup, and several of them were for a Constitutional Convention. Phyllis Schlafly has always been an absolute warrior in battling against a Con-Con. This is another huge reason she endorsed Donald J. Trump, because Trump is adamantly against a Constitutional Convention.



The enemies of EF and Mrs. Schlafly are spreading the lies that she is senile, and this even appeared in an article in the leftist Daily Kos in 2015. However, Phyllis’s public endorsement of Donald Trump in March of 2016, in St. Louis, Missouri, made it clear she still has all her faculties and is sharp as a tack. Not only that, but she recently released a video regarding this attempted takeover which showed the strength and spine this woman still has at the age of 91. See videos here.



Cruz plays fast and dirty, he’ll do anything for an endorsement and money. He changes his tune depending upon to whom he’s reaching out for more campaign cash. These women, including Phyllis’s daughter, Anne Cori, who attained their positions in Eagle Forum because of their founder, Phyllis Schlafly, have turned their backs on her for the likes of a man with low ethical standards, a man who has no problem lying about his opponents and himself. Ted Cruz is the man who hired the dirtiest and lowest campaign manager available, Jeff Roe, and that’s why we have seen so many rotten campaign tricks.



As Phyllis has said, everyone has a right to vote for whomever they wish. But when a group of people within an organization pull a traitorous coup against the leader who put them in these powerful positions, just because they didn’t like Phyllis’s endorsement of Donald Trump, then it’s time for them to be purged.



[P.S. In order to help Mr. Trump we need to increase the hits to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage, etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]



_______________________________________________________



Pro-Cruz Plotters Against Phyllis Schlafly 



Drag Eagle Forum Founder into Court




EXCERPTS:





"The suit was filed by Schlafly’s own daughter, Anne Schlafly Cori, and four other Cruz supporters within Schlafly’s organization: Eunie Smith, Cathie Adams, Carolyn McLarty, and Rosina Kovar. Shirley Curry, the only other member of the so-called “Gang of Six” who is a plaintiff in this case, has not taken a public position on the presidential race.



The defendants in the case are Schlafly’s son, John Schlafly; Schlafly’s handpicked successor, Ed Martin; and Eagle Forum itself, the organization of which Mrs. Schlafly is the chairman."





			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
WHO OWNS YOUR CHILDREN?~THE DANGERS OF GOVERNMENT AS A PARENT~DUKE PESTA: COMMON CORE, FROM FARCE TO FAILURE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

WHO OWNS YOUR CHILDREN?~THE DANGERS OF GOVERNMENT AS A PARENT 



Published on Jun 30, 2014





FreedomProject Education’s Executive Director Alan Scholl discusses the change in direction, leadership, and intent of American Education. Mr. Scholl is currently accepting requests to deliver this speech live in your hometown. Email: information@fpeusa.org to inquire.


The collectivist-humanist philosophy has near-total control of federal, state, and local government schools, educators and agencies.


As a result, the traditional Judeo-Christian family-centered philosophy that built America is falling into disuse, faith and practice banned and attacked in schools, rewritten out of textbooks, and rejected and demonized by teachers, administrators, and teachers unions. How did the Bible, once the core of education in America, become “unsuitable?”


Have generations of students been “re-educated” rather than educated by the very institutions that parents have trusted to teach their children? What about massive changes like the so-called “Common Core State Standards?” Merely the latest fad, a cure, or dangerous indoctrination?


The rapid disintegration of American families and society is obvious. Many sense that we are speeding toward total government. Is this an “evolutionary trend” in education— or a sinister agenda? Watch and decide for yourself.


Learn more about FreedomProject Education by visiting www.FPEUSA.org.













Common Core: From Farce to Failure 
with Dr. Duke Pesta