Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog

OBAMA’S SECRET NO FLY LIST: SHADES OF NAZI GERMANY~AND WHO IS BEING ADDED TO IT? GUN OWNERS, PATRIOTS, CHRISTIANS?

OBAMA’S BACK DOOR TO GUN CONTROL & CONFISCATION

No-Fly List: Shades Of Nazi Germany

by CHUCK BALDWIN
SEE: http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3399/No-Fly-List-Shades-Of-Nazi-Germany.aspxrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Democrat Congressman Mike Thompson (CA) and Republican Congressman Peter King (NY) are trying to push a bill through Congress that would deny gun purchases to people who are on the federal government’s “no-fly” list. President Obama took to the national airwaves a few days ago to further pressure Congress to pass this legislation. King introduced H.R. 1076 back in February of this year. Now, after the shootings in California, Thompson has filed a discharge petition in an attempt to force a vote on the bill. Senate Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is trying to muster support for the bill in the upper house of Congress.
The “no-fly” list was created by President G.W. Bush and when he left office contained 47,000 names. Today, the list has climbed to over 700,000 names. There are no specified reasons why someone’s name is added to “the list.” In fact, the criterion for determining who is added to the list is totally secret. Not even Congress knows what it is. The technology website TechDirt.com estimates that at least 40% of the list is comprised of individuals who have absolutely no connections to terror groups or activities. In other words, they are American citizens just like you and me.
Oh! That reminds me: while I was running for President of the United States on the Constitution Party ticket in 2008, I WAS told at the San Antonio, Texas, airport that my name was on “the list.”
I traveled the better part of 100,000 miles across the continental United States during that campaign. I had a campaign rally on a Saturday mid-morning in San Antonio. I landed at the airport around midnight Friday night. The rally was conducted as scheduled, and I was back at the San Antonio airport to fly to my next stop around noon. I was on the ground for approximately twelve hours. I never had a problem flying before this event.
However, when I tried to fly out, I was denied a boarding pass (third party candidates don’t fly on private jets) and shuffled off to an isolated booth where I was told I was on “the list.” Two men dressed in full battle uniform, complete with body armor, Kevlar helmets, and M16 rifles walked up behind me. To make a long story short, after over an hour of interrogation and phone calls to “upper management,” I was told I would be allowed to fly “this time.”
Yes, that experience in San Antonio was the only time it happened to me; and I’ve logged over 300,000 skymiles since then. But, I was politely told in San Antonio that “once you’re on the list, you NEVER get off.” And I have been routinely subjected to all kinds of “special” scrutiny at I-couldn’t-count-how-many airports since then. So now, Obama, King, Thompson, and Pelosi want to tell me (and hundreds of thousands of people like me) that I cannot purchase a firearm?
And I’ve had it better than some. The trials and tribulations of tens of thousands of innocent air travelers whose names have made it to “the list” are legendary.
For example, the late Senator Ted Kennedy’s name was on the “no-fly” list, and he was denied a boarding pass numerous times. Can you imagine: a U.S. senator?
I could see not letting Ted Kennedy have a driver’s license–but a plane ticket? Get real!
Senator Kennedy is not the only American citizen to be put on the government’s “no-fly” list. There’s Weekly Standard Senior Writer and FOX News contributor Stephen Hayes, U.S. Congressman John Lewis (D-GA), author Naomi Wolf, singer Cat Stevens, peace activists Jan Adams and Rebecca Gordon, Green Party leader Nancy Oden, King Downing and David Fathi of the ACLU, Professor Walter Murphy (emeritus of Princeton University) a 74-year-old Catholic nun, Ozzie and Harriet’s son David Nelson, CNN’s Drew Griffin, U.S. Marines and other servicemen, small children under the age of five, et al., ad infinitum.
And lest you think that denying a fundamental liberty to people on a government watch list is a good idea, remember, YOUR NAME MIGHT BE ON THE LIST. Or if it’s not now, it could be added at any time and for any reason. Some of the people whose names are on “the list” are people who, coincidentally, have taken contrary political positions from those in power.
No. People in OUR government would never stoop to adding those with differing political opinions to a government watch list, would they? Like Hades they wouldn’t! They would, and they do.
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution declares, “No person . . . [shall] be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Depriving an America citizen of his or her liberty to purchase a firearm (thus denying the fundamental right of self-defense) by the simple act of a government bureaucracy adding one’s name to a list (with no criminal conduct being committed) smacks of totalitarian regimes such as Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia, and Mao’s China. Such a thing is repugnant to the very heart and soul of America’s historic ideals and principles.
Writing for The Washington Post, Philip Bump writes, “[T]he no-fly list is a secret list that uses secret criteria to determine who finds a home on it. So if you link banning guns to the no-fly list, the scenario presented is completely feasible: The government could theoretically add anyone it wants to the no-fly list, even broad categories of people, and thereby prevent them from owning a gun.”
Bump continues saying, “Particularly when applied to the ability to own a firearm, many would argue that the no-fly list is a violation of the 5th Amendment, which guarantees the right to due process before people are deprived of life, liberty or property. During the ACLU’s lawsuit, the government admitted that people are added to the list speculatively, before they’ve actually done anything wrong.”
“The list is itself almost necessarily a slippery slope. ‘There’s very little incentive for any particular government official to narrow the list,’ Sparapani said. ‘It’s much easier to put more and more names on it.’ The overlap of politics and terror fears makes officials err on the side of caution. ‘If the list really does need to be in the hundreds of thousands’ — as it appears to be — ‘we’ve got much bigger problems than if people should be able to get on airplanes,’ he said.
“And then, of course, there’s the other question.
“‘Who are these people who are so dangerous that we can’t let them on planes, but we haven’t gone out and arrested them?’ Sparapani asked. ‘At what point do we actually take action against them if they’re under what we think of as passive surveillance? … If they’re too dangerous to be put on a plane but not too dangerous for us to arrest them, what exactly is this list about?’
“Asked another way: Who is too dangerous to be on a plane but not dangerous enough to walk around in public — and should that person be denied the right to own a firearm because they land somewhere in that gray space? President Obama’s goal was not really to keep the guns out of the hands of possible terrorists, in part because the overlap of the no-fly list and possible terrorists looks more like a Venn diagram than a circle. It was, instead, part of his effort to limit the availability of guns in general, using the no-fly list as a tool.”
See the report here:
Of course, Democrats Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O’Malley support denying people on the “no-fly” list access to firearms. (Remember, this list includes hundreds of thousands of innocent people.)  So far, the only Republican presidential candidate who has intimated that he would support this draconian legislation is Donald Trump. Not even big-government toadies Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio are supporting it.
See the report here:
As much as I liked Trump initially (and I still like the fact that he is not an establishment insider), his rhetoric is becoming increasingly authoritarian in nature. I am now questioning his constitutional aptitude and fidelity.
If the government can ban a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms (or any other constitutionally-protected liberty) by simply putting them on a list, WE ARE ALL IN SERIOUS TROUBLE. Trump touts a pro-Second Amendment position, but if he would support this kind of governmental overreach, his commitment to the Second Amendment (and to the Constitution in general) is non-existent.
Regardless, the push is now on to pass Peter King’s backdoor gun-control legislation: H.R. 1076. I urge readers to contact their senators and congressman IN MASS and let them know that the American people will NOT tolerate this extreme violation of constitutional liberties. This might be Barack Obama and his gaggle of gun-grabbers’ last opportunity during his administration to enact more gun control. And, again, they are capitalizing on a mass shooting in a gun-free zone as impetus for their tyranny. It never dawns on them that these shootings always take place in a gun-free zone. Instead, they want to turn the entire U.S. into a gun-free zone.
And, unfortunately, FOX News, a host of “conservative” radio talk show hosts, many so-called “conservative” Internet bloggers, thousands of Christian pastors throughout the country–and now Donald Trump–are incessantly instilling the fear of Muslim terrorism into the hearts of the American people. This only enables big-government toadies in enacting more and more government usurpation of our liberties. “Keeping us safe” is ALWAYS the mantra used by government to enslave its people.
We need to ever remember the sage counsel of Benjamin Franklin, who said, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
And what was it that the famous German pastor and theologian Martin Niemoller said about the Nazis:
“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out–because I was not a Socialist.
“Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out–because I was not a Trade Unionist.
“Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–because I was not a Jew.
“Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.”
By the way, Niemoller spent seven years in Nazi concentration camps; so, I guess he knew what he was talking about.
Are the American people really going to let their government start banning fundamental freedoms based on some government watch list? EGADS! Shades of Nazi Germany, for sure.
_______________________________________________________________

Dont Comply Responds To Obama Gun Ban Speech

Published on Dec 6, 2015
The Don’t Comply Crew responds with a resounding decry of “Come And Take It!” to Obama’s speech outlining his plan to ban gun sales to all no-fly list members.

FROM NO-FLY LIST TO NO-BUY LIST: OBAMA’S PLAN TO TARGET YOUR GUNS

Published on Dec 10, 2015
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Zerohedge writes: The faux “liberal” who holds the White House was at it once again Sunday night. As he’s accommodated to doing, he presented a radically undemocratic and unconstitutional practice as a common sense appeal to the American public to accept gun control. What I am referring to specifically is the following passage from last night’s speech:

To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able to buy a gun. What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.

See the report here:
https://youtu.be/EnePLyEllBg

Read more:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12…


FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP: SHUTTING DOWN THOUSANDS OF TRUTHERS FOR POLITICALLY INCORRECT LANGUAGE

FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP: SHUTTING DOWN THOUSANDS OF TRUTHERS 
ONLY POLITICALLY CORRECT WILL BE ALLOWED; OTHERS BANNED 
Published on Nov 29, 2015
Here’s the Link that goes with the post: http://b4in.info/en0A

Alternative To FakeBook, Up and Coming Site Ready December 3rd: http://seen.life/

Need Food Storage? Then Check Out My Recommended Food Source: http://foodforliberty.com/?affiliates=43
My Recommended Chemtrail Detox: http://www.getthetea.com/

Subscribe to My Website at: 
http://lisahavennews.net/

Like Me on Facebook/Seen/Twitter/Google Plus: 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lisa-H…
https://www.seen.is/profile/34
https://twitter.com/Lisa_Haven
https://plus.google.com/b/10380971731…

Referenced In The Video: 
Grrr Graphic Removed- https://grrrgraphics.wordpress.com/20…
Facebook Censorship- http://www.facebookcensorship.com/
Anti-Facebook Page- https://plus.google.com/u/0/communiti…
Facebook Pro-Veteran page- http://conservativefiringline.com/fac…
Facebook Traditional Marriage- http://www.examiner.com/article/faceb…
We Are Change are Blocked in France- https://youtu.be/2BPNzxLcF08
France- https://edri.org/france-censorship-wi…
Facebook Backing Hillary- http://www.westernjournalism.com/what…
Facebook Marine Emblem- http://www.examiner.com/article/faceb…
Facebook Live Mic http://lisahavennews.net/2015/10/01/f…
Radical Islam- http://libertynews.com/2015/02/distur…
http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/re…
http://www.globalpost.com/article/666…
http://www.theguardian.com/technology…


ISLAMISTS: COLLABORATORS IN FASCISM WITH ISIS & LBGT FACTIONS~ABUSE OF WOMEN NOT CONFINED TO MUSLIM COUNTRIES; IT HAS SPREAD


TOPIC: “APOSTASY, BLASPHEMY & FREE EXPRESSION IN THE AGE OF ISIS”
ISOC Islamist Thugs Attempt To Intimidate Maryam Namazie at Goldsmiths University, UK, During Presentation to Class

Repeated Disruptions of Speech;
Projector Unplugged;
Criticizing Islam Irritates Troublemakers;
Police Would Be No Help
  



Published on Dec 3, 2015
Freethought activist Maryam Namazie was speaking to students at Goldsmiths University and College about ‘Apostasy, blasphemy and free expression in the age of ISIS’ when some primitive Muslims interrupted and constantly heckled her. One even went and switched off the projector with her presentation in a desperate attempt to censor her.
Sources:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/maryamnam…
https://harrymatz.wordpress.com/2015/…
http://www.londonstudent.coop/death-t…
http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/201…

categorically condemn the vile harassment of our ISOC members
https://www.facebook.com/goldsmiths.b…

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ZiZ…

Political Islam (Islamism) is our problem, Bread and Roses TV with Maryam Namazie and Fariborz Pooya

Published on Dec 8, 2015
Political Islam is our problem
Bread and Roses TV with Maryam Namazie and Fariborz Pooya (Persian Programme tomorrow)
Interview with Egyptian Writer and Women’s Rights Campaigner Nawal El Saadawi
Also on:
Arrest of poet Yaghma Golrouee following his song for women’s rights (Video of his song from Stealthy Freedom:https://www.facebook.com/StealthyFree…)
Tehran Symphony Orchestra leaves the stage rather than bow to demand to ban female members in Iran
Failure of Islamic Society thugs to stop Maryam Namazie’s talk at Goldsmiths (full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ZiZ…)
Insane fatwa on women who swim in the ocean guilty of adultery
Kurdish fighters burning ISIS flag after they were kicked out of Sinjar
Translation: Mohammad Basham
Director: Reza Moradi

SUPPORT BREAD AND ROSES WITH AS LITTLE AS $1 A WEEK:
به برنامه نان و گل سرخ کمک مالى هفتگى کنيد براى فقط ىک دلار در هفته
https://www.patreon.com/BreadandRosesTV

___________________________
Women-of-Tehran-Symphony-Orchestra

Tehran Symphony Orchestra Leaves Stage Rather Than Bow to Demand 

to Ban Female Members

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Tehran Symphony Orchestra cancelled a performance that had been planned for the closing ceremony of an international wrestling event on November 29, 2015, after the authorities objected to the presence of women musicians among the orchestra members.
The Iranian Student News Agency’s (ISNA) report of the incident suggested that the women musicians had not fully observed the hijab, or female head covering.
“I said all of us will perform together or we will leave the hall,” ISNA quoted Ali Rahbari, the orchestra’s artistic director. “Some tried to resolve the problem but eventually they said the women cannot be allowed to perform, so I said we will not perform.”
Rahbari described the treatment of women musicians as “embarrassing” and added, “The women musicians were going to perform the country’s national anthem. Why shouldn’t they? I have said many times that I was born in this country and I know very well where the red lines are. As long as I’m the director of this orchestra, I will not allow this kind of treatment.”
The head of the Wrestling Federation, Rasoul Khadem, wrote a letter to Culture and Islamic Guidance Minister Ali Jannati, indicating that his organization had not opposed to the concert, and he issued a new invitation for the orchestra to perform the national anthem at another international wrestling event in Tehran in January.
“This incident has left a negative impact on public opinion and among art lovers in the country,” Khadem added.
During the past year there have been several concert cancellations, mostly in the provinces. But on January 15, 2015, Shahrvand daily reported an incident in Tehran, involving Alim Qasimov and his daughter Ferghana, prominent singers from the Azerbaijan Republic. They were planning to perform a duet in Tehran for three nights. The first two nights went by without any problem. On the third night, the police refused to allow Qasimov’s daughter to perform publicly, only allowing the concert to proceed without her.
“I respect Iran’s laws but nowhere in the world are women artists treated in such a way,” Alim Qasimov told the audience in an expression of apology on stage.
Afterwards, Culture and Islamic Guidance Ministry Spokesman Hossein Noushabadi said the Qasimov concert had all the necessary permits. “Unfortunately when undue interferences happen on the margins, it will have security implications,” he added.
A week before the Qasimov concert, the prominent musician Majid Derakhshani was stopped airport security forces at Imam Khomeini International Airport in Tehran on his way to Dubai and told he was banned from leaving the country. He had previously been interrogated by Iran’s Intelligence and Public Security Police about his formation of an all-female musical group, the Mah Banoo Ensemble.
On September 2, 2014, the Shargh daily reported that the presence of women musicians at live performances had been banned in 13 provinces. Pirooz Arjomand, who was at the time in charge of the music department at the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, opposed the ban and said it went against the Ministry’s policies. “Separating women is a kind of gender segregation. Other institutions may have a problem with women on stage but this does not reflect the view of the Guidance Ministry,” he stated.
During President Rouhani’s term in office dozens of concerts have been cancelled despite having permits from the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. The cost has not just been monetary: the citizens of Iran have been deprived of these many musical performances by renowned and beloved artists.
_________________________________________________________

Muslim Rapes American Woman While Chanting “Allahu Akbar”
Published on Dec 9, 2015
Abdulrahman Ali, a Somalian who arrived in America four years ago, is accused of sexually assaulting a gas station attendant in a bathroom at Gordy’s Travel Plaza in Mapleton, North Dakota. After trying to kiss her, Ali allegedly forced the woman into the women’s bathroom, locked the door behind him and started sexually molesting her while slapping and kicking the victim. When the woman tried to escape, Ali threw her against the wall. After law enforcement arrived, Ali refused to open the door, claiming that the victim was his wife. After police kicked in the door, the woman was found injured and crying. “Documents say she was unsure if Ali was speaking English or a different language, but she could recognize one thing Ali said while they were in the bathroom alone. She heard Ali utter “Allah Akbar,” which, in Arabic means God is the greatest,”http://www.infowars.com/muslim-migran...

______________________________________________________________
"OPEN TO THE PUBLIC", EXCEPT FOR---?

Islamists Deny Media Access At Muslim Free Speech Conference
Published on Jan 20, 2015
This is a video analysis bringing the viewer with us as we examine why we were denied access to the Stand With The Prophet Conference in Garland, TX The SoundVision Foundation along with the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) deny Jesse Watters of Fox News, The United West, Adam Kredo of the Washington Free Beacon, Christian Post and 'certain' individuals who purchased tickets in advance, access to this open to the public event. Watch how the Muslim representatives from CAIR lie and mock the media as they try in vain to gain access to the event. The Islamists at this conference showed great insensitivity to free speech and inclusion. The question that arises is Why were the Muslims denying access and what were they trying to hide. We make this comment because the 'selected' media allowed entry were escorted out of the conference after only 20 minutes and were forced to sign a consent form they would not audio or video tape the speakers inside. CAIR was recently designated a 'Terrorist Organization' by the United Arab Emirates.  Layered on these outrages was the venue itself. The Culwell Center is a taxpayer funded building. As a taxpayer funded building the Muslim group was in clear violation of the Culwell Centers Regulation 1.04 articulating the public can not be denied access to this or any event held there. The purpose of the event was the Strategic Launch of a Communication Center For Muslims. Perhaps it was details of this Strategic Communication Center For Muslims they wanted to keep secret from American non-Muslims.

ALIA SALEM, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF "CAIR" (TIES TO TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS) LIES TO FOX NEWS REPORTERS DENIED ACCESS, DESPITE HAVING PURCHASED TICKETS AND OBTAINED PRESS CREDENTIALS;
BUT THEY HAVE JEWISH LAST NAMES;
ADAM KREDO (ALSO JEWISH) OF WASHINGTON FREE BEACON ALSO DENIED ACCESS:

CAIR-Texas on Fox News to Defend Muslim Free Speech, Refute Allen West’s Smears
Published on Jan 17, 2015
CAIR-DFW Seeks Stepped-Up Police Protection for Muslim Conference After Online Threats http://www.cair.com/press-center/pres...



SENATOR INHOFE SMACKS DOWN OBAMA’S PARIS CLIMATE SUMMIT PLEDGES~TWO THIRDS APPROVAL OF SENATE UNLIKELY

SENATOR INHOFE SMACKS DOWN OBAMA’S PARIS CLIMATE SUMMIT PLEDGES 
Written by  William F. Jasper and Alex Newman
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

PARIS — For die-hard global warming militants, there are few villains in the rogue’s gallery of “deniers” more hated than U.S. Senator James Inhofe (shown). As chairman of the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee, a committee he has served on since coming to the Senate in 1994, the Oklahoma Republican has long been recognized as their leading nemesis in Congress.  
At past UN climate change summits, Senator Inhofe has appeared in person as a “One-Man Truth Squad” to challenge the bogus “consensus” that “the science is settled,” and to warn of the horrendous economic, social, and environmental consequences that a global climate treaty would inflict on the world. In the lead-up to the current Paris summit, there was much speculation in the media as to whether or not he would show up to “crash” the UN party. As it turns out, Sen. Inhofe did show up in Paris, but not in person; instead he sent a video message, which was played at the alternative “Climate Realism” conference being held in Paris by the Heartland Institute, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).
In his 8-minute video address, Senator Inhofe made a number of key points about both the politics and the science of global warming, among which are that President Obama has announced commitments that “the American people neither [want] nor can afford," and that, Inhofe says, Congress is not going to let happen.
Inhofe noted that it is not only Republicans who oppose Obama’s new EPA-mandated “Clean Power Plan” — a centerpiece of the administration’s global warming scheme — but a bipartisan majority who will stop it. And, he noted further, the unconstitutional EPA mandate also faces lawsuits from dozens of states, as well as labor unions and companies.
Sen. Inhofe reported that one recent analysis shows that the president’s power plan will cost an astounding $292 billion, but “it would only reduce CO2 emissions by less than 0.2 percent; it would reduce global temperatures by less than .01 degree Farenheit; and reduce sea level rise by the thickness of two sheets of paper.”
In addition, Sen. Inhofe noted, under the proposed UN plan, China will continue to increase its emissions and India is calling for $2.5 trillion in climate “reparations” — to be paid for by the developed countries, meaning the United States and EU taxpayers.
As far as he is concerned, Inhofe said this is “not going to happen.” He called the administration’s Paris performance a “climate charade” and made it clear he intended to do everything in his power to see that it is never enacted into law, via legislation, treaty, or executive agreement.
Senator Inhofe cited convincing evidence to show that President Obama is going against the wishes of the American people by continuing his climate crusade. Besides recent opinion polls by the Washington Post, Gallup, and Fox News showing that global warming is last or near-last as a major concern of most voters, the president’s own party has failed to support these radical proposals in the past. On his committee website, Inhofe lists this concise history showing that the American people and Congress have spoken out against the federal government regulating carbon emissions through the following votes:
• July 25, 1997, the Senate passed the Byrd-Hagel resolution unanimously with a vote of 95-0 which stated that it was not the sense of the Senate that the United States should be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol.
• Oct. 30, 2003, the Senate defeated S. 139, an effort to cap carbon emissions at the 2000 level, by a vote of 55 to 43.
• June 22, 2005, the Senate once again defeated S. 1151, another attempt to impose mandatory caps on carbon, by a vote of 46-38.
• June 6, 2008, the Senate defeated S. 3036, to cap carbon emissions at 63 percent below 2005 levels by 2050, by a vote of 48-36.
• In 2009, the Waxman-Markey Clean Energy and Security Act, which would have established a variant of an emissions trading plan, was never brought up for a vote under a Democrat-controlled Congress.
During his long career in the Senate, Sen. Inhofe has found himself on both the Majority and the Minority sides of the committee, as control of the Senate has shifted back and forth between Democrats and Republicans. But through it all, he has remained the most outspoken and stalwart opponent of the political agenda that would turn the alleged threat of global warming into an excuse for implementing a massive global regime of taxation and regulation. He chaired the committee during 2003-2007, and when the GOP retook the Senate in last year’s elections, he again took over as chair. Over the years, Inhofe has been responsible for publication of many important committee reports on all aspects of the science, economics, and politics of anthropogenic (human caused) global warming, or AGW.
When he resumed leadership of the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee last year, leftwing bloggers and Hollywood AGW activists went wild. As The New American reported:
Singer/actress Barbra Streisand says the thought of Senator James Inhofe chairing an important Senate committee dealing with the environment and climate is “frightening.” “God help us! This man is going to head the Committee on the Environment in the U.S. Senate. Like giving a fox the keys to the chicken coop,” Streisand said in a December 2 tweet.
“This wld be hilarious if it weren’t so frightening. I thank Sen Inhofe for singling me out as a voice against the perils of climate change,” she said in another tweet.
However, while the celebrity radicals and jet-set billionaires of the AGW alarmist lobby hiss and jeer at Senator Inhofe, the hardworking middle-class voters who pay the taxes (and are struggling  to pay their families’ basic bills) have good reason to cheer him.  
Related articles:


			
		

OBAMA’S CHICANERY, HYPOCRISY, DOUBLE TALK & LIES EXPOSED BY THOSE NON COMPLIANT THINKERS WHO READ BETWEEN THE LINES

“WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE THE ARGUMENT” BY THOSE WHO HAVEN’T SHUT DOWN THEIR BRAINS & DISCERNMENT FOR OBAMA?
OBAMA’S CHICANERY, HYPOCRISY, DOUBLE TALK & LIES 
EXPOSED BY THOSE NON COMPLIANT THINKERS 
WHO CAN STILL READ BETWEEN THE LINES, 
SURVIVED PUBLIC SCHOOL INDOCTRINATION, COMMON CORE &
GLOBALIST SOCIALIST IDEOLOGY
SELECTED INFOWARS CONTEST WINNERS 
THAT WE LIKED TOO:
#1:
THE OTHER TOP VIDEOS: