Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog

PRO SHARIA JIHADIST LINDA SARSOUR WARNS CRITICS AFTER CALLING FOR JIHAD AGAINST TRUMP: “I AM TAKING NAMES”

 http://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/JIHAD-LINDA-SARSOUR-009-01-800x416.jpg
PRO SHARIA JIHADIST LINDA SARSOUR WARNS CRITICS AFTER CALLING FOR JIHAD AGAINST TRUMP: “I AM TAKING NAMES”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Well, come and get me, Ms. Sarsour. If I am on your enemies list, I
do hope you got my name right: it’s Robert, not Richard, and Spencer,
not Spenser. If you sue, our day in court will be most interesting: I argued
that you, as a devout and knowledgeable Muslim, must know that the
Qur’an’s primary vision of jihad involves violence and warfare, and so
does that of the Hadith and Islamic law. To claim that I was “lying”
about you, you would have to demonstrate that you’re completely ignorant
of Islamic texts and teachings. And that could have unfortunate
implications for your reputation among your legions of followers. This
could be great fun!
Meanwhile, Sarsour’s victimhood act is as tiresome as it is
predictable. Here is a woman who is a darling of the Left and the
establishment media whining because she has faced some justified
criticism.
She got a platform in the Washington Post to clarify her
“jihad” remarks, and recently gave the commencement speech at CUNY. She
is lionized and hailed everywhere in the mainstream, while her critics
are shut out of the mainstream, shouted down and physically menaced when
we speak at colleges and universities (if we get invited at all), and
excoriated everywhere as “racists” and “Islamophobes.” Oh, and then
there are the death threats, which have the reality of the Islamic jihad
behind them, while Sarsour’s claim that she has received death threats
has only the chimera of “right-wing extremism” behind it. So kindly cut
the whining, Ms. Sarsour: if you were standing for freedom, you would
find out what it really means to be victimized.

“Linda Sarsour Warns Critics Days After Calling for Trump ‘Jihad’: ‘I Am Taking Names,’” by Joe Bilello, Mediaite, July 12, 2017:

Speaking at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) last week, Palestinian-American, anti-Israel and pro-Sharia activist, Linda Sarsour received major criticism when she called for “jihad” against the Trump administration.
Despite the obvious backlash, it is Sarsour who is now on the
offensive as the incredibly ironic darling of the left has now
threatened the critics who have “lied” about her.
On Wednesday she tweeted, “Just know that I am taking names of those
who have lied about me to defame my character. I may be quiet now but
not for long. I am working.”

She later added, “I have a running document of the lies & who is
putting them out there. This is not about setting records straight, it’s
who will pay 4 lies?”

Sarsour sent several more tweets about the alleged false allegations against her and the vow to confront the perpetrators.

It is unclear as of now who the purveyors of the lies are, but most
media outlets accused of attacking Sarsour did little more than play an unedited video of her in her own words where she called for a “Jihad” against the “white supremacists” in the White House.


Perhaps she is talking about the “Zionists” in the media.

“Every right-wing media outlet in the country. Every right-wing
Zionist outlet in the country engaged in coordinated attacks against me
to discredit my leadership”, she said during the same ISNA conference where she gave her now infamous “jihad” remarks.


Next thing you know, her critics will lie and call her an anti-Semite….

______________________________________________________

 Anni Cyrus Video: Leftist Feminists’ 
S&M Islamic Odyssey
 

YES, LINDA SARSOUR DID INCITE VIOLENCE AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP

 
 
 The Growing Sedition Of Linda Sarsour 
 Published on Jul 10, 2017

Due
to the broad and ironclad protections of the first Amendment, A charge
of sedition against a U.S. citizen is extremely rare. Nevertheless,
sedition remains a crime in the United States under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2384
(2000), a federal statute that punishes seditious conspiracy, and 18
U.S.C.A. § 2385 (2000), which outlaws advocating the overthrow of the
federal government by force. Generally, a person may be punished for
sedition only when he or she makes statements that create a Clear and
Present Danger to rights that the government may lawfully protect. A
person found guilty of seditious conspiracy or advocating the overthrow
of the government may be fined and sentenced to up to 20 years in
prison. States also maintain laws that punish similar advocacy and
conspiracy against the state government.

Brooklyn born Palestinian-American Activist Linda Sarsour is walking a tightrope as she tests those federal statutes.

 SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:

YES, LINDA SARSOUR DID INCITE VIOLENCE 
AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The
hijabbed feminist heroine Linda Sarsour is in the center of another
controversy, and the Leftist establishment media is again rushing to
defend her. This time, she called for “jihad” against President Trump.
The
whole controversy, says Sarsour and her defenders, is just another
indication of conservatives’ ignorance and “Islamophobia.”
But it isn’t: she really did incite violence.
Sarsour’s
call for jihad came in the midst of her denunciation of the Trump
administration at the annual convention of the Islamic Society of North
America (ISNA) over the July 4 weekend.
Sarsour said:

Why, sisters and brothers, why are we so unprepared? Why are we so
afraid of this administration and the potential chaos that they will
ensue on our community?

Invoking Muhammad, she said:

A word of truth in front of a tyrant ruler or leader, that is the best form of jihad.

She added:

I hope that when we stand up to those who oppress our communities, that
Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad, that we are struggling
against tyrants and rulers not only abroad in the Middle East or the
other side of the world, but here in these United States of America,
where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning
in the White House.

She not only denounced Trump, but the idea that Muslims in America should assimilate:

Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our
communities. It is not to assimilate and to please any other people in
authority … Our top priority, even higher than all those priorities, is
to please Allah, and only Allah.

The establishment media rushed to defend her. Time
explained: “Women’s March Organizer Linda Sarsour Spoke of ‘Jihad.’ But
She Wasn’t Talking About Violence.” The Wrap published a piece titled:
“3 Things Conservatives Got Very Wrong About Linda Sarsour’s Speech.” The Huffington Post gloated: “Linda Sarsour Said ‘Jihad’ In A Speech And Conservatives Freaked Out.” ThinkProgress
mocked those ignorant, racist conservatives: “A Muslim activist
referenced jihad and the right freaked out because they don’t know what
it means.” CNN commentator Marc Lamont Hill tweeted: “The people disagreeing with @lsarsour clearly don’t understand what Jihad means.”
Sarsour herself took to the Washington Post to explain:

[I] sent not a call to violence, but a call to speak truth to power and
to commit to the struggle for racial and economic justice.

I was speaking to an
all-Muslim audience; as an American, I should be free to share and
discuss scripture and teachings of my beloved Prophet.
Worst of all to her was the sullying of the reputation of “jihad”:

Most disturbing about this recent defamation campaign is how it is
focused on demonizing the legitimate yet widely misunderstood Islamic
term I used, “jihad,” which to majority of Muslims and according to
religious scholars means “struggle” or “to strive for.” This term has
been hijacked by Muslim extremists and right-wing extremists alike,
leaving ordinary Muslims to defend our faith and in some cases silenced.

Linda
Sarsour is not stupid, and likely knows what Islamic tradition actually
has her “beloved Prophet” saying: “I have been made victorious through
terror” (Bukhari 4:52.220). Muhammad told his followers to offer
non-Muslims three choices: conversion to Islam; subjugation to Islamic
hegemony, as signified by the payment of a poll tax (jizya); or death:

Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war … When you
meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of
action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and
withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept)
Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from
fighting against them. … If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from
them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off
your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight
them. (Muslim 4294)

Islamic tradition also depicts Muhammad saying:

I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not
declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was
guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except
for the right affairs rest with Allah. (Muslim 30)

If one does not profess belief in Allah, his property and life are not protected.
Sarsour
also must know that there is an entire chapter of the Qur’an entitled
“Booty,” or “The Spoils of War” (al-Anfal). What spoils ensue from “a
word of truth spoken in front of a tyrant ruler or leader”? If jihad is
simply a word of truth spoken in front of a tyrant, how is a Muslim
supposed to make Jews and Christians “pay the jizya with willing
submission and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29)? If jihad means
only to “struggle” or “strive,” why have millions of Muslims worldwide
joined violent jihad groups?
Why are there any violent jihad groups at all? Why is this misunderstanding of jihad so widespread?
A
professedly devout and knowledgeable Muslim, Linda Sarsour must know
about all the many exhortations to violence in the Qur’an and Sunnah,
and the doctrines of jihad warfare taught by all the
schools of Sunni jurisprudence. When Sarsour says that “this term has
been hijacked by Muslim extremists and right-wing extremists alike,” she
is attempting not just to intimidate people into dismissing the idea
that jihad involves violence for fear of allying with hated “right-wing
extremists,” but also to liken foes of jihad terror to its proponents,
thereby stigmatizing resistance to jihad terror as “far-right
extremism.”
Of course, the
centrality in Islamic law of jihad as warfare against unbelievers does
not in itself mean that Sarsour was inciting violence against Trump. But
Sarsour certainly knows what Muslims are doing in the name of jihad
around the world today. When she says, “I hope that when we stand up to
those who oppress our communities, that Allah accepts from us that as a
form of jihad,” she may mean a non-violent standing up, but she has to know that when other Muslims who know the real meaning of jihad in Islam hear that, they will hear it as a call to violence.
She
must know that when she says that “our number one and top priority is
to protect and defend our communities” and that “our top priority, even
higher than all those priorities, is to please Allah, and only Allah,”
that some Muslims will think of how pleased Allah is with the deaths of
unbelievers — since he has guaranteed Paradise to those who “kill and
are killed” for him (Qur’an 9:111).
All
the damage control of the Leftist media, heaping contempt upon
conservatives for being so stupid as to think that jihad involves
violence, is simply more of the denial and willful ignorance regarding
jihad that the political and media elites constantly force upon us. If
anyone knows what jihad means in Islam, it is Linda Sarsour. And so she
also must know how incendiary her words really were.
_______________________________________________________

 The Truth About Linda Sarsour;
Brigitte Gabriel Interviewed
 
 

PRO SHARIA JIHADIST LINDA SARSOUR CALLS FOR JIHAD ON TRUMP AT HAMAS MEETING

 OPEN TREASON FOR ADVOCATING
JIHADIST “HOLY WAR”
PRO SHARIA JIHADIST LINDA SARSOUR CALLS FOR JIHAD ON TRUMP AT HAMAS MEETING 
 Published on Jul 6, 2017

At
a Hamas meeting, Muslim activist Linda Sarsour openly calls for jihad
against President Trump, his entire administration, and the United
States government in an act of politicized sedition.

 Linda Sarsour addressing at 54th Annual 
ISNA Convention
 Linda Sarsour: The Enemy of the State
 Published on Jul 6, 2017
Anni Cyrus exposes Linda Sarsour’s hate for America and Human society

 Linda Sarsour Talks About Jihad Against Trump; 
Media Says It’s Not What You Think 
 Published on Jul 8, 2017

Linda
Sarsour, an extremist Muslim activist, spoke of engaging in Jihad
against the “white supremacist in the White House” in reference to
Donald Trump and his administration. The reaction from the mainstream
media has been interesting to say the least. In their respective eyes,
“Jihad” simply means a “struggle.” While the word jihad in the
dictionary does have the word “struggle” as part of it’s definition,
that word is by no means an accurate representation of the term in
question.

Jihad is defined as a struggle or fight against the
enemies of Islam. It is also defined as a personal internal struggle. A
personal and/or internal struggle cannot be applied to external forces
so the only other option is for jihad to be used as a way to fight
enemies of Islam, which is, of course, a direct threat against Donald
Trump.

Mainstream media refuses to view jihad in that way
because many of them agree with the general sentiment that Sarsour laid
out against Trump and his administration. They are also mostly leftists
and for some strange reason, the left has an affinity for Islam. Maybe
it’s daddy issues, maybe it’s an adrenaline rush from engaging in the
forbidden. Either way, the connection is there. Sarsour appears to
represent the marriage of western social justice warrior culture and
middle eastern extremism.

 Top Muslim Leader Calls For Muslims 
Not To Assimilate And To Wage Jihad 
 Published on Jul 10, 2017
Alex
Jones calls out Linda Sarsour who has been given hundreds of millions
by Soros supporting FGM (Muslim female genital mutilation)and Hamas and saying standing up against Trump
is accepted by Allah as jihad.

Linda Sarsour calls for Muslims to wage 

‘jihad’ against Trump

“Our top priority … is to please Allah, and only Allah.”

 by Jordan Schachtel

SEE: https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/linda-sarsour-calls-for-muslims-to-wage-jihad-against-trump; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Linda Sarsour, a Hamas-tied
and prominent Women’s March leader, Islamic supremacist, and
anti-Semite, has called for a “jihad” (Islamic holy war) against
President Trump.


Addressing the 54th Annual ISNA (Islamic Society of North America)
Convention this past weekend, Sarsour delivered a 22-minute screed
attacking the Trump administration and called on the Muslim community to
unite against the White House.


Sarsour began the speech thanking her “favorite person in this room …
Imam Siraj Wahhaj, who has been a mentor, motivator, and encourager of
mine.” She does not mention that Wahhaj was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombings.

“Why sisters and brothers, why are we so unprepared. Why are we so
afraid of this administration and the potential chaos that they will
ensue on our community?” she said.
Then, in a particularly vague, yet terrifying, segment of her speech,
Sarsour said, “I hope, that when we stand up to those who oppress our
communities, that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad.”

“We are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad … but
here in the United States of America, where you have fascists and white
supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House,” she
continued.
“When I wake up in the morning, and I remember who is sitting in the
White House, I am outraged,” Sarsour exclaimed. “This is not normal,
sisters and brothers. Those people sitting in the most powerful seats in
this country, is not normal.”
She continued, calling upon Muslims to refuse to assimilate into America.
“Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our
community. It is not to assimilate and to please any other people in
authority,” she said. “And our top priority … is to please Allah, and
only Allah.”
Sarsour’s address was delivered in front of the nation’s largest Islamic advocacy group, one which has deep ties to extremism.
Federal prosecutors have labeled the
Islamic Society of North America as part of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood
network that was initially set up to raise funds for the Palestinian
terrorist group Hamas.
The annual ISNA convention has often featured radical Islamists. In
2001, Anwar al-Awlaki (who later became the leader of Al Qaeda in the
Arabian Peninsula), gave a keynote lecture on “tolerance.”
The ISNA convention is consistently rife with anti-Semitism and serves as support for U.S.-designated terrorist organizations.
Those sharing the stage with Sarsour at this year’s convention
included a Holocaust denier, multiple imams who support the death
penalty for homosexuals, the daughter of a convicted terrorist, and
others who say Muslims should never cooperate with law enforcement. One
speaker has, in the past, threatened fellow Muslims with physical
violence for cooperating with police.
An estimated 20,000 people attended this year’s convention in Rosemont, Ill.

SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/07/linda-sarsours-jihad-against-trump-
heres-why-she-really-is-inciting-violence 
____________________________________________________ 
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT SARSOUR:
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/01/linda-sarsour-womens-
march-organizer.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2016/04/new-york-city-giving-
10-million-to.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/05/pamela-gellers-afdi-huge
-cuny-protest.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/01/exposed-power-behind
-womens-march.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/05/pamela-gellers-cancel-
sarsour-protest.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/03/muslim-womens-activist
-linda-sarsour-is.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/01/splc-defends-linda-sarsour
-pro-sharia.html 
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/02/screamers-snowflakes-
and-ms-sarsour.html 

PAMELA GELLER’S “AFDI” HUGE CUNY PROTEST AGAINST LINDA SARSOUR~NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL COVERAGE

 SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
 UPDATED REPORT:
AFDI’S HUGE CUNY PROTEST 
We hope you had a good holiday honoring those who fought and died for our freedom. Here’s news from the battles on home front.
The
AFDI demo against CUNY’s obscene invitation to pro-terror Jew-hater
Linda Sarsour to give their commencement address was a smashing success,
with over a thousand people who came out in a downpour of pelting rain
on East 42nd Street outside CUNY’s headquarters
on Thursday afternoon to oppose the mainstreaming of evil. It was an amazing event, a turning point, despite Mayor de Blasio’s nefarious attempts to undermine and destroy the rally.
Assemblyman Dov Hikind
Milo Yiannopoulos
Pamela Geller

Nonie Darwish, Former Muslims United
Statement by Caroline Glick, Jerusalem Post Editor
Statement by Ambassador John Bolton
John Guandolo, Counter Terror Expert, Founder of UnderstandingTheThreat.com.
Lauri B. Regan, Endowment for Middle East Truth and National Women’s Committee of the Republican Jewish Coalition
David Wood, Acts 17 Apologetics
The demo received a lot of national and international press — all of it (with the exception of Israel National News and the Forward) was hostile, of course. Fake news nonparallel (scroll down for photos and media coverage links).
We
had an army of security and costs related to sound, stage, speakers
expenses, hotels, etc. Please help us pay for these expenses.
 
Please
give generously. We have lost so much of our funding from donors —
perhaps because people think it’s better under President Trump.
It’s not. It’s worse.
AFDI
Attention: Pamela Geller
1040 1st Avenue
#121
New York, NY 10022
Mayor De Blasio is a longtime supporter of jihad and Muslim supremacists, and most especially terror-supporter Linda Sarsour. Mayor De Blasio gifted Sarsour’s “organization” with more than $500,000.
She was instrumental in getting de Blasio to partly dismantle the New
York Police Department’s program of spying on the city’s Muslims, and
has worked with officials in City Hall to close public schools for the
observance of Muslim holy days, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha. From her
base at the Arab American Association of New York, the group whose focus
is the sharia device, “Islamophobia,” Sarsour is working to do the same
on immigration policy, voter registration, mass incarceration,
Islamophobia and the Police Department’s stop-and-frisk tactic.
Mayor
de Blasio went to extraordinary lengths to undermine our rally and
silence our voices. New York City is no stranger to protests. Protest is
a thriving tradition, and with the election of President Trump, is a
weekly, sometimes daily, exercise for leftists. So, at this point, the
NYPD has it down to a science. Protest organizers apply for a
permit, and if there is to be a counter protest, their area is set up
across the street, or catacorner to the main event.
This is standard operating procedure. During our Ground Zero Mosque protests, the opposition was penned one block over. Every rally and demo is set up in this same way. Which is why what happened at our event was so very extraordinary.
The vicious, vocal and violent protesters were placed right next to the stage, not three feet away from the stage and our crowd.
And they screamed, blew deafening whistles, and screamed abusive chants
(“Grab that pussy!,” to which we chanted back, “No clit cutting!”).
There was no letup (which is why I am shouting the whole of the rally)
and at the end of the demo, the leftists attacked our people and were
arrested.
 
Screenshot from NY Daily News
The enemedia did not report on this at all. They drummed up the narrative that the event was violent, with the New York Daily News going so far as to say “WILD BRAWL”
in their headline. That’s what de Blasio wanted. He wanted our people
attacked and hurt. And the enemedia eagerly advanced the big lie.
The Daily News said, “No arrests were made.” But two arrests violent leftists were arrested. Did the NYDN even call NYPD?
That said, despite de Blasio’s attempt to undermine our rally, it didn’t work.
It was huge. And the happy warriors took a stand.
Assemblyman Dov Hikind speaking – and organizer Pamela Geller cheering him in.
Milo addresses the throngs of freedom lovers
 Assemblyman Dov Hiikind
Image result for sarsour protest
  
Image result for sarsour protest
Nonie Darwish
Check out the national and international coverage (scroll):

A Muslim-American Activist’s Speech Raises Ire Even Before It’s Delivered

New York Times, May 26, 2017:
 Ms. Sarsour,
one of the lead organizers of the Women’s March on Washington, has
tackled issues like immigration policy, mass incarceration, stop-and-frisk and the New York Police Department’s spying operation on Muslims — all of which have largely inured her to hate-tinged criticism.

Protest in New York over Palestinian-American graduation speaker

Reuters – ‎22 hours ago‎
Anti-Trump
demonstrators (L) grapple over a U.S. flag with demonstrators protesting
against CUNY’s decision to allow Linda Sarsour, a liberal,
Palestinian-American political activist, to speak at this year’s
commencement in New York, U.S., May 25, 2017.
 

Violence erupts at protest of CUNY grad speaker Linda Sarsour

New York Daily News – ‎21 hours ago‎
The scuffle
broke out after an unlikely band of protesters — including conservative
provocateur Pam Geller, Assemblyman Dov Hikind and alt-right bad boy
Milo Yiannopoulos — blasted CUNY’s decision to select civil-rights
activist Linda Sarsour.

Protests after CUNY commencement speech

Daily Mail – ‎11 hours ago‎
Yiannopoulos
at his rally speech said: ‘Linda Sarsour is a Sharia-loving,
terrorist-embracing, Jew-hating, ticking time bomb,’ adding ‘it’s now
more important than ever to fight Islam in America and particularly its
emissaries like Linda Sarsour.’ …

Watch: Protest against Sarsour commencement speech

Israel National News – ‎8 hours ago‎
A crowd gathered on Thursday
outside of the City University of New York building in Manhattan to
protest the university’s intention to host radical anti-Zionist and
Sharia law advocate Linda Sarsour on Friday as a commencement speaker for the degree …
 
 
The Jerusalem Post – ‎22 hours ago‎
NEW YORK – As hundreds of people gathered on Manhattan’s 42nd street on a rainy Thursday
afternoon to protest Linda Sarsour’s upcoming speech at a City
University of New York graduation, they were met with vocal opposition
from the some of the …
 

MILO and Pamela Geller Protest Sharia-Advocate Linda Sarsour in NYC

Breitbart News – ‎20 hours ago‎
Former
Breitbart senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos and Pamela Geller held a
protest against Sharia-advocate Linda Sarsour’s speaking engagement at
The City University of New York (CUNY) on Thursday.
 

Linda Sarsour, Feminist Movement Leader, Too Extreme for CUNY Graduation Speech, Critics Argue

Yahoo News  – ‎May 25, 2017‎
A devout
Muslim who hails from Brooklyn, Sarsour was until recently the head of
the Arab American Association of New York. She was also one of the
organizers of the Women’s March on Washington, D.C., to protest Donald
Trump’s presidency. She has a …
Scuffles broke out as scores of people rallied outside the City University of New York (CUNY), in New York, Thursday,
to demonstrate against the university’s invitation for
Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour to deliver a
commencement speech at a graduation ceremony scheduled on June 1.

Right-wing activists protest against Linda Sarsour speech

Middle East Eye – ‎21 hours ago‎
Protesters in
midtown Manhattan chanted and marched under rainfall to criticise the
school’s choice of Sarsour, 37, an organiser of this year’s Women’s
March on Washington who has drawn fire from conservatives for her
opposition to Israel’s occupation …

Linda Sarsour selected as CUNY graduation speaker sparks outcry

Washington Times – ‎May 25, 2017‎
Foes of Muslim activist Linda Sarsour held a rally Thursday
to decry her selection as graduation speaker at the City University of
New York, accusing her of supporting terrorism and chanting, “Surely
CUNY can do better!” At a protest outside the CUNY …
 

A Spiteful Afternoon With NY’s Anti-Muslim Hate Brigades

Village Voice-May 26, 2017
It was pelting rain on East 42nd Street outside CUNY’s headquarters on Thursday
afternoon, but that didn’t keep several hundred people from turning out
for a gathering of the Greater New York Area’s far-right tribes.
 
Vox Is Neias, May 26, 2017:
Protesters in
midtown Manhattan chanted and marched under rainfall to criticize the
school’s choice of Sarsour, 37, an organizer of this year’s Women’s
March on Washington who has drawn fire from conservatives for her
opposition to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, among
other issues.

Linda Sarsour commencement speech sparks protests

i24NEWS  – ‎13 hours ago‎
Hundreds of protesters gathered on New York’s 42nd on Thursday
to object to Palestinian-American activist Linda Sarsour’s upcoming
speech at a City University of New York graduation ceremony, the
Jerusalem Post reported.. Sarsour is slated to deliver a …

Protests erupt over university inviting Palestinian-American activist to speak at graduation

WCPO – ‎18 hours ago‎
NEW YORK, NY –
MAY 11: Honoree Linda Sarsour speaks onstage during the 30th
Anniversary Celebrating Women Breakfast at Marriott Marquis Hotel on May
11, 2017 in New York City. (Photo by Monica Schipper/Getty Images for
The New York Women’s …
 

Anti-Muslim Activists, White Nationalists and Anti-Government Figures Join Pam Geller in NYC to Protest Linda Sarsour

Southern Poverty Law Center – ‎2 hours ago‎
Her return to
organized protests came on May 25 when she called out City University
of New York (CUNY) for inviting Women’s March co-organizer Linda Sarsour
to speak at the schools 2017 graduation ceremony. Geller started off
the events by calling …

Scuffle erupts at rally against CUNY’s hosting of BDS promoter Linda Sarsour

Jewish Telegraphic Agency – ‎10 hours ago‎
… where
activists against radical Islam, including Pamela Geller and Milo
Yiannopoulos, had rallied in protest of the decision by the
institution’s School of Public Health to host Sarsour on Friday as a commencement speaker, the New York Daily News ..
 

Sarsour commencement speech draws fire

Brooklyn Daily Eagle – ‎May 25, 2017‎
Sarsour, a
political firebrand from Bay Ridge, was one of the organizers of the
Women’s March on Washington, the massive protest demonstration that took
place in the nation’s capitol the day after Donald Trump was
inaugurated the 45th president of the …
 
AFDI
Attention: Pamela Geller
1040 1st Avenue
#121
New York, NY 10022
LOGO NEW AFDI

PAMELA GELLER’S AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE TO PROTEST ISLAMIC JIHADIST LINDA SARSOUR AT CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

PAMELA GELLER’S AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE TO PROTEST ISLAMIC JIHADIST LINDA SARSOUR AT CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
SEE: http://pamelageller.com/
AND: https://www.facebook.com/events/1766093383704173/ 
 Image may contain: 3 people, text


Details

We
will be there. We will protest terror and hate at CUNY– this will not
stand. Be there MAY 25, THURSDAY 12 PM TO 2 PM 217 EAST 42ND STREET
DATE CHANGE DUE TO JEWISH HOLIDAY.
Share widely.
Speakers include: Assemblyman Dov Hikind, 48th Assembly District
John Guandolo, Counter Terror Expert, Founder of UnderstandingTheThreat.com.
Lauri B. Regan, Endowment for Middle East Truth and National Women’s Committee of the Republican Jewish Coalition
David Wood, Acts 17 Apologetics
CUNY has invited a pro-terror, pro-sharia, anti-semite to give the
keynote commencement address. And they will not reconsider. Universities
have disinvited Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Nonie Darwish, Ann Coulter, Milos,
legions of conservative thinkers and voices in defense of freedom, but a
vicious, pro-sharia, Jew hater they will defend to the death and that
is it right there. They fear jihad. They fear Islamic supremacists. They
know no harm with come to them if they smear, defame, libel or cancel
us. They know we don’t destroy, maim, behead like Sarsour supporters and
their violent running dogs on the left
Please contribute here, NOW-– or send a check to:

AFDI
Attention: Pamela Geller
1040 1st Avenue
#121
New York, NY 10022

_____________________________________
 ZOA Pres Mort Klein on Sarsour
Published on May 3, 2017
Zionist
Organization of America National President Morton A. Klein discusses
his concerns surrounding CUNY’s choice to invite Linda Sarsour to speak
at this year’s commencement.
 Pamela Geller on Facebook LIVE – 
Protest Against Jew Hater Linda Sarsour
 Published on May 11, 2017
Pamela
Geller went live on Facebook last evening to urge followers, readers,
listeners to get involved and fight against the norming of evil. Join
us! Protest CUNY’s invitation to Linda Sarsour commencemnt keynote
address.

LISTEN Pamela Geller on Sean Hannity Radio with Nonie Darwish: #CancelSarsour Protest Hate at CUNY 

“What part of Sharia Law is reasonable 

to Linda Sarsour?”

Linda Sarsour Caught Lying about Female Genital Mutilation in Islam 
 Published on Apr 25, 2017

After
learning that a female genital mutilation gang had been arrested in
Michigan, faux feminist Linda Sarsour tweeted: “Female genital
mutilation has no place in Detroit or anywhere else in the world. Female
genital mutilation is barbaric and is not an Islamic practice.”

In
this video, our hero David Wood turns to Muslim scholars and Islam’s
most trusted sources to see if female genital mutilation (female
circumcision) is prescribed in Islam.


1040 1st Avenue #121
New York, NY 10022
AFDI is a 501c3

PAMELA GELLER’S AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE WILL PROTEST LINDA SARSOUR, RADICAL ISLAMIST, AT CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

AFDI PROTEST SARSOUR AT CUNY

CUNY is standing by its decision to honor pro-terror, sharia activist Linda Sarour. The norming of evil.
They
disinvited Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Nonie Darwish, Ann Coulter, Milos, legions
of conservative thinkers and voices in defense of freedom, but a
vicious, pro-sharia, Jew hater they will defend to the death and that is
it right there. They fear jihad. They fear Islamic supremacists. They
know no harm will come to them if they smear, defame, libel or cancel
us. They know we don’t destroy, maim, behead like Sarsour supporters and
their violent running dogs on the left.
Such sanction is so malignant and so evil, it cannot be ignored. There is a responsibility for the time we are living in. Ayn Rand said, “evil is made possible by the sanction youn give it. Withdraw your sanction.”
We will be there. We will protest — this will not stand. Be there —
 
Let’s call upon President Trump to stop taxpayer funding of terror supporting universities.
Here is Sarsour’s twitter feed:
 Displaying
 Displaying
 Displaying
 Displaying
 Displaying
The
left’s chokehold on the nation’s most powerful institutions continues
despite a Trump presidency and a Republican Congress, but this is a step
too far. My colleagues and I are blacklisted from speaking at almost
everywhere because we stand in defense of freedom and oppose jihad
terror and sharia. Anytime we are scheduled to speak, terror-tied
Islamic groups and their supremacist leaders demand we be cancelled. But this annihilationist is being given the honor of commencement speaker?
 The
mainstreaming of evil leads to an unimaginable end. My colleagues and I
have been demonized, marginalized and defamed by the enemedia and the
cultural elites, while terrorists and their promoters enjoy promotion by
these same quislings. Anyone who doesn’t think academia is aligned with
the jihad force is deluded. Stop taxpayer funding of these hotbeds of
radical inculcation.
Adolf
Hitler and his violent, antisemitic political party the Deutsche
Arbeiterpartei – DAP (German Socialist Workers’ Party) — were on the
outer fringe of German society until he was invited to join mainstream
parties in opposition to the Versailles Treaty. Inviting Hitler to join
mainstream political parties in supporting the German referendum of 1929
was key, as it gained the Nazi Party recognition and credibility it
could never have hoped to have gained on its own. Influential German
businessman and politician Alfred Hugenberg made a coalition with
Hitler, which gave Hitler huge legitimacy. After failing at the ballot
box, Hitler, like Islamic supremacists in the West, came to understand
that that power was to be achieved not through revolution outside of the
government, but rather through legal means, within the confines of the
democratic system.
How appropriate that she be a darling of the left now.
An outspoken critic of Israel, Sarsour avidly supports the Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions (BDS) movement, a Hamas-inspired initiative
that uses various forms of public protest, economic pressure, and
lawsuits to advance the Hamas agenda of permanently destroying Israel as
a Jewish nation-state.
Vis-a-vis the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict, Sarsour favorsone-state
solution where an Arab majority and a Jewish minority would live
together within the borders of a single country. She made clear her
opposition to Israel’s existence as a Jewish state when she tweeted in October 2012 that “nothing is creepier than Zionism.”

In 2004, Sarsour acknowledged
that a friend of hers as well as a cousin were both serving long
sentences in Israeli jails because of their efforts to recruit jihadists
to murder Jews. Moreover,
she revealed that her brother-in-law was serving a 12-year prison term because of his affiliation with Hamas.

Speaking of creepy realtives, Sarsour’s husband, Maher Judeh, mourned the 1998 death of the Hamas “master terrorists” Adel and Imad Awadallah; he praised the heroism of a Palestinian Authority police officer who had carried out a shooting attack at a checkpoint in Israel; he has expressed support for the terrorist organization Fatah; and he has lauded the founder of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a Marxist-Leninist revolutionary organization.
In October 2011, Linda Sarsour, who holds free-market economics in low regard, expressed, on behalf of “Muslim New Yorkers,” “solidarity and support” for the pro-communist Occupy Wall Street movement. In 2011 as well, the Obama Administration honored Sarsour as a “champion of change.” Not surprisingly, Sarsour visited the White House on at least seven different occasions during her beloved president’s tenure.
In May 2012 Sarsour tweeted that the so-called “underwear bomber,” an Al-Qaeda operative who in 2009 had tried to blow up a Detroit-bound passenger jet in mid-flight, was actually a CIA agent participating in America’s “war on Islam.”
In November 2012 in Baltimore, Sarsour—ever eager to peddle her woeful tale of Islamic victimhood—spoke at a Muslim Public Affairs Council conference titled “Facing Race: Xenophobic Hate Crimes.” This is the same Council that views the murderous Jew-haters of Hezbollah as members of “a liberation movement” that is “fighting for freedom.”
Sarsour was outraged when a police officer and an FBI agent shot
and killed a young black Muslim named Usaama Rahim in Boston on June 2,
2015, when Rahim lunged at them with a military-style knife
as they attempted to question him about suspected terrorism-related
activities. Naturally, Sarsour’s assessment
of the incident confidently traced everything back to race: “At the end
of the day, a Black man was shot on a bus stop on his way to work and
we should treat this like any other case of police violence.” Period.
End of story.
In August 2015 Sarsour spoke out in support of the incarcerated Palestinian Islamic Jihad member Muhammad Allan, a known recruiter of suicide bombers.
According to CounterJihad.com, Sarsour has attended and spoken at numerous rallies sponsored by Al-Awda, a group that views Israel as a terrorist, genocidal state whose very creation was a “catastrophe” for Arab peoples.
Sarsour has also solicited donations for the Hamas-affiliated Palestine Children’s Relief Fund.
There’s more.
She lied and wrongly portrayed the honor killing  of Shaima Alawadi by her husband as a racist-islamophobic-anti-Muslim killing.
She faked a hate crime against herself, scoring political points nationally by portraying a mentally ill black homeless man as a violent racist.

CUNY Defends Decision to Host Anti-Israel Activist as Commencement Honoree

Linda Sarsour will deliver commencement at taxpayer-funded school

By Adam Kredo, Free Beacon, April 26, 2017:
The
City University of New York (CUNY), a taxpayer-funded institution, is
doubling down on its decision to host a leading anti-Israel activist who
has been accused of anti-Semitism as its honored commencement speaker
next month, a move that has generated calls for New York Democratic Gov.
Andrew Cuomo to step in and cancel the address.
CUNY
is set to host Linda Sarsour, a leading voice in the anti-Israel
movement who has been condemned by human rights groups for her rhetoric
and promotion of terrorism against the Jewish state.

Sarsour,
a Palestinian American and executive director of the Arab American
Association of New York, is scheduled to give the commencement speech
for CUNY’s Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy. 


Local
lawmakers and pro-Israel activists have expressed outrage over the
decision, calling on CUNY to cancel Sarsour’s appearance. CUNY leaders
have continued to praise Sarsour and maintain the speech will take place
as scheduled.
Sarsour
has earned a reputation as one of the country’s most virulent
anti-Israel activists. She has attacked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu as a “bigot” and routinely condemns the Jewish state as
racist. Sarsour attracted outrage in 2015 when she tweeted out a picture
of a Palestinian child with a rock in his hand accompanied by the
caption, “the definition of courage.”
Sarsour
became a darling of the activist left as a participant in the Women’s
March against President Donald Trump and other demonstrations. She also
has embraced and partnered with Rasmea Odeh, an anti-Israel activist and
convicted terrorist who was recently found guilty of immigration fraud
in the United States for failing to disclose her ties to terrorism.
Dov
Hikind, a New York City assemblyman and pro-Israel advocate, told the
Washington Free Beacon that Americans across the country should be
outraged that a taxpayer-funded school is celebrating an individual who
once praised child terrorism.
“This
is a woman who not so long ago put out a tweet with a picture of a
young child holding rocks in his hand and Linda Sarsour put in that
message, ‘the definition of courage,’” Hikind said in an interview with
the Free Beacon.
“The idea this woman would get this honor at a CUNY commencement, a place my tax dollars pay for, is unbelievable audacity.”
Sarsour
“is someone who is an apologist for terrorists, and that’s who we need
to be an example for graduate students at a tax-funded university here
in New York?” Hikind asked. “How do you justify in any way [these
views]? People should speak out everywhere. This should be a no
brainer.”
While
Hikind and other pro-Israel voices have spoken out against Sarsour’s
appearance at CUNY, Cuomo and activist voices such as the
Anti-Defamation League have remained silent.
“The
ADL speaks out 24/7 on defamation of the Jewish people and nothing can
be more defamatory than Linda Sarsour’s statements about Jews and her
glorification of Arabs throwing rocks at Israelis,” Hikind said in a
statement. “But following the invitation from CUNY for Sarsour to
address their graduates, the ADL’s silence has been deafening and
shameful.”

One senior official at a national Jewish organization told the Free Beacon that Sarsour’s appearance at CUNY demonstrates that anti-Israel activism is still being mainstreamed.

“Linda
Sarsour advocates a version of feminist intersectionality that, by
design, excludes liberal Jews who support Israel but welcomes radical
Muslims who deny women’s rights,” said the official, who was not
authorized to speak on record. “In that sense she’s perfect for today’s
upside-down academy. That doesn’t make what she says or what CUNY’s
doing any less disgraceful. It makes the whole thing more disgraceful.”
CUNY
has defended its decision to host Sarsour, telling students in a
community message it is committed to all types of free speech.
Ayman
El-Mohandes, the dean of CUNY’s Graduate School of Public Health and
Health Policy, said in a statement that CUNY is committed to academic
freedom.
“I
hope you all join me in my firm view that a diversity of viewpoints and
an open exchange of ideas is at the heart of our country’s strength,
and our university’s strength,” El-Mohandes said in a statement. “It is
why we at CUNY are so committed to academic freedom, a bedrock principle
of our university.”
“This
will be a very special and meaningful commencement for all of us,”
El-Mohandes added. “I hope to see you all there to celebrate women in
leadership.”

Please
consider supporting this valuable program and our other work at AFDI.
We are only just beginning to produce videos that will change the
national conversation at the best possible time: when real change can be
made.

As
you can see from the furious attacks on Trump, the Left is in panic and
meltdown mode, and is lashing out ever more desperately and fiercely.
We must be more active and determined than ever now, or defeat could be
snatched from the jaws of victory.
That’s why our video series is so much needed: to help ensure that the swamp is indeed drained, now when it is possible.
Please help us in this all-important work, now more than ever.
 
Please contribute here, NOW-– or send a check to:
AFDI
Attention: Pamela Geller
1040 1st Avenue
#121
New York, NY 10022

AFDI is a 501c3.


Your gift is tax deductible




 



MUSLIM WOMEN’S ACTIVIST LINDA SARSOUR IS ARRESTED

 
LINDA SARSOUR IS ARRESTED
HAMAS AGENT, SHARIA PROPONENT, WOMEN’S MARCH LEADER 
FROM BAY RIDGE, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK CITY 
OWEN SCHROYER OF INFOWARS REPORTS
 SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT SARSOUR:

 
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/01/southwest-airlines-flight-turns-on-pink.html

 
SEE ALSO:
http://lindasarsour.blogspot.com/
http://www.arabamericanny.org/lindasarsour
https://www.whitehouse.gov/champions/giving-back-to-community/linda-sarsour
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-on-msnbc-muslim-kids-being-executed-in-the-u-s 
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-says-of-islamophobes-their-job-is-to-vilify-islam-and-muslims
http://www.brooklyndaily.com/stories/2014/37/br-sarsour-beheading-threat-2014-09-12-bk_2014_37.html
http://www.heyridge.com/2015/08/an-assault-reveals-the-deep-divisions-in-bay-ridge/

 

LINDA SARSOUR, WOMEN’S MARCH ORGANIZER UNDER FIRE FOR RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST TIES

 Women’s March Organizer Linda Sarsour Under Fire for Radical Islamist-Terrorist Ties

Women’s March Organizer Linda Sarsour Under Fire 

for Radical Islamist-Terrorist Ties

BY WILLIAM F. JASPER

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25233-women-s-march-organizer-linda-sarsour-under-fire-for-radical-islamist-terrorist-tie

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 The day after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, Linda Sarsour
ascended the global stage at the Women’s March on Washington. Although
not as famous as other speakers — Madonna, Michael Moore, Gloria
Steinem, Ashley Judd, Angela Davis, Van Jones — she is proving to be
equally controversial. Sarsour (shown), a co-chair of the march, is a
“Muslim feminist” and well-known Soros-funded activist in New York City,
where she is executive director of the Arab American Association of New
York (AAANY) and a director of the New York Immigration Coalition
(NYIC), a radical migrant-refugee “rights” organization. She is also,
say critics, connected to jihadi terrorists, such as Hamas, Hezbollah,
and ISIS, and she is a self-proclaimed advocate of Sharia law for
America.

Whereas Madonna talked about blowing up the Trump White House and Ashley Judd’s vulgar rant
charged Donald Trump with misogyny, violence, slavery and racism, Linda
Sarsour is uncomfortably close to terrorists who actually blow things
(and people) up, and an ideology that promotes misogyny, violence,
slavery, and racism.

“As-salmu alaykum, may peace be upon
you brothers and sisters,” the hajib-wearing Sarsour declared in her
screeching harangue
to the Women’s March (see video below). But her
greetings of peace did not extend to President of the United States
Donald Trump, as she soon made clear. “I stand here before you
unapologetically Muslim American, unapologetically
Palestinian-American,” she said, before shrieking, “I will respect the
presidency, but I will not respect this president of the United States
of America!”


The march organizer went on to accuse President Trump of winning the
White House “on the backs of Muslims and black people and undocumented
people and Mexicans and people with disabilities, and on the backs of
women.”

Linda Sarsour, a rising media darling, was honored as a “Champion of
Change” this past year by President Obama and was a delegate to the
Democratic National Convention. However, despite her repeated claims of
devotion to “democracy,” Linda Sarsour has demonstrated an affinity for
totalitarian Islamist ideology. An article by Chuck Ross at the Daily Caller
features a photo of Linda Sarsour posing with Salah Sarsour, an accused
financier of the Hamas terrorist group, at the recent 15th annual
convention of the Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle of North
America. Although the two share the same surname, it is not confirmed
that they are blood-related.
According to Ross, an FBI memo related to the terrorism-financing
trial of the Holy Land Foundation, implicated Salah Sarsour and his
brother Jamil in the criminal Hamas-funding scheme. “The FBI memo stated
that the Sarsours passed money in $1,000 and $2,000 increments to a
Hamas operative named Adel Awadallah through their Milwaukee furniture
store,” Ross writes. “Awadallah was a commander in the Qassam Brigades,
Hamas’ militant wing.”
The Daily Caller story continues:

Salah Sarsour met Awadallah in 1995 while serving an eight month prison sentence in Israel for supporting Hamas.
Sarsour has not been charged with any
crimes in the U.S. His brother Jamil was arrested and charged in 2003
with money laundering after returning back to the U.S. from Israel. He
served a four year jail sentence for his work for Hamas.

According to a sympathetic article on Linda Sarsour in 2004 for the Columbia Journalism Review, she has at least three relatives in jail for terrorist-related charges.
The article reads:

As the presidential election grew near,
Linda Sarsour sat in her small office at the Arab-American Association
in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn,
looking at the photos of two thickly bearded
young Arabs on the front page of an Arabic-language newspaper.
The paper carried fervent slogans calling on young people to become martyrs in the conflict with Israel.
Sarsour, a 24-year-old
Palestinian-American, sighed. One of the men, she said, was a cousin who
has been in Israeli jails for 25 years. The other man, she said, was a
family friend serving a 99-year prison sentence in Israel.
Her brother-in-law, she said, is also serving a 12-year sentence, accused of being an activist in the Hamas.

While it would not be fair to assume guilt by relation or
association, there seems to be plenty of additional evidence to indicate
that Linda Sarsour is uncomfortably comfortable in the company of
terrorist supporters.

A report by Alex Van Ness at the website counterjihad.com this past
July notes troubling ties between Linda Sarsour and Abbas Hamideh, who
is not only co-founder of the Palestinian organization Al-Awda, but also
a supporter of the Hezbollah terrorist group. Van Ness notes:

Al-Awda co-founder and Hezbollah fan,
Abbas Hamideh, categorizes Jews as either “real Jews” or “Zionists.” He
regularly praises Hezbollah and their leader Sayyed Hasan
Nasrallah, calling him “the most honorable man on the face of the
earth.” Additionally, Hamideh calls for the entire region to be
ethnically cleansed of Jews (all in the name of ‘justice’ of course).
[Linda] Sarsour has more than just a
third degree association with Al-Awda and Hamideh.  She
has attended numerous rallies sponsored by
Al-Awda; promoted and solicited donations for their events; and she
has spoken at their rallies.  You can regularly find Sarsour and Hamideh
playfully teasing each other on Twitter.

Linda Sarsour, Abbas Hamideh, and Al-Awda joined with the communist-organized ANSWER Coalition this past fall for a National Palestine Solidarity Demonstration in Washington, D.C. Sarsour
shared the podium there with Professor Cornel West (longtime Marxist
and close associate of the Revolutionary Communist Party) and Diana
Buttu (former spokesperson for the terrorist Palestine Liberation
Organization, PLO).

A post by Joe Hoft at Gateway Pundit on January 23 features a photo of Linda Sarsour flashing the distinctive hand signal used by ISIS terrorists and their supporters.
Several women journalists have posted articles noting the utter
hypocrisy of the “feminist” organizers of the Women’s March allying the
cause with radical Muslims.
Writing at The Federalist, Shireen Qudosi, a Sufi Muslim, called the Women’s March “a Frankenstein’s monster of identity politics.”
“Although she thinks a President Trump will turn back the clock 300
years, Linda Sarsour forgets that Islam never left the Middle Ages in
its view of women,” writes Ms. Qudosi,  in her post titled “Linda Sarsour’s Muslim Identity Politics Epitomize Feminism’s Hypocrisy.” Qudosi,
who is of Afghan and South Asian ancestry, does not suffer lightly the
lunacy of militant “feminists” who embrace the unalloyed misogyny of
Islam. The absurdity of radical ant-Trump white women in Germany
chanting “Allahu Akbar” (“Allah is Greatest” — see video here) is beyond caricature.
Qudosi writes:

A Frankenstein’s monster of identity
politics, the Women’s March on Washington heaved through the streets of
DC one day after the inauguration in a fit of depraved hypocrisy.
That hypocrisy shadows activist and
National Co-Chair of the Women’s March Linda Sarsour. In the past
Sarsour has railed against women spotlighting misogyny in the Muslim
world. She openly advocates for including sharia law in the United
States. Yet sharia law would dwarf her march’s half a million turnout to
250,000, because under sharia a woman’s testimony is worth half that of
a man’s.
Sharia law would also punish the female
protestors for vulgarity in publicly displaying “p[***]y caps” and other
brazen symbols of womanhood. It would also allow men to beat their
wives and daughters for participating in the protest.

Linda Sarsour is an avid promoter of Sharia law. Cristina Laila at Gateway Pundit has posted two of Sarsour’s Sharia tweets here.
“You’ll know when you are living under Sharia Law if suddenly all
your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sounds nice, doesn’t
it?” she tweeted on May 12, 2015. “If you are still paying interest
than Sharia Law hasn’t taken over America. #justsaying,” she again
tweeted on the same day.
“I reached out to Linda Sarsour on Twitter to confront her about the
utter abuses of women under Islam,” Cristina Laila writes. “I also
brought up the fact that child marriage is abhorrent yet sanctioned
under Sharia law.” How did Sarsour respond when asked “if she denounces
these abuses?”
Laila reproduced Sarsour’s Twitter reply: “You are blocked from
following @lsarsour and viewing @lsarsour’s Tweets.” So much for dialog
and debate!
Asra Q. Nomani is another female journalist who finds Linda Sarsour
and the Women’s March militants to be insufferable hypocrites. As we reported previously,
Nomani, a Muslim from India, did some basic research and found that
dozens of the organizations sponsoring the Women’s March on Washington
are funded by George Soros, Hillary Clinton’s biggest donor.
Media to the Defense of Islamist Darling
When critics began pointing out Sarsour’s radical Islamist ties, her media allies immediately jumped into action.
“Women’s March Organizer Linda Sarsour Is Under Attack on Social Media,” screamed the headline at Elle,
the bible of the fashionista set. “Less than 48 hours after the
worldwide event, one of the women who helped plan it is facing
Islamophobic attacks,” declared the subtitle of the Elle article
by Mattie Kahn. “One of the organizers of the Women’s March is under
attack this morning, following reports from conservative news sites like
The Daily Caller that accused her of having ties to
terrorists. Linda Sarsour, a Muslim-American woman, has been an activist
for decades and is widely respected for her dedication to progressive
causes…. People have already rallied around her this morning, tweeting
#IMarchWithLinda to share their support.”
Predictably, the Huffington Post responded with an almost
identical headline and subhead: “Women’s March Organizer Targeted By
Vicious Islamophobic Attacks Online; After Muslim activist Linda Sarsour
was trolled, thousands showed support with #IMarchWithLinda.”
More “solidarity” from Democracy Now!: “#IMarchWithLinda Goes Viral, in Response to Islamophobic Attacks Against Linda Sarsour.”
Here’s Time’s offering on the subject: “The Internet Defends Women’s March Organizer Accused of Having Ties to Terror”
And at BuzzFeed: “People Are Rallying In Support Of A Women’s March Organizer After Right-Wing Attacks”
And, as to be expected, more of the same from Media Matters, the
Soros-funded, left-wing media “watchdog”: “Fake News Purveyors Run With
Bigoted Attacks On Women’s March Organizer And Google Helps Them
Profit.”
Now that they have conquered Washington, D.C., perhaps the courageous
“Champion of Change” and her feminist cohorts will take their “Women’s
March” on the road to challenge misogyny, patriarchy, and “rape culture”
in other bastions of male privilege — such as Tehran, Mecca, Riyadh,
Bagdad, Tripoli, Cairo, and Benghazi? Yeah, right.

Related articles:
Anti-Trump “Women’s March” – Celebrity Profanity, Media Duplicity

PRESIDENT TRUMP – Protests Fizzle, Fail to Stop Inauguration
President Trump Cites Bible in Unity Call; Touts “America First”
Violence Planned for Trump Inauguration Exposed 
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALL OUR NUMEROUS POSTS ABOUT SARSOUR:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/01/splc-defends-linda-sarsour-pro-sharia.html 

 

SPLC DEFENDS LINDA SARSOUR, PRO SHARIA WOMEN’S MARCH ORGANIZER

 SPLC Defends Pro-Sharia Women's March Organizer
 Far-left organization attacks ex-Muslim reformers while championing Sharia advocate
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) defended Linda Sarsour
Friday, the Women’s March organizer who has repeatedly defended Sharia
law.

The SPLC, a far left organization
that has painted mainline conservatives as extremist on numerous
occasions while downplaying or ignoring actual violence from liberals,
jumped to Sarsour’s defense after social media users began pointing out
her radical beliefs.

Sarsour, a Palestinian-American-Muslim, has
praised Sharia law, which states, among other things, that homosexuals
should be put to death.

The activist also has family ties to terror groups in Palestine and recently met with an ex-Hamas operative, reports the Daily Caller.
“Sarsour,
the head of the Arab American Association of New York and an Obama
White House ‘Champion of Change,’ was speaking at last month’s 15th
annual convention of the Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle of
North America,” Chuck Ross writes. “While there, she posed for a picture
with Salah Sarsour, a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and
former Hamas operative who was jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of
his alleged work for the terrorist group.”
Unsurprisingly, as one
Twitter user pointed out, the SPLC has a history of branding former
Muslims calling for reforms in the Islamic world as Islamaphobes.

Despite numerous research polls
showing the Muslim world to hold the most anti-liberal viewpoints, the
left continues to uphold Islam as a compatible belief system with the
West.

The Left & Islam: Unholy Alliance
 SHOCK: #WomensMarch Promotes Islamic Enslavement of Women
 Feminists At Women’s March Triggered By “Islam Is Misogynistic” Sign
 

NEW YORK CITY GIVING $10 MILLION TO LINDA SARSOUR, HATE-FILLED SUPPORTER OF PALESTINIAN JIHAD

Islamic supremacist Linda Sarsour says of “Islamophobes”: 

“Their job is to vilify Islam and Muslims”

linda-sarsour

NEW YORK CITY GIVING $10 MILLION TO LINDA SARSOUR, HATE-FILLED SUPPORTER OF PALESTINIAN JIHAD
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/04/nyc-giving-10-million-to-linda-sarsour-hate-filled-supporter-of-palestinian-jihadrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“The Arab-American Association of New York, a Brooklyn-based nonprofit run by Linda Sarsour, was selected as one of 14 groups by the Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York to receive $10 million over five years…” Linda Sarsour likes to posture as an outsider, struggling against The Man in solidarity with all the other Oppressed People, but in reality she is the quintessential establishment figure, now that the hard-Left and Socialists are firmly ensconced in the corridors of power. Her cynical and disingenuous victimhood posturing and effective clearing-away of obstacles for violent terrorists are completely mainstream these days. The real outsiders and voices of the oppressed who are fighting against authoritarians who do all they can to silence and discredit them are the foes of jihad.
Sarsour is an energetic purveyor of the “Islamophobia” myth, and has hysterically claimed that “Muslim kids” are being “executed” in the United States. She was instrumental in prevailing upon de Blasio to end legal and necessary surveillance in Muslim communities in New York. She is also a frequent visitor to the Obama White House, and has claimed that the jihad underwear bomber was a CIA agent — part of what she claims is a U.S. war against Islam.
Sarsour is also a practiced exploiter of the “hate” smear against foes of jihad terror and Islamic supremacism, and has never apologized for using the Islamic honor murder of Shaima Alawadi to spread lies about the prevalence of hate crimes against Muslims in America. She is also an enthusiastic supporter of the “Palestinian” jihad against Israel. Given the general support for that jihad among Leftists, and the hard-Left tilt of the de Blasio regime in New York, it is not surprising that her hate-filled endeavors are taxpayer-funded. But it is scandalous nonetheless: a grim sign of the times.
“City gives $500K to activist at center of Palestine-Israel Twitter war,” by Rich Calder, New York Post, April 2, 2016:
City First Lady Chirlane McCray is handing over more than $500,000 to an Arab-American activist who came under fire for denouncing critics on Twitter as “Zionist trolls.”
The Arab-American Association of New York, a Brooklyn-based nonprofit run by Linda Sarsour, was selected as one of 14 groups by the Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York to receive $10 million over five years to integrate mental-health services into their community programs. McCray oversees the fund.
Sarsour, a longtime ally and vote-getter for Mayor de Blasio, got into a Twitter war last October with Queens Councilman Rory Lancman, who is Jewish, when she posted a picture of a Palestinian boy clutching rocks in front of Israeli soldiers, labeling it “The definition of courage.”
After Lancman replied, “No, the definition of barbarism,” Sarsour tweeted, “The Zionist trolls are out to play. Bring it. You will never silence me.”…

________________________________________________________________

New York Muslim Leader Responds To Cruz’s Calls To ‘Patrol’ Neighborhoods

“MUSLIMS” Support “BERNIE SANDERS”: LINDA SARSOUR EX. DIR. ARAB AMERICAN ASSN, NY

I Want a President Who Will Welcome Refugees

Published on Sep 12, 2015
Linda Sarsour speaks at the 9/12/15 rally in Union Square in New York City on behalf of the Syrian and other refugees

Arab American life in Brooklyn with Linda Sarsour

Published on Sep 7, 2015
Linda Sarsour talks about her Palestinian background and challenges being Arab American in Brooklyn.

Linda Sarsour – Obama Administration “Champion of Change”
“Common Enemy is White Supremacy”

Islamic Supremacist Linda Sarsour Targets 

Mentally Ill Homeless Man 

BY PAMELA GELLER
SEE: http://pamelageller.com/2014/09/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-targets-mentally-ill-homeless-man-frrbobo.html/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Linda Sarsour is a rabidly anti-Semitic Islamic supremacist who wields her religion like a club to beat politicos, the media and the uninitiated into submission. I debated her on CNNhere. She is a notorious demagogue who ought to be relegated to the very fringe of society. Instead, in this morally inverted culture she is  honored by the White House as a “champion of change.”
In order to give proof to the “islamophobia” lie,  Sarsour has viciously targeted a mentally ill man who lost his sanity after seeing his mother and sister killed in a car accident when he was only 20 years old. He is a long time Bay Ridge fixture, known for his erratic behavior and pathetic outbursts.
Sarsour is going after this poor man much the way nazi goons that targeted the mentally challenged — in order to make an example of them to send a message to everyone else. Sarsour’s vicious attack on a mentally incompetent homeless man is evil.
This isn’t  proof of “Islamophobia”; it’s just the opposite. Scraping the bottom of the barrel for this “incident” proves how infrequently (if ever) this happens.
One of the members of the Brooklyn community wrote me, “I’m writing in the hopes that someone can help with this horrific situation going on in Bay Ridge Brooklyn. There is a woman by the name of Linda Sarsour. It’s an extremely long story but basically she’s taking a local white, drunk, mentally ill man and making him a scapegoat for Islamaphobia (as she calls it). He’s now being charged with a hate crime. Nevermind she’s turned the Muslims completely against all non Muslims in my small neighborhood in New York. There are countless people on Facebook trying to help this man Brian Boshell, but we don’t know where to begin. This woman Linda is apparently very influential & powerful.”
“Hate Crime? Not So, Says Brooklyn Community,” National Review, September 9, 2014
A hate crime making national headlines is debunked by the locals.
A recent incident between an Arab-American activist and a mentally ill homeless man is being distorted by the national media and left-wing activists, say residents of the Brooklyn community of Bay Ridge.
Last Wednesday afternoon, Palestinian-American Linda Sarsour allegedly had a run-in with a well-known local street person as she exited the Arab-American Association of New York’s headquarters on Fifth Avenue in Bay Ridge. According to the Huffington Post, activist Sarsour “noticed a man leaning up against its storefront.” A more recent article in the Daily News says Sarsour’s alleged assailant, 45-year-old Brian Boshell, “was sleeping on the street in Bay Ridge, blocking their organization’s entryway.” Either way, an employee of the Association, of which Sarsour is the executive director, called 911; but before the NYPD arrived, the man became belligerent. He stood up and allegedly shouted, “you are cutting people’s heads off sharmoota. I’m going to cut off you head and see how your people will feel, you Arab b****.” He then threw a New York City garbage can into the street, according to a police report.
According to the Huffington Post, Sarsour and her co-worker ran across the street and called 911 again. After 45 minutes, police officers finally arrived at the scene, only after Sarsour ran into them at a bagel store. They told her that she should have called the incident an “assault” over the phone. If she had, they would have come sooner.
Sarsour, who, according to her profile on the Arab-American Association of New York’s website has been profiled by PBS, Yahoo News, and the U.K. Guardian in addition to being honored by the White House as a “Champion of Change,” is a familiar Bay Ridge community activist. She quickly took to Twitter, where she has more than 18,000 followers, to label the incident a hate crime. She also called Boshell a “bigoted drunk” on Facebook. At the time of the incident, Sarsour was on her way to a Manhattan forum about police-community relations, where she retold her story to the NYPD deputy commissioners present. A hate-crimes unit was then dispatched.
Screen Shot 2014-09-11 at 12.04.26 AMScreen Shot 2014-09-11 at 12.04.39 AMScreen Shot 2014-09-11 at 12.04.48 AMBoshell was arrested and was arraigned Monday for attempted assault as a hate crime and other counts. He is being held on $20,000 bail and faces up to seven years in prison if arrested. ABC’s Bill Ritter called the confrontation a “violent act of hate.” Headlines about the incident have included the following:
NYPD Took 45 Minutes to Respond to Hate Crime, Arab-American Says 

 Screen Shot 2014-09-11 at 12.08.57 AM

Sarsour, a frequent guest on MSNBC, returned to Melissa Harris-Perry’s show Sunday to discuss the assault. In her introduction, Harris-Perry said Sarsour was subjected to racially charged threats and was apparently targeted “because of her identity.” Sarsour, who wears a hijab, recounted the experience and said of Boshell, “If he was African-American, you better believe he wouldn’t be walking in our streets right now.” The panel then discussed relations between the African-American community and the NYPD.

 Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted his condolences to Sarsour, saying that New York City will “never condone such glaring acts of bigotry and tolerance.”

 And who is Brian Boshell, the bigot so full of hatred towards Muslims and Arabs? This man.
Boshell is a mentally ill homeless man widely known in Bay Ridge for his public, incoherent outbursts, which resulted in 56 arrests and 34 minor convictions. Police are familiar with his flare-ups, which have been irksome but not dangerous. The picture above shows him sleeping in a bank on Fifth Avenue, a few blocks away from the Arab-American Association. He is known to “sleep where he falls,” as one resident put it.
The community isn’t buying the story the mainstream media and Sarsour are spinning. A 30-year resident of Bay Ridge, who requested anonymity, tells National Review Online, “Instead of an incident with a drunk man, [Sarsour] is using this as her final proof of Islamaphobia in America . . .  Brian [Boshell] has a 25-year history of outbursts . . .  There is a lot that’s questionable about her not knowing who he was.” This resident, who says she knows Boshell and his family personally, says his mental health started to decline when he was 20 years old, after he witnessed his mother and sister die in a car accident.
“Everyone knows who he is. [Sarsour] knows who he is,” a 22-year Muslim resident of Bay Ridge tells National Review Online.
Brian Doherty, a retired police officer who has lived in Bay Ridge for 20 years and whose wife went to junior high school with Boshell, said he mostly wanders around a stretch of 5th Avenue between 69th and 75th Streets. The Arab-American Association of New York sits on 71st Street and 5th Avenue. “That’s his stomping grounds,” a Bay Ridge local comments.
Another resident familiar with Boshell said he should be in a hospital for treatment of his mental conditions, not prison.
Many residents have taken to social media to express their discontent about the hate-crime charge. The hashtag #FreeBobo, a nickname for Boshell, is circulating on Facebook and on signs in local bars.
Sarsour publicly supported Al Sharpton’s recent march across the Verrazano Bridge to protest the death of Eric Garner, and her Arab-American Association organized buses to join the rally. Many Bay Ridge locals are upset at what they say is her divisive handling of the incident with Boshell. Bay Ridge has a large Arab- 
Muslim community, and the New York Times made Sarsour the lead figure in a 2013 profile and accompanying video about ethnic enclaves in New York City.
 “There is no community in New York City that has embraced Arab culture more than Bay Ridge,” Doherty tells NRO.
According to another local, “This community has lived peacefully with Arabs and this [alleged hate crime] is being used as a wedge in the neighborhood.”
Representatives from the NYPD’s hate-crimes unit will be in attendance at the next 68th Police Precinct Council Meeting on September 16th. “Anyone who feels that Boshell was railroaded should come to the meeting,” a representative tells NRO.
Doherty speculates that Sarsour is seeking attention in hope of succeeding Bay Ridge’s term-limited councilman in 2016. “She’s attempting to make it political because she has her eye on [Vincent] Gentile’s seat,” Doherty tells NRO.
The case lays open the ambiguous and often illogical nature of hate crime laws. Had Boshell merely shouted “b****” without the word “Arab” before hurling the garbage can, he would probably be facing only another misdemeanor. Some Bay Ridge residents expressed concern on social media about whether Boshell, who could be facing a seven-year sentence, would be able to handle a prison populated by gang members and rapists.
“This is a tortured definition of a hate crime,” Doherty says.

 _____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

http://lindasarsour.blogspot.com/
http://www.arabamericanny.org/lindasarsour
https://www.whitehouse.gov/champions/giving-back-to-community/linda-sarsour
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-on-msnbc-muslim-kids-being-executed-in-the-u-s 
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-says-of-islamophobes-their-job-is-to-vilify-islam-and-muslims
http://www.brooklyndaily.com/stories/2014/37/br-sarsour-beheading-threat-2014-09-12-bk_2014_37.html
http://www.heyridge.com/2015/08/an-assault-reveals-the-deep-divisions-in-bay-ridge/


JEW HATRED: CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS COME OUT IN FAVOR OF ANTI-SEMITIC CURRICULUM PRAISING REPS. OMAR, TLAIB & SARSOUR

ISLAMIC JIHADISTS TO BE INCORPORATED IN ANTI-SEMITIC BRAINWASHING OF CHILDREN IN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS:

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/07/california-school-boards-come-out-in-favor-of-anti-semitic-curriculum-praising-omar-tlaib-sarsour;

AND: https://pjmedia.com/culture/robert-spencer/2020/07/23/california-school-boards-come-out-in-favor-of-anti-semitic-curriculum-praising-omar-tlaib-sarsour-n674877

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Ever wonder exactly how schools breed America-haters? Here’s how.

A Leftist protester in Portland recently announced that the goal of the riots that have recently swept the nation is the “abolition of the United States as we know it,” to the applause of her audience (which included not just miseducated children, but a middle-aged priest who should have known better). Rioters around the country, who are overwhelmingly young, middle-class Americans, have made abundantly clear their incandescent hatred for the United States. In the midst of all this, the California Department of Education has given us a vivid illustration of how we got here. It has developed an “Ethnic Studies” curriculum that would make Joseph Goebbels proud.

The Jewish News Syndicate (JNS) reported Thursday that “more than a dozen California school boards have adopted resolutions in support of the state’s proposed ethnic-studies model curriculum, despite it having come under fire for containing anti-Semitic and anti-Israel content, and not addressing issues of anti-Semitism or including Jewish Americans.”

It’s all happening under the cover of darkness, deception, and coronavirus distraction, thanks to a group called “Save CA Ethnic Studies.” A letter to the California Department of Education (CDE) protesting the curriculum states: “School board members asked to vote on the resolution are not shown the original draft curriculum, and not informed about the enormous outpouring of criticism it engendered or that a CDE process is well underway for the curriculum’s redesign.”

The letter adds that school board members are “led to believe that in voting for the resolution they are showing support for AB-2016 and affirming the importance of ethnic studies classes in general, rather than endorsing the highly controversial draft curriculum that was condemned by dozens of state leaders and tens of thousands of Californians.”

The curriculum could have been devised in the editorial offices of Der Stürmer. According to JNS, “the proposed curriculum section on ‘Arab American Studies Course Outline’ contains a number of passages concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, such as ‘Direct Action Front for Palestine and Black Lives Matter,’ ‘Call to Boycott, Divest and Sanction Israel’ and ‘Comparative Border Studies: Palestine and Mexico.’”

As if that weren’t enough, the curriculum “also includes studying national figures such as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the late Columbia University professor Edward Said, Women’s March leader Linda Sarsour, the late radio personality Casey Kasem, actress Alia Shawkat, and the late White House correspondent Helen Thomas—all of whom are associated with anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rhetoric, and in the case of the congresswomen, a push to enact legislation punishing Israel.”

Even in California, this far-Left propaganda has aroused controversy. Nevertheless, “despite the ongoing debate over the ethnic-studies curriculum, at least 13 school boards in the state have recently passed resolutions affirming their support for the ethnic-studies model curriculum draft: Hayward (April 22), Castro Valley (April 23), Albany (April 28), San Francisco (April 28), West Contra Costa (May 6), Alhambra (May 19), Oakland (May 27), South San Francisco (May 28), Jefferson Union (June 2), Jefferson Elementary (June 17), San Mateo Foster City (June 18), El Monte Union (June 24) and Santa Rosa City Schools (July 8).”

Nor is this proposed curriculum remotely singular. The commitment to “multiculturalism” that has now taken over K-12 education in America has been a godsend for Muslims in particular who are anxious to use schools and textbooks not just to preach hatred of Jews and Israel, but to proselytize for Islam.  Worried about appearing insufficiently “tolerant” and “inclusive,” too many public schools and individual teachers have succumbed to an organized campaign by U.S.-based Islamic organizations and their primary benefactor, Saudi Arabia, to present a view of Islam that whitewashes its violent history and intolerant doctrines.

Combine this with the deeply-rooted Leftist bias of curriculum material, and it is no surprise that American children graduate from all too many high schools, colleges and universities hating not just Israel, but their own country and heritage. It creates a population that is rife for insurrection. What we’re seeing now is the outcome of years, indeed decades, of this hard-Left, anti-American indoctrination. When the Left took over our educational system, what other outcome did anyone expect?

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 21 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Der Stürmer | Wikipedia audio article:

CAUTION: EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE ANTISEMITIC PICTURES & CARTOONS: 

SEE: (PROPAGANDA ARCHIVES OF DER STURMER NEWS)

https://diewahrheitistwieeingewitter.wordpress.com/2015/04/26/der-sturmer-caricatures-part-1-1925-1934/

https://diewahrheitistwieeingewitter.wordpress.com/2015/04/26/der-sturmer-caricatures-part-2-1935-1944/

THE MAN WHO ENTERTAINED GERMANS WITH VILE ANTISEMITIC PROPAGANDA

The Man Who Entertained Germans With Vile Antisemitic Propaganda

BY 

SEE: http://thewisdomdaily.com/the-man-who-entertained-germans-with-vile-antisemitic-propaganda/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

July 26, 2018

Julius Streicher was the creator and editor of Der Sturmer, the notorious anti-Semitic newspaper of the Nazi era. He was a hateful bigot of mediocre intelligence, loved by his leader and despised by his fellow Nazis, not for his moral repugnance, but because they generally despised each other. Streicher’s hatred of the Jews was profound and malignant, his ideology rotten to the core, full of lies and contempt. Arrogant and cruel, Streicher showed no remorse for the hatred he spread or the devastation it wrought; rather, he reveled in it and pushed on, until all of Germany was infested with the foul stench of his hatred.

Born February 12, 1885 in the Bavarian town of Fleinhausen, Streicher’s childhood was poor, but happy. The youngest of nine children in a devout Catholic family, his mediocre intelligence ensured he matured into adulthood with a mind that was small and coarse. Though he knew no Jews growing up, his Catholicism provided fertile soil for his later hatred, courtesy of the erroneous foundation of Christian anti-Semitism: that the Jews killed their Christ.

When he left school, he became a teacher; and not a very good one by all accounts. He married and had two sons and looked set to live the life of a drudge, until an angry Bosnian took a potshot at an Austrian nobleman and sparked the First World War. Streicher fought valiantly for his country, gaining both distinction and an Iron Cross, First Class, a significant German military award. During his service, he earned the rank of lieutenant and several citations for bad behavior.

After the war, Streicher returned to a Germany that was seething over its loss of the war and reeling under the weight of the reparations imposed by the victors, to say nothing of the collective trauma of losing almost an entire generation of young men. Unemployment was high, the economy in ruins, and political extremism, rampant. In 1919, Streicher became involved in the German Nationalist Protection and Defense Federation, which was formed in response to the failed German Communist revolution of 1918. The Federation was deeply anti-Semitic and blamed Jews for the loss of the war and the spread of Bolshevism.

In 1921, Streicher attended a meeting of the National Socialist German Workers (NAZI) Party; he was there to hear the Party’s leader, Adolph Hitler, speak. Hitler’s hate-filled rhetoric penetrated Streicher on a spiritual level – like Saul on the road to Damascus – compelling him to join the Nazi Party and become a devoted follower of Hitler. In 1923, his devotion was made manifest with the founding of Der Sturmer (lit: The Stormer or Attacker). The chief aim of Streicher’s weekly rag was to disseminate anti-Semitic propaganda, which demonized Jews and championed the Nazi cause: namely, the building of an Aryan super state, free of Jews and other undesirables.

In its infancy, Der Sturmer was not well received. Most sensible minded Germans, including top Nazi officials, viewed it as nothing more than the libelous ravings of a nutjob. Hitler loved it. The courts agreed with everyone else, heavily fining Streicher for his lies.

Each issue of Der Sturmer relied on contemporary iterations of age-old anti-Semitic tropes, The Blood Libel and world domination among them, mixed in with titillating, semi-pornographic drivel, and the frontpage by-line: The Jews are our misfortune.

Like all good conspiracy theorists, Streicher included a grain of truth in his articles, usually in the form of an actual person, to whom he ascribed all manner of ridiculous misdeeds; tales so ludicrous, only a reader with the mental acuity of a gnat would believe.

Unfortunately, hate begets stupidity; so, when Hitler seized power and hate-mongering became a national pastime, Der Sturmer readership rose from 10’s to 100,000’s per week, making Streicher a millionaire. The more patently ridiculous the stories, the more the Streicher’s readers gobbled them up. Hitler was in his element and read it cover to cover each week and insisted everyone else read it too. To aid this, special display cases (called Sturmerkasten) were erected in towns, so no one missed out.

Sturmerkasten, Worms, Germany

So delighted was Hitler with his vulgar lackey, he made Streicher the Gauleiter (regional leader) of the Bavarian region of Franconia. Streicher used his new-found power to wicked ends, organizing a boycott of Jewish shops in 1933, and the destruction of The Great Synagogue of Nuremberg in 1938, precipitating Kristallnacht (Night of Broken Glass), during which 91 Jewish lives were lost, 8000 Jewish properties destroyed, and 30,000 Jewish men arrested and sent to concentration camps.

Streicher also took it upon himself to indoctrinate German youth with anti-Semitic ideology. To this end, he published three children’s books written by Ernst Hiemer and illustrated by Philipp Rupprecht (pen name Fips), Der Sturmer’s cartoonist since 1925. The most famous of these books was Der Giftpilz (“The Poisonous Mushroom”) an odious manual, warning children of the dangers of Jews.

The Poisonous Mushroom. Published 1938.

In 1940, Streicher was dismissed from his post as Gauleiter when it came to light he’d helped himself to Jewish property during Kristallnacht. Not that Nazis were averse to theft, rather, all stolen property belonged in the coffers of the Reich. Streicher’s release from his Gauleiter duties meant he had more time to dedicate to his pathological Jew-baiting, which continued unhindered until the bitter end.

That end came in 1945, when Germany lost the war (again) and Streicher was captured by the Americans and put on trial in his hometown of Nuremberg. Having taken no part in the waging of war or the decision-making process responsible for the Holocaust, Streicher was tried as a major war criminal based solely on the things that he said (a cautionary tale for any who suppose the privilege of free speech is bulwark against consequence).

What he said was considered so odious, so incendiary, that he was convicted of crimes against humanity and sentenced to hang. His hanging went badly. Having declared his allegiance to his dead Reich, the floor beneath him gave way, but his neck did not break, so he jiggled and moaned until the life was slowly choked out of him, receiving one last kindness from humanity when his executioner pulled on his legs.


References:

Bytwerk, Randall L. (2001) Julius Streicher, Cooper Square Press, New York.

Carruthers, B. (2014) Architects of Darkness: Julius Streicher, Total Content Digital

 




HAMAS LINKED “CAIR” & PRO-PALESTINIAN JIHAD JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE RALLY FOR ILHAN OMAR BEFORE ANTI-SEMITISM VOTE IN DEMOCRAT HOUSE~SARSOUR ATTACKS PELOSI~OCASIO-CORTEZ TWEETS FALSE VIDEO, ACCUSES CPAC OF ISLAMOPHOBIA



Middle Eastern Women’s Coalition Calls for the Resignation of Rep. Ilhan Omar

Assyrian Woman Urges Ilhan Omar’s Supporters to Visit Her Minnesota District
Nahren Anweya calls for Rep. Ilhan Omar to resign at Middle Eastern Women’s Coalition’s press conference in D.C. Wednesday.

Philadelphia Imam Abdelmohsen Abouhatab in Antisemitic Sermons: The Jews Are the Vilest People

HAMAS LINKED “CAIR” & PRO-PALESTINIAN JIHAD JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE RALLY FOR ILHAN OMAR BEFORE ANTI-SEMITISM VOTE IN DEMOCRAT HOUSE 

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/anti-israel-pro-palestinian-jihad-groups-show-support-for-ilhan-omar-before-anti-semitism-voterepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Several anti-Israel, jihad-supporting groups are coming together to promote an event “in support of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), including a Muslim and a Jewish group that both have controversial records on terrorism.”
The groups include CAIR, with its associations with Hamas, a Muslim Brotherhood organization, and Jewish Voice for Peace, “a radical left-wing organization that hosted convicted Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh at a conference in 2017 before she was deported for lying to U.S. immigration officials about her violent past.”
These groups have called the event “Coalition of Muslim, Jewish Groups” in an attempt to deceive Americans into thinking that they are exponents of Jewish-Muslim unity and dialogue. The truth about this sham event is that it is a clear demonstration in support of the Palestinian jihad.
While the article below refers to “anti-Israel extremist groups,” these groups are not just anti-Israel; they are also anti-West. They associate themselves with and defend the Palestinian jihad, despite the Palestinians’ “pay for slay” program to reward jihadists who murder Israeli civilians, including children. The Palestinian Authority agenda, which is supported by Ilan Omar et al, seeks to obliterate the State of Israel.
Last week, Laurie Cardoza-Moore, the founder of Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, called Omar “a Hamas plant” in Congress.
“Anti-Israel Extremist Groups to Show Support for Ilhan Omar Before Antisemitism Vote,” by Joel B Pollak, Breitbart, March 5, 2019:
Several anti-Israel extremist groups are planning an event Wednesday morning in support of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), including a Muslim and a Jewish group that both have controversial records on terrorism.
Omar’s most recent antisemitic remarks, accusing pro-Israel Americans of “allegiance” to a foreign power, came after she had been forced to apologize last month for other, similar remarks.
In response to criticism from Jewish groups, Democratic leaders have planned to hold a vote on a resolution condemning antisemitism on Wednesday.
But some on the left — including Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), who has made similar remarks — are backing Omar.
The event, a press conference to announce a letter of support for Omar, is billed as a “Coalition of Muslim, Jewish Groups,” and was announced Tuesday via a news release from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
CAIR has claimed in the past that American foreign policy is partly to blame for terrorism against Americans. In December 2015, the organization offered legal assistance to the family of the terrorists who killed 14 and wounded nearly two dozen other people in a terror attack on a holiday party in a local government office.
As Breitbart News has noted:
In 2007-8, CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the terror financing trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. That case, in turn, led the FBI to discontinue its work with the organization. In 2009, a federal judge ruled that the government “produced ample evidence to establish” the ties of CAIR with Hamas, the Palestinian terror organization. The United Arab Emirates labeled CAIR a terrorist organization in 2014 (a decision that the Obama administration opposed).
Another group involved in the press conference is Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), a radical left-wing organization that hosted convicted Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh at a conference in 2017 before she was deported for lying to U.S. immigration officials about her violent past…..

_____________________________________________________________

 OMAR’S JEW-HATE GONE WILD 

While Dems bow in deference

BY JOSEPH KLEIN
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273076/omars-jew-hate-gone-wild-joseph-kleinrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The Democrat freshman Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn) has proven again and again her anti-Semitic bent. She continues to caricature American citizens who support the Jewish state of Israel, including such supporters serving in Congress, of harboring dual loyalties and “allegiance to a foreign country.” While some Democrat leaders in Congress have called her out for her remarks, none appear willing to discipline her. Unlike the Republicans’ actions in stripping Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) of his House committee seats after he made remarks that appeared to defend white nationalism, Congresswoman Omar is still a member of the influential House Foreign Affairs Committee, with no current intention by Democrat House leaders to remove her. Democratic House leaders also appear to be caving in to demands from Omar’s supporters that a clear-cut House resolution against anti-Semitism, which would not have called out Omar by name even in its original version, be even further watered down by adding generic condemnations of hatred in all forms, including of so-called Islamophobia.
Omar, a Somali-American, has regularly demonized Israel and sought to delegitimize it, hallmarks in themselves of her anti-Semitism. In the past, she has accused Israel of “evil doings” and of hypnotizing the world.  Earlier this year, she compared Israel to the murderous, terrorist sponsoring Iranian regime and said she “almost chuckle[s]” when the Jewish state is described as a democracy. Omar criticized Israel for instituting laws that “recognize it as a Jewish state and does not recognize the other religions that are living in it.”
Israel, like the United States, is in fact, a pluralistic democracy that honors freedom of worship and religious tolerance. That’s certainly much more than can be said for Omar’s native Somalia, where Islam is the official religion and Islamic sharia is the basic source for national legislation. Employing a double standard when falsely accusing Israel of intolerant behavior that her own native country and other Islamic countries display is yet another hallmark of Omar’s anti-Semitism.
In castigating the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its supposed influence in swaying U.S politicians to favor Israel, Omar claims she is holding fast to her stated position on “the problematic role of lobbyists in politics, whether it be AIPAC, the [National Rifle Association] or the fossil fuel industry.” Somehow, however, she is not worried about the role of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR representatives have regularly lobbied members of Congress and their staff, as well as having conducted closed door meetings with members of the Obama administration. Its agenda is not merely to protect American Muslims’ civil rights, as it claims. The group, like Omar, is stridently anti-Israel. It has accepted foreign donations from radical Muslim countries such as Qatar. CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad proclaimed two decades ago that “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” 
Omar will be speaking at a fund-raising event for CAIR later this month, hosted by CAIR-LA, whose chief executive director, Hussam Ayloush, has compared Israel to the Islamic State. This same CAIR leader claimed after the 2015 San Bernardino, California terrorist attack, in which Islamist terrorists had murdered 14 people and wounded 31 others, that the United States itself was partly to blame for the attack. He said, “let’s not forget that some of our own foreign policy as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism.”
This is the company that Omar keeps – her kind of lobbyists. She is not only an anti-Semite, who deserves at minimum to be kicked off the House Foreign Affairs Committee immediately and censured if she continues accusing her fellow representatives and others who support Israel of dual loyalties. Like the Islamist group she will be fund-raising for, Omar is an apologist for Islamic terrorism.
Shortly after four armed members of al-Shabab, the Somalian jihadist terrorist group, stormed the Westgate mall in Nairobi, Kenya in 2013, resulting in nearly 70 people dead and 200 wounded, Omar said that terrorist acts were the “byproducts of the actions of our involvement in other people’s affairs.” Is that how she justifies the slaughter by al Qaeda of thousands of innocent people who were going about their own business on 9/11? 
In 2016, when Omar was serving as a Minnesota state representative, she pleaded for “compassion” in a letter she sent to a judge considering the sentences for a group of Minnesota men accused of trying to join the Islamic State. She blamed their attraction to the Islamic State and preparations to fight for the Islamist terrorists on the flimsy excuse of “systematic alienation.”  Lets just show these would-be murders some “distributive justice,” she said, instead of the harsh prison sentences they deserve.
Finally, when it comes to complaining about “dual loyalties” and “foreign allegiances,” Representative Omar would do well to speak with her colleague, Palestinian-American Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich). Tlaib said that much of her “strength comes from being Palestinian.” To show where her real allegiance lies, she wore a Palestinian gown, said to be a symbol of Palestinian nationalism, at her swearing-in ceremony. She explained, “Throughout my career in public service, the residents I have had the privilege of fighting for have embraced who I am, especially my Palestinian roots.”
A double standard once again. And today’s Democrat Party is all in, bowing to its radical progressive base. 
_____________________________________________________________

House Democrats condemn anti-Semitism because of anti-Semitic Rep. Ilhan Omar, but don’t name her

BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/house-democrats-condemn-anti-semitism-without-naming-anti-semitic-rep-ilhan-omarrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This is just weak and mealy-mouthed virtue-signaling, designed to cover for their endorsement of Omar and refusal to remove her from the Foreign Affairs Committee. Omar can even vote for this resolution as it stands, and probably will. “War is deceit,” said Muhammad.
“Democratic rebuke of Ilhan Omar won’t name her,” by Susan Ferrechio, Washington Examiner, March 5, 2019:
House Democrats will vote on a resolution Wednesday condemning anti-Semitism, but the measure will not name Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., whose comments prompted the rare condemnation from her fellow lawmakers.
The four-page resolution is sponsored by Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., and “rejects anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values that define the people of the United States.”
The measure outlines the history of anti-Semitic attacks against Jews and addresses “the myth of dual loyalty, including allegations that Jews should be suspected of being disloyal neighbors or citizens.” Omar in a series of tweets raised the idea that Jewish members of Congress shouldn’t be loyal to Israel over America.
“[A]ccusing Jews of dual loyalty because they support Israel, whether out of a religious connection, a commitment to Jewish self-determination after millennia of persecution, or an appreciation for shared values and interests, suggests that Jews cannot be patriotic Americans and trusted neighbors, when Jews have served our Nation since its founding, whether in public life or military service,” the resolution said in rebuttal.
“Jewish people are subject to numerous other dangerous anti-Semitic myths as well, including that Jews control the banks, media, and the United States Government or seek world domination and that Jews are obsessed with money,” it added.
It concluded by saying the House “acknowledges the dangerous consequences of perpetuating anti-Semitic stereotypes,” and also “rejects anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values that define the people of the United States.”…

______________________________________________________________

House Democrats postpone condemnation of anti-Semitism, will add condemnation of “Islamophobia”

BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This became necessary because of the full-throated defenses of Omar from the Democrats’ far-Left anti-Semitic base. The Democrats don’t believe they can afford to alienate those people, so they’re watering down their already watery resolution with a mention of “anti-Muslim bias” that all too often amounts simply to honest analysis of the motivating ideology of jihad terrorism.
“The anti-Semitic gift that keeps on giving,” PJ Media Live Blog (scroll down), March 6, 2019:
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) cannot shut her Jew-hating yapper, so now the Democrats are forced to make some gestures to smooth over relations with an important and generous constituency: the Jewish community. After weighing the cost/benefit analysis of their intersectional bingo political strategy, a resolution to condemn anti-Semitism has been postponed.
The resolution will be updated to include anti-Muslim bias and other forms of bigotry, likely pushing a vote to Thursday, a day later than they had originally hoped, according to two Democratic aides. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told Democratic leaders about the change of plans Tuesday evening, one of the aides said.
And notably, the resolution does not name the anti-Semite in question, Omar.
Without mentioning Omar by name, the four-page resolution says her comment “suggests that Jews cannot be patriotic Americans and trusted neighbors.” She did not answer questions about her comments while leaving her Capitol Hill office Tuesday….

______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.investigativeproject.org/7840/ilhan-omar-spews-more-anti-semitism
AND:
https://www.infowars.com/former-kkk-grand-wizard-david-duke-endorses-ilhan-omar-shes-now-the-most-important-member-of-the-us-congress/
AND:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273078/democrats-go-socialist-they-go-anti-semitic-daniel-greenfield
AND:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/democrats-plan-to-condemn-all-hate-after-backing-down-from-condemning-anti-semitism
AND:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/democrats-retreat-from-anti-semitism-resolution-after-backlash-defending-anti-semitic-rep-omar
AND:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/popular-evangelical-leader-calls-for-justice-dept-investigation-of-omar-for-links-to-muslim-brotherhood-charities
AND:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/273083/dem-resolution-will-condemn-all-hate-except-their-daniel-greenfield
AND:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/rep-ilhan-omar-obama-was-able-to-get-away-with-murder-because-he-had-the-pretty-face-and-the-smile
AND:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/popular-evangelical-leader-calls-for-justice-dept-investigation-of-omar-for-links-to-muslim-brotherhood-charities

______________________________________________________________

 

Linda Sarsour enraged over House resolution condemning anti-Semitism, attacks “white feminist” Nancy Pelosi

BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Surprised? Don’t be. Linda Sarsour is a believing, Sharia-adherent Muslim. She is a devout believer in Islam, and the Qur’an demonizes the Jews in numerous ways. It depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
“Linda Sarsour Attacks ‘White Feminist’ Nancy Pelosi Over Resolution Condemning Anti-Semitism,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, March 5, 2019:
Women’s March co-chair Linda Sarsour attacked Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi Monday night as a “typical white feminist upholding the patriarchy doing the dirty work of powerful white men,” in response to a House resolution condemning anti-Semitism.
House Democrats announced the resolution Monday after Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar’s latest anti-Israel comments, which critics — including other Democrats — have denounced as anti-Semitic.
“This is why we wanted Congresswoman Barbara Lee to be the Speaker of the House and ‘progressives’ were like ‘nah, Pelosi is a leader and omg you should see how she claps. What a clap!’” Sarsour wrote in a lengthy Facebook post.
“Nancy is a typical white feminist upholding the patriarchy doing the dirty work of powerful white men. God forbid the men are upset – no worries, Nancy to the rescue to stroke their egos,” she wrote.
Sarsour accused Democratic leaders of responding more quickly to anti-Semitism than to anti-Muslim rhetoric, and claimed the resolution would only help Republicans.
“Democrats are playing in to the hands of the right. Dividing our base and reinforcing their narrative and giving them an easier path towards 2020,” Sarsour wrote.
“I reject this. I will speak out. I won’t be silent. I am not following this. They don’t speak for me as a Democrat. No more double standards.”…
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.investigativeproject.org/7847/sarsour-and-her-islamist-
entourage-protect
_____________________________________________________________

FAKE NEWS: AOC TWEETS FALSE VIDEO, THEN ACCUSES CPAC OF ISLAMOPHOBIA

Confuses video from 2015 for 2019 CPAC address

BY KELEN MCBREEN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
America’s most talked about young Democrat, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, has been caught spreading misinformation on Twitter while attacking Liberty University founder Jerry Falwell Jr.
“I always thought that if more good people had concealed carry permits, then we could end these Muslims before they [unintelligible]. This was just this weekend at CPAC, the conference attended by the President and members, to 1000s. Where’s the resolution against Islamophobia?” AOC wrote in a retweet of a far-left activist.
Cortez left out the full context of the comments showing Falwell was specifically referring to the two Muslim terrorists who killed 14 people in San Bernardino, California.
Additionally, Falwell’s speech was given the day after the California terror attack in 2015, not at this weekend’s CPAC.
Falwell snapped back on Twitter, writing, “I thought @AOC was just dumb but she is a liar too. She claims this was @CPAC last week when it was actually in 2015 the day after the deadly CA attacks by radical Muslims (“those” Muslims I referenced) She also deleted the last part of my quote “before they walk in and kill us”.
After lying about the date and location of the speech and misquoting Falwell, Cortez called for a “resolution against Islamophobia.”
According to reports, a Democratic aide recently said anti-Islamophobia language will be added to a current resolution condemning anti-Semitism.
Could this open the door to anti-blasphemy laws being introduced in the United States?
Canada recently passed legislation trampling on free speech deemed hateful toward Muslims.
After being told the video was from 2015, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted a correction but continued to push for a resolution against Islamophobia and has yet to delete the original tweet.

“I always thought that if more good people had concealed carry permits,then we could end these Muslims before they [unintelligible].” This was just this weekend at CPAC, the conference attended by the President and members, to 1000s. Where’s the resolution against Islamophobia?

_____________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:
https://www.investigativeproject.org/7844/ocasio-cortez-retweets-pflp-
supporter

Here's Why Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez May Be Headed for JAIL!!!


PAMELA GELLER’S “CANCEL SARSOUR” PROTEST IN FRONT OF CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AMID POURING RAIN & SARSOUR SUPPORTERS, BLARING HORNS

 Pamela Geller speaks at AFDI CUNY Sarsour Protest
 Published on May 26, 2017
Pamela Geller was the first speaker. CUNY could have done better!
May
25, 2017 . Noon to 2 PM – AFDI Pro-Freedom Anti-Terror Protest CUNY
Sarsour . Despite unfettered car horns, shouting, heckling and yes- even
whistles- the AFDI speakers and protestors braved the storm (there was
an unrelenting rain as well) #CancelSarsour was a success. We will NOT be Silent!
 
BRIGITTE GABRIEL ON THE TRUTH ABOUT SARSOUR
 Published on May 18, 2017

Brigitte
Gabriel (National Security Expert) joins Dave Rubin to discuss her
views of Linda Sarsour, Sharia Law, how the Quran views women, the
“gullible” women’s movement in America, the hijab and the niqab,
addresses critics who say she’s a racist who hates Muslims, her #ShariaMarch and more.

 
 David Wood’s Speech on Linda Sarsour, 
CUNY, and Sharia
 
Pamela Geller: How Mayor de Blasio Tried to Incite Violence and Wreck AFDI’s CUNY Rally
 
BY PAMELA GELLER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The AFDI demo against CUNY’s obscene invitation was a smashing
success, with over a thousand people who came out in a downpour of
pelting rain on East 42nd Street outside CUNY’s headquarters on Thursday
afternoon to oppose the mainstreaming of evil — CUNY’s obscene
invitation to a pro-terror Jew-hater to keynote their commencement
address. It was an amazing event, a turning point, despite Mayor de
Blasio’s nefarious attempts to undermine and destroy the rally.

Background: Linda Sarsour is a leader of the illegal and inhumane 
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. Sarsour
has publicly argued that Jews who support Israel can’t be feminists. She
does not recognize Israel or its right to exist, and has made several
tweets indicating she supports armed resistance to Israel. NY State
Assemblyman Dov Hikind considers Sarsour’s views on Israel to be
condoning terrorism, and he, along with a large number of mainstream
Jews, believe Sarsour is strongly anti-Semitic.

“Linda Sarsour’s record of advocating for terrorists
speaks for itself. If she had only called Arabs who hurl rocks at moving
cars ‘the definition of courage,’ that would have been enough,” said
Hikind. “But there’s so much more. Sarsour publicly called for violence
against Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a feminist Muslim author who opposes violence.
She recently shared a stage with and praised Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a
member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine convicted by
an Israeli court for her role in the murder of two students, Leon
Kanner and Eddie Joffe, in a Jerusalem supermarket bombing.

Mayor De Blasio is a longtime supporter of jihad and Muslim supremacists, and most especially terror-supporter Linda Sarsour. Mayor De Blasio gifted Sarsour’s “organization” with more than $500,000.
She was instrumental in getting de Blasio to partly dismantle the New
York Police Department’s program of spying on the city’s Muslims, and
has worked with officials in City Hall to close public schools for the
observance of Muslim holy days, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha. From her
base at the Arab American Association of New York, the group whose focus
is the sharia device, “Islamophobia,” Sarsour is working to do the same
on immigration policy, voter registration, mass incarceration,
Islamophobia and the Police Department’s stop-and-frisk tactic.

When Sarsour faked a “hate crime” against herself, New York City
mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted a reminder that the City “will never
condone such glaring acts of bigotry and intolerance.”

In fact, Sarsour’s attacker was Brian Boshell, a mentally
ill homeless man well-known in the Bay Ridge area for public outbursts.
As National Review reported at the time, Boshell, a regular presence in
the neighborhood for more than two decades, had been arrested nearly 60
times before accosting Sarsour, and even Muslim residents of Bay Ridge
expressed skepticism that she didn’t know who he was. (National Review)

De Blasio issued no mea culpa.

And of course, the Mayor’s office has refused to answer whether the de Blasio Administration exerted any pressure on CUNY to invite Sarsour as the keynote speaker.

All that being said, Mayor de Blasio went to extraordinary lengths to
undermine our rally and silence our voices. New York City is no
stranger to protests. Protest is a thriving tradition, and with the
election of President Trump, is a weekly, sometimes daily, exercise for
leftists. So, at this point, the NYPD has it down to a science. Protest
organizers apply for a permit, and if there is to be a counter protest,
their area is set up across the street, or catacorner to the main event.
This is standard operating procedure. During our Ground Zero Mosque
protests, the opposition was penned one block over. Every rally and demo
is set up in this same way. Which is why what happened at our event was
so very extraordinary.

The vicious, vocal and violent protesters were placed right next to
the stage, not three feet away from the stage and our crowd. And they
screamed, blew deafening whistles, and screamed abusive chants tweets
(“Grab that pussy!,” to which I chanted back, “No clit cutting!”). There
was no letup (which is why I am shouting the whole of the rally)  and
at the end of the demo, the leftists attacked our people and were
arrested.

That said, despite de Blasio’s attempt to undermine our rally, it didn’t work. It was huge. And the happy warriors took a stand.

In this photo, you can see how close the two pens were. As a rule,
the opposition is always across the street. Always. I have been holding
protests and going to them for almost twenty years.

The enemedia did not report on this at all. They drummed up the narrative that the event was violent, with the New York Daily News going so far as to say “WILD BRAWL”
in their headline. That’s what de Blasio wanted. He wanted our people
attacked and hurt. And the enemedia eagerly advanced the big lie. De
Blasio must be defeated in the incoming mayoral election. Bo Dietl for
Mayor.

Here is how one attendee described his experience at our rally:

“AFDI: Today’s protest on E. 42nd Street Protesters were given front row standing space to disrupt the speakers,” by Robin Ticker, May 25, 2017:

I wanted to be close to the Podium of this Protest against Linda Sarsour.

Oops. I maybe accidentally went to a Protesters section of the
Protest..or very close by   Next to me were loud protesters yelling Shut
the F— Up and other insults to the Speakers at the Podium behind their
barricade.

I asked the police that they should move the protest to the protest
so that we can hear the speakers. The policeman told me he couldn’t hear
what I was saying.

These protesters who were screaming “Go Home Fascists” and “Shut the
F- Up” had the best standing room of the entire protest.  Everyone else
was further back.

I was told that the Police’s Legal team said that they couldn’t move
the protesters.  Apparently it didn’t matter that they were drowning out
the speakers. Legally they were protected!

Couldn’t they go across the street to where the Neturei Karta were
protesting.  It was very annoying and extremely provocative having them
right up front to the point that they were clearly disrupting and
distracting the ones on the Podium from speaking. For whatever reason,
the loudspeaker was not loud enough to hear the speakers clearly from
where I was standing which was very close to the podium. People way in
the back apparently did hear better. There was too much loud disruptive
and obscene protesting drowning out the speakers from my position. This
was their intention and they succeeded.  Ok I didn’t see them get
actually physically violent but it was very stupid to allow them there.
Verbally they were extremely abusive and physically potentially so.

>Why is it that unrestrained freedom to Protest is legally given
only to those that disrupt those that Protest for Israel?  Pro Sarsour,
anti Israel, anti America, anti AFDI, anti Trump  who are a scary bunch
gets legal protection to stand in close proximity….

I suppose that if the Police would have moved them they would have caused a riot.  Clearly a security threat!.

No other explanation….The anti Sarsour protester were on the street itself. At least part of it.

Why in heaven’s name did the police give these Pro Sarsour space on
the sidewalk in very close proximity to the podium? They also needed a
large police force on the sidewalk to contain them? Couldn’t the Police
tell the protesters of the protest that the sidewalk is only for
pedestrians?

The police were busy rushing the pedestrians who were walking down
the street.  They wanted to make sure that the sidewalk remained
passable, as it was now one third of its normal space.

After all, there was plenty of room across the Street adjacent to Neturei Karta protest.

My conclusion:

They have no problem putting Neturei Karta protesters,  across the
street far away. Neturei Karta are docile and respectful to the police.
They don’t get violent. In fact, when Neturei Karta protesters were
annoyed at a Jewish female wearing an IDF sweatshirt who was in their
face they got the Police to protect them and she was almost
arrested.That clearly shows that the Police can get really tough when
needed especially when this women was holding an Israeli flag and and
wearing an IDF sweatshirt and clearly provoking the Neturei Karta. I
wonder if she was singing. That really would have been a provocation and
could easily cause a confrontation.

PRO Sarsour  foul mouthed whistle blowers (they literally blow loud
whistles to drown out the speaker)  are protected to do so, because
according to the Police’s legal advice they weren’t doing anything wrong
legally. We can’t disrupt their freedom of speech to protest the
protest.

Get this.  The police allowed a bunch of very foul mouthed pro
Sarsour, anti Islamaphobic, anti Trump, and anti America protesters,
 right next to the podium and in very close proximity to  Pamela Geller.
The Police knew fully well that Pamela Geller and her speakers would
talk negatively of Mohammad and Sharia.
This protest could potentially have gotten violent.

But probably the police were afraid. My guess is that they were
intimidated.  Look carefully at the signs of the counter protest.

Signs at the counter protest of the anti Sarsour protest
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B86sGl9yfinjdV9qUXdJTXk3SUk/view?usp=sharing

Google peoplespower.net and you get http://peoplespowerassemblies.org/. Check out their website.  Also Google http://www.workers.org/

The signs read
“Smash Fascism and White Supremacy  PeoplesPowerAssemblies Peoplespower.net”
“Smash Racism and Islamaphobia”
workers.org
They also chanted “From the River to the Sea Palestine Will be Free”….
“No KKK no Fascist USA”
etc.

Now it make sense. The Police didn’t want to be accused of being
Islamaphobic and in so doing engage in Police Terror according to this
crowd of protesters.  Police were intimidated to openly say that  this
group of seasoned police protesters actually might be a physical threat
to Pamela Geller  and her team.

Surely, the incident at the AFDI Mohammad cartoon contest and recent
terror attacks across the globe in Manchester etc.  should have been
sufficient reason to place them across the street.

Policed didn’t even need any excuses as they commonly put protesters
like Neturei Karta  across the street far away and keep the sidewalks
free for pedestrians.

Another question to the Police Legal team is Isn’t disrupting Freedom of Speech to Protest also illegal?

Thank G-d this time there was no Physical confrontation. We wouldn’t
want a repeat of  the violent confrontation in DC when Police tried to
separate protesters and anti protesters..

Do you really want to wait for a physical confrontation to prove our point?.

Sadly, Linda Sarsour, an anti Semite, anti women and anti women’s
rights, pro Sharia and a Liar gets to speak at CUNY Commencement with
probably lots of protection for her freedom of speech and Pamela Geller
and Noni Darwish etc have no physical protection to speak of nor the
freedom and protection to protest without serious disruption all because
the other side are bullies and are legally protected!

And another person’s account:

I think there was something more sinister going on. I was
one of the first people there. In fact, I offered to help set up. If
anyone remembers, I was the guy with the short sleeve purple polo/golf
shirt with my law firm name and had a backpack. I only got to talk with
David Wood and Marie for few mins and Gavin (I think Pam may know who I
am and David and Marie know Scott from Boston, Gavin has my card). When
the radicals first showed up, you could see that this vile degenerate
loser, Heather Morris, was their leader. She was talking with two others
who asking if her group was with CPUSA, she responded that they were
affiliated( all radical group’s r affiliated whether they know it or
not)If you looked out from the stage, I was at the very front row,at the
farthest left. Nearly right in front of a speaker that was covered from
the rain.I was right against the front rail and left side rail with the
ululating ninnies in my right ear. Originally, the Marxists were
directed down the street toward the back. I observed Morris talking on a
cell phone along with another man. Soon thereafter, some other men
arrived, including a short, fat bald guy, there was some discussion with
a policeman in charge and the Marxist were moved up to where they were
originally, directly next to me. I saw 2 of the Marxist men huddle with
Morris and they were all giggly and smiles, including the short, fat,
bald guy, who quickly wiped his grin off his face when he saw me
glowering at him intently. I stared at them nearly the whole time. They
were vulgar to everyone, especially Heather Morris, swearing at everyone
who passed by, thrusting out her middle finger in peoples faces, trying
to grab peoples American flags and signs. There was a short policeman,
with red hair that was next to me the whole time. He was a nice guy and
clearly disgusted by there antics. I asked him why the Marxists were
allowed back at the front, blocking and harassing foot traffic, he said
he didn’t know but someone higher up changed the cops, who were there,
original call. I was the one who first made the immediate request to the
officers to have them moved back, to clear pedestrian traffic, not
disrupt speakers,and more practical in keeping the peace and safety of
all. As it was the obvious, logical thing to do, the police did just
that. I believe these Marxists have a direct line into someone at
“Red-Bill’s”office or Red Bill himself.The cops there did not seem
happy.I read Morris lies about her arrest, if she was any whiter, she’d
be translucent. And Nobody that I saw, with our group had any sticks,
all our flags, both USA and Israel, had no sticks…I helped hold up both
flags.The only people carrying sticks were the hyenas with there Soros
made signs. I didn’t know anyone from our group that I was standing
with, but there was a brotherhood/sisterhood, a real bond we quickly
formed with each other. Lots of hugs and high-five’s. We also looked out
after each other because Ms. morris, et al, were clearly trying to
provoke and we would calm our fellow patriots down when it seemed like
it was getting heated. Nobody tried to calm the radicals down. Morris
had to be warned a few times as she assaulted and technically battered
several people walking past who were not even paying attention to her.
It may be a good idea in the future, if we can get 2 of our good people
who will volunteer to just video the antifa/Marxists the whole time. It
really was a great event, kudos to Pam, amazing given the lousy weather.

________________________________________________________

  New York Times tries to burnish Linda Sarsour’s image after AFDI protest
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Linda Sarsour is a pro-Sharia anti-Semite; that means the New York Times loves her.

Comments interspersed below.

“A Muslim-American Activist’s Speech Raises Ire Even Before It’s Delivered,” by Eli Rosenberg, New York Times, May 26, 2017:

Linda Sarsour, one of the most prominent Muslim-American
activists in New York, says the messages have been arriving by the hour
recently.

“Your time is coming.”

“A good Arab is a dead Arab.”

“You’re getting two bullets in your head.”

She “says” she has been receiving threats. This is news as far as the
New York Times is concerned, although “journalist” Eli Rosenberg
apparently doesn’t make any attempt to verify her claim. Meanwhile,
Pamela Geller is the target of a fatwa from the Islamic State (ISIS).
The Times, when it speaks about her, never leads with that information.
Apparently, some death threats are just fine with the New York Times, if
their targets are the Times’ ideological enemies.

Ms. Sarsour, one of the lead organizers of the Women’s
March on Washington, has tackled issues like immigration policy, mass
incarceration, stop-and-frisk and the New York Police Department’s
spying operation on Muslims — all of which have largely inured her to
hate-tinged criticism.

Note that everything the Times list shows her to be working actively
to impede and obstruct counterterror efforts. The New York City of
Sarsour’s dreams is supine and defenseless before the advancing jihad.

But it is the commencement address she is to deliver next
week to about 100 students at the City University of New York School of
Public Health that she says has drawn the most hostility and ire she
has ever experienced.

“Linda Sarsour is a Sharia-loving, terrorist-embracing, Jew-hating,
ticking time bomb of progressive horror,” the conservative media
personality Milo Yiannopoulos said at a rally on Thursday outside CUNY’s
main office, as protesters held signs with images associated with the
often racist and anti-Semitic language used by what is known as the
alt-right, a far-right, white nationalist movement.

Note that the Times makes no attempt to determine whether or not Milo’s charges are true (they are).
It just quickly changes the subject to signs “with images associated
with the often racist and anti-Semitic language used by what is known as
the alt-right.” Associated by whom? Why, by the New York Times, of
course. This paragraph is tantamount to saying, “Milo made some charges
against Sarsour, but protesters were holding signs bearing images that
we have previously smeared as racist.”

The controversy over Ms. Sarsour’s appearance is the
latest dispute in a heated national dialogue over free speech on
university campuses.

But in this instance, the roles have been reversed. Other protests
have largely pitted left-wing students against conservative speakers
like Mr. Yiannopoulos, Ann Coulter, Gavin McInnes and Charles Murray.
This time, conservatives are leading the charge against Ms. Sarsour.

This is false. The controversy is not over her appearance at CUNY. We
who are routinely barred from speaking on college campuses, or shouted
down by fascists when we do, would never dream of saying she should not
allowed to speak. In fact, I would be happy to go to CUNY at my own
expense to debate her. The controversy is over whether she should be
celebrated and lionized, given the honor of delivering the commencement
address, in light of her numerous hateful, anti-Semitic, and pro-Sharia
statements.

Her critics are a strange mix, including right-leaning
Jews and Zionists, commentators like Pamela Geller, and some members of
the alt-right.

They accuse her of sympathizing with terrorists, supporting Sharia
law and anti-Semitism for statements she has made about politics in the
Middle East.

And with good reason, although the Times never presents this evidence or bothers to debunk it.

The CUNY chancellor, James B. Milliken, has defended the
appearance on the basis of free speech, and a group of CUNY professors,
some prominent progressives and liberal Jewish groups have spoken in her
support.

Free speech? Funny how universities seldom remember that principle when a conservative speaker comes around.

Fred Smith Jr., a constitutional scholar and assistant
professor at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, said
the controversy was a reminder of the bipartisan nature of the outcry
over free-speech issues.

“There are a few people who have been very effective in branding the
left at shutting down free speech, but the moment they are confronted
with leftist speech they don’t like, they are equally outraged and
poised to suppress that speech,” he said. “I don’t think that’s the
answer for either side. The more you try to suppress speech, the more
the ideas of the suppressed speaker become salient to more people. It
makes the person more well known and attracts more people to those
ideas.”

Once again, this is off the point, and an apparently deliberate
obfuscation. The controversy is not over whether or not she can speak.
It is over whether or not she should be the commencement speaker.

The debate about Ms. Sarsour’s speech began last month
with Dov Hikind, a conservative Democratic state assemblyman who
represents a largely Orthodox community in Brooklyn. Mr. Hikind said Ms.
Sarsour should not have been chosen, pointing to her recent appearance
in Chicago with Rasmea Odeh, who was convicted in Israel of playing a
role in the bombing of a supermarket that killed two civilians in 1969.

Mr. Hikind also pointed to a picture Ms. Sarsour once posted on
Twitter of a Palestinian boy standing across from police officers with
rocks in his hands. Ms. Sarsour wrote that the photo was “The definition
of courage.”

Mr. Hikind said in a phone interview, “You can’t support a terrorist
and then be the commencement speaker at a university that my taxes help
pay for.”

Indeed. And there is no doubt that her speech will be a pep rally of
anti-Israel, anti-American agitprop, with heavy helpings of
self-righteousness and self-pity.

….Brad Lander, a Democratic city councilman from
Brooklyn, described the accusations against Ms. Sarsour as
“preposterous,” and pointed to her help in raising money to repair two
Jewish cemeteries that were vandalized in St. Louis and Pennsylvania in
February.

“She’s been in my synagogue,” he said. “She and my rabbi are friends.
There’s no doubt that part of what this is is backlash against the idea
of having a Palestinian-American as a visible leader and inheritor of
the civil rights movement.”

He added, “One terrible feature of the Trump regime is that it threatens to tribalize all of us.”

The fact that she repaired these cemeteries does not negate her pro-Sharia or viciously anti-Israel statements. She even declared recently
that feminists could not support Israel. Lander is taking an incident
that was an obvious bid to wrongfoot her opponents as a reversal of her
entire stance regarding Israel. It wasn’t.

At the protest, even Mr. Yiannopoulos briefly
acknowledged Ms. Sarsour’s right to speak, before making a racially
tinged joke about her getting paid in goats. He was more restrained in
an emailed response to a question.

“Unlike some of the other speakers, I don’t want Sarsour canceled,”
he wrote. “I want as many people as possible to hear her odious
thoughts. That doesn’t mean I can’t explain why she is dangerous and
wrong.”

Once again: the problem is that she is the commencement speaker. She
should be canceled as the commencement speaker. And brought back to
debate with Pamela Geller or some other defender of freedom.

Ms. Sarsour said she had nothing to apologize about for her views.

She said there were questions about the integrity of Ms. Odeh’s
conviction many decades ago. The photo of the Palestinian boy was taken
during a week when about 200 Palestinians had been killed, she said. And
she said she had never planned to speak about Israel in the
commencement address.

We’ll see about that. In any case, note how the Times gives Sarsour
space to rebut the charges, and never bothers to check on her claims
about Odeh’s conviction or the photo. The Times never offers this
service to those who aren’t Leftists.

Ms. Sarsour said she believed she became a target for
far-right conservatives in the days after the Women’s March, which she
said was evidence of a larger “Islamophobia industry.”

The claim that there is a well-heeled “Islamophobia industry”
churning out hateful material against Muslims is a staple of Leftist
propaganda. Ironically, the organizations such as the Center for
American Progress and others that have produced lavishly printed
“Islamophobia” reports have budgets exponentially larger
than those of the organizations they defame as “Islamophobic.” If there
is any “industry” here, it is that of the truly well-heeled effort to
defame and destroy those who oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression.

She has hired two private bodyguards to accompany her to
public events. She says she regrets that she has not been able to shield
her three children, all teenagers, from the vitriol and threats she has
received online. Still, she said, she does not plan to be silent.

“I’m Muslim, I’m Palestinian, I’m a woman in a hijab,” she said. “I’m everything they stand against.”

She added, “I have a bigger mission here.”

In reality, she is a foe of counter terror efforts, a supporter of the
jihad against Israel, and a woman who normalizes and legitimizes the
Sharia oppression of women. Indeed, everything we stand against.

 


SCREAMERS, SNOWFLAKES AND MS. SARSOUR

SCREAMERS,
SNOWFLAKES AND MS. SARSOUR
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Ronnie Herne


February 2, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
I have
often wondered if the major university campuses have a special course
for University Women to teach them the “F” word. Females seem
so proficient at that once they graduate. Call the course, “Give
Me an ‘F’ and I’ll give you an ‘A’!” Have it taught by a finger-gesticulating
(wink-wink) burly, short cropped PhD female, of course, to get the full
effect……. But I digress….
To the
point: I have witnessed many things much more horrific than the Women’s
March in D.C. this past January 21st. However, I do not believe I have
ever seen anything more revoltingly disgusting done in the name of women.
Ladies.
Girls. The gentler sex. Peaches and cream. Sugar and spice. Mom/Mommy.
Granny/Grandma. Aunt/Sister. Oh, and Pro-Life.
ALL
THROWN UNDER THE BUS!!
And
in the name of what? Let me just tell you “what”. And those
“sisters” out there aren’t going to like it one bit, too bad.
What
the whole wide world saw on display was a raging torrent of hate. At Trump,
you assume? Oh sure, he was in the mix. But he was used more for venting
rather than the being the full object. What actually was on display in
full living pink technicolor was an unkempt force of shrieking, foul females
literally and loudly hating their womanhood and all things associated
with being a woman.
THAT
is what we saw in that march – a bunch of females screaming about
their genitalia and the functions thereof, hating themselves and their
womanliness. Then crudely, vilely, viciously letting the world know all
about it, – and how rough they have it in comparison to men. (Shed
a tear here.)
Well,
“sisters”, there are surgical options opened to you to remedy
all of those complaints. Just don’t do it on my tax dollars.
And
“sisters”, I’ll tell you something else you’ll like even less.
Back in the day your disgusting vitriolic diatribe was called Penis Envy.
Put that in your little pink bonnets, huh?
SENDING
OUT THE SNOWFLAKES….
Sean
Hannity had some ditsy female guest on his radio show on Friday, January
27th. She was all PRO the march; and Madonna’s threat about blowing up
the White House was just artistic free speech. He asked her (several times)
about partial birth abortion which she said she was good with because
there is no such thing… I could not make this up. She told Sean that
partial birth abortion did not create infanticide (the killing of a baby).
Apparently
in her safe space no one had bothered her with the Planned Parenthood
videos of selling baby body parts and suggesting different ways of performing
partial birth abortions, done in the very last days of the pregnancy,
ie, at or near term, so as to make better, more mature organ parts available
for sale.
Clearly
she had also not bothered herself with details of abortionist Kermit Gosnell,
now serving time for multiple infanticides. These truly gruesome details
are available in a book called “Gosnell”.
She
explained to Sean Hannity – very patiently – that partial birth abortion
was when the child was surgically removed by Caesarean Section. The baby
was NOT killed. And if there was just more sex education then there would
be less of an issue with abortion…
Wouldst
that were true! It would be so easy to birth the baby and hand it over
to an adoption agency. But killing the baby is just more feminine, you
think?
And
did you all catch Hillary when she said that the baby shouldn’t be considered
a baby until it’s mother took it home? In case Mom changed her mind about
having the baby? In fact if I recall correctly Hillary also mentioned
that the baby shouldn’t be considered a baby for two weeks after the birth……..
I don’t believe she ever indicated what should be done with the gurgling,
fist-waving little thingie there in the newborn nursery…..
SEEDS
OF SHARIA
How
could any good (?), progressive, sex pontificating, Me-First, pro-abortionist,
wear-what-I-want (or not), LGBT-hugging, social justice, open borders,
smoking/drinking/drugging angry socialist feminist ever trip into the
waiting arms of Sharia Law? (Hey, it worked for Hillary & Huma!)
How
in the name of Allah did they have a Brooklyn-born Palestinian Muslim
female social worker as one of their Women’s March co-chairs? Linda Sarsour.
The pictures I’ve seen show her in a full hijab, a nun-like head covering,
though in her case they are quite gaily colored. And her eyes are heavily
made up. Very Western.
Maybe
that’s it: she wears makeup so she must be okay. Forget the mandates against
women in the Qu-ran (Koran): rape, honor killings, beatings, mutilation,
subjugation, and lots of motherhood. And I guess it would never occur
to Linda Sarsour to throw some of the gay boys off a high roof.
ABORTION
Not
to worry! While you’re hugging Linda Sarsour like a comfortable little
pink teddy bear, Islam has it all figured out for you, dear “sisters”
and snowflakes. According to the Muslim site zawaj.com they teach that
the soul enters the fetus at 120 days, or 4 months. With the fewest possible
exceptions it is unlawful under Islam to abort the fetus before 120 days.
With absolutely no exceptions, it is also unlawful to abort the fetus
on or after 120 days. Rape and incest are not reasons.
Like
Climate Change/Global Warming, clearly we have settled science by consensus
here… Male Muslim consensus you understand. And devout Muslim agent
Linda Sarsour is a poster girl for this Women’s March? Talk about a serious
disconnect.
HITLER,
AND TOUPEES……
While
a “NAAAA-STEEEEE” woman was bemoaning the feel of Hitler in
the streets of D.C. – a moustache exchanged for a toupee – she was apparently
coincidentally mindlessly embracing devout Muslim Palestinian Linda Sarsour.
I know
I mentioned this before but let’s draw out a new and uncomfortable –
for them – observation. In the 1940s, when Hitler’s Field Marshall
Erwin Rommel, the Desert Fox, was romping victoriously with his North
Afrika Korps, just who was Hitler’s talented general aligning himself
with? Why, the Muslim Arabs, of course. He was going to liberate them
from British rule. Hitler, Rommel, Arab Muslims. Got it? Muslims, Rommel,
Hitler: Friends.
So,
when we want to talk about Hitler, let’s keep it straight who was holding
hands with whom.
((Speaking
of the Brits, Teresa May, PM, is distressed with Trump’s temporary ban
on Mid-East immigration. 80 years ago the Brits were a dominant force
in North Africa. Now, the most prevalent male name for newborns inside
Britain is Mohammad. (Talk about the sun setting on the empire…))
THE
OTHER MARCH
I don’t
have a number on the tens of thousands that Marched for Life on January
27th in Washington, D.C. How thrilling it must have been for them to have
the Vice-President come and speak, how hopeful that some of this will
be rolled back.
But
I’ll make a bet that just like the Tea Party versus the Occupiers, the
Right-to-Lifers left one heck of a lot less trash than did the sisters,
snowflakes, and the beta boys. And no broken windows, torched cars, injured
cops, graffiti…? Anyone want to take me up on that…?
Hey
God! Thanks for your blessings!
GO
TRUMP!!
PS:
Given what President Trump has already done so far, what’s he going to
do with the last 3½ years of this first term of his presidency?
PS2:
Just in. Thanks to JT. Reba sings of God. Video. Guaranteed to make the
Left crazier than they already are. Enjoy and share.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS DONALD TRUMP!
AND GOD BLESS YOU AND ALL YOUR DREAMS!

John Quincy Adams and His ‘Essay On Turks’

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2024/03/john-quincy-adams-and-his-essay-on-turks; republished below in full, unedited, for informational, educational, & research purposes:

Today, a side of Adams that was not made much of in his lifetime has for many of us become the most important, and much-needed, part of his legacy: his critical view of Islam and of Muhammad. He derived these views from experience — his own and his father’s — of Muslim behavior (both of the Barbary Pirates and of the Ottoman Turks, from his lifelong study of history, and from his intensive reading of the Qur’an. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were sent in 1786 to negotiate in London with the ambassador from Tripoli, Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, about the seizure of American ships. They reported back in a joint letter to John Jay (then a senior American diplomat), explaining that “We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the grounds of their pretensions to make war upon a nation who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. THE AMBASSADOR ANSWERED US THAT IT WAS FOUNDED ON THE LAWS OF THEIR PROPHET, THAT IT WAS WRITTEN IN THEIR KORAN, THAT ALL NATIONS WHO SHOULD NOT HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THEIR AUTHORITY WERE SINNERS, THAT IT WAS THEIR RIGHT AND DUTY TO MAKE WAR UPON THEM WHEREVER THEY COULD BE FOUND, AND TO MAKE SLAVES OF ALL THEY COULD TAKE AS PRISONERS, AND THAT EVERY MUSSELMAN WHO SHOULD BE SLAIN IN BATTLE WAS SURE TO GO TO PARADISE.”

John Quincy Adams would certainly have learned from his father about what the Tripolitanian ambassador had maintained in his discussions with Adams and Jefferson. He may even have been later shown a copy — he was then a junior at Harvard — of the letter that was sent to John Jay. He also had his own rich store of observations of Muslim behavior, for the Barbary Pirates continued, throughout the next thirty years, from 1786 to 1816, to attack American shipping and seize American seamen, who were then held for exorbitant ransom. For a while after the First Barbary War (1801-1805) with Tripoli, attacks decreased. But when the Americans became preoccupied with European matters, eventually fighting the British in the War of 1812, the Barbary states — Tripoli, Tunis, Algiers — resumed attacks on American and European shipping. Once the War of 1812 had ended, and the Treaty of Ghent (1814) was signed, the Americans resumed a more aggressive policy in the Mediterranean. When America defeated Algiers in the Second Barbary War, that spelled the end of the last major campaign of the Barbary pirates. Western ships increasingly surpassed in speed and deadly force (better cannons) those of the Muslims, and the Barbary pirate threat to Christian shipping steadily decreased as a result.

It was clear to John Quincy Adams, that while force could change Muslim behavior, nothing would change the Muslim belief that they had “a right and a duty” to make war on the Infidels. This war was on continuous display in the Mediterranean against all who were too weak to withstand them, as was their making “slaves of all they could take as prisoners” — the Christian seaman they held as slaves in North Africa, some permanently enslaved, while others were to be ransomed for sums. American shipping initially proved to be a most vulnerable target, given the small size of the American navy. It was only the buildup of that navy, begun by Jefferson, and its deployment to the Mediterranean to take aggressive action against the Barbary pirates, that finally halted, after two wars a decade apart, the attacks by Muslim corsairs on American ships and seamen.

The other example John Quincy Adams had immediately before him of Muslim aggression against Christians was the suppression, by the Turks, of the Greeks when they began their war for independence. That war lasted from 1821 to 1832, and while the Greeks were ultimately successful, Adams, who during this period was Secretary of State (1817-1825), and then President (1825-1829), received direct accounts of the extreme brutality by the Muslim Turks against the Greek Christians.

But it was not just his contemporaneous experience of Muslim behavior toward Christians that formed John Quincy Adams’s view of Islam. He was a deep student of history all of his life. He knew how Islam had spread across the Middle East and North Africa, and how its advance was halted in the west by Charles Martel at Poitiers in 732, and in the east, much later, at the gates of Vienna in 1683. He knew about the 800 years it took the Christians to complete the Reconquista of Spain. He knew how, over 1200 years, Muslim armies had conquered many different lands, and subjugated many different peoples.

And he took a special interest in the Ottoman Turks, who were in a long but steady military decline that began with that defeat at Vienna in 1683. The Ottomans began to lose battles, small ones at first, to the increasingly more powerful Russian forces. Their first major defeat came in the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774, after which they were compelled to sue for peace. According to the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (July 21, 1774), Russia’s right was recognized to intervene to protect Christians in the Ottoman Empire — a clear indication of Muslim brutality against subjugated Christians, for why else would such intervention be thought necessary? A series of Russo-Turkish wars, and Russian victories, continued to whittle away at Ottoman domains in the Caucasus. When Adams was the Minister to Russia (1809-1814), with direct and frequent contact with the Tsar, he would have heard about Russian clashes with, and victories against, the Ottoman Turks in the Caucasus.

After he left the Presidency in 1829, John Quincy Adams undertook almost immediately to write and publish his strong views on Islam and Muslims. This “Essay on Turks,” little noted at the time, has now become the best-known of all his contributions as an American statesman. The “Essay on Turks” is now more famous than the three treaties he negotiated (the Treaty of Ghent, the Treaty of 1818 with Great Britain, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819), more famous than his work on the Monroe Doctrine, more famous than his defense of Indian rights, or even than his argument at the Supreme Court that led to the setting free of African slaves in the Amistad case.

The “Essay on Turks” startles us now because we are not used to such a forthright and truthful account of Muhammad and of Islam. We live in a different time, sunk in a swamp of appeasement and interfaith outreach, when pusillanimity and evasion are the order of the day in public discussions of Islam. The most-quoted part of the “Essay on Turks” was put up at Jihad Watch just a few days ago, on July 11, the 250th anniversary of Adams’s birth, but it deserves to be reposted:

In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.

Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extinction of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man. While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men. The hand of Ishmael will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him. It is, indeed, amongst the mysterious dealings of God, that this delusion should have suffered for so many ages, and during so many generations of human kind, to prevail over the doctrines of the meek and peaceful and benevolent Jesus.

The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat; but the command to propagate the Muslim creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.”

The natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels is in just accordance with the precepts of the Koran.

In writing his “Essay on Turks,” he was really writing an essay on all Muslims, even if what prompted him was the behavior, at the time of its writing, of the Ottoman Turks. In particular, Adams was concerned with the brutality of the methods used by the Turks in suppressing the Greeks who were fighting for their independence. The Ottoman Turks could reasonably be taken to represent Islam and Muslims.They had for centuries possessed the caliphate; they were the leading Muslim power at the time; it was their brutal behavior toward Christians that was most in evidence. And indeed, he makes clear early on that while his essay is about the Turks, they were simply practicing the same Islam, with the same Qur’an, as the Arabs, the Afghans, the Muslims in India, in Central and East Asia.

John Quincy Adams had seen how both the Turks, and the North African pirates, from Tunis, Tripoli, and Algiers, had behaved toward Christians. He had read the Qur’an, understood its contents, realized that the war against all Infidels was not an aberration: “The natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels is in just accordance with the precepts of the Koran.” He had first heard of this from his father’s account of the Tripolitanian ambassador, in 1786. Nothing he learned subsequently, through reading or observation, suggested another — kinder, gentler — view of Islam. Hatred, and perpetual war against the Infidels — these Qur’anic injunctions accorded with the dispatches he received from those reporting on the Barbary Pirates, and the Ottoman-ruled Greece and the Balkans. That war could never end, until the final defeat of one side or the other.

Adams had grasped the doctrine of jihad, even if he never used that word: it signified the struggle, incumbent upon all Muslims, to defeat all Infidels, until Islam everywhere dominated, and Muslims ruled, everywhere: “The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God.” He had seen how the Barbary Pirates and the Turks had behaved toward Christians. He understood how the texts and teachings of Islam explained the behavior of both the Barbary Pirates in their attacks on Christian shipping, and the brutal behavior of the Turks in suppressing the Greeks. He knew, having seen it, about the “false and delusive promise of peace” that the Barbary Pirates would offer after defeats, and “submit to the imperious necessities of defeat,” but were required by their creed to renew warfare whenever it could be “made effective.” The Qur’an required perpetual war until the final victory of Muslims everywhere.

Adams called Islam a “merciless and dissolute dogma.” He understood the “mercilessness” of the actual Muslims, the Turks, then on the warpath against the Greeks. When he spent five years as Minister of Russia, he surely heard from the Russians about the brutal treatment of Christians in the Ottoman domains, which is why the Russians demanded, after their first major victory over the Turks in 1774, that they be allowed to act, when they deemed it necessary, as protectors of those Christian communities. He heard, too, of course, about the treatment of the American seaman seized and enslaved by the Barbary pirates. A student of history, he would have been aware of how Muslims, over 1200 years of conquest, had treated those they defeated, often killing their captives. He had read, in the Qur’an, the suggestions as to various ways that Infidels could be mutilated and killed: striking at their necks, cutting off their hands and feet, crucifying them, and so on. One can well imagine how Adams, who read the Christian Bible daily, must have reacted in horror when he first came across such examples of Qur’an-mandated cruelty, as in 5:33:

The only reward for those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom.

As to what he called the “dissolute dogma” of Islam, by this Adams meant that Muhammad had “poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex.” The Muslim view of women as merely sexual objects, who existed to gratify the sexual passion of men, could be seen in Islam’s acceptance of polygamy, and of using female captives, those who were “slaves that the right hand possesses,” for sexual pleasure, and of conceiving of the Muslim Heaven only in terms of a sexual paradise, where the best Muslims were promised 72 black-eyed virgins, so very different a concept from the Heaven of Christianity. What could be more “dissolute” than the Muslim idea of Heaven as a kind of brothel with dozens of permanently accommodating females for each deserving man?

Adams also grasped the role of religiously-sanctioned deceit or “fraud” that Muslims were allowed to practice both to protect themselves, and to lure their enemies into traps, or even by the making of treaties that could be broken whenever the Muslim side felt strong enough to go to war, never mind what they had promised. The most important Qur’anic verse sanctioning deception of non-Muslims states: “Let believers not take for friends and allies infidels instead of believers." Whoever does this shall have no relationship left with Allah – unless you but guard yourselves against them, taking precautions.” (Quran 3:28; see also 2:173; 2:185; 4:29; 22:78; 40:28).

Al-Tabari’s (838-923 AD) Tafsir, or Quranic exegesis, is a standard reference. It glosses 3:28 as follows: “Under their [infidels’] authority, fearing for yourselves, behaving loyally to them, with your tongue, while harboring inner animosity for them… Allah has forbidden believers from being friendly or on intimate terms with the infidels in place of believers – except when infidels are above them [in authority]. In such a scenario, let them act friendly towards them.”

The Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir (1301-1373) wrote about 3:28: “Whoever at any time or place fears their [infidels’] evil, may protect himself through outward show.”

In support of this, Ibn Kathir quotes two of Muhammad’s companions. Abu Darda said: “Let us smile to the face of some people while our hearts curse them.” Al-Hassan said: “Doing taqiyya is acceptable till the day of judgment [in perpetuity].”

Adams had almost certainly not read Ibn Kathir or Al-Tabari. But he had understood enough from the Qur’an itself, not just from 3:28 but also from other verses, such as 3:54, where Allah is praised as a master schemer, or deceiver: “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” His “Essay on Turks” makes much of the role fraud played in the spread of Islam.

One can well imagine Adams’s surprise when he first read in the Qur’an that Allah was lauded, as “the best of schemers” — one more example of what, Adams realized, was a kind of Christianity in reverse. The praise in the Qur’an of deception and fraud, the command to wage Jihad, or perpetual warfare “in the path of Allah,” against the Infidels, the description of how to strike terror among Islam’s enemies, the practice of sating one’s lust with plural wives, and captive females used as sex slaves, the Muslim heaven which promised the sensual bliss of 72 dark-eyed virgins — all of this horrified him.

John Quincy Adams did not have to worry about a small army of Muslim apologists ready to attack him for stating home truths about Islam. In his day, there was no CAIR, no Linda Sarsour, no John Esposito to condemn him for “Islamophobia” and to try to lead his likely audience astray. There were no Muslims, and consequently no mosques, offering unwary Infidels the chance to participate in those Ask-A-Muslim exercises in cozy taqiyya and tu-quoque. Adams’s uncompromising description of Islam was confirmed by what Americans knew about Muslim behavior, both from their experience with the Barbary Pirates, and from observing how the Turks — the most powerful Muslims of the time, possessors of the caliphate, who ruled, directly or through suzerains, the Middle East, North Africa, Greece, the Balkans, and much of the Caucasus — treated their Christian subjects. His lifetime of study of history naturally included, among its subjects, how Islam spread, what its texts and teachings, as conveyed in the Qur’an, revealed about its essence, what was required of the non-Muslims subjugated by Muslim conquerors, what was revealed about Muhammad’s character from the reports of his words and deeds. Adams’s rereading of the Qur’an to understand the tenets of this faith and the character of its prophet Muhammad, who “by fraud or by force” had conquered so many lands, helped explain, and made sense of, the behavior of “the Turks” as they put down, with their wonted brutality, the Greek Christians who had risen up to defy their Turkish Muslims.

There is one more thing about John Quincy Adams that deserves notice. He was, by all accounts, a brilliant orator, known as “Old Man Eloquent.” That oratorical skill was much in evidence when he argued on behalf of the Amistad prisoners before the Supreme Court. But he was also brilliant as a writer, and had he not been, his essay on “the Turks” (that is, on Islam) would not now be so often read, nor has it had the impact it has had on those who — not least here at this site — have been lucky enough to learn of it. From an early age Adams showed himself to be precociously adept at English composition. As with everything he deemed important, he worked and worked at it. Dip into any of the 14,000 pages of his diaries, even the entries he wrote in his early teens, and you will of course find some laconic jottings, but also the rounded periods of a fully formed prose style. In between diplomatic postings, and while he was simultaneously serving in the United States Senate, which would have been task enough for most men, Adams was appointed to the prestigious post of Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard in 1806; he immediately set to work on the lectures he would deliver to his students. We know that he read and studied many writers on rhetoric, including Quintilian, Cicero, Bacon, and George Campbell, all of whom he made use of in the thirty-six lectures he prepared for his Harvard students between 1806 and 1809. When his students heard that he would be leaving Harvard to become United States Minister to Russia, they asked that his lectures be published, and they were, as “Lectures on Rhetoric and Oratory.” He understood the importance of studying rhetoric, that is the art of persuasion. This was not a mere flourish, but essential to winning and convincing an audience. He ranked it high among his accomplishments. In 1810, Adams wrote in his diary about his Lectures that “I shall never, unless by some special favor of Heaven, accomplish any work of higher elevation.”

Actually, he did “accomplish” one “work of higher elevation” even than his lectures on rhetoric and oratory. His most important written work, as we now realize, is the one on Islam, the “Essay on Turks,” which today amazes many at first reading, and then heartens those who realize they have finally found the American statesman they have been looking for in vain, the one we need most today. And it turns out to be John Quincy Adams who, alone among our presidents, senators, congressmen, cabinet ministers, diplomats (and Adams filled every one of those offices), so perceptively grasped the disturbing sinister essence of Islam.

That same “Essay on Turks” ought to be required reading in courses on American history." Ideally, it ought to be assigned along with both Adams’s furious denunciation of how the white settlers and their government were mistreating the Indians (with the case of the Creeks pushed forcibly westward offered in evidence), and with a description of his central role, including his closing argument before the Supreme Court, in the Amistad case. For Adams will then be understood as what, in fact, he always was — an implacable defender of human rights. The chiefest offenders against human rights, then as now, in 1829 and in 2017, were Muslims. Should his “Essay on Turks” become part of the required reading in American history, and even were it to be assigned by a teacher hostile to its contents, Adams’s eloquent truth-telling will not be convincingly rebutted, and will, in any case, prove impossible to forget.

Who’s Funding the Pro-Hamas Rallies? Taxpayers.

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2023/11/whos-funding-the-pro-hamas-rallies-taxpayers;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

We are literally funding the Muslim Brotherhood.

In the last 15 years, Islamic political interests have dug deep into New York City politics. What does that mean? Beyond the obvious, political power, money. That’s what the currency of power comes down to anyway. And that means government contracts going to so-called community groups. More Muslims living in NYC meant more money was going into Islamist organizations. And much like funding Hamas, that adds up to pro-Hamas rallies.

Big Apple taxpayers have shelled out nearly $9 million since 2010 — including $3.3 million the past two years — to four nonprofits that helped spearhead anti-Israel protests where demonstrators openly cheered Hamas’ terrorist attacks on the Jewish State.

…The biggest winner: The Arab American Association of New York, a Brooklyn-based group that helped plan a hate-filled “Flood Brooklyn for Palestine” protest in Bay Ridge on Oct. 21, where protestors called for the eradication of Israel and held a sign of the Israeli flag in a trash basket that read “Please keep the world clean!”

It’s received $6.8 million in Council pork and city contracts – including $3 million-plus the past two years – for criminal justice services, adult literacy programs, mental health aid through ex-First Lady Chirlane McCray’s failed ThriveNYC initiative and other services, records show.

That would be Linda Sarsour’s group.

The Muslim American Society of New York, another southern Brooklyn-based group that co-sponsored the Bay Ridge rally. It’s received more than $260,000 in city contracts and Council funding.

So taxpayers are literally funding the Muslim Brotherhood.

MAS, like the Muslim Brotherhood, wishes to see the United States governed by sharia or Islamic law. “The message that all countries should be ruled by Islamic law,” writes Gartenstein-Ross, “is echoed throughout MAS’s membership curriculum. For example, MAS requires all its adjunct members to read Fathi Yakun’s book To Be a Muslim. In that volume, Yakun spells out his expansive agenda: ‘Until the nations of the world have functionally Islamic governments, every individual who is careless or lazy in working for Islam is sinful.’”

Hamas is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood and taxpayer money is being directed to Brotherhood organizations. Who’s funding the pro-Hamas rallies? We are.

Far-left Arabella Advisors funnels donor cash to groups organizing pro-Hamas protests across America

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2023/11/far-left-arabella-advisors-funnels-donor-cash-to-groups-organizing-pro-hamas-protests-across-america;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

In regard to the trans madness and LGBTQ propaganda, we are inundated with everywhere, the Leftist/Islamic alliance is showing signs of strain. But when it comes to killing Jews, the two allies are closer than ever, like peas in a pod.

“Dem Dark Money ‘Arabella’ Group Has Funneled $10M To Pro-Hamas Protesters,” by William Upton, National Pulse, November 1, 2023:

Arabella Advisors, a progressive Washington, D.C.-based dark money operation, is using numerous non-profit organizations it controls to funnel left-wing donor cash to groups organizing pro-Hamas protests across America. The firm is at the center of a vast network of dark money groups which has now funneled over $10 million to anti-Israel causes over the past five years.

The funds have moved through Arabella-controlled non-profits like the New Venture Fund, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the Hopewell Fund, and the North Fund. Some of the groups on the final receiving end have outwardly called for the destruction of the State of Israel and the genocide of the Jewish population living there. Reports suggest some of the Palestinian organizations funded by the same network may even have direct links to terrorist groups like Hamas.

Over $5 million in donations were directed to non-profit associated with hardline anti-Semite Linda Sarsour, who was even made to step down as a leader of the radical ‘Women’s March’ protest in 2019 over her open hostility to Jews and affiliation with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Even the far-left Anti-Defamation League has accused Sarsour of “fomenting” anti-Semitism….

Biden’s pact with Muslim Brotherhood-linked group Emgage, and his conundrum over Hamas’ war on Israel

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2023/10/bidens-pact-with-muslim-brotherhood-linked-group-emgage-and-his-conundrum-over-hamas-war-on-israel;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

In early 2020, the organization Emgage launched its Million Muslim Votes campaign in order to galvanize a million Muslim Americans to vote for Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. Emgage’s website stated: “The MMV campaign was our celebration and a reflection of our determination to build elections as a vehicle of change for our community’s political will.” The organization was reportedly a spectacular success in uniting Muslims voters, who turned out in unprecedented numbers in key battleground states, including Michigan and Pennsylvania. Emgage ultimately boasted that “in 2020 we helped turnout 1,087,086 registered Muslim voters. And we’re just getting started.” Emgage and Biden shook hands in a pact in which each made promises to the other. But in all pacts, there is a cost involved in fulfilling the promises; in this instance, the cost to Biden involved the reputation of Emgage, its network, how extensively it managed to infiltrate the administration, and what it all means now, given the fury by Muslims over Biden’s Israel stance.

As Israel battles Hamas, Frank Gaffney recently wrote that Biden:

engaged in outreach to one of his core constituencies: the Muslim Brotherhood. He met privately with five so-called ‘American Arab and Muslim leaders’ including: Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison; Wa’el Alzayat of Emgage, a political mobilization operation; and interfaith influence-operator Imam Mohamed Magid.’ Each has personal and/or organizational associations with the Brotherhood, a group whose Palestinian franchise, Hamas, perpetrated the horrific jihadist attack on Israel on October 7th.

Biden was in urgent damage control mode as Muslims become increasingly enraged over Israel. Take, for example, a Reuters headline: Biden’s Israel stance angers Arab, Muslim Americans; could jeopardize 2024 votesThe magnitude of Biden’s quandary is directly tied to the pact he made with Emgage. To appreciate this, a little history about Emgage is illuminating. According to Middle East Eye, one of Emgage’s first fundraising events “involved Keith Ellison, then a Congressional candidate from Minneapolis. That event in 2006 gave birth to the first iteration of Emgage as a PAC, an entity allowed to raise funds for political candidates. It also helped Ellison become the first Muslim in Congress.” In 2006, the Muslim voter advocacy group was not yet known as Emgage. It was filed as “Center for Voter Advocacy” by registered agent Khurrum Wahid, a founding member and currently the National Chair of Emgage Political Action Committee (PAC). Wahid is also an attorney “who has built his name on representing high profile terrorists”, and landed himself on a federal terrorist watch list in 2011.Discover the Networks names him as “one of the country’s most prominent terror lawyers.”

Emgage’s advocacy and hard work paid off as it rose to prominence during the 2020 election cycle, but the organization’s roots and those of its influential partners were already deep in the Democrat Party prior to the Biden win. Biden addressed the Emgage Million Muslim Votes Summit online in July 2020. This event featured the infamous Linda Sarsour; Emgage CEO Wa’el Alzayat, a decorated diplomat during the Obama administration and an Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University (known for its “Islamophobia” “Fact Sheets”); Nihad Awad, co-founder and Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations; and Khurrum Wahid.

Ahead of the online summit, Emgage Action created an endorsement letter signed by several prominent elected Democrat Muslim officials, including Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, and Indiana Rep. Andre Carson. Wa’el Alzayat, whom Discover the Networks reports is “one of the country’s most prominent terror lawyers,” stated:

Joe Biden’s presence serves not only to galvanize Muslim Americans to cast their ballots, but to usher in an era of engaging with Muslim American communities under a Biden administration.

At the online Summit, Khurrum Wahid stated how Muslims felt “scapegoated and marginalized,” which led to the formation of Emgage. In his introduction of Biden, he revealed the Emgage mission and why Biden was the group’s best choice for President:

That is why we have endorsed you Mr. Vice President….that is why we have you here today. This is truly an historic moment for Muslim Americans…where a presidential nominee has engaged us in such a high priority. It shows us that you care about us and our values and the issues we care about. It shows us you believe in us. Mr. Vice President, I want you to know that we believe in you…You have moved forward funding to nations with large Muslim populations… and you’ve championed the inclusion of Muslim American institutions at the policy table. And we want to partner with you to fix the societal harm of this Trump presidency….We are behind you. We have a swing state strategy and we will deliver for you Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Florida. We will activate large groups of voters in Texas and Arizona…we will have everyone we know to vote Joe.

NPR hailed the event: “Presidential Nominees Rarely Speak to Muslim Audiences. Biden Did Monday.” The story noted that “3,000 people RSVP’d” for Emgage’s livestreamed event with Biden. “Biden focused on Islamophobia…. He didn’t mention terrorism or Islamic extremism.” He then told the audience: “One of the things that I think is important: I wish, I wish we taught more in our schools about the Islamic faith.” It was at this event where Biden promised: “If I have the honor of being president, I will end the Muslim ban on Day 1. Day 1.” Emgage made the pledge to capture more Democrat attention, where Wa’el Alzayat stated:

Emgage made it very clear that as part of our endorsement … we needed a direct engagement with Biden at a visible Muslim-led event. That was one of the clear criteria that we put out there…it’s no longer a question of whether Democrats will engage the Muslim community, but how.  There’s a recognition [in] places like Michigan that went to Trump by just 10,000 votes the importance of all these votes…According to our research, there’s about 150,000 registered Muslim voters in Michigan.

The pact between Biden and Emgage was now sealed with a tit-for-tat agreement: Biden serves the Muslim community, while Muslims deliver votes. According to the Washington Free Beacon:

Emgage has collaborated with a Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated group on events that in recent years attracted speakers who openly opposed LGBT rights and supported terror groups. Last year, Emgage became an official cohost of Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) conferences. ISNA was previously revealed to be part of the Muslim Brotherhood network.

ISNA and CAIR were both listed as unindicted co-conspirators during the Holy Land Foundation Trial. Both were deemed to be, or to have been, “part of the HAMAS social infrastructure in Israel and the Palestinian territories.”

Fast forward to March 2021, when NPR interviewed the Deputy Director of Emgage, Iman Awad, about Biden’s immediate repeal of the Trump travel ban and “what advocates want the Biden administration to do.” The mere question invoked an expectation that the incoming administration would be at the service of Emgage. This was not unreasonable, as it was exactly what Biden had established with Emgage during its summit. So Emgage was now poised to direct the new administration. As expected, the Left took up the cause. Politico reported after the fact that “nearly 1.1 million Muslim voters cast a ballot in the 2020 election, turning out in numbers large enough to swing the presidential race in key battleground states, according to a new report.” The report cited by Politico was that of Emgage itself; it describes its own political action committee (PAC)  as “the nation’s largest Muslim American bi-partisan political action committee that supports local, state, and federal candidates who share our vision of an inclusive and pluralistic America.” The group not only aims to dominate Muslim life in America, but also to represent the broader minority community under the banner of intercultural-interfaith dialogue.

On April 9, 2021, further damage to America’s security was becoming apparent, while Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ignored the real threat of jihad. He announced in a memorandum “the establishment of a Countering Extremism Working Group (CEWG) to spearhead the military’s continued effort to locate and stamp out ‘extremism’ in its ranks.” Austin consistently fails upward. During the Obama administration, he was in charge at US Central Command of the fight against ISIS in Iraq, “when that nation quickly fell to the terrorist group.” See more about his background HERE.

Under Austin, “no fewer than 6 of the CEWG’s 18 members were radical Islamists who viewed the United States as a racist cesspool.” Emgage CEO Alzayat was one of them.

By now, it should be clear to anyone what the ambitions of Emgage are to unite Islamic supremacists everywhere in America, while presenting patriotic Americans as “Islamophobes”; and influencing White House policy, both domestically and abroad. Emgage diligently aims to do nothing less than steer America’s direction as it works with its most powerful ally, the President of the United States. Working as a fifth column from the highest office, the group also has global ambitions, focusing (of course) upon Palestinian interests. Hamas is, after all, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, which a long list of unindicted co-conspirators with Hamas has enabled to operate through an expansive network throughout America. According to a recent news story, “Muslim American leaders, in private meeting, he needs to show more empathy toward Palestinians,” Joe Biden just hosted a core group of Muslim leaders in the White House. According to Frank Gaffney, former Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan and founder of the Center for Security Policy, Biden engaged “in outreach to one of his core constituencies: the Muslim Brotherhood.” The meeting included demands for an end to Israel’s defensive war on Hamas, although the participants called it a “ceasefire.”

Biden has now found himself between a rock and a hard place. He pledged to support the interests of Emgage and its network in exchange for votes. Yet America was shocked awake by Hamas’ ISIS-like attack on innocent civilians in Israel. Biden’s default mode now is remain as non-committal as possible, and even to engage in stalling tactics as he tries to keep his shaky coalition together. He appeals to humanitarian principles as he tries to keep his support base together: Muslims on the one hand, Jews on the other, and everyone in between, all while being forced to live up to expectations that the long history of American support for its ally, Israel, will continue.

The truth is becoming more apparent to mainstream America. The Democrats helped create the current crisis in the Middle East, as well as threats beyond that region). They emboldened Iran and helped fill its coffers through an outrageous deal that was based on lies and backroom deals. Consider more recent activity under Joe Biden:

  • It was discovered that Iranian spies have infiltrated the Biden administration.
  • The Biden administration’s Iran envoy Robert Malley helped “fund, support, and direct an Iranian intelligence operation designed to influence the United States and allied governments.”
  • Right before the Hamas attack on Israel, Iran seized upon a chance to get even more money from Joe Biden.
  • In an extreme act of insensitivity and even provocation to patriotic Americans, Biden announced the deal to send $6,000,000,000 to Iran in exchange for hostages on September 11, of all dates.
  • The Biden regime sent $148 million to Palestinian areas weeks before the attack on Israel.
  • The main goal of Biden’s Israel trip was to secure entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza, not to help fortify Israel against its worst enemies.

And at the private meeting at the White House, Muslim leaders appealed to Biden for “more empathy toward Palestinians.” Among the guests was Emgage CEO Alzayat; the chief of staff of Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Keith Ellison, who recently promoted a pro-Hamas “March for Palestine” rally in Minneapolis, at which demonstrators “called for Israel’s eradication” and used vulgar expletives to condemn Israeli “settlers”; and Imam Mohamed Magid, Executive Imam of All Dulles Area Muslim Society Center in Sterling, Virginia, former President of the Islamic Society of North America, and a big player in the “interfaith dialogue” network, serving as Chairman of International Interfaith Peace Corps. He was also recipient for the Washingtonian of the Year 2009 and the Human Rights Award 2005 from Fairfax County.

Biden now stands at a crossroads. He has pledged his support for Emgage in exchange for votes, and now the Emgage network has arrived to collect.  His public relations with Muslim Brotherhood players can only go so far now that Hamas is fully exposed. So far, Biden hasn’t been backed enough into a corner to pull a stunt that his neighbor Justin Trudeau favors in times of crises: conveniently disappear.

Biden’s Team of Racists and Anti-Semites

An Anti-American coalition in the heart of the White House.

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/bidens-team-of-racists-and-anti-semites/;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.


[Order David Horowitz’s book: The Enemy Within: How a Totalitarian Movement is Destroying America.]

Editor’s note: Because of Hamas’ current barbaric terror attack inside Israel, it is vital to stress how the Biden administration has empowered the terror group in Gaza – and helped spawn its current destruction inside the Jewish state. Frontpage Editors have therefore deemed it urgent to run an article by David Horowitz and John Perazzo that originally appeared in PJMedia.com in its April 13, 2021 issue: Biden’s Team of Racists and Anti-Semites: An Anti-American Coalition in the Heart of the White House.

Don’t miss it!

Formally introducing his cabinet to the public, Joe Biden proudly declared: “This is the first [time] in American history that the Cabinet looks like America.” Looking at the actual appointments and not just the gender, skin color, and ethnic origins of the Biden team, it is a team that may look like America but doesn’t think like America. In fact, it is a team whose outlook is anti-American.

Take Biden’s Vice Presidential choice, Kamala Harris, whose antipathy for America oozes from her every pore. At a February 2019 presidential campaign stop, for example, she said Columbus Day should be replaced with “Indigenous People’s Day” because “we are the scene of a crime when it comes to what we did with slavery and Jim Crow and institutionalized racism in this country.”  This is an accurate summary of the way the Biden White House views its native land, and it is a view encapsulating three big lies.

What America did with the slave system it inherited from the British was end it. America’s abolition campaign began with its revolutionary proclamation that all men are created equal and have a God-given, right to liberty. America began implementing this right in 1787, the first year of its existence, with the enactment of the Northwest Ordinance, outlawing slavery in a territory the size of the original 13 colonies.  Within twenty years slavery was abolished in all the northern states. As for the “original sin” of enslaving the black Africans brought to this country that properly is the achievement of the Africans themselves who then sold their brothers and sisters to Europeans at slave auctions in Ghana and Benin.

All forms of institutional and systemic racism including Jim Crow were outlawed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In one of his first statements as president Biden claimed that “systemic racism” has been built into every aspect of our system.” This is a bald-faced lie. The opposite is the truth. Under the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, systemic racism is outlawed in America. With the exception of affirmative action policies sanctioned by the Supreme Court, there is no systemic racism in America,. If there were systemic racism, there would be a tsunami of legal suits to punish those who practiced it. There is no such tsunami because the claim is a baseless lie.

When 220 U.S. cities were attacked by criminal Black Lives Matter mobs last summer Kamala Harris called them “a coalition of conscience,” and supported the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which made bail payments on behalf of people who were arrested for criminal acts. At the time, Harris claimed that “the life of a Black person in America … has never been treated as fully human….” Tell that to the white majorities who elected Barack Obama the 43rd president of the United States twice. “America,” she claimed “has never fully addressed the systemic racism that has existed in our country.” Chinese communist propagandists couldn’t have framed this malicious indictment better. Not surprisingly Harris has praised racial arsonist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton as a “friend [who] has spent his life fighting for what’s right.”

Picking a cabinet and White House team by skin color and gender, is, of course, racist and “sexist” in their pure forms. Biden’s transgender Assistant Secretary of Health, Rachel Levine, picked to celebrate transgenderism is, in her actual political life, a criminal cohort of Andrew Cuomo, removing her own mother from a nursing home, as Pennsylvania’s Secretary of Health, while committing COVID-19 patients to nursing homes where they killed thousands of not so well-connected elderly residents.

Biden’s Assistant Attorney General in charge of Civil Rights, Kristen Clarke, is the first black woman to be appointed to the position. She is also a racist, praising Farrakhan disciple Tamika Mallory and holding the Farrakhanite view that melanin which is responsible for rich black skin color “endows blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities” than white people. Clarke has long embraced the doctrines of critical race theory, crackpot racism that maintains that America is permanently racist to its core and that consequently the nation’s various institutions and traditions are, by definition, invalid. In 2020, Clarke denounced the “systemic racism that pervades every aspect of our lives, especially when it comes to policing and the operation of the criminal justice system of our country.” For reasons already mentioned this is a racist invention. If police departments were systemically racist how explain all the black police chiefs running those departments in major American cities, or the absence of major lawsuits invoking the Civil Rights Act which outlaws such practices?

In November 2020, Clarke said that collegiate policies permitting black students to be admitted under far lower academic standards than Asian students are “critical for promoting diversity … in an increasingly multi-ethnic society.” This is the statement of a racist who puts skin color first and meritocracy at the end of the line.

Linda Thomas-Greenfield is the second black U.S. Ambassador to the UN. For those not addicted to the new racism in fashion in the Democrat Party, her maiden address to the UN General Assembly praising the malicious and historically illiterate  1619 Project, is cause for alarm. The project conceived by a black racist frames America as a nation defined by slavery and racism and denies that white America played any role in liberating blacks or creating a society that has made them the richest, freest, most privileged blacks anywhere in the world, including black Africa and the Caribbean. Naturally, she has praised the Marxist Black Lives Matter organization as a noble movement for “racial justice.”

Late in his presidency, Donald Trump issued an executive order establishing The 1776 Commission, an advisory committee designed to encourage American schools to provide students with a “patriotic education,” and to counter the America-hating narrative of critical race theory and the 1619 Project. Biden revoked Trump’s executive order — on grounds that the “systemic racism that has plagued our nation for far, far too long couldn’t be ignored any longer.” Susan Rice, his newly appointed Director of the United States Domestic Policy Council, warns Americans about “how serious  a problem we face from nationalists and white supremacists who have demonstrated a willingness to resort to violence in some instances.” On January 26, 2021, Rice said that “for too many American families, systemic racism and inequality in our economy, laws, and institutions still put[s] the American dream far out of reach.  She didn’t explain – if what she says is true – why the Biden administration isn’t suing all those nationalists and white supremacists for practicing institutional and systemic racism which was outlawed over fifty years ago by the Civil Rights Act.

When it comes to Biden’s Middle East policy, the president has diligently deployed skin-color racism to put a team of anti-Semites and supporters of the terrorist regimes in Teheran, the West Bank,, and Gaza in charge. Chief among them, of course, is Susan Rice. In 2015, Rice publicly lauded the Iran nuclear deal as the “most comprehensive and effective” anti-nuclear agreement ever devised. She has continued to support the deal ever since. When President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal in 2018, for instance, Rice falsely stated that “Iran has fully complied with its obligations,” and that the inspections authorized by the deal were “the most intrusive international inspection and monitoring regime in history.

Biden’s new Administrator of USAID, Samantha Power, is a dedicated opponent of Israel. During a 2002 interview  Power said that even if it meant “alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import” (i.e., Jewish Americans), the United States should stop investing “billions of dollars” in “servicing Israel’s military,” and should invest that money instead “in the new state of Palestine” – a regime (not a state) that annually invests hundreds of millions of dollars in terrorism against men, women and children in the Jewish state. During a February 2016 UN Security Council debate on the Middle East, Power – then U.S. Ambassador to the UN equated Palestinian Arab acts of terrorism targeting Jews, with virtually non-existent “settler violence” by Jews in the West Bank. She also falsely portrayed the Palestinian Authority (PA) as an entity that was “pressing for calm,” when, in fact, the PA not only “pays Arabs huge sums of money to murder Jews,” but also “incites violence against innocent Jews in the PA’s speeches, official newspapers, social media, textbooks, schools, clubs, government-controlled mosques, government-controlled television specials, and government ceremonies honoring terrorists.”

Biden’s new Undersecretary of Defense,  Colin Kahlco-drafted the language that attempted – ultimately without success – to omit from the 2012 Democratic Party platform any reference to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. In an August 2012 op-ed in Foreign Policy magazine, Kahl praised President Obama’s call to push Israel’s borders back to the 1949 Armistice lines, which would reward 70 years of Arab aggression and deprive Israel of defensible borders; to accept the creation of a Palestinian state governed by the terrorist organizations PLO and Hamas; and to reject the notion of Jerusalem as Israel’s undisputed capital. In the same article, Kahl blamed the poor living conditions of Palestinians on the “economically debilitating effects of Israeli occupation” – rather than on the Palestinian leaders’ massive corruption and ongoing terrorist aggression.

Biden’s new Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights, Uzra Zeya, is a former staffer at the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, a notoriously anti-Israel publication, where she compiled research for a book claiming that “the Israel lobby” had established a secret network of PACs that bribed and extorted congressional candidates into adopting positions favorable to Israel, thereby “subvert[ing] the American political process to take control of U.S. Middle East policy.”

Wendy Sherman, Biden’s Deputy Secretary of State nominee, has referred to the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat, the world’s most prolific Jew-killer since Hitler, as “the leader of a resistance movement,” while minimizing the moral horrors of Palestinian suicide bombings against innocent Israeli civilians as “nagging disruptions from the Palestinian side.”

In her 2018 book, Not for the Faint of Heart,” Sherman claimed that the Iran nuclear deal, which she helped to negotiate on behalf of the U.S., “was anchored” by: (a) “a common wish to make peace,” and (b) additional “higher principles” that would help facilitate a “reimagining of the world” whereby Americans might “see our adversaries not as eternal enemies, or dispensable ones, but as virtual partners.” Moreover, Sherman falsely claimed that the Iran deal would allow for “intrusive” and “scrupulous” inspections of Iranian nuclear sites.

Symone Sanders is the Senior Advisor and Chief Spokesperson to Vice President, Kamala Harris. Sanders was one of the 2020 Biden presidential campaign’s three senior advisers who apologized to radical Islamic organizations after Biden staffer Andrew Bates had tried to distance Biden from Linda Sarsour, a notorious Jew-hater who, despite supporting the Hamas-inspired Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions (BDS) movement and having ties to numerous Islamic terrorist organizations, was a featured speaker at the 2020 Democratic National Convention. In addition to her apology, Sanders also retweeted a tweet by Emgage, a radical Islamist group, saying that Sarsour “has dedicated her career to fighting for justice.”

Biden’s new Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken,  is opposed to designating Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization and imposing sanctions on it, even though The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran established the IRGC explicitly to “strike terror into [the hearts of] the enemies of Allah” — meaning most prominently the U.S. and Israel — and to “expan[d] the sovereignty” of Islam across the globe. The IRGC’s “terror involvements” have included: “planning 9-11,” “murdering hundreds of American troops in Iraq,” promoting “Iranian nuclear proliferation and weapons delivery systems development,” and “providing weapons, training, funding, and logistical support to Iranian terrorist proxies.”

Biden’s new Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, is a signatory to a J Street letter arguing that the Democratic Party platform should incorporate additional criticism of Israel. The letter also draws a moral equivalence between Palestinian terrorists and their victims, Israeli Jews, by employing the phrase “violence, terrorism, and incitement from ALL sides.” Further, the letter rejects the notion of Israeli and Jewish sovereign rights in the historically Jewish lands of Judea and Samaria and accuses Israel of perpetrating an “occupation” of Palestinian land. This is the lie genocidal Palestinian terrorists use to justify their unprovoked aggressions against the Jewish state, which was created – like Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and Iraq – on land that belonged to the Turks for 400 years previously. Turks are not Palestinians or Arabs.

Biden’s new Deputy Director of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs is Reema Dodin. In her student days at UC Berkeley, Dodin was a campus radical who organized a number of anti-Israel rallies. Among other things, she was a leader of the Muslim Students Association, a Muslim Brotherhood front. The Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamic supremacist organization whose credo proclaims that “death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.” Dodin described the 9/11 attacks as an understandable Islamic response to U.S. support for Israel, which was “angering” Muslims worldwide. Drawing a parallel between the 9/11 hijackers and Palestinian jihadists, she said: “[N]ow you have three generations of Palestinians born under occupation. Maybe if you start to look at Palestinians as human beings, you will stop the suicide bombers.” In a 2002 speech in California, Dodin justified suicide bombing as “the last resort of a desperate people.”

At a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in 2010, Biden’s new Special U.S. Envoy for Iran, Robert Malley, called for the U.S. “to unveil a set of parameters” that included the creation of a Palestinian state along the “1967 borders,” which would have rewarded the Arab aggressors in the Six Day War and been suicidal for Israel. He also advocated: (a) the deployment of third-party armed forces in Judea-Samaria; (b) the forced relocation of hundreds of thousands of Jews from their homes in that region; and (c) Israel’s relinquishment of control of the Golan Heights to Syria, on the premise that Syria was “unlikely to sponsor militant groups … [or] destabilize the region … once an agreement has been reached.”

Biden’s new Senior Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council is Maher Bitar. As a student at Georgetown University, Bitar was an executive board member of Students for Justice in Palestine, an organization that supports the Hamas terrorists and the BDS movement. A 2006 photo from that time period shows Bitar wearing a keffiyah – a terrorist emblem – while dancing in front of a banner reading, “Divest from Israel Apartheid.” At a Palestine Solidarity Movement conference at Georgetown in 2006, Bitar moderated a session that taught attendees how to demonize Israel as a nation guilty of “colonization,” “occupation,” and “oppression.”

Biden’s new Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Israel and Palestinian Affairs is Hady Amr. In January 2002, Amr wrote: “I was inspired by the Palestinian Intifada.” Amr warned that Arabs “will never, never forget what the Israeli people, the Israeli military, and Israeli democracy have done to Palestinian children. And there will be thousands who will seek to avenge these brutal murders of innocents.” He also accused Israel of engaging in the “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians. Ethnic cleansing of Jews is of course the overt goal of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, whereas more than a million Palestinians are Israeli citizens with more rights than the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza.

In sum, while the Biden White House may “look like” America, once one gets past skin color and gender, it is a team of racists and anti-Semites. “Diversity” is exposed as a racist rationale for assembling an anti-American coalition in the heart of the White House itself.

David Horowitz is the founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center and the author of the newly published book, The Enemy Within: How a Totalitarian Movement Is Destroying America.

John Perazzo is the editor of DiscoverTheNetworks.org—an encyclopedic guide to the political Left and a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is the author of Black Lives Matter: Marxist Hate Dressed Up As Racial Justice.

Leftist Group Rocked by Revelation That Its ‘Queer, Muslim, Multi-ethnic’ Equity Chief Is Really A White Lady

Leftist Group Rocked by Revelation That Its ‘Queer, Muslim, Multiethnic’ Equity Chief Is Really A White Lady

Raquel Evita Saraswati

Raquel Evita Saraswati | Flickr

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/culture/robert-spencer/2023/02/18/leftist-group-rocked-by-revelation-that-its-queer-muslim-multiethnic-equity-chief-is-really-a-white-lady-n1671755;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

Raquel Evita Saraswati knows how to play the game, right down to her name itself, with its pleasing multiethnic mélange and artful evocation of Leftist icon Evita Perón. The American Friends Service Committee, a hard-Left organization peddling authoritarianism and dependence upon the all-powerful state under the guise of “social justice,” was likely thrilled when Saraswati applied to be its Chief Equity, Inclusion, and Culture Officer. But then matters took a dark turn, or more precisely, a light turn.

A member of the search committee that ended up hiring Saraswati at the Friends Committee, Oskar Pierre Castro, recounts that during the interview process, Saraswati had represented herself as a “queer, Muslim, multiethnic woman.” With this trifecta of wokeness and victimhood, Saraswati couldn’t miss, and of course, she got the job. “It really touched all the points,” Castro remarked of Saraswati’s background. But now it has come to light that contrary to her claims, she is infected with the Left’s original sin: Raquel Evita Saraswati was born Rachel Elizabeth Seidel, and is as white as the native population of Switzerland.

The revelation of Saraswati’s true ethnicity has been like sandpaper upon the hitherto smooth, complacently Leftist surface of the American Friends Service Committee, with these people of love and tolerance now eyeing one another suspiciously over their tofu and soybean salads: now the organization’s other employees are afraid that they’ve been infiltrated. According to a Thursday report in The Intercept, the fact that their hijab-wearing multiethnic Muslima has turned out to be white has led some inside the Friends Committee to suspect that she is “working on behalf of groups seeking to undermine their organization.” After all, her position “gives her access to the files of dozens of the organization’s staff and volunteers.”

Of course! Why else would Saraswati have lied about her background? It couldn’t be because being white has been so demonized and stigmatized on the Left that all manner of white folks, from Elizabeth Warren to Shaun King to Hilaria Baldwin to Linda Sarsour, are claiming not to be “people of color,” could it? Nah, that couldn’t be it. Saraswati must be a double agent! She must be secretly working for some white supremacist group, right?

Saraswati, according to The Intercept, “for years has encouraged people to believe that she is a woman of color, including Latina as well as of South Asian and Arab descent.” But Raquel/Rachel’s mom, Carol Perone, was unequivocal: “I call her Rachel. I don’t know why she’s doing what she’s doing.” Perone added: “I’m German and British, and her father was Calabrese Italian. She’s chosen to live a lie, and I find that very, very sad.” Indeed. Welcome to the twenty-first century, when happening to be non-white is a badge of honor and whiteness is regarded as it would be if the entire nation had joined the Nation of Islam in thinking that all evil stems from the white race, an intrinsically evil people that was created in the mythic past by an evil scientist, Dr. Yaqub, on the island of Madagascar.

Mama Perone continued: “I’m as white as the driven snow and so is she.” Perone even showed The Intercept childhood photos of Rachel; they showed the future queer, multiethnic Muslima to have a “complexion is significantly lighter than the bronzed look in more recent photographs.” The one thing that appears genuine about Raquel Evita Saraswati is that her mother confirmed that her daughter converted to Islam while in high school.

Related: After Alec Baldwin’s Manslaughter Charge, His Wife Finds Time to Do This Again

Now Oskar Pierre Castro feels cheated: “In my mind, it was, ‘Great, a person of color, a queer person of color, who happens to be a Muslim, it’s a woman, all these things, and someone who seemed to get it. I definitely feel conned… I feel deceived.” Well, sure. But it is certain that neither Oskar Pierre Castro nor anyone else involved with the American Friends Service Committee will pause to consider what they themselves did to create people such as Raquel Evita Saraswati. When the Left started exalting “people of color,” Muslims, and homosexuals as people of superior nobility and insight, did it never occur even to a single Leftist that one day, someone would come to them deceptively claiming to be a homosexual Muslim person of color?

Raquel Saraswati apparently really is “queer” and Muslim, although her affectation of the hijab suggests that she adheres to a moral code that would have her executed for homosexual activity. And of course, she certainly isn’t a person of color. The contradictions and absurdities in her story should have raised eyebrows among the American Friends Service Committee. But her story was just too good, so good as to be irresistible. Now, despite the fact that the truth has come out about her, one thing is certain: among Leftists, no lessons will be learned.

The IRS Came After Pro-Israel Groups, But Protected Hamas

"Come navigate the fine line between legal activism and material support for terrorism."

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-irs-came-after-pro-israel-groups-but-protected-hamas/;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

[Order David Horowitz’s and John Perazzo’s new booklet: “Internal Radical Service: Abuse Of Taxpayer Dollars To Advance Leftwing Causes Illegally And Unconstitutionally”: CLICK HERE.]

 David Boim was only 17 years old when he was shot and killed while waiting at a bus stop north of Jerusalem. The American teenager’s parents, Stanley and Joyce, have spent a quarter of a century trying to bring Hamas, the Islamic terror group behind the attack, and its funders in the United States to justice. Their lawsuits have targeted, among others, the Holy Land Foundation which was found in federal court to have provided “material aid to Hamas” in what became the largest terrorism financing prosecution case in the United States.

The Justice Department stated that “from its inception, HLF existed to support Hamas. Before HLF was designated as a Specially Designated Terrorist by the Treasury Department and shut down in December 2001, it was the largest U.S. Muslim charity.”

It was also a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. The IRS had allowed money used to fund Islamic terrorists to be funneled through a tax-deductible organization. And that was not the first time or the last.

The Boims are still fighting in court over what they allege are new non-profits that are really  ‘alter egos’ that was set up after the Hamas fundraisers lost criminal and civil lawsuits.

One of those is American Muslims for Palestine.

The Boim family lawsuit alleges that “American Muslims for Palestine is merely a new name for the same terrorism funding enterprise”. Last year, a federal judge in Illinois allowed the case against AMP to move forward.

But the bereaved family is not the only one accusing AMP.

Jonathan Schanzer, Vice President of Research for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee that many “high-level and mid-level figures” from the terror charities “gravitated to a new organization called American Muslims for Palestine (AMP).”

Schanzer, who had formerly worked as a terrorism finance analyst at the Treasury Department, then went on to list the connections to Hamas and its front groups. He told Congress about the case of AMP board member Salah Sarsour, an alleged relative of antisemitic figure Linda Sarsour, who told Al-Jazeera “that the conference aims to keep up with and support the Palestinian people’s continuous intifada.” A 2001 FBI memo to the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) describes how Sarsour’s brother, after being arrested by Israel in 1998, told Israeli officials about Sarsour’s “involvement with Hamas and fundraising activities of HLFRD [Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development].”

American Muslims for Palestine officially deny everything. At its events, it’s another matter.

An American Muslims for Palestine conference panel titled, “Do Occupied People Have the Right to Resist their Occupation?” asserted that “it is well recognized under international law that an occupied people have the right to resist its occupation by any means necessary.” “Any means” implies support for terrorism. The panel further complained that “the US has designated most Palestinian groups as terrorist organizations” and invited attendees to, “come navigate the fine line between legal activism and material support for terrorism.”

The IRS is certainly navigating that fine line by maintaining AMP’s tax-deductible status.

Like the dismantled Hamas fundraising groups, American Muslims for Palestine receives tax-deductible funds. It does this through the Americans for Justice in Palestine

Educational Foundation (AJP). AJP got its tax-deductible status in 2010.

A year earlier, Lori Lowenthal Marcus, a journalist, applied for tax-exempt status for her pro-Israel group, Z Street. The IRS informed her that it “has to give special scrutiny to organizations connected to Israel.” The lawsuit originating from the Z Street case helped roll back the curtain on the IRS bias against conservatives and pro-Israel Jewish groups.

Lori Lowenthal Marcus told Front Page Magazine, “One of the excuses given to Z Street by an IRS official was that the IRS had to make sure we were not ‘engaged in terrorism’ because we mentioned ‘terror’ in our mission statement. The part of Z Street’s mission that mentioned terror? ‘We will not engage with, negotiate with, or appease terrorists.’ Yet Z Street’s application for 501(c)(3) status was sidelined for seven years while Z Street litigated the IRS’s unconstitutional application of Viewpoint Discrimination against us.”

Despite the connections between AMP and the largest terrorism financing prosecution case in the country, the IRS appeared to have no such reservations about the anti-Israel group.

Was AMP ever asked by the IRS about its views on Islamic terrorism?

Due to the inaction of the IRS, the AMP’s networks and influence continue to expand.

AJP and AMP have created AJP Action, a 501(c)(4), which lobbies on Capitol Hill and endorses politicians: including Rep. Betty McCollum. Apart from its hostility to Israel, it’s also opposed to the Palestinian Authority, complaining that PA leader Mahmoud Abbas has been backed by Israel and the U.S., “as opposed to his Hamas rivals.”

An AJP Action policy paper critical of Fatah’s Palestinian Authority agonizes that security “has often meant repressing members of Hamas to protect Fatah’s power”.

AMP was founded by Hatem Bazian, who was once quoted calling for the mass murder of Jews. He still serves as the chairman of AMP’s national board and heads the AJP Educational Foundation. Bazian had previously fundraised for one of the Hamas charities and had tweeted an article claiming that “The Europeans who fought Nazism with arms were labeled ‘terrorist’ by Hitler. Hamas is fighting against the occupation of Palestinian lands and is labeled ‘terrorist.”

AMP’s National Policy Director Osama Abuirshaid took part in a conference with top Hamas officials in 2021. He tweeted, “Whether you love Hamas or hate her, her opponents respect her. She stands by her principles and negotiates from a position of strength.”

Taher Herzallah, AMP’s Associate Director of Outreach & Grassroots Organizing, posted on Facebook that, “Hamas’ rockets are an oppressed people’s audible cry for help.”

At an AMP event in New Jersey this year, Herzallah complained that “they make us look like terrorists if we fight back, if we throw a rock, or resist. This is a God-given right.”

“Come navigate the fine line between legal activism and material support for terrorism” indeed.

The issue with the IRS isn’t simply that it maintains a ‘hands off’ policy toward nonprofits, but that it displays a transparent political bias in selecting which organizations it goes after.

The IRS targeted Z Street and other pro-Israel groups even though there was no basis for suspecting any kind of illegal activity, but it carefully looked away from the rise of American Muslims for Palestine despite the links to previous nonprofits that had faced criminal prosecution, an extended lawsuit by the family of a terror victim and congressional testimony by a former Treasury Department specialist in sanctioning terrorist fundraisers.

Americans deserve an IRS that objectively enforces the law rather than picking and choosing its targets for partisan political reasons. As long as the IRS continues to be aligned with the Left, it will also be aligned with the Islamic terrorists who have become integrated within the Left.

And that makes the IRS a threat to national security.

Georgia: Hijabbed state rep has ties to Hamas-linked CAIR and Islamic Relief, which has history of terror financing

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2023/01/georgia-hijabbed-state-rep-has-ties-to-hamas-linked-cair-and-islamic-relief-which-has-history-of-terror-financing;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

If she had supported “white supremacist” terror groups, if there are any actual ones, she would already have been forced to resign. But this? No one will mind.

“Islamist in Georgia Falsely Portrays Herself as Cinderella Candidate,” by Susannah Johnston, Focus On Western Islamism, January 9, 2023:

Georgia swore in its first female Islamist, Ruwa Romman, into public office on January 9, 2023. Despite spending years preparing herself for public life and winning her first election by 15 percentage points, Romman seems keen on portraying herself as a reluctant Cinderella candidate who came out of nowhere to serve as state representative for Georgia’s 97th district.

Upon winning her seat last November, she told CNN she had no plans to run for office until a reporter falsely reported she was “contemplating a run” after seeing her attend a training session for potential political candidates. “That article sparked such an intensely positive community response that I launched my campaign 15 days later,” she said.

After a successful campaign, she referred to her election as “something I never would have imagined, not even five, ten years ago” in an interview with Atlanta station, WSB-TV. Romman earned a bachelor’s in politics at Oglethorpe University where she served as president of the school’s student government. She attended Georgetown where she obtained a master’s in public policy. While there, she served as president of the McCourt Student Association which represents students at Georgetown’s school of public policy.

A cursory review of her career indicates Romman has been preparing herself for a life in politics for quite some time. Her self-portrayal as a reluctant candidate who was uninterested in running for office until a wave of support forced her hand seems a bit far-fetched. In 2015, Romman worked as a field coordinator at the Georgia Muslim Voter Project. Romman has spent years studying and working in politics and public policy and has helped draft federal legislation. In 2016, she told a group of students, “I really do want to become Secretary of State.”

The newly elected state representative has been involved in Islamist-related activism since childhood. Romman’s LinkedIn page lists her as a speaker for the Islamic Speakers Bureau (ISB) from 2011-2017. Romman, a Jordanian-Palestinian by birth, came to the United States as a child and grew up in Georgia. She says she first gained exposure to the ISB in 7th grade, eventually serving as a speaker for the organization.

The ISB was founded in 2001 and listed as an “affiliate” of the Islamic Networks Group (ING). A deleted webpage from 2010 detailed its mission as countering “prejudice and discrimination, promot[ing] intercultural understanding, and foster[ing] mutual respect through education and community engagement.” The webpage also stated that “ING achieves its mission through regional volunteers and affiliated organizations…”

In the early 2000s, the network boasted leadership that had promoted jihad as “the only way” and downplayed the evils of U.S.-designated terror group, Hamas. One prominent ING board member, well-known apologist John Esposito, dismissed the evils of Hamas, declaring the organization “was distinguished by concern for ‘community social services’ and ‘small business ventures,’ including honey production, cheese-making and clothing manufacture.’” Hamas has perpetrated numerous suicide bombings against Israeli civilians since the 1990s.

Romman served as a speaker for the Atlanta based Islamic Speakers Bureau, which lists “ICNA Relief” and “Islamic Relief USA” as partners. Both of these groups have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. ICNA Relief also happens to be listed as a donor to the “violent South Asian Islamist group Jamaat-e-Islami.” And Islamic Relief stands accused of funding terror. Both Israel and the United Arab Emirates list it as a terror-financing organization.

If Romman’s only connection to Islamism lay in her association with the Islamic Speakers Bureau, it might be overlooked. However, Romman helped establish the Georgia branch of the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and became communications director for the branch in 2017. In 2008, the US government listed CAIR National as an unindicted co-conspirator in one of the largest terror financing cases in US history, U.S. vs. Holy Land Foundation. The court found the Holy Land Foundation and its leadership guilty of funneling millions to the terror group Hamas. As of 2008, the FBI “suspended all formal contact between CAIR and the FBI.” And in 2014 the United Arab Emirates listed CAIR as a terror organization.

Romman has not disavowed her involvement with CAIR. She remained silent after her opponent, John Chan, sent out flyers in October pointing out Romman’s work for CAIR and the fact that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has designated CAIR a terror organization.

When talk show host Rico Figlioni asked Romman about the UAE’s terror designation of CAIR, she said that “the last time I checked, we live in the US. The UAE is not a civil rights friendly country…There are literal (sic) think tanks whose entire, for a while it was like a $300 million industry to increase fear about Muslims in America. And they literally would fundraise off of, ‘Let’s find the terrorists among us.’ And we’d see these, like, it was truly like that’s how they would fundraise. And they went after everyone. I mean, they went after CAIR Georgia,” she said.

Romman didn’t stop there. She also defended Islamic Relief, which has a history of terror financing. “They went after an organization called Islamic Relief whose literally only job is to feed and house poor people. That’s truly all that they do,” said Ruwa. Both the UAE and Israel list Islamic Relief (IR) as a terror organization and both the Swiss bank UBS and British bank HSBC have closed its bank accounts. IR has financial ties to proxies for numerous terror groups including Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Al-Qaeda.

In addition to defending CAIR and Islamic Relief, Romman has promoted the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel and called for donations to American Near East Refugee Aid (ANERA). In 2007 ANERA gave $140,000 to a rocket and explosive producing university founded by Hamas “spiritual leader” Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. In November 2022, American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) listed Romman as a speaker for their annual convention. The organization is currently being sued as a revamped successor to several American non-profits found guilty of providing material support to Hamas.

And if all this were not concerning enough, Romman has accepted campaign funds from Huwaida Arraf and Linda Sarsour. Arraf co-founded the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), which she herself acknowledges works with the terror groups Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Sarsour, another Palestinian-American, had her picture taken with a Hamas operative and fundraises for the pro-Palestinian group, Al-Awdah, which endorses terrorism.

Romman has made her support for Sharia (Islamic law) clear too, “We don’t want thinly veiled anti-Muslim laws known as anti-Shariah laws; going after the Muslim community for enhanced surveillance is unacceptable; working with anti-Muslim think tanks that have been fueled by dark money is unacceptable.”…

North Carolina: Anti-Israel ‘Progressive’ Muslim Congressional Candidate Hopes to Become New ‘Squad’ Member

ANOTHER ANTI-SEMITIC MUSLIM WANTS TO GO TO CONGRESS TO JOIN THE "SQUAD"

BY HUGH FITZGERALD

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/11/north-carolina-anti-israel-progressive-muslim-congressional-candidate-hopes-to-become-new-squad-member;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In 2015, the semi-demented Craig Hicks shot three of his neighbors because he believed they were using parking spaces to which they were not entitled. All three were Muslims. But he had a history of berating non-Muslims, too, over both parking spaces and making noise. His wife of seven years testified that he had never spoken ill of Muslims, never denounced them, never expressed hostility to the ideology of Islam, on social media or anywhere else. In fact, he was anti-Christian, and on his Facebook page wrote: “Knowing several dozen Muslims…I’d prefer them to most Christians.” The police said there was no evidence of a “hate crime.” The prosecutor could come up with no evidence of a “hate crime.” But none of that mattered, or matters, to North Carolina Congressional candidate Nida Allam.

Allam has been milking this non-existent hate crime for all it’s worth. Her website Nida For Congress includes this: “After three of her dear friends were murdered in 2015 — a case that drew national attention and triggered calls for stronger hate crime legislation — Nida Allam took to politics.”

She was spurred to run for office  because of the “hate crime” against “three of her dear friends.” Allam is not in the race to further her own well-being. Not at all. Personal aggrandizement, power, and money and fame — these hold no attractions for the self-effacing Nida Allam. She has girded her loins and entered the political arena in answer to a higher call.  She wants to fight against the “hate crimes” that she insists took her friends’ lives.

She has a video at her Nida For Congress website, about her decision to run. Here’s a transcript of part of it:

I was 21 years old when three of my best friends were killed.

Deah, Yusor, and Razan, brutally murdered in a hate crime that shook our community to the core. My lie was shattered but I knew I couldn’t let their legacy die. I looked for ways to fight against the  hate that took my friends  to make sure that no one would have to experience the pain that we [Muslims] endured , to make sure that we [Muslims] could live with dignity and without fear.

I never set out to make history, but sometimes life has different plans [inshallah fatalism]..  It wasn’t just racism and hate that we faced….my service was born out of tragedy…I’m ready to take my passion and my experience [one year as County Commissioner] to the halls of Congress. I’ve been told that I don’t belong, that I ought to wait my turn, but North Carolina can’t wait….I’m Nida Allam, and I’m running for Congress because Congress can’t wait.

Goodness me. So Congress “can’t wait” for the appearance of Nida Allam, who is just like Mighty Mouse, “Here I come,  to save the day/That means that Mighty Mouse is on the way.” She does have a whole list of what she intends to accomplish. Most impressive. Nida Allam has a jobs program because  “everyone deserves a good-paying job.” She wants to fight climate change, because “Black, brown, and working-class communities are on the front lines of this crisis.” She has a health care platform: “Everyone deserves comprehensive high-quality healthcare coverage that includes primary care, vision, hearing, dental, mental health care, reproductive health care, and more.” Sounds good to me. She has a housing plan: “Housing is a human right, and all of our neighbors deserve a safe and stable place to live.” “Education? “Every child deserves a quality public school education.” And so on and so mindlessly forth. Foreign policy? “We need to end our ‘so-called war on terror.'”

She never mentions Israel in her “Nida Allam For Congress” website. A curious but understandable admission – Nida may be a fool, but she’s “no fool,” given that this past May, amid escalating violence between Israel and Hamas, Allam participated in a pro-Palestinian rally where protestors chanted slogans such as “Israel is an apartheid state” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” the latter of which is correctly understood to be a call to eliminate Israel. In a live video she posted to her Facebook page on May 22, Allam appears to have been chanting that line along with her fellow protestors.

A week earlier, Allam attended a May 15 demonstration in downtown Raleigh marking the annual date of the ‘Nakba’ when Palestinians mark the war of 1948.

Following the May 15 rally, the Jewish Community Relations Council and the Jewish Federation of Raleigh-Cary released a statement identifying alleged instances of “antisemitic rhetoric” used by some demonstrators, including “posters combining Israeli and Nazi imagery.” One poster, the statement said, featured then-Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Benjamin “wearing a Hitler moustache,” while another declared, “Israel, Hitler would be proud of you.”

For her part, Allam denounced what she described as “ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and murder of children” in comments to a local newspaper reporter at the event.

Near the beginning of the May conflict, Allam released a statement of her own calling for a wholesale cessation of U.S. military aid to Israel, which is guaranteed in annual installments of $3.8 billion through a memorandum of understanding between the two countries. “We must end this negligent spending that is being used to oppress the Palestinian people,” Allam wrote, echoing the sentiments of a handful of far-left lawmakers in the House who have argued in favor of conditioning or eliminating aid to the Jewish state.

“I condemn all violence in this conflict and urge the United States to acknowledge our complacency in the continuing Israel-Palestine conflict,” Allam argued at the time.

In June 2018, after reports that the U.S. had quietly frozen aid to the Palestinian Authority, Allam weighed in with an incendiary Twitter comment. “This is the United States of Israel.”

Peter Riezes has reported on Nida Allam’s candidacy here:

Nida Allam, a 27-year-old progressive activist and Durham, North Carolina County Commissioner, announced last week that she will run for the Congressional seat of retiring Rep. David Price (D-NC).

I first researched Allam during her 2019 campaign for County Commissioner, due to her anti-Israel positions. What I found was a history of abhorrent statements that extended far beyond Israel.

In 2018, Allam tweeted, “This is the United States of Israel,” which is consistent with centuries-old antisemitic propaganda that Jews seek to dominate the world.

In 2013, Allam tweeted, “F*** the police,” and she has made many offensive and hateful posts over the years.

I spoke with award-winning Durham columnist and Black minister, Carl W. Kenney II, who told me that Allam’s use of the N-word in a 2014 tweet is “appalling.”

When asked if it matters that Allam’s tweet is from 2014, Kenney responded:

I think it speaks to character issues. I think it speaks to a lack of sensitivity. We have a person who has a desire to run for US Congress at 27…What has she done in building relationships with the Black community to help soothe the pain connected to making that type of statement? … I’m not comfortable that she’s learned a lesson.

When asked about Allam’s “F*** the police” tweet, Kenney told me that while he understands the anger, “In Durham, we’re not one to say ‘f*** the police.’ We want to say we want to work with the police.”

Allam was at the time pressuring the Durham police to end their training arrangement with the Israeli police, falsely claiming that such training “militarized” the Durham Police Force.

“I met with Kenney via Zoom and asked if it is acceptable that I — someone who is not Black — cite Allam’s N-word tweet in this column as a warning to the public. Kenney responded, “You have an obligation to do that. … For people to fully understand what we are talking about, they need to have it in its original form.”

Here’s Allam’s unseemly tweet: “Kid in front of me is in a group text called “United N*gga Network.’ Where do I apply?”

In 2019, Allam tweeted a picture of herself standing with a Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) sign. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) describes JVP as “a radical anti-Israel activist group that advocates for a complete economic, cultural and academic boycott of the state of Israel.”…

Allam has repeatedly promoted her close ties with noted antisemite Linda Sarsour, calling Sarsour “my shero, role-model, mentor, and so much more.”

Sarsour has been widely criticized for advocating for the destruction of Israel via the BDS movement and other means, saying “Nothing is creepier than Zionism,” and advising Muslims not to “humanize” Israelis.

Earlier this year, Black constituents and politicians strongly criticized Allam and two other Durham commissioners for what was viewed by many as racially divisive policies.

“There is a sense in the Black community that she [Allam] is among the politicians here who doesn’t really talk to Black people” Kenny [sic] told me. “They have an idea of what is best for Black people without actually engaging in the conversation. That’s a problem.”

On his widely read blog, Kenney warns: “If Allam has her way, the race for Congress will not be determined by local Black voters. It will be won by the support of the national media and progressive politicians desirous of an addition to The Squad — joining Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).”…

Just hours after Allam announced her run for Congress, Ilhan Omar tweeted, “Let’s go Nida!”; Keith Ellison tweeted, “Great Candidate”; and Linda Sarsour retweeted Allam’s campaign announcement….

Nida Allam’s campaign received $115,000 in donations just the first day it opened. Muslims from all over the country sent money, eager to add one more anti-Israel voice to Congress,  provide another potential collaborator of Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, another member of the Squad. No doubt CAIR is out fundraising for her, raising money among Muslims across the country who are relentlessly focused on increasing Muslim power in Washington. This would-be squadette needs to be stopped in her tracks, or headed off at the pass, preferably by an African-American candidate who will make good use of Allam’s “United N*gga Network” tweet,  and of her palpable want of interest, according to the columnist and black minister Carl Kenney II, in African-Americans.

According to her website, the essence of Nida Allam is that she is “working for a brighter future.” What a fantastic idea. Really, who could disagree?

ANTISEMITIC ICE CREAM VENDOR Ben & Jerry’s Board chair supports jihad terror against Israel, has defended Hamas and Hizballah

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/07/ben-jerrys-board-chair-supports-jihad-terror-against-israel-has-defended-hamas-and-hizballah;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

What would have been surprising would have been if Ben and Jerry’s had a Board chair who opposed jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women.

“Meet Ben & Jerry’s Board Chair: Anti-Israel Activist Has Published Defenses of Hezbollah, Hamas,” by Alana Goodman, Washington Free Beacon, July 23, 2021:

Ben & Jerry’s board chairwoman isn’t your average corporate suit. A social justice warrior who’s now under increased scrutiny in the wake of the company’s announcement that it will boycott Israel’s West Bank and East Jerusalem, she has a lengthy history of left-wing activism that includes publishing columns defending Hezbollah and supporting U.S. funding to Hamas.

Anuradha Mittal, the leading force behind the ice cream company’s decision to stop selling its products in parts of Israel, founded the Oakland Institute, which describes itself as an “independent policy think tank,” in 2004 and serves as its executive director. The group has published articles defending Hezbollah and Hamas, terrorist groups that seek the destruction of the Jewish state.

Ben & Jerry’s is under increased scrutiny for its decision to join the anti-Israel boycott movement, which follows criticism over the ice cream maker’s partnership with anti-Semitic figures during the Women’s March in 2018. At the time, the company defended its work with Linda Sarsour, one of the march leaders who was ousted for anti-Semitism. Multiple state and local governments, including Texas and Florida, are considering sanctioning Ben & Jerry’s and its parent company, Unilever, over the boycott decision.

Mittal published an article written by Green Party Senate candidate Todd Chretien during the Israel-Lebanon war in 2006 arguing that progressives should support Hezbollah.

“You do not have to agree with all of Hezbollah’s ideas to support their resistance to Israel,” wrote Chretien. “Condemning ‘both sides’ in the Middle East is just like condemning ‘both sides’ in the American Civil War. During the Civil War, with all its complications, one side fought for slavery and the other fought for emancipation. Today in the Middle East, one side fights to rob and pillage, the other seeks self-determination and dignity.”

Chretien added that Hezbollah’s actions would encourage militants who were fighting U.S. soldiers in Iraq.

“Hezbollah has emerged as the hero to millions of Arabs and Muslims. Hezbollah’s fight will encourage the resistance in Iraq and it will give a boost to opposition forces in Egypt, Jordan and other American client states,” he wrote.

In a “policy brief” published the same year, Mittal expressed concern that the U.S. government would cut off funding to the recently elected Hamas government, which had just won control of Gaza.

“The U.S. has threatened to sever humanitarian aid to the people of Palestine for exercising their right to vote,” wrote Mittal. She argued that this decision would end up “bankrupting” Hamas, which had “assured the international community that all aid revenues will be used on salaries, daily lives, and infrastructure.”

Other articles published by the Oakland Institute claimed that Israel’s strike on Hezbollah was part of a years-long plan to “allow the Cheney/Rumsfeld war party to once again take control” and argued for “a voluntary and sensitive integration of Hezbollah into a reformed, viable Lebanese political arrangement.”…

_____________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_%26_Jerry%27s

EXCERPT: "On 19 July 2021, it was announced that Ben & Jerry's plans to boycott "the Occupied Palestinian Territory," generally presumed in this context to mean West Bank settlements and Jewish neighborhoods of east Jerusalem. However, Anuradha Mittal, chairwoman of Ben & Jerry's Independent Board of Directors, said: "The statement released by Ben & Jerry's regarding its operation in Israel and the Occupied Palestine Territory does not reflect the position of the Independent Board nor was it approved by the Independent Board." In fact, the Ben & Jerry Board wanted to boycott Israel entirely, but was stopped from doing so by Unilever. Avi Zinger, CEO of Ben & Jerry's Israel, the franchisee in Israel since 1987, said he was unwilling to refuse to sell the ice cream to Israeli citizens in settlements and was legally prevented from doing so. In consequence, the company plans not to renew the franchise in 2022. The decision may also run foul of anti-boycott of Israel laws in place in many US states."

_____________________________________________________________

Ben & Jerry’s Embraces BDS’s Israel-Hating Agenda

Why the “woke” ice cream company deserves to be frozen out.

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/07/ben-jerrys-embraces-bdss-israel-hating-agenda-joseph-klein/

EXCERPTS:

“Ben & Jerry’s, a leading socially responsible international company, is finally bringing its policy on Israel’s regime of oppression against Palestinians in line with its progressive positions on Black Lives Matter and other justice struggles,” BDSmovement.net tweeted. “We hope Ben & Jerry’s has understood that, in harmony with its social justice commitments, there can be no business as usual with apartheid Israel.”

Adalah Justice Project, a U.S.-based pro-Palestinian advocacy group, tweeted, “This BDS win is because of our people power. Thank you Vermonters for Justice in Palestine, Movement for Black Lives, and all the organizers behind this win. Our demand remains a complete disengagement from all business dealings with apartheid Israel. We applaud @benandjerrys decision to end business in the settlements. Israel a settler colonial state from the river to the sea. We won't rest.”

Mittal’s own soul, if she has one, is filled with hate for the Jewish state. “The catastrophe continues,"  this anti-Semite tweeted on May 15, 2018. "#Nakba70 years later    #palestine bleeds    Boycott Divest Sanctions #israel,”

The Coalition for Jewish Values has organized an online petition on Change.org to boycott Ben & Jerry’s ice cream products.

Ben & Jerry’s supports all kinds of leftwing progressive causes, including the Black Lives Matter movement.

The “woke” company also slow-walked its response to the inhumane conditions under which migrants, many of them in the country illegally, toiled at dairy farms supplying Ben & Jerry’s with milk.

Stop Jew-Hate: End Islamist Immigration

Filling American cities with anti-Semitic Muslim mobs

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/05/stop-antisemitism-end-islamist-immigration-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

In 2015, The Atlantic ran a cover story titled, "Is It Time for the Jews to Leave Europe?"

In 2021, the question is whether it’s time for the Jews to leave New York and Los Angeles.

The magazine cover story mentioned Malmo. Most stories about antisemitism in Europe reference the Swedish city whose Jewish population dropped from 3,000 to barely 800. Current estimates are that Malmo will have no Jews left by the end of the decade as its population flees Muslim mob violence, firebombings, and random assaults: including 100 aimed at its sole rabbi.

“I hear students shouting in the hallway about killing Jews,” a public school teacher described. Firebombs are routinely thrown at Jewish institutions. Mobs have torn down gates to try to smash their way inside. A Swedish journalist who conducted a hidden camera investigation of what happens to anyone visibly Jewish was harassed within moments of sitting down to eat.

Americans who wondered how this could happen in Europe are now seeing it at home.

There’s nothing confusing about ‘how’ or ‘why’. Or as a CBC article about Malmo gingerly put it, “Anti-Semitism in Malmö reveals flaws in Swedish immigration system”. There are equally big flaws in our immigration system and too many Jewish groups have wasted time on outreach instead of working toward immigration reform to stop the ‘Malmoization’ of New York and LA.

Estimates of the size of the Muslim population in the United States doubled since 9/11.

Islamists claim that there are over 750,000 Muslim settlers in New York City, making up around 9% of the population, and operating hundreds of mosques across the five boroughs. Those numbers may be overstated, but there’s no denying that there are far more Muslims now. And much of the growth has happened at the lower end leading to a large young male population.

The viral videos of antisemitic attacks by mobs of young Muslim men are the outcome.

Like many European cities, New York City now has a large, angry population of young Muslim men who are looking to lash out. And Jews are an easy target. When Waseem Awawdeh was arrested over a vicious assault on a Jewish accountant, he declared, “If I could do it again, I would do it again,” and then received a hero's welcome on his release.

New York City now hosts the largest Muslim population in the country. Los Angeles, the scene of more antisemitic mob attacks, hosts another of the country’s largest Muslim populations. Before 9/11, there were less than 100,000 Muslims in Los Angeles County. Even accounting for Islamist overestimates, the number has grown significantly.

Like NYC, LA is becoming ‘Malmoized’.

There are still enough Jews in both cities that the Democrat politicians offer token condemnations and ask the local police to make a few arrests. As the demographics continue to shift away from Jews and toward Muslims, they’ll react the way that Ilmar Reepalu, Malmo's former mayor did when he blamed Israel for the antisemitic attacks on Jews by Muslims.

The AOC crowd already echoes this type of rhetoric on social media. And George Soros, who funds much of the American Left, had made this exact argument two decades ago. “Attitudes toward the Jewish community are influenced by the pro-Israel lobby’s success in suppressing divergent views,” the former Nazi collaborator had argued.

But that’s only to be expected of an antisemitic movement. American Jews however spent a generation watching European Jews being driven out and did little with that time. After all these years of consuming articles about the fate of the Jews of Paris, Berlin, and Malmo, they went on supporting mass Muslim migration because they were told it was the right thing to do.

When President Trump tried to implement a ban on travel from Muslim terror states, the ZOA became the only Jewish organization to file a Supreme Court brief in defense of the move.

The ADL signed on to every HIAS push against the move to protect Americans from Islamic terror, alongside anti-Israel groups like J Street, Soros' Bend the Arc, and T'ruah. HIAS, T’ruah, and Avodah, a feeder group for the anti-Israel movement funded by Steven Spielberg, showed up to a Linda Sarsour protest. Rallying for Muslim migration mattered more than antisemitism.

While Orthodox Jews stayed out of the protests, not counting Uri L’Tzedek, a component of the heretical leftist Yeshivat Chovevei Torah crowd, the Orthodox Union’s Nathan Diament put out a shameful statement comparing Syrian migrants to Jews fleeing the Nazi Holocaust.

Fortunately, the National Council of Young Israel took a stand, calling the obscene analogy “highly offensive to those Jews who survived Nazi persecution.”

As I wrote at the time, “when one of Diament’s migrants attacks Jews, they will not be able to say, ‘Our hands did not shed this blood and our eyes did not see it.’” Now the blood is being shed and the OU is co-signing letters calling for an antisemitism monitor as if the problem lies in a lack of monitoring rather than the inevitable crisis of Islamist immigration and demographics.

American Jews have followed the same failed strategy as European Jews.

"After two Muslim teenagers attempted to set fire to Malmo’s synagogue last March, HaCohen and Barakat telephoned their school principal, then visited the class the next day to discuss the incident. 'We did not point out the kids,' Barakat says, explaining they used the time to give a lesson about anti-Semitism, rather than punish them,” a Time Magazine article cheerfully notes.

The suicidal hobby of handing out lessons about antisemitism to synagogue burners continues.

Integrating the fight against antisemitism into broader leftist movements against bigotry has failed miserably because the central premise of intersectionality and anti-racism is that some people, privileged white people in general and Jews in particular, deserve to be hated.

The collapse of a liberal middle class into dueling Marxist and Fascist youth mobs is mainstreaming antisemitism in America the way that it already has in Europe. But the heavy lifting will still be done by young men whose parents came here from Iraq, Pakistan, or Gaza that we’ve seen assaulting random Jewish people in New York and Los Angeles.

The cries of “Kill Jews, Free Palestine” are not a horrid aberration: they’re the new normal.

The one thing that could have stopped this and perhaps still might would be for American Jews to be willing to say the unspeakable: that some people belong in this country and others don’t.

The idea that immigration should be a mutual social contract instead of a suicide pact is profoundly alien to everything that millions of Americans, Jews and Christians, have absorbed over the years. Beyond the Christian churches and HIAS which lobby to resettle more Islamists in America, much of the country is wedded to the idea that we must take anyone who comes.

But when we take anyone who comes, then we’re the ones who get taken for a ride.

While our streets are filled with the homeless and unemployed Americans are dying of drug overdoses at record rates, churches and temples lecture their parishioners on their moral duty to bring more Iraqis, Syrians, and Pakistanis to America. But 9/11 and the occasional terror attack in a major city are just the appetizers of Islamist demographic colonization.

The next stage, mob violence by what the European press carefully calls “angry youths”, is now underway in New York and Los Angeles. It won’t stop there. The era of the “lone wolf” Jihadi hasn’t ended yet, but the future of Islamic terror in America will be group attacks, like those in Bataclan in Paris, and more routine riots and mass assaults abetted by their leftist allies.

Jews in New York City are the easiest targets, but as the Swedes or the French could tell you, or the Poles and the Czechs, it rarely ends there.

Muslim violence isn’t a response to oppression or persecution. It’s a supremacist theological mission to colonize and subjugate non-Muslims as numerous Jihadis have told us at their trials.

We chose not to take them at their word.

Israel is not the issue. Just as Mohammed cartoons, a teddy bear with the wrong name, or false reports of a desecrated Koran were not the real issues at the heart of other Muslim rampages.

When thugs and terrorists want to beat and kill people, they can always find an excuse.

Listening to their excuses and taking them seriously is almost as dumb as visiting their countries or letting them inside your country long enough for them to kill you. If we want to survive, we’re going to have to stop being dumb. Otherwise, we’ll learn to live and die like they do in Malmo.

It happened in Europe. Now it’s happening here.

If American Jews want to stop antisemitism, they need to stop importing it from the antisemitic capitals of the world. Really fighting antisemitism means fighting antisemitic immigration.

Or investing in bulletproof windows while educating synagogue burners about antisemitism.

 

1 2 3 4 5